Dep't of Buildings v. 67 Greenwich Street, New York County OATH Index No. 1666/09 (Apr. 10, 2009)
|
|
- Jodie Ryan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dep't of Buildings v. 67 Greenwich Street, New York County OATH Index No. 1666/09 (Apr. 10, 2009) Undisputed evidence at zoning violation proceeding established that property was being used for impermissible advertising purposes. Arterial highway exception found not to apply to sign located in C5-5 zoning district. Removal of sign recommended. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS In the Matter of DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS Petitioner - against - OWNERS, OCCUPANTS AND MORTGAGEES OF 67 GREENWICH STREET, NEW YORK COUNTY Respondents REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION KARA J. MILLER, Administrative Law Judge This proceeding was referred to this tribunal in accordance with Title 28, Article 503 of the New York City Administrative Code ( Administrative Code ). Petitioner alleges that respondents at the premises located at 67 Greenwich Street, New York County, also known as Block: 19, Lot: 11, located in a C5-5 zoning district, erected and maintained an advertising sign greater than 200 square feet without obtaining a permit in violation of section of the New York City Zoning Resolution ( zoning resolution ) and section of the Administrative Code, thereby constituting a public nuisance. Petitioner seeks an order of removal, pursuant to the Administrative Code, to abate the nuisance (ALJ. Ex. 1). At the hearing held on March 3, 2009, Bradley Green, Esq., appeared on behalf of Syms Corp., respondent owner and taxpayer of the premises, and OTR Media Group, Inc., respondent occupant of the façade of the premises. The record was held open until March 24, 2009, for the parties to submit briefs on the issue of whether an arterial highway exception exempted the building from enforcement of Article 503. As discussed below, I find the arterial highway exception inapposite and that respondents use of the premises for the erection and display of an advertising sign, which
2 -2- exceeds 200 square feet, is in violation of the zoning resolution and construction code, and recommend removal of the advertising sign. ANALYSIS Under the revised 2008 construction code (Article 28 of the Administrative Code), a sign (1) having a surface area greater than 200 square feet that is (2) erected, maintained, attached, affixed, painted on, or in any other manner represented on a building or premises in violation of the zoning resolution, the 2008 construction code, the 1968 building code, or any rules adopted pursuant thereto is a public nuisance. Admin. Code The Commissioner may, after notice and hearing, order the removal of such illegal signs. Admin. Code , Here, petitioner presented reliable and unrebutted documentary evidence and testimony from Steven Chuebon, Senior Supervisor of Special Operations, and Earl Rose, associate building inspector. Petitioner s witnesses credibly established that on two inspection dates, July 3, 2007, and October 19, 2008, they observed an advertising sign, which was approximated as measuring in excess of two thousand square feet, on the façade of the building located at 67 Greenwich Street, New York County (Pet. Exs. 1, 2). The witnesses further established that respondents lacked permits for the advertising signs, in violation of section of the construction code. The building is located in a C5-5 zoning district (Pet. Exs. 3, 4). Pursuant to sections and of the zoning resolution, the erection and display of advertising signs is not permitted in C5-5 zoning districts, but only permitted in C6-5, C6-7, C7, and C8 zoning districts. Additionally, pursuant to section of the zoning resolution, the maximum permissible surface area of a non-illuminated sign in a C5-5 zoning district is 200 square feet. The Department credibly established that the signs erected and displayed at the premises were advertising signs and that they exceeded 200 square feet. At trial, respondents counsel moved to dismiss the matter on the basis that although the advertising sign is located in a zoning district normally precluding such signs, the sign is within 200 feet of an arterial highway as designated within the zoning resolution. Respondents contends that the sign therefore falls within a limited exception which allows for the display of such signs, as agreed to by the Department following a constitutional challenge to its regulations. In October 2006, respondent OTR Media filed an action against the City in New York State
3 -3- Supreme Court challenging certain sections of the zoning resolution as it pertained to signs. 1 During the initial stages of the state court litigation, the parties reached an agreement ( Arterial Stay Agreement ) that temporarily suspended the enforcement of two provisions of the zoning resolution relating to signs, sections and 42-55: Until such time as this Court may enter judgment dismissing OTR s constitutional claims, either by summary judgment or otherwise, the City Defendants shall not enforce against OTR the challenged regulatory provisions contained in sections and of the New York City Zoning Resolution.... However, notwithstanding the foregoing, and strictly with respect to signs that are not subject to Zoning Resolution and 42-55, the provisions of the N.Y. Administrative Code (sic), , , and (only with respect to new signs) and the provisions of 1 R.C.N.Y , through 49-33, Rule 49 2 (amending Chapter 13 of the Rules of the City of New York) shall not be stayed. (Pet. Mem., Ex. 2: Stipulation and Order Disposing of Plaintiff s Motion by Order to Show Cause for a Preliminary Injunction, 3). Section sets forth additional regulations for advertising signs that are within view and proximity of arterial highways and larger public parks only in C6-5, C6-7, C7, and C8 commercial zoning districts, while section is similarly only applicable in manufacturing districts. Under the express language of the Arterial Stay Agreement, signs not subject to zoning resolution sections or are not stayed from enforcement. In other words, the Arterial Stay Agreement only prevents the Department from seeking removal of signs located within manufacturing districts or C6-5, C6-7, C7, and C8 commercial districts. As the sign here is located within a C5-5 district, the Department is not precluded by the Arterial Stay Agreement from enforcing Article 503 by seeking an order of removal of the sign. Respondents, in fact, concedes as much, but nonetheless asks this tribunal to reform the mutually agreed upon stipulation, so as to treat the sign here as falling within its scope because it is similarly situated to signs that are currently protected from enforcement initiatives by the Petitioner (Resp. Mem. in Support of Dismissal). There is no authority for this tribunal to unilaterally alter the stipulation, and I decline to do so. See Glucksman v. Glucksman, OTR Media Group, Inc. vs. Lancaster, Index No /2006 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co. filed Oct. 31, 2006). Shortly after the record in this proceeding was closed, a federal court granted the City s motion for summary judgment in a separate proceeding initiated by different owners of billboards and signs throughout the City. The federal court rejected constitutional challenges similar to those brought by respondent OTR Media in the state court case. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. City of New York, Index No. 06 Civ (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2009). 2 Administrative Code section was recodified as section in 2008.
4 -4- A.D.2d 812, 813 (2d Dep t 1999) ( The court had no authority to unilaterally modify the parties agreement to effectively extend the plaintiff's time within which to purchase the defendant's interest, since such relief contravened the express terms of the parties' agreement..., the terms of which are binding upon the parties and the court. ); Weissman v. Bondy & Schloss, 230 A.D.2d 465, (1st Dep t 1997) ( Stipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and not lightly cast aside... all the more so in the case of open court stipulations within CPLR 2104, where strict enforcement not only serves the interest of efficient dispute resolution but also is essential to the management of court calendars and integrity of the litigation process. ). As such, respondents motion to dismiss is denied. Accordingly, the Department established that an advertising sign greater than 200 square feet in surface area had been erected and displayed on the façade of the premises in violation of the zoning resolution and construction code. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The subject premises is situated in a C5-5 zoning district. 2. The premises has been used for the erection and display of an outdoor advertising sign which exceeds two thousand square feet. 3. Respondents did not obtain a permit for the erection and display of the outdoor advertising sign, in violation of the construction code. 4. The erection and display of any advertising sign or any nonilluminated sign exceeding 200 square feet at the subject premises is in violation of the zoning resolution. 5. The erection and display of any sign exceeding 200 square feet at the subject premises without a permit is a public nuisance. 6. The Department is not stayed from enforcing Article 503 of the construction code by the Arterial Stay Agreement.
5 -5- RECOMMENDATION I recommend that the Commissioner issue an order of removal for the illegal outdoor advertising sign erected and displayed at the subject premises. April 10, 2009 Kara J. Miller Administrative Law Judge SUBMITTED TO: ROBERT D. LIMANDRI Commissioner APPEARANCES: ALEX J. BERGER, ESQ. Attorney for Petitioner COHEN HOCHMAN & ALLEN Attorney for Respondents BY: BRADLEY GREEN, ESQ.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 5 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ARTICLE 501 MAINTENANCE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR SIGNS 28-501.1 Permit required. The commissioner may, in his or her discretion, when necessary in the public interest, establish
More informationBusiness Integrity Comm n v. Freire OATH Index No. 1600/13 (Apr. 10, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9511
Business Integrity Comm n v. Freire OATH Index No. 1600/13 (Apr. 10, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9511 At a default hearing, evidence failed to establish that respondent was a business operating for the purpose
More informationDep t of Buildings v. 74 Targee Street, Staten Island OATH Index No. 1302/09 (May 27, 2009)
Dep t of Buildings v. 74 Targee Street, Staten Island OATH Index No. 1302/09 (May 27, 2009) Petitioner established that the premises is being used for an impermissible commercial use. Respondents failed
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/29/ :16 PM INDEX NO. 7926/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/29/2016 EXHIBIT 3
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/29/2016 03:16 PM INDEX NO. 7926/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/29/2016 EXHIBIT 3 NYC Administrative Code 28-501.1 CHAPTER 5 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS* > ARTICLE
More informationFire Dep t v. Harper OATH Index No. 503/14, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2014)
Fire Dep t v. Harper OATH Index No. 503/14, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2014) Employee s application for stay based on pendency of state proceeding is denied. Application for discovery and to compel petitioner
More informationSkyline Credit Ride, Inc. v. Board of Elections OATH Index No. 878/12, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2012)
Skyline Credit Ride, Inc. v. Board of Elections OATH Index No. 878/12, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2012) Petition dismissed as untimely. The petitioner was late in submitting its Notice of Claim to the Comptroller.
More informationPolice Dep't v. Davis OATH Index No. 1297/15, mem. dec. (Dec. 26, 2014)
Police Dep't v. Davis OATH Index No. 1297/15, mem. dec. (Dec. 26, 2014) Respondent s motion to dismiss petition granted where petitioner failed to serve respondent with notice of right to request retention
More informationPIKE TOWNSHIP, OHIO July 6, 2010 ZONING REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 6 - SIGN AND BILLBOARD REGULATIONS Section A - Permitted Signs for Which No Certificate is Required The following signs shall be permitted in the unincorporated area of Pike Township that is subject
More informationPolice Dep t v. Nightstar OATH Index No. 3190/09, mem. dec. (June 19, 2009)
Police Dep t v. Nightstar OATH Index No. 3190/09, mem. dec. (June 19, 2009) In vehicle forfeiture proceeding, ALJ found that petitioner proved that owner was not innocent and that the other Krimstock elements
More informationHealth and Hospitals Corp. (Harlem Hospital Center) v. Norwood OATH Index No. 143/05, mem. dec. (June 20, 2005)
Health and Hospitals Corp. (Harlem Hospital Center) v. Norwood OATH Index No. 143/05, mem. dec. (June 20, 2005) Petitioner's post-report and recommendation motion to reopen the record to submit new evidence
More informationConflicts of Interest Bd. v. Hawkins OATH Index No. 1043/16 (Apr. 19, 2016), adopted, Bd. Dec. (Sept. 22, 2016), appended
Conflicts of Interest Bd. v. Hawkins OATH Index No. 1043/16 (Apr. 19, 2016), adopted, Bd. Dec. (Sept. 22, 2016), appended Respondent, a NYCHA property maintenance supervisor, violated New York City Charter
More informationPolice Dep t v. Weaver OATH Index No. 2419/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009)
Police Dep t v. Weaver OATH Index No. 2419/09, mem. dec. (Mar. 10, 2009) Department is entitled to retain vehicle as the instrumentality of a crime pending a civil forfeiture action. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE
More informationDep't of Buildings v. Mascarella OATH Index No. 2757/10 (Dec. 22, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec (Jan. 5, 2011), appended
Dep't of Buildings v. Mascarella OATH Index No. 2757/10 (Dec. 22, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec (Jan. 5, 2011), appended Respondent, a licensed hoist machine operator, pled guilty to conspiracy
More informationPolice Dep t v. Vertus OATH Index No. 912/09, mem. dec. (Sept. 17, 2008)
Police Dep t v. Vertus OATH Index No. 912/09, mem. dec. (Sept. 17, 2008) Petitioner is entitled to retain vehicle as the instrumentality of a crime pending outcome of a civil forfeiture action. NEW YORK
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Comm n on Human Rights ex rel. Hidalgo v. Ditmas Park Rehabilitation and Care Center, LLC OATH Index Nos. 2415/13, 2416/13, & 2417/13, mem. dec. (Sept. 25, 2013) Respondents who failed to timely submit
More informationCDRB determined that contractor waived its claim regarding its contractual responsibility for wiring installation. Appeal denied.
Summit Construction Services Group, Inc. v. Dep t of Design & Construction OATH Index No. 456/15, mem. dec. (Jan. 26, 2015), aff d, Index No. 155253/2015 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co. Aug. 20, 2015), appended CDRB
More informationPavarini McGovern, LLC v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1565/14, mem. dec. (June 20, 2014)
Pavarini McGovern, LLC v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1565/14, mem. dec. (June 20, 2014) CDRB determined that contractor waived its claim for interpretation of contract documents. Appeal
More informationFire Dep't v. Domini OATH Index No. 2047/11, mem. dec. (July 28, 2011)
Fire Dep't v. Domini OATH Index No. 2047/11, mem. dec. (July 28, 2011) Respondent s motion to dismiss, on the basis of defective pleadings or until a related matter is determined in federal district court,
More informationPrismatic Development Corp. v. Dep t of Sanitation OATH Index No. 1239/16, mem. dec. (June 30, 2016)
Prismatic Development Corp. v. Dep t of Sanitation OATH Index No. 1239/16, mem. dec. (June 30, 2016) General contractor sought extra compensation for costs to install devices that it furnished under the
More informationPolice Dep t v. Neiss OATH Index No. 2094/09, mem. dec. (Feb. 9, 2009)
Police Dep t v. Neiss OATH Index No. 2094/09, mem. dec. (Feb. 9, 2009) In vehicle forfeiture proceeding, ALJ found that claimant failed to provide proof she was the registered or titled owner under Krimstock.
More informationFALL RIVER REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FALL RIVER REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DECLARATION OF COMMERCE PARK COVENANTS As a means of insuring proper development and job creation opportunities, the Fall River Redevelopment Authority (FRRA) would sell
More informationThe following signs shall be permitted in all business and industrial districts:
1405. Signs Authorized in Business and Industrial Districts. The following signs shall be permitted in all business and industrial districts: A. Temporary special event signs. Temporary special event signs,
More informationHuman Resources Admin. v. Cornelius OATH Index No. 2041/13 (July 10, 2013)
Human Resources Admin. v. Cornelius OATH Index No. 2041/13 (July 10, 2013) Undisputed evidence established that respondent was continuously absent without leave (AWOL) for more than a year, from January
More informationCommissioner determined licensee s conduct was sufficiently serious to warrant license revocation and he imposed that penalty.
Dep't of Buildings v. Inglese OATH Index No. 929/10 (Feb. 4, 2010), modified on penalty, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 23, 2010), appended, remanded sub nom Inglese v. LiMandri, 2010 NY Slip Op 32967U; 2010 N.Y. Misc.
More informationTHE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS. In the Matter of : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, : Index No. Petitioner, : 151/94
THE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS -------------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of : DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, : Index No. Petitioner,
More informationTaxi & Limousine Comm n v. Khouma OATH Index No. 2550/15 (July 2, 2015), adopted, Dep. Comm r Dec. (July 23, 2015), appended
Taxi & Limousine Comm n v. Khouma OATH Index No. 2550/15 (July 2, 2015), adopted, Dep. Comm r Dec. (July 23, 2015), appended At summary suspension hearing, petitioner established that respondent taxicab
More informationOffice of the City Clerk v. Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty OATH Index No. 1940/12, mem. dec. (Aug.
Office of the City Clerk v. Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council on Jewish Poverty OATH Index No. 1940/12, mem. dec. (Aug. 30, 2012) Respondent s motion to dismiss for untimeliness denied as the
More informationPetition seeking compensation for alleged unpaid work denied. Claim dismissed as untimely. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Start Elevator, Inc. v. Dep t. of Correction OATH Index No. 1160/11, mem. dec. (Feb. 28, 2011), aff d, Index No. 104620/11 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Co. Jan. 9, 2012), appended, aff d, 104 A.D.3d 488 (1 st Dep t
More informationPRELIMINARY STATEMENT. Petitioner Lewis Family Farm, Inc. submits this memorandum of law in support of its
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT LEWIS FAMILY FARM, INC., -against- ADIRONDACK PARK AGENCY, Petitioner, Respondent. COUNTY OF ESSEX PETITIONER'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF STAY Index No. RJI No. PRELIMINARY
More informationARTICLE 17 SIGNS AND AWNINGS REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 165 ARTICLE 17 SIGNS AND AWNINGS REGULATIONS Section 1. INTENT. The intent of this Article is to promote the health, safety, prosperity, aesthetics and general welfare of the community by providing
More informationSIGN BYLAW
SIGN BYLAW 1662-1987 THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY and is a consolidation of "District of Mission " with the following amending bylaws: Amending Bylaw Date Adopted Section Amended
More informationVILLAGE OF CHATHAM, ILLINOIS
VILLAGE OF CHATHAM, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 99-_~-,-,-1 _ AN ORDINANCE REGULATING BILLBOARDS IN THE VILLAGE OF CHATHAM AND AMENDING THE VILLAGE OF CHATHAM CODE OF ORDINANCES ADOPTED BY THE PRESIDENT AND
More informationOrdinance No. 24 of 2018 died due to a lack of a motion to adopt. Reintroduced as Ordinance No. 34 of Egg Harbor Township. Ordinance No.
Ordinance No. 24 of 2018 died due to a lack of a motion to adopt. Reintroduced as Ordinance No. 34 of 2018. Egg Harbor Township Ordinance No. 24 2018 An ordinance to amend Chapter 225 of the Township Code
More informationMemorandum in Opposition
Memorandum in Opposition COMMITTEE ON CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES CPLR #2 May 19, 2011 S. 5212 By: Senator Bonacic Senate Committee: Judiciary Effective Date: Immediately AN ACT to amend the civil practice
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/30/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/30/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. Qui tam The Bayrock Qui tam Litigation Partnership, Plaintiff, v. Part 45 (Hon. Anil C. Singh) Index
More informationBOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE : CITY OF EAST ORANGE, ESSEX COUNTY, : The record of this matter and the Initial Decision of the Office of Administrative
299-04 (Link to OAL Decision: http://lawlibrary.rutgers.edu/oal/html/initial/edu09449-01_1.html) OAL DKT. NO. EDU 9449-01 AGENCY DKT. NO. 398-9/01 MARK KRAMER, : PETITIONER, : V. : BOARD OF EDUCATION OF
More informationBarker v LC Carmel Retail LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33410(U) December 31, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: David
Barker v LC Carmel Retail LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33410(U) December 31, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 159533/2016 Judge: David Benjamin Cohen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationORDINANCE NUMBER 1255
ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 19.50 AND 19.61 OF THE ZONING CODE TO EXTEND THE APPROVAL PERIOD
More informationDep t of Environmental Protection v. Donas OATH Index No. 781/09 (Feb. 13, 2009), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No, CD SA (Nov.
Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Donas OATH Index No. 781/09 (Feb. 13, 2009), aff d, NYC Civ. Serv. Comm n Item No, CD 09-70- SA (Nov. 12, 2009) Respondent used Department s e-mail in violation of
More informationNow, therefore be it and it is hereby ordained chapter 152 Outdoor Advertising shall read as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-xxx AN ORDINANCE OF THE LONG BEACH TOWN COUNCIL AMENDING CHAPTERS 152 OF THE LONG BEACH TOWN CODE Formatted: Font: Not Bold WHEREAS, the Long Beach Town Council approves the Amendment
More informationFROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH A. Bonwill Shockley, Judge. This case involves a controversy over two billboards owned
Present: All the Justices ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. OPINION BY v. Record No. 001386 CHIEF JUSTICE HARRY L. CARRICO April 20, 2001 BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, ET AL. FROM
More informationEugene Racanelli Inc. v Incorporated Vil. of Babylon 2015 NY Slip Op 32492(U) December 3, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number:
Eugene Racanelli Inc. v Incorporated Vil. of Babylon 2015 NY Slip Op 32492(U) December 3, 2015 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 13433/2011 Judge: William B. Rebolini Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationChapter 1.10 CODE ENFORCEMENT
1.10.010 Chapter 1.10 CODE ENFORCEMENT Sections: 1.10.010 Purpose. 1.10.020 Definitions. 1.10.030 General Enforcement Authority. 1.10.040 Violations and Enforcement Remedies. 1.10.050 Authority to Inspect.
More informationPlanning Commission Meeting Agenda Puyallup City Council Chambers 333 South Meridian, Puyallup Wednesday, November 14, :30 PM
Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Puyallup City Council Chambers 333 South Meridian, Puyallup Wednesday, November 14, 2018 6:30 PM ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 1. WORKSESSION TOPICS 1.a Sign Regulation
More informationb. signs indicating street names and direction; d. public notice signs.
Subdivision 1 - Applications and Compliance 9.3.1. 1. No sign shall be erected, placed, altered, maintained, demolished, or removed unless in conformity with this bylaw or any other relevant city bylaw.
More informationDep t of Buildings v. 120 St. Marks Place, Manhattan OATH Index No. 648/09 (Apr. 27, 2009), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 30, 2009), appended
Dep t of Buildings v. 120 St. Marks Place, Manhattan OATH Index No. 648/09 (Apr. 27, 2009), adopted, Comm r Dec. (Apr. 30, 2009), appended Petitioner established that the premises are being used for an
More informationComm n on Human Rights v. Aksoy OATH Index No. 1617/15 (Aug. 24, 2015), rejected, Comm n Dec. & Order (June 21, 2017), appended
Comm n on Human Rights v. Aksoy OATH Index No. 1617/15 (Aug. 24, 2015), rejected, Comm n Dec. & Order (June 21, 2017), appended Evidence established that respondent violated New York City s Human Rights
More informationPerfetto Enterprises v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1646/15, mem. dec. (June 11, 2015)
Perfetto Enterprises v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 1646/15, mem. dec. (June 11, 2015) Petition seeking additional payment for asphalt work denied because claim was untimely, waived, and
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK ORDINANCE #
STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF WAYNE CITY OF ALLEN PARK ORDINANCE #04-2013 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ALLEN PARK CODE OF ORDINANCE; AMENDING CHAPTER 52, ZONING, ARTICLE VI, SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS, BY ADDING
More informationR E C I T A L S : A. Plaintiff, Town of Brookhaven ( Town ) commenced these actions, now
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK --------------------------------------------------------------- X TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, -against- Plaintiff, JOSEPH MARCARIO, MARIEN MARCARIO a/k/a
More informationDep t of Buildings v. Owners, Occupants and Mortgagees of 700 East 17 th Street, Brooklyn
Dep t of Buildings v. Owners, Occupants and Mortgagees of 700 East 17 th Street, Brooklyn OATH Index No. 1905/01 (February 7, 2002), remanded, Comm r Dec. (June 4, 2002), appended Disposition: Recommended
More informationChapter 160A - Article 19
Page 1 of 10 Part 6. Minimum Housing Standards. 160A-441. Exercise of police power authorized. It is hereby found and declared that the existence and occupation of dwellings in this State that are unfit
More informationMatter of Skyhigh Murals-Colossal Media Inc. v Board of Stds. and Appeals of the City of N.Y NY Slip Op 30088(U) January 13, 2017 Supreme
Matter of Skyhigh Murals-Colossal Media Inc. v Board of Stds. and Appeals of the City of N.Y. 2017 NY Slip Op 30088(U) January 13, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157348/2016 Judge:
More informationDep t of Environmental Protection v. Licari OATH Index No. 1685/07 (June 5, 2007)
Dep t of Environmental Protection v. Licari OATH Index No. 1685/07 (June 5, 2007) Respondent did not appear at the hearing because he is currently incarcerated for arson, insurance fraud and larceny. During
More informationLawson v R&L Carriers, Inc NY Slip Op 33581(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 1207/11 Judge: Augustus C.
Lawson v R&L Carriers, Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 33581(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 1207/11 Judge: Augustus C. Agate Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationKirkyla & Remeza, Inc. v. Dep't of Design and Construction OATH Index No. 1060/04, mem. dec. (June 11, 2004)
Kirkyla & Remeza, Inc. v. Dep't of Design and Construction OATH Index No. 1060/04, mem. dec. (June 11, 2004) Contractor filed appeal with Contract Dispute Resolution Board for compensation under construction
More informationMatter of Van Wagner Communications, LLC v Board of Standards 2014 NY Slip Op 30271(U) January 28, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Matter of Van Wagner Communications, LLC v Board of Standards 2014 NY Slip Op 30271(U) January 28, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 100418/13 Judge: Donna M. Mills Cases posted with a
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BY-LAW NUMBER
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BY-LAW NUMBER 2018-044 Being a by-law to manage and regulate election signs and other election advertising devices within the Town of East Gwillimbury WHEREAS
More informationVILLAGE OF KEREMEOS. BYLAW NO. 586, 1998 Revised May CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE WITH AMENDMENT BYLAW NOS. 680, 2004, 795, 2012 and 818
VILLAGE OF KEREMEOS BYLAW NO. 586, 1998 Revised May 19 2015 CONSOLIDATED FOR CONVENIENCE WITH AMENDMENT BYLAW NOS. 680, 2004, 795, 2012 and 818 SIGN AND CANOPY REGULATION (First line of preamble amended
More informationTITLE 40. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT. CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE, APPLICABILTY, and DEFINITIONS
TITLE 40. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT CHAPTER 1. PURPOSE, APPLICABILTY, and DEFINITIONS 40 M.P.T.L. ch. 1, 1 1 Purpose a. The Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation has an interest in assuring that the administrative
More informationNEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIALS AND HEARINGS
Dep t of Buildings v. 527 East 86 th Street, Brooklyn OATH Index No. 2238/09 (Oct. 23, 2009), aff d, Bd. of Stds & App. Dec. 1-10-A (May 25, 2010), rev d sub nom Faiella v. City of New York, Index No.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/30/ :14 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/30/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/30/2016 03:14 PM INDEX NO. 155091/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/30/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK JONATHAN HAYGOOD, -against-
More informationUNSAFE STRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF FLAT ROCK, NORTH CAROLINA
ORDINANCE NO. 80 UNSAFE STRUCTURES AND PROPERTIES ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF FLAT ROCK, NORTH CAROLINA Adopted: September 12, 2013 Table of Contents I GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1 Section 101. Authority...
More informationDep t of Correction v. LaSonde OATH Index No. 2526/11 (Aug. 18, 2011)
Dep t of Correction v. LaSonde OATH Index No. 2526/11 (Aug. 18, 2011) Correction officer refused to answer questions in MEO-16 interview. Termination from employment recommended. NEW YORK CITY OFFICE OF
More informationRiverbay Corp. v City of New York 2015 NY Slip Op 30590(U) March 9, 2015 Sup Ct, Bronx County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Mark Friedlander Cases
Riverbay Corp. v City of New York 2015 NY Slip Op 30590(U) March 9, 2015 Sup Ct, Bronx County Docket Number: 309465/12 Judge: Mark Friedlander Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationRangitikei District Council Control of Advertising Signage Bylaw 2013
Rangitikei District Council Control of Advertising Signage Bylaw 2013 1 SCOPE 1.1 This bylaw is made pursuant to section 145 of the Local Government Act 2002, which gives authority to the Council to adopt
More informationCHAPTER 370 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT
INVESTMENT SERVICES [CAP. 370. 1 CHAPTER 370 INVESTMENT SERVICES ACT To regulate the carrying on of investment business and to make provision for matters ancillary thereto or connected therewith. 19th
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER XX A by-law to regulate election signs in the City of Burlington
Appendix B to PB-19-18 THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER XX-2018 A by-law to regulate election signs in the City of Burlington WHEREAS, section 11 of the Municipal Act authorizes
More informationARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of -- ) ) Northrop Grumman Corporation ) ASBCA Nos. 52785, 53699 ) Under Contract No. N00024-92-C-6300 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Stanley R. Soya,
More information-- Charles E. Sullivan, Jr., Esq., for the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of the Alleged Violations of Article 27 and 71 of the Environmental Conservation Law ( ECL ) and Part 360 of Title 6 of the Official
More informationGonzalez v 80 W. 170 Realty LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33414(U) November 20, 2018 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Doris M.
Gonzalez v 80 W. 170 Realty LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 33414(U) November 20, 2018 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: 301333/2013 Judge: Doris M. Gonzalez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationPublished by Muncipal Codification Services, Inc.
CODE City of ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Codified through Ordinance No. 45-04, enacted Jan. 3, 2005. (Supplement No. 20) Preliminaries CODE CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN Published by Muncipal Codification Services,
More informationLi Ping Xie v Jang 2012 NY Slip Op 33871(U) February 28, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008E Judge: Paul G.
Li Ping Xie v Jang 2012 NY Slip Op 33871(U) February 28, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 117222/2008E Judge: Paul G. Feinman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationDell-Tech Enterprises, Inc. v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 410/16, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2016)
Dell-Tech Enterprises, Inc. v. Dep t of Parks & Recreation OATH Index No. 410/16, mem. dec. (Jan. 21, 2016) Contractor s petition for additional payment dismissed because it was untimely and waived. NEW
More informationFor the purpose of this subchapter, uses of signs shall be identified as follows:
SIGN REGULATIONS IN GENERAL 151.060 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. BUILDING FACADE.
More informationBY-LAW No OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF COLLINGWOOD
BY-LAW No. 2012-064 OF THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF COLLINGWOOD BEING A BY-LAW TO REGULATE THE SALE AND SETTING OFF OF FIREWORKS WHEREAS Section 121, Subsection (a) of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001,
More informationConcepcion v JetBlue Airways Corp NY Slip Op 30474(U) March 30, 2015 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Robert J.
Concepcion v JetBlue Airways Corp. 2015 NY Slip Op 30474(U) March 30, 2015 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 704599/2014 Judge: Robert J. McDonald Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationSIGN REGULATIONS Exterior signs have a substantial impact on the character and quality of the environment.
1001.08 SIGN REGULATIONS 28 Subd 1. Findings, Purpose and Effect. A. Findings: The City finds: 1. Exterior signs have a substantial impact on the character and quality of the environment. 2. Signs provide
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/09/ :05 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 196 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/09/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 20 Index No.: 156993/2016 56 WEST 11th STREET LLC, Plaintiff, CHRISTINA -against- QUINN, PROBATIONARY STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT Defendant.
More informationDel Pozo v Impressive Homes, Inc NY Slip Op 30502(U) March 1, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5342/2004 Judge: David Elliot
Del Pozo v Impressive Homes, Inc. 2011 NY Slip Op 30502(U) March 1, 2011 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 5342/2004 Judge: David Elliot Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationTHE. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTS, 1963 to 1964
THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTS, 1963 to 1964 Industrial Development Act of 1963, No. 28 Amended by Industrial Development Act Amendment Act of 1964, No. 5 An Act Relating to Industrial Development [Assented
More informationDISTRICT OF VANDERHOOF SIGN BYLAW NO. 995, 2006
DISTRICT OF VANDERHOOF SIGN BYLAW NO. 995, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS page number 1. Application 6 2. Citation 12 3. Definitions 3 4. Duties of the Building Official 11 5. Liability 12 6. Maintenance 6 7.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/2016 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 651587/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PERSEUS TELECOM LTD., v.
More informationSPECIAL BILLBOARD PERMITS (Sec. 1268)
SPECIAL BILLBOARD PERMITS (Sec. 1268) A Special Billboard Permit (BB Permit) is a conditional authorization that may be given by the Board of Adjustment (BOA) to locate off-premise advertisement signs
More informationTOWN OF SIDNEY SIGN BYLAW 2058
TOWN OF SIDNEY SIGN BYLAW 2058 TOWN OF SIDNEY BYLAW NO. 2058 A BYLAW TO REGULATE THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS WHEREAS Council may, pursuant to Section 908 of the Local Government Act and Section
More informationBusiness Integrity Comm n v. All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC OATH Index No. 1107/13 (Feb. 7, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9332
Business Integrity Comm n v. All Green Lawn & Landscaping LLC OATH Index No. 1107/13 (Feb. 7, 2013) Violation No. TWC-9332 In a default hearing, the proof failed to establish that landscaper with dirt
More informationBUILDING CODE HAMPTON FALLS, NEW HAMPSHIRE
BUILDING CODE HAMPTON FALLS, NEW HAMPSHIRE Adopted June 2, 1952 Revised To March 2011 HAMPTON FALLS BUILDING CODE RECORD OF AMENDMENTS TO 1995 PRINTED VERSION All pages of the current version of the Building
More informationMatter of Miller v Roque 2016 NY Slip Op 30381(U) March 5, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Jr., Alexander W.
Matter of Miller v Roque 2016 NY Slip Op 30381(U) March 5, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 100299/15 Judge: Jr., Alexander W. Hunter Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationFire Dep t v. Buttaro OATH Index No. 2430/14, mem. dec. (July 17, 2014)
Fire Dep t v. Buttaro OATH Index No. 2430/14, mem. dec. (July 17, 2014) Respondent s motion to dismiss is denied in part and denied in part with leave to renew. Respondent s motions to preclude interview
More informationARTICLE 2. ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 20 AUTHORITY OF REVIEWING/DECISION MAKING BODIES AND OFFICIALS Sections: 20.1 Board of County Commissioners.
Article. ADMINISTRATION 0 0 ARTICLE. ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER 0 AUTHORITY OF REVIEWING/DECISION MAKING BODIES AND OFFICIALS Sections: 0. Board of County Commissioners. 0. Planning Commission. 0. Board of
More informationDEED RESTRICTIONS SHERBROOK, INC.
DEED RESTRICTIONS SHERBROOK, INC. 1. Said premises shall be used solely and exclusively for single family private residence purposes. No structure shall be erected, altered, placed or permitted to remain
More informationSafka Holdings, LLC v 220 W. 57th St. Ltd Partnership 2014 NY Slip Op 31224(U) May 5, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013
Safka Holdings, LLC v 220 W. 57th St. Ltd Partnership 2014 NY Slip Op 31224(U) May 5, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652371/2013 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationIC Chapter 20. Regulation of Billboards and Junkyards
IC 8-23-20 Chapter 20. Regulation of Billboards and Junkyards IC 8-23-20-1 Agreements with United States Secretary of Commerce Sec. 1. (a) The department and the United States Secretary of Commerce shall
More informationNIGERIAN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING ACT
The Complete Laws of Nigeria Home NIGERIAN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I Plan preparation and administration A: Types and levels of Physical Development Plans SECTION 1.
More informationTug Hill Commission Local Government Conference ENFORCEMENT OF LOCAL LAND USE REQUIREMENTS
Tug Hill Commission Local Government Conference ENFORCEMENT OF LOCAL LAND USE REQUIREMENTS Define the Players Town/Village Board Zoning Enforcement Officer (ZEO) Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) Planning
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/05/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/05/2016 DEFENDANT'S REPLY MEMORANDUM
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/05/2016 02:32 PM INDEX NO. 450175/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/05/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationORDINANCE NO Article I. PERMITS AND REVIEW. Section 1.01
GOODLAND TOWNSHIP SIGN ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 2000 An Ordinance to regulate the size, construction, and location of signs within the Township; to establish penalties for violations; and to repeal prior
More informationChapter 142 SIGNS. ARTICLE I Political Signs
Chapter 142 SIGNS ARTICLE I Political Signs ~ 142-1. Definitions. ~ 142-2. Restrictions. ~ 142-3. Posting time limits. ~ 142-4. Permits; deposit. ~ 142-5. Removal of signs. ~ 142-6. Right of entry. ~ 142-7.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:14-CV-17-BR
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION NO. 5:14-CV-17-BR JOHN T. MARTIN, v. Plaintiff, BIMBO FOODS BAKERIES DISTRIBUTION, INC.; f/k/a GEORGE WESTON BAKERIES
More informationAdministrative Appeals
Administrative Appeals Paul Ridgeway Superior Court Judge NC Conference of Superior Court Judges October 2011 1 Determine Jurisdiction: Appellate or Original Appellate Jurisdiction unless: (a) Agency-specific
More information