~ Constitutional Criminal Procedure Outline ~ Fall 2008 ~ Prof. Bradley
|
|
- Pierce Henry
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ~ Constitutional Criminal Procedure Outline ~ Fall 2008 ~ Prof. Bradley Relevant Portions of the Constitution o Fourth Amendment Protection from unreasonable search and seizure. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. o Fifth Amendment due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, eminent domain. No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. o Sixth Amendment Trial by jury and rights of the accused; Confrontation Clause, speedy trial, public trial, right to counsel In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense. o Fourteenth Amendment - Due Process Clause No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
2 Incorporation o Total Incorporation Incorporator is the Due Process Clause Incorporatees are the amendments 4th, 5th, & 6th amendment Prior to Due Process clause and prior to incorporation of Bill of Rights provisions Were state criminal justice systems obliged to follow them?no, not technically o Selective Incorporation Some provisions of the bill of rights are not incorporated and apply to the states but not all Examples of unincorporated Grand Jury Indictments 8th amendment Excessive Bail 6th amendment jury from the vicinage Constraints of the amendments thereby depend upon which jurisdiction is involved Once incorporated - what is the right amount? o For example: Right to Counsel, what are the essentials and what can we ignore? o What is meant by incorporating jot for jot?make the state follow all the details o Free-standing Due Process Fundamental Fairness - (Powell & Frankfurter) Does it violate due process? Due Process - the protection of private rights, such as the right to a fair trial, during a legal proceeding in accordance with stated rules and principles Interpret the due process clause in and of itself What does due process require? Interpret just the 14th amendment and what is fair given that interpretation as regards the other amendments Relationship between Due Process and Bill of Rights, the due process clause has limited operation beyond the text of the amendments i.e. must violate both the amendment and the due process clause o Is there a benefit to allowing local courts to interpret amendments and what is included with them differently? Federalism Different local needs o Duncan v. Louisiana pg 25 o Baldwin v. New York pg 28 o Williams v. Florida pg 28 o The Problem of Bodily Extractions: Another Look at the Due Process and Selective Incorporation Approaches
3 Rochin v. California pg 31, Breithaupt v. Abram pg 32, Schmerber v. California pg 33, County of Sacremento v. Lewis pg 34 THE RIGHTS TO APPOINTED COUNSEL AND RELATED PROBLEMS (pg 79-93) o RULE: The sixth amendment guarantees a right to counsel; however, that right to counsel attaches only during trial or at a "critical stage" in the proceedings; indictment and beyond. Only after the initiation of adversarial proceedings. Collateral consequences that are not imprisonment attach LIBERTY AND ITS LOSS DRIVING EVERYTHING o Powell v. Alabama (1932) Incorporated right to be heard by counsel for capital crimes on the state level Denial of counsel in such cases = denial of due process Special circumstances rule: In Powell, not appointing counsel because the common man can't handle a defense on their own but that here there were special circumstances at play that made it particularly unfair for these boys not to have appointed counsel Without counsel, the question becomes is this even a trial? o No adversarial proceedings = sham proceedings/railroading o Johnson v. Zerbst(1938): indigent, federal, felony defendants have right to appointed counsel First case to require APPOINTED counsel through reading of the 6th amendment o Betts v. Brady (1942) pg. 80 Counsel is not a fundamental right when defendant is deemed confident to defend themselves Otherwise every traffic court violation would require appointed counsel which would put a huge burden on the state Black, Douglas, Murphy dissent: If this were a case coming from a federal court, we would have to reverse due to fundamental fairness requirements so it should be the same here o Hamilton v. Alabama (1961): requirement of counsel for capital cases extends to capital arraignments o Chandler v. Fretag (1954): Right to your own counsel is unqualified (paid for by defendant not appointed) o Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) pg. 83 Defendant put up the best case a laymen could have been expected to but because of the nature of the system, a jury found him guilty and if he had sufficient counsel the facts of the case implied he had an excellent chance of being found not guilty "court in Betts was wrong in concluding that the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of counsel is not one of these fundamental rights."
4 HARLAN, concurring, Betts made sense given the jurisprudence of the cases prior and should not be so harshly criticized but agree it should be overruled Lawyers are deemed essential by state prosecutions and by defendants who can afford them which implies that "lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries." o Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972) pg 86 Struck down Florida rule which only appointed counsel for non-petty offensives punishable by more than 6 months in prison "counsel may well be necessary for a fair trial even in a petty offense" o No imprisonment without counsel Concurring opinion by Powell & Rehnquist: Three general factors to be weighed by judges in deciding if counsel is needed: o the complexity of the offense charged o the probable sentence to follow the conviction o Individual factors peculiar to the case i.e. competency o Scott v. Illinois (1979) pg 88 Actual imprisonment is the defining line whereby counsel would be required Not mere possibility of imprisonment Brennan, Marshalls, & Stevens dissent: difference between "petty" and mere regulatory offenses o Carries a moral stigma and conviction has different social indicators Job prospects, moral depravity assumed etc. o Nicolas v. United States (1994) pg 90: Even though DUI case did not receive counsel, it's resulting conviction could be used to exacerbate sentence of a later federal offense o Alabama v. Shelton (2002)pg. 90 Suspended sentence equates to prison term "Deprived of counsel when tried, convicted, and sentenced and unable to challenge the original judgment at a subsequent probation revocation hearing, a defendant in Shelton's circumstances faces incarceration on a conviction that has never been subject to the crucible of meaningful adversarial testing" Scalia, Rehnquist, Kennedy, Thomas dissent: Not the issue we are trying, would be different if the state does ultimately attempt to imprison him o The Beginnings of the Right to Counsel: Herein of Criminal Prosecutions and Critical Stages United States v. Gouveia pg 93 What are the different types of proceedings? o Preliminary Hearing:The preliminary hearing is scheduled in all felony cases within three to ten days of defendant's arrest. At this hearing the Commonwealth must establish that there is enough evidence to hold the defendant for trial in Common Pleas Court. If the case is "held for court" the witnesses will be required to appear at the trial in the Criminal Justice Center.
5 o Arraignment: At arraignment the defendant is formally charged with the crime and given a date for trial. Arraignments are held approximately two weeks after the preliminary hearing. No witnesses appear at this listing of the case. After the arraignment, witnesses are notified by mail of the trial date. o Trial: At the trial in Common Pleas Court, the Assistant District Attorney will present all the facts of the case to the judge and/or the jury. This will include testimony from the victim, witnesses and the police officers involved in the case. At this time the judge and/or jury will decide whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty, based on the testimony heard that day. If that case is a misdemeanor, a witness' first appearance will be for the actual trial in Municipal Court. o Sentencing: In misdemeanor cases, the defendant is usually sentenced on the same day as the trial. In felony cases, the sentencing is usually set for a later date. A victim is not required to appear at the sentencing; however, they are encouraged to attend. THE ROLE OF COUNSEL (pg ) o Waiver of the Right to Counsel; The Right to Proceed Pro Se Faretta v. California (1975) pg 115 Charged with grand theft auto, D wants to represent self, judge rules that he has no constitutional right to conduct his own defense. Judge proceeded to appoint a public defender against D's wishes Right to defend is given directly to the accused as it is he who will suffer the consequences of the outcome of his defense Counsel as a tool available to the willing defendant NOT imposed on him by the state o "one thing to say a right to counsel and another to say state may compel a D to take an attorney he does not want Must knowingly and intelligently forego counsel (Johnson v. Zerbst) o but skill and knowledge of a lawyer is not required to proceed pro se Martinez v. Court of Appeals of California (2000) pg 119: Faretta does not apply to appeals o Autonomy interests are less compelling on an appellate level o No constitutional right to appeal means no constitutional guarantee of counsel at said appeal Standby Counsel: McKaskle v. Wiggins (1984) pg 121: a D's rights aren't violated when standby counsel is appointed despite a request. Indiana v. Edwards 128 S. Ct (July 19,2008) State may appoint counsel against defendant's wishes if D is not mentally competent enough to proceed pro se despite being mentally competent enough to stand trial
6 THE RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL (pg ) o Strickland v. Washington pg 144 o Kimmelman v. Morrison pg 157 o Nix v. Whiteside pg 159 o Yarborough v. Gentry pg 161 o Duty to Investigate in Capital Cases o Strickland Exceptions pg 176 United States v. Cronic pg 177 Bell v. Cone pg 178
7 LINEUPS, SHOWUPS, AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES (pg ) o Wade & Gilbert: Constitutional Concern About the Dangers Involved in Eyewitness Identifications pg 745 United States v. Wade pg 745 Stovall v. Denno pg 754 Eyewitness Provisions of the 1968 Crime Control Act pg 754 o The Court Retreats: Kirby & Ash pg 755 Kirby v. Illinois pg 755 Moore v. Illinois pg 757 United States v. Ash pg 758 o Due Process & Other Limitations Stovall v. Denno pg 762 Manson v. Braithwaite pg 763 Duke Lacrosse pg 769
8 The Right to Counsel and the Analogy of Accusatorial, Adversary Trial pg 551 o Crooker v. California pg 551 o Cicenia v. La Gay pg 551 o Spano v. New York pg 551 Massiah and Escobedo: The Court Closes in on the Confession Problem pg 552 o Massiah v. United States pg 552 o Escobedo v. Illinois pg 554 MASSIAH REVISTED; MASSIAH & MIRANDA COMPARED AND CONTRASTED ( pg ) o The Revivification of Massiah Brewer v. Williams (Williams I) pg 722 United States v. Fellers pg 728 Patterson v. Illinois pg 729 Maine v. Moulton pg 733 o Passive v. Active Secret Agents United States v. Henry pg 734 Kuhlmann v. Wilson pg 735 o Texas v. Cobb pg 738 The Interests Protected by the Due Process Voluntariness or Totality of the Circumstances Test for Admitting Confessions pg Miranda v. Arizona pg 566 o The English Warnings o Justice Kennedy s Question about Miranda s Constitutional Status o Can (Did) Congress Repeal Miranda? o Four Decades with Miranda: An Overview Michigan v. Tucker pg 587 New York v. Quarles pg 588 Oregon v. Elstad pg 588
9 State v. McKnight pg 588 Duckworth v. Eagan pg 589 Colorado v. Spring pg 592 Beckwith v. United States pg 593 o Yarborough v. Alvarado pg 600 o Rhode Island v. Innis pg 600 Arizona v. Mauro pg 605 o Illinois v. Perkins pg 607 o Pennsylvania v. Muniz pg 609 o United States v. Velarde-Gomez pg 612 o Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Court pg 613 o New York v. Quarles pg 614 o Meeting the Heavy Burden or demonstrating waiver pg 622 Implied Waiver: North Carolina v. Butler pg 625 Qualified or Conditional Waiver: Connecticut v. Barrett pg 627 o What Constitutes Invocation of Miranda Rights pg 628 Fare v. Michael C. pg 628 o The Scope of Second-Level Miranda Safeguards Michigan v. Mosley pg 629 Edwards v. Arizona pg 630 Arizona v. Roberson pg 631 Minnick v. Mississippi pg 632 o Initiation Further Conversation: Oregon v. Bradshaw pg 634 o How Direct Must Invocation Be: Davis v. United States pg 638 o Sixth Amendment compared Michigan v. Jackson pg 641 McNeil v. Wisconsin pg 641 o Anticipatory invocation of Miranda o Failure to Inform a Lawyer is trying to see suspect: Moran v. Burbine pg 643 The Due Process - Voluntariness Test Revisited (pg ) o Miller v. Fenton pg 701, 703 o Bram v. United States pg 708 o United States v. LeBrun pg 709 o Arizona v. Fulminante pg 710 o Colorado v. Connelly pg 711
United States Constitutional Law: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation
United States Constitutional Law: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation Class 4: Individual Rights and Criminal Procedure Monday, December 17, 2018 Dane S. Ciolino A.R. Christovich Professor of Law Loyola
More informationCivil Liberties & the Rights of the Accused CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES
Civil Liberties & the Rights of the Accused CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES In the U.S. when one is accused of breaking the law he / she has rights for which the government cannot infringe upon when trying
More informationThe Right to Counsel. Within the criminal justice system in the United States today, those people
The Right to Counsel Within the criminal justice system in the United States today, those people accused of a crime are afforded rights, before, during and after trial. One of these rights that the accused
More informationTHE RIGHT TO COUNSEL A Brief History By Kimberly Simmons, Execu8ve Director Idaho State Public Defense Commission
THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL A Brief History By Kimberly Simmons, Execu8ve Director Idaho State Public Defense Commission Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932) Under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment,
More informationFifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights
You do not need your computers today. Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights How have the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments' rights of the accused been incorporated as a right of all American citizens?
More informationDue Process of Law. 5th, 6th and & 7th amendments
Due Process of Law 5th, 6th and & 7th amendments Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his home and brought to the police station where he was questioned After 2 hours he signed a confession,
More informationCRIMINAL PROCEDURE I
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I Spring 2008 Syllabus Professor Butterfoss Required Texts: Tomkovicz & White, "Criminal Procedure: Constitutional Constraints Upon Investigation And Proof" (5 th Ed.) (Lexis/Nexis 2004)
More informationWilliam & Mary Law Review. John C. Sours. Volume 9 Issue 2 Article 17
William & Mary Law Review Volume 9 Issue 2 Article 17 Constitutional Law - Criminal Law - Right of an Accused to the Presence of Counsel at Post- Indictment Line-Up - United States v. Wade, 87 S. Ct. 1926
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 07-1529 In the Supreme Court of the United States JESSE JAY MONTEJO, PETITIONER v. STATE OF LOUISIANA (CAPITAL CASE) ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES
More informationCh. 5 (pt 2): Civil Liberties: The Rest of the Bill of Rights
Name: Date: Period: Ch 5 (pt 2): Civil Liberties: The Rest of the Bill of Rights Notes Ch 5 (pt 2): Civil Liberties: The Rest of the Bill of Rights 1 Objectives about Civil Liberties GOVT11 The student
More informationCriminal Procedure. 8 th Edition Joel Samaha. Wadsworth Publishing
Criminal Procedure 8 th Edition Joel Samaha Wadsworth Publishing Criminal Procedure and the Constitution Chapter 2 Constitutionalism In a constitutional democracy, constitutionalism is the idea that constitutions
More informationCRIMINAL PROCEDURE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS IN A NUTSHELL. Fifth Edition JEROLD H. ISRAEL
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS IN A NUTSHELL Fifth Edition By JEROLD H. ISRAEL Alene and Allan E Smith Professor of Law, University of Michigan Ed Rood Eminent Scholar in Trial Advocacy
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2010 ANTHONY WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D09-1978 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed May 28, 2010 Appeal
More informationHands on the Bill of Rights
Hands on the Bill of Rights Instructions Read the text of each Amendment to see which rights and freedoms it guarantees. To help you remember these rights, perform the finger tricks for each Amendment.
More informationDay 7 - The Bill of Rights: A Transcription
Day 7 - The Bill of Rights: A Transcription The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form. These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791,
More informationA digest of twenty one (21) significant US Supreme Court decisions interpreting Miranda
From Miranda v. Arizona to Howes v. Fields A digest of twenty one (21) significant US Supreme Court decisions interpreting Miranda (1968 2012) In Miranda v. Arizona, the US Supreme Court rendered one of
More informationPeople can have weapons within limits, and be apart of the state protectors. Group 2
Amendment I - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
More informationESCOBEDO AND MIRANDA REVISITED by
ESCOBEDO AND MIRANDA REVISITED by ARTHUR J. GOLDBERGW Shortly before the close of the 1983 term, the Supreme Court of the United States decided two cases, U.S. v. Gouveial and New York v. Quarles 2, which
More informationForensics and Bill of Rights. Elkins
Forensics and Bill of Rights Elkins Our Rights and Their Effect on Forensic Evidence Understanding the rights of United States citizens under the law (Bill of Rights) is vital when collecting, analyzing,
More informationCourt of Appeals of New York, People v. Ramos
Touro Law Review Volume 19 Number 2 New York State Constitutional Decisions: 2002 Compilation Article 11 April 2015 Court of Appeals of New York, People v. Ramos Brooke Lupinacci Follow this and additional
More informationgideon v. wainwright (1963)
gideon v. wainwright (1963) directions Read the Case Background and Key Question. Then analyze Documents A-I. Finally, answer the Key Question in a well-organized essay that incorporates your interpretations
More informationCRIMINAL LAW JURISDICTION, PROCEDURE, AND THE COURTS. February 2017
CRIMINAL LAW JURISDICTION, PROCEDURE, AND THE COURTS February 2017 Prepared for the Supreme Court of Nevada by Ben Graham Governmental Advisor to the Judiciary Administrative Office of the Courts 775-684-1719
More informationThe Constitution. Structure and Principles
The Constitution Structure and Principles Structure Preamble We the People of the United States in Order to form a more perfect Union establish Justice insure domestic Tranquility provide for the common
More informationBill of Rights THE FIRST TEN AMENDMENTS
Bill of Rights { THE FIRST TEN AMENDMENTS The Constitution of the United States: The Bill of Rights These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the "Bill of Rights." Amendment
More informationIn this article we are going to provide a brief look at the ten amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights Introduction The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the Constitution. It establishes the basic civil liberties that the federal government cannot violate. When the Constitution
More informationThe Incorporation Doctrine Extending the Bill of Rights to the States
The Incorporation Doctrine Extending the Bill of Rights to the States Barron v. Baltimore (1833) Bill of Rights applies only to national government; does not restrict states 14 th Amendment (1868) No state
More informationBusiness Law Chapter 9 Handout
Major Differences: 2 Felonies Serious crimes, punishable by Death or prison for more than one (1) year. Misdemeanors Non-serious (petty) crimes punishable by jail for less than one(1) year and/or by fines.
More informationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE DR. RONALD REISNER Fall 2010 Phone: 732-571-3529 ROOM: LSH B117 Email: rreisner@monmouth.edu Class Schedule: T/TH 6:40-8pm Office Hrs:
More informationDuring the constitutional debates many delegates feared that the Constitution as
THE BILL OF RIGHTS Grade 5 United States History and Geography I. Introduction During the constitutional debates many delegates feared that the Constitution as drafted gave too much power to the central
More informationCHAPTER 34. A. Introduction
CHAPTER 34 THE RIGHTS OF PRETRIAL DETAINEES* A. Introduction Pretrial detention refers to the time period during which you are incarcerated after being arrested but before your trial. Pretrial detention
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2012 NO AGAINST
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2012 NO. 1-001 MARY BERGHUIS, WARDEN, Petitioner, AGAINST VAN CHESTER THOMPKINS, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
REL:6/26/2009 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationWHY THE SUPREME COURT WILL NOT TAKE PRETRIAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL SERIOUSLY
WHY THE SUPREME COURT WILL NOT TAKE PRETRIAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL SERIOUSLY Arnold H. Loewy * I. WHEN DOES THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL ATTACH?... 267 II. WHAT DOES THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL ENTAIL?... 268 III. WHY WON
More informationSixth Amendment. Fair Trial
Sixth Amendment Fair Trial Many parts to a fair trial 1. Speedy and Public 2. Impartial jury (local) 3. Informed of the charges 4. Access to the same tools that the state has to prove guilt Speedy Trial
More informationTest Bank for Criminal Evidence Principles and Cases 8th Edition by Thomas J. Gardner and Terry M. Anderson
Test Bank for Criminal Evidence Principles and Cases 8th Edition by Thomas J. Gardner and Terry M. Anderson Link download full: https://digitalcontentmarket.org/download/test-bank-forcriminal-evidence-principles-and-cases-8th-edition-by-gardner-and-anderson/
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 532 U. S. (2001) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 99 1702 TEXAS, PETITIONER v. RAYMOND LEVI COBB ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS [April 2, 2001] JUSTICE
More informationChapter 12 Right to Counsel
Chapter 12 Right to Counsel 12.1 Scope of Right to Counsel 3 A. Right to Appointed Counsel B. Right to Retained Counsel C. Right to Other Expenses of Representation 12.2 Consequences of Denial of Counsel
More informationRight to Counsel in Criminal Cases
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 1966 Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases Edward T. Haggins Follow this and additional works at: http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev
More informationNo. 98,736 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, TRAVIS GUNNER LONG, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 98,736 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. TRAVIS GUNNER LONG, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law over which
More informationThe Law of Interrogation in North Carolina
The Law of Interrogation in North Carolina Jeff Welty December 2011 1. Voluntariness a. Generally. A suspect s statement is voluntary if it is the product of an essentially free and unconstrained choice
More informationMajority Opinion by Thurgood Marshall in. Mempa v. Rhay (1967)
Majority Opinion by Thurgood Marshall in Mempa v. Rhay (1967) In an opinion that Justice Black praised for its brevity, clarity and force, Mempa v. Rhay was Thurgood Marshall s first opinion on the Supreme
More informationBill of Rights! First 10!!! What were the basic rights promised in the Bill of Rights?
Bill of Rights! First 10!!! What were the basic rights promised in the Bill of Rights? The Bill of Rights The First 10 Amendments to the Constitution Take notes on the slides as they appear. Draw pictures
More informationBill of Rights. Bill or Rights Essential Questions;
Bill of Rights Bill or Rights Essential Questions; What is the purpose of the Bill of Rights? How does each amendment protect liberty? In what ways can the government limit individual rights? Key Objectives
More informationThe Bill of Rights determines how you must be treated by the government. It outlines your rights as an American.
Learning Target I can explain the basic rights promised in the Bill of Rights. Why You Should Care The Bill of Rights determines how you must be treated by the government. It outlines your rights as an
More informationCivil Liberties and Civil Rights. Government
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Government Civil Liberties Protections, or safeguards, that citizens enjoy against the abusive power of the government Bill of Rights First 10 amendments to Constitution
More informationDECEPTION Moran v. Burbine*
INTERROGATIONS AND POLICE DECEPTION Moran v. Burbine* I. INTRODUCTION The United States Supreme Court recently addressed the issue of whether police officers' failure to inform a suspect of his attorney's
More informationCOLORADO HOUSE BILL : SAFEGUARDING THE RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY IN MUNICIPAL COURT?
COLORADO HOUSE BILL 16-1309: SAFEGUARDING THE RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY IN MUNICIPAL COURT? New legislation governing a defendant s right to counsel will soon impact municipal court procedures in Colorado.
More informationPolitical Science Legal Studies 217
Political Science Legal Studies 217 Reading and Analyzing Cases How Does Law Influence Judicial Review? Lower courts Analogic reasoning Find cases that are close and draw parallels Supreme Court Decision
More informationWaiver after Request for Counsel--Sixth Amendment: Michigan v. Jackson, 106 S. Ct (1986)
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 77 Issue 3 Article 10 1987 Waiver after Request for Counsel--Sixth Amendment: Michigan v. Jackson, 106 S. Ct. 1404 (1986) Thomas Echikson Follow this and
More informationCONSTITUTION of the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
CONSTITUTION of the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Article Preamble I. Declaration of Rights II. The Legislature III. Legislation IV. The Executive V. The Judiciary Schedule to Judiciary Article VI. Public
More informationSay What?! A Review of Recent U.S. Supreme Court 5 th Amendment Self-incrimination Case Law
Say What?! A Review of Recent U.S. Supreme Court 5 th Amendment Self-incrimination Case Law POPPI RITACCO Attorney Advisor / Senior Instructor State and Local Training Division Federal Law Enforcement
More informationCh 10 Practice Test
Ch 10 Practice Test 2016-2017 Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. What are civil liberties? a. freedom to take part in a civil court case b.
More informationSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRYSTAL STROBEL NO. COA Filed: 18 May 2004
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRYSTAL STROBEL NO. COA03-566 Filed: 18 May 2004 1. Confessions and Incriminating Statements--motion to suppress--miranda warnings- -voluntariness The trial court did not err
More informationCriminal Justice A Brief Introduction
Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction ELEVENTH EDITION CHAPTER 5 Policing: Legal Aspects A Changing Legal Climate U.S. Constitution Designed to protect citizens against abuses of police power U.S. Supreme
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:10-cr-00225-CKK Document 26 Filed 01/31/11 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STEPHEN JIN-WOO KIM Defendant. CASE NO. 1:10-CR-225
More informationObjectives : Objectives (cont d): Sources of US Law. The Nature of the Law
The Nature of the Law Martha Dye-Whealan RPh, JD Pharm 543 Objectives : Identify and distinguish the sources of law in the United States. Understand the hierarchy of laws, and how federal and state law
More informationInterrogation under the Fifth Amendment: Arizona v. Mauro
SMU Law Review Volume 41 1987 Interrogation under the Fifth Amendment: Arizona v. Mauro Eleshea Dice Lively Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.smu.edu/smulr Recommended Citation Eleshea
More informationCrucial Stages, Crucial Confrontations, and the Florida Criminal Defendant's Right to Counsel
Florida State University Law Review Volume 24 Issue 3 Article 4 1997 Crucial Stages, Crucial Confrontations, and the Florida Criminal Defendant's Right to Counsel Anthony J. Mazzeo 1@1.com Follow this
More informationStructure of the Criminal Justice System. Developed by Jo Ann Grode 2004
Structure of the Criminal Justice System Developed by Jo Ann Grode 2004 Sources of Law U.S. Constitution (includes Bill of Rights) U.S. Supreme Court decisions U.S. Code (federal laws) Wisconsin Constitution
More information306 HARVARD LAW REVIEW [Vol. 122:276
306 HARVARD LAW REVIEW [Vol. 122:276 tutes a national consensus, which might result in the chilling effect that Justice Alito and Louisiana suggested occurred in the case of capital rape provisions. If
More informationThe Bill of Rights. Part One: Read the Expert Information and highlight the main ideas and supporting details.
The Bill of Rights Part One: Read the Expert Information and highlight the main ideas and supporting details. Expert Information: The Anti-Federalists strongly argued against the ratification of the Constitution
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, DANIEL W. TIMS, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 109,472 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. DANIEL W. TIMS, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court has jurisdiction to review the State's claim
More informationCriminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step 2 Getting Defendant Before The Court! There are four methods to getting the defendant before the court 1) Warrantless Arrest 2)
More informationVolume 37, May 1963, Number 2 Article 7
St. John's Law Review Volume 37, May 1963, Number 2 Article 7 Constitutional Law--Sixth Amendment and Due Process--Appointment of Counsel Required for Indigent Defendant in All Criminal Cases (Gideon v.
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Keenan, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Keenan, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice OLAN CONWAY ALLEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 951681 SENIOR JUSTICE RICHARD H. POFF June 7, 1996 COMMONWEALTH
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION. COMES NOW Defendant RODNEY TOMMIE STEWART, by and through
Case 1:14-cr-00020-SPW Document 20 Filed 04/01/14 Page 1 of 19 STEVEN C. BABCOCK Assistant Federal Defender Federal Defenders of Montana Billings Branch Office 2702 Montana Avenue, Suite 101 Billings,
More informationThe Five Freedoms: 1. Religion 2. Assembly 3. Press 4. Petition 5. Speech RAPPS
The Five Freedoms: 1. Religion 2. Assembly 3. Press 4. Petition 5. Speech RAPPS A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT NO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. ROMAN CAVANAUGH, JR.
Case: 10-1154 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/26/2010 Entry ID: 3658336 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT NO. 10-1154 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellant, vs. ROMAN CAVANAUGH,
More informationSixth Amendment--Right to Counsel of Prisoners Isolated in Administrative Detention
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 75 Issue 3 Fall Article 12 Fall 1984 Sixth Amendment--Right to Counsel of Prisoners Isolated in Administrative Detention Deborah L. Yalowitz Follow this and
More informationFirst Amendment. Original language:
First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 530 U. S. (2000) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationThe Bill of Rights. If YOU were there... First Amendment
2 SECTION What You Will Learn Main Ideas 1. The First Amendment guarantees basic freedoms to individuals. 2. Other amendments focus on protecting citizens from certain abuses. 3. The rights of the accused
More information7 Principles of the Constitution. 1.Popular Sovereignty- the governments right to rule comes from the people
7 Principles of the Constitution 1.Popular Sovereignty- the governments right to rule comes from the people 2. Limited Government- the government has only the powers that the Constitution gives to it 3.
More informationCivil Liberties and Civil Rights. Government
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Government Civil Liberties Protections, or safeguards, that citizens enjoy against the abusive power of the government Bill of Rights First 10 amendments to Constitution
More informationROLE AND AUTHORITY WRITTEN DIRECTIVE: 1.10 EFFECTIVE DATE: REVISION DATE: SUPERSEDES EDITION DATED:
ROLE AND AUTHORITY WRITTEN DIRECTIVE: 1.10 EFFECTIVE DATE: 01-31-1996 REVISION DATE: 07-20-2017 SUPERSEDES EDITION DATED: 08-15-2016 Contents: I. Purpose II. Policy III. Establishing Goals and Objectives
More informationCriminal Law. The Basics
Criminal Law The Basics Branches of law Criminal Wrongs against the state Civil Private injury, mediated by state Administrative Law of administrative or regulatory agencies Legal categories of crimes
More informationAppendix A. Constitution of the United States of America: Provisions of Particular Interest to Postsecondary Education **** **** ****
A Legal Guide for Student Affairs Professionals, Second Edition by William A. Kaplin and Barbara A. Lee Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Appendix A Constitution of the United States of America: Provisions
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT NEIL J. GILLESPIE vs. Appellant, Case No.: 2D10-5197 Lower Court Case No. 05-CA-007205 BARKER, RODEMS & COOK, PA, a Florida Corporation;
More informationRIGHTS GUARANTEED IN ORIGINAL TEXT CIVIL LIBERTIES VERSUS CIVIL RIGHTS
CIVIL LIBERTIES VERSUS CIVIL RIGHTS Both protected by the U.S. and state constitutions, but are subtly different: Civil liberties are limitations on government interference in personal freedoms. Civil
More informationLoyola University Chicago Law Journal
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal Volume 4 Issue 1 Winter 1973 Article 14 1973 Constitutional Law - Criminal Law - Absent a Knowing and Intelligent Waiver, No Person May Be Imprisoned for Any Offense
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 07-440 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States WALTER ALLEN ROTHGERY, Petitioner, v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth
More informationCriminal Procedure - Confessions - Application of Miranda v. Arizona - People v. Rodney P. (Anonymous), 233 N.E.2d 255 (N.Y.1967)
William & Mary Law Review Volume 9 Issue 4 Article 20 Criminal Procedure - Confessions - Application of Miranda v. Arizona - People v. Rodney P. (Anonymous), 233 N.E.2d 255 (N.Y.1967) Repository Citation
More informationCourse Security Services. Unit IV U.S. Constitution and Constitutional Issues
Course Security Services Unit IV U.S. Constitution and Constitutional Issues Essential Questions What is one of the jurisdictional differences between private security and police and how do the 4 th, 5
More informationTHE JUDICIAL BRANCH. Article III. The Role of the Federal Court
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH Section I Courts, Term of Office Section II Jurisdiction o Scope of Judicial Power o Supreme Court o Trial by Jury Section III Treason o Definition Punishment Article III The Role of
More informationCivil Liberties. What are they? Where are they found?
Civil Liberties What are they? Where are they found? Are protections given to individuals against action of the government. Usually the protections are written in a Constitution. American civil liberties
More informationSixth Amendment--Waiver of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel at Post-Indictment Interrogation
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 79 Issue 3 Fall Article 8 Fall 1988 Sixth Amendment--Waiver of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel at Post-Indictment Interrogation John S. III Banas Follow
More informationMethods of Proposal. Method 1 By 2/3 vote in both the House and the Senate. [most common method of proposing an amendment]
Methods of Proposal Method 1 By 2/3 vote in both the House and the Senate [most common method of proposing an amendment] Method 1 By 2/3 vote in both the House and the Senate [most common method of proposing
More informationALI-ABA Live Teleseminar/Audio Webcast Challenging Confessions in Juvenile Delinquency Cases February 25, 2009
27 ALI-ABA Live Teleseminar/Audio Webcast Challenging Confessions in Juvenile Delinquency Cases February 25, 2009 Motions To Suppress Confessions, Admissions, and Other Statements of the Respondent By
More informationCriminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step Path of Criminal Cases in Queens Commencement Arraignment Pre-Trial Trial Getting The Defendant Before The Court! There are four
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 28, 2010
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 28, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHARLES PHILLIP MAXWELL Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County
More informationPacket Four: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 6: Introduction to Motions
Packet Four: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 6: Introduction to Motions Introduction A motion is an application to the court for an order. 1 If the court has the power or authority 2 to make the order,
More informationChapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Two elements must exist at the same time for a person to be convicted of a crime:
Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business Criminal Liability Two elements must exist at the same time for a person to be convicted of a crime: 1 the performance of a prohibited act (actus reus) 2 a specified
More informationBUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes
BUSINESS LAW Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes Learning Objectives List and describe the essential elements of a crime. Describe criminal procedure, including arrest, indictment, arraignment, and
More informationThe Bill of Rights First Ten Amendments
The Bill of Rights First Ten Amendments Chapter 1 The Bill of Rights...00 Overview Drafting the Bill of Rights.....00 Debate in Congress....00 History of Amendment Language.....00 As Submitted to the States....00
More informationThe United States Constitution
The United States Constitution The Structure of Government Republican Form of Government Representative Democracy Federation of States with a central government THE PREAMBLE: 3 words that changed the world
More informationDisentangling Miranda and Massiah: How to Revive the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel as a Tool for Regulating Confession Law
University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Articles Faculty Scholarship 2017 Disentangling Miranda and Massiah: How to Revive the Sixth Amendment Right to
More informationArgued and submitted December 9, DEMAPAN, Chief Justice, CASTRO, Associate Justice, and TAYLOR, Justice Pro Tem.
Commonwealth v. Suda, 1999 MP 17 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Natalie M. Suda, Defendant/Appellant. Appeal No. 98-011 Traffic Case No. 97-7745 August 16, 1999 Argued
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond, on Thursday, the 3rd day of March, 2005.
VIRGINIA: In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond, on Thursday, the 3rd day of March, 2005. Christopher Scott Emmett, Petitioner, against Record No.
More informationAmerican Government. Topic 8 Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights
American Government Topic 8 Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 5 Due Process of Law The Meaning of Due Process Constitution contains two statements about due process 5th Amendment Federal
More informationPre-AP Agenda (9/1-5)
Pre-AP Agenda (9/1-5) Monday No school Tuesday - copy agenda - Hand le on the Preamble - Principles of the Constitution foldable Wednesday - Voting in America picture analysis Thursday - Where is the Control?
More information