Bar & Bench ( SYNOPSIS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Bar & Bench ( SYNOPSIS"

Transcription

1 SYNOPSIS That the petitioner is approaching this Hon ble Court seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, and thereby defer the implementation of Notification published in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Subsection (ii) dated issued by Respondent no. 1 till completion of permanent High Court premises as the impugned Notification is in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India, particularly Article 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India for all concerned including the Litigants, for which the Courts are meant for and their rights to seek justice are being violated severely. The Petitioners are approaching this Hon ble Court before vacation Court for the reason that the impugned Notification was issued on 26 th December, 2018 and thereby High Court of Andhra Pradesh has to start from at new premises which is not a permanent seat of Court rather same is make shift arrangement. In case, this petition would not be heard before January 1 st, 2019, it shall become infractous at the time of re-opening of the Supreme Court from January 2 nd, Thus, there is urgency to file this matter. Hence, this Writ Petition. LIST OF DATES & EVENTS 1961 That the Petitioner no. 1 is Bar Association at High Court having more than 2000 regular members and this Association is taking many steps for welfare of the lawyers and playing a vital role for the system in its integrated way for Bar & Bench since the year The State of Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated by virtue of The Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 with effect from Since the implementation of the Act, the existing High Court premises is being used as High Court for two states, namely Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. By all practical reasons relating to filing of cases, registry operations, Chamber Block for

2 lawyers, Dispensary, excellent connectivity by surface transport, enough parking space etc, and the Courts are entertaining the petitions for both the states as per roster of the Hon ble Judges and the functioning is smooth and also, even the serial numbers of the cases are in continuity This Hon ble Court passed the orders in Appeal being Union of India Vs T. Dhangopal in SLP (Civil) No. D /2018 to constitute a separate High court for the State of A.P in Hyderabad till alternate infrastructure is developed in the territories of A.P. The Government of A.P. in response to the notice issued in the said SLP filed an affidavit undertaking to hand over the completed buildings by and basing on the said undertaking the Hon ble Supreme court disposed of the SLP by judgment vide order dated A copy of the order dated passed by this Hon ble Court in re Union of India Vs T. Dhangopal in SLP (Civil) No. D /2018 is annexed as Annexure P/ 1. [Page ] The Respondent no. 1 issued the Notification in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Subsection (ii) dated and thereby directed to function Andhra Pradesh High Court at new Premises, despite the fact that the new premises is not ready and same has been proposed at camp Office. A copy of the Notification dated is annexed as Annexure P/ 2. [Page ] The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued a memo whereby the new High Court is proposed to state at Chief Minister s Camp Office. It is to state that the Construction of the new building is incomplete and it may take around 10 more months to complete the same. Now the proposed High Court has been planned to start at a make-shift premises Camp Office of Chief

3 Minister which is basically a residential apartment where there is thoroughfare of the many political persons and the environment itself is not conducive for the Judicial function, that too, of the Constitutional Court. A copy of the memo no. GAD/01/423/SC/F/ 2018 dated is annexed herewith as Annexure P/3[Page ] The Petitioners made a joint represent to the President of India through on 29 th December, 2018 and presented their plight regarding the inaccurate exercise to start the High Court which is not conducive from any angle and it shall defeat the very right of the litigation to access for justice. The Petitioner Association has also taken the current photographs of the incomplete building. A copy of the representation dated 23/ made by the Petitioner Association is annexed as Annexure P/ 4[Page ] Hence the present WRIT PETITION is being filed.

4 A WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SEEKING ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MAMDAMUS AND THEREBY ISSUE DIRECTION TO DEFER THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED IN GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART-II, SECTION 3, SUBSECTION (II) DATED BY RESPONDENT NO. 1. TO, THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUSTICES OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE PETITIONER ABOVE-NAMED MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH : 1. That the petitioner above-named respectfully submits the present petition seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, and thereby defer the implementation of Notification published in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Subsection (ii) dated issued by Respondent no. 1 till completion of permanent High Court premises. The Petitioners are invoking the Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking aforesaid relief(s) being in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India, particularly Article 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India for all concerned including the Litigants, for which the Courts are meant for and their rights to seek justice are being violated severely. The Petitioners are approaching this Hon ble Court before vacation Court for the reason that the impugned Notification was issued on 26 th December, 2018 and thereby High Court of Andhra Pradesh has to start from at new premises which is not a permanent seat of Court rather same is make shift arrangement. In case, this petition would not be heard before January 1 st, 2019, it shall become infractous at the time of re-opening of the Supreme Court from January 2 nd, Thus, there is urgency to file this matter. 2. That the Petitioner no. 1 is Bar Association at High Court having more than 2000 regular members and this Association is taking many steps for welfare of the lawyers and playing a vital role for the system in its integrated way for Bar & Bench since the year The Petitioner no. 2 is the Vice President of the Association

5 and the Petitioner no. 3 is a regular member of the Petitioner no The AP Advocate Association, Hyderabad submit that the State of A.P. was bifurcated under Article 3 of the Constitution of India. Under Article 4, a provision was made enabling the Govt of A.P.to function from Hyderabad under Section 5 of the A.P. State Reorganisation Act, 2014 for a period of 10 years. The Parliament in their wisdom declared the High court at Hyderabad as common facility for both the States till a new High Court is established for the State of A.P. under Section 6 of the said Act. Further under Section 94 of the same Act a provision was made to extend financial support to the successor State of A.P. to develop facilities like Raj Bhavan, Legislative Assembly and High Court. Accordingly the Government of A.P. started functioning from Hyderabad from the appointed date i.e., peacefully. 1. Since State of Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated by virtue of The Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 with effect from Since the implementation of the Act, the existing High Court premises is being used as High Court for two states, namely Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. By all practical reasons relating to filing of cases, registry operations, Chamber Block for lawyers, Dispensary, excellent connectivity by surface transport, enough parking space etc, and the Courts are entertaining the petitions for both the states as per roster of the Hon ble Judges and the functioning is smooth and also, even the serial numbers of the cases are in continuity. 2. In the year 2015 the Government of A.P. rep by its cabinet decided to shift the capital to CRDA notified area ( Amaravathi, Vijayawada and Guntur ) immediately without creating the necessary infrastructure. The offices were shifted into the leased premises at Vijayawada and Guntur in 2016 and 2017 at the cost of public exchequer and officers are working only for 5 days a week to facilitate its staff shuttle between Hyderabad-Vijayawada. The officers are leaving their offices to join their families put up at Hyderabad, in the afternoon of Friday and reaching temporary Capital at Amaravathi by the afternoon of the succeeding Monday.

6 Thus the offices in the A.P. Capital are working for four days a week at the cost of the public inconvenience. 3. As stated supra the interest and governance of A.P. was jeopardized due to shifting of its Government Offices into leased buildings at Vijayawada and Guntur despite the protection to stay in the common capital for 10 years under the provisions of the 2014 Act pending development of facilities and infrastructure in the State of AP. The establishment of the High Court is the Union of India Project. Section 94 of the Act envisages fiscal support for the development of facilities like establishment of High Court of Judicature for the State of A.P. In the Writ Petition (PIL) No. 59 of 2015 filed in the high court of Judicature at Hyderabad by one individual in public interest to bifurcate the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh the government of Telangana came forward to provide accommodation to house the high court for the State of A.P. in a separate building or move the High court of Telangana into separate buildings. The Hon ble High Court rejected the plea in view of the provision in the 2014 Act. 4. The Union of India also moved the Hon ble Supreme court vide SLP (Civil) No. D.29890/2018 to constitute a separate High court for the State of A.P in Hyderabad till alternate infrastructure is developed in the territories of A.P. The Government of A.P. in response to the notice issued in the said SLP filed an affidavit undertaking to hand over the completed buildings by and basing on the said undertaking the Hon ble Supreme court disposed of the SLP by judgement dt Infact the government of A.P. started constructing a building for City Civil Court for the Capital and showed the said building as an alternate structure till the new buildings for housing the High Court are constructed. That alternate building is incomplete and no facilities are provided apart from being insufficient to house the High Court. The pictures of the proposed high court buildings taken after 15 th December 2018 clearly depicts that the undertaking given before the Hon ble Supreme Court by way of affidavit is not fulfilled. During rainy season the vicinity around the proposed building was full of water. The employees working in the nearby Secretariat

7 moved by walk as the available road sunk due to lose nature of the soil. No drains were developed to let out the storm water collected around the proposed building. The buildings constructed in haste to urgently accommodate the Secretariat and Legislative Assembly are leaking during rainy season and all those videos have become viral. The Enquiry Committee, constituted by the Government to find out the reasons for leakage has not submitted its report. 5. The ongoing civil works for the proposed buildings are also running at the same pace and haste. There are no habitations except small village panchayats to accommodate the members of the Bar, Staff and personnel associated with the profession within 20 Kilometers radius. There are no bungalows to accommodate the Hon ble Judges near or around the proposed site. In view of CRDA regulations there is no possibility of developing the infrastructure to accommodate the members of the bar and personnel associated with the system in a radius of 15 to 20 Kilo meters around the proposed city Civil Court/high court buildings. Roads leading to the proposed building are not laid and due to the lose nature of soil the new roads will take at least one rainy season after their laying, to set. There is absolutely no safety to the women members of the bar to reach to and from the proposed City Civil court/high court building. The learned lady advocates also met the Hon ble Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicaturte at Hyderabad on to explain their specific problems if the high court is shifted into the proposed building. 6. As already stated the government employees are still shuttling from Hyderabad at the cost of governance. Four employees of the Secretariat/head offices working in the Capital who came to join their families at Hyderabad succumbed to road accident while going to Hyderabad. Till the infrastructure is developed around the proposed building the lawyers and other personnel also cannot move their families from Hyderabad. If the High court is shifted into the temporary buildings, the members of the bar and personnel associated with the system will suffer irreparably. 7. The shifting of high court in to an ad-interim complex will further jeopardize the financial interest of the State and prove the fiscal

8 assurances made under Section 94 of the 2014 Act futile. Bifurcation of the high court urgently to create a separate one for the State of Andhra Pradesh is not in any body s interest including the State of A.P. and litigant public. The Bar Association of A.P. High Court also passed an unanimous resolution on not to shift into the temporary buildings and shift only after comprehensive infrastructure is developed by the government as contemplated under the 2014 Act. 8. In view of the misleading affidavit filed on behalf of the State of A.P. before the Hon ble Supreme Court undertaking to furnish the construction of alternate structure to house the High court and hand it over to the Hon ble Chief Justice before and the disposal of the SLP (Civil) No. D /2018 observing to issue the notification for constituting the high court for the State A.P.by bifurcating the existing facility by 1 st January 2019, it became necessary to approach this Hon ble Court to review the situation and continue the present facility of high court in the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh until a High Court Building with all the necessary infrastructure and facilities are provided in territories of Andhra Pradesh or separate the high courts so as to enable them to function separately either same buildings or separate buildings, as observed in para 5 of the Judgement dated This Hon ble Court granted an Appeal in petition titled UoI Vs. T, Dhangopal and others being Special Leave Petition [C] No. D of 2018 relating the shifting of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh to Amaravati, a new City under planned construction. It was stated by the State of Andhra Pradesh that the construction of New High Court would be completed by 15 December, 2018 and having such assurance by the State of Andhra Pradesh, this Hon ble Court permitted the Respondent no.1 to issue suitable Notification for bifurcation of the High Court. A copy of the order dated passed by this Hon ble Court in re Union of India Vs T. Dhangopal in SLP (Civil) No. D.29890/2018 is annexed as Annexure P/ 1. [Page ] 10. The Petitioners submits that the High Court can function well at

9 the present place and there ought not to have any objection from the State of Telangana, in view of the statement made at the bar before this Hon ble Court, as under: 5. Notices were issued to both the States of Telangana as well as Andhra 9 Pradesh and respondents. Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel appearing for State of Telangana took the position on an earlier date that State of Telangana was ready to provide a separate building in the city of Hyderabad itself where the High Court of Andhra Pradesh can be temporarily shifted till the time State constructs its own building in Amarawathi. A copy of the order dated passed in UoI Vs. T, Dhangopal and others being Special Leave Petition [C] No. D of 2018 is annexed herewith as Annexure P/2 11. The Respondent no. 1 issued the Notification in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Subsection (ii) dated and thereby directed to function Andhra Pradesh High Court at new Premises, despite the fact that the new premises is not ready and same has been proposed at camp Office. A copy of the Notification dated is annexed as Annexure P/3 12. The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued a memo whereby the new High Court is proposed to state at Chief Minister s Camp Office. It is to state that the Construction of the new building is incomplete and it may take around 10 more months to complete the same. Now the proposed High Court has been planned to start at a make-shift premises Camp Office of Chief Minister which is basically a residential apartment where there is thoroughfare of the many political persons and the environment itself is not conducive for the Judicial function, that too, of the Constitutional Court. A copy of the memo no. GAD/01/423/SC/F/2018 dated is annexed herewith as Annexure P/ The Petitioners made a joint represent to the President of India through on 29 th December, 2018 and presented their plight regarding the inaccurate exercise to start the High Court which is not conducive from any angle and it shall defeat the very right of

10 the litigation to access for justice. The Petitioner Association has also taken the current photographs of the incomplete building. A copy of the representation dated 23/ made by the Petitioner Association is annexed as Annexure P/ 14. That the petitioners crave for the indulgence of this Hon'ble Court to grant of Writ and interim order, inter-alia, on following amongst other grounds : A. Because the High Court bulding is incomplete in all respects and it may take more than 10 months to made the same operational. B. Because the Court officers & Staff are leaving Amravati their offices to join their families put up at Hyderabad, in the afternoon of Friday and reaching temporary Capital at Amaravathi by the afternoon of the succeeding Monday. Thus the offices in the A.P. Capital are working for four days a week at the cost of the public inconvenience. C. Because the undertaking furnished by Government of A.P. in response to the notice issued in the said Special Leave Petition, to hand over the completed buildings by remains unfulfilled and the new building is incomplete. D. Because the alternate building is incomplete and no facilities are provided for the litigants apart from being insufficient to house the High Court officers, working place for lawyers etc. E. Because the ongoing civil works for the proposed buildings are also running at the same pace and haste and there are no habitations except small village panchayats to accommodate the members of the Bar, Staff and personnel associated with the profession within 20 Kilometers radius. F. Because as per CRDA regulations there is no possibility of developing the infrastructure to accommodate the members of the bar and personnel associated with the system in a radius of 15 to 20 Kilo meters around the proposed city Civil Court/high court buildings. Also, Roads leading to the proposed building are not laid and due to the lose nature of soil the new roads will take at least one rainy season after their laying, to set. G. Because there is absolutely no safety to the litigants

11 particularly women and also the women members of the bar to reach to and from the proposed City Civil court/high court building. The learned lady advocates also met the Hon ble Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicaturte at Hyderabad on to explain their specific problems if the high court is shifted into the proposed building. H. Because shifting of high court in to an ad-interim complex will further jeopardize the financial interest of the State and prove the fiscal assurances made under Section 94 of the 2014 Act futile. Bifurcation of the high court urgently to create a separate one for the State of Andhra Pradesh is not in any body s interest including the State of A.P. and litigant public. I. Because the Contraction of the new building is incomplete and it may take around 10 more months to complete the same. Now the proposed High Court has been planned to start at a make-shift premises Camp Office of Chief Minister which is basically a residential apartment where there is thoroughfare of the many political persons and the environment itself is not conducive for the Judicial function, that too, of the Constitutional Court. 18. That the petitioner states that no other or similar petition seeking writ has been filed by him against the similar cause of action before Hon ble Supreme Court and Hon ble High Court. 19. That the Annexures P/1 to P/ 4 produced alongwith the present WRIT PETITION are true copies of their respective originals. PRAYER : In the premises set forth above, it is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to : (i) issue a writ in the nature of Mamdamus or any other appropriate writ and thereby issue direction(s) to defer the implementation of Notification published in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Subsection (ii) dated issued by Respondent no. 1; till completion of permanent High Court premises and;

12 (ii) PASS such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case; AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE PETITIONER SHALL EVER PRAY AS DUTY-BOUND Drawn and Filed by : Advocate (MR.PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI) Advocate for Petitioner DATE OF DRAFTING : 29/12/2018 PLACE : New Delhi FILED ON :

13 MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH : 1. That the above matter is beiomng filed while impugning the Notification published in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Subsection (ii) dated issued by Respondent no. 1; till completion of permanent High Court premises for the reasons and grounds taken in the accompanying Writ Petition 2. The facts and grounds are not repeated for sake of brevity and it is prayed that same may be read as part of this application as well. 3. The developing infrastructure is unable to accommodate the members of the bar and personnel associated with the system in a radius of 15 to 20 Kilo meters around the proposed city Civil Court/ high court buildings. Also, Roads leading to the proposed building are not laid and due to the lose nature of soil the new roads will take at least one rainy season after their laying, to set. 4. There is absolutely no safety to the litigants particularly women and also the women members of the bar to reach to and from the proposed City Civil court/high court building. The learned lady advocates also met the Hon ble Chief Justice of the High Court of Judicaturte at Hyderabad on to explain their specific problems if the high court is shifted into the proposed building. 5. The shifting of high court in to an ad-interim complex will further jeopardize the financial interest of the State and prove the fiscal assurances made under Section 94 of the 2014 Act futile. Bifurcation of the high court urgently to create a separate one for the State of Andhra Pradesh is not in any body s interest including the State of A.P. and litigant public. 6. Hence, the implementation of the impugned Notification deserves to be stayed till further orders. P R A Y E R In the premises set forth above, it is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be

14 pleased to : (i) Stay the Notification published in Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Subsection (ii) dated issued by Respondent no. 1; and (ii) PASS such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case; AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE PETITIONER SHALL EVER PRAY AS DUTY-BOUND Drawn and Filed by : DATE OF DRAFTING : /12/2018 PLACE : New Delhi FILED ON : (MR.PRAVEEN CHATURVEDI) Advocate for Petitioner

Bar&Bench (

Bar&Bench ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Between: W.P.(P.I.L)No. of 2017 Telangana State Panchayat Raj Civil Engineers Forum Govt. Reg.

More information

RESPONDENTS. Article 14 read with Article 19 (1) G. Article 246 read with entry 77 list 1, 7 th schedule.

RESPONDENTS. Article 14 read with Article 19 (1) G. Article 246 read with entry 77 list 1, 7 th schedule. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (EXTRAORDINARY CIVIL JURISDICTION) CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. ------------OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF : Fatehpal Singh Singh R/o Panchkula PETITIONER VERSUS 1. Union of

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WP( C ) NO.. 2017 (IN THE MATTER OF PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION) IN THE MATTER OF : JOGINDER KUMAR SUKHIJA S/o Sh.Prabhu Dayal Sukhija R/o 174, IInd Floor, Avtar

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 IN THE MATTER OF: ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA &

More information

PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ORISSA NOTIFICATION The 20 th April 2010

PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ORISSA NOTIFICATION The 20 th April 2010 PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ORISSA NOTIFICATION The 20 th April 2010 No.270-R- In exercise of powers conferred under Article 225 of the Constitution of India, and as per

More information

Bar and Bench (

Bar and Bench ( 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (ORIGINAL (C.) WRIT JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION (C.) NO. OF 2017 [Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] IN THE MATTER OF : A Public Interest

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.07.2010 + WP (C) 11932/2009 M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner - versus THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER & ANR... Respondent

More information

under the Right to Information Act about action taken if any on the complaint/representations made by him to the Governor of Goa against Advocate

under the Right to Information Act about action taken if any on the complaint/representations made by him to the Governor of Goa against Advocate SYNOPSIS AND LIST OF DATES DATES DATES 29.11.2010 Respondent No.3 herein sought information under the Right to Information Act about action taken if any on the complaint/representations made by him to

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2016 (Arising from the Final Judgment dated 21.04.2016 passed by the Hon ble Uttarakhand High Court at Nainital

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between;

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO OF 2008 AND AND AND AND AND. In the matter between; IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14664 OF 2008 In the matter of a petition under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; AND In the matter

More information

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. The petitioner is filing the present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. The petitioner is filing the present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA TO, HON BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES OF THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. The humble petition of the Petitioner above

More information

Bar & Bench (

Bar & Bench ( IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) 1 I.A. NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION (C) No. OF 2018 [UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA] BETWEEN: DR. G. PARAMESHWAR & ANR. PETITIONER(s)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, Date of decision: WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 Date of decision: 24.05.2011 WP(C) No. 3595/2011 and CM Nos.7523/2011 YUDHVIR SINGH Versus Through: PETITIONER Mr.N.S.Dalal,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS WITH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS WITH 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS....RESPONDENT(S) WITH

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. OF 2017 IN Writ Petition (Civil) No. 131/2013 AND IN THE MATTER OF: ASSOCIATION FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS AND ANR. PETITIONER

More information

Bar & Bench (

Bar & Bench ( IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO OF 2018 (WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF) (ARISING FROM THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER DATED 05.01.2018

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT DELHI EXTRAORDINARY CRIMINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL.) NO. OF 2019 IN THE MATTER OF: VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT DELHI EXTRAORDINARY CRIMINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL.) NO. OF 2019 IN THE MATTER OF: VERSUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT DELHI EXTRAORDINARY CRIMINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL.) NO. OF 2019 IN THE MATTER OF: RAJEEV KUMAR PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. RESPONDENT INDEX S.NO.

More information

Draft of Public Interest Writ Petition Against Restrictions on Withdrawals from Bank Accounts

Draft of Public Interest Writ Petition Against Restrictions on Withdrawals from Bank Accounts Draft of Public Interest Writ Petition Against Restrictions on Withdrawals from Bank Accounts By Anil Chawla Law Associates LLP We are of the opinion that Government of India and Reserve Bank of India

More information

ii) The respondent did not furnish a Bank Guarantee for the amount of Rs crores and also did not pay the service tax payable on the said amount

ii) The respondent did not furnish a Bank Guarantee for the amount of Rs crores and also did not pay the service tax payable on the said amount IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal Nos.... of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 11964-11965 of 2009) Decided On: 06.08.2009 ECE Industries Limited Vs. S.P. Real Estate Developers P. Ltd. and Anr.

More information

Bar & Bench (

Bar & Bench ( In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 06.11.2017 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.28181 of 2017 & WMP.No.30311 of 2017 Mr.Thiagarajan Kumararaja...Petitioner Vs 1.Union

More information

Date and Event. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was

Date and Event. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was 3 Date and Event 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology Act, 2000 was amended by Information Technology (Amendment) Bill 2008 and was passed by the Lok Sabha. 22/12/2008 The Information and Technology

More information

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1696 OF 2015 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1698 OF 2015 WRIT PETITION NO.1751 OF 2015

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, 2016 + W.P.(C) 7068/2014 RAJINDER PAL MALIK... Petitioner Represented by: Dr. Jose P. Verghese and Mr. Jawahar Singh,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 960 OF 2018 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) VERSES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 960 OF 2018 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) VERSES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 960 OF 2018 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) IN THE MATTER OF: ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY PETITIONER VERSES

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) DISTRICT : KOLKATA IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P. No. (W) of 2017 In the matter of :- An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ;

More information

...Petitioner. Versus PAPER BOOK. Of 2015:- Application for permission to file SLP. of 2015:- Application for exemption from.

...Petitioner. Versus PAPER BOOK. Of 2015:- Application for permission to file SLP. of 2015:- Application for exemption from. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [S.C.R., Order XXII Rule 2(1)] CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. OF 2015 UNDER ARTICLE 136 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA (Arising from the impugned

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010 Date of Decision: 10.02.2011 MRS. PRERNA Through Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate with Mr. Raunak Jain, Advocate and

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION CM No. 15134 of 2005 in W.P. (C) No. 1043 of 1987 Orders reserved on : 26th July, 2006 Date of Decision : 7th August, 2006 LATE BAWA HARBANS

More information

Act 21 of Keyword(s): Muslims, Educational Institutions, Public Service, Reservation

Act 21 of Keyword(s): Muslims, Educational Institutions, Public Service, Reservation The Andhra Pradesh Reservation of seats in the Educational Institutions and of appointments or posts in the Public Services under the State to Muslim Community Act, 2005 Act 21 of 2005 Keyword(s): Muslims,

More information

2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura

2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: SURAT WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2018 (PIL) (EXTRA ORDINARY JURISDICTION) Ref: In the matter of Public Interest Litigation related to collection and levy

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) AND -VERSUS AND. Bhaban (3 rd Floor), 56, Agrabad C/A,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) AND -VERSUS AND. Bhaban (3 rd Floor), 56, Agrabad C/A, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) WRIT PETITION NO. 4891 OF 2014. IN THE MATTER OF: An application for extension of stay. AND IN THE MATTER OF: Clewiston

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. WRIT PETITION No.21267/2016(Excise)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI. WRIT PETITION No.21267/2016(Excise) 1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 08 th DAY OF JUNE 2016 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION No.21267/2016(Excise) BETWEEN: S. GOPAL, CL-9 LICENSEE S/O

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Mr. Vivek Madhok & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR.

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Mr. Vivek Madhok & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 70/2010 % PRATEEK SINGH PATEL Through: Date of decision: 8 th July, 2010.... Petitioner Mr. Vivek Madhok & Mr. J.P. Gupta, Advocates. Versus MEDICAL COUNCIL

More information

Bar and Bench (

Bar and Bench ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (EXTRA ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NOOF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF A PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION: Centre for Accountability and Systemic Change

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : IMC ACT, 1956 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 4223/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : IMC ACT, 1956 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 4223/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : IMC ACT, 1956 Date of Decision: 11.07.2013 W.P.(C) 4223/2013 VENKATESHWARA UNIVERSITY... Petitioner Through: Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Mr Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocates

More information

Bar and Bench (

Bar and Bench ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EXTRA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF:- KTC (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central GST Audit-II

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) I.A. NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION (C) No. 536 OF 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) I.A. NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION (C) No. 536 OF 2018 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) 1 I.A. NO. OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION (C) No. 536 OF 2018 [UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA] BETWEEN: DR. G. PARAMESHWAR & ANR. UNION

More information

r&bench (

r&bench ( IN THE HON BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P (C) NO. OF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF: ABHIMANYU BISHNOI (Through Guardian) PETITIONER Versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS RESPONDENTS INDEX

More information

Bar and Bench (

Bar and Bench ( SYNOPSIS The Petitioner is invoking the jurisdiction of this Hon ble Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing the registration of All India Majilis-e-Ittehadul Musalimeen

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2478-2479 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 16472-16473 of 2018) NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

More information

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NO. 45305/2011 (L-PG) BETWEEN: C.D ANANDA RAO S/O SRI DALAPPA AGED

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION )

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015 IN THE MATTER OF : An application under Article 102 of Constitution of the People s Republic

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Co. Pet. 8/2015

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Co. Pet. 8/2015 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Co. Pet. 8/2015 Madhusudan Mandal, Residing at 35E Mahanirban Road, Ground Floor, Post Office- Gariahat, Kolkata-700029,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI) Review Petition No. 73/2013 (Arising out of Misc. Case No. 705/2013 In FAO 6/2013) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No.1366 of 2018 E.Vijay Anand, S/o. Aranga Ellangovan, Advocate, No.5/3, Pranav Apartments, Seethammal Main Road, Alwarpet,

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015 1 RESERVED ORDER A.F.R ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2 OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014 Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015 Hon ble Mr. Justice Virendra Kumar DIXIT, Judicial Member

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE 1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present: The Hon ble The Chief Justice Jyotirmay Bhattacharya. AND The Hon ble Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay. MAT 901 of 2016

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L. P. A. No. 511 of 2009 1.State of Bihar 2.Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna Appellants Versus 1.Ravindra Prasad Singh 2.State of

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 Om Sai Punya Educational and Social Welfare Society & Another.Petitioners Versus All India Council

More information

THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961

THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 Sections:. Short title and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Registrar and Deputy Registrars. THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 96 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 4. Appeals from decisions of a single Judge of the

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.58968/2013 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: K.J. Basavaraj,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015 Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora -Vs-...Petitioner M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 63 OF Sandeep Parekh and ors.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 63 OF Sandeep Parekh and ors. 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 63 OF 2004. IN THE MATTER OF: Sandeep Parekh and ors. Petitioners Applicants VERSUS Union of India

More information

Rio. Koniki Village, Pedapadu Mandal,

Rio. Koniki Village, Pedapadu Mandal, IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANAGANA AND FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Contempt Case No.1003 of 2017 IN WP.No.41794 of 2016 Between: l.yelamanchili Sri Chaitanya Dev,

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23 rd July, 2010. + W.P.(C) 11305/2009, CM No.10831/2009 (u/s 151 CPC for stay), CM No.9694/2010 (u/o1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment) & CM No.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JULY 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B BHOSALE BETWEEN W.P.NO.31809/2014 (GM-CPC) 1. MOHAMMAD FAZLULLA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(C) Nos.28137/2018)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(C) Nos.28137/2018) 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION NON-REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.11355 OF 2018 (Arising from SLP(C) Nos.28137/2018) D. ESWARA NAIDU & ORS....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE SPECIAL DEPUTY

More information

CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.9550 of 2015 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY SAVITRI MOHAN & ORS...

CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.9550 of 2015 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY SAVITRI MOHAN & ORS... 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5372 OF 2016 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.9550 of 2015 GREATER NOIDA IND. DEV. AUTHORITY APPELLANT VERSUS SAVITRI

More information

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN : DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.D.H.WAGHELA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK B HINCHIGERI J

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2171 of 2017 Moizuddin Ahmed.. Petitioner

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO OF 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO OF 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2764 OF 2015 The Chamber of Tax Consultants & Others.. Petitioners. V/s. Union of India & Others.. Respondents.

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A.No.92 of Monday, the 29 th day of July, 2013

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI. O.A.No.92 of Monday, the 29 th day of July, 2013 1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, CHENNAI O.A.No.92 of 2012 Monday, the 29 th day of July, 2013 THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE V. PERIYA KARUPPIAH (MEMBER-JUDICIAL) AND THE HONOURABLE LT GEN (RETD) ANAND

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10583-10585 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO(S). 36057-36059 OF 2016] MUNJA PRAVEEN & ORS. ETC. ETC....

More information

Sl. Description Page No. 3 Writ petition under Article 32 of the. 4 Annexure P1: Profile of the members of the

Sl. Description Page No. 3 Writ petition under Article 32 of the. 4 Annexure P1: Profile of the members of the Index Sl. Description Page No. 1 Listing Proforma 2 Synopsis &List of Dates 3 Writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India with affidavit 4 Annexure P1: Profile of the members of the Governing

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION NO. 2932 OF 2010 IN THE MATTER OF: An application for a direction to the Respondents to allow the Petitioner

More information

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi

ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi 110 001. No. 3/ER/2003/JS-II Dated : 27 th March, 2003 O R D E R 1. Whereas, the superintendence, direction and control, inter alia,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Reserved on: Date of decision:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Reserved on: Date of decision: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Reserved on: 02.04.2009 Date of decision: 15.04.2009 WP (C) No.8365 of 2008 JAY THAREJA & ANR. PETITIONERS Through: Mr. C. Hari Shankar,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos of 2012)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos of 2012) 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 898-900 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 37383-37385 of 2012) THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ANR. Petitioner(s)

More information

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 113 of Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 113 of Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017 1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW A.F.R. (Court No. 1) List A Original Application No. 113 of 2016 Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017 Hon ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA W.P. Nos. 63936/2012 & 64365/2012 (S-REG) BETWEEN: 1. RAMA S/O. NARAYAN

More information

ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH

ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH W.A. NO.122 OF 2014 In the matter of a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.09.2014... Sri Kasinath Nayak. Petitioner -Versus- State

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9970 OF 2018 (arising out of) (SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.25814 OF 2018) Shailesh Bandu Swami and Another

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) Judgment reserved on February 05, 2015 Judgment delivered on February 13, 2015 M/S VARUN INDUSTRIES LTD & ORS... Appellants

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2015

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2015 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 2842 of 2015 Md. Sahid Ali, S/o. Late Akbar Ali, R/o. Village- nmerapani Fareshtablak, P.S.- Merapani,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 298 of 2013 ------- Md. Rizwan Akhtar son of Late Md. Suleman, resident of Ahmad Lane, Azad Basti, Gumla, P.O, P.S. and District: Gumla... Petitioner

More information

THE TAMIL NADU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (REPEAL) BILL, 2012

THE TAMIL NADU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (REPEAL) BILL, 2012 1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA Bill No. XXI of 2012 THE TAMIL NADU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (REPEAL) BILL, 2012 A BILL to provide for the repeal of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Council Act, 2010 and to

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal Nos. 1048-1049 of 2011 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) Nos. 5064-5065 of 2010), Criminal Appeal Nos. 1050-1052 of 2011 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 5112-5114

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF In the matter:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF In the matter: IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF 2018 In the matter: i) Article 226 and 14 of the Constitution of India. ii) The Advocates Act, 1961 iii) The

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO OF 2010.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO OF 2010. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH APPELLATE DIVISION (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO. 2274 OF 2010. IN THE MATTER OF: An application for acceptance of additional grounds

More information

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 9 th February, J U D G M E N T $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI #37 + W.P.(C) 9340/2015 D.K. BHANDARI Through... Petitioner Mr. Rakesh Malviya with Mr. Karanveer Choudhary and Mr. Saurabh, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Writ Appeal Nos.462, 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 25, 166, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL EXTRAORDINARY JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2019 (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL EXTRAORDINARY JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2019 (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL EXTRAORDINARY JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2019 (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) IN THE MATTER OF: YOUTH FOR EQUALITY & Anr., Petitioners

More information

Case No. 17 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., Santacruz (E).

Case No. 17 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., Santacruz (E). Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13 th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005. Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NOS.3873-3874/2014 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. Smt.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. Criminal Original Jurisdiction (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) Writ Petition (Criminal) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. Criminal Original Jurisdiction (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) Writ Petition (Criminal) No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Original Jurisdiction (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) Writ Petition (Criminal) No. of 2013 In the matter of: Dharampal. Petitioner Versus State of

More information

MINUTES OF THE SECOND MEETING OF FIFTH NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES HELD ON AT NOON.

MINUTES OF THE SECOND MEETING OF FIFTH NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES HELD ON AT NOON. MINUTES OF THE SECOND MEETING OF FIFTH NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES HELD ON 15.09.2017 AT 12.00 NOON. Second Meeting of the Fifth National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) was held on

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.865/2000 DIVINE UNITED ORGANISATION Petitioner Through: Mr.

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: August 02, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: August 08, W.P.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment Reserved on: August 02, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: August 08, W.P. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 02, 2016 % Judgment Delivered on: August 08, 2016 + W.P.(C) 446/2016 SURENDER SINGH DALAL & ORS... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Jyoti

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018 MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION (Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018 Revenue Bar Association New No. 115

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION. Date of Judgment: CM(M) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION. Date of Judgment: CM(M) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERPETUAL, MANDATORY INJUNCTION Date of Judgment: 14.02.2012 CM(M) No.557/2008 DALMIA CEMENT (BHARAT) LTD. Through: Mr. D.K. Malhotra, Advocate....

More information

Standing Counsel for TNPSC

Standing Counsel for TNPSC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.20439 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 E.Bamila.. Petitioner Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public

More information

The petitioner in W.P.No.7724/2018 has assailed. Rule 5 of the Karnataka Selection of Candidates for. Admission to Government Seats in Professional

The petitioner in W.P.No.7724/2018 has assailed. Rule 5 of the Karnataka Selection of Candidates for. Admission to Government Seats in Professional 1 BVNJ: 22/02/2018 W.P.No.7724/2018 C/W. W.P. Nos.8182, 8184, 8204, 8206, 8207, 8507, 8508, 8509, 8556, 8569, 8571, 8573 & 8698 of 2018 The petitioner in W.P.No.7724/2018 has assailed Rule 5 of the Karnataka

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Writ Petition (Civil) No. 866 of COMMON CAUSE Vs UNION OF INDIA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Writ Petition (Civil) No. 866 of COMMON CAUSE Vs UNION OF INDIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) Writ Petition (Civil) No. 866 of 2010 COMMON CAUSE Vs UNION OF INDIA PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION SYNOPSIS That the petitioner is filing

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 158 OF 2012 IN. CIVIL APPEAL NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 158 OF 2012 IN. CIVIL APPEAL NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 158 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 868 of 2003 In the matter of:- People for Better Treatment (PBT).Petitioner Vs.

More information

$~41 to 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2889/2013 DIVINE MISSION SOCIETY (REGD.) versus NATIONAL COUNICL FOR TEACHER WITH

$~41 to 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2889/2013 DIVINE MISSION SOCIETY (REGD.) versus NATIONAL COUNICL FOR TEACHER WITH $~41 to 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2889/2013 DIVINE MISSION SOCIETY (REGD.) NATIONAL COUNICL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ORS. + W.P.(C) 7422/2013 PRATAP COLLEGE OF EDUCATION. +

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NOS OF 2014 (LA-RES)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NOS OF 2014 (LA-RES) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24 th DAY OF JUNE 2015 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION NOS. 53890-53891 OF 2014 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. ARUN KUMAR

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07. Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07. Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Railways Act, 1989 W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07 Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008 M.K. SHARMA.. Petitioner Through : Mr. K.N. Kataria,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) 5941/2015 DATE OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) 5941/2015 DATE OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ADMISSION MATTER W.P.(C) 5941/2015 DATE OF DECISION : JUNE 12, 2015 JAMIA HAMDARD (DEEMED UNIVERSITY) & ANR.... Petitioners Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi,

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No.

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) -Vs- WP(C) No. 1846/2010 Sri Ram Prakash Sarki, Constable (Since dismissed from

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPETITION ACT, Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPETITION ACT, Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPETITION ACT, 2002 Judgment reserved on: 17.02.2012 Judgment delivered on: 23.02.2012 W.P.(C) 993/2012 & C.M. Nos. 2178-79/2012 UNION OF INDIA... Petitioner

More information