IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR THE COUNTY OF WHATCOM I. INTRODUCTION AND REQUEST FOR RELIEF
|
|
- Abraham Cunningham
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Fil.ED CUUNTY CLERK ;SNOV AH:W Vi JL'aI uuri C/iiUN i Y WASHINGTON BY. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In re Gabriel S. Galanda, pro se, Anthony S. Broadman, pro se, and Ryan D. Dreveskracht, vs. Petitioners, NOOKSACK TRIBAL COURT, Respondent. FOR THE COUNTY OF WHATCOM No NOOKSACK POLICE CHIEF RORY GILLILAND'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER DOMESTICATING FOREIGN AND ENFORCEMENT EFFORTS I. INTRODUCTION AND REQUEST FOR RELIEF Rory Gilliland submits this Motion to Vacate the Court's Order domesticating the September, Order and Judgment of the Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals, and to quash all ongoing and contemplated execution and enforcement efforts by petitioners, on the ground that the underlying judgment was void ab initio^ has been vacated by the Nooksack Supreme Court, and been found unenforceable by the Nooksack Tribal Court in a separate proceeding. II. FACTS Rory Lee Gilliland is the Chief of the Nooksack Tribal Police. The Nooksack Indian Tribe (the "Tribe") is a federally recognized Indian tribe and a signatory to the Point Elliott treaty of, with all rights and privileges inherent in its sovereign status. The Nooksack Tribal Court, the Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals, and the Nooksack Supreme Court are divisions of the Tribal government, created by the Tribal Council pursuant to the Constitution PAGE 1 OF P.O. BOX DEMING, WA PH: (0) -, FAX: (0) -
2 and By-Laws of the Nooksack Indian Tribe. On September,, the Northwest Intertribal Court System, a Washington non profit corporation, acting under its assumed authority granted by agreement as the Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals, entered an Order and Judgment Awarding Costs against an individual identified only as "the Nooksack Tribe's Chief of Police." The Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals, an appellate body created by ordinance under Nooksack law, lacks original jurisdiction and is not a court of general jurisdiction. In addition, the judges who signed the decision lacked a current appointment to serve as judges for the Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals, and therefore had no authority to act. On October,, the Supreme Court of the Nooksack Indian Tribe vacated all of the orders entered by those same judges, based on their lapsed appointments and absence of authority to act as the Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals. Included among those orders that were vacated on October, was the September, Order and Judgment Awarding Costs ("Judgment") that petitioners have domesticated with this Court. On November,, the Nooksack Tribal Court entered an order in Nooksack Indian Tribe v. Northwest Intertribal Court System, which affirmed the voidness of the Judgment. In that separate proceeding, the Court held: Nothing in the [appellate services] contract documents provide [Northwest Intertribal Court System ("NICS")] or an NICS-engaged appellate panel authorization (a) to NICS to accept filings directly from third parties, as opposed to filings through the [Nooksack Indian Tribe ("NIT")] Clerk; (b) to assert original jurisdiction in matters involving the NIT; (c) to issue orders as a court of original jurisdiction or (d) to issue contempt-related monetary sanctions against an NIT officer acting in his or her official capacity. Nothing in the Code or Constitution appears to grant these powers. It is therefore declared that court of appeals orders issued throughout much of requiring the Clerk to accent filings, and the sheriff to arrest her and pav dailv penalties for each dav he does not, cannot be enforced. This court declares such orders to be invalid, unenforceable, and, to the extent that a lower court can direct vacation of an order of a higher court, vacated. While there is no reason to anticipate NICS will ignore this Order, any collection effort under PAGE OF P.O. BOX DEMING,WA PH: (0) -, FAX: (0) -
3 way against the Tribe or any of its officials must cease and desist forthwith. No person may collect on any order related to the subiect matter of this Order against NIT or any of its officers, agents or employees. There was no waiver of sovereign immunity, and the issuing court lacked jurisdiction to make such orders. The orders holding the Nooksack Sheriff liable for dailv penalties or holding the Nooksack Indian Tribe liable for monetarv penalties or costs, if anv. are unenforceable. November, Order Granting in part. Denying in Part, Plaintiff Nooksack Indian Tribe's Motion for Equitable Relief, at (emphasis in original). III. AUTHORITY A. The Judgment must be Vacated Because the Underlying Court Lacked Jurisdiction and the Order was Vacated Washington law provides for the entry of a foreign judgment as follows: A copy of any foreign judgment authenticated in accordance with the act of congress or the statutes of this state may be filed in the office of the clerk of any superior court of any county of this state. The clerk shall treat the foreign judgment in the same manner as a judgment of the superior court of this state. A judgment so filed has the same effect and is subject to the same procedures, defenses, set-offs, counterclaims, cross-complaints, and proceedings for reopening, vacating, staying, or extending as a judgment of a superior court of this state and may be enforced, extended, or satisfied in like manner. ROW..0(l)(emphasis added). 1. The Underlying Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Issue the Judgment. A "foreign judgment" is "any judgment, decree or order of a court of the United States or of any state or territory which is entitled to full faith and credit in this state." RCW..0. Tribal court decrees are entitled to full faith and credit to the same extent as decrees of sister states. In re Adoption ofbuehl, Wn.d,, P.d (). However, full faith and credit need not be extended to a foreign judgment - or a tribal judgment - if the court lacked jurisdiction to hear a case in the first place. City ofyakima v. Aubrey, Wn. App., 1 P.d (), citing In re Estate of Stein, Wn. App. 1, 1, P.d 0 () ("a PAGE OF P.O. BOX DEMING,WA PH: (0) -, FAX: (0) -
4 decree of a sister state may be subject to collateral attack for want of jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action); State ex rel Eaglin v. Vestal, Wn. App,,, P.d (). A judgment entered by a Tribal court is enforceable "unless the superior court finds the tribal court that rendered the order, judgment or decree (1) lacked jurisdiction over a party or the subject matter, () denied due process as provided by the Indian Civil Rights Act of, or () does not reciprocally provide for recognition and implementation of orders, judgments and decrees of the superior courts of the State of Washington." CR.(c)(emphasis added). Here, treating the Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals' September, Order and Judgment Awarding Costs "as a judgment of the superior court of this state" requires the vacation of the judgment, and the barring of any efforts to execute on such judgment, because the Nooksack Court of Appeals lacked personal and subject matter jurisdiction. N.T.C ("The Court of Appeals is an appellate body only and does not have original jurisdiction to hear and decide non-appellate matters..."); N.T.C ("The court shall have no jurisdiction over any suit brought against the Nooksack Indian Tribe, its officials, its entities, or employees without the consent of the Tribe."). Even if the Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals did have personal and subject matter jurisdiction at the time it entered the Order and Judgment - which it did not - the underlying judgment has been vacated, and thus is void. Civil Rule 0(b) provides, among other bases, that I a party shall be granted relief from a judgment or order because the judgment is void, or the prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated. CR 0(b)(), () Vacation of this Court's Order domesticating petitioners' judgment is warranted based on both grounds. The timing of the Tribe vacating the underlying judgment is irrelevant; the underlying court's judgment has been vacated and is unenforceable. When a trial court is faced with a void judgment, it has no discretion and the judgment must be vacated. Mitchell v. Kitsap County, PAGE OF P.O. BOX DEMING,WA PH: (0) -, FAX: (0) -
5 Wn. App., P.d (0). A void judgment may be vacated at any time. Allstate Ins. Co. V. Khani, Wn. App., P.d (). A judgment is void if entered without subject matter jurisdiction. In re Marriage of Ortiz, Wn.d,, 0 P.d () {citing Dike v. Dike, Wn.d 1,, P.d 0 ()). "Jurisdiction over the subject matter 'of an action is an elementary prerequisite to the exercise of judicial power." In re Buehl, Wn.d,, P.d (). A party may raise the lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time: before there is a final judgment, pursuant to CR (h)() and RAP.(a)(1); and after a final judgment has been entered, pursuant to CR0(b)(). A judgment may be vacated if there was no subject matter jurisdiction, even though a mandate has been issued. Bour v. Johnson, 0 Wn. App., - (). Proceedings to vacate judgments are equitable in nature and the court should exercise its authority liberally to preserve substantial rights and do justice between the parties. Griggs V. AverbeckRealty, Inc., Wn.d, P.d (); In re Hardt, Wn. App., P.d (). A party to the record, adversely affected by a void judgment, may have the judgment vacated as a matter of right. Ballard Sav. c& Loan Ass'n v. Linden, Wash. 0,, P.d (), citing Batchelor v. Palmer, Wash. 0, P. (), Hole v. Page, Wash., P. (). Here, the Tribe had the "foreign judgement" underlying this case vacated by the Nooksack Supreme Court. As such, this Court must vacate its order granting the Petition for entry of foreign judgment of October,.. The underlying Tribal judgment has been vacated. It is black letter law that a judgment entered by a court lacking the proper jurisdiction is void. In re Powell, Wn. App., P.d 1 (). Courts have a nondiscretionary duty to vacate void judgments. Leen v. Demopolis, Wn. App., P.d (1), review denied, 1 Wn.d, P.d (). A vacated judgment has no effect. In PAGE OF P.O. BOX DEMING,WA PH: (0) -, FAX: (0) -
6 -^ re Marriage ofleslie, 1 Wn.d,, P.d (). The rights of the parties are left as though the judgment had never been entered. Anacortes v. Demopoulos, 1 Wn.d, 00 P.d (); Weber v. Biddle, Wn.d,, 1 P.d 0 (); In re Estate of Couch, Wn. App. 1,, P.d 0 (). Here, the Nooksack Supreme Court vacated the underlying Order and Judgment. See October, Order Vacating Tribal Court of Appeals Orders as Void, In re: Orders Entered by Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals After May 0,, Nooksack Supreme Court Case No. -CI-SC-00. That vacation included the September, Order and Judgment Awarding Costs that petitioners have taken steps to domesticate. Because the Order and Judgment has been vacated, it has no effect and cannot form the basis of a domesticated judgment that may be executed upon.. The Underlying Order and Judgment is Void. The reason for which the Nooksack Supreme Coxirt vacated the Order and Judgment provides an additional basis for vacating this Court's order domesticating the judgment: the terms of the judges who entered the September, Order and Judgment expired on May 0,, and therefore the judges lacked a current appointment by the Tribal Council and were not authorized to act as the Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals. See Burton v. Ascol, Wn.d, 1-, P.d 0 ()(all actions taken by a judge without authority to act are null and void), citing National Bank of Washington v. McCrillis, Wn.d,, 0 P.d 01 (), superseded by statute as stated in Zachman v. Whirlpool Fin. Corp., Wn.d, P.d (); Mitchell v. Kitsap County, Wn. App., 1, (0)(if a party has not consented to the appointment of a judge pro tempore, the appointed pro tempore judge lacks jurisdiction, and without jurisdiction, the entire proceedings before the judge pro tempore are yoi^, citing McCrillis, Wn.d at ; CR 0(b)() ("the court may relieve a party or the party's legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding [where]... the judgment PAGE OF P.O. BOX DEMING,WA PH: (0) -, FAX: (0) -
7 is void."). In a separate proceeding, in a decision entered November, by a pro tempore Judge, the Nooksack Tribal Court independently concluded that the Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals lacked the contempt powers it seized by judicial fiat, that the Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to entertain any suit against the Tribe, its Court staff, or its Chief of Police in the absence of a waiver of sovereign immunity, and that the Judgment was void and unenforceable. See November, Order Granting in part, Denying in Part, Plaintiff Nooksack Indian Tribe's Motion for Equitable Relief at. a. The Appellate Judges Lacked Authority to Act. A judgment is void for purposes of CR 0(b)() if the court lacked jurisdiction over the parties or the subject matter of the suit or if it lacked the inherent power to make or enter the particular order involved. State ex rel Turner v. Briggs, Wn. App., 0-0, 1 P.d 1 ()("A void judgment is a 'judgment, decree or order entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction of the parties or of the subject matter, or which lacks the inherent power to make or enter the particular order involved.") {quoting Dike v. Dike, Wn.d 1,, P.d 0 ()); see, also, Bergren v. Adams County, Wn. App., 0 P.d 1, review denied, Wn.d 0 (). Here, even if the Nooksack Supreme Court had not acted to vacate the Court of Appeals Order and Judgment, this Court would be obligated to vacate the order domesticating the judgment because the Tribal Court of Appeals lacked personal and subject matter jurisdiction over the Tribe and its Chief of Police, Rory Gilliland. Order Granting in part. Denying in Part, Plaintiff Nooksack Indian Tribe's Motion for Equitable Relief at. The three appellate judges who signed the Order and Judgment lacked authorization to act because their terms had expired, and without authority to act, they did not constitute the Court of Appeals. See October, Order Vacating Tribal Court of Appeals Orders as Void, In re: Orders Entered by Nooksack Tribal Court of Appeals After May 0,, PAGE OF P.O. BOX DEMING,WA PH; (0) -, FAX: (0) -
8 Nooksack Supreme Court Case No. -CI-SC-00, at -. b. The Court of Appeals Lacked Jurisdiction Because the Tribe Had Not Waived its Sovereign Immunity. In addition, under Noosack law the Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction to enter the Order and Judgment because the Tribe had not waived its sovereign immunity or the sovereign immunity of its agents and officers acting within the scope of their authority. Order Granting in part, Denying in Part, Plaintiff Nooksack Indian Tribe's Motion for Equitable Relief, at. A court must have both personal and subject matter jurisdiction in order to have authority to act. Marley v. Dep't of Labor & Indus., Wn.d, () (a void judgment exists whenever the issuing court lacks personal jurisdiction over the party or subject matter jurisdiction over the claim). Where jurisdiction is lacking, any judgment entered is void. In re Marriage of Ortiz, Wn.d, () ("A judgment, decree or order entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction of the parties or of the subject matter, or which lacks the inherent power to make or enter the particular order involved, is void."). Subject matter jurisdiction is more than a determination as to whether sovereign immunity prevents any lawsuit, but whether the court hearing the lawsuit has authority to hear the type of lawsuit brought before it. See Wright v. Colville Tribal Enter. Corp., Wn.d,1, P.d (0), (Madson, J., concurring). It is well-established that "Indian tribes possess the common-law immunity from suit traditionally enjoyed by sovereign powers." Kiowa Tribe of Okla. v. Mfg. Techs., Inc., U.S. 1, -0 (); Val-U Constr. Co. v. Rosebud Siom Tribe, F.d, (th Cir. ); United States v. James, 0 F.d (th Cir. ). The doctrine applies broadly to a tribe's commercial activities and to activities outside its reservation. See Okla. Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Okla., U.S. 0, - (1); Santa Clara Pueblo V. Martinez, U.S., (). Sovereign immunity extends not only to the tribe itself, but also to tribal officers and PAGE OF P.O. BOX DEMING,WA PH: (0) -, FAX: (0) -
9 tribal employees, as long as their alleged misconduct arises while they are acting in their official capacity and within the scope of their authority. Wright, Wn.d at 1; Cook v. AVI Casino Enters., Inc., F.d, - (^*^ Cir. 0), cert, denied, U.S., S. Ct., L. Ed. d 1 (0). "The principles that motivate the immunizing of tribal officials from suit ^protecting an Indian tribe's treasury and preventing a plaintiff from bypassing tribal I immunity merely by naming a tribal official apply just as much to tribal employees when they are sued in their official capacity." Cook, F.d at {quoting Will v. Mich. Dep't of State Police, 1 U.S., 0-1, S. Ct. 0, L. Ed. d ()). An Indian tribe has the undisputed authority to "'employ police officers to aid in the enforcement of tribal law and in the exercise of tribal power.'" State v. Schmuck, 1 Wn.d,, 0 P.d () {quoting Ortiz-Barraza v. United States, F.d, (^ Cir. )). The Tribe employs Chief Gilliland to aid in the enforcement of Nooksack law and in the exercise of Nooksack power. Chief Gilliland is protected by the Tribe's sovereign immunity from claims arising from acts and omissions undertaken in the scope of his official duties as Chief of Police. Young v. Duena, Wn. App., P.d (). Chief Gilliland is also protected from the domestication of the underlying vacated judgment.. A Void Judgment May Not be Executed Upon. The Washington Supreme Court has long held that "[a] void judgment is, in legal effect, no judgment. By it no rights are divested. From it no rights can be obtained. Being worthless in itself, all proceedings founded upon it are equally worthless. It neither binds nor bars any one. All acts performed under it and all claims flowing out of it are void. The parties attempting to enforce it may be responsible as trespassers." State ex rel. Reed v. Gormley, 0 Wash. 01, 0, P. (0). Where a judgment is void, actions authorized in aid of execution are similarly void. See, e.g., TCAP Corp. v. Gervin, Wn.d,, P.d (0) (because the underlying EFFORTS- PAGE OF P.O. BOX DEMING,WA PH: (0) -, FAX: (0) -
10 foreign judgments had become unenforceable, writs of execution were improperly issued and had to be quashed); Hardin v. Day^ Wash.,, 0 P. 1 (0)(sale that occurs after the lien has expired is void because "[tjhere being no lien in existence, there could have been no authority for the sale in any execution that might have been issued.") {quoting Packwood v. Briggs, Wash. 0,, P. (01)(competing mortgage and judgment liens, held execution void because lien ceased to exits prior to sale); Mueller v. Miller, Wn. App.,, P.d 0 ()(execution through sheriffs sale was void at the outset because lien had expired). Because the underlying Tribal Court of Appeals Order and Judgment has been vacated, this Court's Order domesticating the judgment is void, and no writs or remedies in aid of execution may be issued. RESPECTFULLY MOVED THIS jh^'day OF NOVEMBER,. RicMe^ayne Armstrong, WSBA # 0 Tribal Attomey Office of Tribal Attomey P.O. Box Deming, WA PAGE OF P.O. BOX DEMING, WA PH: (0) -, FAX: (0) -
Case 2:17-cv JCC Document 120 Filed 10/06/17 Page 1 of 9 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 2
Case :-cv-000-jcc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 0 MARGRETTY RABANG, OLIVE OSHIRO, DOMINADOR AURE, CHRISTINA PEATO, and ELIZABETH OSHIRO, v. Plaintiffs, ROBERT KELLY, JR.,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE No. 66969-9-I/2 CHRIS YOUNG as an individual person and as the personal No. 66969-9-I representative of the ESTATE OF JEFFRY YOUNG, ORDER
More informationIN THE NOOKSACK TRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE DEMING, WASHINGTON
IN THE NOOKSACK TRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE DEMING, WASHINGTON In re Gabriel S. Galanda, pro se, Anthony S. Broadman, pro se, and Ryan D. Dreveskracht, Petitioners, Court No. 2016-CI-CL-002
More informationharmed, and continue to be harmed. Unless and until Defendants are enjoined from acting
harmed, and continue to be harmed. Unless and until Defendants are enjoined from acting unlawfully and declaratory relief is issued, Plaintiffs will continue to be harmed.. Nothing in this Complaint should
More informationThe Tribe is not entitled to any of the relief it seeks. As a threshold matter, the Tribe
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 The Tribe is not entitled to any of the relief it seeks. As a threshold matter, the Tribe lacks standing to challenge the Court s entry of the Foreign Judgment Order. Also, the Foreign
More informationIN THE TRIBAL COURT OF THE NOOKSACK TRIBE OF INDIANS FOR THE NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE. Plaintiff, Defendants.
NOOKSACK TRIBAL COURT NOOKSACK INDIAN tribe SEP 0 Z0 TIME; FILED BYi!iO AM/^ CLERK: IN THE TRIBAL COURT OF THE NOOKSACK TRIBE OF INDIANS FOR THE, V. Plaintiff, NORTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURTS SYSTEM, a Washington
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION II CALIFORNIA PARKING SERVICES, INC. Plaintiff and Appellant
No. E050306 SC No. RIC 535124 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION II CALIFORNIA PARKING SERVICES, INC. Plaintiff and Appellant VS SOBOBA BAND OF LUISENO
More informationCase 2:17-cv RSL Document 15 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-0-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, DOING BUSINESS AS CHRISTIANA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-00048-BMM-TJC Document 33 Filed 02/09/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION MICHAEL F. LAFORGE, CV-17-48-BLG-BMM-TJC Plaintiff, vs.
More informationJAMES LAWRENCE BROWN, Plaintiff/Appellant, OFFICER K. ROBERTSON #Y234, YAVAPAI-APACHE NATION POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants/Appellees.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationPUBLISH TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiffs-Appellees, No
PUBLISH FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit September 19, 2007 Elisabeth A. Shumaker UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT MINER ELECTRIC, INC.; RUSSELL E. MINER, v.
More informationCase 2:12-cv TSZ Document 33 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 14
Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Thomas S. Zilly UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 0 THE NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE OF WASHINGTON and the NOOKSACK BUSINESS
More informationSupreme Court of the Unitd Statee
No. 12-1237 IN THE Supreme Court of the Unitd Statee FILED MAY 1 3 20~ OFFICE OF THE CLERK DANIEL T. MILLER; AMBER LANPHERE; PAUL M. MATHESON, Petitioners, Vo CHAD WRIGHT, PUYALLUP TRIBE TAX DEPARTMENT,
More informationCase 1:18-cv DLH-CSM Document 12 Filed 05/07/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Case 1:18-cv-00057-DLH-CSM Document 12 Filed 05/07/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Shingobee Builders, Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-00057-DLH-CSM v. Plaintiff, North
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 12-376 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JOHN V. FURRY, as Personal Representative Of the Estate and Survivors of Tatiana H. Furry, v. Petitioner, MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA; MICCOSUKEE
More informationCase 2:17-cv JCC Document 111 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-000-jcc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON MARGRETTY RABANG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE OE WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHATCOM I. RELIEF REQUESTED
1 The Honorable Deborra E. Garrett 0 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE OE WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHATCOM MARGRETTY RABANG, and ROBERT RABANG, V. Plaintiffs, RORY GILLIAND, MICHAEL ASHBY,
More informationOmnibus Reconsideration Request for Nooksack Tribal Members Purportedly Disenrolled by Nooksack Holdover Tribal Council
Omnibus Reconsideration Request for Nooksack Tribal Members Purportedly Disenrolled by Nooksack Holdover Tribal Council HAND DELIVERED, EMAILED, AND U.S. MAILED December 5, 2016 Nooksack Indian Tribe Nooksack
More informationHoward Shale, Appellant' s Response to Brief of Amicus. Curiae
No. 44654-5 -II COURT OF APPEALS, DIVISION II OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, vs. Howard Shale, Appellant. Jefferson County Superior Court Cause No. 12-1- 00194-0 The Honorable
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-000-LAB-JMA Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CARL EUGENE MULLINS, vs. THE SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION; et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Gabriel S. Galanda, WSBA #0 Anthony S. Broadman, WSBA #0 Ryan D. Dreveskracht, WSBA # 0 th Ave. NE, Suite L P.O. Box Seattle, WA (0) - Attorneys for Defendant Yakama Nation Hon. Lonny R. Suko UNITED STATES
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. DELORES SCHINNELLER, Respondent. No. 4D15-1704 [July 27, 2016] Petition for writ of certiorari
More informationII. FACTS. Late on the afternoon of Thursday, January 16, Nooksack Tribal Council Chairman
II. FACTS Late on the afternoon of Thursday, January, Nooksack Tribal Council Chairman Robert Kelly called the first Special Meeting of the Tribal Council in several months. Chairman Kelly called the meeting
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 5:11-cv-01078-D Document 16 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA APACHE TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, vs. Plaintiff, TGS ANADARKO LLC; and WELLS
More informationCase 3:09-cv WKW-TFM Document 12 Filed 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT
Case 3:09-cv-00305-WKW-TFM Document 12 Filed 05/04/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT T.P. JOHNSON HOLDINGS, LLC. JACK M. JOHNSON AND TERI S. JOHNSON, AS SHAREHOLDERS/MEMBERS,
More informationCase 2:05-cr LHT-DLH Document 33 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:05-cr-00005-LHT-DLH Document 33 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA BRYSON CITY DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cox, J. This is a breach of contract action by Outsource Services
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON OUTSOURCE SERVICES MANAGEMENT, LLC, v. NOOKSACK BUSINESS CORPORATION, Respondent, Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 67050-6-I DIVISION ONE PUBLISHED
More informationGalanda Broadman, PLLC, Occasional Paper
Galanda Broadman, PLLC, Occasional Paper No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Personal Liability Exposure for Tribal Officials in the Wake of Maxwell v. County of San Diego By Scott Wheat and Amber Penn-Roco
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 532 U. S. (2001) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationAPPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Vilas County: NEAL A. NIELSEN, III, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Stark and Hruz, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 10, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in
More informationCase ABA Doc 10 Filed 02/10/16 Entered 02/10/16 14:10:34 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6
Document Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Caption in Compliance with D.N.J. LBR 9004-1(b) McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Kate R. Buck 100 Mulberry Street Four Gateway Center Newark,
More informationCase 4:15-cv BMM Document 37 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED
Case 4:15-cv-00028-BMM Document 37 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 12 FILED James L. Vogel, Attorney-At-Law P.O. Box 525 Hardin, Montana 59034 (406)665-3900 Great FaMs Fax (406)665-3901 (jim vmt@email.com) Attorney
More informationNo CI-CL-002 IN THE NOOKSACK TRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS. GABRIEL S. GALANDA; ANTHONY S. BROADMAN; RYAN D. DREVESKRACHT, Petitioners,
No. 2016-CI-CL-002 IN THE NOOKSACK TRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS GABRIEL S. GALANDA; ANTHONY S. BROADMAN; RYAN D. DREVESKRACHT, Petitioners, v. NOOKSACK TRIBAL COURT, Respondent. MOTION AND AMICI CURIAE BRIEF
More informationCase 1:08-cv TLL-CEB Document 19 Filed 10/09/2009 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-11522-TLL-CEB Document 19 Filed 10/09/2009 Page 1 of 5 JENNIFER SOBER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Case Number 08-11522-BC v. Honorable
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-00-jad-gwf Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Jeffrey D. Gross (AZ Bar No. 00) Christopher W. Thompson (AZ Bar No. 0) GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A. East Camelback Road Phoenix, Arizona 0- Telephone: (0)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00594-CG-M Document 11 Filed 02/20/15 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CHRISTINE WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 2:17-cv JCC Document 152 Filed 03/30/18 Page 1 of 5 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 2
Case :-cv-000-jcc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 0 MARGRETTY RABANG, OLIVE OSHIRO, DOMINADOR AURE, CHRISTINA PEATO, and ELIZABETH OSHIRO, v. Plaintiffs, ROBERT KELLY, JR.,
More informationNo. DA BRIEF OF APPELLEES. On Appeal from the Montana Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, The Honorable James A.
08/08/2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 16-0282 No. DA 16-0282 ROBERT CRAWFORD, V. Plaintiff and Appellant, CASEY COUTURE; FLATHEAD TRIBAL POLICE OFFICER; FLATHEAD TRIBAL
More informationCase 1:16-cv JAP-KK Document 38 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:16-cv-01093-JAP-KK Document 38 Filed 09/06/17 Page 1 of 17 MATT LAW OFFICE Terryl T. Matt, Esq. 310 East Main Cut Bank, MT 59427 Telephone: (406) 873-4833 Fax No.: (406) 873-4944 terrylm@mattlawoffice.com
More informationCase 1:17-cv JCH-KBM Document 9 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:17-cv-00258-JCH-KBM Document 9 Filed 05/25/17 Page 1 of 5 MILTON TOYA, Petitioner, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO vs. No. CV 17-00258 JCH/KBM AL CASAMENTO, DIRECTOR,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Case :-cv-0-bhs Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 DOTTI CHAMBLIN, v. Plaintiff, TIMOTHY J. GREENE, Chairman of the Makah Tribal Council,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Case :-cv-0-lrs Document Filed // 0 Rob Costello Deputy Attorney General Mary Tennyson William G. Clark Assistant Attorneys General Attorney General of Washington PO Box 00 Olympia, WA 0-00 Telephone:
More informationCase 5:15-cv L Document 1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:15-cv-00241-L Document 1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1 JOHN R. SHOTTON, an individual, v. Plaintiff, (2 HOWARD F. PITKIN, in his individual
More informationCA ; CA Pascua Yaqui Tribe Court of Appeals
CA-09-004; CA-09-005 Pascua Yaqui Tribe Court of Appeals MARY LOU BOONE, Evelyn James, Henry Whiskers, Clyde Whiskers, Danlyn James, and the SAN JUAN SOUTHERN PAIUTE TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1998) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 96 1037 KIOWA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA, PETITIONER v. MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA,
More informationNo COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JOY SHEPHERD, Appellant, UNITED COLLECTION SERVICE, INC., Respondent.
No. 54017-3-1 COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JOY SHEPHERD, Appellant, v. V. UNITED COLLECTION SERVICE, INC., Respondent. APPELLANT'S APPELLANT S OPENING BRIEF Marc S. Stern Attorney
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/13/17 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 THE NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE, v. Plaintiffs, KEVIN JACK HAUGRUD, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior; the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR;
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:15-cv-02463-RGK-MAN Document 31 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:335 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 15-02463-RGK (MANx)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-000-wqh -BGS Document 0 Filed 0// Page of 0 0 GLORIA MORRISON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, vs. VIEJAS ENTERPRISES, an entity; VIEJAS BAND OF KUMEYAAY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 4:07-cv-00642-CVE-PJC Document 46 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 01/04/2008 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA WAGONER COUNTY RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO. 2, an agency of the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. NO. CV LRS LICENSING, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-0-lrs Document Filed 0/0/ 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT NO. CV---LRS LICENSING, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) MOTION
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BATES ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION September 14, 2010 9:15 a.m. v No. 288826 Wayne Circuit Court 132 ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.,
More informationCase 2:11-cv KJM -GGH Document 4 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 6
Case :-cv-0-kjm -GGH Document Filed // Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 BRIAN GARCIA, vs. Plaintiff, UNITED AUBURN INDIAN COMMUNITY, et al., Defendants.
More informationCase 6:17-cv AA Document 18 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 12
Case 6:17-cv-00123-AA Document 18 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 12 Anthony S. Broadman, OSB No. 112417 8606 35th Avenue NE, Suite L1 P.O. Box 15416 PH: 206-557-7509 FX: 206-299-7690 anthony@galandabroadman.com
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. October Term, 2006 DON WALTON, Petitioner, TESUQUE PUEBLO et al.
No. 06-361 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term, 2006 DON WALTON, Petitioner, v. TESUQUE PUEBLO et al., Respondents On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari To the Court of Appeals for the
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 10-4 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States GARY HOFFMAN, v. Petitioner, SANDIA RESORT AND CASINO, Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the State of New Mexico
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 10-56671 11/08/2012 ID: 8394026 DktEntry: 38-2 Page: 1 of 26 No. 10-56671 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JIM MAXWELL and KAY MAXWELL, individually and as guardians of
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A150374
Filed 10/31/17 Brown v. Garcia CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two February 22, 2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II ARTHUR WEST, No. 48182-1-II Appellant, v. PIERCE COUNTY COUNCIL, RICK
More informationCase3:11-cv JW Document14 Filed08/29/11 Page1 of 8
Case:-cv-00-JW Document Filed0// Page of 0 Robert A. Rosette (CA SBN ) Richard J. Armstrong (CA SBN ) Nicole St. Germain (CA SBN ) ROSETTE, LLP Attorneys at Law Blue Ravine Rd., Suite Folsom, CA 0 () -0
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:15-cv-00116-D Document 50 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID 326 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION IN RE: INTRAMTA SWITCHED ACCESS CHARGES LITIGATION
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON BACKGROUND
DISTRICT OF OREGON F I L E D April 02, 2015 Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Below is an Order of the Court. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON FRANK R. ALLEY U.S. Bankruptcy Judge In
More informationCase 2:10-cv DGC Document 16 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:10-cv-00533-DGC Document 16 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 12 Timothy J. Humphrey, e-mail: tjh@stetsonlaw.com Catherine Baker Stetson, e-mail: cbs@stetsonlaw.com Jana L. Walker, e-mail: jlw@stetsonlaw.com
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
REL: 09/18/2015 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 11-1485 In the Supreme Court of the United States CHRIS YOUNG, AS A PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFRY YOUNG, PETITIONER v. JOSEPH S. FITZPATRICK, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
More informationCase 5:12-cv C Document 15 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:12-cv-01024-C Document 15 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JENNIFER ROSSER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No.: CIV-2012-1024-C
More informationMotion for Rehearing (Extension of Time Granted to File Motion), Denied March 28, 1994 COUNSEL
1 TOWNSEND V. STATE EX REL. STATE HWY. DEP'T, 1994-NMSC-014, 117 N.M. 302, 871 P.2d 958 (S. Ct. 1994) HENRY TOWNSEND, as trustee of the Henry and Sylvia Townsend Revocable Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
More informationNo STEVEN ROSENBERG, HUALAPAI INDIAN NATION, On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of The State Of Arizona
No. 09-742 STEVEN ROSENBERG, Petitioner, HUALAPAI INDIAN NATION, Respondent. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of The State Of Arizona BRIEF IN OPPOSITION Counsel of Record THEODORE
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRYSTAL ENERGY COMPANY, No. 02-17047 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-01-01970-MHM NAVAJO NATION, Defendant-Appellee. ORDER AND AMENDED
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) No. 80499-1 Petitioner, ) ) v. ) En Banc ) GERALD CAYENNE, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Filed November 13, 2008 C. JOHNSON, J. This case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) KAREN HARRIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 11-CV-654-GKF-FHM ) (2) MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION d/b/a ) RIVER SPIRIT CASINO,
More informationcv IN THE. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ELIZABETH A. TREMBLAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Case 14-2031, Document 43, 11/03/2014, 1361074, Page 1 of 21 14-2031-cv To Be Argued By: PROLOY K. DAS, ESQ. IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ELIZABETH A. TREMBLAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationCase 5:09-cv RDR-KGS Document 19 Filed 11/05/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 5:09-cv-04107-RDR-KGS Document 19 Filed 11/05/09 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ROBERT NANOMANTUBE, vs. Plaintiff, Case No. 09-4107-RDR THE KICKAPOO TRIBE
More informationCase 5:16-cv RSWL-KK Document 11 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:95
Case :-cv-00-rswl-kk Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Kathryn Clenney, SBN Barona Band of Mission Indians 0 Barona Road Lakeside, CA 00 Tel.: - FAX: -- kclenney@barona-nsn.gov Attorneys for specially-appearing
More informationFOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE, in its official capacity ) No. 01-15007 and as a representative of its Tribal members; ) Bishop Paiute Gaming Corporation,
More informationII. ISSUESS PRESENTED. Whether the Tribal Court or Court Clerk clearly erred in rejecting Petitioners
II. ISSUESS PRESENTED Whether the Tribal Court or Court Clerk clearly erred in rejecting Petitioners Complaint and Motion for filing since the Tribal Court previously authorized Petitioners to file a pro
More informationNo. 08- IN TH~OFIRCE OF THE. (ggurt gf [nitdl. COUSHATTA TRIBE OF LOUISIANA, Petitioner, MEYER & ASSOCIATES, INC. and RICHARD MEYER, Respondents.
~gpreme Court, ~LED No. 08- IN TH~OFIRCE OF THE (ggurt gf [nitdl COUSHATTA TRIBE OF LOUISIANA, Petitioner, MEYER & ASSOCIATES, INC. and RICHARD MEYER, Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
More information) PUBLISHED OPINION MONROE SCHOOL DISTRICT, a ) political subdivision of the State of ) Washington, ) ) No
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CREER LEGAL, d/b/a for attorney, ) Erica Krikorian, real party in interest, ) ) DIVISION ONE Appellant, ) ) No. 76814-0-1 V. ) ) PUBLISHED OPINION MONROE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
June 7 2011 DA 10-0392 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2011 MT 124 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF KAREN LYNCH STEVENS, and Petitioner and Appellee, RODNEY N. STEVENS, Respondent and Appellant. APPEAL
More informationCase 2:17-cv JCC Document 48 Filed 06/16/17 Page 1 of 10 THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 2
Case :-cv-00-jcc Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON THE NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE, Case No. :-cv-00-jcc v. Plaintiff, RECONSIDERATION
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 17-387 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE, v. Petitioner, SHARLINE LUNDGREN AND RAY LUNDGREN, Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT
More informationCase 1:13-cv S-LDA Document 16 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Case 1:13-cv-00185-S-LDA Document 16 Filed 08/29/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 178 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ) DOUGLAS J. LUCKERMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 13-185
More information5 Suits Against Federal Officers or Employees
5 Suits Against Federal Officers or Employees 5.01 INTRODUCTION TO SUITS AGAINST FEDERAL OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES Although the primary focus in this treatise is upon litigation claims against the federal
More informationCase 2:17-cv JMA-SIL Document 13 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 73
Case 2:17-cv-05869-JMA-SIL Document 13 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION
Case :-cv-00-bas-ags Document - Filed /0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 0 Kathryn Clenney, SBN Barona Band of Mission Indians 0 Barona Road Lakeside, CA 00 Tel.: - FAX: -- kclenney@barona-nsn.gov Attorney for Specially-Appearing
More information6:14-cv KEW Document 26 Filed in ED/OK on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
6:14-cv-00182-KEW Document 26 Filed in ED/OK on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) CHOCTAW NATION OF ) OKLAHOMA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case
More informationNO COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON OUTSOURCE SERVICES MANAGEMENT, LLC, Respondent, vs.
NO. 67050-6-1 COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON OUTSOURCE SERVICES MANAGEMENT, LLC, Respondent, vs. NOOKSACK BUSINESS CORPORATION, Appellant. APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF Connie Sue Martin,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 4:11-cv-00782-JHP -PJC Document 22 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 03/15/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA EDDIE SANTANA ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 11-CV-782-JHP-PJC
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN PLAINTIFF S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
Case 1:17-cv-01083-JTN-ESC ECF No. 31 filed 05/04/18 PageID.364 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JOY SPURR Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:17-cv-01083 Hon. Janet
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :0-cv-0-VAP-JCR Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 GREGORY F. MULLALLY, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, HAVASU LANDING CASINO, AN ENTERPRISE OF THE CHEMEHUEVI
More informationCase 5:12-cv C Document 6 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:12-cv-01024-C Document 6 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JENNIFER ROSSER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) Case No. CIV-2012-1024-C ) JOHN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-who Document Filed /0/ Page of BOUTIN JONES INC. Daniel S. Stouder, SBN dstouder@boutinjones.com Amy L. O Neill, SBN aoneill@boutinjones.com Capitol Mall, Suite 00 Sacramento, CA -0 Telephone:
More informationNo. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. BOB BURRELL and SUSAN BURRELL,
No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BOB BURRELL and SUSAN BURRELL, v. Petitioners, LEONARD ARMIJO, Governor of Santa Ana Pueblo and Acting Chief of Santa Ana Tribal Police; LAWRENCE MONTOYA,
More informationCase 5:14-cv D Document 2 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:14-cv-00281-D Document 2 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) THE CADDO NATION OF OKLAHOMA, and ) (2) BRENDA EDWARDS, in her capacity
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO ex rel. RICHARD F. : Case No. 2013-0295 DAVET P.O. Box 10092 : Original Action in Prohibition and Cleveland, Ohio 44110 : Mandamus Arising From Cuyahoga
More informationU.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals
U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals OSAGE TRIBAL COUNCIL v U.S. DEPT. OF LABOR PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ----------------------------------------------------------- THE OSAGE
More informationCase: 1:08-cv Document #: 30 Filed: 03/24/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:107
Case: 1:08-cv-00825 Document #: 30 Filed: 03/24/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:107 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MERIT MANAGEMENT GROUP, a Nevada limited partnership,
More informationMOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 13th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA LIQUIDATED INVESTMENTS, LLC., n/k/a CITICOMPANY HOLDINGS, INC. CASE NO: 2009-xxxxx CA 01 Plaintiff, v. HECTOR R.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed February 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Warren County, Paul R.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-029 / 10-1025 Filed February 9, 2011 ESTATE OF TOMMY RAY LYON and RONDA LYON, Plaintiffs-Appellees, vs. RODNEY N. HEEMSTRA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Judge. Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: June 10, 2011 Docket No. 29,975 DAVID MARTINEZ, v. Worker-Appellant, POJOAQUE GAMING, INC., d/b/a CITIES OF GOLD CASINO,
More information