Legal Aspects of Land Use and Occupancy
|
|
- Gillian Beasley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Legal Aspects of Land Use and Occupancy DR. M.A. (PEGGY) SMITH, R.P.F. SFMN Traditional Land Use Mapping Workshop January 15-16, 2009, Saskatoon It s all about the land and who gets to decide how it s used
2 Marshall C.J. Worcester v. State of Georgia, 1832 in Lester 1977 The tribes of Indians inhabiting this country were fierce savages, whose occupation was war, and whose subsistence was drawn chiefly from the forest. To leave them in possession of their country, was to leave the country a wilderness; to govern them as a distinct people was impossible, because they were as brace and high-spirited as they were fierce, and ready to repel by arms every attempt on their independence. What was the inevitable consequence of this state of things? The Europeans were under the necessity of either abandoning the country, and relinquishing their pompous claims to it, or of enforcing those claims by the sword, and by the adoption of principles adapted to the condition of a people with whom it was impossible to mix, and who could not be governed as a distinct society, or of remaining in their neighbourhood, and exposing themselves and their families to the perpetual hazard of being massacred. PRIMITIVE/ NEOLITHIC Govt of Yukon CIVILIZED Flicker: Stop the Tar Sands Whitefeatherforest.com Global Forest Watch Grassy Narrows
3 Different Views of Land PAST FEDERAL POLICIES
4 Federal policies pre 1970s (Butt & Hurley 2006) Indian Act prohibited use of Band funds for claims against government Various recommendations to address land claims, including establishment of Claims Commission and 69 White Paper recommendation to abolish Indian Act, limit federal government responsibility for Indians & settle specific claims upholding treaties & repairing broken promises (Lester 1977) Federal policies pre & post Calder 1973 Dealt only with claims registered by Aboriginal peoples with recognized rights, that is those who had entered into agreements (treaties) with the Crown What about those without agreements, including Métis? Calder 1973: a split decision, but 3 judges agreed that Nisga a had Aboriginal title which had not been extinguished 1973 Statement on Claims of Indian & Inuit People specific & comprehensive Comprehensive extinguishment requirement
5 Historic treaties and modern day land claims SUPREME COURT OF CANADA DECISIONS
6 Recent Supreme Court of Canada Decisions CASE DATE OUTCOME Calder 1973 Recognition of Nisga a ownership or Aboriginal title ; led to land claims Nowegijick 1983 Treaties must be liberally interpreted CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982, s. 35, Aboriginal & treaty rights Guerin 1984 Ottawa must recognize existence of inherent Aboriginal title & fiduciary relationship based on title Sioui 1990 Provincial laws cannot overrule treaty rights Supreme Court of Canada Decisions (cont d) CASE DATE OUTCOME Sparrow 1990 Existing rights in s. 35(1) of Constitution Act defined as any unextinguished rights ( treaty rights in Constitution defined as rights that now exist by way of land claims or may be so acquired Van der Peet 1996 Rights based in historic use Delgamuukw 1997 Aboriginal title, duty to consult; oral evidence given equal weight with historic written evidence in land claim cases; accommod n of Aboriginal interests; inescapable economic component compensation Source: Anderson & Bone 2003: 6
7 Supreme Court of Canada Decisions (cont d) CASE DATE OUTCOME Marshall 1999 Mi kmaq have right to catch & sell fish to earn a moderate living Powley 2003 Métis hunting rights acknowledged Haida 2004 Crown has duty to consult, not private sector; rights need not be proven in Court; asserted Taku River Tlingit 2004 EA provided meaningful consultation time, consider n of FN interests Mikisew 2005 Duty to consult applies to treaty areas, not just Aboriginal title areas (Treaty #8) Sappier & Gray 2006 Mi kmaq have right to harvest timber on Crown land for personal use Source: Anderson & Bone 2003: 6 Aboriginal Title Set out by Supreme Court of Canada in Delgamuuk w A sui generis (unique) form of land ownership, specific to Aboriginal peoples in Canada, a right to land itself Rooted in historic occupation & use of land Existed prior to European settlement, recognized in Royal Proclamation, 1763 Change to more specific rights when agreements (i.e. treaties) negotiated with Crown extinguishment
8 Application to Treaties Treaties sacred & still in effect exchange of solemn promises Interpretation & regulations which affect treaties approached in manner maintaining integrity of Crown no sharp dealings Interpretation differences to be resolved in favour of Aboriginal peoples Onus of proving extinguishment rests with Crown with evidence of clear & plain intent on part of government to extinguish Same principles of minimal infringement & justification apply BIG QUESTION: Does Aboriginal title still apply to treaty lands? Application to Métis Aboriginal rights are communal, grounded in existence of historic & present community, exercisable by virtue of an individual s ancestrally-based membership in present community Métis community with some degree of continuity & stability established through evidence of shared customs, traditions & collective identity, as well as demographic evidence Verification of a claimant s membership in relevant contemporary community
9 The Sparrow Test Is there an existing Aboriginal or treaty right? Has there been an infringement of the right? Can the infringement be justified? Justification Is there a valid legislative objective to regulation or development? Does regulation/development honour special trust relationship (fiduciary duty) of the Crown to Aboriginal peoples Is infringement minimal? Were Aboriginal people affected by regulation/development consulted prior to?
10 Justification (cont d) What is a valid legislative objective? of compelling & substantial importance to the community as a whole (R. vs Gladstone, 1996) Development of agriculture, forestry, mining & hydroelectric power General economic development of interior BC Protection of environment or endangered species Building of infrastructure & settlement of foreign populations to support above aims When does Crown exercise its duty? Duty arises when Crown: knows of potential existence of an Aboriginal right or title considering conduct that might adversely affect right or title
11 Purpose of Duty to Consult Reconciliation Obligation to treat Aboriginal peoples fairly & honourably (no sharp dealing ) & to protect them from exploitation Should trigger negotiations between Crown & AP Requires government to change its plans or policies in order to accommodate Aboriginal concerns, if consultation shows necessity Principles of the Duty Consultation: more than minimum acceptable standard Carried out in good faith Intent: to substantially addressing concerns of Aboriginal peoples whose lands are at issue Case specific each community negotiates with the Crown
12 Burden of Proof Occupancy Delgamuukw 1997 (Thom 2001) Prove occupancy at time of sovereignty (of Crown) Continuity with present & pre-sovereignty occupation rooted in past Demonstrated through physical evidence on ground (houses, enclosed fields, regular use of resources) & Aboriginal laws which govern the territory Occupancy exclusive to group claiming land QUESTIONS OF CLARIFICATION
13 Can Crown use lands & resources however it chooses? (Pape & Salter) No Crown cannot cavalierly run roughshod over Aboriginal interest where claims affecting these interests are being seriously pursued in the process of treaty negotiation & proof. It must respect these potential, but yet unproven, interests. Does Provincial title trump Aboriginal rights & title? (Pape & Salter) No Provincial title is subject to the land-related rights of Aboriginal peoples. Aboriginal peoples do not have a veto over Crown decisions, but Crown has a duty to be responsive to Aboriginal claims, & must change its plans in order to preserve Aboriginal interests.
14 Is the honour of the Crown duty the same as a fiduciary duty? (Pape & Salter) No Honour of the Crown means different duties in different circumstances. The honour of the Crown gives rise to a fiduciary duty. In case of no treaties, Crown needs to determine, recognize & respect rights. In case of treaties, where rights have been defined, Crown needs to recognize and respect rights. ABORIGINAL PERSPECTIVES
15 Aboriginal Perspectives: Inherent Right As the Original Peoples of this Land, we have never reached any agreement or treaty with Canada concerning the occupation, settlement, sovereignty and jurisdiction that Canada claims over Land to which we hold absolute Original Title. Despite federal & provincial assertions of jurisdiction and sovereignty, our absolute Original Title to the Lands and Resources and our Right of Self-Determination remains strong and unbroken. Source: Union of BC Indian Chiefs Aboriginal Perspectives: Inherent Right Canada has held the racist view that Aboriginal people are primitive and are incapable of political, legal, historic or economic thought Canada has put a lot of energy towards making sure Aboriginal people never get involved in the development of legal principles of Aboriginal rights and title, especially in the courts and parliament. Don Ryan, Wet suwet en (cited in Thom, 2001)
16 Conclusion Differing interpretations in meaning of Aboriginal title/original title leads many Aboriginal peoples to insist on control over their territories, even in the face of negotiated agreements Extinguishment of Aboriginal title through negotiations including historic treaties is unacceptable to many Aboriginal peoples Supported by UN Special Rapporteur (Amnesty Int l 2005) THE CHALLENGE: How to reconcile Canadian law and Aboriginal customary law? Way Forward: Reconciliation (RCAP 1996) Honour of the Crown Federal/provincial cooperation to negotiate rights Justice system that acknowledges selfdetermination Aboriginal Use, Occupancy & Governance Implementation of customary law Full use & occupancy New forms of economic development NEW FORMS OF LAND STEWARDSHIP, SHARED OWNERSHIP & BENEFIT-SHARING = CONSOCIATION (Asch 1990) & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
17 Readings & References Asch, M Consociation and the resolution of Aboriginal political rights: The example of the Northwest Territories, Canada. Culture 10(1): Butt, E. and M.C. Hurley Specific Claims in Canada. PRB 06-18E. Parliamentary Information and Research Service, Library of Parliament, Ottawa, ON. Jan. 13/09. Diabo, Russell Implementing Delgamuuk w Conference Transcripts. Hurley, M.C. 1998, rev Aboriginal Title: The Supreme Court of Canada Decision in Delgamuukw vs. British Columbia. Report BP-459E. Parliamentary Information and Research Service, Government of Canada. e.htm#b.%20%20aboriginal%20title%20in%20canada%20(par.% )(txt) Indian Affairs and Northern Development General Briefing Note on the Comprehensive Land Claims Policy of Canada and the Status of Claims. Comprehensive Claims Branch, Claims & Indian Government Sector. Lester, G.S Primitivism versus civilization: A basic question in the law of Aboriginal rights to the land pp in Brice-Bennet, C. (ed.) Our Footprints are Everywhere. Labrador Inuit Assoc., Nain, Labrador (Nfld.). McDonald, M.J Aboriginal Forestry in Canada pp in Anderson, R.B. and R.M. Bone, Natural Resources and Aboriginal People in Canada: Readings, Cases and Commentary. Captus Press, Concord, ON. Readings & References Pape & Salter. A Guide to the Supreme Court of Canada s decision in Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. B.C. Slattery, Brian The Generative Structure of Aboriginal Rights (Draft). UCTURE%20OF%20ABORIGINAL-RIGHTS_CIRCULATION%20CO%E2%80%A6.pdf Thom, B Aboriginal rights and title in Canada after Delgamuukw: Parts I and II. Native Studies Review 14(1&2): 1-26 & Usher, P Reclaiming the land-aboriginal title, treaty rights and land claims in Canada. Applied Geography 12(2): Full judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada can be found at
Recognizing Indigenous Peoples Rights in Canada
Recognizing Indigenous Peoples Rights in Canada Dr. M.A. (Peggy) Smith, RPF Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada Presented to MEGAflorestais, Whistler,
More informationTHE GENESIS OF ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND THE DUTY TO CONSULT
THE GENESIS OF ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND THE DUTY TO CONSULT UBC Institute for Resources, Environment & Sustainability Date: September 16 th, 2014 Presented by: Rosanne M. Kyle 604.687.0549, ext. 101 rkyle@jfklaw.ca
More informationNative Title A Canadian Perspective. R. Scott Hanna, BSc, MRM, CEnvP (IA Specialist) 19 February 2015
Native Title A Canadian Perspective R. Scott Hanna, BSc, MRM, CEnvP (IA Specialist) 19 February 2015 09/2013 Topics of Presentation Aboriginal Peoples and First Nations of Canada Historic and Modern Treaties
More informationTHE GENESIS OF THE DUTY TO CONSULT AND THE SUPERME COURT
THE GENESIS OF THE DUTY TO CONSULT AND THE SUPERME COURT The judicial genesis of the legal duty of consultation began with a series of Aboriginal right and title decisions providing the foundational principles
More informationConsultation with First Nations and Accommodation Obligations
Consultation with First Nations and Accommodation Obligations John J.L. Hunter, Q.C. prepared for a conference on the Impact of the Haida and Taku River Decisions presented by the Pacific Business and
More informationDRAFT GUIDELINES FOR MINISTRIES ON CONSULTATION WITH ABORIGINAL PEOPLES RELATED TO ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND TREATY RIGHTS
For Discussion Purposes Only DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR MINISTRIES ON CONSULTATION WITH ABORIGINAL PEOPLES RELATED TO ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND TREATY RIGHTS This information is for general guidance only and is
More informationAboriginal Title and Rights: Crown s Duty to Consult and Seek Accommodation
Case Comment Bob Reid Aboriginal Title and Rights: Crown s Duty to Consult and Seek Accommodation After the Supreme Court of Canada s decision in Delgamuukw, (1997) 3 S.C.R 1010, stated there was an obligation
More informationABORIGINAL TITLE AND RIGHTS: FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
ABORIGINAL TITLE AND RIGHTS: FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Maria Morellato,Q.C. Mandell Pinder 2009 Constitutional & Human Rights Conference The McLachlin Court s First Decade: Reflections
More informationTHE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF ABORIGINAL RIGHTS. Peter W. HOGG*
30-Lajoie.book Page 177 Mardi, 20. mai 2008 12:26 12 THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF ABORIGINAL RIGHTS Peter W. HOGG* I. ABORIGINAL RIGHTS BEFORE 1982... 179 II. CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982... 181 III. THE SPARROW
More information% AND: FACTUM OF THE INTERVENOR COUNCIL OF FOREST INDUSTRIES. No. CA Vancouver Registry COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN:
No. CA024761 Vancouver Registry COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: AND: CHIEF COUNCILLOR MATHEW HILL, also known as Tha-lathatk, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Kitkatla Band, and KITKATLA
More informationLEGAL REVIEW OF FIRST NATIONS RIGHTS TO CARBON CREDITS
REPORT 6: LEGAL REVIEW OF FIRST NATIONS RIGHTS TO CARBON CREDITS Prepared For: The Assembly of First Nations Prepared By: March 2006 The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily
More informationWhat are Treaties? The PLEA Vol. 30 No.
The PLEA Vol. 30 No. No.11 What are Treaties? A treaty is a negotiated agreement between two or more nations. Nations all over the world have a long history of using treaties, often for land disputes and
More informationDuring settlement and colonization, treaties were negotiated between the Crown and local Aboriginal
What are Aboriginal rights? Aboriginal rights are collective rights which flow from Aboriginal peoples continued use and occupation of certain areas. They are inherent rights which Aboriginal peoples have
More informationA Turning Point In The Civilization
Kichesipirini Algonquin First Nation Kichi Sibi Anishnabe / Algonquin Nation Canada By Honouring Our Past We Determine Our Future algonquincitizen@hotmail.com A Turning Point In The Civilization Re: Ottawa
More informationAboriginal Law 101. Saturday Morning at the Law School. David Laidlaw, Canadian Institute of Resources Law University of Calgary February 20, 2016
Saturday Morning at the Law School Aboriginal Law 101 David Laidlaw, Canadian Institute of Resources Law University of Calgary February 20, 2016 SPONSORED BY Current Aboriginal Issues in Canada Objectives
More informationTHE STORIES WE TELL: SITE-C, TREATY 8, AND THE DUTY TO CONSULT AND ACCOMMODATE
APPEAL VOLUME 23 n 3 ARTICLE THE STORIES WE TELL: SITE-C, TREATY 8, AND THE DUTY TO CONSULT AND ACCOMMODATE Rachel Gutman * CITED: (2018) 23 Appeal 3 INTRODUCTION....4 I. SECTION 35(1) INFRINGEMENT AND
More informationCOLLABORATIVE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY OF FORESTRY SECTOR OPERATIONS ON NADLEH WHUT EN FIRST NATION TERRITORY.
COLLABORATIVE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY OF FORESTRY SECTOR OPERATIONS ON NADLEH WHUT EN FIRST NATION TERRITORY by Rebecca Delorey BPL, University of Northern British Columbia, 2017 THESIS
More informationProject & Environmental Review Aboriginal Consultation Information for Applicants. July 2015
Project & Environmental Review Aboriginal Consultation Information for Applicants July 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 2 2. Overview... 2 3. Principles/Objectives... 2 4. Applicability... 3 5.
More informationFRASER RESEARCHBULLETIN
FRASER RESEARCHBULLETIN FROM THE CENTRE FOR ABORIGINAL POLICY STUDIES July 2014 A Real Game Changer: An Analysis of the Supreme Court of Canada Tsilhqot in Nation v. British Columbia Decision by Ravina
More informationEnergy Projects & First Nations in Canada:
Energy Projects & First Nations in Canada: Rights, duties, engagement and accommodation For Center for Energy Economics, Bureau of Economic Geology University of Texas Bob Skinner, President KIMACAL Energy
More informationAboriginal Law Update
November 24, 2005 Aboriginal Law Update The Mikisew Cree Decision: Balancing Government s Power to Manage Lands and Resources with Consultation Obligations under Historic Treaties On November 24, 2005,
More informationprinciples Respecting the Government of Canada's Relationship with Indigenous Peoples
principles Respecting the Government of Canada's Relationship with Indigenous Peoples Principles Respecting the Government of Canada's 2 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced,
More informationTHE DELGAMUUKW DECISION. Analysis prepared by Louise Mandell
1 THE DELGAMUUKW DECISION Analysis prepared by Louise Mandell These materials were prepared by Louise Mandell, Q.C., Barrister & Solicitor, 500 1080 Mainland Street, Vancouver, BC for a conference held
More informationNORTHWEST TERRITORY MÉTIS NATION
NORTHWEST TERRITORY MÉTIS NATION Our Combined History ~ The Birth of a Nation ~ Our Combined History In the 1700 s when the North West Company explored the Great Slave Lake area they met Francois Beaulieu
More informationEvolution of Yukon s Aboriginal Law and the Goal of Reconciliation,
Evolution of Yukon s Aboriginal Law and the Goal of Reconciliation, A 360 PERSPECTIVE By Dwight Newman Professor of Law & Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Rights in Constitutional and International
More informationDefenders of the Land & Idle No More Networks
Defenders of the Land & Idle No More Networks PRESS RELEASE Defenders of the Land & Idle No More Condemn Government of Canada s 10 Principles (August 25, 2017) When the Government of Canada s released
More informationParliamentary Research Branch. Current Issue Review 89-11E ABORIGINAL RIGHTS. Jane May Allain Law and Government Division. Revised 7 October 1996
Current Issue Review 89-11E ABORIGINAL RIGHTS Jane May Allain Law and Government Division Revised 7 October 1996 Library of Parliament Bibliothèque du Parlement Parliamentary Research Branch The Parliamentary
More informationKINDER MORGAN CANADA LIMITED: BRIEF ON LEGAL RISKS FOR TRANS MOUNTAIN
West Coast Environmental Law Association 200-2006 W.10 th Avenue Vancouver, BC Coast Salish Territories wcel.org 2017 KINDER MORGAN CANADA LIMITED: BRIEF ON LEGAL RISKS FOR TRANS MOUNTAIN May 29, 2017
More informationTHE LAW OF CANADA IN RELATION TO UNDRIP
THE LAW OF CANADA IN RELATION TO UNDRIP Although the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) is not a binding legal instrument and has never been ratified as a treaty would be, the
More information1 Tsilhqot in Nation v. British Columbia, 2007
CASE COMMENT The Mix George Cadman Tsilhqot in Nation v. British Columbia (The Williams Case) Tsilhqot in Nation v. British Columbia, 2007 BCSC 1700, referred to by some as the Williams case, consumed
More informationLEGAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DUTY TO CONSULT November, Meaghan Conroy Associate, Ackroyd LLP
ACKROYD LLP LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DUTY TO CONSULT November, 2009 Meaghan Conroy Associate, Ackroyd LLP Since the release of The Supreme Court of Canada decisions in Haida 1, Taku 2 and Mikisew 3, Canadian
More informationLegal Review of Canada s Interim Comprehensive Land Claims Policy
TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs Bruce McIvor Legal Review of Canada s Interim Comprehensive Land Claims Policy DATE: November 4, 2014 This memorandum provides a legal review of Canada s
More informationDecember 2 nd, Sent Via
December 2 nd, 2014 Sent Via Email Premier@gov.ab.ca The Honourable Jim Prentice Premier of Alberta and Minister of Aboriginal Relations 307 Legislature Building 10800-97 Avenue Edmonton, AB T5K 2B6 Dear
More informationGwaii Haanas: Working Together to Achieve Common Goals
Gwaii Haanas: Working Together to Achieve Common Goals Ernie Gladstone, Field Unit Superintendent, Gwaii Haanas National Park, Reserve and Haida Heritage Site, 60 Second Beach Road, Skidegate (Haida Heritage
More informationPresented to the Vancouver Section of the Canadian Institute of Forestry & Vancouver Wood Forum November 9, 1999
Presented to the Vancouver Section of the Canadian Institute of Forestry & Vancouver Wood Forum November 9, 1999 Presented By: Marlie Beets, Vice President, and Aboriginal Affairs Council of Forest Industries
More informationNative Law Centre Publishing
2018 Catalogue Native Law Centre Publishing furthering learning, knowledge, and research in Aboriginal law Law Reports and Indexes Canadian Native Law Reporter (CNLR) ISSN 0225-2279 Reports all important
More information-1- SHOULD S. 91(24) LANDS REMAIN IN PLACE IN POST-TREATY BRITISH COLUMBIA? Peter R. Grant and Lee Caffrey 1
-1- SHOULD S. 91(24) LANDS REMAIN IN PLACE IN POST-TREATY BRITISH COLUMBIA? Peter R. Grant and Lee Caffrey 1 I. INTRODUCTION This paper is being presented in the context of Canada s Responsibility for
More informationQuÉbec AMERINDIANS AND INUIT OF QUÉBEC INTERIM GUIDE FOR CONSULTING THE ABORIGINAL COMMUNITIES
QuÉbec AMERINDIANS AND INUIT OF QUÉBEC INTERIM GUIDE FOR CONSULTING Interministerial working group on the consultation of the Aboriginal people Ministère du Développement durable, de l Environnement et
More informationPROPHET RIVER FIRST NATION AND WEST MOBERLY FIRST NATIONS. and
Date: 20170123 Docket: A-435-15 Citation: 2017 FCA 15 CORAM: TRUDEL J.A. BOIVIN J.A. DE MONTIGNY J.A. BETWEEN: PROPHET RIVER FIRST NATION AND WEST MOBERLY FIRST NATIONS Appellants and ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationTruth and Reconciliation
Truth and Reconciliation "Colonial Persuasions: Sovereignty as the Limit of Reconciliation Education for New Canadians" Kevin Fitzmaurice P2P Conference Nov 2017 Outline of Talk (A work in Progress) The
More informationEnvironmental Law Centre
Environmental Law Centre Murray and Anne Fraser Building University of Victoria P.O. Box 2400 STN CSC Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3H7 www.elc.uvic.ca Duty to Consult with First Nations Researcher: Paul Brackstone
More informationWeaving a Third Strand Into the Braid of Aboriginal Crown Relations:
Weaving a Third Strand Into the Braid of Aboriginal Crown Relations: Legal Obligations to Finance Aboriginal Governments Negotiated in Canada RAMI SHOUCRI I INTRODUCTION 97 II THE RIGHT TO SELF-GOVERNMENT
More informationTHAT WHICH GIVES US LIFE. The Syilx People have always governed our land according to principles that are entrenched in traditional knowledge.
THAT WHICH GIVES US LIFE The Syilx People have always governed our land according to principles that are entrenched in traditional knowledge. The Syilx/Okanagan People are: A Non-treaty First Nation and
More informationResolving Aboriginal Claims. A Practical Guide to Canadian Experiences
Resolving Aboriginal Claims A Practical Guide to Canadian Experiences Published under the authority of the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 2003 www.ainc-inac.gc.ca 1-800-567-9604
More informationABORIGINAL RIGHTS RECOGNITION IN PUBLIC POLICY
ABORIGINAL RIGHTS RECOGNITION IN PUBLIC POLICY A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE March 8, 2002 Neil J. Sterritt Box 325, Hazelton British Columbia, Canada V0J 1Y0 Telephone: (250) 842-5010 Facsimile: (250) 842-5058
More informationPrepared for the Ontario Justice Education Network by Law Clerks of the Court of Appeal for Ontario
Landmark Case ABORIGINAL TREATY RIGHTS: R. v. MARSHALL Prepared for the Ontario Justice Education Network by Law Clerks of the Court of Appeal for Ontario R. v. Marshall (1999) The accused in this case,
More informationIndexed As: William v. British Columbia et al. British Columbia Court of Appeal Levine, Tysoe and Groberman, JJ.A. June 27, 2012.
Roger William, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Xeni Gwet'in First Nations Government and on behalf of all other members of the Tsilhqot'in Nation (respondent/plaintiff) v. Her
More informationProvincial Jurisdiction After Delgamuukw
2.1 ABORIGINAL TITLE UPDATE Provincial Jurisdiction After Delgamuukw These materials were prepared by Albert C. Peeling of Azevedo & Peeling, Vancouver, B.C. for Continuing Legal Education, March, 1998.
More informationReconciliation and the Supreme Court: The Opposing Views of Chief Justices Lamer and McLachlin
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Articles & Book Chapters Faculty Scholarship 2003 Reconciliation and the Supreme Court: The Opposing Views of Chief Justices Lamer and
More informationDefining Aboriginal Title in the 90's: Has the Supreme Court Finally Got It Right?
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University From the SelectedWorks of Kent McNeil 1998 Defining Aboriginal Title in the 90's: Has the Supreme Court Finally Got It Right? Kent McNeil Available at: https://works.bepress.com/kent_mcneil/75/
More informationDuty to Consult, Reconciliation and Economic Development Frameworks
Duty to Consult, Reconciliation and Economic Development Frameworks Metis Nation Economic Development Policy Forum Vancouver BC March 17, 2017 OUR LAND IS OUR LIFE Stuffed Whitefish Roasted Muskrat Missing:
More informationIndigenous Law and Aboriginal Title
Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons All Papers Research Papers, Working Papers, Conference Papers 2016 Indigenous Law and Aboriginal Title Kent McNeil Osgoode Hall Law School
More informationSelected Leading Aboriginal Law Decisions
By Bob Adkins, Maria Grande and Sacha R. Paul By Sacha R Paul and Catherine Hamilton I. Calder v. British Columbia, [1973] S.C.R. 313 This case is the origin of modern Aboriginal law. The Nishga sued for
More informationIntroduction OWEN LIPPERT
Introduction OWEN LIPPERT About 10,000 years ago, humans started to walk cross the Bering Strait, pushing southward to populate the Americas. On December 11, 1997, the Supreme Court of Canada released
More informationDuty to Consult and the Aboriginal Reconciliation Process in New Brunswick. Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat November 6, 2015
Duty to Consult and the Aboriginal Reconciliation Process in New Brunswick Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat November 6, 2015 Historical Context (400 Years) Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in New Brunswick Jacques
More informationThe Scope of Consultation and the Role of Administrative Tribunals in Upholding the Honour of the Crown: the Rio Tinto Alcan Decision 1
The Scope of Consultation and the Role of Administrative Tribunals in Upholding the Honour of the Crown: the Rio Tinto Alcan Decision 1 By Peter R. Grant 2 Introduction In the 1950s, the government of
More informationChief of Ontario Presentation to the Ipperwash Inquiry Ontario Regional Chief Angus Toulouse Speaking Notes
March 8, 2006 Traditional Greeting. Chief of Ontario Presentation to the Ipperwash Inquiry Ontario Regional Chief Angus Toulouse Speaking Notes I would like to extend my appreciation to Justice Sidney
More informationCase Name: R. v. Stagg. Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Norman Stagg. [2011] M.J. No MBPC 9. Manitoba Provincial Court
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Stagg Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Norman Stagg [2011] M.J. No. 56 2011 MBPC 9 Manitoba Provincial Court B.M. Corrin Prov. Ct. J. February 11, 2011. (19 paras.) Counsel: Nathaniel
More informationTREATIES: CONTEMPORARY LAND CLAIMS
TREATIES: CONTEMPORARY LAND CLAIMS : First Nations, Métis and Inuit Perspectives in Curriculum Aboriginal and Treaty Rights TREATIES: CONTEMPORARY LAND CLAIMS In 1973, the federal government recognized
More informationWritten Submissions by Stswecem c Xgat tem First Nation. Submitted to the Expert Panel regarding the National Energy Board Modernization Review
Stswecem c Xgat tem Written Submissions by Stswecem c Xgat tem First Nation Submitted to the Expert Panel regarding the National Energy Board Modernization Review March 29, 2017 Introduction Stswecem c
More informationChapter 10: Challenging Liberalism. So What ways of thinking can challenge liberalism?
Chapter 10: Challenging Liberalism So 2.10 What ways of thinking can challenge liberalism? In society, different and sometimes conflicting visions of what life should be like are proposed. This means that
More informationRoyal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: An Exercise in Policy Education. For CPSA Panel, June 1 & 2, Peter H. Russell, University of Toronto
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples: An Exercise in Policy Education For CPSA Panel, June 1 & 2, 2010 Peter H. Russell, University of Toronto The Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples was established
More informationDoes the Crown Hold a Duty to Consult Aboriginal Peoples Prior to Introducing Legislation?
May 2013 Aboriginal Law Section Does the Crown Hold a Duty to Consult Aboriginal Peoples Prior to Introducing Legislation? By Ashley Stacey and Nikki Petersen* The duty to consult and, where appropriate,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And R. v. Desautel, 2017 BCSC 2389 Regina Richard Lee Desautel Date: 20171228 Docket: 23646 Registry: Nelson Appellant Respondent And Okanagan
More informationMEMORANDUM. Douglas White and Dr. Roshan Danesh. Tsilhqot in Nation and the British Columbia Treaty Process
MEMORANDUM To: From: Re: Chiefs Executive Council, Okanagan Nation Alliance Douglas White and Dr. Roshan Danesh Tsilhqot in Nation and the British Columbia Treaty Process Date: February 12, 2016 A. QUESTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO)
B E T W E E N: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Court File No. (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) NISHNAWBE-ASKI NATION and GINOOGAMING FIRST NATION, LONG LAKE 58 FIRST NATION, and TRANSCANADA
More informationCanada s Native Languages: The Right of First Nations to Educate Their Children in Their Own Languages
Canada s Native Languages: The Right of First Nations to Educate Their Children in Their Own Languages David Leitch * Introduction Canada used to consider itself not only a bilingual, but also a bicultural
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And R. v. DeSautel, 2018 BCCA 131 Regina Richard Lee DeSautel Date: 20180404 Docket: CA45055 Applicant (Appellant) Respondent Before: The Honourable
More informationTrans Mountain, Site C, and BC LNG: Is it Time for a Sea Change? Matthew Keen and Emily Chan Presented May 26, 2016 at BEST 2016
Trans Mountain, Site C, and BC LNG: Is it Time for a Sea Change? Matthew Keen and Emily Chan Presented May 26, 2016 at BEST 2016 Outline Duty to consult Roles of project proponent and regulator Consultation
More informationThe Crown Fiduciary Duty at the Supreme Court of Canada: Reaching across Nations, or Held within the Grip of the Crown?
Canada in International Law at 150 and Beyond Paper No. 6 January 2018 The Crown Fiduciary Duty at the Supreme Court of Canada: Reaching across Nations, or Held within the Grip of the Crown? Ryan Beaton
More informationCitation: R. v. Martin, 2018 NSSC 141. v. Joseph James Martin, Jr. and Victor Benjamin Googoo. Decision on Summary Conviction Appeal
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Martin, 2018 NSSC 141 Date: 2018-06-13 Docket: Syd. No. 450191 Registry: Sydney Between: Her Majesty the Queen v. Joseph James Martin, Jr. and Victor Benjamin
More informationFor further information into the expanded analysis developed from the initial table and the broader findings of the research, please refer to:
An Evaluation of Ontario Provincial Land Use and Resource Management Policies and Their Intersection with First Nations with Respect to Manifest and Latent Content - Summary Table: Author s Note December
More informationAboriginal Empowerment
Aboriginal Empowerment Ronald L Trosper Report #8 in the Series on Drivers of Change in Canada s Forests and Forest Sector, prepared for the Forest Futures Project of the SFM Network January 2008 1. Introduction
More informationBI-POLE 111 CLOSING COMMENTS TO THE CEC PEGUIS FIRST NATION
BI-POLE 111 CLOSING COMMENTS TO THE CEC PEGUIS FIRST NATION GOOD MORNING MR. CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS OF THE CLEAN ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION. THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING PEGUIS THIS OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE CLOSING
More informationReview of the Navigation Protection Act and First Nations
Review of the Navigation Protection Act and First Nations October 26, 2016 Québec Assembly of First Nations 1 Overview Navigation Protection Act (NPA) Formerly Navigable Waters Protection Act (NWPA) Key
More informationFirst Nations Groups in Canada
First Nations Groups in Canada First Nations in BC Over 200 First Nations Amazing diversity 60% of FN languages in Canada are in BC Terminology Indian an older/outdated term for Aboriginal person First
More informationGovernment of Canada s position on the right of self-determination within Article 1
Government of Canada s position on the right of self-determination within Article 1 25. The Government of Canada believes that the understanding of the right of self-determination is evolving to include
More informationTSILHQOT IN NATION v. BRITISH COLUMBIA: IS IT A GAME CHANGER IN CANADIAN ABORIGINAL TITLE LAW AND CROWN-INDIGENOUS RELATIONS?
TSILHQOT IN NATION v. BRITISH COLUMBIA: IS IT A GAME CHANGER IN CANADIAN ABORIGINAL TITLE LAW AND CROWN-INDIGENOUS RELATIONS? CONTENTS by Bradford W. Morse* I Introduction 65 II Background to the Decision
More informationTOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE SOURCE, PURPOSE, AND LIMITS OF THE DUTY
THE CROWN S DUTY TO CONSULT ABORIGINAL PEOPLES 821 THE CROWN S DUTY TO CONSULT ABORIGINAL PEOPLES: TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE SOURCE, PURPOSE, AND LIMITS OF THE DUTY CHRIS W SANDERSON, QC, KEITH B
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS
BRITISH COLUMBIA ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS Proposed Solutions / Desired Outcomes First Nations Crown Gathering January 24, 2012 BC Assembly of First Nations Proposed Solutions and Desired Outcomes First
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA) - and -
i' - I 1-1 1 YYV,/V 5 i rax!r IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA) No. 23801 lv.*&~%, BETWEEN: DONALD AND WILLIAM GLADSTONE - and - Appellants HER MAJESTY
More informationDISCUSSION PAPER INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION
DISCUSSION PAPER INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION TOPIC: Indigenous engagement and consultation. 1 CONTEXT: The National Energy Board (NEB) Modernization Panel (the Panel) has been asked to focus
More informationWHAT WE HEARD SO FAR
WHAT WE HEARD SO FAR National Engagement with Indigenous Peoples on the Recognition and Implementation of Indigenous Rights February-June 2018 ** Please note that all What we Heard statements included
More informationProposed Listuguj Canada Settlement Agreement: Frequently Asked Questions
Proposed Listuguj Canada Settlement Agreement: Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can you explain what type of Settlement this is? I ve heard it called a specific claim but I ve heard that some people say it
More informationQuincy, Please find comments from MNBC attached. Kind regards, Chris
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: Chris Gall Leung,Quincy [CEAA] Bailey, Scott EAO:EX; Bailie, Anna (NRCan/RNCan); dblack@kitimatclean.ca; dblack@blackpress.ca; Winfield- Lesk, Mellissa; Kim, Dennis;
More informationCases That Have Changed Society
Cases That Have Changed Society Many cases are started by individuals or groups, to respond to a particular event or to change a situation. The outcomes of these cases will often lead to changes in certain
More informationFramework for Aboriginal Rights
Framework for Aboriginal Rights This test will apply in the context of Aboriginal rights, Aboriginal title and claims to Self-government. Note: there is a modified test if Metis rights are involved AND
More informationInstitutional Development and Resource Development
Institutional Development and Resource Development The Case of Canada s Land Claims Agreements (Modern Treaties) Thierry Rodon, Université Laval ICASS IX, UMEA, 2017 The Debate Ongoing debate around the
More informationCriminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 (the Code ) Competition Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34
1 2 3 4 The power to legislate with respect to criminal law (except the constitution of the courts) is reserved to the federal government: 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867 (U.K.), 30 & 31 Vict., c.
More informationVia DATE: February 3, 2014
Via Email: sitecreview@ceaa-acee.gc.ca DATE: February 3, 2014 To: Joint Review Panel Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street, 22 nd Floor Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 British Columbia Environmental
More informationOVERVIEW OF A RECOGNITION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF INDIGENOUS RIGHTS FRAMEWORK
OVERVIEW OF A RECOGNITION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF INDIGENOUS RIGHTS FRAMEWORK Background The Government of Canada is committed to renewing the relationship with First Nations, Inuit and Métis based on the
More informationThe Attorney General of Quebec. Régent Sioui, Conrad Sioui, Georges Sioui and Hugues Sioui
R. v. Sioui, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1025 The Attorney General of Quebec v. Régent Sioui, Conrad Sioui, Georges Sioui and Hugues Sioui Appellant Respondents and The Attorney General of Canada and the National
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (Manitoba Court of Appeal) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (Supreme Court Act section 40 R.S., c.5-19, s.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (Manitoba Court of Appeal) File No. BETWEEN: ERNEST LIONEL JOSEPH BLAIS, - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, - and - MÉTIS NATIONAL COUNCIL, Applicant (Accused), Respondent (Informant),
More informationTaking Section 35 Rights Seriously: Non-derogation Clauses relating to Aboriginal and treaty rights
Taking Section 35 Rights Seriously: Non-derogation Clauses relating to Aboriginal and treaty rights Final Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs December 2007 MEMBERSHIP
More informationThe MacMillan Bloedel Settlement Agreement
The MacMillan Bloedel Settlement Agreement Submissions to Mr. David Perry Jessica Clogg, Staff Counsel West Coast Environmental Law JUNE 30, 1999 Introduction The following submissions build upon and clarify
More informationMIXED MESSAGES: THE APPLICATION OF FIDUCIARY PRINCIPLES TO THE CROWN-NATIVE RELATIONSHIP
MIXED MESSAGES: THE APPLICATION OF FIDUCIARY PRINCIPLES TO THE CROWN-NATIVE RELATIONSHIP Daniel Robinson Bachelor of Arts, University College of the Cariboo, 2000 RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL
More informationUNDRIP: Lands, Territories & Resources and the Indigenous Forests in Canada
UNDRIP: Lands, Territories & Resources and the Indigenous Forests in Canada By Russell Diabo NAFA National Meeting on Indigenous Forest Certainty March 8, 2018, Stolen Algonquin Territory (Gatineau, Quebec)
More informationCOMMENTARIES TSILHQOT IN NATION V. BRITISH COLUMBIA: ABORIGINAL TITLE AND SECTION Introduction
COMMENTARIES TSILHQOT IN NATION V. BRITISH COLUMBIA: ABORIGINAL TITLE AND SECTION 35 1. Introduction The headline result of Tsilhqot in Nation v. British Columbia 1 is that the Supreme Court of Canada
More informationChapter 11. Legal Resources. Primary and Secondary Sources of Law
161 Chapter 11 Legal Resources This chapter provides an introduction to legal resources. It includes information on Canadian primary legal sources (case law and legislation) and secondary legal sources
More informationNews Release. For Immediate Release: January 23, 2012
For Immediate Release: January 23, 2012 News Release British Columbia First Nations Leaders are looking ahead to First Nations/Crown Gathering on January 24, 2012 507-100 Park Royal South West Vancouver,
More information