AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT (ALLEGIANCE TO AUSTRALIA) BILL 2015
|
|
- Lilian McKenzie
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PARLIAMENTARY JOINT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT (ALLEGIANCE TO AUSTRALIA) BILL 2015 JULY 2015 The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella body for refugees, asylum seekers and the organisations and individuals who work with them, representing over 200 organisations and 1,000 individual members. RCOA promotes the adoption of humane, lawful and constructive policies by governments and communities in Australia and internationally towards refugees, asylum seekers and humanitarian entrants. RCOA consults regularly with its members, community leaders and people from refugee backgrounds and this submission is informed by their views. RCOA welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Bill For refugee and humanitarian entrants (particularly those who are stateless), Australian citizenship often has a special significance, representing the culmination of their journey and the end of their displacement. RCOA is therefore concerned that the measures proposed in this Bill are likely to undermine the values and principles of citizenship. In particular, we are concerned that the Bill will allow citizenship and its associated rights to be revoked without due process, and may increase the risk of both refoulement and indefinite detention for people from refugee backgrounds. We therefore recommend that the Bill be rejected in its entirety, and that the Australian Government consider adopting measures to increase social inclusion and participation within the wider community as a more effective way of preventing terrorism. 1. Significance of citizenship for refugee and humanitarian entrants 1.1. The right to a nationality is an essential human right. Article 15 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that everyone has the right to a nationality. Nationality creates rights and duties for both the State and the individual. These rights or duties are not available to a person without citizenship, resulting in a lack of opportunity, protection and participation. Citizenship is also essential in realising a number of other human rights, such as the right to take part in political affairs. While human rights apply globally, citizenship is the main way through which people can access these rights Citizenship has particular significance for refugee and humanitarian entrants. Refugees are, by definition, unable to return to their country of origin because of a well-founded fear of persecution or other forms of serious harm. Australian citizenship is therefore often the first effective and durable form of protection that many refugees receive, and is celebrated and cherished by them. For those who know what it is like to live without freedom and democracy, obtaining citizenship in a free and democratic country can be particularly meaningful. As one former refugee noted in RCOA s community consultations: Having a citizenship is highly valued. It gives you equal rights and equal protection for the first time. Refugees are honoured to have an Australian citizenship and we appreciate the rights, protection and obligations that comes with it. If we didn t have an Australian citizenship we would have nowhere to go. Sydney office: Melbourne office: Suite 4A6, 410 Elizabeth Street Level 2, Flinders Lane Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia Phone: (02) Fax: (02) Phone: (03) admin@refugeecouncil.org.au melbourne@refugeecouncil.org.au Web: Incorporated in ACT ABN
2 1.3. The acquisition of citizenship plays a central role in resolving the situation of refugee and humanitarian entrants. This is recognised by the 1951 Refugee Convention, which requires its signatories to as far as possible facilitate the assimilation and naturalisation of refugees and make every effort to expedite naturalisation proceedings and to reduce as far as possible the charges and costs of such proceedings. Further, two of the three durable solutions for refugees promoted by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) local integration and resettlement rely on refugees becoming citizens of another country International research provides evidence that people from refugee backgrounds are more likely than other migrants to invest in country-specific human capital, including through obtaining citizenship, because they lack the option to return to their homelands. 1 For many refugee and humanitarian entrants, obtaining citizenship represents the culmination of their journey: the point at which they are no longer displaced; can rebuild their lives in safety and security; and feel the sense of belonging which was denied to them in their country of origin Citizenship has even greater significance for stateless people, who by definition are not recognised as nationals of any country. The status of stateless people can only be resolved by obtaining citizenship. Under the 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons, Australia is required to make every effort to expedite naturalisation proceedings and to reduce as far as possible the charges and costs of such proceedings. This is similar to its obligations under the Refugee Convention RCOA therefore encourages the Australian Government to consider the specific impacts of the Bill on refugee and humanitarian entrants and stateless people. We are also concerned more broadly that such measures would undermine the principles of citizenship. Citizenship is a vital bond between people and their country, and this Bill would undermine the strength of this bond by enabling citizenship to be more readily revoked. 2. Revocation of citizenship from Australians suspected of involvement in terrorism 2.1. RCOA understands the need to take appropriate action to prevent terrorism and ensure that people who engage in terrorist activities are held accountable for their crimes. Indeed, many refugees and asylum seekers who have sought protection in Australia have fled from terrorism and related conflicts. Afghan refugees fleeing the Taliban and Syrian and Iraqi refugees fleeing ISIS are just some of many examples of people who have left their country because of terrorism. If Australia is indeed concerned about the impact of terrorism in the world, it should be doing more to protect those affected by terrorism While recognising the need to take appropriate action to prevent terrorism, RCOA is very concerned by the proposal in the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Bill 2015 that dual nations suspected of having committed a terrorist offence would automatically renounce their Australian citizenship. Citizenship is a fundamental right and should only be revoked as a last resort. Depriving a person of citizenship can only be justified if the action is necessary, lawful and proportionate. RCOA believes the current proposals do not meet these requirements Under Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the deprivation of citizenship cannot be arbitrary. Any revocation of citizenship must be set out in law, proportionate and necessary to the harm it seeks to prevent. As noted by the UN Human Rights Council: The consequences of any withdrawal of nationality must be carefully weighed against the gravity of the behaviour or offence for which the withdrawal of nationality is prescribed RCOA does not believe the proposed laws are proportionate to the harm they seek to prevent. While terrorism must be addressed, RCOA believes that the Government has not sufficiently justified the 1 See RCOA s literature review on the economic, civic and social contributions of refugees and humanitarian entrants, available at 2 Human Rights Council, Human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality, 19 December 2013, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/25/28.
3 introduction of such serious measures. There is little evidence that the automatic renunciation of citizenship would have a significant impact on preventing terrorist activities, either in Australia or overseas RCOA also believes that the proposed laws are likely to violate Article 12(4) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which provides that no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country. As the UN Human Rights Council in its General Comment on Article 12(4) of the ICCPR explain: In no case may a person be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his or her own country. The reference to the concept of arbitrariness in this context is intended to emphasize that it applies to all State action, legislative, administrative and judicial; it guarantees that even interference provided for by law should be in accordance with the provisions, aims and objectives of the Covenant and should be, in any event, reasonable in the particular circumstances. The Committee considers that there are few, if any, circumstances in which deprivation of the right to enter one s own country could be reasonable. A State party must not, by stripping a person of nationality or by expelling an individual to a third country, arbitrarily prevent this person from returning to his or her own country It should be noted that under international law, references to a person s own country are broader than the country of his or her nationality and a country can continue to be considered a person s own country even after their citizenship is revoked. 4 As such, even if an individual has been deprived of their nationality, it is likely that the person would still have the right to enter and reside in that country, as their own country. 5 Furthermore, the UN Human Rights Council has stated that punishment by exile is not compatible with the Covenant. 6 In addition, Article 9 of the draft articles on the expulsion of aliens recently adopted by the International Law Commission provides that a State shall not make its national an alien, by deprivation of nationality, for the sole purpose of expelling him or her. 7 As such, any law which seeks to revoke a person s citizenship for the purpose of expelling them from Australia or preventing them from returning to Australia is likely to violate international law The Australian Government must also consider carefully its obligations towards countries which may become responsible for resolving the status of people when Australian citizenship is revoked under this Bill. If Australia was to revoke a person s citizenship while the person is overseas, this responsibility will likely fall on the country in which they happen to be residing at the time. In our view, it is not appropriate for Australia to deflect its responsibilities for its citizens in this manner, particularly where the former citizen has lived most or all of their lives in Australia, has no meaningful connection to any other country, and does not hold citizenship in the country in which they are living. If Australia is genuinely concerned about the security risks posed by dual nationals who may have been involved in terrorism overseas, it is not reasonable for Australia to expect other countries to shoulder these risks instead. 3. Broad application of provisions 3.1. RCOA has serious concerns regarding the kinds of offences which can result in the automatic renunciation of citizenship. For example, proposed section 35A(3)(e) provides that a person ceases to be an Australian citizen if they are found guilty of the offence of intentionally destroying or damaging Commonwealth property under s 29 of the Crimes Act The effect of this Bill would be to revoke a person s citizenship even if a person caused very minor damage and posed no threat 3 Human Rights Committee, CCPR General Comment No. 27: Article 12 (Freedom of Movement), 2 November 1999, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.9, para See Nystrom v Australia (1557/07), in which a non-citizen s strong ties to Australia, including the location of his family and his language, meant that Australia was his own country for the purposes of Article 12(4). See also Warsame v Canada (1959/10). 5 Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 27 on Freedom of Movement, para Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on the Dominican Republic, (1993) UN doc CCPR/C/790/Add.18, para 6. 7 Report of the 64th Session: UN doc. A/67/10 (2012), Chapter IV, Expulsion of aliens, 9, 13, 32-3.
4 to the safety of others. In RCOA s view, such a serious penalty in these circumstances would be seriously disproportionate to the gravity of the offence We also question whether the offence of damaging Commonwealth property necessarily poses a risk to Australia s national security. The provisions of the Bill appear to apply to offences which are entirely unrelated to terrorism. A person who sprays graffiti on the wall of a Commonwealth building or damages a computer in the office of a Government department, for example, could be found guilty of damaging Commonwealth property and thereby automatically renounce their citizenship, despite the fact that there was no risk to national security In addition, we are concerned that a person would automatically lose his or her citizenship by committing less serious terrorism offences. These include the crimes of advocating terrorism (maximum five years imprisonment), 8 urging violence against a group or a member of a group (maximum five or seven years imprisonment), 9 or urging violence against the Constitution, the Government, a lawful authority of the Government, an election, or a referendum (maximum seven years imprisonment) The effect is to increase the punishment for these offences from five to seven years imprisonment to the extraordinary punishment of losing Australian citizenship for life. These crimes carry less severe penalties precisely because they are less serious crimes and pose a less significant threat to safety than, for example, engaging in or financing terrorist acts. It is not, in our view, appropriate to impose such a harsh penalty in these circumstances, and indeed this may be considered an arbitrary deprivation of citizenship RCOA is also concerned that the new measures introduced by the Bill will apply retrospectively. Retrospective legislation undermines fundamental principles of the rule of law, as it prevents people from being able to clearly understand their rights, obligations and potential consequences of their actions. As well, one of the Bill s stated aims is to deter Australians from engaging in terrorist-related conduct an effect it cannot possibly have on people who have already engaged in such conduct. Given the serious consequences involved, RCOA believes any retrospective application of the Bill would be clearly unjust. 4. Standard of proof and judicial oversight 4.1. The Bill would create a process where a person automatically renounces their citizenship through committing certain acts, at the time when the Minister issues a notice to that effect. RCOA has a number of serious concerns with these proposals, especially with regard to the standard of proof and the non-compellable discretion of the Minister The Bill fails to outline a clear standard of proof and procedure for establishing that someone has committed an act which would result in the renunciation of their citizenship. There is no requirement, for example, that a person must have been convicted of a terrorist offence. Indeed, proposed sections 33AA(12) and 35A allow the Minister to rely on intelligence information, including information that does not amount to a security assessment. RCOA is concerned that, without adequate safeguards, there is a significant risk that innocent people may unjustly lose their Australian citizenship The only apparent safeguard in the proposed process is the Minister s non-compellable discretion to rescind the notice and exempt a person from the revocation or cessation of his or her citizenship. However, the Bill clearly states that the rules of natural justice do not apply to this mechanism. RCOA believes this safeguard is wholly inadequate. The UN Human Rights Council notes that procedural safeguards are essential to prevent abuse of the law in relation to the deprivation of citizenship. 11 A non-compellable discretionary mechanism which does not adhere to even basic principles of justice is clearly not a sufficient safeguard. While judicial review may be available, this 8 Criminal Code Act 1995 s 80.2C 9 Criminal Code Act 1995 s 80.2A(1); Criminal Code Act 1995 s 80.2B(1). 10 Criminal Code Act 1995 s Human Rights Council, Human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality, 14 December 2009, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/13/34
5 will not provide an avenue for reviewing the merits of a particular case, and only limited scope for testing the evidence before the Minister In RCOA s view, a decision to revoke citizenship because of involvement in terrorist activities should at the very least require conviction by a court of a serious terrorism-related offence, and should be subject to a robust system of independent merits review. Without these safeguards in place, there is a real risk that innocent people could lose their citizenship unjustly. 5. Statelessness 5.1. Australia has a number of obligations relating to stateless people under international law, including Article 8 of the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness, which prevents Australia from depriving a person of their nationality if it would render them stateless. While the 1961 Convention does allow for the deprivation of citizenship resulting in statelessness in some very limited cases, the UN Human Rights Council has noted that, due to the serious implications of statelessness, the deprivation of citizenship resulting in statelessness would be difficult to justify in terms of proportionality While RCOA understands that the Bill is intended to apply only to dual nationals, there is still a concern that the automatic cessation of citizenship could render people de facto stateless. While a person may hold citizenship of another country in name, that does not mean that a person could exercise those rights in fact. For example, many former refugees in Australia would remain nationals of their country of origin but, because of their well-founded fear of persecution or other serious harm, could not return there. As such, there is a risk that a dual national may become de facto stateless if their Australian citizenship ceases and they are unable to exercise their citizenship rights in another country It is also important to consider that Australia is be alone in seeking to revoke citizenship from dual nationals on security grounds. A person suspected of involvement in terrorist activities who was a dual national of both Australia and the UK, for example, would also be at risk of having their UK citizenship revoked. As such, RCOA believes that the application of the proposed measures only to dual nationals does not offer a sufficient safeguard against statelessness While the powers proposed in the Bill would only apply to dual nationals, RCOA would be greatly concerned if they were to be extended to people who are eligible for citizenship in another country but have not yet obtained it (as proposed in the discussion paper informing the National Consultation on Australian Citizenship 13 ). The revocation of citizenship in these circumstances would inevitably result in statelessness. As well, a person may be theoretically eligible for citizenship in another country, but may not be able to obtain citizenship of that country in practice. Indeed, the fact that their Australian citizenship has been revoked on security grounds is likely to present a significant barrier to obtaining citizenship in another country. 6. Non-refoulement and indefinite detention 6.1. RCOA has serious concerns that the proposed laws may heighten the risk of refoulement. The measures proposed in the Bill appear to presume that people who lose their citizenship under its provisions will be able to reside in another country. As already noted, however, many former refugees would not be able to return to their country of origin because of their well-founded fear of persecution. We believe that the Bill fails to adequately consider measures to prevent refoulement in cases where dual nationals cannot return to or reside in their other countries of nationality There is also a serious risk that the loss of a person s Australian citizenship may result in indefinite detention. If a person loses their Australian citizenship but cannot be returned to his or her other country of citizenship due to Australia s non-refoulement obligations, he or she may remain in 12 Human Rights Council, Human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality, 19 December 2013, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/25/28 13 See
6 indefinite detention for very long periods, as we are seeing today with the current indefinite detention of refugees who have received an adverse security assessment RCOA understands that those who are in Australia and have their citizenship revoked are automatically given an ex-citizenship visa under s35 of the Migration Act The ex-citizen visa is a permanent visa allowing the holder to remain in but not enter or re-enter Australia. However, recent legislative amendments mean that the Minister can now cancel a person s visa (even a permanent visa) if the Minister reasonably suspects that the person does not pass the character test, and the Minister is satisfied that the refusal or cancellation is in the national interest. As such, the deprivation of a person s citizenship, together with the Minister s power to cancel a permanent visa, could result in indefinite detention RCOA believes that Parliament must give greater consideration to mitigating the risks of refoulement and indefinite detention. At the very least, decision-makers should be required to consider potential refoulement concerns before a person s Australian citizenship is determined to have ceased and, if any such concerns are identified, the person should not be deemed to have renounced their citizenship. 7. Children and families 7.1. RCOA is deeply troubled that the measures are proposed to apply to children aged 10 and over. While there may be some offences for which people under the age of 18 can legitimately be held criminally responsible, we do not believe that it would be appropriate to impose such serious penalties on children involved in terrorist offences. In cases where Australian children are suspected of having committed terrorist offences, we believe any response must be strongly guided by child protection considerations If a child has committed such a serious offence at such a young age, this is likely to indicate that the child has been a victim of crime. As the Paris Principles and Guidelines on Children Associated with Armed Forces or Armed Groups 14 clearly state: Children who are accused of crimes under international law allegedly committed while they were associated with armed forces or armed groups should be considered primarily as victims of offences against international law; not only as perpetrators. They must be treated in accordance with international law in a framework of restorative justice and social rehabilitation, consistent with international law which offers children special protection through numerous agreements and principles A significant number of people have been granted protection or resettled in Australia as refugees precisely because they had been forcibly recruited as child soldiers or were at risk of being recruited. The Australian Government clearly recognises that children involved in armed conflict are in need of special care and protection. We therefore question why the same level of care and protection has not been extended to children involved in terrorist activities under the proposed Bill RCOA is also concerned that the Bill may unfairly penalise the innocent children and families of people who have committed terrorist offences. For example, the Bill gives the Minister for Immigration discretion to revoke the citizenship of children with dual nationality if their parents have had their citizenship revoked. In addition, if a partner or child of a former Australian citizen has not yet obtained Australian citizenship in their own right, he or she may be in danger of losing their right of residency in Australia or access to basic services (such as Medicare or income support) if their relative s citizenship ceases. 14 See
7 8. Encouraging inclusion and participation in Australian society 8.1. RCOA believes that, to combat terrorism, the focus should be on promoting the inclusion and participation of all people in Australian society as the most effective way of preventing terrorism, as well as assisting Australians to reach their full potential. The strong emphasis on enforcement reflected in the current Bill is, in contrast, likely to contribute to feelings of exclusion and marginalisation The overwhelming majority of Australians from migrant and refugee backgrounds have been an asset to this country, are committed to Australia and pose no danger to the community. In responding to emerging security threats, RCOA believes it is imperative that the Government refrain from adopting measures which could weaken the core values underpinning the success of our cohesive multicultural society RCOA believes the Government should give further consideration to strategies for promoting the inclusion and participation of all people in our society. As part of this process, we encourage the Government to review policies which adversely affect the capacity of refugee and humanitarian entrants to settle successfully in Australia and contribute to their new communities There are currently a number of policies impeding refugee and humanitarian entrants from full inclusion into Australian society. These policies include: The denial of permanent residency and access to key settlement services to refugees who arrived in Australia without a valid visa, which undermines their ability to settle successfully in Australia and contributes to poor mental health outcomes. Limited access to family reunion opportunities to people from refugee backgrounds (including restrictions on access to family reunion for refugees who arrived without valid visas), which is likely to make it more difficult for people to recover from pre-arrival trauma, move on with their lives and fully engage with the settlement process (such as through learning English and securing sustainable employment). The serious negative impacts of prolonged indefinite immigration detention on health and wellbeing, which in turn undermine positive settlement outcomes for people who were formerly detained (particularly children). Negative political rhetoric (such as labelling asylum seekers who arrive by boat as illegal arrivals and describing refugees as a burden ), which can weaken community support for the Refugee and Humanitarian Program, fuel negative attitudes towards people from refugee backgrounds, and contribute to feelings of isolation and exclusion among refugee and humanitarian entrants settling in Australia RCOA would be happy to provide the Government with further information and detailed recommendations to assist in addressing these issues and promoting positive settlement outcomes for all refugee and humanitarian entrants in Australia, most of whom are likely to be future citizens. Recommendation 1 RCOA recommends that the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Bill 2015 be rejected in its entirety. Recommendation 2 RCOA recommends that the Australian Government give greater consideration to measures for promoting the inclusion and participation of all citizens in Australian society.
8 Recommendation 3 RCOA recommends that the Australian Government review policies which undermine positive settlement outcomes for refugee and humanitarian entrants and interfere with their successful settlement in Australia.
We hope this paper will be a useful contribution to the Committee s inquiry into the extent of income inequality in Australia.
22 August 2014 ATTN: Senate Community Affairs References Committee Please find attached a discussion paper produced by the Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA), outlining concerns relating to the likely
More informationSUBMISSION ON THE MANAGING AUSTRALIA S MIGRANT INTAKE DISCUSSION PAPER
DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS SUBMISSION ON THE MANAGING AUSTRALIA S MIGRANT INTAKE DISCUSSION PAPER The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella body for refugees, people seeking asylum
More informationDELAYS IN CITIZENSHIP APPLICATIONS FOR PERMANENT REFUGEE VISA HOLDERS
report October 2015 DELAYS IN CITIZENSHIP APPLICATIONS FOR PERMANENT REFUGEE VISA HOLDERS Asher Hirsch Policy Officer Contents Executive summary 3 Background 4 Significance of citizenship for refugee and
More informationMIGRATION AND MARITIME POWERS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (RESOLVING THE ASYLUM LEGACY CASELOAD) ACT 2014: WHAT IT MEANS FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS
MIGRATION AND MARITIME POWERS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (RESOLVING THE ASYLUM LEGACY CASELOAD) ACT 2014: WHAT IT MEANS FOR ASYLUM SEEKERS The Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving
More informationAUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESPONSE TO QUESTIONNAIRE FROM THE WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION 8 November 2013
AUSTRALIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESPONSE TO QUESTIONNAIRE FROM THE WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION 8 November 2013 ABN 47 996 232 602 Level 3, 175 Pitt Street, Sydney NSW 2000 GPO Box 5218, Sydney
More informationSUBMISSION TO THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS INQUIRY INTO THE HUMAN RIGHTS (PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY) BILL
SUBMISSION TO THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS INQUIRY INTO THE HUMAN RIGHTS (PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY) BILL The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella body
More informationHAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND
HAUT-COMMISSARIAT AUX DROITS DE L HOMME OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS PALAIS DES NATIONS 1211 GENEVA 10, SWITZERLAND Mandates of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; the Special
More informationCOMMUNITY SUPPORT PROGRAM CONSULTATION
DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION COMMUNITY SUPPORT PROGRAM CONSULTATION The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella body for refugees, asylum seekers and the organisations
More informationInquiry into the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Strengthening the Citizenship Loss Provisions) Bill 2018
FACULTY OF LAW GEORGE W ILLIAMS AO DEAN A NTHO NY MASON P ROFES S O R S CI E NTI A P RO FESSOR 20 December 2018 Committee Secretary Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security Dear Secretary
More informationBorders, Citizenship and Immigration Act August Summary of key changes introduced by the Act: The Refugee Council s concern.
Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009 August 2009 Summary of key changes introduced by the Act: Key change The Refugee Council s concern Sections 39 and 41 establish a new path to citizenship for
More informationOUR IMPACT IN
OUR IMPACT IN 2017-18 OUR IMPACT COORDINATING AND REPRESENTING THE REFUGEE SECTOR We promote humane and compassionate policies for people seeking safety in Australia and around the globe. While we cannot
More informationAustralian Lawyers for Human Rights Refugee Law Kit 2004 (last updated 30 November 2004)
Australian Lawyers for Human Rights Refugee Law Kit 2004 (last updated 30 November 2004) CHAPTER 1 - WHO IS A REFUGEE? Australian Lawyers for Human Rights Australian Lawyers for Human
More informationSUBMISSION ON REVIEW PROCESSES ASSOCIATED WITH VISA CANCELLATIONS MADE ON CRIMIINAL GROUNDS
JOINT STANDING COMMITTEE ON MIGRATION SUBMISSION ON REVIEW PROCESSES ASSOCIATED WITH VISA CANCELLATIONS MADE ON CRIMIINAL GROUNDS The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national peak body for refugees,
More informationProposal for Australia s role in a regional cooperative approach to the flow of asylum seekers into and within the Asia-Pacific region
Proposal for Australia s role in a regional cooperative approach to the flow of asylum seekers into and within the Asia-Pacific region Table of Contents Proposal for Australia s role in a regional cooperative
More informationMigration Amendment (Complementary Protection) Bill 2009
Migration Amendment (Complementary Protection) Bill 2009 Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee 28 September 2009 Queries regarding this submission should be directed
More informationSUBMISSION TO THE MIGRANT INTAKE INTO AUSTRALIA INQUIRY
PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION SUBMISSION TO THE MIGRANT INTAKE INTO AUSTRALIA INQUIRY The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella body for refugees, asylum seekers and the organisations
More information1. Biometric immigration documents non-compliance (clause 7)
UK Borders Bill 2007 Public Bill Committee - March 2007 Contents Introduction p.1 1. Biometric immigration documents effect of non-compliance (clause 7) p.1 2. Conditional leave to enter or remain (clause
More informationAuthority and responsibility of States
Authority and responsibility of States Course on International Migration Law jointly organized by UNITAR, IOM, UNFPA and the MacArthur Foundation 13-15 June 2012 1 Sovereignty State sovereignty 1) External
More informationFEDERAL BUDGET IN BRIEF: WHAT IT MEANS FOR REFUGEES AND PEOPLE SEEKING HUMANITARIAN PROTECTION
2015-16 FEDERAL BUDGET IN BRIEF: WHAT IT MEANS FOR REFUGEES AND PEOPLE SEEKING HUMANITARIAN PROTECTION KEY POINTS The Refugee and Humanitarian Program will provide 13,750 places in 2015-16, the same number
More informationSUBMISSION ON FAMILY UNITY AND REFUGEE PROTECTION
SUBMISSION ON FAMILY UNITY AND REFUGEE PROTECTION 1. Introduction The applicability of the principle of family unity under the Refugee Convention is a complicated and contested area, partly because the
More informationNew Zealand s approach to Refugees: Legal obligations and current practices
New Zealand s approach to Refugees: Legal obligations and current practices Marie-Charlotte de Lapaillone The purpose of this report is to understand New Zealand s approach to its legal obligations concerning
More informationAsylum seekers: 13 things you should know
Asylum seekers: 13 things you should know Frequently Asked Questions Australian Red Cross/Anna Warr Foreword Each year, millions of people are forced to flee their homes to seek protection from persecution
More informationCastan Centre for Human Rights Law. Monash University. Melbourne. Submission to the. Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee
Castan Centre for Human Rights Law Monash University Melbourne Submission to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee Inquiry into the Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character
More informationRCOA S ANALYSIS OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXPERT PANEL ON ASYLUM SEEKERS
RCOA S ANALYSIS OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXPERT PANEL ON ASYLUM SEEKERS August 2012 On 13 August 2012, the Prime Minister s Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers released its report after six weeks of consultation
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-ninth session, August 2017
Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 22 September 2017 A/HRC/WGAD/2017/42 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary
More informationPublic Law & Policy Research Unit
Public Law & Policy Research Unit Friday, 21 July 2017 Submission to the Inquiry into the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Strengthening the Requirements for Australian Citizenship and Other Measures)
More informationAdvance Edited Version
Advance Edited Version 7 February 2018 Original: English Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Revised Deliberation No. 5 on deprivation of liberty of migrants 1. The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
More informationCounter-terrorism Laws, Offences and Other Provisions
Counter-terrorism Laws, Offences and Other Provisions CHAPTER CONTENTS Introduction 2 What is a Terrorist Act? 2 Preparatory and Group-based Terrorism Offences 2 Coercive Powers to Investigate and Prevent
More informationUNHCR-IDC EXPERT ROUNDTABLE ON ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION CANBERRA, 9-10 JUNE Summary Report
UNHCR-IDC EXPERT ROUNDTABLE ON ALTERNATIVES TO DETENTION CANBERRA, 9-10 JUNE 2011 Summary Report These notes are a summary of issues discussed and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNHCR, IDC or
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its eighty-first session, April 2018
Advance edited version Distr.: General 20 June 2018 A/HRC/WGAD/2018/20 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
More informationALRC s Traditional Rights and Freedoms Report: Implications for Australian Migration Laws. Khanh Hoang. Introduction. Rights and Freedoms in Context
ALRC s Traditional Rights and Freedoms Report: Implications for Australian Migration Laws Khanh Hoang Introduction On 2 March 2016, the Australian Law Reform Commission released its final report, Traditional
More informationAustralian Refugee Rights Alliance No Compromise on Human Rights. Refugees and The Human Rights Council THE HUMAN FACE OF AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE POLICY
Australian Refugee Rights Alliance No Compromise on Human Rights Refugees and The Human Rights Council THE HUMAN FACE OF AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE POLICY Australian Refugee Rights Alliance Aileen Crowe Refugees
More informationREFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IN A.C.T. - ABN
REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IN A.C.T. - ABN 87 956 673 083 37-47 ST JOHNS RD, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 PO BOX 946, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 TELEPHONE: (02) 9660 5300 FAX: (02) 9660 5211 rcoa@cia.com.au www.refugeecouncil.org.au
More informationAUSTRALIA: STUDY ON HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLIANCE WHILE COUNTERING TERRORISM REPORT SUMMARY
AUSTRALIA: STUDY ON HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLIANCE WHILE COUNTERING TERRORISM REPORT SUMMARY Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism
More informationUNHCR Provisional Comments and Recommendations. On the Draft Amendments to the Law on Asylum and Refugees
UNHCR Provisional Comments and Recommendations On the Draft Amendments to the Law on Asylum and Refugees 1 1. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) welcomes the opportunity
More informationAustralian Citizenship Act 2007
Australian Citizenship Act 2007 Act No. 20 of 2007 as amended This compilation was prepared on 24 September 2009 taking into account amendments up to Act No. 90 of 2009 The text of any of those amendments
More informationMIA Submission to the National Consultation on Citizenship
Citizenship Policy Department of Immigration and Border Protection PO Box 25 Belconnen, ACT 2616 MIA Submission to the National Consultation on Citizenship The MIA as the peak professional association
More informationSubmission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report -
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report - Universal Periodic Review of: NEW ZEALAND I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
More informationCOMMUNITY VIEWS ON ASYLUM POLICY
AUSTRALIA S REFUGEE AND HUMANITARIAN PROGRAM 2012-13 Community views on current challenges and future directions COMMUNITY VIEWS ON ASYLUM POLICY We know it is too risky to go [to Australia] by boat. When
More informationUNHCR s Comments on the proposed amendments to the Danish Aliens Act
Udvalget for Udlændinge- og Integrationspolitik L 11 - Bilag 1 Offentligt UNHCR s Comments on the proposed amendments to the Danish Aliens Act Denmark is proposing a number of amendments to the Aliens
More informationSECOND ICRC COMMENT ON THE GLOBAL COMPACT FOR SAFE, ORDERLY AND REGULAR MIGRATION FOCUS ON IMMIGRATION DETENTION
SECOND ICRC COMMENT ON THE GLOBAL COMPACT FOR SAFE, ORDERLY AND REGULAR MIGRATION FOCUS ON IMMIGRATION DETENTION In the New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants, States have agreed to consider reviewing
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report Universal Periodic Review: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA I. Background
More informationSubmission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report- Universal Periodic Review: MONGOLIA THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM I. Background
More informationAustralian Citizenship Act 2007
Australian Citizenship Act 2007 No. 20, 2007 Compilation No. 22 Compilation date: 12 December 2015 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 166, 2015 Registered: 4 February 2016 Prepared by the Office of Parliamentary
More informationPROPOSED PILOT OF A PRIVATE/COMMUNITY REFUGEE SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM Discussion Paper
Response to PROPOSED PILOT OF A PRIVATE/COMMUNITY REFUGEE SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM Discussion Paper 27 July 2012 The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella body for refugees, asylum seekers
More informationAuthority and Responsibility of States
Authority and Responsibility of States Session III Nationality, Admission, Stay, Detention and Expulsion: the Balance between State Sovereignty and the Human Rights of Migrants Authority and Responsibility
More informationInquiry into the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Bill 2015
Inquiry into the Australian Citizenship Amendment (Allegiance to Australia) Bill 2015 Submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security July 2015 Australian Citizenship Amendment
More informationTHE CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF REFUGEES AND ITS PROTOCOL
1951 THE CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF REFUGEES AND ITS PROTOCOL 1967 SIGNING ON COULD MAKE ALL THE DIFFERENCE THE 1951 CONVENTION RELATING TO THE STATUS OF REFUGEES AND ITS 1967 PROTOCOL Why accede
More informationECCV Submission To The Federal Joint Standing Committee on Migration Inquiry Into Migrant Settlement Outcomes January 2017
ECCV Submission To The Federal Joint Standing Committee on Migration Inquiry Into Migrant Settlement Outcomes January 2017 The Ethnic Communities Council of Victoria Inc. (ECCV) is the voice of multicultural
More informationThe Rights of Non-Citizens
The Rights of Non-Citizens Introduction Who is a Non-Citizen? In the human rights arena the most common definition for a non-citizen is: any individual who is not a national of a State in which he or she
More informationIntroduction. I - General remarks: Paragraph 5
Comments on the draft of General Comment No. 35 on Article 9 of the ICCPR on the right to liberty and security of person and freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention This submission represents the views
More informationAustralian Citizenship Act 2007
Australian Citizenship Act 2007 No. 20, 2007 as amended Compilation start date: 22 June 2013 Includes amendments up to: Act No. 57, 2013 Prepared by the Office of Parliamentary Counsel, Canberra About
More informationREFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA
REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IN A.C.T. - ABN 87 956 673 083 37-47 ST JOHNS RD, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 PO BOX 946, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 TELEPHONE: (02) 9660 5300 FAX: (02) 9660 5211 info@refugeecouncil.org.au
More informationImmigration Amendment Bill 2012
Submission by the Human Rights Commission Immigration Amendment Bill 2012 to the Transport and Industrial Relations Committee 8 June 2012 Contact person: Michael White Legal and Policy Analyst Human Rights
More informationThe Refugee Council s submission to the review by Lord Carlile of Berriew QC of the definition of terrorism in UK law
The Refugee Council s submission to the review by Lord Carlile of Berriew QC of the definition of terrorism in UK law 2 May 2006 Registered address: Refugee Council, 240-250 Ferndale Road, London SW9 8BB
More informationADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION
Distr. GENERAL CAT/C/USA/CO/2 18 May 2006 Original: ENGLISH ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 36th session 1 19 May 2006 CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE
More informationCanadian Centre on Statelessness Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion
Canadian Centre on Statelessness Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion Joint Submission to the Human Rights Council at the 30 th Session of the Universal Periodic Review (Third Cycle, May 2018) Canada
More informationYouth Settlement Framework Consultation Brief
Youth Settlement Framework Consultation Brief February 2014 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Need for a Youth Settlement Framework... 3 1.2 Guiding principles... 4 1.3 Purpose... 4 1.4 Scope... 4 1.5
More information2013 FEDERAL ELECTION: REFUGEE POLICIES OF LABOR, LIBERAL-NATIONAL COALITION AND THE GREENS
2013 FEDERAL ELECTION: REFUGEE POLICIES OF LABOR, LIBERAL-NATIONAL COALITION AND THE GREENS This Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) summary explains the 2013 Federal election policies on refugee issues
More informationMigration Amendment (Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals and Other Measures) Bill 2012
Migration Amendment (Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals and Other Measures) Bill 2012 Submission to Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee December 2012 Prepared by Adam Fletcher and Tania Penovic
More informationConference celebrates the positive impact migration has had on the United Kingdom its culture, economy and standing in the world throughout history.
F16: A Fair Deal for Everyone: Prosperity and Dignity in Migration Submitted by Federal Policy Committee Mover: Rt Hon Sir Ed Davey MP Summator: Thais Portilho This motion applies to This motion and the
More informationSTRENGTHENING THE TEST FOR AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP
STRENGTHENING THE TEST FOR AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP April 2017 1 Commonwealth of Australia 2017 With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, all material presented in this publication is provided
More informationMigration Legislation Amendment (Regional Processing Cohort) Bill 2016
14 November 2016 Sophie Dunstone, Committee Secretary Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Australia By email: legcon.sen@aph.gov.au Dear
More informationWelsh Action for Refugees: briefing for Assembly Members. The Welsh Refugee Coalition. Wales: Nation of Sanctuary. The Refugee Crisis
Welsh Action for Refugees: briefing for Assembly Members The Welsh Refugee Coalition We are a coalition of organisations working in Wales with asylum seekers and refugees at all stages of their journey,
More informationSubmission to the Australian Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee Inquiry into
Australia Submission to the Australian Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee Inquiry into Family and Community Services Legislation Amendment (Special Benefit Activity Test) Bill 2002 November
More informationREFUGEE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
REFUGEE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. What are the main reasons that people become refugees, and what other reasons drive people from their homes and across borders? There are many reasons a person may
More informationLaw Council submission to the review of the declared area provisions
1 November 2017 Office of the President Mr Andrew Hastie Chair Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security PO Box 6021 CANBERRA ACT 2600 By email: pjcis@aph.gov.au Dear Mr Hastie Law Council
More informationSUBMISSION TO THE JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS EXAMINATION OF THE MIGRATION (REGIONAL PROCESSING) PACKAGE OF LEGISLATION
SUBMISSION TO THE JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS EXAMINATION OF THE MIGRATION (REGIONAL PROCESSING) PACKAGE OF LEGISLATION The Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) is the national umbrella
More informationSubmission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report - Universal Periodic Review: LATVIA THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM I. Background
More informationADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION
Committee against Torture Forty-fifth session 1-19 November 2010 List of issues prior to the submission of the fifth periodic report of Australia (CAT/C/AUS/4)* ADVANCE UNEDITED VERSION Specific information
More informationINCOME MANAGEMENT: IMPACTS ON REFUGEE AND HUMANITARIAN ENTRANTS
INCOME MANAGEMENT: IMPACTS ON REFUGEE AND HUMANITARIAN ENTRANTS May 2012 This paper provides background information about the new income management scheme that will come into effect on 1 July 2012 as well
More informationA/HRC/13/34. General Assembly. United Nations. Human rights and arbitrary deprivation of nationality
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 14 December 2009 Original: English A/HRC/13/34 Human Rights Council Thirteenth session Agenda item 3 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner
More informationReport of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review*
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 31 May 2011 A/HRC/17/10/Add.1 Original: English Human Rights Council Seventeenth session Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report of the Working Group
More informationTHE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report - Universal Periodic Review: THE KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA I. BACKGROUND
More informationSubmission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report-
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees For the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report- Universal Periodic Review: MONGOLIA I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
More informationUK EMN Ad Hoc Query on settlement under the European Convention on Establishment Requested by UK EMN NCP on 14 th July 2014
UK EMN Ad Hoc Query on settlement under the European Convention on Establishment 1955 Requested by UK EMN NCP on 14 th July 2014 Reply requested by 14 th August 2014 Responses from Austria, Belgium, Estonia,
More informationResponse to the UK Border Agency s Consultation on Strengthening the Common Travel Area
16 October 2008 Response to the UK Border Agency s Consultation on Strengthening the Common Travel Area About the organisations responding jointly to this Consultation As a human rights charity, independent
More informationInternational covenant on civil and political rights CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT
UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant on civil and political rights Distr. GENERAL CCPR/C/IRL/CO/3 30 July 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Ninety-third session Geneva, 7 25 July 2008
More informationSubmission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report
Submission by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Compilation Report - Universal Periodic Review BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA I. Background
More informationREFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA
REFUGEE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED IN A.C.T. - ABN 87 956 673 083 37-47 ST JOHNS RD, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 PO BOX 946, GLEBE, NSW, 2037 TELEPHONE: (02) 9660 5300 FAX: (02) 9660 5211 info@refugeecouncil.org.au
More informationAUSTRALIA S ASYLUM POLICIES
AUSTRALIA S ASYLUM POLICIES What s happening and how do we respond? Paul Power CEO, Refugee Council of Australia 16 March 2014 Global displacement today Photo: UNHCR 46 million people forcibly displaced
More informationSubmission to the Lord Goldsmith QC Citizenship Review
Submission to the Lord Goldsmith QC Citizenship Review January 2008 Summary of key recommendations The Refugee Council recommends that the cost of applying for citizenship be significantly reduced for
More informationBackground paper No.1. Legal and practical aspects of the return of persons not in need of international protection
The scope of the challenge Background paper No.1 Legal and practical aspects of the return of persons not in need of international protection Within the broader context of managing international migration,
More informationChapter Six Immigration Policy and the Separation of Powers. Hon Philip Ruddock, MHR
Chapter Six Immigration Policy and the Separation of Powers Hon Philip Ruddock, MHR I would like to thank The Samuel Griffith Society for the invitation to present this address, and I offer my congratulations
More informationSettlement policies: Where to from here?
NATIONAL SETTLEMENT POLICY NETWORK (SPN) BACKGROUND PAPER Wednesday, 2 nd October 2013 Settlement policies: Where to from here? Advocacy priorities for the settlement sector under a new Government INTRODUCTION
More informationStates Obligations to Protect Refugees Fleeing Libya: Backgrounder
States Obligations to Protect Refugees Fleeing Libya: Backgrounder March 1, 2011 According to news reports, more than 140,000 refugees have fled Libya in the wake of ongoing turmoil, a number that is expected
More informationMemorandum to the UK Presidency. Putting refugee protection at the heart of the Hague Programme
Memorandum to the UK Presidency Putting refugee protection at the heart of the Hague Programme EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON REFUGEES AND EXILES CONSEIL EUROPEEN SUR LES REFUGIES ET LES EXILES AD1/7/2005/EXT/RW
More informationRe: FECCA SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE INQUIRY INTO AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT (CITIZENSHIP TESTING) BILL 2007
Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Department of the Senate PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Australia Re: FECCA SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE INQUIRY
More informationNSW Council for Civil Liberties Inc.
14 December 2012 Committee Secretary Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Sir/Madam, Submission in relation to the Inquiry into the Migration
More informationSubmission on Strengthening the test for Australian citizenship
Submission on Strengthening the test for Australian citizenship May 2017 Table of Contents Jesuit Social Services: Who we are... 2 Our recommendations... 4 Introduction... 5 English language requirement...
More informationAlternative Report to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. Submitted by Advocates for Public Interest Law
Alternative Report to the United Nations Human Rights Committee Republic of Korea, 113th Session Submitted by Advocates for Public Interest Law Contact Information: Advocates for Public Interest Law (APIL)
More informationKEYNOTE ADDRESS BY PROFESSOR GILLIAN TRIGGS PRESIDENT OF THE AHRC TO THE NSWCCL ANNUAL DINNER
KEYNOTE ADDRESS BY PROFESSOR GILLIAN TRIGGS PRESIDENT OF THE AHRC TO THE NSWCCL ANNUAL DINNER --------------------------------------------------- Friday 31 July 2015 I was pleased to have been invited
More information20. ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES A RIGHTS BASED APPROACH
POLICY A FAIR GO FOR ALL 20. ASYLUM SEEKERS AND REFUGEES A RIGHTS BASED APPROACH INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1. Australia s policies towards asylum seekers and refugees should, at all times, reflect respect
More informationBill C-24 - Citizenship bill Submission of the Canadian Council for Refugees. 26 March 2014
CONSEIL CANADIEN POUR LES RÉFUGIÉS CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR REFUGEES Bill C-24 - Citizenship bill Submission of the Canadian Council for Refugees 26 March 2014 Introduction Bill C-24, an Act to the amend the
More informationConcluding observations on the sixth periodic report of Denmark*
United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Distr.: General 15 August 2016 CCPR/C/DNK/CO/6 Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding observations on the sixth periodic
More informationreport refugee council of australia BARRIERS TO EDUCATION December 2015 Asher Hirsch Policy Officer
report December 2015 BARRIERS TO EDUCATION FOR PEOPLE SEEKING ASYLUM AND REFUGEES ON TEMPORARY VISAS Asher Hirsch Policy Officer Contents Executive Summary 3 Statistics 4 Ineligibility for higher education
More information4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions And Recommendations 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report provides an insight into the human rights situation of both the long-staying and recently arrived Rohingya population in Malaysia.
More informationMigration Amendment (Character Cancellation Consequential Provisions) Bill 2016
Migration Amendment (Character Cancellation Consequential Provisions) Bill 2016 Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee 4 March 2016 GPO Box 1989, Canberra ACT 2601, DX 5719 Canberra
More informationA HUMAN RIGHTS AGENDA FOR THE NEXT AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
A HUMAN RIGHTS AGENDA FOR THE NEXT AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT PUBLICATION DATE: MAY 2016 AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA LOCKED BAG 23 BROADWAY NSW 2007 WWW.AMNESTY.ORG.AU ABN 64 002 806 233 Cover image: People
More informationDiscrimination on the grounds of nationality
Discrimination on the grounds of nationality Ana Rita Gil FDUNL, 17 November 2014 I Introduction Aliens, Foreigners The outsiders Relation between where we are who we are Nowadays traditional dichotomy
More information