IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER RAJKUMAR
|
|
- Amber Preston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HCA: No.S-1452 of 2003 HCA: 2544 of 2003 (POS) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CURTIS GABRIEL Plaintiff AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PETER RAJKUMAR APPEARANCES: Ms. Gopiesingh for the plaintiff Ms. K. Reid for the defendant JUDGMENT The Plaintiff in this case claims damages for wrongful arrest and/or false imprisonment and/or malicious prosecution, together with aggravated and/or exemplary damages. He brings this claim in the context of an allegation that one Police Constable Sutherland maliciously and without reasonable or probable cause instituted against him three cases where he was charged for armed robbery. He was acquitted but not before he had spent 84 days in prison, 8 days prior to his appearance before a Magistrate, and 76 days thereafter after having been granted $100, in bail, due to his inability to satisfy the conditions of bail. He alleges that he was assaulted by Officer Sutherland and by Officer Williams in order to extract a confession. He also claims that he so indicated to the Learned Magistrate before whom he was taken 8 days later and that he requested then to see a Doctor. He alleged that he was not promptly and with sufficient particularity
2 informed of the reason for his arrest or subsequent detention or false imprisonment and that he was placed in a cell where he was subjected to filthy conditions and assault and, in addition, was not provided with proper or adequate food. The Defendant did not file any witness statement and conceded liability with damages to be assessed. When the matter came up for assessment of damages, no evidence was led on behalf of the Plaintiff and the Defendant indicated that it was prepared to proceed with the assessment on the basis of the allegations of the Plaintiff in his witness statement, untested as they were in cross-examination. Both parties had been granted leave to file written submissions on quantum and Attorneys for the Plaintiff and for the Defendant relied upon those submissions with cited authorities, together with elaborations thereon in answer to questions posed by the Court. I therefore proceed with the assessment on the basis of the allegations set out above and on the basis that the conditions the Plaintiff experienced during his detention as set out in paragraph 6 and paragraph 12 of his witness statement are true and correct, being unchallenged. DISPOSITION In all the circumstances I award: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) the sum of $125, which includes an element for aggravation, the sum of $50, by way of exemplary damages interest thereon at the rate of 12 % per annum from the date of filing of the writ of summons August costs to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff certified fit for advocate attorney at law ANALYSIS AND LAW DAMAGES The Plaintiff contends that the amount to be awarded for the elements of false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and aggravated and exemplary damages are the sums of $150,000.00, $100, and $100, respectively. 2
3 False Imprisonment In respect of his claim for $150, for false imprisonment, it relies upon the case of High Court Action No. 801 of 1997, Abraham v The Attorney General, the decision of the Honourable Justice Smith delivered on 26 th February That case involved an assessment of damages pursuant to a consent order (as in the instant matter) where it was declared that the arrest and detention of the applicant was unconstitutional and illegal (unlike in the instant matter) where an award of $125, was made. The applicant in that case was imprisoned for 70 days, a time period similar to the instant Plaintiff. The applicant in that case described in his testimony conditions of incarceration similar or at least at the same level of horror as the applicant in the instant case. It should be noted, however, that in this case the applicant actually testified and withstood cross-examination with his credibility intact. [See page 2 of the decision.] Malicious Prosecution The applicant also claims the sum of $100, in respect of the malicious prosecution element of the claim. In support, the case of Harricharan v The Attorney General, High Court Action No of 1999, was cited as authority for awarding separate amounts in respect of malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. In the Harricharan decision delivered by the Honourable Justice Deyalsingh on 19 th December 2006, an award of damages which included an element of aggravated damages was made in respect of (a) false imprisonment, $50,000.00, and (b) malicious prosecution, $75, The circumstances of that case were relevant to the outcome. In that case, the Plaintiff was a police officer known to the Prosecutor easily reachable by telephone and who had voluntarily come to the police station on three previous occasions. [See paragraph 54 of that decision.] The Court in that case found that the Prosecutor s investigation of a theft alleged against the plaintiff in that case left much to be desired. The Court found that the Prosecutor did not have an honest belief in the truth of the charge. It was in those extraordinary circumstances that that Court awarded damages for malicious prosecution in the sum of $75,000.00, having concluded that there was more in the mortar than the pestle. [Paragraph 58] 3
4 It is clear that the Court took into account the circumstances attendant upon that Plaintiff s arrest at 5:00 AM at his home in full view of his neighbours, despite the fact that he had voluntarily attended at the police station on 3 occasions prior to his arrest. The Court clearly found that it was unnecessary and amounted to psychological terrorism. I find that the circumstances of that case are more extreme than those in the instant matter and the Court need not in this case make an equivalent award in respect of the malicious prosecution aspect of the instant Plaintiff s claim. In the case of Sorzano & Mitchell v The Attorney General Civ App. 101 of 2002 cited by Attorneys at Law for the Defendant, the Court of Appeal awarded the sum of $180, for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment in circumstances where the accused had spent 385 days in prison until his trial had been completed. I note that Justice of Appeal Mendonca in dealing with (as in the instant case) an assessment of damages in respect of a default judgment for malicious prosecution, found that while the Abraham case was a case dealing with breach of a constitutional right, he did not consider it to be of no relevance. [Paragraphs 25 and 26] Paragraph 25: I recognise that there are differences in an assessment of compensation in such cases (for breach of a constitutional right) compared to an assessment of damages in torts involving the loss of liberty at common law such a false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. Paragraph 26: Loss of liberty is therefore relevant here as it was in the Stanislaus and Abraham cases. While therefore it should be borne in mind that these cases were dealing with the breach of a constitutional right, I do not consider them of no relevance. I also note that in that case [paragraph 9 at page 5], the Court of Appeal cited with approval the statement in McGregor on Damages, 14 th Edition, paragraph 1367: If there has been arrest, and imprisonment up to the hearing of the Court, damages in respect thereof should also be included, and will be the same as would be recoverable in an action for false imprisonment. 4
5 The Defendant refers to the following cases: Eileen Williams, High Court Action No. Cv 370 of 1996 delivered by the Honourable Mr. Justice Jamadar on 20 th June In that case, the Honourable Judge found that an appropriate award for general compensatory damages for assault, false imprisonment, wrongful arrest and malicious prosecution including uplift for aggravated damages was $50, The circumstances as he found, were that the plaintiff was not only grabbed and handcuffed in the presence of several people including her family but was handcuffed onto the gate to her premises while she was holding her baby, had her dress torn exposing her person, and was left in that position for some 20 to 30 minutes and thereafter being imprisoned for at least 10 hours. This case was decided on 20 th June 2001 and in those circumstance, that Court also made an award of $15, in respect of exemplary damages. Counsel also relied upon the case of Barcoo v The Attorney General, High Court Action No of 1989, the decision of the Honourable Justice Mendonca as he then was, dated 19 th December This is a claim (like the instant claim) for damages of false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. The Plaintiff in that matter was a special reserve policeman. In the Barcoo case, an award of $75, was made as compensatory damages. This included an element of aggravated damages in which the Learned Trial Judge took into account the abuse and threats the plaintiff endured during his detention, the circumstances surrounding his detention, conditions of the cage and the cell in which he was detained, the obvious trauma and mental anguish he would have suffered throughout his imprisonment and prosecution, and the fact that the Defendant sought to the end to justify an arrest and prosecution that was clearly unjustifiable. [See page 29 of that decision.] He also made an award of $10, by way of exemplary damages. In this case, there was no allegation of assault (unlike in the instant matter). In the case of Hyndman v A.G. HCA 71 of 1996, a decision by the Honourable Justice Tam delivered on 31 st July 2001, the plaintiff s claim was for damages for assault, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. In that case, the plaintiff was found to have been proceeding about his business when he was abruptly accosted by the second defendant and forced to participate in a search for an accused. He was 5
6 held, threatened and assaulted by the defendant, forced to descend a steep area leading to a beach, then to enter a cave to search for that accused. He was imprisoned for some 20 days before being freed on bail. In those circumstances, the Court awarded $85, which included an element of award for aggravated damages. A further award of $25, was made in respect of exemplary damages. And in the case of Alexis v The Attorney General, High Court Action No. S-1555 of 2002, delivered March per C. Kangaloo J the claimant was awarded the sum of $100, inclusive of aggravated damages and a further $25, as exemplary damages for false imprisonment and malicious prosecution in circumstances in which the police had planted cocaine on the claimant, had fabricated the charge and evidence against him, and he had spent 2½ months in custody. I have also considered the case of Civil Appeal No. 159 of 1992, Thadeus Bernard & Airports Authority of Trinidad & Nixon Quashie delivered 21 st October 1998 (a claim for assault, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution). I note the Court of Appeal commented in the Quashie case that the award of $100, for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment in Tokai, High Court Action No of 1984, which was delivered in 1994, (14 years ago) was not appropriate, and that taking into account the fall in the exchange rate between the TT Dollar and the US Dollar was equally not appropriate. I note that almost 10 years have elapsed since that statement and that in the interim the value of money has fallen, and there has been a gradual increase over time in awards to the point where an award of $100,000. is no longer out of line with the trend of awards in this area. The Court also noted that there should be some correspondence between the awards for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment and awards for personal injury. See page 6 of that decision where the Court noted that: From the cases he cited it appears that awards of this order (that is, $78,000.00) would only be made in the most serious type of physical injury such as irreversible brain damage. Even awards for loss of sight in one eye and other injuries of that magnitude fall well below the figure awarded here as compensatory damages. 6
7 It would seem that although awards for personal injuries have increased over time since delivery of that judgment, the principle remains applicable as a sanity check in that awards of damages for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment should bear some level of correspondence with awards in respect of actual physical personal injury. However the Court of Appeal in Millette v Mc Nicholls Civ. App. No.14 of 2000@ page 7 observed that the process of synchronisation was likely to be a slow and gradual one. In the premises I am guided by the trend that I find established in the above cited cases. Compensatory damages I make an award for compensatory damages which will incorporate an element in respect of aggravation in respect of the circumstances I have described above including, but not limited to, the excessive length of time that lapsed between the Plaintiff s arrest and his being brought before a Court, and the horrendous condition which he described being detained under, together with assaults of various types while being incarcerated. I think an appropriate award in these circumstances would be $125, which includes an element for aggravation. Exemplary damages As set out by the Honourable former Chief Justice de la Bastide in the Bernard v Quashie case citing Rooks v Barnard, two categories of case which the common law recognised as appropriate for the award of exemplary damages included oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional conduct by the servants of the Government. It has also been held that Government servants should be widely interpreted so as to include the police and local and other authorities. [See page 9 of that decision.] I note that no medical evidence was filed in support of the Plaintiff s claim to have been the subject of such assaults and no explanation was provided as to why, after his incarceration had ended, no medical report was obtained or sought in respect of the after effects of such assaults. However I accept the Plaintiff s evidence as unrebutted. The Defendant s servants or agents are not entitled to assault anyone in custody, far less persons who are presumed innocent until proven guilty. 7
8 I find that the behaviour of the Defendant s servants or agents as described in this matter, unrebutted by evidence to the contrary, and in particular the assault that he alleges that was perpetrated by them, is behaviour that qualifies as oppressive and unreasonable. In those circumstances, the Court is prepared to mark its disapproval of such behaviour by an award of exemplary damages in the sum of $50, Conclusion In all the circumstances I award (i) the sum of $125, which includes an element for aggravation, (ii) the sum of $50, by way of exemplary damages (iii) interest thereon at the rate of 12 % per annum from the date of filing of the writ of summons August (iv) costs to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff certified fit for advocate attorney at law. Dated the 4th day June of Peter A. Rajkumar Judge 8
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DECISION-ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2010-04134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN PETER DEACON Claimant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before: Master Margaret Y Mohammed Appearances:
More informationTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2009-04042 BETWEEN PAUL WELCH CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. BOODOOSINGH
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 86 of 2007 IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND IN THE MATTER OF AN ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF CONSTITUTIONAL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN. Between
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PORT OF SPAIN Claim No. CV 2011-00187 Between DENISH KALICHARAN Claimant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. (POLICE CONSTABLE) EDGAR BAIRD THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants.
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE NO. CV 2009-00642 BETWEEN OTIS JOBE Claimant AND (POLICE CONSTABLE) EDGAR BAIRD THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants BEFORE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. RADHIKA CHARAN KHAN a/c RADICA CHARAN KHAN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2011-04688 BETWEEN RADHIKA CHARAN KHAN a/c RADICA CHARAN KHAN Claimant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN BISHAM SEEGOBIN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2009-03089 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN BISHAM SEEGOBIN AND Claimant Before: Master Alexander THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO **************************************************
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL THADEUS CLEMENT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
IN REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 95 of 2010 BETWEEN THADEUS CLEMENT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Appellant Respondent PANEL: P. Weekes, J.A.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND PC DEONARINE JAIMUNGAL #11124 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF REASONS
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV2008-04811 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CHABINATH PERSAD Claimant AND PC DEONARINE JAIMUNGAL #11124 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO ***************************************************
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY FELIX JAMES FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2009-00439 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY FELIX JAMES FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER UNDER PART 56 OF THE CIVIL PROCEEDING RULES (1998)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SUB-REGISTRY, SAN FERNANDO H.C.A No. S-2253 of 2003 IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO ( THE CONSTITUTION
More informationPOLICE CONSTABLE RENNIE LAKHAN NO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO REASONS
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2010-01582 BETWEEN SIEULAL RAMSARAN CLAIMANT AND POLICE CONSTABLE RENNIE LAKHAN NO. 13429 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More informationTHE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant *************
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2011-00312 BETWEEN CURTIS BARKER JASON TITUS Claimants AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant ************* DECISION
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Civil) AND. 2011: February 8; October 17
COMMONWEALTH OF DOMINICA CLAIM NO DOMHCV2010/0030 BETWEEN: THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (Civil) DANNY AMBO Claimant AND [1] MICHAEL LAUDAT [2] THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAND AND TOBAGO Defendant
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No.: CV2011-04900 BETWEEN DENZIL FORDE Claimant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAND AND TOBAGO Defendant Before the Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN NIGEL MORALES CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-02133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN NIGEL MORALES CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HON. MADAME JUSTICE JOAN CHARLES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 1 st Defendant PC MICHAEL CHARLES NO 10208
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No CV2009-02792 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN RAZACK MOHAMMED Claimant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO 1 st Defendant PC MICHAEL CHARLES
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 146 of 2009 BETWEEN URIC MERRICK APPELLANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND JOHN ROUGIER THE COMMISSIONER OF PRISONS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO BETWEEN AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. 113 of 2009 BETWEEN ANTONIO WEBSTER APPELLANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO RESPONDENT Civil Appeal No. 120 of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Owing Goring AND. The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2011-03769 BETWEEN Owing Goring AND Claimant The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago Defendant Before the Honourable Mr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between PAUL CHOTALAL. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2014-00155 Between PAUL CHOTALAL Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendants Before the Honourable
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 03-0669 444444444444 DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., PETITIONER, v. LYNDON SILVA, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between CHRISTOPHER LUCKY AND. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-00224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between CHRISTOPHER LUCKY AND Claimant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-03158 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JULIANA WEBSTER CLAIMANT AND REPUBLIC BANK LIMITED PC KAREN RAMSEY #13191 PC KERN PHILLIPS #16295 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL KEITH MITCHELL. and [1] STEVE FASSIHI [2] GEORGE WORME [3] GRENADA TODAY LTD [4] EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD
GRENADA CIVIL APPEAL NO.22 OF 2003 BETWEEN: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL KEITH MITCHELL and [1] STEVE FASSIHI [2] GEORGE WORME [3] GRENADA TODAY LTD [4] EXPRESS NEWSPAPER LTD Before: The Hon. Mr. Michael Gordon,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No CV2015-02596 BETWEEN MARCUS SHAW Claimant AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before the Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN FRANCIS VINCENT AND
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2008-01217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN FRANCIS VINCENT AND Claimant Before: Master Alexander MERLENE VINCENT First Defendant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between LARRY BAILA. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HCA No. CV2015-00249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between LARRY BAILA Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before the Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationTHE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN ARRESTED
THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN ARRESTED A REVIEW OF THE LAW IN NORTHERN IRELAND November 2004 ISBN 1 903681 50 2 Copyright Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission Temple Court, 39 North Street Belfast
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No.: 451193/2015 COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X Date Purchased: July 17, 2013 FEROZ ALAM, Plaintiff
More informationSummons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between YASIN ABU BAKR. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. 00182-2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between YASIN ABU BAKR Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO First Defendant THE COMMISSIONER OF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-VC Document Filed// Page of RACHEL LEDERMAN (SBN 0) Rachel Lederman & Alexsis C. Beach Attorneys at Law Capp Street San Francisco, CA Telephone:..00; Fax:..0 Email: rachel@beachledermanlaw.com
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN SHAM JAGDEO AND THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2013-00397 BETWEEN SHAM JAGDEO Claimant AND THE HONOURABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before the Honourable Mr. Justice
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-18-2007 Pollarine v. Boyer Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-2786 Follow this and additional
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION DONNY MCGEE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF CHICAGO, CHICAGO POLICE ) DETECTIVE FARLEY, CHICAGO POLICE ) DETECTIVE LENIHAN,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE
Case 1:10-cv-03827-NLH -KMW Document 1 Filed 07/29/10 Page 1 of 19 PageD: 1 Edward Barocas, Esq. (EB8251) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION P.O. Box 32159 Newark, New Jersey 07102
More informationPOLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 CODE G CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE STATUTORY POWER OF ARREST BY POLICE OFFICERS
POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE ACT 1984 CODE CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE STATUTORY POWER OF ARREST BY POLICE OFFICERS Commencement This Code applies to any arrest made by a police officer after midnight on
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And: Varner v. Vancouver (City), 2009 BCSC 333 Gary Varner Date: 20090226 Docket: S032834 Registry: Vancouver Plaintiff John Doe and Richard
More informationHuman Rights and Arrest, Pre-Trial and Administrative Detention
Human Rights and Arrest, Pre-Trial and Administrative Detention (based on chapter 5 of the Manual on Human Rights for Judges, Prosecutors and Lawyers: A Trainer s Guide) 1. International Rules Relating
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND RULING. that he was a prison officer and that on the 17 th June, 2006, he reported for duty at the
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. 2010/2501 BETWEEN ELIAS ALEXANDER Claimant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. BETWEEN MYRTLE CREVELLE, (ADMINISTRATRIX AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF CLYDE CREVELLE (deceased)) Appellant AND
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIV. APP. NO. 45 OF 2007 HCA NO. 117 OF 2003 BETWEEN MYRTLE CREVELLE, (ADMINISTRATRIX AD LITEM OF THE ESTATE OF CLYDE CREVELLE (deceased)) Appellant AND THE ATTORNEY
More informationDocument references: Prior decisions - Special Rapporteur s rule 91 decision, dated 28 December 1992 (not issued in document form)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Kulomin v. Hungary Communication No. 521/1992 16 March 1994 CCPR/C/50/D/521/1992 * ADMISSIBILITY Submitted by: Vladimir Kulomin Alleged victim: The author State party: Hungary Date
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2009-02708 BETWEEN SYDNEY ORR APPLICANT AND THE POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des Vignes
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO P.C. SAMAD P.C. PIERRE THIRD DEFENDANT
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO: CV2007-04365 BETWEEN NIGEL APARBALL ROHIT APARBALL NEIL APARBALL BATCHYA APARBALL CLAIMANTS And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901
More informationA GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE
A GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE A GUIDE TO CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE THE AIM OF THIS BOOKLET IS TO PROVIDE SOME ASSISTANCE IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THE POLICE CONTENTS 02
More informationTHE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE. 1 st Defendant. 2 nd Defendant THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF SOUTH WALES
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION CARDIFF DISTRICT REGISTRY Case Number C90CF012 BE1WEEN MAURICE JOHN KIRK Claimant THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE 1 st Defendant THE NATIONAL PROBATION
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Claim No. ANUHCV 2011/0069 In the Matter of the Constitution of Antigua & Barbuda. -and- In the Matter of an Application
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And. HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. CV 2012-00707 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between ALVIN And AHYEW Claimant HER WORSHIP SENIOR MAGISTRATE MRS. INDRA RAMOO-HAYNES Defendant BEFORE THE HONOURABLE
More informationPlaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege
NEW YORK STATE COURT OF CLAIMS --------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, and MICHAEL KOBLISKA, Claimants, -against- THE STATE OF NEW YORK, T. D AMATO,
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. New York Eastern District Court Case No. 1:11-cv Jordan et al v. The City of New York et al.
PlainSite Legal Document New York Eastern District Court Case No. 1:11-cv-02637 Jordan et al v. The City of New York et al Document 19 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-eighth session, April 2017
Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 6 July 2017 A/HRC/WGAD/2017/32 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2009-01937 BETWEEN PETER LEWIS CLAIMANT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO DEFENDANT Before the Honourable Mr. Justice A. des
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TONY ALLISTER HOLDER AND FRANKIE PATADEEN. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO H.C.A. No. 3864 of 1993 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN TONY ALLISTER HOLDER Plaintiff AND FRANKIE PATADEEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD & TOBAGO Defendants BEFORE: THE
More informationVictim Protection in Criminal Proceedings Legislation: A pan-european Comparison"
Victim Protection in Criminal Proceedings Legislation: A pan-european Comparison" Country Report: Sweden Author: Martin Sunnqvist 1 The questions in the Guidelines are answered briefly as follows below,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between AINSLEY GREAVES. And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2012-02753 Between AINSLEY GREAVES Claimant And THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before the Honourable
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:17-cv-02656 Document 1 Filed 11/07/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 17-cv-02656 Jasmine Still, v. Plaintiff, El Paso
More informationOpinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-ninth session, August 2017
Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 2 October 2017 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinions adopted by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention at its seventy-ninth
More informationPENAL PROCEDURE CODE
In force from 29.04.2006 PENAL PROCEDURE CODE Prom. SG. 83/18 Oct 2005, amend. SG. 46/12 Jun 2007, amend. SG. 109/20 Dec 2007, amend. SG. 69/5 Aug 2008, amend. SG. 109/23 Dec 2008, amend. SG. 12/13 Feb
More informationExtract from the 12 th General Report of the CPT, published in 2002
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) CPT/Inf(2002)15-part Developments concerning CPT standards in respect of police custody Extract from
More informationCHRISTIAN SIKHOLELO TYATYA THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) CASE NO.: 1850/2010 In the matter between: CHRISTIAN SIKHOLELO TYATYA Plaintiff And THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Defendant JUDGMENT
More informationCHILDREN COURT RULES, 2018
CHILDREN COURT RULES, 2018 CONTENTS Rule Page PART 1 CITATION, COMMENCEMENT AND POWERS Citation and Commencement Rule 1.1 Definitions Rule 1.2 Application of the Rules Rule 1.3 Effect of non-compliance
More informationThe court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON
The court process How the criminal justice system works. CONSUMER GUIDE FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON Inside The process Arrest and complaint Preliminary hearing Grand jury Arraignment
More informationFIFTH SECTION. CASE OF TANKO TODOROV v. BULGARIA. (Application no /99)
FIFTH SECTION CASE OF TANKO TODOROV v. BULGARIA (Application no. 51562/99) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 November 2006 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 2 of the Convention.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO JUDGMENT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2007-2686 Between LENNON RICHARDSON First Claimant JASON ALLEYNE Second Claimant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN MUKESH SIRJU VIDESH SAMUEL AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINDIAD AND TOBAGO DECISION
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2014-03454 BETWEEN MUKESH SIRJU VIDESH SAMUEL Claimants AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINDIAD AND TOBAGO Defendant BEFORE THE
More informationCase 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17
Case 3:12-cv-05987 Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA LASHONN WHITE, Plaintiff, vs. No. COMPLAINT CITY OF TACOMA, RYAN KOSKOVICH,
More informationdeprived of his or her liberty by arrest or detention to bring proceedings before court.
Questionnaire related to the right of anyone deprived of his or her liberty by arrest or detention to bring proceeding before court, in order that the court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of
More informationVictims Rights and Support Act 2013 No 37
New South Wales Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 No 37 Contents Part 1 Part 2 Preliminary Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Definitions 2 Victims rights Division 1 Preliminary 4 Object of Part
More informationLaw of the Child (Juvenile Court Procedure)
GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO. 182 published on 20/5/2016 THE LAW OF THE CHILD ACT, (CAP. 13) ARRANGEMENT OF RULES Rule Title 1. Citation. 2. Application of the Rules. 3. Interpretation. PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS
More informationExaminable excerpts of. Bail Act as at 30 September 2018 PART 1 PRELIMINARY
Examinable excerpts of Bail Act 1977 as at 30 September 2018 1A Purpose PART 1 PRELIMINARY The purpose of this Act is to provide a legislative framework for the making of decisions as to whether a person
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL ROY FELIX. And. DAVID BROOKS Also called MAVADO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CA No. S 256/2017 Between ROY FELIX And DAVID BROOKS Also called MAVADO Claimant Defendant PANEL: BEREAUX J.A. NARINE J.A. RAJKUMAR J.A. APPEARANCES:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT : MTHATHA CASE NO. 1299/06. In the matter between: and THE MINSTER OF SAFETY JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT : MTHATHA CASE NO. 1299/06 In the matter between: THANDILE FUNDA Plaintiff and THE MINSTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY Defendant JUDGMENT MILLER, J.:
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS FOR VICTIM TO SIGN: I,, victim of the crime of, (victim) (crime committed) committed on, by in, (date) (name of offender,
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CRIMINAL) THE QUEEN AND SHAM SANGANOO
. THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CRIMINAL) SAINT LUCIA CRIMINAL CASES NOS. SLUCRD 2007/0653, 0669 & 0670 BETWEEN: THE QUEEN AND SHAM SANGANOO Claimant Defendant Appearances:
More informationThe Shariat Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Re. Naheem Hussain and Rehan Zaman
The Shariat Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Re. Naheem Hussain and Rehan Zaman AMICUS BRIEF ON BEHALF OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF THE BAR OF ENGLAND AND WALES August 2011 ZIMRAN SAMUEL Counsel for
More informationSISSETON-WAHPETON SIOUX TRIBE CHAPTER 65
SISSETON-WAHPETON SIOUX TRIBE CHAPTER 65 HARASSMENT AND STALKING CODE 65-01-01 POLICY AND INTENT It shall be and is hereby established as the policy and intent of the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe to prohibit
More informationDOMESTIC ABUSE (SCOTLAND) BILL
DOMESTIC ABUSE (SCOTLAND) BILL FINANCIAL MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION 1. As required under Rule 9.3.2 of the Parliament s Standing Orders, this Financial Memorandum is published to accompany the Domestic Abuse
More informationFIRST SECTION. Application no /07 Gennadiy Nikolayevich KURKIN against Russia lodged on 15 October 2007 STATEMENT OF FACTS
FIRST SECTION Application no. 51098/07 Gennadiy Nikolayevich KURKIN against Russia lodged on 15 October 2007 Communicated on 9 July 2014 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Gennadiy Nikolayevich Kurkin,
More informationTHE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE, 2000 (XXII of 2000)
THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM ORDINANCE, 2000 (XXII of 2000) CONTENTS 1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions 3. Legal assistance 4. Juvenile courts 5. No joint trial of a child and adult
More informationNo End in Sight The Imprisonment and Indefinite Detention of Indigenous Australians with an Intellectual Disability and Acquired Brain Injury
No End in Sight The Imprisonment and Indefinite Detention of Indigenous Australians with an Intellectual Disability and Acquired Brain Injury Aboriginal Disability Justice Campaign Mental Impairment Legislation
More informationQ. What is Bail? Q. What is a Bailable and Non-Bailable offence?
Q. What is Bail? The purpose of arrest and detention of a person is primarily to make sure that the person appears before the court at the time of trial and if he is found guilty and is sentenced to imprisonment,
More information*************************************** NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
State v. Givens, 353 N.J. Super. 280 (App. Div. 2002). The following summary is not part of the opinion of the court. Please note that, in the interest of brevity, portions of the opinion may not have
More information(a) Actually innocent of a felony if he or she did not engage in any illegal conduct alleged in the charging documents; and
Page 1 West's Revised Code of Washington Annotated Currentness Title 4. Civil Procedure (Refs & Annos) Chapter 4.100. Wrongly Convicted Persons 4.100.010. Intent The legislature recognizes that persons
More informationTHE MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY THE NATIONAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS APPEAL JUDGMENT
NOT REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN CASE NO: CA 107/2016 Date Heard: 10 March 2017 Date Delivered: 16 March 2017 In the matter between: THE MINISTER OF SAFETY
More informationTITLE 29. Torts Ordinance. Chapter General Provisions
TITLE 29 Torts Ordinance Chapter 29.01 General Provisions 29.01.01 Findings and Purpose... 1 29.01.02 Definitions... 1 29.01.03 Severability... 2 29.01.04 Retroactivity... 3 Chapter 29.02 Sovereign Immunity
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN JOSEPH BERNARD-BANFIELD AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2009-01926 BETWEEN JOSEPH BERNARD-BANFIELD AND Claimant SARGEANT SOOKRAM REG NO. 9200 First Defendant THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
More informationConvention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
UNITED NATIONS CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE Fortieth session 28 April 16 May 2008 Distr. GENERAL 8 April 2008 Original:
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS FOR VICTIM TO SIGN: I,, victim of the crime of, (victim) (crime committed) committed on, by in, (date) (name of offender,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAM JUSTICE DONALDSON-HONEYWELL
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV: 2013-04300 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN LAKHPATIYA BARRAN (also called DOWLATIAH BARRAN) CLAIMANT AND BALMATI BARRAN RAJINDRA BARRAN MAHENDRA BARRAN FIRST DEFENDANT
More informationAppellant. JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA831/2013 [2014] NZCA 119 BETWEEN AND THE QUEEN Appellant JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent Hearing: 12 March 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Wild, Goddard and Clifford
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Explain the requirements of a lawful arrest.
Unit 11 Title: Criminal Litigation Level: 3 Credit Value: 7 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the powers of the police to arrest and detain a person for the purpose of investigating a criminal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND MAHADEO MAHARAJ AND GUARDIAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REASONS
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE HCA S 2048 of 2004 BETWEEN ROSEANN MAHABAL Plaintiff AND MAHADEO MAHARAJ AND First Defendant GUARDIAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Second
More information3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
3:14-cv-03087-SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 E-FILED Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 02:37:15 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN. Carter Francis AND. The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2012-00475 BETWEEN Carter Francis AND Claimant The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago Defendant Before the Honourable
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case Case 2:08-cv-02695-STA-tmp 2:08-zz-09999 Document Document 806 1 Filed Filed 10/15/2008 Page Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO JUDGMENT
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2010-05237 BETWEEN MIGUEL REGIS Claimant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Before the Honorable Mr. Justice
More informationChapter 8 International legal standards for the protection of persons deprived of their liberty
in cooperation with the Chapter 8 International legal standards for the protection of persons deprived of their liberty Facilitator s Guide Learning objectives I To familiarize the participants with some
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV 2014-01905 BETWEEN MUKESH LUTCHMAN Claimant AND AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Defendant Appearances: Mr Mc Master and Mr
More information