IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
|
|
- Anthony Boone
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 LOWELL JOSEPH KUVIN, -vs- Petitioner, CITY OF CORAL GABLES, Respondent. / IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO. SC BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON JURISDICTION On Appeal from the Third District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida LEOPOLD~KUVIN, P.A PGA Blvd., Ste. 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL and LAW OFFICE OF LOWELL J. KUVIN 17 East Flagler St., Ste. 223 Miami, FL and BURLINGTON & ROCKENBACH, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL (561) (561) (fax) Attorneys for Petitioner aah@flappellatelaw.com
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF AUTHORITIES iii STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS 1-4 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 4-5 ARGUMENT 5-10 THE THIRD DISTRICT S DECISION EXPRESSLY AND DIRECTLY CONFLICTS WITH A DECISION FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL. CONCLUSION 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 11 CERTIFICATE OF TYPE SIZE & STYLE 12 ii
3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES PAGE CASES Aravena v. Miami-Dade County, 928 So.2d 1163, (Fla. 2006) 7 City of Coral Gables v. Wood, 305 So.2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974) 8, 9 City of Nichols Hills v. Richardson, 939 P.2d 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997) 3, 7 Henley v. City of Cape Coral, 292 So.2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) 5, 6 Kuvin v. City of Coral Gables, 2007 WL (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 22, 2007) 2 Kuvin v. City of Coral Gables, 45 So.3d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 11 Proctor v. City of Coral Springs, 396 So.2d 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 OTHER AUTHORITIES Art. V., (b)(3), Fla. Const. 1 iii
4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS This case comes to this Court following the first appellate decision in this State, in a 6-2 en banc decision by the Third District Court of Appeal, and apparently the first reported decision in this country, upholding a local ordinance prohibiting residents (and visitors) from parking their personal-use trucks in (a) their driveway; (b) in front of their residences, or (c) in front of any public places, from 7:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m. This Ordinance encompassed Petitioner Lowell Kuvin s personal-use pick-up truck, but also includes, inter alia, SUV s and minivans. Petitioner argues that this Court has discretionary jurisdiction to review the decision, as it expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of another District Court of Appeal on the same question of law. See Art. V., (b)(3), Fla. Const. Section 8-11 of the City of Coral Gables' Zoning Code provides, in part: (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to park any vehicle displaying advertising signs or any truck, trailer, commercial vehicle, or recreational vehicle, in or upon any property, public or private, in any area of the city which is zoned residential. Section 8-12 of the Coral Gables Zoning Code provides: Except as provided for herein no trucks, trailers, commercial vehicles, or recreational vehicles, shall be parked upon the streets or other public places of the City between the hours of 7:00 p.m. on one day and 7:00 a.m. of the next day. This prohibition is in addition to the total prohibition covering residential areas dealt with in Section In turn, truck is defined by the City as (emphasis added): any motor vehicle designed, used or maintained for transporting or 1
5 delivering property or material used in trade or commerce in general. Trucks shall include any motor vehicle having space designed for and capable of carrying property, cargo, or bulk material and which space is not occupied by passenger seating. Coral Gables, Fla., Zoning Code art. 8 (2010). Kuvin lived in the City of Coral Gables in a residence that did not have a garage (A1-2). Kuvin owned and drove a Ford F-150 pickup truck, for personaluse only (A2; 17; 25). Thus, to comply with the Ordinance, Kuvin was required to either: (a) move to another jurisdiction; (b) move to a residence with an enclosed garage; or (c) relinquish ownership of his personal-use pick-up truck. The City cited Kuvin for parking his vehicle outside his residence (A2; 6-7). The City found Kuvin guilty and fined him, plus fees and court costs (A2). Kuvin then filed a complaint in circuit court, and sought a declaration that the above ordinances were unconstitutional (A2). Kuvin moved for summary judgment, asserting, inter alia, the ordinances violated his right of freedom of association, were unconstitutionally vague, arbitrary, capricious, and selectively enforced as applied to pickup trucks (A3). The City filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the City s Motion, and entered a final judgment to the City (A3). A 2-1 decision by the Third District struck down the City s Ordinances. See Kuvin v. City of Coral Gables, 2007 WL (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 22, 2007). The City sought rehearing en banc, and after three years of debate, a 6-2 en 2
6 banc decision reversed the decision, and upheld the Ordinances (A1-50). Applying a rational-basis test, the majority reasoned the ordinances were shown to bear a rational relationship to a legitimate public purpose (A10-11). The majority accepted the City s argument that the ordinance seeks to preserve (and furthered) the integrity of the residential areas and the unique aesthetic qualities of the City (A14). The majority opinion, however, does not cite to any record evidence explaining or showing how these ordinances furthered this goal. The majority disagreed with the dissenting opinion s contention that the instant case expressly and directly conflicts with Proctor v. City of Coral Springs, 396 So.2d 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (A20-25). The majority reasoned that because a municipality can enact an ordinance banning commercial trucks from being parked overnight in residential driveways, it must be constitutional for the City to restrict Kuvin s pick-up truck that was commercial-looking (A17-18). The majority also held that an Oklahoma decision--that expressed agreement with Proctor-- conflicts with established Florida law (A27, citing City of Nichols Hills v. Richardson, 939 P.2d 17 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997)). The dissent, besides believing there was conflict with Proctor, reasoned that Richardson is a red cow case (A41-42; 47-48). The dissent noted the City of Coral Gables definition of truck was so broad that it encompasses every single SUV, station wagon, and vehicle with a cargo space, no matter how small.... 3
7 Even a car or minivan that has a folding rear seat row becomes a truck under such a broad and arcane definition (A39-40). The dissent also noted that the City of Coral Gables conceded it did not enforce the ordinances against SUV or station wagon owners, and this selective enforcement highlights the not-so-subtle elitism underlying the ordinances and their enforcement (A39, n.2). On the same day of the 6-2 en banc decision, the original panel released its own 2-1 decision, denying rehearing, but certifying a question of great public importance to this Court, see Kuvin v. City of Coral Gables, 45 So.3d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). 1 Kuvin moved for rehearing requesting the Third District certify a question of great public importance to this Court. The City opposed this--though when the City moved for rehearing in 2007, it contended there was a question of great public importance. Kuvin filed a Motion for Leave to File a Reply. The majority denied the motion without comment, with the dissenting judges stating the motion was moot, because a question had already been certified to this Court. Kuvin filed a timely notice to invoke, and this jurisdictional brief follows. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The majority decision expressly and directly conflicts with Proctor. Kuvin can park his pick-up truck at a residence in Coral Springs, but not in Coral Gables. 1 It appears that this certification did not confer jurisdiction on this Court, because the en banc decision was issued the same day. If this Court views this differently, obviously Kuvin will proceed to the briefing stage in this Court. 4
8 The Third District s majority decision is unprecedented in scope and in its implications. The dissent accurately notes that the majority opinion embraces George Orwell s dystopia, where personal rights are subverted by the government (A48). Similarly, the dissent aptly recognizes that the City of Coral Gables enactment (and selective enforcement) of the ordinance is symbolic of elitism. This Court should intervene and invalidate these Ordinances. ARGUMENT THE THIRD DISTRICT S DECISION EXPRESSLY AND DIRECTLY CONFLICTS WITH DECISIONS FROM OTHER DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL. The instant case and Proctor cannot be reconciled with one another, notwithstanding the majority s strained reasoning. Additionally, the instant case conflicts with Henley v. City of Cape Coral, 292 So.2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). In Henley, a municipal ordinance prohibited trucks from being parked overnight in all residentially-zoned areas, regardless of whether the truck was being used for commercial or personal uses. The resident challenging only brought a facial challenge to the constitutionality of this ordinance. The Second District found the ordinance to be on the whole reasonable. Id. at 411. Here, the majority believed that Henley is indistinguishable (A22). But the Second District recognized that, if confronted with an as-applied challenge, id.: We can readily imagine circumstances to which this ordinance may be unconstitutionally applied as for example to a station wagon which 5
9 gives no outward appearance of being used in business. Kuvin s personal-use pick-up truck fits within this box. This Court can accept jurisdiction based on conflict between Henley and this case. 2 Jurisdictional conflict is also clearly reflected in Proctor. An ordinance prohibited commercial vehicles from parking between 9:00 p.m.-6:00 a.m. on private property or just in front of residences (unless in a covered garage or carport). While visiting friends, Mr. Proctor parked his 3/4 ton pickup truck in his friends front yard at night, and was issued a citation. The vehicle was not used for commercial purposes and did not have commercial markings. In striking down this ordinance, the Fourth District noted that the Henley Court anticipated the exact situation and ordinance that targeted Mr. Proctor. See Proctor, 396 So.2d at 772. As the Proctor court concluded, id.: [T]he subject ordinance is unreasonable and unconstitutional as applied to pickup trucks. It restricts drivers of pickup trucks from visiting with friends or family by making it illegal to be parked in a residential driveway, or on the hosts' lawn, or in the street in front of the home after 9:00 p. m. even though the vehicle in question is not truly a commercial vehicle; i.e., without commercial markings of any nature and not used for commercial purposes. The Kuvin majority focused on the fact that Coral Springs bans commercial 2 The majority, without explanation, suggested that Kuvin did not preserve an as applied challenge. This Court is under no obligation to blindly accept that incorrect conclusion. Notably the dissenting opinion in the 2007 panel decision authored by the same judge as the en banc opinion in 2010 did not suggest Kuvin s as-applied challenge was unpreserved. 6
10 vehicles, while Coral Gables bans commercial and residential vehicles (A23-24). Yet, the Fourth District declared the ordinance unconstitutional as applied to Mr. Proctor s personal truck precisely because the ordinance prevented him from parking in residential areas. The Court did not address whether the vehicle fell within or outside the definition of commercial vehicle. See also (A46-47), illustrating the conflict. Jurisdictional conflict exists. See Aravena v. Miami-Dade County, 928 So.2d 1163, (Fla. 2006) (one test for conflict jurisdiction is whether the holdings of two cases are irreconcilable ). The City of Coral Springs aesthetic considerations were not being furthered with this restriction. The majority in this case believes that Richardson conflicts with established Florida law (A27). In that case, the appellate court invalidated an ordinance that prevented a resident from parking his pick-up truck at his residence, without any consideration to the size, weight or use of the vehicle (939 P.2d at 19): Here, as in Proctor v. City of Coral Springs, 396 So.2d 771, 774 (Fla.App.1981), nothing in the record suggests that such an allinclusive ordinance is necessary to meet the city's legitimate responsibility of protecting the public health, safety or general welfare of its citizens. Ordinance No. 700, as in City of Coral Springs, does not speak in terms of weight, width or other relevant concerns, but merely contains a blanket prohibition of all pickup trucks. Id. The Richardson Court added that the targeting of pick-up trucks belies the City's claim that it has enacted the ordinance to protect the aesthetic integrity of the community, and we find this ordinance, as written, is unreasonable and overbroad 7
11 as applied to all pickups and as applied to Appellee. Id. The majority s view here that Richardson (aligning itself with Proctor) conflicts with Florida law is an obvious sign that the instant case cannot be fairly reconciled with Proctor. Municipalities certainly can enact ordinances based on reasonable aesthetic considerations. For example, in City of Coral Gables v. Wood, 305 So.2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), the Third District upheld an ordinance prohibiting campers, trailers, and other vehicles designed and adaptable for human habitation in public and private property. As the dissent in this case noted, however, (A43-44): In Wood, we stated: [T]he Coral Gables [Camper] ordinance is aimed at preventing unsightly appearances and diminution of property values which obtain when camper-type vehicles are parked or stored out of doors in a residential area of the community. Id. at 263. We went on to hold that the owner of the Apache camper was only restricted from indulging in a use that would impinge upon the rights of other property owners. Id. at 264. For these reasons, Wood correctly recognized that municipalities may properly regulate campers under their police powers aimed at aesthetics. The same simply cannot be said with respect to an F-150. It would be ludicrous to suggest that the parking of an F-150 in a driveway or public area of a municipality is indulging in a use that impinges upon the property rights of others. Personal-use vehicles include cars, station wagons, minivans, sportutility vehicles ( SUVs ), and light trucks. Record evidence shows that the category of light trucks may encompass pickup trucks, minivans, and SUVs, many of which are smaller in length than some full-size cars. In sharp contrast to cases involving commercial and recreational vehicles, no case has ever upheld an as-applied constitutional challenge to a regulation banning a personal-use 8
12 vehicle.... In Wood, the Third District acknowledged that an ordinance that is reasonable in some circumstances and unreasonable in others is not void in toto, but would be unenforceable when in the particular circumstances its operation would be unreasonable or oppressive. Wood, 305 So.2d at 263. This case is such an example, particularly where Kuvin does not have an enclosed garage and could not comply with the ordinance. Concluding that this ordinance does not limit Kuvin s ownership because he can reside outside the City, or live at a place within the City containing a garage, misses the point on the unreasonableness of this Ordinance. This Court Should Accept Jurisdiction of this Significant and Important Case Last week, this Court noted the significant public and media interest in this matter, and ordered the parties to file an original and eight copies of all pleadings. While this Court should not take any case because of outside interest, it is the scope of the majority s unprecedented decision that has generated so much outside attention. See, e.g., and The dissent suggested that the majority s decision embraces George Orwell s dystopia and is a reflection of elitism, showing distaste towards pick-up truck owners (A48-49) (citing to the concurring opinion written by then-judge and 9
13 now District-Court Judge Hurley, in Proctor, who stated that, [t]o ban such vehicles in the name of aesthetics smacks of the rankest form of elitism ). That viewpoint seems well-placed, since the City of Coral Gables has yet to ticket a mini-van or SUV that is encompassed within its ordinances. Of course, in another part of this diverse State, or other municipalities in this country, driving a BMW or Mercedes may be perceived as elitist--and banning those vehicles could be argued as an aesthetically-minded consideration. In Leon County, a blue vehicle with a Florida Gators sticker could be seen as aesthetically unpleasing. This Court should accept jurisdiction of this case to address the scope and reach of municipal power. Beyond vehicles used by residents and visitors alike, the Third District s decision essentially imposes no limits on the reach of a municipality enacting any ordinance for such things as aesthetic considerations or to improve property values or for the well-being of a community s traditions. This Court should accept jurisdiction of this case to address these limits, and bring clarity to all municipalities and citizens across this State. CONCLUSION It is respectfully requested that this Court accept jurisdiction to resolve the conflict between the Third District, and Second and Fourth Districts, as to whether a municipality can control which personal-use vehicles can be parked at or outside one s residence, or in parking spaces within the community. 10
14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY a true copy of the foregoing was furnished to ROBERT S. GLAZIER, 540 Brickell Key Dr., Ste. C-1, Miami, FL 33131, JENNIFER COHEN GLASSER, ESQ., One SE 3 rd Ave., 28 th Fl., Miami, FL 33131, and ELIZABETH M. HERNANDEZ, ESQ., 405 Biltmore Way, Coral Gables, FL 33134, by mail, on December 22, Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. LEOPOLD~KUVIN, P.A PGA Blvd., Ste. 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL and Lowell J. Kuvin, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF LOWELL J. KUVIN 17 East Flagler St., Ste. 223 Miami, FL and BURLINGTON & ROCKENBACH, P.A. Courthouse Commons/Suite West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL (561) (561) (fax) Attorneys for Petitioner aah@flappellatelaw.com By: ANDREW A. HARRIS Florida Bar No
15 CERTIFICATE OF TYPE SIZE & STYLE Petitioner hereby certifies that the type size and style of the Brief of Petitioner on Jurisdiction is Times New Roman 14pt. ANDREW A. HARRIS Florida Bar No
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007 Opinion filed August 22, 2007. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D05-2845 Lower Tribunal No. 03-8911
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 01-2015 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SEMINOLE, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 22, OFFENSES, CREATING SECTION 22-1, INTENT AND PURPOSE; CREATING SECTION 22-2, PROHIBITED ACTIVITY, ACT, OR PRACTICE;
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MICHAEL M. ROMAN, STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-905 MICHAEL M. ROMAN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1605 ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Seeking Discretionary Review from the District Court of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-1056 TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL McCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D04-4825 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationORDINANCE # Page 1 of 6
ORDINANCE #12-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE OSCEOLA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULATING THE PARKING OF VEHICLES WITHIN THE INDIAN RIDGE SUBDIVISION; PROVIDING A PURPOSE AND INTENT; PROVIDING A PETITION
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. SC
Electronically Filed 08/26/2013 04:20:02 PM ET RECEIVED, 8/26/2013 16:23:40, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, v. SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Electronically Filed 05/20/2013 12:08:02 PM ET RECEIVED, 5/20/2013 12:08:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC13-782 L.T. Case Nos. 4DII-3838; 502008CA034262XXXXMB
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, vs. CASE NO. SC12 - DCA No. 4D10-3345 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF On Review from the District Court of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 15140956 Electronically Filed 06/23/2014 05:57:34 PM RECEIVED, 6/23/2014 17:58:42, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RICHARD MASONE, v. Petitioner, CASE NO.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC03-1896 LOWER COURT NO.: 4D00-2883 JACK LIEBMAN Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D JAMAR ANTWAN HILL, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-929 DCA CASE NO. 3D06-468 JAMAR ANTWAN HILL, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON APPEAL On Appeal from the Fourth District Court of Appeal
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA AQUA-TERRA, INC. OF MARTIN COUNTY, Petitioner, -vs- CASE NO. SC08-1271 LONG BEACH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, GENE BEBBLE, GARY BALDWIN, MICHAEL W. CONNORS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-901 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 2 5 AN 0 23 SHANDALYN SANDERS, as Personal Representative of the Estates of CLARA --- SANDERS, deceased, and CHAUNCEY SANDERS, deceased, Petitioner,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA S. CT. CASE NO. SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILFRID METELLUS, Petitioner, S. CT. CASE NO. SC02-1494 vs. DCA CASE NO. 5D01-1044 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent. RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO.: SC11-734 THIRD DCA CASE NO. s: 3D09-3102 & 3D10-848 CIRCUIT CASE NO.: 09-25070-CA-01 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
Electronically Filed 05/17/2013 11:04:14 AM ET RECEIVED, 5/17/2013 11:08:35, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARK ERIC OSTERBACK, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC13-812 STATE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 3D
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SPENCER MCGUINNESS, Petitioner, v. PROSPECT ARAGON, LLC, Respondent. RESPONDENT S REPLY BRIEF LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN K. GOODKIND Brian K. Goodkind Fla. Bar No.: 347795 4121 La Playa
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4 th DCA 4D ) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1298 (4 th DCA 4D05-1624) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION LAURA FISHER ZIBURA
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/21/2016 10:21 AM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SOLO AERO CORP., a Florida corporation, vs. Petitioner, AMERICA-CV
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC Lower Case No.: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, NATHANIEL COLBERT, III, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC11-147 Lower Case No.: 4D09-805 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. NATHANIEL COLBERT, III, Respondent. **************************************************************
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC *********************************************************************
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WINYATTA BUTLER, Petitioner v. Case No. SC01-2465 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent / ********************************************************************* ON REVIEW FROM THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. L.T. NO.: 3D ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE RIGGINS, Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC06-205 vs. L.T. NO.: 3D04-2620 AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Respondent. / ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM
More informationRESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA TRUST CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Petitioner/Appellant, CASE NO.: SC11-353 v. DCA NO.: 3D09-2568 STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Respondent/Appellee.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CASE NO. 4D10-3345 RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC TH DCA CASE NO. 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC-11-1477 4 TH DCA CASE NO. 4D08-4729 BRIAN HOOKS, ) Petitioner, ) vs. ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) Respondent. ) ) PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. DCA: 3D AUNDRA JOHNSON, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-966 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. DCA: 3D07-2145 AUNDRA JOHNSON, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 07-1021 CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC07-1672 PETER SPOREA, ET AL., Petitioners, vs. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Appeal from the
More informationFLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Case No.: SC nd DCA Case No.: 2D Lower Tribunal Case No.: G Hillsborough County, Florida Circuit Court
FLORIDA SUPREME COURT MICHAEL F. SHEEHAN, M.D., Petitioner, vs. SCOTT SWEET, Respondent. / Case No.: SC06-1373 2nd DCA Case No.: 2D04-2744 Lower Tribunal Case No.: 03-5936G Hillsborough County, Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO.4D LT. NO CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC10-2361 DCA CASE NO.4D08-1375 LT. NO. 06-4008CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC. TOWN OF PONCE INLET, Petitioner, PACETTA, LLC, ET AL. Respondents. LOWER CASE NUMBER: 5D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC TOWN OF PONCE INLET, Petitioner, v. PACETTA, LLC, ET AL. Respondents. LOWER CASE NUMBER: 5D10-1123 On Discretionary Review From The District Court Of Appeal,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA AMERICA ONLINE, INC., : : Petitioner : : v. : Case No. : ROBERT PASIEKA, on behalf : L.T. Case No: 1D03-2290 of himself and all others : similarly situated,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CHARLIE CRIST, Attorney ) General of the State of ) Florida, ) ) Petitioner, ) Case No. SC vs. ) ) Fourth District REP. CORRINE BROWN, et al., ) Case Nos. 4D02-2353 & 4D02-2401
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LEONARDO DIAZ, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1031 LEONARDO DIAZ, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationRESPONSE BY T3 FAMILY INVESTMENTS, LLC TO PETITIONERS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA APPELLATE DIVISION CASE NO.: 502015CA006598AY NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE OF PALM BEACH, INC., a Florida non-profit
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1141 DCA CASE NO. 3D03-2169 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Petitioner, vs. STEPHEN S. DOBSON, III, P.A., Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D05-4326 Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC09-312 JACK WATKINS HUNTER, BERNIE SIMPKINS, ET AL, Petitioners, v. SCOTT ELLIS AS BREVARD COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, Respondent. / RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D CITY OF MIAMI. Petitioner. vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D01-3050 CITY OF MIAMI Petitioner vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL. Respondents RESPONDENTS ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D02-100 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 00-20940 CA 01 MICHAEL E. HUMER Petitioner/Appellant, Vs. MIAMI-DADE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 10750991 Electronically Filed 02/27/2014 10:29:07 AM RECEIVED, 2/27/2014 10:33:37, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LISA M. DETOURNAY, ) BRENDA RANDOL, and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA BERNARD DOUGHERTY Petitioner, v. Case No. SC12-2365 5th DCA No. 5D10-2755 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOY CHATLOS D ARATA, etc., Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC04-2097 DCA Cases Nos. 5D02-3330 & 5D02-3590 (Consolidated Appeals) THE CHATLOS FOUNDATION, INC., et al. Respondents.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DAVID M. POLEN, v. ROSA POLEN, Petitioner, Respondent. / CASE NO. SC06-1226 4 TH DCA CASE NO. 4D06-1002 AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Respectfully submitted, JOEL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 22133460 E-Filed 01/03/2015 05:17:30 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. Petitioner, EDDIE RUTLEDGE, Case No: SC14-2487 L.T. Case No. 4D10-5022 RECEIVED, 1/3/2015 05:18:49
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. CASE NO.: 5D STATE S RESPONSE TO THE HABEAS PETITION
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT CASEY MARIE ANTHONY, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: 5D08-2512 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent, / STATE S RESPONSE TO THE HABEAS PETITION Pursuant
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA APPELLANT S INITIAL BRIEF
AX THE TAX, INC. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO. SC 04-2253 vs. Appellant, THE CITY OF MAITLAND, FLORIDA, Appellee. / APPELLANT S INITIAL BRIEF Frederic B. O'Neal, Esq. Florida Bar No. 252611
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-2135 LUIS R. COLON, Petitioner, -vs- MERCEDES HOMES, INC., ETC. Respondent. / BRIEF OF PETITIONER, COLON, ON JURISDICTION Michael Manglardi,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case Number: SC RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case Number: SC09-1722 Westgate Tabernacle Petitioners, vs. 4 th DCA CASE No. 4D07-3792 PALM BEACH COUNTY, Respondent. RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF Robert
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, L.T. Case No. 4D ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA OLIVER BOZEMAN, CASE NO. SC06-1463 Petitioner, L.T. Case No. 4D04-2232 vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ****************************************************************
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. L.T. NO.: 3D ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE RIGGINS Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC06-205 vs. L.T. NO.: 3D04-2620 AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Respondent. / ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-1148 INTERNATIONAL UNION OF POLICE ASSOCIATIONS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. On Petition for Discretionary Review of the Opinion of the First
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D
Electronically Filed 10/09/2013 11:26:52 AM ET RECEIVED, 10/9/2013 11:28:34, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC2013-1834 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D11-3004
More informationv. Case No SUMMARY FINAL ORDER Comes now, the undersigned arbitrator, and enters this final order as follows:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Poinciana Place Condominium Association,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-2290 DCA CASE NO. 3D02-2862 VINCENT MARGIOTTI Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- EUGENE MICHAEL BYARS, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC01-1930 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- EUGENE MICHAEL BYARS, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC R.H., G.W., T.L., juveniles, Petitioners, vs.
Electronically Filed 03/14/2013 02:35:25 PM ET RECEIVED, 3/14/2013 14:38:34, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC13-326 R.H., G.W.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA NEW TESTAMENT BAPTIST CHURCH, INCORPORATED OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. CASE NO. SC08- STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ROBERT RANSONE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 09-2084 ROBERT RANSONE, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON THE MERITS Bill McCollum Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780 ****************************************************************** ON APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 15572814 Electronically Filed 07/03/2014 05:32:02 PM RECEIVED, 7/3/2014 17:33:34, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court MOHAMMAD ANWAR FARID AL-SALEH, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC FRANK HERNANDEZ. Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC02-2752 FRANK HERNANDEZ Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.:
MARIA CEVALLOS, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 4th District Case No: 4D08-3042 v. Petitioner, KERI ANN RIDEOUT and LINDA RIDEOUT, Respondents. / PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No: SC03-26 Lower Tribunal No: 2D DAVID C. McNEIL, RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Petitioner/Defendant. v. Case No: SC03-26 Lower Tribunal No: 2D01-4547 DAVID C. McNEIL, Respondent/Plaintiff. / RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA RESPONDENTS ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND RSKCO S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA VICKI LUCAS, vs. Petitioner, ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and RSKCO, CASE NO.: SC07-1736 L.T. Case No.: 1D06-5161 Respondents. / RESPONDENTS ENGLEWOOD
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA VIRGINIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: SC04-1603 vs. Petitioner, THOMAS ALBERT DUNFORD and RACHEL PEERY, Respondents. Application For Discretionary Review
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 3D v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANGELO KYRELIS, Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC12-642 DCA Case No. 3D11-1730 v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992 ONEWEST BANK, FSB (SUBSTITUTED PARTY FOR FORMER PLAINTIFF INDYMAC
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, DCA CASE No. 5D v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SAUL CARMONA, Petitioner, DCA CASE No. 5D03-229 v. CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: CA 01 (02)
Filing # 9049257 Electronically Filed 01/10/2014 04:45:38 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA HERMINE RICKETTS and LAURENCE TOM CARROLL, a married
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FOURTH DISTRICT STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, authorized to do business in Florida, Appellant, v. CASE NO. SC04-351 GREGG A.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RAMESES, INC., d/b/a CLEO S and STEVEN G. MASON, P.A., v. Petitioners, Case No.: SC10-670 Lower Tribunal: 5D09-208 JERRY DEMINGS, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DERRICK GURLEY, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Case No. SC th DCA Case No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DERRICK GURLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Case No. SC05-1376 4 th DCA Case No. 4D04-2697 RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. L.T. No. 1D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT ANDERSON Petitioner, VS. Case No. SC07-306 L.T. No. 1D06-2486 FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On petition for discretionary
More informationDEFENDANT CITY OF HIALEAH S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Filing # 14713582 Electronically Filed 06/11/2014 06:32:24 PM SILVIO MEMBRENO and FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF VENDORS, INC., v. Plaintiffs, THE CITY OF HIALEAH, FLORIDA, Defendants. / IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC L.T. NO. 1D STATE OF FLORIDA,
Filing # 11092791 Electronically Filed 03/07/2014 02:35:35 PM RECEIVED, 3/7/2014 14:38:38, John A Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NOEL PLANK, Petitioner, v CASE NO SC14-414
More informationCITY OF MIAMI, PETITIONER, RESPONDENTS.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1449 CITY OF MIAMI, PETITIONER, VS. FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER OF DADE COUNTY, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. BRIEF ON JURISDICTION OF CITY OF MIAMI ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC th DCA CASE NO. 5D L.T. CASE NO. DR
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-1348 5 th DCA CASE NO. 5D05-3200 L.T. CASE NO. DR99-8641 IN RE: DENISE AYALA, Petitioner, vs. WILLIAM A. GONZALEZ, Respondent. / RESPONDENT=S AMENDED REPLY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC LCN: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIE FRANK DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC09-192 LCN: 4D08-4272 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationCase 1:16-cv FAM Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2016 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-20001-FAM Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2016 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 16-CV-20001-FAM WARREN REDLICH, pro se, vs. Plaintiff, THE CITY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. (4th DCA Case No. 4D ) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JESSIE HILL, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. (4th DCA Case No. 4D02-3362) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. JESSIE HILL, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST JR., Attorney
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF. On Review from the District Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAULA GORDON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES Respondent. Case No.: Lower Case No.: ID03-449 PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. DALE JOHNSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. SC ) (4DCA ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DALE JOHNSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. SC ) (4DCA 05-1585) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Respondent. ) ) PETITIONER=S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Review from the District
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC01-1402 PER CURIAM. WALTER J. GRIFFIN, Petitioner, vs. D.R. SISTUENCK, et al., Respondents. [May 2, 2002] Walter J. Griffin petitions this Court for writ of mandamus seeking
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D L.T. CASE NO.: L
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROB BRAYSHAW, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CASE NO.: SC11-507 FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D09-5894 L.T. CASE NO.: 2009-1337L AGENCY FOR WORKFORCE INNOVATION, Respondent. / RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 3D MATTHEW SANGUINE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-543 L.T. CASE NO. 3D04-1337 MATTHEW SANGUINE, Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW BRIEF OF RESPONDENT ON
More informationFINAL ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART AND REVERSING IN PART CITY OF WINTER PARK CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA JON CHRISTIAN PETERSON, JR., CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000008-A-O Appellant, v. CITY OF WINTER PARK, Appellee. / Appeal from
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JOSE VALDES and JUANA VALDES, his wife, Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-971 JOSE VALDES and JUANA VALDES, his wife, Petitioners, vs. GAB ROBINS NORTH AMERICA, INC., SOUTHERN UNDERWRITERS, INC., CAPITAL ASSURANCE SERVICES, INC.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PERRY TANKSLEY, Petitioner, vs. 214 MAIN STREET CORP. and 3B REALTY NORTH, INC., Sup. Ct. Case No: SC07-272 Second DCA Case No: 2D06-768 Respondents. *********************************/
More informationRESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1365 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D02-4510 RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF GARY A. BARCUS Appellant/Petitioner vs. GROVE AT GRAND PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT MICHNAL, S.CT. CASE NO.: SC03-1021 4 TH DCA CASE NO.: 4D01-3118 Petitioner, - vs- PALM COAST DEVELOPMENT, INC., Respondent. / BRIEF OF RESPONDENT ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-8. Petitioner, On Discretionary Review from the Third District Court of Appeal Case No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-8 MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY, vs. Petitioner, On Discretionary Review from the Third District Court of Appeal Case No. 3D02-3171 BARBARA SIBLEY, Respondent. /
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11-1737 Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D10-4687 Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Case No. 10-07095(25) WILLIAM TELLI, Petitioner, v. BROWARD COUNTY AND
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1248 WILLIE L. CLARK, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST, JR Attorney General
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC Lower T.C. No. 3D Florida Bar No
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-963 Lower T.C. No. 3D07-2079 Florida Bar No. 137172 MICHAEL L. WEATHERLY and CARLA WEATHERLY, vs. Petitioners, JOSEPH G. LOUIS and JEANNE DURELLAN, Respondents.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner/Appellant, CASE NO. vs. DCA CASE NO. 4D PETITIONER S BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA COREY STUDEMIRE, Petitioner/Appellant, CASE NO. vs. DCA CASE NO. 4D05-4019 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent/Appellee. / PETITIONER S BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION CAREY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC TYRA WILLIAMS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 12-655 TYRA WILLIAMS, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION PAMELA JO BONDI Attorney General Tallahassee,
More information