Trends in Class Action Litigation
|
|
- Eric Harvey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CHARLOTTE CHICAGO GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES MOSCOW NEW YORK NEWARK PARIS SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON, D.C. Trends in Class Action Litigation Presented by: Neal R. Marder and Stephen R. Smerek ACCA SoCal DoubleHeader : Preparing For The Rebound November 17, 2009
2 Trends in Class Litigation Recent Trends in Pleading Standards No-injury Product Liability Class Actions "Greenwashing" Consumer Class Actions Securities Class Actions Settlement Scrutiny Post-CAFA 2
3 The views expressed by the persons in this session are those of the independent individual person only and do not necessarily represent the views of any organization, company, corporation, business, firm or entity. 3
4 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions Federal Court Pleading Standard Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a complaint to contain a "short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Historically, the plaintiff merely had to allege that any possible set of facts supported a claim which would entitle him to relief. Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957). U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Twombly and Iqbal Alter the Pleading Landscape 4
5 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) Class action brought by subscribers of telephone and Internet services alleging that local internet and telephone carriers entered into antitrust conspiracy designed to discourage new competitors from entering their markets. The Supreme Court held: Complaint cannot simply contain conclusory statements, but must contain specific facts that would entitle the plaintiff to relief. The complaint must allege more than mere conclusions or a recitation of the elements of the claim. The complaint must be plausible on its face. 5
6 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct (2009) Javid Iqbal, a Muslim originally from Pakistan, was arrested after the 9/11 attacks. Iqbal was designated as a high interest detainee, separated from the general prison population, and assigned to a special section of the prison. Iqbal filed suit, alleging he suffered numerous forms of abuse while in prison, and asserting discrimination and other Eighth Amendment claims against Attorney General Ashcroft and FBI Director Mueller. The Supreme Court held: Heightened pleading standard in Twombly applied to all civil claims. Task of determining whether a complaint included a plausible claim for relief was context-dependant requiring individual courts to use their own judgment. 6
7 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) The Plausibility Pleading Standard Together, the Twombly and Iqbal decisions establish a pleading standard that requires sufficient facts to plausibly support the claim. To state a claim, a plaintiff must plead sufficient factual matter to show that the defendant is culpable for the unlawful conduct. Mere recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by conclusory statements, are not sufficient. A complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. 7
8 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) Application of the Plausibility Pleading Standard What factual allegations make pleading plausible on its face? Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim is a context-specific task that requires the court to draw on its judicial experience and common sense. Where a complaint pleads facts that are merely consistent with a defendant s liability, it stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of entitlement to relief. This pleading standard is not akin to a probability requirement, but asks for more than mere possibility that a defendant acted unlawfully. 8
9 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) Complex v. Simple Cases Under the Plausibility Pleading Standard The factual detail necessary to meet the standard under Twombly and Iqbal varies depending on the legal and factual context. Claims based on scenarios that do not suggest wrongdoing will require greater factual substantiation to pass the plausibility threshold. Benjamin Spector, Understanding Pleading Doctrine, 108 Mich. L. Rev. 1, (2009). How many facts are enough will depend on the type of case. In a complex antitrust or RICO case a fuller set of factual allegations than found in the sample complaints in the civil rules Appendix of Forms may be necessary to show that the plaintiff s claim is not largely groundless. Id. (citing Limestone Dev. Corp. v. Village of Lemont, 520 F.3d 797, 803 (7th Cir. 2008)). 9
10 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) Impact of the "Plausibility" Pleading Standard Conclusory complaints lacking specific factual allegations to support each of the elements of each claim will likely be dismissed. In the months since Iqbal, federal judges have cited to Iqbal over 500 times. In many of these cases, the district courts have afforded plaintiffs the opportunity to file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies in the complaint under Twombly and Iqbal. Balancing of Interest Twombly and Iqbal indicate that courts now play the role of gatekeepers for the purpose of protecting defendants from frivolous actions. Companies now have a greater ability to strike down meritless claims at the pleading stage by filing a motion for dismissal. 10
11 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) Impact of the "Plausibility" Pleading Standard Will the plausibility pleading standard be rolled back? In July, 2009, Senator Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) introduced legislation designed to return the civil pleading standard to its pre-twombly state. In support of his legislation, Senator Specter stated that, the effect of the Supreme Court s actions will no doubt be to deny many plaintiffs with meritorious claims access to the federal court and, with it, any legal redress for their injuries. 11
12 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) In re Tobacco II, 46 Cal. 4 th 298 (2009) Plaintiffs brought a statewide class action lawsuit against a number of tobacco industry defendants alleging that the defendants had engaged in a decades-long public disinformation strategy concerning the health effects of cigarette smoking. Prior to the passage of Proposition 64, the trial court certified a class defined as All people who at the time they were residents of California, smoked in California one or more cigarettes between June 10, 1993 and April 23, 2001, and who were exposed to Defendants marketing and advertising activities in California. 12
13 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) In re Tobacco II, 46 Cal. 4 th 298 (2009) Following the passage of Proposition 64, the defendants moved to decertify the class, arguing that each class member was now required to show an injury in fact, consisting of lost money or property, as a result of the alleged unfair competition. The trial court granted Defendants decertification motion, finding that individual issues would predominate because the language of Proposition 64 required, for standing purposes, a showing of causation as to each class member s injury in fact. The California Court of Appeal affirmed. On review, the California Supreme Court reversed the trial court s order decertifying the class. 13
14 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) In re Tobacco II Decision Holding 1 While carefully limiting its discussion to UCL actions based on a fraud theory involving false advertising and misrepresentations to consumers, the court concluded that Prop 64 imposes an actual reliance requirement. Holding 2 Only the class representatives in a private enforcement action under the UCL need to plead and prove that they suffered injury in fact and lost money or property "as a result of" the alleged wrongdoing. 14
15 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) In re Tobacco II Injury in Fact A sufficient showing is made if the false advertising or misrepresentation has played a substantial part, and so has been a substantial factor, in influencing the plaintiff's decision. Where plaintiff has alleged exposure to a long-term, extensive advertising campaign, the plaintiff is not required to plead and prove individualized reliance on specific misrepresentations or false statements
16 Recent Trends in Pleading Standards & Class Actions (cont'd) In re Tobacco II Further Issues What amount of advertising constitutes an "extensive and long-term advertising campaign" sufficient to relieve plaintiff from burden to plead and prove individualized reliance? Morgan v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. Trial court certified a class of consumers who were exposed to defendant's marketing and advertising activities. What constitutes "exposure" to marketing and advertising activities? Does the In re Tobacco II decision which addressed an allegedly fraudulent misrepresentation also apply to fraud-based UCL claims premised on alleged omissions? Plascencia v. 1st Mortgage In re Tobacco II addressed the "fraud" prong, will the decision also be applied to UCL's "unlawful" and "unfair" prongs? How will the federal court's address this issue given the Article III standing requirement and Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
17 No-Injury Product Liability Class Actions What is a No-Injury Product Liability class action? Class action lawsuit commenced by purchasers of a product who have not suffered personal injury or damage to property from use of the product, yet contend that they have been harmed because the product allegedly contains an unmanifested safety defect 17
18 No-Injury Product Liability Class Actions (cont'd) Typical Contentions in No-Injury Class Actions Plaintiffs generally seek recovery of economic damages only. Plaintiffs contend that they, and a class of similarly situated consumers, have been deceived into paying more for the product than they otherwise would have paid had they known the truth about the product in question (i.e., had they known about the potential dangers of using the product). 18
19 No-Injury Product Liability Class Actions (cont'd) No-Injury Cases & Standing Issues Most federal and state courts that have considered no-injury product liability cases have found that allegations of economic injury alone, in the absence of physical injury or property damage, are not sufficient to establish a legally cognizable injury or standing to sue. O Neil v. Simplicity, Inc., 574 F.3d 501 (8th Cir. 2009) Rivera v. Wyeth-Ayerst Labs., 283 F.3d 315 (5th Cir. 2002) Ziegelmann v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 649 N.W.2d 556 (N.D. 2002) 19
20 No-Injury Product Liability Class Actions (cont'd) Standing The Other Side A handful of courts, however, have reached a different conclusion, holding that allegations of economic harm alone are sufficient to give plaintiff class standing to sue. Cole v. General Motors Corp., 484 F.3d 717 (5th Cir. 2007) Gonzalez v. Pepsico, Inc., 489 F. Supp. 2d 1233 (D. Kan. 2007) Sanchez v. Wal-Mart Stores, No. 2:06-CV-2573, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2008) 20
21 No-Injury Product Liability Class Actions (cont'd) In re Bisphenol-A (BPA) Polycarbonate Plastic Bottle Liability Litig., MDL No. 1967, W.D. Mo. Master Case No MD-W-ODS. Coordination for pre-trial proceedings of several class action lawsuits filed in a number of jurisdictions against various defendants. Plaintiffs allege that they purchased defendants baby bottles and other products. Plaintiffs contend that because defendants products allegedly contain trace amounts of BPA, the products are potentially unsafe. Plaintiffs do not allege that they or their children suffered any physical harm or property loss from their use of defendants products. Nonetheless, plaintiffs seek to recover the full amount of the price they paid for such products, contending that they would not have purchased the products had they been aware of the alleged existence of trace amounts of BPA in the products. 21
22 No-Injury Product Liability Class Actions (cont'd) Summary While the bulk of authorities hold that no-injury product liability claims do not allege a cognizable injury sufficient to confer standing to sue, plaintiffs lawyers continue to bring consumer class action lawsuits premised on potentially harmful products that have not caused physical harm or property damage to plaintiffs or the putative class. To distinguish their case, plaintiffs likely will argue the defect in the product existed at the time of purchase and, as a result, plaintiffs suffered economic harm at the moment they purchased the product. 22
23 "Greenwashing" Consumer Class Actions What is a "Greenwashing" consumer class action? Making a false or unverifiable claim that your product or service is environmentally friendly in an effort to foster a pro-environmental image and increase sales. Examples of common words that could result in a claim of Greenwashing include, among others: environmentally friendly, sustainable, gone green, recyclable content. Symbols are also used to convey that a product is environmentally friendly or green. 23
24 "Greenwashing" Consumer Class Actions (cont'd) Seven Sins of Greenwashing * Sin of the Hidden Trade-off Sin of No Proof Sin of Vagueness Sin of Irrelevance Sin of Lesser of Two Evils Sin of Fibbing Sin of Worshiping False Labels * Identified by TerraChoice Environmental Marketing Inc.; reports and resources available at 24
25 "Greenwashing" Consumer Class Actions (cont'd) Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") The FTC has the power to bring law enforcement actions against false or misleading marketing claims, including environmental or green marketing claims. In order to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive practices, the FTC explained its multi-tiered approach of (1) issuing rules and guides for businesses, (2) challenging fraudulent and deceptive ads through enforcement actions, and (3) publishing materials to help consumers make informed purchasing decisions. 25
26 "Greenwashing" Consumer Class Actions (cont'd) FTC "Green Guides" FTC's Environmental Guides, often referred to as the "Green Guides," outline general principles that apply to all environmental marketing claims and provide guidance on specific green claims, such as biodegradable, compostable, recyclable, recycled content, and ozone safe. See 16 C.F.R. Part 260. The FTC issued the Green Guides in 1992, and updated them in 1996 and The FTC is currently reviewing the Green Guides to ensure that they are appropriately responsive to changes in the marketplace and in consumer perception of environmental claims. 26
27 "Greenwashing" Consumer Class Actions (cont'd) "Green" Class Actions As recognized by the FTC, there has been a proliferation of green claims in the marketplace. Such claims may give rise to consumer class action lawsuits alleging that consumers were misled by false or deceptive claims about the "green" attributes of a product or service Petlack v. SC Johnson & Son, Inc., W.D. Wisc. Case No. 08-cv (filed September 29, 2008) Koh v. SC Johnson & Son, Inc., N.D. Cal. Case No. 09-cv (filed March 2, 2009) Hill v. Roll International Corp, et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. 09-cv (filed April 20, 2009) 27
28 "Greenwashing" Consumer Class Actions (cont'd) Greenwashing & Section Trends to Watch Potential that increased governmental regulation to prevent "greenwashing" will give rise to Section claims based on allegedly "unlawful" business practices Battleground Litigation over standing requirements, injury in fact, and "long-term, extensive advertising" in light of In re Tobacco II 28
29 "Greenwashing" Consumer Class Actions (cont'd) Summary Because consumers are growing increasingly concerned about the impact of their purchases on the environment, companies are likely to try to gain competitive advantage by marketing their products and services as environmentally friendly or green. However, these types of claims, and other claims regarding corporate responsibility, run the risk of sparking consumer class action lawsuits alleging that the claims are deceptive or misleading. Policies and procedures should be put in place to minimize potential exposure from these types of claims. 29
30 Securities Class Actions Trending Downward 2009 Securities Class Actions Filings Filings in the first half of 2009 were down nearly 25% from the first half of 2008 Majority of actions filed against financial companies, who were defendants in two-thirds of the filings in the first half of 2009 (up from 50% in 2008) Emerging global market trend the number of foreign companies targeted continues to rise with 1 in 5 actions so far this year naming a foreign entity. Decline in filings is being attributed to ongoing cases filed in 2007 and 2008 and cyclical nature of the stock market 30
31 Settlement Scrutiny Post-CAFA Approval of Federal Class Action Settlements Rule 23(e) requires a court approving a settlement agreement to find that it is fair, reasonable, and adequate. The factors that go into making such a determination are not delineated in the statute. While the number and wording of factors vary across circuits, each circuit s factors generally comprise four primary concerns. The strength of the plaintiff s case on the merits balanced against the amount offered in settlement The presence of collusion in reaching a settlement The reaction of members of the class to the settlement The stage of the proceedings and the amount of discovery completed 31
32 Settlement Scrutiny Post-CAFA (cont'd) CAFA Heightens Judicial Scrutiny of Federal Class Action Settlements The perceived abuses of class action filings by parties and their attorneys led to the Class Action Fairness Action of 2005 (CAFA) where Congress shifted many class actions to federal court and assigned new responsibilities to federal judges. Judges See Themselves as Class Fiduciary District judges must therefore exercise the highest degree of vigilance in scrutinizing proposed settlements of class actions to consider whether the settlement is fair, adequate, and reasonable, and not a product of collusion. Indeed, the district court judge functions as a fiduciary of the class, who is subject therefore to the high duty of care that the law requires of fiduciaries. Mirfasihi v. Fleet Mortgage Corp., 450 F.3d 745, 748 (7th Cir. 2006). The judge who presides over the class action and must approve any settlement is charged with responsibility for preventing the class lawyers from selling out the class. Thorogood v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 547 F.3d 742, 745 (7th Cir. 2008). 32
33 Settlement Scrutiny Post-CAFA (cont'd) CAFA s Impact on Coupon Settlements CAFA includes several new requirements specifically addressing class action settlements providing for recovery of "coupons" to class members. 28 U.S.C The new provisions governing coupon settlements provide that the court may approve the proposed settlement only after a hearing to determine whether, and making a written finding that, the settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate for class members. 28 U.S.C. 1712(e). While the fair, reasonable and adequate language under CAFA is identical to that in place under Rule 23(e), CAFA has been construed to require the application of a greater level of scrutiny to the existing criteria than existed pre- CAFA. Figueroa v. Sharper Image Corp., 517 F. Supp. 2d 1292, 1321 (S.D. Fla. 2007). The new provisions also place restrictions on attorney's fee awards to class counsel. 28 U.S.C. 1712(a),(b) Heightened judicial scrutiny and restrictions on fee awards under CAFA make coupon settlements a less attractive alternative to resolve weak cases. 33
34 Settlement Scrutiny Post-CAFA (cont'd) CAFA Notice Requirements Noticing the Appropriate Federal and State Officials Defendant must serve notice of proposed settlement on appropriate federal official and appropriate state official for each state in which a class member resides. se counsel is responsible for providing the requisite notice. 28 U.S.C. 1715(b). Notice must be served [n]ot later than 10 days after a proposed settlement of a class action is filed in court. 28 U.S.C. 1715(b). Notice must consist of the complaint; notice of any court hearing; notification to class members; if feasible, the names of class members who reside in each state, or a reasonable estimate of the number of class members residing in each State; information regarding the proportionate share of claims attributable to class members from each state; and any written judicial opinion relating to the settlement. 28 U.S.C. 1715(b). 34
35 Settlement Scrutiny Post-CAFA (cont'd) CAFA Notice Requirements Consequences of New Notice Requirements If defendant fails to give notice to appropriate federal and state officials, class members can choose not to be bound by the settlement. 28 U.S.C. 1715(e)(1). Federal and state officials may chose to object or intervene in action. CAFA does not specify any rights that state officials and attorney generals might have to appear or object to a proposed settlement or to otherwise participate in the action. But under existing procedures, such officials can either object as an interested party or intervene. Federal and state officials have time to comment and object to proposed settlements because a judge s order giving final approval may not be issued until ninety days after appropriate notification is given. 28 U.S.C. 1715(d). Federal and state officials may act to upset settlement. Figueroa v. Sharper Image Corp., 517 F.Supp.2d 1292 (S.D. Fla. 2007) (In denying final approval to coupon settlement, the Court distinguished settlement based on vigorous objections from attorneys general of 35 dates and the District of Columbia). The National Association of Attorneys General now posts summaries of all class-action notices on an internal Website, enabling various state attorneys general s offices to keep abreast of recent filings and to enable coordinated efforts where there is sufficient interest. 35
36 Settlement Scrutiny Post-CAFA (cont'd) Summary CAFA provides greater access for defendants to remove class actions to the to federal courts But, the additional scrutiny governing coupon settlements and additional notice requirements can make settlement more challenging As a result, the decision to remove class actions to federal court needs to be carefully considered in every case, taking into consideration all relevant circumstances, including: the alternate state court forum and experience with similar cases in that forum, the likely defenses to class certification, the strength of the case and the relevant legal and factual issues, and the overall strategy for resolution. 36
Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.
May 2009 Recent Consumer Law Developments at the California Supreme Court: What Ever Happened to Prop. 64 and What Will Consumer Class Actions Look Like in the Future? In the first half of 2009, the California
More informationIqbal And The Twombly Pleading Standard
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Iqbal And The Twombly Pleading Standard Law360,
More informationCase3:14-cv MEJ Document39 Filed10/30/14 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION
Case:-cv-0-MEJ Document Filed/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SERENA KWAN, Plaintiff, v. SANMEDICA INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-mej ORDER RE: MOTION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.
Case :-cv-00-ben-ksc Document 0 Filed 0// PageID.0 Page of 0 0 ANDREA NATHAN, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, v. VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationBELL ATLANTIC V. TWOMBLY: THE DAWN OF A NEW PLEADING STANDARD? Antoinette N. Morgan* Brian K. Telfair
BELL ATLANTIC V. TWOMBLY: THE DAWN OF A NEW PLEADING STANDARD? Antoinette N. Morgan* Brian K. Telfair The United States Supreme Court's decision in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly 1 may very well mark the end
More informationCase: 1:11-cv Document #: 58 Filed: 01/16/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:387
Case: 1:11-cv-07686 Document #: 58 Filed: 01/16/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:387 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RAY PADILLA, on behalf of himself and all others
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:13-CV-678-MOC-DSC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:13-CV-678-MOC-DSC LEE S. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) J.P. MORGAN CHASE NATIONAL
More informationCase3:14-cv RS Document48 Filed01/06/15 Page1 of 10
Case:-cv-000-RS Document Filed0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SCOTT KOLLER, Plaintiff, v. MED FOODS, INC., et al., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION Case No. -cv-000-rs
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:09-cv-07710-PA-FFM Document 18 Filed 02/08/10 Page 1 of 5 Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Paul Songco Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys
More informationCase3:13-cv JD Document60 Filed09/22/14 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION
Case:-cv-0-JD Document0 Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 RYAN RICHARDS, Plaintiff, v. SAFEWAY INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-jd ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-00-H-AJB Document Filed 0//0 Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 REY MARILAO, for himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. MCDONALD S CORPORATION,
More informationCase 0:16-cv WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:16-cv-61856-WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 JENNIFER SANDOVAL, vs. Plaintiff, RONALD R. WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, P.L., SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 8:12-cv-00215-FMO-RNB Document 202 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:7198 Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
More informationPLEADING IN FEDERAL COURT AFTER ASHCROFT v. IQBAL by Paul Ferrer
PLEADING IN FEDERAL COURT AFTER ASHCROFT v. IQBAL by Paul Ferrer LEGAL RESEARCH, ANALYSIS, AND ADVOCACY FOR ATTORNEYS Founded in 1969, NLRG is the nation s oldest and largest provider of legal research
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION. ) Case No. 4:16 CV 220 CDP MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Case: 4:16-cv-00220-CDP Doc. #: 18 Filed: 11/14/16 Page: 1 of 7 PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BYRON BELTON, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. COMBE INCORPORATED,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION. Case No CA B v. Judge Robert R. Rigsby ) ) ) ) ) ORDER
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, Case No. 2017 CA 008375 B v. Judge Robert R. Rigsby THE BIGELOW TEA COMPANY, F/K/A R.C. BIGELOW INC.,
More informationCase 2:06-cv JCC Document 51 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :0-cv-00-JCC Document Filed /0/0 Page of 0 0 JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married individual, d/b/a GORDONWORKS.COM ; OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC., a Washington limited liability company, v. Plaintiffs, VIRTUMUNDO,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : ORDER
Case 117-cv-05214-RWS Document 24 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION VASHAUN JONES, Plaintiff, v. PIEDMONT PLUS FEDERAL
More informationCase 0:14-cv WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:14-cv-60975-WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 WENDY GRAVE and JOSEPH GRAVE, vs. Plaintiffs, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationCase 1:13-cv RHB Doc #14 Filed 04/17/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#88
Case 1:13-cv-01235-RHB Doc #14 Filed 04/17/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#88 TIFFANY STRAND, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, CORINTHIAN COLLEGES,
More informationCase 3:16-cv JST Document 56 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-jst Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, ERIK K. BARDMAN, et al., Defendants. Case No.
More informationCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:488 CENTRAL OF CALIFORNIA Priority Send Enter Closed JS-5/JS-6 Scan Only TITLE: Linda Rubenstein v. The Neiman Marcus Group LLC, et al. ========================================================================
More informationCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL. CASE NO.: CV SJO (JPRx) DATE: December 12, 2014
Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:215 CENTRAL OF CALIFORNIA Priority Send Enter Closed JS-5/JS-6 Scan Only TITLE: Linda Rubenstein v. The Neiman Marcus Group LLC, et al. ========================================================================
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No. 12-cv HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ELCOMETER, INC., Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 12-cv-14628 HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN TQC-USA, INC., et al., Defendants. / ORDER DENYING
More informationCase 1:12-cv ABJ Document 14 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-01369-ABJ Document 14 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DELONTE EMILIANO TRAZELL Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT G. WILMERS, et al. Defendants.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : ORDER
Case 217-cv-00282-RWS Document 40 Filed 09/26/18 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION VASHAUN JONES, Plaintiff, v. LANIER FEDERAL CREDIT
More informationCase 0:10-cv WPD Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2011 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:10-cv-61985-WPD Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2011 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GARDEN-AIRE VILLAGE SOUTH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC., a Florida
More informationFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:13-cv-03074-TWT Document 47 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 16 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SPENCER ABRAMS Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION DORIS LOTT, Plaintiff, v. No. 15-00439-CV-W-DW LVNV FUNDING LLC, et al., Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Defendants
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.
Case :0-cv-0-WQH-AJB Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 CHRISTOPHER LORENZO, suing individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 3:10-cv L Document 22 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID 101 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00546-L Document 22 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID 101 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL RIDDLE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-0546-L
More informationZervos v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Dist. Court, D. Maryland In Re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10)
Zervos v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Dist. Court, D. Maryland 2012 MEMORANDUM JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge. CHRISTINE ZERVOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendant. Civil No. 1:11-cv-03757-JKB.
More informationKyles v. Celadon Trucking Servs.
Kyles v. Celadon Trucking Servs. United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Southern Division October 19, 2015, Decided; October 19, 2015, Filed Case No. 6:15-cv-03193-MDH Reporter
More informationDefending Class Actions in the Wild West : The Changing Landscape of California s Consumer Protection Laws
theantitrustsource w w w. a n t i t r u s t s o u r c e. c o m J u n e 2 011 1 Defending Class Actions in the Wild West : The Changing Landscape of California s Consumer Protection Laws Angel A. Garganta
More information3:14-cv MGL Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 24 Page 1 of 5
3:14-cv-01982-MGL Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 24 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Melinda K. Lindler, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-0-gmn-vcf Document 0 Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RAYMOND JAMES DUENSING, JR. individually, vs. Plaintiff, DAVID MICHAEL GILBERT, individually and in his
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 4:14cv493-RH/CAS
PYE et al v. FIFTH GENERATION INC et al Doc. 42 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION SHALINUS PYE et al., Plaintiffs, v. CASE NO. 4:14cv493-RH/CAS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-00-TEH Document Filed0 Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KIMBERLY YORDY, Plaintiff, v. PLIMUS, INC, Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-teh ORDER DENYING CLASS CERTIFICATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NORINE SYLVIA CAVE, Plaintiff, v. DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-who ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No.,,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION. CASE NO. 3:07cv528-RS-MD ORDER
Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION 316, INC., Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. 3:07cv528-RS-MD MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. / ORDER Before
More informationRULING AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS. Gorss Motels, Inc. ( Gorss Motels or Plaintiff ) filed this class action Complaint on
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT GORSS MOTELS, INC., a Connecticut corporation, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:17-cv-1078
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM. DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge
Case 2:17-cv-04825-DSF-SS Document 41 Filed 10/10/17 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:1057 Case No. Title Date CV 17-4825 DSF (SSx) 10/10/17 Kathy Wu v. Sunrider Corporation, et al. Present: The Honorable DALE S.
More informationCase 3:13-cv L Document 109 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 3052
Case 3:13-cv-02920-L Document 109 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 3052 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION INFECTIOUS DISEASE DOCTORS, P.A., Plaintiff, v.
More informationEnforcing Exculpatory Provisions Against Meritless Claims
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Enforcing Exculpatory Provisions Against Meritless
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
-VPC Crow v. Home Loan Center, Inc. dba LendingTree Loans et al Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 HEATHER L. CROW, Plaintiff, v. HOME LOAN CENTER, INC.; et al., Defendants. * * * :-cv-0-lrh-vpc
More informationCase3:14-cv MEJ Document65 Filed02/25/15 Page1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION
Case:-cv-0-MEJ Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JULIAN ENGEL, Plaintiff, v. NOVEX BIOTECH LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. -cv-0-mej ORDER RE: MOTION
More informationCase 0:14-cv KMM Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2015 Page 1 of 8
Case 0:14-cv-62567-KMM Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/15/2015 Page 1 of 8 TRACY SANBORN and LOUIS LUCREZIA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED APR 18 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS LINDA RUBENSTEIN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:11-cv-00461-DWF -TNL Document 46 Filed 07/13/11 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA William B. Butler and Mary S. Butler, individually and as representatives for all
More informationCase 3:17-cv RS Document 33 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-0-rs Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 TODD GREENBERG, v. Plaintiff, TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I. INTRODUCTION Case No. -cv-0-rs
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. For the Northern District of California 11. No.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 MICHAEL ALLAGAS, ARTHUR RAY, AND BRETT MOHRMAN, et al., v. Plaintiffs, BP SOLAR INTERNATIONAL INC., HOME
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. RDB-08-3233 INNOVATIVE MARKETING, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Sunoptic Technologies, LLC v. Integra Luxtec, Inc et al Doc. 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION SUNOPTIC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company,
More informationRevolution or Minor Disruption Twombly and Iqbal Through the Rear View Mirror
Revolution or Minor Disruption Twombly and Iqbal Through the Rear View Mirror William Frank Carroll Cox Smith Matthews Incorporated 1201 Elm Street, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75270 Board Certified, Civil
More informationCase 4:18-cv PJH Document 37 Filed 11/16/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-pjh Document Filed // Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 JODY DIANE KIMBRELL, Plaintiff, v. TWITTER INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-pjh ORDER Re: Dkt. Nos.,,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BARTOSZ GRABOWSKI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 17 C 5069 ) DUNKIN BRANDS, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationCase 0:17-cv WPD Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:17-cv-61266-WPD Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SILVIA LEONES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
More informationPlaintiffs May Be Hard-Pressed In New Olive Oil Cases
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Plaintiffs May Be Hard-Pressed In New Olive
More informationDISH NETWORK LLC, et als., Plaintiffs, v. FRANCISCO LLINAS, et als., Defendants. Civil No (FAB)
DISH NETWORK LLC, et als., Plaintiffs, v. FRANCISCO LLINAS, et als., Defendants. Civil No. 17-2084 (FAB) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO April 20, 2018 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. Alexander Forouzesh v. Starbucks Corp. CV PA (AGRx) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT Alexander Forouzesh v. Starbucks Corp. CV 16-3830 PA (AGRx) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111701 August 19, 2016, Decided
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 12-CV-5162 ORDER
Case 5:12-cv-05162-SOH Document 146 Filed 09/26/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 2456 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
More informationCase 4:18-cv HSG Document 46 Filed 02/07/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-hsg Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 NITA BATRA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. POPSUGAR, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-hsg ORDER DENYING
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ORDER AND REASONS
Kareem v. Markel Southwest Underwriters, Inc., et. al. Doc. 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA AMY KAREEM d/b/a JACKSON FASHION, LLC VERSUS MARKEL SOUTHWEST UNDERWRITERS, INC.
More informationAshcroft v. Iqbal: Taking Twombly a Step Further
JULY 2009, RELEASE TWO Ashcroft v. Iqbal: Taking Twombly a Step Further Caroline Mitchell & David Wallach Jones Day Ashcroft v. Iqbal: Taking Twombly a Step Further Caroline Mitchell & David Wallach 1
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN BRANCA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. NORDSTROM, INC., Defendant. CASE NO. cv0-mma (JMA)
More informationUnited States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:11-cv-00417-MHS -ALM Document 13 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 249 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ALISE MALIKYAR V. CASE NO. 4:11-CV-417 Judge Schneider/
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
(PC) Blueford v. Salinas Valley State Prison et al Doc. 0 0 JAVAR LESTER BLUEFORD, v. Plaintiff, SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Presently before the Court is Defendants Connecticut General
Mountain View Surgical Center v. CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company et al Doc. 1 O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 MOUNTAIN VIEW SURGICAL CENTER, a California
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER
Case 213-cv-00155-RWS Document 9 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION OVIDIU CONSTANTIN, v. Plaintiff, WELLS FARGO BANK,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MIKE K. STRONG, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA vs. Plaintiff, HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.; CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., US Bank Trust N.A. as Trustee of LSF9 Master Participation
More informationAlexandra Hlista v. Safeguard Properties, LLC
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-5-2016 Alexandra Hlista v. Safeguard Properties, LLC Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL ====== PRESENT: THE HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:11-cv-04175-SJO -PLA UNITED Document STATES 11 DISTRICT Filed 08/10/11 COURT Page 1 of Priority 5 Page ID #:103 Send Enter Closed JS-5/JS-6 Scan Only TITLE: James McFadden et. al. v. National Title
More informationCase 2:09-cv GCS-MKM Document 24 Filed 12/22/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:09-cv-11239-GCS-MKM Document 24 Filed 12/22/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRIAN MCLEAN and GAIL CLIFFORD, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No.
More informationin thewake of Bell Atlantic
2 How Will Seventh Circuit Pleading Requirements and Dismissal Standards Change in thewake of Bell Atlantic By Joshua Yount 1 T his past May, in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 127 S. Ct. 1955 (2007),
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ADVANCED PHYSICIANS S.C., VS. Plaintiff, CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2355-G
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case :0-cv-000-KJD-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 THE CUPCAKERY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ANDREA BALLUS, et al., Defendants. Case No. :0-CV-00-KJD-LRL ORDER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LINDA PERRYMENT, Plaintiff, v. SKY CHEFS, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-kaw ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S
More informationMotion for Decertification of Class
Superior Court of the State of California IN RE TOBACCO CASES II Brown, et al. v. The American Tobacco Co., Inc., et al. Judicial Council Coordinated Proceeding (JCCP) No. 4042 San Diego Superior Case
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DEREK GUBALA, Case No. 15-cv-1078-pp Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Radke, v. Sinha Clinic Corp., et al. Doc. 55 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. ) DEBORAH RADKE, as relator under the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-000-teh Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TERRY COUR II, Plaintiff, v. LIFE0, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-000-teh ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
More informationCase 3:10-cv KRG Document 28 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:10-cv-00013-KRG Document 28 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DARRELL DUFOUR & Civil Action No.3: 10-cv-00013 KATHY DUFOUR
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Montanez et al Doc. 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., CASE NO. :0-cv-0-AWI-SKO v. Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Stubblefield v. Follett Higher Education Group, Inc. Doc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ROBERT STUBBLEFIELD, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 8:10-cv-824-T-24-AEP FOLLETT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 6:10-cv-00414-GAP-DAB Document 102 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID 726 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. and NURDEEN MUSTAFA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-l-nls Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 JASON DAVID BODIE v. LYFT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, Defendants. Case No.: :-cv-0-l-nls ORDER GRANTING
More informationTHE LAW OF UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES. Practical tips for dealing
THE LAW OF UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES Practical tips for dealing with UTP statutes Is this unfair? Price of roses on Valentine s Day: 42% increase (NYC Dep t of Consumer Affairs) Raleigh area: price increases
More informationCase 9:16-cv KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2017 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:16-cv-81973-KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/24/2017 Page 1 of 13 MIGUEL RIOS AND SHIRLEY H. RIOS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-81973-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN
More informationCase 1:17-cv CMH-IDD Document 93 Filed 09/05/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1129
Case 1:17-cv-01459-CMH-IDD Document 93 Filed 09/05/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1129 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division XIA BI, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationCastillo v. Roche Laboratories, Inc. Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-SEITZIO'SULLIVAN
Castillo v. Roche Laboratories, Inc. Doc. 19 WILLIAM JORGE CASTILLO, VS. Plaintiff, ROCHE LABORATORIES INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-20876-CIV-SEITZIO'SULLIVAN
More informationCase4:10-cv CW Document26 Filed08/13/10 Page1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.
Case:0-cv-0-CW Document Filed0//0 Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 GARY BLACK and HOLLI BEAM-BLACK, v. GOOGLE INC., Plaintiffs, Defendant. / No. 0-0
More informationCivil Action No (JMV) (Mf) Plaintiffs alleges that Defendant has wrongfully
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ELIZABETH JOHNSON, Plaintiff V. ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 17-3527 (JMV) (Mf) OPINION Dockets.Justia.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-COHN/SELTZER ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS
GERI SIANO CARRIUOLO, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, GENERAL MOTORS LLC, Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 14-61429-CIV-COHN/SELTZER ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT S MOTION
More informationCase 2:14-cv EEF-KWR Document 27 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ORDER AND REASONS
Case 2:14-cv-02499-EEF-KWR Document 27 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CORY JENKINS * CIVIL ACTION * VERSUS * NO. 14-2499 * BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB,
More information2:12-cv DPH-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 04/30/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 99 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-15205-DPH-MKM Doc # 10 Filed 04/30/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 99 MIQUEL ROSS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 12-15205 v. HONORABLE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Howard v. First Horizon Home Loan Corporation et al Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PATRICK D. HOWARD, v. Plaintiff, FIRST HORIZON HOME LOAN CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
More informationoperated (then known as ClinNet Solutions, LLC, whose members were Martin Clegg,
Jumpstart Of Sarasota LLC v. ADP Screening and Selection Services, Inc. Doc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION JUMPSTART OF SARASOTA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO.
More informationCase 1:05-cv WMN Document 86 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:05-cv-00949-WMN Document 86 Filed 10/06/2008 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BRUCE LEVITT : : v. : Civil No. WMN-05-949 : FAX.COM et al. : MEMORANDUM
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 2/25/10; pub. order 3/2/10 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE PFIZER INC., Petitioner, v. B188106 (Los Angeles County Super.
More informationinstead, is merely seeking to collect additional loan payments. First Amended Complaint
Sutcliffe et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Doc. United States District Court 0 VICKI AND RICHARD SUTCLIFFE, v. Plaintiffs, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More information