Hamburger, Maxson, Yaffe, Knauer & McNally, LLP February 11, Original Content
|
|
- Bonnie Booth
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HMYLAW Hamburger, Maxson, Yaffe, Knauer & McNally, LLP February 11, 2014 Original Content Village s Discriminatory Zoning Change Enjoined Broker Earned Commission Despite Seller s Resistance Workplace Harassment Of Interracial Couple Village s Discriminatory Zoning Change Enjoined In 2002, Nassau County commenced an initiative to sell off certain County owned properties that were no longer needed, in an effort to raise much needed revenue. One of the parcels encompassed acres located in the Incorporated Village of Garden City (the Village ), and has been the subject of contentious litigation, culminating in a recent decision issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The parcel is currently home to the Nassau County Supreme Court Building, the Social Services Building, and the parking lot areas accompanying, among other areas, and is currently zoned as Public. As part of the sale, the Village retained the right to zone the property. In June 2002, at the County s request, the Village created a subcommittee charged with reviewing zoning options for the entire acre parcel. Garden City retained the firm of Buckhurst Fish and Jacquemart ( BFJ ) to assist in this process, and provide a recommendation as to how it should be zoned. After many months of consideration, BFJ recommended applying multifamily residential group ( R-M ) zoning controls to the residential component of the land. This classification would permit about 311 multi-family affordable housing units to be built a proposal supported by the County and the Village, who specifically noted the need for affordable housing in the area. After the announcement of the proposal, public opposition became abundantly clear. Although the Village took almost two years deliberating and considering the R-M zoning, in only a few weeks after the public opposition became clear, BFJ and the Village reversed course, even contradicting their earlier assertion by stating that neither the County nor the Village is looking to create a so-called affordable housing. The Village and BFJ now endorsed a new proposal, to zone the residential area as Residential-Townhouse ( R-T ),
2 which limited construction to one dwelling for each 6,000 square feet, and also prohibited multi-family housing absent a special permit, and even then, only on a small tract of land. Plaintiff, a not-for-profit community-based developer of affordable housing, sued the Village alleging that it discriminatorily re-zoned certain land from R-M to R-T to prevent developers from building low and middle income housing, in violation of the Fair Housing Act ( FHA ), as well as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Mhany Mgt. Inc. v. Inc. Village of Garden City, F.Supp.2d (E.D.N.Y. 2013). The FHA provides generally that it shall be unlawful to refuse to sell, rent or negotiate with any person, with respect to a dwelling, because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status or national origin. Subsumed within this statute is the prohibition against discriminatory zoning practices. See, Fair Hous. In Huntington Comm. Inc. v. Town of Huntington, N.Y., 316 F.3d 357, 366 (2d Cir. 2003). A Claimant may demonstrate that discriminatory zoning practices were employed by presenting either proof of disparate treatment or disparate impact. The Court held that both were present, and ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. A plaintiff can demonstrate disparate treatment by demonstrating that animus against the protected group was a significant factor in the position taken by the municipal decision-makers themselves or by those to whom the decision-makers were knowingly responsive. The Village and Board claimed that there was no discrimination, and the switch in zoning was a legitimate response to concerns about traffic, taxes and school children. The Court held that these were valid non-discriminatory justifications, and thus looked at the evidence as a whole to determine whether prohibited discrimination had occurred. The Court stated: [I]t is clear from the record that there were many different factors some of which reflected race-based opposition surrounding the enactment of R-T zoning. *** Given (1) the sequence of events involved in the Board s Decision to adopt R T zoning instead of R M zoning after it received public opposition to the prospect of affordable housing in Garden City and (2) the considerable impact that this zoning decision had on minorities in that community, the Court finds that the Garden City Defendants acted with discriminatory intent. The defendants could now only escape liability by demonstrating that the Village and Board would have shifted from R-M to R-T zoning even absent the impermissible considerations. The Court held that they could not. The figures relied upon concerning traffic by the defendants were given after the increase in public opposition, and also did not make clear that traffic would be any worse under R-M than R-T. Further, although the zoning was shifted to R-T which allows for the construction of residential townhomes, prior to the public opposition there was no indication that the Village and Board had any desire to make townhomes available. As a result, the Court held that defendants discriminatorily re-zoned the property.
3 As to plaintiffs cause of action under the FHA for disparate impact, the Court held that the plaintiffs again met their burden of demonstrating that the zoning ordinance, although facially neutral, had a significantly adverse or disproportionate impact on persons of a particular type here, intent was not the issue. Certain glaring statistics supported this conclusion. The current zoning ordinance blocks affordable housing, including section 8 housing. Minority households comprised 41.4% of very-low income renters in need of affordable housing in Nassau County, even though they comprised only 14.8% of all households in Nassau County. Moreover, African American and Hispanic households comprised 88% of the Section 8 housing waiting list in Nassau County, even though they comprised only 14.8% of the households in Nassau County. Since the R-T zone largely eliminated the potential for the type of housing that minorities were disproportionally likely to need namely affordable rental units, the Court found that minorities bore the brunt of the negative impacts of the R-T zone. [T]he R-T zone s restriction on development of multi-family housing perpetuates segregation generally because it decreases the availability of housing to minorities in a municipality where minorities constitute only 4.1% of the overall population,... and only 2.6% of the population living in households. The Court then rejected the defendants attempt to demonstrate that no alternative would serve the government s interests with less discriminatory effect. As a result, the Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, and issued an injunction against the Village, prohibiting future FHA violations, and ordered the plaintiffs to submit a proposed remedial plan to the Court within 30 days. Broker Earned Commission Despite Seller s Resistance A New York Appellate Court recently ruled in favor of a real estate broker, reversing the lower court, and awarding her the $10,000 commission she claimed due. Miranda v. Aliotta, N.Y.S.2d, 2013 WL (2d Dept. App. Term 2013). The defendant offered his house for sale through an internet advertisement which specifically stated no brokers, and also placed a sign outside his house which stated for sale by owner. The plaintiff-broker had entered into an agreement with the buyers, and contacted the owner. She showed his house to the buyers and negotiated the sale. The broker testified that she advised the owner that she expected him to pay her a $10,000 commission for brokering the sale, and forwarded him a proposed commission agreement explaining such, but he refused to sign the agreement. The contract of sale stated, in relevant part, that seller shall pay broker any commission earned pursuant to a separate agreement between seller and broker, and listed plaintiff as the only broker for the deal.
4 When the owner refused to pay the broker her commission, she sued. The trial court dismissed the broker s complaint, noting that defendant refused to sign any brokerage agreement, his internet advertisement indicated he had no intent to hire an agent, and the contract of sale indicated that he would have to pay pursuant to a separate written agreement, indicating the need for a signed agreement, of which there was none. The Appellate Court reversed. First, the trial judge erred by stating that the contract called for a written agreement it did not. Instead, the contract merely called for an agreement, and an oral agreement would suffice, according to the Court. The evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff did indeed render brokerage services which resulted in the sale of the house, and found that the language of the contract of sale constituted an admission that plaintiff was due a broker s fee from defendant. The Court did note that because there was no signed written agreement, plaintiff was not entitled to any specific amount, but only a reasonable amount. However, the Court found that plaintiff s demand for $10,000, or % of the purchase price, fell within the parameters of reasonable and thus awarded that sum. Workplace Harassment Of Interracial Couple A former employee of the Erie County Water Authority (the Authority ) sued the Authority and certain former coworkers for wrongful termination and discrimination, under State and federal statutes. The former employee, Scott Matusick, who is white, claimed that he was harassed, assaulted and ultimately terminated from his position at the Authority because of his romantic relationship with an African-American woman, Anita Starks, now Anita Starks- Matusick. The Authority maintained that he was terminated for multiple instances of misconduct, including blocking surveillance cameras and watching television on duty. Matusick was afforded a full hearing after charges of misconduct were brought, and the hearing officer ultimately recommended Matusick be terminated, finding that his employment threatened the integrity of the County s water system ; the Authority adopted this recommendation. Matusick v. Erie Cnty. Water Auth., 739 F.3d 51 (2d Cir. 2014). Although never presented by Matusick at his termination hearing, the trial in federal court revealed that Matusick s co-workers and supervisors subjected him to severe harassment as a result of his relationship with Starks. The Authority did not act to stop the discrimination after it was reported. Matusick suffered physical and verbal abuse, and was repeatedly called racial slurs as a result of his intimate relationship with Starks. The jury found in part for Matusick, and the Authority appealed. The majority of a divided Second Circuit held that although the hearing officer s determination that Matusick had failed to perform [his position] satisfactorily was binding, there was more than ample
5 evidence in the record to support the jury s conclusion that racial animus tainted the investigation. The Court stated: There was evidence in the record that both [individual] defendants knew about the harassment, did nothing to respond to it, and then participated directly in the investigation and termination. More: The jury had before it evidence that [] the employee relations specialist[] had himself taunted Matusick based on Starks s race. It was for the jury to evaluate the credibility of these defendants testimony and weigh it, along with the other evidence before it, to determine whether racial animus in part motivated the decision to terminate. Thus, Matusick s supervisors as well as the Authority were held liable for unlawful termination. The Court also held that Matusick's engagement to Starks constituted an intimate association and as such was entitled to protection under the First Amendment. The First Amendment s right to intimate association protects a citizen s right to maintain certain intimate human relationships without undue intrusion by the State. As for the individual defendants, the Second Circuit held that they were subject to a qualified immunity, which could not be overcome by plaintiff. A plaintiff can only overcome a State official s right to qualified immunity if he demonstrates that the State actor violated his clearly established constitutional rights. Here, although the Court held that Matusick and Starks s relationship was subject to First Amendment protection, the law was not sufficiently clear to overcome the privilege afforded to his supervisor and co-workers. As for the Authority, however, no such protection is afforded. Municipal entities are liable if the deprivation of the plaintiff s rights under federal law is caused by a governmental custom, policy or usage of the municipality. Although isolated acts of non-policymaking employees are rarely sufficient to demonstrate a custom or policy, the Second Circuit in Jones v. Town of E. Haven recently held that liability can attach if the actions are sufficiently widespread and persistent, and supervisors were aware. Here, the Second Circuit concluded that a reasonable fact-finder could conclude, as the jury did, that the verbal and physical harassment of Matusick on the basis of his intimate association with Starks rose to the level of a custom, policy, or practice at the [Authority], and thus, held the Authority liable. Original Content
7 ( tl/il )( ~ c=i..
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 17 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------)( BROADWAY TRIANGLE COIVIMUNITY COALITION, et al., Plaintiffs-
More informationNos and UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 11-55461 12/22/2011 ID: 8009906 DktEntry: 32 Page: 1 of 16 Nos. 11-55460 and 11-55461 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PACIFIC SHORES PROPERTIES, LLC et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants,
More informationCivil Service Promotional and Layoff Strategies to Avoid Discrimination Claims
Communities Should Examine Civil Service Promotional and Layoff Strategies to Avoid Discrimination Claims w By Edward M. Pikula hen municipalities are hiring and promoting, they need reliable information
More informationIndividual Disparate Treatment
Individual Disparate Treatment Hishon v. King & Spalding (U.S. 1984) Title VII prohibits discrimination in compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment A benefit that is part and parcel
More informationPlaintiff, v. 11-CV-6483T. Defendants. INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff Joellen Petrillo ( Petrillo ) brings this action
Petrillo v. Schultz Properties, Inc. et al Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOELLEN PETRILLO, Plaintiff, v. 11-CV-6483T SCHULTZ PROPERTIES, INC., HOLCOMB VILLAGE ASSOCIATES,
More informationInternal Investigations in Light of #MeToo
Internal Investigations in Light of #MeToo Dan Stein Partner, Mayer Brown October 25, 2018 Elizabeth Feeney Assistant General Counsel, Dispute Resolution & Prevention, GlaxoSmithKline Marcia Goodman Partner,
More informationHamburger, Maxson, Yaffe, Knauer & McNally, LLP July 9, Original Content
HMYLAW Hamburger, Maxson, Yaffe, Knauer & McNally, LLP July 9, 2013 Original Content Standard Forms Are Standard For A Reason Getting Possession After A Tax Deed Location, Location, Location: Change Venue
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SCOTT MCLEAN, vs. Plaintiff, CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, a political subdivision of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendant.
More informationForm 61 Fair Housing Ordinance
Form 61 Fair Housing Ordinance Section 1. POLICY It is the policy of the City of Ozark to provide, within constitutional limitations, for fair housing throughout its jurisdiction. It is hereby declared
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
1 1 ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General COLLEEN M. MELODY PATRICIO A. MARQUEZ Assistant Attorneys General Seattle, WA -- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON YAKIMA NEIGHBORHOOD
More informationCorbin Potter * Candidate for Juris Doctor, May 2019, Cumberland School of Law; Cumberland Law Review, Volume 49, Student Materials Editor.
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT KEEPS BIRMINGHAM RESIDENTS MINIMUM WAGE SUIT ALIVE Corbin Potter * In 2015, the Birmingham City Council passed a city ordinance increasing minimum wage throughout the city to $8.50 beginning
More informationDisparate Impact and Fair Housing Enforcement Post- Inclusive Communities Project Housing Justice Network Conference December 12, 2015
Disparate Impact and Fair Housing Enforcement Post- Inclusive Communities Project Housing Justice Network Conference December 12, 2015 Scott Chang Relman Dane & Colfax PLLC Disparate Impact and Affordable
More informationOrdinance. BE IT ORDAINED, by the Metropolitan Council of the Parish of East Baton Rouge and the City of Baton Rouge that: Employment
Ordinance AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE AND PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE TO ENACT NEW CHAPTERS 23 AND 24 OF TITLE 9 AND TO AMEND PORTIONS OF TITLE 8, TO PROVIDE RELATIVE TO
More informationCase 3:18-cv VLB Document 33 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:18-cv-00705-VLB Document 33 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 12 CONNECTICUT FAIR HOUSING CENTER and CARMEN ARROYO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:18cv00705-VLB
More informationCase 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13
Case :-cv-0-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 MICHELLE P. CHUN FOOK; and YOLANDA C. COOPER, v. Plaintiffs, CITY OF SEATTLE, a Washington
More informationWARRENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINING SEMINAR
September 2001 WARRENVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAINING SEMINAR RACIAL PROFILING: Legal and Departmental Issues CHARLES E HERVAS MICHAEL W. CONDON HERVAS, SOTOS, CONDON & BERSANI, P.C. 333 PIERCE ROAD, SUITE
More informationThe following article was published in Fall 1995 about six months after the decision in City of Edmonds, WA v. Oxford House, Inc.
The following article was published in Fall 1995 about six months after the decision in City of Edmonds, WA v. Oxford House, Inc. 514 US 725 (1995) The Law & The Land: The City of Edmonds Case Matthew
More informationA Live 90-Minute Audio Conference with Interactive Q&A
presents Ricci v. DeStefano: Balancing Title VII Disparate Treatment and Disparate Impact Leveraging the Supreme Court's Guidance on Employment Testing and its Impact on Voluntary Compliance Actions A
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN DIVISION YOLAUNDA ROBINSON : CASE NO. 1:08-CV-238
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, WESTERN DIVISION YOLAUNDA ROBINSON : CASE NO. 1:08-CV-238 Plaintiff, : Judge Michael R. Barrett vs. : : CINCINNATI METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY
More informationI. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Fair Housing Legal Update Scott Chang, Housing Rights Center Renee Williams/NHLP Staff, National Housing Law Project Northern California Fair Housing Coalition April - June 2017 June 13, 2017 I. RECENT
More informationCHAPTER 19 FAIR HOUSING
CHAPTER 19 FAIR HOUSING ARTICLE 1 - GENERAL PROVISIONS 4 19.1.01. DECLARATION OF POLICY... 4 ARTICLE 2 - DEFINITIONS 5 19.2.01. DEFINITIONS... 5 ARTICLE 3 - EXEMPTIONS 7 19.3.01. EXEMPTIONS... 7 ARTICLE
More informationHousing, Fair Housing and Immigration. Housing Justice Network Conference Scott Chang Relman & Dane PLLC February 28, 2010
Housing, Fair Housing and Immigration Housing Justice Network Conference Scott Chang Relman & Dane PLLC February 28, 2010 Fair Housing Act Covers persons regardless of immigration status Does not expressly
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 13-481 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States JOHN G. ROWLAND, Former Governor of the State of Connecticut, and MARC S. RYAN, Former
More informationHamburger, Maxson, Yaffe & McNally, LLP December 5, Original Content
HMYLAW Hamburger, Maxson, Yaffe & McNally, LLP December 5, 2017 Original Content A Wink, A Leer And A Blown Kiss Do Not Create A Hostile Work Environment Bringing A Contract Rescission Action Is NOT An
More informationEEOC Issues Comprehensive Guidance Regarding Employers' Use of Criminal Background Information
A Publication of the American Bar Association Section of Labor and Employment Law EEOC Issues Comprehensive Guidance Regarding Employers' Use of Criminal Background Information On April 25, 2012, the U.S.
More informationNovember 1, 2004 VIA FACSIMILE: ( ) Dear Mr. Chandler:
November 1, 2004 Attn: James M. Chandler Director of Low Income Housing Tax Credit Programs Virginia Housing Development Authority 601 S. Belvidere St. Richmond, VA 23220. VIA FACSIMILE: (804-343-8356)
More informationOffice of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. Protecting Your Workplace Rights
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs Protecting Your Workplace Rights Introduction to OFCCP Federal civil rights enforcement agency within the U.S. Department of Labor Mission: Enforce for the
More informationCase 1:16-cv RM-MJW Document 39 Filed 04/05/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12
Case 1:16-cv-00091-RM-MJW Document 39 Filed 04/05/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 12 Civil Action No. 16-cv-00091-RM-MJW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore
More informationCase 1:14-cv RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-01483-RM-MJW Document 1 Filed 05/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE STATE OF COLORADO Case No. CANDICE ZAMORA BRIDGERS, vs. Plaintiff, CITY
More informationBulletin. Housing Law. Recent Developments in Challenges to Residency Preferences. Table of Contents. Volume 43 July 2013
Housing Law Bulletin Volume 43 July 2013 Published by the National Housing Law Project 703 Market Street, Suite 2000, San Francisco, CA 94103 Telephone (415) 546-7000 Fax (415) 546-7007 www.nhlp.org nhlp@nhlp.org
More informationChapter 220 HUMAN RIGHTS. ARTICLE I Discriminatory Practices. Section Unlawful Housing Practices.
Chapter 220 HUMAN RIGHTS Section 220.010. Unlawful Housing Practices. ARTICLE I Discriminatory Practices A. It shall be an unlawful housing practice: 1. To refuse to sell or rent after the making of a
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: December 11, 2014 Decided: January 13, 2015) Docket No.
13 4635 Darryl T. Coggins v. Police Officer Craig Buonora, in his individual and official capacity UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: December 11, 2014 Decided:
More informationCase 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:18-cv-05171-JSC Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7 Beilal Chatila (SBN 314413 CHATILA LAW, LLP 306 40th Street, Suite C Oakland, CA 94609 Ph: (888 567-9990 Anthony J. Palik (SBN 190971 LAW OFFICE
More informationRecent Decision in Case Challenging Sex Offender Residency Regulations Yields Important Lessons
1 April 28, 2017 League-L Email Newsletter Recent Decision in Case Challenging Sex Offender Residency Regulations Yields Important Lessons By Claire Silverman, Legal Counsel, League of Wisconsin Municipalities
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No JENNIFER KYNER; JODY PRYOR; BOB BEARD, ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit February 10, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT BRYAN LYONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 09-3308 JENNIFER
More informationFighting Hidden Discrimination: Disparate Impact Claims Under the Fair Housing Act
Missouri Law Review Volume 79 Issue 3 Article 9 Summer 2014 Fighting Hidden Discrimination: Disparate Impact Claims Under the Fair Housing Act Sean Milford Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr
More informationXX... 3 TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION... 3 CHAPTER 819. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION... 4
XX.... 3 TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION... 3 CHAPTER 819. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION... 4 SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 4 819.1. Purpose... 4 819.2. Definitions... 4 819.3. Roles
More informationCase 1:18-cv LG-RHW Document 17 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:18-cv-00109-LG-RHW Document 17 Filed 06/19/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION MISSISSIPPI RISING COALITION, RONALD VINCENT,
More informationCOMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
2:17-cv-12623-GAD-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 08/10/17 Pg 1 of 32 Pg ID 1 JOSE SUAREZ, vs. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CITY OF WARREN; LIEUTENANT JAMES
More informationCase 1:13-cv JG-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1
Case 1:13-cv-02573-JG-JMA Document 1 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------X FAIR
More informationSENATE FILE NO. SF0132. Sponsored by: Senator(s) Scott and Representative(s) Stubson and Walters A BILL. for
0 STATE OF WYOMING LSO-0 SENATE FILE NO. SF0 Wyoming Fair Housing Act. Sponsored by: Senator(s) Scott and Representative(s) Stubson and Walters A BILL for AN ACT relating to housing discrimination; defining
More informationUnveiling the Complexities of Sexual Harassment Laws
Unveiling the Complexities of Sexual Harassment Laws ACCA Presentation June 19, 2008 Presented by: Marie Burke Kenny, Esq. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP mkenny@luce.com Sexual Harassment: The Basics
More informationCase 1:10-cv RPP Document 38 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of against - OPINION AND ORDER
Case 1:10-cv-00912-RPP Document 38 Filed 08/13/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X FAIR HOUSING
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE RECOMMENDED DECISION ON DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Case 1:18-cv-00300-LEW Document 13 Filed 11/02/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 123 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE GARY MANUEL, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 1:18-cv-00300-LEW ) STATE OF MAINE, et al.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ORDER
0 0 MARY MATSON, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES CASE NO. C0- RAJ ORDER On November,
More informationConflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law. Janet Savage 1
Conflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law Janet Savage 1 Plaintiffs suing their former employers for wrongful discharge or employment discrimination
More informationJody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division
Order Code RS22686 June 28, 2007 Pay Discrimination Claims Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act: A Legal Analysis of the Supreme Court s Decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. Summary
More informationSPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 27, 2017
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING CALL TO ORDER/RECORD OF ATTENDANCE The special Sikeston City Council meeting of March 27, 2017 was called to order at 11:30 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, located at 105
More informationAPPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Brown County: TIMOTHY A. HINKFUSS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 3, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-00843 Document 1 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION CITY OF AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. NO. STATE OF TEXAS and GREG
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted
More informationLavar Davis v. Solid Waste Services Inc
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-20-2015 Lavar Davis v. Solid Waste Services Inc Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationAn Advocate s Guide to. the Fair Housing Act. South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center
An Advocate s Guide to the Fair Housing Act South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center November 2007 FOREWORD This guide was produced by the South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center. It is intended
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
1 2 3 4 ITS IONG 00t:NTY, Y NWON SH NOV 6 4 ftl"10m COM FMK X_ 7 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 23 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. -2-931-1
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
-1-cv (L) Bernstein v. Village of Wesley Hills UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 21, 2018 525301 TOWN OF DELAWARE, v Respondent, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IAN LEIFER, Individually and
More informationDisparate Impact Liability Under the Fair Housing Act After Inclusive Communities
Disparate Impact Liability Under the Fair Housing Act After Inclusive Communities Daniel Sheehan Introduction... 391 I. Inclusive Communities and the New Disparate Impact Test... 393 A. Facts of Inclusive
More informationSupreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D46584 Q/hu
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department D46584 Q/hu AD3d Argued - June 25, 2015 WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P. RUTH C. BALKIN CHERYL E. CHAMBERS JOSEPH J. MALTESE,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. v. : CIV. NO. 3:02CV2292 (HBF) RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FEMI BOGLE-ASSEGAI : :: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : v. : CIV. NO. 3:02CV2292 (HBF) : STATE OF CONNECTICUT, : COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS : AND OPPORTUNITIES, : CYNTHIA WATTS-ELDER,
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed as Modified and Opinion filed December 17, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00283-CV THE CITY OF ANAHUAC, Appellant V. C. WAYNE MORRIS, Appellee On Appeal from the 344th District
More informationFILED 16 NOV 03 PM 2:13
FILED 16 NOV 03 PM 2:13 1 2 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CLERK E-FILED CASE NUMBER: 16-2-931-1 SEA 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 8 STATE OF WASHINGTON,
More informationby DAVID P. TWOMEY* 2(a) (2006)). 2 Pub. L. No , 704, 78 Stat. 257 (1964) (current version at 42 U.S.C. 2000e- 3(a) (2006)).
Employee retaliation claims under the Supreme Court's Burlington Northern & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. White decision: Important implications for employers Author: David P. Twomey Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1459
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals No. 16-3661 For the Seventh Circuit JOSEPH L. REED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District
More informationThe Dallas City Code CHAPTER 46 UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES RELATING TO SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY AND EXPRESSION GENERAL.
The Dallas City Code CHAPTER 46 UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES RELATING TO SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY AND EXPRESSION Sec. 46-1. Declaration of policy. Sec. 46-2. Administration. Sec. 46-3.
More informationPROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 726
SB - (LC 0) // (JAS/ps) Requested by Senator TAYLOR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL 0 0 On page of the printed bill, delete lines through. Delete pages through and insert: SECTION. Sections to of this
More informationCase 5:08-cv GTS-GJD Document 1 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 1 of 15
Case 5:08-cv-01211-GTS-GJD Document 1 Filed 11/10/2008 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES DEFERIO, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF ITHACA; EDWARD VALLELY, individually
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BARBARA GRUTTER, vs. Plaintiff, LEE BOLLINGER, et al., Civil Action No. 97-CV-75928-DT HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN Defendants. and
More informationCase 1:13-cv LG-JCG Document 133 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:13-cv-00383-LG-JCG Document 133 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
More informationVILLAGE OF BENSENVILLE
VILLAGE OF BENSENVILLE Profiling Training Seminar Racial CHARLES E HERVAS MICHAEL W. CONDON HERVAS, SOTOS, CONDON & BERSANI, P.C. 333 PIERCE ROAD, SUITE 195 P.O. BOX 4109 ITASCA, IL 60143-4109 630-773-4774
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHICAGO MINIATURE LAMP WORKS, Defendant-Appellant
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHICAGO MINIATURE LAMP WORKS, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT 947 F.2d
More informationEqual Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 8-3-2005 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Revolution Studios and Smile Productions, LLC Judge
More informationORDINANCE NO
Item 7 Attachment A ORDINANCE NO. 2018-363 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALABASAS, CALIFORNIA ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 20 TO TITLE 5 OF THE CALABASAS MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING ADVERTISEMENTS
More informationA. Definitions. When used in this Part, and hereafter in this Chapter, except as otherwise indicated, the following definitions shall apply:
515 RICR 10 00 1 TITLE 515 COMMISSION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS CHAPTER 10 OPERATION SUBCHAPTER 00 N/A PART 1 Definitions and General Applicability 1.1 Authorization The following Regulations of the Rhode Island
More informationFair Housing and Discrimination After Inclusive Communities
ACREL Notes September 2017 Fair Housing and Discrimination After Inclusive Communities David L. Callies, Wm. S. Richardson School of Law, Honolulu, HI Derek B. Simon**, Carlsmith Ball, LLP, Honolulu, HI
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv VMC-TBM.
[DO NOT PUBLISH] NEELAM UPPAL, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-13614 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-00634-VMC-TBM FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:17-cv-05595 Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID: 1 Michael P. Hrycak NJ Attorney ID # 2011990 316 Lenox Avenue Westfield, NJ 07090 (908)789-1870 michaelhrycak@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiffs
More informationCase 4:16-cv MW-CAS Document 26 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 4:16-cv-00626-MW-CAS Document 26 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Tallahassee Division FLORIDA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 11-1507 In the Supreme Court of the United States Township of Mount Holly, et al., Petitioners, v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., et al., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Derek Hall appeals the district court s grant of summary judgment to
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit September 15, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT DEREK HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERSTATE
More information)(
Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL
More informationUNITED STATES SUPREME COURT MAKES TRIALS OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS EASIER TO OBTAIN
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT MAKES TRIALS OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS EASIER TO OBTAIN SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP JUNE 19, 2000 The United States Supreme Court has significantly lightened the
More informationWhere Do We Belong? Fixing America s Broken Housing System
Where Do We Belong? Fixing America s Broken Housing System PRESENTER: john a. powell Director, Haas Institute DATE: 10/5/2016 Housing in America Nearly ten years after the foreclosure crisis, we have a
More informationCase 4:15-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 4:15-cv-00093-RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA AT NEW ALBANY LINDA G. SUMMERS, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) CASE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NEW GENERATION CHRISTIAN ) CHURCH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) ROCKDALE COUNTY, GEORGIA, ) JURY DEMANDED
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
--cv Dowrich-Weeks v. Cooper Square Realty, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order
More informationCOMMENTARY. Disparate Impact One Year After Inclusive Communities. Amy M. Glassman and Shanellah Verna
COMMENTARY Disparate Impact One Year After Inclusive Communities Amy M. Glassman and Shanellah Verna I. Introduction... 12 II. Background... 12 III. Regulatory Updates... 14 IV. Litigation Updates... 16
More informationWilliam Peake v. Pennsylvania State Police
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-15-2016 William Peake v. Pennsylvania State Police Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA MICHAEL SALMAN in Custody at the Maricopa County Jail, PETITIONER, v. JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff of Maricopa County, in his official capacity, Case No. Prisoner No. P884174
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-60764 Document: 00513714839 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, United States Court of Appeals Fifth
More informationCase 2:07-cv JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 CIVIL ACTION INTRODUCTION
Case 2:07-cv-02507-JFB-WDW Document 15-2 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and SUKHBIR KAUR, Plaintiffs,
More informationAPPEAL from a judgment and order of the circuit court for Racine County: GERALD P. PTACEK, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear
More informationLawyers for employees breathed a
F O C U S MANAGED CARE LIABILITY Desert Palace v. Costa and Hill v. Lockheed Martin: One Step Forward, One Step Back by Ann Groninger Ann Groninger practices civil litigation and criminal defense with
More informationThe Legal Relationship Between Counties and Sheriffs Past, Present and Future. Introduction
Introduction The Legal Relationship Between Counties and Sheriffs Past, Present and Future The relationship between each county and its sheriff is fraught with political, budgetary, territorial, and performance
More informationCITY OF LOGAN, UTAH ORDINANCE NO
CITY OF LOGAN, UTAH ORDINANCE NO. 10-26 AN ORDINANCE ENACTING NEW CHAPTER 2.62 LOGAN MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATORY EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR GENDER IDENTITY.
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS WOLTERS REALTY, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 3, 2004 v No. 247228 Allegan Circuit Court SAUGATUCK TOWNSHIP, SAUGATUCK LC No. 00-028157-CZ PLANNING COMMISSION,
More informationIn The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV
REVERSE and REMAND; Opinion Filed November 30, 2017. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00783-CV WILLIE E. WALLS, III, MELODY HANSON, AND MY ROYAL PALACE, DAVID WAYNE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOAN ROSS WILDASIN, Plaintiff, Civil No. 3:14-cv-2036 v. Judge Sharp PEGGY MATHES; HILAND, MATHES & URQUHART; AND BILL COLSON
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D17-45
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DR. AMANDA SAUNDERS, Appellant, v. Case
More informationEEOC v. U-Haul International Inc.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 9-23-2013 EEOC v. U-Haul International Inc. Judge S. Thomas Anderson Follow this and additional works at:
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS HAMILTON LYNCH HUNT CLUB LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED October 10, 2013 v No. 312612 Alcona Circuit Court LORRAINE M. BROWN and BIG MOOSE LC No. 10-001662-CZ
More information