NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES UNIONIZATION AND WAGE INEQUALITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE U.S., THE U.K., AND CANADA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES UNIONIZATION AND WAGE INEQUALITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE U.S., THE U.K., AND CANADA"

Transcription

1 NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES UNIONIZATION AND WAGE INEQUALITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE U.S., THE U.K., AND CANADA David Card Thomas Lemieux W. Craig Riddell Working Paper NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA January 2003 Some parts of this paper are taken from our forthcoming chapter in the International Handbook of Trade Unions, edited by John Addison and Claus Schnabel. We are grateful to John Addison for comments. Funding for Card s research was provided by the Center for Labor Economics at UC Berkeley, while that of Lemieux and Riddell was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research by David Card, Thomas Lemieux, and W. Craig Riddell. All rights reserved. Short sections of text not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit including notice, is given to the source.

2 Unionization and Wage Inequality: A Comparative Study of the U.S., the U.K., and Canada David Card, Thomas Lemieux, and W. Craig Riddell NBER Working Paper No January 2003 JEL No. J3, J5 ABSTRACT This paper presents a comparative analysis of the link between unionization and wage inequality in the U.S., the U.K., and Canada. Our main motivation is to see whether unionization can account for differences and trends in wage inequality in industrialized countries. We focus on the U.S., the U.K., and Canada because the institutional arrangements governing unionization and collective bargaining are relatively similar in these three countries. The three countries also share large nonunion sectors that can be used as a comparison group for the union sector. Using comparable micro data for the last two decades, we find that unions have remarkably similar qualitative impacts in all three countries. In particular, unions tend to systematically reduce wage inequality among men, but have little impact on wage inequality for women. We conclude that unionization helps explain a sizable share of cross-country differences in male wage inequality among the three countries. We also conclude that de-unionization explains a substantial part of the growth in male wage inequality in the U.K. and the U.S. since the early 1980s. David Card Department of Economics University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA and NBER card@econ.berkeley.edu Thomas Lemieux Department of Economics University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada and NBER tlemieux@interchange.ubc.ca W. Craig Riddell Department of Economics University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada criddell@interchange.ubc.ca

3 This paper presents a comparative analysis of the link between unionization and wage inequality in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Our investigation is motivated by several factors. One is to understand better trends in income inequality. Several previous studies have concluded that falling unionization contributed to the steep increase in wage inequality in the U.S. and the U.K. that occurred in the 1980s. Wage inequality did not rise as quickly in these countries in the 1990s. This raises the question of whether the evolution of union coverage and union wage impacts can account for some of the changing trend in wage inequality. More generally, differences across these countries in the timing of changes in unionization and in wage inequality provide an opportunity for further assessing the contribution of institutional change to trends in income inequality. With the addition of questions on union status and wages to the U.K. Labour Force Survey (LFS) in 1993 and the Canadian LFS in 1997, it is now possible to use comparable large-scale micro data sets to examine the impact of unions on wages in the three countries. Estimates of the role of unionization in cross-country differences in wage inequality are no longer significantly affected by survey differences or by the limitations of small sample sizes. Our study is also motivated by the fact that in these three countries the institutional arrangements governing unionization and collective bargaining provide an environment that is suitable for estimating the impacts of unions on wage inequality. As with other aspects of the economy, collective bargaining institutions in these countries are broadly similar. In particular, negotiations are conducted at the enterprise level, and there is no general mechanism to extend union wage floors beyond the organized sector. The fraction of workers covered by collective agreements in the three countries is also relatively modest currently under one-third of wage and salary workers. Thus it is possible to compare the structure of wages for workers whose

4 2 wages are set by union contracts, and those wages are not, and potentially infer the effect of unions on overall wage inequality. A similar task is far more difficult in other countries (including the major European countries and Australia) because there is no clear distinction between the union and nonunion sectors. Collective bargaining in these countries is conducted at the industry or sectoral level, and the provisions are formally or informally extended to most of the labor force. Moreover, in many countries, unions exert considerable influence on political decisions (such as minimum wages) that directly effect labor market outcomes. We also seek to assess whether there are common patterns in the impact of unions on the wage structure in countries with economies and industrial relations systems that are broadly similar. Of particular interest are patterns in union coverage and union wage impacts by gender and skill. After briefly reviewing trends in union membership in the three countries, we begin by developing a simple framework for measuring the effect of unions on wage inequality, based on the potential outcomes framework that is now widely used in program evaluation. Our framework emphasizes three key aspects of collective bargaining coverage: How does the probability of union coverage vary for workers who would earn more or less in the nonunion sector? How much do unions raise average wages for workers in different skill groups? How do unions affect the dispersion of wages within narrow skill groups? We then use micro data samples to compare the incidence and average wage effect of unions by skill level on male and female workers in the three countries, and measure recent trends in union coverage by skill level. Despite some differences in the institutional systems that govern the determination of union status across workplaces in the three countries, we find remarkable similarity in the overall patterns of union coverage and in the degree to which unions

5 3 affect average wages of different skill groups. Within narrowly defined skill groups, wage inequality is always lower for union workers than nonunion workers. For male workers, union coverage tends to be concentrated at the middle of the skill distribution, and union wages tend to be flattened relative to nonunion wages. As a result, unions have an equalizing effect on the dispersion of male wages across different skill groups in the three countries, complementing the effect on within-group inequality. For female workers, however, union coverage is concentrated near the top of the skill distribution, and there is no tendency for unions to flatten skill differentials across groups. Thus, unions tend to raise inequality between more and less skilled women in the three countries, offsetting their effect on within-group inequality. As a final step, we use data from the past 25 years to compute the changing effect of unionization on wage inequality. During the 1980s and 1990s, unionization rates fell in all three countries, with the most rapid decline in the U.K. and the slowest fall in Canada. These trends contributed to rising male wage inequality, particularly in Britain. Indeed, we estimate that the precipitous fall in unionization in the U.K. can explain up to two thirds of the difference in the trend in male wage inequality between Britain and the U.S. I. Union Membership and Collective Bargaining Coverage Table 1 presents data on union membership rates as a fraction of paid (wage and salary) employment in the U.S., Britain, and Canada over the past 40 years. As has been noted in many previous studies (e.g., Freeman, 1998; Farber and Western, 2000) union membership rates have been declining in the U.S. since the mid-1950s, and are currently under 15 percent. In the U.S. a relatively small fraction of workers who are covered by collective bargaining agreements are not

6 4 union members (10-15 percent), so the trend in coverage by collective agreements is similar. 1 In contrast to the U.S., union membership rates in Canada rose between 1960 and 1980, but in the 1990s have begun to decline. 2 In Canada, as in the U.S., the fraction of workers covered by collective bargaining agreements is only slightly above the union membership rate, so trends in union membership and coverage are similar. In 1960 the union membership rate was higher in Britain than in the U.S. or Canada, and over the 1960s and 1970s membership expanded, peaking at over 50 percent in During the past two decades, however, union membership has fallen rapidly, losing about 10 percentage points in the 1980s and another 10 points in the 1990s. 3 Recent data from the labor force survey suggest that in the U.K. in the late 1990s, the fraction of workers whose pay is set by collective bargaining agreements is about 5 percentage points higher than union membership (Bland, 1999, Table 6). There are no comparable data from earlier periods. Nevertheless, crude estimates of union coverage rates suggest that collective bargaining coverage has declined at least as fast as union membership (OECD, 1997). The relative similarity of collective bargaining institutions but very different levels and trends in union membership in the U.S., Canada, and Britain suggest that comparisons between these countries may be particularly informative in understanding the role of unionization in the 1 See Budd and Na (2000) for a discussion of the institutional setting and a comparison between members and covered non-members. Hirsch and MacPherson (2002) present separate data and membership and coverage rates: both declined about 10 percentage points between 1980 and Different data sources show somewhat faster or slower rates of decline in union membership in Canada in the 1980s and 1990s. Traditionally, union membership rates have been constructed from trade union membership tallies. These rates show a very modest fall since the mid-1980s, while estimates from micro surveys show a much sharper decline. 3 See Pencavel (2003) for a discussion of alternative explanations for the rapid decline in U.K. unionization.

7 5 evolution of wage inequality. To the extent that other confounding factors, such as technological change and rising globalization, are common across the three countries, we may be able to quantify the effects of changing unionization by comparing relative trends in inequality to relative trends in unionization. II. Unions and Wage Inequality A. Conceptual Framework A convenient framework for analyzing the effect of unions on wage inequality is the potential outcomes model now widely used in program evaluation (see Angrist and Krueger, 1999). Assume for the moment that each worker faces two potential wages: a log wage in the union sector, W U i, and a log wage in the nonunion sector W N i. Ignoring dual job holders, a given individual is either in one sector or the other at any point in time, so one of the potential outcomes is observed and the other is not. Letting U i denote an indicator for union status, the observed wage of individual i is W i = U i W U i + (1- U i ) W N i. Let W U and W N represent the means of the potential wage outcomes in the two sectors, and let V U and V N represent the corresponding variances. Finally, let W and V represent the mean and variance of observed wages. In this setting, a natural measure of the effect of unions on wage inequality is V!V N : the difference between the observed variance of wages and the variance that would prevail if everyone was paid his or her nonunion potential wage. There are two problems with this measure. The first is purely practical: how do we estimate V N? The second is conceptual. Arguably, any given individual in the union sector has a well-defined potential wage in the nonunion sector. But if the union sector disappeared, the

8 6 equilibrium set of wage offers in the nonunion sector could change. 4 Thus V N is really a function of the size of the union sector, V N (u), where 0#u#1 indexes the fraction of workers in the union sector. In the absence of unionization, the variance of observed wages would be V N (0). This means that the effect of unionization on wage inequality, taking account of the general equilibrium impact of the presence of the union sector, is: V! V N (0). Despite its theoretical appeal, it is difficult to imagine developing a credible estimate of V N (0). Under strong assumptions, however, it may be possible to estimate V N (U), where U is the current fraction of unionized workers. The obvious advantage of this measure is that potential nonunion wage outcomes under the current level of unionism are at least partially observed (for all current nonunion workers). Since V! V N (U) = V! V N (0) + { V N (0)! V N (U) }, the difference V!V N (U) overstates or understates the true effect of unions by a term reflecting how much the variance of nonunion wage outcomes would change if the union sector was eliminated. While acknowledging this potential bias, in the rest of the paper we focus on comparisons between V, the observed variance of wages, and V N (U), the variance that would prevail if everyone were paid according to the current nonunion wage structure. B. Estimating the Variance of Potential Nonunion Wages In order to estimate V N we have to make an assumption about how current union workers 4 This possibility was emphasized by Lewis (1963). The presence of unionized employers may lead to higher wages in the nonunion sector (if nonunion employers raise wages to deter unionization efforts) or to lower wages (if unionization reduces employment in the union sector, increasing labour supply in the nonunion sector).

9 7 would be paid if they worked in the nonunion sector. One starting point is the assumption that union status is as good as randomly assigned, conditional on observed skill characteristics. In this case, the counterfactual variance V N can be estimated as the variance of wages for a suitably reweighted sample of nonunion workers. In this section we show how the resulting calculations are related to three key factors: the variation in the union coverage rate by wage level in the absence of unions, the size of the union wage effect for different skill groups, and the unionnonunion difference in the variance of wages within skill categories. We then show how the assumption that union status is independent of unobserved productivity factors can be relaxed. Let W N i (c) represent the log wage that individual i in skill group c would earn in the nonunion sector, and let W U i (c) denote the log wage for the same individual if employed in a union job. Assume that W N i (c) = W N N (c) + e i W U i (c) = W U U (c) + e i where W N (c) and W U (c) are the mean nonunion and union log wages for individuals in skill group c, respectively, and the random terms e N i and e U i are independent of actual union status (conditional on the observed skill level c). Let V U (c) and V N (c) denote the variances of potential wage outcomes for individuals in skill group c in the union and nonunion sectors, respectively. The union-nonunion gap in average wages for workers in skill group c is w (c)= W U (c)! W N (c) while the corresponding variance gap is v (c) = V U (c)! V N (c). Under the independence assumption, W N (c) and V N (c) provide unbiased estimates of the

10 8 mean and variance of nonunion wage outcomes for all workers in skill group c, not just those who are actually working in the nonunion sector. The variance of wages in the nonunion sector will not necessarily equal V N, however, if the distribution of nonunion workers across skill groups differs from the distribution of the overall workforce. A simple way to estimate V N is to reweight individual observations from the nonunion workforce to account for this difference. Letting U(c) denote the fraction of workers in skill group c in union jobs, the appropriate weight for nonunion workers in group c is 1/(1!U(c)). While reweighting provides a convenient way to calculate V N, it is nevertheless instructive to develop an analytical expression for V!V N under the conditional independence assumption. First, note that the average wage in skill group c is W(c) = W N (c) + U(c) w (c), (1) while the variance of log wage outcomes for all workers in skill group c is V(c) = V N (c) + U(c) v (c) + U(c)(1-U(c)) w (c) 2. (2) The second term in this expression reflects the within-sector effect for skill group c that arises if wages are more or less disperse under collective bargaining than in the absence of collective bargaining. The third term is a between sector effect that is necessarily positive whenever w (c) 0, reflecting the wedge between the average wage of otherwise identical union and nonunion workers. The variance of log wages across all skill groups is the sum of the betweengroup and within-group variances: V = Var[W(c)] + E[V(c)]. where expectations (denoted by E[ ]), and variances (denoted by Var[ ]) are taken across the skill categories. Using equations (1) and (2), this expression be rewritten as:

11 9 V = Var[W N (c) + U(c) w (c)] + E[V N (c) + U(c) v (c) + U(c)(1!U(c)) w (c) 2 ] = Var[W N (c)] + Var[U(c) w (c)] + 2Cov[W N (c), U(c) w (c)] + E[V N (c)] + E[U(c) v (c)] + E[U(c)(1!U(c)) w (c) 2 ] (3) where Cov[, ] denotes the covariance across skill groups. In contrast to equation (3), if all workers were paid according to the wage structure in the nonunion sector, the variance of wage outcomes would be V N = Var[W N (c)] + E[V N (c)]. The effect of unions on the variance of wage outcomes, relative to what would be observed if all workers were paid according to the current wage structure in the nonunion sector, is therefore V - V N = Var[U(c) w (c)] + 2Cov[W N (c), U(c) w (c)] + E[U(c) v (c)] + E[U(c)(1!U(c)) w (c) 2 ] (4) Substituting observed values for W N (c), U(c), w (c), and w (c) into equation (4) leads to an expression that is numerically equal to the difference between the observed variance of wages V and the reweighting estimate of V N, derived by reweighting each nonunion worker by 1/(1!U(c)). To understand the implications of equation (4) it is helpful to begin by considering a case where the union coverage rate, the union wage effect w (c), and the union variance gap are all constant across skill groups. In this case, the first two terms of equation (4) are zero and the effect of unions on the economy-wide variance of wages is just an average of the within-sector and between-sector effects across skill groups. The two additional terms in equation (4) reflect differences in the union coverage rate U(c) and/or the union wage effect w (c) across skill groups. The first term in (4) is a positive component that arises whenever the union wage gain

12 10 U(c) w (c) varies across groups. The second is a covariance term that may be positive or negative, depending on how the union wage gain varies across the wage distribution. If union coverage is higher for less-skilled workers, or if the union wage impact is higher for such workers, then the covariance term will be negative, enhancing the equalizing effect of unions on wage dispersion. C. Allowing for Unobserved Heterogeneity The assumption that union status is as good as random conditional on observed skills is convenient but arguably too strong. In this section we show how the presence of unobserved productivity differences between union and nonunion workers biases the calculation that ignores these differences. As before, assume that workers are classified into skill categories on the basis of observed characteristics, and suppose that potential nonunion and union wages are given by: W i N (c) = W N (c) + a i + e i N W i U (c) = W U (c) + a i + e i U, (5a) (5b) where a i represents an unobserved skill component that is equally rewarded in the union and nonunion sectors. Continue to assume that e N i and e U i are independent of union status, and let θ(c) = E[a i U i =1, c]! E[a i U i =0, c] represent the difference in the mean of the unobserved skill component between union and nonunion workers in group c. If union workers in group c tend to have higher unobserved skills than their nonunion counterparts, for example, then θ (c) > 0. The observed wage gap between union and nonunion workers in group c includes the true union wage premium and the difference attributable to unobserved skills:

13 11 D w (c) = w (c) + θ(c). Similarly, assuming that e N i and e U i are independent of a i, the observed difference in the variance of wages between union and nonunion workers in group c is: D v (c) = v (c) + Var[a i U i =1, c]!var[a i U i =0, c], which is a combination of the true union effect on within-group inequality and any difference in the variance of the unobserved productivity effects between union and nonunion workers. If union workers tend to have a narrower distribution of unobserved skills, for example, the observed variance gap D v (c) will be biased downward relative to the true union effect v (c). Assuming that potential wage outcomes are generated by equations (5a, 5b), it can be shown that the difference in the variance of wages in the presence of unions and in the counterfactual situation in which all workers are paid according to the nonunion wage structure is V - V N = Var[U(c) w (c)] + 2Cov[W N (c), U(c) w (c)] + E[U(c) v (c)] + E[U(c)(1!U(c)){ (θ(c)+ w (c)) 2!θ(c) 2 }]. (6) Only the last term of this equation differs from equation (4), the expression that applies when θ(c)=0 for all groups. 5 In the presence of unobserved heterogeneity, however, w (c) and v (c) can no longer be estimated consistently from the observed differences in the means and variances of union and nonunion workers in skill group c. By the same token, it is no longer possible to use a reweighting procedure based on the fraction of union members in different 5 Equation (6) is only correct if unobserved skills are rewarded equally in the union and nonunion sectors, although it may provide a good first approximation if the rewards for unobserved ability in the union sector are not too much lower than in the nonunion sector. Lemieux (1998) presents a model in which unobserved attributes are rewarded differently in the union and nonunion sectors.

14 12 observed skill groups to estimate V N. It is instructive to compare the estimated effect of unions under the as good as random assumption to the true effect, when potential wages are generated by equations (5a,5b). The estimated effect is given by equation (4), using the observed within-skill group union differences D w (c) and D v (c) as estimates of w (c) and v (c). The true effect is given by equation (6). The difference is Bias = Var[U(c)D w (c)]! Var[U(c) w (c)] + 2Cov[W N (c), U(c)( D w (c)! w (c) ) ] + E[ U(c)( D v (c)! v (c) ) ] + E[ U(c)(1-U(c)) { D w (c) 2! w (c) 2!2 θ(c) w (c) } ]. There are various competing factors here. For example, if D w (c) varies more across skill groups than w (c), the sum of the first two terms is likely to be positive. On the other hand, if D w (c) is more strongly negatively correlated with nonunion wages across skill groups than w (c) (as argued in Card, 1996), then the third (covariance) term will be negative, leading to an overstatement of the equalizing effect of unions. We return to this issue below. III. Estimating the Effect of Unions on Wage Inequality A. Data Sources We use a variety of micro data files to compare the effects of unions on wage outcomes in the U.S., the U.K., and Canada over the past thirty years. Our U.S. samples are the most straightforward, since the Current Population Survey (CPS) has been collecting data on wages and union status on an annual basis since We use the pooled May 1973 and May 1974

15 13 CPS samples as our first U.S. observation. For later years, we use the monthly earnings supplement files (the so-called outgoing rotation group files) for 1984, 1993, and The earnings and union status information all pertain to an individual s main job as of the CPS survey week. Starting in 1993 the U.K. s Labour Force Survey (UKLFS) began asking questions on union status and earnings that are comparable to the questions in the CPS. Strictly comparable data are unavailable for earlier years. The 1983 General Household Survey (GHS) is the only large scale micro data set that contains information on union status and wages in the U.K. prior to the 1990s. While this data source has several limitations, we elected to combine the 1983 GHS with the 1993 and 2001 UKLFS samples for our U.K. analysis. The Canadian Labour Force Survey (CLFS) added questions on earnings and union status in To supplement these data, we combine two smaller surveys the 1991 and 1995 Surveys on Work Arrangements (SWA) -- as a source of information for the early 1990s, and use the 1984 Survey of Union Membership as a source of information for the early 1980s. All three of these surveys were conducted as supplements to the regular CLFS. In addition to the usual problems that arise in comparing survey responses over time and across countries, a significant issue for our analysis is the measurement of union status. The 1984 and later CPS files include questions on both union membership and union coverage. The 1973 and 1974 May CPS files, however, only ask about union membership. For comparability reasons, we therefore focus on union membership as our measure of union status in the U.S. Our U.K. data sets include data on union membership as well as responses to a question about whether there is a union presence at the individual s place of employment. As noted in Bland (1999, Table 6), however, the latter question significantly overstates coverage under collective

16 14 bargaining agreements. As in our U.S. analysis, we therefore use union membership as our measure of unionization in the U.K. With respect to Canada, consistent information on union membership cannot be recovered from the 1991 and 1995 SWA s, so we use union coverage as our measure of unionization in Canada. We believe that this choice has little effect on the results, since only about two percent of Canadian employees are covered by collective agreements but are not union members. 6 In the data appendix we explain in detail how we process the various data sets to arrive at our final estimation samples. Generally speaking, our samples include only wage and salary workers age 16 to 64 (15 to 64 in Canada) with non-allocated wages and earnings (except in 1984 and 2001 in Canada). We use hourly wages for workers who are paid by the hour and compute average hourly earnings for the other workers by dividing weekly earnings by weekly hours (or earnings for a longer time period divided by the corresponding measure of hours). We also exclude workers with very low or very high hourly wage values. Sample weights are used throughout except in the 1983 GHS for which sample weights are not available. To implement the methods developed in Section II, we divide workers in each sample into skill groups, based on age and educational attainment. The number of skill groups used varies by country, reflecting differences in the sample sizes and the age and education codes reported in the raw data files. In the earlier Canadian data sets age is only reported in 10-year categories (a total of 5 categories for workers age 15 to 64), and education can only be consistently coded into 5 categories. Thus we only use 25 skill groups for Canada. Given the 6 In the 2001 CLFS, 2.4 percent of male workers and 1.9 of female workers are covered by collective bargaining but not members of a union. The two different measures of unionization lead to nearly identical estimates of the union wage premium in a conventional linear regression of wages on union status, education, and experience.

17 15 small sample sizes available in the 1983 GHS and the 1993 UKLFS, we use the same number of skill groups for the U.K. (five age and five education groups). In our U.S. samples, we are able to use a much larger number of skill categories because of the larger sample sizes and detailed age and education information in the CPS. We have re-analyzed the U.S. data using about the same number of skill groups as in Canada and the U.K., however, and found that this has little impact on our results. B. Patterns of Union Coverage and Union Wage Effects To set the stage for our analysis it is helpful to begin by looking at how union coverage and the size of the union wage gap vary by skill level. Figures 1-3 show the unionization rates of men and women in the U.S., the U.K. and Canada, by the level of real hourly wages. These graphs are constructed by calculating union membership/coverage rates for workers in narrow wage bins, and smoothing across bins. 7 In all three countries, unionization rates of men tend to follow a hump-shaped pattern, peaking for workers near the middle or upper middle of the wage distribution. By comparison, unionization rates of women in the U.S. and Canada are about the same for highly paid workers as for those in the middle. This pattern is driven in part by relatively high rates of unionization for teachers, nurses, and other public sector workers, who are near the top of the female wage distribution. In the U.K. there is more of a fall-off in union membership among the highest-paid women, especially in the more recent data. Comparisons of the unionization rates in different years reveal the rapid decline in union membership among U.S. and U.K. men. Declines are also evident for Canadian men and for women in all three 7 In the U.S., for example, we use bins for the log hourly wage of width We use smaller bins for our U.K. and Canadian samples.

18 16 countries. The framework developed in Section II suggests that the effect of unions on wage inequality depends in part on how the union wage gap varies by skill. Figures 4-6 provide some simple evidence on this variation, using data from the early 1990s for the three countries. These figures plot mean wages for unionized workers in a given age-education group (i.e., W U (c) in the notation of Section II) against the corresponding mean for non-union workers with the same skill level (i.e., W N (c)) for 25 age-education groups in Canada and the U.K., and about 150 groups in the U.S. In interpreting these figures, note that if union and nonunion workers in a given skill group have the same average wages, then the points in these graphs will lie on the 45-degree line. On the other hand, if the union wage gap w (c) is positive, then the points will lie above the 45-degree line. Moreover, if w (c) is larger for lower wage workers, then the points will tend to be further above the 45 degree line for low-wage skill groups (on the left side of the graph) than for high-wage groups (on the right). This is in fact the case for U.S. men. The best-fitting line relating W U (c) to W N (c) is also shown in the figure, and lies above the 45 degree line but with a slope of less than 1. Interestingly, the same pattern is true for men in Canada and the U.K., as shown in Figures 5a and 6a. For skill groups with low average wages (e.g., less educated and relatively young men) the mean union wage tends to be substantially higher than the mean nonunion wage, while for groups with high average wages (e.g., middle age college or university graduates) the mean union wage is not too much above the mean nonunion wage. Thus, in all three countries w (c) is larger for low-wage men than high-wage men, implying that unions tend to flatten wage differentials across skill groups. As we discuss in the next section, one caveat to this

19 17 conclusion is that there may be unobserved skill differences between union and nonunion workers in different age-education groups that tend to exaggerate the apparent negative correlation between wages in the non-union sector and the union wage gap. For women, the patterns of union wages relative to nonunion wages are also remarkably similar in the three countries. Unlike the patterns for men, however, the union wage gaps for women are roughly constant. Coupled with the tendency for unionization rates of women to rise across the wage distribution, the absence of a flattening effect of unions on female wages implies that covariance between the nonunion wage W N (c) and the union wage gain U(c)) w (c) is either zero or positive, limiting the potential equalizing effect of unions on female inequality. Although the data in Figures 4-6 pertain to the early 1990s, similar plots from other years show that the basic patterns have been very stable in all three countries over the past years. In all our sample years, the union-nonunion wage gap for men tends to be highest for the least skilled workers, and to be relatively small (or even negative) for highly skilled men. The union gap for women, on the other hand, tends to be stable or only slightly declining with skill level. The consistency of these patterns over time and across the three countries is remarkable. C. The Effect of Unions on Wage Inequality With this background, we turn to our analysis of the effect of unions on wage inequality in the three countries. Tables 2, 3, and 4 summarize a variety of facts about unionization and the structure of wages for the U.S., Canada, and the U.K., respectively. Reading across the columns of Table 2, a comparison of the entries in the first row confirms the steep decline in U.S. unionization rates documented in Table 1. As illustrated in Figures 1a and 1b, however, these aggregate figures hide a sharp difference between men and women. Between 1973 and

20 , the unionization rate of women declined only about 2 points, from 14 to 12 percent, while for men it fell by 50 percent, from 31 to 15 percent. This sharp male-female difference has much to do with the gradual shift of unionization from the private to the public sector. For instance, Card (2001) shows that for both men and women, unionization rates declined by about 50 percent in the private sector between 1973 and During the same period, however, unionization rates increased sharply in the public sector. Women in general, and unionized women in particular, are much more concentrated in the public sector than their male counterparts. As a result, the rise in public sector unionism has largely offset the decline in private sector unionization among women. The trends in unionization in Canada between 1984 and 2001 (Table 3) are similar to those in the U.S. The male unionization rate declined by 14 percentage points, even more than the 9 percentage point decline in the U.S. over the same period. As in the U.S., the decline for women was more modest (4 percentage points). The drop in unionization in our Canadian samples is much steeper than the decline registered in membership tallies obtained from union reports, but is consistent with the trends reported by Riddell and Riddell (2001) based on similar micro data sources. The data in Table 4 show that unionization rates have also fallen sharply in the U.K. in the past two decades: by 27 percentage points for men and by 14 percentage points for women. As in the U.S. and Canada, the faster decline in male unionization is linked to the relative shift of unionization from the private to the public sector (Gosling and Lemieux, 2001). In the U.K., this shift was compounded by privatization of many nationalized industries (e.g., steel, coal, and public utilities), which transferred sizeable numbers of mainly male workers from the unionized public sector to the much less organized private sector (Gosling and Lemieux, 2001).

21 19 Interestingly, the relatively faster decline of male unionization in the three countries meant that by 2001, male and female unionization rates were not too different in the U.S., Canada, or the U.K. This near equality marks a sharp departure from the historical pattern of greater unionization among men. The next set of rows in Tables 2-4 show the evolution of mean wages of nonunion and union workers, and the trend in the corresponding union wage gap. We also report an adjusted wage gap, calculated from a regression that includes a full set of dummies for each of the skill categories. As in the case for the unionization rates, the estimated wage gaps show a remarkably similar pattern across the three countries. The unadjusted wage gaps tend to be larger for women than for men. The adjusted wage gaps are uniformly smaller than the unadjusted gaps, and in all three countries the divergence has increased over time, implying that union membership rates have fallen more for relatively unskilled workers (as is apparent in Figures 1-3). Like the unadjusted union wage gap, the adjusted wage gap is typically larger for women than for men. Nevertheless, male-female differences in the adjusted gaps are less pronounced than the corresponding differences in the unadjusted gaps, especially in more recent years. For example, the unadjusted wage gaps in the U.S. in 2001 were for men and for women, versus adjusted wage gaps of and This pattern is consistent with Figures 1 to 3, which show that unionized women are more highly concentrated in the upper end of the skill distribution than unionized men. As a result, controlling for the skill composition of the workforce reduces the union wage gap far more for women than for men. Another trend that is shared by all three countries is a gradual decline in the adjusted union wage gap, by 5 to 10 percentage points (depending on gender and country) between the early 1980s and Since the rate of unionization also declined sharply during this period, the

22 20 implied effect of unions on average wages the union wage gain E[U(c) w (c)] has declined dramatically over the last two decades. For example, the adjusted impact of unions on male wages in the U.K. went from 9.2 percentage points in 1983 (unionization rate of 0.57 times an adjusted gap of 0.162) to 1.7 percentage points in 2001 (0.307 times 0.045). In the U.S., the effect on average wages of men fell from 5.7 percentage points (unionization rate of times an adjusted gap of 0.185) to 2.3 percent in 2001 (0.149 times 0.156). The next rows in Tables 2-4 report measures of wage dispersion within the union and nonunion sectors. Once again, the results are remarkably consistent across countries. As first documented in Freeman (1980), the standard deviation of wages is always smaller in the union than in the nonunion sector. Moreover, the gap between the standard deviation in the union and nonunion sector is always larger for men than for women. These observations are confirmed by Figures 7 to 12, which show kernel density estimates of the densities of log hourly wages in the union and nonunion sectors, and for the two sectors pooled together, by gender and time period. 8 For example, Figure 7 displays the wage distribution for U.S. males. In all four time periods, wages are more tightly distributed in the union than the nonunion sector. In particular, while the upper tails of the union and nonunion densities look qualitatively similar, the lower tail goes much further to the left in the nonunion sector. By contrast, the inter-sectoral differences in wage dispersion are much less striking for U.S. women (Figure 8). In 1984, for example, the union and nonunion distributions show different skewness, and average wages are higher in the union sector. However, it is not clear whether wages are more narrowly distributed in the union or nonunion sector. 8 The densities are estimated using a bandwidth of See DiNardo, Fortin and Lemieux (1996) for more detail.

23 21 Inspection of Figures 7 and 8 (and the corresponding figures for Canada and the U.K.) suggests that the minimum wage is an important factor in explaining overall trends in wage inequality, particularly for nonunion female workers. 9 An interesting conjecture is that unions appear to have a more limited effect on the dispersion of female wages in part because minimum wages limit the amount of dispersion in the lower tail of the female wage distribution. The wage densities for Canadian men (Figure 9) and women (Figure 10) are qualitatively similar to those in the U.S. In particular, it is clear that male wages are more narrowly distributed in the union sector than the nonunion sector. Things are not as clear for women, in part because of the minimum wage, which has a surprisingly large visual impact in the nonunion sector, especially in Relative to the U.S. or Canada it is more difficult to see union wage compression effects for U.K. males (Figure 11) or females (Figure 12). Comparing the reported standard deviations of wages in the two sectors in Table 3, however, the union-nonunion gaps are nonetheless quite similar to those in Canada or the United States. The bottom rows of Tables 2-4 show the various components of our analysis of the effect of unions on wage inequality. For reference purposes, we first present a simplified analysis that ignores any differences across skill groups. In this case, equation (4) reduces to V - V N = U v + U(1!U) w 2 (4') where U represents the overall unionization rate, v represents the difference in the variance of log wages between union and nonunion workers, and w represents the (unadjusted) difference in mean wages between union and nonunion workers. The first term is the within sector effect of 9 This is similar to DiNardo, Fortin and Lemieux (1996) who show that the minimum wage has a much larger impact on women than on men.

24 22 unions, and is negative since the variance of wages is lower for union workers, while the second is the between sector effect, which is always positive. Comparing the results across countries and over time, the results from this simplified analysis are remarkably consistent. For men, the within-sector effect is substantially larger (in absolute value) than the between-sector effect, implying that unions reduce wage dispersion. Relative to the overall variance, the compression effect ranges from 31 percent in the U.K. in 1984, when the unionization rate was 57 percent, to 6 percent in the U.S. in 2001 (unionization rate of 15 percent). More generally, the compression effect of unions is highly correlated with the overall level of unionization (4'). 10 In contrast to the situation for men, the simplified analysis of equation (4') implies that unions have either no effect on female wage inequality, or a slightly disequalizing effect. This contrast is attributable to three complementary factors. First, the female unionization rate is lower, reducing the size of the within-sector effect. Second, the gap in overall wage dispersion between union and nonunion workers is much smaller for women than men. Third, the union wage gap is systematically larger for women than men, yielding a larger (more positive) between-sector effect U(1!U) 2 w. Indeed, in the later years of our analysis, the between-sector effect dominates in all three countries. Consistent with findings reported in Card (2001) and Lemieux (1993), unions thus tend to increase the variance of wages among women. The final set of rows in Tables 2-4 show the effect of unions on the variance of wages when we distinguish among skill groups. Recall from equation (4) that this analysis includes 10 The derivative of the right hand side of equation (4') with respect to the unionization rate is v + (1!2U) w 2. This is negative as long as v is large relative to w 2.

25 23 three components: an average within-sector effect, E[U(c) v (c)], an average between-sector effect, E[U(c)(1!U(c)) w (c) 2 ], and the sum of two between-skill-group terms, Var[U(c) w (c)] + 2Cov[W N (c), U(c) w (c)] that reflect the rise in inequality between groups if the union wage gain varies by skill group, and any tendency of unions to raise wages more or less for higher wage workers. Starting with men, the introduction of controls for observable skill systematically reduces the magnitudes of both the within- and between-sector effects. It is easy to see why this happens in the case of the between-sector effect. As we have noted, adjusting for characteristics reduces the union wage gap, and thus decreases the size of the between-group effect. In other words, part of the measured between-sector effect in the simple two-sector calculation is a spurious consequence of that fact that union workers are more skilled, on average, than nonunion workers. A similar reasoning can be used to understand why the within-group effect also declines when differences in observed skills are taken into account. Recall from Figures 1a-3a that unionized men are more concentrated in the middle of the wage distribution than nonunion men. Part of the lower dispersion of wages in the union sector is thus a spurious consequence of the fact that union workers are more homogenous. Interestingly, adjusting for observed skill characteristics also reduces the magnitude of the between-sector effect for women but increases (or leaves unchanged in the U.S.) the magnitude of the within-group effect. The latter finding means that union women are no more homogenous (in terms of their observable skills) than their nonunion counterparts, which is consistent with the evidence reported in Figures 1b, 2b, and 3b. Once worker characteristics are taken into account, the within-sector effect tends to dominate the between-sector effect for both

26 24 men and women. Thus, the results from a simplified analysis which ignores measured skill differences tends to overstate male-female differences in the effect of unions on wage inequality. The final components of the union effect are the two terms which reflect the effect of unions on the distribution of wages across skill groups. As highlighted in our discussion of Figures 4-6, the union wage effect w (c) is systematically lower for high-wage men, inducing a negative covariance between W N (c) and U(c) w (c). By contrast, the wage gap for women is not much lower for high-wage groups, and the higher unionization rate for those groups induces a positive covariance between W N (c) and U(c) w (c). The results in Tables 2-4 are broadly consistent with this prediction. As expected, unions tend to reduce wage dispersion across skill groups for men (except in recent years in Canada where the effect is essentially zero). Also as expected, unions tend to increase wage dispersion across skill groups for women in Canada and the U.K. In the U.S., however, unions have little effect on female wage dispersion across skill groups from 1973 and 1993, and actually reduce wage dispersion in A natural explanation for the difference between the U.S. on one hand, and Canada and the U.K., on the other, is that the union wage gap for U.S. women tends to decline slightly with higher nonunion wages (see Figure 4b). This lowers the covariance between W N (c) and U(c) w (c) for U.S. women relative to the other two countries. Once all three factors are taken into consideration, our calculations show that unions systematically reduce the variance of wages for men. By contrast, the effects for women tend to be small and slightly positive (i.e., unions raise inequality). This pattern of result is quite similar to what we found with the simpler model, though the magnitude of the effects tend to be smaller when we control for worker s characteristics.

27 25 E. Biases from Unobserved Heterogeneity As we noted in Section II, a potential problem with estimates of the equalizing effect of unions based on equation (4) is that union workers may be more or less productive than otherwise similar nonunion workers. In this case, comparisons of the mean and variance of wages for union and nonunion workers with the same observed skills confound the true union effect and unobserved differences in productivity. Traditionally, economists have argued that union workers are likely to have higher unobserved skills than their nonunion counterparts (Lewis, 1986). Underlying this view is the notion that union wage structures do not fully compensate high productivity individuals, so employers can reduce the burden of above-market wage scales by hiring more productive workers. This line of argument suggests that the degree of employer selectivity may be higher, the higher is the union wage premium. 11 If unions really raise wages more for lower skill groups, unionized employers may respond by hiring only the very best workers in the lowest skill groups, inducing a pattern of selectivity bias that accentuates the true union wage premium, and leading to an overstatement of the between group equalizing effect of unions. Previous studies by Lemieux (1993), Card (1996), and Lemieux (1998) have attempted to use data on job changers to measure the extent to which union and nonunion workers in different skill groups have different unobserved productivity characteristics. 12 The two Lemieux 11 Modify equation (5b) to: W i U (c) = W U (c) + ka i + e i U, where k#1, and assume that a worker s expected productivity (in either the union or nonunion sector) is equal to his or her expected nonunion wage, W N (c) + a i. Then a unionized employer will be willing to hire any worker in skill group c with a i $ w (c) /(1-k). Note that the higher is w (c), the more selective is the subset of workers who are hired. 12 Taking a more direct approach, Hirsch and Schumacher (1998) examine test score data and find that union members with high measured skills have relatively low test scores.

Unions and Wage Inequality: The Roles of Gender, Skill and Public Sector Employment

Unions and Wage Inequality: The Roles of Gender, Skill and Public Sector Employment DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 11964 Unions and Wage Inequality: The Roles of Gender, Skill and Public Sector Employment David Card Thomas Lemieux W. Craig Riddell NOVEMBER 2018 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES

More information

The Impact of Deunionisation on Earnings Dispersion Revisited. John T. Addison Department of Economics, University of South Carolina (U.S.A.

The Impact of Deunionisation on Earnings Dispersion Revisited. John T. Addison Department of Economics, University of South Carolina (U.S.A. The Impact of Deunionisation on Earnings Dispersion Revisited John T. Addison Department of Economics, University of South Carolina (U.S.A.) and IZA Ralph W. Bailey Department of Economics, University

More information

Labor Market Dropouts and Trends in the Wages of Black and White Men

Labor Market Dropouts and Trends in the Wages of Black and White Men Industrial & Labor Relations Review Volume 56 Number 4 Article 5 2003 Labor Market Dropouts and Trends in the Wages of Black and White Men Chinhui Juhn University of Houston Recommended Citation Juhn,

More information

III. Wage Inequality and Labour Market Institutions

III. Wage Inequality and Labour Market Institutions Fortin Econ 56 Lecture 3D III. Wage Inequality and Labour Market Institutions D. Labour Market Institutions 1. Overview 2. Effect of Minimum Wages 3. Effect of Unions on Wage Inequality Fortin Econ 56

More information

The Impact of Unionization on the Wage of Hispanic Workers. Cinzia Rienzo and Carlos Vargas-Silva * This Version, May 2015.

The Impact of Unionization on the Wage of Hispanic Workers. Cinzia Rienzo and Carlos Vargas-Silva * This Version, May 2015. The Impact of Unionization on the Wage of Hispanic Workers Cinzia Rienzo and Carlos Vargas-Silva * This Version, May 2015 Abstract This paper explores the role of unionization on the wages of Hispanic

More information

Changes in Wage Inequality in Canada: An Interprovincial Perspective

Changes in Wage Inequality in Canada: An Interprovincial Perspective s u m m a r y Changes in Wage Inequality in Canada: An Interprovincial Perspective Nicole M. Fortin and Thomas Lemieux t the national level, Canada, like many industrialized countries, has Aexperienced

More information

Residual Wage Inequality: A Re-examination* Thomas Lemieux University of British Columbia. June Abstract

Residual Wage Inequality: A Re-examination* Thomas Lemieux University of British Columbia. June Abstract Residual Wage Inequality: A Re-examination* Thomas Lemieux University of British Columbia June 2003 Abstract The standard view in the literature on wage inequality is that within-group, or residual, wage

More information

The Impact of Unionization on the Wage of Hispanic Workers. Cinzia Rienzo and Carlos Vargas-Silva * This Version, December 2014.

The Impact of Unionization on the Wage of Hispanic Workers. Cinzia Rienzo and Carlos Vargas-Silva * This Version, December 2014. The Impact of Unionization on the Wage of Hispanic Workers Cinzia Rienzo and Carlos Vargas-Silva * This Version, December 2014 Abstract This paper explores the role of unionization on the wages of Hispanic

More information

Why are the Relative Wages of Immigrants Declining? A Distributional Approach* Brahim Boudarbat, Université de Montréal

Why are the Relative Wages of Immigrants Declining? A Distributional Approach* Brahim Boudarbat, Université de Montréal Preliminary and incomplete Comments welcome Why are the Relative Wages of Immigrants Declining? A Distributional Approach* Brahim Boudarbat, Université de Montréal Thomas Lemieux, University of British

More information

Volume 35, Issue 1. An examination of the effect of immigration on income inequality: A Gini index approach

Volume 35, Issue 1. An examination of the effect of immigration on income inequality: A Gini index approach Volume 35, Issue 1 An examination of the effect of immigration on income inequality: A Gini index approach Brian Hibbs Indiana University South Bend Gihoon Hong Indiana University South Bend Abstract This

More information

Revisiting Union Wage and Job Loss Effects Using the Displaced Worker Surveys

Revisiting Union Wage and Job Loss Effects Using the Displaced Worker Surveys Revisiting Union Wage and Job Loss Effects Using the Displaced Worker Surveys Barry Hirsch, Georgia State University and IZA Bonn* and Abhir Kulkarni, Georgia State University** Draft Version 1, December

More information

IV. Labour Market Institutions and Wage Inequality

IV. Labour Market Institutions and Wage Inequality Fortin Econ 56 Lecture 4B IV. Labour Market Institutions and Wage Inequality 5. Decomposition Methodologies. Measuring the extent of inequality 2. Links to the Classic Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Fortin

More information

The Impact of Deunionisation on Earnings Dispersion Revisited

The Impact of Deunionisation on Earnings Dispersion Revisited DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 724 The Impact of Deunionisation on Earnings Dispersion Revisited John T. Addison Ralph Bailey W. Stanley Siebert February 2003 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HOMEOWNERSHIP IN THE IMMIGRANT POPULATION. George J. Borjas. Working Paper

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HOMEOWNERSHIP IN THE IMMIGRANT POPULATION. George J. Borjas. Working Paper NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HOMEOWNERSHIP IN THE IMMIGRANT POPULATION George J. Borjas Working Paper 8945 http://www.nber.org/papers/w8945 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge,

More information

Volume Author/Editor: Katharine G. Abraham, James R. Spletzer, and Michael Harper, editors

Volume Author/Editor: Katharine G. Abraham, James R. Spletzer, and Michael Harper, editors This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Labor in the New Economy Volume Author/Editor: Katharine G. Abraham, James R. Spletzer, and Michael

More information

Explaining the Deteriorating Entry Earnings of Canada s Immigrant Cohorts:

Explaining the Deteriorating Entry Earnings of Canada s Immigrant Cohorts: Explaining the Deteriorating Entry Earnings of Canada s Immigrant Cohorts: 1966-2000 Abdurrahman Aydemir Family and Labour Studies Division Statistics Canada aydeabd@statcan.ca 613-951-3821 and Mikal Skuterud

More information

Inequality in Labor Market Outcomes: Contrasting the 1980s and Earlier Decades

Inequality in Labor Market Outcomes: Contrasting the 1980s and Earlier Decades Inequality in Labor Market Outcomes: Contrasting the 1980s and Earlier Decades Chinhui Juhn and Kevin M. Murphy* The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect

More information

Rural and Urban Migrants in India:

Rural and Urban Migrants in India: Rural and Urban Migrants in India: 1983-2008 Viktoria Hnatkovska and Amartya Lahiri July 2014 Abstract This paper characterizes the gross and net migration flows between rural and urban areas in India

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE LABOR MARKET IMPACT OF HIGH-SKILL IMMIGRATION. George J. Borjas. Working Paper

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE LABOR MARKET IMPACT OF HIGH-SKILL IMMIGRATION. George J. Borjas. Working Paper NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE LABOR MARKET IMPACT OF HIGH-SKILL IMMIGRATION George J. Borjas Working Paper 11217 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11217 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts

More information

Revisiting Union Wage and Job Loss Effects Using the Displaced Worker Surveys

Revisiting Union Wage and Job Loss Effects Using the Displaced Worker Surveys Revisiting Union Wage and Job Loss Effects Using the Displaced Worker Surveys Abhir Kulkarni, Georgia State University* and Barry Hirsch, Georgia State University and IZA Bonn** December 2018 Abstract:

More information

EPI BRIEFING PAPER. Immigration and Wages Methodological advancements confirm modest gains for native workers. Executive summary

EPI BRIEFING PAPER. Immigration and Wages Methodological advancements confirm modest gains for native workers. Executive summary EPI BRIEFING PAPER Economic Policy Institute February 4, 2010 Briefing Paper #255 Immigration and Wages Methodological advancements confirm modest gains for native workers By Heidi Shierholz Executive

More information

Rural and Urban Migrants in India:

Rural and Urban Migrants in India: Rural and Urban Migrants in India: 1983 2008 Viktoria Hnatkovska and Amartya Lahiri This paper characterizes the gross and net migration flows between rural and urban areas in India during the period 1983

More information

The labor market in Japan,

The labor market in Japan, DAIJI KAWAGUCHI University of Tokyo, Japan, and IZA, Germany HIROAKI MORI Hitotsubashi University, Japan The labor market in Japan, Despite a plummeting working-age population, Japan has sustained its

More information

Wage Structure and Gender Earnings Differentials in China and. India*

Wage Structure and Gender Earnings Differentials in China and. India* Wage Structure and Gender Earnings Differentials in China and India* Jong-Wha Lee # Korea University Dainn Wie * National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies September 2015 * Lee: Economics Department,

More information

Poverty Reduction and Economic Growth: The Asian Experience Peter Warr

Poverty Reduction and Economic Growth: The Asian Experience Peter Warr Poverty Reduction and Economic Growth: The Asian Experience Peter Warr Abstract. The Asian experience of poverty reduction has varied widely. Over recent decades the economies of East and Southeast Asia

More information

Executive summary. Part I. Major trends in wages

Executive summary. Part I. Major trends in wages Executive summary Part I. Major trends in wages Lowest wage growth globally in 2017 since 2008 Global wage growth in 2017 was not only lower than in 2016, but fell to its lowest growth rate since 2008,

More information

Immigration, Wage Inequality and unobservable skills in the U.S. and the UK. First Draft: October 2008 This Draft March 2009

Immigration, Wage Inequality and unobservable skills in the U.S. and the UK. First Draft: October 2008 This Draft March 2009 Immigration, Wage Inequality and unobservable skills in the U.S. and the First Draft: October 2008 This Draft March 2009 Cinzia Rienzo * Royal Holloway, University of London CEP, London School of Economics

More information

Working women have won enormous progress in breaking through long-standing educational and

Working women have won enormous progress in breaking through long-standing educational and THE CURRENT JOB OUTLOOK REGIONAL LABOR REVIEW, Fall 2008 The Gender Pay Gap in New York City and Long Island: 1986 2006 by Bhaswati Sengupta Working women have won enormous progress in breaking through

More information

Education, Credentials and Immigrant Earnings*

Education, Credentials and Immigrant Earnings* Education, Credentials and Immigrant Earnings* Ana Ferrer Department of Economics University of British Columbia and W. Craig Riddell Department of Economics University of British Columbia August 2004

More information

Labour Market Institutions and Outcomes: A Cross-National Study

Labour Market Institutions and Outcomes: A Cross-National Study Labour Market Institutions and Outcomes: A Cross-National Study CILN is a collaborative research venture between the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and McMaster University. Additional

More information

WORKING PAPER SERIES WAGE INEQUALITY IN SPAIN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS NO 781 / JULY by Mario Izquierdo and Aitor Lacuesta

WORKING PAPER SERIES WAGE INEQUALITY IN SPAIN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS NO 781 / JULY by Mario Izquierdo and Aitor Lacuesta /CEPR LABOUR MARKET WORKSHOP ON WAGE AND LABOUR COST DYNAMICS WORKING PAPER SERIES NO 781 / JULY 2007 WAGE INEQUALITY IN SPAIN RECENT DEVELOPMENTS by Mario Izquierdo and Aitor Lacuesta WORKING PAPER SERIES

More information

Wage Trends among Disadvantaged Minorities

Wage Trends among Disadvantaged Minorities National Poverty Center Working Paper Series #05-12 August 2005 Wage Trends among Disadvantaged Minorities George J. Borjas Harvard University This paper is available online at the National Poverty Center

More information

Backgrounder. This report finds that immigrants have been hit somewhat harder by the current recession than have nativeborn

Backgrounder. This report finds that immigrants have been hit somewhat harder by the current recession than have nativeborn Backgrounder Center for Immigration Studies May 2009 Trends in Immigrant and Native Employment By Steven A. Camarota and Karen Jensenius This report finds that immigrants have been hit somewhat harder

More information

5A. Wage Structures in the Electronics Industry. Benjamin A. Campbell and Vincent M. Valvano

5A. Wage Structures in the Electronics Industry. Benjamin A. Campbell and Vincent M. Valvano 5A.1 Introduction 5A. Wage Structures in the Electronics Industry Benjamin A. Campbell and Vincent M. Valvano Over the past 2 years, wage inequality in the U.S. economy has increased rapidly. In this chapter,

More information

Abstract/Policy Abstract

Abstract/Policy Abstract Gary Burtless* Gary Burtless is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. The research reported herein was performed under a grant from the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) funded as part

More information

Real Wage Trends, 1979 to 2017

Real Wage Trends, 1979 to 2017 Sarah A. Donovan Analyst in Labor Policy David H. Bradley Specialist in Labor Economics March 15, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45090 Summary Wage earnings are the largest source

More information

REVISITING THE GERMAN WAGE STRUCTURE 1

REVISITING THE GERMAN WAGE STRUCTURE 1 REVISITING THE GERMAN WAGE STRUCTURE 1 Christian Dustmann Johannes Ludsteck Uta Schönberg Abstract This paper shows that wage inequality in West Germany has increased over the past three decades, contrary

More information

REVISITING THE GERMAN WAGE STRUCTURE

REVISITING THE GERMAN WAGE STRUCTURE REVISITING THE GERMAN WAGE STRUCTURE CHRISTIAN DUSTMANN JOHANNES LUDSTECK UTA SCHÖNBERG This paper shows that wage inequality in West Germany has increased over the past three decades, contrary to common

More information

Earnings Inequality: Stylized Facts, Underlying Causes, and Policy

Earnings Inequality: Stylized Facts, Underlying Causes, and Policy Earnings Inequality: Stylized Facts, Underlying Causes, and Policy Barry Hirsch W.J. Usery Chair of the American Workplace Department of Economics Andrew Young School of Policy Sciences Georgia State University

More information

Inequality in the Labor Market for Native American Women and the Great Recession

Inequality in the Labor Market for Native American Women and the Great Recession Inequality in the Labor Market for Native American Women and the Great Recession Jeffrey D. Burnette Assistant Professor of Economics, Department of Sociology and Anthropology Co-Director, Native American

More information

In class, we have framed poverty in four different ways: poverty in terms of

In class, we have framed poverty in four different ways: poverty in terms of Sandra Yu In class, we have framed poverty in four different ways: poverty in terms of deviance, dependence, economic growth and capability, and political disenfranchisement. In this paper, I will focus

More information

Inequality of Wage Rates, Earnings, and Family Income in the United States, PSC Research Report. Report No

Inequality of Wage Rates, Earnings, and Family Income in the United States, PSC Research Report. Report No Peter Gottschalk and Sheldon Danziger Inequality of Wage Rates, Earnings, and Family Income in the United States, 1975-2002 PSC Research Report Report No. 04-568 PSC P OPULATION STUDIES CENTER AT THE INSTITUTE

More information

GLOBALISATION AND WAGE INEQUALITIES,

GLOBALISATION AND WAGE INEQUALITIES, GLOBALISATION AND WAGE INEQUALITIES, 1870 1970 IDS WORKING PAPER 73 Edward Anderson SUMMARY This paper studies the impact of globalisation on wage inequality in eight now-developed countries during the

More information

CROSS-COUNTRY VARIATION IN THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION: CANADA, MEXICO, AND THE UNITED STATES

CROSS-COUNTRY VARIATION IN THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION: CANADA, MEXICO, AND THE UNITED STATES CROSS-COUNTRY VARIATION IN THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION: CANADA, MEXICO, AND THE UNITED STATES Abdurrahman Aydemir Statistics Canada George J. Borjas Harvard University Abstract Using data drawn

More information

DO COGNITIVE TEST SCORES EXPLAIN HIGHER US WAGE INEQUALITY?

DO COGNITIVE TEST SCORES EXPLAIN HIGHER US WAGE INEQUALITY? DO COGNITIVE TEST SCORES EXPLAIN HIGHER US WAGE INEQUALITY? Francine D. Blau Cornell University, Russell Sage Foundation, and NBER and Lawrence M. Kahn Cornell University and Russell Sage Foundation June

More information

Inequality and City Size

Inequality and City Size Inequality and City Size Nathaniel Baum-Snow, Brown University & NBER Ronni Pavan, University of Rochester July, 2012 Abstract Between 1979 and 2007 a strong positive monotonic relationship between wage

More information

BLS Spotlight on Statistics: Union Membership In The United States

BLS Spotlight on Statistics: Union Membership In The United States Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Federal Publications Key Workplace Documents 9-2016 BLS : Union Membership In The United States Megan Dunn Bureau of Labor Statistics James Walker Bureau

More information

Canadian Labour Market and Skills Researcher Network

Canadian Labour Market and Skills Researcher Network Canadian Labour Market and Skills Researcher Network Working Paper No. 29 The Effect of Immigrant Selection and the IT Bust on the Entry Earnings of Immigrants Garnett Picot Statistics Canada Feng Hou

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES. THE DIFFUSION OF MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS DURING THE 1990s: EXPLANATIONS AND IMPACTS. David Card Ethan G.

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES. THE DIFFUSION OF MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS DURING THE 1990s: EXPLANATIONS AND IMPACTS. David Card Ethan G. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE DIFFUSION OF MEXICAN IMMIGRANTS DURING THE 1990s: EXPLANATIONS AND IMPACTS David Card Ethan G. Lewis Working Paper 11552 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11552 NATIONAL BUREAU

More information

IS THE MEASURED BLACK-WHITE WAGE GAP AMONG WOMEN TOO SMALL? Derek Neal University of Wisconsin Presented Nov 6, 2000 PRELIMINARY

IS THE MEASURED BLACK-WHITE WAGE GAP AMONG WOMEN TOO SMALL? Derek Neal University of Wisconsin Presented Nov 6, 2000 PRELIMINARY IS THE MEASURED BLACK-WHITE WAGE GAP AMONG WOMEN TOO SMALL? Derek Neal University of Wisconsin Presented Nov 6, 2000 PRELIMINARY Over twenty years ago, Butler and Heckman (1977) raised the possibility

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES. THE WAGE GAINS OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN IN THE 1940s. Martha J. Bailey William J. Collins

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES. THE WAGE GAINS OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN IN THE 1940s. Martha J. Bailey William J. Collins NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE WAGE GAINS OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN IN THE 1940s Martha J. Bailey William J. Collins Working Paper 10621 http://www.nber.org/papers/w10621 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

More information

Labor Market Adjustment to Globalization: Long-Term Employment in the United States and Japan 1

Labor Market Adjustment to Globalization: Long-Term Employment in the United States and Japan 1 Preliminary Draft WORKING PAPER #519 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SECTION June 2007 Version: September 11, 2007 Labor Market Adjustment to Globalization: Long-Term Employment in the United

More information

Over the past three decades, the share of middle-skill jobs in the

Over the past three decades, the share of middle-skill jobs in the The Vanishing Middle: Job Polarization and Workers Response to the Decline in Middle-Skill Jobs By Didem Tüzemen and Jonathan Willis Over the past three decades, the share of middle-skill jobs in the United

More information

Does Inequality in Skills Explain Inequality of Earnings Across Countries?

Does Inequality in Skills Explain Inequality of Earnings Across Countries? Does Inequality in Skills Explain Inequality of Earnings Across Countries? Dan Devroye and Richard Freeman Harvard University May 2000 1 Does Inequality in Skills Explain Inequality of Earnings Across

More information

This analysis confirms other recent research showing a dramatic increase in the education level of newly

This analysis confirms other recent research showing a dramatic increase in the education level of newly CENTER FOR IMMIGRATION STUDIES April 2018 Better Educated, but Not Better Off A look at the education level and socioeconomic success of recent immigrants, to By Steven A. Camarota and Karen Zeigler This

More information

Family Ties, Labor Mobility and Interregional Wage Differentials*

Family Ties, Labor Mobility and Interregional Wage Differentials* Family Ties, Labor Mobility and Interregional Wage Differentials* TODD L. CHERRY, Ph.D.** Department of Economics and Finance University of Wyoming Laramie WY 82071-3985 PETE T. TSOURNOS, Ph.D. Pacific

More information

Patrick Adler and Chris Tilly Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UCLA. Ben Zipperer University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Patrick Adler and Chris Tilly Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UCLA. Ben Zipperer University of Massachusetts, Amherst THE STATE OF THE UNIONS IN 2013 A PROFILE OF UNION MEMBERSHIP IN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA AND THE NATION 1 Patrick Adler and Chris Tilly Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, UCLA Ben Zipperer

More information

Volume Author/Editor: David Card and Richard B. Freeman. Volume URL:

Volume Author/Editor: David Card and Richard B. Freeman. Volume URL: This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Small Differences That Matter: Labor Markets and Income Maintenance in Canada and the United

More information

Policy brief ARE WE RECOVERING YET? JOBS AND WAGES IN CALIFORNIA OVER THE PERIOD ARINDRAJIT DUBE, PH.D. Executive Summary AUGUST 31, 2005

Policy brief ARE WE RECOVERING YET? JOBS AND WAGES IN CALIFORNIA OVER THE PERIOD ARINDRAJIT DUBE, PH.D. Executive Summary AUGUST 31, 2005 Policy brief ARE WE RECOVERING YET? JOBS AND WAGES IN CALIFORNIA OVER THE 2000-2005 PERIOD ARINDRAJIT DUBE, PH.D. AUGUST 31, 2005 Executive Summary This study uses household survey data and payroll data

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TRENDS IN U.S. WAGE INEQUALITY: RE-ASSESSING THE REVISIONISTS. David H. Autor Lawrence F. Katz Melissa S.

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TRENDS IN U.S. WAGE INEQUALITY: RE-ASSESSING THE REVISIONISTS. David H. Autor Lawrence F. Katz Melissa S. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES TRENDS IN U.S. WAGE INEQUALITY: RE-ASSESSING THE REVISIONISTS David H. Autor Lawrence F. Katz Melissa S. Kearney Working Paper 11627 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11627 NATIONAL

More information

Research Report. How Does Trade Liberalization Affect Racial and Gender Identity in Employment? Evidence from PostApartheid South Africa

Research Report. How Does Trade Liberalization Affect Racial and Gender Identity in Employment? Evidence from PostApartheid South Africa International Affairs Program Research Report How Does Trade Liberalization Affect Racial and Gender Identity in Employment? Evidence from PostApartheid South Africa Report Prepared by Bilge Erten Assistant

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES RECENT TRENDS IN THE EARNINGS OF NEW IMMIGRANTS TO THE UNITED STATES. George J. Borjas Rachel M.

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES RECENT TRENDS IN THE EARNINGS OF NEW IMMIGRANTS TO THE UNITED STATES. George J. Borjas Rachel M. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES RECENT TRENDS IN THE EARNINGS OF NEW IMMIGRANTS TO THE UNITED STATES George J. Borjas Rachel M. Friedberg Working Paper 15406 http://www.nber.org/papers/w15406 NATIONAL BUREAU

More information

IS THE UNSKILLED WORKER PROBLEM IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES GOING AWAY?

IS THE UNSKILLED WORKER PROBLEM IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES GOING AWAY? 1 IS THE UNSKILLED WORKER PROBLEM IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES GOING AWAY? Edward Anderson # Keele University, U.K. June 2001 Abstract Recent data suggest that the fortunes of unskilled workers in developed

More information

Earnings Inequality: Stylized Facts, Underlying Causes, and Policy

Earnings Inequality: Stylized Facts, Underlying Causes, and Policy Earnings Inequality: Stylized Facts, Underlying Causes, and Policy Barry Hirsch Department of Economics Andrew Young School of Policy Sciences Georgia State University Prepared for Atlanta Economics Club

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, SELF-SELECTION, AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF WAGES: EVIDENCE FROM MEXICO AND THE UNITED STATES

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, SELF-SELECTION, AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF WAGES: EVIDENCE FROM MEXICO AND THE UNITED STATES NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, SELF-SELECTION, AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF WAGES: EVIDENCE FROM MEXICO AND THE UNITED STATES Daniel Chiquiar Gordon H. Hanson Working Paper 9242 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9242

More information

The Employment of Low-Skilled Immigrant Men in the United States

The Employment of Low-Skilled Immigrant Men in the United States American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 2012, 102(3): 549 554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.549 The Employment of Low-Skilled Immigrant Men in the United States By Brian Duncan and Stephen

More information

7 ETHNIC PARITY IN INCOME SUPPORT

7 ETHNIC PARITY IN INCOME SUPPORT 7 ETHNIC PARITY IN INCOME SUPPORT Summary of findings For customers who, in 2003, had a Work Focused Interview as part of an IS claim: There is evidence, for Ethnic Minorities overall, of a significant

More information

Immigration and Poverty in the United States

Immigration and Poverty in the United States April 2008 Immigration and Poverty in the United States Steven Raphael and Eugene Smolensky Goldman School of Public Policy UC Berkeley stevenraphael@berkeley.edu geno@berkeley.edu Abstract In this paper,

More information

Cities, Skills, and Inequality

Cities, Skills, and Inequality WORKING PAPER SERIES Cities, Skills, and Inequality Christopher H. Wheeler Working Paper 2004-020A http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2004/2004-020.pdf September 2004 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS Research

More information

Wage Inequality in the United States and Europe: A Summary of the major theoretical and empirical explanations in the current debate

Wage Inequality in the United States and Europe: A Summary of the major theoretical and empirical explanations in the current debate 1 Wage Inequality in the United States and Europe: A Summary of the major theoretical and empirical explanations in the current debate Frank Schroeder New York, October 2001 I want to acknowledge financial

More information

Is inequality an unavoidable by-product of skill-biased technical change? No, not necessarily!

Is inequality an unavoidable by-product of skill-biased technical change? No, not necessarily! MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Is inequality an unavoidable by-product of skill-biased technical change? No, not necessarily! Philipp Hühne Helmut Schmidt University 3. September 2014 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58309/

More information

Attenuation Bias in Measuring the Wage Impact of Immigration. Abdurrahman Aydemir and George J. Borjas Statistics Canada and Harvard University

Attenuation Bias in Measuring the Wage Impact of Immigration. Abdurrahman Aydemir and George J. Borjas Statistics Canada and Harvard University Attenuation Bias in Measuring the Wage Impact of Immigration Abdurrahman Aydemir and George J. Borjas Statistics Canada and Harvard University November 2006 1 Attenuation Bias in Measuring the Wage Impact

More information

Canadian Labour Market and Skills Researcher Network

Canadian Labour Market and Skills Researcher Network Canadian Labour Market and Skills Researcher Network Working Paper No. 133 Has the Canadian Labour Market Polarized? David A. Green University of British Columbia Benjamin Sand York University April 2014

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE LABOR SUPPLY OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS. George J. Borjas. Working Paper

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE LABOR SUPPLY OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS. George J. Borjas. Working Paper NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE LABOR SUPPLY OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS George J. Borjas Working Paper 22102 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22102 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue

More information

WhyHasUrbanInequalityIncreased?

WhyHasUrbanInequalityIncreased? WhyHasUrbanInequalityIncreased? Nathaniel Baum-Snow, Brown University Matthew Freedman, Cornell University Ronni Pavan, Royal Holloway-University of London June, 2014 Abstract The increase in wage inequality

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WELFARE REFORM, LABOR SUPPLY, AND HEALTH INSURANCE IN THE IMMIGRANT POPULATION. George J. Borjas

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WELFARE REFORM, LABOR SUPPLY, AND HEALTH INSURANCE IN THE IMMIGRANT POPULATION. George J. Borjas NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WELFARE REFORM, LABOR SUPPLY, AND HEALTH INSURANCE IN THE IMMIGRANT POPULATION George J. Borjas Working Paper 9781 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9781 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC

More information

WORKINGPAPER SERIES. Did Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market Make Conditions Worse for Native Workers During the Great Recession?

WORKINGPAPER SERIES. Did Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market Make Conditions Worse for Native Workers During the Great Recession? Did Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market Make Conditions Worse for Native Workers During the Great Recession? Robert Pollin & Jeannette Wicks-Lim RESEARCH INSTITUTE POLITICAL ECONOMY Gordon Hall 418 North

More information

The Poor in the Indian Labour Force in the 1990s. Working Paper No. 128

The Poor in the Indian Labour Force in the 1990s. Working Paper No. 128 CDE September, 2004 The Poor in the Indian Labour Force in the 1990s K. SUNDARAM Email: sundaram@econdse.org SURESH D. TENDULKAR Email: suresh@econdse.org Delhi School of Economics Working Paper No. 128

More information

The Improving Relative Status of Black Men

The Improving Relative Status of Black Men University of Connecticut DigitalCommons@UConn Economics Working Papers Department of Economics June 2004 The Improving Relative Status of Black Men Kenneth A. Couch University of Connecticut Mary C. Daly

More information

When supply meets demand: wage inequality in Portugal

When supply meets demand: wage inequality in Portugal ORIGINAL ARTICLE OpenAccess When supply meets demand: wage inequality in Portugal Mário Centeno and Álvaro A Novo * *Correspondence: alvaro.a.novo@gmail.com Research Department, Banco de Portugal, Av.

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHAT DO UNIONS DO... TO VOTING? Richard B. Freeman. Working Paper 9992

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHAT DO UNIONS DO... TO VOTING? Richard B. Freeman. Working Paper 9992 NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHAT DO UNIONS DO... TO VOTING? Richard B. Freeman Working Paper 9992 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9992 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge,

More information

FOREIGN FIRMS AND INDONESIAN MANUFACTURING WAGES: AN ANALYSIS WITH PANEL DATA

FOREIGN FIRMS AND INDONESIAN MANUFACTURING WAGES: AN ANALYSIS WITH PANEL DATA FOREIGN FIRMS AND INDONESIAN MANUFACTURING WAGES: AN ANALYSIS WITH PANEL DATA by Robert E. Lipsey & Fredrik Sjöholm Working Paper 166 December 2002 Postal address: P.O. Box 6501, S-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden.

More information

Long-Run Changes in the U.S. Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing. Claudia Goldin Harvard University and NBER

Long-Run Changes in the U.S. Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing. Claudia Goldin Harvard University and NBER Long-Run Changes in the U.S. Wage Structure: Narrowing, Widening, Polarizing Claudia Goldin Harvard University and NBER Lawrence F. Katz Harvard University and NBER September 2007 This paper has been prepared

More information

The wage gap between the public and the private sector among. Canadian-born and immigrant workers

The wage gap between the public and the private sector among. Canadian-born and immigrant workers The wage gap between the public and the private sector among Canadian-born and immigrant workers By Kaiyu Zheng (Student No. 8169992) Major paper presented to the Department of Economics of the University

More information

George J. Borjas Harvard University. September 2008

George J. Borjas Harvard University. September 2008 IMMIGRATION AND LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES IN THE NATIVE ELDERLY POPULATION George J. Borjas Harvard University September 2008 This research was supported by the U.S. Social Security Administration through

More information

EXAMINATION 3 VERSION B "Wage Structure, Mobility, and Discrimination" April 19, 2018

EXAMINATION 3 VERSION B Wage Structure, Mobility, and Discrimination April 19, 2018 William M. Boal Signature: Printed name: EXAMINATION 3 VERSION B "Wage Structure, Mobility, and Discrimination" April 19, 2018 INSTRUCTIONS: This exam is closed-book, closed-notes. Simple calculators are

More information

Immigrant-native wage gaps in time series: Complementarities or composition effects?

Immigrant-native wage gaps in time series: Complementarities or composition effects? Immigrant-native wage gaps in time series: Complementarities or composition effects? Joakim Ruist Department of Economics University of Gothenburg Box 640 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden joakim.ruist@economics.gu.se

More information

LABOUR-MARKET INTEGRATION OF IMMIGRANTS IN OECD-COUNTRIES: WHAT EXPLANATIONS FIT THE DATA?

LABOUR-MARKET INTEGRATION OF IMMIGRANTS IN OECD-COUNTRIES: WHAT EXPLANATIONS FIT THE DATA? LABOUR-MARKET INTEGRATION OF IMMIGRANTS IN OECD-COUNTRIES: WHAT EXPLANATIONS FIT THE DATA? By Andreas Bergh (PhD) Associate Professor in Economics at Lund University and the Research Institute of Industrial

More information

Economic assimilation of Mexican and Chinese immigrants in the United States: is there wage convergence?

Economic assimilation of Mexican and Chinese immigrants in the United States: is there wage convergence? Illinois Wesleyan University From the SelectedWorks of Michael Seeborg 2012 Economic assimilation of Mexican and Chinese immigrants in the United States: is there wage convergence? Michael C. Seeborg,

More information

The Demography of the Labor Force in Emerging Markets

The Demography of the Labor Force in Emerging Markets The Demography of the Labor Force in Emerging Markets David Lam I. Introduction This paper discusses how demographic changes are affecting the labor force in emerging markets. As will be shown below, the

More information

The Impact of Education on Economic and Social Outcomes: An Overview of Recent Advances in Economics*

The Impact of Education on Economic and Social Outcomes: An Overview of Recent Advances in Economics* The Impact of Education on Economic and Social Outcomes: An Overview of Recent Advances in Economics* W. Craig Riddell Department of Economics University of British Columbia December, 2005 Revised February

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SKILL COMPRESSION, WAGE DIFFERENTIALS AND EMPLOYMENT: GERMANY VS. THE US. Richard Freeman Ronald Schettkat

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SKILL COMPRESSION, WAGE DIFFERENTIALS AND EMPLOYMENT: GERMANY VS. THE US. Richard Freeman Ronald Schettkat NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SKILL COMPRESSION, WAGE DIFFERENTIALS AND EMPLOYMENT: GERMANY VS. THE US Richard Freeman Ronald Schettkat Working Paper 7610 http://www.nber.org/papers/w7610 NATIONAL BUREAU OF

More information

Illegal Immigration. When a Mexican worker leaves Mexico and moves to the US he is emigrating from Mexico and immigrating to the US.

Illegal Immigration. When a Mexican worker leaves Mexico and moves to the US he is emigrating from Mexico and immigrating to the US. Illegal Immigration Here is a short summary of the lecture. The main goals of this lecture were to introduce the economic aspects of immigration including the basic stylized facts on US immigration; the

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES POVERTY IN AMERICA: TRENDS AND EXPLANATIONS. Hilary Hoynes Marianne Page Ann Stevens

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES POVERTY IN AMERICA: TRENDS AND EXPLANATIONS. Hilary Hoynes Marianne Page Ann Stevens NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES POVERTY IN AMERICA: TRENDS AND EXPLANATIONS Hilary Hoynes Marianne Page Ann Stevens Working Paper 11681 http://www.nber.org/papers/w11681 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH

More information

11/2/2010. The Katz-Murphy (1992) formulation. As relative supply increases, relative wage decreases. Katz-Murphy (1992) estimate

11/2/2010. The Katz-Murphy (1992) formulation. As relative supply increases, relative wage decreases. Katz-Murphy (1992) estimate The Katz-Murphy (1992) formulation As relative supply increases, relative wage decreases Katz-Murphy (1992) estimate KM model fits well until 1993 Autor, David H., Lawrence Katz and Melissa S. Kearney.

More information

III. Wage Inequality and Labour Market Institutions. A. Changes over Time and Cross-Countries Comparisons

III. Wage Inequality and Labour Market Institutions. A. Changes over Time and Cross-Countries Comparisons III. Wage Inequality and Labour Market Institutions A. Changes over Time and Cross-Countries Comparisons 1. Stylized Facts 1. Overall Wage Inequality 2. Residual Wage Dispersion 3. Returns to Skills/Education

More information

Revisiting the German Wage Structure

Revisiting the German Wage Structure Revisiting the German Wage Structure Christian Dustmann Johannes Ludsteck Uta Schönberg This Version: January 2008 Abstract This paper challenges the view that the wage structure in West Germany has remained

More information

Job Displacement Over the Business Cycle,

Job Displacement Over the Business Cycle, cepr CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH Briefing Paper Job Displacement Over the Business Cycle, 1991-2001 John Schmitt 1 June 2004 CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH 1611 CONNECTICUT AVE., NW,

More information

Recent Patterns of Participation Rates: A Canada - United States Comparison

Recent Patterns of Participation Rates: A Canada - United States Comparison May 1998 Recent Patterns of Participation Rates: A Canada - United States Comparison by Irene Ip, Sheryl King and Geneviève Verdier Research Department, Bank of Canada Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0G9

More information

Immigrant Employment and Earnings Growth in Canada and the U.S.: Evidence from Longitudinal data

Immigrant Employment and Earnings Growth in Canada and the U.S.: Evidence from Longitudinal data Immigrant Employment and Earnings Growth in Canada and the U.S.: Evidence from Longitudinal data Neeraj Kaushal, Columbia University Yao Lu, Columbia University Nicole Denier, McGill University Julia Wang,

More information