MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT, as Temporary Administrator )
|
|
- Basil Hutchinson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION â â â X This Document Relates To: MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT, as Temporary Administrator for the Estate of PIETRO MACALUSO, Index No /2015 -against- Plaintiffs-Respondents, A.O.SMITH CORPORATION, et. al., X Defendants, PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT BURNHAM'S MOTION TO ADOPT PLAINTIFF EXPERT TESTIMONY Dear Justice Mendez: A. Expert Pulmonologist Opines That Exposure any Chrysotile Asbestos Product Cannot Cause Mesothelioma, Thus Foreclosing Burnham From Claiming That Such Exposures Substantially Contributed To Plaintiff's Disease Though Plaintiff has always embraced the possibility of exposures to other manufacturer's asbestos-containing products, including gaskets and packing, ultimately, it is burden to prove that such exposures substantially contributed to Plaintiff's disease. Rather than meet that burden, however, Burnham instead made the strategic decision to disclaim any such exposure. To that end, Defendant's expert pulmonologist, Dr. Brian Taylor will give very specific opinions regarding what caused Plaintiff's disease. First, Dr. Taylor will opine that Mr. Macaluso's exposure to asbestos to amphibole asbestos from thermal insulation systems contributed to his mesothelioma, or if no other likely source of amphibole asbestos is identified it was a spontaneous mesothelioma. See Exhibit 1 report of Brian Taylor at page 13.
2 In the case of Thomas McGlynn v. Jenkins Brothers, case before Judge Shulman involving the law firm representing Burnham in this matter, the parties had a similar argument. In that case, however, the defendant only pursued a theory that gaskets and packing could not cause disease and not a sweeping claim that 95% of all commercially used asbestos in the country could not cause disease in foreseeable quantities. The defense expert inmcglyyn, Dr. Stanley Fiel concluded that any exposure to gaskets would not have been sufficient to contribute to his disease: I' Q: So as I've described before when I was at the easel board, the exposure Mr. McGlynn may have had from working on the Burnham valves with chrysotile gasket and packing in them [would] not have the sufficient amount of exposure or dose to give him the disease mesothelioma. [McGlynn transcript. at 1319: :3 available upon request] Despite this admission, at the close of Defendant's case Jenkins sought to include all entities named by Plaintiff, including those entities which, like Jenkins, utilized asbestoscontaining gaskets and packing. The Court, however, after hearing multiple rounds of argument on the issue, ultimately correctly ruled that Jenkins' choice to eliminate the possibility that exposure to asbestos in gaskets and packing could have been a medical cause of Mr. McGlynn's injury ultimately foreclosed Defendant from arguing that such exposure did in fact cause the disease in the alternative, for to do so would have required Jenkins to wholly adopt Plaintiff's experts' conclusions while abandoning its own: THE COURT: I do not believe on this record whatever Dr. Moline said helps [Defendant] although if she had said something to help can' their specific causation that may have been a possibility, but I can't reconcile that with the fact that Doctor [Fiel] has made his categorical announcement in the affirmative to allow this kind of alternative theory. [Id. at 1433:6-13].
3 B. The Court Should Bar Burnham From Offering A Contradictory Theory Of Cansation Which Is Only Supported By Plaintiff's Proofs, And Is Unsupported By Its Own Affirmative Position At Trial While Article 16 would normally permit a defendant to attempt to apportion liability where the proofs would so permit, in the instant case, Burnham prevented any such apportionment against defendants utilizing asbestos-containing gaskets and packing by choosing to take the position that s sole causation witness opines that exposure to chrysotile asbestos could not cause mesothelioma under any circumstances. Further, Burnham has claimed throughout the pendency of this trial that the only asbestos Burnham used in connection with its boiler s was chrysotile asbestos. Therefore, in the instant scenario, an alternative jury instruction allowing the jury to consider evidence discounted by own expert would therefore not only be improper, but indeed entirely unsupported by any authority. party' Indeed, New York courts recognize that a party may not adopt wholly adopt another party's expert in lieu of presenting evidence affirmatively itself. Justice Scarpulla made this exact ruling in a case involving a valve manufacturer which similarly attempted to utilize Plaintiff's expert to prove an element of its case: I am not precluding you from bringing in your own expert testimony about what the state of knowledge was at that time. That's the point of everyone getting their own experts. So you cannot convert the expert into your expert. The plaintiff said what he based his knowledge on, he talked in detail about it; you are free to cross-examine and have been cross-examining him about that information. Anything else is beyond the scope. [available upon request Relevant Excerpts of Thibodeau Trial Tr., Feb. 6, 2014 at 336:11-19 (emphasis added]. Burnham flatly states in their late night motion that "If it's good for the plaintiff, it's good for the defendant." What Burnham ignores in its reasoning that that with the submission of
4 testimony of Dr. Taylor, Burnham is expressly stating that "what is good for the plaintiff (chrysotile causation is NOT good for the defendant. Burnham acknowledges its CPLR 1603 for its burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, its equitable share of the total liability. What Burnham refuses to acknowledge is that, in attempting to prove its equitable share under its chosen theory of the case, it necessarily absolved other similar defendants of liability. Burnham will not point to any authority allowing the type of severely eased burden it would have the Court apply. s argument again primarily relies on Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP v. Global Nuclear Services And Supply, LTD., 280 A.D.2d 360 (1st Dep't Importantly, this case in no way addresses whether a party may bring a wholly alternate theory, contradictory to its main theory. Rather, it simply addresses the evidence a plaintiff may use to meet its burden, which can be gleaned from admissions of an opposing party during cross examination. Specifically, the court in that case conducted a traverse hearing to determine whether the defendant was properly served with a summons. Id at 360. The First Department reversed the IAS court's determination that the plaintiff failed to meet its burden of proving that a summons was properly served on the defendant's place of business because the IAS failed to consider the defendant's own testimony, which was favorable to the plaintiff, establishing the location of his place of business as the same where the summons was served. Id While the First Department emphasized that a plaintiff may rely on any "favorable evidence," regardless of source, to meet its burden, the court does not in any way state that a party may, in the alternative, use evidence contrary to its theory of the case. Id at 361. Indeed, considering burden, which, Ci i«i i 6 i b. i lib\ d
5 not chrysotile, caused Plaintiff's disease, or that Mr. Macaluso's disease was spontaneous and not related to asbestos at all there was no other "favorable" evidence from Plaintiff's case to utilize. 1 In the case of Bigelow v. AC&S, Inc., 196 A.D.2d 436 (1st Dep't 1993, an asbestos personal injury case, the Appellate Division reversed a trial court's ruling of directed verdict against a defendant attempting to prove shares of apportionment. Id at 438. The First Department noted that the jury should have been permitted to consider evidence including inter alia, the plaintiff's own answers to interrogatories listing various companies that also contributed to the plaintiff's asbestos exposure but notably, the defendant, Celotex, did not contest its liability, but merely sought to retry the apportionment phase of the trial. Id at 437. This is in stark contrast to the instant case, where Burnham is taking the affirmative position at trial that neither it nor any other defendant utilizing chrysotile asbestos could have caused Plaintiff's disease. This is not an instance where (as in Bigelow Burnham would not permitted to utilize all evidence to support its burden. Burnham has defined its own theory of the case and proceeded accordingly. Plaintiff's contrasting evidence in no way aids theory of its case, and Burnham should not be permitted to launch a fallback theory unsupported by any of its own witnesses or evidence simply because the jury rejected its defense on specific causation. Burnham additionally relies on Lippel v. The City of New York, 281 A.D.2d 327 (1st Dep't 2001, a case addressing whether a plaintiff may call an opposing party's witness in the plaintiff's case in chief when that witness's testimony supports the plaintiffs case. As the Court (and Burnham is aware, it is common practice to call defendants' witnesses at trial, most commonly in 1 Indeed, s causation expert will testify that that exposure to any chrysotile product is LESS likely to cause mesothelioma, due to the difference in potency between chrysotile and other fiber types, s current argument might have some validity since a rational jury could conclude that if one defendant's insulation, gaskets and packing contributed to Plaintiff's disease, then so too did others'. Burnham will not elicit this testimony, however, and instead advanced a theory that no exposure to chrysotile could cause mesothelioma,
6 the form of defendant's corporate representatives. See McDermott v. Manhattan Eye, Ear and (" Throat Hosp., 15 N.Y.2d 20, 26 (1964 ("It has long been recognized in this State that a party in a civil suit may be called as a witness by his adversary and, as a general proposition, questioned as to matters relevant to the issues in dispute.". This allowance is a far cry from attempt to retroactively bootstrap Plaintiff's experts' testimony as an "alternative" to affirmative proposition that chrysotile asbestos could not have caused Mr. Macaluso's mesothelioma. The issue is not whether Plaintiff was on notice of questioning of his experts, it is on the manner of use of these experts' testimonies when they stand in stark contrast to every theory that will be put forth by Burnham in its case in chief. The remaining cases Burnham relies on are similarly inapposite, and in no way stand for the proposition that another party's evidence may be considered to support a theory not O' affirmatively advanced in a party's case in chief. See Keeton v. Cardinal O'Hara High School, 233 A.D.2d 839, 840 (4th Dep't 1996 (When determining whether the plaintiff had met its burden of proving that a defendant had actual or constructive notice that its sidewalk was icy, evidence consistent with this theory presented by defendants may also be considered; Nat'l BankofN Am. V Systems Home Improvement, 69 A.D.2d 557 (2d Dep't 1979 (In a foreclosure action, where the plaintiff had the burden of establishing the fair market value of the property, defendant's expert's testimony supported plaintiff's burden, and thus should have been considered. it' Burnham is nakedly attempting to have it ALL ways. The "if it's good for the Plaintiff, it's good for the defendant" rule and argument only makes sense when the defendant does not expressly try to prove that theories of causation espoused by the Plaintiff are decidedly false. For the defendant to be allowed to later try to turn around and adopt Plaintiff's theory of causation alternative" should their initial defense fail is to invite a long line of "in the arguments not
7 supported by their own. "Throw it all on the wall and see what sticks" is not a fair or viable legal defense, and one not permitted in any efficient and just courtroom. Lastly, as Plaintiff made crystal clear during his direct examination of Dr. Markowitz on March 5, 2018, all causation opinions proffered were specifically to Burnham, Peerless, and A.O. Smith alone. In setting up the causation hypotheticals, plaintiff stated, Now, Doctor, the plaintiff's burden, why I'm calling you, is regarding Mr. Macaluso's exposure to Burnham, A.O. Smith and Peerless boilers; and I am expressly not going to ask you about his exposures to other asbestos-containing products, despite the fact that plaintiff admits he was indeed exposed to other asbestos-containing materials in his life. Okay? (see trial transcript p. 649:11-17 Today, in cross examination, it is anticipated that defendants will endeavor to illicit further causation opinions on other products to meet their article 16 burden. Such questions will be expressly outside the scope of direct examination and should be precluded. Respectfully Submitted, 7 Simmons Hanly Conroy Daniel P. Blouin James Kramer
SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERIMENTS" OPINIONS AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF "FIBER RELEASE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------X IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION --------------------------------------------------------------------------X This Document
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/04/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 424 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/04/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X Index No.: 190311/2015 IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION : NYCAL
More informationMARY MURPHY-CLAGETT, AS : DECOTIIS IN OPPOSITION TO
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : INDEX NO.: 190311/2015 ASBESTOS LITIGATION : : This Document Relates To: : : AFFIRMATION OF LEIGH A MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT,
More informationSIMMONS HANLY CONROY 51MMONSFIRM.COM A NATIONAL LAW FIRM (800) February 20, 2018 BACKGROUND
SIMMONS HANLY CONROY 51MMONSFIRM.COM A NATIONAL LAW FIRM (800) 479-9533 From the desk offames M. framer February 20, 2018 Via NYSCEF & Hand Delivery Hon. Manuel J. Mendez New York City Civil Court, New
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 245 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY Index No.: 40000/1988 ASBESTOS LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: KELLY O' O'CONNOR, Personal Representative of the Estate
More information: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANT FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S OMNIBUS MOTION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO GASPAR HERNANDEZ-VEGA Plaintiff, -against- AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP., et al.,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/17/ :28 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/17/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY Index Number : 105671/1999 PART STRAUCH, NELSON A. JR. VS A.C. 8 S. INDEX NO. Sequence Number : 001 MOTION DATE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION SEQ. NO. The
More informationState of New York Court of Appeals
State of New York Court of Appeals MEMORANDUM This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 123 In the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation.
More informationMatter of Macaluso 2017 NY Slip Op 31095(U) May 17, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted
Matter of Macaluso 2017 NY Slip Op 31095( May 17, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190245/15 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/25/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 355 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/25/2018
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT LEWIS COUNTY COURTHOUSE 7660 North State Street Lowville, New York 13367-1396 HON. CHARLES C. MERRELL e (3W 3%-5366 Far (315) 266-U75 DEBORAH W. EARL Supreme Court Justice
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/12/ :16 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 320 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/12/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK N RE: NEW YORK COUNTY ',NYCAL ASBESTOS LTGATON,.A.S. Part 46 ' (Mendez, J.) This Document Relates to: ndex No. 190311/2015 MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT,
More informationBACKGROUND SIMMONS HANLY CONROY 5IMMONSFIRM.COM. A NATIONAL LAW FIRM (800) Room 210 New York, NY From the desk of James M.
SIMMONS HANLY CONROY 5IMMONSFIRM.COM. A NATIONAL LAW FIRM (800) 479-9533 From the desk of James M. Kramer March 30, 2018 Justice Manuel Mendez 71 Thomas Street Room 210 New York, NY 10013 Re: Mary Murphy-Claggett
More informationLowe v AERCO Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 30391(U) February 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /04 Judge: Sherry Klein
Lowe v AERCO Intl., Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 30391(U) February 20, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 110194/04 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationHackshaw v ABB, Inc NY Slip Op 30043(U) January 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Cynthia S.
Hackshaw v ABB, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 30043(U) January 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190022/13 Judge: Cynthia S. Kern Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationBattistoni v AERCO Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 32552(U) December 21, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Peter H.
Battistoni v AERCO Intl., Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 32552(U) December 21, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190103/2015 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationBANKRUPTCY TRUST TRANSPARENCY: GARLOCK DECISION
CLM 2016 SOUTHWEST CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 3-4, 2016 IN DALLAS, TEXAS BANKRUPTCY TRUST TRANSPARENCY: GARLOCK DECISION I. Historical Perspective. A. Johns-Manville, Bankruptcies, and Garlock. In 1982 the Reagan
More informationEckert SeamansCherin & Mellott, LLC 'IEL Mulberry Street FAX Newark, New Jersey 07102
NNENs ATTORNEYS AT LAW Eckert SeamansCherin & Mellott, LLC 'IEL 973-855-4715 100 Mulberry Street FAX 973-855-4701 Newark, New Jersey 07102 www.eckertseamans.com April 3, 2018 The Honorable Manuel Mendez,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 299 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION LA.S. Part 13 This Document Relates To: (Hon. Manuel J. Mendez) KELLY CONNOR, Personal Representative
More informationRau v Aerco Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 32368(U) September 4, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein
Rau v Aerco Intl., Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 32368(U) September 4, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190414/12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More information2016 WL (N.Y.Sup.) (Trial Order) Supreme Court, New York. New York County
2016 WL 3802961 (N.Y.Sup.) (Trial Order) Supreme Court, New York. New York County In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. Walter MILLER, Plaintiff, V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, et al., Defendants. No. 190087/2014.
More informationMatter of New York City Asbestos Litig NY Slip Op 32705(U) October 8, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge:
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. 2014 NY Slip Op 32705(U) October 8, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190278/13 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFebruary 27, Plaintiff s motions in limine in the above-captioned matter on behalf of A.O. Smith Water Products
ATTORNEYS AT LAW SN Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 1EL 973 855 4700 Four Gateway Center FAX 973 855 4701 100 Mulberry Street, Suite 401 www.eckertseamans.com Newark, NJ 07102 February 27, 2018 Misha
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/23/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 121 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL I.A.S. Part 13 (Mendez, M.) MARIO PICCOLINO and ARCANGELA Index No. 190186/2016 PICCOLINO, Plaintiffs,
More informationMatter of New York City Asbestos Litig NY Slip Op 30005(U) January 4, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Peter
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. 2017 NY Slip Op 30005(U) January 4, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190034/15 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationASBESTOS LITIGATION ALERT
A. PARTIES FILE RESPONSES TO AMICI BRIEFS IN CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT COMPONENT PARTS DISPUTE O Neil, et al., v. Crane Co., et al.,, No. S177401, petition filed (Calif. Sup. Ct. Sept. 18, 2009) In a dispute
More informationHoward V. A.W. Chesterton: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reminds Us That They Meant What They Said On Toxic Tort Causation by Eric K.
4/25/14 - Volume 17, Issue 1 - April 2014 Howard V. A.W. Chesterton: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reminds Us That They Meant What They Said On Toxic Tort Causation by Eric K. Falk "I meant what I said,
More informationCase No. 11-cv CRB ORDER DENYING FOSTER WHEELER S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-0-crb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 GERALDINE HILT, as Wrongful Death Heir, and as Successor-in-Interest to ROBERT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Case No.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,, et al. Plaintiff Defendants Case No. NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER 1 The Pretrial Conference in the above captioned matter
More informationBova v A.O. Smith Water Products Co NY Slip Op 33139(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /03 Judge: Sherry Klein
Bova v A.O. Smith Water Products Co. 2013 NY Slip Op 33139(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 102148/03 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationSchwartz v Advance Auto Supply 2019 NY Slip Op 30090(U) January 9, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Manuel J.
Schartz v Advance Auto Supply 219 NY Slip Op 39( January 9, 219 Supreme Court, Ne York County Docket Number: 19316/217 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted ith a "3" identifier, i.e., 213 NY Slip Op 31(,
More informationMEMORANDUM OF LAW OF A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NYCAL ASBESTOS LITIGATION.. Index No.: 190311/2015 This Document Relates To: I.A.S. Part 13 MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT as Temporary Hon. Manuel
More informationFebruary 21, Re: Ivette Montanez, et al. v. American Honda Motor Co., et al.; Index No
600 Lexington Avenue 8 th Floor New York, NY 10022 P: 212.897.9655 F: 646.589.8700 hptylaw.com ATTORNEYS AT LAW Atlanta Austin Charleston Dallas Los Angeles New York St. Louis San Francisco Honorable Cynthia
More informationSri McCam ri Q. August 16, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING AND OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
Sri McCam ri Q ae ga I Se 9 al McCambrid J e Sin g er &Mahone Y V Illinois I Michigan I Missouri I New Jersey I New York I Pennsylvania I 'Texas www.smsm.com Jennifer L. Budner Direct (212) 651.7415 jbudnernsmsm.com
More informationKelly v Airco Welders Supply 2013 NY Slip Op 32395(U) October 7, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /08 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler
Kelly v Airco Welders Supply 2013 NY Slip Op 32395(U) October 7, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 105643/08 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationHammer v Algoma Hardwoods, Inc NY Slip Op 31993(U) July 28, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases
Hammer v Algoma Hardwoods, Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 31993(U) July 28, 2014 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 190363/12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN & DEUTSCH, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 THIRD AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y Luc:
AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN & DEUTSCH, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 THIRD AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10016 212 593-6700 Luc: 212 593-6970 Via E-Filing, Regular Mail, and Hand Delivery Hon. Barbara Jaffe, J.S.C.
More informationShulman v Brenntag N. Am., Inc NY Slip Op 30089(U) January 9, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Manuel J.
Shulman v Brenntag N. Am., Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 30089(U) January 9, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190025/2017 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationMcCloskey v A.O. Smith Water Prods NY Slip Op 32326(U) August 29, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Barbara
McCloskey v A.O. Smith Water Prods. 2014 NY Slip Op 32326(U) August 29, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190441/12 Judge: Barbara Jaffe Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/06/16 Page 1 of 59 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-05913 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/06/16 Page 1 of 59 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN CRANE INC., v. Plaintiff, Case
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/11/2017 06:40 PM INDEX NO. 190088/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/11/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION ) ) ALLEN T. and TOMMIE ) HOOFMAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N12C-04-243 ASB ) AIR & LIQUID
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 7/8/14 Modified and Certified for Publication 7/21/14 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ROSE MARIE GANOE et al., Plaintiffs
More informationTRIAL MOTIONS and MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Civil Perspective
TRIAL MOTIONS and MOTIONS IN LIMINE Civil Perspective Article 44 Trial Motions CPLR 4401 Motion for Judgment During Trial (a/k/a Judgment as a matter of law ) Any party may move for judgment with respect
More informationREPORT OF CONFERENCE COMMITTEE
REPORT OF CONFERENCE COMMITTEE MR. SPEAKER AND MR. PRESIDENT: We, the undersigned conferees, have had under consideration the amendments to the following entitled BILL: H. B. No. 1426: Asbestos Transparency
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ANDREW V. KOCHERA, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS vs. Case No. 14-0029-SMY-SCW GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This
More informationZachman v A.C. and S., Inc NY Slip Op 33617(U) November 25, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /89 Judge: Sherry Klein
Zachman v A.C. and S., Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 33617(U) November 25, 2014 Supreme Court, Ne York County Docket Number: 013282/89 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted ith a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/20/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/20/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ----------------------------------------------------------------------X X Index No.: 514015/2016 MARIA MORALES, Plaintiff, -against- AFFIRMATION IN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
FUOCO v. 3M CORPORATION et al Doc. 96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY J OSEPHINE E. FUOCO, individually : Hon. J oseph H. Rodriguez and As Executrix of the Estate of J oseph R. Fuoco,
More informationCase 3:12-cv DJH-DW Document 207 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 6848
Case 3:12-cv-00724-DJH-DW Document 207 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 6848 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CAROL LEE STALLINGS, Individually and as
More informationNo GIOVANNA SETTIMI CARAFFA, as personal representative of the Estate of BENEDETTO EMANUELLE CARAFFA, Petitioner, v.
No. 16-1074 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States GIOVANNA SETTIMI CARAFFA, as personal representative of the Estate of BENEDETTO EMANUELLE CARAFFA, Petitioner, v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION, Respondent.
More informationMatter of New York City Asbestos Litig NY Slip Op 30530(U) April 10, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2014 Judge:
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. 2015 NY Slip Op 30530(U) April 10, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190033/2014 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationGonzalez v Schlau 2011 NY Slip Op 31048(U) April 12, 2011 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 8960/2009 Judge: Robert J. McDonald Republished
Gonzalez v Schlau 2011 NY Slip Op 31048(U) April 12, 2011 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 8960/2009 Judge: Robert J. McDonald Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationTobin v Aerco Intl NY Slip Op 32916(U) November 13, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler
Tobin v Aerco Intl. 2013 NY Slip Op 32916(U) November 13, 2013 Supreme Court, Ne York County Docket Number: 190337/12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted ith a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationSupreme Court Evaluates Consumer Expectations Test in Strict Liability Claims
Supreme Court Evaluates Consumer Expectations Test in Strict Liability Claims Armando G. Hernandez, Daily Business Review November 16, 2015 In one of the most highly anticipated opinions in recent memory
More informationBardone v AO Smith Water Prods. Co NY Slip Op 30914(U) May 14, 2015 Supreme Court, State of New York Docket Number: /2014 Judge: Peter H.
Bardone v AO Smith Water Prods. Co. 2015 NY Slip Op 30914(U) May 14, 2015 Supreme Court, State of New York Docket Number: 190134/2014 Judge: Peter H. Moulton Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/29/ :41 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 411 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/29/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X SHANYN WOLF, Individually, and as Special : Administrator of the Estate of RANDY
More information2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20
2:16-cv-02222-EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20 E-FILED Friday, 18 May, 2018 03:51:00 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD Members of the jury, you have seen and heard all the evidence and will hear the arguments
More informationHammer v Algoma 2013 NY Slip Op 31801(U) July 29, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from
Hammer v Algoma 2013 NY Slip Op 31801(U) July 29, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 190363/12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Krik v. Crane Co., et al Doc. 314 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CHARLES KRIK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 10-cv-7435 v. ) ) Judge John Z. Lee
More informationHooper-Lynch v Colgate-Palmolive Co NY Slip Op 33116(U) December 4, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge:
Hooper-Lynch v Colgate-Palmolive Co. 2018 NY Slip Op 33116(U) December 4, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190328/2015 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-btm-bgs Document 0 Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 GAIL ELIZABETH WALASHEK, Individually and as successor-ininterest to THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL
More informationMaryland tort lawyers may need to re-think their understanding of
4 Maryland Bar Journal September 2014 The Evolution of Pro Rata Contribution and Apportionment Among Joint Tort-Feasors By M. Natalie McSherry Maryland tort lawyers may need to re-think their understanding
More informationParra v Trinity Church Corp NY Slip Op 34122(U) June 13, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /08 Judge: Doris Ling-Cohan Cases
Parra v Trinity Church Corp. 2011 NY Slip Op 34122(U) June 13, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 114956/08 Judge: Doris Ling-Cohan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationCase 2:13-cv DDP-VBK Document 864 Filed 08/01/16 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:36038 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-ddp-vbk Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #:0 O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 VICTORIA LUND, individually and as successor-in-interest to WILLIAM LUND, deceased;
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BEVERLY AHNERT Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of Daniel Ahnert, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 13-C-1456 EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationFILED: ONTARIO COUNTY CLERK 08/03/ :17 PM INDEX NO NYSCEF DOC. NO. 258 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/03/2018
FILED: ONTARIO COUNTY CLERK 08/03/2018 03:17 PM INDEX NO. 116247-2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 258 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/03/2018 201808030266 Index # : 116247-2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /
STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION PLAINTIFF NAME v. DEFENDANT NAME Case No. Hon. Richard N. LaFlamme / PLAINTIFF S COUNSEL NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE AND
More informationClarification Questions and Answers
Clarification Questions and Answers For purposes of this competition, the answer to any clarification question shall be treated as a stipulation during the trial. The competitors are bound by the answers
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 442 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X NYCAL IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S Part 13 -----------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFeinstein v Armstrong Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 31800(U) July 29, 2013 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler
Feinstein v Armstrong Intl., Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 31800(U) July 29, 2013 Sup Ct, Ne York County Docket Number: 190195/12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from Ne York State Unified Court System's
More informationLawson v R&L Carriers, Inc NY Slip Op 33581(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 1207/11 Judge: Augustus C.
Lawson v R&L Carriers, Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 33581(U) November 8, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 1207/11 Judge: Augustus C. Agate Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division. Chapter 11
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division IN RE: GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC, et al. 1 Debtors. Case No. 10-31607 Chapter 11 Jointly Administered
More informationJUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES
JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES SUPREME COURT COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND GENERAL IAS PART COURTROOM 242 60 CENTRE STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 PHONE: 646-386-3265 FAX: 212-374-0452 Law
More informationDistrict Court of Appeal For the Fourth District State of Florida
E-Copy Received Aug 25, 2014 2:07 PM District Court of Appeal For the Fourth District State of Florida DCA Case No. 4D13-4351 Circuit Court No. 12-25722 CA-27 Crane Co., Defendant-Appellant, v. Richard
More informationCase 2:17-cv JFW-SS Document 104 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:1392 CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case 2:17-cv-02227-JFW-SS Document 104 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:1392 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL Case No. CV 17-2227-JFW(SSx) Date:
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --.-------------------------------X â EDDIE M. AMARANTE TIBURCIO, Plaintiff, Index No: 161083/2015 Affirmation in Opposition THE CORINTHIAN CONDOMINIUM,
More informationLEXSEE 233 ILL.2D 416. SALLY NOLAN, as Executrix of the Estate of Clarence Nolan, Appellee v. WEIL-McLAIN, Appellant. Docket No.
Page 1 LEXSEE 233 ILL.2D 416 SALLY NOLAN, as Executrix of the Estate of Clarence Nolan, Appellee v. WEIL-McLAIN, Appellant. Docket No. 103137 SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS 233 Ill. 2d 416; 910 N.E.2d 549;
More information* * * * * * * COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS/EDWARD A. ALBERES, ET AL.
EDWARD ANTHONY ALBERES, ET AL. VERSUS ANCO INSULATIONS, INC., ET AL. * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2013-CA-1549 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH
More informationSchoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al Doc. 553
Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al Doc. 553 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X ADRIAN SCHOOLCRAFT,
More informationNauheimer v Union Carbide Corp NY Slip Op 33220(U) December 13, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /17 Judge: Manuel J.
Nauheimer v Union Carbide Corp. 2018 NY Slip Op 33220(U) December 13, 2018 Supreme Court, Ne York County Docket Number: 190098/17 Judge: Manuel J. Mdez Cases posted ith a "30000" idtifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationMoore v Asbeka Indus. of N.Y NY Slip Op 33522(U) December 21, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Sherry Klein
Moore v Asbeka Indus. of N.Y. 2010 NY Slip Op 33522(U) December 21, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190144/09 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationThe Law Offs. of Ira L. Slade, P.C. v Singer 2018 NY Slip Op 33179(U) December 10, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018
The Law Offs. of Ira L. Slade, P.C. v Singer 2018 NY Slip Op 33179(U) December 10, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650874/2018 Judge: Arthur F. Engoron Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationMichael J. Hutter, for appellant. John Ned Lipsitz, for respondent. In this multi-defendant action, Supreme Court erred in
================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationFeinstein v Armstrong Intl., Inc NY Slip Op 33478(U) December 24, 2013 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Judge: Sherry
Feinstein v Armstrong Intl., Inc. 2013 NY Slip Op 33478(U) December 24, 2013 Supreme Court, Ne York County Docket Number: 190195/12 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Cases posted ith a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION : 112010JR TRIAL GROUP : Limited to: : : HENDERSON, BRUCE : C.A. No. 09C-07-188 ASB HENDERSON, ELIZABETH
More informationSkelly v A.C.&S., Inc NY Slip Op 31527(U) June 7, 2011 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /01 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from
Skelly v A.C.&S., Inc. 2011 NY Slip Op 31527(U) June 7, 2011 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 107095/01 Judge: Sherry Klein Heitler Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service.
More informationASBESTOS LITIGATION ALERT
A. STUDY PREDICTS NEARLY 30,000 NEW ASBESTOS CLAIMS WILL BE FILED OVER NEXT THIRTY-FIVE TO FIFTY YEARS A study by TowersWatson, a risk and financial management consulting company, finds that close to thirty
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION NATHANIAL HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. DEERE & CO., et al., Defendants. C.A. No. N14C-03-220 ASB May 10, 2017 Upon Defendant Deere & Company
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO : : CASE # PLAINTIFF VS. : CIVIL PRE-TRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIAL) DEFENDANT IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT AS FOLLOWS: 1. JURY TRIAL: The case is scheduled for a Primary
More informationGrace v Metropolitan Tr. Auth NY Slip Op 33240(U) December 14, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Robert D.
Grace v Metropolitan Tr. Auth. 2018 NY Slip Op 33240(U) December 14, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150049/2017 Judge: Robert D. Kalish Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationMatter of Johnson v A.O. Smith Water Prods NY Slip Op 32698(U) October 19, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012
Matter of Johnson v A.O. Smith Water Prods. 2018 NY Slip Op 32698(U) October 19, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 190454/2012 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/06/ :22 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/06/2016
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/06/2016 05:22 PM INDEX NO. 700847/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/06/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS ----------------------------------------x
More informationDepartment 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.
Location: Stanley Mosk Courthouse Department: 16 (213) 633-0516 Motions in Department 16 Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.
More informationTrial Motions. Motions in Limine. Civil Perspective
Trial Motions and Motions in Limine from the Civil Perspective New York State Bar Association Young Lawyers Section Trial Academy 2016 Cornell Law School - Ithaca, New York Presented by: Michael P. O Brien
More informationA Duty To Warn For The Other Manufacturer's Product?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com A Duty To Warn For The Other Manufacturer's Product?
More informationBorja v Moshouris 2007 NY Slip Op 32534(U) August 8, 2007 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /2006 Judge: Patricia P.
Borja v Moshouris 2007 NY Slip Op 32534(U) August 8, 2007 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 0006736/2006 Judge: Patricia P. Satterfield Republished from New York State Unified Court System's
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT NIAGARA INDUSTRIES, INC. and RHEEM SALES COMPANY, Petitioners, v. GIAQUINTO ELECTRIC LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, GUARDIAN
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 20, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D18-792 Lower Tribunal No. 17-13703 Highland Stucco
More informationAt IAS Part of the Supreme Court of. County of Kings at the courthouse located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York , on the day 2018.
At IAS Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Kings at the courthouse located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York 10007, on the day 2018. of, PRESENT: HON.
More informationMantilla v Bartyzel 2016 NY Slip Op 30649(U) April 15, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Janice A.
Mantilla v Bartyzel 2016 NY Slip Op 30649(U) April 15, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 702046/13 Judge: Janice A. Taylor Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More information