: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANT FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S OMNIBUS MOTION
|
|
- MargaretMargaret Goodman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO GASPAR HERNANDEZ-VEGA Plaintiff, -against- AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., et al., Defendants. (NYCAL) INDEX NO /2014 I.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton, P.) MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANT FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S OMNIBUS MOTION Fisher Controls International LLC ( Fisher ) hereby adopts and incorporates by reference any and all non-adverse oppositions filed by co-defendants in this matter, whether or not the codefendants remain at the time of trial. III. OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO PRECLUDE REFERENCES REGARDING PLAINTIFF S EXPOSURE TO ASBESTOS PRODUCTS MANUFACTURED OR SOLD BY COMPANIES THAT ARE BANKRUPT ENTITIES OR ARE OTHERWISE NOT DEFENDANTS AT THE TIME OF TRIAL AND EXCLUDE THE DEFENDANTS NAMED ON THE COMPLAINT, BANKRUPT ENTITIES, OR SETTLED PARTIES FROM BEING LISTED ON THE VERDICT SHEET Plaintiff asks This Court to preclude defendants from introducing any evidence regarding Plaintiff s exposure to products manufactured or sold by companies that are not defendants at the time of trial and/or or not a party to this lawsuit. See Plaintiff s Affirmation at 11. Plaintiff also specifically seeks to preclude defendants from mentioning or alleging that the plaintiff was exposed to asbestos products that were manufactured, marketed, distributed and/or 1 1 of 7
2 sold by any bankrupt entity. See Plaintiff s Affirmation at 15. However this request runs counter to the CPLR and applicable case law. In 1986, as part of a broader tort-reform measure, the New York Legislature enacted CPLR 1601 and substantially modified the traditional rule of joint and several liability, under which tortfeasors were held jointly and severally liable for the entire verdict, regardless of culpability. See Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp., 79 N.Y.2d 540, 556 (1992)(explaining that joint and several liability means that tortfeasors are each responsible for the full amount [of the judgment] regardless of culpability. ). Section 1601 of the CPLR provides minimally negligent joint tortfeasors, those whose liability is found to be fifty percent or less, relief from joint and several liability under limited circumstances. See Morales v. Co. of Nassau, 96 N.Y.2d 218, 224 (2001)(recognizing that Article 16 is the result of a painstaking balance of interests by the Legislature and addresses both the concerns of innocent plaintiffs and low-fault defendants who were consistently paying a disproportionate share of damages awards. ). CPLR 1601(1) states, in relevant part Notwithstanding any other provision of law, when a verdict or decision in an action or claim for personal injury is determined in favor of a claimant in an action involving two or more tortfeasors jointly liable or in a claim against the state and the liability of a defendant is found to be fifty percent or less of the total liability assigned to all persons liable, the liability of such defendant to the claimant for non-economic loss shall not exceed that defendant s equitable share determined in accordance with the relative culpability of each person causing or contributing to the total liability for non-economic loss the culpable conduct of any person not a party to the action shall not be considered in determining any equitable share herein if the claimant proves that with due diligence he or she was unable to obtain jurisdiction over such person in said action (or in a claim against the state, in a court of this state). 2 2 of 7
3 This Court should follow the plain language of the statute and the sound reasoning of Justice Helen E. Freedman, as affirmed by the Appellate Division in In re New York City Asbestos Litigation (Tancredi), 775 N.Y.S.2d 520, 6 A.D.3d 352 (1st Dep t 2004), and rule that a bankrupt, non-party tortfeasor is not beyond the personal jurisdiction merely by virtue of having filed for bankruptcy and therefore allow the jury to consider the fault of the bankrupt, non-party tortfeasors when allocating shares of liability for plaintiffs non-economic damages under Article 16 of the CPLR. V. OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANTS FROM PRESENTING SPECULATIVE DOSE RECONSTRUCTION TESTIMONY As set forth herein, plaintiff s counsel mischaracterizes Mr. Spencer s report and his conclusions. Mr. Spencer s report is not a dose reconstruction, but rather is a liability and causation report that analyzes evidence, studies, and accepted criteria to determine whether the type of work that the plaintiff described concerning Fisher valves increased his risk for developing mesothelioma. Plaintiff s counsel deliberately misconstrues that issue and focuses instead on a narrow part of Mr. Spencer s overall analysis. Indeed, unlike plaintiffs experts, who render bald and conclusory opinions that all exposures constitute a substantial contributing factor, Mr. Spencer utilized an exposure assessment as part of his methodology. To conclude that Mr. Spencer cannot testify because a portion of his analysis actually assessed exposure and toxicity relative to ambient exposures is nonsensical. In essence, plaintiff s counsel argues in favor of allowing experts in industrial hygiene and/or toxicology to render causation opinions without any reference to levels or dosage of exposure. Additionally, a cursory analysis of Mr. Spencer s report shows that, contrary to plaintiff s assertion, he does not claim to be able to calculate the number or quantity of fibers to which the plaintiff was exposed from Fisher products. Rather, using the plaintiff s testimony regarding 3 3 of 7
4 Fisher and exposure/fiber release testing of packing and gaskets similar to what decedent described, Mr. Spencer concluded that the tasks described in the plaintiff s deposition testimony involving gasket and packet materials associated with Fisher valves would have created airborne asbestos fiber concentration, if any, that would have been well-below historical and contemporary occupational exposure limits. (Spencer Report, Apr. 28, 2015, at p. 18) (emphasis added). To grant plaintiff s motion would render dosage estimates irrelevant to specific causation opinions in asbestos cases; a result that would be in direct conflict with the Court of Appeals decision in Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp., 7 N.Y.3d 434, 448, 824 N.Y.S.2d 584 (2006) (holding that [i]t is well-established that an opinion on causation should set forth a plaintiff s exposure to a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation). ); see also Cornell v. 360 W. 51st St. Realty, LLC, 22 N.Y.3d 762 (2014) (reaffirming Parker). Finally, the use of calculations and exposure assessments as part of one s methodology has been accepted in courts throughout the country as a methodical and scientific component of specific causation expert opinions in asbestos cases. Indeed, Mr. Spencer s approach is consistent with the science of industrial hygiene and accepted industry guidelines that recognize that in the absence of actual air sampling data of the specific jobsite at the time of the alleged exposure, the best means to assess exposure levels is through quantitative dose reconstruction. Thus, plaintiff s position that quantitative exposure estimates are, as a matter of law, improper is inconsistent with controlling New York case law on point as well as the accepted standards, practices, and scientific procedures in the field of industrial hygiene. 4 4 of 7
5 VI. OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO PRECLUDE ANY EVIDENCE, TESTIMONY, OR ARGUMENT REGARDING THE SMOKING HISTORY OF THE PLAINTIFF OR HIS FAMILY Plaintiff argues that defendants should be barred from introducing evidence of plaintiff s and plaintiff s family s smoking history for two reasons. First, plaintiff argues that evidence of plaintiff s and plaintiff s family s smoking history should be precluded as prejudicial because smoking does not cause mesothelioma. See Plaintiff s Affirmation at To the extent that the motion is based on an assumption that the defendants will at some point claim that smoking causes mesothelioma, Fisher respectfully submits that the motion should be denied as premature. Plaintiff also blanketly asserts that [c]igarette warnings are irrelevant. See Plaintiff s Affirmation at 30. To the contrary, cigarette warnings are directly related to the plaintiff s propensity to disregard safety warnings, which is at issue in this case. The First Department has unequivocally and repeatedly held that [c]ontrary to plaintiff's argument, in this state, it remains plaintiff's burden to prove that defendant's failure to warn was a proximate cause of his injury and this burden includes adducing proof that the user of a product would have read and heeded a warning had one been given. Sosna v. Am. Home Prods., 298 A.D.2d 158, 158, 748 N.Y.S.2d 548, 549 (1st Dep t 2002)(internal citations omitted)(emphasis added); Mulhall v. Hannafin, 45 A.D.3d 55, 61, 841 N.Y.S.2d 282, 288 (1st Dep t 2007)( Under well settled law, to prove proximate cause, a plaintiff has the obligation to adduce proof that had a warning been provided, she would have read the warning and heeded it. )(internal citations omitted); Reis v. Volvo Cars of N. Am., Inc., 73 A.D.3d 420, 423, 901 N.Y.S.2d 10, 13 (1st Dep t 2010). The evidence that plaintiff is seeking to preclude is evidence that establishes that the plaintiff did not heed the warnings of the cancer-causing potential related to smoking contained 5 5 of 7
6 on a product that he used multiple times per day for thirty-five years. Contrary to plaintiff s assertions, this evidence is relevant to the issue of proximate cause and must be admitted. X. OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE, ARGUMENTS, OR INFERENCE THAT ANY PURPORTED NEGLIGENCE BY PLAINTIFF S EMPLOYERS, OR THE CONDITIONS AT ANY OF THE FACILITIES AT WHICH HE WORKED, RESULTED IN HIS INJURY Plaintiff argues that evidence of plaintiff s workplace exposure to asbestos and his employer s negligence are absolutely immaterial and irrelevant to all contested issues of this lawsuit. See Plaintiff s Affirmation at To the contrary, such evidence is material and relevant and exclusion of the evidence would be unfairly prejudicial. In New York, defendants are entitled to dispute causation or the existence of a plaintiff s alleged injuries by presenting alternative, superseding, or intervening explanations for plaintiff s injuries and the symptoms that a plaintiff presents as evidence of her injury. Van Wert v. Randall, 35 Misc. 3d 1201(A), *1 (Sup Ct, Rensselaer Cty 2012), affd, 100 A.D.3d 1079 (3rd Dept 2012). An order barring the introduction of evidence in support of such explanations is facially improper. Id. New York law is clear that a defendant seeking to apportion liability to non-party companies pursuant to Article 16 has the burden of submitting evidence that a non-party s negligence was significant cause of plaintiff s [mesothelioma]. See Plaintiff s Affirmation at 12, 43, citing In re New York City Asbestos Litig. (Marshall/Pride), 28 A.D.3d 255, 256 (1 st Dept 2006) and In re New York City Asbestos Litig. (Rosini), 256 A.D.2d 250, 252 (1st Dept 1998). If plaintiff s motion was granted, Article 16 would be rendered useless. Accordingly, plaintiff s motion must be denied. 6 6 of 7
7 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Fisher respectfully requests that the Court deny plaintiff s motions in limine. MCELROY, DEUTSCH, MULVANEY & CARPENTER LLP Attorneys for Defendant Fisher Controls International LLC Dated September 7, 2016 By /s/ Nancy McDonald,Esq. Nancy McDonald, Esq. 7 7 of 7
State of New York Court of Appeals
State of New York Court of Appeals MEMORANDUM This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 123 In the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/17/ :28 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/17/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY Index Number : 105671/1999 PART STRAUCH, NELSON A. JR. VS A.C. 8 S. INDEX NO. Sequence Number : 001 MOTION DATE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION SEQ. NO. The
More information2016 WL (N.Y.Sup.) (Trial Order) Supreme Court, New York. New York County
2016 WL 3802961 (N.Y.Sup.) (Trial Order) Supreme Court, New York. New York County In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. Walter MILLER, Plaintiff, V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, et al., Defendants. No. 190087/2014.
More informationMatter of New York City Asbestos Litig NY Slip Op 30005(U) January 4, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Peter
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. 2017 NY Slip Op 30005(U) January 4, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190034/15 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/25/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 355 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/25/2018
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT LEWIS COUNTY COURTHOUSE 7660 North State Street Lowville, New York 13367-1396 HON. CHARLES C. MERRELL e (3W 3%-5366 Far (315) 266-U75 DEBORAH W. EARL Supreme Court Justice
More informationMARY MURPHY-CLAGETT, AS : DECOTIIS IN OPPOSITION TO
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : INDEX NO.: 190311/2015 ASBESTOS LITIGATION : : This Document Relates To: : : AFFIRMATION OF LEIGH A MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT,
More informationLawson v R&L Carriers, Inc NY Slip Op 33581(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 1207/11 Judge: Augustus C.
Lawson v R&L Carriers, Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 33581(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 1207/11 Judge: Augustus C. Agate Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationFebruary 21, Re: Ivette Montanez, et al. v. American Honda Motor Co., et al.; Index No
600 Lexington Avenue 8 th Floor New York, NY 10022 P: 212.897.9655 F: 646.589.8700 hptylaw.com ATTORNEYS AT LAW Atlanta Austin Charleston Dallas Los Angeles New York St. Louis San Francisco Honorable Cynthia
More informationHackshaw v ABB, Inc NY Slip Op 30043(U) January 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Cynthia S.
Hackshaw v ABB, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 30043(U) January 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190022/13 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationBattistoni v AERCO Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 32552(U) December 21, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Peter H.
Battistoni v AERCO Intl., Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 32552(U) December 21, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190103/2015 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/2015 01:47 PM INDEX NO. 190350/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2015 03:49 PM INDEX NO. 190202/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/22/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 422 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/22/2016 06:23 PM INDEX NO. 190367/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 422 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY ---------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationFILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ :02 PM
FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/2017 12:02 PM INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002373 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/23/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONEIDA FRANK JAKUBOWKI AND GLORIA
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 442 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X NYCAL IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S Part 13 -----------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :24 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/2015 04:24 PM INDEX NO. 190079/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/23/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 121 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL I.A.S. Part 13 (Mendez, M.) MARIO PICCOLINO and ARCANGELA Index No. 190186/2016 PICCOLINO, Plaintiffs,
More informationMARY MURPHY-CLAGETT, as Temporary Administrator )
----------------------------------------------------------X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION â â â ------------------------------------------------------------------X This Document Relates To:
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/2016 0433 PM INDEX NO. 190115/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF 06/07/2016 LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP 137 West 25th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10001 (212) 302-2400
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/2016 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 190043/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X JOHN D. FIEDERLEIN AND
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x LEROY BAKER, Index No.: 190058/2017 Plaintiff, -against- AF SUPPLY USA INC.,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/2016 05:04 PM INDEX NO. 190293/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X VINCENT ASCIONE, v. ALCOA,
More informationFILED: ALBANY COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :51 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2016
FILED ALBANY COUNTY CLERK 01/05/2016 0951 AM INDEX NO. 901530/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF 01/05/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ALBANY LYNN M. LOCKWOOD, as Executrix for
More informationMatter of New York City Asbestos Litig NY Slip Op 30530(U) April 10, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge:
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. 2015 NY Slip Op 30530(U) April 10, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190033/2014 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/04/2016 12:53 PM INDEX NO. 190187/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ANGELO C. ABRUZZINO and BARBARA
More informationASBESTOS LITIGATION ALERT
A. STUDY PREDICTS NEARLY 30,000 NEW ASBESTOS CLAIMS WILL BE FILED OVER NEXT THIRTY-FIVE TO FIFTY YEARS A study by TowersWatson, a risk and financial management consulting company, finds that close to thirty
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ /30/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2014 10/30/2014 12:42 PM INDEX NO. 190087/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2014 10/30/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2015 01:23 PM INDEX NO. 190245/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/ :18 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 172 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/20/2014 10:18 AM INDEX. 190017/2013 NYSCEF DOC.. 172 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/20/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOIU< COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------------J{
More informationDefendant, Prevost Car (US) Inc., Individually and as. Successor to Nova Bus, by its attorneys, MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES,
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/08/2016 11:03 PM INDEX NO. 190300/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/08/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/27/ :26 PM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONEIDA -----------------------------------------------------------------------x FRANK JAKUBOWSKI and GLORIA JAKUBOWSKI, -against- Plaintiffs, A.O. SMITH
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/21/ :07 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/21/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/21/2016 0507 PM INDEX NO. 651546/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/21/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2016 02:54 PM INDEX NO. 190047/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X NORMAN DOIRON AND ELAINE
More informationSri McCam ri Q. August 16, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Sri McCam ri Q ae ga I Se 9 al McCambrid J e Sin g er &Mahone Y V Illinois I Michigan I Missouri I New Jersey I New York I Pennsylvania I 'Texas www.smsm.com Jennifer L. Budner Direct (212) 651.7415 jbudnernsmsm.com
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/12/ :04 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/12/2015 11:04 AM INDEX NO. 190275/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationASBESTOS LITIGATION ALERT
A. PARTIES FILE RESPONSES TO AMICI BRIEFS IN CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT COMPONENT PARTS DISPUTE O Neil, et al., v. Crane Co., et al.,, No. S177401, petition filed (Calif. Sup. Ct. Sept. 18, 2009) In a dispute
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/2017 06:40 PM INDEX NO. 190088/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
More informationMaryland tort lawyers may need to re-think their understanding of
4 Maryland Bar Journal September 2014 The Evolution of Pro Rata Contribution and Apportionment Among Joint Tort-Feasors By M. Natalie McSherry Maryland tort lawyers may need to re-think their understanding
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/28/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/28/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------- x IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL --------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCase No. 11-cv CRB ORDER DENYING FOSTER WHEELER S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-0-crb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 GERALDINE HILT, as Wrongful Death Heir, and as Successor-in-Interest to ROBERT
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 245 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY Index No.: 40000/1988 ASBESTOS LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: KELLY O' O'CONNOR, Personal Representative of the Estate
More informationFILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 05/22/ :57 PM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT In Re Seventh Judicial District Asbestos Litigation This Document Applies to: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF MONROE JENNIFER
More informationTRIAL MOTIONS and MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Civil Perspective
TRIAL MOTIONS and MOTIONS IN LIMINE Civil Perspective Article 44 Trial Motions CPLR 4401 Motion for Judgment During Trial (a/k/a Judgment as a matter of law ) Any party may move for judgment with respect
More information1300 MOUNT KEMBLE AVENUE P.O. BOX 2075 MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY (973) FACSIMILE (973) December 8, 2016
ATTORNEYS AT LAW KATHLEEN CHET7A Di~eci dial: (973) 425-8677 kchetta@mdmc-law.com 1300 MOUNT KEMBLE AVENUE P.O. BOX 2075 MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY 07962-2075 (973) 993-8100 FACSIMILE (973) 425-0761 December
More informationFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/03/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016
FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 11/03/2016 03:59 PM INDEX NO. 25545/2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/03/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX ------------------------------------------------------x
More informationEckert SeamansCherin & Mellott, LLC 'IEL Mulberry Street FAX Newark, New Jersey 07102
NNENs ATTORNEYS AT LAW Eckert SeamansCherin & Mellott, LLC 'IEL 973-855-4715 100 Mulberry Street FAX 973-855-4701 Newark, New Jersey 07102 www.eckertseamans.com April 3, 2018 The Honorable Manuel Mendez,
More informationHooper-Lynch v Colgate-Palmolive Co NY Slip Op 33116(U) December 4, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge:
Hooper-Lynch v Colgate-Palmolive Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 33116(U) December 4, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190328/2015 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: ALBANY COUNTY CLERK 03/08/ :09 PM INDEX NO NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ALBANY ---------------------------------------------------------------------x DAVID BROWN and MARIA BROWN, -against- 3M COMPANY and RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC.,
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED MAR 29 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SANDRA BROWN COULBOURN, surviving wife and on behalf of decedent's
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 511 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------- X In Re NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationShulman v Brenntag N. Am., Inc NY Slip Op 30089(U) January 9, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Manuel J.
Shulman v Brenntag N. Am., Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 30089(U) January 9, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190025/2017 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationFILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 05/19/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 62 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/19/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ----------------------------------------------------------------------X HOULIHAN/LAWRENCE INC., Index No. 71209/2015 -against- Plaintiff, REPLY
More informationLowe v AERCO Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 30391(U) February 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /04 Judge: Sherry Klein
Lowe v AERCO Intl., Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 30391(U) February 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 110194/04 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationFILED: MONROE COUNTY CLERK 09/27/ :50 AM
MONROE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE THIS IS NOT A BILL. THIS IS YOUR RECEIPT. Receipt # Book Page Return To: No. Pages: 19 JOSEPH THOMAS KREMER I istmment: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT Control #: Unrecorded #7461348
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS HELENE IRENE SMILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION October 26, 2001 9:05 a.m. v No. 217466 Oakland Circuit Court HELEN H. CORRIGAN, LC No. 96-522690-NI and Defendant-Appellant,
More informationLG Funding, LLC v Filton LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33289(U) December 14, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /17 Judge: Jack L.
LG Funding, LLC v Filton LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33289(U) December 14, 2018 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 606949/17 Judge: Jack L. Libert Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 112 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO Assunte Catazano a/k/a Sue Catazano, as Personal INDEX NO. 190298-16 Representative
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/02/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2016
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/02/2016 04:32 PM INDEX NO. 514527/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE ONE
More informationCase 3:13-cv SMY-SCW Document 400 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #6092
Case 3:13-cv-01338-SMY-SCW Document 400 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #6092 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SHARON BELL, Executor of the Estate of Mr. Richard
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Case No.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,, et al. Plaintiff Defendants Case No. NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER 1 The Pretrial Conference in the above captioned matter
More informationHammer v Algoma Hardwoods, Inc NY Slip Op 31993(U) July 28, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases
Hammer v Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 31993(U) July 28, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 190363/12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/25/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/25/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE CITY OF NEW YORK, - against - Plaintiff, Index No. 451648/2017 Mot. Seq. No. 002 FC 42 ND STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OF
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/29/ :41 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 411 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/29/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X SHANYN WOLF, Individually, and as Special : Administrator of the Estate of RANDY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANDREW V. KOCHERA, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS vs. Case No. 14-0029-SMY-SCW GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This
More informationBova v A.O. Smith Water Products Co NY Slip Op 33139(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /03 Judge: Sherry Klein
Bova v A.O. Smith Water Products Co. 2013 NY Slip Op 33139(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 102148/03 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationCPLR 7503(a): Mere Conclusory Allegations in Support of a Stay of Arbitration Proceedings Under MVAIC Statute Deemed Insufficient
St. John's Law Review Volume 47, October 1972, Number 1 Article 34 CPLR 7503(a): Mere Conclusory Allegations in Support of a Stay of Arbitration Proceedings Under MVAIC Statute Deemed Insufficient St.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/2016 05:12 PM INDEX NO. 190113/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
More informationMcCloskey v A.O. Smith Water Prods NY Slip Op 32326(U) August 29, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Barbara
McCloskey v A.O. Smith Water Prods. 2014 NY Slip Op 32326(U) August 29, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190441/12 Judge: Barbara Jaffe Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationParra v Trinity Church Corp NY Slip Op 34122(U) June 13, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /08 Judge: Doris Ling-Cohan Cases
Parra v Trinity Church Corp. 2011 NY Slip Op 34122(U) June 13, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 114956/08 Judge: Doris Ling-Cohan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/04/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 424 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/04/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X Index No.: 190311/2015 IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION : NYCAL
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2011
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2011 Opinion filed September 28, 2011. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D10-1333 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationSIMMONS HANLY CONROY 51MMONSFIRM.COM A NATIONAL LAW FIRM (800) February 20, 2018 BACKGROUND
SIMMONS HANLY CONROY 51MMONSFIRM.COM A NATIONAL LAW FIRM (800) 479-9533 From the desk offames M. framer February 20, 2018 Via NYSCEF & Hand Delivery Hon. Manuel J. Mendez New York City Civil Court, New
More informationHoward V. A.W. Chesterton: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reminds Us That They Meant What They Said On Toxic Tort Causation by Eric K.
4/25/14 - Volume 17, Issue 1 - April 2014 Howard V. A.W. Chesterton: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reminds Us That They Meant What They Said On Toxic Tort Causation by Eric K. Falk "I meant what I said,
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:16-cv MR-DLH
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00157-MR-DLH HOWARD MILTON MOORE, JR. and ) LENA MOORE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) MEMORANDUM
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION ) ) ALLEN T. and TOMMIE ) HOOFMAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N12C-04-243 ASB ) AIR & LIQUID
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/16/2016 03:26 PM INDEX NO. 190113/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 105 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/16/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
More informationTrial Motions. Motions in Limine. Civil Perspective
Trial Motions and Motions in Limine from the Civil Perspective New York State Bar Association Young Lawyers Section Trial Academy 2016 Cornell Law School - Ithaca, New York Presented by: Michael P. O Brien
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/12/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/12/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/12/2014 INDEX NO. 190087/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/12/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :27 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/2016 11:27 AM INDEX NO. 190093/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK LESLIE FOGEL and CATHERINE
More informationCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ORDER TO SHOW. New York, held in and for the SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. NOEL RICHARDS and YOLANDA MIERES, CAUSE
At IAS Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of New York, at the Courthouse located at 60 Centre Street, New York on the _ day of, 2018. P R E S E N T : Hon. J.S.C.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK VERIFIED REPLY TO 89 BOWERY AND HUA YANG'S COUNTERCLAIMS IN VERIFIED AMENDED ANSWER Index No. 150738/2017 Plaintiff, 93 BOWERY HOLDINGS LLC ("93
More informationMatter of Macaluso 2017 NY Slip Op 31095(U) May 17, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted
Matter of Macaluso 2017 NY Slip Op 31095( May 17, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190245/15 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(,
More information2. Denies knowledge and information suffrcient to form a belief with respect to
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEV/ YORK COUNTY OF ONEIDA In Te FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION This document applies to: FRANCIS JAKUBOWSKI and GLORIA JAKUBOWSKI, X Index No. EFCA2}I 6-00237
More informationLaGuerre v Holley 2013 NY Slip Op 32877(U) April 12, 2013 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: Judge: Steven M. Jaeger Cases posted with a
LaGuerre v Holley 2013 NY Slip Op 32877(U) April 12, 2013 Sup Ct, Nassau County Docket Number: 22408-09 Judge: Steven M. Jaeger Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/14/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 253 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/14/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/14/2016 0540 PM INDEX NO. 190087/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 253 RECEIVED NYSCEF 10/14/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT ---------------------------------------------------------------
More informationSmith v Ashland, Inc NY Slip Op 32448(U) September 26, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Arlene P.
Smith v Ashland, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 32448(U) September 26, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 156780/2017 Judge: Arlene P. Bluth Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/19/2017
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/2017 0627 PM INDEX NO. 651715/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF 06/19/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IAS PART - - - - - - - - - -
More informationBANKRUPTCY TRUST TRANSPARENCY: GARLOCK DECISION
CLM 2016 SOUTHWEST CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 3-4, 2016 IN DALLAS, TEXAS BANKRUPTCY TRUST TRANSPARENCY: GARLOCK DECISION I. Historical Perspective. A. Johns-Manville, Bankruptcies, and Garlock. In 1982 the Reagan
More informationINDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 595 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2011
INDEX NO. 104675/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 595 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/30/2011 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
More informationTRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST. Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims
TRONOX TORT CLAIMS TRUST Individual Review and Arbitration Procedures for Category A and Category D Personal Injury Claims Pursuant to Sections 3.4 and 3.5 of the Tronox Tort Claims Trust Distribution
More informationCase 2:18-cv KJD-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-kjd-cwh Document Filed // Page of 0 MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 HUNTER S. DAVIDSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 00 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada
More informationDust Diseases Tribunal (Standard Presumptions Apportionment) Order 2007
No 142 New South Wales Dust Diseases Tribunal (Standard Presumptions Apportionment) Order under the Dust Diseases Tribunal Regulation I, Robert John Debus MP, the Attorney General, in pursuance of clause
More informationAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN & DEUTSCH, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 THIRD AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y Luc:
AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN & DEUTSCH, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 THIRD AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10016 212 593-6700 Luc: 212 593-6970 Via E-Filing, Regular Mail, and Hand Delivery Hon. Barbara Jaffe, J.S.C.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/29/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/29/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/29/2016 05:27 PM INDEX NO. 805365/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 7 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/29/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK H.L. an Infant by his Mother
More informationGOL : New York Court of Appeals Adopts Aggregation Method in Crediting Settlements to Verdicts Assessed Against Non- Settling Defendants
St. John's Law Review Volume 68 Issue 1 Volume 68, Winter 1994, Number 1 Article 12 March 2012 GOL 15-108: New York Court of Appeals Adopts Aggregation Method in Crediting Settlements to Verdicts Assessed
More informationCase 6:13-cv GAP-DAB Document 91 Filed 08/09/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3428
Case 6:13-cv-00434-GAP-DAB Document 91 Filed 08/09/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID 3428 D.B., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA - ORLANDO DIVISION Plaintiffs, v. ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA;
More informationFILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 07/21/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/21/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU JOSEPH V. BOCCAFOLA, Plaintiff, - against - A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et. al. Defendants. Index No. 605032/2017 UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION S
More informationFILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/25/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/25/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS -------------------------------------------------------------------X MIRIAM E. AGURTO, Index No.: 713230-15 Plaintiff, -against- REPLY AFFIRMATION
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERIMENTS" OPINIONS AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF "FIBER RELEASE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------X This Document
More information