09/27/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED BY THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL STD /30/2013 /REB

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "09/27/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED BY THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL STD /30/2013 /REB"

Transcription

1 REDACTED 09/27/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED BY THE OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL STD /30/ /27/2013 Objection Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN DEFENDANTS OBJECTION TO PROSECUTIONS NOTICE OF EVIDENCE BEST CHARACTERIZED AS RES GESTAE PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER [D-073] ***SUPPRESSED***** SUPPRESSED ENVELOPE #39 STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER D-82A REGARDING JURY QUESTIONNARE **********SUPPRESSED******* SUPPRESSED ENVELOPE #40 STD /27/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REPLY TO PROSECUTIONS RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR PROSECUTIONS FAILURE TO PROVIDE DISCOVERY IN A TIMELY FASHION [D-136] STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REPLY TO PROSECUTIONS RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION TO HAVE SAME NUMBER OF CLOSING ARGUMENTS AT ANY SENTENCING TRIAL [D-142] STD /30/2013

2 09/27/2013 Reply Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REPLY TO PROSECUTIONS RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REQUIRE THAT THE JURY MUST DETERMINE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THAT PROVEN STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS OUTWEIGH MITIGATION AT STEP THREE OF ANY SENTENCING PROCEEDING OR ALTERNATIVELY TO DECLARE COLORADOS DEATH PENALTY SCHEME UNCONSTITUTIONAL [D-143] STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REPLY TO PEOPLES RESPONSE TO MOTION TO PRECLUDE THE DEATH PENALTY AS A POSSIBLE PUNISHMENT IN THIS CASE BECAUSE COLORADOS CURRENT DEATH PENALTY SENTENCING SCHEME AS INTERPRETED IN PEOPLE V DUNLAP J975 P 2D 723 (COLO 1999) [DUNLAP I] IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL [D-144] STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REPLY TO PROSECUTIONS RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DECLARE COLORADOS DEATH PENALTY SCHEME UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN LIGHT OF PEOPLE V DUNLAP 36 P 3D 778 (COLO 2001) [DUNLAP II] [D-145] STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REPLY TO RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO PUT THE BURDEN OF PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT ON THE STATE AT THE SECOND AND THIRD STEPS AND THAT THE

3 STATE BEAR THE BURDEN OF PERSUASION BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT AT THE FOURTH STEP OF THE STATUTORY SENTENCING PROCESS SHOULD THOSE STEPS BE REACHED AND OBJECTION TO ANY OTHER STANDARD [D-146] STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REPLY TO RESPONSE TO MOTION THAT THE STATE BE REQUIRED 1-TO PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT EVERY ALLEGED NON STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACT/CIRCUMSTANCE AND 2-TO PROVIDE NOTICE OF EVERY ALLEGED NON STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACT/CIRCUMSTANCE IT MAY RELY ON AT THE FOURTH STEP OF ANY SENTENCING PHASE [D-147] STD /30/ /27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL MOTIONS REGARDING REPORT OF CMHIP SANITY EVALUATION (D-179). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/27/2013 Response Event ID: PEOPLES RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER D-82-A REGARDING JURY QUESTIONAIRE [P-061]*************SUPPRESSED *********** SUPPRESSED ENVELOPE #41 STD /27/2013

4 09/27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO DECLARE THE DEATH PENALTY UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR ITS FAILURE, IN PRACTICE, TO MEET THE MINIMUM CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN FURMAN, GREGG AND THEIR PROGENCY [D-149] FILED BY THE DA STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO PREVENT DEATH QUALIFICATIONS OF THE JURY [D-150] FILED BY THE DA STD /30/ /27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER SETTING HEARING ON MOTION REGARDING MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR REALISTIC, GOOD FAITH WITNESS LIST (D-96A). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS INITIAL ORDER REGARDING COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM (C-61). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, AND TANYA SMITH.

5 09/27/2013 Notice Filed Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS NOTICE LABELING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ON BEHALF OF THE COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO "C-61". COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON AND TANYA SMITH. 09/27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CONDUCT VIDEO RECORDINGS OF JURY SELECTION [D-151] FILED BY THE DA STD /30/ /27/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS INITIAL ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM PSDT-3, PSDT-4, PSDT-5 AND PSDT-6 (D-178). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO QUASH FILED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL [C-61] FILED BY THE DA STD /30/2013

6 09/27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO MOTION TO PERMIT ALTERNATING VOIR DIRE [D-152] FILED BY THE DA STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO JURY VIEW OF STERLING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY COLORADO STATE PENITENTIARY SAN CARLOS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND CENTENNIAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY IN THE EVENT THAT A CAPITAL SENTENCING TRIAL IS HELD [D-153] FILED BY THE DA STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION FOR PARTICULAR PROCEDURES DURING JURY SELCTION [D-154] FILED BY THE DA STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DEATH PENALTY OR FOR OTHER ALTERNATIVE RELIEF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT COURTS JURISPRUDENCE ON JURY SELECTION IN CAPTIAL CASES IS IN IRRECONCILABLE CONFLICT WITH THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT AND EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY/PROPORTIONALITY IN CAPITAL CASES [D-155] FILED BY THE DA STD /30/2013

7 09/27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO DECLARE DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS OF SECTION (3) (C) AND CRIM P 32.1 (D) (7) UNCONSTITUTIONAL [D-156] FILED BY THE DA STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO DECLARE CRS (2012) UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE IS FAILS TO SUFFICIENTLY NARROW THE CLASS OF INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR THE DEATH PENALTY [D-157] STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DECLARE CRS (5) (J) (HEINOUS CRUEL OR DEPRAVED AGGRAVATOR) UNCONSTITUTIONAL [D-158] BY DA STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DECLARE CRS (5) (1) (CREATION OF A GRAVE RISK OF DEATH AGGRAVATOR) UNCONSTITUTIONAL [D-159] STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DECLARE CRS (5) (M) INTENTIONAL KILLING OF A CHILD UNDER TWELVE AGGRAVATOR UNCONSTITUTIONAL [D-160] STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DECLARE CRS (5) (L) KILLING TWO OR MORE PERSONS AGGRAVATOR UNCONSTITUTIONAL [D-161] STD /30/2013

8 09/27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DECLARE CRS (5) (F) LYING IN WAIT AGRRAVATING FACTOR UNCONSTITUTIONAL [D-162] STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO DECLARE CRS UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE THE CLASSIFICATIONS IT CREATES BETWEEN MURDER CASES ARE ARBITRARY [D-163] STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO DECLARE COLORADOS DEATH PENALTY UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE IN PRACTICE IT IS ARBITRARY IN BOTH APPLICATION AND OPERATION [D-164] STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DEATH PENALTY BECAUSE IT VIOLATES THE STATE AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROHIBITIONS AGAINST CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF BOTH CONSTITUTIONS AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE CLAUSE OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION [D-165] STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-047: PEOPLE'S PROPOSED ALLOCUTION ADVISEMENT - STD /JR

9 09/27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-048, P-051, P-053, P-054, AND P-055: PEOPLE'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION OF CAPTIAL PUNISHMENT OPINION EVIDENCE P-048, PEOPLE'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT CONCERNING HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF DEATH PENALTY P-051, PEOPLES MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE OF METHOD OF EXECUTION P-53, PEOPLE'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION OF ALL EVIDENCE OF OTHER MURDER CASES P-0854, PEOPLE'S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE OF PRISON CONDITIONS P STD /JR 09/27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-049 PEOPLES MOTION FOR DEFENSE DISCLOSURE OF MITIGATING FACTORS PRIOR TO CLOSE OF EVIDENCE AT SENTENCING STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-050 PEOPLES MOTION REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTION CONCERNING DUTY TO DELIBERATE STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-051 PEOPLES MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION EVIDENCE OR ARGUMENT CONCERNING HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF DEATH PENALTY [P-051] STD /30/2013

10 09/27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-052 PEOPLES MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING IMPACT OF POTENTIAL EXECUTION ON THE DEFENDANTS FAMILY FRIENDS OR OTHERS STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-053 PEOPLES MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE OF METHOD OF EXECUTION P-053 STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-054 PEOPLES MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION OF ALL EVIDENCE OF OTHER MURDER CASES [P-054] STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-055 PEOPLES MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE OF PRISON CONDITIONS [P-055] STD /30/ /27/2013 Reply Event ID: PEOPLES REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION P-056 PEOPLES MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING EXCLUSION OF RESIDUAL DOUBT EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT STD /30/2013

11 09/27/2013 Response Event ID: PEOPLES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR REALISTIC GOOD FAITH WITNESS LIST [D-096A] STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO EXCLUDE VICTIM IMPACT TESTIMONY FROM ANY PENALTY PHASE HEARING HELD BEFORE THE JURY IN THIS CASE AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO DECLARE CRS (1) (B) UNCONSTITUTIONAL STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 32 1 (D) (2) [D-167] STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR A PRETRIAL EVIDENTIARY HEARING TO LITIGATE ISSUES SURROUNDING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF ANY PROFFERED VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE [D-168 STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DEATH PENALTY DUE TO THE LACK OF A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT D-175 STD /30/2013

12 09/27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DEATH PENALTY DUE TO THE LACK OF A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT D-176 STD /30/ /27/2013 Response Event ID: RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE THE DEATH PENALTY DUE TO THE LACK OF A GRAND JURY INDICTMENT D-177 STD /30/13 09/30/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC PROCEDURES TO SAFEGUARD MR. HOLMES'S RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY AN IMPARTIAL JURY (D-180). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/30/2013 Minute Order (print) Event ID: STATUS/SDT RETURNS JUDGE SAMOUR REPORTER J. MARTIN DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH COUNSEL MS. TAMERA BRADY, MR. DANIEL KING, MS. KRISTEN NELSON AND MS. REBEKKA HIGGS PRESENT FOR THE PEOPLE ARE DDA MS. KAREN PEARSON, MR. DANIEL ZOOK, MR. RICH ORMAN, MR. JACOB EDSON, MS. LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, AND DA GEORGE BRAUCHLER **************

13 JANA WINTER IS PRESENT WITH HER ATTORNEYS, MR. MICHAEL THEIS, MR. CHRISTOPHER MURRAY AND MS. THERESA HOUSE. THE COURT CONTINUES MS. WINTER'S SUBPOENA UNTIL JANUARY 3, 2014 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDER C-53. ************** NEXT, THE COURT ADDRESSES DEFENDANT'S MOTION D-178, WHICH SEEKS TO QUASH FOUR SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM SERVED BY THE PEOPLE: PSDT-3, PSDT-4, PSDT-5, AND PSDT-6. THE PEOPLE RESPONDED TO THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION ON SEPTEMBER 26. THE NEXT DAY THE COURT ISSUED ORDER D-178 STATING THAT THE DEFENDANT COULD REPLY TO THE MOTION ORALLY AT TODAY'S HEARING, OR, IF THE DEFENDANT PREFERRED TO REPLY IN WRITING, THE COURT WOULD SET A DEADLINE FOR SUCH REPLY. MS. BRADY ASKS TO FILE A WRITTEN REPLY, WHICH WILL BE FILED BY OCTOBER 1. ************** MR. STEVE ZWECK-BRONNER IS PRESENT FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO WITH DOCUMENTS IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-6. THE COURT PROPOSES OCTOBER 7 AS A NEW SUBPOENA RETURN DATE FOR PSDT-6. NEITHER PARTY OBJECTS. MR. ZWECK-BONNER INDICATES THAT HE CAN BE AVAILABLE ON OCTOBER 7. ACCORDINGLY, PSDT-6 IS CONTINUED UNTIL OCTOBER 7, 2013, AT 9:00 A.M. THE COURT INSTRUCTS MR. ZWECK-BONNER TO KEEP THE SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS UNTIL THEN. ************** MS. TANYA SMITH AND ALICIA CALDERON WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE APPEAR ON BEHALF OF THE COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO (CMHIP) AND TWO OF ITS CLINICIANS. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FILED A MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS PSDT-4 AND PSDT-5 ON BEHALF OF TWO CLINICIANS AT CMHIP ON SEPTEMBER 27. MS. SMITH CONFIRMS THAT CMHIP IS NOT CHALLENGING PSDT-3 (THIS WAS SERVED ON CMHIP). THE PEOPLE HAVE FILED A RESPONSE TO THE

14 MOTION TO QUASH. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE WOULD LIKE A CHANCE TO FILE A REPLY, AND WILL DO SO BY TOMORROW. WITHOUT OBJECTION, THE RETURN DATE FOR SUBPOENAS PSDT-3, PSDT-4, AND PSDT-5 IS CONTINUED UNTIL OCTOBER 7, 2013 AT 9:00 A.M. *************** NEXT, THE COURT HEARS ORAL ARGUMENT FROM MR. ORMAN AND MS. BRADY REGARDING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION D-179, WHICH SEEKS LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL MOTIONS RELATED TO THE CMHIP SANITY EVALUATION REPORT. THE COURT WILL ALLOW THE DEFENSE TO FILE ADDITIONAL MOTIONS RELATED TO THE EVALUATION SINCE THE REPORT FROM CMHIP WAS NOT COMPLETED UNTIL AFTER THE DEADLINES FOR NON-CAPITAL AND CAPITAL MOTIONS HAD EXPIRED. THEREFORE, THE COURT LIMITS ORAL ARGUMENT TO THE ISSUE OF SETTING A DEADLINE FOR THE ANTICIPATED MOTIONS. THE COURT TAKES THE MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT AND WILL ISSUE A WRITTEN RULING. ************** LASTLY, THE COURT HEARS ORAL ARGUMENT FROM MR. KING AND MR. EDSON REGARDING THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION D-96A IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT ASKS THE COURT TO RECONSIDER THE DEADLINE FOR THE PEOPLE TO PROVIDE A GOOD FAITH WITNESS LIST FOR TRIAL. THE DEFENSE WOULD LIKE THE LIST AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 15. MR. EDSON STATES THAT THE PEOPLE CANNOT PREPARE A GOOD FAITH WITNESS LIST UNTIL THE COURT HAS RULED ON ALL THE NON-CAPITAL MOTIONS, INCLUDING THOSE SET FOR HEARING IN OCTOBER. AFTER CONFERRING WITH CO-COUNSEL, MR. EDSON INDICATES THAT THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THEY COULD PROVIDE A GOOD FAITH WITNESS LIST BY DECEMBER 1. THE COURT TAKES THE MATTER UNDER ADVISEMENT AND WILL ISSUE A WRITTEN RULING.

15 09/30/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER CORRECTING CAPTIONS OF PLEADINGS BY NON-PARTY WITNESS JANA WINTER (C-64), COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, MICHAEL THEIS, CHRISTOPHER MURRAY, AND DORI ANN HANSWIRTH. 09/30/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR PROSECUTION'S FAILURE TO PROVIDE DISCOVERY IN A TIMELY FASHION (D-136). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/30/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER GRANTING REQUESTS TO SUPPRESS: (1) PEOPLE'S RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER D-82-A REGARDING JURY QUESTIONNAIRE (P-61); (2) DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER D-82-A REGARDING JURY QUESTIONNAIRE (D-82A); AND (3) DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PROSECUTION'S NOTICE OF EVIDENCE BEST CHARACTERIZED AS RES GESTAE PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER D-73 (D-73)--(C-62). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON.

16 09/30/2013 Notice Filed Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS NOTICE CHANGING START TIME FOR SOME OF THE NON-CAPITAL MOTIONS HEARINGS (C-63). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/30/2013 Order Event ID: ORDER RULING ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR REALISTIC, GOOD FAITH WITNESS LIST (D-96-B). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/30/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER RULING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ADDITIONAL MOTIONS REGARDING REPORT OF CMHIP SANITY EVALUATION (D-179A). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 09/30/2013 Status Conference 09/30/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Length: 1.00 Hour(s) Status: HELD-Hearing Held 09/30/2013 Motions Hearing 10/07/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Length: 1.00 Day(s)

17 09/30/2013 Motions Hearing 10/09/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Length: 1.00 Day(s) 09/30/2013 Motions Hearing 10/15/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Length: 1.00 Day(s) 09/30/2013 Motions Hearing 10/16/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Length: 1.00 Day(s) 09/30/2013 Motions Hearing 10/21/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Length: 1.00 Hour(s) 09/30/2013 Motions Hearing 10/22/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Length: 1.00 Day(s) 09/30/2013 Motions Hearing 10/23/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Length: 1.00 Day(s) 09/30/2013 Hearing 09/30/ :00 AM 201 Officer: CARLOS A SAMOUR JR. Status. HELD-Hearing Held Length: 1.00 Hour(s) Note..: SDT RETURN 10/01/2013 Reply Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REPLY TO PROSECUTION'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM PSDT-3, PSDT-4, PSDT-5, PSDT-6 [D-178] FILED BY THE DEFENSE STD /01/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PERMIT ALTERNATING VOIR DIRE (D-152). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER,

18 SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 10/01/2013 Order Event ID: ORDER REGARDING PEOPLE'S MOTION REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTION CONCERNING DUTY TO DELIBERATE (P-50). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, AND KRISTEN NELSON. 10/01/2013 Reply Event ID: REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM (C-61) FILED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STD /02/2013 Response Event ID: PEOPLES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC PROCEDURES TO SAFEGUARD [DEFENDANT]'S RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY AN IMPARTIAL JUTY [D-180] FILED BY THE DA STD /02/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM PSDT-3, PSDT-4, PSDT-5, AND PSDT-6 (D-178-A). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, TANYA SMITH, AND STEVEN ZWECK-BONNER./AG

19 10/02/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER RULING ON MOTION TO QUASH PSDT-4 AND PSDT-5 FILED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ON BEHALF OF AND AT COLORADO MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE AT PUEBLO (C-61-A). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, AND TANYA SMITH. /AG 10/02/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS PROTECTION ORDER REGARDING TEST MATERIALS AND RAW DATA, INCLUDING RAW DATA PRINTOUTS, FROM CMHIP (C-65). COPIES SENT VIA TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON, RICH ORMAN, DAN ZOOK, JACOB EDSON, LISA TEESCH-MAGUIRE, GEORGE BRAUCHLER, SHERILYN KOSLOSKY, RHONDA CRANDALL, DANIEL KING, TAMARA BRADY, KRISTEN NELSON, AND TANYA SMITH. /AG 10/02/2013 Motion Event ID: MEDIA PETITIONERS' OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC PROCEDURES TO SAFEGUARD MR. HOLMES' RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY AN IMPARTIAL JURY [D-180] STD /02/2013 Letter Event ID: LETTER TO JUDGE SAMOUR STD

20 10/02/2013 Motion Event ID: NON-PARTY JANA WINTER'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SPECIFIC PROCEDURES TO SAFEGUARD MR. HOLMES'S RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY AN IMPARTIAL JURY (D-180) STD End of Case: 2012 CR

08/30/2013 Motion Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN ATTACHEMENTS - STD /JR. 08/30/2013 Motion Event ID:

08/30/2013 Motion Event ID: DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN ATTACHEMENTS - STD /JR. 08/30/2013 Motion Event ID: REDACTED 08/30/2013 Motion Event ID: 000793 MOTION TO DELCARE THE DEATH PENALTY UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR ITS FAILURE IN PRACTICE TO MEET THE MINIMUM CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN FURMAN GREGG AND

More information

08/16/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY --

08/16/2013 Order Event ID: THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY -- REDACTED 08/16/2013 Order Event ID: 000743 THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY -- MISSING MEDICAL REPORTS (D-42). COPIES SENT VIA EMAIL TO KAREN PEARSON, AMY JORGENSON,

More information

REDACTED. 10/04/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION REGARDING ORDERS TO PRODUCE RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-3, PSDT-4 AND

REDACTED. 10/04/2013 Motion Event ID: MOTION REGARDING ORDERS TO PRODUCE RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-3, PSDT-4 AND REDACTED 10/04/2013 Motion Event ID: 000945 MOTION REGARDING ORDERS TO PRODUCE RECORDS IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-3, PSDT-4 AND PSDT-5 FILED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STD 201 10-4-2013 /REB 10/04/2013 Notice Filed

More information

09/06/2013 Letter Event ID: LETTER RECEIVED FROM MICHAEL C THEIS. 09/06/2013 Motion Event ID: HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN

09/06/2013 Letter Event ID: LETTER RECEIVED FROM MICHAEL C THEIS. 09/06/2013 Motion Event ID: HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN REDACTED 09/06/2013 Letter Event ID: 000821 LETTER RECEIVED FROM MICHAEL C THEIS RE: UPDATE CONCERNING NEW YORK APPEAL OF NON-PARTY WITNESS JANA WINTER 09/06/2013 Motion Event ID: 000822 REVISED MOTION

More information

REDACTED. 4/03/2015 Filing Other Event ID: E-Filed: N DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-7 SEALED ENVELOPE #197 /LKO

REDACTED. 4/03/2015 Filing Other Event ID: E-Filed: N DOCUMENTS PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO PSDT-7 SEALED ENVELOPE #197 /LKO REDACTED 4/03/2015 Order Event ID: 000730 E-Filed: N THE COURT ENTERS ORDER REGARDING REQUEST TO SUPPRESS PEOPLE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION D-285A (C-191). COPIES SENT VIA EMAIL TO KAREN PEARSON,

More information

REDACTED. 01/30/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 9

REDACTED. 01/30/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 9 REDACTED 01/30/2015 Notice Filed Event ID: 000608 E-Filed: N DEF/ HOLMES, JAMES EAGAN DEFENSE NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RULE 16(III)(B) (D-278) SUPPRESSED ENVELOPE #179 STD 201 1 30

More information

REBEKKA HIGGS, KATHERINE SPENGLER, AND KRISTEN NELSON. THE PEOPLE ARE

REBEKKA HIGGS, KATHERINE SPENGLER, AND KRISTEN NELSON. THE PEOPLE ARE REDACTED 03/13/2015 Motion Event ID: 000691 E-Filed: N MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE (D-206A) WITH ATTACHED CD AND EXHIBITS FILED BY

More information

REDACTED. 03/06/2015 Motion Event ID: E-Filed: N MOTION BY MEDIA PETITIONERS TO UNSUPPRESS THE JURY QUESTIONNAIRE.

REDACTED. 03/06/2015 Motion Event ID: E-Filed: N MOTION BY MEDIA PETITIONERS TO UNSUPPRESS THE JURY QUESTIONNAIRE. REDACTED 03/06/2015 Motion Event ID: 000675 E-Filed: N MOTION BY MEDIA PETITIONERS TO UNSUPPRESS THE JURY QUESTIONNAIRE. STD 3 6 15 /LKO 03/06/2015 Order Event ID: 000676 E-Filed: N THE COURT ENTERS ORDER

More information

REDACTED. 02/26/2015 Minute Order (No Print) Event ID: E-Filed: N COURTROOM 202 MONITOR THIS MORNING WAS XXX AND THIS AFTERNOON WAS XXX /CMR

REDACTED. 02/26/2015 Minute Order (No Print) Event ID: E-Filed: N COURTROOM 202 MONITOR THIS MORNING WAS XXX AND THIS AFTERNOON WAS XXX /CMR REDACTED 02/26/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000659 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 25 FEBRUARY 26, 2015 REPORTERS: ELMSHAUESER MORNING; TROYANEK AFTERNOON DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH HIS ATTORNEYS

More information

REDACTED. 5/07/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL DAY 63 MAY 7, 2015

REDACTED. 5/07/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL DAY 63 MAY 7, 2015 REDACTED 5/07/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000793 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL DAY 63 MAY 7, 2015 REPORTER: TROYANEK ALL DAY REPRESENTED BY GEORGE BRAUCHLER, JACOB EDSON, KAREN PEARSON, RICH ORMAN, THE

More information

REDACTED MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER D [D-263] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL

REDACTED MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER D [D-263] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL REDACTED District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado Filed Arapahoe County Courthouse 7325 S. Potomac St., Centennial, CO 80112 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, DEC 2 4 2014 Plaintiff CLERK OF THE COMBINED

More information

6/24/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 91 JUNE 24, 2015

6/24/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 91 JUNE 24, 2015 REDACTED 6/24/2015 Minute Order (print) Event ID: 000851 E-Filed: N JURY TRIAL - DAY 91 JUNE 24, 2015 REPORTER: FIKANY ALL DAY DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH HIS ATTORNEYS KATHERINE SPENGLER AND KRISTEN

More information

REDA TE MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE OF AN OUT OF STATE WITNESS FROM CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL

REDA TE MOTION FOR A CERTIFICATE TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE OF AN OUT OF STATE WITNESS FROM CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL REDA TE District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado Arapahoe County Courthouse 7325 S. Potomac St., Centennial CO 80112 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. Plaintiff v. JAMES HOLMES, Defendant DOUGLAS K.

More information

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL [D-267] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL [D-267] CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL REDACTED District Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado Arapahoe County Courthouse 7325 S. Potomac St., Centennial, CO 80112 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Plaintiff Filed JAN o'7 2015 CLERK OF THE COMBINED

More information

I, as well as all evidence and testimony of Dr. Reid's opinions and. Division: 202 ^COURT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

I, as well as all evidence and testimony of Dr. Reid's opinions and. Division: 202 ^COURT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO REDACTED DISTRICT COURT, ARAPAHOE COLNTY, STATE OF COLORADO 7325 S. Potomac St. Centennial, Colorado 80 1 12 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO ^COURT USE ONLY^ v. JAMES EAGAN HOLMES, I)efendant Case No.

More information

Criminal Law Table of Contents

Criminal Law Table of Contents Criminal Law Table of Contents Attorney - Client Relations Legal Services Retainer Agreement - Hourly Fee Appearance of Counsel Waiver of Conflict of Interest Letter Declining Representation Motion to

More information

(a) Except as provided in K.S.A Supp and , and amendments thereto, if a

(a) Except as provided in K.S.A Supp and , and amendments thereto, if a Special Session of 2013 HOUSE BILL NO. AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure; relating to sentencing of certain persons to mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 40 or 50 years;

More information

Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights

Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights You do not need your computers today. Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights How have the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments' rights of the accused been incorporated as a right of all American citizens?

More information

PEOPLE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENSE "MOTION FOR SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS TO WITNESSES AND JURORS REGARDING VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE" [D-242] Introduction

PEOPLE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION FOR SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS TO WITNESSES AND JURORS REGARDING VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE [D-242] Introduction REDACTED DISTRICT COURT, ARAPAHOE COUNTY STATE OF COLORADO Arapahoe County Justice Center 7325 S. Potomac Street Centennial, Colorado 80112 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO vs. Defendant( s): JAMES

More information

Volume 7. Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 1

Volume 7. Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 1 Volume 7 1 2 IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 3 DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 4 5 6 7 THE STATE OF TEXAS } 8 VS: } NO. F-96-39972-J 9 DARLIE LYNN ROUTIER } & F-96-39973-J 10 11 12 13 14 STATEMENT OF FACTS 15

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v., Defendant(s). Case No. PRETRIAL AND CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER The defendant(s), appeared for

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY September 22, 2015: Criminal Trial Scheduling and Discovery IN THE MATTER OF : CRIMINAL TRIAL SCHEDULING : STANDING ORDER AND DISCOVERY : The Court having considered a revised protocol for scheduling in

More information

Religious Beliefs, Motion for Voir Dire on Sentence Length, and Motion for Voir

Religious Beliefs, Motion for Voir Dire on Sentence Length, and Motion for Voir IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CRIMINAL COURT DEPARTMENT STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff, VS. FRAZIER GLENN CROSS, JR., Defendant. 14CR853 Div. 17 STATE S BRIEF RE: JURY SELECTION COMES NOW

More information

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS LOCAL SMITH COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL TRIAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURTS AND COUNTY COURTS AT LAW SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS The following local rules of civil trial are adopted for use in non-family law civil trials

More information

Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure. Basic Concepts. What is Proof (Evidence) David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx.

Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure. Basic Concepts. What is Proof (Evidence) David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx. Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx Basic Concepts PresumptionofInnocence:BurdenonStateto erase presumption by proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Absolute

More information

Kffiffi tu{:www. 1. The prosecution takes issue with four categories of evidence the defense inlends

Kffiffi tu{:www. 1. The prosecution takes issue with four categories of evidence the defense inlends Kffiffi tu{:www Disfict Court, Arapahoe County, Colorado Arapahoe County Courthouse 7325 S. Pctomac St.. Centennial. CO 80112 Filod THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Plaintiff JAN 0 7 t06 v. JAMES HOLMES,

More information

Judge s Introductory Remarks. Center. My name is Carlos Samour, and I am the judge assigned to this division.

Judge s Introductory Remarks. Center. My name is Carlos Samour, and I am the judge assigned to this division. Judge s Introductory Remarks Hello everyone. Welcome to division 201 of the Arapahoe County Justice Center. My name is Carlos Samour, and I am the judge assigned to this division. Let me start off by thanking

More information

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and

AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING,  ANALYSIS TO: and LFC Requester: AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, EMAIL ANALYSIS TO: LFC@NMLEGIS.GOV and DFA@STATE.NM.US {Include the bill no. in the email subject line, e.g., HB2,

More information

SCOTUS Death Penalty Review. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center

SCOTUS Death Penalty Review. Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center SCOTUS Death Penalty Review Lisa Soronen State and Local Legal Center lsoronen@sso.org Modern Death Penalty Jurisprudence 1970s SCOTUS tells the states they must limit arbitrariness in who gets the death

More information

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. GlosaryofLegalTerms acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. affidavit: A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making

More information

APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY 120 S. CT (2000)

APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY 120 S. CT (2000) Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 10 Spring 4-1-2001 APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY 120 S. CT. 2348 (2000) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/crsj

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: U. S. (1998) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Department 9 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HON. CHARLES S. CRANDALL INSTRUCTIONS TO PLAINTIFF(S)/CROSS-COMPLAINANT(S):

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, vs. STEVEN DALE GREEN, DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT

More information

Case 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!

Case 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k! FILED Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t

More information

Investigations and Enforcement

Investigations and Enforcement Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Sections 24.21 24.29 Last Revised August 14, 2017 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor

More information

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL Rule Effective Chapter 1. Felony Cases 800. Pretrial Motions in Felony Cases 07/01/98 805. Motions in Capital Cases 07/01/09 806. Subpoena Duces Tecum 07/01/12 Chapter 2. Misdemeanor

More information

ORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT

ORDER ON ARRAIGNMENT Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT -WC Document 132 Filed 10/18/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR NO. 2:10cr186-MHT

More information

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step

Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step 2 Getting Defendant Before The Court! There are four methods to getting the defendant before the court 1) Warrantless Arrest 2)

More information

SURVIVING PRE- TRIAL HEARINGS

SURVIVING PRE- TRIAL HEARINGS SURVIVING PRE- TRIAL HEARINGS Sherry M. Statman Austin Municipal Court Most Judges would rather be chased by hungry zombies Goals 1 IDENTIFY LEGAL AUTHORITY 2 DISTINGUISH PRE-TRIAL MATTERS FROM PRE-TRIAL

More information

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS

FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS... 1 RULE 4.010. SCOPE

More information

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 6, 2003) SECOND REPRINT A.B. 15. Referred to Committee on Judiciary

(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 6, 2003) SECOND REPRINT A.B. 15. Referred to Committee on Judiciary (Reprinted with amendments adopted on May, 00) SECOND REPRINT A.B. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY (ON BEHALF OF LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE TO STUDY DEATH PENALTY AND RELATED DNA TESTING (ACR OF THE

More information

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Phone: 845-431-1752 Fax: 845-486-2227 (1-3-2013 and effective

More information

CRIMINAL LITIGATION PARALEGAL

CRIMINAL LITIGATION PARALEGAL CRIMINAL LITIGATION PARALEGAL 2007 revision and update by Heather S. Magga, Killmer, Lane, & Newman, LLP, and Roz Lynn Dorf. 2007 revision and update reviewed by David A. Lane, Esq., Killmer, Lane, & Newman,

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1 SUBCHAPTER XV. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Article 100. Capital Punishment. 15A-2000. Sentence of death or life imprisonment for capital felonies; further proceedings to determine sentence. (a) Separate Proceedings

More information

Legal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice

Legal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice Legal Assistant Utilization May Optimize Client Services in Litigation Practice To get the most from an experienced and trained legal assistant1 in litigation practice, an attorney may need to open their

More information

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed. 1 PREPARING FOR TRIAL I. To Be Completed 60 Days Before Trial The following is a list of things that we should endeavor to have done 60 days before trial. While we cannot control what deadlines the court

More information

Civil Litigation Forms Library

Civil Litigation Forms Library Civil Litigation Forms Library Notice of Circumstances Giving Rise to Claim and Claim Against Governmental Subdivision, Its Officers, Employees, or Agents Notice of Claim Against State Officer, Employee,

More information

Case 5:06-cr TBR Document 101 Filed 03/21/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH

Case 5:06-cr TBR Document 101 Filed 03/21/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH Case 5:06-cr-00019-TBR Document 101 Filed 03/21/2008 Page 1 of 11 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06 CR-00019-R UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF

More information

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL Rule Effective Chapter 1. Felony Cases 800. Pretrial Motions in Felony Cases 01/01/13 805. Motions in Capital Cases 07/01/09 806. Subpoena Duces Tecum 07/01/12 Chapter 2. Misdemeanor

More information

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR JUDGE/COMMISSIONER BENCH BOOK. JUDGE/COMMISSIONER: Jennifer Valencia Second District Court

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR JUDGE/COMMISSIONER BENCH BOOK. JUDGE/COMMISSIONER: Jennifer Valencia Second District Court 1. Discovery QUESTIONNAIRE FOR JUDGE/COMMISSIONER BENCH BOOK JUDGE/COMMISSIONER: Jennifer Valencia Second District Court Q: What is your practice with respect to setting an initial case schedule? Modifying

More information

STRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL: (FELONY)

STRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL: (FELONY) TRIAL: (FELONY) STRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL Crimes are divided into 2 general classifications: felonies and misdemeanors. A misdemeanor is a lesser offense, punishable by community service, probation, fine

More information

HOMICIDE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES STATE ATTORNEY S OFFICE, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLORIDA

HOMICIDE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES STATE ATTORNEY S OFFICE, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE STATE ATTORNEY FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 311 W. Monroe Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202 HOMICIDE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES STATE ATTORNEY S OFFICE, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FLORIDA 1.010 Purposes

More information

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk July 23, 2013 INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge Chambers Courtroom Deputy Clerk United States Courthouse Ms. Gina Sicora 300 Quarropas Street (914) 390-4178

More information

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Code of Civil Procedure 1985.8 Subpoena seeking electronically stored information (a)(1) A subpoena in a civil proceeding may require

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) / STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION PLAINTIFF NAME v. DEFENDANT NAME Case No. Hon. Richard N. LaFlamme / PLAINTIFF S COUNSEL NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE AND

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C ATLANTA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * JUDGE SHAWN ELLEN LaGRUA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C ATLANTA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF GEORGIA * * * JUDGE SHAWN ELLEN LaGRUA COpy IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON C ATLANTA JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF GEORGIA FILED IN OFFICE TYFEB 1 7 2017 INRE: CRIMINAL CASE MANAGEMENT * JUDGE SHAWN ELLEN LaGRUA * * STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

More information

STATE V. GRELL: PLACING THE BURDEN ON DEFENDANTS TO PROVE MENTAL RETARDATION IN CAPITAL CASES

STATE V. GRELL: PLACING THE BURDEN ON DEFENDANTS TO PROVE MENTAL RETARDATION IN CAPITAL CASES STATE V. GRELL: PLACING THE BURDEN ON DEFENDANTS TO PROVE MENTAL RETARDATION IN CAPITAL CASES Mary Hollingsworth INTRODUCTION In determining eligibility for the death penalty, Arizona law requires defendants

More information

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

P R E T R I A L O R D E R DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER COLORADO Address: City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 COURT USE ONLY Plaintiff(s):, v. Defendant(s):. Case Number: Courtroom: 424 P R

More information

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO HB 2490 would amend various statutes related to criminal sentencing.

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO HB 2490 would amend various statutes related to criminal sentencing. SESSION OF 2014 CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2490 As Agreed to April 4, 2014 Brief* HB 2490 would amend various statutes related to criminal sentencing. The bill would establish that

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Western Alliance Bank v. Jefferson Doc. 1 1 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Western Alliance Bank, Plaintiff, :1-cv-01 JWS vs. ORDER AND OPINION Richard Jefferson, [Re: Motions at

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 315 Filed 05/21/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No. 13-10200-GAO DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV ) ) DEFENDANT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD J. DAVILA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES I. APPLICATION OF STANDING ORDER Unless otherwise indicated by the Court,

More information

Montana's Death Penalty after State v. McKenzie

Montana's Death Penalty after State v. McKenzie Montana Law Review Volume 38 Issue 1 Winter 1977 Article 7 1-1-1977 Montana's Death Penalty after State v. McKenzie Christian D. Tweeten Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/mlr

More information

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS Rule 1:18. Pretrial Scheduling Order. A. In any civil case the parties, by counsel of record, may agree and submit for approval

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY. Submitted: January 19, 2005 Decided: January 27, 2005

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY. Submitted: January 19, 2005 Decided: January 27, 2005 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY STATE OF DELAWARE, v. MICHAEL JONES, Defendant. Case I.D. 9911016309 Submitted: January 19, 2005 Decided: January 27, 2005 UPON

More information

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED

TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED 1.1 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL Order By Daniel L. Young PART ONE STATE PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 1. BAIL 1.2 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL CURRENTLY

More information

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN Revised: January 3, 2011 Chambers Deputy/Law Clerk United States District Court Jim Reily Southern District of New York (212) 805-0120 500 Pearl

More information

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition. RULE 1.310. DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION (a) When Depositions May Be Taken. After commencement of the action any party may take the testimony of any person, including a party, by deposition upon oral

More information

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS

OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS What happens during a criminal case may be confusing to a victim or witness. The following summary will explain how a case generally progresses through Oklahoma s criminal

More information

A GUIDEBOOK TO ALABAMA S DEATH PENALTY APPEALS PROCESS

A GUIDEBOOK TO ALABAMA S DEATH PENALTY APPEALS PROCESS A GUIDEBOOK TO ALABAMA S DEATH PENALTY APPEALS PROCESS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 PROCESS FOR CAPITAL MURDER PROSECUTIONS (CHART)... 4 THE TRIAL... 5 DEATH PENALTY: The Capital Appeals Process... 6 TIER

More information

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 53

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 53 COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2013 COA 53 Court of Appeals No. 11CA2030 City and County of Denver District Court No. 05CR4442 Honorable Christina M. Habas, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2007 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO [Cite as State v. Hughbanks, 159 Ohio App.3d 257, 2004-Ohio-6429.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, v. HUGHBANKS, Appellant. APPEAL

More information

JOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK (716)

JOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK (716) Supplemental Outline on Effective Discovery JOSEPH M. LATONA, ESQ. 716 BRISBANE BUILDING 403 MAIN STREET BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14203 (716) 842-0416 INTRODUCTION This outline supplements the thorough course

More information

2:15-cr VAR-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 09/24/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

2:15-cr VAR-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 09/24/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:15-cr-20382-VAR-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 09/24/15 Pg 1 of 5 Pg ID 24 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION vs Criminal Action No:

More information

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

P R E T R I A L O R D E R DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER COLORADO Address: City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 COURT USE ONLY Plaintiff(s):, v. Defendant(s):. Case Number: Courtroom: 215 P R

More information

CALIFORNIA v. BROWN SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 479 U.S. 538; Argued December 2, 1986, Decided January 27, 1987

CALIFORNIA v. BROWN SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 479 U.S. 538; Argued December 2, 1986, Decided January 27, 1987 357 CALIFORNIA v. BROWN SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 479 U.S. 538; Argued December 2, 1986, Decided January 27, 1987 OPINION: CHIEF JUSTICE REHNQUIST delivered the opinion of the Court. The question

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. TASHANE M. CHANTILOUPE, Respondent. No. 4D18-162 [June 6, 2018] Petition for writ of prohibition or certiorari

More information

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA

716 West Ave Austin, TX USA GLOBAL Headquarters the gregor building 716 West Ave Austin, TX 78701-2727 USA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION About This Course... 2 Video... 2 The Law-Fact Distinction... 3 The Trial Setting... 3 Trial

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Frank, Beales and Senior Judge Bumgardner Argued at Alexandria, Virginia TOMMY L. HARMON, JR. MEMORANDUM OPINION BY v. Record No. 0694-11-4 JUDGE RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER,

More information

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

P R E T R I A L O R D E R DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER COLORADO Address: City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 COURT USE ONLY Plaintiff(s):, v. Defendant(s):. Case Number: Courtroom: 424 P R

More information

CHRONOLOGICAL OUTLINE OF A CAPITAL MURDER TRIAL

CHRONOLOGICAL OUTLINE OF A CAPITAL MURDER TRIAL Capital Defense Journal Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 17 Spring 3-1-1993 CHRONOLOGICAL OUTLINE OF A CAPITAL MURDER TRIAL Rhonda L. Overstreet Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlucdj

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 12, 2007

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 12, 2007 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 12, 2007 ROY NELSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. P-28021 W. Otis

More information

2013 CO 31. No. 12SA156, People v. Brothers Subpoena Motion to Quash Preliminary Hearing Child victim Standing

2013 CO 31. No. 12SA156, People v. Brothers Subpoena Motion to Quash Preliminary Hearing Child victim Standing Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us and are posted on the Colorado Bar Association homepage

More information

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:05-cr EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:05-cr-00545-EWN Document 295 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 12 Criminal Case No. 05 cr 00545 EWN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Edward W. Nottingham UNITED STATES

More information

Court Records Glossary

Court Records Glossary Court Records Glossary Documents Affidavit Answer Appeal Brief Case File Complaint Deposition Docket Indictment Interrogatories Injunction Judgment Opinion Pleadings Praecipe A written or printed statement

More information

Rhode Island False Claims Act

Rhode Island False Claims Act Rhode Island False Claims Act 9-1.1-1. Name of act. [Effective until February 15, 2008.] This chapter may be cited as the State False Claims Act. 9-1.1-2. Definitions. [Effective until February 15, 2008.]

More information

People v Murray 2013 NY Slip Op 34063(U) March 8, 2013 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Barbara G.

People v Murray 2013 NY Slip Op 34063(U) March 8, 2013 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: Judge: Barbara G. People v Murray 2013 NY Slip Op 34063(U) March 8, 2013 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 12-1281-02 Judge: Barbara G. Zambelli Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

More information

JUVENILE LITIGATION PARALEGAL

JUVENILE LITIGATION PARALEGAL JUVENILE LITIGATION PARALEGAL Drafted by Maddie Vines, formerly the Division Manager and Paralegal, Office of the District Attorney for the 4th Judicial District Juvenile Prosecution Unit and Special Assignments

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 536 U. S. (2002) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 01 488 TIMOTHY STUART RING, PETITIONER v. ARIZONA ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA [June 24, 2002] JUSTICE BREYER,

More information

Group / Category Docket Description Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths

Group / Category Docket Description Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths Affidavits and Oaths CRIMINAL FILINGS Group / Category Docket Description Criminal Report Affidavit Affidavit to Attend School - Out of County Affidavit to Attend School Affidavit Option - Plea Submitted Affidavit of Violation

More information

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND Due to changes to the Ohio Administrative Code regarding the qualifications of and the process for appointing assigned counsel to indigent clients (OAC:120-1-10),

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 09-70030 Document: 00511160264 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2010 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D June 30, 2010 Lyle

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT *, v. *, Plaintiff, Case No. * Division 11 Chapter 60 Defendant, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Now on this * day of *, 201*, after review

More information

MOTIONS PRACTICE BEFORE THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD AND THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION By Ernest C. Hadley and Sarah S.

MOTIONS PRACTICE BEFORE THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD AND THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION By Ernest C. Hadley and Sarah S. MOTIONS PRACTICE BEFORE THE MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD AND THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION By Ernest C. Hadley and Sarah S. Tuck TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE CHAPTER ONE - FEDERAL RULES OF

More information

POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT

POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT Research Division, Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT Criminal Procedure April 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Detention and Arrest... 1 Detention and Arrest Under a Warrant... 1 Detention

More information

Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties

Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties IN THE MATTER OF: Claimant(s): Respondent(s): Case Number: Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order Parties This case was filed under the American Arbitration Association Expedited Commercial Rules.

More information

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No st April, RULES THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES, 2016

Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No st April, RULES THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULES, 2016 Legal Supplement Part B Vol. 55, No. 45 21st April, 2016 181 LEGAL NOTICE NO. 55 REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, CHAP. 12:02 RULES MADE BY THE RULES COMMITTEE UNDER SECTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN GRAHAM, a.k.a. JOHN BOY PATTON, and VINE RICHARD MARSHALL, a.k.a. RICHARD VINE

More information