IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA"

Transcription

1 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) SATERA WASHINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) (2) UHS OKLAHOMA CITY LLC ) d/b/a CEDAR RIDGE, ) ) Defendant. ) CIV L PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, SATERA WASHINGTON, files this action against Defendant, UHS OKLAHOMA CITY LLC d/b/a CEDAR RIDGE, and by way of complaint against Defendant alleges the following: I. Nature of Action 1.1 This jury action seeks redress for Defendant s violation of the laws in connection with the termination of Plaintiff s employment. The action specifically seeks to enforce rights created under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ( ADA ) 42 U.S.C et. seq., the Family and Medical Leave Act ( FMLA ) 29 U.S.C et. seq., and Oklahoma common law. As redress for Defendant s violation of the ADA, Plaintiff prays for and demands declaratory, legal and equitable relief, including back pay, reinstatement or, in the alternative, front pay, punitive damages, damages for emotional distress and attorney fees and costs. As redress for Defendant s violation of the FMLA, Plaintiff prays for and demands declaratory, equitable and legal relief, including 1

2 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 2 of 19 compensatory damages, liquidated damages and attorney fees and costs. As redress for Defendant s violation of Oklahoma common law Plaintiff prays for and demands legal and equitable relief, including back pay, compensatory damages, punitive damages and attorney fees and costs. II. Jurisdiction and Venue 2.1 This Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiff s FMLA claim brought under federal law and this suit is authorized and instituted pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 2617(a)(2). Jurisdiction of Plaintiff s ADA claim is invoked pursuant to 42 U.S.C and 42 U.S.C. 2000e At all times material to this action, Plaintiff was an employee who had been employed for at least 12 months by Defendant and worked for at least 1,250 hours of service with Defendant during the previous 12 month period within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. 2611(2)(A). 2.3 Venue is proper in this Court over Plaintiff s ERISA claims pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 1132(e)(2). 2.4 Venue is proper in this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391, because all or a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims set forth herein occurred within the judicial district of this Court, and because Defendant resides within the judicial district of this Court. 2.5 Plaintiff was an employee of Defendant, and Defendant was the employer of Plaintiff, within the meaning of 29 U.S.C (2)(A) and (4)(A) of the FMLA. 2

3 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 3 of At all relevant times, Defendant has continually been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 101(5) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C (5) and Section 101(7) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. Section 12111(7). 2.7 At all relevant times, Defendant has continuously been a covered entity under Section 101(2) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. Section 12111(2). 2.8 All conditions precedent to Plaintiff's entitlement to relief in this action have been fulfilled and satisfied. On or about June 3, 2009 Plaintiff filed a charge of disability discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. After investigation, the EEOC issued a Cause Determination, dated November 14, 2010, finding disability discrimination. After conciliation failed, the EEOC issued a Notice of Right to Sue dated November 8, 2010 and this suit is instituted within the 90-day deadline contained within the notice. 2.9 This Court has pendent jurisdiction over the state law claims as the claim arose under the same set of facts as the federal statutory claims. III. Parties 3.1 Plaintiff is a female citizen of the United States and a resident of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. 3.2 Defendant is a domestic limited liability corporation registered to do business in the State of Oklahoma Process may be served upon its duly authorized agent: The Corporation Company, 120 N. Robinson, Suite 735, Oklahoma City, OK

4 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 4 of 19 IV. Background Facts 4.1 On or about July 2006 Defendant hired Plaintiff to work at the position of Registered Nurse. She was later promoted to Campus Supervisor. She had always met or exceeded her performance standards. Torn ACL of Knee 4.2 On or about July 23, 2008, Plaintiff sustained a non-occupational injury at her knee and ankle. She was ultimately diagnosed with a torn anterior cruciate ligament of the knee and a fracture of the leg. 4.3 Plaintiff returned to work on or about August 5, 2008 with limited duties and schedule. She was using crutches with physician restrictions and worked a reduced schedule. FMLA Leave Request 4.4 Upon her return she obtained FMLA certification forms from Human Resources. Plaintiff returned the completed FMLA certificates approving her for FMLA leave from her physician to Human Resources a few days later. Plaintiff sought FMLA leave to cover additional absences for treatment of her knee, including surgery and postoperative rehabilitation. 4.5 After receiving the completed FMLA certificates, Defendant never notified Plaintiff of approval or denial of her FMLA request. Thereafter, Plaintiff continued to work limited duties and part-time. 4

5 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 5 of On or about October 31, 2008 Plaintiff delivered to Human Resources a notification from her physician advising Defendant of removal from work effective November 1, 2008 and reconstructive knee surgery scheduled for November 13, After receiving the physician s note, Defendant never notified Plaintiff of acceptance or denial of her request. Beginning November 1, 2008 Plaintiff did not return to work based upon her physician s orders. 4.8 On November 13, 2008 Plaintiff underwent reconstructive knee surgery and thereafter a regimen of post-operative rehabilitation. Return to Work Denied 4.9 Plaintiff s physician released Plaintiff to return to work with physical restrictions effective on or about January 8, Plaintiff delivered the release to Rose Adams, Human Resources. After no response, Plaintiff made inquiries with HR for permission to return to work. Ms. Adams ultimately refused to permit Plaintiff s return to work due to the physical restrictions Plaintiff filed for unemployment benefits with the Oklahoma Employment Security Commission. In January, 2009, in response, Defendant sent a letter to the OESC stating Plaintiff was employed at least six months or until released to work by her physician On or about February 9, 2009 Plaintiff delivered to Ms. Adams another work release from her physician permitting full-time status with reduced physical restrictions. In response, Ms. Adams gave to Plaintiff a job description for the position 5

6 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 6 of 19 of Campus Supervisor to be reviewed by her physician with the representation that Plaintiff would fill the position if her physician authorized her return to the position Plaintiff met with her physician. At this visit, her physician reviewed the job duties of the position and issued a (third) work release dated February 24, 2009 permitting Plaintiff to work the position of Campus Supervisor and removed all physical restrictions 4.13 Plaintiff delivered the release to Ms. Adams approving her for the position of Campus Supervisor Defendant never interviewed Plaintiff for the Campus Supervisor position nor permitted her to fill the position. Plaintiff also applied for various nurse positions within the facility. Defendant never offered her any positions she previously applied for or which became vacant before and after her termination. Denied Other Positions 4.15 Defendant never permitted Plaintiff s return to her former position, the Campus Supervisor position or any vacant positions after her termination On or about March 30, 2009 Plaintiff applied for a nurse manager position with Defendant. Defendant never communicated with her regarding acceptance or rejection for the position. Full Duty Release and Termination 4.17 On April 9, 2009 her physician released her back to work, like before, full duty without any restrictions. Plaintiff delivered the full duty release to Rita Huntsman, HR. 6

7 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 7 of Defendant terminated Plaintiff s employment by a letter to her house effective April 22, The letter purports to advise Plaintiff of prior exhaustion of FMLA leave the first time Defendant advised Plaintiff of FMLA leave approval from her August Attached to the letter of termination was a notice of her rejection for the Nurse Manager position Based upon information and belief, at her termination, Plaintiff had a balance of unused paid time off of 21 hours. At her termination, Plaintiff was not under any physical restrictions. EEOC CAUSE DETERMINATION 4.20 Plaintiff filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC. The EEOC investigated and entered a Determination finding disability discrimination in her termination. DOL Complaint 4.21 In March 2010 Plaintiff filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Labor alleging violations of the FMLA by Defendant Defendant has not offered to rehire Plaintiff to her former position or to fill any vacant positions since her DOL complaint. COUNT I: ADA 5.1 Plaintiff incorporates and realleges, in full, paragraphs 1.1 through 4.22 of this Original Complaint. 5.2 Plaintiff had a disability within the meaning of 42 U.S.C (2)(A) and/or Plaintiff was regarded as having such an impairment by Defendant within the 7

8 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 8 of 19 meaning of 42 U.S.C (2)(C) and/or Plaintiff has a record of such an impairment within the meaning of (2)(B). 5.3 Defendant willfully, knowingly, and intentionally discriminated against Plaintiff on the basis of a disability in the terms or conditions of her employment, and/or otherwise failed to reasonably accommodate Plaintiff s disability, by engaging in the following conduct: (a) by refusing permission to return to work after a release by her physician; (b) failing to interact with Plaintiff in good faith to find Plaintiff reasonable accommodations and return to work; (c) by conditioning her return to work on a release from her physician then refusing to permit her return to work; (d) by failing and refusing to reasonably accommodate Plaintiff with a medical leave of absence and/or light duty positions; (e) by refusing to transfer or hire Plaintiff for other positions available and for positions Plaintiff applied and (f) by terminating Plaintiff s employment. By engaging in such conduct, Defendant violated 12112(a), which makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate against any person with respect to hiring, discharge and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment because of a disability or being regarded as disabled. 5.4 As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s violation of the ADA, Plaintiff has been damaged by the loss of her employment with Defendant and the loss of compensation, including salary and employee benefits, she would have received as an employee of Defendant had she not been discharged in violation of the ADA. 8

9 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 9 of As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s actions as alleged under this Count, Plaintiff has suffered nonpecuniary losses, including emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental anguish and loss of enjoyment of life. 5.6 Defendant engaged in the conduct alleged herein with malice and reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Plaintiff. 5.7 As a direct and proximate cause of the violations of the ADA as alleged under this Count, Plaintiff has also suffered other pecuniary losses, the type and amount of which will be established at the trial of this cause. Count II: ADA Retaliation 6.1 Plaintiff incorporates and realleges, in full, paragraphs 1.1 through 5.7 of this Original Complaint. 6.2 Defendant willfully, knowingly, and intentionally retaliated against Plaintiff for requesting a medical leave of absence as an accommodation in the terms or conditions of her employment, by engaging in the following conduct: (a) by failing and refusing to reasonably accommodate Plaintiff with a medical leave of absence and/or light duty positions; (b) by terminating Plaintiff s employment for taking a medical leave of absence; (c) by refusing permission to return to work after a release by her physician; (d) failing to interact with Plaintiff in good faith to find Plaintiff reasonable accommodations and return to work; (e) by conditioning her return to work on a release from her physician then refusing to permit her return to work; (f) by refusing to transfer or hire Plaintiff for other positions available and for positions Plaintiff applied and (g) by terminating Plaintiff s employment. By engaging in such conduct, Defendant violated 12112(a), 9

10 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 10 of 19 which makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discriminate against any person with respect to hiring, discharge and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment because of a disability or being regarded as disabled. 6.3 Plaintiff s request for reasonable accommodations was a motivating factor in the discharge of her employment. Defendant willfully, knowingly and intentionally retaliated or discriminated against Plaintiff for requesting an accommodation to her disability in her termination of employment. 6.4 As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s violation of the ADA, Plaintiff has been damaged by the loss of her employment with Defendant and the loss of compensation, including salary and employee benefits, she would have received as an employee of Defendant had she not been terminated in violation of the ADA. 6.5 As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s actions as alleged under this Count, Plaintiff has suffered nonpecuniary losses, including emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental anguish and loss of enjoyment of life. 6.6 Defendant engaged in the conduct alleged herein with malice and reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Plaintiff. 6.7 As a direct and proximate cause of the violations of the ADA as alleged under this Count, Plaintiff has also suffered other pecuniary losses, the type and amount of which will be established at the trial of this cause. 10

11 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 11 of 19 COUNT III: FMLA (Interference, Restraint or Denial of FMLA rights) (Retaliation for Requesting FMLA leave) 7.1 Plaintiff incorporates and realleges, in full, paragraphs 1.1 through 6.7 of this Original Complaint. 7.2 Plaintiff worked for Defendant at least twelve months and Defendant has continuously employed and does employ fifty or more employees within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. Section 2611(2). 7.3 All conditions precedent to the prosecution of this cause of action by Plaintiff have been satisfied. 7.4 At all times material to this action, Defendant has retaliated and/or interfered with, restrained, and denied to Plaintiff the exercise of and attempted exercise of rights under Section 2615(a)(1) of the FMLA by terminating Plaintiff s employment while on FMLA leave and failing to rehire or reinstate Plaintiff after her FMLA leave. 7.5 At all times material to this action, Defendant has retaliated and/or interfered with, restrained, and denied to Plaintiff the exercise of and attempted exercise of rights under Section 2615(a)(1) of the FMLA by Defendant s action and omissions including but not limited to the following: a. Failing to notify Plaintiff of decision to designate her leave under FMLA leave, full or intermittent, after receiving sufficient information from Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff s physician of FMLA-qualifying reasons. 29 C.F.R (a) 11

12 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 12 of 19 b. Failing to notify Plaintiff of eligibility for FMLA leave within 5 days after Plaintiff s request. 29 C.F.R (b) & (d)(2) c. Failing to provide notice to Plaintiff of the amount of leave counted against Plaintiff s FMLA leave entitlement then terminating after 12 weeks even though Plaintiff had a fully duty release from her physician. 29 C.F.R (d)(6) d. Retroactively designating leave as FMLA without justification or appropriate notice. 29 C.F.R (d) e. Refusing to permit Plaintiff to work after submitting a fitness for duty certificate requested by Defendant. 29 C.F.R (d) f. Terminating Plaintiff s employment during FMLA qualified leave and by failing to rehire or reinstate Plaintiff to her position with all benefits upon her return to work after her FMLA leave of absence. 7.6 As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s violation of the FMLA, Plaintiff has been damaged by the loss of her employment with Defendant and the loss of compensation, including salary and employee benefits, she would have received as an employee of Defendant had her rights under the FMLA not been interfered, restrained or denied or been retaliated for her attempted exercise of FMLA rights. 7.7 In violating the FMLA, Defendant acted with malice and with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Plaintiff within the meaning of 29 U.S.C (a)(1)(a)(iii) of the FMLA. 12

13 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 13 of As a direct and proximate cause of the violations of the FMLA as alleged under this Count, Plaintiff has also suffered other pecuniary losses, the type and amount of which will be established at the trial of this cause. COUNT IV: BREACH OF CONTRACT/PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL 8.1 Plaintiff incorporates and realleges, in full, paragraphs 1.1 through 7.8 of this Original Complaint. 8.2 A contract of employment existed between Plaintiff and Defendant consisting of a verbal and/or written promise by Defendant to permit Plaintiff to fill the position of Campus Supervisor if approved by her physician after examining the position s job description. 8.3 Defendant made these representations with the expectation that such promises would induce Plaintiff to meet with her physician, obtain his opinion and submit her request for the position of Campus Supervisor with supporting physician paperwork. 8.4 In material reliance upon these representations, Plaintiff did meet the conditions for permitting her to work the position of Campus Supervisor imposed by Defendant. Plaintiff would not have foregone looking or applying for other positions, meeting with her physician and submitting her request for the position but for Defendant s representations. 8.5 Defendant then terminated the employment of Plaintiff for being medically unable to work at Defendant. 8.6 By terminating Plaintiff s employment Defendant breached the contract between the parties. 13

14 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 14 of As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s unlawful conduct, Plaintiff has been damaged by the loss of her employment with Defendant and the loss of compensation, including salary and employee benefits, she would have received as an employee of Defendant had she not been terminated. 8.8 Defendant acted willfully, maliciously, grossly and/or recklessly such that punitive damages should be awarded. 8.9 As a direct and proximate result cause of Defendant s unlawful conduct as alleged under this Count, Plaintiff has also suffered other pecuniary losses, the type and amount of which will be established at the trial of this cause. Count V: Fraudulent Misrepresentation 9.1 Plaintiff incorporates and realleges, in full, paragraphs 1.1 through 8.9 of this Complaint. 9.2 Defendant made representations to Plaintiff that she could fill the position of Campus Supervisor if approved by her physician after examining the position s job description. 9.3 Defendant made these representations with the expectation that such promises would induce Plaintiff to meet with her physician, obtain his opinion and submit her request for the position of Campus Supervisor with supporting physician paperwork. 9.4 In material reliance upon these representations, Plaintiff did meet the conditions for permitting her to work the position of Campus Supervisor imposed by Defendant. Plaintiff would not have foregone looking or applying for other positions, 14

15 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 15 of 19 meeting with her physician and submitting her request for the position but for Defendant s representations. 9.5 Defendant then terminated the employment of Plaintiff for being medically unable to work at Defendant. 9.6 After promising Plaintiff the position if she met the conditions, Defendant never had any intention of keeping its promise of permitting Plaintiff to work the position of Campus Supervisor. Defendant thus knew these representations to be false when made. 9.7 Defendant made these fraudulent misrepresentations intentionally and with the expectation that such misrepresentations would induce Plaintiff to meet with her physician and submit medical approval for the position. 9.8 As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s unlawful conduct, Plaintiff has been damaged by the loss of her employment with Defendant and the loss of compensation, including salary and employee benefits, she would have received as an employee of Defendant had she not been terminated. 9.9 Defendant acted willfully, maliciously, grossly and/or recklessly such that punitive damages should be awarded As a direct and proximate result cause of Defendant s unlawful conduct as alleged under this Count, Plaintiff has also suffered other pecuniary losses, the type and amount of which will be established at the trial of this cause. COUNT VI: Public Policy Exception 10.1 Plaintiff incorporates and realleges, in full, paragraphs 4.1 through 9.10 of this Original Complaint. 15

16 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 16 of Oklahoma law provides under the Oklahoma Anti-discrimination Act, 25 O.S. Section 1302 that an employer shall not discriminate against an employee because of handicap Defendant discriminated against Plaintiff based upon her disability or in retaliation for requesting reasonable accommodations in her termination By terminating Plaintiff s employment, Defendant violated the Oklahoma public policy prohibiting handicap discrimination and retaliation for requesting accommodations. Defendant willfully, knowingly and intentionally discriminated and/or retaliated against Plaintiff in her termination As a direct and proximate result of the violation of Oklahoma public policy, Plaintiff has been damaged by Defendant s discrimination and/or retaliation in loss of compensation, including wages, employee benefits, opportunities for promotion and advancement and other pecuniary benefits she would have received as an employee at Defendant after her termination of employment In wrongfully discharging Plaintiff, Defendant also acted with malice. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to punitive damages As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s violation of the Oklahoma public policy, Plaintiff has suffered other pecuniary losses, the type and amount of which will be established at trial As a direct and proximate result of Defendant s violation of the Oklahoma public policy, Plaintiff has suffered nonpecuniary losses, including emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental anguish and loss of enjoyment of life. 16

17 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 17 of 19 Prayer for Relief WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF prays that this Court: 1. A judgment that Defendant has engaged in all of the conduct alleged in this Original Complaint, and that Defendant has, by engaging in such conduct, violated the FMLA, ADA, and Oklahoma common law. 2. An injunction permanently enjoining Defendant from engaging in the future the discriminatory employment practices alleged in this Original Complaint. 3. A judgment against Defendant awarding Plaintiff an amount equal to the lost wages and employment benefits had she not been terminated by Defendant in violation of the FMLA, ADA, and Oklahoma common law. 4. An order reinstating Plaintiff to the position, seniority and level of compensation, including salary, bonuses and benefits, she would have enjoyed had she not been terminated by Defendant in violation of the FMLA, ADA, and Oklahoma common law, or, in the alternative, a judgment awarding Plaintiff an amount equal to the front pay, including salary, bonuses and benefits, she would have received, from the date of judgment through the date she would have retired or resigned from employment at Defendant. 5. Enter an equivalent money judgment awarding Plaintiff liquidated damages, as provided in 29 U.S.C (a)(1)(a)(iii); 6. A judgment against Defendant awarding Plaintiff compensatory damages as redress for Defendant s unlawful conduct under the ADA, FMLA and Oklahoma common law. 17

18 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 18 of A judgment against Defendant awarding Plaintiff exemplary damages to punish and make an example of Defendant for their unlawful conduct. 8. A judgment against Defendant awarding Plaintiff compensation for past and future nonpecuniary losses, including but not limited to emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment of life and humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial. 9. A judgment against Defendant awarding Plaintiff an amount equal to the costs of bringing this action, including a reasonable attorney fee. 10. A judgment awarding Plaintiff such other legal and equitable relief as may be appropriate, including prejudgment and postjudgment interest. Respectfully submitted, S/Jeff Taylor Jeff A. Taylor State Bar No N. Classen Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK Telephone: (405) Facsimile: (405) jeffataylor@att.net ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 18

19 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 19 of 19 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 38(b), Plaintiff demands a jury trial of all of her claims in this action. s/ Jeff A. Taylor Jeff A. Taylor 19

20 Case 5:11-cv L Document 1-1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA Case 5:10-cv-00480-L Document 1 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) DETROY JARRETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) (1) UHS

More information

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:08-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:08-cv-02739-REB Document 1 Filed 12/16/2008 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. ANTHONY PARSONS, v. Plaintiff CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS,

More information

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:16-cv-02339-JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ASIA BLUNT ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ) KANSAS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:16-cv-13540-GAD-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/03/16 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil

More information

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org Case 5:04-cv-01148-L Document 1 Filed 09/14/04 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 1. VELMA McMAHAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No. CIV-04- ) 1. TVC MARKETING

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII CV Case 1:13-cv-00674-ACK-RLP Document 1 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 Anna Y. Park, CA SBN 164242 255 East Temple Street, Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-1108 Facsimile:

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service Case 3:14-cv-01961-KI Document 1 Filed 12/08/14 Page 1 of 17 Daniel Snyder, OSB No. 78385 dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Carl Post, OSB No. 06105 carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Cynthia Gaddis,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION KESEANDA BROOKS, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) Hon. v. ) Magistrate ) MEDICAL FACILITIES OF ) AMERICA, INC., d/b/a HANOVER ) HEALTH

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION CASE 0:14-cv-03408-SRN-SER Document 1 Filed 09/08/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, CUMMINS POWER

More information

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:11-cv LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7 Case 1:11-cv-00355-LG-JCG Document 2 Filed 11/17/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

More information

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-00-gmn-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 COLLIN M. JAYNE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON 00 South Seventh Street, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada

More information

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:11-cv CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7 Case 3:11-cv-00041-CRW-TJS Document 1 Filed 04/06/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF low A DAVENPORT DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10

Case5:11-cv EJD Document28 Filed09/09/11 Page1 of 10 Case:-cv-0-EJD Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 Zahra Billoo, State Bar No. COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS (CAIR) 000 Scott Blvd., Suite 0 Santa Clara, CA 0 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - Email:

More information

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7 Case 4:16-cv-02909 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

More information

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008

This is an action under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------x EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY : COMMISSION, : CIVIL ACTION NO. : Plaintiff, :

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SANDRA DILAURA and : Civil Action No. 03-2200 JEFFREY DILAURA, w/h, and : THE UNITED STATES EQUAL : EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY : COMMISSION,

More information

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7

Case 0:10-cv KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7 Case 0:10-cv-61437-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/10/2010 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. BRADLEY SEFF, COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, vs.

More information

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 9:12-cv-02672-PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION JULIE BANGERT, ) Civil Action #: ) PLAINTIFF,

More information

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION Case 6:17-cv-01365 Document 1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION WILLIAM PIERCE, VERSUS Plaintiff, SHERIFF LOUIS M. ACKAL,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION CHARLES TAYLOR ) 1524 NOVA AVENUE ) CAPITOL HEIGHTS, MD 20743 ) ) ) ) Individually and as ) Class Representative ) ) PLAINTIFF )

More information

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16

Case 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16 Case :-cv-0-edl Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Jinny Kim, State Bar No. Alexis Alvarez, State Bar No. The LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:

More information

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 7:17-cv KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 7:17-cv-05077-KMK Document 1 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, )

More information

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:14-cv MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6 Case 2:14-cv-00527-MPK Document 1 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. EZEFLOW USA, INC.,

More information

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the

NATURE OF THE ACTION. This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Case Case 3:06-cv-04596-MLC-JJH 1:33-av-00001 Document Document 329-1 1-1 Filed Filed 09/27/2006 Page Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION Case 1:16-cv-00628 Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 KIMBERLY PERREAULT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND v. C.A. HARMONY FIRE DISTRICT and STUART D. PEARSON, Chief Individually

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/15/2015 04:39 PM INDEX NO. 155631/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/15/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION. Nature Of The Action , UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA DAVENPORT DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. REMEDY INTELLIGENT STAFFING, INC., Defendant. Ci~l!../~,tion J:io. r-~.~..

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 Anna Y. Park, SBN Michael Farrell, SBN U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION East Temple Street, Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( -1 E-Mail: lado.legal@eeoc.gov

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. GREENHOUSE ENTERPRISE, INC. D/B/A SUSHI AT THE LAKE,

More information

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD.,

IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. ..-ECHOSTAR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION n/k/a DISH, LTD., Civil Action No. 02-M-581 (BNB) IN TI-[E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COf~RT DE~IVER. COLORADO JUN 4 2002 JAMES H. MAIgSPEAKER CLERK EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION Case 4:15-cv-00066-DLH-CSM Document 1 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CASING

More information

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:04-cv JSW Document 168 Filed 10/20/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :0-cv-00-JSW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 ROBERT D. UNITAS (MA KENNETH J. KRYVORUKA (DC, OH ERICA D. WHITE-DUNSTON (DC, MD EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 0 L Street N.W. Washington,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION CYNTHIA HUFFMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 01-3144-ODS ) NEW PRIME, INC. d/b/a/ PRIME, INC. ) Serve Registered

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION Case 3:17-cv-00034-DHB-BKE Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ) OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) )

More information

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION Case 1:18-cv-02319-RDB Document 1 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Action

More information

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES

CASE NO. 5:00-CV COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION ON BEHALF OF JACKQULINE STOKES ~~~~~~~SAS DEC 1 5 ZOOO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT R EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JAMES1P~COR~ CLE WESTERN DIVISION BY:~ bep CCEF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION PLAINTIFF VS. CASE NO.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION FILED DEC 1 2 2005 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, PlaintITf, CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-4176 GEORGE CLARK, JR.,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. WEST FRONT STREET FOODS, LLC d/b/a COMPARE FOODS,

More information

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1-2 Filed: 06/03/09 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:2 Case: 1:-cv-01 Document #: 1- Filed: 0/0/0 Page 1 of PageID #: WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 0 JONATHAN T. PECK, SBN (VA) LINDA S. ORDONIO-DIXON, SBN 0 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco

More information

)(

)( Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION Case 1:16-cv-00629 Document 1 Filed 11/21/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 LINDA FERRAGAMO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STATE OF RHODE ISLAND v. C.A. HARMONY FIRE DISTRICT and STUART D. PEARSON, Chief Individually

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION Case: 3:14-cv-00638-bbc Document #: 1 Filed: 09/30/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. FLAMBEAU, INC. Plaintiff,

More information

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G?

2. One of the defendant in the case is Parker & Gould (P&G). What is exactly P&G? Civil Litigation A complaint and a answer of defendant may be found below. These are U.S. documents, adapted here for educational purposes. As you will notice, they are rather different from the complaints

More information

Case 2:17-cv JES-CM Document 1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv JES-CM Document 1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION Case 2:17-cv-00417-JES-CM Document 1 Filed 07/24/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 -.. FILED UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION 2017 JUL 24 AH 9: 28 CLERK US f11ddle 'o1

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-1186 ) v. ) ) COMPLAINT HUFCOR, INC., d/b/a Total Quality

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. BEATRICE JEAN, and other similarly situated individuals, v. Plaintiff(s, NEW NATIONAL LLC d/b/a National Hotel, Defendant.

More information

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Case 3:04-cv RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO Case 3:04-cv-02031-RLA Document 1-1 Filed 09/30/2004 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ) OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

Case 5:12-cv LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 5:12-cv LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 5:12-cv-01380-LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION LEIF HENRY, : : No. Plaintiff : : v. : : CITY OF

More information

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No.

DJAS FILED. eelveo PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18. Case No. eelveo FEB 2 0 018 DJAS Case 1:18-cv-00150-RP Document 1 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 of 18 FILED FEB 202018 CLERK tj.. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ci.ix, U.S DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FARRAH

More information

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Case 5:14-cv-00801-DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action

More information

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8 Case 4:17-cv-02226 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff,

More information

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626

1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626 // : AM CV0 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 1 KAON-JABBAR EAST EL, an individual, v. Plaintiff, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a foreign business corporation, Defendant.

More information

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand)

COMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demand) Document Number Case Number Case: 1:07-cv-02339 Document #: 32-2 Filed: 04/26/07 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:7 002 06 C- 05 16-C United States Oistnct Court. "' ~ _\ Q Wes1ern District of Wiscons.n r\ (j (,,

More information

)

) Case 3:00-cv-01084-HES Document 66 Filed 01/07/2002 Page 1 of 9 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. THOMPSON & WARD LEASING CO., INC, and IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

More information

Case 1:10-cv LTB Document 1 Filed 08/31/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT

Case 1:10-cv LTB Document 1 Filed 08/31/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COMPLAINT Case 1:10-cv-02125-LTB Document 1 Filed 08/31/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. TABITHA OLIVAS, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES,

More information

Case 2:17-cv KJM-KJN Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv KJM-KJN Document 1 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-kjm-kjn Document Filed // Page of Lindsey Wagner 00 W Alameda Ave Suite 00 Burbank, CA 0 Tele: () -0 Fax: ()-000 Email: LWagner@scottwagnerlaw.com Mail@scottwagnerlaw.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No.

Case 2:14-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Case No. Case 2:14-cv-00684-MRH Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Athena Miller Plaintiff, Case No. v. Select Medical Corporation Defendant. JURY

More information

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6

Case 4:07-cv JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6 , Case 4:07-cv-00603-JLH Document 1 Filed 06/29/2007 ( Page 1 of 6 ) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

More information

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:18-cv-00498-RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 LISA COLE, Plaintiff, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY DEPARTMENT

More information

2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO.

2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO. 2:18-cv-10735-PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 TARA EDWARDS, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. SCRIPPS MEDIA, INC., d/b/a WXYZ-TV,

More information

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT

-CIVIL RIGHTS EMPLOYMENT WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 0 DAVID F. OFFEN-BROWN, SBN 0 ELIZABETH ESPARZA-CERVANTES, SBN 0 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 0 The Embarcadero, Suite 00 San Francisco,

More information

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Case 3:16-cv-01907-MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Daniel Snyder, OSB No. 783856 dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Carl Post, OSB No. 061058 carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com John Burgess,

More information

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5 Case:0-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0//0 Page of Wayne Johnson, SBN: Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 0 Oakland, CA 0 (0) - Attorney for Plaintiffs 0 LYNART COLLINS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13 Case :-cv-0-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 MICHELLE P. CHUN FOOK; and YOLANDA C. COOPER, v. Plaintiffs, CITY OF SEATTLE, a Washington

More information

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:16-cv JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13 Case 4:16-cv-00648-JEG-CFB Document 1 Filed 12/23/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION COURTNEY GRAHAM CASE NO. Plaintiff v. DRAKE UNIVERSITY/KNAPP

More information

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

) I ClV a S - BUN. 18 This is an action under Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil 1 A. LUIS LUCERO, JR. BARBARAJ. STANDAL 2 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 909 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 400 3 SEATTLE, WA 98104 TEl: (206 220-6896 4 ORIGINAL.' --,., >: i;:;,', -.!,-. --r, 5 6 7 8 UNITED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-4176 GEORGE CLARK, JR., RICKEY JOHNSON, and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION MONICA DANIEL HUTCHISON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No.: 09-3018-CV-S-RED vs. ) ) Jury Trial Demanded TEXAS COUNTY,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH // :: AM CV 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON IN THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH MICHAEL BOYLE, v. Plaintiff, THE CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation Defendant. Case No. -cv- AMENDED COMPLAINT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION!

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT! WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN! SOUTHERN DIVISION! Case 1:13-cv-01294-PLM Doc #1 Filed 11/27/13 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JILL CRANE, PLAINTIFF, v. MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION HOSPITAL,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901

More information

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2

Case: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2 Case: 5:15-cv-01425-SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2 3. At all times material herein, Suarez Corporation was Stewart s employer within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. 623 et seq. 4. At all times

More information

Case 0:16-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11

Case 0:16-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11 Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION RAPHAEL U. ESTEVEZ, CASE NO.: Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Deanna Richert, Civil File No. 09-cv-00763 (ADM/JJK) Plaintiff, v. ANSWER National Arbitration Forum, LLC, and Dispute Management Services, LLC, d/b/a

More information

: : : : : : Plaintiffs Amy Morgan, Terri Smith, and Erin Harris ( Plaintiffs ), upon their INTRODUCTION

: : : : : : Plaintiffs Amy Morgan, Terri Smith, and Erin Harris ( Plaintiffs ), upon their INTRODUCTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 17-CV-540 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x AMY MORGAN, TERRI SMITH, ERIN HARRIS,

More information

Case3:13-cv NC Document1 Filed12/09/13 Page1 of 18

Case3:13-cv NC Document1 Filed12/09/13 Page1 of 18 Case:-cv-0-NC Document Filed/0/ Page of Marsha J. Chien, State Bar No. Christopher Ho, State Bar No. THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California

More information

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (Miami Division) Case No: DAVID BALDWIN, vs. COMPLAINT Plaintiff,

More information

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220

Case: 1:06-cv JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220 Case: 1:06-cv-02337-JRA Doc #: 28 Filed: 05/08/09 1 of 9. PageID #: 220 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY CIVIL ACTION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-WYD-CBS STEVEN HOWARDS, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO VIRGIL D. GUS REICHLE, JR., in his individual and official capacity,

More information

Filing # E-Filed 06/09/ :22:25 PM

Filing # E-Filed 06/09/ :22:25 PM Filing # 28256098 E-Filed 06/09/2015 12:22:25 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION PATRICIA WISE-YOUNGREN, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: HAINES

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~~ ~  FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON FILED ~"~ h pt CITI ~ :, t, r" IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~,~,~,,.c~...,... ~~"~ ~ " FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLI~ SEP -9 ;i ~ [~: 0~ CBA~OTTE OIVlSlON EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

More information

10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT.

10/18/ :38 AM 18CV47218 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT. // : AM CV 1 1 1 SHANNON TANDBERG, v. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Plaintiff, PORTLAND CREMATION CENTER, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, Defendant. FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

More information

Case 5:14-cv CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 5:14-cv CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 Case 5:14-cv-00152-CMC Document 1 Filed 12/05/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ELISABETH ASBEL, Plaintiff, vs. RENEWABLE

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:17-cv-07390 Document 1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-cv-7390

More information

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT

2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT 2:18-cv-02186-CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 E-FILED Friday, 06 July, 2018 11:28:40 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA Civil Action No: 8:03CV165 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY and/or OMAHA

More information

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 5:15-cv SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 5:15-cv-04918-SAC-KGS Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS COURTNEY L. CANFIELD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE SUSAN EDMONSOND, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Serve Clerk of the County Commission: 102 East Wall Street

More information

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017

FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/ :56 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017 FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 01/16/2017 09:56 AM INDEX NO. 150126/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/16/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No. COUNTY OF RICHMOND Date purchased:

More information

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No.

FILED. , #, Case 5:05-cv WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 JUN COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ALICIA MANSEL, Civil Action No. , #, Case 5:05-cv-00965-WRF Document 29 Filed 06/06/2006Page 1 of 9 FILED JUN - 6 2006 CLERK~~k~Iu, COURT COMMISSION, Plaintiff, ~ D~PUTY CLERK ALICIA MANSEL, VS. Plaintiff-Intervenor, Civil Action No.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NO. } 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES ~~ ~J Lichelle Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE 1) S D,C Atlanta M AY 16 2008 JAMES NATT EN, C lerk By. AU-I~ Plaintiff,

More information

Introduction. Jurisdiction. Parties

Introduction. Jurisdiction. Parties Case 5:07-cv-00064-UWC Document 1-1 Filed 01/09/2007 Page 1 of 8 FILED 2007 Jan-12 PM 01:52 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

More information

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com

thejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TADDRICK MINGO v. Plaintiff, SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 3:08-cv-00052-KRG 3:05-mc-02025 Document 23 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 1 of of 9 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LISA DOHNER, Civil Action vs. Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1) Americans for Safe Access Webster St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: () - Fax: () 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, THERESA CHASE, Plaintiff, Plaintiff-Intervenor, CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-CV-1091 (GLS/RFT) Vo WHITE HOUSE

More information

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:09-cv BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6 Case 2:09-cv-10601-BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 6 Case 2:09-cv-10601-BSJ-RLE Document 67 Filed 10/28/11 Page 2 of 6 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA NATURE OF THE ACTION ", 1 3 7 8 9 10 11 1 13 1 1 1 17 18 19 0 1 3 7 Mary Jo O'Neill #009 C. Emanuel Smith P. David Lopez Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Phoenix District Office 3300 North Central Avenue, Suite 90 Phoenix,

More information

Case 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6 Case 4:12-cv-01680 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MICHELLE LYONS Plaintiff v. CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII THOMAS M. GEISNESS The Geisness Law Firm Colman Building, Suite Seattle, WA. Telephone: () - Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenors HONORABLE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY HONORABLE BARRY M. KURREN UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information