CIPA Introductory Certificate in Patent Administration Syllabus
|
|
- Gillian Richard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Introduction - Structure of the syllabus This syllabus is set out as follows: 1. Information about the qualification. 2. The aims of the qualification. 3. A unit by unit description of the qualification content which contains the: a) name and number of the unit and section of the syllabus; b) content of each section of the syllabus; c) learning outcomes for each section of the syllabus. The learning outcomes set out what candidates will have to demonstrate in an examination to show that they have the required knowledge and/or skills. 4. Information about the examination. 1. About the qualification This qualification includes the underlying principles, the essential legal background and the practice of Patent and Design Administration. It encourages the development of knowledge, understanding and critical awareness of the structure, personnel and functions of a patent department, including the work of patent attorneys and support staff. It encourages utilisation and expansion of candidates existing knowledge, and supports them in their day to day role and career aspirations. The assessment requires the development of skills in and understanding of the formalities role and is a gateway qualification for the advanced course. 2. Aims of the qualification The aims of the qualification are to develop: the knowledge and skills necessary to deal with the filing and prosecution formalities of GB, EP and PCT patent applications; an awareness of design formalities; the ability to review correspondence to identify formalities deadlines and actions required; an understanding of the critical importance of meeting legal requirements and deadlines. Page 1 of 7
2 3. Qualification content Unit 1: Introduction 1.1 Introduction to the PAC The objective of this unit is for candidates to be able to explain the reasons for the patent system and the form of protection it gives to the patent owner, the patent administrator s role in supporting the patent process, the different stages and routes that a patent application may follow, and the concept of priority. Title Subject Content Learning Outcomes 1. Reasons for the patent system and the form of protection it gives to the patent owner. 2. What a patent attorney does in order to secure a patent and a patent administrator s role in supporting the patent process. 3. The duty of care. 4. The importance of meeting time limits and following correct procedures. 5. Content of a patent application. 6. Different stages that a patent application goes through from filing to grant. 7. Different routes which can be followed in order to gain patent protection. 8. The concept of priority. At the end of Unit 1.1 candidates will be able to: a) Plan how to study the course. b) Define the term patent. c) Explain the importance of the patent system. d) Describe your role as a patent administrator. e) Explain the patent administrator s duty of care. f) Explain the procedural stages from priority through to grant and attaining a patent. g) Explain the required contents of a patent application. Page 2 of 7
3 Unit 2: GB Patents 2.1 GB Patents Part GB Patents Part 2 The objective of this unit is for candidates to be able to describe the requirements for filing all types of GB application, and be able to apply them. In addition candidates will be able to describe the subsequent prosecution through to grant, identify official communications, and calculate relevant deadlines, including renewals. 1. The different types of filing available in the UK. 2. Preparing all relevant forms. 3. Calculating relevant due dates in order to complete all types of filing. 1. The steps in prosecution of a GB application from search to grant. 2. UKIPO communications. 3. Calculating relevant deadlines. 4. Renewal Procedure for GB patents. At the end of Unit 2.1, in the context of GB patent applications, candidates will be able to: a) Summarise timelines of GB applications. b) Identify and prepare forms PF1 and PF7. c) State minimum requirements to obtain a filing date. d) Identify and calculate subsequent deadlines in order to complete filing formalities. e) Recognise UK IPO communications and calculate and record appropriate deadlines therefrom. At the end of Unit 2.2, in the context of GB patent applications, candidates will be able to: a) Identify and prepare form PF9A. b) Recognise search reports and calculate deadlines set by them. c) Identify publication notices and calculate deadlines deriving from them. d) File requests for examination using form PF10, including fees due. e) Recognise and record examination reports and deadlines set by them. f) Recognise UK IPO communications relating to acceptance and grant and calculate resulting deadlines. g) Explain and apply the renewal payment procedure for GB patents. Page 3 of 7
4 Unit 3: PCT The objective of this unit is for candidates to be able to identify the timeline of a PCT application including the National and/or Regional phasing routes, prepare relevant forms, and calculate relevant due dates in order to complete all types of filing. 3.1 PCT Part 1 1. Timeline of a PCT application up to 30/31 months. 2. Preparing all relevant forms. 3. Relevant due dates in order to complete all types of filing. 3.2 PCT Part 2 1. Timeline of a PCT application including the National and Regional phase. 2. Awareness of relevant forms and documentation. 3. Calculating relevant due dates in order to complete all types of filing. At the end of Unit 3.1, in the context of PCT applications candidates will be able to: a) State the advantages of PCT filing. b) Summarise timelines of PCT applications. c) Prepare forms for use during the International Phase of a PCT application including the RO/101 and the Demand for International Preliminary Examination. d) Identify minimum requirements to obtain a filing date. e) Identify and calculate subsequent deadlines. f) Recognise PCT communications and calculate and record appropriate deadlines therefrom. At the end of Unit 3.2, in the context of the National and/or Regional phasing route, candidates will be able to: a) Summarise timelines. b) Identify the phasing route, the differences and deadlines required. c) Identify the minimum requirements to obtain a filing date, including fees and forms for both GB and selected foreign National phases. d) Locate required information. e) Recognise agent communications and calculate and record appropriate deadlines therefrom. Page 4 of 7
5 Unit 4: European Patents 4.1 European Patents Part European Patents Part 2 The objective of this unit is for candidates to be able to meet the formalities requirements for all types of EP application, including prosecution through to Grant, Search and Examination, calculating relevant deadlines and applying the 10 day rule. 1. Requirements for filing all types of EP application. 2. Subsequent prosecution through to grant. 3. Official communications. 4. Calculating relevant deadlines, including renewals. 1. The steps in the processing of EP applications from search. 2. Types of publication. 3. Examination. 4. Oral Proceedings. 5. EPO communications. 6. Calculating relevant deadlines, including the applicability of the 10 day rule. 7. The steps required and relating to the Intention to Grant of a European patent application through the national validation process up to opposition proceedings. 8. Recognising EPO communications. 9. Calculating relevant deadlines and renewals. Page 5 of 7 At the end of Unit 4.1, in the context of European Patents, candidates will be able to: a) Describe relevant timelines. b) Carry out filing for Non Convention, Convention, Regional Phase and Divisional. c) Explain filing requirements and ways to file. d) State subsequent deadlines. At the end of Unit 4.2, in the context of European Patents, candidates will be able to: a) Recognise the Search report and calculate deadlines set by it b) Identify the different types of Publication notice and calculate deadlines deriving from them c) File requests for examination, including fees due d) Recognise and record Examination reports and deadlines set; and state availability of extensions e) Recognise the applicability of the 10 day rule and apply it. f) Recognise Oral Proceedings notices and record the required deadlines. g) Recognise Appeal notifications. h) Recognise and distinguish Pre- and Post-grant communications and calculate deadlines set by those. i) Distinguish between EP and National post-grant renewals. j) Explain the roles of external suppliers and third party agents, including external translators and foreign agents, in completing the National Validation process. k) Recognise Opposition Proceedings notices and record the required deadlines.
6 Unit 5: Designs The objective of this unit is for candidates to be able to identify the different types of Designs filing available in the UK, Community and foreign jurisdictions. It will also cover preparation of relevant forms and calculating relevant due dates in order to complete all types of filing. 5.1 Designs 1. Requirements for filing all types of Design applications. 2. Subsequent prosecution through to grant. 3. Official communications. 4. Calculating relevant deadlines, including renewals. At the end of this Unit 5.1 candidates will be able to: a) Summarise timelines of Design applications. b) Identify required forms for all types of filing and all available systems. c) Identify minimum requirements to obtain a filing date, including fees. d) Identify and calculate subsequent deadlines in order to complete filing formalities. e) Explain the renewal payment procedure for Design applications. 4. The Examination This syllabus is assessed via a closed book examination which is two hours in length with an additional 15 minutes reading time allowed before candidates may start writing. The law that will be assessed is the law that is current at the time of the last teaching session of the course. The question paper The questions will test the syllabus subject content and learning outcomes. Each question paper will comprise questions with a marks range from 1 to 15. All the questions will be compulsory. The question paper will be out of 80 marks. All the units, but not necessarily all the learning outcomes, will be assessed in all question papers. Page 6 of 7
7 Question type The questions will be either: i. form-based or ii. short answer questions such as data entry or date calculations or iii. longer answer questions where an explanation is required or iv. a short scenario with related questions. (The scenario materials will either be part of the question or provided as a separate scenario.) Additionally, questions may be set which relate to the scenario presented in any form question. If reasoning, explanation and/or calculations workings are required in an answer, the question will advise the candidate accordingly. Materials provided Calendars for the relevant years, and Patent Offices closure dates will be provided where needed. Materials which the examiners wish candidates to have in order to answer a question will also be provided either as part of the question or separately. Examination outcomes There are 80 marks available in total. Candidates will be awarded one of the following categories: Fail, Pass, Merit or Distinction. Page 7 of 7
Foundation Certificate
Foundation Certificate International Patent Law FC3 Friday 13 October 2017 10:00 to 13:00 INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES 1. You should attempt five of questions 1 to 6. 2. Each question carries 20 marks. 3.
More informationFC3 (P5) International Patent Law 2 FINAL Mark Scheme 2017
Question 1 Part A Your UK-based client, NC Ltd, employs 50 people and is about to file a new US patent application, US1, claiming priority from a GB patent application, GB0. US1 is not subject to any licensing.
More information1. Information to be inserted into EPO Forms 1001 and 1002: 6. Applicant s/representative s ref. Z9876EP
1. Information to be inserted into EPO Forms 1001 and 1002: 6. Applicant s/representative s ref. Z9876EP 7. Applicant PISCATORIA LIMITED 8. Address 10 Broad Street Windermere Cumbria LA23 2AB GB [United
More informationPatent Administrators Course 2015 Final Examination Answers
Patent Administrators Course 2015 Final Examination Answers Full marks are still available for answers which do not contain the matter in square brackets [ ] below. Question 1 15 marks. Deduct 0.5 marks
More informationManaging costs and timeliness at EPO & UKIPO. Mike Jennings A.A.Thornton & Co October 2017
Managing costs and timeliness at EPO & UKIPO Mike Jennings A.A.Thornton & Co October 2017 Patent attorneys don t like: Excessive official fees such as EPO fees on entry to PCT regional phase may deter
More informationQUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 51%
QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 5% Question A a) The client does qualify.5(i) as the number of employees must be 5 or fewer b) A micro entity must be an individual with 4 or fewer
More informationThe following fees must be paid in connection with the filing of a PCT application:
PAPER: FD1 MARK AWARDED: 70 Question 1 The following fees must be paid in connection with the filing of a PCT application: - Transmittal fee - Application fee - Search fee These fees do not need to be
More informationR 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is
Candidate s Answer DII 1. HVHF plugs + PP has: US2 - granted in US (related to US 1) EP1 - pending before EPO + + for all states LBP has: FR1 - France - still pending? EP2 - granted for DE, ES, FR, GB
More informationRaising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010
Platform Formalities Officers 1 st Annual Formalities Officers Conference Rijswijk, 11 March 2010 Raising the Bar and EPC changes as from 1 April 2010 Luise Zimmermann European Patent Office Content Raising
More informationDIFFICULT EPO ACTIONS TO DOCKET uithe Reliability of your IP Data your IP Data Integrity: How to Ruin the Reliability of your IP Data
DIFFICULT EPO ACTIONS TO DOCKET uithe Reliability of your IP Data your IP Data Integrity: How to Ruin the Reliability of your IP Data Difficult EPO Docketing Items Presenters and panelists: o Ann McCrackin,
More informationStrategic Use of the PCT:
Strategic Use of the PCT: A US User s Perspective David Reed, Consultant, PCT Legal Division, WIPO Published 22 July 2011 This presentation draws upon a wealth of practical filing experience and presents
More informationQUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FD1 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 66%
QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FD1 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 66% Question 1 Because the subject matter of the invention relates to military technology there is an obligation on the applicant not to disclose
More informationTopic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)
Topic 1: Overview of Search and Examination under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Lutz Mailänder Head, Patent Information Section Global IP Infrastructure Sector Tokio 26 November 2013 Agenda PCT system
More informationTHE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
IP5 Statistics Report 2011 THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) This chapter presents statistics describing various activities of the IP5 Offices that relate to the PCT system. The graphs
More informationIntellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office
User Guidelines for filing a request to the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office for acceleration under the Global Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program Intellectual Property Office is an operating
More informationLower Filing Fees for Patents and Trade Mark Protection
Revised Fees, Implementation of Goods and Services Tax and Change in Procedure for Amendment and Correction of Patents documents with effect from 1 April 2017 (Circular No. 1/2017, dated 3 February 2017)
More informationOur Speakers: Rudy I. Kratz Partner; Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP. Tony Wray Director and Founder; Optimus Patents Ltd.
Our Speakers: Rudy I. Kratz Partner; Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP Tony Wray Director and Founder; Optimus Patents Ltd. August 30, 2016 2016 Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP First of All... These
More informationSCHEDULE OF CHARGES Fortified with transparency
SCHEDULE OF CHARGES 2017 Fortified with transparency Patents Filing and Prosecution page 3 Patents Validations and Miscellaneous page 6 Patents Renewals page 7 Patents Recordals page 9 Benelux Trademarks
More informationFC3 International Patent Law Question Paper Sample Assessment Material
SECTION A Question 1 a) List six facts relating to utility models, at least one of which should relate to a difference between utility models and patents. b) Can utility models be obtained in Germany,
More informationPatent Prosecution Highway Pilot Programme between the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and the Korean Intellectual Property Office
Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Programme between the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and the Korean Intellectual Property Office 1. Background To obtain patent protection for an invention in
More informationTable of Contents I INTERNATIONAL PHASE BEFORE THE RECEIVING OFFICE AND INTERNATIONAL BUREAU.. 14
Table of Contents I INTERNATIONAL PHASE BEFORE THE RECEIVING OFFICE AND INTERNATIONAL BUREAU.. 14 I.1. Who can file a PCT application?... 19 I.1.1. US law and the applicant (declaration of inventorship)...
More informationTopic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art
Topic 12: Priority Claims and Prior Art Lutz Mailänder Head, International Cooperation on Examination and Training Section Harare September 22, 2017 Agenda Prior art in the presence of priorities Multiple
More informationThe effects of the EPC
The effects of the EPC The second round of amendments to the European Patent Convention Implementing Regulations is imminent By Paul-Alexander Wacker and Stephan Kopp, Kuhnen & Wacker IP firm, Freising
More informationQUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% six months after the publication of European search report
QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FC3 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 59% Question 1 a) Deadline for validating granted European patent in EPC six months after the publication of European search report 0 b) i) Germany
More informationP1 Basic UK Patent Law and Procedure. Friday 3 October p.m p.m. Time allowed THREE hours
INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES Basic UK Patent Law and Procedure Friday 3 October 2014 2.00 p.m. 5.00 p.m. Time allowed THREE hours 1. You should attempt four of questions 1 to 5 in Part A and three of questions
More informationEU Trade Mark Application Timeline
EU Trade Mark Application Timeline EU Trade Marks, which cover the entire EU, are administered by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM). The timeline below gives approximate timescale
More informationIP: Patent law & prosecution
IP: Patent law & prosecution Tech Transfer course 2018 28 August 2018 Griet Den Herder, PhD, IP Manager Patent law & organisations International : Vienna convention: treaty following principle of good
More informationTHE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
Chapter 5 THE IP5 OFFICES AND THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) This chapter presents firstly the impact of the PCT system on patenting activity. Then it describes the various activities of the IP5 Offices
More informationEPO boards of appeal decisions. Date of decision 30 October 1991 Case number J 0042/
Abstract Applicants submitted an international application requesting a European patent (Euro-PCT application). A European application was subsequently submitted claiming priority of the Euro-PCT application.
More informationForeign Patent Law. Why file foreign? Why NOT file foreign? Richard J. Melker
Foreign Patent Law Richard J. Melker Why file foreign? Medical device companies seek worldwide protection (US ~50% of market) Patents are only enforceable in the issued country Must have patent protection
More informationCandidate's Answer - DI
Candidate's Answer - DI Candidate's Answer - DI Question 1 Deadline for entering European Regional Phase = 31 m from filing date or priority date if priority is claimed (Art 39(1)(b) PCT, R107 EPC). No
More informationPRV fees valid as from 1 april 2018
PRV fees valid as from 1 april 2018 1 (12) 1 (12) National applications and patents s for government services, such as applications and registrations, and copies and printouts of public documents, are
More informationIntellectual Property Office of the Philippines
Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines Issues 1. Statistics on Examination a. Number of applications per year 2009 2,935 2010 3,390 2011 3,120 2012 2,981 As of October 2013 2,571 b. Fraction of
More informationAdded matter under the EPC. Chris Gabriel Examiner Directorate 1222
Added matter under the EPC Chris Gabriel Examiner Directorate 1222 April 2018 Contents Added matter under the EPC Basic principles under the EPC First to file Article 123(2) EPC Interpretation Gold standard
More informationIP IN A POST-BREXIT EUROPE ENSURING YOUR EUROPEAN IP RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENTERS: CHRIS FINN, BEN GRAU AND GRAHAM MURNANE
IP IN A POST-BREXIT EUROPE ENSURING YOUR EUROPEAN IP RIGHTS ARE PROTECTED DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2016 PRESENTERS: CHRIS FINN, BEN GRAU AND GRAHAM MURNANE BACKGROUND A fundamental aspect of the European Union
More informationEPO s QMS. Piotr Wierzejewski Quality Management
EPO s QMS Piotr Wierzejewski Quality Management February 2018 Employing highly qualified specialists as examiners Minimum requirements Master's degree in physics, chemistry, engineering or natural sciences
More informationOverview on EPO s Current Initiatives for Improving Timeliness. Heli Pihlajamaa Director Patent Law
Overview on EPO s Current Initiatives for Improving Timeliness Heli Pihlajamaa Director Patent Law 14 October 2016 Content Time matters Early Certainty Expediting the Proceedings Streamlined opposition
More informationNEW ZEALAND - Patents - Schedule of Charges
NEW ZEALAND - Patents - Schedule of Charges Including forwarding any examination report 1 Filing Standard application and forwarding the Letters Patent Deed 250.00 800.00 1050.00 2 Filing PCT NZ National
More informationThe transfer of priority rights
The transfer of priority rights The question of who is a successor in title to the right to claim priority has recently been considered again by the UK Patents Court in KCI Licensing. Serious doubt remains
More informationDeveloping an International IP strategy. Leslie Prichard UK Chartered & European Patent Attorney European Design Attorney culverstons
Developing an International IP strategy Leslie Prichard UK Chartered & European Patent Attorney European Design Attorney culverstons Introduction Brief overview of IP rights Patents: developing a strategy
More informationFICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality
FICPI & AIPLA Colloquium, June 2007 A Comprehensive Approach to Patent Quality Deficiencies in patent applications and problems created by applicants and attorneys Author : J Pearce, EPO Date : 8 June
More informationREGISTRATION DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS (SEYCHELLES)
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE THE PROCEDURE IN THE NATIONAL PHASE ANNEX Fees... Annex.I List
More informationUnitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC)
Unitary Patent in Europe & Unified Patent Court (UPC) An overview and a comparison to the classical patent system in Europe 1 Today s situation: Obtaining patent protection in Europe Direct filing and
More informationPart IV. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase. Fees - general remarks
IV.7.5. extend beyond the originally filed contents of the application in the original language, then the application in its original language can form the basis for such an amendment, which is consequently
More informationPatent Filing Strategies
Patent Filing Strategies There are several possible strategies when filing patent applications covering more than one country. Although the protection afforded by one or the other option may be comparable
More informationRequirements and Procedures to File a Request to CIPO for the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
Requirements and Procedures to File a to for the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) to for accelerated examination under the PPH An applicant should file a request for accelerated examination under the Patent
More informationDehns Guide to the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court
Dehns Guide to the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court Contents Introduction 1 Part I: The Unitary Patent 2 Part II: The Unified Patent Court 16 Part III: Implications for Brexit 32 Summary: How Dehns
More informationExamination Procedure. Japan Patent Office
Examination Procedure Japan Patent Office 0 Outline I. Overview II. First Action (FA) III. Second Action (SA) 1 Outline I. Overview II. First Action (FA) III. Second Action (SA) 2 I. Overview A. General
More informationPatent Prosecution Procedures under the Japanese Patent Law. Sera, Toyama, Matsukura & Kawaguchi
Patent Prosecution Procedures under the Japanese Patent Law Sera, Toyama, Matsukura & Kawaguchi General Procedures for Patent Prosecution in Japan Application 1) Direct Japanese application Filing in English
More informationSession Patent prosecution practice in Japan Tips for obtaining a patent in Japan - Part I -
Session Patent prosecution practice in Japan Tips for obtaining a patent in Japan - Part I - Shusa Endo Toshinori Tanno Hiroyasu Ninomiya Japan Patent Attorneys Association International Activities Center
More informationPart IV. IV.7. Republication of the international application in an EPO official language. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase
IV.7. Republication of the international application in an EPO official language Art.158(1) EPC The publication under Art.21 PCT of an international application designating the EPO takes the place of the
More informationBEST PRACTICES FOR EFFICIENT DOCKETING OF ROUTINE FORMALITIES: PART 1
BEST PRACTICES FOR EFFICIENT DOCKETING OF ROUTINE FORMALITIES: PART 1 Best Practices for Efficient Docketing of Routine Formalities Presenters: o Ann McCrackin, President, Black Hills IP, LLC o Kristi
More informationPatents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan
Murgitroyd and Sonoda & Kobayashi present Topic 1 Topic 2 Topic 3 Topic 4 Contact Patents: Utility Models Overview of requirements, procedures and tactical use in Europe and Japan Dr.sc. Robert Börner
More information2015 Noréns Patentbyrå AB
Self-Collision in patent applications How to Avoid Shooting Your Client in the Foot A European perspective with some thoughts on the global situation, including other jurisdictions Jan Modin FICPI Special
More informationUpdate on the CRISPR IP Saga and lessons to be learnt. Claire Irvine and Cath Coombes #healthcare #intellectualproperty
Update on the CRISPR IP Saga and lessons to be learnt Claire Irvine and Cath Coombes #healthcare #intellectualproperty Background In the last 6 years this field has generated: 600+ pending European patent
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE SINGAPORE PATENTS ACT AND RULES
AMENDMENTS TO THE SINGAPORE PATENTS ACT AND RULES Entry into Force: 14 February 2014 INTRODUCTION Amendments to the Singapore Patents Act and Rules are due to come into force on 14 February 2014. The amendments
More informationJETRO seminar. Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO:
JETRO seminar Recent Rule change and latest developments at the EPO: Alfred Spigarelli Director Patent procedures management DG1 Business services EPO Düsseldorf 4 November, 2010 Overview RAISING THE BAR
More informationTHE NEW EU PATENT: COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUR BUSINESS
THE NEW EU PATENT: COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUR BUSINESS GRAHAM MURNANE (GLASGOW OFFICE), DR MARINA MAURO (MILAN OFFICE), DR BEN GRAU (MUNICH OFFICE) EUROPEAN PATENT PACKAGE EUROPEAN PATENT PACKAGE
More informationGERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK
GERMAN UTILITY MODEL THE UNDERRATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT DATE: WEDNESDAY 12 NOVEMBER 2014 LOCATION: GLASGOW, UK INTRODUCTION In Germany the utility model is an unexamined, technical IP right having
More informationAnnex 2 DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES
DEFINITIONS FOR TERMS AND FOR STATISTICS ON PROCEDURES This annex contains firstly definitions of the main terms used in the report 51. After that there is an explanation of the patent procedures relating
More informationPERU ANSWERS IN THE NAME OF THE PERUVIAN GROUP. by Maria del Carmen Arana Courrejolles QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PUBLICATION OF PATENT APPLICATIONS
PERU ANSWERS IN THE NAME OF THE PERUVIAN GROUP by Maria del Carmen Arana Courrejolles QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PUBLICATION OF PATENT APPLICATIONS Questions Groups are invited to answer the following questions
More informationEUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE IP5 GLOBAL DOSSIER: SCOPE, CONTENT, AVAILABILITY AND PERFORMANCE
EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE IP5 GLOBAL DOSSIER: SCOPE, CONTENT, AVAILABILITY AND PERFORMANCE At the 2014 IP5 Heads and Industry meeting in Busan, Korea, the first IP5 Global Dossier implementations were launched
More informationDETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS
DETAILED TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface... v v About the Authors... xiii vii Summary Table of Contents... xv ix Chapter 1. European Patent Law as International Law... 1 I. European Patent Law Arises From Multiple
More informationFinal Diploma Syllabus
Final Diploma Syllabus Contents Guidance for Candidates The Syllabus Reading The Examination Effective from and including the 2018 examinations 1. Guidance for Candidates The aim of the Final Diploma examinations
More informationLALL & SETHI ADVOCATES
PATENT IN I. Filing of Application An application for patent can be made by completing and submitting a set of forms along with the prescribed fees with the Indian Patent Office (IPO). To file an application
More informationHighlights from the European Patent Office
Highlights from the IP5 Heads and IP5 Industry meeting New Orleans, 13 June 2018 Benoît Battistelli, President Main challenges for the EPO Consistent growth in demand for patents Competitive international
More informationQUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FD1 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 56%
QUESTION PAPER REFERENCE: FD1 PERCENTAGE MARK AWARDED: 56% Question 1 The invention relates to military use and hence needs security clearance before any foreign filing. Alternatively, first filing can
More informationSpeed of processing at the EPO. Timely delivery of quality products
Speed of processing at the EPO Timely delivery of quality products John Beatty EPO September 18 th, 2017 Agenda Early certainty: 6 / 12 / 15 Accelerating & shortening the procedure: Your choices! Quality
More informationBIO-EUROPE Anticipated changes to European Patent Law. Ingwer Koch Director Patent Law European Patent Office. 12 November 2007, Hamburg
BIO-EUROPE 2007 Anticipated changes to European Patent Law Ingwer Koch Director Patent Law European Patent Office 12 November 2007, Hamburg EPC 2000 Revision Conference: 20 29 November 2000 EPC 2000 enters
More informationHastings Science & Technology Law Journal
Alicia Pitts and Joshua Kim, Ph.D.: The Patent Prosecution Highway Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal The Patent Prosecution Highway: Is Life in the Fast Lane Worth the Cost? Abstract ALICIA PITTS
More informationIn accordance with Article 12 of the Unitary Patent Regulation, the renewal fees have to be inter alia:
European Patent Organisation: The first concept for assessing the amounts of renewal fees for the unitary patent Reported by Dr. Rudolf Teschemacher 1 After entry into force of the Agreement on a Unified
More informationCourse of patent infringement proceedings before the Unified Patent Court
proceedings before the Unified Patent Court AIPPI Forum 7 September 2013, Helsinki by Dr. Klaus Grabinski Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Germany I. Written Procedure I. Statement of claim
More informationPatent Fees and Pricing: Structures and Policies
Patent Fees and Pricing: Structures and Policies The Output of R&D activities: Harnessing the Power of Patent Data JRC-IPTS 4 th Workshop Nikolaus Thumm, EPO Chief Economist Sevilla 24 May, 2012 Background
More informationTHE PATENTS ACT, 1978 PATENT EXAMINATION REGULATIONS
THE PATENTS ACT, 1978 PATENT EXAMINATION REGULATIONS The Patent Examination Board, established in terms of section 21 of the Patents Act, 1978 (Act No. 57 of 1978), has, in terms of section 21(3)(a) of
More information13345/14 BB/ab 1 DG G3
Council of the European Union Brussels, 19 September 2014 (OR. en) 13345/14 PI 108 MI 672 IND 254 INFORMATION NOTE From: To: Subject: Presidency Council Competitiveness Implementation of the Patent package
More informationSession 1 Patent prosecution practice in Japan Tips for obtaining a patent in Japan
Session 1 Patent prosecution practice in Japan Tips for obtaining a patent in Japan Japan Patent Attorneys Association International Activities Center 1 Scenario Characters US Patent attorney :Seattle:
More informationPatent and License Overview. Kirsten Leute, Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University
Patent and License Overview Kirsten Leute, Senior Associate Office of Technology Licensing, Stanford University kirsten.leute@stanford.edu Patent Overview History Patentable subject matter Statutory
More informationTHE PATENTS EXAMINATION REGULATIONS, as published in GenN 25 in GG of 17 January 2003
THE PATENTS EXAMINATION REGULATIONS, 2003 as published in GenN 25 in GG 24290 of 17 January 2003 The Patent Examination Board, established in terms of section 21 of the Patents Act, 1978 (Act 57 of 1978),
More informationPhilippines. Information on the filing of Patents, Designs and. Trademarks in Philippines COMANAS CORP. IP Management Service Group
Philippines Information on the filing of Patents, Designs and Trademarks in Philippines COMANAS CORP IP Management Service Group CONTENTS 1. Patent 2. PCT National Phase Entry 3. Trademark 4. Design [Patent]
More informationIP Part IV: Patent prosecution
IP Part IV: Patent prosecution Tech Transfer course 2017 22 August 2017 Griet Den Herder, PhD, IP Manager Patent prosecution Interaction between applicants and a patent office regarding a patent application
More informationpct2ep.com the reliable and efficient way to progress your PCT patent application in Europe Pocket Guide to European Patents
pct2ep.com the reliable and efficient way to progress your PCT patent application in Europe Pocket Guide to European Patents How it works 1. Get a quote Enter the number of your PCT application and a few
More informationEffect of Brexit on IP protection
Effect of Brexit on IP protection Contents Introduction 1 Patents 2 UK Patents 6 International Patent Applications 7 Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court 8 Supplementary Protection Certificates 10 Plant
More informationDevelopments towards a unitary European patent system
Developments towards a unitary European patent system 3rd workshop The Output of R&D Activities: Harnessing the Power of Patents Data Nikolaus Thumm Chief Economist European Patent Office Seville, 13 June
More informationEuropean patent prosecution
Houston Paris Austin Tokyo Hangzhou Alexandria European patent prosecution Tips to reduce costs while maintaining quality March 2, 2018 Francesca Giovannini European patent attorney giovannini@oshaliang.eu
More informationAUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges
AUSTRALIA - Standard Patents - Schedule of Charges Effective 1 January 2018 Applications 1 Filing non-convention Standard application (filed electronically) 370.00 630.00 1000.00 2 Filing PCT AU National
More information9107/15 TB/at 1 DG G 3 B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 21 May 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional Files: 2011/0093 (COD) 2011/0094 (CNS) 9107/15 COMPET 244 PI 35 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Council
More informationCAPITAL MARKET AUTHORITY THE RESOLUTION OF SECURITIES DISPUTES PROCEEDINGS REGULATIONS
CAPITAL MARKET AUTHORITY THE RESOLUTION OF SECURITIES DISPUTES PROCEEDINGS REGULATIONS English Translation of the Official Arabic Text Issued by the Board of Capital Market Authority Pursuant to its Resolution
More informationPART I IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO PART I OF THE CONVENTION
EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the grant of European Patents as last amended on 15 October 2014 enter into force on 1 April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I IMPLEMENTING
More informationEuropean Patent Law. Gwilym Roberts Daniel Brook
European Patent Law Gwilym Roberts Daniel Brook Overview 4-minute reminder of the system Cost/benefit of litigating with UPC Projected cost of patenting with UP Forum shopping? Troll heaven? Case studies
More informationMEXICAN INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 MEXICAN INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY (INSTITUTO MEXICANO DE LA PROPIEDAD INDUSTRIAL) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY
More informationC Receiving Offices C IB
PCT Applicant s Guide International Phase Annex C Page 1 Competent receiving for nationals and residents of: 1 All PCT Contracting States 2 Language in which international applications may be filed: Any
More informationImplementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents
Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of 5 October 1973 as adopted by decision of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation of 7 December 2006
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ON THE DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR RULES ON THE EUROPEAN PATENT LITIGATION CERTIFICATE AND OTHER APPROPRIATE QUALIFICATIONS
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ON THE DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR RULES ON THE EUROPEAN PATENT LITIGATION CERTIFICATE AND OTHER APPROPRIATE QUALIFICATIONS According to Article 48(2) of the Agreement on a Unified Patent
More informationINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGENCY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGENCY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE SUMMARY
More informationPartial Priorities and Transfer of Priority Rights. Dr. Joachim Renken
Partial Priorities and Transfer of Priority Rights Dr. Joachim Renken AN EXAMPLE... 15 C Prio 20 C Granted Claim 10 C 25 C In the priority year, a document is published that dicloses 17 C. Is this document
More informationREGISTRAR GENERAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT (SUDAN)
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 REGISTRAR GENERAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT (SUDAN) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE SUMMARY
More informationJames D. Hallenbeck (Officer, Minneapolis Office)
Andre L. Marais (Managing Shareholder, Silicon Valley Office) 408 278 4042 amarais@slwip.com James D. Hallenbeck (Officer, Minneapolis Office) 612 373 6938 jhallenbeck@slwip.com Patent Prosecution Highway
More informationUnitary Patent Procedure before the EPO
Unitary Patent Procedure before the EPO Platform Formalities Officers EPO The Hague H.-C. Haugg Director Legal and Unitary Patent Division D.5.2.3 20 April 2017 Part I General Information What is the legal
More informationIP Institute for Paralegals. Table of Contents I. CHRONIC LOW-GRADE ANXIETY: THE STRESS OF THE BILLABLE HOUR GOAL
IP Institute for Paralegals Table of Contents GENERAL SESSION I. CHRONIC LOW-GRADE ANXIETY: THE STRESS OF THE BILLABLE HOUR GOAL Edward R. Ergenzinger, PhD Raleigh CHRONIC LOW-GRADE ANXIETY: THE STRESS
More informationCA/102/17 Orig.: en Munich, Amendments of the Rules relating to Fees. President of the European Patent Office
CA/102/17 Orig.: en Munich, 6.10.2017 SUBJECT: SUBMITTED BY: ADDRESSEES: Amendments of the Rules relating to Fees President of the European Patent Office 1. Budget and Finance Committee (for opinion) 2.
More information