Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
|
|
- Daniella Barker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PHILIP ZOPPI, : NO. 3:02CV-1619 (AWT) Plaintiff, : V. : CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE : TROOPER PERRY WILSON and : CONNECTICUT STATE POLICE : SERGEANT ROBERT BRENNAN, : Defendants. : JANUARY 8, 2007 DEFENDANT S INPUT TO AMENDED JOINT PRE-TRIAL MEMORANDUM In accordance with the Standing Order Regarding Trial Memoranda in Civil Cases, the defendants hereby offer the following pre-trial memorandum: 1. TRIAL COUNSEL: For the Defendants: Stephen R. Sarnoski Assistant Attorney General MacKenzie Hall 110 Sherman Street Hartford, Connecticut Tel. (860) stephen.sarnoski@po.state.ct.us 2. JURISDICTION: The jurisdiction of the court is invoked under the provisions of Sections 1331, 1343(3) and 1367(a) of Title 28, and Sections 1983 and 1988 of Title 42 of the United States Code.
2 Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 2 of 9 3. JURY/NON-JURY: The plaintiff has claimed a trial by jury of all issues raised in his complaint. 4. NATURE OF CASE: This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C by the plaintiff, Philip Zoppi, against the defendants, Connecticut State Police Trooper Perry Wilson and Sergeant Robert Brennan, in both their individual and official capacities. This lawsuit arises out of a March 17, 2002 incident in which the plaintiff was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs on Interstate 95 in the Town of Westport, Connecticut. Following his arrest, the plaintiff was brought to the State Police barracks at Bridgeport, Connecticut, where, he claims, troopers stole approximately $ from his wallet, and illegally detained him overnight despite the fact that he posted a $500 surety bond. In his complaint dated December 31, 2002, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants acts violated his federal constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution by subjecting him to false imprisonment. In addition, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants acts violated his rights under Article First, 8 and 9 of the Connecticut Constitution, and constituted false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil theft under Connecticut common law. In recompense for his injuries, the plaintiff seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorneys fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C STIPULATIONS OF FACT AND LAW: a. At all times relevant to this lawsuit, the defendants were acting in their official capacities as Connecticut State Police troopers, under color of state law. b. The plaintiff s arrest for driving while under the influence of alcohol was supported by probable cause. 2
3 Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 3 of 9 6. PLAINTIFF S CONTENTIONS: 7. DEFENDANT S CONTENTIONS: The defendants contend that all of their actions with regard to the plaintiff were constitutionally reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, and did not violate state constitutional or common law. They claim that probable cause existed to support the arrest of the plaintiff. The defendants contend that they are entitled to absolute immunity for their actions in setting and adjusting the conditions of bond regarding the plaintiff s release. See Bryant v. City of New York, 404 F.3d 128 (2nd Cir. 2005); Clynch v. Chapman, 285 F.Supp.2d 213 (D.Conn. 2003). Further, the defendants claim that they are entitled to qualified immunity for their actions in arresting and detaining the plaintiff pending his appearance in court. 8. LEGAL ISSUES: a. Whether there existed probable cause to support the arrest of the plaintiff; b. Whether the actions of the defendants constituted the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress under Connecticut common law; c. Whether the actions of the defendants constituted the tort of civil theft under Connecticut common law; and d. Whether the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity for their actions. 9. VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS: See Tab A attached to this memorandum. 10. LIST OF WITNESSES: 3
4 Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 4 of 9 a. Officer Christopher Proudfoot, Westport Police Department, 50 Jesup Road, Westport, Connecticut. Officer Proudfoot first encountered the plaintiff on patrol and pulled his vehicle to the roadside. He will testify as to his training and experience as a police officer, and will describe his actions, observations made and conclusions reached during the course of the Zoppi investigation. He will also authenticate portions of the police investigative report to support its admission as an exhibit in this case. b. Officer Craig Kupson, Westport Police Department, 50 Jesup Road, Westport, Connecticut. Officer Proudfoot first encountered the plaintiff on patrol and pulled his vehicle to the roadside. He will testify as to his training and experience as a police officer, and will describe his actions, observations made and conclusions reached during the course of the Zoppi investigation. He will also authenticate portions of the police investigative report to support its admission as an exhibit in this case. c. Trooper Perry Wilson, Connecticut State Police, 1111 Country Club Road, Middletown, Connecticut. Trooper Wilson was the first Connecticut State Police trooper on the scene of the Zoppi investigation and, ultimately, was assigned as the case officer. He will testify as to his training and experience as a State Police Trooper, and will describe his actions, observations made and conclusions reached during the Zoppi investigation. He will also authenticate portions of the police investigative report to support its admission as an exhibit in this case. d. Trooper Thomas Kiely, Connecticut State Police, 1111 Country Club Road, Middletown, Connecticut. Along with Trooper Wilson, Trooper Kiely was the first Connecticut State Police trooper on the scene of the Zoppi investigation and was assigned to conduct field 4
5 Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 5 of 9 sobriety tests upon the plaintiff. He will testify as to his training and experience as a State Police Trooper, and will describe his actions, observations made and conclusions reached during the Zoppi investigation. He will also authenticate portions of the police investigative report to support its admission as an exhibit in this case. e. Trooper Joseph Bukowski, Connecticut State Police, 1111 Country Club Road, Middletown, Connecticut. Trooper Bukowski assisted in processing the plaintiff during the course of his arrest and detention at the Bridgeport State Police barracks. He will testify as to his training and experience as a State Police Trooper, and will describe his actions, observations made and conclusions reached during the Zoppi investigation. He will also authenticate portions of the police investigative report to support its admission as an exhibit in this case. f. Sergeant Robert Brennan, Connecticut State Police, 1111 Country Club Road, Middletown, Connecticut. Sergeant Brennan was the on-duty supervisor at the time of the plaintiff s arrest, processing and detention. Sergeant Brennan set the plaintiff s bond in accordance with established State Police procedure. He will testify as to his training and experience as a State Police Sergeant, and will describe his actions, observations made and conclusions reached during the Zoppi investigation. He will also authenticate portions of the police investigative report to support its admission as an exhibit in this case. 11. EXHIBITS: D-1. Connecticut State Police Investigative Report #G D-2. Connecticut State Police Investigative Report #G D-3. State of Connecticut, Department of Public Safety, Personal Property Inventory & Prisoner Processing Form for Philip Zoppi, Case No. G
6 Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 6 of DEPOSITION TESTIMONY: None anticipated. 13. REQUESTS FOR JURY INSTRUCTIONS: See Tab B attached to this memorandum. 14. ANTICIPATED EVIDENTIARY PROBLEMS: The defendants make the following objections to the testimony of the plaintiff's witnesses listed below: a. Philip Zoppi: The defendant objects to the plaintiff s proffered testimony concerning his activities prior to his encounters with the defendants and other members of law enforcement during his arrest and subsequent confinement at the Connecticut State Police Barracks, Troop G, Bridgeport. The plaintiff s activities prior to the night of his arrest, and his interaction with other members of law enforcement apart from the defendants at other places and times, are irrelevant to the issues in this lawsuit. Finally, the plaintiff s proffered testimony with regard to prior conflicts with the defendants is irrelevant. This is a Fourth Amendment action. The question before the court is whether the defendants actions in arresting and detaining the plaintiff were objectively reasonable. Their subjective motivation for arresting and detaining the plaintiff is irrelevant. b. Timothy Gay: The defendant objects to the testimony of this witness in that he was not disclosed as a potential witness by the plaintiff in response to the defendants interrogatories and requests for production. Moreover, his proffered testimony concerning his observations of the activities at Troop G while he was there for the purpose of bonding out the plaintiff, to the extent that they do not relate to the defendants, are not relevant to this action. c. Eileen Zoppi: The defendant objects to the proffered testimony regarding this witness encounters at Troop G with members of law enforcement during the plaintiff s 6
7 Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 7 of 9 confinement at Troop G. This is a Fourth Amendment action. The question before the court is whether there existed probable cause to support the arrest and detention of the plaintiff. The witness encounters with troopers at the barracks following the plaintiff s arrest, whatever their nature, are not relevant to this inquiry. Moreover, to the extent that such encounters were of a conversational nature, they are impermissible hearsay. d. Domenick Perry: The defendants object to the proffered witness testimony concerning his knowledge of a prior conflict between the defendants and the plaintiff. This is a Fourth Amendment action. The question before the court is whether the defendants actions in arresting and detaining the plaintiff were objectively reasonable. Their subjective motivation for arresting and detaining the plaintiff is irrelevant. e. Albert J. Zoppi: The defendant objects to the proffered testimony regarding this witness encounters at Troop G with members of law enforcement while attempting to secure bail for the plaintiff at Troop G following his arrest. This is a Fourth Amendment action. The question before the court is whether there existed probable cause to support the arrest and detention of the plaintiff. The witness encounters with troopers at the barracks following the plaintiff s arrest, whatever their nature, are not relevant to this inquiry. Moreover, to the extent that such encounters were of a conversational nature, they are impermissible hearsay. Finally, this witness testimony concerning the physical and emotional changes experienced by the plaintiff after his arrest are merely cumulative of the testimony of the plaintiff s wife, Eileen Zoppi. f. John Mullin, Esq.: The defendant objects to the proffered testimony of this witness concerning his conversations with the plaintiff and members of law enforcement, other than the 7
8 Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 8 of 9 defendants, during a telephone call while plaintiff was confined at Troop G. Such testimony is impermissible hearsay. Finally, this witness testimony concerning the physical and emotional changes experienced by the plaintiff after his arrest are merely cumulative of the testimony of the plaintiff s wife, Eileen Zoppi. g. Faye Ahmadian, M.D.: The defendants object to the testimony of this witness as they have been unable to obtain from her the plaintiff s medical records related to his treatment for conditions which he claims are related to this lawsuit. The witness no longer practices at the address provided by the plaintiff, and the defendants have been otherwise unable to locate this individual. The Connecticut Department of Public Health has no medical practitioner licensed under this name. 15. PROPOSED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Not applicable to jury trials. 16. TRIAL TIME: The defendants estimate that trial of this matter, exclusive of jury selection will require three (3) days. 17. FURTHER PROCEEDINGS: None anticipated. 18. ELECTION FOR TRIAL BY MAGISTRATE: None made, however, the defendants do not object to trial before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. 19. OTHER MATTERS: A. PROPOSED JURY INTERROGATORIES: See Tab C attached to this memorandum. B. PROPOSED OPENING STATEMENT: None requested. 8
9 Case 3:02-cv AWT Document 39 Filed 01/08/2007 Page 9 of 9 DEFENDANTS Perry Wilson and Robert Brennan RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTORNEY GENERAL By: Stephen R. Sarnoski Assistant Attorney General MacKenzie Hall 110 Sherman Street Hartford, Connecticut Tel: (860) Federal Bar #ct stephen.sarnoski@po.state.ct.us CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on January 8, 2007, a copy of foregoing notice was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent by to all parties by operation of the Court s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court s system. Philip Russell, Esq. 71 Lewis Street Greenwich, Connecticut /s/ Stephen Sarnoski Assistant Attorney General 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT Federal Bar #ct stephen.sarnoski@po.state.ct.us Tel.: (860) Fax: (860)
Case 3:01-cv TPS Document 65 Filed 09/03/2004 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:01-cv-01589-TPS Document 65 Filed 09/03/2004 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOSE GALAZO : NO.: 3:01-CV-01589 (DJS)(TPS) Plaintiff, vs. : CITY OF WATERBURY, ET
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 STEVEN EDWARDS, v. Plaintiff, A. DESFOSSES, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff Steven Edwards is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this
More informationCase 3:02-cv AVC Document 47 Filed 04/15/2005 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:02-cv-00041-AVC Document 47 Filed 04/15/2005 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT KIMBERLY GILBERT : Plaintiff, : : v. : CASE NUMBER: 3:02CV41 (AVC) : EAST HARTFORD
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Kokoska v. Hartford et al Doc. 132 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PHILIP KOKOSKA Plaintiff, v. No. 3:12-cv-01111 (WIG) CITY OF HARTFORD, et al. Defendants. RULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTIONS
More information2:13-mj DUTY Doc # 16 Filed 08/13/13 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 256 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:13-mj-30484-DUTY Doc # 16 Filed 08/13/13 Pg 1 of 13 Pg ID 256 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Criminal Case No. 13-30484
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 JESSE WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. R. SAMUELS, Defendant. Case No.: :-cv-00-sab (PC ORDER REGARDING PARTIES MOTIONS IN LIMINE [ECF Nos. 0 & 0]
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:15-cv-01061 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN TAPIA and FELIPE HERNANDEZ, ) No. ) Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:02-cv-00458-MRK Document 43 Filed 10/08/2004 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DAISY CHAVEZ, : DOCKET NO. 3:02CV458 (MRK) Plaintiff : : v. : : THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
More informationCOMPLAINT. The Plaintiff, Marie Menard, brings this civil action for violation of her rights secured
RETURN DATE: August 16, 2011 MARIE MENARD Plaintiff v. SUPERIOR COURT J. D. OF FAIRFIELD At BRIDGEPORT STRATFORD BOARD OF EDUCATION, IRENE CORNISH (Official and Individual Capacity) Defendants JULY 18,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Foxx v. Knoxville Police Department et al (TWP1) Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE BRANDON ALLEN FOXX, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 3:16-CV-154 ) Judge Phillips
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY Plaintiff(s, Case No. v. Division 3 Defendant(s. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER Now on this day of, 20, this matter is called and
More informationCase: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1
Case: 3:12-cv-02380-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ALFONSO VASQUEZ-PALAFOX, ) ) No. Plaintiff, )
More informationINDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS
INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE DEBORAH A. BATTS Nothing in my Individual Practices supersedes a specific time period for filing a motion specified by statute or Federal Rule including but not limited to
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Destiny Payne, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:17-cv-01769 ) City of St. Louis, Vernon Betts, ) Charlene Deeken, Kimberly
More informationINDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk
July 23, 2013 INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge Chambers Courtroom Deputy Clerk United States Courthouse Ms. Gina Sicora 300 Quarropas Street (914) 390-4178
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:02-cv-02136-AVC Document 31 Filed 08/03/2004 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT HERBERT L. MITCHELL : NO. 3:02CV2136(AVC) Plaintiff : V. : : MAURICE L. COLLIN, : TASI
More informationCase 3:01-cv MRK Document 88 Filed 05/14/2004 Page 1 of 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:01-cv-00211-MRK Document 88 Filed 05/14/2004 Page 1 of 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ESTATE OF RITA GENECIN, by : VICTOR GENECIN, Personal : Representative, : Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:01-cv AWT Document 143 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : :
Case 301-cv-02402-AWT Document 143 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PETER D. MAINS and LORI M. MAINS Plaintiffs, v. SEA RAY BOATS, INC. Defendant. CASE
More informationCase 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17
Case 3:12-cv-05987 Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA LASHONN WHITE, Plaintiff, vs. No. COMPLAINT CITY OF TACOMA, RYAN KOSKOVICH,
More information4:15-cv TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
4:15-cv-11949-TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 DOMINIQUE RONDEAU, individually; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION -v- Plaintiff, No. Hon. DETROIT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. No. CV JH/DJS NOTICE
CECILIA VALDEZ, et al., IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Plaintiff(s), vs. No. CV 09-668 JH/DJS MARY HERRERA, et al., Defendant(s) NOTICE BY DIRECTION OF THE HONORABLE
More informationCase 3:02-cv MRK Document 44 Filed 07/23/2004 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:02-cv-01474-MRK Document 44 Filed 07/23/2004 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT RICHARD J. ELDERKIN : and LUIS MAIA : : VS. : NO. 3:02CV1474(MRK) : PATRICK BONA, :
More informationCase 3:09-cr JAJ-TJS Document 17 Filed 11/25/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
Case 3:09-cr-00117-JAJ-TJS Document 17 Filed 11/25/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Criminal No. 3:09-cr-117 Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
Case 1:10-cv-03827-NLH -KMW Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 1 of 19 PageD: 1 Edward Barocas, Esq. (EB8251) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION P.O. Box 32159 Newark, New Jersey 07102
More informationCase 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Case 4:08-cv-00364-SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BRETT DARROW, Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. Cause No.
More informationCase 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423
Case 3:16-cv-00625-CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE INSIGHT KENTUCKY PARTNERS II, L.P. vs. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON
More information* IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT * * * *
NKEMAKONAM OBINEME 1731 E. Lombard Street Baltimore, MD 21230 IN THE iug SF:P 29 PH,(}! 26 CIRCUIT COURT v. Plaintiff, WINFRED MURPHY 242 W. 29th Street Baltimore, Maryland 21211, and JOI-IN DOE 242 W.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
,.," Case 2:10-cv-00258-RWS Document 1 Filed 12/07/10 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION DR. JOESPH S. MOSES, JR., Plaintiff, Civil Action
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:10-cv-00279-JNE-JJK Document 3 Filed 03/04/10 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Derryl M. Jenkins, v. Plaintiff, Richard Walker, George Warzinik, Michael Honeycutt,
More informationCharles Texter v. Todd Merlina
2009 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-26-2009 Charles Texter v. Todd Merlina Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-2020 Follow
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION JUDGE:
Case 3:09-cv-01264-RGJ-KLH Document 1 Filed 07/29/09 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION RENEE STRINGER Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO: JUDGE: WESLEY
More informationCase4:07-cv PJH Document1171 Filed05/29/12 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:0-cv-0-PJH Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 ORACLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, No. C 0- PJH v. FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER SAP AG, et al.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL
Case 2:15-cv-07503-MWF-JC Document 265 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:9800 Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge Deputy Clerk: Rita Sanchez Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
More informationLEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007
LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 COMMUNICATIONS For questions concerning general calendar matters, call the Deputy Clerk, Mr. Andrew
More informationCourthouse News Service
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X JANE DOE, -against- Plaintiff, COUNTY OF ULSTER, ULSTER COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT,
More information2:15-cv PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:15-cv-10547-PDB-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 02/11/15 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 Timothy Davis and Hatema Davis, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN
More information) Cause No. 1:14-cv-937-WTL-DML. motions are fully briefed and the Court, being duly advised, resolves them as set forth below.
SCHEIDLER v. STATE OF INDIANA Doc. 88 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION BRENDA LEAR SCHEIDLER, Plaintiff, vs. STATE OF INDIANA, Defendant. Cause No. 1:14-cv-937-WTL-DML
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS March 2, 2012 TERESA W. HAYWOOD, ET AL.
Present: All the Justices JENNIFER BING v. Record No. 102270 OPINION BY JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS March 2, 2012 TERESA W. HAYWOOD, ET AL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY R. Bruce Long, Judge
More informationPlaintiff, Willie Nevius, a resident of North Carolina, by way of complaint against the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY WILLIE NEVIUS, : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : Docket No. : vs. : : : COMPLAINT NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE ; : JOSEPH FUENTES, IN HIS OFFICIAL : CAPACITY
More informationThird, it should provide for the orderly admission of evidence.
REPORT The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, most state rules, and many judges authorize or require the parties to prepare final pretrial submissions that will set the parameters for how the trial will
More informationCase 1:10-cr LEK Document 393 Filed 06/04/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1524
Case 1:10-cr-00384-LEK Document 393 Filed 06/04/12 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1524 FLORENCE T. NAKAKUNI #2286 United States Attorney District of Hawaii BEVERLY WEE SAMESHIMA #2556 Chief, Drug and Organized
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1
Case: 1:15-cv-00720 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MALIA KIM BENDIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. )
More informationINDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON
Revised 10/24/05 INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES OF JUDGE LOUIS L. STANTON Unless otherwise ordered by Judge Stanton, matters before Judge Stanton shall be conducted in accordance with the following practices: 1.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT LARRY MASON; individually and : on behalf of a class similarly situated; : MODESTO RODRIGUEZ; : individually and on behalf of a class : CIVIL ACTION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Case 1:12-cv-01118-JMS-DML Document 35 37 Filed 11/30/12 12/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 263 308 MARIE FRITZINGER, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
More informationCase 3:09-cv AWT Document 150 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:09-cv-00690-AWT Document 150 Filed 04/17/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DEBORAH MAHON, ) on behalf of herself and all others similarly ) situated, )
More informationJoseph Ollie v. James Brown
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-2-2014 Joseph Ollie v. James Brown Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 13-4597 Follow this
More informationMEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS. The defendant, Sean M. McHugh, submits this memorandum of law in support of his
MMX-17-CV-5009315-S : SUPERIOR COURT : MCHUGH, CHAPMAN & VARGAS, : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LLC : : VS. : MIDDLESEX AT MIDDLETOWN : SEAN M. MCHUGH : JUNE 20, 2017 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-28-2007 Byrd v. Philadelphia Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-3894 Follow this and
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Plaintiff, Defendants.
[YOUR NAME] [YOUR ADDRESS] Telephone: [YOUR PHONE NUMBER] [YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS] Fax: [YOUR FAX NUMBER] STATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1 1 1 1 1, a [single/married man/woman], v. Plaintiff,
More informationINDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES. Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge
INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR CIVIL CASES Lorna G. Schofield United States District Judge Mailing Address: United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV )
Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 290 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. No. 13-10200-GAO ) DZHOKHAR TSARNAEV ) MOTION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PETER M. WILLIAMSON, State Bar # 0 WILLIAMSON & KRAUSS Panay Way, Suite One Marina del Rey, CA 0 () - Attorneys for Plaintiff ANTHONY MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 MIKE BAKER, Plaintiff, v. S. CACOA, et al., Defendants. Case No.: 1:1-cv-00-AWI-BAM (PC ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO STAY SUMMARY
More informationCase: 3:17-cv GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/31/17 Page: 1 of 9 - Page ID#: 1
Case: 3:17-cv-00061-GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/31/17 Page: 1 of 9 - Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION Electronically Filed ALBERT JONES, Plaintiff Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION KIRK CHRZANOWSKI, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 12 CV 50020 ) LOUIS A. BIANCHI, individually and in ) Judge: his
More informationIn re: CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, Debtor. Case No Chapter 9. Case Filed 10/23/12 Doc 587
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 34 MARC A. LEVINSON (STATE BAR NO. 57613) malevinson@orrick.com NORMAN C. HILE (STATE BAR NO. 57299) nhile@orrick.com JOHN W. KILLEEN (STATE BAR NO. 258395) jkilleen@orrick.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Way et al v. Rutherford et al Doc. 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION CURTIS ANTONIO WAY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:08-cv-1005-J-34TEM JOHN H. RUTHERFORD, etc.;
More information11/9/2017 9:48 AM 17CV48960 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES. Case No.
11/9/2017 9:48 AM 17CV48960 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF DESCHUTES 8 MELISSA GOTTLIEB, an individual, and A.G., a minor, by and through his natural 9 parent
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-0-awi-sko Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Victor J. Otten (SBN 00) vic@ottenandjoyce.com OTTEN & JOYCE, LLP 0 Pacific Coast Hwy, Suite 00 Torrance, California 00 Phone: (0) - Fax: (0) - Donald
More informationCase 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:15-cv-80521-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JEAN PAVLOV, individually and as Personal Representative
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case Case 2:08-cv-02695-STA-tmp 2:08-zz-09999 Document Document 806 1 Filed Filed 10/15/2008 Page Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/29/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:18-cv-05946 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/29/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TAD JOHNSON and CHARLENE JOHNSON, Plaintiffs, vs. Case
More informationCase 1:17-cv RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION)
Case 1:17-cv-00628-RDB Document 1 Filed 03/06/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (NORTHERN DIVISION) DELVON L. KING * 2021 Brooks Drive District Heights, MD
More informationRULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)
RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011) TITLE I. INTRODUCTION Rule 1. Title and Scope of Rules; Definitions. 2. Seal. TITLE II. APPEALS FROM JUDGMENTS AND
More informationCase 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION
Case 2:10-cv-01141-HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION VERSUS CITY OF COVINGTON, RICHARD PALMISANO, JACK WEST,
More informationCase 3:01-cv RNC Document 45 Filed 09/13/2004 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:01-cv-01632-RNC Document 45 Filed 09/13/2004 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT KEITH WORTZ : Docket No. 3:01CV01632 (RNC) VS. : MELVIN WEARING : SEPTEMBER 13, 2004
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION
Doe v. Corrections Corporation of America et al Doc. 72 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JANE DOE, ET AL., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) NO. 3:15-cv-68
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. July 31, 2000 I. INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MICHAEL ELBERY, Pro Se Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 97-11047-PBS JAMES HESTER Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER July 31, 2000 Saris, U.S.D.J. I. INTRODUCTION
More informationINTRODUCTION. 1. This is an action, filed pursuant to U.S. Const. Amend. XIV, Title 42
8:17-cv-00280-JFB-CRZ Doc # 9 Filed: 08/01/17 Page 1 of 10 - Page ID # 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BRIENNE SPLITTGERBER ) CASE NO: 8:17-cv-280 ) Plaintiff, ) ) AMENDED
More informationCase 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION
Case 5:17-cv-00007 Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION MARCEL C. NOTZON, III, Individually vs. CAUSE NO. CITY
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 216 Filed: 03/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1811
Case: 1:13-cv-01851 Document #: 216 Filed: 03/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1811 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BASSIL ABDELAL, Plaintiff, v. No. 13 C 1851 CITY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 18, 2003 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 18, 2003 Session ELLA BARBEE, ET AL. v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lauderdale County No. 5470 Joseph
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES GENERAL
Case 2:13-cv-01615-MWF-AN Document 112 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:1347 Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, U.S. District Judge Deputy Clerk: Rita Sanchez Attorneys Present for Plaintiff:
More informationCase 1:12-cv RPM Document 24 Filed 03/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:12-cv-00395-RPM Document 24 Filed 03/06/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-CV-00395-RPM-MEH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-WYD-CBS STEVEN HOWARDS, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO VIRGIL D. GUS REICHLE, JR., in his individual and official capacity,
More informationCase 2:12-cv APG-VCF Document 8 Filed 02/08/13 Page 1 of 9 DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00-apg-vcf Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 OPP SIGAL CHATTAH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No.: LAW OFFICES OF SIGAL CHATTAH S. Rainbow Blvd. #0 Las Vegas, Nevada Tel: (0 0-00 Fax:(0 - Attorney for Plaintiff
More informationCase 3:03-cv JCH Document 100 Filed 06/24/2005 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendant.
Case 3:03-cv-00986-JCH Document 100 Filed 06/24/2005 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SUSAN E. WOOD, v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:03-CV-986 (JCH) SEMPRA ENERGY TRADING
More informationPatterson v. School Dist U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10245; (E.D. PA 2000)
Opinion Clarence C. Newcomer, S.J. Patterson v. School Dist. 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10245; (E.D. PA 2000) MEMORANDUM Presently before the Court are defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment and plaintiff's
More informationCriminal Law Table of Contents
Criminal Law Table of Contents Attorney - Client Relations Legal Services Retainer Agreement - Hourly Fee Appearance of Counsel Waiver of Conflict of Interest Letter Declining Representation Motion to
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Angel Cruz v. No. 1748 C.D. 2015 Argued October 17, 2016 Police Officers MaDonna, Robert E. Peachey, and Christopher McCue Appeal of Police Officer Robert E. Peachey
More informationCase 3:14-cv MLC-DEA Document 6 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 30
Case 314-cv-04104-MLC-DEA Document 6 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 30 F. MICHAEL DAILY, JR., LLC ATTORNEY ID #011151974 ATTORNEY AT LAW 216 Haddon Avenue Sentry Office Plaza Suite 106 Westmont, New
More informationCase 3:03-cv RNC Document 32 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendants.
Case 3:03-cv-00252-RNC Document 32 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 7 WILLIAM SPECTOR IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION LLC C.A. NO. 3:03-CV-00252
More informationCase 6:17-cv JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Case 6:17-cv-02138-JA-GJK Document 1 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION CINDY LEE OSORIO, on behalf of herself and others similarly
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE. JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13. CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13 CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE SANTA ANA, CA 92701
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. v. : CRIMINAL NO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : CRIMINAL NO. 08-270 JOCELYN KIRSCH : GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO REVOKE BAIL AND FOR PRETRIAL DETENTION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 25, 2015 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT MEMPHIS February 25, 2015 Session LYDRANNA LEWIS, ET AL. V. SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT00368611 Robert S. Weiss,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NEWARK VICINAGE
Case 2:14-cv-05480-SDW-LDW Document 28 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 12 PagelD: 244 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A. JONES Filing Attorney: Jessica L. Di Bianca, Esq. Attorney ID# 012012006 354 Eisenhower Parkway Livingston,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 17-3274 Michelle MacDonald Shimota; Thomas G. Shimota lllllllllllllllllllllplaintiffs - Appellants v. Bob Wegner; Christopher Melton; Timothy Gonder;
More informationAPPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: CRAIG R. DAY, Judge. Reversed.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the
More informationCASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:12-cv-00824-PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil File No.:12-CV-824 (PJS/TNL) WILLIAM DEMONE WALKER ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) AMENDED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 Christine Baker, vs. Plaintiff, TransUnion, LLC, et. al., Defendants. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA No. CV0--PCT- NVW CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER On August, 0, a Case
More informationCase 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:09-cv-00349-JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV- REBECCA LEACH, ) ) Complaint
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1
Case: 1:10-cv-05593 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION KURT KOPEK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY
More informationCase 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK QUANTUM STREAM INC., Plaintiff(s), No. 15CV8240-LTS-FM PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, VS. THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL. NO. 13-579-BAJ-RLB Defendants. STATUS REPORT Introduction Plaintiff
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:75-cv-04111-DDP Document 238 Filed 10/28/10 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:3093 1 PAUL B. BEACH, State Bar No. 166265 12_b_eachlallbaclaw.com 2 JUSTINW. CLARK, State Bar No. 235477 jclark@lbaclaw.com 3 MATTIIEWP.
More informationRULE CHANGE 2018(06) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
RULE CHANGE 2018(06) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 16.1. Simplified Procedure for Civil Actions (a) Purpose and Summary of Simplified Procedure. (1) Purpose of Simplified Procedure. The purpose
More information