SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DlVISION. Case N O. ANB INJ-BNCTIVE R-Ebl-EFi PEJil'ION - 1 -

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DlVISION. Case N O. ANB INJ-BNCTIVE R-Ebl-EFi PEJil'ION - 1 -"

Transcription

1 .. ~ \! vi 'i, Craig A. Sherman, Esq. (SBN ) CRAIG A. SHERMAN, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORP First A venue, Suite 219 San Diego, CA Telephone: (619) CraigShermanAPC@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiffs PARENTS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION; MARGARET SANBORN; and RICARDO CASTILLO ;. '"l. '.; f. t. ' ~,i wrn SEP PM I: 33 f ' i c,st~:;j ~,{u,; uoj;,ff i if l;o/; '<J:;., SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DlVISION 11 PARENTS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION; MARGARET SANBORN, an individual; 12 and RICARDO CASTILLO, an individual; 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; KEVIN BEISER, in his official capacity as 16 Board President of the San Diego Unified School District; CITY OF SAN DIEGO; 17 MYRTLE COLE, in her official capacity as President of the San Diego City Council; L. 18 MICHAEL VU, in his official capacity as the Registrar of Voters of San Diego County; and 19 DOES ONE through TWENTY-FIVE, inclusive; 20 Defendants I Respondents. 21 Case N O s eu-j R-CTL COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY ANB INJ-BNCTIVE R-Ebl-EFi PEJil'ION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE [Violation of The California Voting Rights Act of 2001] KEVIN BEISER and TOM KELIINOI, candidates in the general election for the District B seat on the San Diego Unified Board of Education; MICHAEL MCQUARY and MARCIA NORDSTROM, candidates in the general election for the District C seat on the San Diego Unified Board of Education; and DOES TWENTY-SIX through FIFTY, inclusive; Real Parties in Interest COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDA TE

2 I INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF LAWSUIT This action challenges defendant SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT's 4 ("SDUSD") imposition of a discriminatory at-large system to elect members of its governing board, 5 because this election system violates the California Voting Rights Act ("CVRA"), California 6 Elections Code, section et seq. But SDUSD is not wholly to blame because defendant CITY 7 OF SAN DIEGO's ("City"), as the charter city controlling the historic and now arcane election 8 methodology for the membership of the SDUSD school board ("SDUSD School Board"), has refused 9 to revise and correct said voting methodology Therefore, this action more directly challenges the CITY OF SAN DIEGO's ("City") 11 breach of its legal and ministerial duty to allow and provide an election system that complies with the 12 CVRA, because City's voting scheme for the SDUSD, as set forth in City Charter 66 - providing 13 for district-wide at-large voting to elect particular school district representatives for the SDUSD 14 board members - discriminates and prevents certain races or ethnic groups from electability to the 15 SDUSD school board Because City and SDUSD continue to allow, and refuse to take action to correct the 17 violative voting methodology, Plaintiffs name and sue defendant L. MICHAEL VU, as the 18 Registrar of Voters of San Diego County ("Registrar of Voters") to prevent him and his office 19 from certifying results of the November 6, 2018 election because it is known and can be proven 20 that said election and City's and SDUSD's election methodology violates the CVRA Because Plaintiffs' lawsuit seeks to invalidate the November 6, 2018 election for 22 the SDUSD School Board, Plaintiffs also name those running for election as real parties in 23 interest, KEVIN BEISER, TOM KELIINOI, MICHAEL MCQUARY, and MARCIA 24 NORDSTROM (hereafter "Real Parties"), because enjoining and disqualifying the election 25 results of the November 6, 2018 election stands to impair potential rights of said named Real 26 Parties

3 II. 2 PARTIES, JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3 5. Plaintiff PARENTS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION ("PQE") is a public interest 4 group formed under California laws to improve public education through increased involvement 5 of parents and the community in the educational process. The ultimate goals are to strengthen 6 the capacity of communities to act as catalysts to transform and revitalize public education, so 7 every child receives a quality education and establish a grassroots presence in local, state, and 8 federal legislative bodies to positively influence K-12 education policy and secure adequate laws 9 to ensure quality education for children and youth On or before March of 2017, PQE initiated a local San Diego initiative and 11 project called "Community Voices for Education" (CVE) to bring accountability, transparency, 12 and real representation in San Diego's public education system so that every child receives a 13 quality education. PQE began advocating through CVE for the City reform the election 14 methodology for School Board Election. CVE objected and demanded that City revise the 15 election process for the SDSUD School Board to have Subdistrict only elections, following the 16 model of City Council elections Plaintiff MARGARET SANBORN is a registered City and SDUSD voter who 18 lives within one of the SDUSD school subdistricts and is of API race, descent, or ethnicity that is 19 both impaired in its ability to elect a SDSUD School Board member and who is a member of a 20 "protected class," as that term is defined in the CVRA Plaintiff RICARDO CASTILLO is a registered City and SDUSD voter who lives 22 within one of the SDUSD school subdistricts and is of Latino race, descent, or ethnicity that is 23 both impaired in ability to elect SDSUD School Board members who are members of a 24 "protected class," as that term is defined in the CVRA Defendant SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ("SDUSD") is a public 26 school district within the State of California, County of San Diego serving all public school 27 grades including K-12. SDUSD is required to follow the mandate, and prevent violations, of the CVRA

4 10. Defendant CITY OF SAN DIEGO ("City") is organized and existing under the 2 laws of the State of California, and its status as a Charter City, with its governing body as the 3 San Diego City Council. City is required to follow the mandate, and prevent violations, of the 4 CVRA Defendant L. MICHAEL VU is the Registrar of Voters for the County of San 6 Diego (hereafter "Registrar of Voters"), who is named and sued to prevent him and his office 7 from certifying results of the November 6, 2018 election because Plaintiffs and this Court need 8 to have jurisdiction and control to order the Registrar of Voters to take specific preventative and 9 prohibited action once it is proven that said election and election methodology was conducted in 10 violation of the CVRA Because Plaintiffs' lawsuit seeks to invalidate the November 6, 2018 election for 12 the SDUSD School Board, Plaintiffs also name those running for election as real parties in 13 interest, KEVIN BEISER, TOM KELIINOI, MICHAEL MCQUARY, and MARCIA 14 NORDSTROM (hereafter "Real Parties"), because enjoining and disqualifying the election 15 results of the November 6, 2018 election stands to impair the rights of said named Real Parties. 16 Specifically, Real Pa~ies KEVIN BEISER and TOM KELIINOI are candidates for election of 17 the seat for Subdistrict Bon the SDUSD School Board and Real Parties MICHAEL MCQUARY 18 and MARCIA NORDSTROM are candidates for the seat for Subdistrict C seat on the SDUSD 19 School Board The true names and capacities of defendants and respondents DOES ONE through 21 TWENTY-FIVE, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiffs who therefore sue such unknown 22 defendants by fictitious names pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 474. The true 23 names and capacities of real parties in interest DOES TWENTY-SIX through FIFTY are also 24 unknown to Plaintiffs who therefore sue such unknown real parties by fictitious names pursuant 25 to California Code of Civil Procedure 474. Plaintiffs will amend this complaint to allege the 26 true names and capacities of any unknown or necessary defendants, respondents, or real parties 27 in interest sued herein as DOES ONE through FIFTY, inclusive, if and when ascertained

5 14. All parties hereto are within the unlimited jurisdiction of this Court. The unlawful 2 acts complained occurred in San Diego County. Venue in this Court is proper. 3 III. 4 ESSENTIAL FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS SDUSD is located in San Diego County, California and mainly serves the area in 6 and around the City. The governing SDUSD School Board is made up of five members who are 7 elected district wide, with each of the SDUSD's five Subdistricts nominating the top two 8 candidates for their board representatives in the primary election, but the entire SDUSD school 9 district votes "at-large" for each Subdistrict representative in the general election. Each elected 10 member is purported to represent the entire school district. The at-large voting process, for the 11 SDUSD School Board, does not align with most every other publicly elected school board 12 official, including City Council offices for the City, and further does not align with any of the 13 other three largest school districts in the state The total emollment of students served by SDUSD, as of September 15, 2017, 15 was 127,112 students, of whom only 23% are white (as of January 25, 2017). This is in stark 16 contrast to members serving on the Board which is 60-80% white and potentially or 17 approximately 60% non-hispanic white. This reflects the systematic unfairness of at-large 18 elections in which a district-wide white electorate majority elects predominantly white 19 candidates of their choice, even though the number of white students is a demographic minority 20 of actual students in the SDUSD school system The at-large method of SDUSD School Board elections disenfranchises African 22 Americans, Asians, Pacific Islanders, Latinos, Inda-Chinese, Native Americans, Filipinos, and 23 others, who together make up 77% of the SDUSD school district. Under the CVRA, the at-large 24 elections system must be replaced by a district-based system so that non-white groups, who are 25 electoral race and ethnic minorities, but represent a majority of the actual student population, 26 may have their chance and fair opportunities to elect candidates of their choice, rather than the 27 disparate and water-down election process that results from an at-large election

6 18. Elections conducted for the SDUSD School Board are characterized by racially 2 polarized voting. Racially polarized voting occurs when members of a protected class, as 3 defined by the CVRA and California Elections Code 14025, subdivision (d), vote for 4 candidates and electoral choices that are limited, different, or watered-down from the rest of the 5 electorate based on the manner of voting or the districts drawn for voting. Racially polarized 6 voting exists for the SDUSD School Board for Latino and API voters because their choice of 7 candidates, as compared with other non-latino or API candidates, who are preferred as Latino or 8 API candidates, usually lose and have little or no chance of winning in an at-large election Racially polarized voting is legally significant in SDUSD School Board elections Io because it dilutes the opportunity of Latino and API voters to elect candidates of their choice. 11 Patterns of racially polarized voting has the effect of impeding the opportunity for Latino and 12 API voters to elect candidates of their choice via an at-large election where Latino and API 13 populations have their votes diluted, as opposed to Subdistrict elections wherein Latino and API 14 voters, either as individual groups or as a coalition, have the opportunity to elect candidates of 15 their choice. For several years now, Latino and API voters have been harmed by racially 16 polarized voting and the City's and SDUSD's voting methodology The at-large method of election and repeated racially polarized voting has caused 18 Latino and API voting dissolution within the SDUSD School Board. When Latinos or API and 19 the rest of the electorate express different preferences for candidates and other electoral choices, 20 non-latino and API voters, by virtue of overall numerical majority among voters in the at-large 21 district level dilute the preferences of Latino and API voters The obstacles posed by City's and SDUSD's at-large method of election, together 23 with racially polarized voting, impairs the ability of people of certain races, color, language, or 24 minority groups, such as Latino and API voters, to elect candidates of their choice or to influence 25 the outcome of elections conducted for the SDUSD School Board An alternative and more regularly accepted method of elections exists, by way of 27 district-based elections, that will provide an opportunity for the members of the protected classes - 6 -

7 (as defined by the CVRA) to elect candidates of their choice and be able to have a more regular 2 and fair manner to influence and have a say in the outcome of SDUSD School Board elections. 3 IV. 4 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION -DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 5 Violation of California Voting Rights Act of (As Against Defendant City) Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference all paragraphs above and below as 8 if set forth fully herein City is a political subdivision within the state of California and is a charter city. Pursuant to California Elections Code 14026, subdivision ( c ), the CVRA applies 11 to charter cities City, through its governing body of the City Council, has the inherent power to 13 enact laws or new ordinances to comply with State Law including the CVRA City is aware of the racial polarization and vote dilution arising from at-large 15 elections for members of the SDUSD School Board. 16. Racially polarized voting has occurred, and continues to occur, in elections for the 17 members of the SDSUD School Board. As a result, City's at-large method of election for the 18 SDUSD School Board is imposed in a manner that impairs the ability of protected classes, as 19 defined by the CVRA, to elect candidates of their choice or influence the outcome of elections An alternative method of elections, such as district-based elections, exists that 21 will provide an opportunity for the members of a protected class (as defined by the CVRA) to 22 elect candidates of their choice or influence the outcome of the SDUSD School Board elections An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between Plaintiffs and 24 Defendants, relating to the legal rights and duties of Plaintiffs and CITY Specifically, City has a duty under the CVRA to use its inherent legislative 26 powers to stop racial polarization and vote dilution under the CVRA as currently present in the 27 City Charter

8 32. Plaintiffs have a clear, present and beneficial right to the proper performance by 2 City in its duties and compliance with the laws and legal principles as set forth herein The declaratory and injunctive relief requested herein is proper to delineate and 4 clarify the parties' rights and liabilities and resolve, quiet, or stabilize an uncertain or disputed 5 jural relation and to prevent further violations of the CVRA. Without the grant of declaratory 6 relief and the granting of an injunction, City will continue to proceed in a manner not allowed by 7 law and will continue to take action outside of the law and their authority resulting in harm to 8 Plaintiffs, its members, supporters, and the citizenry of the City of San Diego and State of 9 California for whom this litigation is equally brought. In order to vindicate the legislative intent 10 of the CVRA and to enforce their respective provisions, Plaintiffs have no choice but to obtain 11 the relief sought herein Plaintiffs seek a judicial determination that Charter 66 violates the CVRA in its 13 current form and manner of implementation and therefore is null, void, and unenforceable Plaintiffs seek a judicial determination regarding City's compliance with the 15 CVRA for a remedy and vindication of the rights of all voters within the school district, 16 including Plaintiffs. A declaratory judgment should be granted in favor of Plaintiffs as alleged 17 and requested herein. 18 V. 19 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION -PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE 20 (As Against Defendant City) Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference all paragraphs above and below as 22 if set forth fully herein Plaintiffs do not have any plain, speedy, or adequate remedy in the ordinary 24 course of law. Plaintiffs' only recourse is the relief provided by the CVRA which provides for 25 judicial review If the City's actions are allowed to stand and continue, Plaintiffs' rights will be 27 impaired and will suffer irreparable harm, including racially polarized voting, in elections for the members of the SDUSD School Board, and in elections incorporating other electoral choices by - 8 -

9 voters residing within the geographical districts of the SDUSD. No money damages or other 2 legal remedy could adequately compensate Plaintiffs for the harm from violation of their rights 3 under the CVRA that City has caused and will continue to cause by acting in contravention and 4 refusing to comply with the CVRA Plaintiffs request that this Court issue a peremptory writ of mandamus directing 6 City to comply wit_h its duties, and correct the at-large election method that violates the CVRA. 7 VI. s THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION -DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 9 Violation of California Voting Rights Act of (Against Defendant SDUSD) Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference all paragraphs above and below as 12 if set forth fully herein SDUSD is a political subdivision within the state of California and is a school 14 district SDUSD accepts that City (through its laws and City Charter) employs a modified 16 at-large method of election, whereby each of SDUSD's five Subdistricts holds a primary vote, 17 with the top two vote-getters competing in an at-large general election in which the entire 18 jurisdiction votes to elect SDUSD School Board members Racially polarized voting has occurred, and continues to occur, in elections for the 20 members of the SDUSD School Board. As a result, SDUSD has accepted, not challenged, nor 21 requested that City amend the City's at-large method of election that impairs the ability of 22 protected classes, as defined by the CVRA, to elect candidates of their choice or influence the 23 outcome of elections Alternative methods of elections, such as district-based elections, exist that will 25 provide an opportunity for the members of a protected class (as defined by the CVRA) to elect 26 candidates of their choice or influence the outcome of the SDUSD School Board elections An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties relating to the legal rights and duties of Plaintiffs and SDUSD and City regarding the manner of voting for COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEf AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE

10 SDUSD School Board elections Plaintiffs have a clear, present and beneficial right to the proper performance by 3 SDUSD and City in their duties and compliance with the laws and legal principles as set forth 4 herein The declaratory and injunctive relief requested herein is proper to delineate and 6 clarify the parties' rights and liabilities and resolve, quiet, or stabilize an uncertain or disputed 7 jural relation and to prevent further violations of the CVRA. Without the grant of declaratory 8 relief and the granting of an injunction, SDUSD will continue to allow and/or promote that City 9 will proceed in a manner not allowed by law and will continue to take action outside of the law 10 and their authority resulting in harm to Plaintiffs, its members, supporters, and the citizemy of 11 the SDUSD and City of San Diego and State of California for whom this litigation is equally 12 brought. In order to vindicate the legislative intent of the CVRA and to enforce their respective 13 provisions, Plaintiffs have no choice but to obtain the relief sought herein Plaintiffs seek a judicial determination of SDUSD' s lack of compliance with the 15 CVRA and a vindication of the rights of all voters within the district. A declaratory judgment 16 should be granted in favor of Plaintiffs as alleged and requested herein Plaintiffs seek an injunction to prohibit the future election of board members of 18 the SDUSD School Board through at-large district voting, and a preliminary and permanent 19 injunction that no SDUSD School Board member, elected as a result of the November 6, 2018, 20 be seated on the SDUSD School Board and may not make any vote, fake any action, or perform 21 any duty of a duly elected SDUSD School Board member until compliance with the CVRA is 22 obtained as alleged herein. 23 VII. 24 FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION - PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE 25 (As Against Defendant SDUSD) Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference all paragraphs above and below as 27 if set forth fully herein

11 51. Plaintiffs do not have any plain, speedy, or adequate remedy in the ordinary 2 course of law. Plaintiffs' only recourse is the relief provided by the CVRA which provides for 3 judicial review If the SDUSD's actions are allowed to stand and continue, Plaintiffs' rights will s be impaired and will suffer irreparable harm, including racially polarized voting, in elections for 6 the five members of the Board, and in elections incorporating other electoral choices by voters 7 residing within the SDUSD. No money damages or other legal remedy could adequately 8 compensate Plaintiffs for the harm from violation of their rights under the CVRA that SDUSD 9 has caused, allowed to continue and/or endorse, and will continue to cause by continuing at-large Io elections Plaintiffs request that this Court issue a peremptory writ of mandamus directing 12 SDUSD to take all reasonable and necessary actions to move to a district-based election system 13 (rather than at-large method), and ordering that SDUSD not seat any Board member elected in 14 the November 6, 2018 election, or any subsequent election, unless and until such elections are 15 held in a member that complies with the CVRA. 16 VIII. 11 FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION -DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 18 Violation of California Voting Rights Act of (As Against Defendant Registrar of Voters) Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference all paragraphs above and below as if set forth fully herein. 55. Defendant Registrar of Voters certifies elections in San Diego County, including 23 elections for the SDUSD School Board The Registrar of Voters shall not certify an election which has been alleged, is 25 known, and/or has been proven to be in violation of the CVRA Based on allegations in this Complaint that are to be proven in this lawsuit, the 27 method of at-large elections for seats on the SDUSD School Board violates the CVRA and thus

12 an appropriate court order to the Registrar of Voters may be made to prevent, suspend and cure 2 any such violations Plaintiffs seek preliminary and permanent injunctive relief that the results of the 4 November 6, 2018 election for seats on the SDUSD School Board not be certified by the 5 Registrar of Voters and, henceforth, the Registrar of Voters may only certify voting results in 6 subsequent elections to the SDUSD School Board once a remedial and an alternate system (such 7 as a district-based voting methodology), that is compliant with the CVRA, is put into place. 8 IX. 9 PRAYER FOR RELIEF 10 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against defendants SDUSD, City and 11 Registrar of Voters, and each of them, as follows: For a declaration of law and judgment in favor of Plaintiffs that City's and 13 SDUSD's current, at-large method of election for the SDUSD School Board violates the 14 California Voting Rights Act of For a preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit defendant SDUSD from 16 seating board members from the results of the November 6, 2018 election for all board member 17 positions voted upon during said election, and not seat any board members from subsequent 18 elections until an alternative to the at-large system of electing SDUSD School Board members is 19 replaced with a method compliant with the CVRA For a writ of mandate commanding and compelling City and SDUSD to 21 implement district-based elections, as defined by the California Voting Rights Act of 2001, or 22 other alternative relief tailored to remedy City's and SDUSD's violation of the California Voting 23 Rights Act of 2001 before it may seat any new members of the SDUSD School Board For a preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting that the Registrar of 25 Voters may not certify the election or election results of the November 6, 2018 election for the 26 SDUSD School Board candidates that was known, and/or has been proven, to violate the CVRA, 27 and that the Registrar of Voters may not certify voting election results for SDUSD School Board

13 in subsequent elections until an alternate system is put into place that is compliant with the 2 CVRA For a declaration of law and judgment that City Charter 66, in its current form 4 and content, violates the CVRA and is null and void, to the extent it is not compliant with 5 existing state law under as enacted by the State Legislature under the CVRA That Plaintiffs have a right to preliminary and injunctive relief, and/or a writ of 7 mandate to prevent implementation of City Charter 66 and compel nullification and courts ordered amendment of City Charter 66 in its current form, including but not limited to 9 mandated implementation of district-based elections (as defined, required, or contemplated by 10 the California Voting Rights Act of 2001), or other alternative relief tailored by this Court to 11 remedy City's and SDUSD's violation of the CVRA For reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit pursuant to the CVRA, California 13 Elections Code 14030, California Code of Civil Procedure , and any other relevant 14 statutes For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, or otherwise 16 is allowed and naturally flowing from such claims and requested remedies, as a matter of law or 17 based on equities and necessity for appropriate remedial relief Dated: September 27, CRAIG A. SHERMAN Attorney for Plaintiffs PARENTS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION, MARGARET SANBORN, and RICARDO CASTILLO

14 1 X 2 VERIFICATIONS 3 I, Bret Caslavaka, as a duly authorized officer and president of the Plaintiff organization 4 PARENTS FOR QUALITY EDUCATION, hereby verifies this COMPLAINT FOR 5 DECLARATORY RELIEF AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE 6 pursuant to Civil Procedure Section 446. The facts herein alleged are true of my own and my 7 organization's knowledge, except as to the matters which are based on information and belief, 8 which I believe to be true. I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of California that 9 the above foregoing is true and correct and that this verification was executed on the below stated 10 date in San Diego County, California. 11 Dated: September 27, By~~ ~slavaka We, Margaret Sanborn and Ricardo Castillo are individuals who verify this COMPLAINT 16 FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PETITION FOR WRIT OF 17 MANDATE pursuant to Civil Procedure Section 446. The facts herein alleged are true of our own 18 knowledge, except as to the matters which are based on information and belief, which we believe to 19 be true. We declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of California that the above 20 foregoing is true and correct and that this verification was executed on the below stated date in San 21 Diego County, California. 22 Dated: September 27, By:---...~="',F---~= =::..._--- Ricardo Castillo Dated: September,

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PAUL C. MINNEY, SBN LISA A CORR, SBN KATHLEEN M. EBERT, SBN CATHERINE E. FLORES, SBN 0 01 University Ave. Suite 0 Sacramento, CA Telephone: ( -00 Facsimile: ( -00 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Magnolia Educational

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Craig A. Sherman, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 171224) LAW OFFICE OF CRAIG A. SHERMAN 1901 First Avenue, Ste. 335 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: (619) 702-7892 Facsimile: (619) 702-9291 Attorneys for Petitioner

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 1 Denise Hulett (SBN 121553) dhulett @maldef.org 2 Matthew J. Barragan (SBN 283883) mbarragan @maldef.org 3 MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 4 634 S. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90014

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Case No.: COMPLAINT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. Case No.: COMPLAINT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ben Eilenberg (SBN 1 Law Offices of Ben Eilenberg 00 Lime Street, Suite 1 Riverside, CA 0 EilenbergLegal@gmail.com (1 - BUBBA LIKES TORTILLAS, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, v. SUPERIOR COURT

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0 Brian T. Hildreth (SBN ) bhildreth@bmhlaw.com Charles H. Bell, Jr. (SBN 0) cbell@bmhlaw.com Paul T. Gough (SBN 0) pgough@bmhlaw.com BELL, McANDREWS & HILTACHK, LLP Capitol Mall, Suite 00 Sacramento,

More information

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Introduction

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Introduction STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC. SUPERIOR COURT SHAUNNE N. THOMAS, : : Plaintiff, : : VS. : C.A. No. : JUSTICE ROBERT G. FLANDERS, : JR., in his Official Capacity as : Appointed Receiver to the City

More information

Case3:13-cv NC Document1 Filed12/09/13 Page1 of 18

Case3:13-cv NC Document1 Filed12/09/13 Page1 of 18 Case:-cv-0-NC Document Filed/0/ Page of Marsha J. Chien, State Bar No. Christopher Ho, State Bar No. THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California

More information

Sequoia Park Associates, a California limited partnership, Petitioner and Plaintiff,

Sequoia Park Associates, a California limited partnership, Petitioner and Plaintiff, 1 1 1 STEVEN M. WOODSIDE # County Counsel SUE GALLAGHER, #1 Deputy County Counsel DEBBIE F. LATHAM #01 Deputy County Counsel County of Sonoma Administration Drive, Room Santa Rosa, California 0- Telephone:

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1 Americans for Safe Access 1 Webster Street #0 Oakland, CA 1 Telephone: (1 - Fax: ( -00 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

More information

WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS)

WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS) SAN MATEO COUNTY LAW LIBRARY RESEARCH GUIDE #13 WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS This resource guide only provides guidance, and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice you need

More information

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 2:15-cv-09300 Document 1 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ALDER CROMWELL, and ) CODY KEENER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) KRIS KOBACH,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO CENTRAL DIVISION UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO CENTRAL DIVISION UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO CENTRAL DIVISION UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE 1 1 1 1 MICHAEL S. GREEN, an individual, and DOES 1 through, inclusive, v. Plaintiffs, CITY OF FRESNO, a political subdivision

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Lowell Finley, SBN 1 LAW OFFICES OF LOWELL FINLEY SOLANO AVENUE BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 0- TEL: -0- FAX: -- Attorney for Plaintiffs and Petitioners SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ASSOCIATION S COMPLAINT FOR

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ASSOCIATION S COMPLAINT FOR Gregg McLean Adam, No. gregg@majlabor.com MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP Montgomery Street, Suite San Francisco, California Telephone:..00 Facsimile:.. Attorneys for San Francisco Police Officers Association

More information

Case3:13-cv WHA Document25 Filed02/26/14 Page1 of 21

Case3:13-cv WHA Document25 Filed02/26/14 Page1 of 21 Case:-cv-0-WHA Document Filed0// Page of 0 Marsha J. Chien, State Bar No. Christopher Ho, State Bar No. THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, California

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. No. 1 Americans for Safe Access 1 Webster Street, Suite 0 Oakland, CA 1 Telephone: (1 - Fax: ( 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF

More information

United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

United States Bankruptcy Court. Northern District of California ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Marc Voisenat (CSB# 0 0 Broadway, Suite Oakland, Ca. Tel: ( - Fax: ( - Attorney for Debtors Richard Souza Caporale Isabel Ann Caporale United States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of California In

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 1 1 1 GARY BOSTWICK, Cal. Bar No. 000 JEAN-PAUL JASSY, Cal. Bar No. 1 KEVIN VICK, Cal. Bar No. 0 BOSTWICK & JASSY LLP 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: --0 Facsimile:

More information

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30

Case 2:16-cv DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30 Case 2:16-cv-00038-DN Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 30 Marcus R. Mumford (12737) MUMFORD PC 405 South Main Street, Suite 975 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 428-2000 Email: mrm@mumfordpc.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. v. C.A. No. 03- VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction And Venue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. v. C.A. No. 03- VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Jurisdiction And Venue UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND CHRISTINE MELENDEZ TOWN OF NORTH SMITHFIELD, by its Treasurer, RICHARD CONNORS, and LOCAL 3984, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIREFIGHTERS,

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 Stuart M. Flashman (SBN 1) Ocean View Dr. Oakland, CA -1 Telephone/Fax: () - e-mail: stu@stuflash.com Attorney for Petitioner and Plaintiff Transportation Solutions Defense and Education Fund IN

More information

Case 1:17-cv LJA Document 1 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv LJA Document 1 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION Case 1:17-cv-00109-LJA Document 1 Filed 06/14/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION MATHEW WHITEST, M.D., SARAH : WILLIAMSON, KENYA WILLIAMSON,

More information

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11

Case 5:11-cv OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11 Case 5:11-cv-00360-OLG-JES-XR Document 95 Filed 08/01/11 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION SHANNON PEREZ, HAROLD DUTTON, JR. AND GREGORY TAMEZ,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com 00 Newport Place, Ste. 00 Newport Beach,

More information

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

Case 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Case 9:18-cv-80674-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 Google LLC, a limited liability company vs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Plaintiff, CASE NO.

More information

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 0 TIMOTHY J. SABO, SB # E-mail: sabo@lbbslaw.com KAREN A. FELD, SB# E-Mail: kfeld@lbbslaw.com 0 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 00 San Bernardino, California 0 Telephone: 0..0 Facsimile: 0.. Attorneys for

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. Case :-cv-0-tor Document Filed 0// Sarah A. Dunne, WSBA No. La Rond Baker, WSBA No. UNION OF WASHINGTON 0 Fifth Avenue, Suite 0 Seattle, Washington Telephone: () - Email: dunne@aclu-wa.org lbaker@aclu-wa.org

More information

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7 Case 3:18-cv-05171-JSC Document 1 Filed 08/23/18 Page 1 of 7 Beilal Chatila (SBN 314413 CHATILA LAW, LLP 306 40th Street, Suite C Oakland, CA 94609 Ph: (888 567-9990 Anthony J. Palik (SBN 190971 LAW OFFICE

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1) Americans for Safe Access Webster St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: () - Fax: () 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN

More information

e; SktS5 OFFiec 2011MAY 10 FILED CiffiliAL 4DIVISVt CLEgit-StiPERICR SAW DIEGO COUNTY. CA

e; SktS5 OFFiec 2011MAY 10 FILED CiffiliAL 4DIVISVt CLEgit-StiPERICR SAW DIEGO COUNTY. CA Allan Cate (SBN: 248526) CATE LEGAL GROUP 888 Prospect Street, Suite 200 La Jolla, CA 92037 Tel: (858) 224-5865 Fax: (858) 228-9885 allan@acatelaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff, Duy Trang FILED e; SktS5 OFFiec

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SONOMA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SONOMA Rose M. Zoia. sbn Law Office of Rose M. Zoia 0 Old Courthouse Square, Suite 0 Santa Rosa, California 0 0... fax..0 rzoia@sbcglobal.net Attorney for Petitioner 0 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 0 0 WILLIAM ROSTOV, State Bar No. CHRISTOPHER W. HUDAK, State Bar No. EARTHJUSTICE 0 California Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA T: ( -000 F: ( -00 wrostov@earthjustice.org; chudak@earthjustice.org Attorneys

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA and DARRYL BONNER, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES JUDD, KIMBERLY BOWERS, and DON PALMER,

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LAKE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LAKE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. ) 00 Fell Street #1 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () - Email: joeelford@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE

More information

Case No. C JSC

Case No. C JSC 1 1 1 1 David M. Levin, SBN 01 Robert P. Capistrano, SBN 0 BAY AREA LEGAL AID Macdonald Avenue, P.O. Box Richmond, CA 01 Telephone: -- Facsimile: -- Email: dlevin@baylegal.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 Case 1:16-cv-00065 Document 1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION PRAXAIR, INC., PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC. Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION LULAC OF TEXAS, MEXICAN AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON, TEXAS (MABAH), ANGELA GARCIA, BERNARDO J. GARCIA,

More information

Case 2:12-cv RJS Document 75 Filed 12/28/12 Page 1 of 12

Case 2:12-cv RJS Document 75 Filed 12/28/12 Page 1 of 12 Case 2:12-cv-00039-RJS Document 75 Filed 12/28/12 Page 1 of 12 Steven C. Boos, USB# 4198 Maynes, Bradford, Shipps & Sheftel, LLP 835 East Second Avenue, Suite 123 P.O. Box 2717 Durango, Colorado 81301/2

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND BRIAN MONTEIRO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF EAST PROVIDENCE, ) EAST PROVIDENCE CANVASSING AUTHORITY, ) C.A. No. 09- MARYANN CALLAHAN,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RICHARD L. DUQUETTE Attorney at Law P.O. Box 2446 Carlsbad, CA 92018 2446 SBN 108342 Telephone: (760 730 0500 Attorney for Petitioner CHRISTINA HARRIS SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com Victoria C. Knowles, Bar No. vknowles@pacifictrialattorneys.com

More information

Case 5:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:11-cv Document 1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Case 5:11-cv-00490 Document 1 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Texas Latino Redistricting Task Force, Joey Cardenas,

More information

Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) Peter Fagen, F3 Larry Ferchaw, CS James Ayden, F3 July 24, 2017

Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) Peter Fagen, F3 Larry Ferchaw, CS James Ayden, F3 July 24, 2017 Introduction to the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) Peter Fagen, F3 Larry Ferchaw, CS James Ayden, F3 July 24, 2017 1 Purpose of Discussion Introduction to CVRA Discuss where District stands Next Steps

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA DEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. CITY OF ATLANTA and FELICIA A. MOORE, ATLANTA CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT, in her Official Capacity, CIVIL

More information

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 23 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: NEWPORT TRIAL GROUP A Professional Corporation Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. sferrell@trialnewport.com Richard H. Hikida, Bar No. rhikida@trialnewport.com David

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No. 1 1 1 1 0 1 Joshua H. Haffner, SBN 1 (jhh@haffnerlawyers.com) Graham G. Lambert, Esq. SBN 00 gl@haffnerlawyers.com HAFFNER LAW PC South Figueroa Street, Suite Los Angeles, California 001 Telephone: ()

More information

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: TREVOR Q. CODDINGTON, PH.D. (CSB NO. 0) trevorcoddington@sandiegoiplaw.com JAMES V. FAZIO, III (CSB NO. ) jamesfazio@sandiegoiplaw.com SAN DIEGO IP LAW

More information

CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO GAUTAM DUTTA, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) 0 Paseo Padre Parkway # Fremont, CA Telephone:.. Email: dutta@businessandelectionlaw.com Fax:.0. Attorney for Plaintiffs MONA FIELD, RICHARD WINGER, STEPHEN A. CHESSIN,

More information

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,

Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual, VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 0) rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN ) sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Bahar Sodaify (SBN 0) bsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com

More information

CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO GAUTAM DUTTA, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) 0 Paseo Padre Parkway # 0 Fremont, CA Telephone:..0 Email: dutta@businessandelectionlaw.com Fax:.0. Attorney for Plaintiffs MONA FIELD, RICHARD WINGER, STEPHEN A. CHESSIN,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. Defendant : COMPLAINT. Parties and Jurisdiction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. Defendant : COMPLAINT. Parties and Jurisdiction UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND SOUTHCOAST FAIR HOUSING, INC. : : Plaintiff : : v. : C.A. No. 18- : DEBRA SAUNDERS, in her official capacity as : Clerk of the Rhode Island

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CHEROKEE NATION WEST, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 14-CV-612-JED-TLW vs. ) ) Jury Trial Demand ARMY CORP OF ENGINEERS and TOM )

More information

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHELLE RENEE MCGRATH and VERONICA O BOY, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICHELLE RENEE MCGRATH and VERONICA O BOY, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated Case :-cv-0-jm-ksc Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 COHELAN KHOURY & SINGER Michael D. Singer, Esq. (SBN 0 Jeff Geraci, Esq. (SBN 0 C Street, Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0 Tel: ( -00/ Fax: ( -000 FARNAES

More information

Case 8:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1

Case 8:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1 Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 MILSTEIN, ADELMAN, JACKSON, FAIRCHILD & WADE, LLP Gillian L. Wade, Bar No. gwade@milsteinadelman.com 00 Constellation Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 00 Tel:

More information

Filing # E-Filed 01/02/ :02:25 AM

Filing # E-Filed 01/02/ :02:25 AM Filing # 82720346 E-Filed 01/02/2019 11:02:25 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA DR. ERWIN D. JACKSON, Plaintiff, CASE NO. v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE, a

More information

ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER

ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER Michael S. Winsten, Esq. (Cal. State Bar No. 1) WINSTEN LAW GROUP 01 Puerta Real, Suite Mission Viejo, CA 1 Tel: () -00 Fax: () -00 E-mail: mike@winsten.com Attorneys for Petitioner ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY; BOYD L. RICHIE, in his capacity as Chairman of the Texas Democratic Party; HARRIS COUNTY DEMOCRATIC

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION JUNE ST. CLAIR ATKINSON, individually and in her official capacity as Superintendent of Public Instruction

More information

TITLE VI JUDICIAL REMEDIES CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

TITLE VI JUDICIAL REMEDIES CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS TITLE VI JUDICIAL REMEDIES CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 6-1-1-Purpose. The purpose of this title is to provide rules and procedures for certain forms of relief, including injunctions, declaratory

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: Bobby Saadian, Esq. SBN: 0 Colin M. Jones, Esq. SBN: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM 0 Wilshire Blvd., th Floor Los Angeles, California 000 Tel: () - Fax: () - Attorneys

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-wqh-ags Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Helen I. Zeldes (SBN 00) helen@coastlaw.com Andrew J. Kubik (SBN 0) andy@coastlaw.com COAST LAW GROUP, LLP 0 S. Coast Hwy 0 Encinitas, CA 0 Tel:

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CARL W. HEWITT and PATSY HEWITT ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. ) CITY OF COOKEVILLE, TENNESSEE, ) ) Defendant.

More information

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018

IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION. March 27, 2018 IUSD ELECTORAL PROCESS UNDER CONSIDERATION March 27, 2018 No Impact on School Attendance Areas The election method for the members of the IUSD Board of Education has no impact on school or district student

More information

RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF: SOLARCITY CORPORATION,

RELIEF FOR VIOLATIONS OF: SOLARCITY CORPORATION, Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Abbas Kazerounian, Esq. (0) ak@kazlg.com Matthew M. Loker, Esq. () ml@kazlg.com 0 East Grand Avenue, Suite 0 Arroyo Grande, CA 0 Telephone: (00) 00-0

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA MARCOS SAYAGO, individually, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: 2014-CA- Division BILL COWLES, in his official capacity as Supervisor

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON - - 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION, AKRON Pain Management Technologies, Inc., ) 0 Home Ave., Bldg. A ) Case No. Akron, Ohio 0, ) ) Judge Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-000-l-nls Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of HAINES LAW GROUP, APC Paul K. Haines (SBN ) phaines@haineslawgroup.com Tuvia Korobkin (SBN 0) tkorobkin@haineslawgroup.com Fletcher W. Schmidt (SBN

More information

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:16-cv WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8 Case 3:16-cv-00371-WHB-JCG Document 4 Filed 05/31/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF

More information

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DOUGLAS GILLIES Torino Drive Santa Barbara, CA (0-0 douglasgillies@gmail.com in pro per SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA DOUGLAS GILLIES, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE

More information

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:17-cv SS Document 1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:17-cv-01186-SS Document 1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY and GILBERTO HINOJOSA, in his capacity

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-psg-pla Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Edward J. Wynne (SBN ) ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com J.E.B. Pickett (SBN ) Jebpickett@wynnelawfirm.com WYNNE LAW FIRM 0 Drakes Landing Road, Suite

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendants.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Plaintiff, Defendants. KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California FRANCES T. GRUNDER Senior Assistant Attorney General MICHELE VAN GELDEREN Supervising Deputy Attorney General WILLIAM R. PLETCHER (SBN 1) BERNARD A. ESKANDARI

More information

CIVIL ACTION. Defendant Jeff Carter, by and through his counsel Law Offices of Walter M. Luers, by

CIVIL ACTION. Defendant Jeff Carter, by and through his counsel Law Offices of Walter M. Luers, by WALTER M. LUERS, ESQ. - 034041999 LAW OFFICES OF WALTER M. LUERS, LLC Suite C203 23 West Main Street Clinton, New Jersey 08809 Telephone: 908.894.5656 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff

More information

Counsel for Plaintiff

Counsel for Plaintiff Edward Barocas (026361992) Jeanne LoCicero (024052000) Alexander Shalom (021162004) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION P.O. Box 32159 Newark, NJ 07101 (973) 642-2086 Counsel for Plaintiff

More information

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:17-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 05/23/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 Case :-cv-00-ajb-ksc Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 DAVID M. BECKWITH (CSB NO. 0) davidbeckwith@sandiegoiplaw.com TREVOR Q. CODDINGTON, PH.D. (CSB NO. 0) trevorcoddington@sandiegoiplaw.com JAMES

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 Anna Y. Park, SBN Michael Farrell, SBN U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION East Temple Street, Fourth Floor Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: ( - Facsimile: ( -1 E-Mail: lado.legal@eeoc.gov

More information

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case 1:07-cv-00852-MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ESCORT, INC., Plaintiff, V. COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION,

More information

Case 0:16-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2016 Page 1 of 10

Case 0:16-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2016 Page 1 of 10 Case 0:16-cv-61474-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2016 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION ANDREA BELLITTO and )

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:17-cv-01397-TCB Document 1 Filed 04/20/17 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEORGIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, as an organization;

More information

Attorney for Plaintiff San Diego Police Officers Association SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO

Attorney for Plaintiff San Diego Police Officers Association SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO MICHAEL A. CONGER, ESQUIRE (State Bar # LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL A. CONGER San Dieguito Road, Suite -1 Mailing: P.O. Box Rancho Santa Fe, California 0 Telephone: ( -000 Facsimile: ( -0 Attorney for Plaintiff

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA EDWARD J. WYNNE, SBN 11 WYNNE LAW FIRM Wood Island 0 E. Sir Francis Drake Blvd., Ste. G Larkspur, CA Telephone: (1) 1-00 Facsimile: (1) 1-00 ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and the putative

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF FRESNO 0 HAMILTON CANDEE (SBN ) hcandee@altshulerberzon.com BARBARA J. CHISHOLM (SBN ) bchisholm@altshulerberzon.com ERIC P. BROWN (SBN ) ebrown@altshulerberzon.com ALTSHULER BERZON LLP Post Street, Suite 00

More information

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc., Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program Summer --0 EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc., Judge Ramona V. Manglona Follow this and additional

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, Plaintiff A. Donald McEachin, Senator of Virginia, by counsel, and for

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND COMPLAINT. COMES NOW, Plaintiff A. Donald McEachin, Senator of Virginia, by counsel, and for V I R G I N I A: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND ) ) A. DONALD McEACHIN, Senator of Virginia ) ) v. ) CASE NO. ) WILLIAM T. BOLLING, Lieutenant ) Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia )

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-jfw-jc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: BOREN, OSHER & LUFTMAN LLP Paul K. Haines (SBN ) Email: phaines@bollaw.com Fletcher W. Schmidt (SBN ) Email: fschmidt@bollaw.com N. Sepulveda

More information

Case 2:13-cv DSF-MRW Document 14 Filed 12/16/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:150

Case 2:13-cv DSF-MRW Document 14 Filed 12/16/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:150 Case :-cv-00-dsf-mrw Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 Case :-cv-00-dsf-mrw Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0. Plaintiff brings this class action to secure injunctive relief and restitution for

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APPLE INC. v. Plaintiff, MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) )

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 1 1 1 Darrell J. York, Esq. (SBN 1 Sarah L. Garvey, Esq. (SBN 1 Law Offices of York & Garvey 1 N. Larchmont Blvd., #0 Los Angeles, CA 000 Telephone: ( 0- Facsimile: ( -0 Email: djylaw@gmail.com Email:

More information

AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AMENDED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (hereinafter Agreement ) is entered into as of, 2016, by and between CITY OF PLACENTIA, a California charter law municipal corporation, ( Placentia

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LAW OFFICES OF DONALD B. MOONEY DONALD B. MOONEY (CA Bar # 153721 129 C Street, Suite 2 Davis, California 95616 Telephone: (530 758-2377 Facsimile: (530 758-7169 dbmooney@dcn.org Attorneys for Petitioner

More information

City Council Election System Changes Project. CVRA Community Input Workshop

City Council Election System Changes Project. CVRA Community Input Workshop City Council Election System Changes Project CVRA Presentation Overview» Project Overview» Small Group Exercise Method to elect the mayor Factors to consider when drawing districts» Opportunities for Public

More information

AGENDA SUMMARY EUREKA CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENT TO CITY CHARTER SECTION 201 FROM AT-LARGE TO WARD BASED ELECTIONS

AGENDA SUMMARY EUREKA CITY COUNCIL AMENDMENT TO CITY CHARTER SECTION 201 FROM AT-LARGE TO WARD BASED ELECTIONS AGENDA SUMMARY EUREKA CITY COUNCIL TITLE: AMENDMENT TO CITY CHARTER SECTION 201 FROM AT-LARGE TO WARD BASED ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: CITY ATTORNEY CYNDY DAY-WILSON PRESENTED FOR: Action Information

More information

COMES NOW Plaintiff PAUL SAPAN (hereinafter referred to as

COMES NOW Plaintiff PAUL SAPAN (hereinafter referred to as Case :-cv-0-ag-rao Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Justin Prato SBN PRATO & REICHMAN, APC Aero Drive, Suite 0 San Diego, CA Telephone: --0 Email: Jmprato@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff PAUL SAPAN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-lab-wvg Document Filed 0// Page of 0 LANAK & HANNA, P.C. Christopher M. Cullen, Esq. (Bar No. ) Michael K. Murray, Esq. (Bar No. ) The City Drive South, Suite 0 Orange, CA Telephone: () 0-0

More information

Counsel for Plaintiff

Counsel for Plaintiff Edward Barocas (026361992 Jeanne LoCicero (024052000 Alexander Shalom (021162004 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW JERSEY FOUNDATION P.O. Box 32159 Newark, NJ 07101 (973 642-2086 Counsel for Plaintiff

More information

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ). 0 0 Robert J. Lauson (,) bob@lauson.com Edwin P. Tarver, (0,) edwin@lauson.com LAUSON & TARVER LLP 0 Apollo St., Suite. 0 El Segundo, CA 0 Tel. (0) -0 Fax (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC

More information

Case 3:14-cv DMS-DHB Document 1 Filed 06/04/14 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:14-cv DMS-DHB Document 1 Filed 06/04/14 Page 1 of 17 Case :-cv-0-dms-dhb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 JOHN H. DONBOLI (SBN: 0 E-mail: jdonboli@delmarlawgroup.com JL SEAN SLATTERY (SBN: 0 E-mail: sslattery@delmarlawgroup.com DEL MAR LAW GROUP, LLP 0 El

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Richard D. Ackerman, Esq. (00 LIVELY & ACKERMAN A Partnership of Christian Attorneys Enterprise Circle North, Ste. Temecula, CA 0 (1 0- Tel. (1 0- Fax. Professora@aol.com Attorney for

More information

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Now comes Plaintiff, the Rhode Island Affiliate, American Civil Liberties Union

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Now comes Plaintiff, the Rhode Island Affiliate, American Civil Liberties Union STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC SUPERIOR COURT RHODE ISLAND AFFILIATE, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Plaintiff, v. RHODE ISLAND BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JOHN A. DALUZ, in his capacity as Chairman of the

More information