REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of CLALLAM County, Washington Cause No CHARLES DEAN BINGHAM
|
|
- Meredith Cain
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DATE FILED: 12/2/82 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior Court of CLALLAM County, Washington Cause No State v. CHARLES DEAN BINHAM INSTRUCTIONS: Please answer each question. If you do not have sufficient information to supply an answer, please so indicate after the specific question. If sufficient space is not allowed on the questionnaire form for answer to the question, use the back of the page, indicating the number of the question which you are answering, or attach additional sheets. If more than one defendant was convicted of aggravated first degree murder in this case, please make out a separate questionnaire for each such defendant. The statute specifies that this report shall, within thirty (30) days after the entry of the judgment and sentence, be submitted to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, to the defendant or his or her attorney, and to the prosecuting attorney. 0008
2 - 2 - (1) Information about the Defendant CHARLES DEAN (a) Name: BINHAM, Last, First Middle Date of Birth: 8/2/56 Sex: M Marital Status: Never Married F Married Separated Divorced Spouse Deceased Race or ethnic origin of defendant: 1/4 TO 1/2 PONCA INDIAN AND CAUCASIAN (Specify) (b) Number and ages of defendant's children: ONE CHILD - 6 MONTH OF AE AT PRESENT TIME (DOB 5/2/82) (c) Defendant's NATURAL Father living: UNKNOWN If deceased, date of death: Defendant's NATURAL Mother living: UNKNOWN If deceased, date of death: BOTH ADOPTIVE PARENTS ARE LIVIN. (d) Number of children born to defendant's parents: 3 (e) Defendant's education--check highest grade completed: College: Intelligence Level: Low IQ Score: 76 Medium Above Average High
3 - 3 - Further explanation or comment: HIS IQ SCORE PLACES HIM AT THE 5TH PERCENTILE (I.E. 95% OF THE POPULATION SCORES HIHER). DR. DIANE O LEARY, THE CLINICAL PSYCHOLOIST WHO PERFORMED THE IQ TEST (WESCHLER ADULT INTELLIENCE SCALE) STATED, THE PATTERN OF SCORES IS UNIFORMLY DEPRESSED AND WOULD INDICATE AN INDIVIDUAL OF MARINAL CONITIVE CAPACITY. THE IQ WHICH IS REPORTED HERE FALLS IN THE BORDERLINE RANE OF MENTAL RETARDATION. THIS CONDITION IS A ENERALIZED CONITIVE FEATURE, AND IS NOT PREDICTIVE OF SPECIFIC LEARNIN DEFICIT OR FOCAL BRIAN DAMAE. THERE WAS REFERENCE IN THE TESTIMONY TO A SCORE ACHIEVED BY THE DEFENDANT OF 93 ON AN IQ TEST ADMINISTERED WHILE HE WAS AN INMATE AT THE SOUTH DAKOTA STATE PENITENTIARY FROM SEPTEMBER OF 1979 TO JANUARY OF 1981, BUT NO DETAILED TESTIMONY OR EXPLANATION OF THAT IQ TEST.
4 - 4 - (f) Was a psychiatric evaluation performed: If yes, did the evaluation indicate that the defendant was: able to distinguish right from wrong? (i) able to perceive the nature and quality (ii) of his or her act? able to cooperate intelligently in his (iii) or her own defense? NOTE: DR. JOAN HAMPSON, M.D., THE PSYCHIATRIST WHO PERFORMED THE EVALUATION INDICATED THE DEFENDANT WAS UNABLE TO DISTINUISH RIHT FROM WRON AND UNABLE TO PERCEIVE THE NATURE AND QUALITY OF HIS ACTS AT THE TIME OF THE OFFENSE BECAUSE OF ALCOHOL INTOXICATION. THIS OPINION WAS BASED UPON THE HISTORY IVEN HER. (g) Please describe any character or behavior disorders found or other pertinent psychiatric or psychological information: DIANOSTIC IMPRESSION OF DR. O LEARY FROM D.S.M. III: ANTI- SOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER, ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, EPISODIC, V BORDERLINE INTELLECTUAL FUNCTIONIN. SEE COPY OF DR. O LEARY S REPORT OF MAY 6, 1982 TESTIN ATTACHED. (h) Please describe the work record of the defendant: DEFENDANT HAS BEEN EMPLOYED AS A TRUCK DRIVER, CONSTRUCTION LABORER, FARM LABORER, AND HANDYMAN. HIS EMPLOYMENT WAS SPORADIC. THE LONEST SINLE JOB HE HELD WAS FOR APPROXIMATELY SIX MONTHS. (i) If the defendant has a record of prior convictions, please list: Offense Date Sentence Imposed SEE EXCERPT FROM BILL OF PARTICULARS FILED IN THIS CAUSE BY THE PROSECUTIN ATTORNEY, WHICH LISTS THE ENTIRE RECORD OF THE DEFENDANT S PRIOR CONVICTIONS, ATTACHED HERETO. (j) Length of time defendant has resided in: Washington: 9/81 TO DATE County of conviction: 10/81 TO DATE
5 - 5 - (2) Information about the Trial (a) How did the defendant plead to the charge of aggravated first degree murder?: uilty Not uilty Not uilty by reason of insanity (b) Was the defendant represented by counsel?: (c) Please indicate if there was evidence introduced or instructions given as to any defense(s) to the crime of aggravated first degree murder: Evidence Instruction(s) Excusable Homicide Justifiable Homicide Insanity Duress Entrapment Alibi Intoxication Other specific defenses:
6 - 6 - (d) If the defendant was charged with other offenses which were tried in the same trial, list the other offenses below and indicate whether defendant was convicted: Convicted NONE (e) What aggravating circumstances, as set forth in Laws of 1981, ch , were alleged against the defendant and which of these circumstances were found to have been applicable?: Aggravating Circumstances Alleged Found Applicable RAPE IN THE FIRST OR SECOND DEREE (f) Please provide the names of each other defendant tried jointly with this defendant, the charges filed against each other defendant, and the disposition of each charge: Name: NONE Offenses Charged Disposition
7 - 7 - Name: Offenses Charged Disposition (3) Information Concerning the Special Sentencing Proceeding (a) Date of Conviction: 10/28/82 Date special sentencing proceeding commenced: 11/1/82 (b) Was the jury for the special sentencing proceeding composed of the same jurors as the jury that returned the verdict to the charge of aggravated first degree murder? If the answer to the above question is no, please explain: THREE ALTERNATE JURORS WERE SELECTED AND SAT THROUH THE UILT PHASE OF THE TRIAL. WHILE THE JURY DELIBERATED THE ALTERNATE JURORS WERE EXCUSED BUT WERE INSTRUCTED THEY WERE STILL POTENTIAL JURORS AND ADVISED NOT TO EXPOSE THEMSELVES TO ANYTHIN ABOUT THE CASE OUTSIDE THE COURTROOM. WHEN THE JURY RECONVENED THE ALTERNATE JURORS WERE ALSO BROUHT BACK. HOWEVER, THE ALTERNATE JURORS, DURIN THE SENTENCIN PHASE WERE HOUSED IN A SEPARATE AVAILABLE JURY ROOM, SO THAT THEY WERE SEREATED FROM THE REULAR JURY, EXCEPT WHILE SEATED IN THE JURY BOX DURIN COURT PROCEEDINS. THE ALTERNATE JURORS WERE INSTRUCTED TO HAVE NO CONTACT WITH THE MEMBERS OF THE REULAR JURY. THE ALTERNATES WERE NOT NEEDED AND WERE FULLY DISCHARED AT THE TIME THE JURY RETIRED TO DELIBERATE UPON THE SENTENCE. (c) Was there, in the court's opinion, credible evidence of any mitigating circumstances as provided in Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 7?
8 - 8 - If yes, please describe: THE JURY COULD FIND THAT THE DEFENDANT S ENTIRE CRIMINAL HISTORY WAS ALCOHOL RELATED, AND THAT HE ONLY BECAME ASSAULTIVE OR PHYSICALLY VIOLENT WHEN UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL. THE JURY COULD FURTHER FIND THAT THE DEFENDANT WAS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL AND/OR DRUS AT THE TIME OF THE COMMISSION OF THE MURDER, AND THAT HE EXPERIENCED AN ALCOHOLIC BLACKOUT OF ANY OF THE EVENTS DIRECTLY CONNECTED WITH THE MURDER. AND THAT THE DEFENDANT, IN THE WORDS OF ONE OF THE EXPERT WITNESSES FOR THE DEFENDANT WAS ACTIN LIKE A SLEEPWALKER AT THE TIME THE MURDER WAS COMMITTED. IN ADDITION, THE JURY COULD FIND THAT IT IS NOT LIKELY THAT THE DEFENDANT WOULD BE A DANER TO OTHERS IN THE FUTURE, IVEN A LIFE SENTENCE WITHOUT PAROLE. HE WAS DESCRIBED AS A OOD PRISONER BY THE WARDEN OF THE S. DAKOTA STATE PENITENTIARY DURIN THE TIME THE DEFENDANT SPENT THERE FROM 9/18/79 TO 1/27/81 AND THAT THE DEFENDANT POSED NO SERIOUS PROBLEMS FOR THEM.
9 - 9 - (d) Was there evidence of mitigating circumstances, whether or not of a type listed in Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 7, not described in answer to (3)(c) above? If yes, please describe: THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT THE DEFENDANT HAD A DEPRIVED CHILDHOOD. HIS NATURAL MOTHER WAS AN ALCOHOLIC AND ABUSED AND NELECTED HER CHILDREN. HE WAS IN THE CUSTODY OF HIS NATURAL MOTHER UP UNTIL ABOUT THE AE OF 1.5 TO 2 YEARS. FURTHER THERE WAS EVIDENCE HE DID NOT HAVE A OOD RELATIONSHIP WITH HIS ADOPTED FATHER OR MOTHER, AND THEY TOOK NO PRIDE OR PLEASURE IN HIM AS THEIR CHILD. (e) How did the jury answer the question posed in Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 6(4), that is: "Having in mind the crime of which the defendant has been found guilty, are you convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that there are not sufficient mitigating circumstances to merit leniency? (f) What sentence was imposed? LIFE IN PRISON WITHOUT PAROLE (4) Information about the Victim (a) Was the victim related to the defendant by blood or marriage? If yes, please describe the relationship: (b) What was the victim's occupation, and was the victim an employer or employee of the defendant? THE VICTIM WAS RETARDED AND LIVIN IN A ROUP HOME IN PORT ANELES. SHE WAS EMPLOYED THROUH THE ROUP HOME, WHICH PROVIDED JANITORIAL SERVICES. SHE WAS NOT AN EMPLOYER OR EMPLOYEE OF THE DEFENDANT.
10 (c) Was the victim acquainted with the defendant, and if so, how well? THE DEFENDANT MET THE VICTIM ON A BUS, TRAVELIN FROM PORT ANELES TO SEQUIM APPROXIMATELY TWO TO THREE HOURS BEFORE THE MURDER OCCURRED. (d) If the victim was a resident of Washington, please state: Length of Washington residency: County of residence: Length of residency in that county: ALL HER LIFE (27 YEARS) CLALLAM APPROXIMATELY 5 YEARS (e) Was the victim of the same race or ethnic origin as the defendant? If no, please state the victim's race or ethnic origin: 1/16 SNOHOMISH INDIAN AND CAUCASIAN (f) Was the victim of the same sex as the defendant? (g) Was the victim held hostage during the crime? If yes, for how long: (h) Please describe the nature and extent of any physical harm or torture inflicted upon the victim prior to death: PLEASE SEE THE AUTOPSY REPORT OF DR. REAY ATTACHED. IN ADDITION, DR. REAY TESTIFIED AT TRIAL THAT THE BITE MARKS UPON THE VICTIM S BREASTS OCCURRED AFTER DEATH. OTHER TESTIMONY AT THE TRIAL INDICATED THAT THE VICTIM S PUBIC HAIR HAD BEEN SINED, THAT THAT THERE WERE NO BURNS TO THE VICTIM S SKIN. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE AS TO WHEN THE VICTIM S HAIRS HAD BEEN SINED.
11 (i) What was the age of the victim? 27 YEARS (j) What type of weapon, if any, was used in the crime? NONE (5) Information about the Representation of Defendant (If more than one counsel represented the defendant, answer each question separately as to each counsel. Attach separate sheets containing answers for additional counsel.) (a) Name of counsel: SEE NEXT PAE (b) Date on which counsel was secured: SEE NEXT PAE (c) Was counsel retained or appointed? If appointed, please state the reason therefor: APPOINTED BY REASON OF DEFENDANT S INDIENCY. (d) How long has counsel practiced law, and what is the nature of counsel's practice? SEE NEXT PAE (e) Did the same counsel serve at both the trial and the special sentencing proceeding, and if not, why not? YES, FORD AND ROSS DID.
12 COUNSEL WERE APPOINTED AND RELIEVED OF THEIR DUTIES AS FOLLOWS: THE CLALLAM COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE WAS APPOINTED FEBRUARY 22, 1982 AND RELIEVED OF THEIR DUTIES ON APRIL 8, BRIAN PAUL COUHENOUR WAS APPOINTED TO ASSIST THE PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE IN REPRESENTIN THE DEFENDANT ON FEBRUARY 22, 1982* AND HE WAS RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES ON SEPTEMBER 1, TIMOTHY K. FORD WAS APPOINTED TO REPRESENT THE DEFENDANT ON APRIL 8, 1982 AND SERVED THROUHOUT THE REMAINDER OF THE TRIAL. KATHRYN ROSS WAS APPOINTED TO REPRESENT THE DEFENDANT ON AUUST 16, 1982 AND SERVED THROUHOUT THE REMAINDER OF THE TRIAL. PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE WAS RELIEVED OF THEIR DUTIES AND MR. FORD SUBSTITUTED BECAUSE THE PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE DID NOT HAVE ADEQUATE STAFF TO PROPERLY REPRESENT A DEFENDANT IN A CAPITAL MURDER CASE, CONSIDERIN THE CASE LOAD OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE. MR. COUHENOUR WAS RELIEVED OF HIS DUTIES ON SEPTEMBER 1, 1982 BECAUSE IT HAD BECOME APPARENT TO THE DEFENSE TEAM THAT IT MIHT BE NECESSARY TO CALL MR. COUHENOUR AS A WITNESS AT THE PENALTY PHASE OF THE TRIAL. MR. COUHENOUR WAS ULTIMATELY CALLED AS A WITNESS AT THE PENALTY PHASE. (d) COUNSEL S EXPERIENCE: TIMOTHY K. FORD - HAS PRACTICED LAW SINCE JANUARY HE IS A SOLE PRACTITIONER, AND HIS PRACTICE IS MOSTLY DEVOTED TO CRIMINAL DEFENSE. HE HAS PREVIOUSLY PARTICIPATED DURIN THE TRIAL PHASE IN ONE DEATH PENALTY CASE. HE HAS BEEN A CONSULTANT ON A SUBSTANTIAL BASIS IN APPROXIMATELY FIFTY DEATH PENALTY CASES. HE HAS BRIEFED AND ARUED AT THE APPELLATE LEVEL APPROXIMATELY SIX DEATH PENALTY CASES. KATHRYN ROSS - HAS PRACTICED LAW SINCE THE FALL OF SHE HAS A ENERAL PRIVATE PRACTICE. SHE HAS PARTICIPATED AT THE TRIAL STAE IN TWO PREVIOUS DEATH PENALTY CASES, ONE OF WHICH WAS TRIED THROUH TO A VERDICT BY THE JURY, AND ONE OF WHICH RESULTED IN A PLEA BARAIN. *MR. COUHENOUR WAS SELECTED BY THE PUBLIC DEFENDER S OFFICE TO ASSIST THEM PURSUANT TO COURT AUTHORIZATION. WHEN THE PUBLIC DEFENDER WAS RELIEVED ON APRIL 8, 1982, MR. COUHENOUR CONTINUED ALON WITH MR. FORD AS COUNSEL OF RECORD UNTIL MR. COUHENOUR WAS RELIEVED OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES.
13 (6) eneral Considerations (a) Was the race or ethnic origin of the defendant, victim, or any witness an apparent factor at trial? If yes, please explain: THERE WAS EVIDENCE OF THE DEFENDANT S NATIVE AMERICAN BACKROUND, AND NO EVIDENCE OF THE VICTIM S NATIVE AMERICAN BACKROUND. OTHERWISE IT WAS NOT AN APPARENT FACTOR. (b) What percentage of the population of the county is the same race or ethnic origin as the defendant? Race Ethnic Origin Under 10% NATIVE AMERICAN 10-25% 25-50% 50-75% 75-90% Over 90% If there appears to be any reason to answer this question with respect to a county other than the county in which the trial was held, please explain:
14 (c) How many persons of the defendant's or victim's race or ethnic origin were represented on the jury? Defendant: Victim: Further explanation or comment: ALL MEMBERS OF THE JURY WERE CAUCASIAN EXCEPT ONE WHO WAS PART SIOUX INDIAN. ONE PROSPECTIVE JUROR WHO WAS APPARENTLY A FULL BLOODED NATIVE AMERICAN INDIAN WAS PASSED FOR CAUSE AND SUBSEQUENTLY PEREMPTORILY CHALLENED BY THE DEFENDANT. (d) Was there any evidence that persons of any particular race or ethnic origin were systematically excluded from the jury? If yes, please explain: (e) Was the sexual orientation of the defendant, victim, or any witness an apparent factor at trial? If yes, please explain:
15 (f) Was the jury specifically instructed to exclude race, ethnic origin, or sexual preference as an issue? (g) Was there extensive publicity in the community concerning this case? (h) Was the jury instructed to disregard publicity? (i) Was the jury instructed to avoid any influence of passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary factor when considering its verdict or its findings in the special sentencing proceeding? AT THE PENALTY PHASE, YES. AT THE SENTENCIN PHASE, NO. THE JURY WAS IVEN THE PATTERN INSTRUCTION WPIC 1.01, THE LAST SENTENCE OF WHICH CAUTIONS THE JURY TO NOT ALLOW SYMPATHY OR PREJUDICE TO INFLUENCE THEM. THE ONLY FACTOR THAT WOULD MAKE SUCH AN INSTRUCTION NECESSARY IN THIS CASE WAS THE EVIDENCE ITSELF. (j) Please describe the nature of any evidence suggesting the necessity for instructions of the type described in 6(f) through 6(i) above which were given: THE TRIAL WAS REPORTED, ALTHOUH NOT EXTENSIVELY. ALL ARTICLES DURIN TRIAL WERE ON THE BACK PAES OF THE PAPER EXCEPT THE REPORT OF THE VERDICT WAS ON PAE 1. THERE WERE NO PICTURES.
16 (k) eneral comments of the trial judge concerning the appropriateness of the sentence, considering the crime, the defendant, and other relevant factors: THE CRIME WAS A RAPE AND MURDER BY STRANULATION OF A RETARDED IRL WITH WHOM THE DEFENDANT HAD NO PRIOR RELATIONSHIP UNTIL A FEW HOURS BEFORE THE MURDER OCCURRED. ALTHOUH ONLY TWENTY-SIX, THE DEFENDANT WAS A PRACTICIN ALCOHOLIC FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS WITH HIS ALCOHOLISM ETTIN WORSE IN THE LAST FEW YEARS. HE HAD TAKEN NO REAL ACTION TO SOLVE HIS PROBLEM, AND BECAUSE OF HIS LOW INTELLIENCE AND LACK OF MOTIVATION, THERE IS A SUBSTANTIAL RISK THAT HE WILL CONTINUE TO DRINK AND COMMIT VIOLENT CRIMES WHILE IN AN INTOXICATED CONDITION. THEREFORE, LIFE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE IS AN APPROPRIATE SENTENCE. ON THE OTHER HAND, THERE WERE SUBSTANTIAL MITIATIN FACTORS, AS SET FORTH IN THE ANSWER TO QUESTION NO. 3(C), WHICH JUSTIFIED THE JURY IN REFUSIN TO IMPOSE THE DEATH PENALTY; IN PARTICULAR, THE FACT THAT THE DEFENDANT ONLY POSED A RISK OF SERIOUS VIOLENT CRIMES WHEN UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL OR DRUS, AND THE FACT THAT WHEN INCARCERATED, WITHOUT ACCESS TO DRUS, HE IS A OOD PRISONER AND POSES NO PROBLEMS. (7) Information about the Chronology of the Case (a) Date of offense: 2/15/82 (b) Date of arrest: (DEFENDANT WAS IN CUSTODY AT THE TIME OF HIS ARREST, HAVIN BEEN ARRESTED ON A MISDEMEANOR ON 2/16/82) 2/22/82 (c) Date trial began: (JURY SELECTION BEAN 9/15/82) TRIAL ORIINALLY SET FOR 4/19/82, AND CONTINUED AT DEFENDANT S REQUEST TO 8/9/82 OVER THE OBJECTION OF PLAINTIFF. TRIAL WAS AAIN CONTINUED TO 8/16/82 BECAUSE OF COURT S SCHEDULIN PROBLEMS; TRIAL WAS THEN CONTINUED TO 9/13/82 AT THE DEFENDANT S REQUEST AND OVER THE OBJECTION OF THE PLAINTIFF. DEFENDANT WAIVED HIS RIHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL FOR ALL CONTINUANCES. 10/7/82
17 (d) Date jury returned verdict: 10/28/82 (e) Date post-trial motions ruled on: 10/28/82,10/29/82, AND 11/29/82 (f) Date special sentencing proceeding began: 11/1/82 (g) Date sentence was imposed: 11/29/82 (h) Date this trial judge's report was completed: 11/29/82 JAMES MADDOCK TRIAL JUDE
REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of CLARK County, Washington Cause No MICHAEL PATRICK IHDE
DATE FILED: 4/28/87 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case
DATE FILED: 4/5/96 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of KITSAP County, Washington Cause No TIMOTHY ERIC CAFFREY
DATE FILED: 3/15/91 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of PIERCE County, Washington Cause No LESLIE EUGENE MCVAY
DATE FILED: 11/29/89 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case
DATE FILED: 8/5/93 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of WHATCOM County, Washington Cause No
DATE FILED: 12/9/81 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of WHATCOM County, Washington Cause No
DATE FILED: 3/7/83 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of PIERCE County, Washington Cause No
DATE FILED: 11/29/89 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of SPOKANE County, Washington Cause No CHARLES CURTIS TATE
DATE FILED: 12/10/90 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case
DATE FILED: 4/18/91 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of YAKIMA County, Washington Cause No
DATE FILED: 1/8/92 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of ASOTIN County, Washington Cause No
DATE FILED: 9/27/89 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of KING County, Washington Cause No
DATE FILED: 4/1/91 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of PIERCE County, Washington Cause No
DATE FILED: 9/7/93 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case
DATE FILED: 5/22/89 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case
DATE FILED: 11/6/86 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of KING County, Washington Cause No JEREMIAH J.
DATE FILED: 12/1/93 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case
DATE FILED: 7/1/96 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case
DATE FILED: 1/17/83 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationREPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDGE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case. Superior Court of CLARK County, Washington Cause No
DATE FILED: 8/20/92 (to be indicated by Clerk of Supreme Court) Questionnaire approved for use pursuant to Laws of 1981, ch. 138, 12. REPORT OF THE TRIAL JUDE Aggravated First Degree Murder Case Superior
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1
SUBCHAPTER XV. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Article 100. Capital Punishment. 15A-2000. Sentence of death or life imprisonment for capital felonies; further proceedings to determine sentence. (a) Separate Proceedings
More informationAGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, ANALYSIS TO: and
LFC Requester: AGENCY BILL ANALYSIS 2017 REGULAR SESSION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BILL POSTING, EMAIL ANALYSIS TO: LFC@NMLEGIS.GOV and DFA@STATE.NM.US {Include the bill no. in the email subject line, e.g., HB2,
More informationSuperior Court of Washington For Pierce County
Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County State of Washington, Plaintiff vs.. Defendant No. Statement of Defendant on Plea of Guilty to Sex Offense (STTDFG) 1. My true name is:. 2. My age is:. 3.
More information(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May 6, 2003) SECOND REPRINT A.B. 15. Referred to Committee on Judiciary
(Reprinted with amendments adopted on May, 00) SECOND REPRINT A.B. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY (ON BEHALF OF LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE TO STUDY DEATH PENALTY AND RELATED DNA TESTING (ACR OF THE
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : : GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY EXPLANATION OF DEFENDANT S RIGHTS You or your attorney
More informationTerry Lenamon s Collection of Florida Death Penalty Laws February 23, 2010 by Terry Penalty s Death Penalty Blog
Terry Lenamon s Collection of Florida Death Penalty Laws February 23, 2010 by Terry Penalty s Death Penalty Blog Mention the death penalty and most often, case law and court decisions are the first thing
More informationTable of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...17 FORWARD...23 A...31 APPEALS District Court to Superior Court Infractions Procedures When Appealing From District Court to Superior Court Pretrial Release State s Right
More informationCase 5:06-cr TBR-JDM Document 202 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 29
Case 5:06-cr-00019-TBR-JDM Document 202 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 29 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED
More informationJuvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7
Juvenile Proceedings Scripts - Table of Contents Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION
More informationYES, I DO WANT THE WISCONSIN INNOCENCE PROJECT TO CONSIDER MY APPLICATION.
APPLICATION FOR ASSISTANCE Wisconsin Innocence Project of Frank J. Remington Center University of Wisconsin Law School 975 Bascom Mall Madison, WI 53706 Check only one of these two boxes. YES, I DO WANT
More informationCERTIFICATION PROCEEDING
CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING PURPOSE: TO ALLOW A JUVENILE COURT TO WAIVE ITS EXCLUSIVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND TRANSFER A JUVENILE TO ADULT CRIMINAL COURT BECAUSE OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE ALLEGED
More informationThe court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON
The court process How the criminal justice system works. CONSUMER GUIDE FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON Inside The process Arrest and complaint Preliminary hearing Grand jury Arraignment
More informationCAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MEMBERS OF THE JURY: You have found the Defendant, name, guilty of the offense of driving
More informationSTATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO.
STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXAMINATION OF DEFENDANT PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant ) PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY The defendant represents to the Court: 1. My
More informationMissouri Revised Statutes
Page 1 of 38 Missouri Revised Statutes Chapter 565 Offenses Against the Person August 28, 2009 Procedure for chapter 565. 565.001. 1. The provisions of this chapter shall govern the construction and procedures
More informationFall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?
Fall, 2017 F Criminal Litigation 20 17 Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal! Something must go wrong.! A wrongful act must occur. How Do We Get A Case?! If the law states that the wrongful act is
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION
-GR-102-Guilty Plea IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) NO. Criminal Sessions, VS. ) Charge: ) ) Defendant. ) BEFORE THE
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC14-1053 JOHN RUTHELL HENRY, Appellant, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [June 12, 2014] PER CURIAM. John Ruthell Henry is a prisoner under sentence of death for whom a warrant
More informationIntended that deadly force would be used in the course of the felony.] (or)
Page 1 of 38 150.10 NOTE WELL: This instruction and the verdict form which follows include changes required by Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782, 102 S.Ct. 3368, 73 L.Ed.2d 1140 (1982), Cabana v. Bullock,
More informationDeath Penalty. Terry Lenamon on the. Terry Lenamon s List of State Death Penalty Mitigation Statutes (Full Text)
Terry Lenamon on the Death Penalty Sidebar with a Board Certified Expert Criminal Trial Attorney Terence M. Lenamon is a Terry Lenamon s List of State Death Penalty Mitigation Statutes (Full Text) Florida
More informationReferred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Provides for the issuance of certain orders for protection. (BDR 3-839)
REQUIRES TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY VOTE ( 0) S.B. SENATE BILL NO. SENATORS RATTI, FORD, MANENDO, SPEARMAN, FARLEY; ATKINSON, CANCELA, CANNIZZARO, DENIS, PARKS, SEGERBLOM AND WOODHOUSE MARCH 0, 0 Referred to
More informationInformation Memorandum 98-11*
Wisconsin Legislative Council Staff June 24, 1998 Information Memorandum 98-11* NEW LAW RELATING TO TRUTH IN SENTENCING: SENTENCE STRUCTURE FOR FELONY OFFENSES, EXTENDED SUPERVISION, CRIMINAL PENALTIES
More informationSection 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631. Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section Murder in the First Degree
Section 20 Mistake as to a Justification 631 THE LAW Wyoming Statutes (1982) Chapter 4. Offenses Against the Person Article 1. Homicide Section 6-4-101. Murder in the First Degree (a) Whoever purposely
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIE MILLER, Appellant, v. Case No. SC01-837 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT NANCY A. DANIELS PUBLIC DEFENDER NADA M. CAREY ASSISTANT PUBLIC
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Skaggs, 2004-Ohio-4471.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 83830 STATE OF OHIO JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee AND vs. OPINION PATRICK SKAGGS Defendant-Appellant
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY LEACH, HAYWOOD, HUGHES AND BLAKE, MAY 8, 2017 AN ACT
PRINTER'S NO. 0 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL No. 0 Session of 0 INTRODUCED BY LEACH, HAYWOOD, HUGHES AND BLAKE, MAY, 0 REFERRED TO JUDICIARY, MAY, 0 AN ACT 0 Amending Titles (Crimes
More informationCourtroom Terminology
Courtroom Terminology Accused: formally charged but not yet tried for committing a crime; the person who has been charged may also be called the defendant. Acquittal: a judgment of court, based on the
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS FOR VICTIM TO SIGN: I,, victim of the crime of, (victim) (crime committed) committed on, by in, (date) (name of offender,
More informationGUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE
GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Before completing the questionnaire please note: You must not be currently represented by counsel and the crime and conviction must have occurred in Michigan.
More informationTAB 12: Aggravating & Mitigating Circumstances
TAB 12: Aggravating & Mitigating Circumstances AGGRAVATING AND MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES Jeff Welty and Jamie Markham Overview of Penalty Phase Same jury as guilt phase Opening statements discretionary
More informationCase 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!
FILED Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t
More informationSENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE
LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2007 SUMMARY Synopsis: Type of Impact: Eliminates the death
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 822
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 SESSION LAW 2005-145 HOUSE BILL 822 AN ACT TO AMEND STATE LAW REGARDING THE DETERMINATION OF AGGRAVATING FACTORS IN A CRIMINAL CASE TO CONFORM WITH THE UNITED
More informationCARBON COUNTY CUSTODY Intake: COMPLAINT/MODIFICATION/CONTEMPT Docket Number: Name: Date of Birth:
CARBON COUNTY CUSTODY Intake: COMPLAINT/MODIFICATION/CONTEMPT Docket Number: Petitioner ( Mother Father Other) Name: Date of Birth: Address: Apt: City: State: Zip: Home Phone: Other Phone Petitioner s
More informationLandmark Case MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE FOR MURDER R. v. LATIMER
Landmark Case MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE FOR MURDER R. v. LATIMER Prepared for the Ontario Justice Education Network by a Law Student from Pro Bono Students Canada R. v. Latimer (2001) Facts Tracy Latimer
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 1:08-cr-00523-PAB Document 45 Filed 10/13/09 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 AO 245B (Rev. 09/08) Judgment in a Criminal Case Sheet 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. District of
More informationReferred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Provides for the issuance of orders of protection relating to high-risk behavior.
S.B. 0 SENATE BILL NO. 0 SENATORS RATTI AND CANNIZZARO PREFILED JANUARY, 0 Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Provides for the issuance of orders of protection relating to high-risk behavior. (BDR
More informationCHAPTER 186. (Senate Bill 279) Criminal Law Death Penalty Repeal Evidence
CHAPTER 186 (Senate Bill 279) AN ACT concerning Criminal Law Death Penalty Repeal Evidence FOR the purpose of repealing restricting the death penalty; repealing to a case in which the State presents certain
More informationHave you ever been a victim or a witness to a crime? If so, you may be entitled to certain rights under Louisiana's Crime Victim Bill of Rights.
VICTIMS RIGHTS Have you ever been a victim or a witness to a crime? If so, you may be entitled to certain rights under Louisiana's Crime Victim Bill of Rights. As a victim or designated family member of
More informationALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1
ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 Constitution Art. I, 6.01 Basic rights for crime victims. (a) Crime victims, as defined by law or their lawful representatives, including the next of kin of homicide victims,
More informationDodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)
Dodge County (Sixth Judicial District) 1. Rules of Decorum 2. Civil Practice 3. Rules of Criminal Procedure 4. Rules of Family Court Procedure 5. Filing of Papers by Electronic Filing and Facsimile Transmission
More information80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 966 SUMMARY
Sponsored by COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY 0th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--0 Regular Session Senate Bill SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the
More informationINSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS FOR FILING PRO SE CUSTODY ACTIONS IN POTTER COUNTY, PA
INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS FOR FILING PRO SE CUSTODY ACTIONS IN POTTER COUNTY, PA Forms 1. Instructions for Pro Se Custody Action in Potter County, PA 2. Key Custody Definitions 3. Release and Disclaimer 4.
More informationEffective October 1, 2015
Modification to the Sentencing Standards. Adopted by the Alabama Sentencing Commission January 9, 2015. Effective October 1, 2015 A 3 Appendix A A 4 I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS - Introduction The Sentencing
More informationG.S. 15A Page 1
15A-1340.16. Aggravated and mitigated sentences. (a) Generally, Burden of Proof. The court shall consider evidence of aggravating or mitigating factors present in the offense that make an aggravated or
More informationINMATE FORM FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY
INMATE FORM FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY (NOTE: O.C.G.A. 9-10-14(a) requires the proper use of this form, and failure to use this form as required will result in the clerk of any
More informationUnited States District Court Western District of Kentucky PADUCAH DIVISION
USDC KYWD (v 10.VC.1) 245B (12/04) Sheet1 - Judgment in a Criminal Case UNITED STATES OF AMERICA United States District Court Western District of Kentucky PADUCAH DIVISION JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE V.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 105,988. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, AARON ISREAL SALINAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 105,988 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. AARON ISREAL SALINAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Under the facts of this case, the district court did not abuse
More informationTitle 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL
Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL Chapter 105-A: MAINE BAIL CODE Table of Contents Part 2. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL... Subchapter 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 3 Section 1001. TITLE... 3 Section 1002. LEGISLATIVE
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY June 9, 1995 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Present: All the Justices THOMAS LEE ROYAL, JR. v. Record No. 942223 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY June 9, 1995 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF HAMPTON Nelson T. Overton,
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS FOR VICTIM TO SIGN: I,, victim of the crime of, (victim) (crime committed) committed on, by in, (date) (name of offender,
More informationTITLE 4 LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS TRIBAL COURT RULES OF PROCEDURE
TITLE 4 LUMMI NATION CODE OF LAWS TRIBAL COURT RULES OF PROCEDURE Enacted: Resolution S-13 (10/4/1974) Amended Resolution 2003-092 (8/4/2003) Resolution 2007-081 (5/22/2007) (Emergency Adoption of LCL
More informationThe defendant has been charged with first degree murder.
Page 1 of 11 206.14 FIRST DEGREE MURDER - MURDER COMMITTED IN PERPETRATION OF A FELONY 1 OR MURDER WITH PREMEDITATION AND DELIBERATION WHERE A DEADLY WEAPON IS USED. CLASS A FELONY (DEATH OR LIFE IMPRISONMENT);
More informationSCMF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCMF-11-0000315 03-JAN-2013 10:22 AM SCMF-11-0000315 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I In the Matter of the Publication and Distribution of the Hawai'i Pattern
More informationCharlotte County Sheriff s Office
Charlotte County Sheriff s Office VICTIM RIGHTS BROCHURE YOUR RIGHTS AS A VICTIM OR WITNESS: We realize that for many persons, being a victim or witness to a crime is their first experience with the criminal
More informationAPPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE OF GEORGIA, Petitioner, Civil Action No. Inmate Number vs., Habeas Corpus Warden, Respondent (Name of Institution where you are now located) APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
More informationAs Amended by Senate Committee. SENATE BILL No By Committee on Judiciary 2-6
{As Amended by Senate Committee of the Whole} Session of 0 As Amended by Senate Committee SENATE BILL No. 0 By Committee on Judiciary - 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning children; relating to crimes and punishment;
More informationTransition to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act of This chapter may be cited as the "Criminal Injuries Compensation Act.
TITLE 12 Criminal Procedure CHAPTER 12-25 Criminal Injuries Compensation 12-25-1.1. Transition to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act of 1996. New cases shall be filed through the Criminal Injuries
More informationCriminal Code CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT) (NO. 2) BILL, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES
BELIZE: CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT) (NO. 2) BILL, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES 1. Short title. 2. Amendment of section 12. 3. Repeal and substitution of section 25. 4. Amendment of section 45. 5. Repeal and
More informationCertificates of Rehabilitation in Fresno County Filing Instructions
Certificates of Rehabilitation in Fresno County Filing Instructions 1. You must be a resident of Fresno County to file a certificate of rehabilitation in Fresno County. However, the offense may have occurred
More informationIn the Indiana Supreme Court
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Dustin Houchin Salem, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Steve Carter Attorney General of Indiana J.T. Whitehead Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana In the Indiana Supreme
More informationTOWN OF COLUMBINE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT
TOWN OF COLUMBINE VALLEY POLICE DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT BASIC REQUIREMENTS SEX: AGE: EDUCATION: HEIGHT & WEIGHT: EYESIGHT: Equal Opportunity Employer Officer Position-Between 21 and 65 Years
More informationIN THE MUNICIPAL COURT CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) CASE NO. Defendant hereby ordered to have psychiatric evaluation with Dr. on at as follows (check one):
CASE NO. STATE/MUNICIPALITY vs. JOURNAL ENTRY DEFENDANT Order for Evaluation trial. It has come to this court s attention that the defendant may not be competent to stand Defendant hereby ordered to have
More information(Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda)
Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda
More informationDepartment of Corrections
Agency 44 Department of Corrections Articles 44-5. INMATE MANAGEMENT. 44-6. GOOD TIME CREDITS AND SENTENCE COMPUTATION. 44-9. PAROLE, POSTRELEASE SUPERVISION, AND HOUSE ARREST. 44-11. COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS.
More informationFr:8 I "TAFJ. Case 2:02-cr DT Document 1541 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 2:02-cr-002-DT Document 1541 Filed 02/13/07 Page 1 of 14 FILED CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 2 3 4 5 Fr:8 I 307 CEN'rAAi: DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BY DEPUTY "TAFJ 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
More informationARTICLE 11A. VICTIM PROTECTION ACT OF 1984.
ARTICLE 11A. VICTIM PROTECTION ACT OF 1984. 61-11A-1. Legislative findings and purpose. (a) The Legislature finds and declares that without the cooperation of victims and witnesses, the criminal justice
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 26, 2010
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 26, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LADARIUS TYREE SPRINGS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No.
More informationPrefiled pursuant to Article III, Section 2(A)(4)(b)(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana.
2017 Regular Session HOUSE BILL NO. 223 BY REPRESENTATIVE MORENO AND SENATOR CLAITOR Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section 2(A)(4)(b)(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana. DOMESTIC ABUSE: Provides relative
More informationCASE SUMMARY CATEGORY: DEFENDANT S NAME: JURISDICTION : RESEARCHED BY: Exoneration Rolando Cruz DuPage County, Illinois Thomas Frisbie and Randy Garrett Authors and Volunteer Researchers Center on Wrongful
More informationA GUIDEBOOK TO ALABAMA S DEATH PENALTY APPEALS PROCESS
A GUIDEBOOK TO ALABAMA S DEATH PENALTY APPEALS PROCESS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 PROCESS FOR CAPITAL MURDER PROSECUTIONS (CHART)... 4 THE TRIAL... 5 DEATH PENALTY: The Capital Appeals Process... 6 TIER
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEN COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO * CASE NO. : CR -v- * JUDGMENT ENTRY Defendant * OF SENTENCING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * On, a sentencing hearing was held pursuant
More informationINMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA
INMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY (NOTE: O.C.G.A. 9-10-14(a) requires the proper use of this form, and failure to use this form as required
More information1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person
1 California Criminal Law (4th), Crimes Against the Person I. ASSAULT AND BATTERY A. In General. 1. Nature of Offenses. (a) [ 1] In General. (b) [ 2] Relationship Between Offenses. (c) [ 3] Classification
More informationAN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:
(131st General Assembly) (Amended Substitute Senate Bill Number 97) AN ACT To amend sections 2152.17, 2901.08, 2923.14, 2929.13, 2929.14, 2929.20, 2929.201, 2941.141, 2941.144, 2941.145, 2941.146, and
More informationIDAHO SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION
IDAHO SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION CONTACT INFORMATION Idaho State Police Central Sex-Offender Registry PO Box 700 Meridian, ID 83680-0700 Telephone: 208-884-7305 E-mail: idsor@isp.state.id.us
More informationIdentifying Chronic Offenders
1 Identifying Chronic Offenders SUMMARY About 5 percent of offenders were responsible for 19 percent of the criminal convictions in Minnesota over the last four years, including 37 percent of the convictions
More informationMASSACHUSETTS SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION
MASSACHUSETTS SEX-OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION CONTACT Commonwealth of Massachusetts Sex-Offender Registry Board INFORMATION PO Box 4547 Salem, MA 01970-0902 Telephone: 978-740-6400 http://www.state.ma.us/sorb/community.htm
More informationINNOCENCE PROJECT SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE
INNOCENCE PROJECT SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE NAME: Ricky Smith PRISONER NUMBER: #5679832 DATE OF BIRTH: July 15, 1967 SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: CURRENT CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND ADDRESS: New Columbia Correctional
More information