COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
|
|
- Alfred Stevenson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Court File No. M21842 M21857 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO as represented by the MINISTER OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING, and THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF LONGLAC and Moving Parties TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED LONG LAKE 58 FIRST NATION THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BEARDMORE, THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GERALDTON, THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NAKINA, BOB GRAY, COMMISSIONER OF THE GREENSTONE RESTRUCTURING COMMISSION, and THE TRANSITION BOARD OF THE GREENSTONE RESTRUCTURING COMMISSION and Responding Parties NISHNAWBE-ASKI NATION and GINOOGAMING FIRST NATION Responding and Cross-Moving Parties FACTUM OF THE NISHNAWBE-ASKI NATION AND THE GINOOGAMING FIRST NATION ON THE MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL AND THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CROSS-APPEAL Suite Bay St. Canada Trust Tower - BCE Place Toronto ON M5J 2S1 Morris/Rose/Ledgett H.W. Roger Townshend Tel: (416) Fax: (416) Solicitors for The Nishnawbe-Aski Nation and the Ginoogaming First Nation
2 -ii- TO: Attorney General for Ontario Crown Law Office - Civil 720 Bay St., 8th Floor Toronto, ON M5G 2K1 Dennis W. Brown, Q.C. Tel: (416) Fax: (416) Solicitors for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario AND TO: McKitrick, Jones 17A Cumberland St. S. Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5G1 Allan G. McKitrick, Q.C. Tel: (807) Fax: (807) AND TO: Solicitors for the Transition Board of the Greenstone Restructuring Commission Poole Milligan Yonge Corporate Centre Suite Yonge St. North York, ON M2P 2B5 Richard N. Poole J. Bradford Nixon Tel: (416) Fax: (416) Solicitors for TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.
3 - iii - AND TO: Alan Pratt 3550 Torwood Dr. R.R. #1 Dunrobin, ON K0A 1T0 Tel: (613) Fax: (613) AND TO: Solicitor for Long Lake 58 First Nation Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing Legal Services Branch 16th Floor, 777 Bay St. Toronto, ON M5G 2E5 Stephen Scharbach Tel: (416) Fax: (416) Solicitor for Bob Gray, Commissioner of the Greenstone Restructuring Commission AND TO: Rene Larson Law Office 2821 Arthur St. E., Suite 200 Thunder Bay, Ontario P7E 5P5 Rene Larson Katja Huitikka Tel: (807) Fax: (807) Solicitors for the Corporation of the Town of Longlac
4 Court File No. M21842 M21857 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO as represented by the MINISTER OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING, and THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF LONGLAC and Moving Parties TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED LONG LAKE 58 FIRST NATION THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BEARDMORE, THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF GERALDTON, THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NAKINA, BOB GRAY, COMMISSIONER OF THE GREENSTONE RESTRUCTURING COMMISSION, and THE TRANSITION BOARD OF THE GREENSTONE RESTRUCTURING COMMISSION and Responding Parties NISHNAWBE-ASKI NATION and GINOOGAMING FIRST NATION Responding and Cross-Moving Parties FACTUM OF THE NISHNAWBE-ASKI NATION AND THE GINOOGAMING FIRST NATION ON THE MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL AND THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO CROSS-APPEAL PART I - FACTS 1) Except as stated below, for the purposes of the motions for leave to appeal, the Nishnawbe-Aski Nation (NAN) and the Ginoogaming First Nation (GFN) accept the facts as stated in the factum of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing ("Ontario") and in the factum of the Corporation of the Town of Longlac ("Longlac").
5 -2-2) NAN and GFN do not accept that the Greenstone Restructuring Commission (the "Commission") complied with all the requirements of s of the Municipal Act, asserted as a fact in paragraph 31 of Ontario's factum and paragraph 15 of Longlac's factum, as this is a conclusion of law. 3) NAN and GFN do not accept, as asserted in paragraph 17 of Longlac's factum, that the Commission reviewed "all applicable studies and information available with regard to local governance issues". The Divisional Court found that the Commission reviewed "selected documents", and specified some materials which were available to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs which were not forwarded to the Commission. Reasons for Decision of O'Driscoll J., December 31, 1997, p.27, Motion Record filed by Attorney General for Ontario, Tab B, p.33. 4) NAN and GFN do not accept, as asserted in paragraph 21 of Longlac's factum, that the Commission "commented" on the legal tests applied by the Ontario Municipal Board in past hearings involving some of the same territory - the Commission stated "categorically" that these principles guided its decision. Reasons for Decision of O'Driscoll J., December 31, 1997, p.35, Motion Record filed by Attorney General for Ontario, Tab B, p.43. 5) NAN and GFN do not accept the characterization of the intention of legislative amendments asserted as fact in paragraph 21 of Longlac's factum, since this is a conclusion of law. 6) NAN and GFN do not accept, as asserted in paragraph 21 of Longlac's factum, that "First Nations throughout the subject area were aware of and concerned about the proposed restructuring". It is accepted that NAN, GFN and the Aroland First Nation were aware and concerned. However, there is insufficient evidence (or no evidence) of this as applied to the First Nations of Long Lake #58, Rocky Bay, Sand Point, Poplar Point, Red Rock and Lake Nipigon Ojibway. 7) With respect to assertions about who was represented by NAN in paragraph 23 of Longlac's Factum and paragraph 65 of Ontario's factum, NAN denies that it represented the "First Nations in the area". NAN
6 -3- represented GFN and the Aroland First Nation. In one letter only, sent to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing concerning an earlier restructuring proposal, before the appointment of the Commission, NAN unintentionally and erroneously stated that it also represented Long Lake #58 First Nation. NAN does not, and did not claim to represent any of the other First Nations in the area. Testimony of Charles Fox, Transcript, November 12, 1997, pp and ) With respect to the assertion in paragraph 65 of Ontario's factum that a representative of Long Lake 58 "may not" have been present at a specific meeting, the Divisional Court specifically found, prompted by an admission by counsel for Ontario, that "Grand Chief Fox, Chief Echum and Peter Moonias were telling the truth when they swore that Chief Abraham was not at the July 6, 1997 meeting". The inference is inescapable that the Ministry's witness were not telling the truth when they swore to the contrary. Ontario appears to be resiling from an admission made at the hearing of the application. Reasons for Decision of O'Driscoll J., December 31, 1997, p.28, Motion Record filed by Attorney General for Ontario, Tab B, p.34. 9) The Divisional Court quashed the Final Proposal and Order of the Commission for a number of independent reasons, as follows: a)the Commission ordered a type of restructuring which was not permitted by the relevant regulations; b)the Commission was required to consult with First Nations in the area, but failed to consult at all with Long Lake #58, and failed to consult properly, adequately and meaningfully with NAN and GFN; c)the "three filter" test used in a previous hearing by the Ontario Municipal Board, which was explicitly adopted by the Commission, still represent the benchmark for restructuring proposals.
7 -4- However, the Commission applied this test in a way which was "overwhelmingly" unreasonable, and made conclusions without any evidence. d)the Commission appeared to be biased Reasons for Decision of O'Driscoll J., December 31, 1997, p , Motion Record filed by Attorney General for Ontario, Tab B, p )The Divisional Court summarized this by observing: It is not my duty or place to comment upon how a Commission under s of the Municipal Act should be conducted. However, I am constrained to say that this case could be used as a text book of how it should not be conducted. Reasons for Decision of O'Driscoll J., December 31, 1997, p. 49, Motion Record filed by Attorney General for Ontario, Tab B, p.56. PART II - ISSUES RAISED BY THE MOVING PARTIES 11) The Divisional Court quashed the Commission's Order for four independent sets of reasons, as set out above. Any one of these reasons would justify the Court's ruling. Therefore, unless all of these reasons are in error, the ruling of the Court must stand. Further, unless the moving parties meet the tests for leave to appeal with respect to all of the issues they raise, an appeal would be pointless. Consultation with First Nations 12) The Divisional Court found that Long Lake #58 had not been consulted at all by the Commission. It is submitted that this is a question of fact alone, from which no appeal to this Court lies. Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O c. C.43, s. 6(1)(a)
8 -5-13) It is established law that First Nations must be consulted about developments that may affect them. R. v. Sparrow, (1990) 70 D.L.R. 4th 385 (S.C.C.) at Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans), [1997] F.C.J. No.984, para (F.C.T.D.) R. v. Jack [1996] 2 C.N.L.R. 113 (B.C.C.A.) at R. v. Sampson [1996] 2 C.N.L.R. 184 ( B.C.C.A.) at R. v. Noel, [1995] 4 C.N.L.R. 78 (N.W.T. Terr. Ct.) at 94-5 Halfway River First Nation v. British Columbia (Ministry of Forestry), [1997] B.C.J. No. 1494, p (B.C.S.C.). 14) It is therefore submitted that the moving parties have failed to establish that they have raised an "arguable question" concerning consultation with First Nations. The O.M.B. "Filter" Test 15) The moving parties submit that the "three filter" test used by the Ontario Municipal Board in the context of municipal restructuring is no longer applicable. If this is so, this constitutes an admission that the Commission was in error since it explicitly adopted this test. If it is not so, the challenge to the ruling of the Divisional Court evaporates. Thus, either option leads to the result that the Commission's decision was fatally flawed. 16) It should also be observed that the "three filters" in question are greatest common good, common sense, and fairness. The position of the moving parties appears to be that a Restructuring Commission is not required to use common sense or be fair. 17) It is therefore submitted that the moving parties have failed to establish that they have raised an "arguable question" concerning the O.M.B. "filter" test.
9 -6- PART III - ADDITIONAL ISSUE - THE CROSS-APPEAL 18) In the Divisional Court, NAN and GFN argued that the Commission's Order infringed their treaty rights, as protected by s. 35 of the Constitution Act, The Divisional Court found it unnecessary to deal with this question since the applications succeeded on other grounds. Reasons for Decision of O'Driscoll J., December 31, 1997, p. 42-3, Motion Record filed by Attorney General for Ontario, Tab B, p ) It is therefore submitted that the decision of the Divisional Court cannot be reversed without a determination of this question. It is submitted that it would be more convenient for this Court to deal with this question than to remit the question to O'Driscoll J. for a decision, should the appeal be successful on the issues relied on by O'Driscoll J. PART IV - ORDER REQUESTED 20) NAN and GFN seek an order dismissing the motions for leave to appeal by Ontario and by Longlac. 21) In the alternative, should leave to appeal be granted, NAN and GFN seek an order allowing their motion for leave to cross-appeal. ALL OF WHICH IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED April 30, 1998 Suite Bay St. Canada Trust Tower - BCE Place Morris/Rose/Ledgett
10 -7- Toronto ON M5J 2S1 H.W. Roger Townshend Tel: (416) Fax: (416) Solicitors for The Nishnawbe-Aski Nation and the Ginoogaming First Nation
11 -8- Schedule A - List of Authorities R. v. Sparrow, (1990) 70 D.L.R. 4th 385 (S.C.C.) Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans), [1997] F.C.J. No.984 (F.C.T.D.) R. v. Jack [1996] 2 C.N.L.R. 113 (B.C.C.A.) R. v. Sampson [1996] 2 C.N.L.R. 184 ( B.C.C.A.) R. v. Noel, [1995] 4 C.N.L.R. 78 (N.W.T. Terr. Ct.) Halfway River First Nation v. British Columbia (Ministry of Forestry), [1997] B.C.J. No (B.C.S.C.).
12 -9- Schedule B - Statutes Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O c. C.43, s. 6(1)(a) 6(1) An appeal lies to the Court of Appeal from, (a) an order of the Divisional Court, on a question that is not a question of fact alone, with leave of the Court of Appeal as provided in the rules of court;
13 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO et al and TRANSCANADA PIPELINES LIMITED ET AL Moving Parties Responding Parties Court File No. M21842 M21857 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Proceeding commenced at Toronto FACTUM ON THE MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL AND TO CROSS APPEAL MORRIS/ROSE/LEDGETT Barristers and Solicitors Canada Trust Tower, BCE Place Suite Bay Street Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1 H.W. Roger Townshend Phone: (416) Fax: (416) Solicitors for The Nishnawbe-Aski Nation and the Ginoogaming First Nation
14 (Responding and Cross-Moving Parties) N:\62922\hwrt
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO)
B E T W E E N: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Court File No. (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) NISHNAWBE-ASKI NATION and GINOOGAMING FIRST NATION, LONG LAKE 58 FIRST NATION, and TRANSCANADA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO)
Court File No 5 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) BETWEEN: NISHNAWBE-ASK1 NATION and GINOOGAMING FIRST NATION, LONG LAKE 58 FIRST NATION. and TRANSCANADA PIPELINES
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE PLATINEX INC. - and
Court File No. 06-0271 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: PLATINEX INC. Plaintiff - and KITCHENUHMAYKOOSIB INNINUWUG FIRST NATION, DONNY MORRIS, JACK MCKAY, CECILIA BEGG, SAMUEL MCKAY, JOHN CUTFEET,
More informationAboriginal Title and Rights: Crown s Duty to Consult and Seek Accommodation
Case Comment Bob Reid Aboriginal Title and Rights: Crown s Duty to Consult and Seek Accommodation After the Supreme Court of Canada s decision in Delgamuukw, (1997) 3 S.C.R 1010, stated there was an obligation
More informationTHE GENESIS OF THE DUTY TO CONSULT AND THE SUPERME COURT
THE GENESIS OF THE DUTY TO CONSULT AND THE SUPERME COURT The judicial genesis of the legal duty of consultation began with a series of Aboriginal right and title decisions providing the foundational principles
More informationONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE (Toronto Region) -and- G.(J.) D.(A.) I.(E.) SURREPLY SUBMISSIONS OF AMICUS CURIAE JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH
ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE (Toronto Region) BETWEEN: The Toronto Star Applicant v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN -and- G.(J.) D.(A.) I.(E.) SURREPLY SUBMISSIONS OF AMICUS CURIAE JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH November
More informationMatawa Chiefs Council Report Prepared for the 23rd Annual General Meeting July 26th - July 28th, 2011 Hosted By Constance Lake First Nation
Matawa Chiefs Council Report 2010-2011 Prepared for the 23rd Annual General Meeting July 26th - July 28th, 2011 Hosted By Constance Lake First Nation Matawa First Nations Chiefs Council Report 2010/2011
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No. CV-12-448912 B E T W E E N: BARRY GLASPELL Plaintiff/Moving Party - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF MUNICIPAL
More informationCORONERS COURT NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT. IN THE MATTER OF the Coroners Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.37;
CORONERS COURT IN THE MATTER OF the Coroners Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.37; AND IN THE MATTER OF the Inquest Concerning the Death of Romeo Wesley NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT TAKE NOTICE that Cat Lake First
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA) - and -
i' - I 1-1 1 YYV,/V 5 i rax!r IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA) No. 23801 lv.*&~%, BETWEEN: DONALD AND WILLIAM GLADSTONE - and - Appellants HER MAJESTY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ONTARIO)
BETWEEN: S.C.C. File No. 37863 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ONTARIO) KEATLEY SURVEYING LTD. APPLICANT (Appellant) AND: TERANET INC. RESPONDENT (Respondent) AND:
More informationDirector s Order No. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT ORDER PURSANT TO SECTION 136, 196
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change 435 James Street South Suite 331 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Ministère de l Environnement et de l Action en matière de changement climatique 435, rue James sud
More informationLEGAL REVIEW OF FIRST NATIONS RIGHTS TO CARBON CREDITS
REPORT 6: LEGAL REVIEW OF FIRST NATIONS RIGHTS TO CARBON CREDITS Prepared For: The Assembly of First Nations Prepared By: March 2006 The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily
More informationFEDERAL COURT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA. -and-
Court File No. T- ' \ ~ - A- FEDERAL COURT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA -and- APPLICANT FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY CARING SOCIETY OF CANADA, ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS, CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION,
More informationAlgonquin Negotiation Representative Elections
Algonquin Negotiation Representative Elections September, 2004 Alan Pratt, Barrister & Solicitor Dunrobin, Ontario Introduction Algonquins have used and occupied the Ottawa Valley since before Europeans
More informationJOHN DOE #1, proposed representative Respondent on behalf of a class of Respondents RESPONDENT (DEFENDANT)
Court File No. T-662-16 FEDERAL COURT PROPOSED CLASS PROCEEDING B E T W E E N: VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC, COBBLER NEVADA, LLC, PTG NEVADA, LLC, CLEAR SKIES NEVADA, LLC, GLACIER ENTERTAINMENT SARL OF LUXEMBOURG,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT
Page 1 of 15 Home Feedback Site Map Français Home Court of Appeal for Ontario Superior Court of Justice Ontario Court of Justice Location Superior Court of Justice Divisional Court Appeal Information Package
More informationFACTUM OF THE APPLICANT
Court File No. 12821-15 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N : TANNER CURRIE -and- Applicant THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, and CHRISTOPHER LABRECHE Respondents FACTUM
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. The Honourable Justice J. C. MacPherson ) THURSDAY, THE 30th ) DAY OF ) AUGUST, 2018 ORDER
Court of Appeal File No.: C65807 (YI 4qsov COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO The Honourable Justice J. C. MacPherson THURSDAY, THE 30th DAY OF AUGUST, 2018 IN THE MATTER OF A REFERENCE to the Court of Appeal
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
Court File No. CV-12-444388 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: EPOCH S GARAGE LIMITED, COOK SCHOOL BUS LINES LIMITED, 678928 ONTARIO INC. and ROBERT DOUGLAS AKITT O/A DOUG AKITT BUS LINES - and
More informationTHE QUEEN'S BENCH WINNIPEG CENTRE. APPLICATION UNDER Queens Bench Rule 14.05(2)(c)(iv) WESTERN CANADA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE, - and -
File No. CI 11-01-72733 THE QUEEN'S BENCH WINNIPEG CENTRE APPLICATION UNDER Queens Bench Rule 14.05(2)(c)(iv) BETWEEN: WESTERN CANADA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE, Applicant, - and - THE GOVERNMENT OF MANITOBA,
More informationFEDERAL COURT. Anamaria Carla Taban. and. Her Majesty the Queen MOTION RECORD
Court File No.: T-2467-14 FEDERAL COURT Anamaria Carla Taban and Plaintiff Her Majesty the Queen MOTION RECORD Defendant On plaintiff s motion to request that that the proceeding continue as a specially
More informationTHE LAW OF CANADA IN RELATION TO UNDRIP
THE LAW OF CANADA IN RELATION TO UNDRIP Although the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) is not a binding legal instrument and has never been ratified as a treaty would be, the
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA PRESTIGIOUS PROPERTIES INC.
Clerk's stamp: COURT FILE NUMBER: 1603 04928 COURT: JUDICIAL CENTRE: PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS: DOCUMENT: COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA EDMONTON PRESTIGIOUS PROPERTIES INC. COLD LAKE ESTATES INC., NORTHERN
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (DIVISIONAL COURT) SHERYL ABBEY. -and-
Court File No.: 476/16 BETWEEN: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (DIVISIONAL COURT) SHERYL ABBEY -and- Applicant HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF COMMUNITY AND
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT J. WILSON, KARAKATSANIS, AND BRYANT JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Ministry of Attorney General and Toronto Star and Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2010 ONSC 991 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 34/09 DATE: 20100326 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL
More informationISSUE NO. 18 JULY 2008 FOR MORE INFORMATION TRIBUNALS HAVE A DUTY TO PROVIDE REASONS
FOR MORE INFORMATION This newsletter is published by Steinecke Maciura LeBlanc, a law firm practising in the field of professional regulation. For more information, contact: Lisa S. Braverman Steinecke
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
Court File No. 842/12 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: 2145850 ONTARIO LIMITED, o/a Highland Bus Services, BARR BUS LINES LIMITED, CLARK BUS & MARINA LIMITED, HEALEY TRANSPORTATION LIMITED,
More informationEnvironmental Law Centre
Environmental Law Centre Murray and Anne Fraser Building University of Victoria P.O. Box 2400 STN CSC Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3H7 www.elc.uvic.ca Duty to Consult with First Nations Researcher: Paul Brackstone
More informationOntario (Attorney General) v. Bear Island Foundation, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 570
Ontario (Attorney General) v. Bear Island Foundation, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 570 The Bear Island Foundation and Gary Potts, William Twain and Maurice McKenzie, Jr. on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all
More informationOrder F Ministry of Justice. Hamish Flanagan Adjudicator. March 18, 2015
Order F15-12 Ministry of Justice Hamish Flanagan Adjudicator March 18, 2015 CanLII Cite: 2015 BCIPC 12 Quicklaw Cite: [2015] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 12 Summary: The applicant requested records from the Ministry
More informationProcedural Rules Mining and Lands Commissioner
FR MENU Procedural Rules Mining and Lands Commissioner These rules apply to all proceedings before the Mining and Lands Commissioner that started on or after February 5, 2018. On this page Preamble Application
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Court of Appeal File No. Divisional Court File No. 130/13 (Court File No. 08-CV-347100CP) B E T W E E N: LISA CAVANAUGH, ANDREW HALE-BYRNE, RICHARD VAN DUSEN, MARGARET GRANGER
More information% AND: FACTUM OF THE INTERVENOR COUNCIL OF FOREST INDUSTRIES. No. CA Vancouver Registry COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN:
No. CA024761 Vancouver Registry COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: AND: CHIEF COUNCILLOR MATHEW HILL, also known as Tha-lathatk, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of the Kitkatla Band, and KITKATLA
More informationONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD IN THE MATTER OF subsection 51(39) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended Appellant: Sustainable Brant Subject: Proposed Plan of Subdivision Conditions Appellants:
More informationImpact of Class Action Rules on Lawsuits by Aboriginal Nations in Federal Court
August 10, 2004 Ms. Éloïse Arbour Secretary to the Rules Committee Federal Court of Appeal Ottawa ON K1A 0H9 Dear Ms. Arbour: Re: Impact of Class Action Rules on Lawsuits by Aboriginal Nations in Federal
More informationCANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL. - and - CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION. - and -
Docket: T1340/7008 CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY CARING SOCIETY OF CANADA and ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS - and - CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - and - ATTORNEY
More informationTHE GENESIS OF ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND THE DUTY TO CONSULT
THE GENESIS OF ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND THE DUTY TO CONSULT UBC Institute for Resources, Environment & Sustainability Date: September 16 th, 2014 Presented by: Rosanne M. Kyle 604.687.0549, ext. 101 rkyle@jfklaw.ca
More informationPek~ THE APPELLANT ASKS that the judgment of Madam Honour Justic(. Pm.sons Jated March 20, 2018, be set aside and a judgment be granted, as follows:
CourtFileNo. Cw~,w BETWEEN: NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL Workplace Safety & Insurance Board - WSIB Applicant (Appellant) cc,_, ;i1 fc,- :;;:;Jti'-J... _,.,., w, _...,,~E Workplace Safety
More informationand THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA AND CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC ORDER
Federal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20130315 Docket: T-1820-11 Ottawa, Ontario, March 15, 2013 PRESENT: Madam Prothonotary Aronovitch BETWEEN: MARTEN FALLS FIRST NATION, WEBEQUIE FIRST NATION, NIBINAMIK
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
COURT FILE NO.: DC06-0065ML DATE: 20070209 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT B E T W E E N: NIAGARA ESCARPMENT COMMISSION Appellant - and - PALETTA REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF HALTON CITY
More informationBarristers and Solicitors. Leo F. Longo Direct: February 1, 2017 Our File No
Aird & Berlis LLP Barristers and Solicitors Leo F. Longo Direct: 416.865.7778 E-mail: llongo@airdberlis.com February 1, 2017 Our File No. 135231 To whom it may concern Dear Sir/Madame: Re: The Town of
More informationIN THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL (ON APPEAL FROM THE DIVISIONAL COURT)
Court of Appeal Number: C61116 Divisional Court File No.: 250/14 IN THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL (ON APPEAL FROM THE DIVISIONAL COURT) B E T W E E N: TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY and BRAYDEN VOLKENANAT Applicants
More informationSubstantial and Unreasonable Injurious Affection after Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. Ontario (Transportation)
May 2013 Municipal Law Section Substantial and Unreasonable Injurious Affection after Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. Ontario (Transportation) By Scott McAnsh Antrim Truck Stop is located just off Highway
More information2008 BCCA 404 Get Acceptance Corporation v. British Columbia (Registrar of Mortgage Br...
Page 1 of 7 COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And Get Acceptance Corporation v. British Columbia (Registrar of Mortgage Brokers), 2008 BCCA 404 Get Acceptance Corporation and Keith
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE MICHAEL JACK. - and -
Court file no.: CV-12-470815 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: MICHAEL JACK Plaintiff - and - ONTARIO PROVINCIAL POLICE AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNITY SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL
More informationKINDER MORGAN CANADA LIMITED: BRIEF ON LEGAL RISKS FOR TRANS MOUNTAIN
West Coast Environmental Law Association 200-2006 W.10 th Avenue Vancouver, BC Coast Salish Territories wcel.org 2017 KINDER MORGAN CANADA LIMITED: BRIEF ON LEGAL RISKS FOR TRANS MOUNTAIN May 29, 2017
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: Yahey v. British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 278 Date: 20180226 Docket: S151727 Registry: Vancouver Marvin Yahey on his own behalf and on behalf of all
More informationTsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia Page 2 [1] In this action the plaintiff sought, inter alia, declarations of Aboriginal title to land in a part
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia, 2008 BCSC 600 Date: 20080514 Docket: 90-0913 Registry: Victoria Roger William, on his own behalf and
More informationConstitutional Practice and Procedure in Administrative Tribunals: An Emerging Issue
Constitutional Practice and Procedure in Administrative Tribunals: An Emerging Issue David Stratas Introduction After much controversy, 1 the Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that tribunals that have
More informationFEDERAL COURT. - and -
Court File No. T-616-12 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: LEEANNE BIELLI Applicant - and - ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, MARC MARYLAND (Chief Electoral Officer), URMA ELLIS (RETURNING OFFICER FOR DON VALLEY EAST),
More informationSET FINE APPLICATIONS BEST PRACTICES MANUAL
SET FINE APPLICATIONS BEST PRACTICES MANUAL Ministry of the Attorney General Crown Law Office-Criminal 720 Bay Street, 10 th Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2S9 Tel: (416) 326-1831 Fax: (416) 326-1746 September
More informationProvince of Alberta QUEEN S COUNSEL ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter Q-1. Current as of May 14, Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta QUEEN S COUNSEL ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter Q-1 Current as of May 14, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: PHS Community Services Society v. Canada (Attorney General), 2008 BCSC 1453 Date: 20081031 Docket: S075547 Registry: Vancouver Between: PHS Community
More information-1- SHOULD S. 91(24) LANDS REMAIN IN PLACE IN POST-TREATY BRITISH COLUMBIA? Peter R. Grant and Lee Caffrey 1
-1- SHOULD S. 91(24) LANDS REMAIN IN PLACE IN POST-TREATY BRITISH COLUMBIA? Peter R. Grant and Lee Caffrey 1 I. INTRODUCTION This paper is being presented in the context of Canada s Responsibility for
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR THE YUKON TERRITORY
COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE YUKON TERRITORY Citation: Between: And And Yukon v. McBee, 2010 YKCA 8 Government of Yukon Yukon Human Rights Commission Donna McBee a.k.a. Donna Molloy and Yukon Human Rights Board
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT DIRECTOR, MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT
Court File No: C56382 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KAWARTHA LAKES Appellant - and - DIRECTOR, MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, WAYNE GENDRON, LIANA GENDRON, DOUG THOMPSON
More informationMOTION RECORD (re extension of time to file a proposal) (returnable February 27, 2018)
Estate File No.: 32-2338424 Court File No.: 32-2338424 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) IN THE MATTER OF THE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO MAKE A PROPOSAL OF
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE SUMMARY CONVICTION APPEAL COURT
COURT FILE NO.: SCA(P2731/08 (Brampton DATE: 20090724 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE SUMMARY CONVICTION APPEAL COURT B E T W E E N: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Cynthia Valarezo, for the Crown Respondent -
More informationFACTUM OF THE APPELLANTS (MOVING PARTIES)
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Court of Appeal Court File No. M28645 BETWEEN: MARLENE C. CLOUD, GERALDINE ROBERTSON, RON DELEARY, LEO NICHOLAS, GORDON HOPKINS, WARRN DOXTATOR, ROBERTA HILL, J. FRANK HILL,
More informationDIVISIONAL COURT, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE CAPITAL ONE BANK (CANADA BRANCH) APPELLANT S FACTUM I. STATEMENT OF THE APPEAL
Divisional Court File No. DC-12-463-00 DIVISIONAL COURT, SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: CAPITAL ONE BANK (CANADA BRANCH) -and- Plaintiff (Appellant) LAURA M. TOOGOOD aka LAURA MARIE TOOGOOD aka
More informationL. Kamerman ) Monday, the 23rd day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of April, 2007.
File No. CA 003-05 L. Kamerman ) Monday, the 23rd day Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of April, 2007. THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT IN THE MATTER OF An appeal to the Minister pursuant to subsection
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (Manitoba Court of Appeal) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (Supreme Court Act section 40 R.S., c.5-19, s.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (Manitoba Court of Appeal) File No. BETWEEN: ERNEST LIONEL JOSEPH BLAIS, - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, - and - MÉTIS NATIONAL COUNCIL, Applicant (Accused), Respondent (Informant),
More information** DEADLINE FOR APPLICATIONS WED. JAN.
Position Title: Summer Law Student 2018 Ministry: ATTORNEY GENERAL Division: Various Branch/Office: Various Offices Location: Various Number of Positions Available: 16 Toronto only: 2 nd year Toronto only:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA. CITATION: R. v. Punko, 2012 SCC 39 DATE: DOCKET: 34135, 34193
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: R. v. Punko, 2012 SCC 39 DATE: 20120720 DOCKET: 34135, 34193 BETWEEN: AND BETWEEN: John Virgil Punko Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Randall Richard Potts
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN LESLIE CAMERON KING
PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Citation: R. v. King 2008 PESCTD 18 Date: 20080325 Docket: S1-GC-572 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: AND: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN LESLIE
More informationDESIGNATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION MAKERS REGULATION
Province of Alberta ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND JURISDICTION ACT DESIGNATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION MAKERS REGULATION Alberta Regulation 69/2006 With amendments up to and including Alberta Regulation
More informationJanuary 6, 2010 File No.: /14186 VIA
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP * Barristers and Solicitors Patent and Trade-mark Agents www.fasken.com 2900-550 Burrard Street Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 0A3 604 631 3131 Telephone 604 631
More informationIn the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Anita Endean, as representative plaintiff Plaintiff and
. It, SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER REGISTRY MAY 0 9 Z018 No. C965349 Vancouver Registry In the Supreme Court of British Columbia Between Anita Endean, as representative plaintiff Plaintiff
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, S.N.B. 2004, c. S-5.5 AND IN THE MATTER OF. MAITLAND CAPITAL LTD., AL GROSSMAN and STEVE LANYS.
IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, S.N.B. 2004, c. S-5.5 AND IN THE MATTER OF MAITLAND CAPITAL LTD., AL GROSSMAN and STEVE LANYS (Respondents) DECISION AND ORDER PURUSANT TO SUBSECTION 184(1.1) BACKGROUND
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And The Council of the Haida Nation v. British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 277 The Council of the Haida Nation and Peter Lantin, suing on his own behalf
More information1 Tsilhqot in Nation v. British Columbia, 2007
CASE COMMENT The Mix George Cadman Tsilhqot in Nation v. British Columbia (The Williams Case) Tsilhqot in Nation v. British Columbia, 2007 BCSC 1700, referred to by some as the Williams case, consumed
More informationSCC File No.: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA) - and -
SCC File No.: 36612 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA) BETWEEN: ALAN PETER KNAPCZYK - and - APPELLANT (Respondent) HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN RESPONDENT (Appellant)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) NELL TOUSSAINT. and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) File Number: 34336 BETWEEN NELL TOUSSAINT Applicant Appellant and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Respondent
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RESPONDENT S FACTUM
C.A. N o A-093-17 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN: The CITY OF THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO (Appellant) - and - MICHELLE RAINFOOT DAVID MORRISON (Respondents) RESPONDENT S FACTUM O Neill and Pray 1267 Chapman
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. - and DIRECTOR OF THE ONTARIO DISABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM. FACTUM OF THE MOVING PARTY On a motion for leave to appeal
Court File No. M44407 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO BETWEEN: BRADLEY FERRIS - and Moving Party (Proposed Appellant) DIRECTOR OF THE ONTARIO DISABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM Responding Party (Proposed Respondent)
More informationSERVICES REVIEW DEPARTMENTS
DATE: February 9, 2012 SERVICES REVIEW DEPARTMENTS Provincial Offences Administration and Legal Department SERVICES Administrative Services for the Ontario Court of Justice (POA Administration) Prosecution
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. B. Notice of Application dated April 12, Written Representations of the Applicants (Moving Parties)
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab 1 Notice of Motion dated June 25, 2013 2. Affidavit of Rizwan Khan dated June 25, 2013 A. CEAA Registry posting of the Responsible Authorities decision statement dated March 14,
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: R. v. Vellone, 2011 ONCA 785 DATE: 20111214 DOCKET: C50397 MacPherson, Simmons and Blair JJ.A. BETWEEN Her Majesty the Queen Ex Rel. The Regional Municipality of York
More informationThe Planning Act: What s New, What Remains, What You Should Know
The Planning Act: What s New, What Remains, What You Should Know The Court and the OMB by: Dennis H. Wood and Johanna R. Myers June 2006 Municipal, Planning and Development Law 65 Queen Street West, Suite
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: Dixon v. Powell River (City), 2009 BCSC 406 Date: 20090326 Docket: S082905 Registry: Vancouver John Dixon and British Columbia Civil Liberties
More informationSET FINE APPLICATIONS
SET FINE APPLICATIONS Kerry Lee Thompson Crown Counsel Ministry of the Attorney General Crown Law Office-Criminal 720 Bay Street, 10 th Floor Toronto, Ontario M7A 2S9 Tel: (416) 326-1831 Fax: (416) 326-1746
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
BETWEEN CITATION: Pierre v. McRae, 2011 ONCA 187 DATE: 20110310 DOCKET: C51589 and C51590 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Weiler, Laskin and Sharpe JJ.A. Elizabeth Pierre and Marlene Pierre and Applicants
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Garber v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 BCCA 385 Date: 20150916 Dockets: CA41883, CA41919, CA41920 Docket: CA41883 Between: And Kevin Garber Respondent
More informationSCC File No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL)
SCC File No. 37276 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: DELTA AIR LINES INC. APPELLANT (Respondent) - and - DR. GÁBOR LUKÁCS RESPONDENT (Appellant) - and
More informationDear Deputy Commissioner Callens, A/Comm Norm Lipinski, Chief Supt. Bain, and Mr. Friesen,
VIA EMAIL Josh Paterson Direct Line/ligne directe: 604-630-9752 Email/courriel: josh@bccla.org Page 1/5 Deputy Commissioner Callens RCMP "E" Division 14200 Green Timbers Way, Surrey, B.C. V3T 6P3 A/Comm
More informationDISCLOSURE: THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS IN PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE CASES. Andrew J. Heal
DISCLOSURE: THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS IN PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE CASES Andrew J. Heal ANDREW J. HEAL, PARTNER HEAL & Co. LLP - 2 - DISCLOSURE: THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROSECUTION
More informationDecision F08-07 MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND CITIZENS SERVICES. David Loukidelis, Information and Privacy Commissioner. July 24, 2008
Decision F08-07 MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND CITIZENS SERVICES David Loukidelis, Information and Privacy Commissioner July 24, 2008 Quicklaw Cite: [2008] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 25 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/other_decisions/decisionf08-07.pdf
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: And And Before: Burnaby (City) v. Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC, 2014 BCCA 465 City of Burnaby Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC The National Energy Board
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA) BARRETT RICHARD JORDAN and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and Court File No. 36068 APPELLANT (Appellant) RESPONDENT (Respondent)
More informationCANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION. - and -
Tribunal File: T1340/7008 B E T W E E N: CANADIAN HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY CARING SOCIETY OF CANADA and ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS Complainants (Moving Party) - and - CANADIAN
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NELL TOUSSAINT. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA. and THE CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL Court File No.: A-362-10 BETWEEN: NELL TOUSSAINT Appellant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent and THE CANADIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW OF THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (On Appeal from the British Columbia Court of Appeal)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (On Appeal from the British Columbia Court of Appeal) Court File No. 29419 BETWEEN: THE MINISTER OF FORESTS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA on behalf of Her
More informationNishnawbe Aski Nation
A Handbook on Consultation in Natural Resource Development 3rd Edition 2007 $25.00 (For non-nan Associaties) Table of Contents Acknowledgement... 2 About this Guide... 3 About... 4 First Nations in...
More informationONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 24. Applications for Review under the Employment Standards Act, 2000
ONTARIO LABOUR RELATIONS BOARD INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 24 Applications for Review under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 This Information Bulletin describes what happens when an employee, employer,
More informationA summary of Injurious Affection
A summary of Injurious Affection Where no land of the claimant is expropriated By Devesh Gupta 30 March 2011 For the Ontario Expropriation Association Introduction The Ontario Expropriations Act 1 ( OEA
More informationTHAT Council receive report FAF entitled Research Memo Coverage of Litigation Costs for information.
This document can be made available in other accessible formats as soon as practicable and upon request STAFF REPORT: Chief Administrative Officer A. Recommendations THAT Council receive report FAF.16.67
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-15-10832-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF MANITOBA
Origin: Appeal from a decision of the Master of the Court of Queen's Bench, dated June 5, 2013 Date: 20131213 Docket: CI 13-01-81367 (Winnipeg Centre) Indexed as: Jewish Community Campus of Winnipeg Inc.
More informationPursuant to Section 34 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O this Permit To Take Water is hereby issued to:
Ministry of the Environment Ministère de l Environnement AMENDED PERMIT TO TAKE WATER Surface and Ground Water NUMBER 5183-8EZKMA Pursuant to Section 34 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O. 1990
More information