Between brain drain and brain gain post-2004 Polish migration experience

Transcription

1 Between brain drain and brain gain post-2004 Polish migration experience Paweł Kaczmarczyk Centre of Migration Research University of Warsaw Conference Fachkräftebedarf und Zuwanderung IAB, Nuernberg May 31st June 1st 2011 Main questions / issues The term / notion of brain drain how useful? Polish post-accession migration experience lessons to be drawn? Brain drain / gain and Polish-German perspective 1

2 Notion of brain drain Definitional issues highly skilled: what does it mean: highly skilled? controversies definition typically applied - based on the years of formal education (5-6 level in ISCED classification) Notion of brain drain selective outflow of highly skilled persons assessment of the impacts theoretical approaches Theoretical approaches Two distinctive parts of the literature on consequences of highly skilled mobility: traditional approach - Grubel and Scott (1966), Bhagwati and Hamada (1974): a pessimistic view, emphasis on costs and losses, i.e. fiscal effects, impact on factors productivity brain drain; modern approach - Stark et al. (1997), Mountford (1997), Beine et al. (2001) new economics of brain drain: migration as a probabilistic event, i.e. the outcome of a lottery where the would-be migrant has a positive probability p of actually migrating, where p<1 the decision to invest in education is driven by the expected return to human capital a positive probability p of migrating increases the expected return to investment in human capital compared to the no-migration situation an increase in the optimal level of human capital possible brain gain (?). 2

3 Theoretical background Additional effects: brain waste - Mattoo et al. (2005) rate of return to human capital (?) brain drain or brain overflow Kaczmarczyk and Okólski (2008) the scope for a beneficial brain drain should be substantially reduced - Egger and Felbermayr (2007), Brücker et al. (2007) A dynamic approach: Beine et al. (2001) Brain drain model with "brain effect" and "drain effect" selected conclusions Important assumptions: Human capital is transferable Higher returns to education abroad From the theoretical analysis it follows that: Share of well educated depends on migration prospects Economic growth depends on the share of well educated (in a positive way) and migration (negatively) outcome? Important: Static effect drain effect (ex post) Dynamic effect brain effect (ex ante) Beneficial Brain Drain (BBD) emerges when the brain effect dominates empirical issue 3

4 Post-2004 migration experience Country 2002 (May) 2004* 2005* 2006* 2007* 2008* 2009* National Census In thousand Total Including: EU Austria Belgium France Germany Ireland Italy Netherlands Norway Spain Sweden United Kingdom Percentage change as compared with previous year** Total.. 45,0 34,5 16,4 2,6 15,4 EU ,0 32,5 20,0 2,2 13,7 Austria.. 66,7 36,0 14,7 2,6 5,0 Belgium.. 61,5 33,3 10,7 6,5 3,0 France.. 0,0 63,3 12,2 1,8 16,1 Germany.. 11,7 4,7 8,9 0,0 15,3 Ireland.. 406,7 57,9 66,7 10,0 22,2 Italy.. 18,6 21,4 2,4 1,1 3,4 Netherlands.. 87,0 27,9 78,2 10,2 22,2 Norway ,6 18,4 Spain.. 42,3 18,9 81,8 3,8 1,2 Sweden.. 54,5 47,1 8,0 7,4 6,9 United Kingdom.. 126,7 70,6 19,0 5,8 14,6 600 Stock of Polish migrants staying temporarily abroad according to the Labour Force Survey, (2 nd quarter) February May August November February May August November February May August November February May August November February May August November February Persons staying abroad between 2(3) and 12 months Persons staying abroad longer than 12 months Source: SOPEMI

5 Recent migration from Poland destinations France Germany Ireland 400 Italy Netherlands Spain 300 Sweden United Kingdom Source: SOPEMI 2010 Socio demographic profile of Polish pre and post accession migrants, selected features in % Source: Own elaboration based on the LFS data 5

6 Socio demographic profile of Polish post accession migrants in the UK and Germany, selected features in % Source: Own elaboration based on the LFS data Socio demographic profile of Polish post accession migrants in the UK, Italy and Spain, selected features in % Source: Own elaboration based on the LFS data 6

7 Selectivity patterns explanatory factors Migratory regime UK vs. Germany Socio cultural factors, e.g. language UK / Ireland vs. Sweden Structure of the receiving labour markets UK vs. Italy Insitutions of the labour market UK vs. Sweden Role of migrant networks UK / Ireland vs. Germany / Italy / Spain Is there a brain drain? Percentage of persons with tertiary education in the native and migrant population in the NMS, Resident population Migrant population Migrant population, age adjusted Bulgaria Czech Republic Estonia Hungary Lithuania Latvia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovak Republic Source: Bruecker et al

8 Drain effect? Unemployment and labour shortages stylized facts: : unemployment rate approx. 20% : unemployment rate below 10% - Number of unemployed: 2004 () 3.1 million 2007 () 1.5 million - Percentage of companies reporting hiring difficulties: 2005 () 1.8% 2007 () 12.7% Labour shortages in Poland (by sector) Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 2007 Manufacturing Construction Trade Transport Other Source: WB

9 Job vacancy rates in Poland, (by sector) Source: Eurostat Decline in unemployment and labour shortages main reasons Economic growth process of job creation Changes in educational system (vocational education) Low rates of internal mobility Low level of occupational mobility Long-term developments (demographic change, technological change, education) Post-accession migration 9

10 Brain overflow? Unemployment rate in Poland, , in % Source: Eurostat Brain effect? accumulation of human capital Percentages of students in the population aged 15-29, EU25 and NMS10, % 25% EU25 Bulgaria 20% Czech Republic Estonia Latvia 15% Lithuania Hungary 10% Poland Romania 5% Source: Eurostat 10

11 Accumulation of human capital share of persons with tertiary education Source: Eurostat Selective outflow of the highly skilled Percentage of persons with tertiary education in the native and migrant population in the NMS, Resident population Migrant population Migrant population, age adjusted Bulgaria Czech Republic Estonia Hungary Lithuania Latvia Poland Romania Slovenia Slovak Republic Source: Bruecker et al

12 Integration on the labour market abroad UK experience Distribution of the Polish population in Poland and in the UK by occupation (%), 2006 and Poles in the UK Poles in Poland 40 Poles in the UK Poles in Poland high-skilled middle low-skilled 0 high-skilled middle low-skilled Source: Olszewska 2011 Brain waste? Net weekly pay of full-time workers from Poland in the UK nominal and relative to the average (as per cent, in bold) Pre-accession migrants Post-accession migrants Age left full-time education Less than to 17 Age groups Age groups Total Total to More than Students Total Source: own elaboration based on the LFS data Net weekly pay of full-time workers from EU14 in the UK nominal and relative to the average (as per cent, in bold) EU15 immigrants Age groups Age left full-time education Total Less than to to More than Students Total Source: own elaboration based on the LFS data 12

13 Brain waste? Net weekly pay of full-time native workers in the UK nominal and relative to the average (as per cent, in bold), 2002 and , 2006, Age left full-time education Less than to to 20 More than 21 Students Age groups Age groups Total Total Total Source: own elaboration based on the LFS data Econometrics Brain waste? Estimated returns to education PL 02 PL 06 PL <04 PL >04 NMS7 NMS7 EU15 in NMS2 in Model in UK in UK <04 in >04 in UK UK UK UK Variable Education (years) (26.48) (24.75) (5.94) (3.04) (4.94) (3.33) (23.01) (1.76) Experience (months) (10.76) (14.30) (2.35) (2.58) (1.55) (1.15) (10.15) (0.17) Sex (female) ( ) (-23.05) (-6.49) (-4.74) (-3.06) (-2.72) (-11.73) (-2.65) Age (3.72) (2.04) (-1.05) (1.44) (-0.04) (0.43) (3.65) (-1.87) Marital status (partner) (9.95) (9.64) (0.85) (1.09) (0.51) (-0.04) (7.37) (1.93) UK citizenship (-0.53) (3.76) (2.10) (4.32) (1.33) Full time work (33.01) (31.16) (14.70) (7.58) (8.74) (4.92) (40.87) (7.33) Student (-10.41) (-4.50) (-3.56) (2.29) (-2.97) (-1.00) (-9.96) (-2.90) Private sector (-6.66) (-6.61) (-1.73) (-1.88) (0.86) (-1.30) (-2.13) (-3.14) CDE sector (3.54) (4.14) (-1.74) (0.36) (1.67) (-0.51) (0.15) (1.86) F sector (3.16) (3.45) (-1.74) (1.66) (1.22) (-0.00) (3.03) GHI sector (2.20) (3.07) (-2.23) (0.18) (-0.17) (-0.33) (-1.60) (2.06) JK sector (5.34) (5.51) (-1.29) (-0.12) (1.41) (0.84) (1.65) (3.70) LMNO sector (0.75) (3.90) (-2.01) (-0.42) (0.71) (-1.42) (-0.84) (1.87) P sector (-1.87) (-0.11) (-2.57) (-4.16) (-2.41) (-0.86) (-3.15) London/ Warsaw (16.79) (16.31) (3.93) (1.53) (2.48) (-2.15) (10.31) (1.59) Constant (98.33) (95.40) (13.74) (23.59) (14.56) (9.84) (47.05) (21.26) R Sample size ) In parentheses t-statistics calculated for robust standard errors 2) The reference groups for the respective variables are: male, without partner, non-uk citizen, working part-time, not a student, employed in the AB, public sectors, and working outside of the capital city. Data between the Polish LFS and UK LFS is not fully comparable. Source: Own evaluation based on UK LFS ( ) and Polish LFS (second quarters 2002 and 2006) 13

14 Instead of conslusions Consequences of highly skilled mobility unambigous Is brain waste an inescapable phenomenon? Transferability of skills Recognition of credentials Skills mismatch But: Migrants strategies Structure of demand secondary sectors, 3D jobs Lessons for migration policy: Areas of public intervention (???) Are we able to utilize skills? Do we really need highly skilled? New model of skilled mobility brain circulation? 14