IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI"

Transcription

1 E-Filed Document Nov :21: KA COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KA COA SHERMAN BILLIE, SR. APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE Appeal From Neshoba County, Mississippi Circuit Court Eighth Judicial District BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT James E. Smith, III, MSB # 101, N. Pearl St., P.O. Box 387 Carthage, Mississippi (601) Office Attorney for Appellant

2 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KA COA SHERMAN BILLIE, SR. APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the Judges of the Court of Appeals may evaluate possible disqualifications or recusal. 1. Appellant: Sherman E. Billie, Sr 2. Attorney for Appellant: James E. Smith III 3. Appellee: State of Mississippi 4. Attorney for Appellee: John R. Henry, Mississippi Attorney General s Office 5. Hon. Marcus D. Gordon, presiding Circuit Judge, 8 th Judicial Circuit Court Respectfully submitted, this the 30th day of October, APPELLANTS BY: /s/ JAMES E. SMITH III James E. Smith, III, MSB # 101, N. Pearl St., P.O. Box 387 Carthage, Mississippi (601) Office Attorney for Appellant i

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... iii STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND... 3 ARGUMENT... 6 I. The Trial Court Erred in Failing to Suppress the Defendant s Written Statement A. Because The Defendant Did Not Intelligently, Knowingly, or Voluntarily Waive his Rights Under Miranda, The Trial Court Erred in Failing to Suppress Any Statement Elicited by Investigator Sciple B. Because the Trial Court Failed to Apply Fruit-of-the-Poisonous-Tree Doctrine, It Erred In Failing to Suppress the Defendant s Final Statement CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ii

4 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Mississippi State Court Cases Blue v. State, 674 So. 2d 1184, 1204 (Miss. 1996) Depreo v. State, 407 So. 2d 102, 106 (Miss.1981) Gavin v. State, 473 So. 2d 952, 954 (Miss. 1985) Glasper v. State, 914 So. 2d 708, 716 ( 21) (Miss. 2005)... 9 Horne v. State, 825 So. 2d 627 (Miss. 2002)... 11, 12 Jones v. State, 461 So. 2d 686, (Miss.1984) Keller v. State, 138 So. 3d 817 (Miss. 2014) Lee v. State, 338 So. 2d 399, 401 (Miss.1976) Manix v. State, 895 So. 2d 167, (Miss. 2005)... 9 Marshall v. State, 584 So. 2d 437, 438 (Miss. 1991) Neal v. State, 451 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 1984) Neal v. State, 57 So. 3d 1271 (Miss. 2011) Stokes v. State, 797 So. 2d 381, 383 ( 3) (Miss. Ct. App. 2001)... 9 United States Supreme Court Cases Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433, 445 (1974) Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct (1966)... 10, 12, 13 Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533, 536 (1988) Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939) Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963) iii

5 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES I. Whether the Trial Court Erred in Failing to Suppress the Defendant s Final Statement. A. Because The Defendant Did Not Intelligently, Knowingly, or Voluntarily Waive his Rights Under Miranda, The Trial Court Erred in Failing to Suppress Any Statement Elicited by Investigator Sciple. B. Because the Trial Court Failed to Apply Fruit-of-the-Poisonous-Tree Doctrine, It Erred In Failing to Suppress the Defendant s Final Statement. 1

6 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT Sherman Billie, the Defendant, orally confessed to the crime of sexual battery in the presence of Investigator Sciple on October 7, 2013, while under the effects of sleeping pills taken immediately prior to his arrest that morning. Moreover, the Defendant was led to believe that in exchange for his confession, Investigator Sciple would lower his bond amount. Less than 24 hours later, the Defendant signed a written confession for Investigator Sciple, who was alone and did not record the encounter, while still under the effects of sleeping pills and believing that his bond would be lowered in exchange for the confession. The trial court erred when it failed to suppress the Defendant s statement, as the totality of the circumstances did not establish that the Defendant s statement was made intelligently, knowingly, or voluntarily. Alternatively, if the statement was made intelligently, knowingly, or voluntarily, the State failed to sufficiently remove and distinguish from the conditions present in the oral confession to purge the primary taint of the oral statement. 2

7 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND This case is on appeal from Neshoba County Circuit Court, where Sherman Billie, Sr., the Defendant, was tried and convicted of the sexual battery of a minor, Jacob Bruce. When he was 14, Bruce moved to Neshoba County, Mississippi to live with this stepfather and little brother in April, A few months after Bruce moved in with his stepfather, the Defendant, who is brother of Bruce s stepfather, moved in with them. During this time, the Defendant attended Police Academy for the Choctaw Police Department. Beginning in September of 2010, Bruce alleges that the Defendant began sexually molesting him. Bruce alleged that the Defendant would come into his room at night and would molest him over the period of several months until the Defendant finally moved out. Some three years later, around September of 2013, Bruce reported the alleged action of the Defendant to the Neshoba County Sheriff s Department, who arrested the Defendant on October 7, When the Defendant was arrested on October 7, 2013, he had just gotten home from working a night shift with Choctaw Police Department. As he normally did, the Defendant took sleeping pills to sleep during the day. He had just taken four sleeping pills when Sheriff s deputies came and arrested him and took him to the Sheriff s office. Once there, he was interviewed by Investigator Ralph Sciple. Investigator Sciple advised the Defendant of his rights, which he waived, and questioned him regarding the nature of the accusations, in the presence of an additional officer. The Defendant made an oral confession to Investigator Sciple. This took place at approximately 12:30 p.m. 3

8 Investigator Sciple interviewed the Defendant again at approximately 8:30 a.m. on October 8, 2013, less than 24 hours after the first and after the Defendant spent the night in the county jail. The Defendant again signed a waiver of rights and again made a confession to Investigator Sciple, who was alone during this interview and did not record the interaction in any way. The second statement was put into writing by the Defendant, and witnessed by Investigator Sciple. During a suppression hearing at trial regarding the statement, the Defendant and his wife, Kultilda Billie, provided testimony that the Defendant took sleeping pills, and that those sleeping pills had an adverse effect on his ability to understand things. They both testified that the effects of the pills lasted longer than 12 hours and caused the Defendant to not be able to recognize things and becomes worse if he is not able to sleep. When Investigator Sciple discussed the nature of the second interview, he testified that he felt a second one was necessary because the Defendant was noticeably distraught during the first interview. He further testified, however, that the Defendant appeared perfectly normal during the second interview, and seemed to understand the waiver of his rights before giving his statement. At the end of the suppression hearing, the trial judge allowed the statement to be admitted, ruling that the Defendant was given Miranda rights properly and that he knowingly and intelligently recognized his rights and voluntarily waived them. After Investigator Sciple completed his testimony, the Defendant s counsel moved for directed verdict, which was overruled. The jury subsequently found the Defendant guilty of sexual battery. 4

9 STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court has held that the standard of review regarding the admissibility of a confession is abuse of discretion, where it will reverse a trial court's finding that a confession is admissible only when an incorrect legal standard was applied, manifest error was committed, or the decision is contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Stokes v. State, 797 So. 2d 381, 383 ( 3) (Miss. Ct. App. 2001). Further, since the trial court sits as the fact-finder when determining the issue of whether an accused's confession has been intelligently, knowingly and voluntarily given, we will only reverse the trial court's determination of this issue when such determination is manifestly wrong. Glasper v. State, 914 So. 2d 708, 716 ( 21) (Miss. 2005) (citing Manix v. State, 895 So. 2d 167, (Miss. 2005)). 5

10 ARGUMENT I. The Trial Court Erred in Failing to Suppress the Defendant s Written Statement. A confession stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant is not admissible unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards to secure the privilege against self-incrimination. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct (1966). Although it is possible for a defendant to waive these privileges, the waiver must be done so voluntarily, willingly, and intelligently. Id. Once the defendant waives the rights, the State must bear the burden of proving that it was done so voluntarily, willingly, and intelligently. Neal v. State, 451 So. 2d 743 (Miss. 1984). When the Defendant waived his rights on October 7th and 8th, he did so under the severe effects of sleeping pills and could not completely understand the magnitude of his actions. The State did not carry its heavy burden of proving that the Defendant was not or no longer under such effects when he waived his rights. The State even conceded that it was clear he was too impaired to give an adequate statement on October 7th. Further, the second statement was based wholly off of the first statement, which was so clearly inadmissible. When the State relied on the use of the second statement without purging it of the inadmissibility of the first, it relied on fruit of the poisonous tree and should have been precluded from using it to prove its case. Because the Defendant did not sufficiently waive his rights under Miranda, and because the State failed to purge the second statement by the Defendant of its primary taint, the trial court committed manifest error by failing to suppress this evidence at trial. 6

11 A. Because The Defendant Did Not Intelligently, Knowingly, or Voluntarily Waive his Rights Under Miranda, The Trial Court Erred in Failing to Suppress Any Statement Elicited by Investigator Sciple. When the Defendant made his oral statement to Investigator Sciple on October 7 th and his written statement on October 8 th, he did not intelligently or knowingly waive his Due Process rights. The Defendant had taken sleeping pills immediately before his arrest, and testified during the suppression hearing that he was still under the effects of the pills when making his written statement to law enforcement. (Trial Tr. 71). Because he did not appropriately waive his rights, any statements elicited from him by Sciple were inadmissible. Therefore, the trial court erred by failing to suppress the Defendant s statement. For a confession to be admissible at trial, it must have been intelligently, knowingly, and voluntarily given, and not the product of police threats, promises or inducements. Neal v. State, 57 So. 3d 1271 (Miss. 2011). Further, the State bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that confession was voluntary, which is met and prima facie case made out by testimony of officer, or other persons having knowledge of facts, that confession was voluntarily made without threats, coercion, or offer of reward. Horne v. State, 825 So. 2d 627 (Miss. 2002) (where the court held that officers testimony, along with videotaped evidence, established that intoxication was not a factor in his decision to waive Miranda rights). In the present case, however, there is no videotaped evidence to support a prima facie case that Sherman was not under the effects of sleeping pills. In fact, the testifying officer, Investigator Sciple, was the only law enforcement officer present to take Sherman s statement, and made no recordings of the interaction of any kind. In fact, the 7

12 only time that Investigator Sciple was able to determine that the Defendant was unable to give an adequate statement due to his impairment was while in the presence of another officer. This is an important fact that distinguishes the present case from Horne, inter alia, in that this Court has rarely, if ever, determined that a single officer s unsubstantiated testimony was enough to establish a sufficient prima facie case. This holds especially true when faced with such conflicting testimony from witnesses other than the Defendant that conditions existed which would greatly challenge the validity of a Miranda waiver. Because the trial court sits as the fact finder when determining voluntariness of a confession, it cannot be reversed unless that determination is manifestly wrong. Blue v. State, 674 So. 2d 1184, 1204 (Miss. 1996). This Court, however, must look to the totality of the circumstances in determining whether the accused has knowingly and voluntarily waived his or her privilege against self-incrimination. Gavin v. State, 473 So. 2d 952, 954 (Miss. 1985) (citing Jones v. State, 461 So. 2d 686, (Miss.1984); Depreo v. State, 407 So. 2d 102, 106 (Miss.1981); Lee v. State, 338 So. 2d 399, 401 (Miss.1976)). Here, the Defendant and his wife testified that the sleeping pills taken by the Defendant immediately prior to his arrest had long lasting and dire effects. After testimony by the Defendant that he had taken more than the normal amount that morning, the trial court accepted simply the investigator s testimony that the Defendant personally appeared able to understand the waiver of his rights. When asked about why the he attempted to take an additional statement however, Investigator Sciple did indicate that at one point the Defendant had indeed been noticeably unable to adequately waive his rights: 8

13 Q: Was there any reason or any difference that you can tell me or tell the Court between the 7 th and the 8 th as to why you didn t take a statement on the 7 th and you did on the 8 th? A: Now, the day before he was very distraught because he knew he was fixing to lose his job, he was fixing to lose his family, and he was very remorseful at that time. (Trial Tr. 48, lines 11-18). The investigator s second attempt at a statement from the Defendant came less than 24 hours after the first. In the second attempt, Investigator Sciple was alone and made no recordings of the interaction of any kind. Under the totality of the circumstances, the great weight of the evidence stands against the testimony of a single officer, whose opinion is unsubstantiated and which fails to carry the State s burden of proof. Because the State failed to carry its heavy burden in establishing that the Defendant had the capacity to knowingly and intelligently waive his Miranda rights, the trial court committed manifest error in failing to suppress the Defendant s subsequent statement and must be overturned. B. Because the Trial Court Failed to Apply Fruit-of-the-Poisonous-Tree Doctrine, It Erred In Failing to Suppress the Defendant s Final Statement. When Investigator Sciple took the written statement by the Defendant on October 8 th, 2013, it was based on an inadmissible oral statement given less than 24 hours before on October 7 th. When the State failed to purge the second statement of the primary taint regarding the inadmissibility of the first, the trial court failed to apply fruit-of-thepoisonous-tree doctrine in failing to suppress the second statement and committed error. 9

14 Statements taken in violation of the Miranda principles must not be used to prove the prosecution s case at trial. Keller v. State, 138 So. 3d 817 (Miss. 2014) (citing Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433, 445 (1974)). In Keller, the trial court found that the defendant did not voluntarily or knowingly give incriminating statements on two separate occasions to police while in extreme distress in the emergency room due to gunshots, despite Miranda warnings given on both occasions, although the trial court allowed a third Miranda warning the following day while the defendant was in the ICU. As stated supra, the law enforcement officer who took the written statement of the Defendant on October 8th did so only after realizing that the previous oral statement was invalid. During testimony, however, the officer noted that the second statement was based largely, if not entirely, on the previous oral statement: Q: Did you try to get a statement from Mr. Billie the day before, on the 7th? A: I talked to him. Q: Yes, sir. A: Did not get a written statement from him. He told me everything that he told me at this time on his statement, what he told me the day before. (Trial Tr. 48, lines 4-10). The issue in Keller regarding the illegality of the third confession was whether the defendant was in the same condition of extreme distress that existed at the time of the first two confessions. Although the Court ultimately determined that he was not, it was aided largely by the availability of medical evidence to suggest so. The defendant had been moved out of the emergency room and into ICU, which was a much more stable environment. Here, there exists no evidence to aid a finder of fact in determining that the 10

15 Defendant was no longer substantially affected by sleeping pills other than the unsubstantiated testimony of the officer who took the confession, by himself, with no recordings of the interaction whatsoever. The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine prohibits introduction into evidence of tangible materials seized during an unlawful search. Marshall v. State, 584 So. 2d 437, 438 (Miss. 1991) (citing Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533, 536 (1988)). To overcome this barrier to admissibility, the evidence must reach the point at which the connection becomes so attenuated as to dissipate the taint. Id. (citing Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939); see also Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963)). Here, the investigating officer s own testimony establishes that there were no changes in the nature and substance of the Defendant s statements in the few hours between the two. When the Defendant s first statement is so clearly inadmissible, any use of a subsequent statement is inadmissible as long as it fails to become so attenuated as to dissipate the taint. Because the State failed to establish sufficient evidence to adequately rebut the Defendant s testimony that he was under the effects of sleeping pills when making both statements, the State failed to sustain the burden of purging the first statement of its primary taint. The trial court erred by failing to suppress the Defendant s written statement on exclusionary rule grounds, and must be reversed. CONCLUSION For all of the foregoing reasons, the Defendant is entitled to a reversal of his convictions and sentences, and moves this Court to remand this case to the Neshoba County Circuit Court for a new trial. Respectfully submitted, 11

16 SHERMAN BILLIE, SR., APPELLANT By: _/s/ James E. Smith III James E. Smith, III Attorney for Sherman E. Billie, Sr. 12

17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, James E. Smith, attorney for the Appellant, Sherman Billie, Sr., hereby certify that I have electronically filed the above Brief of the Appellant with the Clerk of the Court using the MEC System which sent notification of such filing to all counsel of record. DATED this the 30th day of October, /s/ JAMES E. SMITH, III 13

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Mar 29 2018 15:36:58 2017-KA-01112-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY MARTIN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-TS-01112 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No KA KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No KA KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee E-Filed Document May 1 2015 11:58:24 2014-KA-00697 Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Cause No. 2014-KA-00697 KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee APPEAL FROM

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 18, 2002 v No. 237738 Wayne Circuit Court LAMAR ROBINSON, LC No. 99-005187 Defendant-Appellant.

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Feb 2 2018 15:26:36 2017-KA-01455-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LADALE AIROSTEVE HOLLOWAY APPELLANT v. No. 2017-KA-01455-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Nov 14 2017 13:53:28 2017-KA-00436-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JULIUS BENDER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00436-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Hall, 2014-Ohio-1731.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100413 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ROBIN R. HALL DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 22 2014 15:58:43 2013-CP-00239-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHELBY RAY PARHAM APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 23 2017 16:38:55 2017-KA-00181-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EDDIE EARL DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00181 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jan 8 2016 13:04:43 2014-KA-01838-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBERT W. TRIPLETT a/k/a ROBERT WARREN TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a ROBERT TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 15, 2006 v No. 259193 Washtenaw Circuit Court ERIC JOHN BOLDISZAR, LC No. 02-001366-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 28 2015 16:28:45 2014-KA-01783-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ANDREW GRAHAM APPELLANT v. No. 2014-KA-1783-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED October 20, 2015 v No. 327393 Wayne Circuit Court ROKSANA GABRIELA SIKORSKI, LC No. 15-001059-FJ Defendant-Appellee.

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Nov 12 2014 12:40:07 2014-KA-00266-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STEWART CHASE VAUGHN APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-0266-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 16, 2001 v No. 214253 Oakland Circuit Court TIMMY ORLANDO COLLIER, LC No. 98-158327-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Sep 15 2015 14:14:52 2015-CP-00265-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMOTHY BURNS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00265-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 14 2017 16:56:06 2016-KA-01711-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL MCKEITHAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01711-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 1 2014 16:28:06 2013-KA-01785-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TREVOR HOSKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01785-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JANUARY SESSION, 1998

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JANUARY SESSION, 1998 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED JANUARY SESSION, 1998 March 5, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9703-CC-00108 ) Appellee,

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Criminal Law/Criminal Procedure And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Deft saw

More information

PETITION FOR REHEARING

PETITION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Mar 6 2018 19:55:11 2016-KA-00932-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-00932-COA JACARRUS ANTYONE PICKETT APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jun 16 2014 10:52:26 2013-KM-01129-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI D'ANDRE TERRELL APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

Court of Appeals of Georgia. FRAZIER v. The STATE. No. A11A0196. July 12, 2011.

Court of Appeals of Georgia. FRAZIER v. The STATE. No. A11A0196. July 12, 2011. --- S.E.2d ----, 2011 WL 2685725 (Ga.App.) Briefs and Other Related Documents Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. Court of Appeals of Georgia. FRAZIER v. The STATE. No. A11A0196. July 12,

More information

E-Filed Document Jun :33: KA COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.

E-Filed Document Jun :33: KA COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. E-Filed Document Jun 2 2017 08:33:26 2017-KA-00177-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-KA-00177-COA CHRISTOPHER ALLEN JOINER APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Mar 13 2017 09:59:29 2015-CP-01388-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANA EASTERLING APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01388-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

Court of Common Pleas

Court of Common Pleas Motion No. 4570624 NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas MOTION TO... March 7, 201714:10 By: SEAN KILBANE 0092072 Confirmation Nbr.

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE APRIL SESSION, 1995

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE APRIL SESSION, 1995 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE APRIL SESSION, 1995 FILED October 18, 1995 RICKY GENE WILLIAMS, Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) C.C.A. NO. 03C01-9412-CR-00451 Appellate Court Clerk ) Appellant,

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 1 2015 20:59:33 2013-KA-02110-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL HAMPTON APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-KA-02110-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 4 2017 16:36:59 2016-CP-01145-COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THOMAS HOLDER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01145 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 18:30:21 2015-KA-00898-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GREGORY LORENZO PRITCHETT APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00898-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) [Cite as State v. Haslam, 2009-Ohio-696.] STATE OF OHIO, MONROE COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. JEFFREY R. HASLAM, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CASE NO. 08-MO-4

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 28 2015 11:05:44 2014-KA-01230-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMMY DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01230 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 6 2016 16:21:36 2014-KA-01520-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI KENNY STEWART APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-01520-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 14 2015 11:36:28 2014-KA-01327-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAURICE TOWNSEND APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01327-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For plaintiff-appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS : For defendant-appellant:

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For plaintiff-appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS : For defendant-appellant: [Cite as State v. Ricks, 2004-Ohio-6913.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 84500 STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-appellee : : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS :

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMIE LEE ANDERSON APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-0601-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2010 ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D09-1978 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed May 28, 2010 Appeal

More information

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI E-Filed Document May 11 2016 11:16:48 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN A/K/A BOOTY VS. APPELLANT NO. 2014-KA-00615-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 5 2014 14:44:19 2013-KA-02048-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CLARENCE DWAYNE JEFFERSON APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-KA-02048-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2016 14:31:24 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00615-SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

No. 112,329 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS Plaintiff-Appellant. vs. NORMAN C. BRAMLETT Defendant-Appellee

No. 112,329 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS Plaintiff-Appellant. vs. NORMAN C. BRAMLETT Defendant-Appellee FLED No. 112,329 JAN 14 2015 HEATHER t. SfvilTH CLERK OF APPELLATE COURTS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS Plaintiff-Appellant vs. NORMAN C. BRAMLETT Defendant-Appellee BRIEF

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 10 2017 16:56:22 2016-KA-01527-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODISE JENKINS APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01527-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed August 04, 2015 - Case No. 2014-1560 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : CASE NO. 2014-1560 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, vs. : ON APPEAL FROM THE HAMILTON

More information

A digest of twenty one (21) significant US Supreme Court decisions interpreting Miranda

A digest of twenty one (21) significant US Supreme Court decisions interpreting Miranda From Miranda v. Arizona to Howes v. Fields A digest of twenty one (21) significant US Supreme Court decisions interpreting Miranda (1968 2012) In Miranda v. Arizona, the US Supreme Court rendered one of

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2001-KA-00587-COA JEFF WIMBERLY A/K/A JEFFERY W. WIMBERLY A/K/A JEFFERY WAYNE WIMBERLY APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF TRIAL COURT

More information

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 E-Filed Document May 12 2014 14:25:52 2013-CA-01006 Pages: 18 2013-CA-01006 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 C.H. MILES APPELLANT V. BRENDA C. MILES APPELLEE APPELLEE

More information

NO. FIELD(MAT_Cause No) STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT. VS. FIELD(MAT_Court) JUDICIAL. TOUPPER(FIELD(MAT_Client Name)) BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

NO. FIELD(MAT_Cause No) STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT. VS. FIELD(MAT_Court) JUDICIAL. TOUPPER(FIELD(MAT_Client Name)) BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS NO. FIELD(MAT_Cause No) STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT VS. FIELD(MAT_Court) JUDICIAL DISTRICT TOUPPER(FIELD(MAT_Client Name)) BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS MOTION TO SUPPRESS WRITTEN OR ORAL STATEMENTS OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 21 2014 17:48:58 2014-KA-00188-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY ALLEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-00188-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D09-9

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D09-9 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2009 JUAN ACEVEDO, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D09-9 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed November 13, 2009 Appeal from

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Sep 30 2016 10:44:44 2016-KA-00422-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAIRUS COLLINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-00422 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED June 16, 2016 v No. 328740 Mackinac Circuit Court RICHARD ALLAN MCKENZIE, JR., LC No. 15-003602 Defendant-Appellee.

More information

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 12 CR 110

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 12 CR 110 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff, : Case No. 12 CR 110 v. : Judge Berens CHARLES W. FURNISS, : ENTRY Overruling in Part and Sustaining in Part Defendant

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 14:04:25 2013-CP-02023-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURTNEY ELKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02023-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY. Court of Appeals No. L Trial Court No. [Cite as State v. Kohli, 2004-Ohio-4841.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Appellee Court of Appeals No. L-03-1205 Trial Court No. CR-2002-3231 v. Jamey

More information

In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania

In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania In the Superior Court of Pennsylvania No. 166 MDA 2008 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ADAM WAYNE CHAMPAGNE, Appellant. REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT On Appeal from the Judgment of the Court of Common Pleas

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 16 2015 14:56:53 2014-CP-01341-COA Pages: 20 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANIEL RICHARD ZALES APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-01341-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT E-Filed Document Feb 3 2015 14:53:56 2014-KA-00992-COA Pages: 29 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL LEROY KNIGHT APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-00992 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA-1783 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA-1783 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 17 2015 07:28:18 2014-KA-01783-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ANDREW GRAHAM APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-1783 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 26 2015 11:04:08 2014-CP-00755-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROY DALE WALLACE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 11 2017 16:34:51 2016-KA-01329-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GEROME MOORE APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01329-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document May 5 2017 13:43:04 2016-CP-01474-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LYNDON BRITAIN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01474 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRYSTAL STROBEL NO. COA Filed: 18 May 2004

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRYSTAL STROBEL NO. COA Filed: 18 May 2004 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRYSTAL STROBEL NO. COA03-566 Filed: 18 May 2004 1. Confessions and Incriminating Statements--motion to suppress--miranda warnings- -voluntariness The trial court did not err

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Aug 5 2014 01:08:18 2014-CA-00054-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DENNIS TERRY HUTCHINS APPELLANT V. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00054-COA

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 6 2016 12:52:15 2015-CP-01248-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL BRIAN BALLE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01248-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D01-2723 JAMES HARRINGTON, Appellee. / Opinion filed March 7, 2003 Appeal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TERRANCE MONTREAL JENKINS NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TERRANCE MONTREAL JENKINS NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Sep 29 2016 11:46:05 2016-KA-00206-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TERRANCE MONTREAL JENKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-00206 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA NORRIS RIGGS, : vs. Petitioner, : STATE OF FLORIDA, : Case No. SC05-133 L.T. No. 2D03-2961 Respondent. : DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 17:12:34 2014-CP-01810-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AKIVA KAREEM CLARK APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-01810-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. No CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT PATRICK J. HIGGINS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. No CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT PATRICK J. HIGGINS E-Filed Document Jun 2 2015 00:01:29 2014-CA-00251 Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK J. HIGGINS APPELLANT v. No. 2014-CA-00251 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOSEPH RONALD HARTFIELD A/K/A APPELLANT RONALD DREW HARTFIELD V. NO.

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOSEPH RONALD HARTFIELD A/K/A APPELLANT RONALD DREW HARTFIELD V. NO. E-Filed Document Sep 17 2014 07:04:12 2012-CT-01232-SCT Pages: 14 THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOSEPH RONALD HARTFIELD A/K/A APPELLANT RONALD DREW HARTFIELD V. NO. 2012-CT-01232-SCT STATE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GEORGE LEE BUTLER APPELLANT v. NO. 200S-KA-0883-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI OFFICE OF I~APPEALS Erin E. Pridgen,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 15, 2002 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 15, 2002 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 15, 2002 Session RICHARD BROWN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Robertson County No. 8167 James E. Walton,

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2008 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D07-3833 LISA MARIE NOWAK, Appellee. / Opinion filed December 5, 2008 Appeal

More information

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE.

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. E-Filed Document May 29 2015 11:28:47 2013-KA-02000-COA Pages: 11 NO. 2013-KA-02000-COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. ON APPEAL

More information

v No Macomb Circuit Court

v No Macomb Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED October 17, 2017 v No. 332830 Macomb Circuit Court ANGELA MARIE ALEXIE, LC No.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2014 14:11:45 2013-CP-00467 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY YEARBY, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

NO IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

NO IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I NO. 29921 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I STATE OF HAWAI'I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALAN KALAI FILOTEO, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON No. 131 March 25, 2015 41 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT DARNELL BOYD, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 201026332; A151157

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 24, 2008 v No. 277652 Wayne Circuit Court SHELLY ANDRE BROOKS, LC No. 06-010881-01 Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Sep 7 2017 10:15:38 2016-KA-00914-COA Pages: 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHALONDA NIKKIA VALE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-00914-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2006 CHAD BARGER, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D04-1565 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed March 24, 2006 Appeal

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED October 20, 2005 v No. 263104 Oakland Circuit Court CHARLES ANDREW DORCHY, LC No. 98-160800-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 22 2015 12:14:02 2015-CP-00008-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY HOLTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00008 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS. FILED Plaintiff Below, Respondent June 22, 2012 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK MEMORANDUM DECISION

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS. FILED Plaintiff Below, Respondent June 22, 2012 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK MEMORANDUM DECISION STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS State of West Virginia, FILED Plaintiff Below, Respondent June 22, 2012 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK vs) No. 11-0677 (Ohio County 10-F-62) SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

More information

In the Supreme Court of the United States

In the Supreme Court of the United States No. In the Supreme Court of the United States MICHAEL F. MARTEL, WARDEN, Petitioner, v. REUBEN KENNETH LUJAN, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED December 23, 2008 v No. 277901 Oakland Circuit Court JOSEPH JEROME SMITH, LC No. 2007-212716-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

MR. FLYNN: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court: This case concerns itself with the conviction of a defendant of two crimes of rape and

MR. FLYNN: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court: This case concerns itself with the conviction of a defendant of two crimes of rape and MR. FLYNN: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court: This case concerns itself with the conviction of a defendant of two crimes of rape and kidnapping, the sentences on each count of 20 to 30 years to

More information

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: December 15, 2016 107199 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JUANITO

More information

STATE V. SOLIZ, 1968-NMSC-101, 79 N.M. 263, 442 P.2d 575 (S. Ct. 1968) STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Santos SOLIZ, Defendant-Appellant

STATE V. SOLIZ, 1968-NMSC-101, 79 N.M. 263, 442 P.2d 575 (S. Ct. 1968) STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Santos SOLIZ, Defendant-Appellant 1 STATE V. SOLIZ, 1968-NMSC-101, 79 N.M. 263, 442 P.2d 575 (S. Ct. 1968) STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Santos SOLIZ, Defendant-Appellant No. 8248 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 1968-NMSC-101,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jan 20 2016 16:02:50 2015-KA-00770-COA Pages: 18 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JUSTINE LYNN NATIONS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-KA-00770 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: v. Case No. 2008CF000567

State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: v. Case No. 2008CF000567 State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2008CF000567 Miguel Ayala, and Carlos Gonzales, Defendant. Motion to Suppress Evidence Seized as a Result

More information

Case 1:08-cr SLR Document 24 Filed 07/14/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:08-cr SLR Document 24 Filed 07/14/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:08-cr-00040-SLR Document 24 Filed 07/14/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Criminal Action No. 08-40-SLR

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO KA Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial District of Jones County, Mississippi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO KA Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial District of Jones County, Mississippi IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2007-KA-02300 WANDA LEONA BLAKENEY APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial District of Jones County,

More information

Case 3:07-cr KES Document 15 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 3:07-cr KES Document 15 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION Case 3:07-cr-30063-KES Document 15 Filed 08/27/2007 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OF LAW

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP-01499 STEVEN EASON APPELLANT vs. CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, ALICIA BOX and RONALD KING APPELLEES On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED March 28, 2017 v No. 335272 Ottawa Circuit Court MAX THOMAS PRZYSUCHA, LC No. 16-040340-FH Defendant-Appellant.

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 22 2017 21:22:44 2016-KA-01351-COA Pages: 16 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE BRENT APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01351-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO BA-250-SCT THE MISSISSIPPI BAR BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO BA-250-SCT THE MISSISSIPPI BAR BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Nov 17 2017 23:59:25 2017-BA-00250-SCT Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2017-BA-250-SCT MICHAEL W. CROSBY APPELLANT VERSUS THE MISSISSIPPI BAR APPELLEE

More information

Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ., and Russell and Lacy, S.JJ.

Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ., and Russell and Lacy, S.JJ. Present: Kinser, C.J., Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, and Mims, JJ., and Russell and Lacy, S.JJ. D ANGELO BROOKS v. Record No. 091047 OPINION BY JUSTICE WILLIAM C. MIMS June 9, 2011 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 16, 2012 v No. 301461 Kent Circuit Court JEFFREY LYNN MALMBERG, LC No. 10-003346-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information