Additional Guidance Regarding Surviving Spouses of Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (REVISED)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Additional Guidance Regarding Surviving Spouses of Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (REVISED)"

Transcription

1 U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington. DC U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Interoffice Memorandum HQDOMO 70/6.1.I-P 70/6.1.3-P AFMUpdate ADIO-09 To: Executive Leadership From: Donald Neufeld no' Acting Associate ~r Domestic Operations Directorate J~ri ScialaM).(./. 11 Associat..- II Refug, urn, and International -erations Directorate ~ /'YY/ Pearl Chang Acting Chief L~73- r Office of Policy and Strategy Date: DEC SUBJECT: Additional Guidance Regarding Surviving Spouses of Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (REVISED) Effect of FY20 10 DRS Appropriations Act on eligibility to immigrate after death of visa petitioner Revisions to Adjudicator's Field Manual (AFM) Chapter(s) 21.2(a)(4) and (h)(l)(c) (AFM Update AD10-09) I. Purpose This memorandum supersedes an earlier memorandum on this subject, dated November 13, 2009, and provides updated guidance to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) field offices and service centers regarding the processing of Forms 1-130, petitions for alien relative, and 1-485, application to register permanent residence or adjust status, filed by surviving spouses of deceased U.S. citizens and the qualifying children of the surviving spouses. This new guidance is based on the enactment of section 568(c) of the Department of Romeland Security Appropriations Act, 2010, Pub. L No , 123 Stat. 4142,4186 (2009), which provides

2 Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (FY20 I 0 DHS Appropriations Act) Page 2 relief for these aliens. Section 568(c) entered into force on October 28,2009, the date of enactment. Sections 568(d) and (e) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act, which provide relief for aliens who are surviving beneficiaries of certain pending or approved petitions filed by certain qualifying categories of noncitizens, will be addressed in a separate memorandum. II. Background A. Prior Policy and Related Litigation For many years, U.S. immigration policy has been that a Form could not be approved if the petitioner died while the Form was pending. See Matter of Sa no, 19 I&N Dec. 299 (BIA 1985); Matter of Varela, 13 I&N Dec. 453 (BIA 1970). As far back as 1938, our immigration regulations have provided for the revocation of the approval of a visa petition upon the petitioner's death. More recently, the regulations, while maintaining that general policy, have provided for discretion, for "humanitarian reasons," to reinstate the approval. 8 C.F.R (a)(3)(i)(c)(2). Also, since 2006,8 C.F.R (i)(I)(iv) and (a)(3)(i)(c)(1) have provided that the automatic revocation provision does not apply to a spousal immediate relative visa petition, if the deceased petitioner and the alien widow(er) had been married at least two years when the petitioner died. Over the past several years, widow( er)s of citizens who had died before the second anniversary of the underlying marriages have challenged this long-standing policy as being inconsistent with the statute. The federal courts of appeals have split on the legal issue. Compare Robinson v. Napolitano, 554 F.3d 358 (3d Cir. 2009) (sustaining agency view that petitioner's death while a Form is pending ends the beneficiary's eligibility); petition for cert. filed, No (U.S. filed July 23,2009), with Taing v. Napolitano, 567 F.3d 19 (1st Cir. 2009) (holding agency policy violative of statute); Lockhart v. Napolitano, 561 F.3d 611 (6th Cir. 2009) (same); and Freeman v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2006) (same). The issue has engendered much litigation before the federal district courts in recent months, with most courts ruling against the agency. Among the unfavorable decisions is. the class action ruling in Hootkins v. Napolitano, _ F. Supp. 2d _,2009 WL (C.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2009), which is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Other cases are pending in district courts throughout the United States. B. Section 568(c) offy2010 DHS Appropriations Act Congress, however, recently acted to resolve the issue. On October 28,2009, the President signed into law the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act. Section 568(c) of the new law amends the second sentence in section 201 (b )(2)(A)(i) of the INA so that, for a widow( er) of a citizen to qualify as an immediate relative, it is no longer necessary for the couple to have been married at least two years when the citizen died. The second sentence of section 201 (b)(2)(a)(i) now reads,

3 Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act) Page 3 In the case of an alien who was the spouse of a citizen of the United States and was not legally separated from the citizen at the time ofthe citizen's death, the alien (and each child of the alien) shall be considered, for purposes of this subsection, to remain an immediate relative after the date of the citizen's death but only if the spouse files a petition under [section 204(a)(I)(A)(ii) ofthe INA] within 2 years after such date and only until the date the spouse remarries. When a widow(er) qualifies as an immediate relative under the second sentence in section 201 (b)(2)(a)(i) of the INA, his or her children, as defined in sections 101(b)(I) and 201(f) of the INA, also qualify. The amendment made by section 568(c) applies equally to aliens abroad who are seeking immigrant visas and aliens in the United States who are seeking adjustment of status. The amendment applies to any alien whose spouse died before October 28,2009, and who had a Form pending on October 28,2009. Ifno Form was pending, then an alien whose U.S. citizen spouse died before October 28,2009, and before the second anniversary of their marriage, may file a visa petition under section 204(a)(l)(A)(ii) ofthe INA so long as (a) the alien has not remarried, and (b) the petition is filed no later than October 28, Section 568(c) relates only to the impact of the citizen's death on the alien's eligibility for classification as an immediate relative. All other requirements for approval of a visa petition remain in force. In particular, the alien must still establish that he or she was the citizen's legal spouse, and that the marriage was a bona fide marriage and not an arrangement solely to confer immigration benefits on the alien. If the alien was in removal proceedings at the time of the marriage, the "clear and convincing evidence" standard in section 245(e)(3) of the INA will still apply to the adjudication of the visa petition. If the necessary visa petition is approved, the alien may then seek an immigrant visa or adjustment of status. The alien must still establish that he or she is admissible as an immigrant and, in an adjustment case, that he or she meets all other adjustment eligibility requirements and merits a favorable exercise of discretion. In light of this new legislation, the policy guidance stated in the November 8, 2007, memorandum entitled "Effect of Form Petitioner's Death on Authority to Approve the Form 1-130" (AFMUpdate AD08-04) is obsolete. This memorandum amends the Adjudicator's Field Manual to remove the material added in that earlier memorandum. III. Policy Guidance and AFM Update AFMUpdate 1. Chapter 21.2 of the AFM entitled "Factors Common to the Adjudication of All Relative Visa Petitions" is amended by a. Removing chapter 21.2( a)( 4) b. Removing the Note at the end of chapter 21.2(h)(1)(C).

4 Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (FY20IO DHS Appropriations Act) Page 4 A. Widow(er)s with pending cases Section 568(c)(2)(A) of the FY2010 DRS Appropriations Act makes the amendment to the second sentence in INA section 201 (b)(2)(a)(i) applicable to any visa petition or adjustment application "pending on or after the date of enactment." As noted, the date of enactment is October 28, Reopening of pending Form cases For purposes ofthis amendment, a Form will be deemed "pending" on October , if the deceased citizen had filed a Form on or before that date but: USCIS has not adjudicated the Form 1-130; USCIS denied the Form 1-130, but USCIS granted a motion to reopen or reconsider, so that the Form is, again, pending; USCIS denied the Form 1-130, but has not yet ruled on a motion to reopen or reconsider; USCIS denied the Form 1-130, but the alien's appeal from that decision is pending before the Board oflmmigration Appeals (BIA) or the period for appeal ofthe adverse USCIS decision to the BIA had not yet expired; or The USCIS or BIA decision denying the Form is the subject of pending litigation before a federal court (including cases in which the district court issued a decision before October 28,2009, but the appeals period established by law had not yet expired). Under 8 C.F.R (i), a citizen's spousal Form is automatically converted to a widow(er)'s Form if, on the date of the citizen's death, the beneficiary qualifies as a widow(er) under the second sentence in section 20 1 (b)(2)(a)(i). Under section 568(c) of the FY DRS Appropriations Act, these aliens now qualify under the second sentence. Thus, any Form that is "pending" as described in the preceding paragraph will be deemed to be, and adjudicated as, a widow(er),s Form In any Form case in which a motion to reopen or for reconsideration was filed, but not acted on, USCIS will grant the motion and make a new decision in light of section 568( c) of the FY DRS Appropriations Act. Any Form that is the subject oflitigation in any federal court on the issue ofthe effect of the petitioner's death is, as of the date of this memorandum, reopened for a new decision in light of section 568( c) of the FY201 0 DRS Appropriations Act. The beneficiary need not file a separate motion. Nor does it matter, for purposes of reopening the Form 1-130, whether the beneficiary is currently in the United States or abroad. If the decision denying or terminating action on the Form was pending in any court on October 28, 2009, the decision is now

5 Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (FY201O DHS Appropriations Act) Page 5 reopened. USCIS will therefore make a new decision in light of section 568( c) of the FY DHS Appropriations Act. Cases challenging the denial of a spousal immediate relative Form based on the petitioner's death have been filed in district courts throughout the United States. USCIS officers must consult with the appropriate regional or service center counsel to identify those cases that are the subject oflitigation that was pending on October 28,2009. Once a case is identified as subject to reopening under this memorandum, the USCIS officer will notify the alien in writing that the Form is reopened in light of section 568(c) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act, and will be readjudicated as a Form Ifit is determined that a Form had been filed but was not "pending" on October 28,2009, because a USCIS decision denying the Form had become final before October 28, 2009 (and no administrative appeal or civil action challenging the denial was pending on October 28, 2009), please refer to part IlI(B) of this memorandum. 2. Reopening of pending Form /-485 cases Section 568(c)(2)(A) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act also makes the amendment applicable to any Form that was pending on the date of enactment. A Form is deemed "pending" on the date of enactment if it was filed before the deceased citizen's death but: USCIS has not adjudicated the Form USCIS denied the Form 1-485, but USCIS granted a motion to reopen or reconsider, so that the Form is, again, pending USCIS denied the Form 1-485, but has not yet ruled on a motion to reopen or reconsider; The Form is the subject of litigation before a federal court (including cases in which the district court issued a decision before October 28, 2009, but the appeals period established by law had not yet expired). With this guidance memo, USCIS also reopens, without the need for a formal motion, any Form that is the subject of litigation on this issue in any federal court, ifuscis still has jurisdiction to act on the Form As with the reopening of the related Form 1-130, the USCIS officer will notify the applicant in writing that the Form is reopened in light of section 568(c) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act. In the case ofa widow(er) who entered the United States as a K-l nonimmigrant, and filed a Form after marrying the deceased citizen who had filed the Form 1-129F, ordinarily there will not be a Form If the Form is still "pending" as described in this memo, and USCIS still has jurisdiction to act on it, the Form will also be reopened for a new decision in light of section 568(c) ofthe FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act, without the need for a formal

6 Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (FY201 0 DHS Appropriations Act) Page 6 motion. Since no Form is required for a K-I nonimmigrant to seek adjustment after marrying the K petitioner within the period specified by statute, the K-I nonimmigrant will also be deemed the beneficiary ofa Form if the K-I nonimmigrant now qualifies as a widow( er). The K -I nonimmigrant still may not adjust on any basis other than the K-I nonimmigrant's having married the citizen petitioner who filed the Form I-129F. Some aliens may have been placed into removal proceeding after USCIS denied their Forms Except for "arriving aliens," this factor would mean that USCIS no longer has jurisdiction to adjudicate the Form C.F.R (a)(I) and (a)(1). USCIS would have jurisdiction to adjudicate the Form only if the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) terminated the removal proceeding. Whether to support or oppose terminating a removal proceeding is a matter for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to decide, not USCIS. If a USCIS office reopens a Form involving an alien in removal proceedings, the USCIS office must, through the appropriate USCIS counsel, advise the local counsel for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Some aliens whose citizen spouses had died may have left the United States voluntarily, without obtaining a grant of advance parole. Others may have left after obtaining advance parole, but may have remained abroad after expiration of the Form Under 8 C.F.R (a)(ii)(4)(B), these aliens have abandoned their adjustment applications. Also ~bandoned is the adjustment application of an alien who left as the result of removal proceedings. 8 C.F.R (a)(4)(ii)(A). In these situations, a Form will not be deemed "pending" for purposes of section 568(c)(2)(A). However, where section 568(c) applies to the approved Form 1-130, and the Form has been approved as a Form 1-360, the alien approved on that who has left the United States may apply for an immigrant visa abroad. 3. Petition already approved before death If a widow( er) is the beneficiary of a Form that was approved before the citizen petitioner's death, it is not necessary for the widow(er) to request humanitarian reinstatement of the approval. Under 8 C.F.R (i)(1)(iv), the approved Form is automatically converted to an approved Form Any children ofthe widow(er) will also be eligible to seek an immigrant visa or adjustment of status based on the converted petition. There may be some cases in which a spousal immediate relative Form was approved, but the approval was revoked automatically under 8 C.F.R (a)(3)(i)(c) upon the citizen petitioner's death. If the alien is now eligible for classification as the widow(er) ofa citizen under section 568(c)(2)(A) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act, the approval will be deemed to have been reinstated, effective October 28,2009. No separate request for reinstatement is necessary. Under 8 C.F.R (i)(I)(iv), the Form will be deemed to be an approved Form

7 Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (FY20 10 DHS Appropriations Act) Page 7 4. Admissibility issues Whether an alien is actually admissible is not gennane in adjudicating a Fonn Matter oj 0-, 8 I&N Dec. 295 (BIA 1959). The only issue resolved by enactment of section 568( c) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act is that the death ofthe citizen spouse, by itself, does not make the widow(er) ineligible for immediate relative classification. Thus, the alien must still be admissible as an immigrant to obtain adjustment of status or an immigrant visa. For those aliens, however, who had pending Fonn cases, and who now can benefit from section 568(c) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act, two inadmissibility grounds warrant special consideration. The first is section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the Act, under which an alien is inadmissible if the alien seeks admission within a specified period after the alien leaves the United States, if the alien has accrued a lengthy period of unlawful presence. The second is section 212(a)(9)(A), under which an alien who has been removed (or who left the United States while under a final administrative order of removal) must obtain consent to reapply, if the alien seeks admission within the period set in section 2l2(a)(9)(A). It is important to note that the special provisions in this memorandum relating to INA section 2l2(a)(9)(A) and (B) apply only to an alien who was the beneficiary ofa Fonn that was filed by a now-deceased spouse petitioner, and that can now be approved as a Form under section 568(c) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act. The purpose of these special provisions is simply to minimize the adverse effect on these aliens of the disputed, and now resolved, issue of the impact of the death of the petitioning spouse on the alien's eligibility. a. Unlawful presence By specifying, in section 568(c)(2)(A) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act, that the amendment should apply to pending cases, Congress indicated its desire to resolve these cases fully. For this reason, for purposes of INA section 2l2(a)(9)(B)(i), if an alien remained in the United States while awaiting the outcome offonn that can now be approved as a Fonn under section 568(c) ofthe FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act, the alien will be deemed not to have accrued any unlawful presence. This protection applies even if the alien was not actually in a lawful status while the now-converted Form was pending. An alien who had a Fonn pending on October 28, 2009, but who is present in the United States without a lawful admission or parole generally cannot obtain adjustment under INA section 245(a). Rather, the alien must generally seek adjustment under INA section 245(i). But this relief is not available to an alien who did not have a petition or labor certification filed before April 30, Thus, even ifthe Fonn can now be approved as a Fonn 1-360, the alien may need to leave the United States to obtain an immigrant visa. But since, under this guidance memorandum, the alien will be deemed not to have accrued any unlawful presence, he or she will not be inadmissible under INA section 2l2(a)(9)(B)(i). Again, these special provisions relating to the accrual of unlawful presence apply only to an alien who is the beneficiary of a spousal immediate relative F onn that was pending on October

8 Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act) Page 8 28,2009, and that is now approved under section 568(c)(2)(A) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act and 8 C.F.R (i)(1)(iv) as a widow(er)'s Form 1-360: the widow(er) and his or her accompanying child(ren). Ordinarily, the pendency of a visa petition, itself, does not prevent accrual of unlawful presence. A pending adjustment application, by contrast, does prevent accrual of unlawful presence. Adjudicator's Field Manual chapter 40.9(b)(3)(A). Most aliens who have been in litigation because the death of a spouse led to denial of the Form are probably already protected from unlawful presence under the ordinary provisions in the AFM. This broader protection against unlawful presence, for this narrow class of cases, is designed to maximize the ability of those aliens whose specific situations gave rise to the new legislation to fully benefit from it. b. Consent to reapply for admission after removal These protections against accrual of unlawful presence apply even if the alien was actually removed from the United States under a removal order. Still, because the alien was removed under a valid order, the alien is inadmissible under INA section 212(a)(9)(A)(i) or (ii). USCIS, however, has discretion under section 212(a)(9)(A)(iii) to consent to the alien's re-application for admission. USCIS should generally exercise discretion favorably and grant an application for consent to reapply under section 212(a)(9)(A)(iii), if: The Form that had been filed by the alien's spouse has now been approved as a Form under section 568(c) of the FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act; The alien is otherwise admissible, and The alien's case does not present significant adverse factors beyond the removal itself. A USCIS adjudicator will not deny a Form filed by an alien whose case was in litigation on October 28,2009, and whose Form has been approved as a Form under section 568(c)(2)(A) ofthe FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act without consulting USCIS Headquarters through appropriate channels. 5. Remarriage Any immediate relative Form that was filed on behalf of the spouse of a U.S. citizen, and that was pending on October 28,2009, is no longer a spousal immediate relative Form By operation of8 C.F.R (i)(I)(iv), what was filed as a spousal immediate relative Form is now a widow(er)'s Form The converted Form may be approved only if the beneficiary, who is now also deemed to be the petitioner, qualifies as the widow( er) of a citizen, as described in INA section 20 1 (b)(2)(a)(i). Eligibility for classification as an immediate relative continues "only until the date the spouse remarries."

9 Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act) Page 9 6. Ninth Circuit cases In acting on the guidance in this memorandum, USCIS adjudicators must keep in mind that the Hootkins case was certified as a class action. Thus, an individual need not be a named Plaintiff in Hootkins in order for his or her Form and Form to be reopened under this memorandum. If an individual has not already been identified as a member of the Hootkins class, that individual may make a written request to have his or her Form and Form reopened and readjudicated. The purpose ofthe written request is simply to identify the case as a Hootkins case. The individual is not required to pay the filing fee for a motion to reopen. The case will be considered a Hootkins class member case if the case was denied on or after August 30,2001,1 and: either the citizen spouse petitioner or the alien spouse beneficiary lived in the Ninth Circuit when the citizen spouse died; or a USCIS office in the Ninth Circuit made the prior decision on the Form or Form B. Widow(er)s without pending cases The alien widow(er) ofa citizen who died before October 28,2009, but who did not have a Form pending on that date, may now file a Form 1-360, provided that he or she does so no later than October 28,2011, and has not remarried. FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act 568(c)(2)(B). Section 568(c)(2)(B) applies if the citizen spouse did not file a Form on the alien spouse's behalfbefore dying. But it also applies if there was a Form filed, but the decision denying the Form had become administratively final before October 28,2009, because the decision was not the subject of any type of administrative or judicial review that was pending on October 28,2009. Note that section 568(c)(2)(B)(i) says the Form must be filed "not later than the date that is 2 years after the date of the enactment." Thus, a Form that is filed on October 28,2011, will still be timely. A Form filed on or after October 29,2011, will be untimely. For any case in which a citizen dies on or after October 28,2009, the alien widow(er) must file the Form within 2 years of the citizen's death. C. Children ofwidow(er)s The child ofa widow(er) whose Form is approved may, as specified in the second sentence of INA section 20 1 (b)(2)(a)(i) and in INA section 204(a)(I)(A)(ii), be included in the widow(er),s petition. Whether an individual qualifies as the widow(er)'s "child" is determined according to INA sections 101(b)(1) and 201(f). 1 Any case denied before August 30,2001, is time-barred under 28 U.S.c. 2401(a). But even if a Ninth Circuit case is not considered "pending" because of Hootkins, the alien may still be eligible to immigrate as the widow( er) of a citizen, if the alien has not remarried and files the Form no later than October 28,2011.

10 Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children (FY201 0 DHS Appropriations Act) Page 10 In a case in which the deceased citizen had filed a Form for his or her spouse, and the Form can now be adjudicated as a Form widow(er)'s petition, the child(ren) of the widow(er) will be deemed to be included in the converted Form Thus, it will not be necessary to act on any separate Form(s) that the deceased citizen may have filed for the widow(er)'s children. And the child(ren) of the widow(er) will be deemed included in the converted Form even ifthe deceased citizen had not filed any Form(s) for the child(ren). Note that, in light of INA section 201(f), whether an individual qualifies as the "child" of a widow(er) depends on the individual's age when the visa petition was filed. For those cases that were pending on October 28,2009, the Form filing date is deemed to be the date on which the deceased citizen filed the prior Form If a widow( er) has an unmarried son or daughter who was under 21 when the deceased citizen filed the Form 1-130, that individual will still be deemed to be under 21 for purposes of the widow(er)'s now-converted Form D. Affidavits of support Under section 212(a)(4)(C)(i)(I) ofthe INA, a Form (Affidavit of Support under Section 213A of the Act) is not required in the case of the widow(er) ofa citizen and the widow(er)'s accompanying children. 2 E. Conversion of deferred action applications filed under prior guidance While remedial legislation was pending in Congress, the Secretary of Homeland Security directed the use of deferred action reliefto allow widow(er)s of citizen whose cases may have been affected by the legislation to remain in the United States. In the September 4, 2009 Memorandum, "Guidance Regarding Surviving Spouses of Deceased U.S. Citizens and their Children," USCIS designated the Form as the form an individual would use to request deferred action under the Secretary's policy. Now that Congress has enacted the legislation, any Form that had been filed to obtain deferred action relief, and that has not yet been adjudicated as a deferred action request, will now be considered to be, and adjudicated as, a widow(er)'s visa petition under 8 C.F.R (b). If the Form has already been approved as a deferred action request, it will be reopened and adjudicated as a visa petition under 8 C.F.R (b). It is not necessary for the alien to file a formal motion, nor to pay a new Form filing fee. Additionally, any prior grant of deferred action relief need not be rescinded and should remain undisturbed. 2 There may be an individual case in which, regardless of the Form issue, the factors specified in INA section 212(a)( 4)(B) and the standard public charge guidance, as published at 64 Fed. Reg (1999), will support a finding that a widow(er) is inadmissible as an alien likely to become a public charge. Even in this case, a Form J- 864 is not required. Rather, since the statute does not specifically require the Form 1-864, the Form can be used instead. 8 C.F.R. 213a.5. It is important to note that, on a Form 1-134, the sponsor does not have to meet the requirements in INA section 213A(t), and so does not need to be someone who could have been a "substitute sponsor" in a case in which a Form actually is required.

11 Deceased u.s. Citizens and their Children (FY2010 DHS Appropriations Act) Page II Under the deferred action guidance, an alien could file a Form 1-765, application for employment authorization, only if the deferred action request had been granted. Now that a Form that was filed to request deferred action is deemed to be a widow(er)'s visa petition, the alien can, if otherwise eligible, file a Form even before the approval of the Form C.F.R 245.2(a)(2)(i)(B). Filing the Form permits the alien to file a Form C.F.R. 274a.12(c)(9). F. Implementation Section 568(c) of the FY2010 DRS Appropriations Act became effective on October 28,2009, the date of enactment. USCIS offices and centers, therefore, are to begin implementing the instructions established in this memorandum immediately. USCIS adjudicators should note that Congress clearly intended to benefit the aliens affected by these provisions. AFM Transmittal Memorandum Revisions. The AFM Transmittal Memorandum button is revised by adding a new entry, in numerical order, to read: AD Chapter 21.2 This memorandum removes [Date of Signature] chapter 21.2(a)(4) and the Note at the end of chapter 21.2(h)(1 )(C) to reflect enactment of section 568( c) of Public Law H. Contact Information Questions regarding this memorandum should be directed to the Office of Domestic Operations through appropriate channels. For cases adjudicated overseas, questions should be directed to the International Operations Division, Programs Branch. This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. Distribution: Regional Directors District Directors Field Office Directors National Benefits Center Director Service Center Directors

Interoffice Memorandum

Interoffice Memorandum U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington. DC 20529 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Interoffice Memorandum To: Field Leadership From: Donald Neufeld Is! Acting

More information

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC HQDOMO 70/23.1-P AD06-07

U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC HQDOMO 70/23.1-P AD06-07 U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20529 Memorandum AD06-07 TO: FROM: Field Leadership Donald Neufeld /s/ Acting Associate Director, Domestic Operations DATE:

More information

741 F.3d 1228 (2014) No United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 17, 2014.

741 F.3d 1228 (2014) No United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. January 17, 2014. Page 1 of 7 741 F.3d 1228 (2014) Raquel Pascoal WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Defendants-Appellees.

More information

Policy Memorandum. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. May 10,2018 PM Accrual of Unlawful Presence and F, J, and M Nonimmigrants

Policy Memorandum. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. May 10,2018 PM Accrual of Unlawful Presence and F, J, and M Nonimmigrants FOR PUBUC COMMENT Posted: 05-11-2018 Cornmentperiodends: 06-11-2018 U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Ofice of the Director (MS 2000) Washington, DC 20529-2000

More information

HQDOMO 70/1-P. From: Michael Aytes /s/ Associate Director, Domestic Operations. Date: February 8, 2007

HQDOMO 70/1-P. From: Michael Aytes /s/ Associate Director, Domestic Operations. Date: February 8, 2007 20 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC 20529 To: Regional Directors District Directors, including Overseas District Directors Service Center Directors National Benefits Center Director Associate Director,

More information

Family-Based Immigration

Family-Based Immigration Family-Based Immigration By Charles Wheeler [Editor s note: This article is an adaptation of Chapters 1 and 2 of CHARLES WHEELER, FAMILY-BASED IMMIGRATION: A PRACTITIONER S GUIDE (2004), published by the

More information

Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations 46697 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 66, No. 174 Friday, September 7, 2001 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect,

More information

IMMIGRATING THROUGH MARRIAGE

IMMIGRATING THROUGH MARRIAGE CHAPTER 5 IMMIGRATING THROUGH MARRIAGE Introduction The process of immigrating through marriage to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident (LPR) alien has so many special rules and procedures that

More information

Scope Unless specifically exempted herein, once finalized, this PM will apply to and will be binding on all USCIS employees.

Scope Unless specifically exempted herein, once finalized, this PM will apply to and will be binding on all USCIS employees. DRAFT FOR COMMENT ONLY Posted: 12-12-2012 Comment period ends: 1-10-2013 This draft does not constitute agency policy in any way or for any purpose. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of

More information

Copyright American Immigration Council, Reprinted with permission

Copyright American Immigration Council, Reprinted with permission Copyright American Immigration Council, Reprinted with permission PRACTICE ADVISORY 1 August 28, 2013 ADVANCE PAROLE FOR DEFERRED ACTION FOR CHILDHOOD ARRIVALS (DACA) RECIPIENTS By the Legal Action Center

More information

March 10, Submitted via

March 10, Submitted via March 10, 2016 Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of the Director 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20529-2140 Submitted via e-mail: ope.feedback@uscis.dhs.gov

More information

Termination of the Central American Minors Parole Program

Termination of the Central American Minors Parole Program This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/16/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-16828, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY [CIS

More information

AILA InfoNet Doc. No (Posted 01/26/10)

AILA InfoNet Doc. No (Posted 01/26/10) MAY 1 9 2009 U.S. Department ofhomeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office a/the Director (MS 2000). Washington, DC 20529-2000 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Memorandum

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YELENA IZOTOVA CHOIN, Petitioner, No. 06-75823 v. Agency No. A75-597-079 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. YELENA IZOTOVA

More information

HQADN 70/23.1. March 8, 2002

HQADN 70/23.1. March 8, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service HQADN 70/23.1 Office of the Executive Associate Commissioner 425 I Street NW Washington, DC 20536 March 8, 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR REGIONAL

More information

Case 2:09-cv DLG Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2009 Page 1 of 14

Case 2:09-cv DLG Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2009 Page 1 of 14 Case 2:09-cv-14118-DLG Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2009 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT PIERCE DIVISION CLOSED CIVIL CASE Case No. 09-14118-CIV-GRAHAM/LYNCH

More information

Grounds of Inadmissibility

Grounds of Inadmissibility Grounds of Inadmissibility Affidavit of Support 212(h) Criminal Waivers Unlawful Presence New York/Miami/Chicago/L.A./San Francisco 2003 Affidavit of Support Due to the transition, the final rule implementing

More information

The Child Status Protection Act Children of Asylees and Refugees

The Child Status Protection Act Children of Asylees and Refugees 20 Massachusetts Avenue Washington, DC 20529 HQOPRD 70/6.1 To: Regional Directors Service Center Directors District Directors From: William R. Yates /s/ Associate Director for Operations U.S. Citizenship

More information

INTRODUCTION TO CONDITIONAL PERMANENT RESIDENCE AND FILING THE PETITION TO REMOVE THE CONDITIONS ON RESIDENCE (FORM I-751)

INTRODUCTION TO CONDITIONAL PERMANENT RESIDENCE AND FILING THE PETITION TO REMOVE THE CONDITIONS ON RESIDENCE (FORM I-751) Practice Advisory December 2017 INTRODUCTION TO CONDITIONAL PERMANENT RESIDENCE AND FILING THE PETITION TO REMOVE THE CONDITIONS ON RESIDENCE (FORM I-751) I. Overview This practice advisory is designed

More information

Matter of CHRISTO'S, INC. Decided April 9,2015 s

Matter of CHRISTO'S, INC. Decided April 9,2015 s Matter of CHRISTO'S, INC. Decided April 9,2015 s U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (1) An alien who submits false documents representing

More information

Procedures for Calculating Maximum Period of Stay Regarding the Limitations on Admission for H-1B and L-1 Nonimmigrants (AFM Update AD 05-21)

Procedures for Calculating Maximum Period of Stay Regarding the Limitations on Admission for H-1B and L-1 Nonimmigrants (AFM Update AD 05-21) 20 Massachusetts Ave Washington, DC 20529 HQPRD 70/6.2.8 HQPRD 70/6.2.12 AD 05-21 To: REGIONAL DIRECTORS SERVICE CENTER DIRECTORS DISTRICT DIRECTORS OFFICERS-IN-CHARGE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS OFFICE DIRECTOR

More information

Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations 42587 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 66, No. 157 Tuesday, August 14, 2001 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :0-cv-0-CAS-MAN Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 0 Carolyn Robb Hootkins, et al. vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, Janet Napolitano, U.S. Department of Homeland

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:18-cv-10225 Document 1 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) LILIAN PAHOLA CALDERON JIMENEZ, ) ) Civ. No. Petitioner, ) ) ) PETITION FOR WRIT OF KIRSTJEN

More information

Family-Sponsored Immigration

Family-Sponsored Immigration Chapter 3 Family-Sponsored Immigration 3:1 Introduction 3:1.1 Overview of the Family-Sponsored Immigration Structure [A] Immediate Relatives [B] Family-Sponsored Preference Categories [C] Annual Caps and

More information

APPLICATION OF THE CHILD STATUS PROTECTION ACT TO ASYLEES AND REFUGEES

APPLICATION OF THE CHILD STATUS PROTECTION ACT TO ASYLEES AND REFUGEES APPLICATION OF THE CHILD STATUS PROTECTION ACT TO ASYLEES AND REFUGEES The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA), 1 enacted on August 6, 2002, is a complex law that applies in different ways to certain types

More information

Non-Immigrant Category Update

Non-Immigrant Category Update Pace International Law Review Volume 16 Issue 1 Spring 2004 Article 2 April 2004 Non-Immigrant Category Update Jan H. Brown Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Recommended

More information

Authority INA 212(a)(6)(A)(i), 212(d)(5)(A), 235(a), and 245(a), (c); 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(A)(i), 1182(d)(5)(A), 1225(a), and 1255(a), (c)

Authority INA 212(a)(6)(A)(i), 212(d)(5)(A), 235(a), and 245(a), (c); 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(6)(A)(i), 1182(d)(5)(A), 1225(a), and 1255(a), (c) U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of the Director (MS 2000) Washington, DC 20529-2000 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services November 15,2013 PM-602-0091

More information

Case 1:08-cv VM Document 16 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:08-cv VM Document 16 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:08-cv-07770-VM Document 16 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FEIMEI LI, ) DUO CEN, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Civil Action No: 09-3776 v. ) ) DANIEL M.

More information

If 2nd Level review Required: List of additional documentation that may be required

If 2nd Level review Required: List of additional documentation that may be required EAD Category If 2nd Level review Required: List of additional documentation that may be required Conforming Eligible FHA Eligible VA (co-borrower) A1 Lawful Permanent Resident Permanent Resident Card Passport

More information

APPLYING FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS AFTER REENTERING THE UNITED STATES WITHOUT BEING ADMITTED: I-212s, 245(i) and VAWA 2005

APPLYING FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS AFTER REENTERING THE UNITED STATES WITHOUT BEING ADMITTED: I-212s, 245(i) and VAWA 2005 The American Immigration Law Foundation 515 28th Street Des Moines, IA 50312 www.asistaonline.org PRACTICE ADVISORY APPLYING FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS AFTER REENTERING THE UNITED STATES WITHOUT BEING ADMITTED:

More information

BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION AND THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF THE RESPONDENT

BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION AND THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF THE RESPONDENT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS In Re Ting Ting Chi ) ) Case No.: A96-533-521 ) Respondent. ) ) ) REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS ) ) BRIEF OF

More information

LEXSEE 107 H.R FULL TEXT OF BILLS. 107th CONGRESS, 2ND SESSION IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES ENGROSSED SENATE AMENDMENT H. R.

LEXSEE 107 H.R FULL TEXT OF BILLS. 107th CONGRESS, 2ND SESSION IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES ENGROSSED SENATE AMENDMENT H. R. Page 1 LEXSEE 107 H.R. 1209 FULL TEXT OF BILLS 107th CONGRESS, 2ND SESSION IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES ENGROSSED SENATE AMENDMENT 2002 H.R. 1209; 107 H.R. 1209; Retrieve Bill Tracking Report SYNOPSIS:

More information

Questions and Answers January 14, 2010

Questions and Answers January 14, 2010 Office of Public Engagement Questions and Answers January 14, 2010 Temporary Protected Status for Haiti The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary, Janet Napolitano, has determined that an 18-month

More information

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION UPDATED PRACTICE ADVISORY ON THE CHILD STATUS PROTECTION ACT Practice Advisory 1 By Mary A. Kenney 2 March 8, 2004 The Child Status Protection Act (CSPA), Pub. L. 107-208

More information

AFTER TPS: OPTIONS AND NEXT STEPS

AFTER TPS: OPTIONS AND NEXT STEPS Practice Advisory June 2018 AFTER TPS: OPTIONS AND NEXT STEPS By ILRC Attorneys Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, will end for hundreds of thousands of individuals in late 2018 and 2019. 1 As TPS recipients

More information

March 27, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THOMAS E. COOK ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF ADJUDICATIONS

March 27, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THOMAS E. COOK ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF ADJUDICATIONS U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and Naturalization Service HQCOU 90/15 Office of the General Counsel 425 I Street NW Washington, DC 20536 March 27, 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THOMAS E. COOK ACTING ASSISTANT

More information

Administrative Closure Post-Castro-Tum. Practice Advisory 1. June 14, 2018

Administrative Closure Post-Castro-Tum. Practice Advisory 1. June 14, 2018 Administrative Closure Post-Castro-Tum Practice Advisory 1 June 14, 2018 I. Introduction Administrative closure is a docket-management mechanism that immigration judges (IJs) and the Board of Immigration

More information

Voluntary Departure: When the Consequences of Failing to Depart Should and Should Not Apply

Voluntary Departure: When the Consequences of Failing to Depart Should and Should Not Apply PRACTICE ADVISORY 1 Updated December 21, 2017 Voluntary Departure: When the Consequences of Failing to Depart Should and Should Not Apply There is a common perception that a grant of voluntary departure

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 06-2550 LOLITA WOOD a/k/a LOLITA BENDIKIENE, v. Petitioner, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, Petition for Review

More information

CHILDREN AND IMMIGRATION

CHILDREN AND IMMIGRATION CHILDREN AND IMMIGRATION NICHOLAS A. CIPRIANNI FAMILY LAW AMERICAN INN OF COURT SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 Presenters: Stephanie Gonzalez, Esquire Barry Kassel, Esquire Maggie Niebler, Esquire Janice Sulman, Esquire

More information

SUBJECT: Revocation of VAWA-Based Self-Petitions (Forms I-360); AFM Update AD10-49

SUBJECT: Revocation of VAWA-Based Self-Petitions (Forms I-360); AFM Update AD10-49 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of the Director (MS 2000) Washington, DC 20529-2000 December 15, 2010 PM-602-0022 Policy Memorandum SUBJECT: Revocation of VAWA-Based Self-Petitions (Forms

More information

In re Rodolfo AVILA-PEREZ, Respondent

In re Rodolfo AVILA-PEREZ, Respondent In re Rodolfo AVILA-PEREZ, Respondent File A96 035 732 - Houston Decided February 9, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Section 201(f)(1)

More information

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. 8 CFR Parts 214 and 274a. CIS No ; DHS Docket No. USCIS RIN 1615-AB92

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. 8 CFR Parts 214 and 274a. CIS No ; DHS Docket No. USCIS RIN 1615-AB92 9111-97 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 8 CFR Parts 214 and 274a CIS No. 2501-10; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2010-0017 RIN 1615-AB92 Employment Authorization for Certain H-4 Dependent Spouses AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship

More information

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUMEI HUANG, Petitioner, LORETTA LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

Case No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. RUMEI HUANG, Petitioner, LORETTA LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. RESTRICTED Case: 16-72269, 01/10/2017, ID: 10261504, DktEntry: 10-1, Page 1 of 40 Case No. 16-72269 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RUMEI HUANG, Petitioner, v. LORETTA LYNCH,

More information

BILLING CODE: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. 8 CFR Parts 214 and 248

BILLING CODE: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. 8 CFR Parts 214 and 248 BILLING CODE: 9111-97 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 8 CFR Parts 214 and 248 [CIS No. 2429-07; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2007-0056] RIN 1615-AB64 Period of Admission

More information

Looking Beyond DACA/DAPA Part 1: Advance Parole June 28, 2016

Looking Beyond DACA/DAPA Part 1: Advance Parole June 28, 2016 Looking Beyond DACA/DAPA Part 1: Advance Parole June 28, 2016 Presented By Peter Schey Executive Director Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 I. Political

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv DLG.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv DLG. Case: 14-11084 Date Filed: 12/19/2014 Page: 1 of 16 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-11084 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-22737-DLG AARON CAMACHO

More information

Final Guidance on Extreme Hardship

Final Guidance on Extreme Hardship The following article is a supplement to the Extreme Hardship section in Chapter 7 of AILA s Immigration Law and the Family, 4th Ed., edited by Charles Wheeler: Final Guidance on Extreme Hardship On October

More information

654 F.3d 376 (2011) Docket No cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: May 12, Decided: June 30, 2011.

654 F.3d 376 (2011) Docket No cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: May 12, Decided: June 30, 2011. 654 F.3d 376 (2011) Feimei LI, Duo Cen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel M. RENAUD, Director, Vermont Service Center, United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, United

More information

SUBJECT: Matter of I- Corp., Adopted Decision (AAO Apr. 12, 2017)

SUBJECT: Matter of I- Corp., Adopted Decision (AAO Apr. 12, 2017) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of the Director (MS 2000) Washington, DC 20529-2000 April 12, 2017 PM-602-0143 Policy Memorandum SUBJECT: Matter of I- Corp., 2017-02 (AAO Apr. 12, 2017)

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Agency No. A versus

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Agency No. A versus Case: 15-11954 Date Filed: 07/05/2016 Page: 1 of 19 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 15-11954 Agency No. A079-061-829 KAP SUN BUTKA, Petitioner, versus U.S.

More information

Summary The Speaker of the House and the Senate majority leader have pledged to take up comprehensive immigration reform legislation at some point in

Summary The Speaker of the House and the Senate majority leader have pledged to take up comprehensive immigration reform legislation at some point in Immigration Legislation and Issues in the 111 th Congress Andorra Bruno, Coordinator Specialist in Immigration Policy Karma Ester Information Research Specialist Chad C. Haddal Specialist in Immigration

More information

Adjustment of Status for T Nonimmigrants By Sarah Bronstein

Adjustment of Status for T Nonimmigrants By Sarah Bronstein Adjustment of Status for T Nonimmigrants By Sarah Bronstein The Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000 created two new immigration benefits, T and U nonimmigrant status, in an effort

More information

Screening TPS Beneficiaries for Other Potential Forms of Immigration Relief. By AILA s Vermont Service Center Liaison Committee 1

Screening TPS Beneficiaries for Other Potential Forms of Immigration Relief. By AILA s Vermont Service Center Liaison Committee 1 Screening TPS Beneficiaries for Other Potential Forms of Immigration Relief Background Information By AILA s Vermont Service Center Liaison Committee 1 When assisting a client with renewing their Temporary

More information

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 9 - Visas 9 FAM NOTES. (CT:VISA-1374; ) (Office of Origin: CA/VO/L/R)

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 9 - Visas 9 FAM NOTES. (CT:VISA-1374; ) (Office of Origin: CA/VO/L/R) 9 FAM 41.85 NOTES (Office of Origin: CA/VO/L/R) 9 FAM 41.85 N1 U NONIMMIGRANT VISA a. The U nonimmigrant classification was created to strengthen the ability of law enforcement agencies to investigate

More information

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services U.S. Department of Homeland Secu rity U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office 20 Massachusetts Ave.. N.W.. MS 2090 Washi ngton. DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration

More information

USCIS GIVES DE FACTO ACCEPTANCE TO EMERGING VIEW OF CSPA PROVISIONS IN INA 203(h)(3)

USCIS GIVES DE FACTO ACCEPTANCE TO EMERGING VIEW OF CSPA PROVISIONS IN INA 203(h)(3) USCIS GIVES DE FACTO ACCEPTANCE TO EMERGING VIEW OF CSPA PROVISIONS IN INA 203(h)(3) by David Froman * On February 8, 2011, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reopened on service motion

More information

Immigration Legislation and Issues in the 111 th Congress

Immigration Legislation and Issues in the 111 th Congress Immigration Legislation and Issues in the 111 th Congress Andorra Bruno, Coordinator Specialist in Immigration Policy Karma Ester Information Research Specialist Margaret Mikyung Lee Legislative Attorney

More information

n a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild

n a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild n a t i o n a l IMMIGRATION p r o j e c t of the national lawyers guild PRACTICE ADVISORY: SAMPLE CARACHURI-ROSENDO MOTIONS June 21, 2010 By Simon Craven, Trina Realmuto and Dan Kesselbrenner 1 Prior to

More information

Question & Answer May 27, 2008

Question & Answer May 27, 2008 Question & Answer May 27, 2008 USCIS NATIONAL STAKEHOLDER MEETING Answers to National Stakeholder Questions Note: The next stakeholder meeting will be held on June 24, 2008 at 2:00 pm. 1. Question: Have

More information

Gayatri Grewal v. US Citizenship

Gayatri Grewal v. US Citizenship 2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-28-2011 Gayatri Grewal v. US Citizenship Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-1032 Follow

More information

INDEX Abused spouses and children. See Vio- lence Against Women Act (VAWA) Addicts. See Drug abusers Adjustment of status. See also Form I-485

INDEX Abused spouses and children. See Vio- lence Against Women Act (VAWA) Addicts. See Drug abusers Adjustment of status. See also Form I-485 A Abused spouses and children. See Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) Addicts. See Drug abusers Adjustment of status. See also Form I-485 generally, 61 77 after-acquired dependents, 65 67 approvable petition

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. (Submitted: December 12, 2007 Decided: July 17, 2008) Docket No ag

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. (Submitted: December 12, 2007 Decided: July 17, 2008) Docket No ag 05-4614-ag Grant v. DHS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2007 (Submitted: December 12, 2007 Decided: July 17, 2008) Docket No. 05-4614-ag OTIS GRANT, Petitioner, UNITED

More information

U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. IMMIGRANT WAIVERS Procedures for Adjudication of Form I-601 For Overseas Adjudication Officers 1

U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES. IMMIGRANT WAIVERS Procedures for Adjudication of Form I-601 For Overseas Adjudication Officers 1 U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES IMMIGRANT WAIVERS Procedures for Adjudication of Form I-601 For Overseas Adjudication Officers 1 April 28, 2009 1 Guidance from the Vermont Service Center Adjudicator

More information

Dakaud v. Atty Gen USA

Dakaud v. Atty Gen USA 2010 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-24-2010 Dakaud v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-2152 Follow this and

More information

Case 1:08-cv VM Document 15 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 30. v. 08 Civ (VM)

Case 1:08-cv VM Document 15 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 30. v. 08 Civ (VM) Case 1:08-cv-07770-VM Document 15 Filed 02/11/10 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FEIMEI LI and DUO CEN, Plaintiffs, v. 08 Civ. 7770 (VM) DANIEL M. RENAUD, 1 Director,

More information

Overview of the Permanent Residence Process and Adjustment of Status

Overview of the Permanent Residence Process and Adjustment of Status NAFSA Reg. Practice Committee, KCISSS Task Force: Practice Advisory on PAA Status Issues Steve Springer, Assistant Director, International Student & Scholar Services, University of Texas at Austin James

More information

FALSE CLAIMS TO U.S. CITIZENSHIP: CONSEQUENCES AND POSSIBLE DEFENSES 1 (July 2014) by Jessica Chicco and Zahava Stern 2

FALSE CLAIMS TO U.S. CITIZENSHIP: CONSEQUENCES AND POSSIBLE DEFENSES 1 (July 2014) by Jessica Chicco and Zahava Stern 2 CENTER for HUMAN RIGHTS and INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE at BOSTON COLLEGE POST-DEPORTATION HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT Boston College Law School, 885 Centre Street, Newton, MA 02459 Tel 617.552.9261 Fax 617.552.9295

More information

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Introduction to Citizenship

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. 1.1 Introduction to Citizenship Naturalization & US Citizenship CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION This chapter includes: 1.1 Introduction to Citizenship... 1-1 1.2 Overview of the Basic Requirements for Naturalization... 1-3 1.3 How to Use This

More information

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION

AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAW FOUNDATION DADA V. MUKASEY Q &A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND APPROACHES TO CONSIDER June 17, 2008 The Supreme Court s decision in Dada v. Mukasey, No. 06-1181, 554 U.S. (June 16, 2008),

More information

OVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS

OVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS OVERVIEW OF THE DEPORTATION PROCESS A Guide for Community Members & Advocates By Em Puhl The immigration system is very complex and opaque, containing many intricate moving parts. Most decisions that result

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2771 Mary Mwihaki Hamilton, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder,

More information

Chapter 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO HARDSHIP AND THE MANUAL. This chapter includes:

Chapter 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO HARDSHIP AND THE MANUAL. This chapter includes: CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO HARDSHIP AND THE MANUAL Hardship in Immigration Law Chapter 1 This chapter includes: 1.1 Introduction... 1-1 1.2 How Does Hardship Come into Play?... 1-1 1.3 Hardship Is a Discretionary

More information

8 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

8 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see TITLE 8 - ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12 - IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY SUBCHAPTER II - IMMIGRATION Part V - Adjustment and Change of Status 1255. Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person

More information

Matter of M-A-F- et al., Respondents

Matter of M-A-F- et al., Respondents Matter of M-A-F- et al., Respondents Decided August 21, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Where an applicant has filed an asylum application

More information

USCIS Update Dec. 11, 2008

USCIS Update Dec. 11, 2008 Office of Communications USCIS Update Dec. 11, 2008 USCIS FINALIZES STREAMLINING PROCEDURES FOR H-2A PROGRAM WASHINGTON U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today changes to the

More information

MEMORANDUM FOR: James W. McCament Acting Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

MEMORANDUM FOR: James W. McCament Acting Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 1 of 6 9/5/2017, 12:02 PM MEMORANDUM FOR: James W. McCament Acting Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Thomas D. Homan Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Kevin K. McAleenan

More information

Asylum and Refugee Provisions

Asylum and Refugee Provisions FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM Summary of S. 744 The Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act Asylum and Refugee Provisions On April 17, 2013, Senators Chuck

More information

New Protections for Immigrant Women and Children Who Are Victims of Domestic Violence

New Protections for Immigrant Women and Children Who Are Victims of Domestic Violence Copyright 1996 by the National Clearinghouse for Legal Services, Inc. All right reserved. New Protections for Immigrant Women and Children Who Are Victims of Domestic Violence By Charles Wheeler Charles

More information

(iv) Section 101(a)(15)(J) is divided into (J)(i) for principal aliens and (J)(ii) for such alien's spouse and children;

(iv) Section 101(a)(15)(J) is divided into (J)(i) for principal aliens and (J)(ii) for such alien's spouse and children; 214.1 Requirements for admission, extension, and maintenance of status. (a) General (1) Nonimmigrant classes. For the purpose of administering the nonimmigrant provisions of the Act, the following administrative

More information

Shahid Qureshi v. Atty Gen USA

Shahid Qureshi v. Atty Gen USA 2002 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-30-2002 Shahid Qureshi v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 01-2558 Follow

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. Agency No. A

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. Agency No. A Nau Velazquez-Macedo v. U.S. Attorney General Doc. 1117145135 Case: 13-10896 Date Filed: 08/26/2013 Page: 1 of 7 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-10896

More information

Immigration Law's Catch-22: The Case for Removing the Three and Ten-Year Bars

Immigration Law's Catch-22: The Case for Removing the Three and Ten-Year Bars Penn State Law From the SelectedWorks of Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia 2014 Immigration Law's Catch-22: The Case for Removing the Three and Ten-Year Bars Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia Available at: https://works.bepress.com/shoba_wadhia/31/

More information

December 31, Office of Management and Budget USCIS Desk Officer

December 31, Office of Management and Budget USCIS Desk Officer Office of Management and Budget USCIS Desk Officer oira_submission@omb.eop.gov Re: Agency Information Collection Activities: Application for Travel Document, Form I 131; Revision of a Currently Approved

More information

Interoffice Memorandum

Interoffice Memorandum U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington. DC 20529 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services HQ 70/21.1 AD07-18 Interoffice Memorandum To: Field Leadership From: Lori

More information

There are 11 new questions and explanations in the FAQ. This article will look closely at each of them, in the order they appear in the FAQ.

There are 11 new questions and explanations in the FAQ. This article will look closely at each of them, in the order they appear in the FAQ. DACA Update: New FAQs from USCIS By Jennie Guilfoyle and Susan Schreiber On January 18, 2013, USCIS amended the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) that create the eligibility and filing requirements for

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: Carl Shusterman, CA Bar # Amy Prokop, CA Bar #1 The Law Offices of Carl Shusterman 00 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 10 Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: (1 - Facsimile: (1-0 E-mail: aprokop@shusterman.com Attorneys

More information

DACA LEGAL SERVICES TOOLKIT Practice Advisory 6 of 7

DACA LEGAL SERVICES TOOLKIT Practice Advisory 6 of 7 DACA LEGAL SERVICES TOOLKIT Practice Advisory 6 of 7 DEFENSES FOR DACA RECIPIENTS FACING ENFORCEMENT OR REMOVAL (DEPORTATION) PROCEEDINGS Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law 256 S. Occidental

More information

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION. 8 CFR Part 212 RIN 1651-AA97 USCBP

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION. 8 CFR Part 212 RIN 1651-AA97 USCBP This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/08/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-04741, and on FDsys.gov 9111-14 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Antonio de Jesus MARTINEZ and Vivian MARTINEZ, v. Plaintiffs-Petitioners, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security; THOMAS HOMAN,

More information

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: 2005 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-6-2005 Danu v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 03-1657 Follow this and additional

More information

NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ROSALINA CUELLAR DE OSORIO; et al., Plaintiffs Appellants,

NO IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. ROSALINA CUELLAR DE OSORIO; et al., Plaintiffs Appellants, Case: 09-56786 04/19/2010 Page: 1 of 46 ID: 7306784 DktEntry: 7 NO. 09-56786 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROSALINA CUELLAR DE OSORIO; et al., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. ALEJANDRO

More information

PRACTICE ADVISORY. April 21, Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano

PRACTICE ADVISORY. April 21, Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano PRACTICE ADVISORY April 21, 2011 Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano This advisory concerns the Ninth Circuit s recent decision in Diouf v. Napolitano, 634 F.3d 1081

More information

NATURALIZATION & US CITIZENSHIP: THE ESSENTIAL LEGAL GUIDE 15 TH EDITION TABLE OF CONTENTS

NATURALIZATION & US CITIZENSHIP: THE ESSENTIAL LEGAL GUIDE 15 TH EDITION TABLE OF CONTENTS Naturalization & US Citizenship NATURALIZATION & US CITIZENSHIP: THE ESSENTIAL LEGAL GUIDE 15 TH EDITION TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview 1.1 Introduction to Citizenship... 1 1.2 Overview

More information

9 FAM 40.6 EXHIBIT I GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY AVAILABLE WAIVERS

9 FAM 40.6 EXHIBIT I GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY AVAILABLE WAIVERS 9 FAM 40.6 EXHIBIT I GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY AVAILABLE WAIVERS (CT:VISA-1613; 01-04-2010) (Office of Origin: CA/VO/L/R) HEALTH RELATED GROUNDS Class of Inadmissibility NIV Waivers IV Waivers Communicable

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 15 2063 NIKOLAY ZYAPKOV, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. Petition for Review of an

More information

WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY

WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY CHAPTER 7 WAIVERS OF INADMISSIBILITY Overview The purpose of this chapter is to explain the eligibility requirements for waivers of certain inadmissibility grounds, set forth the legal standards used for

More information

Melvin Paiz-Cabrera v. Atty Gen USA

Melvin Paiz-Cabrera v. Atty Gen USA 2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-20-2012 Melvin Paiz-Cabrera v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 11-2723 Follow

More information

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 9 - Visas 9 FAM NOTES. (CT:VISA-1317; ) (Office of Origin: CA/VO/L/R)

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 9 - Visas 9 FAM NOTES. (CT:VISA-1317; ) (Office of Origin: CA/VO/L/R) 9 FAM 40.41 NOTES (Office of Origin: CA/VO/L/R) 9 FAM 40.41 N1 BACKGROUND Several pieces of legislation changed the "public charge" provisions of the law: (1) The Welfare Reform Act (officially The Personal

More information