WRIT PETITION No of Anil Kumar Jain. Versus. State of Chhattisgarh & others.
|
|
- Hubert Woods
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH Single Bench: Hon ble Shri Justice Sanjay K.Agrawal WRIT PETITION No of 2006 PETITIONER Anil Kumar Jain Versus RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others. WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Appearances of the counsel: Mr. V.G. Tamaskar, counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents ORAL ORDER (Passed on ) (1) The seminal question involved in this writ petition is whether the 3 rd respondent Collector, Koria is empowered under Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966 (henceforth Rules, 1966 ) to place the petitioner under suspension and to institute departmental enquiry against him. (2) The required facts, necessary for disposal of the writ petition in nutshell, are as under:-
2 2 (2.1) The petitioner is a Sub Engineer working in the office of Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Services Division, Baikunthpur, District Korea. (2.2) The State of Chhattisgarh by its order dated vide Annexure P/5 sent the petitioner on deputation to the Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, thereafter, the Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, by its order dated (Annexure P-6) posted him as Sub Engineer at Janpad Panchayat, Manendragarh, District Koria. (2.3) Third respondent Collector, Koria, by its order dated vide (Annexure P-1) placed the petitioner under suspension and further instituted departmental enquiry against him in accordance with Rule 14 of the Rules, 1966 vide (Annexure P-2). (2.4) The petitioner has questioned the legality and validity of the order passed by the Collector placing him under suspension and instituting regular departmental enquiry against him under the Rules, 1966 in this writ petition filed on the sole ground that Collector is neither his Disciplinary authority nor Appointing Authority and, therefore, the Collector was not empowered either to place him under suspension or institute departmental enquiry and, therefore, the order of suspension (Annexure P-1) and order instituting departmental enquiry (Annexure P-2) against him deserves to be quashed as passed by the incompetent authority, and accordingly,
3 3 prayed for appropriate writ be issued against the respondents quashing both the orders i.e. Annexure P-1 & Annexure P-2. (2.5) On rule being issued, the respondent-state has filed its return stating inter alia that petitioner is a Class III employee; and vide Annexure R-1 by notification dated , the State Government has delegated the power to the Collectors to place the Class III & IV employees under suspension and to impose minor penalty under Rule 10 of the Rules, 1966 and, therefore, 3 rd respondent has rightly placed the petitioner under suspension and instituted departmental enquiry against him and, as such, the writ petition deserves to be dismissed. (2.6)Questioning the orders dated (Annexure P-1) & (Annexure P-2), instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner herein. (2.7)The petitioner, after filing of the instant writ petition, has filed application for taking documents on record and filed copy of order dated (Annexure P-10) passed by the then State of Madhya Pradesh directing that Sub Engineer appointed on the pay scale of Rs. 2, declaring them as Gazetted Officer, Class II and copy of the same has been endorsed to the petitioner herein; and the petitioner has also filed copy of service Book (Annexure P/11), in which, there is an endorsement to the effect that pursuant to the order dated passed by the then, State of
4 4 Madhya Pradesh, the petitioner (Sub Engineer) is declared as Gazzetted Officer, Class-II. (3) Appearing for the petitioner, Shri V.G. Tamaskar, learned counsel would submit that the petitioner was appointed on the pay scale of Rs. 2,000-2,900 by the then competent authority with effect from , which was duly recorded in his service record and, as such, by order dated , Sub Engineers appointed on the pay scale of Rs has been declared as Gazzetted Officer, Class II by the then State of Madhya Pradesh, which has duly been endorsed on his service record vide Annexure P-12 and, therefore, the order of the State Government dated 23 rd May, 1995 vide Annexure R-1 delegating the power to the Collectors to place Class III & IV employees under suspension and to impose minor penalty under Rule 10 of the Rules, 1966 is not applicable to him and, as such, the order passed by the Collector placing him under suspension and directing holding of the departmental enquiry against him deserve to be quashed as the same has been passed by the in-competent authority having no jurisdiction to pass such orders. (4) Appearing for the respondent/state, Shri R.K. Gupta, learned Deputy Advocate General would submit that the order passed by the 3 rd respondent placing the petitioner under suspension and instituting the departmental enquiry is in accordance with the power delegated to Collector under the Rules of 1966 by order dated 23 rd
5 5 May, 1996; and looking to the misconduct committed by the petitioner, departmental enquiry pending against him and due to which, petitioner has been placed under suspension. Therefore, the writ petition being devoid of merit deserves to be dismissed. (5) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the rival submissions made therein and also gone through the relevant record including service book of the petitioner with utmost circumspection. (6) The sole question is to be considered is whether the petitioner, on the date of passing of the impugned orders dated (Annexure P-1) & (Annexure P-2), was holding Class-II (Gazzetted) post for which under the Rules of 1966, the Collector was empowered to place him under suspension and to institute departmental enquiry. (7) Admittedly, the petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Sub Engineer in the Department of Water Resources in the then State of Madhya Pradesh on on the pay scale of Rs /- and time to time his pay scale was revised and ultimately with effect from , his pay scale was fixed as Rs.2,000-2,900/-. It would be proper to extract the remarks made and the order passed in that regard appointing the petitioner on the pay scale of Rs /- duly entered in his service record which states as under:-
6 6 Pay of Shri A.K. Jain, Sub-Engineer is fixed as sanctioned vide M.P. Govt. Employees Welfare and Administration and Development Department and Pay Commission 1990 Order No.136/209/11 Pay Commission/90 Bhopal dated and Accordingly, his pay fixed in the revised pay scale ` /- due to completion of 12 years service in one post as Sub Engineer w.e.f to = 12 years. He is drawing pay Rs. 1,800 w.e.f which (the basic pay is not crossed the minimum of higher pay scale Rs. 2000/- p.m.. As per provision given in F-R 22 AG.1 and F.P., 2 his pay scale fixed w.e.f at stage Rs. 2,000/- pm and his date of next increment fall on Sd/- Executive Engineer Water Resources Division Baikunthpur, Sarguja (M.P.) (8) The order dated (Annexure P-10), Department of Water Resources, State of Madhya Pradesh directed as under:- e/;izns k kklu ty lalk/ku fohkkx ea=ky; cyyhk Hkou] Hkksiky vkns k dzekad 20@5@97@ih@13 Hkksiky fnukad jkt; kklu e/;izns k kklu] ty lalk/ku fohkkx ds v/khu izoj Js.kh osrueku :Ik;s 2000&2900 esa fu;qdr mi;af=;ksa dks,rn~ }kjk jktif=r Js.kh nks?kksf"kr djrk gs A
7 7 e/;izns k ds jkt;iky ds uke ls rfkk vkns kkuqlkj ts-,u-oekz voj lfpo e/;izns k kklu] ty lalk/ku fohkkx (9) In compliance of the aforesaid order, Executive Engineer, Department of Water Resources, has made an entry in the service record of the petitioner on vide Annexure P-12 to the following effect:- ße-iz- ty lalk/ku fohkkx ea=ky; Hkksiky ds vkns k dzekad 20@5@97@ih@31 fnukad }kjk jkt; kklu e-iz- ty lalk/ku fohkkx ds v/khu izoj Js.kh osrueku :Ik;s 2000&2900 esa fu;qdr mi;a=hs dks,rn~ }kjk jktif=r Js.kh nks?kksf"kr fd;k x;k gsaþ (10) Thus, on the basis of the order passed by the State Government, it is quite vivid that on the date of passing the impugned order, according to the order passed by the then State of Madhya Pradesh, the petitioner duly appointed on the pay scale of Rs /- was holding Class II Gazzetted post with effect from (11) Respondent No.1 has placed implicit reliance on the order dated (Annexure R-1), by which the State Government has delegated the power to the Collectors to place the Class III & IV employees under suspension and impose minor penalty under Rule 10 of the Rules, 1966, which reads as under :- Hkk siky] fnukw ad 23 ebz 1996
8 8 dzekad lh- 6µ7µ96µ3µ,dµ ¼1½ jkt; 3kklu,rn }kjk dysdvjksa dks muds ftys esa inlfk lhkh fohkkxksa ds r`rh;,oa prqfkz Js.kh dezpkfj;ksa ¼iqfyl dfez;ksa dks NksM+dj½ dks e-iz-flfoy lsok ¼oxhZdj.k rfkk vihy½ fu;e 1966 ds fu;e ds varxzr fuyfecr djus,oa,sls dezpkfj;ksa ij mijksdr fu;e 10 ds varxzr y?kq vf/kjksfir djus ds vf/kdkj izr;k;ksftr djrk gs A ;g vkns k tkjh gksus ds fnukad ls izhkko khy gksxk A (12)In light of foregoing discussion, it is clear that the petitioner became Class-II officer holding Class-II Gazzetted post with effect from and petitioner ceased to be Class III employee and, therefore, delegation made to the Collector vide order dated 23 rd May, 1996 to place the Class III & IV employee was clearly not applicable to the petitioner and the Collector was not the competent authority to place the petitioner as the Collector is neither his appointing authority nor his disciplinary authority, who is working as Sub Engineer holding Class-II post, to place him under suspension and to initiate the department enquiry against him and, thus, such orders passed by the Collector was clearly without jurisdiction and without authority of law as the Collector, Koria was incompetent to pass such orders. (13) In Steel Authority of India, Successor of Bokaro Steel Limited Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court at Bokaro Steel City, Dhanbad, and another 1, their Lordship of the Supreme Court has clearly held that if the particular Officer has not been authorised under the approved Rules, then the charge-sheet served and Enquiry Committee constituted by such officer being unauthorized and the order passed is invalid. 1 (1980) 3 SCC 734
9 9 (14) Following the principles of law laid down by their Lordship s of the Supreme Court in the above quoted cases and taking into consideration the fact that the Collector was neither the appointing authority nor the disciplinary authority of the petitioner and petitioner being the Gazzetted Officer holding class II post, the Collector was incompetent to place the petitioner under suspension and to hold departmental enquiry against him, this Court is of the opinion, the order passed by the Collector (Annexure P-1) placing the petitioner under suspension and holding department enquiry (Annexure P-2) is clearly unsustainable and bad in law. (15) As a fall out and the consequence of the aforesaid discussion, the writ petition is allowed. Order dated (Annexure P-1) placed the petitioner under suspension & the order dated (Annexure P-2) directing institution of departmental enquiry liable to be and is hereby quashed. (16) No order as to costs. (17) However, the respondents are at liberty to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. Judge Dubey
10 10 Head Note English (1) Collector of a District is not empowered under Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966 to place the Class II Officer (Gazzetted) under suspension and to institute departmental enquiry against him. HINDI (1) ftkyk dysdvj] fu;e] 1966 ds v/khu oxz nks vf/kdkjh ¼jktif=r½ dks fuyfecr djus rfkk mlds fo:) fohkkxh; tkwap laflfkr djus ds fy, vf/kd`r ugha gs A (Amit Kumar Dubey) Private Secretary
11 11
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR AFR WPL No. 227 Of 2014 St.Xavier s H.S.School, Ambikapur, District Sarguja (CG) through its Manager Kalyanus Minj S/o Temba Minj R/o St. Xavier s H.S.School, Ambikapur
More information** vf/klwpuk ** Bhopal 10 th April, 2007
** vf/klwpuk ** Hkksiky] fnukad 10 vizsy] 2007 Hkkjr ds lafo/kku ds vuqpnsn 348 ds [k.m ¼3½ ds vuqlj.k esa] bl fohkkx dh vf/klwpuk dz dzekad@,q&49@1@2007@42&1 fnukad 10 vizsy] 2007 }kjk izdkf kr jktho
More information80 e/;izns'k 'kklu forr fohkkx %% ea=kky; %oyyhk Hkou]Hkksiky &462002
dzekad 526@99@lh@pkj] Hkksiky] fnukad 30 ekpz 1999- izfr] 'kklu ds lelr fohkkx lelr fohkkxk/;{k v/;{k] jktlo e.my Xokfy;j lelr dfe'uj lelr dysdvj e/;izns'k 80 e/;izns'k 'kklu forr fohkkx %% ea=kky; %oyyhk
More informationW.P. (C) No. 45 of 2013
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) A I Z A W L B E N C H :: A I Z A W L W.P. (C) No. 45 of 2013 Sh. J. Vanlalchhuanga, S/o Ralkapliana R/o Ramhlun,
More informationfgekpy izns k ljdkj iz kklfud lq/kkj laxbua vf/klwpuk
fgekpy izns k ljdkj iz kklfud lq/kkj laxbua la[;k Ikh bz vkj ¼, vkj½,q ¼7½&2@98&oksy&1 22 vdrwcj] 2008 f keyk&2 vf/klwpuk fgekpy izns k dh jkt;iky lwpuk dk vf/kdkj vf/kfu;e] 2005 dh /kkjk 27 dh mi/kkjk
More informationHIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR W.P. No.750/2017 Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.P and another Shri Sameer Seth, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri R.K. Sahu,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 9 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.58968/2013 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: K.J. Basavaraj,
More informationTHE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 4494/2004 NLK-204 Anuj Sonowal Son of Late Jadunath Sonowal C/o Sri Ratul Das, Vill-Khajuabeel,
More informationHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR. Writ Petition (C) No.3341 of Order reserved on: Order delivered on:
Page 1 of 12 AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.3341 of 2017 Order reserved on: 14 12 2017 Order delivered on: 2 1 2018 N.R. Sharma, S/o Late Shri Manoharlal Sharma, aged about
More informationMISCELLEANEOU APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(k) OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SINGLE BENCH: HON BLE SHRI SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010 Date of Decision: 10.02.2011 MRS. PRERNA Through Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate with Mr. Raunak Jain, Advocate and
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.235/2000 % Date of decision: 3 rd March, 2010 DULI CHAND Through:... Petitioner Mr. Pravin Sharma, Advocate. versus P.O.LABOUR COURT-VIII & ANR. Through:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Special Appeal No. 478 of 2018 Paresh Tripathi Versus Ganesh Prasad Badola and others...appellant. Respondents. Present: Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No of 2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 3455 of 2013 M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad... Petitioner Versus Sri Arun Krishna Rao Hazare, Ex General Manager (HRD), Bharat Coking Coal
More informationGovernment of Himachal Pradesh Printing & Stationery Department No: Mudran (B)10-4/2011 Dated Shimla-2 the
(Authoritative English Text of this department Notification No: Mudran (B)10-4/2011 Dated 9-1-2014, as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India.) Government of Himachal Pradesh
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA R BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION
More informationSub: In the matter of representation in compliance to the directions of Hon ble High Court, Jabalpur in Writ Petition no.
ORDER (Date of hearing: 12 th March, 2015) (Date of order: 30 th March, 2015) Shri Ashok Kumar Sable, - Petitioner S/o Shri Anand Rao Sable, R/o near Gas Godown, Mordongri Road, Sarni, District Betul (M.P.)
More informationGovernment of Himachal Pradesh Printing & Stationery Department No: Mudran (B)10-9/2010 Dated Shimla-2 the
Authoritative English Text of this department Notification No: Mudran (B)10-9/2010 Dated 9-1-2014, as required under clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution of India.) Government of Himachal Pradesh
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 135/1997 Reserved on: 18th July, 2012 Decided on: 23rd July, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 135/1997 Reserved on: 18th July, 2012 Decided on: 23rd July, 2012 M/S SUNDERLAL JAIN CHARITABLE HOSPITAL... Petitioner Through:
More informationlnl;ksa dh ny ifjorzu ds vk/kkj ij fujgzrk
lnl;ksa dh ny ifjorzu ds vk/kkj ij fujgzrk DISQUALIFICATION OF MEMBERS ON GROUND OF DEFECTION jkt; lhkk lfpoky; ubz fnyyh RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI 2012 izlrkouk lafo/kku ¼ckouoka la'kks/ku½ vf/kfu;e]
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2855 of 2010 Ramesh Goswami Writ Petitioner
More informationCOURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009
COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009 O.A. No. 140/2009 IN THE MATTER OF:...Applicant Through : Mr. P.D.P. Deo with Ms. Monica Nagi, counsels for the Applicant
More informationMr. Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate. versus ABUL KALAM AZAD ISLAMIC AWAKENING CENTRE THROUGH. Through: Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, Advocate
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) 6392/2007 & CM Appl.12029/2007 Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Decided on: 1st August, 2012 MOHD. ISMAIL Through:... Petitioner Mr.
More information- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 nd DAY OF JULY, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.NO. 45305/2011 (L-PG) BETWEEN: C.D ANANDA RAO S/O SRI DALAPPA AGED
More informationBar & Bench (
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH W.A. No.168/2015 (Smt. Sunita Jain vs. Pawan Kumar Jain and others) Shri K.C. Ghildiyal, counsel for the petitioner. Shri Siddharth Patel, counsel for the respondent No.1.
More information1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015 1. Bahari Reserve Gaon Min Samabai Samity Limited, Village & PO- Bahari, PS-
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Delhi Land Revenue Act, Reserved on: January 27, Pronounced on: February 22, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 Reserved on: January 27, 2012 Pronounced on: February 22, 2012 W.P.(C) No. 2047/2011 & CM No.4371/2011 JAI PAL AND ORS....
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Petitioners : WP(C) No.3049 of 2006 1. M/s. Bogidhola Tea and Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 2145/1999
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 2145/1999 Shri Wahed Ali, Son of Late Mafizuddin Ahmed, Resident of Dhirenpara, P.S. Fatasil Ambari,
More informationHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5295 of 2010 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5296 OF 2010 AND SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5297 OF 2010 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
More information$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus
$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 23, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2366/2004 RAJ KUMAR JAIN Through: versus... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. Ashish Bansal and Ms. Preety Manderna,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) -Vs- WP(C) No. 1846/2010 Sri Ram Prakash Sarki, Constable (Since dismissed from
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO Of 2011 SRI MAHABIR PROSAD CHOUDHARY...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8320 Of 2011 SRI MAHABIR PROSAD CHOUDHARY...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. OCTAVIUS TEA AND INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR....RESPONDENT(S)
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +CM Nos.7694-95/2010 (for restoration of CM No.266/2010 and for condonation of delay in applying for the same) in W.P.(C) 4165/2000 % Date of decision: 3 rd June,
More informationPRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9844-9846 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition
More informationfgekpy izns k ljdkj jktlo fohkkx rkjh[k f keyk&2 12 flrecj] vf/klwpuk
Page 1 of 18 fgekpy izns k ljdkj jktlo fohkkx la[;k%jso0ch-,-¼3½3@2013&a rkjh[k f keyk&2 12 flrecj] 2014- vf/klwpuk fgekpy izns k VSusUlh,.M ys.m fjqksezt ¼veS.MeSaV½:Yt]2014 dk izk:ik] fgekpy izns k vfhk/k`fr
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO OF 2015) VERSUS
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 12581 OF 2015) THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE & ANR....APPELLANT(S)
More informationMeghalaya Public Service Commission, Limitations of Functions
Meghalaya Public Service Commission, Limitations of Functions (As amended upto march 1984) Regulations 1972 Instruction regarding direct recruitment through the Public Service Commission issued by the
More informationW.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI
BY COURT: 1 W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India) Parmanand Pandey & Anr.. Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors.....
More informationThrough : Mr. A.K.Singla, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pankaj Gupta and Ms.Promila K.Dhar Advocates. Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROVIDENT FUND MATTER Writ Petition (C) Nos.670, 671 & 672/2007 Reserved on : 01.02.2007 Date of decision : 09.02.2007 IN THE MATTER OF : PRUDENTIAL SPINNERS
More informationMADHYA PRADESH ACT NO. 22 OF 1996 THE GWALIOR VYAPAR MELA PRADHIKARAN ADHINIYAM, 1996.
¼5½ MADHYA PRADESH ACT NO. 22 OF 1996 THE GWALIOR VYAPAR MELA PRADHIKARAN ADHINIYAM, 1996. TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections : 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Constitution of Gwalior
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO OF 2012 [S-R]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF MARCH 2016 BETWEEN BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.72291 OF 2012 [S-R] SRI RAMADAS S/O. DURGAPPA SIRSIKAR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1199 of 2016 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1452 of 2016 With CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11072 of 2016 In LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1199
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2. OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014. Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015
1 RESERVED ORDER A.F.R ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW COURT NO 2 OA 274/2014 with MA 1802/2014 Thursday, this the 16th of Feb 2015 Hon ble Mr. Justice Virendra Kumar DIXIT, Judicial Member
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION CM No. 15134 of 2005 in W.P. (C) No. 1043 of 1987 Orders reserved on : 26th July, 2006 Date of Decision : 7th August, 2006 LATE BAWA HARBANS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P. (C) No. 2222/2003 & CM No.4818/2005 Reserved on : 22.11.2007 Date of decision : 28.11.2007 IN THE MATTER OF : Dr. Virender Kumar Darall...
More informationW.P. (C) No of 2005
-1- W.P. (C) No. 1992 of 2005 WITH W.P. (C) No. 3105 of 2007 [In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] By Court: Jharkhand State Electricity Board through Electrical
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ)
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL Original Application No. 129/2013 (CZ) CORAM: Hon ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh (Judicial Member) Hon ble Mr. P.S.Rao (Expert Member) BETWEEN:
More informationThe brief facts of the case, as set out in the contempt application follows:
Court No. - 10 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3671 of 2010 Petitioner :- Ram Sakha Singh Respondent :- Sunil Kumar Chaudhary, State Chief Information Commissioner, Petitioner Counsel :- Dhirendra
More informationCase No. 17 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., Santacruz (E).
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13 th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005. Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 298 of 2013 ------- Md. Rizwan Akhtar son of Late Md. Suleman, resident of Ahmad Lane, Azad Basti, Gumla, P.O, P.S. and District: Gumla... Petitioner
More informationCONTENTS. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, Preamble
CONTENTS Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 Sections Preamble 1. Short title, extent and application 2. Interpretation 3. Submission of draft standing orders 4. Conditions for certification
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Crl.Rev.260/2011 Date of Decision: Versus...
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Crl.Rev.260/2011 Date of Decision: 27.04.2012 SANDEEP DIXIT Through: Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate.... PETITIONER STATE Through: Ms.Fizani Husain,
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner.
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.07.2010 + WP (C) 11932/2009 M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner - versus THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER & ANR... Respondent
More informationGovernment of Jammu and Kashmir General Administration Department (Services) Civil Secretariat, Srinagar
www.jkgad.nic.in Fax No. 0194-2473664 (S) 0191-2545702 (J) E-mail gad-jk@nic.in Government of Jammu and Kashmir General Administration Department (Services) Civil Secretariat, Srinagar Subject: SWP No.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ON THE 24 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K L MANJUNATH AND THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH Writ Petition No. 20807 of 2010 (S-KAT)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. W.P.(C) No.2940/1995. Date of Decision : March 3, 2009.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.2940/1995 Date of Decision : March 3, 2009. PEOPLES UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES... Petitioners Through Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Mr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No. 4484 of 2008 Birendra Kumar Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- Secretary, Foundary Forge Co-operative Society Ltd., Dhurwa, Ranchi CORAM: - HON BLE MR.
More informationWRIT PETITION (C) NO. 233O OF 2006
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND;MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 233O OF 2006 Sri Kajal Kumar Paul, Son of Late Rajkukar Paul, Resident of Santipara, Saratpalli,
More informationTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE & ANR. Vs. ANASUYA. ANASUYA BAI (D) BY LRs. & ORS.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE & ANR. Vs. ANASUYA BAI (D) BY LRS. & ORS. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2017 (ARISING
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. WP(C) No.7716/2011. Date of Decision: Through Mr.Subhashish Mohanty, Advocate.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER WP(C) No.7716/2011 Date of Decision: 22.12.2011 Randhir Singh. Petitioner Through Mr.Subhashish Mohanty, Advocate. Versus Central Industrial
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 2882/2005 M/s. Ladi Steel Industries Pvt. Limited, a private limited company duly incorporated under
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8444/2011 Date of Decision: 29 th September, 2015 REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY... Petitioner Through Mr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU. Writ Appeal No 3169 of 2014 (S-RES)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Dated this the 6 th day of March, 2017 PRESENT: THE HON BLE MR SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE R AND THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE BUDIHAL R B Writ Appeal No
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
$~R-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: September 24, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6616/1998 VANDANA JHINGAN Through:... Petitioner Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate, with Mr. A.P. Dhamija, Advocate
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)
Review Petition No. 73/2013 (Arising out of Misc. Case No. 705/2013 In FAO 6/2013) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development
More informationBar & Bench ( IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10577 OF 2018 (arising out of SLP (C) No. 16836 of 2018) THE INCOME TAX OFFICER URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST VERSUS APPELLANT(S)
More informationThrough: Mr. Kartik Prasad with Ms. Reeja Varghese, Adv. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE W.P.(C) No. 943/2015 & CM Nos.1653-1654/2015 DATE OF DECISION : 30th January, 2015 SUBHA KUMAR DASH... Petitioner Through: Mr.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 2973/2006 Sri Ajit Kumar Kakoti Lecturer, Son of Late Padmadhar Kakoti, Assam Textile
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 1961 of 2010 Smt. Padma Rani Mudai Hazarika - Versus - - Petitioner Union of India
More informationCRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) The Federal Bank Ltd. Petitioner VERSUS Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. Respondents CRP No. 220/2014 The Federal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) Nos.
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 691-693 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) Nos. 21462-64 OF 2013) State of Tripura & Ors..Appellants Versus
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Sri Rajesh Jaiswal, S/o Sri Radha Raman Jaiswal, Resident of Thana Back Road, Ward No. 11, New Amolapatty, Golaghat-785621.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1956 W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005 Judgment decided on: 14.02.2011 C.D. SINGH Through: Mr Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate....Petitioner
More information1. The State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Education Department, Dispur, Guwahati-6.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 4717/2007. 1. Md. Alauddin Mondal, Son of Late Hazrat Ali Mondal, A resident of village-kaimari
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW RESERVE (Court No. 2) Original Application No. 47 of 2014
1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW RESERVE (Court No. 2) Original Application No. 47 of 2014 Wednesday, this the 23 rd day of November, 2016 Hon ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon
More information3. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer South Western Railway Hubli Division, Hubli PETITIONERS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA WRIT PETITION NOS.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR C.S.T.A.NO.7/2014 BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) No. 469/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 Judgment delivered on: 11.07.2011 W.P.(C) No. 469/2011 Anil Kumar Sharma Petitioner Through: Ms.Anju Bhattacharya, Advocate.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Crl. Rev. P. No.286/2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Rev. P. No.286/2009 Reserved on : 09.07.2010 Date of Decision : 12.08.2010 STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI).Petitioner Through : Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 911 2007 Ejaj Ahmad Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Binay Kumar Opposite Parties CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Writ Petition (Civil) No of 2008 and CM No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7230 of 2008 and CM No.13974 of 2008 Decided on: October 03, 2008 1. The Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 520 of 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 520 of 2005 Fr. Mariya Packian S.J. Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 3. Land Reforms Deputy Collector,
More informationCivil Revision Petition No. 118/2009 -VERSUS-
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Civil Revision Petition No. 118/2009 1. Md. Iman Ali, 2. Md. Abdul Basar, Both are sons of Late Ahmed Ali, 3. Msstt.
More informationVersus. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court No.VI,... Respondents. Delhi and Anr. Through Ms.Amita Gupta, Advocate
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Writ Petition (C) No.4397/1999 Reserved on : 13. 03.2007 Date of decision : 03.04.2007 IN THE MATTER OF : Rameshwar Dayal...Petitioner.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Page 1 of 15 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) NO.4448/2007 1. Sri Abhiram Pegu, S/o Damodar Pegu, R/O- Nalipipar, P.O & P.S- Dhemaji, District-
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: FAO (OS) 298/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 17.01.2013 FAO (OS) 298/2010 SHIROMANI GURUDWARA PRABHANDHAK COMMITTEE AND ANR... Appellants Through Mr. H.S.
More information$~41 to 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2889/2013 DIVINE MISSION SOCIETY (REGD.) versus NATIONAL COUNICL FOR TEACHER WITH
$~41 to 66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2889/2013 DIVINE MISSION SOCIETY (REGD.) NATIONAL COUNICL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ORS. + W.P.(C) 7422/2013 PRATAP COLLEGE OF EDUCATION. +
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI Writ Appeal No.136/2015 1. SRI CHITTARANJAN DASH CHIEF MANAGER (FINANCE
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017 1. SMTI. TETERI DEVI, Wife of Late Mohendra Harizon. 2. SHRI RAMANANDA HARIZON, Son of Late Mohendra
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016 Sri Bhabesh Das Son of Late Dhruba Das Vill Kulhati, No.2 Hidalghurisupa Police
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No of Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3996 of 2006 1. Bokaro Steel Workers Union 2. N.M.D.C. Mines Workers' Union Petitioners Versus Steel Authority of India Limited and others Respondents
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR. WRIT PETITION Nos /2015 (T-RES)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.8854-8874/2015 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S.PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS
More information% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment delivered on: November 27, 2015 % W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004 M/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI... Petitioner Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. versus
More informationTHE SALARY AND ALLOWANCES OF THE CHIEF WHIP IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015 A BILL
Bill No. 22 of 2015 THE SALARY AND ALLOWANCES OF THE CHIEF WHIP IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015 A BILL Further to amend the Salary and Allowances
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR W.P.No.2556/2012 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI.PRAKASH S/O PARAMESHWARAPPA AGED
More informationHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR. Writ Petition (Art. 227) No.699 of Order reserved on: Order delivered on:
Page 1 of 21 AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (Art. 227) No.699 of 2015 Order reserved on: 18-10-2016 Order delivered on: 25-11-2016 M/s. I.C.S.A. (India Limited), Through Managing
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment pronounced on: W.P.(C) 393/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Judgment pronounced on: 20.01.2012 W.P.(C) 393/2012 SH. ADIL RASHID SIDDIQUI Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Respondents Advocates
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Execution Application No. 154 of Tuesday, the 21 st day August, 2018
1 Court No. 1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Execution Application No. 154 of 2018 Tuesday, the 21 st day August, 2018 Hon ble Mr. Justice SVS Rathore, Member (J) Hon ble Air Marshal BBP
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL. Original Application No. 264/2014 (THC) (CZ)
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL CENTRAL ZONAL BENCH BHOPAL Original Application No. 264/2014 (THC) (CZ) CORAM: Hon ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh (Judicial Member) Hon ble Mr. P.S.Rao (Expert Member) BETWEEN:
More information