Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID# 9631
|
|
- Coleen Charles
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID# 9631 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division UNITED STATES of AMERICA, v. Case No. 3:14-cr-12 (JRS) Hon. James R. Spencer ROBERT F. MCDONNELL MAUREEN G. MCDONNELL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT MAUREEN G. MCDONNELL S MOTION # 23 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL PURSUANT TO RULE 29 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
2 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 2 of 14 PageID# 9632 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION...1 ARGUMENT...2 I. MRS. MCDONNELL IS ENTITLED TO A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON COUNTS 1-11 BECAUSE HER HUSBAND DID NOT PERFORM OR PROMISE TO PERFORM ANY OFFICIAL ACTS TO BENEFIT MR. WILLIAMS, AND AS A PRIVATE CITIZEN, SHE CANNOT BE GUILTY IN HER OWN RIGHT....2 II. III. MRS. MCDONNELL IS ENTITLED TO A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON COUNT 13 BECAUSE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT SHE KNOWINGLY MADE A FALSE STATEMENT TO PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION IN ORDER TO INFLUENCE THE BANK....3 MRS. MCDONNELL IS ENTITLED TO A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON COUNT 14 BECAUSE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT SHE INTENDED TO OBSTRUCT A GRAND JURY PROCEEDING....4 A. The Note Contains No False Assertions of Fact....5 B. There Was No Existing or Prospective Federal Grand Jury Proceeding....6 C. The Government Has Not Presented Any Evidence of a Nexus Between Mrs. McDonnell s Note and Obstruction of Any Grand Jury Proceeding....7 CONCLUSION...11
3 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 3 of 14 PageID# 9633 INTRODUCTION After nearly three weeks of trial, the Government has rested its case-in-chief without presenting sufficient evidence as to any of the charges made against Maureen G. McDonnell in the Indictment. As set forth in the memorandum supporting Robert F. McDonnell s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, Dkt. Nos. 408 & 409, 1 the Government has failed to show that Governor McDonnell performed or promised to perform any official act for Mr. Williams, as required to prove Counts 1-11 of the Indictment. This failure to produce any evidence that would allow a jury to conclude that the Governor promised to exercise (or to influence others to exercise) any actual governmental power to benefit Mr. Williams is fatal as to the charges against Mrs. McDonnell, since Mrs. McDonnell was not a public official and cannot be convicted of honest services wire fraud or Hobbs Act violations in her own right. With respect to Count 13, the Government has offered no evidence as to Mrs. McDonnell beyond the fact that she signed the loan application to Pentagon Federal Credit Union ("PenFed"). This is insufficient to establish that Mrs. McDonnell made a false statement to the bank in order to influence the bank s action respecting a loan to her, or that she made such a statement knowingly. Finally, as to the obstruction charge alleged in Count 14 of the Indictment, the Government has failed to offer evidence showing (1) that the letter Mrs. McDonnell gave to Jonnie Williams was false; (2) that in giving the letter to Jonnie Williams, Mrs. McDonnell intended to obstruct, influence or impede a grand jury proceeding; or (3) that Mrs. McDonnell s conduct, if successful, would have had the natural and probable effect of interfering with the due administration of justice. For these reasons, Mrs. McDonnell is entitled to a judgment of acquittal on Counts 1-11 and of the Indictment. 1 Mrs. McDonnell joins in Robert F. McDonnell s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal. 1
4 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 4 of 14 PageID# 9634 ARGUMENT The standard governing a Rule 29 motion for a judgment of acquittal is whether there is substantial evidence (direct or circumstantial) which, taken in the light most favorable to the prosecution, would warrant a jury finding that defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Jaensch, 678 F. Supp. 2d 421 (E.D. Va. 2010) (quoting United States v. MacCloskey, 682 F.2d 468, 473 (4th Cir. 1982)). For the prosecution to withstand a Rule 29 motion, the evidence must be sufficient to support a reasonable inference that each of the elements necessary for conviction is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. (citing MacCloskey, 682 F.2d at 474). Here, the evidence will not support a jury finding that Mrs. McDonnell committed the crimes charged in Counts 1-11 or of the Indictment. A judgment of acquittal should therefore be entered on all of these counts. I. MRS. MCDONNELL IS ENTITLED TO A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON COUNTS 1-11 BECAUSE HER HUSBAND DID NOT PERFORM OR PROMISE TO PERFORM ANY OFFICIAL ACTS TO BENEFIT MR. WILLIAMS, AND AS A PRIVATE CITIZEN, SHE CANNOT BE GUILTY IN HER OWN RIGHT. It is undisputed in this case that [a]s First Lady of Virginia, defendant Maureen G. McDonnell was not a public official. See Stipulation 1, 17, Dkt As a mere volunteer, Mrs. McDonnell cannot herself be guilty of either honest services wire fraud (Counts 1-4) or Hobbs Act extortion (Counts 5-11), since she did not owe any honest services to the citizens of Virginia and had no public office to corrupt. Rather, the Government s theory in this case is that Mrs. McDonnell conspired with her husband to corrupt his public office. Thus, the corruption charges against Mrs. McDonnell necessarily rise or fall with the Government s case against Mr. McDonnell. As shown in the memorandum accompanying Robert F. McDonnell s concurrently filed Motion for Judgment of Acquittal, Dkt. Nos. 408 and 409, the Government has failed to establish 2
5 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 5 of 14 PageID# 9635 that Governor McDonnell agreed (or conspired) to perform official acts in exchange for receiving things of value from Mr. Williams, as required to prove honest services wire fraud and Hobbs Act extortion. Nor is there any evidence that Mrs. McDonnell attempted to influence her husband to corrupt his office. See July 30, 2014 Tr. 680:25 681:6 (Q: Well, to be clear, she s saying that she s going to help you, but she s not promising you that the Governor is going to help you, right? A: No. Q: And she never tells you at this meeting, I ll get Bob to do X, Y, or Z if you give us the money? A: No. ). The Government s proof as to Counts 1-11 of the Indictment is therefore deficient as to both Mr. and Mrs. McDonnell. II. MRS. MCDONNELL IS ENTITLED TO A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON COUNT 13 BECAUSE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT SHE KNOWINGLY MADE A FALSE STATEMENT TO PENTAGON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION IN ORDER TO INFLUENCE THE BANK. Count 13 of the Indictment charges Mrs. McDonnell and her husband with violating 18 U.S.C by knowingly making a false statement to PenFed on February 1, 2013 when they submitted a joint Uniform Residential Loan Application to refinance one of their properties. Specifically, the Government alleges that the McDonnells failed to list at least $120,000 in loans from Mr. Williams on the application. See Indictment 121. In order to establish a violation of 1014, the Government must prove (1) that Mrs. McDonnell made a false statement, (2) that she made that statement in order to influence a bank s action respecting a loan to her, and (3) that she made the statement knowingly. See Elliott v. United States, 332 F.3d 753, 759 (4th Cir. 2003). The evidence offered by the Government in this case is insufficient to establish either the second or third elements. The PenFed representative, Nanette Bolt, could not recall whether Maureen McDonnell was on the initial January 23, 2013 conference call in which Ms. Bolt collected general financial information in order to prepare the McDonnells loan application. See August 13, 2014 Tr. at 3
6 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 6 of 14 PageID# :2-5 (Q. And who was on the call from the Governor s family side? A. The Governor was, I think Ms. McDonnell, I don t recall, and the sister, Maureen McDonnell. ); id. at 3130:11 17 (MR. BURCK: The witness doesn t recall if Ms. McDonnell is on the phone call. He is referring to both McDonnells. THE COURT: Is that what you said? That you didn t recall whether she was, Ms. McDonnell, was on the call or not? THE WITNESS: Correct. ). The Government proffered no evidence showing that Mrs. McDonnell participated in the preparation of the loan application, nor did they demonstrate that she actually reviewed the application after it had been prepared. See August 13, 2014 Tr. 3213:5 8 (Q: Is it fair to say that even though she was on the call, that you don t recall her saying anything on that call? A: Correct. ); 3213: :5 (Q: Okay. Now, the -- you ve testified about a number of conversations and s you had with Governor McDonnell today. And do you recall having any specific conversations with Ms. McDonnell, Maureen McDonnell, the wife, about this application? A: Not very much. Q: Okay. Is it fair to say that Governor McDonnell was the person you were dealing with with respect --" A: "Point of contact, right. Q: And getting information during the various iterations of the application, that information came from Governor McDonnell, right? A: Correct. ). Rather, the sum total of the Government s evidence against Mrs. McDonnell is that her signature appears on the document. This is insufficient to establish that Mrs. McDonnell knowingly made a false statement with the intent to influence the bank s actions. III. MRS. MCDONNELL IS ENTITLED TO A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON COUNT 14 BECAUSE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT SHE INTENDED TO OBSTRUCT A GRAND JURY PROCEEDING. Finally, the Court should grant a judgment of acquittal in relation to Count 14 because the Government (a) has not presented any evidence that Mrs. McDonnell made any false assertion of fact; (b) has not presented any evidence that Mrs. McDonnell had knowledge or notice of 4
7 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 7 of 14 PageID# 9637 existing or prospective grand jury proceedings; and (c) has not presented, and cannot present, any evidence of the nexus requirement necessary to establish intent to influence a grand jury proceeding under 18 U.S.C. 1512(c)(2). Thus, the Government has failed to adduce evidence to establish the elements it bears the burden of proving to support a conviction for obstruction, namely, (1) knowledge or notice of the grand jury proceedings, and (2) that the defendant acted with corrupt intent, (3) to obstruct, influence, or impede an official proceeding. See United States v Hymer, 6:09-CR , 2011 WL (S.D. W. Va. Feb. 14, 2011) (citing United States v. Crandle, 274 F. App x 324, 327 (4th Cir. 2008) and United States v. Brooks, 111 F.3d 365, 372 (4th Cir. 1997)); United States v Reynolds, 178 F. App x 281, 287 (4th Cir. 2006). A. The Note Contains No False Assertions of Fact. The note Mrs. McDonnell sent to Mr. Williams when she returned the dresses to him cannot constitute obstruction because it contains no false assertions of fact. The note states: Dearest Celeste & Jonnie, I can t begin to thank you how special [sic] you made me feel on Cailin s wedding day and on our 35th wedding anniversary day all dressed up in the beautiful outfits you adorned me in on both momentous occasions. I m so happy we ve been able to share so many significant milestones in our lives with you both! I truly hope your daughter will now be able to enjoy these lovely outfits and show them off on many grand occasions. If not, I m sure there are many exemplary charitable organizations like we talked about who would welcome the opportunity to auction them for a wonderful cause, having been worn only once by the First Lady of Virginia to her daughter s wedding at the Executive Mansion and celebrating her 35th wedding Anniversary with the Governor! Actually, if that happens I think I ll be there to bid on them myself! Please know that we cherish our friendship with you and look forward to many more wonderful memories together ahead! Xoxo! Maureen McDonnell. See GX-3 (emphasis added). There is no statement in this note that the Government has shown to be false. The Government alleges that Mrs. McDonnell and Mr. Williams never agreed that 5
8 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 8 of 14 PageID# 9638 Mrs. McDonnell would return the dresses that she included with this note, and to be sure, Mr. Williams testified to this effect. See, e.g., August 1, 2014 Tr. at 1025:15 18 ( This is a fabrication right here.... What s not true is that this -- these clothes were never intended to be returned to me. I purchased these clothes for Maureen McDonnell. ). But Government s Exhibit 3 does not claim Mrs. McDonnell and Mr. Williams had an agreement to return the dresses. The Government apparently focuses on two aspects of the note: (1) Mrs. McDonnell s hope that Mr. Williams s daughter will now be able to enjoy these lovely outfits and show them off on many grand occasions and (2) Mrs. McDonnell s statement that there are many exemplary charitable organizations like we talked about who would welcome the opportunity to auction them for a wonderful cause. As a simple matter of grammar, there is no possible construction of these statements that amounts to a claim that Mrs. McDonnell and Mr. Williams previously had agreed that Mrs. McDonnell would return the dresses. No amount of textual exegesis can draw such a statement out of the words that appear on the face of Government Exhibit 3. It is impossible for an accurate statement to obstruct a grand jury. See, e.g., United States v. Thomas, 916 F.2d 647, (11th Cir. 1990) (reversing conviction where statement was not established to be false and where determining falsity would require conjecture and innuendo ). On this basis alone, there is no evidence to support a conviction of Mrs. McDonnell on Count 14. B. There Was No Existing or Prospective Federal Grand Jury Proceeding. The absence of an existing or pending federal grand jury proceeding at the time Mrs. McDonnell returned the dresses similarly requires acquittal on Count 14. According to testimony from the Government s own witness, there was no federal grand jury investigation into the McDonnells at the time the charged conduct occurred. August 12, 2014 Tr. at 2992: :6 (Q: At the time you went to interview Ms. McDonnell in February of 2013, was there a 6
9 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 9 of 14 PageID# 9639 federal grand jury investigation open into the McDonnells for public corruption? A: No, there was not. ). Indeed, no federal officials attended the February 15 interview of Mrs. McDonnell, see August 12, 2014 Tr. at 2971:13 17 (Q: Now, you show up at the Mansion. Do you show up with Special Agent Kennedy? A: No, I did not. Q: So it was just yourself and -- A: Special Agent Lyons. ), so Mrs. McDonnell clearly had no inkling of federal involvement. Although no state of mind need be proved with respect to the circumstance that the proceeding sought to be obstructed was, in fact, federal, 1512(g), or that the federal proceeding sought to be obstructed was pending at the time, 1512(g), the Government nevertheless must show that what Mrs. McDonnell purportedly intended to obstruct, in fact, was a federal official proceeding. United States v. Dunn, 434 F. Supp. 2d 1203, (M.D. Ala. 2006) (finding defendant did not obstruct where defendant only knew about the local murder investigation, not the federal investigation). Because the Government has not adduced any evidence that Mrs. McDonnell had the intent to obstruct a federal proceeding, a judgment of acquittal as to Count 14 is required. C. The Government Has Not Presented Any Evidence of a Nexus Between Mrs. McDonnell s Note and Obstruction of Any Grand Jury Proceeding. As the Government has conceded, it must show a nexus in time, causation, or logic with the judicial proceedings.... In other words, the endeavor must have the natural and probable effect of interfering with the due administration of justice. See United States v Aguilar, 515 U.S. 593, 599 (1995); United States v Reich, 479 F.3d 179, 186 (2d Cir. 2007) (applying nexus requirement to 1512(c)(2)); see also United States v Wein, 521 F. App x 138, 141 (4th Cir. 2013) (same); United States v. Johnson, 553 F. Supp. 2d 582, 626 (E.D.Va. 2008) (citing Aguilar); Government s Response in Opposition to Maureen McDonnell s Motion to Dismiss, Dkt No. 147, at 7 ( [I]t is true that at trial, the Government will have to establish the so-called 7
10 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 10 of 14 PageID# 9640 nexus requirement in connection with the intent element ). Courts have held that this means that the Government must show that Mrs. McDonnell wrote the note and provided it to Mr. Williams with the specific intent to obstruct the federal grand jury. Schwarz, 283 F.3d at 107 (emphasis added). This is the minimum required. See id. The Supreme Court s decision in Aguilar made clear that conduct is punishable where the defendant acts with an intent to obstruct justice, and in a manner that is likely to obstruct justice. Id. at 601 (emphasis added); United States v. Blair, 661 F.3d 755, 766 (4th Cir. 2011) (defendant must be aware that success in the allegedly obstructive conduct is likely to obstruct an official proceeding). In Aguilar, the defendant (a federal district court judge) lied to FBI agents about his participation in an embezzlement case and his knowledge of a wiretap authorized by another district court judge. 515 U.S. at 597. At the time that the defendant lied to the agents, he was aware that a grand jury was investigating an alleged conspiracy to influence the embezzlement case. Id. at There was no indication, however, that the grand jury had authorized or directed the FBI investigation, nor that the grand jury had even summoned the particular agents to testify. Id. at 600. Therefore, the Court held that it was speculative as to what use would be made of the defendant s false statements and that it could not be said that the natural and probable effect would be the interference with the due administration of justice. Id. at 601 ( But what use will be made of false testimony given to an investigating agent who has not been subpoenaed or otherwise directed to appear before the grand jury is far more speculative. ). In rejecting Justice Scalia s dissent, the Court in Aguilar said: Justice SCALIA also apparently believes that any act, done with the intent to obstruct... the due administration of justice, is sufficient to impose criminal liability. Under the dissent s theory, a man could be found guilty under 1503 if he knew of a pending investigation and lied to his wife about his whereabouts at the time of the crime, thinking that an FBI agent might decide to interview 8
11 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 11 of 14 PageID# U.S. at 602. her and that she might in turn be influenced in her statement to the agent by her husband s false account of his whereabouts. The intent to obstruct justice is indeed present, but the man s culpability is a good deal less clear from the statute than we usually require in order to impose criminal liability. In United States v. Schwarz, the defendant was aware of a federal grand jury investigation relating to the charges at issue in that case. 283 F.3d 76, 107 (2d Cir. 2002). The defendant was himself served with a federal grand jury subpoena and then interviewed two days later by federal investigators about the conduct then being investigated by a federal grand jury. Id. Indeed, the defendant initiated the meeting with the very same federal law enforcement officers that served him with the federal grand jury subpoena. Id. It was during this interview that he made the allegedly false statements that were the basis of the obstruction charge. Id. Nonetheless, the Court of Appeals determined that there was insufficient evidence to enable a rational trier of fact to conclude that the defendant knew that his false statements would be provided to the federal grand jury "or that he entertained any expectations on that score that were based on such knowledge." Id. This is so because the Court of Appeals determined the defendant "had not himself been called to testify and there is no evidence that the investigators gave him any indication that they would repeat his statements to the grand jury." Id. Count Fourteen cannot withstand scrutiny under Aguilar or Schwarz. There is no evidence in this case that Mrs. McDonnell was called to testify at the time she sent the note to Mr. Williams, or even at any time thereafter. Nor is there any evidence that Mr. Williams had been called to testify or that Mrs. McDonnell was given any other indication that the note would be provided to a prospective federal grand jury. Mrs. McDonnell did not receive a federal grand jury subpoena for documents until after she sent the note. And unlike the defendants in Aguilar and Schwarz, with respect to whom the 9
12 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 12 of 14 PageID# 9642 courts determined there was insufficient evidence to support the nexus element of obstruction, the evidence in this case, at the time she sent the note, is that: Mrs. McDonnell had received no federal grand jury subpoena for documents or testimony; Mrs. McDonnell had received no indication that the note would be provided to the federal grand jury, which did not exist at the time; Mrs. McDonnell was not aware of any federal grand jury proceeding; and There was, in fact, no federal grand jury proceeding. It is a fatal defect in the government s case that there was no showing that [Mrs. McDonnell]... knew that the allegedly false [note] she sent to Mr. Williams would be conveyed to a federal grand jury. See Schwarz, 283 F.3d at 109; see also Aguilar, 515 U.S. at 599. The government has therefore failed to offer sufficient evidence of [Mrs. McDonnell s] intent to obstruct the federal grand jury for if the defendant lacks knowledge that his actions are likely to affect the judicial proceeding, [s]he lacks the requisite intent to obstruct. Id.; see also Aguilar. If the defendants in Aguilar and Schwarz could not be convicted of obstruction of justice, it must be true that under the evidence presented in this case, Mrs. McDonnell is entitled to a judgment of acquittal as a matter of law. 10
13 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 13 of 14 PageID# 9643 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court should grant Mrs. McDonnell a judgment of acquittal on Counts 1-11 and of the Indictment. Dated: August 15, 2014 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Heather H. Martin QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP William A. Burck (pro hac vice) Stephen M. Hauss (pro hac vice) Heather H. Martin (VSB No ) Daniel R. Koffmann (pro hac vice) 777 Sixth Street NW, 11 th Floor Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) williamburck@quinnemanuel.com stephenhauss@quinnemanuel.com heathermartin@quinnemanuel.com danielkoffmann@quinnemanuel.com Attorneys for Maureen G. McDonnell 11
14 Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 413 Filed 08/15/14 Page 14 of 14 PageID# 9644 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Heather H. Martin, am a member of the Bar of this Court. I hereby certify that I caused the foregoing Motion to be filed with the Court s CM/ECF system this 15 th day of August, 2014, thereby causing it to be served on all registered users. /s/ Heather H. Martin Heather H. Martin (VSB # 65694) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP 777 6th Street NW, Suite 1100 Washington, D.C (202) (202) (fax) heathermartin@quinnemanuel.com 12
Case 3:14-cr JRS Document 11 Filed 01/22/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 108
Case 3:14-cr-00012-JRS Document 11 Filed 01/22/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 108 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V. ROBERT F. MCDONNELL
More informationCase 1:09-cr LEK Document 121 Filed 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 902 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Case 1:09-cr-00398-LEK Document 121 Filed 03/06/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 902 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. ARTHUR LEE ONG, Plaintiff, Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 188 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID 5418 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationCase 1:12-cr LO Document 147 Filed 11/19/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 1996 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:12-cr-00003-LO Document 147 Filed 11/19/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 1996 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. KIM
More informationCase 1:18-cr TSE Document 223 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4200
Case 1:18-cr-00083-TSE Document 223 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4200 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT-WC Document 1751 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES PROPOSED VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS
Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 106 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 351 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 3:16-cr-93-J-32JRK
More informationCase: 1:16-cr TSB Doc #: 229 Filed: 11/22/17 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 5045 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:16-cr-00063-TSB Doc #: 229 Filed: 11/22/17 Page: 1 of 6 PAGEID #: 5045 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Case No. 1:16-CR-63 v.
More informationCase 1:18-cr DLF Document 71 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF Document 71 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CRIMINAL NUMBER: 1:18-cr-00032-2 (DLF) CONCORD
More informationCase 1:14-cr JEI Document 114 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1312 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:14-cr-00263-JEI Document 114 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1312 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case No. 14-00263-1 (JEI) JOSEPH SIGELMAN ORDER
More informationCase 5:14-cr M Document 27 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:14-cr-00318-M Document 27 Filed 05/04/15 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) No. 5:14-cr-00318
More informationCase 1:12-cr LO Document Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1416 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:12-cr-00003-LO Document 120-1 Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1416 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v.
More informationCase 4:15-cr BRW Document 74 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case 4:15-cr-00300-BRW Document 74 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS UNITED STATES v. CRIMINAL NO. 4:15-cr-00300-BRW THEODORE E. SUHL MOTION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal No. 1:10CR485 Hon. Leonie M. Brinkema v. JEFFREY ALEXANDER STERLING Defendant.
More informationCase 1:19-cr ABJ Document 70 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:19-cr-00018-ABJ Document 70 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, ROGER J. STONE, JR., Defendant. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationCase 1:08-cr JLT Document 73 Filed 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:08-cr-10049-JLT Document 73 Filed 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) CRIMINAL NO. 08-CR-10049-JLT v. ) ) [ORAL
More informationCase 1:17-cr ABJ Document 505 Filed 02/13/19 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:17-cr-00201-ABJ Document 505 Filed 02/13/19 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Defendant. Criminal No. 17-201
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 3:14-cr-00012-JRS Document 9 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 28 PageID# 79 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V. ROBERT F. MCDONNELL
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL,
Appeal: 15-4019 Doc: 59 Filed: 03/06/2015 Pg: 1 of 18 No. 15-4019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, Defendant-Appellant.
More informationCase 1:19-cr ABJ Document 27 Filed 02/08/19 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:19-cr-00018-ABJ Document 27 Filed 02/08/19 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case No.: 1:19-CR-00018-ABJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, ROGER
More informationCase 1:12-cr JPJ-PMS Document 215 Filed 11/18/12 Page 1 of 9 Pageid#: 933
Case 1:12-cr-00002-JPJ-PMS Document 215 Filed 11/18/12 Page 1 of 9 Pageid#: 933 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : Case
More informationCase 1:13-cr DPW Document 240 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:13-cr-10238-DPW Document 240 Filed 06/09/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) ) Crim. No. 13-10238-DPW AZAMAT TAZHAYAKOV ) ) Defendant
More informationCase 1:18-cr AJT Document 57 Filed 03/01/19 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 363
Case 118-cr-00457-AJT Document 57 Filed 03/01/19 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 363 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Case
More informationCase 1:05-cr RBW Document 230 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:05-cr-00394-RBW Document 230 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) CR. NO 05-394 (RBW) v. ) ) I. LEWIS LIBBY, ) also
More informationCase 8:18-cr TDC Document 35 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 8:18-cr-00012-TDC Document 35 Filed 10/23/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal No. TDC-18-0012 MARK T. LAMBERT, Defendant.
More informationCase 1:18-cr TSE Document 93 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1738
Case 1:18-cr-00083-TSE Document 93 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1738 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationCASE 0:17-cr DWF-TNL Document 1009 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 10
CASE 0:17-cr-00107-DWF-TNL Document 1009 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 10 United States of America, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Case No.: 17-CR-107 (16) DWF/TNL Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM
More informationCase 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 1907 Filed 10/14/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT-WC Document 1907 Filed 10/14/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR.
More informationCase 1:08-cr EGS Document 126 Filed 10/02/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-cr-00231-EGS Document 126 Filed 10/02/2008 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) Crim. No. 08-231 (EGS) THEODORE
More informationCase 1:10-cr LMB Document 192 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1711
Case 1:10-cr-00485-LMB Document 192 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1711 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal
More informationUSA v. Fabio Moreno Vargas
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-18-2015 USA v. Fabio Moreno Vargas Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationCase 1:17-cr TSE Document 216 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1545 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:17-cr-00106-TSE Document 216 Filed 06/15/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1545 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LAMONT
More informationThe United States of America, by and through JULIE BURNHAM. PORTER, Attorney for the United States, Acting Under Authority Conferred
Case: 1:08-cr-00888 Document #: 1235 Filed: 07/11/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:28102 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ROD BLAGOJEVICH
More informationCase 1:18-cr TSE Document 249 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 5497
Case 1:18-cr-00083-TSE Document 249 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 13 PageID# 5497 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) CRIMINAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT-WC Document 2357 Filed 02/25/12 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, V. CR NO.
More informationCase 1:18-cr TSE Document 304 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 6635
Case 1:18-cr-00083-TSE Document 304 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 6635 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL,
No. 15-4019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, Defendant-Appellant. On Appeal From the United States District
More informationCase 6:13-cr JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1085 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 6:13-cr-00099-JAJ-KRS Document 245 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID 1085 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JAMES FIDEL SOTOLONGO, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO
More informationCase 3:18-cr MMH-JRK Document 59 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 149
Case 3:18-cr-00089-MMH-JRK Document 59 Filed 10/17/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID 149 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. CASE NO.: 3:18-cr-89-J-34JRK
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
Case 16-1618, Document 142-1, 09/26/2017, 2133207, Page1 of 12 16-1618-cr (L) United States v. Skelos UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT
More informationThe McDonnell Case: A Clarification of Corruption Law or a Confusing Application of Corruption Law
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2015 The McDonnell Case: A Clarification of Corruption Law or a Confusing Application of Corruption Law Henry L.
More informationCase 1:10-cr LMB Document 322 Filed 10/07/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 2438 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:10-cr-00485-LMB Document 322 Filed 10/07/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 2438 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. JEFFREY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION. v. : NO
Case 1:06-cr-00125-SLR Document 67 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION v. : NO. 06-125 TERESA FLOOD
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 25, 2011
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 25, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. THOMAS W. MEADOWS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. S57,691 Robert
More informationCase: 2:13-cr MHW-TPK Doc #: 56 Filed: 08/28/14 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 368
Case 213-cr-00183-MHW-TPK Doc # 56 Filed 08/28/14 Page 1 of 7 PAGEID # 368 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 213-CR-183
More informationCase 2:08-cr GER-DAS Document 36 Filed 05/13/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:08-cr-20585-GER-DAS Document 36 Filed 05/13/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Case 2:08-cr-20585-DML-DAS
More informationCase 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 1814 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT-WC Document 1814 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, * PLAINTIFF, * V.
More informationFILE IN THE DEARBORN SUPERIOR CCOU413 II 2012
STATE OF INDIANA )SS: COUNTY OF DEARBORN ) STATE OF INDIANA, ) Plaintiff, ) FILE IN THE DEARBORN SUPERIOR CCOU413 II 2012 CLERK OF DEARBORN CIRCUIT COURT CAUSE NO. 15D021103-FD-084 v. DANIEL BREWINGTON,
More informationCase 2:19-cr JLS Document 57 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:19-cr-00064-JLS Document 57 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : CRIMINAL NO. 19-64 JOHN DOUGHERTY
More informationCase 1:10-cr LMB Document 187 Filed 09/14/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID# Alexandria Division
Case 1:10-cr-00485-LMB Document 187 Filed 09/14/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 1677 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. JEFFREY
More informationCase 1:18-cr Document 16 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:18-cr-00083 Document 16 Filed 02/27/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 150 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Case No:
More informationCase 1:10-cr RDB Document 71 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:10-cr-00181-RDB Document 71 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * v. * Criminal No. 1:10-cr-0181-RDB THOMAS ANDREWS
More informationCase 1:18-cr DLF Document 93 Filed 01/22/19 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF Document 93 Filed 01/22/19 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING LLC CRIMINAL
More informationIN THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 15A PC-2889 STATE S BRIEF OF APPELLEE
IN THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15A04-1712-PC-2889 DANIEL BREWINGTON, Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee-Respondent. Appeal from the Dearborn Superior Court 2, No. 15D02-1702-PC-3,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 3:09-cr-00272-EMK Document 158 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : NO. 3:CR-09-000272 vs. : : MARK A. CIAVARELLA,
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. Missouri Eastern District Court Case No. 4:09-cv Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v.
PlainSite Legal Document Missouri Eastern District Court Case No. 4:09-cv-01252 Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v. Cassity et al Document 2163 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think
More informationCase 2:10-cr MHT -WC Document 608 Filed 02/14/11 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT -WC Document 608 Filed 02/14/11 Page 1 of 10 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CR.
More informationCase 1:15-cr KMW Document 23 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 15 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS
Case 1:15-cr-00317-KMW Document 23 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, - V. - Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos, S1 15 Cr 317 (KMW)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) No. 05 CR 408-2 v. ) Judge John F. Grady ) P. NICHOLAS HURTGEN ) GOVERNMENT'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER
More informationSUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF JOEL SANDERS IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 72 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, - against - STEVEN DAVIS, STEPHEN DICARMINE, JOEL SANDERS, and ZACHARY WARREN, Ind. No. 773/2014 Defendants.
More informationNO. 50,546-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * versus * * * * * *
Judgment rendered May 4, 2016. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C.Cr.P. NO. 50,546-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * STATE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division NICOLE P. ERAMO, v. Plaintiff, ROLLING STONE, LLC, SABRINA RUBIN ERDELY, and WENNER MEDIA, LLC, Defendants.
More informationCase 8:16-cv MSS-JSS Document 90 Filed 10/04/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2485 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:16-cv-02012-MSS-JSS Document 90 Filed 10/04/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 2485 VIP AUTO GLASS, INC., individually, as assignee, and on behalf of all those similarly situated UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More informationCase 1:18-cr TSE Document 216 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4171
Case 1:18-cr-00083-TSE Document 216 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID# 4171 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL
More informationCase 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 1869 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:10-cr-00186-MHT-WC Document 1869 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CASE
More informationCase 1:10-cr RDB Document 75 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:10-cr-00181-RDB Document 75 Filed 03/15/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND v. * Criminal No. 10-0181-RDB THOMAS ANDREWS DRAKE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cr-00201-ABJ Document 384 Filed 08/24/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Crim. No. 17-cr-201-1 (ABJ) Defendant.
More informationExceptional Reporting Services, Inc. P.O. Box Corpus Christi, TX
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GREEN BAY DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CASE NO: :-CR-00-WCG-DEJ- ) Plaintiff, ) CRIMINAL ) vs. ) Green Bay, Wisconsin ) RONALD H. VAN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT APPELLANT S MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL
USCA Case #18-3037 Document #1738356 Filed: 06/28/2018 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Case No. 18-3037 PAUL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Case 1:11-cv-01255-AJT-JFA Document 11 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 38 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION AMY LAMARCA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2009 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-6-2009 USA v. Teresa Flood Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-2937 Follow this and additional
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT. No. 128 EM 2014 : : : : : : : DISSENTING STATEMENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT IN RE MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN, TRAFFIC COURT JUDGE, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PETITION OF MICHAEL J. SULLIVAN No. 128 EM 2014 Application for Relief from the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEFFREY K. SKILLING, and KENNETH L. LAY, Plaintiff, Defendants. Crim. No. H-04-25 (Lake, J. DEFENDANT
More informationCase 3:14-cv REP-AWA-BMK Document 146 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 5723
Case 3:14-cv-00852-REP-AWA-BMK Document 146 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID# 5723 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION Golden Bethune-Hill, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:08-cr FB Document 187 Filed 09/25/09 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:08-cr-00415-FB Document 187 Filed 09/25/09 Page 1 of 6 U.S. Department of Justice JM:IJ:PSS:BS United States Attorney Eastern District of New York 271 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, New York 11201
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. The STATE OF OHIO, : : Appellee, : : JOURNAL ENTRY : v. : and : : OPINION JORDAN, : : Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Jordan, 168 Ohio App.3d 202, 2006-Ohio-538.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 85817 The STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, JOURNAL ENTRY v. and OPINION JORDAN, Appellant.
More informationCase: 1:10-cr SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 1 of 5. PageID #: 18606
Case: 1:10-cr-00387-SL Doc #: 898 Filed: 06/04/12 1 of 5. PageID #: 18606 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. 1:10CR387
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, vs. STEVEN DALE GREEN, DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No In re: MARTIN MCNULTY,
Case: 10-3201 Document: 00619324149 Filed: 02/26/2010 Page: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 10-3201 In re: MARTIN MCNULTY, Petitioner. ANSWER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 309-cr-00272-EMK Document 155 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. 3CR-09-272 MARK A. CIAVARELLA, JR.
More informationCase 3:17-cv L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171
Case 3:17-cv-03300-L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MBA ENGINEERING, INC., as Sponsor and Administrator
More informationCase 1:15-cv GBL-MSN Document 31 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 317
Case 1:15-cv-00675-GBL-MSN Document 31 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 317 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR ADOPTION,
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, and Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, and Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice BRIDGETTE JORDAN, ET AL. OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No. 961320 February 28, 1997
More informationCase 1:10-cr LMB Document 182 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1647 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case 1:10-cr-00485-LMB Document 182 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 1647 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:11-cr-00161-UA Document 39 Filed 09/06/11 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) ) CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1:11-CR-161-1
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cr-000-vap Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 JOHN NEIL McNICHOLAS, ESQ. STATE BAR #0 McNicholas Law Office Palos Verdes Blvd., Redondo Beach, CA 0 (0) -00 (0) -- FAX john@mcnicholaslawoffice.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) ) SOUFIAN AMRI ) ) No. 1:17-CR-50 and ) ) MICHAEL QUEEN, ) ) Defendants. )
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
MARC J. VICTOR, P.C. 0 South Alma School Road, Suite Chandler, Arizona (0 - Fax (0-0 Marc J. Victor - SBN 0 Marc@AttorneyForFreedom.com Attorneys for Defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
More informationNOV Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDE.R. I Ienry William Saad. Cynthia Diane Stephens Presiding Judge
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDE.R People of Michigan v Shunta Tcmar Small Dock~ o. 328476 LC o. 14-008713-FH Cynthia Diane Stephens Presiding Judge I Ienry William Saad Patrick M. Meter Judges
More informationCase 1:15-cr KMW Document 215 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 23 DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CONTINUE BAIL AND STAY FINANCIAL PENALTIES PENDING APPEAL
Case 1:15-cr-00317-KMW Document 215 Filed 07/12/16 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, - v. - S1 15 Cr. 317 (KMW) Dean Skelos and Adam Skelos,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO DIVISION
Case :-cv-00-dms-mdd Document - Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 Wilson G. Barmeyer* Carol T. McClarnon* John H. Fleming* 00 Sixth Street NW, Suite 00 Washington, DC 000 (0) -000 wilsonbarmeyer@eversheds-sutherland.com
More informationObstruction of Justice: An Abridged Overview of Related Federal Criminal Laws
Obstruction of Justice: An Abridged Overview of Related Federal Criminal Laws Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law April 17, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22783
More informationCase 1:09-cr RJL Document 4 Filed 07/23/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:09-cr-00181-RJL Document 4 Filed 07/23/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Holding a Criminal Term Grand Jury Sworn in on November 15, 2007 UNITED STATES
More informationCase 6:18-cr RBD-DCI Document 59 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Case 6:18-cr-00043-RBD-DCI Document 59 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 393 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI JOINTLY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Case 6:18-cr-00043-RBD-DCI Document 51 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 34 PageID 307 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
0 0 Randolph H. Barnhouse Justin J. Solimon (Pro Hac Vice Johnson Barnhouse & Keegan LLP th Street N.W. Los Ranchos de Albuquerque, NM 0 Telephone: (0 - Fax: (0 - Email: dbarnhouse@indiancountrylaw.com
More informationCase 1:16-cr GHW Document 444 Filed 12/04/18 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:16-cr-00468-GHW Document 444 Filed 12/04/18 Page 1 of 7 VIA ECF Honorable Gregory H. Woods United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Meringolo
More informationCase 1:08-cv GBL-JFA Document 197 Filed 02/08/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 2343
Case 1:08-cv-00827-GBL-JFA Document 197 Filed 02/08/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 2343 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SUHAIL NAJIM ABDULLAH AL SHIMARI,
More informationCase 1:19-cr ABJ Document 31 Filed 02/13/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:19-cr-00018-ABJ Document 31 Filed 02/13/19 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case No.: 1:19-CR-00018-ABJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, ROGER
More informationCase 1:08-cv GBL-TCB Document 21 Filed 06/27/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 652
Case 1:08-cv-00254-GBL-TCB Document 21 Filed 06/27/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 652 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NEMET CHEVROLET LTD. 153-12 Hillside
More information