) ) N. State College Blvd. Suite Orange, CA Telephone: (714) Fax: (714) ) )
|
|
- Whitney Briggs
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CASE MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM A telephonic hearing was conducted November 1, 2012 (Hearing, to consider the Motion for Summary Judgment submitted on behalf of Respondents, et al. t (Claimant.. of, Esq., appeared on behalf of Claimant appeared on behalf of Having considered the submissions of the parties, including oral argument offered during the Hearing, the Arbitrator makes the following findings and orders: vs.., Petitioner, Respondents. ARBITRATION NO JAMS ARBITRATION NO CASE MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM No. 4 (Ruling on Motion for ~ Summary Judgment ARBITRATION PROCEEDING JUDICIAL ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION SERVICE 1 Hon. James L. Smith (Ret. JAMS N. State College Blvd. Suite Orange, CA Telephone: ( Fax: (
2 2 medical care and treatment provided to Claimant by fell below the applicable standard of 3 care. The care and treatment addressed by the Claim herein commenced on or about December 4 22, 2009, when Claimant presented himself to for the trimming ofhis toenails, and 5 concluded when Claimants right leg was amputated below the knee in or about June, CASE MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM 2 28 ORDER: submissions it is clear that Claimant received care and treatment well within the applicable 26 standard of care and Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted. 24 In summary, assuming the accuracy of all uncontested material facts alleged in the 22 issues presented. There has been no evidence offered that would suggest a causal relationship 23 between the use of that medication and the injuries claimed herein. 20 of Claimant regarding the conduct of in prescribing Allopurinol, a drug used in the 21 treatment of gout, when uremic acid tests later showed there was no gout are not material to the 18 below the standard of care is moot in that there is no evidence to support a finding there existed 19 a causal relationship between that procedure and the injuries claimed. Similarly, the contentions 17 Claimant's contention that the manner in which the toe nail trimming was done was 8 just below the knee. On December 22, 2009, when first treated by, Claimant was 84 9 years old and suffering from numerous and complex health issues described in the submissions 10 of both parties, including respiratory insufficiency, asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary 11 Disease, likely metastasized kidney cancer, hyperlipidemia (elevated lipid levels in blood 12 caused by diabetes, chronic renal insufficiency (failure of kidneys to filter toxins and waste 13 products from the blood, lacunar brain infarcts (occlusion of arteries feeding the brain, 14 congestive heart failure, diabetic retinopathy (damage to the retina of the eye caused by 15 diabetes, peripheral artery disease (reduction ofblood supply to the portions the body distal to 16 the heart, and Diabetes Mellitus Type II (adult on-set diabetes. 6 Claimant contends trimmed the toenail on the left big toe too short, thus 7 precipitating a series of events that ultimately resulted in the amputation of Claimant's right leg There are no triable issues of material fact supporting Claimant's contention that the
3 2 and is granted. An Award in favor of 3 Respondents is hereby made. 4 This being a final adjudication of rights Claimant is advised that nothing in this 5 arbitration prohibits or restricts Claimant, as an enrollee of Respondents, from discussing or CASE MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM Date: November 5, ofmanaged Health Care. 6 reporting the underlying facts, results, terms and conditions of this decision to the Department 1 The Motion for Summary Judgment submitted by Respondents
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 1 Hon. James L. Smith (Ret. JAMS N. State College Blvd. Suite Orange, CA Telephone: ( Fax: ( ARBITRATION PROCEEDING JUDICIAL ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION SERVICE IO vs. Claimant, Respondents. l Arbitration No JAMS Reference No Arbitrator: Hon. James L. Smith (Ret. I AWARD OF ARBITRATOR All parties herein having submitted this dispute for binding arbitration pursuant to JAMS COMPREHENSIVE RULES DF ARBITRATION and the Arbitrator having been selected, an arbitration hearing was properly noticed and conducted on November 26, 2013, at the offices of JAMS, 707 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, California. of, appeared on.behalf of Respondents. There was no appearance by or on behalf of Petitioner 28 AW ARD OF ARBITRATOR
13 I Counsel for Respondents,, was sworn and testified that all 2 of the factual allegations contained in Respondent's Arbitration Management Brief dated 3 October 22, 2013, are true and correct of his own knowledge. 4 The Arbitrator makes the following AW ARD and provides a STATEMENT OF 5 REASONS for such Award. The Statement of Reasons provided herein shall not be deemed a 6 part of the Award. 7 8 STATEMENT OF REASONS 9 10 Claimant's Demand for Arbitration was filed on his behalf by, Esq., on September 27, Shortly thereafter, on November 2, 2012, Respondents served written discovery relating to he claims made. No responses were provided by Claimant. An Arbitration Management Conference was conducted January 7, 2013, and continued at the request of Claimant. On January 18, 2013, Mr. withdrew as counsel for Claimant and Claimant was substituted in in prqpria persona. A second Arbitration Management Conference was conducted March 29, Claimant did not appear, although his father, (, a non~attomey, did appear. was advised that he could not formally represent his son in this proceeding and was urged by the Arbitrator to take whatever steps were necessary to obtain legal representation for Claimant. The Arbitrator emphasized the importance of the various procedural rules that apply in arbitration proceedings and the problems that would likely result if Claimant continued to represent himself This admonition was repeated in an effort to emphasize its importance. assured the Arbitrator that steps were bein~ taken and that Claimant would be represented counsel. After the failure of Claimant to provided responses to disoovery, Respondents notice Claimants deposition for July 30, Prior to that date counsel for Respondents was contacted by and told Claimant was in the process of retaining Mr. ~Esq., to 28 2 AWARD OF ARBITRATOR
14 I represent Claimant in this action. In reliance upon this Respondents cancelled the deposition 2 noticed for July 30, Mr. did not substitute in as counsel for Claimant On August 7, 2013, Respondents served on Claimant Requests for Admission. No responses were provided by Claimant. On September 11, 2013, Respondents served on Claimant its Demand for Exchange of Expert Witnesses. No response to this demand was provided by Claimant. Respondent again noticed Claimant's deposition for October 10, Claimant failed to appear for his deposition. Claimant's failure to respond to the Requests for Admission results in those requests being deemed admitted. Included in the Requests for Admission was the following: 11 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1: 12 Admit that nothing ' or 13 their employees or agents did or failed to do caused or was a substantial factor in causing YOU 14 (The term "YOU" shall mean Claimant, any injury or damage. 15 Based on the above findings the Arbitrator will find -in favor of Respondents and against 16 Claimant in this Arbitration AWARD The Arbitrator finds for Respondents ; and,, and against Claimant Claimant shall take nothing by this action Date: November 26, 2013 ' Nothing in this arbitration decision prohibits or restricts the enrollee from discussing or reporting the underlying facts, results, terms and conditions of this decision to the Department of Managed Health Care (DMBC. 3 AWARD OF ARBITRATOR
15 Attorneys for Respondents, 5,, and IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN 9 10 ARBITRATION NO vs. Claimant, tpr POSEB] ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENTS AND 14, and MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Respondents. Date: December 5, 2013 Time : 9 : 3 0 am Place: VIA TELEPHONIC HEARING ( , PRESS * The motion of respondents 21, and 22 for Summary Judgment came on regularly 23 for hearing by the Honorable James L. Smith on December 5, Claimant appeared telephonically in Pro Per and respondents 25 appeared telephonically by their attorney of record herein, 26, Esq. of 27, A Professional Corporation. 28 RESPONDENT'S REPLY TO CLAIMANT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
16 Having read and considered the moving papers, the opposition papers, and the reply papers, and having heard and considered the arguments of Claimant and counsel, the Arbitrator finds that the subject motion is well founded and the same is granted since claimant failed to retain any controverting expert testimony in support of her claims. Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. 10 I.I 11 I Nothing in this arbitration decision prohibits or restricts the enrollee from discussing or reporting the underlying facts, results, terms or conditions of this decision to the Department of Managed Health Care. Dated: \z( lb}($ I,,,.~"'...,~., --~~ ~--L.. Hqno1able James L. Smith (Ret., ~j::bijrator l/ 28 2 RESPONDENT'S REPLY TO CLAIMANT'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1 2 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN vs., Claimant,, M.D.,, M.D. Respondents.. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 14478
1 2 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 vs., Claimant,, M.D.,, M.D. Respondents.. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 14478 RE: RESPONDENT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OR
More information1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures
1. Intent OCERS Board Policy The Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System ( OCERS ) specifically intends that this policy shall apply to and shall govern in each administrative
More informationRelevant Excerpts of the Rules of the City of New York Title 61 - Office of Collective Bargaining Chapter 1 - Practice and Procedure
Relevant Excerpts of the Rules of the City of New York Title 61 - Office of Collective Bargaining Chapter 1 - Practice and Procedure 1-01 Definitions 1-07 Proceedings before the Board of Collective Bargaining
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Employee
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F508997 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Employee RED DRAGON CHINESE RESTAURANT, INC., Uninsured Employer CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JANUARY 31, 2006
More informationLOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY
LOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY Supplementing the Rules of Civil Procedure Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Effective July 1, 2005 Hon. James G. Arner President
More informationNAM EMPLOYMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION/ARBITRATION REQUEST FORM FOR EMPLOYERS
Employment Rules and Procedures 990 Stewart Avenue, First Floor Garden City, NY 11530 Telephone: 1-800-358-2550 Fax: 516-794-8971 www.namadr.com NAM EMPLOYMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION/ARBITRATION
More informationMcCabe v Avalon Bay Communities Inc 2018 NY Slip Op 33108(U) November 30, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge:
McCabe v Avalon Bay Communities Inc 2018 NY Slip Op 33108(U) November 30, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 156813/2016 Judge: Gerald Lebovits Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationAppealed. Judgment Rendered l iay Joseph Williams COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 2223 MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL PROCEEDING OF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 2223 IN RE MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL PROCEEDING OF EMMER WILLIAMS VS JANET E LEWIS M D PCF FILE NO 2006 01385 Judgment Rendered l iay 1 3 2009
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE. JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13. CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE JUDGE MELISSA R. McCORMICK DEPARTMENT C13 CLERK: Alma Bovard COURT ATTENDANT: As Assigned CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER 700 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE SANTA ANA, CA 92701
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.
Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed // PageID.0 Page of 0 IN RE: AMERANTH CASES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS. cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS
More informationNAM EMPLOYMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION/ARBITRATION REQUEST FORM FOR EMPLOYEES
Employment Rules and Procedures 990 Stewart Avenue, First Floor Garden City, NY 11530 Telephone: 1-800-358-2550 Fax: 516-794-8971 www.namadr.com NAM EMPLOYMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION/ARBITRATION
More informationFNAL COMPENSATION ORDER
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS SEBASTIAN/MELBOURNE DISTRICT OFFICE Ray Jones, Employee/Claimant, vs. Indian River County Fire Rescue/Johns
More informationConsolidated Arbitration Rules
Consolidated Arbitration Rules THE LEADING PROVIDER OF ADR SERVICES 1. Applicability of Rules The parties to a dispute shall be deemed to have made these Consolidated Arbitration Rules a part of their
More informationResettlement needs assessment
Subject Instructions for evaluating and reporting the resettlement of refugees overseas who have been selected for resettlement in Canada in the context of the immigration medical examination (IME). Goal/Objective
More informationInitial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties
IN THE MATTER OF: Claimant(s): Respondent(s): Case Number: Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order Parties This case was filed under the American Arbitration Association Expedited Commercial Rules.
More informationNAM EMPLOYMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION/ARBITRATION REQUEST FORM FOR EMPLOYEES OF TA OPERATING LLC, D/B/A MINIT MART
Employment Rules and Procedures 990 Stewart Avenue, First Floor Garden City, NY 11530 Telephone: 1-800-358-2550 Fax: 516-794-8971 www.namadr.com NAM EMPLOYMENT RULES AND PROCEDURES DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION/ARBITRATION
More informationNo. 46,036-CA No. 46,037-CA (Consolidated Cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * *
Judgment rendered January 26, 2011 Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 46,036-CA No. 46,037-CA (Consolidated Cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT
More informationBinding Mediation Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxx
Binding Mediation Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxx I. Parties A. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx B. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx II. Date, Time and Location of the Binding Mediation Date: Time: Location:
More informationSTREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E907655 JOSEPH GARRETT, EMPLOYEE SDS TRANSPORTATION, EMPLOYER CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE
More informationFederal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Revised: October 0 Federal Pro Se Clinic CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA How to Submit a Motion A motion is a formal request to the Court. To file a motion in the U.S. District Court for the Central District
More informationARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL
ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE RULES AS PART OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT PAGES 1.1 Application... 1 1.2 Scope... 1 II. TRIBUNALS AND ADMINISTRATION 2.1 Name
More informationAPG ASBESTOS TRUST. 1. A copy of these ADR Procedures; 2. Form Affidavit of Completeness; 3. Election Form and Agreement for Binding Arbitration; and
APG ASBESTOS TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES Pursuant to Section 5.10 of the First Amended and Restated APG Asbestos Trust Distribution Procedures (the TDP ), the APG Asbestos Trust
More informationStreamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures
RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: OCTOBER 24, 2014; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2013-CA-000917-MR PIKEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. APPELLANT APPEAL FROM PIKE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE
More informationIN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.
NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard
More informationAn Analysis of Post-2005 Work Injuries Involving Idiopathic Conditions
An Analysis of Post-2005 Work Injuries Involving Idiopathic Conditions MSIA ANNUAL CONFERENCE PRESENTED BY: ROSS C. BALL DATE: SEPTEMBER 22, 2014 St. Louis Chicago Kansas City 8000 Maryland Ave Suite 550
More informationArbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx
Arbitration Agreement ADR Systems File # xxxxxxxxxxx Insurance Claim # xxxxxxxxxx I. Parties A. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx B. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx II., Time and Location of the Arbitration : Time: Location: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More informationNational Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS
National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Important Notice...3 Introduction...3 Standard Clause...3 Submission Agreement...3 Administrative
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Sterling E. Norris, Esq. (SBN 00 Paul J. Orfanedes (Appearing Pro Hac Vice JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. 0 Huntington Drive, Suite 1 San Marino, CA 0 Tel.: ( -0 Fax: ( -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff HAROLD P. STURGEON,
More informationRules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012
Rules of the Legal Fee Arbitration Board of the Massachusetts Bar Association As Amended and Effective September 1, 2012 20 West Street Boston, MA 02111-1218 TELEPHONE (617) 338-0500 FAX (617) 338-0550
More informationALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES
KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES 00015541-3 Page 1 of Attachment A to Asbestos TDP KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION
More informationThese rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
BUSINESS OF THE COURT L.R. No. 51 TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
More informationIVAMS Administrative and Arbitration Rules (Amended September 22, 2015) IVAMS Administrative Rules
IVAMS ARBITRATION & MEDIATION SERVICES Corporate Offices: 8287 White Oak Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Tel: (909) 466-1665 Fax: (909) 466-1796 E-mail: info@ivams.com www.ivams.com IVAMS Administrative
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.
Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 IN RE: AMERANTH CASES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS. cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS
More informationWilliam Jacobsen, Appellant, v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Respondent. 6563, /08
Page 1 William Jacobsen, Appellant, v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Respondent. 6563, 103714/08 SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT 97 A.D.3d 428; 948 N.Y.S.2d
More informationCase 3:17-cv VC Document Filed 09/06/18 Page 1 of 6
Case :-cv-00-vc Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 CLARKSON LAW FIRM, P.C. Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 0 rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Bahar Sodaify (SBN
More informationREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2005 STEPHEN E. THOMPSON BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0281 September Term, 2005 STEPHEN E. THOMPSON v. BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND Adkins, Krauser, Rodowsky, Lawrence F., (Retired, Specially Assigned)
More informationERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS
ERITREA ETHIOPIA CLAIMS COMMISSION RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER ONE: RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS SECTION I - INTRODUCTORY RULES Scope of Application Article 1 1. Pursuant to Article 5, paragraph
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3. Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN MICHAEL SWEENEY, Index No.: /2017.
Index Number: 650053/2017 Page 1 out of 15 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3 MICHAEL SWEENEY, Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 650053/2017 RJI Filing
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Dec 1 2014 16:28:06 2013-KA-01785-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TREVOR HOSKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01785-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationState of Wyoming Office of Administrative Hearings
State of Wyoming Office of Administrative Hearings MATTHEW H. MEAD 2020 CAREY AVENUE, FIFTH FLOOR GOVERNOR CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82002-0270 (307) 777-6660 DEBORAH BAUMER FAX (307) 777-5269 DIRECTOR Summary
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 11. : : Petitioner, : : Respondent.
Case 117-cv-00554 Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------ x ORACLE CORPORATION,
More informationCase 3:15-cr BAS Document 166 Filed 03/02/17 PageID.752 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cr-0-bas Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 MESEREAU LAW GROUP Thomas A. Mesereau, Jr., CSBN: 000 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 00, Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel: (0) -0 Fax: (0) - Email: mesereau@mesereaulaw.com
More informationRobert A. Rees [State Bar No ] Rees Law Firm P.C Century Park East, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California Telephone: (310) 27
1 2 3 4 5 Robert A. Rees [State Bar No. 94295] Rees Law Firm P.C. 1925 Century Park East, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 277-7071 Facsunile: (310) 277-7067 E-mail: robertreeslaw@att.net
More informationOPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN June 11, 1999
Present: All the Justices CLAUDE A. BASS, JR. v. Record No. 980612 CITY OF RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT JOHN B. PATTON, JR. OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN June 11, 1999 v. Record No. 980861 LOUDOUN
More informationCase 3:16-md BRM-LHG Document 270 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 1341
Case 316-md-02750-BRM-LHG Document 270 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1341 Case 316-md-02750-BRM-LHG Document 270 Filed 08/16/18 Page 2 of 7 PageID 1342 Case 316-md-02750-BRM-LHG Document 270 Filed
More informationDocket Number: SHOVEL TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC. William G. Merchant, Esquire CLOSED VS.
Docket Number: 1120 SHOVEL TRANSFER & STORAGE, INC. William G. Merchant, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD Gary F. DiVito, Chief Counsel Kenneth B. Skelly, Chief
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G OPINION FILED OCTOBER 4, 2016
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G304428 GREG HACKING, EMPLOYEE REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC., EMPLOYER TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY/ GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, INC., INSURANCE
More informationTHE LMAA TERMS (2006)
THE LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION THE LMAA TERMS (2006) Effective for appointments on and after 1st January 2006 THE LMAA TERMS (2006) PRELIMINARY 1. These Terms may be referred to as the LMAA
More informationSTATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT : COUNTY OF MONROE. DAVID and EDDIE INNOCENT, -against- OAS, LLC and I.M. LEADFREY, Index Number:
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT : COUNTY OF MONROE DAVID and EDDIE INNOCENT, -against- Plaintiffs, OAS, LLC and I.M. LEADFREY, Defendants. Index Number: 1234-2016 MEMORANDUM OF LAW SUBMITTED IN OPPOSITION
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F JERRY SLAUGHTER (DEC D), EMPLOYEE CITY OF HAMPTON, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F500501 JERRY SLAUGHTER (DEC D), EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT CITY OF HAMPTON, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT MUNICIPAL LEAGUE WC TRUST, CARRIER RESPONDENT OPINION
More informationChapter 6 MOTIONS. 6.1 Vocabulary Introduction Regular Motions 7
Chapter 6 MOTIONS 6.1 Vocabulary 3 6.2 Introduction 6 6.3 Regular Motions 7 6.3.1 "Notice of Motion 8 6.3.1.1 Setting the Hearing 8 6.3.1.2 Preparing the Notice 8 6.3.2 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
More informationAssociation of Workplace Investigators Training Institute RETENTION AGREEMENTS. By: Pamela L. Hemminger
Association of Workplace Investigators Training Institute RETENTION AGREEMENTS By: Pamela L. Hemminger pamela.hemminger@gmail.com Lindsay Harris lindsay_harris@sbcglobal.net It is critical that an outside
More informationTERRON TAYLOR AND OZNIE R. MANHERTZ, Petitioners, Respondent, and. No. 2 CA-SA Filed September 25, 2014
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO TERRON TAYLOR AND OZNIE R. MANHERTZ, Petitioners, v. HON. KAREN J. STILLWELL, JUDGE PRO TEMPORE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE
More informationORDER DENYING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
CODE: FILED Electronically 2015-07-30 05:08:3 PM Jacqueline Brya t Clerk of the Cou Transaction # 5071 96 IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR
More informationvs. Date: Time: Location:
JOSEPH M. ELIE, ESQ. 1 0 1 Arthur Court 2 Roseville, CA 95661 3 Telephone: (916) 803-4408 Facsimile: (916) 791-4408 4 5 6 7 Arbitrator 8 IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION OF 9 10 II 12 Claimants, ARBITRATION
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO ENTRY
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LOCAL RULES: ENTRY The following local rules are adopted to govern the practice and procedures of this Court, subject
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION In re Engle Progeny Cases Tobacco Litigation Case No. 08-CA-80000 Division D (Trial Division) Pertains
More informationPurpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration
Purpose of Mandatory Fee Arbitration The purpose of the San Gabriel Valley Lawyer Referral Service Mandatory Fee Arbitration Program is to resolve fee disputes between clients and attorneys. Clients and
More informationAward FINRA Dispute Resolution. Claimant Case Number: Karl Austin Pettijohn REPRESENTATION OF PARTIES
Award FINRA Dispute Resolution In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Claimant Case Number: 15-01376 Karl Austin Pettijohn vs. Respondent Robert Berra Hearing Site: Los Angeles, California Nature of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
September 22, 2015: Criminal Trial Scheduling and Discovery IN THE MATTER OF : CRIMINAL TRIAL SCHEDULING : STANDING ORDER AND DISCOVERY : The Court having considered a revised protocol for scheduling in
More informationGUIDE TO ARBITRATION
GUIDE TO ARBITRATION Arbitrators and Mediators Institute of New Zealand Inc. Level 3, Hallenstein House, 276-278 Lambton Quay P O Box 1477, Wellington, New Zealand Tel: 64 4 4999 384 Fax: 64 4 4999 387
More informationJudgment Rendered December
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2007 CA 0657 SAM HAYNES VERSUS ANDREW HUNTER AND COLBY LAYELLE Judgment Rendered December 21 2007 On Appeal from the Twenty
More informationOwner and Contractor OCSS101. Agreement Between: Contract Type: where the basis for Payment is a Stipulated Sum. Document No.
Page 1 of 7 AGREEMENT made as of the in the year of (In words, indicate day, month and year) day of BETWEEN the Owner: Example, and the Contractor: Nielsen Environmental 8484 Wilshire Blvd Suite 720 Beverly
More informationSuperior Court of California County of Orange
Superior Court of California County of Orange HONORABLE PETER J. WILSON DEPARTMENT C15 CLERK: Virginia Harting COURT ATTENDANT: Natalie Castro COURT REPORTER: None Assigned CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER 700 CIVIC
More informationPLANT ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES
PLANT ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES PLANT ASBESTOS SETTLEMENT TRUST ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) PROCEDURES Pursuant to Section 5.10 of the Plant Asbestos
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F LATOYA NESBITT, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT OUACHITA COUNTY MED. CTR., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F309992 LATOYA NESBITT, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT OUACHITA COUNTY MED. CTR., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT RISK MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, TPA RESPONDENT OPINION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Special Action Industrial Commission
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF
More informationARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties
ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter
More informationPART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS
PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NOS. G309211/G JOSE TURCIOS, Employee. TYSON FOODS, INC., Self-Insured Employer
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NOS. G309211/G402139 JOSE TURCIOS, Employee TYSON FOODS, INC., Self-Insured Employer CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Hearing
More informationELECTRONICALLY RECEIVED Superior Court of California, County of Orange. 02/ at 11:58:07 AM
I ELECTRONICALLY RECEIVED Superior Court of California, County of Orange 0/ at ::0 AM Clerk of the Superior Court By Sonya Wilson,Deputy Clerk FILED SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL
More informationJAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures
JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures Effective September 1, 2016 JAMS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION RULES JAMS International and JAMS provide arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationGENERAL ARBITRATION RULES AND PROCEDURES Revised March 15, 2016 Copyright by CDRS 2016 all rights reserved
RESOLUTION SERVICES CONSTRUCTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES, LLC SPECIALIZING IN MEDIATION & ARBITRATION & DISPUTE REVIEW BOARDS PO BOX 8029 Santa Fe, NM 87504 New Mexico: 505-473-7733 Toll Free: 888-930-0011
More informationRULES FOR KAISER PERMANENTE MEMBER ARBITRATIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR
RULES FOR KAISER PERMANENTE MEMBER ARBITRATIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR AMENDED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. GENERAL RULES...1 1. Goal...1 2. Administration
More informationCommercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)
Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes) Rules Amended and Effective October 1, 2013 Fee Schedule Amended and Effective June 1,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT C17 LAW AND MOTION AND TRIAL PROCEDURES JUDGE GLENDA SANDERS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT C17 LAW AND MOTION AND TRIAL PROCEDURES JUDGE GLENDA SANDERS CLERK: DELIA SANCHEZ COURTROOM ATTENDANT: DANIELLE DUNNING REPORTER: DARCI LAKIN COURTROOM
More informationTennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Department of State Division of Publications 312 Rosa L. Parks, 8th Floor Snodgrass/TN Tower Nashville, TN 37243 Phone: 615.741.2650 Fax: 615.741.5133 Email: register.information@tn.gov For Department
More informationFEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE I. APPOINTMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMITTEE
FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE I. APPOINTMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMMITTEE A. This Committee, and its Chair, shall consist of Attorneys who are trained in Mediation, and/or Arbitration,
More informationVA PRESUMPTIONS ARE REBUTTABLE
VA PRESUMPTIONS ARE REBUTTABLE All VA presumptions are rebuttable. For example: VA may rebut presumption of sound condition under 38 U.S.C. 1111 with clear and unmistakable evidence that demonstrates both
More informationBRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES. 1. Upon the filing of a divorce or custody action pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of
BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES Local Rule 51 These rules shall be known as the Bradford County Rules of Civil Procedure and may be cited as Brad.Co.R.C.P. Local Rule 205.2(b) 1. Upon the filing of a
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-00-ben-jlb Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 VIRGINIA DUNCAN, et al., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity
More informationMansfield Independent School District. Sick Leave Bank Guidelines and Procedures
Mansfield Independent School District Sick Leave Bank Guidelines and Procedures Effective November 7, 2012 SECTION I PURPOSE AND DEFINITION The purpose of the Sick Leave Bank is to provide additional paid
More informationIn the Matter of the Arbitration between. Claim One: Violation of Electronic Funds Transfer Act - Unauthorized Transactions
AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION In the Matter of the Arbitration between Case Number: 01-16-0001-1601 Jannah Rasul -vs- UniRush, LLC and MetaBank AWARD OF ARBITRATOR I, Laurel G Yancey, THE UNDERSIGNED
More informationBRIEF OF APPELLEE BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. VS. LARRY B.
BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. A SELF-INSURER APPELLANT VS. LARRY B. HARRIS APPELLEE CAUSE NO. 2012-WC-01975-COA APPEAL FROM ORDER OF WORKERS'
More informationWills and Trusts Arbitration RULES
Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2009 Introduction Standard Arbitration Clause Administrative Fees Wills and Trusts Arbitration Rules 1. Incorporation of These Rules
More informationFiling an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12
ADVISORY LITIGATION PRIVATE EQUITY CONVERGENT Filing an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12 Michael Stegawski michael@cla-law.com 800.750.9861 x101 This memorandum is provided for
More informationbeing preempted by the court's criminal calendar.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF «County» «PlaintiffName», vs. «DefendantName», Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No. «CaseNumber» SCHEDULING
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cr-000-vap Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 JOHN NEIL McNICHOLAS, ESQ. STATE BAR #0 McNicholas Law Office Palos Verdes Blvd., Redondo Beach, CA 0 (0) -00 (0) -- FAX john@mcnicholaslawoffice.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
PO Box 0 Phoenix, AZ 0 0--0 brianw@operation-nation.com In Propria Persona Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 1 1 1, Plaintiff, vs. Maricopa County; Joseph M. Arpaio,
More informationTHE PHI KAPPA TAU FRATERNITY CLAIM AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLAN AND RULES
CLAIM AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLAN AND RULES CLAIM AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION PLAN 1. Purpose and Construction The Plan is designed to provide for the quick, fair, accessible, and inexpensive resolution of
More informationFIRST CIRCUIT VERSUS. Judgment Rendered: APR * * * * * Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellee, Linda Rosenberg-Kennett
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COlJRT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO. 2014 CA 1555 LINDA ROSENBERG-KENNETT VERSUS CITY OF BOGALUSA Judgment Rendered: APR 2 4 2015 * * * * * On Appeal from
More informationWills and Trusts Arbitration RULES
Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES Effective September 15, 2005 Introduction Standard Arbitration Clause Administrative Fees Wills and Trusts Arbitration Rules 1. Incorporation of These Rules into a Will
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G JASON GRIFFIETH, Employee. TYSON FOODS, INC., Self-Insured Employer
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G202773 JASON GRIFFIETH, Employee TYSON FOODS, INC., Self-Insured Employer CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED MAY 20, 2013 Hearing before ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ST. PETERSBURG DISTRICT OFFICE FINAL ORDER
STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS ST. PETERSBURG DISTRICT OFFICE Ralph Velez, Employee/Claimant, vs. City of Zephyrhills, Employer, OJCC Case
More informationDon t worry, be happy. The judge is presumed to disregard any incompetent evidence. John Rubin UNC School of Government February 2011
John Rubin UNC School of Government February 2011 In a TPR case, the DSS attorney asks the judge to take judicial notice of the prior proceedings in the abuse, neglect, and dependency case. The attorney
More informationADR CODE OF PROCEDURE
Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims
More informationRULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS
RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 0800-02-21 MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-02-21-.01 Scope 0800-02-21-.13 Scheduling Hearing 0800-02-21-.02
More information