QUANTUM MERUIT SOME PITFALLS
|
|
- Christian Cole
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 QUANTUM MERUIT SOME PITFALLS Ben Jacobs 8 November 2017
2 OVERVIEW CONTEXT A valid construction contract has been repudiated by one party, such repudiation having been validly accepted by the other party who terminates the contact, and one party subsequently claims an entitlement to quantum meruit.
3 OVERVIEW TWO ISSUES INTERRELATED 1. What is the relevance of the contract price? 2. What is the relevance of who repudiated the contract?
4 OVERVIEW PRINCIPLE What the concept of monetary restitution involves is the payment of an amount which constitutes, in all the relevant circumstances, fair and just compensation for the benefit or enrichment actually or constructively accepted. : Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221 (Pavey & Matthews) per Deane J at 263.
5 OVERVIEW CONTRACTUAL BACKGROUND Every case where the contract is discharged for repudiation by the defendant, plaintiff is entitled to damages. But plaintiff is also entitled to reasonable remuneration for any non-monetary benefit conferred, at least where contract price not recoverable. By contrast, if the contract was discharged by the defendant for the plaintiff's repudiation, plaintiff is not entitled to damages or the contract price. In almost all cases, a claim for reasonable remuneration will also fail.
6 QUANTUM MERUIT KEY ELEMENTS Unjust enrichment is commonly accepted as consisting of four elements (See, eg Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton (2012) 246 CLR 498 per French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ at [30]): Enrichment/benefit; At the claimant s expense; The unjust factor; and No defence.
7 QUANTUM MERUIT ACCEPTANCE Acceptance of benefit is the orthodox basis for establishing an entitlement to reasonable remuneration: Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (in liq) (2008) 232 CLR 635 (Lumbers v W Cook) at 656 and 662. It has been suggested that acceptance satisfies both benefit and injustice elements: Restitution law in Australia / Keith Mason, J W Carter and G J Tolhurst (3 rd ed) 2016 (Restitution law in Australia) at [1156].
8 QUANTUM MERUIT ACCEPTANCE However, acceptance has a differential operation in that acceptance is either irrelevant or deemed to occur, if performance of the contract was not completed due to breach by the defendant. Whereas, if the defendant elected to treat the contract as discharged, for the plaintiff s repudiation, acceptance must be proved independently of contractual receipt. See Restitution Law in Australia at [1157].
9 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY Geneses of why acceptance is deemed to occur against the defendant in these cases is that a defendant in breach is not permitted to deny that part performance of the contract is beneficial. Useful to consider this point in light of a modern case: Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 (Renard Constructions).
10 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS FACTS Concerned two contracts, both were for the construction of pumping stations as part of a sewerage project in the Gosford/Wyong area. Failure by the principal to supply materials. Principal subsequently served a notice on the contractor to show cause why it should not take the remaining work out of the contractor s hands.
11 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS FACTS When exercising the power to take the work out of Renard s hands, the relevant person at the principal was not aware of either the: Bearing that the non-supply by the principal would have on the date for PC; or Steps taken to accelerate, i.e. increased work force, longer hours and new, highly experienced foreman. Renard treated the action as repudiation, terminated the contract and commenced arbitration.
12 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS HISTORY Arbitrator held that the principal was unreasonable in the exercise of its power amounting to repudiation and that Renard was entitled to recover on a quantum meruit calculated by reference to reasonable remuneration for the contractor. Principal appealed to Cole J on the grounds that: Arbitrator reached the wrong conclusion on repudiation; and Arbitrator applied the wrong method of calculation.
13 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS HISTORY Cole J upheld the appeal on the first ground only. Unnecessary to decide, but Cole J said he would be against the principal on the second ground for the reasons he had given in Jennings Construction Ltd v Q H and M Birt Ltd (Cole J, 16 December 1988, unreported). Appeal and cross-appeal to the Court of Appeal, Priestley JA, Meagher JA and Handley JA.
14 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS APPEAL Principal s cross-appeal raised to points: Contractual sum must form the upper limit of the total receivable by the contractor (ceiling point). Arbitrator should have found an amount representing the value to the principal of the work performed by the contractor, not a reasonable remuneration to the contractor (value to principal point).
15 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS DECISION Court of Appeal upheld Renard s appeal and reinstated arbitrator s decision, and dismissed the cross-appeal (Meagher JA, Priestley and Handley JJA agreeing).
16 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS VALUE TO THE PRINCIPAL Court of Appeal approved of what Cole J had said in Jennings Construction Ltd v Q H and M Birt Ltd (Cole J, 16 December 1988, unreported) applying the judgments of Mason J and Wilson J (jointly) and Deane J in Pavey & Matthews.
17 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS CEILING POINT Court of Appeal approved of what the New Zealand Court of Appeal in Slowey v Lodder (1901) 20 NZLR 321; approved by the Privy Council in Lodder v Slowey [1904] AC 442.
18 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS CONTINUED an innocent party who accepts the defaulting party's repudiation of a contract has the option of either suing for damages for breach of contract or suing on a quantum meruit for work done. An election presupposes a choice between different remedies, which presumably may lead to different results. The nature of these different remedies renders it highly likely that the results will be different. : Renard Constructions per Meagher JA at 277 [emphasis added].
19 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS CONTINUED The most one can say is that the amount contractually agreed is evidence of the reasonableness of the remuneration claimed on a quantum meruit; strong evidence perhaps, but certainly not conclusive evidence. : per Meagher JA at 278 [emphasis added].
20 CLAIMS BY INNOCENT PARTY RENARD CONSTRUCTIONS CONTINUED On the other hand, it would be extremely anomalous if the defaulting party when sued on a quantum meruit could invoke the contract which he has repudiated in order to impose a ceiling on amounts otherwise recoverable. : per Meagher JA at 278 [emphasis added]. [It is trite to observe that a plaintiff wrongdoer claiming quatum meruit, even if can establish claim, should not be permitted to put themselves into a better position than they would have been had they not repudiated the contract.]
21 CLAIMS BY WRONGDOER SUMPTER V HEDGES Plaintiff sued on a quantum meruit for value of work done and materials supplied. Progress payments were made, but plaintiff ran out of money and abandoned the works. Where the plaintiff's repudiation led to termination, the general rule is that reasonable remuneration is not available to recover the value of part performance: Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673 (Sumpter v Hedges).
22 CLAIMS BY WRONGDOER SUMPTER V HEDGES CONTINUED Sumpter v Hedges was decided on implied contract, overtaken by Pavey & Matthews and restitution or unjust enrichment analysis. However, still authority for the proposition that an independent liability, i.e. completely independent of the contract, must be established. Interesting point is that the claim for work done failed, however the claim for materials supplied but not incorporated was upheld.
23 CLAIMS BY WRONGDOER ACCEPTANCE Where work is done by one party under a special contract, but not according to its terms, the other may refuse to accept it; but if he does accept it and takes the benefit of it, he may be sued for the value on this [common indebitatus] count [for work done]. : Steele v Tardiani (1946) 72 CLR 386 (Steele v Tardiani) per Latham CJ at 393 (adopting the rule as stated in Bullen and Leake).
24 CLAIMS BY WRONGDOER STEELE V TARDIANI FACTS Italian war internees were released on the condition that they work for the defendant cutting firewood on his land. Found that the contract specified certain dimensions for the firewood and that the plaintiffs had breached the contract for failure to comply with those terms.
25 CLAIMS BY WRONGDOER STEELE V TARDIANI DECISION Plaintiffs were entitled to recover on a quantum meruit, since although contract was part-performed, a new contract could be implied from the circumstances under which defendant allowed the plaintiffs without any objections to split the wood to widths greater than six inches and subsequently disposed of the wood. Implied contract is no longer the basis (Pavey & Matthews), however acceptance is a foundation for independent liability.
26 CLAIMS BY WRONGDOER STEELE V TARDIANI CONTINUED In Steele v Tardiani, in the context of work done, Dixon J (at 402) referred to 'taking the benefit of the work', and said that this assumes the exercise of some choice actually open to the defendant. Evidence of a verbal request made by the defendant to the plaintiffs to continue cutting the wood/promise to pay, notwithstanding non-compliance Steele v Tardiani is very rarely applied (see Valleyarm Digital Ltd v Peake [2016] VSC 98 for a recent attempt)
27 CONCLUSIONS SUMMARY The preferential treatment of a restitutionary claim by a plaintiff who elected to terminate the contract for the defendant's breach or repudiation stems from the fact that a defendant in breach is not permitted to deny that part performance is beneficial (contractual receipt is sufficient). Where the plaintiff was the wrongdoer, an independent basis for liability must be proven and acceptance as previously explained is an appropriate concept.
28 CONCLUSIONS LUMBERS V W COOK Useful example of difficulties faced where the plaintiff is not entitled to deemed acceptance by the defendant (although not a repudiation case). W Cook Sons entered into a contract with Lumbers to construct a house on its land. In reality, W Cook Builders (an associated company) performed most of the work required by the contract, which included the engagement of building sub-contractors and supervision of their work.
29 CONCLUSIONS LUMBERS V W COOK Lumbers were not shown to have received a benefit at Builders expense which they accepted, and which it would be unconscionable for them to retain without payment: Lumbers v W Cook per Gummow, Hayne, Crennan and Kiefel JJ at 662. In reaching the same conclusion, Gleeson CJ discussed: Steele v Tardiani need to establish acceptance; and Sumpter v Hedges the dilemma of the landowner on whose land work is done but not accepted. C.f. materials claim.
30 CONCLUSIONS TAKE AWAY POINTS What the concept of monetary restitution involves is the payment of an amount which constitutes, in all the relevant circumstances, fair and just compensation for the benefit or enrichment actually or constructively accepted : Pavey & Matthews per Deane J at 263 [emphasis added].
31 CONCLUSIONS TAKE AWAY POINTS CONTINUED Contract price: Is evidence of the reasonableness of the remuneration claimed, possibly strong evidence, but is not determinative; In the case where the defendant repudiated the contract, cannot impose a ceiling on amounts otherwise recoverable; and In cases where the plaintiff repudiated the contract, ought to restrict recovery (in unlikely event successful)
32 CONCLUSIONS TAKE AWAY POINTS CONTINUED Acceptance: Is irrelevant or deemed to occur, if performance of the contract was not completed due to breach by the defendant; and Must be proved independently of contractual receipt, if the defendant elected to treat the contract as discharged.
33
To Discharge By Performance
To Discharge By Performance Requirements Start by looking at the contract to see if it has a term that of entire performance. If not then the exceptions may apply. 1. ENITRE PERFORMANCE RULE - The general
More informationIn the contractual context partial failure of consideration is concerned with. Partial Failure of Consideration JOHN TARRANT *
PARTIAL FAILURE OF CONSIDERATION 59 Partial Failure of Consideration JOHN TARRANT * The common law has long made a distinction between total failure of consideration and partial failure of consideration.
More informationQUANTUM MERUIT QUANTUM MERUIT FOR BUILDING SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER AN UNENFORCEABLE OR TERMINATED CONTRACT INTRODUCTION.
QUANTUM MERUIT QUANTUM MERUIT FOR BUILDING SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER AN UNENFORCEABLE OR TERMINATED CONTRACT Chris Fenwick INTRODUCTION Quantum meruit simply means as much as he or she has earned. 1 Courts
More informationRELEVANCE OF DOCTRINE OF QUANTUM MERUIT IN INDIA AND ENGLAND. Dr. Saroj Saini, Assistant Professor,Department of Laws, Punjab University, Chandigarh.
LAW MANTRA THINK BEYOND OTHERS (I.S.S.N 2321-6417 (Online) Ph: +918255090897 Website: journal.lawmantra.co.in E-mail: info@lawmantra.co.in contact@lawmantra.co.in RELEVANCE OF DOCTRINE OF QUANTUM MERUIT
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of Research Contract is defined in various ways. A contract has been defined by Beatson in Anson s Law of Contract as a legally binding agreement made between two
More informationPowell v Braun [1954] 1 All ER 484; Turriff Constructions Ltd v Regalia Knitting Mills Ltd (1971) 9 BLR 24.
Quantum meruit 1. What it is (c) The expression quantum meruit means "the amount he deserves" or "what the job is worth". Essentially, quantum meruit is an action for payment of the reasonable value of
More informationA breach of contract occurs where a party does not comply with one or more of the terms of contract, express or implied.
CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG Breach and Remedy Refer to Richards, P. Law of Contract Chapters 16-18 Uff, J. Construction Law 9 th Edition Chapter 9 BREACH OF CONTRACT A breach of contract occurs where
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Martinek Holdings Pty Ltd v Reed Construction (Qld) Pty Ltd [2009] QCA 329 PARTIES: MARTINEK HOLDINGS PTY LTD ACN 106 533 242 (applicant/appellant) v REED CONSTRUCTION
More informationBond Law Review. Radhika Withana Baker & McKenzie. Volume 24 Issue 1 Article 5
Bond Law Review Volume 24 Issue 1 Article 5 2012 The availability of restitutionary remedies in the context of an illegal contract: Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton; Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Cunningham's Warehouse
More informationTHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE LAWS OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND CONTRACT: UNPACKING LUMBERS V COOK
Angus O Brien* THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE LAWS OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT AND CONTRACT: UNPACKING LUMBERS V COOK Abstract Although the High Court s recent decision in Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (in
More informationNote: At the start say Presuming all the elements of a valid contract are satisfied
Note: At the start say Presuming all the elements of a valid contract are satisfied Remedies: SELF HELP: Withholding Performance: One simply does not perform their part of the contract. Termination: Considered
More informationTHE COMMON LAW OF RESTITUTION
THE COMMON LAW OF RESTITUTION SIXTH STUDY PACK CONTRACTUAL BENEFITS Where the plaintiff has him/herself conferred the benefit on the defendant. Where the plaintiff conferred a benefit under an ineffective
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: David & Gai Spankie & Northern Investment Holdings Pty Limited v James Trowse Constructions Pty Limited & Ors [2010] QSC 29 DAVID & GAI SPANKIE & NORTHERN
More informationwith in this paper, namely the circumstances in which tracing is not available.
Tracing The Loss of the Right to Trace 1. Introduction: The Nature of Tracing 1.1 Consistently with the conceptual and linguistic difficulties associated with the topic of tracing, there is no uncontroversial
More informationThe definitive version of this article is at (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 284, available electronically at
The definitive version of this article is at (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 284, available electronically at www.blackwell-synergy.com FAILURE OF CONSIDERATION Roxborough v Rothmans Peter Jaffey * Introduction
More informationIndex (2006) 22 BCL
Acceleration costs implied direction to accelerate works requires clearest evidence, 62-74 Accord and satisfaction whether terms of settlement amounted to, 16-30 Accreditation scheme Commonwealth building
More informationProfiting from your own mistakes: Common law liability and working directors
Profiting from your own mistakes: Common law liability and working directors Author: Tim Wardell Special Counsel Edwards Michael Lawyers Profiting from your own mistakes: Common law liability and working
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Gemini Nominees Pty Ltd v Queensland Property Partners Pty Ltd ATF The Keith Batt Family Trust [2007] QSC 20 PARTIES: GEMINI NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 011 020 536) (plaintiff)
More informationA CASE NOTE ON KOOMPAHTOO LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL v SANPINE PTY LIMITED
A CASE NOTE ON KOOMPAHTOO LOCAL ABORIGINAL LAND COUNCIL v SANPINE PTY LIMITED Br o o k e Ho b s o n * I In t r o d u c t i o n Much contractual litigation arises in the case where one party has terminated
More informationWEEK 4-6: REMEDIES FOR BREACH
WEEK 4-6: REMEDIES FOR BREACH Overview of Remedies for breach (weeks 4-6) Damages Specific performance/injunction Liquidated damages/penalties Restitution/Action for debt Week 4: Remedies Damages (measures
More informationWaiver, Estoppel and Election in the context of adjudication applications
1 Waiver, Estoppel and Election in the context of adjudication applications Adjudication Forum 13 November 2012 Max Tonkin The Pareto Principal Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto observed in 1906 that 80%
More informationWill Barkerʼs 1015LAW Revision
Will Barkerʼs 1015LAW Revision Discharge by Performance 2 Discharge by Subsequent Agreement 5 Discharge by Frustration 6 Discharge by Breach 8 Termination for Repudiation 10 Restrictions on the Right to
More informationDistrict Court New South Wales
District Court New South Wales THE TORT OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION Introduction 1 To succeed in an action for damages for the tort of malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must prove four things: (1) That the
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES: EMPHASISING THE LAW OF CONTRACT. Tom Brennan 1. Barrister, 13 Wentworth Chambers
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES: EMPHASISING THE LAW OF CONTRACT Tom Brennan 1 Barrister, 13 Wentworth Chambers Australian law has shifted from regulating the employer/employee relationship
More informationRestitution for a Total Failure ofconsideration: When a Total Failure is not a Total Failure
Restitution for a Total Failure ofconsideration: When a Total Failure is not a Total Failure James Edelman" The doctrine of total failure ofconsideration, now part of the distinct law of restitution, has,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Tropac Timbers P/L v A-One Asphalt P/L [2005] QSC 378 PARTIES: TROPAC TIMBERS PTY LTD ACN 108 304 990 (plaintiff/respondent v A-ONE ASPHALT PTY LTD ACN 059 162 186
More informationCAPE TOWN IRON & STEEL
Case No 70/95 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (APPELLATE DIVISION) In the matter between SA METAL & MACHINERY CO (PTY) LTD APPELLANT and CAPE TOWN IRON & STEEL WORKS (PTY) LTD NATIONAL METAL (PTY)
More informationQuantum Meruit in the Building Disputes Tribunal
13 1---------------Building ---------------------t Quantum Meruit in the Building Disputes Tribunal - Philip Davenport, Lecturer, School of Building, University of New South Wales. Synopsis Many claims
More informationExamining the current law relating to limitation and causes of action (tortious and contractual) within a construction context
Examining the current law relating to limitation and causes of action (tortious and contractual) within a construction context Received (in revised form): 11th September, 2005 Sarah Wilson is an associate
More informationTAJJOUR V NEW SOUTH WALES, FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, AND THE HIGH COURT S UNEVEN EMBRACE OF PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW
TAJJOUR V NEW SOUTH WALES, FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, AND THE HIGH COURT S UNEVEN EMBRACE OF PROPORTIONALITY REVIEW DR MURRAY WESSON * I INTRODUCTION In Tajjour v New South Wales, 1 the High Court considered
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Maclag (No 11) P/L & Anor v Chantay Too P/L (No 2) [2009] QSC 299 PARTIES: MACLAG (NO 11) PTY LTD ACN 010 611 631 AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BURNS FAMILY TRUST (first plaintiff)
More informationDamages in Tort 6. Damages in Contract 18. Restitution 27. Rescission 32. Specific Performance 38. Account of Profits 40.
LW401 REMEDIES Damages in Tort 6 Damages in Contract 18 Restitution 27 Rescission 32 Specific Performance 38 Account of Profits 40 Injunctions 43 Mareva Orders and Anton Piller Orders 49 Rectification
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Jackson-Knaggs v Queensland Newspapers P/L [2005] QCA 145 MARK ANDREW JACKSON-KNAGGS (applicant/respondent) v QUEENSLAND BUILDING SERVICES AUTHORITY (first
More informationCONVEYANCING LECTURE ON 31 JULY 2006
CONVEYANCING LECTURE ON 31 JULY 2006 Note: Students should read the Chapters in Lang & Skapinker and the cases referred to in the Guide. These notes are NOT a substitute for reading the text and considering
More informationCourt of Appeal Supreme Court. New South Wales. Abergeldie Contractors Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Case Name: Abergeldie Contractors Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2017] NSWCA 113 Hearing Date(s): 5 May 2017 Decision Date: 26
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND TECU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2010-01135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN ERNEST TROTMAN CAMILLE RICHARDS TROTMAN Claimants AND TECU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED ************************************************
More informationAdjudicators Discussion 15 June 2016
Probuild Constructions v DDI Group Alucity v ASC/ Alucity v Hick Adjudicators Discussion 15 June 2016 David Campbell-Williams Two recent cases Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v DDI Group Pty Ltd
More informationImmigration Law Conference February 2017 Panel discussion Judicial Review: Emerging Trends & Themes
Immigration Law Conference February 2017 Panel discussion Brenda Tronson Barrister Level 22 Chambers btronson@level22.com.au 02 9151 2212 Unreasonableness In December, Bromberg J delivered judgment in
More informationStatutory Interpretation and the Critical Role of Soft Law Guidelines in Developing a Coherent Law of Remedies in Australia
27 Statutory Interpretation and the Critical Role of Soft Law Guidelines in Developing a Coherent Law of Remedies in Australia Elise Bant 1 and Jeannie Paterson 2 I. Introduction This chapter considers
More informationTOPIC 2: LEGAL REMEDIES (DAMAGES - IN TORT AND CONTRACT)
TOPIC 2: LEGAL REMEDIES (DAMAGES - IN TORT AND CONTRACT) Damages in tort to award expectation loss Damages in contract to award for the compensation of expected benefits/disappointed expectations in both
More informationThe highly anticipated conclusion to a five-year battle over the status of the
Rozelle Macalincag* PACIOCCO v AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD (2016) 90 ALJR 835 I Introduction The highly anticipated conclusion to a five-year battle over the status of the doctrine of penalties
More informationCASE NOTE RUXLEY ELECTRONICS AND CONSTRUCTION LTD V FORSYTH
CASE NOTE RUXLEY ELECTRONICS AND CONSTRUCTION LTD V FORSYTH LADDINGFORD ENCLOSURES LTD V FORSYTH I. INTRODUCTION Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v F orsyth 1 ("Ruxley") is a recent House of Lords
More informationContractual Interpretation: A Roundabout Approach
Contractual Interpretation: A Roundabout Approach Paul J Hayes Barrister-at-Law The Victorian Bar, Dever s List (List D) Legalwise Seminar Melbourne 28 March 2014 Introduction Importance? The meaning of
More informationWORK HEALTH AND SAFETY BRIEFING
NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR OHS REGULATION WORK HEALTH AND SAFETY BRIEFING Work Health and Safety Briefing In this Briefing This Work Health and Safety Briefing presents three key cases. The cases have
More informationPANCHAKSHARI s PROFESSIONAL ACADEMY Pvt. Ltd. CA CPT Law Unit 12 Test
1. The remedies available to a person, suffering from breach of contract are a. Suit for Damages b. Suit for Injunction 2. The remedies available to a person, suffering from breach of contract are a. Recession
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Schepis & Anor v Esanda Finance Corp Ltd & Anor [2007] QCA 263 PARTIES: ANTHONY SCHEPIS (first plaintiff/first appellant) MICHELE SCHEPIS (second plaintiff/second
More informationReasonableness and withholding consent to an assignment of contractual rights
Investing in Infrastructure International Best Legal Practice in Project and Construction Agreements January 2016 Damian McNair Partner, Legal M: +61 421 899 231 E: damian.mcnair@au.pwc.com Reasonableness
More informationLAW203 Torts Week 1 Law and Theory CH 1 + 2
LAW203 Torts Week 1 Law and Theory CH 1 + 2 Tort Law Categories Intentional/Trespass Torts Trespass to Person (Assault, Battery & False Imprisonment) Trespass to Land Trespass to Goods (including Conversion
More informationCONTRACTS DISCARDED THROUGH BREACH 51 CONTRACTS DISCHARGED THROUGH BREACH: RESTITUTION FOR SERVICES RENDERED NICHOLAS RAFFERTY 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONTRACTS DISCARDED THROUGH BREACH 51 CONTRACTS DISCHARGED THROUGH BREACH: RESTITUTION FOR SERVICES RENDERED BY THE INNOCENT PARTY NICHOLAS RAFFERTY 0 The author examines the autonomous claim in unjust
More informationAustralia. Mike Hales. MinterEllison Perth. Law firm bio
Australia Mike Hales MinterEllison Perth mike.hales@minterellison.com Law firm bio Co-Chair, IBA Litigation Committee and Conference Quality Officer 1. What are the current challenges to enforcement of
More informationCHOICE OF LAW (GOVERNING LAW) BOILERPLATE CLAUSE
CHOICE OF LAW (GOVERNING LAW) BOILERPLATE CLAUSE Need to know A choice of law clause (or governing law clause) enables contracting parties to nominate the law which applies to govern their contract. The
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. Between. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Appellant. And
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Civil Appeal No. P 009 of 2014 Claim No. CV2011-04593 HCA 3386 of 2004 Between THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Appellant And TRINSALVAGE
More informationPossible Legal Issues of Unilaterally Contract Termination for Convenience
Possible Legal Issues of Unilaterally Contract Termination for Convenience Seng Hansen Master Student of Construction Contract Management UTM Email: Hansen_zinck@yahoo.co.id Introduction The Malaysian
More informationTopics this week. Part A Classification of Contract Terms. Part B Performance, Breach & Right of Termination
Topics this week So far we have looked at contract formation and how terms are incorporated into the contract. We have also looked at how to interpret the meaning of contract terms and whether extrinsic
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Bourne v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2018] QSC 231 KATRINA MARGARET BOURNE (applicant) v QUEENSLAND BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION
More informationWeek 2 - Damages in Contract. The plaintiff simply needs to show that there was a breach of contract
Week 2 - Damages in Contract In order for the court to award the plaintiff compensatory damages in contract, it must find that: a) Does the plaintiff have a cause of action in contract (e.g breach of contract)?
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Lavery Law, No. 594 C.D. 2016 Petitioner Submitted September 23, 2016 v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Two Brothers Italian Grill and Bar and George Drivas),
More informationCHAPTER 107 CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND JOINT WRONGDOERS
Cap.107] CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND JOINT WRONGDOERS CHAPTER 107 CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND JOINT WRONGDOERS Act No. 12 of 1968. AN ACT TO AMEND THE LAW RELATING TO CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE AND JOINT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Lucas Drilling Pty Limited v Armour Energy Limited [2013] QCA 111 PARTIES: LUCAS DRILLING PTY LIMITED ACN 093 489 671 (appellant) v ARMOUR ENERGY LIMITED ACN 141 198
More informationFOREWORD KEITH MASON *
996 UNSW Law Journal Volume 36(3) FOREWORD KEITH MASON * Thematic editions of law reviews have been around a long time. But, until the last decade, no commonality would have been perceived in four articles
More informationPENALTIES AND RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE OF JOINT VENTURE INTERESTS
Penalties and Relief Against Forfeiture of Joint Venture Interests 219 PENALTIES AND RELIEF AGAINST FORFEITURE OF JOINT VENTURE INTERESTS Michael Lishman A common provision in an exploration joint venture
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: FILE NO/S: No 3696 of 2018 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Midson Construction (Qld) Pty Ltd & Ors v Queensland Building and Construction Commission
More informationQuasi Contract or Contract Implied-in-Fact Form the Basis to Recover for Services Provided in the Absence of a
Practitioner Insights Practitioner Insights In the absence of a contract, liability for services rendered can be imposed by an action for quasi-contract or quantum meruit Updated: April 24, 2013 by Simeon
More informationUnjust enrichment? Bank secures equitable charge where it failed to get a legal charge: Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus [2015] UKSC 66
Unjust enrichment? Bank secures equitable charge where it failed to get a legal charge: Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus [2015] UKSC 66 1. The decision of the Supreme Court in Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd
More informationGood faith: where are we at? the Hon. Marilyn Warren AC *
Good faith: where are we at? the Hon. Marilyn Warren AC * [F]or a number of reasons, some to do with the work of legislatures, some to do with judicial law making, and some to do with the temper and spirit
More informationMistaken Payments - The Right of Recovery and the Defences
Bond Law Review Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 7 1995 Mistaken Payments - The Right of Recovery and the Defences Kwai-Lian Liew Bond University Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/blr
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC UNDER the Arbitration Act 1996
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2016-404-000219 [2016] NZHC 2011 UNDER the Arbitration Act 1996 BETWEEN AND CUSTOM STREET HOTEL LIMITED Plaintiff PLUS CONSTRUCTION NZ LIMITED First
More informationESTOPPEL in PROPERTY CASES PRINCIPLES and DEVELOPMENTS. Dr Simon Blount*
1 ESTOPPEL in PROPERTY CASES PRINCIPLES and DEVELOPMENTS Dr Simon Blount* Equity is concerned with good conscience, not a sentimental urge to render sinners virtuous. 1 COMMON LAW AND EQUITABLE ESTOPPELS
More informationSwain v Waverley Municipal Council
[2005] HCA 4 (High Court of Australia) (relevant to Chapter 6, under new heading Role of Judge and Jury, on p 256) In a negligence trial conducted before a judge and jury, questions of law are decided
More informationAUSTRALIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW NEWS
AUSTRALIAN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW NEWS NEW SOUTH WALES SENTENCING PRINCIPLES OF TOTALITY" AND "EVENHANDEDNESS" CamillerVs Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority Unreported, Court of Criminal
More informationCase management in the Commercial Court and under the Civil Procedure Act *
Case management in the Commercial Court and under the Civil Procedure Act * The Hon. Justice Clyde Croft 1 SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA * A presentation given at Civil Procedure Act 2010 Conference presented
More informationNo SHERBERT & CAMPBELL, P.C. IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE
No. 2008-07105 SHERBERT & CAMPBELL, P.C. IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff v. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MOSTYN and CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY Defendants 280 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT A. Discovery Control Plan
More informationFEES? NOT SO SIMPLE: ANDREWS AND ORS V AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD [2012] HCA 30 (6 SEPTEMBER 2012)
FEES? NOT SO SIMPLE: ANDREWS AND ORS V AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LTD [2012] HCA 30 (6 SEPTEMBER 2012) LUDMILLA K ROBINSON * I INTRODUCTION On 22 September 2010 the appellants commenced representative
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Port Ballidu Pty Ltd v Mullins Lawyers [2017] QSC 91 PARTIES: PORT BALLIDU PTY LTD ACN 010 820 185 (plaintiff) v MULLINS LAWYERS (third defendant) FILE NO/S: No 7459
More informationSubmission to the Commission for the European Communities by Claims Funding International plc
Submission to the Commission for the European Communities by Claims Funding International plc White Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC anti-trust rules A. INTRODUCTION Claims Funding International
More informationBUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK
BUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK SECOND EDITION CHARLES YC CHEW CHAPTER 4: CONTRACT: TERMS AND REMEDIES FOR BREACH TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE 1. The terms of a contract may be either express or implied. Explain what is
More informationCONVEYANCING LECTURE ON 6 AUGUST 2007
CONVEYANCING LECTURE ON 6 AUGUST 2007 Note: Students should read the Chapters in Lang & Skapinker and the cases referred to in the Guide. These notes are NOT a substitute for reading the text and considering
More informationRIGHTS TO TERMINATE A COMMERCIAL CONTRACT SUCCESSFUL USE AND LIABILITY FOR MISUSE. David Thomas QC and Matthew Finn Keating Chambers.
RIGHTS TO TERMINATE A COMMERCIAL CONTRACT SUCCESSFUL USE AND LIABILITY FOR MISUSE David Thomas QC and Matthew Finn Keating Chambers 18 January 2018 INTRODUCTION It is often the case that one party to a
More informationTiming it right: Limitation periods in personal injury claims
July 2011 page 72 Timing it right: Limitation periods in personal injury claims By SIMONE HERBERT-LOWE Simone Herbert-Lowe is a senior claims solicitor with LawCover and is an Accredited Specialist in
More informationDEVELOPMENTS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE CONTEXT OF IMMIGRATION CASES. A Comment Prepared for the Judicial Conference of Australia's Colloquium 2003
DEVELOPMENTS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW IN THE CONTEXT OF IMMIGRATION CASES A Comment Prepared for the Judicial Conference of Australia's Colloquium 2003 DARWIN - 30 MAY 2003 John Basten QC Dr Crock has provided
More informationTHE PUBLIC LAW OF RESTITUTION
THE PUBLIC LAW OF RESTITUTION G REG W EEKS * Restitution is the body of law that responds to unjust enrichment. It is a private law doctrine but, like other fields of private law such as the law of torts,
More informationSUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER 20
Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 195 ALR 24 The text on pages 893-94 sets out s 474 of the Migration Act, as amended in 2001 in the wake of the Tampa controversy (see Chapter 12); and also refers
More informationMISTER BIG STUFF AUTO RENTALS LTD AND BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER JUDGMENT
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Cv. No: 2010/0078 BETWEEN MISTER BIG STUFF AUTO RENTALS LTD CLAIMANT AND SHERWIN LOPEZ DEFENDANT BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MADAME JUSTICE DEAN-ARMORER APPEARANCES
More informationCITATION: Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council [2009] NSWSC 802
NEW SOUTH WALES SUPREME COURT CITATION: Firedam Civil Engineering Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council [2009] NSWSC 802 JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S): 55037/2009 HEARING DATE(S): 24 July 2009 JUDGMENT
More informationDAMAGES FOR M ~ ADISTRESS DAMAGES FOR MENTAL DISTRESS IN CONTRACT
DAMAGES FOR M ~ ADISTRESS L IN coi?l'ract 111 DAMAGES FOR MENTAL DISTRESS IN CONTRACT Dean ~ambovski* A long established principle under common law is that damages are not recoverable for mental distress
More informationCASE NOTE HISTORY OF THE PROCEEDINGS. The Commission and the Full Commission
CASE NOTE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA INC V INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA [2012] HCA 25 NICHOLAS LENNINGS The Second PSA Case 1 is now one of a number of decisions
More informationCaltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Limited v Stavar
Caltex Refineries (Qld) Pty Limited v Stavar (2009) 75 NSWLR 649; [2009] NSWCA 258 Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal (This case comes after Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan; Ryan v
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
REL: 09/26/2014 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationTopic 10: Implied Political Freedoms
Topic 10: Implied Political Freedoms Implied Freedom of Political Communication P will challenge the validity of (section/act) on the grounds that it breaches the implied freedom of political communication
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DROST LANDSCAPE, INC. Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 5, 2013 v No. 308146 Charlevoix County Circuit Court DERITA AND ROBERT DOWNEY, LC No. 11-000498-23-CK Defendants-Appellee/Cross-
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Cousins v Mt Isa Mines Ltd [2006] QCA 261 PARTIES: TRENT JEFFERY COUSINS (applicant/appellant) v MT ISA MINES LIMITED ACN 009 661 447 (respondent/respondent) FILE
More informationLAWYER-CLIENT CONTINGENT-FEE AGREEMENT
1 1. Parties. This Lawyer-Client Contingent-Fee Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into by 2 and between Dane S. Ciolino, LLC ( Lawyer ), and 3 ( Client ) as of the latest date set forth 4 below. Lawyer
More informationfailing to get the contract signed (something that never ceases to amaze lawyers!);
Professionals involved in design-build projects should be aware of the risks they face when they contract with the owner to be solely responsible for both construction and design. In this respect, the
More informationIndex. Volume 21 (2005) 21 BCL
Index Abandoned claims judgment on, principally concerned with costs, 12-13, 33-44 whether cost reduction appropriate because of, 125 Access to the premises AS 4917-2003, 9-10 Acts Interpretation Act 1954
More informationTHE LAW OF CONTRIBUTION AN EQUITABLE DOCTRINE OR PART OF THE LAW OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT?
471 THE LAW OF CONTRIBUTION AN EQUITABLE DOCTRINE OR PART OF THE LAW OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT? Victoria Stace * This article looks at the changes made to the equitable doctrine of contribution by the New Zealand
More informationVIANINI LAVORI S.P.A. v THE HONG KONG HOUSING AUTHORITY - [1992] HKCU 0463
1 VIANINI LAVORI S.P.A. v THE HONG KONG HOUSING AUTHORITY - [1992] HKCU 0463 High Court (in Chambers) Kaplan, J. Construction List No. 4 of 1992 6 March 1992, 27 May 1992 Kaplan, J. This matter raises
More informationGood Faith in Australian Contract Law
Good Faith in Australian Contract Law J W Carter * and Elisabeth Peden This article seeks to address and arrest the recent judicial trend to reduce good faith in contract law to an implied term with a
More informationPublished Conference Papers
Australasian Law Teachers Association ALTA Annual Conference 61 st Annual ALTA Conference Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 4 7 July 2006 Legal Knowledge: Learning, Communicating and
More informationA Question of Law: Practice and Procedure in Courts and Tribunals in New South Wales
A Question of Law: Practice and Procedure in Courts and Tribunals in New South Wales A paper delivered by Mark Robinson SC to a LegalWise Government Lawyers Conference held in Sydney on 1 June 2012 I am
More informationTYPES OF MONETARY DAMAGES
TYPES OF MONETARY DAMAGES A breach of contract entitles the non-breaching party to sue for money damages, including: Compensatory Damages: Damages that compensate the non-breaching party for the injuries
More information