Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Small Claims Court) BARBARA DOWDS. - and - SCHEDULE A PLAINTIFF S CLAIM
|
|
- Melissa Eaton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Court File No /12 B E T W E E N : Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Small Claims Court) BARBARA DOWDS - and - Plaintiff DESIGNER SUNROOMS AND ADDITIONS o/b ONTARIO LTD. Defendant SCHEDULE A PLAINTIFF S CLAIM Claim 1. The Plaintiff claims against the Defendant as follows: (a) Damages for breach of contract, negligence, and misrepresentation, in the amount of twenty five thousand ($25,000.00) dollars, or such further and other amounts as may become known, and shall be disclosed, prior to trial; (b) Pre-judgment interest and post judgment interest in accordance with the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, as amended; (c) Costs of the action on a full indemnity scale including all applicable taxes; and (d) Such further and other relief that this Honourable Court deems just.
2 - 2 - Parties 2. The Plaintiff, Barbara Dowds (the Plaintiff or Ms. Dowds ), is a human person, a Canadian citizen, and at all material times the owner of the residential dwelling and real property located at the address municipally known as 28 Burningham Crescent, Ajax, Ontario (the Property ). 3. The Defendant, Designer Sunrooms and Additions as operated by Ontario Ltd. (the Defendant or Designer Sunrooms ), is a legal person, a corporation duly incorporated pursuant to the laws of the Province of Ontario, and whereas Ontario Ltd. was at all material times doing business as Designer Sunrooms and Additions and who was at all material times carried on business as a contractor installing sunrooms and additions among other things. Background 4. On or about November , the Defendant was contracted by the Plaintiff to provide or obtain designs, plans, specifications, and permits, as well as to perform, manage, or supervise, the construction or installation or erection of a two storey sunroom addition including exterior decking with stairway and railings (the Project ). 5. On May , a building permit for the Project was issued by the Town of Ajax. 6. In or about May 2012, the Defendant commenced work upon the Project. 7. In or about July 2012, the Plaintiff began reporting defective and deficient work with requests for correction or remediation to the Defendant.
3 Subsequently, the Defendant investigated the defective and deficient work and failed to correct or remediate such defective and deficient work. 9. In or about October 2012, the Plaintiff commenced remedial work by hiring consultants and contractors as necessary to correct and remediate the Project or otherwise ensure the making good of the defective and deficient workmanship of the Defendant. 10. On or about October , the Plaintiff received a Hazardous Investigation Defect Notice from the Electrical Safety Authority identifying defects in respect of electrical workmanship performed by the Defendant and instructing that remedial work be performed. 11. On or about October , the Plaintiff received an expert roofer s commentary report identifying defects in respect of improper installation of roofing materials and eaves troughs, installation of roofing materials below the grade of materials as specified within building code regulations, 12. On or about November , the Plaintiff received an investigative consultant s moisture mapping and thermal imaging report identifying defects in respect of improper installation of roofing materials, structure slope, and flashings that require correction to ensure that run-off water may properly drain away from structures. Additionally, building code violations including omission of various structural supports and improper design practices were noted. Remediation work was recommended. 13. Subsequently, the Plaintiff continues to hire, consultants and contractors charged with the task of performing work as necessary for the correction and remediation of the defective and deficient work of the Defendant.
4 - 4 - Negligence 14. The Plaintiff pleads that the damages were caused by the negligence, want of care, breach of contract, breach of duty, and breach of statute, by the Defendant, and/or its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees or servants, for whom in law the Defendant is responsible, the particulars of which are as follows: (a) The Defendant failed to take reasonable care when in conducting its explicit and implied duties under the contract with the Plaintiff; (b) The Defendant failed to take reasonable care in performing to proper standards of workmanship; (c) The Defendant failed to follow the designs, plans, specifications, and procedures required to properly complete the Project; (d) The Defendant hired incompetent contractors, subcontractors, employees, servants, and agents, whom were without the proper knowledge and skills required to properly complete the Project; (e) The Defendant failed to adequately, if at all, ensure that the contractors, subcontractors, employees, servants, and agents, were capable of properly performing their respective functions including ability to meet the reasonable standards of proper workmanship; (f) The Defendant failed to adequately, if at all, train the contractors, subcontractors, employees, servants, and agents, as to how to properly perform
5 - 5 - their respective functions including ability to meet the reasonable standards of proper workmanship; (g) The Defendant failed to ensure the contractors, subcontractors, employees, servants, and agents, were physically fit and capable of proper performance of their respective functions including ability to meet the reasonable standards of proper workmanship; (h) The Defendant failed to use, provide, or ensure availability, of the proper machinery and tools required to carry out the workmanship as necessary to the Project; (i) The Defendant failed to consider, or consider at all, the injury, losses, or dangers, posed to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff s family members, the Plaintiff s animals as pets, the Plaintiff s friends, and visitors whether as invitees or trespassers to the Property, when conducting workmanship; (j) The Defendant knew or ought to have known or with the exercise of reasonable diligence should have known of the knowledge and skills required and necessary to perform the work required to properly complete the Project; (k) The Defendant employed or contracted with incompetent contractors, subcontractors, employees, servants, and agents, without proper knowledge and training; (l) The Defendant failed to properly instruct, control, and supervise the work conducted by contractors, subcontractors, employees, servants, and agents;
6 - 6 - (m) The Defendant used, allowed, or failed to prevent the use, of machinery or tools or equipment, in an unsafe, unreasonable, incompetent, hazardous, and careless manner, without due care, attention, and concern, for the Plaintiff and other persons who may use or otherwise be present upon the Property; (n) The Defendant allowed or failed to prevent defective and deficient workmanship that resulted in improperly installed steps and railings and whereas such improperly installed steps and railings pose risk and/or safety hazards requiring correction at substantial expense to the Plaintiff; (o) The Defendant allowed or failed to prevent defective and deficient workmanship that resulted in improperly installed walls, floors, and ceilings and whereas such improperly installed walls, floors, and ceilings pose risk and/or safety hazards requiring correction at substantial expense to the Plaintiff; (p) The Defendant allowed or failed to prevent defective and deficient workmanship that resulted in improperly installed electrical wiring and whereas such improperly installed electrical wiring poses risk and/or safety hazards requiring correction at significant expense to the Plaintiff; (q) The Defendant allowed or failed to prevent defective and deficient workmanship that resulted in improperly installed roofing materials and whereas such improperly installed roofing materials pose risk and/or safety hazards requiring correction at significant expense to the Plaintiff;
7 - 7 - (r) The Defendant allowed or failed to prevent defective and deficient workmanship that resulted in improperly installed windows and doors and whereas such improperly installed windows and doors pose risk and/or safety hazards requiring correction at significant expense to the Plaintiff; (s) The Defendant allowed or failed to prevent defective and deficient workmanship that resulted in improperly installed eaves, troughs, and fascia and whereas such improperly installed eaves, troughs, and fascia pose risk and/or safety hazards requiring correction at significant expense to the Plaintiff; (t) The Defendant failed to act in a prudent and cautious manner and in accordance with the accepted standards of workmanship governing their trade; (u) The Defendant failed to act in a prudent and cautious manner and in accordance design, plans, and specifications of the Project; (v) The Defendant undertook to complete or perform the Project despite lacking the requisite licensing, experience, equipment, expertise, knowledge, skills, and qualifications; (w) The Defendant failed to re-attend at the Property to make reasonable and proper corrections to those parts of the Project that were defective and deficient; (x) The Defendant was incompetent and ought to have refrained from undertaking to complete the Project;
8 - 8 - (y) The Defendant created dangerous conditions that posed risk and/or safety hazards that were, or will be, corrected at significant expense to the Plaintiff; and (z) The Defendant created cosmetically unappealing work that devalued the Property and were, or will be, corrected at significant expense to the Plaintiff. Breach of Contract and Misrepresentation 15. Further and in the alternative, the Plaintiff pleads that the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a legally binding contract with respect to the Project. 16. The contract contained implied and express terms requiring the Defendant to properly conduct and perform its duties and workmanship in completing the Project including refraining from causing loss or damage to the Property as a result of the work and refraining from creating or causing risk and/or safety hazards as a result of the work. In breach of the said contract, the Defendant failed to ensure that the work was conducted properly. 17. The Plaintiff further pleads that the contract with the Defendant contained the following express or implied terms whereas the agreement was such that: (a) The Defendant, contractors, subcontractors, employees, servants, and agents, were properly qualified and well experienced with the necessary experience, skill, expertise, training, and knowledge to undertake the work required to properly complete the Project;
9 - 9 - (b) The Defendant would fully and completely correct, repair, or replace, all faulty materials and workmanship flaws including all damages caused to the Property or hazards created upon the Property as arising out of or related to the Defendant s operations; (c) The Defendant would perform all work in a good, safe, and workmanlike manner; (d) The Defendant would complete and deliver the Project free from defective and deficient workmanship; and (e) The Defendant would employ and assign work only to persons experienced, qualified, skilled, competent, and physically fit, to perform the work required. 18. Further and in the alternative, the Plaintiff pleads that the negligence of the Defendant as aforesaid also constituted a breach of the contract. 19. The Plaintiff states that the work performed with respect to the Project was at all material times under the sole care, possession, and control of the Defendant. 20. The Plaintiff therefore pleads and relies upon the legal principle res ipsa loquitor and states that it is plain and obvious that the defective and deficient workmanship arose as a result of the conduct of the Defendant. 21. In entering into the contract with the Defendant, the Plaintiff relied upon the following representations made by the Defendant: (a) That the Defendant was properly qualified and well experienced in the work necessary to complete the Project;
10 (b) That the Defendant had the necessary experience, skill, expertise, training, and knowledge, to undertake the Project; and (c) That the Defendant was qualified, competent and properly trained, and where necessary also properly licensed by the Province of Ontario. 22. The Plaintiff relied on the misrepresentation statements and suffered detrimentally as a result. Damages 23. The Plaintiff pleads that as a result of the Defendant s negligence, lack of care, breach of duty, breach of contract, and negligent misrepresentation, as set out herein, the Plaintiff has suffered damages, including property damages, out-of-pocket expenses, loss of enjoyment of property, diminution of value of property, and such further and other damages for which the particulars shall be provided to the Defendant prior to the trial of this action. 24. It was a foreseeable consequence that as a result of the Defendant s conduct, the Project would be unsatisfactorily completed, many risk and safety hazards would be created, the Plaintiff would be put to expense in correcting the Defendant s work, and the Property would be damaged or devalued. 25. The Plaintiff pleads and relies upon the provisions of: (a) The Negligence Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. N.1; (b) The Building Code Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 23;
11 (c) The Ontario Electrical Safety Code; (d) The municipal bylaws of the Town of Ajax or Regional Municipality of Durham; (e) The amendments and regulations to the statutes listed above; and (f) The further and other statutes and regulations the particulars of which shall be provided to the Defendant prior to trial. Jurisdiction 26. The Plaintiff resides in the Town of Ajax within the Regional Municipality of Durham. 27. The Defendant conducts business within the Regional Municipality of Durham. 28. The wrongdoings as alleged occurred within the Regional Municipality of Durham. 29. The Plaintiff proposes that the trial of this action take place within the Regional Municipality of Durham at the Superior Court of Ontario Small Claims Court located in the City of Oshawa. Dated: December F.P. LEGAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 36 Park Road South Oshawa, Ontario L1J 3G8 Lori Flock LSUC# P06943 T: Paralegal for the Plaintiff
Construction Warranties
Construction Warranties Jon W. Gilchrist Payne & Jones, Chartered Sealant, Waterproofing & Restoration Institute Fall Technical Meeting September 2006 Montreal Definition: What is a warranty? warranty?
More informationFiling # E-Filed 12/01/ :28:55 PM
Filing # 35008457 E-Filed 12/01/2015 02:28:55 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION MARK LaROCCA and SILVIA LaROCCA, v. Plaintiffs, Case
More informationb. signs indicating street names and direction; d. public notice signs.
Subdivision 1 - Applications and Compliance 9.3.1. 1. No sign shall be erected, placed, altered, maintained, demolished, or removed unless in conformity with this bylaw or any other relevant city bylaw.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AT LAW
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WILL COUNTY, ILLINOIS INJURED PERSON, Plaintiff, v. RESPONSIBLE PARTIES Defendants. COMPLAINT AT LAW NOW COMES the plaintiff, INJURED PERSON, by and
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017 EXHIBIT 1
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/2017 05:00 PM INDEX NO. 655700/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017 EXHIBIT 1 2010 WL 706778 (N.Y.Sup.) (Trial Pleading) Supreme Court of New York. New
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/2016 12:53 PM INDEX NO. 190187/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ANGELO C. ABRUZZINO and BARBARA
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DAVID CARMICHAEL. -and-
(1fl ~ I CJ~!fl%'1( Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DAVID CARMICHAEL -and- Plaintiff VIA RAIL CANADA INC., CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY, and CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY Defendants
More informationBody Corporate Operational Rules
Body Corporate 200012 Operational Rules 1. Interpretation of terms, and rules binding owners, occupiers, employees, agents, invitees, licensees and tenants are: Terms defined in the Unit Titles Act 2010
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS CONCERNING THE LIABILITY OF BUILDING PROFESSIONALS IN NSW
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS CONCERNING THE LIABILITY OF BUILDING PROFESSIONALS IN NSW Paper given by Brian Walton to the Annual Conference of the Australian Institute of Building Surveyors 21 22 July 2014 Introduction
More informationVILLAGE OF MARCELIN BYLAW NO. 02/2015 A BYLAW RESPECTING BUILDINGS
VILLAGE OF MARCELIN BYLAW NO. 02/2015 A BYLAW RESPECTING BUILDINGS The Council of the Village of Marcelin in the Province of Saskatchewan enacts as follows: SHORT TITLE 1. This Bylaw may be cited as the
More informationOLIVIA WAIYEE LEE Appellant. WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent. Winkelmann, Simon France and Woolford JJ
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA656/2015 [2016] NZCA 258 BETWEEN AND OLIVIA WAIYEE LEE Appellant WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Hearing: 4 May 2016 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Winkelmann,
More informationContract and Tort Law for Engineers
Contract and Tort Law for Engineers Christian S. Tacit Tel: 613-599-5345 Email: ctacit@tacitlaw.com Canadian Systems of Law There are two systems of law that operate in Canada Common Law and Civil Law
More informationCALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS
CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTIONS 895-945.5 895. (a) "Structure" means any residential dwelling, other building, or improvement located upon a lot or within a common area. (b) "Designed moisture barrier"
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/08/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/08/2016 02:32 PM INDEX NO. 151976/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x
More informationEXHIBIT B TITLE 7 REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS
EXHIBIT B TITLE 7 REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS INDEX TO EXHIBIT B Chapter Title Exhibit Designation Chapter 1 Definitions Exhibit B-1 Chapter 2 Actionable Defects Exhibit B-2 Chapter
More informationCITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No
Authority: North York Community Council Item 8.35, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on July 12, 13 and 14, 2011 Enacted by Council: October 4, 2012 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 1228-2012 To amend Zoning
More informationTITLE 12 BUILDING, UTILITY, ETC. CODES CHAPTER 1 BUILDING PERMIT
12-1 TITLE 12 BUILDING, UTILITY, ETC. CODES CHAPTER 1. BUILDING PERMIT. 2. BUILDING CODE. 2. GAS CODE. 3. ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE. CHAPTER 1 BUILDING PERMIT SECTION 12-101. Permit required. 12-102. Compliance
More informationBYLAW NUMBER 33M2016
BEING A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF CALGARY TO REQUIRE VISUAL ASSESSMENT OF BUILDING EXTERIORS AND THE MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * WHEREAS The City of
More informationFILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 02/15/ :54 PM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/15/2017
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NIAGARA MARTINE JURON vs. Plaintiff, GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS HOLDING CORPORATION, COMPLAINT GENERAL MOTORS LLC, SATURN OF CLARENCE, INC., now known
More informationCONTRACT FOR THE DEMOLITION OF A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
CONTRACT FOR THE DEMOLITION OF A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING This Agreement is made and entered into this day of, 20, by and between the CITY OF ELKHART, INDIANA, ( CITY ), and. RECITALS: WHEREAS, the CITY desires
More informationHome Building Amendment Act 2014 No 24
New South Wales Home Building Amendment Act 2014 No 24 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Schedule 2 Amendment of NSW Self Insurance Corporation Act 2004 No 106 48 Schedule 3 Repeals 50 New
More informationFiling # E-Filed 05/22/ :20:45 PM
Filing # 27631401 E-Filed 05/22/2015 01:20:45 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 20 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION BERNICE CLARK, as Personal Representative
More informationCHAPTER 9 BUILDING AND ELECTRICAL CODES
CHAPTER 9 BUILDING AND ELECTRICAL CODES ARTICLE 2. ELECTRICAL CODE 9.11 Adoption 9.12 Administration and enforcement 9.13 Inspections 9.14 Fees ARTICLE 3. PENALTIES 9.15 Penalties ARTICLE 9. VACANT BUILDINGS
More informationCITATION: Berta v. Arcor Windows and Doors Inc., 2016 ONSC 7395
CITATION: Berta v. Arcor Windows and Doors Inc., 2016 ONSC 7395 COURT FILE NO.: C-14-2600-SR DATE: 2016/11/29 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: Steve Berta and Manon Berta, Plaintiffs AND: Arcor
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF SUNDRIDGE BY-LAW NUMBER THE BUILDING BY-LAW
THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF SUNDRIDGE BY-LAW NUMBER 2002-022 THE BUILDING BY-LAW THE CORPORATION OF THE VILLAGE OF SUNDRIDGE BY-LAW NUMBER 2002-022 THE BUILDING BY-LAW INDEX PAGE 1. Short Title 1
More informationMyles F. Corcoran Construction Consulting, Inc. Summary of SB CCC Title 7
SB-800 Summary February 28, 2011 Page 1 Myles F. Corcoran Construction Consulting, Inc. Summary of SB-800 - CCC Title 7 As a public service to our builder clients we have prepared this memorandum on what
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ONTARIO LIMITED. -and- GREG KELLY, JOAN KELLY, ONTARIO INC. and TRADESMAN HOME INSPECTIONS
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No.: CV-12-466870 B E T W E E N: 2180511 ONTARIO LIMITED Plaintiff -and- GREG KELLY, JOAN KELLY, 1159387 ONTARIO INC. and TRADESMAN HOME INSPECTIONS STATEMENT
More informationPlaintiff, for its Complaint against the above-captioned Defendants, states and
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ESTATE OF HARLAND OLSEN c/o Eadie Hill Trial Lawyers 3100 E. 45 St., Suite 218 Cleveland, Ohio 44127 and vs. Plaintiff, ATHENIAN ASSISTED LIVING, INC.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF [COUNTY [NAME], vs. [NAME], Plaintiff, Defendants. Case No. COMPLAINT (Personal Injury Negligence and Violations of Oregon Residential Landlord
More informationIngles v. The Corporation of the City of Toronto Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada dated March 2, 2000
Ingles v. The Corporation of the City of Toronto Decision of the Supreme Court of Canada dated March 2, 2000 (City Council at its regular meeting held on October 3, 4 and 5, 2000, and its Special Meetings
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 14, 2005
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 14, 2005 N. VICTORIA HOLLADAY v. CHARLES SPEED, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. 99-1112-2 Arnold B. Goldin, Chancellor
More informationCHAPTER IV. BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION
CHAPTER IV. BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION Article 1. Fire Limits Article 2. Building Code Article 3. Electrical Code Article 4. Plumbing and Gas-Fitting Code Article 5. Moving Buildings Article 6. Dangerous
More informationChapter 10 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS*
Chapter 10 BUILDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS* *Cross references: Community development, ch. 22; fire prevention and protection, ch. 34; stormwater management, ch. 48; subdivisions, ch. 50; utilities,
More informationHome Foundation Subcontractor Services Agreement
Home Foundation Subcontractor Services Agreement This Packet Includes: 1. General Information 2. Instructions and Checklist 3. Step-by-Step Instructions 4. Home Foundation Subcontractor Services Agreement
More informationCity of Mexico Beach Replacement of Fire Department Roofing Shingles
City of Mexico Beach Replacement of Fire Department Roofing Shingles 2018 BID INFORMATION, REQUIREMENTS, INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS BID INFORMATION BIDS DUE BY: Thursday, April 19 th, 2018 at 2:00
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN BY-LAW NUMBER
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN BY-LAW NUMBER 2008-23 Being a By-law to provide for the administration and Enforcement of the Ontario Building Code Act Within the Township of
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CLARENCE-ROCKLAND BY-LAW NUMBER BEING A BY-LAW TO REGULATE HEIGHT AND DESCRIPTION OF LAWFUL FENCES
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CLARENCE-ROCKLAND BY-LAW NUMBER 2002-09 BEING A BY-LAW TO REGULATE HEIGHT AND DESCRIPTION OF LAWFUL FENCES WHEREAS paragraphs 25, 26, 27 and 28 of Section 210 of the Municipal
More informationORDINANCE NO Section 2. Definitions: As used in this ordinance, the following terms shall have the following subscribed meanings:
ORDINANCE NO. 07-46 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED THE REVISED GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE ADOPTED BY THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE AND AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME
More informationLICENCE Waterfront BE_RU_. Licence Fee - CDN$2.00. Plant Name: OPGI File No: OPG Assessment # OPGI Lands Legal Description. Box Date of Licence
LICENCE Waterfront BE_RU_ Plant Name: OPGI File No: OPG Assessment # OPGI Lands Legal Description Box Date of Licence 1 2 Licensor ONTARIO POWER GENERATION INC., a corporation incorporated under the Business
More informationCHAPTER 150: BUILDINGS. Building Code. Permits and General Requirements. Construction Sites. Electrical Inspections
CHAPTER 150: BUILDINGS Section Building Code 150.01 Codes adopted by reference 150.02 Application, administration and enforcement 150.03 Permits and fees 150.04 Building Code optional chapter 150.15 Miscellaneous
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 18, 2012 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 18, 2012 Session THE COUNTS COMPANY, v. PRATERS, INC. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 11C408 Hon. W. Jeffrey Hollingsworth,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND
Antrobus et al v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lynette Antrobus, Individually c/o John Mulvey, Esq. 2306 Park Ave., Suite 104
More informationCase 7:16-cv NSR Document 5 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 7:16-cv-09921-NSR Document 5 Filed 12/29/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o GOLDENS BRIDGE FIRE DISTRICT, Civil
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HALL OF JUSTICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 GERALD SINGLETON, State Bar No. 0 ERIKA L. VASQUEZ, State Bar No. 0 BRODY A. McBRIDE, State Bar No. 0 SINGLETON LAW FIRM, APC West Plaza Street Solana Beach, CA 0 Tel: (0-10 Fax: (0-1
More informationSECTION 7: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 7: Sections 500.230 and 500.240 of Article VII of Chapter 500 of Title V of the code of Ordinances of the City of O Fallon, Missouri, are hereby repealed and two new Sections initially to be designated
More informationENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT. THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL (hereinafter called "the Region") OF THE FIRST PART
ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN: -AND- THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL (hereinafter called "the Region") OF THE FIRST PART 2022662ONTARIO INC. (hereinafter called "the Owner") OF THE SECOND PART WHEREAS
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
Reverse and Render and Opinion Filed July 3, 2018 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00372-CV AVPM CORP. D/B/A STONELEIGH PLACE, Appellant V. TRACY L. CHILDERS AND MARY
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF LOYALIST TOWNSHIP BY-LAW NO
THE CORPORATION OF LOYALIST TOWNSHIP BY-LAW NO. 2014-062 A BY-LAW TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KINGSTON FOR AN URBAN PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE IN LOYALIST
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CALAVERAS CIVIL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
GERALD SINGLETON, State Bar No. 0 ERIKA L. VASQUEZ, State Bar No. 0 BRODY A. McBRIDE, State Bar No. 0 SINGLETON LAW FIRM, APC West Plaza Street Solana Beach, CA 0 Tel: (0-0 Fax: (0 - Email: gerald@geraldsingleton.com
More informationORDINANCE NO 100 CITY OF PATTISON, TEXAS SUBSTANDARD BUILDING ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO 100 CITY OF PATTISON, TEXAS SUBSTANDARD BUILDING ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PATTISON, TEXAS, RELATING TO THE REPAIR OR DEMOLITION OF SUBSTANDARD, UNINHABITABLE OR OTHERWISE DANEGEROUS
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF OAKVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF OAKVILLE BY-LAW NUMBER 2013-088 A by-law to provide for the construction, demolition and change of use or transfer of permits, inspections and related matters and to repeal
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO /2010
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/2010 INDEX NO. 107442/2010... NYSCEF DON 61712010 DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2010 -against- Plaintiff@), LIFE FTTNESS, A DIVISION OF BRUNSWICK CORPORATION and
More informationCOMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND. Plaintiffs Furlandare Singleton, individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 2013-Aug-09 14:17:37 60CV-13-3137 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION FURLANDARE SINGLETON, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Dequan Singleton,
More informationDetermination regarding a dispute about a house built by one shareholder of a jointly owned block of Maori land at 41 Rarapua Place, Te Puna, Tauranga
Determination 2009/115 Determination regarding a dispute about a house built by one shareholder of a jointly owned block of Maori land at 41 Rarapua Place, Te Puna, Tauranga 1. The matters to be determined
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY THEODORE J. MARCUCILLI and C.A. No. 99C-02-007 JUDY G. MARCUCILLI, PLAINTIFFS, v. BOARDWALK BUILDERS, INC., DEFENDANT and THIRD-
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/09/2013 INDEX NO. 153197/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/09/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------
More information2014 ONSC 4841 Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Cruz v. McPherson CarswellOnt 11387, 2014 ONSC 4841, 244 A.C.W.S. (3d) 720
2014 ONSC 4841 Ontario Superior Court of Justice Cruz v. McPherson 2014 CarswellOnt 11387, 2014 ONSC 4841, 244 A.C.W.S. (3d) 720 Terra Cruz and Carmen Cruz, Plaintiffs and Jason Mcpherson, 546291 Ontario
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION MICHAEL VASILIK, : Plaintiff : : v. : Case No. 2015-C-904 : VOIPOCH, LLC, : Defendant : ***************************************************
More informationAs Passed by the House. Regular Session Sub. H. B. No
132nd General Assembly Regular Session Sub. H. B. No. 504 2017-2018 Representative Pelanda Cosponsors: Representatives Cera, Patton, Slaby, Roegner, Fedor, Carfagna, Reineke, Lang, Rezabek, Boggs, Boyd,
More informationORDINANCE NO BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MANATEE. Section of the Manatee County Code of Ordinances is hereby
AN ORDINANCE OF MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO CONTRACTOR LICENSING; CREATING SECTION 2-6-101 OF THE MANATEE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR LOCAL CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY FOR GARAGE DOOR
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/17/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/17/2016 1226 PM INDEX NO. 156305/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF 01/17/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationWHEREAS the Legislature of the Province of Alberta has passed the Safety Codes Act, Chapter S , Revised Statutes of Alberta, as amended;
Last Revised Sept. 30, 2013 Sheet 1 5624 B/L 5848 A CONSOLIDATION OF A BYLAW OF THE CITY OF LETHBRIDGE PASSED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE SAFETY CODES ACT OF ALBERTA WHEREAS the Legislature of the
More informationTHE TOWNSHIP OF WILMOT BY-LAW NO
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WILMOT BY-LAW NO. 2005-53 Being a By-law respecting Construction, Demolition, Change of Use, Conditional Permits, Sewage Systems and Inspections WHEREAS Section 7 of
More informationIllinois Legal Update. Patrick M. Miller, Partner
Illinois Legal Update Patrick M. Miller, Partner ILLINOIS Legal Update Case Law Update: Limitations periods applicable to construction related and indemnification claims Strict application of affidavit
More informationILLINOIS LAW MANUAL CHAPTER IV STATUTORY CAUSES OF ACTION. Effective February 14, 1995, the Illinois Structural Work Act was repealed.
If you have questions or would like further information regarding the Structural Work Act, please contact: Larry Kowalczyk 312-540-7616 lkowalczyk@querrey.com Result Oriented. Success Driven. www.querrey.com
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 03/19/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/19/2018
N8%' SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -- --X DELORES BRANNIGAN and DALE BRANN1GAN, Index No.: 500562/2013 Plaintiffs, RESPONSE TO -against- DEMAND FOR A VERIFIED BILL OF NEW YORK
More informationSigned: Page 1 of 9. By Order of the Commissioner: g 7/ Date: 'ssioner Judith Frydland. Published: 02/01/15 Effective: 02/11/15
PROBLEM LANDLORD LIST LAST UPDATED: 10/22/2015 Mayor Rahm Emanuel Commissioner Judy Frydland BY AUTHORITY VESTED IN THE COMMISSIONER OF BUILDINGS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 2-22- 040(4) AND 2-92-416(G) AND THE
More informationRequest For Proposals Hwy 124 E ADA Door Opener Hallsville City Hall
Request For Proposals 2018-1 202 Hwy 124 E ADA Door Opener Hallsville City Hall The City of Hallsville, Missouri (the City ) seeks bids from qualified contractors for all materials and labor to install
More informationHALEY WHITTERS and JULIE HENDERSON
CITATION: Whitters v. Furtive Networks Inc., 2012 ONSC 2159 COURT FILE NO.: CV-11-420068 DATE: 20120405 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: HALEY WHITTERS and JULIE HENDERSON - and - FURTIVE NETWORKS
More informationBUILDING SERVICES CORPORATION ACT 1989 Na 147
BUILDING SERVICES CORPORATION ACT 1989 Na 147 NEW SOUTH WALES 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Definitions TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 - PRELIMINARY PART 2 - REGULATION OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WORK AND
More informationSAMPLE. Hayman Road Bentley Western Australia 6102
Residential Licence Agreement by resident for occupation of room Student residence, To: The Manager CRICOS provider code 00301J is a trademark of of Technology I the undersigned accept from you on licence
More informationLICENSE OF OCCUPATION
LICENSE OF OCCUPATION Country Gardens RV Park Ltd. (Owner) - AND Name: Date of Birth: (Site User/Contracting Party: hereinafter the OCCUPANT ) #1 Name: Date of Birth: (Site User/Contracting Party: hereinafter
More informationIN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citaton: Kirby v. Scotia Structures Inc., 2016 NSSM 62
IN THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citaton: Kirby v. Scotia Structures Inc., 2016 NSSM 62 Claim No: SCCH 447943 BETWEEN: Dr. R. Lee Kirby and Patricia M. Kirby Claimants v. Scotia Structures Inc.
More informationExample of Heritage Conservation Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act
Example of Heritage Conservation Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF LONDON THIS AGREEMENT made this day of [month] 20 between (the "Owner") and [name
More informationCORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2011-XX
CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON BY-LAW NUMBER 2011-XX Being a By-law to Regulate the Fortification of Land and to Prohibit Excessive Fortification of Land and to Prohibit the Application of Excessive
More informationU.S. TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
U.S. TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT AGENCY MODEL CONTRACT FOR USTDA-FUNDED TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE This is a model contract, designed only to facilitate the drafting of a Contract between the Grantee and the U. S.
More informationAGREEMENT #AGR FRIENDS OF DUNNELLON CHRISTMAS PARADE, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TO RAINBOW SPRINGS ART, INC.
AGREEMENT #AGR2018-25 FRIENDS OF DUNNELLON CHRISTMAS PARADE, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT TO RAINBOW SPRINGS ART, INC. THIS ASSIGNMENT OF MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT is hereby made and entered
More informationSuperior Court Of California, awoodward Bv *^^ TBeoutv Case Number S87-CU-CD-GDS. Sacramento Detmis Jones, Executive Officer 01/22/2008
1 CLAYTON M. ANDERSON (SBN 088) MATTHEW R. SCHOECH (SBN ) ANDERSON & KRIGER 81 N. Freeway Blvd., Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 8 Tel: () -10 Fax: () -1 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RLED Superior Court Of California,
More informationAllan Kinsey & Anor v Sunway Rahman Putra Sdn Bhd & Anor; Dekon Sdn Bhd (Third Party)
Allan Kinsey & Anor v Sunway Rahman Putra Sdn Bhd & Anor; Dekon Sdn Bhd (Third Party) HIGH COURT, SHAH ALAM SUIT NO: 22(NCVC) 971 2011 PRASAD SANDOSHAM ABRAHAM J 16 APRIL 2015 [2016] 1 CIDB-CLR 72 The
More informationLAW REVIEW JANUARY 1987 MUST LANDOWNER PROTECT MOONING REVELER FROM HIMSELF? James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D James C.
MUST LANDOWNER PROTECT MOONING REVELER FROM HIMSELF? James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1987 James C. Kozlowski The very successful 1986 Congress for Recreation and Parks in Anaheim, California is history.
More informationAppealed from the TwentyThird Judicial District Court. Honorable Thomas J Kliebert Jr Presiding. Remodeling
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2010 CA 1885 PATRICK AND BRENDA OCONNELL VERSUS DALE BRAUD DBA DALE SBUILDERS AND REMODELING y Judgment Rendered AU6
More informationMINIMUM HOUSING STANDARDS ORDINANCE
MINIMUM HOUSING STANDARDS ORDINANCE FINDINGS AND AUTHORITY. Pursuant to G. S. 160-A-441, it is hereby declared that there exist in the planning jurisdiction of the Town of Pine Level, dwellings which are
More informationICON DRILLING PURCHASE ORDER TERMS & CONDITIONS
ICON DRILLING ABN 75 067 226 484 PURCHASE ORDER TERMS & CONDITIONS Acceptance of this offer is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Acceptance of materials, work or services, payment
More informationFacility Crossing Agreement
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of the day of, 20. BETWEEN ( Grantor ) (hereinafter and in Schedules A, B & C referred to as the Grantor) and ( Grantee ) (hereinafter and in Schedules A, B & C
More informationFINAL DETERMINATION Adjudicator: P A McConnell
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2012-100-000058 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 12 BETWEEN AND AND AND AND ENGELA SOUTH TRUSTEE LIMITED Claimant AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent R J NEALE LIMITED Second
More informationAust Law Symposium. Wednesday, 21 April Park Royal, Darling Harbour
Aust Law Symposium Wednesday, 21 April 2016 Park Royal, Darling Harbour The Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) - recent changes and cases Introduction 1. In late 2014 and early 2015, the NSW legislature passed
More informationSUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. (Date of Subdivision Map Recordation: )
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Tract Map No.: (Date of Subdivision Map Recordation: ) THIS AGREEMENT is between the City of Fontana, a municipal corporation, County of San Bernardino, State of California
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID YOUMANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED July 26, 2011 v No. 297275 Wayne Circuit Court BWA PROPERTIES, L.L.C., LC No. 09-018409-NI Defendant-Appellee. Before:
More informationLICENSE OF OCCUPATION
790 Elm Tree Road! Little Britain, ON K0M 2C0! Phone: (705) 879-4442 E-Mail: info@mariposaestates.ca Web: www.mariposacreekestates.com BETWEEN: LICENSE OF OCCUPATION Mariposa Creek Estates (Hereinafter
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 31, 2010 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 31, 2010 Session FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A/S/O ROBERT AND JOANIE EMERSON, v. MARTIN EDWARD WINTERS, D/B/A WINTERS ROOFING COMPANY Appeal from
More informationlsdnlaw.com RECENT CASE REVIEWS FROM THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL [ JUNE 8, 2010 JULY 26, 2010 ] August 2010 Content ADA: ATTORNEYS FEES
August 2010 RECENT CASE REVIEWS FROM THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL [ JUNE 8, 2010 JULY 26, 2010 ] Content ADA: ATTORNEYS FEES Mundy v. Neal Second District Case No. B219711 June 30, 2010 DUTY: THIRD PARTIES
More informationCITY OF GRANDE PRAIRIE OFFICE CONSOLIDATION BYLAW C-1293
CITY OF GRANDE PRAIRIE OFFICE CONSOLIDATION BYLAW C-1293 A Bylaw of the City of Grande Prairie, to regulate neighbourhood nuisance, safety and liveability issues (As Amended by Bylaw C-1293A) WHEREAS pursuant
More informationPDF Version. ELECTRICAL SAFETY ACT [REPEALED] published by Quickscribe Services Ltd.
PDF Version [Printer-friendly - ideal for printing entire document] ELECTRICAL SAFETY ACT [REPEALED] published by DISCLAIMER: These documents are provided for private study or research purposes only. Every
More informationFacility Crossing Agreement
Schedule A Mutually Agreed to Terms and Conditions Schedule A forms part of the Facility Crossing Agreement. 1. Interpretation 1.01 In this Agreement, including the recitals, the words and terms used shall
More informationFACILITIES USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL I. RECITALS
FACILITIES USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made this 10th day of November, 2014 (the Effective Date ), by and
More informationOntario Municipal Board Order issued November 9, 2015 in Board File No. PL CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No (OMB)
Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Order issued November 9, 2015 in Board File No. PL140865 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 1274-2015(OMB) To amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86, as amended,
More informationCITY OF KINGSTON. Ontario. By-Law Number A By-Law To Regulate Fences. By-Law Number: Date Passed: September 9, 2014
CITY OF KINGSTON Ontario By-Law Number 2003-405 A By-Law To Regulate Fences Passed: November 4, 2003 As Amended By By-Law Number: By-Law Number: Date Passed: 2014-140 September 9, 2014 (Office Consolidation)
More informationTHE TOWN OF DEERPARK, ORANGE COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2011
THE TOWN OF DEERPARK, ORANGE COUNTY, NEW YORK LOCAL LAW NO. 2 OF 2011 A LOCAL LAW REPEALING CHAPTER 119 OF THE TOWN OF DEERPARK CODE AND CREATING A PROCEDURE FOR THE REPAIR, VACATION, AND DEMOLITION OF
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA PLAINTIFFS VERSUS
22nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE THE PARISH OF OF ST. ST. TAMMANY TAMMANY STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. DIVISION: PLAINTIFFS VERSUS DEFENDANT SELLER / BUILDER, L.L.C., DEFENDANT BUILDER, L.L.C., ABC INSURANCE
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA HERITAGE PERMITS BY-LAW (Amended by 3-19)
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA HERITAGE PERMITS BY-LAW 78-18 (Amended by 3-19) WHEREAS subsection 11(3)5 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c. 25, as amended, (the Municipal Act, 2001 )
More information