Why Can t We Be Friends: Top Ten Ways To Be Affirmed or Reversed
|
|
- Brooke Preston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2013 Spring Judges Meeting Thursday, April 11, :30 pm Why Can t We Be Friends: Top Ten Ways To Be Affirmed or Reversed I. Default Judgments A. The statutes Hon. D. Milton Moore, III Court of Appeal, Second Circuit mmoore@la2nd.org 1. La. C.C.P. art Judgment by default (the preliminary default). 2. La. C.C.P. art Confirmation of default judgment. Proof of the demand sufficient to establish a prima facie case. a. Conventional obligation. b. Delictual obligation. c. Sum due on open account promissory note or other negotiable instrument. d. Discretion of trial court to require a hearing; clerk s certification. 1 e. Personal injury demands sworn narratives of treating physician or dentist in lieu of live testimony. f. Proceedings under La. C.C. art. 103(1). 3. La. C.C.P. art Confirmation of default without hearing in open court. Minimum requirements, certifications. 1 See Rule 9.1 of Uniform Rules of District Courts which eliminated necessity of filing clerk of court s certification. The rule now provides that by moving for preliminary default, the attorney is certifying to the court that defendant has been properly served and failed to answer within prescribed time period. 1
2 B. 4. La. C.C.P. art Scope of judgment. 5. La. C.C.P. art Confirmation of default judgment and suits against the state or a political subdivision. 6. La. C.E. art A(1): Except as otherwise provided by legislation, the provisions of this code shall be applicable to the determination of questions of fact in all contradictory judicial proceedings and in proceedings to confirm a default. Seminal La. Supreme Court Cases 1. Kem Search, Inc. v. Sheffield, 434 So. 2d 1067 (La. 1983). 2. Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp., 616 So. 2d 1254 (La. 1993). 3. Power Marketing Direct, Inc. v. Foster, (La. 9/6/06), 938 So. 2d Arias v. Stolthaven New Orleans, LLC, (La. 5/5/09), 9 So. 3d 815. C. The Essential Principles Confirmation of a default judgment requires proof of the demands deficient to establish a prima facie case. La. C.C.P. art. 1702A; Power Marketing Direct, supra at 670. Frank L. Maraist & Harry T. Lemmon, 1 La. Civil Law Treatise: Civil Procedure, 12.3 at 326(2). A prima facie case is established when the plaintiff proves the essential allegations of the petition, with competent evidence, to the same extent as if the allegations had been specifically denied. Sessions & Fishman, supra at 1258; Power Marketing Direct, supra at 670; Maraist & Lemmon, supra, 12.3 at The plaintiff must present competent evidence that convinces the court that it is probable that he would prevail at trial on the merits. Id. A plaintiff seeking to confirm a default must prove both the existence and the validity of his claim. Arias, supra at
3 A default judgment cannot be different in kind from what is demanded in the petition and the amount of damages must be proven to be properly due. La. C.C. art. 1703; Arias, supra at 820. At the hearing on confirmation of default, the provisions of the Code of Evidence generally apply. La. C.E. art A(1); Maraist, supra at The plaintiff must follow the rules of evidence even though there is no opponent. Arias, supra at 820. Because at a default confirmation there is no objecting party, to prevent reversal on appeal, both the plaintiff and the trial judge should be vigilant to assure that the judgment rests on admissible evidence that establishes the prima facie case. Arias, supra at 820, citing George W. Pugh, et al., Handbook on La. Evidence Law, 677 (2007). Inadmissible evidence, except as specifically provided by law, may not support a default judgment even though it was objective because the defendant was not present. Arias, supra at 820, Frank L. Maraist, 19 Civil Law Treatise: Evidence & Proof, 1.1 at 5 (2 ed. 2007). There is a presumption that a default judgment is supported by sufficient evidence, but this presumption may be rebutted by the record upon which the judgment is rendered. Arias, supra at 820; Ascension Builders, Inc. v. Jumonville, 262 La. 519, 527, 263 So. 2d 875, 878 (1972). D. A Sampling of Appellate Jurisprudence 1. Default judgments reversed on appeal. Goldfinch v. United Cabs, Inc., (La. App. 4 Cir. 5/13/09), 13 So. 3d Personal injury default judgment award reversed for failure to present a prima facie case. An unsworn doctor s report was inadmissible, incompetent evidence and could not serve as a basis for finding surgery caused by a taxi cab incident was medically necessary. 3
4 Duckworth Properties, LLC v. Williams, (La. 4 Cir. 11/24/10), 52 So. 3d 287. The fourth circuit annulled a default judgment rendered in city court because of pendency of the defendant s suit against the plaintiff in district court, finding that enforcement of default judgment would be unconscionable and inequitable. Moore Finance v. Ebarb, 46,392 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/18/11), 70 So. 3d 856. The creditor failed to present evidence showing the right to demand immediate payment of unpaid balance on promissory note, when neither suit record nor promissory note contained affidavit or other competent support showing that the maker failed to pay the debt. Keller v. Keller, (La. App. 1 Cir. 12/21/11), 87 So. 3d 783, writ denied, (La. 3/30/12), 85 So. 3d 119. Default judgment was vacated as absolute nullity because district judge who caused it to be entered had previously recused herself from the case. La. C.C.P. art (judgment of preliminary default). Williams v. Smith, 45,069, (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/28/10), 37 So. 3d 1133, writ denied, (La. 10/1/10), 45 So. 3d Default judgment in personal injury matter was vacated for lack of competent evidence to support showing of prima facie case of negligence. Mount v. Hand Innovations, LLC, (La. App. 5 Cir. 11/27/12), 105 So. 3d 940. In personal injury case, the only medical evidence offered by plaintiff was his own testimony and certified copies of operative notes of surgical procedures; this was insufficient to make out a prima facie case. C.C.P. art D requires some type of sworn statement of treating physician, either testimony or a sworn narrative report such as an affidavit. First Bank & Trust v. Bayou Land & Marine, (La. App. 5 Cir. 10/30/12), 103 So. 3d Default judgment against personal guarantor of promissory note was vacated where guarantor had filed a motion for extension of time to file answer to petition; bank should have sent guarantor notice of date of entry of 4
5 II. preliminary judgment of default per La. C.C.P. art A. Cameron v. Roberts, 47,789 (La. App. 2 Cir. 2/27/13), 2013 WL Default judgment in suit for negligence and breach of contract against timber consultant was reversed, where much of plaintiff s case consisted of leading questions and inadmissible hearsay evidence. 2. Default judgments affirmed on appeal. Youngblood v. Southern Air, Inc., 46,183 (La. App. 2 Cir. 3/2/11), 58 So. 3d In a suit claiming defective installation of an air conditioning unit in the plaintiff s home, default judgment against the vendor installer affirmed, the court holding that the obligation was a verbal contract of the vendor as skill and installation rather than a delictual obligation, which would have required additional oral testimony per C.C.P. art B(2). Pollock v. Talco Midstream Assets, Ltd., 46,302 (La. App. 2 Cir. 5/18/11), 70 So. 3d 835, writ denied, (La. 9/23/11), 69 So. 3d Default judgment in property damage case was affirmed even though counsel for plaintiff had agreed earlier not to take adverse action without prior written notice. Counsel for plaintiff instructed officer of the defendant company to file an answer at this time but none was ever filed. River Parish Contractors, Inc. v. Savoie, (La. App. 5 Cir. 9/11/12), 101 So. 3d 495. An interesting case where appellate court affirmed the grant of a writ of mandamus to require individual officer of a corporation to take necessary steps to correct error in name and ownership of Tiger Stadium suite from individual s name to corporation s name. This helpful opinion details the extensive testimony presented by plaintiff at the hearing to confirm the default. Reasons for Judgment A. Statutes 1. La. C.C.P. art Findings of the court and reasons for judgment. 2. La. C.C.P. art Form of final judgment, with 5
6 B. Cases requirement of separate judgment from written reasons/ opinion. 1. Graham v. St. Charles General Hosp., 559 So. 2d 979 (La. App. 4 Cir. 1990). 2. Custom-Bilt Cabinet & Supply, Inc. v. Quality Built Cabinets, Inc., 31,441 (La. App. 2 Cir. 12/8/99), 748 So. 2d 594 (La. 1999). 3. Brocato v. Brocato (La. App. 1 Cir.), 369 So. 2d 1083, writ denied, 371 So. 2d 1341 (1979). 4. La. Dept. of Agriculture and Forestry v. Harper, 45,598 (La. App. 2 Cir. 12/19/07), 973 So. 2d M. Tahir Qayyum, M.D. v. Morehouse Parish Hosp. Serv. Dist., 47,324 (La. App. 2 Cir. 8/15/12), 104 So. 3d 505, writ denied, (La. 1/11/13), 106 So. 3d 554. C. Important Principles 1. The court must give in writing its findings of fact and reasons for judgment when requested to do so in writing by a party. The article applies to all appealable contested cases other than those tried by a jury. The request must be made not later than 10 days after mailing of notice of judgment. 2. The remedy when a trial judge fails to comply with mandatory duty under Art is to file for a supervisory writ of review to the appellate court or to file a motion with the appellate court for remand to trial court for preparation of written reasons. It is not proper to urge as an assignment of error on direct appeal. 3. Appeals are taken from a judgment, not from the written reasons for judgment. While the reasons define the principles on which the court is deciding a case, form no part of the official judgment signed. Similarly, the trial judge s written reasons are not binding and not appealable; rather, only the judgment itself has judicial effect and is subject to appeal. 6
7 4. When written reasons for the judgment are assigned, they shall be set out in an opinion separate from the judgment. 2 2 In Qayyum, supra, this court considered and rejected a certain kind of shortcut used by the district court: We note the peculiar judgment forms used by the trial court in this case, which consisted of pre-made forms on which details for a suit could then be listed in blank spaces. Several of these rulings and orders contained very brief written reasons for judgment. La. C.C.P. art provides that: A final judgment shall be identified as such by appropriate language. When written reasons for judgment are signed, they should be set out in an opinion separate from the judgment. The Supreme Court of Louisiana has held that the language contained in La. C.C.P. art. 1918, in connection with La. C.C.P. art. 5051, is precatory and, as such, does not render an otherwise complete and valid judgment invalid except for the inclusion of the reasons. Hinchman v. Int l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local Union # 130, 292 So. 2d 717 (La.1974); see also Martin v. JKD Investments, LLC, 42,196 (La. App. 2d Cir. 06/20/07), 961 So.2d 575. However, this should not be used by courts as an excuse to ignore the directive that a judgment must be definite, precise and certain as well as separate from written reasons for judgment. La. C.C.P. art. 1918; see also Security Nat. Partners, Limited P ship v. Baxley, 37,747 (La. App.2d Cir. 10/29/03), 859 So. 2d 890; Simon v. Hulse, 12 La. App. 450, 124 So. 845 (La. App. 1st Cir.1929). Rather than enhancing judicial efficiency, form judgments, such as those employed in the case sub judice, though convenient, often serve to merely increase confusion for litigants and reviewing courts alike. District courts should avoid this appealable issue entirely by fully complying with La. C.C.P. art
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 18-167 MATTHEW A. HILLMAN VERSUS COREY SENECA ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. C-2017-265
JUDE G. GRAVOIS JUDGE
WILLIE EVANS VERSUS TARUN JOLLY, M.D. NO. 17-CA-159 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA NO.
No. 44,629-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered September 23, 2009 Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 44,629-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * DOROTHY
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT consolidated with CW DANNY CLARK AND GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE (UK), PLC **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 10-1281 consolidated with CW 10-918 ROGER CLARK VERSUS DANNY CLARK AND GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE (UK), PLC ********** APPEAL FROM THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CW ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CW13-251 SUCCESSION OF MARILYN VAUGHN SMITH PHILLIPS SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 51,686 HONORABLE
No. 51,708-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered November 15, 2017. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 51,708-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA BYRON McCALL
No. 50,954-CW COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered December 14, 2006 Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 50,954-CW COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * MILDRED
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER JUDGE
RAUL-ALEJANDRO RAMOS VERSUS EBONY D. WRIGHT ALEXANDER AND FRANK "NITTI" ALEXANDER NO. 18-CA-355 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC NO CA-0659 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL FRANKIE J. KELLY FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC VERSUS FRANKIE J. KELLY * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-CA-0659 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM FIRST CITY COURT OF NEW ORLEANS NO. 2008-51454, SECTION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CYNTHIA BRIDGES, SEC. DEPT. OF REV., STATE OF LOUISIANA
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 10-1183 CYNTHIA BRIDGES, SEC. DEPT. OF REV., STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RONALD G. LYLES ********** APPEAL FROM THE NINTH
* * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO , DIVISION D-16 Honorable Lloyd J. Medley, Judge
THE HABITAT, INC. VERSUS THE COMMONS CONDOMINIUMS, LLC, THE COMMONS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., AND TIME SHARE CONSTRUCTION, LLC * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-CA-1384 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 06-1321 KATHLEEN WHITEHURST, ET AL. VERSUS A-1 AFFORDABLE SIDING, INC., ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF
NO CA-1024 BRENDA PITTS VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LOUISIANA CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
BRENDA PITTS VERSUS LOUISIANA CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION NO. 2008-CA-1024 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2008-1891,
DECEMBER 2, 2015 AMANDA WINSTEAD, ET AL. NO CA-0470 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL STEPHANIE KENYON, ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
AMANDA WINSTEAD, ET AL. VERSUS STEPHANIE KENYON, ET AL. * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2015-CA-0470 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2013-07433,
NO CA-1455 LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS, ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL
LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS, ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY CONSOLIDATED WITH: AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY
No. 51,049-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered December 21, 2016 Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 51,049-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * REMIJIO
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CHIEF JUDGE
ELVIA LEGARRETA VERSUS WENDY'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. NO. 16-C-419 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY REVIEW FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH
CONTENTS. How to use the Lake Charles City Court...2. What is the Lake Charles City Court?...2. Who may sue in Lake Charles City Court?...
CONTENTS Page How to use the Lake Charles City Court...2 What is the Lake Charles City Court?...2 Who may sue in Lake Charles City Court?...3 Who may be sued in Lake Charles City Court?...3 What kind of
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2005 STEPHEN E. THOMPSON BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND
REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0281 September Term, 2005 STEPHEN E. THOMPSON v. BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND Adkins, Krauser, Rodowsky, Lawrence F., (Retired, Specially Assigned)
Greer v. Town Constr. Co. (La. App., 2012)
JONATHAN GREER AND RENE GREER v. TOWN CONSTRUCTION CO, INC, CHRISTOPHER A. TOWN, CHRIS TOWN CONSTRUCTION, LLC AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY NO. 2011 CA 1360 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 51,005-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * SUCCESSION OF HENRY EARL DAWSON * * * * *
Judgment rendered November 16, 2016. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 51,005-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA SUCCESSION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 14-194 DEVANTE ZENO VERSUS JPS CONTAINERS, LLC, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER2015 CA 0815 WHITNEY BANK VERSUS C. NORMAN NOLAN, ELIZABETH A. NOLAN, NEN CRUSHED CONCRETE, LLC, NEN LIME, LLC, AND
AFFIRM in Part, REVERSE in Part, and REMAND; Opinion Filed November 6, In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
AFFIRM in Part, REVERSE in Part, and REMAND; Opinion Filed November 6, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00032-CV PEDRO DIAZ DBA G&O DIAZ TRUCKING, Appellant V.
BARRY F. KERN NO CA-0915 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL BLAINE KERN, SR. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
BARRY F. KERN VERSUS BLAINE KERN, SR. * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-CA-0915 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2011-3812, DIVISION L-6
No. 52,034-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered May 23, 2018. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 52,034-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * JOANN
AMBRE P. MCGINN, ET AL. NO CA-0165 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL CRESCENT CITY CONNECTION BRIDGE AUTHORITY, ET AL. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
AMBRE P. MCGINN, ET AL. VERSUS CRESCENT CITY CONNECTION BRIDGE AUTHORITY, ET AL. NO. 2015-CA-0165 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO.
MILDRED JONES NO CA-0407 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL NEXT GENERATION HOMES, LLC AND RECOVERY DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
MILDRED JONES VERSUS NEXT GENERATION HOMES, LLC AND RECOVERY DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC NO. 2011-CA-0407 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO.
ETHAN BROWN NO CA-1679 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL
ETHAN BROWN VERSUS RONAL SERPAS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT, NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2013-CA-1679 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT
JUDE G. GRAVOIS JUDGE
REGIONS BANK VERSUS MICHELLE C. KEYS, A/K/A MICHELLE M. COOPER KEYS, DIVORCED WIFE OF/AND JEFFREY W. KEYS NO. 18-CA-97 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL
MARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE
GEORGETTE LAVIOLETTE VERSUS VICKIE CHARLES DUBOSE NO. 14-CA-148 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. CHARLES, STATE OF
JUDE G. GRAVOIS JUDGE
DR. JOHN SAER VERSUS NEW ORLEANS REGIONAL PHYSICIAN HOSPITAL ORGANIZATION (DIB/A PEOPLES HEALTH NETWORK) NO. 14-CA-856 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH
KENNETH L. TRUXILLO NO CA-0363 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL
KENNETH L. TRUXILLO VERSUS LOUISIANA STADIUM AND EXPOSITION DISTRICT, ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, SMG, DEF INSURANCE COMPANY, MARDI GRAS PRODUCTIONS, INC., AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY * * * * * * * * * * * NO.
MICHAEL EDWARD BLAKE NO CA-0655 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL ALICIA DIMARCO BLAKE FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * CONSOLIDATED WITH:
MICHAEL EDWARD BLAKE VERSUS ALICIA DIMARCO BLAKE CONSOLIDATED WITH: ALICIA VICTORIA DIMARCO BLAKE VERSUS MICHAEL EDWARD BLAKE * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2012-CA-0655 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 13-214 HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP. VERSUS MORRIS DAVIS ********** APPEAL FROM THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CONCORDIA, NO. 46953 HONORABLE
No. 44,749-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered September 23, 2009. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 44,749-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO , DIVISION F-10 Honorable Yada Magee, Judge * * * * * *
LOUIS V. DE LA VERGNE VERSUS CHARLES E. DE LA VERGNE, JR. AND HUGHES J. DE LA VERGNE, II * * * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2004-CA-0412 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT
MARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE
CLYDE PRICE AND HIS WIFE MARY PRICE VERSUS CHAIN ELECTRIC COMPANY AND ENTERGY CORPORATION AND/OR ITS AFFILIATE NO. 18-CA-162 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS
--- ------~-------- STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE POLICE AND WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE On Application
AUGUST 26, 2015 DYNAMIC CONSTRUCTORS, L.L.C. NO CA-0271 COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERNMENT FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
DYNAMIC CONSTRUCTORS, L.L.C. VERSUS PLAQUEMINES PARISH GOVERNMENT * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2015-CA-0271 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM 25TH JDC, PARISH OF PLAQUEMINES NO.
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 13-185 KATIE TIDWELL VERSUS PREMIER STAFFING, INC. ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION DISTRICT 03 PARISH OF CALCASIEU, DOCKET NO.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION RYAN GOOTEE GENERAL CONTRACTORS LLC NO CA-0678 COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS PLAQUEMINES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, ET AL.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION RYAN GOOTEE GENERAL CONTRACTORS LLC VERSUS PLAQUEMINES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, ET AL. * * * * NO. 2015-CA-0678 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * *
OCT Judgment Rendered:
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2014 cw 0298 JESSIE MAY PERKINS, JESSIE HARVEY, JR., EVA MAE BURNETI, CHARLES RAY HARVEY, PRESTON HARVEY, MINNIE H. JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF
NO CA-1292 CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL. VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL KEVIN M. DUPART FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * CONSOLIDATED WITH:
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL. VERSUS KEVIN M. DUPART CONSOLIDATED WITH: KEVIN M. DUPART VERSUS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2013-CA-1292 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA CONSOLIDATED WITH:
* * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO , DIVISION C Honorable Sidney H. Cates, Judge * * * * * *
GULF COAST BANK AND TRUST COMPANY VERSUS ELIZABETH ELMORE, WIFE OF/AND FERDINAND G. D'ORVILLE, III * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2010-CA-1237 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL
No CV. On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC A
Reverse and Render and Opinion Filed July 11, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-10-01349-CV HARRIS, N.A., Appellant V. EUGENIO OBREGON, Appellee On Appeal from the
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 05-484 NICHOLAS ROZAS AND BETTY ROZAS VERSUS KEITH MONTERO AND MONTERO BUILDERS, INC. ************ APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH
No. 48,370-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * *
Judgment rendered October 2, 2013. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 48,370-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * SANDRA
Follow this and additional works at:
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-10-2008 Hinman v. Russo Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-3814 Follow this and additional
NO CA-0232 RUSSELL KELLY D/B/A AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONTRACTORS, LLC COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT THOMAS H.
RUSSELL KELLY D/B/A AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONTRACTORS, LLC THOMAS H. O'NEIL D/B/A 3RD STREET PROPERTIES, LLC NO. 2011-CA-0232 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA THOMAS H. O'NEIL, BIENVILLE
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER JUDGE
BILOXI CAPITAL, LLC VERSUS KENNETH H. LOBELL NO. 17-CA-529 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA
AUGUST 15, 2017 THOMAS D. BAYER AND LAURA D. KELLEY NO CA-0257 COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS STARR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ET AL FOURTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS D. BAYER AND LAURA D. KELLEY VERSUS STARR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, ET AL NO. 2017-CA-0257 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KRISTY S. HOLT, Appellant, v. CALCHAS, LLC, Appellee. No. 4D13-2101 [January 28, 2015] On Motion for Rehearing Appeal from the Circuit Court
MARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE
CHARLES BROOKS VERSUS SHAMROCK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., GHK DEVELOPMENTS, INC., AND WALGREENS LOUISIANA COMPANY, INC. NO. 18-CA-226 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE
June 28, 2018 ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE. Panel composed of Judges Jude G. Gravois, Robert A. Chaisson, and Hans J. Liljeberg
DELORIES TATE WIFE OF/AND ELVORN TATE VERSUS OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION NO. 18-C-305 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPLICATION FOR SUPERVISORY REVIEW FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL
No. 44,188-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Judgment rendered April 8, 2009. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 44,188-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * CARTER
Office Of The Clerk. State oflouisiana. www la fcca. ol 2. Notice of Judgment. June Stephen M Irving 111 Founders St Ste 700 Baton Rouge
Christine L Crow Clerk of Court Office Of The Clerk Court of Appeal First Circuit State oflouisiana www la fcca ol 2 Notice of Judgment Post OffIce Box 4408 Baton Rouge LA 70821 4408 225 382 3000 June
No. 52,015-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered May 23, 2018. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 52,015-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * IN RE:
No. 47,525-CW COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * * McNEW, KING, MILLS, BURCH. Defendants-Respondents
Judgment rendered April 10, 2013. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 47,525-CW COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * JAMES
HANS J. LILJEBERG JUDGE
GADREL, L.L.C. VERSUS ARTHUR ALPHONSE WILLIAMS NO. 17-CA-537 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
[Cite as KY Invest. Properties, L.L.C., 2013-Ohio-1426.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT KY INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC, ) ) CASE NO. 12 MA 115 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
HANS J. LILJEBERG JUDGE
JEFFERSON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD VERSUS TIMBRIAN, LLC NO. 17-CA-668 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
SMALL CLAIMS MANUAL. The following information has been made available through the office of the McHenry County Clerk of the
SMALL CLAIMS MANUAL The following information has been made available through the office of the McHenry County Clerk of the Circuit Court. It has been compiled through the cooperation of the Judges of
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT KENYETTA M. BROOKS, ET AL. VERSUS 06-1497 CHRISTUS HEALTH SOUTHWESTERN LOUISIANA D/B/A CHRISTUS ST. PATRICK HOSPITAL OF LAKE CHARLES, ET AL. **********
NO CA-1201 IN RE: INTERDICTION OF VELMA AGNES BURAS PARNELL COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
IN RE: INTERDICTION OF VELMA AGNES BURAS PARNELL NO. 2013-CA-1201 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2012-09784, DIVISION I-14 Honorable
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-514 CHARLES HARRISON VERSUS DR. ANDREW MINARDI, ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EVANGELINE, NO. 68,579
No pleading or other legal paper that complies with the Pennsylvania Rules of
205.2. Filing Legal Papers with the Prothonotary No pleading or other legal paper that complies with the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure shall be refused for filing by the prothonotary based on a
* * * * * * * * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO , DIVISION I Honorable Terri F. Love, Judge * * * * * *
GERALYN C. TRISS VERSUS MICHAEL E. CAREY, M.D. NO. 2000-CA-0608 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 98-2937, DIVISION I Honorable Terri
MARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy, Fredericka Homberg Wicker, and Marc E. Johnson
DATA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION VERSUS THE PARISH OF ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST NO. 11-CA-581 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. JOHN
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION KRISTA STANLEY VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 08-221 ST. CHARLES GAMING COMPANY, INC. D/B/A ISLE OF CAPRI CASINO-LAKE CHARLES ********** APPEAL
2018 SPRING JUDGES CONFERENCE
2018 SPRING JUDGES CONFERENCE April 12-13, 2018 DoubleTree by Hilton Lafayette DISTRICT JUDGES ROUNDTABLE JUDGE C. WENDALL MANNING (moderator) 4 th Judicial District Court JUDGE BRADY O CALLAGHAN 1 st
Mexican Civil & Commercial Legal Proceedings
Mexican Civil & Commercial Legal Proceedings Commercial Litigation Subject matter governed by Commerce Code. Suit brought by at least one commercial party. Suit based on a commercial activity such as a
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-1067 BARBARA DEVILLE, ET AL. VERSUS ALBERT CRAIG PEARCE, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
EVENSTAR, INC., THE GOLF CLUB OF NEW ORLEANS, L.L.C. AND EASTOVER REALTY, INC. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO EXCEPTIONS FILED BY EVENSTAR. INC.
CIVIL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 08-7729 DIV: H-12 EARTH SERVICES & EQUIPMENT, INC. AND MOORE TESTING & INSPECTION, EVENSTAR, INC., THE GOLF CLUB OF NEW ORLEANS, L.L.C.
STEPHEN J. WINDHORST JUDGE
UNITED PROFESSIONALS COMPANY, ET AL. VERSUS RAMSEY F. SKIPPER; R.E.A.L. DEVELOPMENT, LLC; GO-GRAPHICS, LLC, GO-GRAPHICS OF NEW ORLEANS, LLC; AND GO-GRAPHICS OF SHREVEPORT, LLC NO. 17-CA-425 FIFTH CIRCUIT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-1699
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2006-CA-1699 ISAAC K. BYRD, JR., KATRINA M. GIBBS, AND BYRD, GIBBS & MARTIN, PLLC, f/k/a BYRD & ASSOCIATES, PLLC APPELLANTS WILLIE J. BOWIE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND CHARLES
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 06-1058 STATE OF LOUISIANA, BOARD OF ETHICS VERSUS JIM DARBY, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST.
MARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE
ALL AMERICAN HEALTHCARE, L.L.C. AND NELSON J. CURTIS, III, D.C. VERSUS BENJAMIN DICHIARA, D.C. NO. 18-CA-432 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA Tribal Court Small Claims Rules of Procedure Table of Contents RULE 7.010. TITLE AND SCOPE... 3 RULE 7.020. APPLICABILITY OF RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE... 3 RULE 7.040. CLERICAL
* * * * * * * COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, STEPHEN DUNCAN SAUSSY, JR.
STEPHEN DUNCAN SAUSSY, JR. VERSUS LESLIE A. BONIN D/B/A LESLIE A. BONIN, LLC AND CNA INSURANCE COMPANY * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2012-CA-1755 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM
No. 47,314-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * *
Judgment rendered September 26, 2012. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 47,314-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * JACQUELINE
SHAMEKA BROWN NO CA-0750 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL THE BLOOD CENTER FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
SHAMEKA BROWN VERSUS THE BLOOD CENTER * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2017-CA-0750 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2015-07008, DIVISION
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JZQ, INC., ZUHER QONJA, and JAMAL QONJA, UNPUBLISHED May 27, 2004 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v No. 244538 Wayne Circuit Court MAMOON KARIM, LC No. 01-105611-CH Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee,
No. 51,791-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered January 10, 2018. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 51,791-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * PAMELA
CASE NO. 1D Sally B. Fox and Brian J. Hooper of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA THE PANAMA CITY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF
Case 2:04-cv JTM-DEK Document 59-4 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:04-cv-01052-JTM-DEK Document 59-4 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ************************************** FRANK G. SAMPSON * * CIVIL ACTION
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 11-124 TOMMY MCCAIN VERSUS JOANNA CASSIDY ********** APPEAL FROM THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES, NO. 83539, DIV. B HONORABLE
Responding to a Complaint: Maryland
Resource ID: w-011-5932 Responding to a Complaint: Maryland CHRISTOPHER C. JEFFRIES AND STEVEN A. BOOK, KRAMON & GRAHAM, WITH PRACTICAL LAW LITIGATION Search the Resource ID numbers in blue on Westlaw
No. 44,058-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * *
Judgment rendered February 25, 2009 Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 44,058-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * TODD
* * * * * * * JONES, J., CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART FOR THE REASONS ASSIGNED BY JUDGE LOVE LOVE, J., CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART.
DR. SUSAN HOOPER, D.C. VERSUS TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY AND ROBERT AND LEAH PAYNE * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2010-CA-1685 C/W NO. 2011-CA-0220 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL
No. 49,574-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered January 14, 2015. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 49,574-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * DAVID
BRANDY M. D'ANGELO NO CA-1555 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL
BRANDY M. D'ANGELO VERSUS MANDY GUARINO WIFE OF/AND EUGENIO GUARINO, STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, TERRY TEDESCO, INC., AND XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2010-CA-1555 COURT OF
NO. 18-CA-453 CHALANDER SMITH FIFTH CIRCUIT VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL
CHALANDER SMITH VERSUS RAVEN WARREN AND ELIANA DEFRANCESCH, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CLERK OF COURT FOR ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH NO. 18-CA-453 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 03-0614 ALFRED PALMA, INC. VERSUS CRANE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO. 2002-166
ROBERT A. CHAISSON JUDGE
TERRY COLLINS AND LAINIE COLLINS VERSUS THE HOME DEPOT, U.S.A. INC. NO. 16-CA-516 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 06-965 ELLA MAE LEDAY VERSUS VILLE PLATTE HOUSING AUTHORITY, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
8 California Procedure (5th), Attack on Judgment in Trial Court
8 California Procedure (5th), Attack on Judgment in Trial Court I. INTRODUCTION A. Direct Attack. 1. [ 1] Nature and Significance of Concept. 2. Methods of Direct Attack. (a) [ 2] In Trial Court. (b) [
No. 51,245-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered April 5, 2017. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 51,245-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * ROCHUNDRA
FIRST CIRCUIT RAYF RANDO VERSUS. Judgment Rendered MAY Appealed. from the Nineteenth Judicial District Court. Trial Court Number
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT fttj1 Wff NUMBER 2008 CA 1981 RAYF RANDO C 04 VERSUS ANCO INSULATIONS INC ET AL Judgment Rendered MAY 8 2009 Appealed from
No. 51,598-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus
Judgment rendered September 27, 2017. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 51,598-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * *