THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR REMITTANCE TRANSFERS UNDER THE DODD-FRANK ACT
|
|
- Jody Copeland
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Vol. 28 No. 6 June 2012 THE NEW REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR REMITTANCE TRANSFERS UNDER THE DODD-FRANK ACT The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has issued a final rule, as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, requiring remittance transfer providers to give detailed disclosures to consumers that initiate cross-border transactions. While the final rule includes provisions regarding exceptions to these detailed disclosure requirements and the use of estimates in certain cases, the ability to rely on such exceptions and estimates is very limited. The final rule also gives consumers cancellation and error resolution rights. Concurrent with the final rule, the Bureau issued a second proposed rule, which seeks to refine certain aspects of the final rule. The authors review the final rule and the issues left open by the proposed rule, and outline steps providers will need to take to secure compliance. By Christina A. LaVera and Stephen Krebs * The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ( Bureau ) recently issued its first final rule (the Final Rule ), which implements Section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act. 1 Section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act amended the Electronic Fund Transfer Act ( EFTA ) by adding a new Section 919 entitled Remittance Transfers. This section creates protections for U.S. consumers who send remittance transfers to recipients in foreign countries. The Final Rule implements the consumer protections provided for in Section 1073 by, among other things, mandating that financial institutions give senders of remittance transfers detailed disclosures of certain specified data related to the transfer. Financial institutions that send remittance transfers must also adhere to a new error resolution scheme and are subject to liability for their own acts, the acts of their agents, 1 Electronic Fund Transfers (Regulation E), 77 Fed. Reg (Feb. 7, 2012). and, in some cases, acts of consumers. In addition, the Final Rule provides senders with the right to cancel a remittance transfer and the right to a refund in certain circumstances. The Final Rule is substantially similar to although not identical to the proposed rule that was issued in May 2011 (the First Proposed Rule ). 2 Notably, the First Proposed Rule was issued not by the Bureau, but by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve ( Board ) prior to the date the Bureau came into existence. When the Bureau was officially established on July 21, 2011, the authority to promulgate rules under the EFTA and its implementing regulation, Regulation E, transferred to the Bureau (along with a range of other consumer protection rules). 2 Electronic Fund Transfers, 76 Fed. Reg (May 23, 2011). CHRISTINA A. LAVERA is counsel to and STEPHEN KREBS is an associate at Alston & Bird LLP in Washington, D.C. Their practice covers the full range of federal and state banking, and financial regulatory matters. Their addresses are christina.lavera@alston.com and stephen.krebs@alston.com. IN THIS ISSUE REMITTANCE TRANSFERS AFTER THE DODD-FRANK ACT June 2012 Page 61
2 RSCR Publications LLC Published 12 times a year by RSCR Publications LLC. Executive and Editorial Offices, 2628 Broadway, Suite 29A, New York, NY Subscription rates: $650 per year in U.S., Canada, and Mexico; $695 elsewhere (air mail delivered). A 15% discount is available for qualified academic libraries and full-time teachers. For subscription information and customer service call (866) or visit our Web site at General Editor: Michael O. Finkelstein; tel ; mofinkelstein@hotmail.com. Associate Editor: Sarah Strauss Himmelfarb; tel ; shimmelfarb@comcast.net. To submit a manuscript for publication contact Ms. Himmelfarb. Copyright 2012 by RSCR Publications LLC. ISSN: Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. Information has been obtained by The Review of Banking & Financial Services from sources believed to be reliable. However, because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by our sources, The Review of Banking & Financial Services does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of such information. In concert with its issuance of the Final Rule, the Bureau issued an additional proposed rule seeking further public comment regarding discrete areas within the Final Rule (the Second Proposed Rule ). 3 Because the Second Proposed Rule has yet to be finalized, a number of open issues remain with respect to the scope and requirements of the Final Rule. Despite these open issues, the Final Rule is scheduled to take effect on February 7, This article provides an overview of the Final Rule, outlines the contents of the Second Proposed Rule (including the associated open issues), and discusses practical implications regarding the new remittance transfer requirements. BACKGROUND Every year, consumers in the United States send tens of billions of dollars in remittance transfers to recipients in foreign countries. 4 The term remittance transfer typically refers to payments originated by immigrants who send money to their families in their home countries. 5 However, as noted in the Final Rule, consumer-initiated foreign transfers can be made by any consumers in the U.S., not just immigrants. 6 According to the World Bank, global remittance flows exceeded $440 billion in These transfers can be made using a variety of channels, although the Final Rule noted that most remittance transfers are made through non-depository money transmitters and wire transfers at depository institutions. 8 Remittance transfers may also be made through other means, including through credit or debit card transactions, through an Automated Clearing House ( ACH ) debit to a consumer s bank 3 Electronic Fund Transfers, 77 Fed. Reg (Feb. 7, 2012) Fed. Reg Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, Report to the Congress on the Use of the Automated Clearinghouse System for Remittance Transfers to Foreign Countries (July 2011), available at rptcongress/ach_report_ pdf Fed. Reg Board of Governors, Report to the Congress, supra note Fed. Reg. 6194, account, or by sending prepaid cards to recipients abroad. Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, remittance transfer transactions were generally excluded from federal consumer protection laws. Accordingly, Section 1073 was included in the Dodd-Frank Act to establish minimum protections for remittances sent by consumers in the United States to other countries and specifically to protect immigrants who send substantial portions of their earnings to family members abroad. 9 Notably, the Senate Report on the bill that became the Dodd-Frank Act states that these senders of remittance transfers face significant problems with their remittance transfers, including being overcharged or not having the funds reach intended recipients. 10 THE FINAL RULE Scope and Key Terms Prior to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act and issuance of the Final Rule, the term remittance transfer was traditionally understood to mean a cross-border, consumer-to-consumer payment of relatively low value. 11 By contrast, Section 1073 and the Final Rule define the term remittance transfer more expansively than this traditional definition. Specifically, the Final Rule defines the term remittance transfer to mean the electronic transfer of funds requested by a sender to a designated recipient that is sent by a remittance transfer provider S. Rep , at 179 (2010), available at /fdsys/pkg/crpt-111srpt176/pdf/crpt-111srpt176.pdf. 10 Id. 11 The Board acknowledged in the preamble to the First Proposed Rule that traditional remittance transfers often consist of consumer-to-consumer payments of low monetary value. 76 Fed. Reg Furthermore, in its report to Congress on the use of the ACH system for remittance transfers to foreign countries, the Board noted that the majority of sources that compile data on remittance transfers focus on transactions that meet this definition. Board of Governors, Report to the Congress, supra note C.F.R (e)(2). The Final Rule only includes narrow exceptions from coverage for (1) small value transfers June 2012 Page 62
3 The term sender is defined to mean a consumer in a state who, primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, requests a remittance transfer provider to send a remittance transfer to a designated recipient. The term designated recipient is defined to mean any person specified by the sender as the authorized recipient of a remittance transfer to be received at a location in a foreign country. The Final Rule imposes a range of compliance obligations on remittance transfer providers (or providers ). The term remittance transfer provider is defined to mean any person that provides remittance transfers for a consumer in the normal course of its business, regardless of whether the consumer holds an account with such person. 13 As these broad definitions, and the preamble and commentary to the Final Rule make clear, Section 1073 of the Dodd-Frank Act and the Final Rule cover the vast majority of consumer-initiated electronic funds transfers (including wire and ACH transactions) that originate in the U.S. and are sent to designated recipients in foreign countries, despite the fact that not all such transfers are remittance transfers within the traditional sense. 14 In fact, the Final Rule broadly applies to, among other things: (1) funds transfers, whether or not they are electronic funds transfers within the meaning of the EFTA; (2) all providers that satisfy the definitions outlined above regardless of whether the sender maintains an account with the provider; and (3) all crossborder transfers initiated in the U.S. by a consumer to be sent outside of the U.S. (regardless of whether the recipient is a business or natural person); and (4) all such transfers in any amount over $15 (rather than to transfers of relatively low value). Required Disclosures The Final Rule requires remittance transfer providers to give senders of remittance transfers detailed footnote continued from previous page of $15 or less and (2) transfers made for the purpose of purchasing or selling securities or commodities. 13 Id (f). The commentary to the Final Rule contains a facts and circumstances test for determining whether a provider provides remittance transfers for a consumer in the normal course of its business. In the Second Proposed Rule, the Bureau proposed to add a safe harbor to make it easier to determine when certain companies are excluded from the statutory scheme because they do not provide remittance transfers in the normal course of business C.F.R (e)(1). disclosures about the transfer both before and after the transfer. Specifically, a provider must give a sender a written prepayment disclosure when the sender requests the transfer, but prior to payment for the transfer. 15 In general, the provider must also give the sender a written receipt when payment is made for the transfer. 16 As an alternative, a provider may give the sender (at the time the prepayment disclosure is required) a single, combined disclosure containing the information that must be included on both the prepayment disclosure and receipt. 17 The prepayment disclosure must contain, as applicable: the transfer amount (in the currency in which the transfer is funded); fees and taxes imposed by the provider; the total amount of the transaction (in the currency in which the transfer is funded); the exchange rate; the transfer amount (in the currency in which the funds will be received by the designated recipient); other fees and taxes (i.e., those imposed on the transfer by a person other than the provider); and the total amount that will be received by the designated recipient (in the currency in which the funds will be received). 18 In most cases, the prepayment disclosure must be provided to the sender when the sender requests the remittance transfer, but prior to payment for the transfer. 19 The written receipt must contain: the information that must be included in the prepayment disclosure; 15 Id (e)(1). 16 Id (e)(2). Separate timing requirements apply if the transaction is conducted entirely by telephone or if the transfer is a preauthorized transfer. Id (e)(2); (a). 17 Id (b)(3). 18 Id (b)(1). 19 Note that separate timing requirements apply to preauthorized remittance transfers. See Transfers Scheduled in Advance infra. June 2012 Page 63
4 the date the funds will be available to the designated recipient; the name of (and, if provided, contact information for) the designated recipient; a statement about the sender s error resolution and cancellation rights; the name of and contact information for the remittance transfer provider; and a statement that the sender may contact the state agency that licenses or charters the remittance transfer provider and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, along with relevant contact information. 20 In most cases, the receipt disclosure must be provided to the sender when payment is made for the remittance transfer, although different timing/delivery rules apply to transfers conducted entirely by phone, as well as transfers conducted entirely by phone where the sender has an account with the remittance transfer provider. 21 As noted above, the combined disclosure must contain information required to be included in both the prepayment disclosure and receipt disclosure, and must be provided to the sender when the sender requests the remittance transfer, but prior to payment for the transfer. The disclosure requirements outlined above create a range of compliance challenges for certain financial institutions due to the operational realities of current international funds transfer systems. For example, many institutions use open networks to send transfers to unaffiliated institutions in foreign countries. Within open networks, funds are transferred from the sending institution to a recipient institution through a network of correspondent and intermediary institutions. A remittance transfer provider that sends a remittance transfer through an open network system often has limited control over and limited access to information regarding the transaction because intermediary institutions along the transmittal route typically have no direct relationship with the sending institution and, at present, no obligation to provide rate, fee, and tax information that is necessary to inform the disclosures required by the Final Rule C.F.R (b)(2). 21 Note that separate timing requirements apply to preauthorized remittance transfers. See Transfers Scheduled in Advance infra. Notably, the preamble to the Final Rule acknowledges that the disclosures required by the Final Rule may pose a particular challenge for providers that send transfers through open networks. The preamble expressly states that the Bureau is aware that a number of providers likely do not currently possess or have easy access to the information needed to satisfy the new disclosure requirements for every transaction and for these providers, as well as their operating partners, compliance may require modification of current systems, protocols, and contracts. Exceptions and Estimates The Final Rule provides two limited exceptions that permit certain providers to disclose estimates rather than exact amounts: a temporary exception for insured depository institutions and a permanent exception for transfers to certain countries. The temporary exception permits a provider to disclose estimates of certain information (the exchange rate, the transfer amount, other fees and taxes, and total to recipient) if: a provider cannot determine exact amounts for reasons beyond its control (such as when the exchange rate is set by a person with which the insured institution has no correspondent relationship after the insured institution sends the remittance transfer); a provider is an insured institution; 22 and the remittance transfer is sent from the sender s account with the insured institution. 23 Although the temporary exception was designed to alleviate some of the compliance challenges this new disclosure regime poses, notably, it expires on July 21, Thus, once it expires, providers will be required to disclose actual amounts as opposed to estimates, unless they qualify for the permanent exception (and unless the Bureau exercises its authority to extend the temporary exception for five years). 22 For purposes of this exception, insured institution means insured depository institutions (which includes uninsured U.S. branches and agencies of foreign depository institutions) as defined in Section 3 of the FDIC Act, and insured credit unions as defined in Section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act C.F.R (a). 24 Section 1073 gives the Bureau the authority to extend the temporary exception for an additional five years (through July 21, 2020) if it determines that termination of the exception would negatively affect the ability of insured institutions to send remittances to foreign countries. June 2012 Page 64
5 The permanent exception permits a provider to give estimates of certain items when it cannot determine the exact amounts at the time the disclosure is required because: the laws of the recipient country do not permit such a determination, or the method by which transactions are made in the recipient country does not permit such determination. 25 The Bureau has interpreted the method exception to apply only to remittances sent via international ACH on terms negotiated by the U.S. government and the government of a recipient country where the exchange rate is set by the recipient country s central bank after the transfer is sent. The Bureau indicated in the preamble to the Final Rule that it expects to publish a safe harbor list of countries that qualify for the permanent exception, but has not yet done so. A provider that qualifies for either the temporary or permanent exception must comply with certain specified approaches for calculating estimates. 26 Cancellation and Error Resolution The Final Rule generally gives consumers the right to cancel a transfer within 30 minutes of making payment for the transfer. 27 The two conditions on this right set forth in the Final Rule are (i) the sender s oral or written request to cancel must enable the provider to identify the sender and the particular transfer to be cancelled and (ii) the transferred funds must not have been picked up by or deposited into the account of the designated recipient. If these two conditions are satisfied, providers are required to refund to the sender the total amount provided by the sender in connection with the transfer. 28 Providers must make this refund at no additional cost to the sender and must do so within three business days of receiving the request. 29 The Final Rule also requires a provider to investigate and remedy an error if it receives notice of the error no 25 Id (b) C.F.R (c). 27 Id (a). Note, however, that the 30-minute cancellation period described in (a) does not apply to remittance transfers scheduled at least three business days before the date of the transfer. Id (c). See Transfers Scheduled in Advance infra. 28 Id (b). 29 Id. later than 180 days after the disclosed date of availability of the transfer and certain other conditions are met (such as the notice of error enables the provider to identify the sender, the recipient, and the transfer to which the notice of error applies). 30 The Final Rule defines error to include: an incorrect amount paid by a sender in connection with a remittance transfer; a computational or bookkeeping error made by the provider relating to a remittance transfer; the failure to make available to a designated recipient the amount of currency stated in the receipt or combined disclosures, unless (i) the disclosure stated an estimate and the difference results from the application of the actual amounts rather than estimated amounts or (ii) the failure resulted from extraordinary circumstances outside the provider s control that could not have been reasonably anticipated; the failure to make funds available to a designated recipient by the date of availability stated in the receipt or combined disclosure, unless the failure resulted from (i) extraordinary circumstances outsider the provider s control that could not have been reasonably anticipated; (ii) delays related to fraud, BSA, OFAC, or other similar screening; or (iii) the transfer being made with fraudulent intent by the sender or any person acting in concert with the sender; or the sender s request for documentation (required by the disclosure provisions of the Final Rule), or for additional information or clarification concerning a transfer, including a request to determine whether an error exists. 31 The provider must investigate and determine whether an error occurred within 90 days of receiving a notice of error and report the results to the sender, including notice of any remedies available, within three business days after completing its investigation. 32 A provider is also required to correct the error as designated by the sender in accordance with the remedy provisions contained in the Final Rule. These remedies include refunding to the sender the amount of funds provided by the sender in connection with a transfer that was not properly transmitted (or the amount appropriate to 30 Id (b)(1). 31 Id (a)(1). 32 Id (c)(1). June 2012 Page 65
6 resolve the error) or making available to the designated recipient, without additional cost to the sender or designated recipient, the amount appropriate to resolve the error. 33 There is a specific provision of the Final Rule applicable to situations in which a provider fails to make funds available to the designated recipient by the disclosed date of availability. Under these circumstances the provider must, as applicable, either (i) give the sender a refund or (ii) make available to the designated recipient the amount appropriate to resolve the error without additional cost to the sender or to the designated recipient. 34 This means that in some circumstances a provider may be required to resend the transfer at no additional cost to the sender or the designated recipient. If, however, the sender provided incorrect or insufficient information to the provider in connection with the transfer, the provider may impose third-party fees for resending the transfer with the corrected or additional information (although the provider may not require the sender to pay the principal transfer amount again). 35 With respect to this type of error, a provider is also required to refund to the sender any fees and, to the extent not prohibited by law, taxes imposed for the remittance transfer, unless the sender provided incorrect or insufficient information to the provider in connection with the transfer. The Final Rule also makes providers liable for any violation of the Final Rule by an agent when the agent acts for the provider. 36 Transfers Scheduled in Advance The Final Rule contains modified requirements for preauthorized remittance transfers. A preauthorized remittance transfer is defined to mean a remittance transfer authorized in advance to recur at substantially 33 Id (c)(2). In the case of a sender s request for documentation or for additional information or clarification concerning a transfer, including a request to determine whether an error exists, the provider must provide the requested documentation, information, or clarification. 34 Id (c)(2)(ii). 35 Id. Furthermore, when this type of error has occurred, the provider must also refund to the sender any fees and (to the extent not prohibited by law, taxes) imposed for the transfer, unless the sender provided incorrect or insufficient information to the provider in connection with the transfer. Id (c)(2)(ii)(B). 36 Id regular intervals. 37 Notably, however, these requirements are subject to change as a result of the Second Proposed Rule, which is discussed in more detail below. For the first in a series of preauthorized transfers, a provider must provide the prepayment disclosure and receipt in accordance with the general timing requirements for all remittance transfers (i.e., when the sender requests the transfer, but prior to payment for the transfer, and when payment is made for the transfer, respectively). 38 For subsequent transfers in a series, the prepayment disclosure must be mailed or delivered within a reasonable time prior to the scheduled date of the transfer. 39 Furthermore, the receipt must be mailed or delivered to the sender no later than one business day after the date on which the transfer is made. 40 If the transfer involves the transfer of funds from the sender s account held by the provider, the receipt may be provided on or with the next regularly scheduled periodic statement for the account, or within 30 days after payment is made if a periodic statement is not provided. 41 In addition, the Final Rule provides that for remittance transfers scheduled by the sender at least three business days before the date of the transfer, a provider must comply with a request to cancel that is received at least three business days before the scheduled date of the transfer. 42 THE SECOND PROPOSED RULE As noted above, the Bureau issued a separate notice simultaneously with the Final Rule seeking additional input with respect to discrete issues within the Final Rule. In particular, the Second Proposed Rule sought comment on two primary areas: (1) how to set the parameters of a safe harbor from coverage for those providers that are not engaged in providing remittance transfers in the normal course of business; and (2) how to address a range of issues that relate to remittance transfers that are scheduled by a consumer in advance of the transfer date. 43 Each of these topics is discussed 37 Id (d). 38 Id (a)(1). 39 Id (a)(2). 40 Id. 41 Id. 42 Id (c). As with transfers that are not scheduled in advance, the request to cancel must also enable the provider to identify the sender s name and address or telephone number, and the particular transfer to be cancelled Fed. Reg (Feb. 7, 2012). June 2012 Page 66
7 below. Comments were due on the Second Proposed Rule on April 9, 2012, and the Bureau has not yet issued a final rule that corresponds to the Second Proposed Rule. Safe Harbor As noted above, the Final Rule defines the term remittance transfer provider to mean any person that provides remittance transfers for a consumer in the normal course of its business, regardless of whether the consumer holds an account with such person. Comment 30(f)-2 to the Final Rule provides for a facts-andcircumstances test in determining if an entity is engaged in the normal course of business, which includes, among other factors, the total number and frequency of remittance transfers sent by the provider. In the Second Proposed Rule, the Bureau seeks to revise Comment 30(f)-2 to adopt a bright-line test to determine if someone is engaged in providing remittance transfers in the normal course of business. Under this test, persons that have provided no more than 25 remittance transfers in the previous calendar year will not be deemed to be providing remittance transfers in the normal course of business for the current calendar year if the person provides no more than 25 remittance transfers in the current calendar year. In addition, the Second Proposed Rule seeks to further revise Comment 30(f)-2 to make clear that if that person makes a 26th remittance transfer in the current calendar year, the person would be evaluated under the facts-and-circumstances test to determine whether that person is a remittance transfer provider for that transfer and any other transfers provided through the rest of the year. Thus, the final version of the Second Proposed Rule could result in a change to the way in which institutions determine whether they are remittance transfer providers subject to Section 1073 and its implementing regulations. However, in light of the low threshold offered under the Second Proposed Rule, it is unlikely that this safe harbor would offer much relief to institutions that provide consumer-initiated, cross-border transfers. Transfers Scheduled in Advance As outlined above, the Final Rule includes specific provisions for remittance transfers that are scheduled in advance to recur at substantially regular intervals. These provisions include tailored disclosure and cancellation requirements. The Second Proposed Rule sought additional input on how these tailored requirements might be modified to further ease compliance burdens associated with preauthorized remittance transfers. Specifically, the Second Proposed Rule solicited comment regarding, among other things: whether use of estimates should be permitted in the prepayment disclosure and receipt in the following two circumstances: (i) a consumer schedules a onetime transfer or the first in a series of preauthorized transfers to occur more than 10 days after the transfer is authorized, or (ii) a consumer enters into an agreement for preauthorized remittance transfers where the amount of the transfers can vary and the consumer does not know the exact amount of the first transfer at the time the disclosures for that transfer are given; whether a provider that uses estimates in the prepayment disclosure and receipt in the two situations described above should be required to provide a second receipt disclosure with accurate information within a reasonable time prior to the scheduled date of the transfer; and whether possible refinements to the disclosure rules applicable to subsequent preauthorized remittance transfers should be established. In particular here, the Second Proposed Rule solicited comment on two alternative approaches to the disclosures rules for subsequent preauthorized remittance transfers: (i) whether the prepayment disclosure requirement should be retained for each subsequent transfer, but with a safe harbor interpreting the within a reasonable time standard for providing this disclosure, or (ii) whether the Bureau should instead eliminate the prepayment disclosure requirement for each subsequent transfer. The Second Proposed Rule also solicited comment on whether the Bureau should adopt changes to the cancellation requirements for certain remittance transfers that a sender schedules in advance, including preauthorized remittance transfers. That is, under the Final Rule, transfers scheduled in advance may be cancelled if the sender gives notice to the provider at least three business days prior to the scheduled transfer (provided that the transfer itself was scheduled at least three days in advance). The Second Proposed Rule solicits comment on whether the three-business-day deadline to cancel such remittances transfers in the Final Rule should be changed to be earlier or later than three business days. Furthermore, the Second Proposed Rule seeks additional input with respect to three issues related to the disclosure of the deadline to cancel as set forth in the Final Rule: June 2012 Page 67
8 whether the three-business-day deadline to cancel transfers scheduled in advance should be disclosed more clearly to consumers, such as by requiring a provider to disclose in the receipt the specific date the deadline to cancel will expire; whether a provider should be allowed on a receipt to describe both the three-business-day and 30-minute, deadline-to-cancel time frames and either describe to which transfers each deadline to cancel is applicable, or alternatively, use a check box or other method to indicate which deadline is applicable to the transfer; and whether the deadline to cancel should be disclosed in the prepayment disclosure for each subsequent transfer, rather than in the receipt given for each subsequent transfer. As demonstrated by the many areas regarding preauthorized remittance transfers addressed in the Second Proposed Rule, there remain a wide range of open issues for these types of transfers. Accordingly, a great many details are subject to change for remittance transfers scheduled in advance, which makes it difficult for financial institutions to begin developing compliance systems for these types of transfers. OBSERVATIONS AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS Institutions covered by the Final Rule will need to modify current systems, protocols, and contracts in order to comply with these new requirements. In addition to the challenges associated with disclosing the information that must be disclosed under the Final Rule, another consequence of the new remittance transfer regime may be legal uncertainty for institutions that provide international wire transfer services to consumers. In particular, UCC Article 4A contains a well-established legal framework that determines the respective rights and obligations of the parties to a wire transfer. However, Article 4A-108 provides that UCC Article 4A does not apply to a funds transfer, any part of which is governed by the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. Because international wire transfers initiated by consumers will be governed in part by the EFTA (as a result of Section 1073 and the Final Rule), UCC 4A will no longer apply to those transfers. The Final Rule does not address the interbank rights and obligations set forth in UCC 4A that have traditionally governed the liability of financial institutions involved in a wire transfer. Accordingly, certain rights and obligations among financial institutions that are parties to a wire transfer that is also a remittance transfer may be undefined when the Final Rule takes effect on February 7, Moreover, given the broad scope of the Final Rule beyond the traditional understanding of remittance transfer transactions, implications will be far-reaching. Ensuring compliance by the Final Rule s effective date will require significant time and effort, and may warrant a range of measures, including: revisions to existing policies, procedures, and practices to ensure overall compliance with the Final Rule, including adequate supervisory oversight and resource allocation, employee training, ongoing compliance monitoring, updates to the compliance program as needed, and third-party oversight (which may warrant changes to vendor management processes); review of current disclosures and disclosure practices, and incorporation of the new remittance transfer disclosures into that process; review of and revisions to processes for disclosing exchange rates and estimating foreign currency amounts to be transferred across business line; establishment of new error resolution procedures to comply with the Final Rule s requirements and integration of those error resolution procedures within the institution s existing error resolution processes; and evaluation and, where necessary, renegotiation of agreements with third parties to ensure sufficient information flow to accomplish the disclosure obligations. Given the breadth and depth of modifications that are likely to be necessary to comply with the Final Rule, we recommend institutions begin developing compliance systems as early as possible. June 2012 Page 68
Regulation E: Dodd-Frank Provisions
THE PAYMENTS INSTITUTE July 20-23, 2014 Emory Conference Center Hotel, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia Regulation E: Dodd-Frank Provisions Duncan Douglass Partner, Alston & Bird LLP AGENDA Dodd-Frank
More informationRemittance Transfers Under Dodd-Frank: The Final Rules and Their Far-Reaching Implications
Oklahoma City University School of Law From the SelectedWorks of Alvin C. Harrell 2013 Remittance Transfers Under Dodd-Frank: The Final Rules and Their Far-Reaching Implications Alvin C. Harrell, Oklahoma
More informationCONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU FINAL RULE ON REMITTANCE TRANSFERS - 12 CFR PART 1005, SUBPART B
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU FINAL RULE ON REMITTANCE TRANSFERS - 12 CFR PART 1005, SUBPART B Appleseed Briefing on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Remittance Rule, the Fair Remittance
More informationConsumer Financial Protection Bureau Finalizes Regulatory Scheme for Remittance Transfers
February 10, 2012 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Finalizes Regulatory Scheme for Remittance Transfers By Ezra C. Levine, Andrew M. Smith, and M. Sean Ruff Earlier this week, the Consumer Financial
More informationDocket No. CFPB ; Request for Information Regarding the Bureau s Adopted Regulations and New Rulemaking Authorities
June 19, 2018 Via Electronic Delivery Comment Intake Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552 Re: Docket No. CFPB 2018 0011; Request for Information Regarding the Bureau
More informationPayments System Law Rationalizing Laws and Regulations
Payments System Law Rationalizing Laws and Regulations Stephanie Heller Deputy General Counsel and Senior Vice President The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter and do not necessarily
More informationCFPB Shines Spotlight On Consumer Remittance Transfers
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com CFPB Shines Spotlight On Consumer Remittance
More informationCFPB ; RIN 3170-AA33
Comments to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 12 C.F.R. Part 1005 Regulation E; Docket No. CFPB-2012-0050; RIN 3170-AA33 Electronic Fund Transfers: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Published December
More informationJune 19, Acting Director Mick Mulvaney Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20552
June 19, 2018 Acting Director Mick Mulvaney Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 1700 G Street NW Washington, DC 20552 Re: Agency/Docket Number: Docket No. CFPB-2018-0011 -- Request for Information Regarding
More informationStructure and Functions of the Federal Reserve System
Structure and Functions of the Federal Reserve System name redacted Specialist in Macroeconomic Policy December 26, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional
More informationWhat It Means for the Prepaid Card Industry BRYAN CAVE WEBINAR August 16, 2010
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act: What It Means for the Prepaid Card Industry BRYAN CAVE WEBINAR August 16, 2010 1 J. Rinearson Agenda Introductions and Background - - Judie Rinearson
More informationREMOTE ACCOUNT TRANSFER SERVICE AGREEMENT
P.O. Box 22219 San Francisco, CA 94122 800.222.1391 Members_Info@sfpcu.org www.sfpcu.org REMOTE ACCOUNT TRANSFER SERVICE AGREEMENT IMPORTANT: THE AGREEMENT SETS FORTH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH
More informationComments to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 12 CFR Part 1005 Docket No. CFPB
Introduction. Comments to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 12 CFR Part 1005 Docket No. CFPB-2017-004 Request for Information Regarding Remittance Rule Assessment 1 by the National Consumer Law
More informationREMOTE DEPOSIT ANYWHERE AGREEMENT
PLEASE READ THIS TIOGA STATE BANK REMOTE DEPOSIT ANYWHERE CAREFULLY AND KEEP A COPY FOR YOUR REFERENCE. 1. DEFINITIONS: In this Agreement, the words "you" or "your" mean the consumer or business that has
More informationDodd-Frank Act and Remittances to Post-Conflict Countries:
From the SelectedWorks of Raymond Natter Fall October 11, 2013 Dodd-Frank Act and Remittances to Post-Conflict Countries: Raymond Natter Available at: https://works.bepress.com/raymond_natter/5/ 2. Dodd-Frank
More informationTHE RIGHT PROTECTION: MORE ON ADVANCEMENT AND INDEMNIFICATION
Vol. 41 No. 21 December 3, 2008 THE RIGHT PROTECTION: MORE ON ADVANCEMENT AND INDEMNIFICATION In three recent opinions, the Delaware Court of Chancery has addressed the scope of indemnification and advancement
More informationProvider Listing Agreement
Provider Listing Agreement This Provider Listing Agreement ( Agreement ) is between Driver Alliance, LLC an Arizona company ( Driver Alliance or We ) and the provider ( Provider or You ) wishing to have
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY #2013-040 In the Matter of: RBS Citizens, N.A. Providence, Rhode Island ) ) ) ) CONSENT ORDER AA-EC-2013-12 The Comptroller
More informationACH Origination Agreement
(Please return completed form to your nearest credit union branch, attention Business Banking.) This agreement is made this the day of between: University of Virginia Community Credit Union ( UVACCU )
More informationCampaign Finance Manual
Campaign Finance Manual Published by Elections Division 255 Capitol St NE Suite 501 Salem OR 97310-0722 503 986 1518 fax 503 373 7414 tty 1 800 735 2900 www.oregonvotes.gov Adopted by Oregon Administrative
More informationPeachCourt Document Access User Agreement Terms of Use
PeachCourt Document Access User Agreement Terms of Use Welcome to PeachCourt, Georgia s statewide Document Access and efiling System. PeachCourt is comprised of various web pages operated by GreenCourt
More informationHow To Use This Manual... 3
Compliance Manual for Political Committees TABLE OF CONTENTS How To Use This Manual... 3 Help with Using This Manual... 3 Definition of a Political Committee... 4 Topic I: Appointing a Campaign Treasurer...
More informationHow to Use This Manual
Please Read This First How to Use This Manual The Compliance Manual for Candidates is applicable to candidates participating in an election. A person who is a write-in is considered to be a candidate and,
More informationARTICLE ONE GENERAL 2009 OPERATING RULES ARTICLE ONE. SUBSECTION Effect of Illegality
2009 OPERATING RULES ARTICLE ONE ARTICLE ONE GENERAL SECTION 1.1 Application of Rules These rules apply to all entries and entry data transmitted through one or more ACH Operators, except where superseded
More informationCompliance Manual for Continuing Political Committees (CPCs) Legislative Leadership Committees (LLCs) Political Party Committees (PPCs)
2017 Compliance Manual for Continuing Political Committees (CPCs) Legislative Leadership Committees (LLCs) Political Party Committees (PPCs) Summary of Requirements Contribution Limits Chart Registration
More informationHow to Use This Manual
Compliance Manual for Candidates Please Read This First How to Use This Manual The Compliance Manual for Candidates is applicable to candidates participating in an election. A person who is a write-in
More informationE-Channels Customer Master Agreement - HSBCnet (Business) Customer Details. Full Customer (Company) Name: Address: Emirate: Postal Code / PO Box:
Section 1 E-Channels Customer Master Agreement - HSBCnet (Business) Customer Details Full Customer (Company) Name: Address: Postal Code / PO Box: Emirate: Principal Contact Name: Telephone Number: Fax
More informationSales Order (Processing Services)
SO# DIRECT CUST# INDIRECT CUST# Sales Order (Processing Services) Note: RelayHealth will assign CUST# s and SO# will be completed upon receipt. Sold To ( End User ): Bill To: Note: cannot be a P.O. Box
More informationChapter 24: Publications Committee
Chapter 24: Publications Committee I. Purpose The Publications Committee shall have responsibility for: Coordinating the dissemination of information in DttP or other publications or through correspondence
More informationKey Issues in Recording Remittances in the Balance of Payments Statistics and Recent Improvements in Concepts and Definitions
International Technical Meeting on Remittances Statistics Key Issues in Recording Remittances in the Balance of Payments Statistics and Recent Improvements in Concepts and Definitions The World Bank Washington,
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL for the SINGLE AUDIT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL BUREAU AUDIT DIVISION REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL for the SINGLE AUDIT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA For the years ending JUNE 30, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 RELEASE DATE: January 10, 2014 DUE DATE:
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT made by and between The Chief Financial Officer of Florida,
STATE OF FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made by and between The Chief Financial Officer of Florida, hereinafter referred to as Chief Financial Officer and hereinafter to as Qualified
More informationPlease return the following to
Court Street USA has become a reliable provider in the real estate industry for search services. We have been doing document retrievals and title searches since 1999. We provide our clients with nationwide
More informationPlease contact the UOB Call Centre at (toll free if calls are made from within Singapore) if you need any assistance.
Terms and Conditions of UOB estatement Services This document sets out the general terms and conditions which will apply to the estatement Services we provide to you. These terms and conditions are binding
More informationOnline Remittance User Guide
Online Remittance User Guide 2016 State Bank of India (California). All rights reserved. Table of Contents About this Document... 3 About SBIC Remittances.. 3 What is Remittance?.. 3 Features and Benefits....
More informationCHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill Nos. 716 and 2660
CHAPTER 2006-300 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill Nos. 716 and 2660 An act relating to campaign finance; amending s. 106.011, F.S.; redefining the terms political committee,
More information1. By Cashier s/official Check payable to Bank of Baroda. In this case, the funds will be remitted on the next business day after deposit of check.
Guidance for Completing the Remittance Application form Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Please fill remittance application form in block letters after reading instructions and rules governing remittances printed
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS
TERMS AND CONDITIONS The use of this application and/or site or any other site owned or maintained by Pruvit Ventures, Inc.., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Texas ( Company ) is
More informationNATIONAL REMITTANCE PLAN 2015 UNITED STATES
NATIONAL REMITTANCE PLAN 2015 UNITED STATES G20 National Remittance Plans 1 NATIONAL REMITTANCE PLAN 2015 UNITED STATES Background Market overview Total remittances sent by immigrants residing in the U.S.
More informationButte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal
Butte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal Clerk of the Board Use Only Agenda Item: 3.26 Subject: Revenue Contract Amendment Department: Sheriff-Coroner Meeting Date Requested: January 8, 2013
More informationCASH MANAGEMENT SERVICES MASTER AGREEMENT
This Cash Management Services Master Agreement (the Master Agreement ) and any applicable Schedules (the Master Agreement and any applicable Schedules are together referred to as the Agreement ) sets out
More informationLabor Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 480-1-2 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS 480-1-2-.01 Petition For Adoption, Amendment Or Repealer Of Rules 480-1-2-.02 Petition For Declaratory
More informationPolicy Title: FOIA Procedures and Guidelines Policy 104 Number:
,) lō. "" ~i~ o:: '-,,,,",, // ~A"C, r~ Administrative Policies and Procedures Policy Title: FOIA Procedures and Guidelines Policy 104 Number: Effective: 7/15 Supersedes: APR #106 (dated 3/99), APP #104
More informationthe Notices section below.
BY ACCESSING THIS WEBSITE OR ANY RELATED WEB PAGES (COLLECTIVELY REFERRED TO AS THE WEBSITE ), PRINTING OR DOWNLOADING MATERIALS FROM THE WEBSITE, OR OTHERWISE USING THE WEBSITE, YOU ( YOU, YOUR OR USER
More informationCFTC Adopts Final Anti-Manipulation and Anti-Fraud Rules & Begins Final Rulemaking Phase Implementing Dodd-Frank
CFTC Adopts Final Anti-Manipulation and Anti-Fraud Rules & Begins Final Rulemaking Phase Implementing Dodd-Frank by Peggy A. Heeg, Michael Loesch, and Lui Chambers On July 7, 2011, the Commodity Futures
More informationCODERED NEXT SERVICES AGREEMENT
CODERED NEXT SERVICES AGREEMENT This CodeRED NEXT Services Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and effective as of the last date written below (the Effective Date ) by and between Emergency Communications
More informationWire Transfer Agreement (Non-Personal Accounts)
Wire Transfer Agreement (Non-Personal Accounts) Client Name: Authorized Signature: Printed Name: Authorized Signature: Printed Name: Authorized Signature: Printed Name: Date: Per Wire Authority Limit:
More informationADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED. Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors I. PURPOSE This Charter specifies the scope of the responsibilities of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Board
More informationRegulatory Coordinating Committee
Regulatory Coordinating Committee On November 5, 1996, the Section submitted comments to the General Services Administration regarding its proposed rule on procurement integrity. The proposed rule would
More information3. Accout means your deposit account with us to which you are authorized to make a deposit using a Capture Device.
Mobile Deposit Service User Agreement Bank of the Valley Mobile Deposit Service USER AGREEMENT This Bank of the Valley Mobile Deposit Service User Agreement (the Agreement ) is entered into by Bank of
More informationLOUISIANA REVISED STATUTES TITLE 6 BANKS AND BANKING CHAPTER 13. SALE OF CHECKS AND MONEY TRANSMISSION
1031. Citation LOUISIANA REVISED STATUTES TITLE 6 BANKS AND BANKING CHAPTER 13. SALE OF CHECKS AND MONEY TRANSMISSION (Current through 2018 Regular Legislative Session) This Chapter may be cited as "The
More informationSubscription Agreement
Subscription Agreement PURCHASER QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT (Unaccredited Investors Only) Common Stock In United News International, Inc. ( Company ) This Subscription Agreement (the Agreement
More informationAutomated Clearing House (ACH) Origination Service Addendum to Business Online User and Access Agreement
Automated Clearing House (ACH) Origination Service Addendum to Business Online User and Access Agreement We suggest you read this document carefully and print a copy for your reference. You may refer back
More information1 77 Fed. Reg (December 31, 2012). 2 Affiliations for all law professors are for identification purposes only.
COMMENTS to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 12 CFR Part 1005 Docket No. CFPB-2012-0050 1 RIN 3170-AA33 Electronic Fund Transfers Changes to Remittances Protections by the National Consumer
More informationCISCO COLLEGE 101 COLLEGE HEIGHTS CISCO, TEXAS 76437
CISCO COLLEGE 101 COLLEGE HEIGHTS CISCO, TEXAS 76437 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS # RFP-052017 To serve as Depository for the Purpose of Assisting with the Banking Functions for All or Certain Funds Of Cisco
More informationColorado Secretary of State Rules Concerning Campaign and Political Finance [8 CCR ]
Colorado Secretary of State Rules Concerning Campaign and Political Finance [8 CCR 1505-6] Table of Contents Rule 1. Definitions... 2 Rule 2. Candidates and Candidate Committees... 4 Rule 3. Political
More informationSADC Payment System Oversight Committee Report
SADC Payment System Oversight Committee Report 2016/17 COMMITTEE OF CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS SADC PAYMENT SYSTEM OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE Southern African Development Community (SADC) All rights reserved. No
More informationTHE FUTURE OF SAY-ON-PAY DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Vol. 45 No. 7 April 11, 2012 THE FUTURE OF SAY-ON-PAY DERIVATIVE LITIGATION Negative say-on-pay advisory votes in a number of cases have spawned shareholder derivative litigation claims that directors
More informationSUBCHAPTER 05B UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION SECTION.0100 GENERAL PROVISIONS
18 NCAC 05B.0101 SCOPE SUBCHAPTER 05B UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE SECTION SECTION.0100 GENERAL PROVISIONS History Note: Authority G.S. 25-9-526; 143A-23; Temporary Adoption Expired Eff. March 29, 2002. 18
More information1000. MEMBERSHIP, REGISTRATION AND QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Application and Membership Interview
1000. MEMBERSHIP, REGISTRATION AND QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS 1010. Membership Proceedings 1011. Definitions 1012. General Provisions 1013. Application and Membership Interview 1014. Department Decision
More informationNASD Notice to Members Executive Summary
INFORMATIONAL Membership Rules SEC Approves Amendments To NASD Membership Rules; Effective Date: November 15, 2000 SUGGESTED ROUTING The Suggested Routing function is meant to aid the reader of this document.
More informationClaudia Swendseid October 23, 2012
Claudia Swendseid October 23, 2012 Claudia Swendseid Senior Vice President Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Minneapolis, MN Member of the Bank s Management Committee & provides executive oversight to
More informationIII. For which Fiscal Year (FY) is this recommendation being made: Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Date
1 IPA Recommendation Form for Local Public Bodies Under the Tiered System (LPB) (Please Use your LPB s Letterhead when printing this recommendation) Complete the contract (including obtaining the IPA's
More informationCHAPTER 468L TRAVEL AGENCIES
Part I. General Provisions CHAPTER 468L TRAVEL AGENCIES SECTION 468L-1 Definitions 468L-2 Registration and renewal 468L-2.5 Denial of registration 468L-2.6 Revocation, suspension, and renewal of registration
More informationMobile Deposit User Agreement
PlainsCapital Bank Mobile Deposit User Agreement PlainsCapital Bank Deposit Support Department P.O. Box 271 Lubbock, TX 79408 Customer Service 866.762.8392 Fax 866.580.3331 Voice Banking 866.762.7782 PlainsCapital.com
More informationBilling Code P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. [Docket No. IC ]
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/09/2014 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-15993, and on FDsys.gov Billing Code 6717-01-P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
More informationARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL
ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE RULES AS PART OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT PAGES 1.1 Application... 1 1.2 Scope... 1 II. TRIBUNALS AND ADMINISTRATION 2.1 Name
More informationASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Request for Proposal. Municipal Treasurers Association of Wisconsin (MTAW)
ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Request for Proposal Municipal Treasurers Association of Wisconsin (MTAW) June 1, 2018 The Municipal Treasurers Association of Wisconsin (MTAW) invites qualified independent
More informationCAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE
NORTH DAKOTA CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE These resources are current as of 8/7/14. We do our best to periodically update these resources and welcome any comments or questions regarding new
More informationTotal CUSIP and/or ISIN Nos.
OFFER TO PURCHASE AND CONSENT SOLICITATION STATEMENT Rain Carbon Inc. Offer to Purchase Any and All Outstanding 8.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2018 8.250% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 and 8.500% Senior
More informationWoodland Bank. Mobile Check Deposit Application End User License Agreement
Woodland Bank Mobile Check Deposit Application End User License Agreement This Remote Deposit Capture Application End User License Agreement ( Agreement ) constitutes a legal agreement between Woodland
More informationINTRODUCING BROKER AGREEMENT
3.2 IB shall be responsible for delivering to and obtaining from Customers and returning to PFD all documentation, including, without limitation, forms, agreements, financial statements, power of attorney
More informationNotice to Members. NASD Releases Minor Rule Violation Plan (MRVP) Guidelines. Executive Summary. Questions/Further Information
Notice to Members MARCH 2004 SUGGESTED ROUTING Legal & Compliance Registered Representatives Senior Management GUIDANCE NASD Releases Minor Rule Violation Plan (MRVP) Guidelines KEY TOPICS Minor Rule Violation
More informationCustodian Agreement. as Client. and. Butterfield Bank (Cayman) Limited as Custodian. Butterfield Bank (Cayman) Limited IS4-12
Custodian Agreement 20 as Client and Butterfield Bank (Cayman Limited as Custodian Butterfield Bank (Cayman Limited THIS AGREEMENT is made the day of,... BETWEEN (1.(the Client ; and (2 Butterfield Bank
More informationIEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
Approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board December 2017 IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5997, USA Copyright
More informationCORE BANKING AGREEMENT SWIFT DIRECT CORPORATE ACCESS. Product & Services Terms & Conditions
CORE BANKING AGREEMENT SWIFT DIRECT CORPORATE ACCESS Product & Services Terms & Conditions Contents Important Information 1 1. Definitions and interpretation 3 2. Background 4 3. Provision of the Service
More informationISDA AUGUST 2012 DF SUPPLEMENT 1
ISDA AUGUST 2012 DF SUPPLEMENT 1 published on August 13, 2012, by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. 1 This DF Supplement is intended to address requirements of the following final
More informationBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS OVERSIGHT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
0 MARY ANN SMITH Deputy Commissioner MIRANDA LEKANDER Assistant Chief Counsel ALEX M. CALERO (State Bar No. Senior Counsel CHARLES CARRIERE (State Bar No. Counsel Department of Business Oversight One Sansome
More informationMedicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 34 - Reopening and Revision of Claim Determinations and Decisions
Medicare Claims Processing Manual Chapter 34 - Reopening and Revision of Claim Determinations and Decisions Transmittals for Chapter 34 (Rev. 3568, 07-29-16) Table of Contents 10 - Reopenings and Revisions
More informationORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BILLING AND ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT
ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BILLING AND ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMON TERMS AND CONDITIONS... 2 1.1 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE...4 1.2 TERM...5 CONSOLIDATED BILLING
More informationTools Regulatory Review Materials California Accountancy Act
Article 1.5 Continuing Education Tools Regulatory Review Materials California Accountancy Act 5026. Continuing education requirement The Legislature has determined it is in the public interest to require
More informationBELIZE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION APPLICATION FORM III
BELIZE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION APPLICATION FORM Any services provided by Orion Corporate & Trust Services Ltd. are pursuant to the laws of Belize only. To ensure you are in full compliance with the laws
More informationCITY OF GONZALES BANK DEPOSITORY SERVICE RFP
CITY OF GONZALES BANK DEPOSITORY SERVICE RFP NOTICE TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS PROPOSAL FOR DEPOSITORY CONTRACT " ;. ':,; Notice is hereby given that the Governing Body of the City of Gonzales, Texas, subject
More informationFEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS > $10,000
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS > $10,000 1.0 GENERAL This Contract is subject to the terms of a financial assistance contract between the Santa Cruz Metropolitan
More informationUSER AGREEMENT FOR ARBITERPAY USERS
USER AGREEMENT FOR ARBITERPAY USERS This User Agreement ( Agreement ) is a contract between you and ArbiterPay. This Agreement governs your use of the ArbiterPay Services, your Account and the Website,
More informationLOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE ACT
LOBBYIST REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE ACT 3-6-101. Short title. 3-6-102. Definitions 3-6-103. Duties of registry of election finance, attorney general and reporter. 3-6-104. Registration - Fee Exceptions.
More informationBefore the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ADOPTING ORDER. Adopted: November 15, 2012 Released: November 15, 2012
Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of TDS Telecommunications Corporation Compliance with the Commission s Rules and Regulations Governing Customer Proprietary
More informationELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONS ACT, ACT NO. 25 OF 2002 [ASSENTED TO 31 JULY 2002] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 30 AUGUST 2002]
REVISION No.: 0 Page 1 of 17 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND TRANSACTIONS ACT, ACT NO. 25 OF 2002 [ASSENTED TO 31 JULY 2002] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 30 AUGUST 2002] To provide for the facilitation and regulation
More informationHOME WARRANTY COMPANY ARBITRATION RULES AND PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS March 15, 2019 Copyright by CDRS 2019 all rights reserved
RESOLUTION SERVICES CONSTRUCTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES, LLC S PECIALIZING IN MEDIATION & ARBITRATION & DISPUTE REVIEW BOARDS B PO BOX 8029 New Mexico: 505-473-7733 Toll Free: 888-930-0011 Santa Fe,
More informationEnd User License Agreement
End User License Agreement Remote Deposit Capture Application End User License Agreement This Remote Deposit Capture Application End User License Agreement ( Agreement ) constitutes a legal agreement between
More informationAgent/Agency Agreement
Agent/Agency Agreement This Agent/Agency Agreement ( Agreement ) between CareConnect Insurance Company Inc. and ( CCIC ) and ( Agent ) sets forth the terms and conditions under which Agent may sell health
More informationEXHIBIT D THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE USE OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS WITH AMERICAN COMMENTARY
Below is the complete text of the Convention. Each article of the Convention is followed by United States commentary prepared by the ULC Committee. Article 1. Scope of application CHAPTER I. SPHERE OF
More informationEQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT
EQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT THIS EQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of this [ ] day of [ ] by and between Ascentium Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability
More informationThis Agreement was last updated on June 14th, It is effective between You and Axosoft as of the date of You accepting this Agreement.
GitKraken End User License Agreement The following End User License Agreement (the Agreement ) governs Your use of the Software (as defined below) provided to You by Axosoft, LLC, an Arizona limited liability
More informationModel Administrative Rules
Uniform Commercial Code, Article 9 Model Administrative Rules 2015 Edition Revised May 19, 2015 As promulgated by International Association of Commercial Administrators Secured Transaction Section Copyright
More informationAudit of the Legislative Assembly s
Report 5: July 2012 Audit of the Legislative Assembly s Financial Records www.bcauditor.com Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Audit of the Legislative Assembly s financial records
More information8.130, 8.201, 8.235, 8.310, and 8.315, relating to General Applicability and Standards; Definitions;
Railroad Commission of Texas Page 1 of 16 The Railroad Commission of Texas (Commission) proposes amendments to 8.1, 8.5, 8.101, 8.130, 8.201, 8.235, 8.310, and 8.315, relating to General Applicability
More informationSPECIFIC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between
SPECIFIC MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Box 9740, Mississippi State, MS 39762 Mississippi State University Extension Service Box 9601, Mississippi
More informationSoftware Licence Terms
Software Licence Terms The following terms (hereinafter referred to as the Terms ) are effective BETWEEN (1) BTCSoftware Limited incorporated and registered in England and Wales whose registered office
More informationThe Saskatchewan Gazette
THE SASKATCHEWAN GAZETTE, JULY 4, 2014 1095 The Saskatchewan Gazette PUBLISHED WEEKLY BY AUTHORITY OF THE QUEEN S PRINTER/PUBLIÉE CHAQUE SEMAINE SOUS L AUTORITÉ DE L IMPRIMEUR DE LA REINE PART II/PARTIE
More information