SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT NADRA BANK'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
|
|
- Rachel Melton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YULIA TYMOSHENKO and JOHN DOES 1 through 50, on behalf of themselves and all of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 11 Civ (KMW) -against- DMYTRO FIRTASH a/k/a DMITRY FIRTASH, SEMYON MOGILEVICH, ROSUKRENERGO AG, GROUP DF, GROUP DF LIMITED, GROUP DF FINANCE LIMITED, GROUP DF REAL ESTATE, NADRA BANK, CENTRAGAS HOLDING AG, CMZ VENTURES, LLC, KALLISTA INVESTMENTS LLC a/k/a CALISTER INVESTMENTS LLC, THE DYNAMIC GROUP a/k/a THE DYNAMIC FUND, BARBARA ANN HOLDINGS LLC, VULCAN PROPERTIES, INC., BRAD S. ZACKSON, PAUL J. MANAFORT, YURIY BOYKO, VALERIY KHOROSHKOVSKY, VIKTOR PSHONKA, RENAT KUZMIN, OLEKSANDR NECHVOGLOD and LILIA FROLOVA and JOHN DOES 1 through 100., Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT NADRA BANK'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT
2 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 2 of 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT...1 II. ARGUMENT...2 A. TYMOSHENKO S ATS CLAIM SHOULD BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE BECAUSE THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST EXTRATERRITORIALITY BARS HER CLAIM Tymoshenko s ATS Claim Does Not Touch And Concern The Territory Of The United States The Allegations Against Nadra Bank Do Not Touch or Concern The Territory of The United States Whatever Connection To United States Territory Plaintiff May Have Alleged, If Any, It Is Not Of Sufficient Force To Displace The Presumption Against Extraterritorial Application Of The ATS...5 III. TYMOSHENKO S ATS CLAIM SHOULD BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND NO LEAVE TO REPLEAD SHOULD BE GIVEN...7 IV. CONCLUSION...9 i
3 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 3 of 12 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page FEDERAL CASES Cedeño v. Castillo, 457 F. App x 35, 2012 WL (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2012)... 7 Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99 (2d Cir. 2000)... 8 Haugh v. Schroder Inv. Mgmt. N. Am. Inc., No. 02 Civ. 7955(DLC), 2003 WL (S.D.N.Y. May 14, 2003)... 8 In re Rhodia S.A. Secs. Litig., 531 F. Supp. 2d 527 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)... 8 In re WorldCom, Inc. Secs. Litig., 303 F. Supp. 2d 385 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)... 7 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 2013 WL (U.S. Apr. 17, 2013)... passim Morrison v. Nat l Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S.Ct (2010)... 2, 4, 5 Mortimer Off Shore Servs., Ltd. v. Fed. Republic of Germany, 615 F.3d 97 (2d Cir. 2010)... 8 Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. Access Indus., Inc., 631 F.3d 29 (2d Cir. 2010)... 5 Republic of Iraq v. ABB AG, No. 08 Civ. 5951(SHS), 2013 WL (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2013)... 6 Sudler v. City of N.Y., 689 F.3d 159 (2d Cir. 2012)... 8 Tylicki v. Schwartz, 401 F. App x 603, 2010 WL (2d Cir. Nov. 24, 2010)... 7 Tymoshenko v. Firtash, No. 11 CV 2794 (KMW), 2013 WL (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2013)... passim Tymoshenko v. Firtash, No. 11 CV 2794 (KMW), 2013 WL (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2013)... 1, 3, 7 Xiang Li v. Morrisville State College, 434 F. App x 34, 2011 WL (2d Cir. Oct. 6, 2011)... 7 ii
4 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 4 of 12 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT On April 17, 2013, the United States Supreme Court decided Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 2013 WL (U.S. Apr. 17, 2013), and addressed the question whether and under what circumstances courts may recognize a cause of action under the Alien Tort Statute [ ATS ], for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. Id. at *3. Or, in short, whether a claim may reach conduct occurring in the territory of a foreign sovereign. Id. at *4. The Court held that the presumption against extraterritoriality applies to claims under the ATS, and that nothing in the statute rebuts that presumption so that petitioners case seeking relief for violations of the law of nations occurring outside the United States is barred. Id. at *10. On April 22, 2013, this Court directed Nadra Bank and Plaintiffs ( Plaintiffs or Tymoshenko ) to address the effect, if any, of the Kiobel decision on the issues presented in the motion to dismiss. Order, Apr. 22, 2013 [Dkt. No. 81]. As further explained below, the Supreme Court s Kiobel decision means that Tymoshenko s ATS claim is barred because, as this Court has found, all of the conduct underlying Plaintiffs claims occurred abroad and the alleged human rights abuses took place entirely in the Ukraine. 1 Tymoshenko v. Firtash, No. 11 CV 2794 (KMW), 2013 WL , at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2013). 1 The Amended Complaint also names fifty Doe Plaintiffs who are alleged to be former Ukrainian administration officials that served during Tymoshenko s terms as Prime Minister. (AC 26).
5 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 5 of 12 II. ARGUMENT A. TYMOSHENKO S ATS CLAIM SHOULD BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE BECAUSE THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST EXTRATERRITORIALITY BARS HER CLAIM The allegations in the Amended Complaint ( AC ) in support of the Plaintiffs ATS claim concern alleged perpetrators [who] committed no wrongdoing in the United States and injuries [Plaintiffs] sustained in Ukraine (politically-motivated trial and imprisonment). Tymoshenko v. Firtash, No. 11 CV 2794 (KMW), 2013 WL , at *13 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2013). It is the precise sort of claim that the Supreme Court held in Kiobel is barred under the ATS. The presumption against extraterritorial application provides that [w]hen a statute gives no clear indication of an extraterritorial application, it has none. Kiobel, 2013 WL , at *4 (quoting Morrison v. Nat l Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S.Ct. 2869, 2878 (2010)). As the Court in Kiobel pointed out to rebut the presumption, the ATS would need to evince a clear indication of extraterritoriality. Id at *6 (quoting Morrison at 2883). The Supreme Court concluded [i]t does not because nothing in the text of the statute suggests that Congress intended causes of action recognized under it to have extraterritorial reach. Id. Moreover, the Court found that [n]or does the historical background against which the ATS was enacted overcome the presumption against application to conduct in the territory of another sovereign, Id. at *7, and therefore conclude[d] that the presumption against extraterritoriality applies to claims under the ATS, and that nothing in the statute rebuts that presumption. Id. at *10. Plaintiffs ATS claim seeks redress for injuries [they] sustained in Ukraine (politicallymotivated trial and imprisonment), Tymoshenko, 2013 WL , at *13, and concerns matters that are wholly located in Ukraine surrounding a political dispute that took place entirely in the Ukraine while all of the conduct underlying Plaintiffs claims occurred abroad. 2
6 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 6 of 12 Tymoshenko, 2013 WL , at *6-7. As a result, Plaintiffs ATS claim should be dismissed under Kiobel. 1. Tymoshenko s ATS Claim Does Not Touch And Concern The Territory Of The United States In its decision in Kiobel, the Supreme Court made clear that even where the claims touch and concern the territory of the United States, they must do so with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritorial application. Kiobel, at *10. Plaintiffs, the former Ukrainian Prime Minister and other political opposition members named as Does (AC 1), claim that their arbitrary arrests and prolonged detentions perpetrated by Ukrainian government officials violate the ATS. (AC 262). It was thus the Ukrainian officials who perpetrated the offenses in Ukraine that are the focus of Plaintiffs claim. Tymoshenko, 2013 WL , at *10. Accordingly, Plaintiffs human rights were allegedly violated in Ukraine and not in the territory of the United States. Nor do Plaintiffs arrest or detentions touch and concern United States territory, for all of the conduct underlying Plaintiffs claims occurred abroad and was allegedly perpetrated upon other Ukrainians. (AC 1, 17-22). Tymoshenko, 2013 WL , at *6. 2. The Allegations Against Nadra Bank Do Not Touch or Concern The Territory of The United States Tymoshenko s sole allegation against Nadra Bank is that Defendants Firtash and Centragas have used Nadra Bank to transfer unlawfully obtained proceeds... to bank accounts in New York... to be used for political bribery. (AC 137). However, the Amended Complaint does not identify a single transfer by Nadra Bank to New York, or anywhere in the United States, in connection with 3
7 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 7 of 12 Plaintiffs alleged ATS claim. 2 Accordingly, Plaintiffs ATS claim, as far as Nadra Bank is concerned, does not touch or concern the territory of the United States other than by virtue of a conclusory statement. But even had Plaintiffs alleged a transfer by Nadra Bank, such a transfer by necessity would have been made abroad as Nadra Bank has no offices in New York or the United States. Kholevan Decl., 2-3 [Dkt. No. 68]. Moreover, transferring money and political bribery by themselves are not violations of international law actionable under the ATS even if they took place within the territory of the United States. The Court s statement that the claims themselves must touch and concern the territory of the United States, indicates that some element of the ATS claim itself must occur in the United States or that the defendant must be a U.S. entity or person (or perhaps a foreign defendant who seeks refuge in the U.S.). See Kiobel at *10. Moreover, it is a rare case of prohibited extraterritorial application that lacks all contact with the territory of the United States. But the presumption against extraterritorial application would be a craven watchdog indeed if it retreated to its kennel whenever some domestic activity is involved in the case. Morrison, 130 S.Ct. at 2884 (emphasis in original). To say that conduct by foreigners done abroad and alleged merely to aid and abet a purported ATS violation could touch or concern United States territory under Kiobel would reintroduce the conduct-and-effect -test rejected by Morrison. But even under that lenient standard of statutory interpretation replaced by the presumption against extraterritoriality in Kiobel and Morrison, virtually all foreign-cubed actions actions in which (1) foreign plaintiffs [are] suing (2) a foreign [defendant] in an American court for violations... based on [conduct] in (3) foreign 2 The only actual transfer to New York mentioned in the AC is $25 million... wired from Raiffeisen Bank AG. (AC 118). 4
8 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 8 of 12 countries would fail. Morrison at 2894, n.11 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted, emphasis in original). Accordingly, whatever touch and concern the territory of the United States may mean under Kiobel, it does not include Tymoshenko s foreign cubed ATS claim. 3. Whatever Connection To United States Territory Plaintiff May Have Alleged, If Any, It Is Not Of Sufficient Force To Displace The Presumption Against Extraterritorial Application Of The ATS It is, as of yet, unclear what the practical meaning is of the Supreme Court s statement in Kiobel that even where the claims touch and concern the territory of the United States, they must do so with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritorial application. Kiobel, at *10 (emphasis added). There is no judicial precedent on-point interpreting the language in Kiobel. However, in the context of Plaintiffs RICO claims, this Court has already addressed the question whether the allegations in the Amended Complaint concerning United States activity such as the alleged activity by the U.S. Defendants is sufficient to domesticate what is essentially a foreign alleged scheme. In granting the U.S. Defendants motion to dismiss, this Court s held that [t]he focus of Plaintiffs allegations is on a foreign enterprise and a pattern of... activity that occurred abroad and dismissed Plaintiff s RICO claim because the statute does not provide a cause of action for extraterritorial offenses. Tymoshenko, 2013 WL , at *11. That reasoning applies equally to whether Tymoshenko s (albeit conclusory) allegations concerning transfers to New York bank accounts by Nadra Bank suffice to rescue her ATS claim. The Norex decision, which held that RICO does not have extraterritorial application, is particularly informative in this regard as it too, like the holding in Kiobel, was based on Morrison. Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. Access Indus., Inc., 631 F.3d 29, (2d Cir. 2010) (per curiam). Accordingly, simply alleging that some domestic conduct occurred cannot support a claim of 5
9 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 9 of 12 domestic application. Id. at 33 (emphasis added). This is of particular relevance here because peripheral contacts with the United States up to and including the use of a domestic bank account do not bring an otherwise foreign scheme within the reach of the... statutes. Republic of Iraq v. ABB AG, No. 08 Civ. 5951(SHS), 2013 WL , at *21 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 2013) (internal citations omitted). As a result, there is no reason to believe that the allegation that other Defendants used Nadra Bank to transfer [funds] to bank accounts in New York (AC 137) would meet the sufficient force requirement set forth in Kiobel needed to displace the presumption against extraterritorial application. Kiobel at *10. Any argument that peripheral allegations of conduct with some connection to the United States not by themselves violations of international law would suffice to bring Plaintiffs ATS claim within the ambit of claims [that] touch and concern the territory of the United States... with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritorial application ignores the central holding of Kiobel that relief for violations of the law of nations occurring outside the United States is barred. Id. This Court has said as much when it held, in dismissing Tymoshenko s RICO claim, that [t]he scheme alleged here where both the victims and victimizers are foreign and the alleged perpetrators committed no wrongdoing in the United States, but merely invested alleged funds in U.S.-based corporations is not sufficient to state a claim for a domestic... violation. Tymoshenko, 2013 WL , at *13. Key to the findings that [Plaintiffs] did not state a claim for a domestic RICO violation was the fact that the actors, victims and conduct were foreign, and the connection to the United States was essentially incidental. Id. at *12 (internal citations omitted). The Court s reasoning applies equally to Tymoshenko s ATS claim against Nadra Bank, and to Tymoshenko s conclusory allegation that it was used to make transfers to 6
10 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 10 of 12 bank accounts in New York. See also Cedeño v. Castillo, 457 F. App x 35, 37-38, 2012 WL , at *1-2 (2d Cir. Jan. 25, 2012) (complaint alleging imprisonment and money laundering by Venezuelan government officials and their agents alleges inadequate conduct in the United States to state a domestic... claim ). III. TYMOSHENKO S ATS CLAIM SHOULD BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND NO LEAVE TO REPLEAD SHOULD BE GIVEN Although Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that leave to amend shall be freely give[n]... when justice so requires, justice does not so require if amendment would be futile. Xiang Li v. Morrisville State College, 434 F. App x 34, 35, 2011 WL , at *1 (2d Cir. Oct. 6, 2011). [A]mendment would likely be futile [when] it does not appear that [plaintiff] has any viable [ATS] claims that could be brought if permitted to amend the complaint. See Tylicki v. Schwartz, 401 F. App x 603, 604, 2010 WL , at *2 (2d Cir. Nov. 24, 2010). Moreover, [i]n the absence of any identification of how a further amendment would improve upon the Complaint, leave to amend must be denied as futile. In re WorldCom, Inc. Secs. Litig., 303 F. Supp. 2d 385, 391 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). Here all of the conduct underlying Plaintiffs claims occurred abroad and the alleged human rights abuses took place entirely in the Ukraine where Plaintiffs, citizens of Ukraine, were tried and imprisoned. Tymoshenko, 2013 WL , at *6. According to the Amended Complaint, this alleged misconduct has been perpetrated by Ukrainian officials in the Yanukovich administration, and masterminded by Defendant Dmytro Firtash... a Ukrainian billionaire and Yanukovich confidant. Tymoshenko, 2013 WL , at *1. Because under Kiobel relief for violations of the law of nations occurring outside the United States is barred, Kiobel at *10, [p]laintiffs could add no facts to their complaint that would change in their favor the state of the law. Thus, the proposed amendment would be futile. Sudler v. City of N.Y., 689 F.3d 159, 179 (2d 7
11 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 11 of 12 Cir. 2012); see also Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000) ( we do not find that the complaint liberally read... suggests that the plaintiff has a claim that she has inadequately or inartfully pleaded and that she should therefore be given a chance to reframe ) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). The problem with [Tymoshenko] s cause[] of action is substantive; better pleading will not cure it. Repleading would thus be futile. Such a futile request to replead should be denied. Id. Moreover, [i]t is well-established that one good reason to deny leave to amend is... when... additional information does not cure the complaint. Mortimer Off Shore Servs., Ltd. v. Fed. Republic of Germany, 615 F.3d 97, 114 (2d Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks and alternations omitted); see also In re Rhodia S.A. Secs. Litig., 531 F. Supp. 2d 527, 551 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (dismissing complaint as it pertains to Foreign Plaintiffs that did not meet the territoriality requirements of the Exchange Act when [i]t is clear to the Court that Lead Plaintiffs allegations about the location of any relevant conduct are complete, and that therefore there are no further allegations which could remedy the Complaint s subject matter jurisdiction infirmities ); Haugh v. Schroder Inv. Mgmt. N. Am. Inc., No. 02 Civ. 7955(DLC), 2003 WL , at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 14, 2003) ( [w]hile it would appear that principles of sovereignty and even international comity may permit Congress to draw the line differently, it did not do so [and] plaintiff[s] cannot overcome this bar on... [their] cause of action [because] any amendment would be futile, and the motion to amend must be denied ). 8
12 Case 1:11-cv KMW Document 83 Filed 04/29/13 Page 12 of 12 IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Nadra Bank respectfully requests the Court to enter an Order dismissing the Amended Complaint as to it in its entirety with prejudice. DATED: New York, New York April 29, 2013 CONNON WOOD SCHEIDEMANTLE LLP By: /s/ Robert A. de By Robert A. de By (RD-6197) Kathleen M. Wood (KW-8399) Constance Kim (CK-5678) 35 East Union Street, Suite C Pasadena, California Phone: (626) rdeby@connonwood.com kwood@connonwood.com ckim@connonwood.com Attorneys for Defendant NADRA BANK 9
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 02-56256 05/31/2013 ID: 8651138 DktEntry: 382 Page: 1 of 14 Appeal Nos. 02-56256, 02-56390 & 09-56381 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEXIS HOLYWEEK SAREI, ET AL., Plaintiffs
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-345
Case 4:12-cv-00345 Document 18 Filed in TXSD on 05/31/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION KHALED ASADI, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-345
More informationHave Alien Tort Statute Claims Run Their Course?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Have Alien Tort Statute Claims Run Their
More informationCase 1:13-cv WHP Document 20 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:13-cv-00317-WHP Document 20 Filed 08/08/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MENG-LIN LIU, 13-CV-0317 (WHP) Plaintiff, ECF CASE - against - ORAL ARGUMENT
More informationCase 1:11-cv KMW Document 45 Filed 04/27/12 Page 1 of 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:11-cv-02794-KMW Document 45 Filed 04/27/12 Page 1 of 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) YULIA TYMOSHENKO ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-02794
More informationA (800) (800)
No. 15-1464 In the Supreme Court of the United States FARHAN MOHAMOUD TANI WARFAA, Cross-Petitioner, v. YUSUF ABDI ALI, Cross-Respondent. On Conditional Cross-Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United
More informationDo Extraterritorial RICO Claims Still Exist in a Post-Morrison World?
Do Extraterritorial RICO Claims Still Exist in a Post-Morrison World? By Patricia A. Leonard and Gerardo J. Rodriguez-Albizu The U.S. Supreme Court made clear in 2010 that the federal RICO statute does
More informationCase 2:17-cv RSL Document 18 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-0-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 0 RYANAIR DAC, an Irish company, Plaintiff, vs. EXPEDIA
More informationKIOBEL V. SHELL: THE STATE OF TORT LITIGATION UNDER THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE RYAN CASTLE 1 I. BACKGROUND OF THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE
KIOBEL V. SHELL: THE STATE OF TORT LITIGATION UNDER THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE BY RYAN CASTLE 1 I. BACKGROUND OF THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE One of the oldest acts passed by Congress, the Judiciary Act of 1789
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 11-649 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RIO TINTO PLC AND RIO TINTO LIMITED, Petitioners, v. ALEXIS HOLYWEEK SAREI, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United
More informationCase5:11-cv EJD Document163 Filed08/31/15 Page1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case:-cv-0-EJD Document Filed0// Page of 0 DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE III, DOE IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE, ROE VIII, DOE IX, LIU Guifu, WANG Weiyu, and those individual similarly situated,
More informationCase 2:08-cv DWA Document 99 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:08-cv-00299-DWA Document 99 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALUMINUM BAHRAIN B.S.C., Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 8-299
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Case 14-4104, Document 162-1, 07/27/2015, 1562222, Page1 of 22 14 4104 (L) Balintulo v. Ford Motor Co. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2014 Nos. 14 4104(L), 14
More informationCase 1:16-cv KPF Document 60 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 14. : : Plaintiff, : : : : : Defendants. :
Case 116-cv-00548-KPF Document 60 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------X WAMEEDH AL AZZAWI, Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Plaintiff, Case No. 17-CR-124
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 17-CR-124 MARCUS HUTCHINS, Defendant. DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT (IMPROPER
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 15-138 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RJR NABISCO, INC., et al., v. Petitioners, THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, acting on its own behalf and on behalf of the Member States it has power to represent,
More informationCase: Document: Page: 1 01/25/ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
Case: 10-3861 Document: 227-1 Page: 1 01/25/2012 506643 6 10-3861-cv Eligio Cedeño v. Castillo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL
More informationMEMORANDUM AND ORDER 09-CV-1422 (RRM)(VVP) - against - Plaintiffs Thomas P. Kenny ( Kenny ) and Patricia D. Kenny bring this action for
Kenny et al v. The City of New York et al Doc. 67 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------X THOMAS P. KENNY and PATRICIA D.
More informationDefendant. SUMMARY ORDER. Plaintiff PPC Broadband, Inc., d/b/a PPC commenced this action
Case 5:11-cv-00761-GLS-DEP Document 228 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PPC BROADBAND, INC., d/b/a PPC, v. Plaintiff, 5:11-cv-761 (GLS/DEP) CORNING
More informationCase 1:12-cv CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-04873-CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR TO WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR
More informationCase 1:18-cv ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case 1:18-cv-00011-ABJ Document 19 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, JR., Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN,
More informationRICO S EXTRATERRITORIAL REACH: THE IMPACT OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITY V.RJRNABISCO
RICO S EXTRATERRITORIAL REACH: THE IMPACT OF EUROPEAN COMMUNITY V.RJRNABISCO Victoria L. Safran* INTRODUCTION... 48 I. THE SUPREME COURT S MORRISON DECISION SETS THE STAGE... 50 A. The Second Circuit Decisions
More informationCase 1:17-cv NMG Document 60 Filed 09/27/18 Page 1 of 18. United States District Court District of Massachusetts
Case 1:17-cv-10007-NMG Document 60 Filed 09/27/18 Page 1 of 18 NORMA EZELL, LEONARD WHITLEY, and ERICA BIDDINGS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE
More informationCase 1:13-cv RJS Document 34 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 18 ) ) ECF CASE ) )
Case 1:13-cv-06882-RJS Document 34 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) JOHN ORTUZAR, Individually and On Behalf ) of All Others Similarly Situated,
More informationLIU MENG-LIN V. SIEMENS AG, 763 F.3D 175 (2D CIR. AUG. 14, 2014) United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
LIU MENG-LIN V. SIEMENS AG, 763 F.3D 175 (2D CIR. AUG. 14, 2014) United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. LIU MENG LIN, Plaintiff Appellant, v. SIEMENS AG, Defendant Appellee. Docket No. 13 4385
More informationNo IN THE. PROMEGA CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. 14-1538 IN THE LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, ET AL., Petitioners, PROMEGA CORPORATION, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re DIGITAL MUSIC ANTITRUST : LITIGATION : x MDL Docket No. 1780 (LAP) ECF Case DEFENDANT TIME WARNER S SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW
More informationCase 1:08-cv GBL-JFA Document 420 Filed 05/08/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID# 6862
Case 1:08-cv-00827-GBL-JFA Document 420 Filed 05/08/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID# 6862 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ) SUHAIL NAJIM ABDULLAH ) AL SHIMARI,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
NO. 10-1491 In the Supreme Court of the United States ESTHER KIOBEL, ET AL., v. Petitioners, ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO., ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationINTRODUCTION. Plaintiff Crazy Dog T-Shirts, Inc. ( Plaintiff ) initiated this action on December 11,
Crazy Dog T-Shirts, Inc. v. Design Factory Tees, Inc. et al Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CRAZY DOG T-SHIRTS, INC., v. Plaintiff, Case # 15-CV-6740-FPG DEFAULT JUDGMENT
More informationCase 1:11-cv WHP Document 24 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 9 USDC SDNY - DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED
Case 1:11-cv-01982-WHP Document 24 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 9 USDC SDNY - DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED BANK OF AMERICA CORP. et al., Defendants. PATRICIA GROSSBERG LIVING TRUST, Plaintiff, BANK OF AMERICA
More informationORDER. VIKKI RICKARD, Plaintiff,
Case 1:12-cv-01016-SS Document 28 Filed 03/13/13 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEX13 MAR 13 AUSTIN DIVISION L. E. [2; VIKKI RICKARD, Plaintiff, VESIL : -vs-
More informationCase 1:14-cr JEI Document 114 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1312 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:14-cr-00263-JEI Document 114 Filed 11/07/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 1312 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case No. 14-00263-1 (JEI) JOSEPH SIGELMAN ORDER
More informationCase 3:12-cv MAP Document 58 Filed 05/07/13 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
Case 3:12-cv-30051-MAP Document 58 Filed 05/07/13 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION SEXUAL MINORITIES UGANDA v. Plaintiff, SCOTT LIVELY, individually
More informationPlaintiffs Anchorbank, fsb and Anchorbank Unitized Fund contend that defendant Clark
AnchorBank, FSB et al v. Hofer Doc. 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ANCHORBANK, FSB, and ANCHORBANK UNITIZED FUND, on behalf of itself and all plan participants,
More informationCase , Document 48-1, 07/16/2015, , Page1 of 1
Case 15-1886, Document 48-1, 07/16/2015, 1555504, Page1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857-8500
More informationCase 2:08-cv DWA Document 97 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:08-cv-00299-DWA Document 97 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALUMINUM BAHRAIN B.S.C., Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 8-299
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 EDWIN LYDA, Plaintiff, v. CBS INTERACTIVE, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-jsw ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS
More informationDean Schomburg;v. Dow Jones & Co Inc
2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-14-2012 Dean Schomburg;v. Dow Jones & Co Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-2415
More informationDEFENDANT TIME WARNER'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re DIGITAL MUSIC ANTITRUST LITIGATION x MDL Docket No. 1780 (LAP) DEFENDANT TIME WARNER'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION Margery Frieda Mock and Eric Scott Ogden, Jr., individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Case
More informationThe Challenges For CEA Price Manipulation Plaintiffs
The Challenges For CEA Price Manipulation Plaintiffs By Mark Young, Jonathan Marcus, Gary Rubin and Theodore Kneller, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP Law360, New York (April 26, 2017, 5:23 PM EDT)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-CR-124 MARCUS HUTCHINS, Defendant. UNITED STATES RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT S MOTION TO
More informationCase 7:06-cv TJM-GJD Document 15 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 10. Plaintiff, Defendants. DECISION & ORDER
Case 7:06-cv-01289-TJM-GJD Document 15 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PAUL BOUSHIE, Plaintiff, -against- 06-CV-1289 U.S. INVESTIGATIONS SERVICE,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION. Case No. 3:16-cv-178-J-MCR ORDER
Case 3:16-cv-00178-MCR Document 61 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID 927 MARY R. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION vs. Case No. 3:16-cv-178-J-MCR
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Kinard v. Greenville Police Department et al Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Ira Milton Kinard, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. 6:10-cv-03246-JMC
More informationCase 1:14-cv WYD-MEH Document 26 Filed 07/17/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-00262-WYD-MEH Document 26 Filed 07/17/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 Civil Action No. 14 cv 00262-WYD-MEH MALIBU MEDIA, L.L.C., v. Plaintiff, RICHARD SADOWSKI, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES
More informationWHILE the Racketeer Influenced. The Extraterritorial Defense: A Border to RICO Claims Arising from International Transactions
The Extraterritorial Defense: A Border to RICO Claims Arising from International Transactions By Lorrie L. Hargrove, Edward S. Sledge, IV and Katie M. Kimbrell Lorrie L. Hargrove is a shareholder at Maynard,
More informationCase 1:16-cv RNS Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2017 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-21221-RNS Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/15/2017 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ANTHONY R. EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 16-21221-Civ-Scola
More informationCase 3:14-cv AET-DEA Document 9 Filed 10/17/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID: 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 314-cv-05655-AET-DEA Document 9 Filed 10/17/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 117 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In Re Application of OWL SHIPPING, LLC & ORIOLE Civil Action No. 14-5655 (AET)(DEA)
More informationCase 1:09-md LAK Document 685 Filed 02/03/12 Page 1 of 14 : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Case 109-md-02017-LAK Document 685 Filed 02/03/12 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------x IN RE LEHMAN BROTHERS
More informationPanzella v. County of Nassau et al Doc. 73. On October II, 2013, plaintiff Christine Panzella ("plaintiff') commenced this civil
Panzella v. County of Nassau et al Doc. 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------){ CHRISTINE PANZELLA, Individually and
More informationCase 1:13-cv PAE Document 50 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 5. Plaintiff, : Defendant. :
Case 113-cv-05633-PAE Document 50 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X ERGOWERX
More informationCase 1:17-cv LGS Document 47 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 9 X : : : : : : : : : X. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case 117-cv-06990-LGS Document 47 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- CARTER PAGE, OATH INC.,
More informationU.S. Supreme Court Forecloses Non-U.S. Corporate Liability Under the Alien Torts Statute
U.S. Supreme Court Forecloses Non-U.S. Corporate Liability Under the Alien Torts Statute Non-U.S. Corporations May Not Be Sued by Non-U.S. Plaintiffs Under the Alien Torts Statute for Alleged Violations
More informationCase 2:17-cv MSG Document 7 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-01903-MSG Document 7 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARCIA WOODS, et al. : : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : : NO.
More informationfunited STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-82-DPJ-FKB ORDER
Funches, Sr. v. Mississippi Development Authority et al Doc. 24 funited STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ANDRE FUNCHES, SR. PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-82-DPJ-FKB
More informationCase 1:12-cv WJM-KMT Document 64 Filed 09/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11
Case 1:12-cv-02663-WJM-KMT Document 64 Filed 09/05/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 Civil Action No. 12-cv-2663-WJM-KMT STAN LEE MEDIA, INC., v. Plaintiff, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, Defendant. IN THE UNITED
More informationCase 3:11-cv DPJ -FKB Document 26 Filed 01/05/12 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:11-cv-00332-DPJ -FKB Document 26 Filed 01/05/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION AUGUSTUS P. SORIANO PLAINTIFF V. CIVIL
More informationThis is a securities fraud case involving trading in commercial mortgage-backed
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -v- 17-CV-3613 (JPO) OPINION AND ORDER JAMES H. IM, Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
More informationTRUSTEE S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY BY ROBERT BLECKER
Pg 1 of 12 Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated
More informationCopyright 2013 by Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern University Law Review Vol. 107, No. 3. Notes & Comments
Copyright 2013 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. Northwestern University Law Review Vol. 107, No. 3 Notes & Comments RACKETEERING AFTER MORRISON: EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF
More informationCase 2:16-cv LDW-ARL Document 12 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 130
Case 2:16-cv-01414-LDW-ARL Document 12 Filed 06/27/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 130 Christine A. Rodriguez BALESTRIERE FARIELLO 225 Broadway, 29th Floor New York, New York 10007 Telephone: (212) 374-5400
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Clemons v. Google, Inc. Doc. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION RICHARD CLEMONS, v. GOOGLE INC., Plaintiff, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:17-CV-00963-AJT-TCB
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ADVANCED PHYSICIANS S.C., VS. Plaintiff, CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2355-G
More informationCase 1:11-cv LBS Document 190 Filed 07/09/12 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case 1:11-cv-02564-LBS Document 190 Filed 07/09/12 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. POKERSTARS; et al., Plaintiff, Case No. 1:11 Civ.
More informationCase 1:09-cv JFK-GWG Document 159 Filed 06/12/14 Page 1 of 7
Case 109-cv-05583-JFK-GWG Document 159 Filed 06/12/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------X CURTIS JAMES JACKSON, III, p/k/a 50 CENT,
More informationCase 1:09-cr WHP Document 900 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 10. -against- : 09 Cr. 581 (WHP) PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, et. al., : OPINION & ORDER
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 900 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------- X UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : -against- : 09
More information4 Takeaways From The High Court's New Rule On RICO's Reach
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 4 Takeaways From The High Court's New Rule
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- WILLIAM GIL PERENGUEZ,
More informationCase 1:17-cv DPG Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:17-cv-20713-DPG Document 48 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 17-cv-20713-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES RICHARD KURZBAN, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:12-cv Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:12-cv-00044 Document 99 Filed in TXSD on 04/07/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION VOTING FOR AMERICA, PROJECT VOTE, INC., BRAD
More informationNo IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ARAB BANK, PLC,
No. 16-499 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JOSEPH JESNER, ET AL., v. ARAB BANK, PLC, On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Petitioners, Respondent.
More informationThe Supreme Court Decision in Empagran
The Supreme Court Decision On June 14, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated opinion in Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. v. Empagran S.A, 2004 WL 1300131 (2004). This closely watched
More informationCase 1:96-cv KMW-HBP Document Filed 04/01/2009 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT F RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT (RICO) 1
Case 1:96-cv-08386-KMW-HBP Document 368-7 Filed 04/01/2009 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT F RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT (RICO) 1 I. RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT (RICO)...1
More informationAlexandra Hlista v. Safeguard Properties, LLC
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-5-2016 Alexandra Hlista v. Safeguard Properties, LLC Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationCase 1:12-cv LLS Document 36 Filed 05/24/13 Page 1 of 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:12-cv-09070-LLS Document 36 Filed 05/24/13 Page 1 of 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PETRÓLEOS MEXICANOS AND PEMEX-REFINACIÓN Plaintiffs, - against -
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv SCJ. versus
Case: 14-10948 Date Filed: 06/03/2015 Page: 1 of 5 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 14-10948 D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-01588-SCJ PARESH PATEL, versus DIPLOMAT
More informationCase 1:17-cv JPO Document 25 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:17-cv-09785-JPO Document 25 Filed 01/02/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NEXTENGINE INC., -v- Plaintiff, NEXTENGINE, INC. and MARK S. KNIGHTON, Defendants.
More informationmg Doc 28 Filed 06/20/14 Entered 06/20/14 17:18:03 Main Document Pg 1 of 10
Pg 1 of 10 Hearing Date and Time: July 23, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time) Response Date and Time: July 4, 2014 at 4:00 p.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time) UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED MAR 25 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS JESUS JARAS, No. 17-15201 v. EQUIFAX INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C.
More informationCase 7:12-cv KMK Document 177 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 7
Case 7:12-cv-06421-KMK Document 177 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, EDWARD BRONSON; E-LIONHEART ASSOCIATES,
More informationCase 1:04-cv RJH Document 32-2 Filed 09/15/2005 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:04-cv-06626-RJH Document 32-2 Filed 09/15/2005 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN RAPAPORT, RAPAPORT USA and INTERNET DIAMOND EXCHANGE, L.L.C., CIVIL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:13-CV-678-MOC-DSC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:13-CV-678-MOC-DSC LEE S. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) J.P. MORGAN CHASE NATIONAL
More informationCase 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 41 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 189
Case 1:16-cv-02431-JMS-DML Document 41 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 189 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION JOHN DOE, formerly known as ) JANE DOE,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division - IN RE: BLACKWATER ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT LITIGATION Case No. 1:09-cv-615 Case No. 1:09-cv-616 Case No. 1:09-cv-617
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO ORDER AND REASONS
Hernandez et al v. Dedicated TCS, LLC, et al Doc. 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JOENDEL H ERNANDEZ, ET AL. Plain tiffs CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 16-36 2 1 DEDICATED TCS, L.L.C.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
HBN, Inc. v. Kline et al Doc. 28 Civil Action No. 08-cv-00928-CMA-KLM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HBN, INC., d/b/a RE/MAX SOUTHWEST REGION, v. Plaintiff, ROBERT C.
More informationCase 1:16-md GAO Document 381 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:16-md-02677-GAO Document 381 Filed 08/17/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE: DAILY FANTASY SPORTS LITIGATION 1:16-md-02677-GAO DEFENDANTS
More informationLEXSEE 587 F.3D 127. Docket No cv UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Page 1 LEXSEE 587 F.3D 127 HAWKNET, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OVERSEAS SHIPPING AGENCIES, OVERSEAS WORLDWIDE HOLDING GROUP, HOMAY GENERAL TRADING CO., LLC, MAJDPOUR BROS. CUSTOMS CLEARANCE, MAJDPOUR
More informationCase 1:12-cv JSR Document 13 Filed 09/19/12 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:12-cv-05717-JSR Document 13 Filed 09/19/12 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT
More informationCase 2:13-cv MJP Document 34 Filed 10/02/13 Page 1 of 14
Case :-cv-00-mjp Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 TRADER JOE'S COMPANY, CASE NO. C- MJP v. Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS
More informationv. CIVIL ACTION NO. H
Rajaee v. Design Tech Homes, Ltd et al Doc. 42 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SAMAN RAJAEE, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-2517 DESIGN TECH
More informationPlaintiffs, who represent a class of African American and Latino teachers in the New
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------X GULINO, ET AL., -against- Plaintiffs, 96-CV-8414 (KMW) OPINION & ORDER THE BOARD OF EDUCATION
More informationLILIANA MARIA CARDONA, et al. Petitioners, v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Respondents. DOES 1-144, et al.
Nos. 14-777, 14-1011 IN THE LILIANA MARIA CARDONA, et al. Petitioners, v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Respondents. DOES 1-144, et al. Petitioners, v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-md In re: North Sea Brent Crude Oil Futures Litigation.
PlainSite Legal Document New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-md-02475 In re: North Sea Brent Crude Oil Futures Litigation Document 366 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer
More informationDOCI: DATE FILED: /%1Ot
Case 2:02-cv-01263-RMB-HBP Document 181 Fil 09/11/12 Page 1 of 11 DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERNDISTRICTOFNEWYORK = x DOCI: DATE FILED: /%1Ot INREACTRADEFINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES,LTD.SECURITIES
More informationKIOBEL V. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO.: THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE S PRESUMPTION AGAINST EXTRATERRITORIALITY
CASENOTE KIOBEL V. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO.: THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE S PRESUMPTION AGAINST EXTRATERRITORIALITY I. INTRODUCTION... 172 II. FACTS AND HOLDING... 173 III. BACKGROUND... 176 A. HISTORY SURROUNDING
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK )(
Case 1:02-md-01499-SAS Document 282 Filed 08/28/14 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------- )( IN RE SOUTH AFRICAN APARTHEID
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST KEIWIT AND CMF
Thabico Company v. Kiewit Offshore Services, Ltd. et al Doc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED
More information