The Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013 S. 619
|
|
- Cori Ray
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013 S. 619 Written Statement of Shon Hopwood 1 Gates Public Service Law Scholar University of Washington School of Law Senators Leahy and Paul, and the entire Senate Judiciary Committee, thank you for the kind invitation to present my views about the Justice Safety Valve Act of I am writing to express support for the Bill, which I believe is a necessary step towards strengthening our communities, ingraining a sense of fairness into federal sentencing, and returning sentencing discretion back to where it rightfully belongs: the federal judiciary. My perspective on the issue of mandatory minimum sentencing is unique. Unlike most witnesses who come before you, I am a product of the federal criminal justice system. I received a sentence of over 12 years for my role in five bank robberies that I committed at the age of 22 when I was a reckless and immature young man. That sentence included a mandatory minimum five years of imprisonment for carrying a firearm during one of the robberies. I am now a committed husband, father, community volunteer, and a law-school student in my third year at the University of Washington School of Law. My sentence was just. But I saw many that weren t. In fact, it is fair to say that what I saw in federal prison would shock and shame most Americans. What I saw was a colossal waste of humanity and resources wrapped into a system of mass incarceration. And at the heart of that waste is our mandatory minimum sentencing regime.
2 The Randomness of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Before I explain why this Bill is needed, I d like to explain why mandatory minimum sentences result mostly from sheer random bad luck when they are actually imposed on criminal defendants. This random bad luck is largely determined not by the defendant s criminal conduct or lack of remorse but by the prosecutor assigned to the defendant s case. Adam Clausen s case was not much different from my own. While in his early twenties, Adam committed nine robberies in Philadelphia, crimes for which he undoubtedly deserved some imprisonment. 2 The federal prosecutor assigned to Adam s case made several plea bargains with Adam s co-defendants, but the same prosecutor was unwilling to offer Adam a reasonable deal. So, Adam went to trial and a jury convicted him of robbery and firearms charges. Although our crimes were similar, a federal judge sentenced Adam to 213 years of imprisonment and his release date is December 1, Adam now spends his days teaching and mentoring other prisoners. Unless there is a miraculous presidential commutation of his sentence, Adam Clausen will die in prison. Assuming that he lives until the age of 75, taxpayers can expect to hemorrhage a sum of over 1.2 million dollars to incarcerate him. How did Adam receive 213 years when I received 12 years for comparable crimes? In the 1980s and 1990s, Congress passed several get-tough-on-crime mandatory minimum sentencing laws. One of those laws requires a judge to impose an additional 25-year sentence for anyone convicted of a second or subsequent firearm charge, even if that subsequent offense is part of a single and continuous crime spree with no intervening arrest. 3 Because of these laws, Adam faced 205 years of mandatory minimums just for the firearm offenses. 2
3 Without these laws, Adam may have received the same 12-year sentence I did. Instead, mandatory minimums sentencing provisions allowed the prosecutor to transform a crime that averages a 10-year sentence into lifelong imprisonment. Congress passed mandatory minimum sentencing laws, in part, because it believed that similar crimes deserved similar punishments. But what it did not consider is the role federal prosecutors play in charging the accused. Possessing an arsenal of over 4,500 federal criminal statutes, a federal prosecutor can manipulate prison sentences by picking and choosing which crimes to charge. These charging decisions ultimately dictate the prison sentence a judge must impose under federal law. In my case, a federal prosecutor brought charges that allowed me a second chance in life despite the prosecutor s unchecked discretion. Adam was not so lucky. When the law leads to such arbitrary results, we normally take it as a sign that the law needs to be rethought. On a fundamental level, a criminal defendant s sentence should result from even application of sentencing laws and by a judge carefully weighing the aggravating and mitigating factors, not by the subjective charging decisions made by prosecutors at the outset of a case. Giving federal prosecutors the discretion to trigger harsh mandatory minimum sentences has created much greater randomness in federal sentencing, not less. Give the Discretion Back to the Federal Judiciary The Justice Safety Valve Act raises a fundamental question as to which body should possess discretionary sentencing authority to impose mandatory minimum sentences. I would vote for Article III judges. Why are federal judges better equipped than federal prosecutors to decide which criminal defendants should receive mandatory minimum sentences? To begin with, federal sentencing judges enjoy the constitutional protection of life tenure and 3
4 salary protection, which shelter them from the popular hysteria that often accompanies crime and punishment in this country. This allows federal judges to make sentencing decisions with clear heads and honest hearts deemed essential to good judges. 4 Judges are also the best-equipped group to make the weighty decision of whether a mandatory minimum sentence should be imposed on a particular defendant. Most judges, unlike many prosecutors, are not seeking career advancement. Indeed, most are life-long public servants. And just like when Congress rightly thinks it can do a better job at legislating than, say, an administrative agency, most judges believe the judiciary is the best-positioned group to weigh the competing goals of sentencing and then determine what sentence should be imposed. They are, after all, judges. The Judiciary has more information at its disposal than prosecutors when deciding whether to impose a mandatory minimum sentence. Through the adversarial process, judges receive both the prosecution and defense views on what the proper sentence should be. Additionally, judges can tap into the wisdom of federal probation officers. These officers ordinarily interview defendants and family members, and obtain school, employment, medical, and mental health records, before drafting a presentence investigation report explaining the aggravating and mitigating factors relevant to an individual defendant s sentence. And criminal defendants sometimes send their sentencing judge a letter before sentencing, placing their actions into context or explaining their remorse for those actions all factors essential to determining a fair and just sentence. Sentencing judges thus possess a broader array of information than prosecutors to use in fashioning an appropriate sentence. Federal judges often spend a great deal of time thinking about federal sentencing, contemplating whether a particular sentence is correct both as a matter of policy and as a matter of individual justice. I saw this in action last summer while working for Senior Judge John C. Coughenour of the United States District 4
5 Court for the Western District of Washington. What few people outside his chambers will ever understand is just how much time and thought Judge Coughenour expends on federal sentencing. When difficult cases arose, he would convene a group together in the early morning hours before the courthouse doors opened. Clerks and interns role played as prosecutors and defense attorneys, peppering Judge Coughenour with hypothetical arguments the real lawyers might present in the upcoming sentencing hearing that day. 5 While I have never witnessed a federal prosecutor prepare a case, I doubt that a busy prosecutor, faced with an overwhelming caseload, is thinking about sentencing with the same depth and effort of a Judge Coughenour. 6 And it almost goes without saying that when it comes to imposing a mandatory minimum sentence of a decade or two in prison on another human being, thoughtfulness and thoroughness count for a great deal. As the Supreme Court recently noted, we have a tradition of judicial sentencing, and sentencing should not be left to employees of the same Department of Justice that conducts the prosecution. 7 This Bill correctly places the discretion to impose a statutory minimum sentence with the judiciary where it belongs. Legislation Is Necessary: A Change in DOJ Policy Will Not Work Attorney General Eric Holder released a memo on August 12, 2013, directing prosecutors to decline to charge the quantity of drugs necessary to trigger mandatory minimum sentences, if the defendant meets several criteria. There are a number of reasons why this Bill is superior to the new policy change directed by the Attorney General. First, any policy change created by the Executive is a temporary fix. The Attorney General s new policy is susceptible to change with the next administration. The changes made by this Bill are of such monumental importance to the effort of criminal justice reform that they should be enshrined into law and made impervious to Executive modification. 5
6 Second, the Attorney General s memo does not go far enough with respect to drug cases. The memo applies to defendants only if: 1) the defendant s relevant conduct, which includes the conduct of others and not just the defendant herself, does not involve possession of firearms or violence; 2) the defendant is not a leader, organizer, or manager of a drug conspiracy; 3) the defendant does not have ties to a large drug operation or gang; and 4) the defendant does not have a significant criminal history, defined as at least three criminal history points. From my experience, almost all federal drug offenses can be said to be tied to a large drug operation or gang, if only remotely, and, unless the offender is particularly young, most federal drug offenders have three or more criminal history points usually associated with small sales of drugs, simple possession, or even traffic violations. Based on the criteria set forth by the Attorney General s memo, I question how many of the 25,000 federal defendants sentenced each year for involvement with drugs will be affected by the changes, and I understand that the Federal Public Defenders have analyzed the data and found that fewer than 1,000 defendants per year would be affected. Third, the Attorney General s memo does not apply to mandatory minimums applicable to firearms, which have created some of the most absurd and abhorrent results. Consider again the example of Adam Clausen who committed nine robberies in one crime spree before his arrest. Because of the provision for a second or subsequent use of a firearm, 8 he received consecutive mandatory minimum sentences of 5, 25, 25, 25, 25, 25, 25, 25, and 25 years, for nine charges. Or, to put it somewhat differently, Adam received a higher sentence than terrorists, 9 persons convicted of child rape, 10 and some murderers. 11 Adam is not the only one. During my time in federal prison, I met several prisoners who had received mandatory minimum sentences of 15 years under the Armed Career Criminal Act. 12 One received a sentence because he had committed a prior felony and police found a few bullets in his car. Another felon received 15 years because he possessed a rifle on his farm that he used to scare away the deer 6
7 in his wife s garden. Both of these defendants had wives and children, and the cost of incarcerating them totaled over $700,000. While these two were wrong to possess firearms after previously having been convicted of a felony, stiff sentences like these would be better reserved for far more serious crimes. The Attorney General s memo fails to address these cases. The Human Toll Adam Clausen is not the same 22-year-old that committed some robberies. In prison he has become a life coach to others, takes college classes for selfimprovement, and teaches physical-fitness classes for other prisoners. He has a wife and family, and they simply don t understand why Adam received the sentence he did. To be sure, Adam made a serious mistake, but it was not the kind of mistake that required a sentence of 213 years. Adam s story easily could have been my story. Had a different prosecutor been assigned to my case, I could have received four additional firearm charges. Had I received those additional firearm charges, the judge would have sentenced me to 85 years in mandatory minimums and the taxpayers would be footing the bill to incarcerate me over a lifetime for a crime that rarely carries a sentence of more than 20 years of imprisonment. I truly believe that my story of rehabilitation is one that could be easily repeated, if some prisoners are given the chance. Many of the mandatory minimum sentencing provisions remove that second chance from the sentencing equation. And sentences such as Adam s serve little purpose other than to perpetuate the human suffering and waste of taxpayer dollars, when judges are forced to impose harsh mandatory sentences, even where the facts and circumstances suggest that a mandatory minimum sentence is not appropriate. 7
8 Conclusion The Justice Safety Valve Act of 2013 is an important step forward in meaningfully addressing some of the harshest and most unfair aspects of the federal system of criminal justice. Federal mandatory minimums are often imposed simply because of the prosecutor assigned to the case, and this Bill will prevent injustices from occurring by handing over the discretion of mandatory minimum sentencing to the actor best equipped to decide whether to impose such sentences: federal sentencing judges. This Bill is also needed because the Attorney General s memo is a temporary and inadequate fix and fails to address some of the most pressing injustices in current mandatory minimum sentencing. Most importantly, this Bill will alleviate the human toll that mandatory minimum sentencing provisions have inflicted on those like Adam Clausen, whose criminal culpability did not match the punishment imposed. 1 I am a Gates Public Service Law Scholar at the University of Washington School of Law and the 2 See United States v. Clausen, 328 F.3d 708 (3d Cir. 2003) U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(C)(i). 4 Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594, 2609 (2011) (citing 1 Works of James Wilson 363 (J. Andrews ed. 1896)). 5 I asked Judge Coughenour if I could share this story and he graciously agreed. However, he expresses no opinion on the substance of my testimony. 6 In fact, it s not a prosecutor s role to do so. They are one side in the adversary system, not a judge. 7 Setser v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 1463, (2012) U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(C)(i); see also 18 U.S.C. 922(g) & (h) http:// fense_topics/199503_federal_rape_cases.pdf U.S.C. 924(e). 8
Testimony of Kemba Smith before the Inter American Commission on Human Rights. March 3, 2006
Testimony of Kemba Smith before the Inter American Commission on Human Rights March 3, 2006 Members of the Commission, my name is Kemba Smith, and only a little over five years ago, I was identified by
More informationSentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining
Sentencing Factors that Limit Judicial Discretion and Influence Plea Bargaining Catherine P. Adkisson Assistant Solicitor General Colorado Attorney General s Office Although all classes of felonies have
More informationHearing on Reevaluating the Effectiveness of Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentences
Written Statement of Antonio M. Ginatta Advocacy Director, US Program Human Rights Watch to United States Senate, Committee on the Judiciary Hearing on Reevaluating the Effectiveness of Federal Mandatory
More informationCourt of Common Pleas Lake County, Ohio 47 North Park Place Painesville, Ohio 44077
Court of Common Pleas Lake County, Ohio 47 North Park Place Painesville, Ohio 44077 Administrative Judge Telephone (440) 350-2100 Facsimile (440) 350-2210 E-mail JudgeLucci@LakeCountyOhio.gov Website http://www.lakecountyohio.gov/cpcgd/
More informationUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, Shawn PICKERING, Defendant-Appellee. No United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shawn PICKERING, Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-5464. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. June 25, 1999. Appeal from the United States District
More information4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014
4B1.1 GUIDELINES MANUAL November 1, 2014 PART B - CAREER OFFENDERS AND CRIMINAL LIVELIHOOD 4B1.1. Career Offender (a) (b) A defendant is a career offender if (1) the defendant was at least eighteen years
More informationAN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:
(131st General Assembly) (Amended Substitute Senate Bill Number 97) AN ACT To amend sections 2152.17, 2901.08, 2923.14, 2929.13, 2929.14, 2929.20, 2929.201, 2941.141, 2941.144, 2941.145, 2941.146, and
More informationSealing Criminal Records for Convictions, Acquittals, & Dismissals. Expungements in Ohio
Sealing Criminal Records for Convictions, Acquittals, & Dismissals Expungements in Ohio May, 2008 Why Should You Have Your Criminal Record Sealed? When you apply for jobs, apartments, and licenses, the
More informationWho Is In Our State Prisons? From the Office of California State Senator George Runner
Who Is In Our State Prisons? From the Office of California State Senator George Runner On almost a daily basis Californians read that our state prison system is too big, too expensive, growing at an explosive
More informationPA PAC Questionnaire for District Attorney Candidates
PA PAC Questionnaire for District Attorney Candidates - 2018 Please return this completed form along with your resume or a brief biographical statement describing your education, work history, community
More informationSealing Criminal Records for Convictions, Acquittals, & Dismissals. Expungements in Ohio
Sealing Criminal Records for Convictions, Acquittals, & Dismissals Expungements in Ohio Revised by Melissa Will, Equal Justice Fellow Ohio State Legal Services Association May 2008 2008, Ohio State Legal
More informationOnly Mostly Dead? The Continued Vitality of Simmons in the Wake of North Carolina s Justice Reinvestment Act of 2011
Only Mostly Dead? The Continued Vitality of Simmons in the Wake of North Carolina s Justice Reinvestment Act of 2011 by Christian Dysart, and Jenny Leisten, Research & Writing Attorney, FPD United States
More informationCHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE. I. Introduction. II. Sentencing Rationales. A. Retribution. B. Deterrence. C.
CHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE I. Introduction II. Sentencing Rationales A. Retribution B. Deterrence C. Rehabilitation D. Restoration E. Incapacitation III. Imposing Criminal Sanctions
More informationFLORIDA CRIMINAL OFFENSES AMANDA POWERS SELLERS AND JENNA C. FINKELSTEIN
If You Have Been Charged with a Crime in Florida, Familiarizing Yourself with Your Charges and the Potential Penalties If You are Convicted is the First Step to Making Yourself More Informed, Empowered
More informationDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 820 NORTH FRENCH STREET WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801
KATHLEEN JENNINGS ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 820 NORTH FRENCH STREET WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801 CIVIL DIVISION (302) 577-8400 CRIMINAL DIVISION (302) 577-8500 FRAUD DIVISION (302) 577-8600
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT MICHAEL HARRY, Defendant. No. CR17-1017-LTS SENTENCING OPINION AND
More information20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates
20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates CANDIDATE: KATHY JENNINGS (D) The Coalition for Smart Justice is committed to cutting the number of prisoners in Delaware in half and eliminating racial
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 822
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2005 SESSION LAW 2005-145 HOUSE BILL 822 AN ACT TO AMEND STATE LAW REGARDING THE DETERMINATION OF AGGRAVATING FACTORS IN A CRIMINAL CASE TO CONFORM WITH THE UNITED
More informationJURISDICTION WAIVER RECENT SENTENCING AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES
JURISDICTION WAIVER RECENT SENTENCING AND LEGISLATIVE ISSUES Presentation provided by the Tonya Krause-Phelan and Mike Dunn, Associate Professors, Thomas M. Cooley Law School WAIVER In Michigan, there
More informationPractice Test. Law & the Courts -1-
Practice Test Law & the Courts -1- 1. United States Supreme Court? United States District Court Which court correctly completes the diagram above? A. United States Court of Records B. United States Court
More informationCERTIFICATION PROCEEDING
CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING PURPOSE: TO ALLOW A JUVENILE COURT TO WAIVE ITS EXCLUSIVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND TRANSFER A JUVENILE TO ADULT CRIMINAL COURT BECAUSE OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE ALLEGED
More informationG.S. 15A Page 1
15A-1340.16. Aggravated and mitigated sentences. (a) Generally, Burden of Proof. The court shall consider evidence of aggravating or mitigating factors present in the offense that make an aggravated or
More information) NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY
Case 2:03-cr-00836-JAP Document 86 Filed 06/16/2006 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) CRIMINAL NO. 03-836 (JAP) ) v. ) GOVERNMENT'S NOTICE
More informationArmed Career Criminal and Career Offender Enhancements. If you can t avoid them, deflect them.
Armed Career Criminal and Career Offender Enhancements If you can t avoid them, deflect them. ACCA - mandatory 15 year sentence: Who does it apply to? Defendant must: be adjudicated guilty under 18 U.S.C.
More informationTestimony of. Ed Marsico Dauphin County District Attorney. Lisa Lazzari-Strasiser Somerset County District Attorney
Testimony of Ed Marsico Dauphin County District Attorney Lisa Lazzari-Strasiser Somerset County District Attorney Craig W. Stedman Lancaster County District Attorney Before the Senate Judiciary Committee
More informationA. How Much is Life Without Parole Used for Murderers and Other Prisoners? B. Life Without Parole: An Alternative to the Death Penalty
Life Without Parole Presentation to Olympia FOR s Committee for Alternatives to the Death Penalty Tuesday June 23, 2009 Community Room of Tumwater Apartments Glen Anderson Outline of Topics A. How Much
More informationWhen Is A Felony Not A Felony?: A New Approach to Challenging Recidivist-Based Charges and Sentencing Enhancements
When Is A Felony Not A Felony?: A New Approach to Challenging Recidivist-Based Charges and Sentencing Enhancements Alan DuBois Senior Appellate Attorney Federal Public Defender-Eastern District of North
More informationUSA v. Edward McLaughlin
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-25-2016 USA v. Edward McLaughlin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationObjectives. A very brief history 1/26/18. Jamie Markham. Grid fluency Handbook and form familiarity Avoid common errors
Introduction to Structured Sentencing and Probation Violations Jamie Markham Assistant Professor of Public Law and Government Objectives Grid fluency Handbook and form familiarity Avoid common errors A
More informationImpact of Immigration on Families: Intersection of Immigration and Criminal Law. Judicial Training Network Albuquerque, New Mexico April 20, 2018
Impact of Immigration on Families: Intersection of Immigration and Criminal Law Judicial Training Network Albuquerque, New Mexico April 20, 2018 Judicial Training Network 1 Introductions David B. Thronson
More informationHOUSE BILL No December 14, 2005, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
HOUSE BILL No. HOUSE BILL No. December, 00, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary. A bill to amend PA, entitled "The code of criminal procedure," by amending sections and
More informationSENTENCING IN SUPERIOR COURT. Jamie Markham (919) STEPS FOR SENTENCING A FELONY UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING
SENTENCING IN SUPERIOR COURT Jamie Markham markham@sog.unc.edu (919) 843 3914 STEPS FOR SENTENCING A FELONY UNDER STRUCTURED SENTENCING 1. Determine the applicable law 2. Determine the offense class 3.
More informationWho Is In Our State Prisons?
Who Is In Our State Prisons? On almost a daily basis Californians read that our state prison system is too big, too expensive, growing at an explosive pace, and incarcerating tens of thousands of low level
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 81B 1
Article 81B. Structured Sentencing of Persons Convicted of Crimes. Part 1. General Provisions. 15A-1340.10. Applicability of structured sentencing. This Article applies to criminal offenses in North Carolina,
More informationDONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, is convicted of one or both of the capital offenses relating
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. DONALD SCOTT TAYLOR, Defendant. CRIMINAL NO. 07-1244 WJ NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK A SENTENCE OF
More informationOverview of Federal Criminal Cases Fiscal Year 2014
Overview of Federal Criminal Cases Fiscal Year 2014 UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION United States Sentencing Commission One Columbus Circle, N.E. Washington, DC 20002 www.ussc.gov Patti B. Saris Chair
More informationOffice Of The District Attorney
SHANNON G. WALLACE District Attorney Office Of The District Attorney BLUE RIDGE JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Cherokee County Justice Center 90 North Street, Suite 390 Canton, Georgia 30114 Phone 770-479-1488 Fax 770-479-3105
More information20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates
20 Questions for Delaware Attorney General Candidates CANDIDATE: CHRIS JOHNSON (D) The Coalition for Smart Justice is committed to cutting the number of prisoners in Delaware in half and eliminating racial
More informationCitation: R. v. Finck, 2017 NSPC 73. Matthew Finck. Restriction on Publication: Pursuant to s of the Criminal Code DECISION ON SENTENCE
PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Finck, 2017 NSPC 73 Date: 20171129 Docket: 8074143/8074144 Registry: Amherst Between: Her Majesty the Queen v. Matthew Finck Restriction on Publication:
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES Where to find the Guidelines ONLINE at www.ussc.gov/guidelines In print from Westlaw Chapter Organization Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Offense Conduct Chapter
More informationSession of SENATE BILL No By Committee on Judiciary 2-1
Session of 0 SENATE BILL No. By Committee on Judiciary - 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure; relating to criminal discharge of a firearm; sentencing; amending K.S.A. 0 Supp.
More informationStephen M. Reasoner Eastern District of Arkansas. Why am I here? 1
Stephen M. Reasoner Eastern District of Arkansas Why am I here? 1 I think it is a real shame that a person who apparently has been a good husband and father and productive member of society, and so late
More informationTHE IMPORTANCE OF AN INDIVIDUALIZED ASSESSMENT: MAKING THE MOST OF RESENTENCING UNDER
THE IMPORTANCE OF AN INDIVIDUALIZED ASSESSMENT: MAKING THE MOST OF RESENTENCING UNDER THE AMENDED CRACK COCAINE GUIDELINES I. Background Patricia Warth Co-Director, Justice Strategies On December 10, 2007,
More informationChapter 6 Sentencing and Corrections
Chapter 6 Sentencing and Corrections Chapter Objectives Describe the different philosophies of punishment (goals of sentencing). Understand the sentencing process from plea bargaining to conviction. Describe
More informationChapter 4 Conviction and Sentence for Immigration Purposes
Chapter 4 Conviction and Sentence for Immigration Purposes 4.1 Conviction for Immigration Purposes 4-2 A. Conviction Defined B. Conviction without Formal Judgment C. Finality of Conviction 4.2 Effect of
More informationA GUIDE TO THE JUVENILE COURT SYSTEM IN VIRGINIA
- 0 - A GUIDE TO THE JUVENILE COURT SYSTEM IN VIRGINIA prepared by the CHARLOTTESVILLE TASK FORCE ON DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2! How This Guide Can Help You 2!
More informationCREATIVE SENTENCING Capital Sentencing Techniques for Your Non-Capital Client
CREATIVE SENTENCING Capital Sentencing Techniques for Your Non-Capital Client Kathryn Kase Executive Director Texas Defender Service Your Most Difficult Client... Describe him without reference to the
More informationJustice in Iceland Judge Tómas Magnússon
Justice in Iceland Judge Tómas Magnússon On April 1, 2004, Green Bag Contributing Editor Dan Currell visited Judge Sigurður Tómas Magnússon in his chambers in Reykjavík, Iceland. Judge Magnússon sat on
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr WTM-GRS-1
Case: 17-10473 Date Filed: 04/04/2019 Page: 1 of 14 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 17-10473 D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr-00154-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationCriminal Justice A Brief Introduction
Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction ELEVENTH EDITION CHAPTER 10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections What is Probation? Community corrections The use of a variety of officially ordered program-based
More informationThe court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON
The court process How the criminal justice system works. CONSUMER GUIDE FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON Inside The process Arrest and complaint Preliminary hearing Grand jury Arraignment
More informationCRIMMIGRATION. The Intersection of Criminal and Immigration Law. John Gihon Shorstein, Lasnetski & Gihon
CRIMMIGRATION The Intersection of Criminal and Immigration Law John Gihon Shorstein, Lasnetski & Gihon John@slgattorneys.com RESOURCES & TERMS n Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) n Code of Federal
More informationCRIMINAL DEFENSE LITIGATION HYPOTHETICAL ANSWER KEY. LABE M. RICHMAN, Esq.
CRIMINAL DEFENSE LITIGATION HYPOTHETICAL ANSWER KEY by LABE M. RICHMAN, Esq. Attorney at Law New York City 145 146 HYPOTHETICAL ANSWER KEY Improving Immigration Outcomes In Criminal Cases NY State Bar
More informationSupervised Release (Parole): An Abbreviated Outline of Federal Law
Supervised Release (Parole): An Abbreviated Outline of Federal Law Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law March 5, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21364 Summary
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2814 United States of America, Appellant, Appeals from the United States District Court for the v. Western District of Missouri. Michael Hatcher,
More informationAmendment to the Sentencing Guidelines
Amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines January 21, 2016 Effective Date August 1, 2016 This document contains unofficial text of an amendment to the Guidelines Manual submitted to Congress, and is provided
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Docket No. YY-CR-YYY Plaintiff, ) District Judge ZZZZZZ ) v. ) 18 U.S.C. 3661 ) Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(i) XXX
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 94-CF-163. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationFor An Act To Be Entitled
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. 0 0 0 State of Arkansas 0th General Assembly A Bill DRAFT BPG/BPG Regular Session, 0 HOUSE BILL By: Representative
More informationColorado Legislative Council Staff
Colorado Legislative Council Staff Distributed to CCJJ, November 9, 2017 Room 029 State Capitol, Denver, CO 80203-1784 (303) 866-3521 FAX: 866-3855 TDD: 866-3472 leg.colorado.gov/lcs E-mail: lcs.ga@state.co.us
More informationWhen a State Felony is not A Federal Felony. Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder
When a State Felony is not A Federal Felony Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder Federal Felony Definition, generally: a conviction punishable by a term that exceeds one year imprisonment If the term exceeding
More informationNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING. Thursday, December 6, a.m. Legislative Office Building, Room 1C 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Monday, November 26, 2018 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Thursday, December 6, 2018 10 a.m. Legislative Office Building, Room 1C 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 On Thursday, December
More informationHow the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Work: An Abridged Overview
How the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Work: An Abridged Overview Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law July 2, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41697 Summary Sentencing
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2006 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-14-2006 USA v. Marshall Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-2549 Follow this and additional
More informationSuperior Court of Washington For Pierce County
Superior Court of Washington For Pierce County State of Washington, Plaintiff vs.. Defendant No. Statement of Defendant on Plea of Guilty to Sex Offense (STTDFG) 1. My true name is:. 2. My age is:. 3.
More informationMichigan s Parolable Lifers: The Cost of a Broken Process
Michigan s Parolable Lifers: The Cost of a Broken Process In August 1987, the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC) responded to an inquiry from the Legislative Corrections Ombudsman regarding delays
More informationAttorney General Sessions Delivers Remarks to the National Sheriffs Association Annual Conference. New Orleans, LA ~ Monday, June 18, 2018
JUSTICE NEWS Attorney General Sessions Delivers Remarks to the National Sheriffs Association Annual Conference New Orleans, LA ~ Monday, June 18, 2018 Remarks as prepared for delivery Thank you, Jonathan,
More informationIn the Case of the Central City Drug Bust, suppose Harry and Daisy
Consequences In the Case of the Central City Drug Bust, suppose Harry and Daisy are found guilty. What would happen? Would they immediately be whisked off to prison? In Georgia, the judge sentences the
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : :
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : VS. : NO. : : GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY EXPLANATION OF DEFENDANT S RIGHTS You or your attorney
More informationNew Beginnings. A Congregational Guide to Restorative Justice through Expungement. Retributive Justice vs. Restorative Justice
New Beginnings A Congregational Guide to Restorative Justice through Expungement Your congregation can help those with felony convictions expunge their records so they can rejoin the human community as
More informationEffective October 1, 2015
Modification to the Sentencing Standards. Adopted by the Alabama Sentencing Commission January 9, 2015. Effective October 1, 2015 A 3 Appendix A A 4 I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS - Introduction The Sentencing
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 27, 2004
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 27, 2004 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAVID CLINTON YORK Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Clay County No. 4028 Lillie
More informationTHE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT,
[Cite as State v. Wilson, 129 Ohio St.3d 214, 2011-Ohio-2669.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WILSON, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Wilson, 129 Ohio St.3d 214, 2011-Ohio-2669.] Criminal law When a cause
More informationTHE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017
THE ABC S OF CO AND ACCA FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER CJA PANEL SEMINAR DECEMBER 15, 2017 https://youtu.be/d8cb5wk2t-8 CAREER OFFENDER. WE WILL DISCUSS GENERAL APPLICATION ( 4B1.1) CRIME OF VIOLENCE ( 4B1.2(a))
More informationCalifornia Wobblers : How to Determine Whether a Prior California Conviction Was a Felony or a Misdemeanor
California Wobblers : How to Determine Whether a Prior California Conviction Was a Felony or a Misdemeanor There is considerable confusion among federal practitioners about when a California offense that
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 16, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEREINO
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: April 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016)
-1-cr; 1--cr United States v. Boykin 1-1-cr; 1--cr United States v. Boykin 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 01 (Argued: April, 01 Decided: August
More informationCONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO HB 2490 would amend various statutes related to criminal sentencing.
SESSION OF 2014 CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT BRIEF HOUSE BILL NO. 2490 As Agreed to April 4, 2014 Brief* HB 2490 would amend various statutes related to criminal sentencing. The bill would establish that
More informationSENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE
LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2007 SUMMARY Synopsis: Type of Impact: Eliminates the death
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 11, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, J. Hobart Darbyshire,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-576 / 10-1815 Filed July 11, 2012 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. CHRISTINE MARIE LOCKHEART, Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the Iowa District Court
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 294
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. 0 State of Arkansas st General Assembly As Engrossed: S// A Bill Regular Session, SENATE BILL By: Senator
More informationDETERMINATE SENTENCING
DETERMINATE SENTENCING 29 TH Annual Juvenile Law Conference San Antonio, Texas February 22, 2016 Ryan J. Mitchell, Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1570 Houston, Texas 77251-1570 Phone: 832.534.2542 Fax: 832.369.2919
More informationPRISON REFORM AND REDEMPTION ACT 115 TH CONGRESS H.R (Collins)
PRISON REFORM AND REDEMPTION ACT 115 TH CONGRESS H.R. 3356 (Collins) STATUS: H.R. 3356 is a bipartisan bill pending in Congress. It is not a law. We do not know if or when it could become law. To become
More informationRecent Caselaw 2017 Robert E. Shepherd, Jr. Juvenile Law and Education Conference University of Richmond School of Law
Recent Caselaw 2017 Robert E. Shepherd, Jr. Juvenile Law and Education Conference University of Richmond School of Law Julie E. McConnell Director, Children s Defense Clinic University of Richmond School
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,517 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DANIEL LEE SEARCY, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,517 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DANIEL LEE SEARCY, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from McPherson
More informationMandatory Minimum Sentences Created, Increased, or Expanded By Congress,
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Number of Sentences Created 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Mandatory Minimum
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 113
CHAPTER 99-12 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 113 An act relating to punishment of felons; amending s. 775.087, F.S., relating to felony reclassification and minimum sentence
More informationWRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION BEFORE THE ANTITRUST MODERNIZATION COMMISSION
WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION BEFORE THE ANTITRUST MODERNIZATION COMMISSION Hearing on Consideration of Antitrust Criminal Remedies November 3, 2005 Madam Chair, Commissioners,
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JAMARR LANARD SCOTT, Appellant, v. Case No. 2D08-2945 STATE OF
More informationSenate Bill No. 361 Senators Cannizzaro, Segerblom, Manendo, Ratti, Farley; Atkinson, Cancela, Denis, Ford, Parks, Spearman and Woodhouse
Senate Bill No. 361 Senators Cannizzaro, Segerblom, Manendo, Ratti, Farley; Atkinson, Cancela, Denis, Ford, Parks, Spearman and Woodhouse CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to domestic violence; providing under
More informationVictim / Witness Handbook. Table of Contents
Victim / Witness Handbook Table of Contents A few words about the Criminal Justice System Arrest Warrants Subpoenas Misdemeanors & Felonies General Sessions Court Arraignment at General Sessions Court
More informationNo. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. October Term 2013
No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term 2013 DANIEL RAUL ESPINOZA, PETITIONER V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationCandidate Q&As: Three face off in judge race
Candidate Q&As: Three face off in judge race By DAILY RECORD STAFF Updated 17 hrs ago Three Ellensburg attorneys CK Powers, Candace Hooper and Chris Herion are running for Kittitas County Superior Court
More informationSelect Florida Mandatory Minimum Laws
Select Florida Laws IMPORTANT NOTE: This is not necessarily a complete list. Laws frequently change, and these sentences may no longer be accurate or up to date. Talk with a lawyer in your state if you
More informationSentencing hearing after conviction for impaired driving; determination of grossly aggravating and aggravating and mitigating factors;
20-179. Sentencing hearing after conviction for impaired driving; determination of grossly aggravating and aggravating and mitigating factors; punishments. (a) Sentencing Hearing Required. After a conviction
More informationCourt of Appeals of Michigan. PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Kenya Ali HYATT, Defendant Appellant.
PEOPLE v. HYATT Court of Appeals of Michigan. PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Kenya Ali HYATT, Defendant Appellant. Docket No. 325741. Decided: July 21, 2016 Before: SHAPIRO, P.J.,
More informationFamilies Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C
Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 202-822-6700 www.famm.org Summary of The Gang Deterrence and Community Protection Act of 2005 Title I Criminal
More informationH 7075 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED ======== LC003045/SUB A ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
01 -- H 0 SUBSTITUTE A AS AMENDED LC000/SUB A S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO CRIMINAL OFFENSES -- WEAPONS Introduced By: Representatives
More informationF4 & F5 Offender Placement
September 12, 2012 Christina Madriguera Esq., Legislative Liaison/Analyst Seeking Sponsor F4 & F5 Offender Placement PROPOSED TITLE INFORMATION To modify language in Ohio Revised Code 2929.13(B)(1)(a),
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee
Case: 15-40264 Document: 00513225763 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/08/2015 No. 15-40264 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAYMOND ESTRADA,
More information