IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHASWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
|
|
- Janel Allison
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CASE NO : 265/02 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHASWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In thematterbetween: TSHEPO JOHN MAAGA APPLICANT and BRIAN ST CLAIR COOPER NO BLESSING GCABASHE NO FERDINAND ZONDAGH NO [In theircapacitiesasthefinaljoint JudicialManagersof thenorth WEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED(underfinalJudicialManagement)] 1 st RESPONDENT NQOBISIZWE NDLOVU 2 nd RESPONDENT THE SHERIFF ODI 3 RD RESPONDENT MMABATHO FOR THE APPLICANT : G L M BOKABA FOR THE 1 ST RESPONDENT : L C J MAREE SC DATE OF HEARING: 13FEBRUARY 2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT : 06MARCH 2003
2 JUDGMENT LEEUW J: 1.The Applicant approached this Honourable Court on an urgent basis on the 11 th June 2002 for an order in the following terms: 2. Treating this matter as urgent and dispensing to (sic) the rules relating to service and time frames as laid down in Rule 6 of the Uniform Rules of the above Honourable Court. 3.Granting Applicant leave to bring this application against First Respondent. 4.Declaring that Applicant s agreement regarding business finance between Applicant and First Respondent, was transferred from Applicant to Second Respondent or Applicant was substituted as a party thereto by the Second Respondent. (sic) 5.Declaring that if First Respondent has any cause of action, same cannot be proceeded with against Applicant. 6.Alternatively, declaring that First Respondent s debt against Applicant has prescribed and no longer executable due to the lapse of time within which to execute. 7.Setting aside the warrant of execution as well as the notice of sale in execution, dated 19 th March 2002 and 9 th May Rescinding the judgment granted against Applicant on the 22 nd June 1998
3 under Case Number 773/98, in the Magistrate s Court for the district Odi. 9.Ordering Second Respondent to discover all returned cheques that he issued to First Respondent personally or on behalf of Bitos CC in favour of First Respondent; the lease agreement that he had with JHI Property Services and all other documents and correspondence which was exchanged between First and Second Respondents and other persons which are relevant to this matter, between February 1998 till 31 st May Interdicting the Sheriff Odi from proceeding with the sale in execution, of the immovable property known as 375 Unit U, Mabopane, North West Province, which belongs to Applicant. 11.Ordering First Respondent to pay the costs of this application. 2.The following order, per agreement between the parties hereto, was made by this Court on the 11 th June 2002: 1. That the 1 st Respondent will cause the Sale in Execution scheduled for 13 th June 2002 to be stayed pending the final outcome of this application; 2.That the normal dies be applicable for the filing of Answering and Replying Affidavits; 3.That the matter be postponed sine die; 4.That the costs be reserved.
4 3.The matter was again enrolled on the 12 th December 2002 and the following order, was made per agreement between the two parties: 1. That this matter be postponed to 13 February 2003; 2.That the Applicant be ordered to pay the wasted costs and the costs of today s application. 3.That the Applicant be afforded the opportunity to submit reasons to this Honourable Court on 13 February 2003 why such costs should not be awarded on a costs de bonis propiis scale; 4.That such reasons and or representations be filed and served on the First Respondent two weeks prior to 13 February 2003 to enable the First Respondent to respond thereto. 4.At the hearing of this application on the 13 th February 2003, Mr Bokaba on behalf of the Applicant, asked the Court to grant an order against the Applicant s Attorneys for payment of the wasted costs and costs occasioned by the postponement of the 12 th December 2002, de bonis propiis. 5.Mr Maree, on behalf of the First Respondent, intimated that after the postponement of the 13 th June 2002 the following proposal, per letter dated 5 th August 2002 (Annexure LFS 1 to the Answering the Affidavit), was made to the Applicant s Attorneys by First Respondent s Attorneys: We advise that we are of the opinion that the matter can be resolved in the
5 following manner: 12.That you take an order in terms of your paragraph 7 of your Notice of Motion. 13.That the matter is to proceed in the Magistrate s Court as a contested action and the normal dies applicable for filing of further pleadings after the order referred to above is granted. 14.We are of the opinion that you are not entitled to paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of your Notice of Motion in these proceedings. 15.That each party pays its own costs. 16.That with regard to your client s housing loan your client approach our client URGENTLY to make arrangements for the payment thereof. 17.Should your client not find these suggestions acceptable, that we file papers and the matter be proceeded with. 6.The response from the Applicant s Attorney, dated 13 th August 2002 (Annexure LFS 2") was as follows: Your proposals are unacceptable. Respondent must file its answering affidavit within 5 days, from date hereof, henceforth the rules of court must be complied with. 7. Subsequently, the First Respondent s Answering Affidavit and Supporting documents, dated 20 th August 2002 were filed. The matter was set down on
6 the 13 th November 2002, for hearing on the 12 th December 2002 by the First Respondent s Attorneys, and the First Respondent s Heads of Argument were filed on the 5 th December At the hearing of the application on the 12 th December 2002, the Applicant had neither filed his Replying Affidavit nor Heads of Argument. It is for this reason that the order dated 12 th December 2002 which was confirmed on the 13 th February 2003 was made de bonis propiis against Applicant s Attorneys. 9.Prior to the postponement of the matter on the 12 th December 2002, the Applicant s Replying Affidavit was filed with the Registrar on the 10 th December 2002, which was already out of time. No application for condonation for the late filing was made. At the hearing of this application which was before me on the 13 th February 2003, no application for condonation was made for the late filing of the Replying Affidavit. It was for this reason that I disallowed the Replying Affidavit, and it will therefore not be considered for the purpose adjudicating this matter. 10.The Applicant s case in the Founding Affidavit is to the effect that: (a) He entered into a loan contract with the First Respondent for a total amount of R plus an amount not exceeding R which was advanced to him by the First Respondent which agreement is contained in a written contract dated 30 August 1996, Annexure TJM 1" (Written Contract); (b) He hypothecated site 375, Block U, Mabopane his private dwelling, under Mortgage Bond for a debt of R on the 3 rd September
7 1996, in favour of the First Respondent; (c) He conducted a Chicken Licken business but experienced financial problems towards the end of 1997 to the extent that he was unable to meet his financial obligations towards the First Respondent; (d) He approached the Acting Manager at the Small Business Unit of the First Respondent s Ga Rankuwa offices, and explained his plight and financial problems to him. He was then advised by the Acting Manager of the First Respondent to find a person or substitute who would take over his business, inheriting both the assets and the liabilities of the business. The identity of the Acting Manager is not disclosed; (e) He acted as advised and the business (assets and liabilities), was then taken over and conducted by the Second Respondent after an oral agreement was entered into between the Second Respondent and the Acting Manager of the First Respondent. It was agreed that Second Respondent would deposit an initial amount of R which amount was deposited in the First Respondent s bank account on the 9 th November 1998; (f) He, Applicant, was subsequently served with a summons on the 27 th May 1998 by the First Respondent for breach of contract based on the written contract. The summons was for the payment of the arrear amounts owing and for an order declaring the Applicant s immovable property, which was hypothecated under the Mortgage Bond executable; (g) Applicant then approached the Legal Official of the First Respondent, a certain M S Wing Phiri (Mr Phiri) at the Ga Rankuwa offices who
8 undertook to stay the proceedings. This was done by Mr Phiri per letters dated 14 July 1998 and 28 July 1998 to First Respondent s Attorneys and the Applicant respectively; (h) The Second Respondent took over the business on the 1 August 1998 and he continued paying the Applicant s debt to the First Respondent. A total amount of R was paid as at 31 March 2002 and the balance outstanding was R ; (i) He further alleges that he was amazed when he was served on the 29 th March 2002 with a Warrant of Execution and a Notice of Attachment dated 22 March 2002 and 28 March 2002 respectively. He was not aware of the Default Judgment taken against him by the First Respondent at the Magistrates Court. The property of the Applicant was to be auctioned on the 13 th June The sale in execution was stayed on the 11 th June 2002 by an order of this Court. 11.In the written and oral submissions on behalf of the Applicant, it is argued that the Applicant s assets and liabilities in the business, and the security given for the debt were discharged when the business was transferred to the Second Respondent. Alternatively that if I do not make such a finding, in the First Applicant s favour then I should find that the debt has prescribed. The debt was due on the 22 nd June 1998 and the Warrant of Execution was issued on the 19 th March In response to the Applicant s allegations, Mr Erasmus Albertus Schoeman (Mr Schoeman) on behalf of the First Respondent, raised preliminary point to the effect that the Applicant had not laid grounds or circumstances which would allow this Court to grant the rescission of the Magistrates Court judgment in accordance with Rule 49
9 (1) and section 36 of the Magistrates Court Act. 13.On the merits, the First Respondent alleges that he has no knowledge of the oral contract entered into between the Acting Manager, the Applicant and the Second Respondent. He avers that in terms of Clause 23 of the written contract, no variation to the terms of the contract would be valid unless reduced in writing and signed by the parties hereto; that their contract is still in force and binding in the absence of such variation. 14.The Applicant approached this Court on an urgent basis on the 11 th June 2002 for the purpose of stopping the sale of his house which was to take place on the 13 th June He alleges that the judgment by default which was granted by the Magistrates Court on the 22 nd June 1998, was obtained fraudulently. The Warrant of Execution, which was issued on the 22 nd March 2002, was as a result of the Default Judgment which was granted almost three years prior to the Warrant of Execution being issued. It was therefore convenient for the Applicant to bring both the application for setting aside the Warrant of Execution as well as the Sale in Execution, and an order for the rescission of the judgment granted against the Applicant on the 22 nd June 1998 to this Court. Compare Yokelo v Bodlani 1990 (3) SA 970 at With regard to the Default Judgment and the subsequent Warrant of Execution issued on the 19 th March 2002, it is important to note the following: (a) The Warrant of Execution was re issued on the 19 th March 2002 and dated 22 nd March 2002; (b) It is not known, from the papers filed, as to when the previous Warrant of
10 Execution was issued; (c) Section 63 of the Magistrates Courts Act No 32 of 1944 (The Act), provides that: Execution against property may not be issued upon a judgment after three years from the day on which it was pronounced or on which the last payment in respect thereof was made, except upon an Order of the Court in which judgment was pronounced or of any Court having jurisdiction, in respect of the judgment debtor, on the application and at the expense of the judgment creditor, after due notice to the judgment debtor to show cause why execution should not be issued. (My emphasis). (d) (e) Assuming that the previous Warrant of Execution was not timeously obtained after the Default Judgment was granted, it would then become superannuated if not acted upon three years from the date it was granted. According to the Applicant, the Default Judgment was taken against him on the 22 nd June 1998; thereafter there were verbal negotiations and or agreements between him and the First Respondent which is evident from the correspondence dated 14 July 1998, 22 July 1998 and 28 July 1998 between the Applicant, Mr Phiri on behalf of the First Respondent and the latter s legal representative. The letters were allegedly written as a result of the Default Judgment. ( f) There is evidence on record (Annexure TJM7") to substantiate the fact that subsequent to the Default Judgment of the 22 nd June 2002 being granted, several payments were made by or on behalf of the Applicant s account up to and including 31 st March 2002;
11 (g) It therefore appears, on the face of the information available, that the First Respondent was obliged to duly notify the Applicant in terms of section 63 of the Act and show cause as to why the Warrant of Execution should not be issued. (h) In terms of section 66 (4) of the Act, if a sale in execution of immovable property does not take place within a period of one year from the date of attachment, such attachment shall lapse; This period may be extended by further periods of one year each, upon application by the judgment creditor and after due notice of such application has been given to the judgment debtor. See section 66 (5) of the Act. It would seem such procedure was not followed in this case when the First Respondent applied for the re-issued Warrant of Execution (Annexure TJM 8"). 16.A valid judgment is a prerequisite for the granting of a Warrant of Execution. See section 66 (1). It is difficult, with the information placed before me, for one to assess whether the Default Judgment was correctly granted because of the following: (a) The Applicant was served with the summons on the 27 th April 1998; (b) Default Judgment against him was granted on the 22 nd June 1998; (c) The correspondence between the Applicant and the First Respondent s representative and attorneys, wherein the abeyance of the proceedings was discussed and agreed upon, is between the periods 29 th June 1998 and 28 th July 1998;
12 (d) According to Annexure TJM 7", (the transcript of payments made by Applicant) Applicant continued to make payments after the service of the summons and after the Default Judgment was granted; (e) This matter may be cleared by evidence in action proceedings. 17.For the above reasons, I find that the Warrant of Execution was not properly granted by the Court a quo and also find that it is not possible for me to rescind the default judgment granted on the 22 nd June 1998 on the scanty information placed on record. I nevertheless take note of the fact that the First Respondent has conceded that the Warrant of Execution as well as the Sale in Execution dated 19 March 2002 and 9 May 2002 respectively, be set aside. 18.With regard to the prayers 3 and 4 of the Notice of Motion, I make the following remarks: (a) Evidence has not been placed before me with regard to the circumstances and the facts of the oral agreement between the Applicant, the First Respondent s representative and the Second Respondent; (b) The First Respondent has referred to a clause 23 in the Written Contract which nullifies an oral agreement which purports to vary the terms of the contract unless reduced in writing and signed by the parties to the written contract. (c) It will, therefore be inappropriate to grant an order based on the dispute of fact and papers lacking of detail with regard to these aspects.
13 19.As far as prayer 5 ( Declaring the Respondent s debt against Applicant has prescribed and no longer executable due to the lapse of time within which to execute ) is concerned: (a) I agree with Mr Maree s submissions that in terms of section 11 (a) (ii) of the Prescription Act, 1969 (Act 68 of 1969), a judgment debt only prescribes after thirty (30) years. (b) My remarks in paragraph 17 supra with regard to the default judgment granted on the 22 nd June 1998 are apposite. 20.The Second Respondent did not make any appearance and for the same reasons mentioned in paragraph 18 above, I am not in a position to grant the order in terms of paragraph 8 of the Notice of Motion. 21.As far as costs are concerned, the First Respondent after the postponement of this matter on the 11 th June 2002, and having acceded to Applicant s prayer to cause the Sale in Execution scheduled for the 13 June 2002 to be set aside, made an attempt to mitigate the costs by initiating negotiations with the Applicant for the purpose of reaching a settlement. This is apparent from Annexure LF51", dated the 5 th August The Applicant s Attorneys adopted a recalcitrant attitude and enrolled the matter for hearing on the 12 th December 2002 and subsequently for hearing on the 13 th February Applicant has succeeded partly up to the stage when the Sale in Execution was set aside, but failed to mitigate the costs thereafter through the proposed offer for settlement by the First Respondent, when it would have been reasonable to accept the proposal in the circumstances.
14 23.For the above reasons, I accordingly make the following order: (a) That the Applicant s non compliance with the normal forms and service is condoned in terms of Rule 6 (12); (b) Applicant is granted leave to bring this application against the First Respondent; (c) Setting aside: (i) The re issued Warrant of Execution by the Magistrates Court under Case No 773/98 dated 19 th March 2002; (ii) The Notice of Sale in Execution dated 9 th May 2002 under Magistrates Court Case No 773/98; and declaring same null and void and of no force and effect. (d) Prayers 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the Notice of Motion are dismissed with costs. (e) Defendant is ordered to pay costs occasioned by the application up to and including the 11 th June 2002; (f) Applicant is ordered to pay costs of suit incurred in relation to the subsequent proceedings after the 11 th June The wasted costs and the costs occasioned by the postponement of the 12 th December 2002
15 shall be costs de bonis propiis against the Applicant s attorneys of record. M M LEEUW JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT Applicant sattorneys : MotlhabaneMakgale 1 st Respondent sattorneys : SmitStantonInc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN In the matter between:- Case No. : 2631/2013 JACQUES VLOK Applicant versus SILVER CREST TRADING 154 (PTY) LTD MERCANTILE BANK LTD ENGEN
More informationIncrease in 2013 TABLE A COSTS PART I
RULES BOARD FOR COURTS OF LAW ACT, 1985 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1985) AMENDMENT OF RULES REGULATING THE CONDUCT OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE MAGISTRATES' COURTS OF SOUTH AFRICA Nov-13 16-Jul-10 15-Jun-09 Increase
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU NATAL DIVISION, DURBAN AND STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED JUDGMENT
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU NATAL
More informationCOURTS OF LAW AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA COURTS OF LAW AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 75); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 39943 of 22 April 2016)
More informationCivil Procedure II - Part II: Civil proceedings in the High Court Multi Choice Q & A 2014 S1 3 April 2014: Unique number:
1 Civil Procedure II - Part II: Civil proceedings in the High Court Multi Choice Q & A 2014 S1 3 April 2014: Unique number: 883833 QUESTION 1: M issues summons against N for damages as a result of breach
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO:83409/2015 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHERS JUDGES: YES/NO (3) REVISED...... DATE
More informationCOURTS OF LAW AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA COURTS OF LAW AMENDMENT BILL (As amended by the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services (National Assembly)) (The English text is the offıcial text of the Bill)
More informationRULES BOARD FOR COURTS OF LAW ACT, 1985 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1985)
Justice and Constitutional Development, Department of/ Justisie en Staatkundige Ontwikkeling, Departement van R. 1272 Rules Board for Courts of Law Act (107/1985): Amendment of the Rules of High Court
More information(1 December to date) CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, 1996
(1 December 2003 - to date) CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, 1996 (Gazette No. 17678, Notice No. 2083 dated 18 December 1996. Commencement date: 4 February 1997 unless otherwise indicated)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) MICHAEL ANDREW VAN AS JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 26 AUGUST 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: CASE NO: 10589/16 MICHAEL ANDREW VAN AS Applicant And NEDBANK LIMITED Respondent JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 26 AUGUST
More information[1] This is an urgent application for an interdict restraining the first, second
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (CAPE OF GOOD HOPE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) CASE NO: 9940/06 In the matter between: JONAS DANIEL CHARLES DE BRUYN First Applicant MARGARET MARIA DE BRUYN Second Applicant
More informationLABOUR COURT RULES, 2017 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES PART I PRELIMINARY
Statutory Instrument 150 of 2017 LABOUR COURT RULES, 2017 SI 150/2017, 8/2018. ARRANGEMENT OF RULES PART I PRELIMINARY Rule 1. Title. 2. Application. 3. Interpretation. 4. Computation of time and certain
More informationNo. R January 2015 RULES BOARD FOR COURTS OF LAW ACT, 1985 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1985) MAGISTRATES' COURTS: AMENDMENT OF THE RULES OF COURT SCHEDULE
50 No. 38399 GOVENMENT GAZETTE, 23 JANUAY 2015 No.. 33 23 January 2015 ULES BOAD FO COUTS OF LAW ACT, 1985 (ACT NO. 107 OF 1985) MAGISTATES' COUTS: AMENDMENT OF THE ULES OF COUT The ules Board for Courts
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 33118/2010. In the matter between:
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA CASE NO: 563/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE, MTHATHA CASE NO: 563/2008 In the matter between: NONTWAZANA MANGQO Plaintiff and MEC FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, EASTERN CAPE Defendant JUDGMENT
More informationCIVIL PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR THE REGIONAL COURTS IN SOUTH AFRICA
FOR THE REGIONAL COURTS IN SOUTH AFRICA Page 1 INTRODUCTION The Civil Practice Directives deal essentially with the daily functioning of the courts, court- and case-flow management and intend to introduce
More informationDISTRIBUTED BY VERITAS TRUST
DISTRIBUTED BY VERITAS TRUST Veritas makes every effort to ensure the provision of reliable information, but cannot take legal responsibility for information supplied. CHAPTER 24:27 RECONSTRUCTION OF STATE-INDEBTED
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION,
More informationTHE PROBATE RULES. (Section 9) PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS (rules 1-3)
THE PROBATE RULES (Section 9) G.Ns. Nos. 10 of 1963 107 of 1963 369 of 1963 PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS (rules 1-3) 1. Citation These Rules may be cited as the Probate Rules. 2. Interpretation In these
More informationTHE SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACT (No. 2 of 2016) THE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS RULES, 2017
LEGAL NOTICE NO. ARRANGEMENT OF RULES THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACT (No. 2 of 2016) THE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS RULES, 2017 1 Short title and commencement 2 Interpretation 3 Filing a claim 4 Serving the statement
More information7:12 PREVIOUS CHAPTER
TITLE 7 Chapter 7:12 TITLE 7 PREVIOUS CHAPTER SMALL CLAIMS COURTS ACT Acts 20/1992, 8/1996, 22/2001, 14/2002; S.I. s 134/1996, 136/1996, 158/2000 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short
More informationABSA BANK LIMITED Plaintiff AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) Case No.: 8850/2011 In the matter between: ABSA BANK LIMITED Plaintiff and ROBERT DOUGLAS MARSHALL GAVIN JOHN WHITEFORD N.O. GLORIA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN In the matter between: Case No.: 3048/2015 STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED Plaintiff And JOROY 0004 CC t/a UBUNTU PROCUREM 1 st
More informationRules for the conduct of proceedings before the CCMA. Act. Published under. GN R1448 in GG of 10 October as amended by
Rules for the conduct of proceedings before the CCMA Act Published under GN R1448 in GG 25515 of 10 October 2003 as amended by GN R1512 in GG 25607 of 17 October 2003 GN R1748 of 2003 in GG 25797 of 5
More informationIN THE GAUTENG DIVISION OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA SERVAAS DANIEL DE KOCK
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
More informationALIENATION OF LAND ACT 68 OF 1981 i * [ASSENTED TO 28 AUGUST 1981] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 19 OCTOBER 1982] (Except s. 26: 6 December 1983) (English
ALIENATION OF LAND ACT 68 OF 1981 i * [ASSENTED TO 28 AUGUST 1981] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 19 OCTOBER 1982] (Except s. 26: 6 December 1983) (English text signed by the State President) as amended by Alienation
More informationMaintenance Act 9 of 2003 section 49
MADE IN TERMS OF section 49 Government Notice 233 of 2003 (GG 3093) came into force on date of publication: 17 November 2003 The Government Notice which issues these regulations repeals the regulations
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA. N$17.60 WINDHOEK 9 May 2014 No. 5461
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$17.60 WINDHOEK 9 May 2014 No. 5461 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 67 High Court Practice Directions: Rules of High Court of Namibia, 2014... 1 Government
More informationBANDILE KASHE, in his capacity as the Executor for the Estate Late W.M. M., Reference No: 2114/2007 JUDGMENT
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EAST LONDON
More informationThe Debt Adjustment Act
DEBT ADJUSTMENT c. 87 1 The Debt Adjustment Act being Chapter 87 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1940 (effective February 1, 1941). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been
More informationTHE RULES OF THE WAIKATO LACROSSE ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
THE RULES OF THE WAIKATO LACROSSE ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED These Rules rescind all previous Rules. Dated 19 August 2015 1.1 DEFINITIONS PART 1- INTRODUCTION The following words shall have the following
More informationTHE COURTS ACT. Rules made by the Chief Justice, after consultation with the Rules Committee and the Judges, under section 198 of the Courts Act
THE COURTS ACT Rules made by the Chief Justice, after consultation with the Rules Committee and the Judges, under section 198 of the Courts Act 1. Title These rules may be cited as the Supreme Court (International
More informationCIVIL PRACTICE DIRECTIVES REGIONAL COURTS IN SOUTH AFRICA
FOR THE REGIONAL COURTS IN SOUTH AFRICA 2016 Third Revision INTRODUCTION The Civil Practice Directives embraces the constitutional principle that everyone has the right to have any dispute that can be
More informationTHE SMALL CLAIMS COURT BILL, 2007
Small Claims Courts Bill, 2007 Section THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT BILL, 2007 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES PART 1 - PRELIMINARY 1 - Short title and commencement 2 - Purpose 3 - Interpretation PART II ESTABLISHMENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION) FIRSTRAND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION) Case No: 17622/2008 In the matter between FIRSTRAND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED Applicant And PETER JAQUE WAGNER N.O. PETER JAQUE WAGNER First Respondent
More informationJUDGMENT THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 07897/2016. In the matter between: SAPOR RENTALS (PTY) LIMITED
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 07897/2016 (1) REPORTABLE: NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3) REVISED. 23 February 2017.. DATE... SIGNATURE In the matter
More informationBuffalo City Metropolitan Municipality JUDGMENT
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EAST LONDON CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION Case nos: EL270/17; ECD970/17 Date heard: 22/6/17 Date delivered: 28/6/17 Not reportable In the matter between: David Barker Applicant
More informationDRUMMOND FARMS (PTY) LTD
Reportable In the High Court of South Africa (South Eastern Cape Local Division) (Port Elizabeth High Court) Case No 2047/07 Delivered: In the matter between DRUMMOND FARMS (PTY) LTD Applicant and CHARLES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. WELTMANS CUSTOM OFFICE FURNITURE Appellant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: WELTMANS CUSTOM OFFICE FURNITURE Appellant (PTY) LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) and WHISTLERS CC Respondent CORAM : HEFER, NIENABER, SCHUTZ,
More informationReproduced by Data Dynamics in terms of Government Printers' Copyright Authority No dated 24 September 1993
2 No. 417 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 2 AUGUST 17 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: [ ] Words in bold type in square brackets indicate omissions from existing enactments. Words underlined with a solid line indicate insertions
More informationMEMORANDUM OF DEPOSIT
MEMORANDUM OF DEPOSIT THIS MEMORANDUM OF DEPOSIT ( Memorandum ) is made on BETWEEN: (1) KGI SECURITIES (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., a company incorporated in the Republic of Singapore and having its registered
More information(27 November 1998 to date) ALIENATION OF LAND ACT 68 OF 1981
(27 November 1998 to date) [This is the current version and applies as from 27 November 1998, i.e. the date of commencement of the Alienation of Land Amendment Act 103 of 1998 to date] ALIENATION OF LAND
More informationThe Attachment of Debts Act
The Attachment of Debts Act being Chapter 59 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1920 (Assented to November 10, 1920). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated for
More informationANAND-NEPAUL APPLICANT CITIBANK N.A. FIRST RESPONDENT MAHARAJ ATTORNEYS SECOND RESPONDENT THE SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT, DURBAN NORTH THIRD RESPONDENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DURBAN AND COAST LOCAL DIVISION CASE NO 366/2005 In the matter between: ANAND-NEPAUL APPLICANT AND CITIBANK N.A. FIRST RESPONDENT MAHARAJ ATTORNEYS SECOND RESPONDENT THE
More informationThe first plaintiff is a businessman who was acting as an agent of the. terms of the laws of the Republic of South Africa.
2 Introduction 1. This matter came to court by way of action. The first plaintiff is a businessman who was acting as an agent of the second, third and fourth plaintiffs who are all companies registered
More informationRepublic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) JUDGMENT DELIVERED : 3 NOVEMBER 2009
Republic of South Africa REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) CASE No: A 178/09 In the matter between: CHRISTOPHER JAMES BLAIR HUBBARD and GERT MOSTERT Appellant/Defendant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. FIRSTRAND BANK LIMITED Plaintiff. ANDRé ALROY FILLIS First Defendant. MARILYN ELSA FILLIS Second Defendant JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NOT REPORTABLE EASTERN CAPE, PORT ELIZABETH Case No.: 1796/10 Date Heard: 3 August 2010 Date Delivered:17 August 2010 In the matter between: FIRSTRAND BANK LIMITED Plaintiff
More informationALIENATION OF LAND ACT NO. 68 OF 1981
ALIENATION OF LAND ACT NO. 68 OF 1981 [View Regulation] [ASSENTED TO 28 AUGUST, 1981] DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 19 OCTOBER, 1982] (except s. 26 on 6 December, 1983) (English text signed by the State President)
More informationSOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 2008/41609 DATE:30/08/2010 In the matter between: GEODIS WILSON SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD Plaintiff and ACA (PTY) LTD First Defendant
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA WHITELEYS CONSTRUCTION
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between:- Case No. : 2924/09 WHITELEYS CONSTRUCTION Plaintiff and CARLOS NUNES CC Defendant HEARD ON: 3 DECEMBER 2009 JUDGMENT
More informationCIVIL PRACTICE DIRECTIVES REGIONAL COURTS IN SOUTH AFRICA
FOR THE REGIONAL COURTS IN SOUTH AFRICA 2017 Fourth Revision PREAMBLE Whereas the Chief Justice has issued Norms and Standards for the performance of judicial functions in terms of section 8(3) read with
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to
More informationEXCLUSIVE ACCESS TRADING 73 (PTY) LTD JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE HIGH COURT GRAHAMSTOWN) In the matter between: CASE NO: 3829/2009 DATE HEARD: 28/02/2011 DATE DELIVERED: 01/03/2011 EXCLUSIVE ACCESS TRADING 73 (PTY) LTD
More informationSMALL CLAIMS COURT ACT
LAWS OF KENYA SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACT NO. 2 OF 2016 Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org Small Claims Court No. 2 of 2016 Section
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA [WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN] Coram: LE GRANGE, J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA [WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN] Coram: LE GRANGE, J In the matter between: CASE NO: 15967/07 - REPORTABLE- ABSA BANK LIMITED Plaintiff And NAFIESA MAGIET NO Defendant
More informationPART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS
PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009
COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Court of Appeal Rules 2009 Arrangement of Rules COURT OF APPEAL RULES 2009 Arrangement of Rules Rule PART I - PRELIMINARY 7 1 Citation and commencement... 7 2 Interpretation....
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at RANDBURG on 25 October 1999 before Gildenhuys J, Goldblatt (assessor) Decided on: 30 November 1999 CASE NUMBER: LCC116/98 In the case of: THE FORMER HIGHLANDS
More informationBELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003
BELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003 This is a revised edition of the Subsidiary Laws, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under
More informationMAINTENANCE AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA MAINTENANCE AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 7); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 38138 of 29 October 2014)
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA
GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$15.20 WINDHOEK - 7 November 2014 No. 5608 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICES No. 227 Amendment of Rules of High Court of Namibia: High Court Act, 1990... 1
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG NUPSAW OBO NOLUTHANDO LENGS
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JR 2494/16 In the matter between: NUPSAW OBO NOLUTHANDO LENGS Applicant and GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE SECTORAL
More information(EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) CASE NO.: 812/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE PORT ELIZABETH) CASE NO.: 812/2012 In the matter between: CLIMAX CONCRETE PRODUCTS CC t/a CLIMAX CONCRETE PRODUCTS CC Registration Number CK 1985/014313/23
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAHIKENG
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAHIKENG CASE NO. 100/2014 In the matter between: SCHALK VISSER PLAINTIFF and PEWTER STAR INVESTMENTS CC 1 ST DEFENDANT SUSANNA MARGARETHA WEISS
More informationRULE 55 PROCEDURE ON A REFERENCE
RULE 55 PROCEDURE ON A REFERENCE GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR CONDUCT OF REFERENCE Simple Procedure to be Adopted 55.01 (1) A referee shall, subject to any directions contained in the order directing the reference,
More informationTITLE 25. RESIDENTIAL FORECLOSURE AND EVICTION LAW CHAPTER 1. SHORT TITLE, FINDINGS, AND PURPOSE
TITLE 25. RESIDENTIAL FORECLOSURE AND EVICTION LAW CHAPTER 1. SHORT TITLE, FINDINGS, AND PURPOSE 25 M.P.T.L. ch. 1 1 Section 1. Short Title This Law shall be known as the Residential Foreclosure and Eviction
More informationINTRODUCING BROKER AGREEMENT
INTRODUCING BROKER AGREEMENT is made the [ ] between: (1) DIF Broker SA Rua Eng. Ferreira Dias 452-1º Porto Portugal and WHEREAS: This Agreement sets out the terms upon which business may be introduced
More informationJUNE 2012 EXAMINATION DATE: 6 JUNE 2012 DURATION: 2 HOURS PASS MARK: 40% (PP-50)
DEBBUS JUNE 2012 EXAMINATION DATE: 6 JUNE 2012 TIME: 14H00 16H00 TOTAL: 100 MARKS DURATION: 2 HOURS PASS MARK: 40% (PP-50) DEBT COLLECTING THIS EXAMINATION PAPER CONSISTS OF 3 SECTIONS: SECTION A: CONSISTS
More informationFederal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2000
Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2000 Commencement: 1st May 2000 In exercise of the powers conferred on me by section 254 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 and all powers
More informationGUTSCHE FAMILY INVESTMENTS (PTY) LIMITED
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION, PORT ELIZABETH CASE NO: 4490/2015 DATE HEARD: 02/03/2017 DATE DELIVERED: 30/03/2017 In the matter between GUTSCHE FAMILY INVESTMENTS (PTY)
More informationSOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. SP&C CATERING INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD Plaintiff
SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, JOHANNESBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No.2010/09079 Date:22/09/2010 In the matter between: SP&C CATERING INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD Plaintiff and MANUEL JORGE MAIA DA CRUZ First
More informationIN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAHIKENG MARTHINUS JOHANNES LAUFS DATE OF HEARING : 28 OCTOBER 2016 DATE OF JUDGMENT : 01 DECEMBER 2016
Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to Magistrates: Circulate to Regional Magistrates: YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO IN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAHIKENG In the matter between: CASE NO:
More informationANNEXURE K RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE RESTAURANT, CATERING AND ALLIED TRADES TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANNEXURE K RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE RESTAURANT, CATERING AND ALLIED TRADES TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE SERVING AND FILING DOCUMENTS 1. How to contact the
More informationFederal Magistrates Court (Bankruptcy) Rules
Federal Magistrates Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 1 2006 Select Legislative Instrument 2006 No. 1 We, Federal Magistrates, make the following Rules of Court under the Federal Magistrates Act 1999. Dated 30
More informationTHE ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST AND RECOVERY OF DEBTS LAWS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2012
9 Bill No. 122-F of 2011 THE ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST AND RECOVERY OF DEBTS LAWS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2012 (AS PASSED BY THE HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT LOK SABHA ON 10TH DECEMBER, 2012 RAJYA SABHA ON 20TH
More informationLabour Court Rules, 2006 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES PART I
DISTRIBUTED BY VERITAS TRUST Tel: [263] [4] 794478 Fax & Messages [263] [4] 793592 E-mail: veritas@mango.zw VERITAS MAKES EVERY EFFORT TO ENSURE THE PROVISION OF RELIABLE INFORMATION, BUT CANNOT TAKE LEGAL
More informationBERMUDA RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BERMUDA BX 1 / 1965
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BERMUDA BX 1 / 1965 [made under section 9 of the Court of Appeal Act 1964 and brought into operation on 2 August 1965] TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN PIETER WILLEM DU PLOOY OOS VRYSTAAT KAAP BEDRYF BEPERK
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN In the matter between Case No: 5277/2014 PIETER WILLEM DU PLOOY APPLICANT and OOS VRYSTAAT KAAP BEDRYF BEPERK RESPONDENT CORAM: NAIDOO,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: YES/NO Of Interest to other Judges: YES/NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO In the matter between: Appeal number: A1/2016
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ENGEN PETROLEUM LIMITED
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case No: 1771/2012 ENGEN PETROLEUM LIMITED Applicant and MR ROBERT HOWARD VAN LOGGERENBERG NO MRS PETRONELLA FRANCINA
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Judicial Matters Amendment Bill, 2016
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Judicial Matters Amendment Bill, 2016 (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 75); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No... of. 2016)
More informationBANKRUPTCY ACT (CHAPTER 20)
BANKRUPTCY ACT (CHAPTER 20) Act 15 of 1995 1996REVISED EDITION Cap. 20 2000 REVISEDEDITION Cap. 20 37 of 1999 42 of 1999 S 380/97 S 126/99 S 301/99 37 of 2001 38 of 2002 An Act relating to the law of bankruptcy
More informationCONSTITUTION AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING AND PROCESSING MACHINERY ASSOCIATION LIMITED ACN
CONSTITUTION OF AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING AND PROCESSING MACHINERY ASSOCIATION LIMITED ACN 051 288 053 A Company Limited by Guarantee under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) CONSTITUTION OF AUSTRALIAN PACKAGING
More informationThe Deserted Wives and Children s Maintenance Act
The Deserted Wives and Children s Maintenance Act UNEDITED being Chapter 341 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1965 (effective February 7, 1966). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments
More informationBY-LAWS ALBERTA ALPINE SKI ASSOCIATION
BY-LAWS OF ALBERTA ALPINE SKI ASSOCIATION TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION.. 1 Section 1.1 Definitions. 1 Section 1.2 Societies Act. 2 Section 1.3 Grammatical Conformance 2 ARTICLE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) NOT REPORTABLE CASE NO: 26952/09 DATE: 11/06/2009 In the matter between: TIMOTHY DAVID DAVENPORT PHILIP Applicant and TUTOR TRUST
More informationENERGY ARBITRATION COUNCIL (EAC) RULES OF ARBITRATION
ENERGY ARBITRATION COUNCIL (EAC) RULES OF ARBITRATION Page 2 of 30 PREAMBLE Dr. Gopal Energy Foundation is a non-profit organization working in the field of inter alia Energy Sector founded on 15 th April
More informationSUMMARY OF CONTENTS SC-1.
SUMMARY OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Chapter 1. Preliminary Matters............................ 1-1 Chapter 2. Parties...................................... 2-1 Chapter 3. Service......................................
More informationRepublic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) CASH CRUSADERS FRANCHISING (PTY) LTD
Republic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: Case No: 1052/2013 2970/2013 CASH CRUSADERS FRANCHISING (PTY) LTD Applicant v LUVHOMBA
More informationIN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
1 IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 2813/2010 In the matter between: HENDRIK JOHANNES VAN JAARSVELD HENDRIK JOHANNES VAN JAARSVELD N.O EMMERENTIA FREDERIKA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DURBAN AND COAST LOCAL DIVISION REPORTABLE 11974/2006. KRISHENLALL HIRALAL APPLICANT versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA DURBAN AND COAST LOCAL DIVISION REPORTABLE 11974/2006 KRISHENLALL HIRALAL APPLICANT versus LUGASEN NAICKER FIRST RESPONDENT SHANIKA NAICKER SECOND RESPONDENT RESERVED
More informationGOLF NT INCORPORATED CONSTITUTION
GOLF NT INCORPORATED CONSTITUTION THIS IS THE ANNEXURE MARKED A REFERRED TO IN THE STATUTORY DECLARATION OF (Name of Public Officer) MADE ON THE DAY OF 20 BEFORE ME (signature of witness on statutory declaration)
More informationTHE ADVOCATES ACT. (Cap. 16)
108 Kenya Subsidiary Legislation, 1979 LEGAL NOTICE No. 62 THE ADVOCATES ACT (Cap. 16) IN EXERCISE of the powers conferred by section 48 of the Advocates Act, the Chief Justice, on the recommendation of
More informationJUDGMENTS (ENFORCEMENT) RULES
JUDGMENTS (ENFORCEMENT) RULES Arrangement of Orders Part I Preliminary Part II Rules I Duties of the Sheriff II General III Stay of Judgments and Process IV Issue of Process V Attachment VI Interpleader
More informationSmall Claims rules are covered in:
Small Claims rules are covered in: CCP 116.110-116.950 CHAPTER 5.5. SMALL CLAIMS COURT Article 1. General Provisions... 116.110-116.140 Article 2. Small Claims Court... 116.210-116.270 Article 3. Actions...
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY CONVEYANCING ARBITRATION RULES
THE LAW SOCIETY CONVEYANCING ARBITRATION RULES (For disputes arising under the Contract for Sale of Land 2005 Edition) Preamble The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales resolved at a meeting on
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION,
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA M AND K ACCOUNTING AND TAX CONSULTANTS
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case number: 2197/2011 In the matter between:- M AND K ACCOUNTING AND TAX CONSULTANTS Applicant and CENTLEC (PTY) LTD Respondent CORAM: SNELLENBURG,
More information---~~~ ).C?.7.).~
1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Case Number: 34949/2013 (1) REPORTAB LE: NO [2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3) REVISED. ---~~~... 0.1.).C?.7.).~
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA)
IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) CASE NO: 70623/11 [1) REPORTABLE: [2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: t^no) it [3) REVISED. DATE In the matter between: CENTWISE 153 CC
More information