UKRAINIAN NATIONALISM IN THE POST -STALIN ERA

Transcription

1 UKRAINIAN NATIONALISM IN THE POST -STALIN ERA

2 STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY HISTORY Volume 4 1. Rupieper, Hermann J. The Cuno Government and Reparations : Politics and Economics. 1979, viii ISBN Hirshfield, Claire. The Diplomacy oj Partition: Britain, France and the Creation oj Nigeria , viii ISBN Kacewicz, George V. Great Britain, the Soviet Union and the Polish Government in Exile , xv ISBN

3 UKRAINIAN NATIONALISM IN THE POST -STALIN ERA Myth, Symbols and Ideology in Soviet Nationalities Policy KENNETH C. FARMER Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin II 1980 MARTINUS NIJHOFF PUBLISHERS THE HAGUE / BOSTON / LONDON

4 Distributors: for the United States and Canada K1uwer Boston, Inc. 160 Old Derby Street Hingham, MA USA for all other countries Kluwer Academic Publishers Group Distribution Center P.O. Box AH Dordrecht The Netherlands Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Farmer, Kenneth C. Ukrainian Nationalism in the Post-Stalin Era. (Studies in Contemporary History - 4) Bibliography: p. Includes index. I. Ukraine--politics and government Nationalism--Ukraine. 3. Russia--ethnic relations. i. Title. ii. Series. DKS08.8.F '4' ISBN-13: e-isbn-13: : / Cover design: Martin Mol Copyright 1980 by Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, P. O. Box 566, 2501 CN The Hague, The Netherlands.

5 GLENDOWER: HOTSPUR: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare Henry IV

6 PREFACE It is a truism that, with only a few notable exceptions, western scholars only belatedly turned their attention to the phenomenon of minority nationalism in the USSR. In the last two decades, however, the topic has increasingly occupied the attention of specialists on the Soviet Union, not only because its depths and implications have not yet been adequately plumbed, but also because it is clearly a potentially explosive problem for the Soviet system itself. The problem that minority nationalism poses is perceived rather differently at the "top" of Soviet society than at the "bottom." The elite views - or at least rationalizes - the problem through the lens of Marxism-Leninism, which explains nationalist sentiment as a part of the "superstructure," a temporary phenomenon that will disappear in the course of building communism. That it has not done so is a primary source of concern for the Soviet leadership, who do not seem to understand it and do not wish to accept its reality. This is based on a fallacious conceptualization of ethnic nationalism as determined wholly by external, or objective, factors and therefore subject to corrective measures. In terms of origins, it is believed to be the result of past oppression and discrimination; it is thus seen as a negative attitudinal set the essence of which lies in tangible, rather than psychological, factors. Below the level of the leadership, however, ethnic nationalism reflects entrenched identifications and meanings which lend continuity and authenticity to human existence. The nationality probzem is experienced as discrimination against national languages and cultures, and the domination of cultural and political life by Russians Minority nation-

7 VIII alism thus has both a psychological and a substantive base, and regime policies (and their unintended side-effects) reinforce it rather than hasten its demise. The Ukraine - because of its size and certain historical realities - is a barometer of minority nationalist discontent in the Soviet Union. The Soviet regime appears to be particularly interested in specifically Ukrainian loyalty to the Soviet idea. For this reason, the study of minority nationalism and nationalities policy in the Soviet Union must always begin with the study of Ukrainian nationalism. This study has a two-fold purpose: to provide a history of Ukrainian nationalism in the period from Khrushchev's consolidation of power to the demise of Petro Shelest - and simultaneously, to develop and employ a conceptual framework useful for the study of a subject such as nationalism which is fraught with subjectivities, and in the context of a notoriously data-scarce society. This framework is symbolic politics, and the study of the manipulation of the myths and symbols which inform ideological discourse. In the transliteration of Russian and Ukrainian words and proper names, I have employed a modified Library of Congress system, omitting diacritical marks. For the names of individuals, I have employed Russian spellings for the names of Russians, and Ukrainian spellings for Ukrainians. I have departed from this convention for those names which through usage have acquired a standard English spelling: Dzyuba, Podgorny, Hrushevsky, etc. with the exception of the city and oblast of Kiev and the oblast of Crimea, I have made it a point to employ the Ukrainian spellings of Ukrainian place-names, which seems only proper. Where the Ukrainian spelling differs markedly from the Russian, the Russian version appears in parentheses upon the first appearance of the place-name in the text. Any scholarly effort is in the final analysis a collective endeavor. While reserving responsibility entirely to myself for its shortcomings, I am endebted to numerous individuals and institutions for aid and advice in the

8 IX course of this study. Professor John A. Armstrong, who guided the dissertation out of which this study grew, not only provided the initial stimulus, but an abiding example of scholarly integrity and straightforwardness. Professors Murray Edelman, Ellen Seidensticker, Melvin Croan, and Michael B. Pet:rovich, all of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Professor Mary McAuley of the University of Essex, were generous with their time and kind with their moral support. Portions of this work were read at various times by Dr. Walter Dushnyck, and Professors Yaroslav Bilinsky, Stephan Horak, and John Kress; I am grateful to them for their comments and criticisms without, to be sure, implicating them in the final product. The University of Wisconsin Graduate School provided travel funds. I am also indebted to the Center for Slavic and East European Studies at the Ohio State University for taking time to help me locate materials. Finally, the Research Department of Radio Liberty in Munich, West Germany, was patient and generous during my stay there, and provided access to materials without which this study could not have been done. I wish gratefully to acknowledge the contribution in terms of their time and knowledge of the following individuals: John Basarab, Ilia Belau, Mariia Belau, Albert Boiter, Keith Bush, Peter Dornan, Christian Duevel, Natalia Gorbanevskaia, Mykola Hoffman, Olga Kannabykh, Suzanne Kilner-Frank, Israel Kleyner, Ivan Koshelivets, Anatoly Levitin-Krasnov, Borys Lewytzkyj, Viktor Nekrasov, Leonid Plyushch, Rewenna Rebet, Fatima Salkazanova, and Tatiana Zhytnykova-Plyushch. Major portions of Chapter 4 of this book were published as "Language and Linguistic Nationalism in the Ukraine," in NationaLities Papers, Vol. VI, No. 2(Fall, 1978). Portions of Chapter 5 were published in two installments as "Ukrainian Dissent: Symbolic Politics and Sociodemographic Aspects," in The Ukrainian Quarterly, Vol. XXXIV, Nos. 1 and 2(Spring and Summer, 1978). I am grateful to the editors of these

9 x journals for permission to use these materials here. My wife, Jill, assisted me in many ways in all phases of the research and writing of this study; a stern critic, she has also been - and remains - an unfailing source of encouragement and support. Mi~waukee, May 1980

10 CONTENTS PREFACE VII I. INTRODUCTION: APPROACH AND CONCEPTUALIZATION 1 Ukrainian Nationalism 4 Western Scholarly Writings on the Soviet Nationalities Problem and the Ukraine 7 An Analytical Framework 23 II. IDEOLOGY AND MYTH: SOVIET NATIONALITIES POLICY 36 The Myth of Proletarian Internationalism The Myth of Proletarian Internationalism in Flux, Conclusions III. CULTURE AND SYMBOLISM: THE MYTH OF NATIONAL MORAL PATRIMONY 78 Socialist Realism and National Cultural Revival 78 Culture and Historiographic Nationalism 90 The Ambiguity of National Symbols: Establishment Intellectuals and the Crystallization of the Dissent Movement 95 Symbols of the National Patrimony in Popular Culture 109 Conclusions 121 IV. SYMBOLISM AND STATUS: THE UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE 122 The Language Question in Official Nationalities Policy 124 Present Status of the Ukrainian Language 127 Controversy over Language in the Soviet Ukraine 133 Conclusions V. SYMBOLIC ACTION: NATIONALIST OPPOSITION AND REGIME RESPONSE Structural and Programmatic Characteristics of Ukrainian National Dissidence Demographic Breakdown of Dissidence Strategies and Tactics of the Dissidents Regime Response to Nationalist Dissidence Conclusions VI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS BIBLIOGRAPHY INDEX

11 Belorussian SSR Poland ~ : I I \ I 11 \ / :, I 1 4 " : \.,J"", J I '"_''''''',./ A... 7 \ " '_',: "... T'."" I 12 L, ",-r- I,,-, I,', 18 I ~--, :', J, {.. :. r '., -- : L 22, r I 5 I I... ' 13 I,_"",",,,_. ', J,," \'-'I, \," '" 10 \',_-..,, _'y'''' ""_~, " 6 '.-.. C.- \,'-' \' ~. 14, I.. 19 I 23. I.. 9)-l...,",_ ' '. I If -A'-.."... <, "v-c.,...\ \..., \ " ~----f 24 Rumania ' " ' I '16 I \ ~ " 1.0,_ RSFSR Sea OBLASTS OF THE UKRAINIAN SSR 1. Yolyn 2. L'viv 3. Zakarpattia 4. Rivne 5. Ternopil' 6. Ivano-Frankivs'k 7. Zhytomyr 8. Khmel'nyts'kyi 9. Chernivtsi 10. Vinnytsia 11. Chernihiv 12. Kiev 13. Cherkasy 14. Kirovohrad 15. Odesa 16. Myko1aiiv 17. Sumy 18. Po1tava 19. Dnipropetrovs'k 20. Kherson 21. Crimea 22. Kharkiv 23. Donets'k 24. Zaporizhzhia 25. Yoroshilovhrad I I