Policy Statement on the Incarceration of Undocumented Migrant Families
|
|
- Zoe Byrd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Am J Community Psychol (2016) 57: DOI /ajcp POLICY STATEMENT Policy Statement on the Incarceration of Undocumented Migrant Families Society for Community Research and Action Division 27 of the American Psychological Association Society for Community Research and Action 2016 Executive Summary In the summer of 2014, the US government massively expanded its detention of immigrant families particularly mothers with young children at least in part mobilized by an effort to respond to an increase in the number of families apprehended at or near the United States Mexico border. According to a recent report issued by the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (LIRS) and the Women s Refugee Commission (WRC) (Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC), 2014, October), since 2011, the number of families from Central America risking their lives to cross into the United States has increased steadily. Between October of 2013 and September of 2014, the US government apprehended 68,334 children accompanied by a parent at the southwest border, representing a 361% increase in the number of family apprehensions over the previous fiscal year, and more than half of all the children who entered family detention in Fiscal Year 2014 were 6 years old or younger (Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC), 2014, October). This increase parallels the deeply related increase in unaccompanied minors whose numbers This policy statement is an official statement of the Society for Community Research and Action, Division 27 of the American Psychological Association, and does not represent the position of the American Psychological Association or any of its other Divisions or subunits. Written by Jessica Chicco, Patricia Esparza, M. Brinton Lykes, Fabricio E. Balcazar, and Kevin Ferreira on behalf of the Society for Community Research and Action - Community Psychology, Division 27 of the American Psychological Association. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60608, USA spiked in the spring and summer of Both sets of migrants form part of a regional trend of increased requests for refugee status by for those fleeing the northern triangle of Central America (i.e., Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador) and Mexico. As has been widely reported, these families and children are fleeing violence, domestic and/or family abuse, and dangerous gang-related activity from which their governments have been unable to protect them (Stinchcomb & Hershberg, 2014). In fact, The Guardian reported 45 cases of US deportees who have been murdered on their return to El Salvador, 3 in Guatemala, and 35 in Honduras since January 2014 (Brodzinsky & Pilkington, 2015; October 12). While the United States upholds itself as a beacon of hope for those seeking freedom from persecution and oppression, the current US immigration policies and their enforcement have detrimental effects on migrant adults, children, families, and communities (Brabeck, Lykes & Hunter, 2014). The Department of Homeland Security s (DHS) practice of detaining families on a no bond, no release policy has been widely criticized and successfully challenged in court. Foley (2015a), June 2) reported that in May, 33 of the 44 senators in the Democratic caucus wrote a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson advocating the abolition of immigrant family detention except in extreme circumstances. The letter followed a similar one written by 136 of the 188 House Democrats the previous week, as well as numerous pleas from human rights groups to eliminate the practice. A federal judge in the District of Columbia, in the case of RILR v. Johnson (Civil action No D.D.C. February 20, 2015) issued an order prohibiting DHS from detaining class members [of families who are found to have a credible fear of persecution in their home country and are eligible for release] for deterring future immigration to the United
2 256 Am J Community Psychol (2016) 57: States and from considering deterrence of such immigration as a factor in such custody determinations (American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU), 2015). Similar critiques have been mounted against the unusually and in many cases prohibitively high bonds imposed by DHS for families (Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC), 2014). We assert that there is no way to humanely detain children and families. As set forth in more detail below, we: Urge the government to close all of its family detention facilities; Recommend the improvement of the screening procedures to identify families in need of protection, and the revision of US policy of high bonds for migrant families, especially those seeking refuge in the United States; Call on the government to implement several costeffective alternatives to detention that are successful in ensuring that migrant families appear for scheduled court hearings; Call on our professional organizations to better prepare professionals in order to address the needs of these migrants and to collaborate in the development of public education campaigns about their fate and the need for policy reform. Background Information The use of family detention in the United States. has been marked by abuse. The first family detention facility, which operates to this day, was opened in 2001 in Pennsylvania. The US government dramatically increased its family detention space in 2006 by opening the 512-bed T. Don Hutto Residential Center in Texas, operated by Corrections Corporations of America, the largest private for-profit correctional corporation in the country. Children housed there were required to wear prison garb and families were detained in small cells with little privacy and were prohibited from keeping food, toys, or writing utensils in their cells (Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC), 2007). Significant advocacy and coordinated community efforts, including local and national protests and lawsuits based on reports of severe abuse and poor living conditions, forced the closing of this facility in September 2009 (Bernstein, 2009). However, in response to the increased influx of women and children from Central America in 2014 many of whom are seeking asylum and related protections the Obama administration once again began detaining families in large facilities. The Karnes Detention Center in Texas began holding families in late summer Operated by the GEO GROUP Inc., another for-profit correctional corporation, it currently holds approximately 520 women and children. The GEO Group has also broken ground on a project to double the bed space at that site (CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project, 2015). In 2014, the DHS also operated a makeshift facility in Artesia, New Mexico, holding approximately 650 women and children. The facility was closed late that year, at least in part because of the multiple allegations of abuse and mistreatment (see below), but many of its detainees were transferred to a newly built family detention center in Dilley, Texas (Coleman, 2014, November 18). The new facility in Dilley, for which the DHS solicited bids despite significant opposition from immigrants rights groups, faith-based, civil rights, human rights, professional organizations including the American Psychological Association and criminal justice reform organizations (see Letter to President Obama, September 25, 2014), is operated by the Correction Corporation of America, the same company that ran the now-closed Hutto detention center. The facility was holding 819 mothers and 1000 children by early June 2015, according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Foley, 2015b; June 19). Despite improved physical conditions, the Dilley detention center is also a lock-down facility. Moreover, it is less than two hours away from the Karnes detention center, putting even more strain on the limited and already overwhelmed legal service providers in the area (Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC), 2014). In addition to inadequate access to child care, medical and mental health care, and legal assistance, the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC) (2014) report pointed out that family detention remains rife for abuse especially given the vulnerability of this population. In October 2014, the Karnes facility was at the center of allegations of sexual assault by guards threatening or bribing detained women (CNN News, 2014). Representatives from non-governmental organizations and attorneys who visited the Artesia facility in New Mexico before its closure reported several significant concerns, including malnutrition and severe weight loss of children, the isolation of the facility (approximately 200 miles from the nearest large city, which makes access to legal services extremely difficult), lack of educational services for the detained children, lack of access to phones, and the absence of adequate private spaces for the women to meet with attorneys, thus forcing them to recount physical and sexual abuse to their attorneys in front of their children (Detention Watch Network, 2014, September). Psychosocial Effects of Detention on Families: A Brief Overview Families enter detention after being arrested by local law enforcement or Immigration and Customs Enforcement
3 Am J Community Psychol (2016) 57: (ICE). The families are held in these detention centers while they await deportation hearings. While research on the family detention experience is limited, especially in the United States, the information available suggests that it has direct negative effects on detained families while indirectly affecting the wider community. The process and duration of detention can be stressful for every member of a family. Children of parents who have been detained tend to experience feelings of depression, anxiety, and even post-traumatic stress symptoms (Brabeck et al., 2014; Chaudry et al., 2010; Suarez- Orozco, Bang & Kim, 2011). Researchers have discovered similar findings in the mental health of detained asylum seekers (Physicians for Human Rights & Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of Torture, 2003). These findings parallel research in other countries (e.g., Australian Human Rights Commission, 2014). Interviews with 14 adults and 20 children at a remote immigration detention center in Australia revealed that each person met criteria for at least one psychiatric disorder at the time of the interview (Steel et al., 2004). Furthermore, prolonged detention has been shown to have a long-term effect on the psychological health of refugees which persists after the detention (Steel et al., 2004, 2006). Again at an Australian detention center, among the 16 adults and 20 children interviewed, all of the children had at least one parent with a psychiatric disorder (Mares & Jureidini, 2004). Of the 10 children (ages 6 17 years old) that were able to undergo a psychological assessment, 100% met criteria for both post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depression, 80% exhibited self-harming behaviors, and 70% exhibited symptoms of an anxiety disorder. The children also reported difficulty sleeping, poor concentration, little motivation to study, a sense of hopelessness, overwhelming boredom, thoughts of death and dying, and recurrent para-suicidal ideation (Mares & Jureidini, 2004). One of the points made in the Letter to President Obama by the NGOs (September 25, 2014) in opposition to family detention is that imprisonment harms children s health. Their physical and psychological development suffers during detention, and such harms can be long-lasting. Being held in a prison-like setting, even for a short period of time, can cause psychological trauma for children and increase their risk factor for future mental disorders (Cleveland, Rousseau & Kronick, 2012; April). According to Physicians for Human Rights and Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of Torture (2003), detention can also exacerbate the trauma experienced by both children and adults who have fled violence in their home countries precisely the population detained at Artesia and Karnes. Additionally, detention damages the family structure by stripping parents of their role as arbiter and decisionmaker in the family unit, confusing children and undermining child-rearing (Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC), 2007, February). Foley (2015a) reports an interview with Luis Zayas, who has made multiple visits to the Karnes facility and reported that many children there showed signs of depression and anxiety. He indicated that detention can be detrimental to a child s brain development and emotional intelligence. His recent book (Zayas, 2015) examines the negative impact of the deportation of undocumented immigrants on their citizen-children who are left behind, that is, deportation orphans. Zayas research and findings reported by those who have psychologically evaluated children held in detention centers throughout the United States should help to increase public awareness about the impact of current policies and practices on children s well-being. In addition to research focused explicitly on detained families, researchers have found that greater vulnerability to the threat of deportation and detention has been associated with negative impacts on the mental health of parents and children (Brabeck & Xu, 2010). In terms of parental impact, greater levels of vulnerability were related to negative emotional well-being, decreased financial stability, and poor parent child relations. Similarly, children with vulnerable parents were more likely to experience decreased emotional well-being and poor academic performance (Brabeck & Xu, 2010). Unfortunately children s voices have been notably absent from this literature, thus limiting advocates understanding of children s lived experiences of detention and the meanings they make about these experiences. Brabeck et al. (2014) have documented the effects of detention and deportation on children that are separated from their detained parents. The authors argue that the loss of a deported person s income can lead to housing insecurity, food insecurity, psychological distress, and slipping from low income into poverty. Dreby (2012)added that a parent s deportation can lead to a permanent change in family structure and in extreme cases, family dissolution. Brabeck et al. (2014) call for more research that offers children an opportunity to tell their stories in their own voices. Such research would contribute importantly to recommendations for better treatment of families directly impacted by detention policies. In fact, research on how these different policies affect children and families is important: both to identify the harm caused, and potentially, if other approaches/alternatives to detention are implemented, to study the effects of Alternatives to Detention (ATDs). Although research to date has focused primarily on the direct psychological effects of incarceration, detention, and deportation on families, the above policies and practices have identifiable effects on the wider US-based migrant community. Maya-Salas, Ayon and Gurrola
4 258 Am J Community Psychol (2016) 57: (2013) conducted a series of focus groups with undocumented immigrants and found that these individuals and/ or their children share everyday feelings of isolation, powerlessness, frustration, fear, stress, and chronic trauma. Major themes included: (a) Risking our lives participants shared the dangers involved in migrating to the United States; (b) looking out the window participants reported that they live in a constant state of fear of being arrested and deported, which significantly restricts how they live their lives; and (c) we are traumatized participants shared the effects of trauma often manifested in fear, intense nervousness, and depression that all members of the family experienced. However, parents were especially concerned about the trauma their children were experiencing. Research has documented how the presence of ICE and/or the threat of detention or deportation can cause significant negative psychological outcomes in a migrant community. Fear of ICE and the threat of detention was found to have shaped the behavior of the people in Lowell, MA as evidenced by increases in crime, fewer filed reports of crimes, direct and indirect health issues, and increased instability within businesses, schools, and available human services (Sladkova, Garcia Mangado & Reyes Quinteros, 2012). Furthermore, local community organizations were also impacted in that they lost some program participants, had limited resources to address deportation issues, experienced greater financial burdens, and had to add to the workload of staff (Sladkova et al., 2012). Thus, the mere threat or possibility of detention or deportation has been found to have deleterious effects on the wellbeing of parents, children and the communities in which they live (Dreby, 2012; Maya-Salas et al., 2013). It has also been documented that fears of deportation can limit immigrants participation in various psychosocial programs (Guerra & Knox, 2008; Knox, Guerra, William & Toro, 2011) and prompt immigrant day laborers to tolerate discrimination and isolation (Negi, 2013). Alternatives to Detention and Advocacy for Better Practices In addition to the multiple negative effects on migrant families including rupture of parental child relationships, psychosocial risk, etc. documented above detention and incarceration are neither the least restrictive nor the most efficient or cost-effective means of ensuring parental appearance before immigration officials. In fact, the policy of incarcerating families runs counter to principles of respect for human dignity and protection of children, especially those seeking refugee status (i.e., United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (2012); Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), 2014). Further, international human rights law strongly disfavors the use of detention and rejects it completely in the case of children. The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (2012) stated that detaining children constitutes a violation of a child s rights and always contravenes the principle of the best interest of the child. Moreover, according to the American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU) (2015), it will cost taxpayers an estimated $298 per bed per day or approximately $261 million annually to operate just one of the facilities (Dilley) described above; while alternatives to detention are estimated to cost 17 cents to $17 per person per day (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 2014); including intensive monitoring at a cost of $10.55 per day (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2014). Alternatives to Detention (ATD) In many instances, detained migrants may be released on their own recognizance or on a bond set by an immigration official. As set forth in the U.S. Department of Justice (2009/2013) Immigration Court Practice Manual, immigration judges may then review bond decisions based on an assessment of the individual s flight risk and danger to the community. Migrants rights to such procedures are underscored by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2012) emphasis on the importance of assessing necessity and proportionality in each refugee s individual case (Field & Edwards, 2006). Unfortunately, many of these families have been detained on a no bond, no release policy, or immigration judges have set bonds at uncharacteristically high levels (Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC), 2014). Both of these practices de facto incarcerate women and their children in detention centers. A reasonable bond amount may allow families to post the bond money and be released from detention while they pursue requests for protection in immigration court. In addition to these clearly delineated release options, there are a number of ATD frameworks that may include release subject to specific reporting conditions, including, for example, a regular check-in time with immigration (in person or by phone, weekly, monthly, or in another frequency). ATDs have been widely reported as effective. In FY 2010, the federal government s ATD programs yielded a 93.8 percent appearance rate for immigration hearings (Lutheran Immigration and refugee Services (LIRS), 2012). Immigrant rights advocates typically press for no conditions to release, and for the imposition of a monitoring program of some kind only in those instances
5 Am J Community Psychol (2016) 57: in which there are concerns around flight risk that can be equally mitigated with these cheaper and more humane ATDs (Costello & Kaytaz, 2013). For example, the Vera Institute s 3-year pilot program funded by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service showed low absconding rates and high compliance with an intensive community supervision program in comparison to a group on bail or parole (Sullivan, Mottino, Khashu & O Neil, 2000). While the research literature distinguishes the effectiveness among ATD programs for refugees, asylum seekers, and other migrants (Costello & Kaytaz, 2013; International Detention Coalition, 2011), the Vera Institute Appearance Assistance Program demonstrated high appearance rates above 90% across migrant groups in removal proceedings who participated in the intensive supervision programs, and furthermore showed that certain groups of migrants achieved high appearance rates without the need for intensive supervision. (Sullivan et al., 2000). The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2012) reports that supervision or reporting procedures that are overly burdensome will reduce cooperation. This research confirms that treating migrants with dignity and respect, as well as providing them with clear and timely information, increases cooperation and compliance (Costello & Kaytaz, 2013; United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2011). Thus, these findings suggest that ATD programs are highly recommended for undocumented migrant families, and especially those seeking refuge in the United States. Alternatives to detention can also include more intensive monitoring, though these more restrictive conditions should only be used when absolutely necessary (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2012). In particular, seemingly punitive methods such as Global Positioning System (GPS) electronic monitoring devices (i.e., ankle bracelets) typically require hours of charging each day, restrict an individual s movement, and have been described by those who have worn them as demeaning while also stigmatizing them as criminals vis-a-vis their children who must watch them recharge their monitors on a daily basis (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2012). Such GPS devices should only be used sparingly if at all as an alternative to detention. In many instances, ICE contracts with private companies to provide these ATD monitoring services. The cost is, of course, just a fraction of that of detention. Finally, the DHS announced a new alternative to detention program in mid-september 2015 that may allow for the release of 1500 families (May, 2015). While the use of alternatives to detention is welcomed, the contract for the pilot program, called Family Case Management Program, has been awarded to the GEO Group the same for-profit correctional corporation that has been widely criticized for poor detention conditions (CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project, 2015). Given the reputation of the contractor, there is considerable skepticism that the program will constitute what are proposed below as feasible best practices. Advocacy for Better Practices Alternatives to Detention have been documented to be effective and efficient practices for ensuring migrant family compliance with ICE requirements, particularly for migrants seeking asylum in the United States. In addition, community support programs not currently funded by ICE provide case management and referrals to legal and social services professionals for non-detained individuals. Edwards (2011) reports that such support helps people understand their legal obligations and improves court appearance rates and compliance with final case outcomes, while minimizing the damage to their mental and physical health and the disruption to their families and communities caused by institutional detention. As importantly, these initiatives offer migrants easier access to the needed legal and human service resources required to advocate for themselves before immigration judges and/or in asylum processes, thus supporting their protagonist role. In fact, detention and lack of representation significantly affect an individual s ability to obtain immigration relief. According to the New York Study Group on Immigrant Representation (2011), only 3% of detained, unrepresented immigrants in New York reached a successful outcome in their cases; 13% of unrepresented non-detained immigrants reached a successful outcome in their cases; and the number jumped to 74% when the non-detained immigrant was legally represented. Finally, the American Psychological Association (APA) has been proactive through its Public Interest Government Relations Office (PI-GRO) in expressing to congressional leaders, the president, and the general public, the negative impact of racial profiling, mental health concerns facing recent immigrants, the stigmatization of immigrants, the trauma of family separation, and the negative effects of the detention and deportation process on immigrants and their families among several other issues that have been examined (American Psychological Association, n.d.). Regarding its opposition to family detention, the APA has co-signed two separate letters to President Obama, the first one in September 25, 2014 which listed 168 NGOs (American Psychological Association, 2014) and the second in June 15, 2015 which listed 97 service providers, faith, civil rights, labor, professional, and other policy and advocacy organizations (American Psychological Association, 2015). In addition, the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI) has also released multiple
6 260 Am J Community Psychol (2016) 57: policy resources regarding immigration, including a recent one (Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), 2014) that addresses the significant economic, psychological, and humanitarian costs of detention, deportation, and surveillance. Recommendations The Society for Community Research and Action (SCRA) request that President Obama directs the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to STOP THE CURRENT PRACTICE OF FAMILY DETENTION and promote reasonable and humane alternatives to incarceration of mothers and children that guarantee the human rights of these migrant families. In addition, SCRA calls upon: 1. The Department of Homeland Security to: fear of persecution if returned to their countries of origin (U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services, 2015). Families should have opportunities at all stages of the process to express a fear, and they should have full and fair access to the appropriate screening processes and legal information in a language that they can speak and understand. 2. The Department of Justice to ensure that immigration courts consider these families for no-bond or reasonable bonds that adequately reflect the individual s danger to the community and flight risk if released on their own recognizance or participation in an ATD program is not available. 3. The Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the National Institute of Mental Health, and State agencies to fund research with parents and children facing immigration detention in the United States to: c a b End the practice of family detention described above by closing all existing family detention facilities and halting any existing plans for expansion. Institutionalize a preference for release and/or referrals to community support programs for all families who can establish identity and community ties and who do not pose a security risk. Specifically, immigrant detainees, and especially women and children, should: (1). Be considered for release on their own recognizance to family or community members. If release on their own recognizance is not available, they should: (2). Be considered for release to an alternative to detention program (with the least restrictive monitoring necessary to ensure appearance at future hearing or compliance with reporting requirements). ATD programs can include community-based supervision, including meaningful case management by trained professionals. Programs can also include phone or in-person check-ins at regular intervals, though such check-ins should not be so onerous as to significantly disrupt migrants life (by, for example, requiring that the individual travel a long distance for frequent in-person check-ins). Electronic monitoring through the use of GPS monitoring devices or similar technology should only be used when absolutely necessary. Improve screening procedures for families seeking refugee status. Currently, more than three quarters of all families screened are found to have a credible a b Allow for a more comprehensive examination of the effects of current policies, with particular attention to research with detained children and children orphaned by deportation; and Document the effects and outcomes of ATD programs. 4. The American Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Work, the National Lawyers Association, and legal and other professional organizations to educate members who could work with migrants and their families and communities in order to address some of their service needs and legal challenges. In particular, we recommend: a That the SCRA disseminate this policy document to all APA members and to other related professional organizations (e.g., National Association of Social Workers, National Lawyers Association) with the recommendation that the latter organizations develop and disseminate their own policy statements on alternatives to detention of migrant families. b That training programs for psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, counselors, and lawyers integrate information about the needs of incarcerated migrant families and interventions that could help them. c That these professional organizations collaborate in the development and implementation of a public education campaign about the impact of current family incarceration policies on those affected and their communities. This could include both press releases and videos like the one developed by the APA (see
7 Am J Community Psychol (2016) 57: d Finally, we support the policy recommendations submitted by APA (Glassgold, 2015, June 25), at a congressional hearing on immigration. Specifically, APA recommended that Congress: Pursue legislation that includes the necessary reforms to prohibit the involuntary separation of children from their parents, families, and/or caregivers during immigration proceedings. Provide sufficient funding to the Department of Health and Human Services/ORR, Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Justice to ensure that immigrant youth are receiving appropriate medical and mental health services Establish humane detention standards when detention is absolutely necessary. Fund additional research to understand the current surge of child and adult immigrants, their exposure to trauma, the impact of detention, and their most appropriate placement (e.g., foster care versus detention or shelter facilities for unaccompanied youth). Having reviewed the available scientific evidence on the negative effects of family incarceration and the alternatives to detention, we believe these actions will help alleviate the negative impact the current US policy of incarceration is having on the wellbeing and mental health of migrant family members and their communities. Additional Resources and Information American Psychological Association (2013). Working with immigrant-origin clients: An update for mental health professionals. Retrieved from: topics/immigration/immigration-report-professionals.pdf Lost in detention. FRONTLINE and the Investigative Reporting Workshop explore the secretive world of immigration detention and examine the Obama administration s controversial get-tough immigration policy, available at: 891/ References American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU). (2015, February 23). Immigrants Rights Project Practice Advisory. Retrieved from: pdf American Psychological Association. (2014). NGOs United in Opposition to Family Detention Facilities. A letter signed by 168 NGOs sent to President Obama, Sept. 25, Retrieved from: aspx American Psychological Association. (2015). Family Detention. A letter to President Obama, with 97 signers, June 15, Retrieved from: 06/Family-Detention-with-signers.pdf American Psychological Association (n.d.). APA initiatives on Immigration and Related Issues: Over a Decade of Education, Outreach and Advocacy. Retrieved from: gr/issues/minority/immigration-related-initiatives.aspx Australian Human Rights Commission. (2014). The forgotten children: A national inquiry into children in immigration detention. BN Retrieved from: forgotten-children-national-inquiry-children Bernstein, N. (2009, August 5). U.S. to reform policy on detention for immigrants. The New York Times, Retrieved from: Brabeck, K.M., Lykes, M.B., & Hunter, C. (2014). The psychosocial impact of detention and deportation on U.S. migrant children and families. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84, Brabeck, K., & Xu, Q. (2010). The impact of detention and deportation on Latino immigrant children and families: A quantitative exploration. Hispanic Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 32, Brodzinsky, S., & Pilkington, E. (2015, October 12). US government deporting Central American migrants to their deaths. The Guardian. Retrieved from: - CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project. (2015). Obama Administration Again Hands Families Over to Private Prison Company. American Immigration Lawyers Association. Retrieved from: Chaudry, A., Capps, R., Pedroza, J., Casta~neda, R.M., Santos, R., & Scott, M.M. (2010). Facing our future: Children in the aftermath of immigration enforcement. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from: _FacingOurFuture_final.pdf Cleveland, J., Rousseau, C., & Kronick, R. (2012, April). The harmful effects of detention and family separation on asylum seekers mental health in the context of Bill C-31. Brief Submitted to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration concerning Bill C-31, the Protecting Canada s Immigration System Act, pp Retrieved from Publications_CRF/brief_c31_final.pdf. CNN News. (2014, October 4). Women allege sexual abuse at Texas immigrant detention center. Retrieved from com/2014/10/03/justice/texas-immigrant-detention-allegations Coleman, M. (2014, November 18). Detention center in Artesia to close. Inside the Beltway, Albuquerque Journal. NM. Retrieved from: Costello, C., & Kaytaz, E. (2013). Building empirical research into alternatives to detention: Perceptions of asylum-seekers and refugees in Toronto and Geneva (Legal and Protection Policy Series) (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Division of International Protection). Retrieved from: Detention Watch Network. (2014, September). Expose & close: Artesia family residential center. Retrieved from: files/expose_close_-_artesia_family_residential_center_nm_2014. pdf.
8 262 Am J Community Psychol (2016) 57: Dreby, J. (2012). The burden of deportation on children in Mexican immigrant families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, Edwards, A. (2011). Back to Basics: The Right to Liberty and Security of Person and Alternatives to Detention of Refugees, Asylum Seekers, Stateless Persons, and Other Migrants. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees, PPLA/2011/ 01.Rev.1. Retrieved from: vtx/home/opendocpdfviewer.html? docid=4dc949c49&query= PPLA/2011/01.Rev.1 Field, O., & Edwards, A. (2006). Alternatives to detention of asylum seekers and refugees (Legal and Protection Policy Research Series) (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Division of International Protection Services). Retrieved from: a2&query=ophelia%20field Foley, E. (2015a, June 2). Backlash Against Mass Family Immigrant Detention Grows As Senate Democrats Pile On. Huffington Post Politics. Retrieved from: /06/02/family-immigrant-detention_n_ html Foley, E. (2015b, June 19). Critics Say Amenities Don t Make Up For Psychological Damage Done At Family Immigrant Detention Centers. Huffington Post Politics. Retrieved from: n_ html Glassgold, J.M. (2015, June 25). Testimony before the U.S. House Judiciary Committee on behalf of the American Psychological Association. Retrieved from: news/2014/immigration-testimony.aspx Guerra, N.G., & Knox, L. (2008). how culture impacts the dissemination and implementation of innovation: A case study of the Families and Schools Together Program (FAST) for preventing violence with immigrant Latino youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR). (2014). IACHR Wraps Up Visit to the United States of America. Retrieved from: Knox, L., Guerra, N.G., William, K.R., & Toro, R. (2011). Preventing children s aggression in immigrant Latino families: A mixed methods evaluation of the families and schools together program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, Lutheran Immigration and refugee Services (LIRS). (2012). Unlocking liberty: A way forward for U.S. immigration detention policy. Retrieved from: 20liberty. Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC). (2007, February). Locking up family values. Retrieved from: uploads/2012/05/rptlockingupfamilyvalues2007.pdf. Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services & Women s Refugee Commission (LIRS & WRC). (2014, October). Locking up family values, again. Retrieved from: Mares, S., & Jureidini, J. (2004). Psychiatric assessment of children and families in immigration detention: Clinical, administrative, and ethical issues. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 28, May, C. (2015).New DHS Program Pair Illegal Immigrant with Social Workers. Retrieved from big-government/2015/09/23/new-dhs-program-pairs-illegal-immigrants-social-workers/ Maya-Salas, L., Ayon, C., & Gurrola, M. (2013). Estamos traumados: The effect of anti-immigrant sentiment and policies on the mental health of Mexican immigrant families. Journal of Community Psychology, 41, Negi, N.J. (2013). Battling discrimination and social isolation: Psychological distress among Latino day laborers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, Physicians for Human Rights and Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of Torture. (2003, June). From persecution to prison: The health consequences of detention for asylum seekers. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from: PHR_Reports/persecution-to-prison-US-2003.pdf. Sampson, R., Mitchell, G., & Bowring, L. (2011). There are alternatives: A handbook for preventing unnecessary immigration detention. Melbourne: (The International Detention Coalition). Retrieved from: alternatives_a_handbook_for_preventing_unnecessary_immigration_detention Sladkova, J., Garcia Mangado, S.M., & Reyes Quinteros, J. (2012). Lowell immigrant communities in the climate of deportations. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12, Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI). (2014). Immigration reform and psychology. Retrieved from: 20-%20Immigration.pdf Steel, Z., Momartin, S., Bateman, C., Hafshejani, A., Silove, D., Everson, N., Roy, K., Dudley, M., Newman, L., Blick, B., & Mares, S. (2004). Psychiatric status of asylum seeker families held for a protracted period in a remote detention center in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 28, Steel, Z., Silove, D., Brooks, R., Momartin, S., Alzuhairi, B., & Sljsjik, I. (2006). Impact of immigration detention and temporary protection on the mental health of refugees. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, Stinchcomb, D., & Hershberg, E. (2014, November). Unaccompanied migrant children from Central America: Context, causes, and responses. CLALS Working Paper Series No. 7. Retrieved from: Suarez-Orozco, C., Bang, H.J., & Kim, H.Y. (2011). I felt like my heart was staying behind: Psychological implications of family separations & reunifications for immigrant youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26, Sullivan, E., Mottino, F., Khashu, A., & O Neil, M. (2000). Testing community supervision for the INS: An evaluation of the Appearance Assistance Program. Vera Institute of Justice Library. Retrieved from: resources/downloads/ins_finalreport.pdf United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). (2012). Committee on the Rights of the Child, Report of the 2012 Day of General Discussion on the Rights of All Children in the Context of International Migration. Retrieved from: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2011). Global roundtable on alternatives to detention of asylum-seekers, refugees, migrants and stateless persons. Retrieved from: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2012). Detention guidelines: Guidelines on the applicable criteria and standards relating to the detention of asylum-seekers and alternatives to detention. Retrieved from: html U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services. (2015). USCIS Asylum Division, Family Facilities Reasonable fear. Retrieved from: RF-familiy-facilities-FY2015Q2.pdf U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (2014). Salaries and Expenses, Fy2014
9 Am J Community Psychol (2016) 57: Congressional Budget Justification. Retrieved from: Performance%20Report%20and%20Congressional-Budget- Justification-FY2014.pdf U.S. Department of Justice. (2009/2013, June 10). Executive Office for Immigration Review. Immigration Court Practice Manual. Retrieved from: U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2014). Alternatives to Detention: Improved Data Collection and Analyses Needed to Better Assess Program Effectiveness. Retrieved from: Zayas, L.H. (2015). Forgotten citizens: Deportation, children, and the making of American exiles and orphans. New York: Oxford University.
SECOND ICRC COMMENT ON THE GLOBAL COMPACT FOR SAFE, ORDERLY AND REGULAR MIGRATION FOCUS ON IMMIGRATION DETENTION
SECOND ICRC COMMENT ON THE GLOBAL COMPACT FOR SAFE, ORDERLY AND REGULAR MIGRATION FOCUS ON IMMIGRATION DETENTION In the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, States have agreed to consider reviewing
More informationRIGHTING THE WRONG: WHY DETENTION OF ASYLUM-SEEKING MOTHERS AND CHILDREN IN AMERICA MUST END NOW
RIGHTING THE WRONG: WHY DETENTION OF ASYLUM-SEEKING MOTHERS AND CHILDREN IN AMERICA MUST END NOW A POSITION PAPER FROM TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER OCT. 28, 2015 BALTIMORE baltimore@tahirih.org 410-999-1900
More informationFurther, we ask that you consider the following steps to help ensure that refugees have access to counsel and are able to have their day in court:
February 18, 2016 The Honorable Jeh Johnson Secretary of Homeland Security Washington, D.C. 20528 The Honorable Alejandro Mayorkas Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Washington, D.C. 20528 Via Email
More informationotnngr 55 of t}fr lltnit taf 5 ma.s ingtnn, i)qt 20515
otnngr 55 of t}fr lltnit taf 5 ma.s ingtnn, i)qt 20515 October 27, 2014 President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania A venue, NW Washington, DC 20502 Dear President Obama: In recent months,
More informationSTATEMENT FOR THE RECORD. An Administration-Made Disaster: The South Texas Border Surge of Unaccompanied Minors. Submitted to the
STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD On An Administration-Made Disaster: The South Texas Border Surge of Unaccompanied Minors Submitted to the House Judiciary Committee June 25, 2014 About Human Rights First Human
More informationSummary of the Issue. AILA Recommendations
Summary of the Issue AILA Recommendations on Legal Standards and Protections for Unaccompanied Children For more information, go to www.aila.org/humanitariancrisis Contacts: Greg Chen, gchen@aila.org;
More informationStatement for the Record of Eleanor Acer Director, Refugee Protection Human Rights First
Statement for the Record of Eleanor Acer Director, Refugee Protection Human Rights First House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security Hearing Another Surge of Illegal Immigrants Along
More informationUNHCR-IDC EXPERT ROUNDTABLE ON ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION CANBERRA, 9-10 JUNE Summary Report
UNHCR-IDC EXPERT ROUNDTABLE ON ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION CANBERRA, 9-10 JUNE 2011 Summary Report These notes are a summary of issues discussed and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNHCR, IDC or
More informationSummary of Emergency Supplemental Funding Bill
For Wildfires: Summary of Emergency Supplemental Funding Bill The supplemental includes $615 million in emergency firefighting funds requested for the Department of Agriculture s U.S. Forest Service. These
More informationLocking Up Family Values, Again
FAMILY DETENTION REPORT OCTOBER 2014 Locking Up Family Values, Again A REPORT ON THE RENEWED PRACTICE of family immigration detention by Lutheran Immigration & Refugee Service and the Women s Refugee Commission
More informationLong-Term Detention of Mothers and Children in Pennsylvania
Long-Term Detention of Mothers and Children in Pennsylvania On August 8, 2016, 22 mothers at the Berks County Residential Center launched a hunger strike to protest their long-term detention and the harm
More informationSupporting Immigrants Mental Health & Wellness in these Times. Presented by: Cathi Tillman, LSW Corinne Guest, LSW
Supporting Immigrants Mental Health & Wellness in these Times Presented by: Cathi Tillman, LSW Corinne Guest, LSW La Puerta Abierta/The Open Door (LPA) works to ensure access to holistic, culturally and
More informationConsultation on changes to immigration-related Home Office statistical outputs: response of Bail for Immigration Detainees
Consultation on changes to immigration-related Home Office statistical outputs: response of Bail for Immigration Detainees Bail for Immigration Detainees (BID) is an independent charity that exists to
More informationU.S. Detention of Families Seeking Asylum
U.S. Detention of Families Seeking Asylum A One-Year Update June 2015 ON HUMAN RIGHTS, the United States must be a beacon. Activists fighting for freedom around the globe continue to look to us for inspiration
More informationFamily Detention. Still Happening, Still Damaging
Family Detention Still Happening, Still Damaging October 2015 ON HUMAN RIGHTS, the United States must be a beacon. Activists fighting for freedom around the globe continue to look to us for inspiration
More informationStatement of. JAMES R. SILKENAT President. on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. for the record of the hearing on
Statement of JAMES R. SILKENAT President on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION for the record of the hearing on An Administration Made Disaster: The South Texas Border Surge of Unaccompanied Alien
More informationLutheran Social Services of New York
Lutheran Social Services of New York Overview of Achievements, 2016-2017 The Survivors of Violence Immigration Initiative at Lutheran Social Services of New York s Immigration Legal Program (LSSNY-ILP)
More informationM U YL D AS NTION AN DETE
DETENTION AND ASYLUM DETENTION AND ASYLUM AT A GLANCE The Issue More than 360,000 people a year are held in immigration detention, some for a few days, some for months or even years. Many of those detained
More informationSUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF DHS MEMORANDUM Implementing the President s Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies
SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF DHS MEMORANDUM Implementing the President s Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies For questions, please contact: Greg Chen, gchen@aila.org INTRODUCTION:
More informationIn the absence congressional action to reform our immigration laws, the next Administration should continue administrative relief programs.
IMMIGRATION Of the more than 58 million 40 Hispanics living in the United States, 35% are foreign-born. 41 Federal immigration law and policy continues to be a top priority for the Latino community. Our
More informationAsylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know
CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES October 2018 Asylum Removal and Immigration Courts: Definitions to Know Asylum Definition: An applicant for asylum has the burden to demonstrate that he or she is eligible
More informationBorder Crisis: Update on Unaccompanied Children
Border Crisis: Update on Unaccompanied Children REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES (RAICES) JONATHAN RYAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, COMMISSION ON IMMIGRATION
More informationQ&A: DHS Implementation of the Executive Order on Border Security and Immigration Enforcement
Q&A: DHS Implementation of the Executive Order on Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Release Date: February 21, 2017 UPDATED: February 21, 2017 5:15 p.m. EST Office of the Press Secretary Contact:
More informationAddressing the Legal and Mental Health Needs of Undocumented Immigrant Children
Reference Committee A - Advocacy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Resolution #12 (15) 2015 Annual Leadership
More informationHow to Stop the Surge of Migrant Children
JULY 8, 2014 How to Stop the Surge of Migrant Children INTRODUCTION Children slept last month in a holding cell at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection processing facility in Brownsville, Tex. Pool photo
More informationKAREN T. GRISEZ. on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. for a briefing before the UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Statement of Karen T. Grisez On behalf of the American Bar Association STATEMENT of KAREN T. GRISEZ on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION for a briefing before the UNITED STATES COMMISSION ON CIVIL
More informationNovember 5, Submitted electronically at Dear Assistant Director Seguin:
November 5, 2018 Debbie Seguin, Assistant Director Office of Policy, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Department of Homeland Security 500 12 th Street SW Washington, DC 20563 Re: DHS Docket No.
More informationOctober 29, 2018 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
Memorandum October 29, 2018 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: Refugees International (RI) 1 SUBJECT: The Migrant Caravan: Securing American Borders, American Values, and American Interests Purpose To
More informationDetainee/Former Detainee Assessment and Referral Form
Detainee/Former Detainee Assessment and Referral Form Referral Details Referring agency Referral date Detention Visit (Yes/No) Centre/Facility Name/Location Telephone assessment (Yes/No) Worker contact
More informationF.A.O.: The All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees and the All Party Parliamentary
F.A.O.: The All Party Parliamentary Group on Refugees and the All Party Parliamentary Group on Migration Re: Submission for the Parliamentary Inquiry into the use of immigration detention in the UK Dear
More informationThe law does not require imprisonment. The law favors release.
TABLE OF CONTENTS p. 2 Background pp. 3 4 Frequently Asked Questions p. 5 Discussion Leader Instructions pp. 6 10 Images and Quotes for Discussion p. 11 Invitation to Action Families Held Captive, a film
More informationTrauma and Immigrant Families
Trauma and Immigrant Families Family Detention Poster, Detention Watch Network - www.detentionwatchnetwork.org Laura Valdéz, Chief Program Officer East Bay Agency for Children May 23, 2017 Early Childhood
More informationImmigrant Health in the US
Immigrant Health in the US Marietta Vázquez, M.D., FAAP Associate Professor Pediatrics Yale University School of Medicine Director, Yale Pediatric Global Health Track Director, Yale Children s Hispanic
More informationSUMMARY OF LEAKED, DRAFT REPORT DETAILING DHS PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF BORDER ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVE ORDER
SUMMARY OF LEAKED, DRAFT REPORT DETAILING DHS PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF BORDER ENFORCEMENT EXECUTIVE ORDER Contact Greg Chen, gchen@aila.org or Kate Voigt, kvoigt@aila.org On April 12, 2017, the Washington
More informationTo: United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Migrants. Re: The Situation of Immigrant Women Detained in the United States INTRODUCTION
Briefing Paper To: United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Migrants From: National Immigrant Justice Center 1 Date: April 16, 2007 Re: The Situation of Immigrant Women Detained in the United
More informationFlores Settlement Agreement & DHS Custody
Flores Settlement Agreement & DHS Custody Flores History The 1997 Flores Settlement Agreement (Flores) was the result of over a decade of litigation responding to the Immigration and Naturalization Service
More informationDivision of Unaccompanied Children s Services
Division of Unaccompanied Children s Services FY2008 Who are Unaccompanied Alien Children? Homeland Security Act of 2002 Section 462 Under 18 years old No lawful immigration status in US Without a parent
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report Universal Periodic Review: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I. Background
More informationCase 1:14-cv ABJ Document 41 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:14-cv-01437-ABJ Document 41 Filed 01/30/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA M.S.P.C., et al., v. Plaintiffs, JEH JOHNSON, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
More informationSTATEMENT OF. RONALD D. VITIELLO Deputy Chief Office of the Border Patrol U.S. Customs and Border Protection U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
STATEMENT OF RONALD D. VITIELLO Deputy Chief Office of the Border Patrol U.S. Customs and Border Protection U.S. Department of Homeland Security And THOMAS HOMAN Executive Associate Director Enforcement
More informationP-HSJCC Webinar Series: Immigration Detention and Mental Health
P-HSJCC Webinar Series: Immigration Detention and Mental Health April 10, 2018 Moderator: Tasha Rennie Network Engagement and Communications Officer, HSJCC Secretariat HSJCC Webinars We will have a Q&A
More informationJuly 27, Sarah Saldaña Director Immigration and Customs Enforcement Department of Homeland Security th St., SW Washington, D.C.
July 27, 2015 Sarah Saldaña Director Immigration and Customs Enforcement Department of Homeland Security 500 12th St., SW Washington, D.C. 20536 Dear Director Saldaña: The undersigned organizations, which
More informationEnd-Child-Detention: Protection of the Rights of the Refugee -/Asylum Seeker Child, Migrant Child and Unaccompanied Minor
February 2014 There are alternatives to child detention Approximately 83,000 migrant workers and 52,000 asylum seekers live in Israel today. Due to the lack of migration policy in Israel, many of the said
More informationDecember 18, President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC Dear Mr. President,
December 18, 2014 President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, We, the undersigned civil rights and civil liberties, human rights, faith,
More informationHALFWAY HOME: Unaccompanied Children in Immigration Custody
WOMEN S REFUGEE COMMISSION HALFWAY HOME: Unaccompanied Children in Immigration Custody EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Women s Refugee Commission Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP February 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I didn
More informationLatino Policy Coalition
The Latino Policy Coalition www.latinopolicycoalition.org is a national non-partisan non-profit consortium of the country s leading Latino research organizations and scholars, established in 2007. Chaired
More informationTerms of Reference Content Development Consultant - EIDHR Project Result 1: Monitoring Immigration Detention
Terms of Reference Content Development Consultant - EIDHR Project Result 1: Monitoring Immigration Detention Project Title: Component: Duty Station: Duration: Contract Type: Consultancy 1 EIDHR Project
More informationCOMMUNITY VIEWS ON ASYLUM POLICY
AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE AND HUMANITARIAN PROGRAM 2012-13 Community views on current challenges and future directions COMMUNITY VIEWS ON ASYLUM POLICY We know it is too risky to go [to Australia] by boat. When
More informationUnaccompanied Immigrant Youth in Alameda County: Building Communities of Support
Unaccompanied Immigrant Youth in Alameda County: Building Communities of Support Jasmine Gonzalez, UIY Senior Clinical Case Manager Center for Healthy Schools and Communities Alameda County Health Care
More informationOverview on Children of Immigrants
Supporting Young Children & Families Impacted by Immigration Policies September 27, 2017 Hannah Matthews, Director, Child Care and Early Education, CLASP Dr. Michael McNeil, Seattle Children s Hospital
More informationStatistical Analysis Shows that Violence, Not U.S. Immigration Policies, Is Behind the Surge of Unaccompanied Children Crossing the Border
Statistical Analysis Shows that Violence, Not U.S. Immigration Policies, Is Behind the Surge of Unaccompanied Children Crossing the Border By Tom K. Wong, tomkwong@ucsd.edu, @twong002 An earlier version
More informationMayor s Office of Immigrant Affairs Newsletter June 2018
Mayor s Office of Immigrant Affairs Newsletter June 2018 In 2013, Mayor Eric Garcetti re-established the Mayor s Office of Immigrant Affairs (MOIA) in order to promote and advance the economic, cultural,
More informationA Plan to Address the Humanitarian and Refugee Crisis on the Southern Border and in Central America
A Plan to Address the Humanitarian and Refugee Crisis on the Southern Border and in Central America There is a humanitarian and refugee crisis in the U.S. and Central American region. Tens of thousands
More informationRanking Member. Re: May 22 hearing on Stopping the Daily Border Caravan: Time to Build a Policy Wall
May 21, 2018 Rep. Martha McSally Chair Homeland Security Committee Border Security Subcommittee Washington, DC Rep. Filemon Vela Ranking Member Homeland Security Committee Border Security Subcommittee
More informationHUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF MIGRANT AND REFUGEE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES IN THE UNITED STATES
HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATION OF MIGRANT AND REFUGEE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES IN THE UNITED STATES Hearing before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 153rd Ordinary Period of Sessions October 27, 2014
More information14 facts that help explain America's child-migrant crisis - Vox
Page 1 of 18 14 facts that help explain America's child-migrant crisis Updated by Dara Lind on July 29, 2014, 11:43 a.m. ET dara@vox.com @DLind Dara Lind explains the child migrant crisis in two minutes.
More informationThe acute and chronic human right
Executive Summary EXPOSE CLOSE A group of advocates, community organizers, legal service providers, faith groups and individuals... have identified these ten prisons and jails as facilities that are among
More informationAdvance Edited Version
Advance Edited Version 7 February 2018 Original: English Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Revised Deliberation No. 5 on deprivation of liberty of migrants 1. The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
More informationVulnerable groups in Immigration Detention: Mental Health
Archway Resource Centre, 1b Waterlow Road, London N19 5NJ www.aviddetention.org.uk/enquiries@aviddetention.org.uk 0207 281 0533/07900 196 131 Vulnerable groups in Immigration Detention: Mental Health About
More informationJoint Public Statement by Psychology Groups on U.S. Immigration Policies and Practices July 3, 2018
Joint Public Statement by Psychology Groups on U.S. Immigration Policies and Practices July 3, 2018 This statement is an official statement of the specific signatories listed below, and does not represent
More informationCrossing Borders: Latin American refugee mothers reunited with their children in the United States. by Ruth Vargas-Forman
Crossing Borders: Latin American refugee mothers reunited with their children in the United States by Ruth Vargas-Forman Paper presented at the conference on Philosophical Inquiry into Pregnancy, Childbirth,
More information20. ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES A RIGHTS BASED APPROACH
POLICY A FAIR GO FOR ALL 20. ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES A RIGHTS BASED APPROACH INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1. Australia s policies towards asylum seekers and refugees should, at all times, reflect respect
More informationCGRS Statement for Hearing: The 2014 Humanitarian Crisis at Our Border: A Review of the Government s Response to Unaccompanied Minors One Year Later
Protecting Refugees Advancing Human Rights CGRS Statement for Hearing: The 2014 Humanitarian Crisis at Our Border: A Review of the Government s Response to Unaccompanied Minors One Year Later Senate Homeland
More informationRA16 Refugee and asylum seeker health contextual unit
RA16 Refugee and asylum seeker health contextual unit Rationale A notable proportion of new migrants to Australia are of refugee or asylum seeker backgrounds. 1 The Australian government allocates approximately
More informationFebruary 14, Mr. Paolo Abrão Executive Secretary Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 1889 F St., N. W. Washington, D.C.
TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL CLINIC GITTIS CENTER FOR CLINICAL LEGAL STUDIES 3501 Sansom Street Philadelphia, PA 19104-6204 February 14, 2017 Mr. Paolo Abrão Executive Secretary Inter-American Commission on Human
More informationbecause it does not seek information regarding the implementation of the Settlement Agreement.
1. Questions relating to implementation of 9, 10 and 41. a. Do defendants agree that the Settlement governs the detention, release, and treatment of minors in DHS s legal custody? If not, please identify
More informationMariana s Story. Unaccompanied Children: The Journey from Home to Appearing before the Immigration Court in the United States
Unaccompanied Children: The Journey from Home to Appearing before the Immigration Court in the United States An IAN webinar, presented jointly with CLINIC and KIND March 23, 2011 Panelists Tanisha Bowens,
More informationUnaccompanied Migrant Children
Unaccompanied Migrant Children Unaccompanied Migrant Children 1 (UMC) are children or adolescents who travel across country borders without a legal guardian and without legal immigration documents. As
More informationImmigration Court Appearances Rates
ISSUE BRIEF: FEBRUARY 2018 Immigration Court Appearances Rates As Congress and the Trump Administration debate immigration policy reforms, one critical and often misrepresented piece of information is
More informationChild Migration by the Numbers
Immigration Task Force ISSUE BRIEF: Child Migration by the Numbers JUNE 2014 Introduction The rapid increase in the number of children apprehended at the U.S.-Mexico border this year has generated a great
More informationA LONG AND DANGEROUS ROAD: HOW FUNDERS CAN RESPOND TO THE SURGE MIGRATING TO THE UNITED STATES OF UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN
A LONG AND DANGEROUS ROAD: HOW FUNDERS CAN RESPOND TO THE SURGE OF UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN MIGRATING TO THE UNITED STATES 1 Wednesday, July 9, 2014 Dial-in: 866-740-1260; Access Code: 8244374 Daranee Petsod,
More information3.2 Summary Conclusions: Article 31 of the 1951 Convention
3.2 Summary Conclusions: Article 31 of the 1951 Convention Expert Roundtable organized by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva,
More informationTopic 1: Protecting Seafaring Migrants. Seafaring migrants are those who are fleeing from economic depression, political
Topic 1: Protecting Seafaring Migrants Background: Seafaring migrants are those who are fleeing from economic depression, political repression, conflicts, dramatic changes and/or natural disasters through
More informationIntroduction. I - General remarks: Paragraph 5
Comments on the draft of General Comment No. 35 on Article 9 of the ICCPR on the right to liberty and security of person and freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention This submission represents the views
More informationA LONG AND DANGEROUS ROAD: HOW FUNDERS CAN RESPOND TO CHILDREN MIGRATING TO THE UNITED STATES THE SURGE OF UNACCOMPANIED
A LONG AND DANGEROUS ROAD: HOW FUNDERS CAN RESPOND TO THE SURGE OF UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN MIGRATING TO THE UNITED STATES 1 Wednesday, July 9, 2014 Dial-in: 866-740-1260; Access Code: 8244374 Daranee Petsod,
More information#THEBERKSKIDS ACTIVISM TOOLKIT SPRING 2018
#THEBERKSKIDS ACTIVISM TOOLKIT SPRING 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS # THE FACTS THE BERKS KIDS The Issue Where It s Happening 03 04 TAKING ACTION What Can You Do About This? Social Media Guide Tips for Letters
More informationYoung people from migrant and refugee backgrounds
National Youth Settlement Framework: Young people from migrant and refugee backgrounds Introduction This resource has been developed as a supplement to the MYAN Australia s National Youth Settlement Framework
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Petitioners-Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-00-dms-mdd Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of Lee Gelernt* Judy Rabinovitz* Anand Balakrishnan* AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT Broad St., th Floor New York,
More informationNTCA SITUATION HIGHLIGHTS. NORTHERN TRIANGLE OF CENTRAL AMERICA SITUATION December ,600
NORTHERN TRIANGLE OF CENTRAL AMERICA SITUATION December 2016 HIGHLIGHTS 137,600 Refugees and asylum-seekers from the Northern Triangle of Central America (NTCA) until June 30. 174,000 IDPs in Honduras
More informationSubmission to Canada Border Services Agency s. Consultation on the National Immigration Detention Framework. May 22, 2017
55 University Avenue, Suite 1500 Toronto, Ontario M5J 2H7 Tel: 416-920-1633 Fax: 416-920-5855 Submission to Canada Border Services Agency s Consultation on the National Immigration Detention Framework
More informationPetitioner-Plaintiff,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Lee Gelernt* Judy Rabinovitz* Anand Balakrishnan* AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT 1 Broad St., 1th Floor New York, NY 00 T: (1) -0 F: (1) - lgelernt@aclu.org
More informationADDRESSING THE MENTAL HEALTH NEEDS OF REFUGEE CHILDREN
ADDRESSING THE MENTAL HEALTH NEEDS OF REFUGEE CHILDREN AHMET ÖZASLAN The aim of this guide is to increase awareness on the complex mental health needs of refugee children among caregivers, charities, teachers
More informationTrump's entry ban on refugees will increase human vulnerability and insecurity, expert says 31 March 2017, by Brian Mcneill
Trump's entry ban on refugees will increase human vulnerability and insecurity, expert says 31 March 2017, by Brian Mcneill Trump's travel ban recently with VCU News. As someone who has worked with refugees
More informationNew refugee system one year on 9 December 2013
CONSEIL CANADIEN POUR LES RÉFUGIÉS CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES New refugee system one year on 9 December 2013 On December 15, 2012, major changes to Canada s refugee determination system were implemented.
More informationApplication of National Detention Standards to Detainees Held at Sheridan FCI
June 15, 2018 Director Thomas Homan U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement 500 12th St., SW Washington, D.C. 20536 RE: Application of National Detention Standards to Detainees Held at Sheridan FCI One
More informationNOT FOR REPRODUCTION. Advocating for Children from Immigrant Families: Assessing for Immigration Relief
Advocating for Children from Immigrant Families: Assessing for Immigration Relief Cristina Ritchie Cooper, JD American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law Elaine M. Kelley, PhD, MSW U.S. Citizenship
More informationRE: Support for H.R. 1215, the Immigration Oversight and Fairness Act of 2009
February 26, 2009 RE: Support for H.R. 1215, the Immigration Oversight and Fairness Act of 2009 Dear Member of Congress: We, the undersigned faith, human rights, civil liberties, refugee and immigrant,
More informationApril 20, Access for Pro Bono Volunteers at Karnes, Dilley and Berks Family Detention Centers
STEVEN H. SCHULMAN +1 202.887.4071/fax: +1 202.887.4288 sschulman@akingump.com Via email c/o Leonard Joseph, Chief of Staff (leonard.p.joseph@ice.dhs.gov) Sarah Saldaña, Esq. Director, Immigration and
More informationCentral American Women and Children Migrants and Refugees to and through Mexico
Central American Women and Children Migrants and Refugees to and through Mexico Migration, Trafficking, and Organized Crime in Central America, Mexico, and the United States Woodrow Wilson International
More informationST. FRANCES CABRINI CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT LEGAL ASSISTANCE Presenter: Wafa Abdin, Esq.
ST. FRANCES CABRINI CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT LEGAL ASSISTANCE Presenter: Wafa Abdin, Esq. EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND NEW POLICY MEMOS IMPACTING IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES EXECUTIVE ORDERS The President signed 4 Executive
More informationImmigration in the Age of Trump
Before the law sits a gatekeeper. To this gatekeeper comes a man from the country who asks to gain entry into the law. But the gatekeeper says that he cannot grant him entry at the moment. The man thinks
More informationOVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS
OVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS A Guide for Community Members & Advocates By Em Puhl The immigration system is very complex and opaque, containing many intricate moving parts. Most decisions that result
More informationA/HRC/20/24. General Assembly. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, François Crépeau. United Nations
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 2 April 2012 Original: English Human Rights Council Twentieth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic,
More informationMigration and Health. Medical and humanitarian assistance for people on the move, MSF experience and challenges
Migration and Health. Medical and humanitarian assistance for people on the move, MSF experience and challenges Apostolos Veizis,M.D Director of the Medical Support Unit apostolos.veizis@athens.msf.org
More informationTESTIMONY OF ALINA DAS, MEMBER, CRIMINAL COURTS COMMITTEE OF THE NEW YORK CITY BAR ASSOCIATION
Contact: Maria Cilenti - Director of Legislative Affairs - mcilenti@nycbar.org - (212) 382-6655 TESTIMONY OF ALINA DAS, MEMBER, CRIMINAL COURTS COMMITTEE OF THE NEW YORK CITY BAR ASSOCIATION NEW YORK CITY
More informationSubmission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report - Universal Periodic Review: JAPAN I. BACKGROUND AND CURRENT
More informationWhat is the Definition of an Unaccompanied Alien Child under U.S. Federal Law?
In recent months there has been an unprecedented increase in the number of children fleeing their home countries in Central America to seek refuge in surrounding countries, including the United States.
More informationThe Right to Education for Migrant and Refugee Children: Too Often Denied or Ignored
The Right to Education for Migrant and Refugee Children: Too Often Denied or Ignored by Msgr. Robert J. VITILLO Secretary General, International Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC) and Ecclesiastical
More informationJustice for Immigrants Webinar
Justice for Immigrants Webinar Family Separation at the Border May 30, 2018 Agenda & Speakers Introduction Timeline of Key Events Zero-Tolerance Policy Separation A Growing Practice Trends Seen by USCCB
More informationUnaccompanied Child Migrants in the United States: How Are They Faring?
Unaccompanied Child Migrants in the United States: How Are They Faring? October 15, 2015 2015 Migration Policy Institute Presenters Marc R. Rosenblum, Deputy Director, U.S. Immigration Policy Program,
More information