PREPARING A CASE FOR APPEAL
|
|
- Kory Rodgers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PREPARING A CASE FOR APPEAL Presented by Randy Glasser, Esq. November 6, Conklin Street Farmingdale, New York Century Hill Drive Latham, New York
2 INTRODUCTION The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( IDEA ) provides for due process procedures to promptly resolve disputes that arise between parents and school districts, so that children will receive appropriate special education services. B.C. v. Pine Plains Cent. Sch. Dist., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS at *5 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) citing 20 U.S.C. 1415(b)(6) (7). New York State has implemented a two tiered system of administrative review for disputes regarding "any matter relating to the identification, evaluation or educational placement of a student with a disability...or the provision of a [FAPE] to such a student." Id. citing Id.; 8 NYCRR 200.5(i)(1). 2
3 INTRODUCTION (Cont d) First, "[p]arents may challenge the adequacy of their child's IEP in an 'impartial due process hearing' before an [Impartial Hearing Officer ("IHO")] appointed by the local board of education." Id. citing E.A.M. ex rel. E.M., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS at *2 (quoting Gagliardo, 489 F.3d at 109). Either party may then appeal the IHO's decision to a State Review Officer ("SRO"), an officer of the New York State Education Department, who conducts an impartial review of these proceedings. Id.; 34 C.F.R (b)(2); 8 NYCRR 279.1(d). 3
4 Notice of Intention to Seek Review When It Is Required: The parent or person in parental relationship to a student with a disability who intends to seek review by the SRO of an IHO s decision must personally serve upon the school district a Notice of Intention to Seek Review in the form set forth in 8 NYCRR
5 Notice of Intention to Seek Review Timeline: The Notice of Intention to Seek Review must be personally served upon the school district not less than ten (10) days before a copy of the petition is served, and within twentyfive (25) days from the date of the decision sought to be reviewed. Id. The Petition for Review must be personally served upon the school district within thirty five (35) days from the date of the decision sought to be reviewed. If the decision has been served by mail upon petitioner, the date of mailing and the four (4) days subsequent thereto shall be excluded in computing the twenty five (25) or thirty five (35) day period. Id. 5
6 Notice with Petition (8 NYCRR 279.3) Each petition must contain the Notice set forth in 8 NYCRR
7 Petition (8 NYCRR 279.4) Timeline: Petitioner must file with the Office of State Review the Petition for Review and the Notice of Intention to Seek Review where required, together with proof of service upon the other party to the hearing, within three (3) days after service is complete. Id. Filing by facsimile or electronic transmission is not permitted. Id. The Petition for Review must clearly indicate the reasons for challenging the impartial hearing officer s decision, identifying the findings, conclusions and orders to which exceptions are taken, and shall indicate what relief should be granted by the State Review Officer to the petitioner. Id. 7
8 Affidavit of Service (8 NYCRR 275.9) Within five (5) days after the service of any pleading or paper, the original, together with the affidavit of verification and an affidavit of service, proving the service of a copy such pleading or paper on the other party, must be transmitted to the Office of Counsel, New York State Education Department, State Education Building, Albany, NY The affidavit of service must be in substantially the form set forth in 8 NYCRR 275.9, and indicate the name and official character of the person upon whom service was made (see attached). The Affidavit of Service must be signed in the presence of a Notary Public or a Commissioner of Deeds by the person who delivered the Petition, Answer, Reply, etc. The original of the Affidavit should be attached to each pleading. 8
9 Cross Appeals (8 NYCRR 279.4) A respondent who wishes to seek review of an IHO s decision may cross appeal from all or a part thereof by setting forth a cross appeal in respondent s answer. A cross appeal is timely if it is included in the answer, which is served within the time permitted by section of the Commissioner s Regulations. The petitioner must answer respondent s cross appeal within ten (10) days after service of a copy of the answer and cross appeal and file the answer to the cross appeal, together with proof of service, with the Office of State Review within two (2) days after service is complete. Id. No filing by facsimile or electronic transmission is permitted. Id. 9
10 Answer (8 NYCRR 279.5) Respondent shall, within ten (10) days after the date of service of a copy of the petition, answer by either concurring in a statement of facts with petitioner or by service of an answer, with any written argument, memorandum of law, and additional documentary evidence. Id. Such answer or agreed statement of facts, together with proof of service of a copy of such documents upon the petitioner, shall be filed with the Office of State Review within two (2) days after such service. Id. No filing by facsimile or electronic transmission shall be permitted. Id. 10
11 Additional Pleadings (8 NYCRR 279.6) No pleading, other than a petition or answer, will be accepted or considered by the SRO, except a reply by petitioner to any procedural defenses interposed by respondent and to any additional documentary evidence served with the answer. Id. Such reply must be served upon the opposing party withinthree(3)daysafterserviceoftheanswerand thereafter shall be filed, along with proof of service, with the Office of State Review within two (2) days after service of the reply is complete. Id. No filing by facsimile or electronic transmission is permitted. Id. 11
12 Verification of Pleadings (8 NYCRR 279.7) All pleadings must be verified. The petition must be verified by the oath of at least one of the petitioners, except that when the appeal is by a Board of Education, it will be verified by any person who is familiar with the facts underlying the appeal, pursuant to a resolution of such Board authorizing the commencement of such appeal on behalf of such trustees or Board (e.g. superintendent). Id. When the appeal is brought from the action of a school district, verificationoftheanswermustbemadebyanypersonwhois familiar with the facts underlying the appeal. If two or more respondents are united in interest, verification of the answer must be made by at least one of them, who is familiar with the facts. Id. A reply must be verified in the manner set forth for the verification of an answer. Id. 12
13 Pleadings and Memorandum of Law Form: (8 NYCRR 279.8) Documents that do not comply with the requirements listed below may be rejected by the SRO. All pleadings and memoranda of law shall be in the following form: On 8 ½ by 11 inch white paper of good quality, with erasures or interlineations materially defacing the pleadings; Typewritten in black ink, single sided, and text double spaced (block quotation and footnotes may be single spaced). All text with the exception of page numbering, shall appear on pages containing margins of at least 1 inch. Text shall appear as minimum 12 pointtypeandthetimesnewromanfont (footnotes may appear as minimum 10 pointtypeandthetimesnewroman font). Compacted or other compressed printing features are prohibited; Set forth the allegation(s) of the parties in numbered paragraphs; 13
14 Pleadings and Memorandum of Law (8 NYCRR 279.8) (cont d) Pages shall be consecutively numbered and fastened together; Petition, answer, or memorandum of law shall not exceed twenty (20) pages in length and a Reply shall not exceed ten (10) pages in length; A party shall not circumvent page limitation through incorporation by reference e.g. memorandum of law submitted as a closing statement for impartial hearing; and Extensive footnotes may not be used to circumvent page limitations. 14
15 Petition Answer, Reply and Memorandum of Law Pleadings and Memorandum of Law: These documents must cite the record on appeal, identify the relevant page number(s) in the hearing decision, transcript, exhibit number, or letter, and if the exhibit consists of multiple pages, the exhibit page number. Id. 15
16 Record (8 NYCRR 279.9) Introduction: Whether the Board of Education is the petitioner or the respondent, it must file with the Office of State Review, a copy of the IHO s decision, a bound copy of the transcript from the impartial hearing including a word index for the transcript, an electronic copy of the transcript, copies of pre hearing conference summaries or transcripts, a copy of the original exhibits accepted into evidence at the hearing, and an index to the exhibits. Id. 16
17 Record (8 NYCRR 279.9) (Cont d) Certification: The Board of Education must submit a signed certification with the record stating that the record submitted is a true and complete copy of the hearing record before the IHO. Id. Where petitioner is a party other than the Board of Education, the Board of Education must file the completed and certified record with the Office of State Review within ten (10) days after service of the notice of the intention to seek review. Where the Board of Education is the petitioner, it mustfiletherecordbeforetheihotogetherwith the petition for review. Id. 17
18 Record (8 NYCRR 279.9) (Cont d) Certification (cont d): An SRO may dismiss an appeal by the Board of Education when a complete and certified hearing record is not filed with the petition for review. Id. AnSRO'sdismissalofanappealfromanIHO's decision, when based on procedural grounds, will not be overturned unless it is arbitrary and capricious. B.C. v. Pine Plains Cent. Sch. Dist., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS at *
19 Record (8 NYCRR 279.9) (Cont d) The "arbitrary and capricious" inquiry requires the Court to determine whether the SRO's decision was supported by a consideration of the relevant factors and whether a clear error of judgment occurred. R.S., 899 F. Supp. 2d at (citation omitted). "The law of arbitrary and capricious administrative behavior...requires consistency in agencies' application of law," and "ultimately...is a rule of reasonableness" that safeguards against unpredictability. Id. citing Id.at
20 Additional evidence (8 NYCRR (b)) IntheeventtheSROdeterminesthatadditional evidence is necessary, it may seek additional oral testimony or documentary evidence. Id. The SRO may conduct hearings for the purpose of taking additional evidence at a time and place which is reasonably convenient to the parties. The procedures for such hearing shall be consistent with the requirements of 8 NYCRR 200.5(j)(3). 20
21 Interim Determinations (8 NYCRR (d)) With the exception of a pendency determination, it is not permissible to appeal an IHO s ruling, decision, or refusal to decide an issue during a hearing. Id. However,either party may appeal any interim ruling, decision, or refusal to decide an issue to the SRO from a final determination of an IHO. Id. 21
22 Extensions of Time to Answer (8 NYCRR (e)) No party shall be granted an extension of time to answer the petition for review, interpose a crossappeal, or reply to an answer by the SRO unless timely application is made, upon written notice to all parties. Id. Such application shall be in writing, addressed to the Office of State Review, postmarked no later than the date on which the time to answer a reply expires, set forth the reasons for the request, and briefly state whether the other party consents or opposes the application for extension. Id. The time to respond to a pleading may not be extended solely by stipulation of the parties or their counsel. Id. 22
23 Computation of Days When computing the ten (10) day period in which service of an answer and cross appeal must be made, the date upon which personal service of the petition was made upon respondent is excluded. Id. If the answer was served by mail upon petitioner or petitioner s counsel, the date of mailing and the two (2) days subsequent thereto shall be excluded in the computation of the three (3) day period in which a reply to procedural defenses or a response to additional documentary evidence served with the answer may be served and filed by petitioner. Id. 23
24 Computation of Days (Cont d) If the last day for service of a notice of intention to seek review, a petition for review, an answer, or response to an answer falls on a Saturday or Sunday, service may be made on the following Monday; if the last day for such service falls on a legal holiday, service may be made on the following business day. Id. 24
25 Decision of SRO (8 NYCRR ) The SRO s decision must be based solely upon the record, and is final, unless an aggrieved party seeks judicial review. Id. The decision of the SRO must be mailed by the Office of State Review to counsel for petitioner and respondent, parties appearing pro se and the Superintendent or Superintendent s designee of the school district involved as a party in the appeal. Id. The Superintendent, or the Superintendent s designee, must forward a copy of the decision as soon as practicable to the Principal and Chairperson of the Committee on Special Education of the school involved in developing the most recent Individualized Education Program ( IEP ) that wasincontentionintheappeal. Id. 25
26 Dismissal by SRO (8 NYCRR ) An SRO may dismiss sua sponte a late petition for review. Id. However, an SRO may excuse a failure to timely serve or file a petition for review within the time specified for good cause shown. Id. The reasons for such failure shall be set forth in the petition for review. Id. 26
27 Appeal of SRO Decision The Decision of the SRO is final unless either party seeks review, in either State Supreme Court or Federal District Court, within four (4) months from the date of the SRO s decision. N.Y. Educ. Law 4404(3)(a). 27
28 PENDENCY If an SRO issues a placement decision that agrees with the parents, pendency during any subsequent appeal to a Court is the placement decision by the SRO. If the SRO issues a placement decision that agrees with the school district, pendency during the subsequent appeal to a Court is the student s current educational placement. Unless the school district and the parents or persons in parental relationship otherwise agree, the student shall remain in his or her then current educational placement during the pendency of an appeal of an SRO decision to either State or Federal Court, or, if applying for initial admission to a public school, shall be placed in the public school program until all such proceedings have been completed. N.Y. Educ. Law 4404(4)(b). 28
29 RECENT COURT AND SRO DECISIONS B.C. v. Pine Plains Cent. Sch. Dist., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS , supra: The Court granted, defendant, school district s motion to dismiss, and thus declined to review the merits of Plaintiff's claim because of Plaintiff s failure to timely and properly initiate her appeal to the SRO, and therefore failure to exhaust her administrative remedies under the IDEA. 29
30 R.S. and M.S., individually and on behalf of their minor child, O.S. v. Bedford Cent. Sch. Dist., 899 F. Supp. 2d 285 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) Plaintiffs appealed an SRO decision dismissing their appeal as untimely. In dismissing Plaintiffs' appeal, the SRO relied on 8NYCRR 279.2(b) and which provide that "the petition for review shall be personally served upon the school district" within 35 days, id. at279.2(b); and that the SRO, "in his or her sole discretion, may excuse a failure to timely serve or file a petition for review within the time specified for good cause shown," id.at In this case Plaintiffs did not dispute that service on the school district was a day late, or show cause for their lateness. The Court granted defendant, school district s motion for summary judgment and denied as moot Plaintiffs' previous motion for an extension of time to file their notice of appeal because Plaintiffs were unable to circumvent the IDEA's exhaustion requirement. 30
31 T.W. v. Spencerport Cent. Sch. Dist., 891 F. Supp. 2d 438 (W.D.N.Y. 2012) The Court granted defendant, school district s motion to dismiss, stating in part, I conclude that plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies, or to plausibly allege that such exhaustion would have been futile, and have failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #11, #12) are granted, and the complaint is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Id. at
32 Appeal No (2013) Petitioner, school district, appealed the decision of an IHO which found that it failed to offer an appropriate educational program to respondents (the parents ) son and ordered it to reimburse the parents for their son s tuition costs at the McCarton School and home based services for the school year. The parents crossappealed and sought modifications to the IHO decision. The SRO dismissed the appeal, finding that the school district failed to properly initiate the appeal, in that the District failed to serve the notice of appeal on a timely basis. 32
33 Appeal No (2013) Petitioner, school district, appealed from the IHO s decision which denied its motion to dismiss and found the district denied the student a FAPE for the school year. The SRO dismissed the appeal, before reaching the merits of the case, because the district failed to properly initiate the appeal. The district s affidavit of service indicated that the petition was served on parents counsel, instead of serving the parents personally, which is not permitted by State regulations (see 8 NYCRR 275.8(a); 279.2(b)). Moreover, the parents did not agree to waive service by personal delivery. Accordingly, the SRO dismissed the appeal, finding that while the district filed a reply to the parents procedural defense, the reply did not assert any reason why the district failed to serve the parents on a timely basis, and there was no record of any attempt to personally serve the parents. 33
34 Appeal No (2012) Petitioner appealed from the decision of an IHO which denied her request to be reimbursed for her son s tuition costs at the Gow School for the school year. The parent s affidavits of service indicated that thepetitionforreviewwasservedonthedistrict by mail and on counsel for the district by private overnight delivery service, which is not permitted by state regulations, and the district did not agree to waive service by personal delivery. 34
35 Appeal No (2012) (Cont d) The parent also did not file a reply responding to the district s procedural defense, or assert in the petition any reason why she could not timely personally serve the district or that the district agreed to waive personal service. There was also no indication in the record that the parent attempted to effectuate personal service of the petition on the district prior to mailing or made a request to an SRO to effectuate service by alternative means. Accordingly, the SRO dismissed the appeal. 35
36 Appeal No (2012) Petitioners (the parents) appealed from an interim decision of an IHO which ordered the appointment of a guardian ad litem for the student. The impartial hearing began on June 1, 2011, continued for additional hearing dates, but at the time of the appeal had not yet concluded. The IHO ordered the appointment of a guardian ad litem in an interim decision. The SRO found that the parents appeal was premature and dismissed the appeal since the authority of an SRO in direct appeals from interim decisions of IHOs is limited to pendency placement determinations. The SRO s decision was based upon 8 NYCRR (d). 36
37 Appeal No (2012) Petitioner (the district) appealed from the decision of an IHO which ordered it to reimburse respondents (the parents) for a portion of their son s tuition costs at the Norman Howard School for the school year. The parents crossappealed, from the IHO s determination which denied their request for full tuition reimbursement. 37
38 Appeal No (2012) (Cont d) The IHO s decision was dated February 4, 2012, but was mailed on February 3, The date of the mailing and the four days subsequent were excluded in calculating the 35 day period within which the petition needed to be timely served. Therefore, the petition was required to be served personally on the parents no later than March 13, However, the district personally served the petition upon the parents on or before March 22, 2012, which was nine days late. The district requested the delay be excused, explaining that they failed to serve the petition on a timely basis, because of their belief that the parents were going to serve the district with an appeal. The SRO dismissed the appeal, finding that their reason didn t constitute good cause. 38
39 Appeal No (2012) (Cont d) The SRO also noted that even if the district s late petition had been accepted, it would still have been dismissed because while 8 NYCRR states that respondents must be served between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., the parents here were served at approximately 9:10 p.m. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed on this ground as well. 39
40 Appeal No (2012) Petitioner (the parent) appealed from the decision of an IHO which denied her request to be reimbursed for her son s tuition costs at the Kildonan School for the school year. The SRO dismissed the appeal holding, Based upon the aforementioned nonconformities with State regulations including the parent s failure to initiate the appeal in a timely manner with proper service, I will exercise my discretion and dismiss the petition without determination of the merits of the parent s claims (8 NYCRR ; see 8 NYCRR (b), (c), ) 40
41 Appeal No (2012) (Cont d) In this appeal personal service of the second petition* upon the district did not occur, nor did service occur pursuant to any of the enumerated exceptions to personal service requirement. In this regard the parent s affidavit of service was not filed, as required to show that the second petition was served upon the district, and the district alleged that it was never served with the petition. *The first petition was rejected by the SRO because it exceeded 20 pages in length and thus failed to comply with 8 NYCRR 279.8(a)(5). 41
42 Appeal No (2012) (Cont d) In the petition, the parent did not offer any explanation for her failure to personally serve the petition. Given that the original petition was rejected by the Office of State Review, and in the absence of any showing that the parent personally served the district with the second petition, obtained an agreed upon waiver of personal service, or obtained permission from an SRO for service by means other than personal service, the SRO found that the parent did not effectuate proper service pursuant to 8 NYCRR
43 Appeal No (2012) (Cont d): The SRO found that the appeal had not been initiated in a timely manner with proper service and the cause alleged in the petition was not sufficient to excuse the untimeliness of the parent s appeal. In the instant case, the IHO s decision was dated January 19, Accordingly, personal service on the district was required no later than February 28, 2012, after excluding the date of mailing and the four days subsequent thereto in calculating the 35 days within which the petition would have been timely served pursuant to 8 NYCRR 279.2(b). 43
44 Appeal No (2012) (Cont d): The parent failed to set forth any reasons in the petition to explain why she could not personally serve the petition within the requisite time period, and did not file a reply to the procedural defenses interposed by the district in its answer. The parent was represented by experienced counsel who ha[d] previously appeared before the Office of State Review. Under the circumstances of this case, I find that the petition was not properly served upon the district prior to the expiration of the parent s time to initiate an appeal (8 NYCRR ; see 8 NYCRR 279.2[b]). 44
45 Appeal No (2012) (Cont d): In addition, the SRO held that the parent did not personally serve a notice of intention to seek review upon the district, which resulted in the delay of the hearing record being submitted to the Office of State Review. The SRO also noted that the parent s memorandum of law failed to comply with the regulations as it did not include a table of contents as required by 279.8(a)(6) of the Commissioner s regulations. Finally since the verification appeared to be a copy of the original verification from the rejected petition which was then affixed to the second petition, the SRO held that he could not conclude that the second petition was verified as required by of the Commissioner s regulations. 45
RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE
RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the following amendments to the Rules of Appellate Procedure were adopted to take effect on January 1, 2019. The amendments were approved
More informationRules of the Court of Appeals of Virginia (not including forms)
As of June 0 0 0 Rules of the Court of Appeals of Virginia (not including forms) PART FIVE A THE COURT OF APPEALS A. General. Rule A:. Scope, Citation, Applicability and General Provisions. (a) Scope of
More informationSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Date of Public Notice: November 5, 1997 Date of Public Hearing: November 18, 1997 Effective
More informationINDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN
INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN Revised: January 3, 2011 Chambers Deputy/Law Clerk United States District Court Jim Reily Southern District of New York (212) 805-0120 500 Pearl
More informationADR CODE OF PROCEDURE
Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims
More informationRehabilitation Services Chapter ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER FORMAL HEARINGS
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 795-2-3 FORMAL HEARINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS 795-2-3-.01 Request For Formal Hearing And Appointment Of Hearing Office 795-2-3-.02
More informationRULES OF THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I (SCRU-10-0000115) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai i Comments and commentary are provided by the rules committee for
More informationHAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47
HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47 LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Subchapter 1
More informationLEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007
LEWIS A. KAPLAN United States District Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 COMMUNICATIONS For questions concerning general calendar matters, call the Deputy Clerk, Mr. Andrew
More informationTITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER n: DISPUTE RESOLUTION
ISBE 23 ILLINOIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 475 TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES : EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION : DISPUTE RESOLUTION PART 475 CONTESTED CASES AND OTHER FORMAL HEARINGS
More informationRelevant Excerpts of the Rules of the City of New York Title 61 - Office of Collective Bargaining Chapter 1 - Practice and Procedure
Relevant Excerpts of the Rules of the City of New York Title 61 - Office of Collective Bargaining Chapter 1 - Practice and Procedure 1-01 Definitions 1-07 Proceedings before the Board of Collective Bargaining
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 1A 1
1A-1. Rules of Civil Procedure. The Rules of Civil Procedure are as follows: Chapter 1A. Rules of Civil Procedure. Article 1. Scope of Rules One Form of Action. Rule 1. Scope of rules. These rules shall
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. VALERIE SOTO, as Guardian Ad Litem of Y.D., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Case: 17-16705, 11/22/2017, ID: 10665607, DktEntry: 15, Page 1 of 20 No. 17-16705 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VALERIE SOTO, as Guardian Ad Litem of Y.D., a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationNew York State Court of Appeals Rules of Practice. (22 NYCRR Part 500)
New York State Court of Appeals Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR Part 500) www.courts.state.ny.us/ctapps Effective February 1, 2013 RULES OF PRACTICE: RULE TITLE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK RULES OF
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER March 29, 2012 This Standing Order supercedes all prior Standing Orders regarding pending
More information(1 December to date) CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, 1996
(1 December 2003 - to date) CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, 1996 (Gazette No. 17678, Notice No. 2083 dated 18 December 1996. Commencement date: 4 February 1997 unless otherwise indicated)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant/s.
Case :-cv-0-jak -JEM Document #:0 Filed 0// Page of Page ID UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JONATHAN BIRDT, Plaintiff/s, v. CHARLIE BECK, et al., Defendant/s. Case No. LA CV-0
More informationMONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES
MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES Rule 1 Form of Papers Presented for Filing. (a) Papers Defined. The word papers as used in this Rule includes all documents and copies except exhibits and records on
More informationTHERE ARE NO SUBMITTED MOTIONS IN THIS PART AND ALL MOTIONS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, MUST BE ORALLY ARGUED.
Supreme Court, Bronx County - Civil Term I.A.S. PART 8 RULES Presiding Justice: Donald A. Miles Courtroom: 706 Chambers: 807 Telephone: (718) 618-1242 Telephone: (718)618-1490 1. APPEARANCES a) Counsel
More informationConstitutional review by district court of administrative decisions and orders. A. Scope of rule. This rule governs writs of certiorari to
1-075. Constitutional review by district court of administrative decisions and orders. A. Scope of rule. This rule governs writs of certiorari to administrative officers and agencies pursuant to the New
More informationRULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)
RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011) TITLE I. INTRODUCTION Rule 1. Title and Scope of Rules; Definitions. 2. Seal. TITLE II. APPEALS FROM JUDGMENTS AND
More informationARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties
ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter
More informationVIRGINIA: tbit;yo/~on, Friday tk 10th clayo/ April, ~ tkj~ tbowdo/r~kuat"tk J~ tbowd?l3~ in tk
VIRGINIA: ~ tkj~ tbowdo/r~kuat"tk J~ tbowd?l3~ in tk tbit;yo/~on, Friday tk 10th clayo/ April, 2015. It is ordered that the Rules heretofore adopted and promulgated by this Court and now in effect be and
More informationAPPEALS TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT HON. FRANCES E. CAFARELL
APPEALS TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT by HON. FRANCES E. CAFARELL Clerk of the Court, New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division Fourth Department Rochester APPEALS TO THE APPELLATE
More informationProceedings Relative to Debarment and Suspension from Contracting Appendix D: Rules of Practice in
Sam Procurement Manual 2 Appendix D: Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Debarment and Suspension from Contracting Appendix D: Rules of Practice in Proceedings Relative to Debarment (REPRINT OF
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 150B Article 3 1
Article 3. Administrative Hearings. 150B-22. Settlement; contested case. It is the policy of this State that any dispute between an agency and another person that involves the person's rights, duties,
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire adopts
More informationLOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]
LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana] Local Rule 1.1 - Scope of the Rules These Rules shall govern all proceedings
More informationADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope... 3 Rule 2 Construction of
More informationRULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-02-13 PROCEDURES FOR PENALTY ASSESSMENTS AND HEARING TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-02-13-.01 Scope
More informationDEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION GENERAL RULES
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION GENERAL RULES (By authority conferred on the director of the department of licensing and regulatory affairs by sections 7,
More informationCase GLT Doc 644 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 13:52:10 FILED Desc Main Document Page 1 of 20
Case 17-22045-GLT Doc 644 Filed 06/30/17 Entered 06/30/17 135210 FILED Desc Main Document Page 1 of 20 6/30/17 133 pm CLERK U.S. BANKRUPTCY IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT COURT - WDPA FOR THE WESTERN
More information31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands
CLICK HERE to return to the home page 31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands (a) In General. (1)Issuance and service. Whenever the Attorney General, or a designee (for purposes of this section),
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CHAPTER NINE APPELLATE DIVISION RULES...201
CHAPTER NINE APPELLATE DIVISION RULES...201 9.1 GENERAL PROVISION...201 (a) Assignment of Judges...201 (b) Appellate Jurisdiction...201 (c) Writ Jurisdiction...201 9.2 APPEALS...201 (a) Notice of Appeal...201
More informationINDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk
July 23, 2013 INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge Chambers Courtroom Deputy Clerk United States Courthouse Ms. Gina Sicora 300 Quarropas Street (914) 390-4178
More informationRules of the Equal Opportunities Commission November 10, 2016
Rules of the Equal Opportunities Commission November 10, 2016 1. Procedural Rules... 1 2. Definitions... 4 3. Procedures for Processing Complaints... 5 4. Investigation... 8 5. Initial Determination of
More informationKansas Corporation Commission
Agency 82 Kansas Corporation Commission Articles 82-1. RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE. 82-2. OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION. 82-3. PRODUCTION AND CONSERVATION OF OIL AND GAS. 82-4. MOTOR CARRIERS OF PERSONS
More informationNotice and Protest Procedures for Protests Related to a University s Contract Procurement Process.
18.002 Notice and Protest Procedures for Protests Related to a University s Contract Procurement Process. (1) Purpose. The procedures set forth in this Regulation shall apply to protests that arise from
More informationLANCASTER COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
LANCASTER COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 1. Title and Citation of Rules These rules shall be known as the Lancaster County Rules of Civil Procedure and may be cited as L.C.R.C.P. No.. RULE 10. Business
More informationState of Wyoming Office of Administrative Hearings
State of Wyoming Office of Administrative Hearings MATTHEW H. MEAD 2020 CAREY AVENUE, FIFTH FLOOR GOVERNOR CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82002-0270 (307) 777-6660 DEBORAH BAUMER FAX (307) 777-5269 DIRECTOR Summary
More informationNevada Constitution Article 19 Section 1. Referendum for approval or disapproval of statute or resolution enacted by legislature. Sec. 2.
Nevada Constitution Article 19 Section 1. Referendum for approval or disapproval of statute or resolution enacted by legislature. 1. A person who intends to circulate a petition that a statute or resolution
More information47064 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 171 / Thursday, September 3, 1998 / Notices
47064 Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 171 / Thursday, September 3, 1998 / Notices Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
More informationRULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF TENNCARE
RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION BUREAU OF TENNCARE CHAPTER 1200-13-19 APPEALS OF CERTAIN ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1200-13-19-.01 Scope and Authority 1200-13-19-.12
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 150B Article 3A 1
Article 3A. Other Administrative Hearings. 150B-38. Scope; hearing required; notice; venue. (a) The provisions of this Article shall apply to: (1) Occupational licensing agencies. (2) The State Banking
More informationRULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES
RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES Effective March 23, 2001 Scope of Application and Definitions Article 1 1. These Rules shall govern an arbitration
More informationPART FAMILY LAW
11.01 Scope 11.02 Affidavit of Parties and Production of Documents 11.03 Interrogatories 11.04 Attorney for the Child 11.05 Conciliation, Mediation, Advice to Court, Investigations and Reports 11.06 Case
More informationNATIONAL LAW CENTER ON HOMELESSNESS & POVERTY
NATIONAL LAW CENTER ON HOMELESSNESS & POVERTY Arkansas State Procedures McKinney-Vento Act Dispute Resolution Pursuant to the McKinney Vento Homeless Assistance Act, a Local Agency ( LEA ) must continue
More informationCONTENTS OF PROPOSED TIME CALCULATION CHANGES TO COLORADO RULES COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (RULES 1-122). 2
CONTENTS OF PROPOSED TIME CALCULATION CHANGES TO COLORADO RULES (Effective 1/1/2012) COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (RULES 1-122). 2 COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (RULES 201-260).. 30 COLORADO RULES
More informationSupreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018
Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018 Justice: Law Secretary: Secretary: Part Clerk: Hon. Sharon M.J. Gianelli, J.S.C. Karen L.
More informationStreamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures
RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding
More informationLOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, Preamble
LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, 2010 Preamble The purpose of the Lawyer Dispute Resolution Program is to give timely, reasonable,
More informationWorkforce Services, Department of
Workforce Services, Department of Labor Standards Chapter 3: Fair Employment Rules Wyoming Administrative Rules Effective Date: Rule Type: Reference Number: 11/21/2016 to Current Current Rules & Regulations
More informationJAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures
JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures Effective September 1, 2016 JAMS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION RULES JAMS International and JAMS provide arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationBRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES. 1. Upon the filing of a divorce or custody action pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of
BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES Local Rule 51 These rules shall be known as the Bradford County Rules of Civil Procedure and may be cited as Brad.Co.R.C.P. Local Rule 205.2(b) 1. Upon the filing of a
More informationUNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Effective November 1, 2010
UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Effective November 1, 2010 Rule Page Title I. Scope of Rules; Amendment 1. Scope of Rules... I 2. Amendment...
More informationIC Chapter 3. Adjudicative Proceedings
IC 4-21.5-3 Chapter 3. Adjudicative Proceedings IC 4-21.5-3-1 Service of process; notice by publication Sec. 1. (a) This section applies to: (1) the giving of any notice; (2) the service of any motion,
More informationTHE TORONTO LICENSING TRIBUNAL
THE TORONTO LICENSING TRIBUNAL BY-LAW NO. 1 (as amended January 16, 2014) RULES OF PROCEDURE To Govern the Proceedings of the Toronto Licensing Tribunal DEFINITIONS 1. In these Rules, unless the context
More informationRULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS
RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 0800-02-21 MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-02-21-.01 Scope 0800-02-21-.13 Scheduling Hearing 0800-02-21-.02
More informationStanding Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals
Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE. For Applications & Appeals
Attachment A Resolution of adoption, 2009 KITSAP COUNTY OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER RULES OF PROCEDURE For Applications & Appeals Adopted June 22, 2009 BOCC Resolution No 116 2009 Note: Res No 116-2009
More informationRULE 3. [Reserved] CHAPTER III. PETITION PRACTICE AND PLEADING
PETITION PRACTICE AND PLEADING 231 Rule 3.1 Rule 3.1. [Reserved]. 3.2 3.6. [Reserved]. 3.7. [Reserved]. Rule 3.1. [Reserved]. RULE 3. [Reserved] The provisions of this Rule 3.1 amended December 10, 2013,
More informationNEW LONDON FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER FAIR HEARING PLAN
NEW LONDON FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER FAIR HEARING PLAN NEW LONDON FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER FAIR HEARING PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I... 1 INITIATION OF HEARING... 1 1.1 ACTIONS OR RECOMMENDED ACTIONS... 1
More informationWills and Trusts Arbitration RULES
Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES Effective September 15, 2005 Introduction Standard Arbitration Clause Administrative Fees Wills and Trusts Arbitration Rules 1. Incorporation of These Rules into a Will
More informationSupreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department Rules of Procedure 22 NYCRR Part 670 Effective May 1, 1990 As amended June 18, 1990, effective May 25, 1990; September
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT Effective April 29, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1 1. Authority and Applicability.... 1 2. Definitions.... 1 A. Administrative Law
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT Effective April 27, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1 1. Authority and Applicability.... 1 2. Definitions.... 1 A. Administrative Law
More informationRULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER
RULES OF PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COWLITZ COUNTY HEARINGS EXAMINER INTRODUCTION The following Rules of Procedure have been adopted by the Cowlitz County Hearing Examiner. The examiner and deputy examiners
More informationALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
ALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 880-X-5A SPECIAL RULES FOR HEARINGS AND APPEALS SPECIAL RULES APPLICABLE TO SURFACE COAL MINING HEARINGS AND APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS 880-X-5A-.01
More informationFraming the Issues on Appeal Nuts and Bolts November 15, 2016
Framing the Issues on Appeal Nuts and Bolts November 15, 2016 READ PART VIII OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE, AND THEN READ THEM AGAIN. THIS IS ONLY A GUIDE AND SUMMARY! I. Timely filing of
More informationDelaware County Court of Common Pleas LOCAL ORPHANS COURT RULES
Delaware County Court of Common Pleas LOCAL ORPHANS COURT RULES * Copyright 2002 Delaware County Bar Association. This compilation of the Local Orphans Court Rules of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware
More informationSOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE Accepted and approved, as amended, by the Standing Administrative Committee on June 22, 2001 SOUTHWEST INTERTRIBAL COURT OF APPEALS RULES
More informationSTREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers
More informationRhode Island False Claims Act
Rhode Island False Claims Act 9-1.1-1. Name of act. [Effective until February 15, 2008.] This chapter may be cited as the State False Claims Act. 9-1.1-2. Definitions. [Effective until February 15, 2008.]
More informationTITLE 04 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Rulemaking Agency: NC Industrial Commission TITLE 04 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Rule Citations: 04 NCAC 10A.0605,.0609A,.0701-.0702; 10C.0109;.10E.0202-.0203; 10L.0101-.0103 Public Hearing: Date: September
More informationLOCAL RULES COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MERCER COUNTY, 35 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Orphans Court Rules Promulgated by the. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
LOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MERCER COUNTY, 35 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Supplementing the Orphans Court Rules Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 1. PRELIMINARY
More informationIntroduction Rules for Impartial Determination of Union Fees Application of Rules Initiation of Arbitration...
Rules for Impartial Determination of Union Fees As Amended and Effective January 1, 1988 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Rules for Impartial Determination of Union Fees... 2 1. Application of Rules...
More informationDSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy
DSCC Uniform Administrative Procedures Policy 01: Mission, Purpose and System of Governance 01:07:00:00 Purpose: The purpose of these procedures is to provide a basis for uniform procedures to be used
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION CALENDAR 7 COURTROOM 2405 JUDGE DIANE J. LARSEN STANDING ORDER 2.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION Chambers Telephone: 312-603-3343 Courtroom Clerk: Phil Amato Law Clerks: Azar Alexander & Andrew Sarros CALENDAR 7 COURTROOM
More informationDepartment of Labor Relations TABLE OF CONTENTS. Connecticut State Labor Relations Act. Article I. Description of Organization and Definitions
Relations TABLE OF CONTENTS Connecticut State Labor Relations Act Article I Description of Organization and Definitions Creation and authority....................... 31-101- 1 Functions.................................
More informationM.G. et al v. New York City Department of Education et al Doc. 38. The parents of three autistic children bring this action against the New
M.G. et al v. New York City Department of Education et al Doc. 38 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDCSD'NY I DQC'l1ME."NT ZU MZMセ M]ZM セM セM セZMセ ZMZセセi セ M.G. and V.M. on behalf of themselves individually,'..-
More informationARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas
ARTICLE.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS December, 00-0. Title. K.S.A. -0 through - - shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas administrative procedure act. History: L., ch., ; July,.
More informationDe Leon & Associates, PLLC
Edgar De Leon ** Sharifa M. Nasser * Of Counsel Walter D. Nealy De Leon & Associates, PLLC Attorneys and Counselors at Law Integrity in Practice - Commitment to Excellence 26 Broadway - Suite 2100 New
More informationRULES OF COURT 21ST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI
RULES OF COURT 21ST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI Effective September 6, 2001 RULE TABLE OF CONTENTS ADMINISTRATION 1. Divisions of Court 2. Hours and Terms of Court 2.1 Hours of Court 2.2
More information9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT
HONORABLE FRANKLIN U. VALDERRAMA STANDING ORDER CALENDAR 3 Room 2402, Richard J. Daley Center Telephone: 312-603-5432 No Fax or Email Law Clerks: Alexandra M. Franco Samantha Grund-Wickramasekera Court
More informationRULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Tribal Council Resolution
RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE Tribal Council Resolution 16--2008 Section I. Title and Codification This Ordinance shall be known as the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribal Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.
More informationWills and Trusts Arbitration RULES
Wills and Trusts Arbitration RULES Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2009 Introduction Standard Arbitration Clause Administrative Fees Wills and Trusts Arbitration Rules 1. Incorporation of These Rules
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES
DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES First Issued: March 1998 Amended: November 1999 Amended: July 2000 Amended: September 2001 Amended: September 2003 Amended: October 2004 Amended: May 2005 Amended: September 2005
More informationCHAPTER 10 - INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION SUBCHAPTER 10A - WORKERS' COMPENSATION RULES SECTION ADMINISTRATION
CHAPTER 10 - INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION SUBCHAPTER 10A - WORKERS' COMPENSATION RULES SECTION.0100 - ADMINISTRATION 04 NCAC 10A.0101 LOCATION OF MAIN OFFICE AND HOURS OF BUSINESS The main office of the North
More informationWIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES
APPENDIX 3.17 WIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES (as from 1 October 2002) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Abbreviated Expressions Article 1 In these Rules: Arbitration Agreement means
More informationGUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES
GUIDE TO DISCIPLINARY HEARING PROCEDURES All persons named as respondents in a disciplinary proceeding brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) have the right to a hearing. The purpose
More informationBLB-EA, BLC, GJC-RA, GJD-RB, JGA-RB Board of Education. Rules of Procedure in Appeals and Hearings
POLICY BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY Related Entries: Responsible Office: BLB-EA, BLC, GJC-RA, GJD-RB, JGA-RB Board of Education Rules of Procedure in Appeals and Hearings A. PURPOSE To provide
More informationGENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT. Amended and Effective January 1, Rule Title Page No.
GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT Amended and Effective January 1, 2017 Rule Title Page No. 1 Purpose and Scope 1 2 Mandatory Business Court Designation 3 3
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationRULES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION LORAIN COUNTY, OHIO
RULES OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION LORAIN COUNTY, OHIO EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2005 David A. Basinski, Judge Debra L. Boros, Judge Paulette J. Lilly, Judge 1 INDEX RULE PAGE NO. 1.
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (22 NYCRR) Parts 1250 and 600 Effective September 17, 2018 Practice Rules in the Appellate Division, First Department
General Information FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (22 NYCRR) Parts 1250 and 600 Effective September 17, 2018 Practice Rules in the Appellate Division, First Department Q: What rules govern practice in the
More informationPart 44 Alberta Divorce Rules
R561.1-562.1 Part 44 Alberta Divorce Rules Forms will be found in Schedule B Definitions 561.1 In this Part, (a) Act means the Divorce Act (Canada) (RSC 1985, c3 (2nd) Supp.); (b) divorce proceeding means
More informationIN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.
NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard
More informationCase 1:08-cv SO Document 10 Filed 10/24/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-02398-SO Document 10 Filed 10/24/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JEFFREY WINKELMAN, et al., ) Case No.: 1:08 CV 2398 ) Plaintiffs
More informationThese rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
BUSINESS OF THE COURT L.R. No. 51 TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
More information3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1
3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments 2008 - Page 1 1 L.A.R. 1.0 SCOPE AND TITLE OF RULES 2 1.1 Scope and Organization of Rules 3 The following Local Appellate Rules (L.A.R.) are adopted
More information