IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
|
|
- Homer Powers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED: THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH BETWEEN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2009 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. (BY SRI S.S.ASPALLI, GOVT. PLEADER) AND MOHAN S/O GOVIND CHAVAN AGED 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O SHERI BADA TANDA, TQLUK CHINCHOLI, DIST. GULBARGA. (BY SRI S.S.SAJJANSHETTY, ADVOCATE) APPELLANT RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 377 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED PASSED BY THE PRL. SESSIONS JUDGE, GULBARGA IN S.C.NO.128/2007 IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO IMPOSING INADEQUATE SENTENCE ON THE RESPONDENT FOR THE
2 2 OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 354 OF IPC, ETC. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This appeal is by the State challenging the finding of the Sessions Judge, Gulbarga in SC No.128/2007 in so far as it relates to imposition of inadequate sentence for the offence punishable under Section 354 of IPC. 2. The victim is said to have filed a complaint on alleging commission of the offence punishable under Section 354 of IPC and also other offences like 341, 323, 504, 506, 493, 509 of IPC against accused No.1. After 35 days of filing the complaint, the victim is said to have given a further statement alleging the offence of rape committed on her by accused No.1 and accused No.2 to 7 abetted accused No.1 for commission of the offence. As such, in pursuance of the further statement of victim, the offence
3 3 under Section 354 of IPC is converted into the offence under Section 376 of IPC. Accordingly, charge sheet was filed alleging the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 493, 509, 354, 376 and 109 of IPC against accused Nos.1 to 7. Since the offence under Section 376 of IPC is triable by the Court of Sessions, the matter was committed to the Sessions Court. On committal of the matter by the Magistrate to the Sessions Court, Sessions Court framed charges against accused No.1 for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC and other offences and against accused No.2 to 7 for the offence of abettment of commission of other offences. Since the accused denied the charges levelled against them, the Sessions Court having examined as many as 10 witnesses and during inquiry, about 9 documents were got marked and contradictions at Ex.D1 were got marked, recorded the statement of accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. and while acquitting the accused No.1 of the offences except
4 4 the offence under Section 354 of IPC holding that it is not a case of rape, it is only outraging the modesty of a woman and that accused No.1 is guilty of the offence under Section 354 of IPC, learned Sessions Judge has sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine, ordered the accused to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment. The learned Sessions Judge has acquitted the accused No.2 to 7 of the offences alleged against them. Being not satisfied with the quantum of sentence stating that there should have been a sentence of imprisonment as is provided under Section 354 of IPC, the State is in appeal. 3. The facts of the case are that the victim is a resident of Sheri Bada Tanda, residing along with her grand-parents viz., Gopu and Chandrabai. This accused No.1 and victim Savitha were in love. It is alleged that accused No.1 used to have sexual intercourse with her by promising her that he would
5 5 marry her. Later victim came to know that marriage of accused No.1 is fixed with some other girl. It is alleged that on in the morning when the victim had gone to well to fetch water from the well situated in the land of one Vasu, at that time accused No.1 went there and caught hold of her hand and asked her to come along with him and started pulling her. Victim also told the accused that since his marriage is fixed with some other girl, question of she going along with him does not arise. This has been witnessed by one Umesh. Later it is alleged that accused No.1 took her forcibly and committed rape on her and also assaulted her and abused and threatened her with dire consequences not to inform the act of commission of rape on her after having committed rape on her. When victim told her grand-parents about the acts of the accused No.1, they went to his house and requested him to marry their grand-daughter and also in this regard, a panchayat was convened and in that panchayat, they were
6 6 threatened with dire consequences that they would finish of the victim. That on since the accused No.1 refused to marry the victim, complaint was lodged against the accused No.1 and by way of further statement, the offence under Section 376 and 109 of IPC were also added. 4. The learned Sessions Judge after having dilated the evidence on record, formed an opinion that it is not a case of rape, at the most it is outraging the modesty of a woman and convicted the accused No.1 for the offence punishable under Section 354 of IPC while acquitting the accused for other offences and sentenced the accused No.1 to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine directed the accused to undergo six months rigorous imprisonment. 5. The points that arise for consideration are; i) Whether the Sessions Judge was justified in sentencing the
7 7 accused to pay fine only instead of sentencing him to undergo imprisonment? ii) What order? 6. PW-2 is the victim. PW-1 is the eyewitness to the incident who speaks about forcing the victim to accompany him by pulling her hand and to co-operate for sexual intercourse. He has totally turned hostile to the case of prosecution. According to the version of prosecution, this accused No.1 had promised the victim to marry her and having made her to believe that he will marry her, had sexual intercourse with her. That version is not supported by PW-1. The sole evidence of PW-2-victim is that she has no parents and her grandparents are looking after her. It is stated by her that accused No.1 s marriage is fixed with some other girl and on the date of incident, when she went near the well of one Vasu, accused No.1 held her and pulled her, at that time she told accused No.1 that his marriage has
8 8 been fixed with some other girl, despite that he has forcibly committed rape on her. After commission of rape on her by the accused, one Umesh came there and she went and complained the same to her grandparents. In the cross-examination, of course she has stated that the place where the incident taken place is a smooth surface, as such, she did not suffer any injuries. She has tried to get released from the clutches of the accused, but she could not escape from him, as he held her hands forcibly. To the suggestion of the defense that the grand-parents of the victim have forced accused No.1 to marry the victim, for which he has refused, as such, out of ire a false case has been filed against this accused No.1, the victim has denied the suggestion. Apart from that, the medical evidence i.e., evidence of PW-8 who has examined the victim on is that the victim was aged about 19 years. She found no external injuries. Hymen was absent and also stated that there is no evidence of recent sexual
9 9 intercourse. But she is used to the act similar to sexual intercourse. Accordingly, she has issued certificate at Ex.P.7. Looking into the medical evidence and also having noted that there is a delay in filing the complaint, Sessions Judge has opined that it is not a case of forcibly committing rape on the victim and at the most, it is outraging the modesty of a woman. The trial Court having taken note of the fact that the delay itself is not fatal to the case of prosecution, however, relied on the medical evidence and also Ex.P.4 which depicted that accused went on promising the victim to marry her and under false promise, he had sexual intercourse with her. But this Ex.P.4 has not been relied upon by the trial court on the ground that she has not whispered in her chief examination regarding committing rape on her by the accused. Ex.P.4 is the complaint lodged by the victim and noting that nothing is stated by the victim regarding commission of rape and that it is an improvement made by her in her further statement
10 10 stating that on , the accused had forcibly took her and committed rape on her against her will and consent, the same has not been mentioned in the complaint, the version of the victim is disbelieved. It has also opined that if really she has been raped by accused No.1, the victim could have narrated the said fact in the complaint given to the police on The evidence of grand-parents i.e., PWs.5 and 6 is disbelieved by the Sessions Court on the ground that there is inordinate delay in complaining of committing rape on the victim. 7. Thus, the Sessions Court having opined that prosecution is able to establish the guilt of the accused No.1 beyond reasonable doubt for the offence punishable under Section 354 of IPC, has sentenced the accused No.1 to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and also default sentence of six months.
11 11 8. However, the State is aggrieved by the quantum of sentence imposed. Section 354 of IPC provides for punishment by way of imprisonment up to two years or with fine or with both. The trial Court of course, on appreciation having come to the conclusion that it is not a case of rape as per the evidence and also complaint and medical evidence, opined that it is outraging the modesty of a woman. Of course, the sentence part is imposing of only fine instead of sentencing the accused to undergo imprisonment. However, as per the theory of punishment, normally imprisonment or fine would be in the alternative or imposing fine as well as imprisonment normally go together. But, however, the Sessions Judge exercised the discretion and sentenced the accused to pay fine only, as the other accused have been acquitted for the alleged offence of abetment to commit rape. The respondent/accused is said to be an agricultural coolie, sentencing him to pay a fine and default sentence is
12 12 substantial, as there is alternative sentence provided for the above offence. The imposition of fine in the circumstances, and the default sentence of six months in default to pay the fine amount, itself would meet the ends of justice. In that view of the matter, appeal filed by the State is dismissed. Send back the records. nsp Sd/- JUDGE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY BETWEEN: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1194 OF 2008 1. Sharnabasappa,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B. A. PATIL. CRIMINAL PETITION No /2017
1 Between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 20 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B. A. PATIL CRIMINAL PETITION No.200106/2017 Mallappa @ Mallikarjun S/o
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2785/2009
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 03 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015 BETWEEN BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2785/2009 1. BASU SHANKRAPPA CHAVAN @ LAMANI,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.882/2005 (C)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA BETWEEN: CRIMINAL APPEAL No.882/2005 (C) Amjad, S/o Sabjan,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B. A. PATIL. CRIMINAL PETITION No /2016
1 Between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 2 ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B. A. PATIL CRIMINAL PETITION No.201293/2016 1. Budeppagouda S/o Gangannagouda
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 27 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN: CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No. 100025/2014 ULAS S/O RATANAKAR
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM:NAGALAND:MEGHALAYA:MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM:NAGALAND:MEGHALAYA:MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL REVISION No.236 of 2004 Ala Uddin Laskar, Son of late Yusuf Ali Laskar, Village-Gangpar
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA. Crl.A. No /2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA BETWEEN: Crl.A. No.100219/2016 SAMEER AHMED S/O SAWOODSAB KACHI,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Meghalaya:Manipur: Tripura:Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Meghalaya:Manipur: Tripura:Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) (AIZAWL BENCH) CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.4 of 2011(J) Sh.Krosnunnapara -Vs- State
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF MARCH 2013 BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.2619 OF 2010 BETWEEN: Mohd. Shafi, Son
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.13/2012 The State of Mizoram. Appellant. -Versus 1. Sh. David Lalthuammawia, 2. Sh. B. Lalruatfela,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh ) Crl.Appeal No.101 of 2009
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh ) Crl.Appeal No.101 of 2009 Sri Ratia Gowala S/O Sri Kishan Gowala R/O Nimana Garh T.E. P.S. Mathurapur, Dist.-Sivasagar,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON BLE Mr. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5144 OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE Mr. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5144 OF 2015 BETWEEN: SRI SURENDRA BABU R S/O SRI
More information-:1:- IN THE COURT OF SH. NARINDER KUMAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK COURTS ROHINI DELHI
-:1:- IN THE COURT OF SH. NARINDER KUMAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK COURTS ROHINI DELHI SC No. 100/2 dated 20/12/2006 Date of Decision: 02/04/2007 State Versus 1. SURESH S/o Sh. Sukhbir Singh R/o
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA Crl. P. No. 100023/2015 C/w. Crl. P. Nos. 102080/2014 & 100135/2015 CRL.P.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED: THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH BETWEEN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15090 OF 2013 1. RAMESH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, GULBARGA BENCH
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, GULBARGA BENCH BETWEEN Dated this the 18 th day of September, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V. PINTO Criminal Appeal No.3655/2009 JEETENDRANATH S/O BABU RAO HERUR
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL (J) NO.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) APPELLANTS 1. Sri Dharmendra Gogoi 2. Sri Chakra Bora CRIMINAL APPEAL (J) NO.14/2004
More informationAnil Goswami Appellant( Cr. Apl. No. 485 of 2009) Ashok Rawani Appellant(Cr. Apl. No. 625 of 2009) -Versus-
Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.485 of 2009 With Criminal Appeal(S.J.) No. 625 of 2009 --- Against the common judgment of conviction dated 8.5.2009 and order of sentence dated 12.5.2009 passed by Shri Vijay
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH. Crl. Appeal No.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH Smt. Moni Orang - Versus The State of Assam - Appellant - Opposite party BEFORE HON
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN WRIT PETITION NO.85369/2013 (GM-RES) ASHOK KADAPPA JADAGOUD
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MEGHALAYA; MANIPUR; TRIPURA; MIZOAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MEGHALAYA; MANIPUR; TRIPURA; MIZOAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL 75/2003 Sri Halla Dhar Das, Son of Late Soneswar Das, Village
More informationIN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE, PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCE ACT (POCSO) MIZORAM, AIZAWL
1 IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE, PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCE ACT (POCSO) MIZORAM, AIZAWL BEFORE Mrs. Lucy Lalrinthari Special Judge, POCSO Act Aizawl Judicial District, Aizawl SC. No.56
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) Criminal Appeal No. 188 (J) of 2007 Shri Ajit @ Anil Mahapatra. Versus The State
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12 th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 12 th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN: M.F.A. NO.2536/2008 (MV) C/w. M.F.A. NO.2535/2008 (MV)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA. CRIMINAL PETITION No.1073/2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF MARCH 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA BETWEEN: CRIMINAL PETITION No.1073/2015 1. SRI NAGESH AGED ABOUT 35
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1177/2012. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Appellant(s) VERSUS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1177/2012 STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Appellant(s) VERSUS SHRIRAM & ANR.. Respondent(s) O R D E R 1. This criminal appeal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Criminal Appeal No 1289 of SK. KHABIR Appellant(s) VERSUS J U D G M E N T
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No 1289 of 2012 SK. KHABIR Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T N. V. RAMANA,
More informationIN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE: BHUBANESWAR. PRESENT:- Sri I.K. Das LLB, Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar.
1 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE: BHUBANESWAR. PRESENT:- Sri I.K. Das LLB, Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar. Crl. Appeal No. 2/18 of 2012 (Arising out of judgment dtd. 12.4.12 in GR case No.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2642/2009
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 07 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR BETWEEN M/S PREETI IMPLEX REGD PARTNERSHIP FIRM BY ITS PARTNERS
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh)
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Criminal Revision No.543 of 2004 & Criminal Revision No.590 of 2004 Criminal
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal (J) No. 63 of 2014 Bhupen Doley, Son of Late Punya Doley, Resident of Jon Misuk, Sisi Kolghor,
More informationIN THE COURT OF THE V ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE (MAHILA COURT) AT HYDERABAD. PRESENT: Smt. T. Rajani, M.A., B.L.
IN THE COURT OF THE V ADDITIONAL METROPOLITAN SESSIONS JUDGE (MAHILA COURT) AT HYDERABAD PRESENT: Smt. T. Rajani, M.A., B.L. V Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Mania Court, Hyderabad Dated this the 26
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 265-266 OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Criminal) Nos. 1815-1816 of 2016) DINESH KUMAR KALIDAS PATEL... APPELLANT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO /2015
1 BETWEEN: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16 TH DAY OF APRIL 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100060/2015 UMESH HANUMANTHAPPA KORAVAR,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE :BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6306/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 17 th SEPTEMBER, 2014 :BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6306/2013 1. SRI. KESHAVA ACHARYA, S/O LATE MONAPPA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2758/2014 BETWEEN: INDRANI BENJAMIN, W/O S.B.SELVARAJ,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2015 BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1045 OF 2014 BETWEEN: M/S BANGALORE ENTERPRISES
More information- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR BETWEEN CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101110/2015 1. S.K.MANJUNATH
More informationO.M THANKACHAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA & ORS
O.M CHERIAN @ THANKACHAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA & ORS REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2387 OF 2014 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 2487/2014) O.M.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.169 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.1221 of 2012) Perumal Appellant Versus Janaki
More information- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101181/2015 CW/ CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101199/2015
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2013 VERSUS J U D G M E N T
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1656 OF 2013 VIJAY MOHAN SINGH VERSUS APPELLANT STATE OF KARNATAKA RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T M.R. SHAH, J.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-01-2007 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.REGUPATHI Crl. Appeal No.859 of 2000 1.Pukkraj 2.Kamalabai 3.Prakash 4.Kishore.. Appellants. Versus State rep.
More informationList of Laws Protecting Women & Children in India - GK Notes in PDF for SSC, Bank & Railway Exams
List of Laws Protecting Women & Children in India - GK Notes in PDF for SSC, Bank & Railway Exams Knowing the basic government laws and rules can help you score good marks in your general awareness section.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL 98 OF 2010 Md. Abdur Rezzak Ahmed -Accused-appellant - Versus - The State of Assam - Opposite
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA. CRIMINAL PETITION No.7191/2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17 th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7191/2015 BETWEEN: HEMANTH @ HEMANTH SINGH
More informationSultanabegum vs State Of Maharashtra on 8 February, 2007
Supreme Court of India Author: C Thakker Bench: C.K. Thakker, Lokeshwar Singh Panta CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 141 of 2006 PETITIONER: SAYARABANO @ SULTANABEGUM RESPONDENT: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2184 OF 2014 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5192 of 2014] State of Rajasthan... Appellant Vs.
More informationLEGAL KNOWLEDGE. Administrative Law How the (administration) government will perform it's functions Administrative Law - Droid Administrative (France)
LEGAL KNOWLEDGE International Law Term coined by - Jeremy Bentham (18 th Century) Relations b/w States a.k.a Law of Nations Prize Law Regulates practices of capture of ships and cargo in wartime Established
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No of 2014 with I.A. No. 175 of 2011 in Cr.Appeal (D.B.) No. 904 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 1409 of 2014 with I.A. No. 175 of 2011 in Cr.Appeal (D.B.) No. 904 of 2008 1. Prabir Pradhan @ Pravir Pradhan 2. Amit Dubey Appellants I.A. No. 1079 of
More informationCrl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017
Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 31.07.2017 Heard Mr. Pallab Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nava Kumar Kalita, learned Additional Public
More informationUNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT ALANDUR
UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT ALANDUR PRESENT HON BLE MR. S. ETHIRAJ, B.A., BL., DISTRICT MUNISIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ALANDUR C.C. NO. 151/98 DATE: FRIDAY, JULY
More informationJ U D G M E N T CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2007 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No of 2006) Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
Supreme Court of India Shaik Mastan Vali vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 3 August, 2007 Author:. A Pasayat Bench: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 1003 of 2007 PETITIONER:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 312 OF 2010 VERSUS J U D G M E N T
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 312 OF 2010 LALTU GHOSH STATE OF WEST BENGAL VERSUS...APPELLANT...RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.REV.P. 76/2009 Reserved on: 30th April, 2012 Decided on: 11th July, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.REV.P. 76/2009 Reserved on: 30th April, 2012 Decided on: 11th July, 2012 ANIL KUMAR... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S. Malik and Mr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of decision: CRL.L.P. 598/2011, Crl. M.A.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of decision: 07.03.2012 CRL.L.P. 598/2011, Crl. M.A. 19759/2011 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : Sh. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC.... Petitioner
More informationPART I SEXUAL OFFENCES
1 of 8 10/20/2008 7:30 AM PART I SEXUAL OFFENCES 1 Incest (1) Any male person who has sexual intercourse with a person related to him in a degree specified in column 1 of the Table set out at the end of
More information$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 48/2015 Date of decision:
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 48/2015 SHIV KUMAR & ANR. Through: Date of decision: 03.12.2015... Petitioners Mr.Vikas Padora and Mr.Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advocates. STATE versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON' BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA WRIT PETITION NO OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA WRIT PETITION NO. 28602 OF 2015 BETWEEN SMT. SWATI PAI, W/O MR. PRAVEEN
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT: ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal No. 357of 2013 Sri Rabindra Das Appellant -Versus- The State of Assam Respondent -BEFORE- HON
More informationCRIMINAL APPEAL NOS OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos of 2016) THE STATE OF GUJARAT Appellant. Versus
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.895-896 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos.8259-60 of 2016) THE STATE OF GUJARAT Appellant Versus NAVINBHAI
More informationIN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE AIZAWL JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AIZAWL, MIZORAM. Sessions Case No. 30 of 2015 Crl Tr. No.
1 IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE AIZAWL JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AIZAWL, MIZORAM. Present : Shri Vanlalenmawia, MJS Additional Sessions Judge, Aizawl Judicial District, Aizawl. Sessions Case No. 30
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) Nos.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 69 70 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) Nos.4139 4140 of 2017) Sudhir Kumar..Appellant Versus State of Haryana and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL. R.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2686/2009
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL. R.B BETWEEN: CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2686/2009 M.R.ACHUT KUMAR S/O M RAMAKRISHNA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR MFA NO.20826/2009 (MV)
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16 TH DAY OF MARCH 2017 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR BETWEEN: MFA NO.20826/2009 (MV) United India Insurance Company Limited
More informationoutside and saw that the light in front of the house of Inderjit Singh was on and two Sikh youths armed with Kirpans stained with blood were shouting
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal Nos. 786-789 of 2003 Decided On: 28.05.2009 State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and Ors. Hon'ble Judges: Mukundakam Sharma and B.S. Chauhan, JJ. Mukundakam Sharma,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 15th January, RFA 269/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 15th January, 2014. RFA 269/2013 GANGADHAR PADHY... Appellant Through: Counsel for the appellant (appearance not given)
More informationTAMIL NADU S NEW INITIATIVES ON POLICE REFORMS - A COMMONER S PERSPECTIVE: EXERCISES IN SUBTERFUGE By V.P.SARATHI - July 22, 2008
TAMIL NADU S NEW INITIATIVES ON POLICE REFORMS - A COMMONER S PERSPECTIVE: EXERCISES IN SUBTERFUGE By V.P.SARATHI - July 22, 2008 The seven directives of the Supreme Court on bringing new reforms in the
More informationK.K. MISHRA.APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT. 2. By the order impugned, the High Court. of Madhya Pradesh has negatived the challenge
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S) 547 OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL] NO.6064 OF 2017] K.K. MISHRA.APPELLANT(S)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE RESERVED ON : 28th January, 2013 DECIDED ON : February 05, 2013 CRL.A.No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE RESERVED ON : 28th January, 2013 DECIDED ON : February 05, 2013 CRL.A.No.323/1999 SUBHASH & ANR.... Appellants Through : Mr.K.B.Andley,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE. Date of Decision: 12th November, 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 35 OF 1984.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of Decision: 12th November, 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 35 OF 1984 STATE Through: Mr. M.N.Dudeja, Advocate.Appellant Versus SHYAM SUNDER..Respondent
More informationBar & Bench (
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 456 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P (Crl.) No. 208 of 2019) PERIYASAMI AND ORS....APPELLANTS Versus S. NALLASAMY...RESPONDENT
More informationPrevention of Sexual Harassment Policy
Prevention of Sexual Harassment Policy Document No: PG-08 Revision No: 1.8 Document Owner: PwC SDC (Kolkata) Prevention of Sexual Harassment Internal Complaints Committee Document Classification: DC1 Released:
More informationLegislative Brief The Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2012 and Ordinance, 2013
Legislative Brief The Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2012 and, 2013 The Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 4, 2012 by the Minister of Home Affairs, Mr Sushil Kumar Shinde. It was referred
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT: ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 2013 Abdul Baten Appellant -Versus- State of Assam & 15 Others Respondents -BEFORE-
More informationBEFORE HON BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJIT SINGH HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND MIZORAM) Criminal Appeal No. 129(J) of 2013 Appellant/Accused. Brindaban Mandal and another Respondents. The State of Assam
More informationCr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 136 of 2000(R)
1 Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 136 of 2000(R) Against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.3.2000 and 31.3.2000 respectively passed by 2 nd Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh in S.T. No.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.743/2010
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.743/2010 BETWEEN: Mr B Shivaram S/o Boraiah Aged about
More information1993 SCR (1) SCC Supl. (3) 150 JT 1993 (4) SCALE (1)637
Equivalent citations: 1993 SCR (1)1087, 1993 SCC Supl. (3) 150 Bench: Verma, J Saran PETITIONER: STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. RESPONDENT: RAGHUBIR SINGH DATE OF JUDGMENT18/02/1993 BENCH: VERMA, JAGDISH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of Decision: CRL.A. 121/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of Decision: 01.04.2014 CRL.A. 121/2010 RAHUL & ORS. Through: Mr M.L. Yadav, Adv.... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI Through: Mr
More informationLaws Relating to Child Sexual Abuse
Laws Relating to Child Sexual Abuse 1.1 Introduction Child sexual abuse is a crime. Any person who commits such a crime can be prosecuted and, if found guilty, can be jailed and/or whipped and/or fined.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Crl. Leave Petition 28/2014 Smt. Rekha Bhargava, Wife of Sri Amrit Bhargava, D/o. Sri Satya Narayan Bhargava,
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL (J) NO. 85 OF 2016.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL (J) NO. 85 OF 2016 Lakhindra Gogoi Appellant -Versus- The State of Assam Respondent BEFORE HON BLE
More informationJUSTICES CLERKS SOCIETY SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE (CHIEF MAGISTRATE)
Senior District Judge (Chief Magistrate) JUSTICES CLERKS SOCIETY SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE (CHIEF MAGISTRATE) Youth Court Jurisdiction The Modern Approach July 2015 This is the joint advice of the Justices'
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE. CRIMINAL PETITION No.7626 OF 2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 12 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE: THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE CRIMINAL PETITION No.7626 OF 2014 BETWEEN: G.Suresh, S/o. Ganeshan,
More information- 1 - (By Sri Uday Holla, Senior Counsel for Sri Satish Ninan & Sri Santosh Mathew, Advocates)
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 12 TH FEBRUARY 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.V.PINTO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10710/2012 BETWEEN Sri.Rajeev Chandrasekhar,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: 21.03.2012 W.P.(C) No.1616/2012 Ex. Constable Mohan Kumar Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2011 VERSUS. STATE OF HARYANA Respondent O R D E R
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1226 OF 2011 REPORTABLE LILLU @ RAJESH & ANR. Appellants VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA Respondent O R D E R 1. This criminal
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) APPELLANTS 1) Tafar Tappo 2) Milkush Lekra CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.13(J)/2005 By advocate
More informationTHE INDIAN PENAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 303 of 2016 45 of 1860. 5 THE INDIAN PENAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016 By SHRIMATI SUPRIYA SULE, M.P. A BILL further to amend the Indian Penal Code, 1860. BE it enacted
More informationقانون اساءة استخدام الكمبيوتر البريطاني COMPUTER MISUSE ACT 1990 (UK) Commencement 29 August 1990
Section 1 Computer misuse offences قانون اساءة استخدام الكمبيوتر البريطاني COMPUTER MISUSE ACT 1990 (UK) Commencement 29 August 1990 1.(1) A person is guilty of an offence if - (a) he causes a computer
More informationThe Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO, 2012)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO, 2012) Need for POCSO Act, 2012: Existing laws (IPC, IT Act, 2000 and JJ Act, 2000) not enough to address sexual offences No specific provisions
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA, BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA, ON THE 2 ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2013, BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.30618/2008 (WC) BETWEEN: DIVISIONAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. CRLMC No Of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK CRLMC No. 3031 Of 2006 An application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with G.R. Case No.844 of 2003 pending on the file of S.D.J.M.,
More informationHIGH COURT (BISHO) JUDGMENT. 1. The appellant who was accused no. 3 in the proceedings in the court a quo,
HIGH COURT (BISHO) CASE No. CA & R 21/2000 DUMISANIMBEBE Appellant and THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT EBRAHIM J: 1. The appellant who was accused no. 3 in the proceedings in the court a quo, was convicted
More informationCriminology is a science which makes scientific study of. cases and it finds the causes for crime. It investigates as to
1 SPEECH DELIVERED BY HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN.M. SHANTANAGOUDAR ON LOCATING VICTIM UNDER THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE KARNATAKA JUDICIAL ACADEMY, BANGALORE ON 15.06.2013 The Criminal Justice System
More informationAll about Execution, Suspension, Remission and Commutation of Sentences under. Chapter 32, Code of Criminal Procedure,1973. By: Nishita Kapoor
All about Execution, Suspension, Remission and Commutation of Sentences under Chapter 32, Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 By: Nishita Kapoor Q1. Differentiate between Suspension, Remission and Commutation
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CRL.M.C. 4966/2014 & Crl. M.A /2014. Versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 1, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4966/2014 & Crl. M.A. 17011/2014 VIJAY KUMAR WADHAWAN... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Tarun Goomber, Mr. Gaurav
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.440/2014
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2 ND DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE A.S.PACHHAPURE CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.440/2014 BETWEEN: MR.CHETAN SHAH, S/O SRI
More information