POLICE VS BUNDHOO KARUNA
|
|
- Marlene McCoy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 POLICE VS BUNDHOO KARUNA 2017 INT 133 POLICE VS BUNDHOO KARUNA Cause Number: 737/15 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of:- POLICE VS BUNDHOO KARUNA Judgment INTRODUCTION The Accused stands charged under 2 Counts with the offence of using an information and communication service for the purpose of causing annoyance in breach of sections 46(h)(ii) and 47 of the Information and Communication Technologies Act. She pleaded not guilty to both Counts and was assisted by Counsel. The particulars of the charge against the Accused is that in the months of January and October 2012, she used her cellular phone with sim card number and sent unsolicited messages on cellular phone holding sim card number to Mr Emraj. THE FACTS The Accused was married to Mr Emraj. In the year 2012, they got separated but kept living under the same roof. Subsequently, Mr Emraj filed for divorce. Mr Emraj is the subscriber and user of sim card number with Orange. He testified that the Accused sent him many messages on his sim card number from different sim card numbers, causing him to feel stressed out, disturbed and humiliated.
2 The Accused declined to give a statement to the police when she was interviewed in relation to the present case and opted for her right of silence. OBSERVATIONS I have assessed the evidence on record. The Accused is charged under 46(h) (ii) of the Information and Communication Technologies Act which read as follows Any person who uses an information and communication service, including telecommunication service, - (i) (ii) for the transmission or reception of a message which is grossly offensive, or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character; or for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to any person; shall commit an offence. The particulars of the charge against the Accused is in relation to messages allegedly sent by her from sim card number to sim card number belonging to Mr Emraj. The subscriber of phone number is Mrs Jugun. I have perused the itemized bill from Mauritius Telecom which has been produced in Court and which contains details of outgoing and incoming calls and messages to and from phone number The itemized bill reveals that there were incoming calls and messages on phone number from phone number
3 In the midst of the enquiry, PS Soomaroo examined phone number belonging to Mr Emraj and noted that it contained messages sent from phone number Who is the author of the impugned messages? The declarant, Mr Emraj, has alleged that the messages which he received on his phone number from phone number came from the Accused. He reached this conclusion basing himself on the tenure of the messages and the language used which allegedly correspond to that of the Accused. For a case of this nature, the identification of the Accused cannot be made directly since the offence is committed through a phone which is an information and communication service. Hence, it is important to look at all the evidential and circumstantial evidence for the commissioner of the offence to be identified. I find comfort in my reasoning from the case of DEW BOKHORY VS THE STATE (2010) SCJ 421 where the Appeal Court found that the trial Court was right in rejecting the Appellant s version that the latter did not call the declarant because he had lost his phone. The circumstances of the case made it clear that the Appellant was the one to use a mobile phone for the transmission of a message of menacing character. Further, the case of TATIAH V VS THE STATE (2010) SCJ 389 concerned an appeal where the inferences made by the Trial Court to the effect that the incriminating phone number from which the messages were sent belonged to the Appellant, were challenged. The Appeal Court found the Trial s Court conclusion that
4 the only strong and irresistible inference that the Appellant was the author of the impugned messages, was correct. In light of the cases mentioned above, I have deemed it fit to consider the evidential and circumstantial issues in this case. I have noted that sim card number was registered on the name of Mrs Jugun. Mrs Jugun is the grandmother of the Accused. She came to Court and confirmed that she bought sim card number but then lost same without having ever used the sim card in a phone. Given the proximity between Mrs Jugun and the Accused, I have considered the version of Mrs Jugun with care. Mrs Jugun is a lady of more than 60 years old who testified that she suffered from a bad health. She had difficulties remembering the events in the present case but she still deposed under oath to the best of her abilities. In this version of events, she never implicated the Accused, such that there is no evidence that the sim card number which was owned by Mrs Jugun and which got lost, was ever used by the Accused. I find that the conclusion reached by Mr Emraj that the impugned messages received on his phone came from the Accused to be too hasty and unsupported by evidence. The bad blood existing between Mr Emraj and the Accused in light of their marital relationship with turned sour, leaves the version of Mr Emraj, questionable. Given that Mrs Jugun never established that she remitted or gave the sim card number to the Accused, I find that there is no evidence that the sim card came in possession of the Accused. Given the numerous possibilities which could have occurred when Mrs Jugun lost her sim card, it would be most unsafe for this Court to conclude that the Accused was the one exclusive person who used sim card number to send messages to Mr Emraj. Did the messages cause annoyance to Mr Emraj? For a case of this nature, the Prosecution must prove all the elements of the offence. (RE: LOKEE VS THE STATE (2010) SCJ 378). Hence, it is not sufficient
5 that the Prosecution establishes that the Accused used an information and communication service. The Prosecution must also prove that annoyance was caused. On this score, I have considered the nature of the messages sent. I have noted that the Information did not particularise the impugned messages allegedly sent by the Accused to Mr Emraj. Nonetheless, the Court has been favoured with a report from PC Somaroo who examined the Mr Emraj s phone and who noted down the messages which he read on the phone, in the said report. Mr Emraj explained whilst he was under cross-examination that there were swear words used which caused him annoyance, namely the words macro, pilon, gogot. However, I find that the messages which PC Soomaroo read from Mr Emraj s phone do not contain the swear words as alleged by Mr Emraj, such that the Court is in the dark as to the exact messages which allegedly caused annoyance to Mr Emraj. The Information and Communication Technologies Act does not define the term annoyance. I have therefore applied the normal dictionary meaning to those terms. According to the Oxford dictionary, the term annoyance is defined as follows: Annoyance the feeling or state of being annoyed; irritation In the present case, in view of the lack of particulars and inconsistencies in relation to the impugned messages allegedly sent by the Accused to Mr Emraj, I cannot conclude that the messages, if they were sent, caused any irritation to Mr Emraj or caused him to be in a state of being annoyed. CONCLUSION In light of the above, I find that the Prosecution has failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the Accused is the author of the impugned messages and has also failed to prove the nature of the messages sent as well as any connotation of annoyance attached thereto.
6 I find that the Prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. I dismiss the case against the Accused. Judgment delivered by: M.GAYAN-JAULIMSING, Ag Magistrate, Intermediate Court Judgment delivered on: 10 th April 2017
POLICE VS BUNGAROO PRATIMA
POLICE VS BUNGAROO PRATIMA 2017 INT 86 POLICE VS BUNGAROO PRATIMA Cause Number: 452/15 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of:- POLICE VS BUNGAROO PRATIMA Judgment INTRODUCTION The Accused
More informationStatutory Frameworks. Safeguarding and Prevent. 1. Safeguarding
Safeguarding and Prevent Statutory Frameworks 1. Safeguarding The legal framework for the protection of children in the UK is set out in the Children Act 1989. A child is defined by this act as any person
More informationPolice v Nylprakash Nunkoo IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES NYPRAKASH NUNKOO
Police v Nylprakash Nunkoo 2016 PMP 310 Police v Nylprakash Nunkoo IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES CN: 1666/13 POLICE V NYPRAKASH NUNKOO JUDGMENT Accused stands charged of having on the 9 th of
More informationGUIDELINES ON PROSECUTING CASES INVOLVING COMMUNCATIONS SENT VIA SOCIAL MEDIA
GUIDELINES ON PROSECUTING CASES INVOLVING COMMUNCATIONS SENT VIA SOCIAL MEDIA Introduction 1. These guidelines set out the approach that prosecutors should take when making decisions in relation to cases
More informationICAC v LUTCHMEENARAIDOO HARISHCHANDRAH 2009 INT 266
ICAC v LUTCHMEENARAIDOO HARISHCHANDRAH 2009 INT 266 CN : 1151/07 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of :- ICAC V Harishchandrah Lutchmeenaraidoo Judgment The accused stands charged with
More informationMooken v Top Notch Ltd (labour office case)
Mooken v Top Notch Ltd (labour office case) Though the Court concluded that the disciplinary committee rightly found the worker guilty of gross misconduct, it however found that the latter was not afforded
More informationMarion County Attorney s Office 214 E. Main Knoxville, IA (641) TO ALL BUSINESSES/PERSONS UTILIZING THE BAD CHECK PROCEDURE
Marion County Attorney s Office 214 E. Main Knoxville, IA 50138 (641) 828-2223 TO ALL BUSINESSES/PERSONS UTILIZING THE BAD CHECK PROCEDURE Attached are forms, samples, and instructions for utilizing the
More informationINDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION VIS BEEKHY Nasser Osman
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS C N 1620/12 INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION VIS BEEKHY Nasser Osman JUDGMENT The accused stands charged with the offence of Limitation of payment in cash
More informationFinal Stage Resource Assessment: Summary offences in the Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines (MCSG)
Final Stage Resource Assessment: Summary offences in the Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines (MCSG) 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document fulfils the Council s statutory duty to produce a resource assessment
More informationIN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS. Police v/s 1. Peroomal Veeren 2. Vishnu Dusorath 3. Gilbert Noel Louise
Police v Veeren Peroomal & ors 2017 INT 197 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS C N 156-2012 Police v/s 1. Peroomal Veeren 2. Vishnu Dusorath 3. Gilbert Noel Louise Judgment All three Accused stand
More information???IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS?????(Criminal Division)? In the matter of :-???????C.No.313/2010
ICAC v B.M Seedeer 2012 INT 92???IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS?????(Criminal Division)? In the matter of :-???????C.No.313/2010???ICAC v Bhye Mamed SEEDEER J U D G M E N T?Accused, a Road Traffic
More informationSection 66-A Punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service, etc.
Section 66-A Punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service, etc. Any person who sends, by means of a computer resource or a communication device,- a) any information that is grossly
More informationBreach of the Peace. Breach of the Peace 1. Unit. Your Notes. Lesson Aim. Learning Outcomes. What is a Breach of the Peace?
Crime Breach of the Peace Unit Lesson Aim To introduce you to the common law crime of Breach of the Peace and a number of statutory alternatives. Learning Outcomes After this lesson you will be able to:
More informationICAC v Boutanive. In the Intermediate Court of Mauritius (Criminal Division) Independent Commission Against Corruption. Jean Roland BOUTANIVE
ICAC v Boutanive 2012 INT 240 Cause Number: 859-2009 In the matter of: In the Intermediate Court of Mauritius (Criminal Division) Independent Commission Against Corruption v Jean Roland BOUTANIVE Judgment
More informationRegulation of Interception of Act 18 Communications Act 2010
ACTS SUPPLEMENT No. 7 3rd September, 2010. ACTS SUPPLEMENT to The Uganda Gazette No. 53 Volume CIII dated 3rd September, 2010. Printed by UPPC, Entebbe, by Order of the Government. Regulation of Interception
More informationCOMPLAINTS. Table of Contents
COMPLAINTS COMPLAINTS Table of Contents Model Complaint for State Law Violations... 6 Model Complaint for City Ordinance Violations... 7 Model Application for Citizen Complaint... 8 Editor s Note: Sample
More informationInterim guidelines on prosecuting cases involving communications sent via social media. Issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions
Interim guidelines on prosecuting cases involving communications sent via social media Issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions 19 December 2012 Interim guidelines on prosecuting cases involving communications
More informationOTTAWA 130 Albert Street, B1 Level, Suite 7, Ottawa, K1P 5G4
OTTAWA 130 Albert Street, B1 Level, Suite 7, Ottawa, ON K1P 5G4 MON-FRI 9AM-5PM 1000 Finch Ave. W. 3601 HWY 7 East, 1010 Sherbrooke St. 400 5th Avenue SW, 550 West Broadway Suite 900, Suite 1005, West
More informationSUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION REFUGEES APPEALS BOARD (PROCEDURES) REGULATIONS
REFUGEES APPEALS BOARD (PROCEDURES) [S.L.420.01 1 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 420.01 REFUGEES APPEALS BOARD (PROCEDURES) REGULATIONS 29th October, 2001 LEGAL NOTICE 252 of 2001, as amended by Legal Notices
More informationSMS (Text) Notifications to You Cell Phone Application Form
Last Name First Name Cell Phone Number Name of the provider (Bell, Fido, etc.) SMS (Text) Notifications to You Cell Phone Application Form In some cases email notifications might be categorized as junk
More informationTM2/TM3 Online Terms and Conditions
TM2/TM3 Online Terms and Conditions All Users of services provided by BLUE ZINC IT LTD, by use of such services, accept the terms of business set out in the form of service agreement which follows, irrespective
More informationINDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT
INDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT CHAPTER 12:01 48 of 1920 5 of 1923 21 of 1936 14 of 1939 25 of 1948 1 of 1955 10 of 1961 11 of 1961 29 of 1977 45 of 1979 Act 12 of 1917 Amended by *See Note
More informationSECOND. I make I make this this affidavit in support in of of the the Respondent s application to
FAMILY COURT OF THE STATE OF OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X In the Matter of of a Family Offense Proceeding File #: 553318 Docket
More informationAdvocacy Resources: What NACDL Can Do for You. Monica L. Reid Grassroots Advocacy Manager National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Advocacy Resources: What NACDL Can Do for You Monica L. Reid Grassroots Advocacy Manager National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers NACDL Advocacy Resources What NACDL Can Do for Your Organization
More informationEVIDENCE ACT CHAPTER 80 LAWS OF KENYA
LAWS OF KENYA EVIDENCE ACT CHAPTER 80 Revised Edition 2012 [2010] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org CAP. 80 [Rev. 2012] CAP.
More informationCOMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY ACT COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY ACT. Revised Laws of Mauritius. Cap March 1944
Revised Laws of Mauritius COMMISSIONS OF INQUIRY ACT Cap 286 16 March 1944 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title 2. Appointment of Commissions of Inquiry 3. Powers of President 4. Commissions
More informationExamination of witnesses
Examination of witnesses Rules and procedures in the courtroom for eliciting (getting information) from witnesses Most evidence in our legal system is verbal. A person conveying their views and beliefs,
More informationIN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS
S.Boodhoo v R. Ram and anor 2017 INT 196 Cause Number : 186/2012 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS Seewan Boodhoo Plaintiff Judgment v. 1. Ravind Ram 2. Top Turf Defendants The Plaintiff claims from
More information3. Press *57 (1157 for rotary or dial pulse telephones), then listen for the announcement.
Call Tracing Call Tracing allows you to initiate an automatic trace of the last call you received. Your telephone company will automatically receive a message containing the phone number where the obscene
More informationPolice stations. What happens when you are arrested
Police stations What happens when you are arrested This factsheet looks at what happens at the police station when the police think you have committed a crime. This factsheet may help you if you, or someone
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between:- THE STATE and Review No. : 160/2012 SIFISO TSHABALALA CORAM: KRUGER, J et DAFFUE, J JUDGMENT BY: DAFFUE, J DELIVERED
More informationSure Data Centre General Terms and Conditions
DATA CENTRE SERVICES PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Sure (Guernsey) Limited offer data centre services from data centres in Guernsey and Alderney. These services enable Sure to provide You a facility for access to
More informationRuling-ICAC v P.Jugnauth
Ruling-ICAC v P.Jugnauth 2014 INT 257???IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS?????(Criminal Division) In the matter of :-????????C.No. 265/2014?Independent Commission Against Corruption [ ICAC ] v?pravind
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY OCEAN COUNTY
Record Impounded NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS. E.C., Plaintiff, v. R.H., Defendant.. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY OCEAN COUNTY CHANCERY DIVISION FAMILY PART DOCKET
More informationCROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE
CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE Twelfth edition COLIN TAPPER, MA, BCL Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS Preface to the 12th edition v Extractfrom the preface
More informationMANDATORY ORDER FORM. 323 Geary Street, # 815 San Francisco, CA Toll Free
MANDATORY ORDER FORM Deliver / Mail / Drop-off to a location that is closest to your jurisdiction: 2200 Pennsylvania Ave NW 4th Floor E. Washington, DC 20037 Toll Free 1-877-400-0235 Fax 1-866-835-4372
More informationJAMAICA. JEROME ARSCOTT v R. 10 November [1] On 10 February 2011, a young lady went home to find a group of police and
[2014] JMCA Crim 52 JAMAICA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL RESIDENT MAGISTRATES CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 21/2013 BEFORE: THE HON MR JUSTICE DUKHARAN JA THE HON MRS JUSTICE McINTOSH JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA JEROME
More informationLEGAL GUIDE TO RELEVANT CRIMINAL OFFENCES IN TASMANIA
LEGAL GUIDE TO APPREHENDED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDERS LEGAL GUIDES TASMANIA : Women s technology safety, legal resources, research & training LEGAL GUIDE TO RELEVANT CRIMINAL OFFENCES IN TASMANIA Introduction
More informationEntebbe, by Order of the Government. S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2007 No. 51. THE LOCAL COUNCIL COURTS REGULATIONS, 2007
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS SUPPLEMENT No. 29 19th October, 2007 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS SUPPLEMENT to The Uganda Gazette No. 57 Volume C dated 19th October, 2007 Printed by UPPC, Entebbe, by Order of the Government.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clay County, Patrick M.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-749 / 10-1952 Filed November 9, 2011 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. TRACEY RICHTER ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the Iowa District Court
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 15th January, RFA 269/2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 15th January, 2014. RFA 269/2013 GANGADHAR PADHY... Appellant Through: Counsel for the appellant (appearance not given)
More informationEVIDENCE ACT CHAPTER 80 LAWS OF KENYA
LAWS OF KENYA EVIDENCE ACT CHAPTER 80 Revised Edition 2014 [2012] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2014] CAP. 80 CHAPTER
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A141183
Filed 11/26/14 Kwan v. Murcia CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationHave you ever been a victim or a witness to a crime? If so, you may be entitled to certain rights under Louisiana's Crime Victim Bill of Rights.
VICTIMS RIGHTS Have you ever been a victim or a witness to a crime? If so, you may be entitled to certain rights under Louisiana's Crime Victim Bill of Rights. As a victim or designated family member of
More informationCHAPTER 5:03 EVIDENCE ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I. Guilty Knowledge. 6. Proof of previous possession of stolen property on charge of receiving.
Evidence 3 CHAPTER 5:03 EVIDENCE ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PRELIMINARY SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Application. 4. Operation of common law rules and principles. 5. Saving of special
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. THE STATE and [T.] [J ] [M..] Accused 1 [M.] [R.] [M.] Accused 2
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI [2017] NZHC 526. NEW ZEALAND POLICE Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CRI-2017-404-000012 [2017] NZHC 526 BETWEEN AND NEW ZEALAND POLICE Appellant B Respondent Hearing: 21 March 2017 Counsel: PD Marshall and AB Richards
More informationFAQs: Commissioning vs. Notarizing a Document
FAQs: Commissioning vs. Notarizing a Document Commissioner for Taking Affidavits (and Statutory Declarations) 1. As a lawyer, what do I need to do to become a commissioner? Section 1(1) of the Ontario
More information2 No GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 22 JANUARY 2003
2 No. 24286 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 22 JANUARY 2003 AND PROVISION OF COMMUNICATION-RELATED INFORMATION ACT, 2002 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: [ ] Words in bold type in square brackets indicate omissions from
More informationIN THE KWAZULU NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA APPEAL NO. AR 140/2006 In the matter between: MQONDENI MBONGENI NGEMA
1 IN THE KWAZULU NATAL HIGH COURT, PIETERMARITZBURG REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA APPEAL NO. AR 140/2006 In the matter between: MQONDENI MBONGENI NGEMA Appellant and THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT GORVEN J [1]The
More informationTelkom prepaid Terms and Conditions Conditions of Use for the Telkom Voice Prepaid Services
Telkom prepaid Terms and Conditions Conditions of Use for the Telkom Voice Prepaid Services 1. DEFINITIONS 1. Conditions of Use means these terms and conditions; 2. Equipment includes your mobile phone
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF Navaneethakrishnan... Appellant(s)
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1134 OF 2013 Navaneethakrishnan... Appellant(s) Versus The State by Inspector of Police... Respondent(s) WITH
More informationAct 2 Code of Evidence Act 2006
ACTS SUPPLEMENT No. 1 10th February, 2009. ACTS SUPPLEMENT to The Southern Sudan Gazette No. 1 Volume I dated 10th February, 2009. Printed by Ministry Legal Affairs and Constitutional Development, by Order
More informationRomance Fraud, Catfishing and the Law: Is there really nothing that can be done? Prof Alisdair A. Gillespie Head of Lancaster University Law School.
Romance Fraud, Catfishing and the Law: Is there really nothing that can be done? Prof Alisdair A. Gillespie Head of Lancaster University Law School. This Presentation Focuses on the issue of catfishing
More informationLEGAL GUIDE TO RELEVANT CRIMINAL OFFENCES IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA
LEGAL GUIDE TO APPREHENDED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ORDERS LEGAL GUIDES WESTERN AUSTRALIA : Women s technology safety, legal resources, research & training LEGAL GUIDE TO RELEVANT CRIMINAL OFFENCES IN WESTERN
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) J.o.. 13./2.ol.1- oari JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) \0 \ 5! 20i1- Case Number: 9326/2015 ( 1) REPORT ABLE: "ff!& I NO (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: '!@/NO (3) REVISED. J.o.. 13./2.ol.1- oari
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal (J) No. 63 of 2014 Bhupen Doley, Son of Late Punya Doley, Resident of Jon Misuk, Sisi Kolghor,
More informationTHE EVIDENCE ACT 1967 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I- PRELIMINARY CHAPTER II-OF THE RELEVANCY OF FACTS PART I
THE EVIDENCE ACT 1967 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I- PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Application. 3. Interpretation. 4. Permissible inferences. 5. Presumptions. 6. Conclusive
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 8, 2014
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 8, 2014 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANDRE WILSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 12-01044 Lee V. Coffee,
More informationPOLICE CONSTABLE RENNIE LAKHAN NO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO REASONS
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CV2010-01582 BETWEEN SIEULAL RAMSARAN CLAIMANT AND POLICE CONSTABLE RENNIE LAKHAN NO. 13429 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More informationLegal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 40, No. 184, 28th September, No. 14 of 2001
Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 40, No. 184, 28th September, 2001 No. 14 of 2001 First Session Sixth Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago SENATE BILL AN ACT to prescribe
More informationBefore : THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES MR JUSTICE OWEN MR JUSTICE GRIFFITH WILLIAMS Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 2157 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION DIVISIONAL COURT Case No: CO/2350/2011 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 27/07/2012 Before
More informationWho s who in a Criminal Trial
Mock Criminal Trial Scenario Who s who in a Criminal Trial ACCUSED The accused is the person who is alleged to have committed the criminal offence, and who has been charged with committing it. Before being
More informationAPPENDIX A. FORM PETITION READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE PREPARING THE PETITION
APPENDIX A. FORM PETITION The following form petition shall be available without cost to a prisoner in the prisons and other places of detention and shall also be available without cost to any potential
More informationGUEST WIFI NETWORK. Terms and Conditions and Acceptable Use Protocol
GUEST WIFI NETWORK Terms and Conditions and Acceptable Use Protocol PLEASE READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND THE ACCEPTABLE USE PROTOCOL CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THE GUEST WIFI NETWORK SERVICE TERMS AND
More informationDATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 SUPERVISORY POWERS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER MONETARY PENALTY NOTICE
DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 SUPERVISORY POWERS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER MONETARY PENALTY NOTICE To: MyHome Installations Limited Of: Watson House, St Leonards Road, Maidstone, ME16 0LS 1. The Information
More informationJURY INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION-CRIMINAL
JURY INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION-CRIMINAL Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury Panel: I. Thank you for being here. We are here to select a jury. Six of you will be chosen for the jury. Even if
More informationPETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER District Court Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Case No. PO-20 Court Phone Number (918) 567-3582 Petitioner First Middle Last and/or on behalf of minor family member(s) Additional
More informationPETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER In The Court of the Quapaw Nation Case No. 5681 S. 630 Road, Quapaw, OK, 74363; (918) 542-1853 Petitioner Additional Petitioner Information Name(s) and age(s) of minor family
More informationDATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 SUPERVISORY POWERS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER MONETARY PENALTY NOTICE
DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 SUPERVISORY POWERS OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER MONETARY PENALTY NOTICE To: IAG Nationwide Limited Of: 24-26 Greek Street, Stockport SK3 8AB 1. The Information Commissioner
More informationBYLAWS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE CARTAGENA AGREEMENT DECISION 1 8 4
BYLAWS OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE CARTAGENA AGREEMENT DECISION 1 8 4 THE COMMISSION OF THE CARTAGENA AGREEMENT: HAVING SEEN Article 14 of the Treaty creating the Court of Justice of the Cartagena Agreement
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information & Instructions: Summary judgment 1. The purpose of a Summary Judgment is to expedite the collection process and avoid the expense and delay of a trial. Summary Judgments are most commonly obtained
More informationZambia Police (Amendment) [No. 14 of GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBIA ACT. No. 14 ot1999. An Act. to amend the Zambia Police Act
Zambia Police (Amendment) [No. 14 of 1999 361 GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBIA ACT No. 14 ot1999 Date of Assent: 23rd December, 1999 An Act. to amend the Zambia Police Act [24th December. 1999 ENACTED by the Parliament
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION. RYAN GALEY and REGINA GALEY
Galey et al v. Walters et al Doc. 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION RYAN GALEY and REGINA GALEY PLAINTIFFS V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv153-KS-MTP
More informationCERTIFICATE OF URGENCY
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MILIMANI LAW COURTS PETITION NO. OF 2018 ARTICLES 1, 2, 3, 4(2), 10, 12(1)(A), 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 41(1), 47,
More informationCouncil meeting 15 September 2011
Council meeting 15 September 2011 Public business GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) Recommendation: The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) at Appendix 1.
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA
' l.. GOVERNMENT GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA N$4.68 WINDHOEK 19 March 1999 No. 2065 CONTENTS Page GOVERNMENT NOTICE No. 41 Promulgation of Namibia Refugees (Recognition and Control) Act, 1999 (Act
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION) UNREPORTABLE CASE NO: A221/06 DATE: 21/05/2007 THE STATE APPELLANT V OSCAR NZIMANDE RESPONDENT JUDGMENT R D CLAASSEN J: 1 This is an appeal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: 21.03.2012 W.P.(C) No.1616/2012 Ex. Constable Mohan Kumar Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents
More informationPleading not guilty. in a criminal matter. The law in Victoria. Preparation. Police interviews. The Court process. defence lawyers
Pleading not guilty in a criminal matter The law in Victoria Preparation Police interviews The Court process Written by Josh Taaffe and Dee Giannopoulos defence lawyers Index 3 3 4 4 5 6 6 6 7 7 8 11 12
More informationSTIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine
STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No. 09-3031 State of New Maine Instruction Number Instruction Description 1. Preliminary Instructions 2. Functions of
More information1.1.1 True, accurate, current and complete information about Yourself or Your company or institution.
Terms and Conditions - www.midlandssimon.com The midlandsimon.com website is owned and operated by Midlands Simon Community, a company registered under the laws of Ireland Reg No 371956 and as a registered
More informationTHE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION ;: THOMSON REUTERS SWEET & MAXWELL
THE COMMON LAW LIBRARY PHIPSON ON EVIDENCE SEVENTEENTH EDITION SWEET & MAXWELL ;: THOMSON REUTERS PAGE Foreword Preface Table of Cases Table of Statutes Table of Civil Procedure Rules Table of Legislation
More informationCHAPTER 17:01 STATISTICS
CHAPTER 17:01 STATISTICS ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Matters as to which statistics may be collected 4. Census of production, distribution, agriculture, etc. 5.
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information & Instructions: Petition to enforce foreign judgment 1. The following form, Petition to Enforce Foreign Judgment, is used to enforce a judgment obtained in a state other than Texas. 2. In order
More informationThinking Evidentially
Thinking Evidentially Writing & Arguing Powerful Motions October 17, 2013 2013 www.rossdalecle.com Presentation of Proof Plaintiff (or prosecutor) presents case-in-chief, then rests; When witnesses are
More informationCHAPTER 6 THE EVIDENCE ACT. Arrangement of Sections. PART I PRELIMINARY. PART II RELEVANCY OF FACTS.
CHAPTER 6 THE EVIDENCE ACT. Arrangement of Sections. Section PART I PRELIMINARY. Application. Interpretation. Presumptions. PART II RELEVANCY OF FACTS. Evidence may be given of facts in issue and relevant
More informationThis Bill contains 4 Parts and seeks to provide for the prevention and punishment of electronic crimes.
ELECTRONIC CRIMES BILL, 2013 EXPLANATORY NOTES This Bill contains 4 Parts and seeks to provide for the prevention and punishment of electronic crimes. PART I of the Bill, Clauses 1-4, deals with matters
More informationTHE CRIMINAL LAW (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE, 1968
THE CRIMINAL LAW (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE, 1968 SECTIONS 1. Short title and extent. 2. Definitions. 3. Trial of scheduled offences. (W.P. Ord. II of 1968) C O N T E N T S 4. Cognizance of scheduled
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR SEPARATE MAINTENANCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN
SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA v. Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR SEPARATE MAINTENANCE WITHOUT MINOR CHILDREN My name is and I am representing myself in this
More informationBELIZE FIRE INQUIRIES ACT CHAPTER 123 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE FIRE INQUIRIES ACT CHAPTER 123 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Date of Decision: CRL.A of 2013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Date of Decision: 06.03.2014 CRL.A. 1011 of 2013 S.K. JAIN... Appellant Mr. Ajay K. Chopra, Adv. versus VIJAY KALRA... Respondent
More informationRECORDING OF EVIDENCE.
1 RECORDING OF EVIDENCE. The primary questions are cropup in the mind of audience would be what evidence mean and who has to record such evidence and what is the purpose of recording of evidence. The term
More information654 May 24, 2017 No. 245 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
654 May 24, 2017 No. 245 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JASON DARRELL SHIFFLETT, Defendant-Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 13C43131; A156899
More informationA SIMPLIFIED GUIDE TO THE PROTECTION FROM HARASSMET ACT
A SIMPLIFIED GUIDE TO THE PROTECTION FROM HARASSMET ACT First published by the Women s Legal Centre in 2015 Copyright Women s Legal Centre Funded by: The Women s Legal Centre reserves all of its rights.
More informationMULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A
MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A 2010 Second Semester Assignment 1 Question 1 If the current South African law does not provide a solution to an evidentiary problem, our courts will first of all search
More informationSRI GANESH COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
SRI GANESH COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PONDY CUDDALORE ECR ROAD) MULLODAI PONDICHERRY - 607402 Laws and Procedures: Sexual Harassment in the Workplace HAVING REGARD to the definition of human
More informationUNIFORM APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
UNIFORM APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF No. NAME OF APPLICANT (to be filled in by the clerk) JUDICIAL DISTRICT PRISON NUMBER PARISH OF PLACE OF CONFINEMENT STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. CUSTODIAN (Warden,
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR VISITATION COMMON PLEAS COURT
COMPLAINT FOR VISITATION COMMON PLEAS COURT THESE ARE PACKETS OF LEGAL FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE IN THE STATE OF OHIO COURTS AND THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE A GENERAL GUIDE TO GET THE FORMS FILLED OUT,
More informationDocument references: Prior decisions - Special Rapporteur s rule 91 decision, dated 28 December 1992 (not issued in document form)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Kulomin v. Hungary Communication No. 521/1992 16 March 1994 CCPR/C/50/D/521/1992 * ADMISSIBILITY Submitted by: Vladimir Kulomin Alleged victim: The author State party: Hungary Date
More information