THE MYTH OF THE CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED UP OR DOWN VOTE The True History of Checks and Balances, Advice and Consent in the Senate
|
|
- Alexander Wilkinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE MYTH OF THE CONSTITUTIONALLY REQUIRED UP OR DOWN VOTE The True History of Checks and Balances, Advice and Consent in the Senate May 2005 To justify a truly unparalleled 1 nuclear option parliamentary maneuver to end filibusters of judicial nominations by breaking the Senate s rules, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist asserts that Democratic filibusters are unprecedented and that Senators have a constitutional duty to give presidential nominations an up or down vote on the Senate floor. This assertion is squarely refuted by the history of the confirmation process in the Senate. To the contrary, as the examples below illustrate, for over 200 years members of the Senate have used delaying tactics, including the filibuster, to defeat presidential nominations to both the federal judiciary and the executive branch. On many occasions they have been successful. Furthermore, nuclear option proponents themselves, including Senator Frist, have repeatedly used the filibuster to delay nominations, including judicial nominations, and have even successfully defeated nominations through a filibuster and other delaying tactics. Under the Senate's rules there is a right of unlimited debate on any question that comes before the Senate, including a nomination. It takes 60 votes to "invoke cloture," ending unlimited debate and bringing a nomination or other matter to a final vote. It takes 2/3 of the Senators present (as many as 67) to end debate on a change to the Senate's rules. The nuclear option is a proposed parliamentary maneuver under which a simple majority of the Senate (51) would break the Senate's rules to amend the Senate rule that requires sixty Senators to end a filibuster on a nomination. The Text of the Constitution Nowhere in the text of the Constitution is there a requirement for a simple majority for vote on nominations or for a vote at all. What the Constitution does say expressly 2 is that the Senate holds the sole power to make its rules, which certainly must include the rules governing debate on the Senate floor. This interpretation is validated by 216 years of Senate consideration of nominations. Use of the Filibuster Until 1949, when Senate Rule XXII was amended to allow the Senate to invoke cloture on any matter before the Senate, there was no way for the Senate to end extended debate or delaying tactics on a nomination. In the last 32 years of the twentieth century, the Senate leadership was forced to file cloture on at least 34 nominations to end a filibuster on the Senate floor. Among these 34 were 13 judicial nominations, of which 3 people were nominated to be Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court and 8 were individuals nominated to the federal circuit courts of appeals. Twenty-six of the 34 filibusters, approximately three-quarters, were led by Republican Senators. 1 PFAWF Memorandum: No Defense For the Nuclear Option: Response to the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy Article, March 16, U.S. Constitution, Article 1, section M Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC Telephone Fax pfaw@pfaw.org Web site
2 Among those, Abe Fortas, nominated in 1968 to be a Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, was denied a final up or down vote by a Republican-led filibuster which the Senate failed to stop on a vote to invoke cloture of While the vote indicates that a majority of the Senate supported a final vote, 3 because of primarily Republican obstructionism a final up or down vote did not occur. Senator Howard Baker Jr. (R-TN) argued during the debate, in defense of the filibuster of Fortas by a Senate minority, that "On any issue the majority at any given moment is not always right." 4 Similarly, the nomination of Henry Foster to be Surgeon General of the United States was killed by a successful Republican filibuster in 1995, as was the nomination of Sam Brown to be a U.S. Ambassador in On both of these votes a clear majority of the Senate supported the nominations. The exact same advice and consent clause in the Constitution applies to both judicial and executive branch nominations. 5 3 PFAW memorandum: The Fortas Filibuster, July 29, Charles Babbington, Filibuster Precedent? Democrats Point to '68 and Fortas; But GOP Senators Cite Differences in Current Effort to Bar Votes on Judges, The Washington Post, March 18, 2005, A03. 5 U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 2. "And he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States[.]" Therefore, despite the claims of nuclear option proponents, filibusters of executive and judicial nominees are of equal constitutional validity. 2
3 Current proponents of the nuclear option supported several of these filibusters. For example, Senator Frist supported a filibuster against U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Richard Paez in In fact Senate Republicans including Senators Frist, Lott, and McConnell were so adamant in trying to block a final vote on Paez that they forced the Senate to vote on an extremely rare motion to postpone the nomination indefinitely after cloture had been invoked. 6 Some current nuclear option proponents have been among the most frequent Republican filibusterers of nominations. Senators Lott, Hatch and McConnell all voted against cloture (to continue a filibuster) on 11 nominations during the first three years of the Clinton Administration, including on two occasions where filibusters defeated nominees with majority support in the Senate. 7 Former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott on at least one occasion even prevented a cloture motion from being filed on a nomination. In 1998 President Clinton nominated James Hormel to be the U.S. Ambassador to Luxembourg. Despite an overwhelming bipartisan vote of approval in committee (16-2), 8 Lott simply refused to bring the nomination to the floor despite clear evidence that at least 60 senators would have voted to confirm the nomination had there been an up or down vote. 9 Use of Delay and Other Tactics to Deny an Up or Down Vote 10 The filibuster is only one of many tactics that have been employed in the Senate over a period of over 200 years to deny a nominee an up or down vote. In some cases, nominations were rejected when the Senate committee to which they were referred blocked the nomination from going to the Senate floor. In other cases, individual Senators or groups of Senators blocked the Senate from taking action even after the nomination was reported to the full Senate. Such tactics date back to the very beginning of our Republic. During the administration of President John Adams, at least 9 of his nominations were postponed indefinitely from and died through inaction of the Senate. 11 During the Monroe administration, the Senate failed to act on so many of his nominations that his successor to the Presidency, John Quincy Adams, felt honor bound to renominat[e] every person nominated by Mr. Monroe, and upon whose nomination the Senate had declined acting Senate Vote 39, 106 th Congress 2 nd Session, March The nominations filibustered were Walter Dellinger, Janet Napolitano, Sam Brown, Derek Shearer, Ricki Tigert, Henry Foster, and five State Department nominations considered en bloc. The nominations of Sam Brown to be a U.S. Ambassador and Henry Foster to be U.S. Surgeon General were defeated by the filibusters. 8 Paul Bedard, Hormel Appointment Appears Dead Lott Expected to Refuse Roll to Call Vote, The Washington Times, July 1, 1998, A6. 9 Id. 10 Some, like the authors of the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy article frequently cited by proponents of the nuclear option, expressly include in their definition of a filibuster placing a hold on a bill or nomination, [and] refusing to report a bill or nomination out of Committee. Martin B. Gold, Dimple Gupta, The Constitutional Option to Change Senate Rules and Procedures: A Majoritarian Means to Over Come the Filibuster, Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Volume 28, Issue 1 (2004) Under that definition, many of the instances of delay and other tactics discussed below would be defined as a filibuster. Regardless of whether such tactics constitute a filibuster, they obviously result in denying a nominee an up or down vote on the -floor of the Senate the very constitutional duty which nuclear proponents claim binds the Senate. 11 George H. Haynes, The Senate of the United States Its History and Practice, 1938, p. 753 footnote Id at 735 (Quoting John Quincy Adams). 3
4 At times rejection by inaction has been far more common than rejection by up or down vote. One study of the Senate's exercise of the advice and consent power found that during a twenty year period from , the Senate rejected 15,263 presidential nominations through inaction. In the same period only 84 nominations were rejected by straight up or down votes. 13 Such large numbers rejected without a vote are not an aberration. In 1917, roughly 2000 of President Wilson's nominations were blocked through the end of the session due to senatorial unrest over his nomination of his personal physician (Dr. Cary Grayson) to be a Rear Admiral. 14 Rejection by failure to take a final vote has frequently defeated judicial nominations and executive branch nominations. For example, in 1828, the Senate Committee tasked with considering judicial nominations on at least one occasion expressly found that it was within the authority of the Senate to decide that it was inexpedient to advise and consent to the nomination now and to therefore take no action, killing the nomination after the Senate adjourned. 15 Deliberately denying a Supreme Court nominee an up or down vote in the Senate appears to be particularly common. Of 24 nominations to the U.S. Supreme Court whom the Senate did not confirm between 1789 and 2002, 14 (nearly 60%) were defeated through inaction or delay. 16 These 14 defeated without an up or down vote represent nearly 10 percent of all the Supreme Court nominations made in our nation s history. 17 As one scholar of the Senate wrote in 1938, The Senate, on its part has often taken no action upon [a nomination], or, after long delay, has voted to postpone its consideration indefinitely. At least ten nominations to the Supreme Court have been blocked in this way. 18 Such was the fate of Andrew Jackson Supreme Court nominee Roger Taney on President Jackson s first attempt to nominate him. The Senate held up the nomination for six weeks and then voted to indefinitely postpone a final confirmation vote. Reportedly, when President Jackson heard the news, well after midnight, that the Senate had defeated his nominee by inaction he referred to the body as damned scoundrels. 19 Taney was later renominated and confirmed as Chief Justice. Other 19 th century examples include President John Tyler s nominations of Judge Edward King and Reuben Walworth to the bench which were blocked in the Senate for over a year until he finally withdrew them. After he submitted two new names for the bench (John Meredith Read and Samuel Nelson), the Senate confirmed Nelson but refused to take final action on Read. 20 President Millard Fillmore nominated three individuals during the 1850s, Edward Bradford, George Badger, and William Micou, for the same seat on the Supreme Court. The Senate failed to confirm all three without taking a final up or down vote to confirm or reject. In the case of Badger, the Senate 13 Joseph P. Harris, Advice and Consent of the Senate, 1968, p Haynes, supra, at Id., at Henry B. Hogue, Supreme Court Nominations Not Confirmed, , CRS Report for Congress July 9, Senate Historical Office. Document found at 18 Haynes, at 770 (emphasis added). Note that the reference to 10 defeated by inaction was through Id. 20 Harris, at 68. 4
5 formally postponed his nomination until the end of the session, effectively rejecting the nomination. 21 Delay and other tactics as the preferred means of defeating judicial nominations without any vote was revived with a vengeance in the late 20th century when the Senate came under Republican control. From 1995 to 2000, over 60 of President Clinton's judicial nominees were blocked in the Senate, sometimes by the action of only one Senator, and were rejected without an up or down vote. 22 Over that period, none of President Clinton s appellate court nominees were rejected by the Senate through up or down votes. Every appeals court nominee not confirmed was defeated by inaction or obstruction including 16 in the 106 th Congress alone 56 percent of such nominations. 23 Conclusion Senator Frist is justifying a parliamentary maneuver that has never been done with a history of a United States Senate that never occurred. For at least 208 years, nearly as long as there has been a United States Senate, there have been documented examples of presidential nominations rejected by the Senate without a final up or down vote through delay, inaction, and parliamentary tactics including the filibuster. This history demonstrates conclusively what is clear from the text of the U.S. Constitution: there is no requirement for the Senate to vote on a Presidential nomination. Indeed, it does not require the Senate to take any action on a nomination at all. The history of the confirmation process in the Senate also illustrates one other central fact: Presidents have had the most success with their nominations when they have viewed the entire Senate as a partner in the nominations process, not an adversary. This suggests that the better way out of the current stalemate, and the best way to preserve our fair and independent judiciary, is not tyranny of the majority in the Senate. Rather, it is genuine bipartisan cooperation and consultation with Senators on both sides of the aisle For 200 years, the right of unlimited debate in the Senate has been a tool of moderation and compromise. The Senate was designed to be the more deliberative body in Congress. The current situation with one party dominating the White House and Congress in spite of a narrowly divided national electorate demonstrates the wisdom of our constitutional framework s checks and balances. The nuclear option not only represents a clear abuse of power; by eliminating the filibuster for judicial nominations it would also change the nature of the Senate and its role in our constitutional system. 21 Id., at Statement of Senator Patrick Leahy, November 143, Found at 23 PFAWF Report: President Bush, the Senate and the Federal Judiciary: Unprecedented Situation Calls for Unprecedented Solution, October,
The Nuclear Option in the Senate: A Preemptive Strike for Absolute Power
TO: FR: RE: Journalists Ralph G. Neas The Nuclear Option in the Senate: A Preemptive Strike for Absolute Power DATE: February 1, 2005 Introduction A January National Review column by former Senate Judiciary
More informationU.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations During President Obama s First Five Years: Comparative Analysis With Recent Presidents
U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations During President Obama s First Five Years: Comparative Analysis With Recent Presidents Barry J. McMillion Analyst on the Federal Judiciary January 24, 2014 Congressional
More informationThe Legislative Branch
The Legislative Branch Congress Legislative Branch of National Government Established in Article I of the Constitution Makes laws, ratifies treaties, impeachment, confirm presidential appointments, controls
More informationHolds in the Senate. Mark J. Oleszek Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process. March 19, 2015
Mark J. Oleszek Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process March 19, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43563 Summary The Senate hold is an informal practice whereby Senators
More informationThe Scalia Vacancy in Historical Context: Frequently Asked Questions
The Scalia Vacancy in Historical Context: Frequently Asked Questions Barry J. McMillion Analyst in American National Government March 1, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44773 Summary
More informationEvolution of the Senate s Role in the Nomination and Confirmation Process: A Brief History
Order Code RL31948 Evolution of the Senate s Role in the Nomination and Confirmation Process: A Brief History Updated July 2, 2008 Betsy Palmer Analyst on the Congress and Legislative Process Government
More informationThe full speech, as prepared for delivery, is below:
Washington, D.C. Senator Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, the senior member and former Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, spoke on the floor today about the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the United
More informationCloture Attempts on Nominations
Richard S. Beth Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process Betsy Palmer Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process January 31, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared
More informationChapter 12: Congress in Action Section 4
Chapter 12: Congress in Action Section 4 Objectives 1. Describe how a bill is introduced in the Senate. 2. Compare the Senate s rules for debate with those in the House. 3. Describe the role of conference
More informationHolds in the Senate. Walter J. Oleszek Senior Specialist in American National Government. May 19, 2008
Walter J. Oleszek Senior Specialist in American National Government May 19, 2008 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 7-5700 www.crs.gov
More informationTHE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE FILIBUSTER
THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE FILIBUSTER Michael J. Gerhardt* INTRODUCTION Ignorance about the filibuster is almost universal. What many people might know about the filibuster is based on the climax of
More informationPoints of Order, Rulings, and Appeals in the Senate
Points of Order, Rulings, and Appeals in the Senate Valerie Heitshusen Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process April 7, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 98-306 T he Senate
More information7) For a case to be heard in the Supreme Court, a minimum of how many judges must vote to hear the case? A) none B) one C) nine D) five E) four
Exam Name MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) Common law is. A) laws passed by legislatures B) the requirement that plaintiffs have
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RL32684 Changing Senate Rules: The Constitutional or Nuclear Option Betsy Palmer, Government and Finance Division November
More informationEXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES: The Legacy of the Gang of 14 and a Proposal for Judicial Nominations Reform
EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES: The Legacy of the Gang of 14 and a Proposal for Judicial Nominations Reform Michael Gerhardt & Richard Painter November 2011 REVISED All expressions of opinion are those of
More informationCh. 11 Powers of Congress (Article I) Ch. 11 Powers of Congress (Article I) Ch. 11 Powers of Congress (Article I) Non Legislative Powers
Non Legislative Powers Congress can propose an Amendment to the Constitution The House of Representatives can elect the President if no candidate gets a majority of electoral votes The Senate can elect
More informationThe Executive Branch
The Executive Branch What is the job of the Executive Branch? The Executive Branch is responsible for executing (or carrying out) the laws made by the Congress. Executive Branch The qualifications to be
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code RL32684 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Changing Senate Rules: The Constitutional or Nuclear Option Updated May 26, 2005 Betsy Palmer Analyst in American National Government
More informationPoints of Order, Rulings, and Appeals in the Senate
Points of Order, Rulings, and Appeals in the Senate Valerie Heitshusen Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process April 7, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 98-306 Congressional
More informationChanges to Senate Procedures in the 113 th Congress Affecting the Operation of Cloture (S.Res. 15 and S.Res. 16)
Changes to Senate Procedures in the 113 th Congress Affecting the Operation of Cloture (S.Res. 15 and S.Res. 16) Elizabeth Rybicki Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process March 13, 2013 CRS
More informationChapter 11. Congress. What is Congress main job?
Chapter 11 Congress What is Congress main job? The Constitution and the Legislative Branch of the Government o Article I describes structure of Congress n Bicameral legislature o Divided into two houses
More informationThe Constitution and the Legislative Branch of the Government
Chapter 7 Congress The Constitution and the Legislative Branch of the Government o Article I describes structure of Congress n Bicameral legislature o Divided into two houses o Each state sends two Senators
More information1. States must meet certain requirements in drawing district boundaries. Identify one of these requirements.
Multiple Choice 1. States must meet certain requirements in drawing district boundaries. Identify one of these requirements. a. A person's vote in the largest district of a state must have only half the
More informationChapter 7. Congress. American Government 2006 Edition To accompany Comprehensive, Alternate, Texas, and Essentials Editions O Connor and Sabato
Chapter 7 Congress American Government 2006 Edition To accompany Comprehensive, Alternate, Texas, and Essentials Editions O Connor and Sabato The Constitution and the Legislative Branch of the Government
More informationSupreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice,
Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789-2011 Richard S. Beth Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process Betsy Palmer Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process
More informationSS7 CIVICS, CH. 8.1 THE GROWTH OF AMERICAN PARTIES FALL 2016 PP. PROJECT
PROJECT SS7 CIVICS, CH. 8.1 THE GROWTH OF AMERICAN PARTIES DATE FALL 2016 CLIENT PP. 1. WHAT IS A POLITICAL PARTY? A POLITICAL PARTY IS AN ASSOCIATION OF VOTERS WITH COMMON INTERESTS WHO WANT TO INFLUENCE
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS21908 Updated October 14, 2004 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Senate Select Committee on Intelligence: Term Limits and Assignment Limitations Summary Judy Schneider Specialist
More informationExceptions to Symmetry. Congress: The Legislative Branch. In comparative perspective, Congress is unusual.
Congress: The Legislative Branch In comparative perspective, Congress is unusual. Most legislatures, particularly in parliamentary systems, are relatively weak. Congress exhibits symmetric bicameralism:
More informationPrepared for Members and Committees of Congress
Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Œ œ Ÿ The rules of the Senate emphasize the rights and prerogatives of individual Senators and, therefore, minority groups of Senators. The most important
More informationVoting and Quorum Procedures in the Senate
name redacted, Coordinator Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process August 19, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional Research Service 7-...
More informationAdvocacy and Lobbying Rules for Nonprofits. Agenda. Comparing Nonprofits. Webinar July 27, 2010
Advocacy and Rules for Nonprofits Webinar July 27, 2010 Agenda 1. What does it mean to be a 501(c)(3) organization? 2. What is advocacy? 3. Why do advocacy? 4. success stories 5. What is lobbying and how
More informationName: Class: Date: 5., a self-governing possession of the United States, is represented by a nonvoting resident commissioner.
1. A refers to a Congress consisting of two chambers. a. bicameral judiciary b. bicameral legislature c. bicameral cabinet d. bipartisan filibuster e. bipartisan caucus 2. In the context of the bicameral
More informationThoughts on the Reform of Senate Procedures
1 Thoughts on the Reform of Senate Procedures Objective Senator Jeff Merkley November 16, 2010 The purpose for reforming Senate procedures is to improve the Senate as a deliberative legislative body. While
More informationAP US GOVERNMENT: CHAPER 7: POLITICAL PARTIES: ESSENTIAL TO DEMOCRACY
AP US GOVERNMENT: CHAPER 7: POLITICAL PARTIES: ESSENTIAL TO DEMOCRACY Before political parties, candidates were listed alphabetically, and those whose names began with the letters A to F did better than
More informationMechanism of democracy. The correlation of the filibuster and disaster.
Mechanism of democracy The correlation of the filibuster and disaster. Let the Welfare of the People be the Ultimate Law Marcus Tullius Cicero on January 18th 37 BC Stood Alone among the Fearful Senators
More informationCordray s Recess Appointment: Future Legal Challenges. By V. Gerard Comizio and Amanda M. Jabour*
Cordray s Recess Appointment: Future Legal Challenges By V. Gerard Comizio and Amanda M. Jabour* Introduction On January 4, 2012, President Obama appointed Richard Cordray as director of the Consumer Financial
More informationLobbying Rules for Public Charities. Agenda. What is Advocacy?
Rules for Public Charities We ll begin at approximately 2:00 PM Eastern Time Any tech questions? Contact GoToMeeting Technical Support at (888) 259-8414. Other questions? Call Christina Peltier at Alliance
More informationHatch Ornstein Filibuster Exchange in Roll Call
Hatch Ornstein Filibuster Exchange in Roll Call GOP Should Handle Filibusters the Old-Fashioned Way By Norman Ornstein November 17, 2004 Wednesday Some things just keep coming back, like Rasputin after
More informationDate Title Page # 2/22 Law Making Process (RSP) 18
Date Title Page # 2/22 Law Making Process (RSP) 18 BILL PROPOSED LEGISLATION TO BECOME LAW ON PASSAGE BY BOTH CHAMBERS AND SIGNED BY THE PRESIDENT JOINT RESOLUTION LEGISLATIVE MEASURE PASSED BY BOTH CHAMBERS
More informationPolitical Science 10 American Politics: Congress
Political Science 10 American Politics: Congress Loren Collingwood, Political Science May 27, 2014 1 / 23 Current Events: Jim Messina 2 / 23 Current Events: SCOTUS Raises Bar on low-iq Executions 3 / 23
More informationTHE STATE OF THE JUDICIARY Judicial Selection During the Remainder of President Obama s First Term
THE STATE OF THE JUDICIARY Judicial Selection During the Remainder of President May 7 th, 2012 A report by Alliance for Justice 11 Dupont Circle NW, Second Floor Washington, DC 20036 www.afj.org About
More informationBackground of the Senate s Rules The Founders envisioned the Senate as a slow and deliberative legislative body. Not surprisingly,
BACKGROUNDER No. 2696 Tyranny in the United States Senate Brian Darling Abstract Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has regularly used a procedural tactic called filling the amendment tree to restrict Senators
More informationUnit V Test Congress and the President Practice Test
Unit V Test Congress and the President Practice Test 1. The "revolving door" involves: (A) members of Congress who travel extensively between Washington D.C. and their home states (B) diplomats who engage
More informationVITA RICHARD FLEISHER
VITA RICHARD FLEISHER Personal Information Education Office Address: Department of Political Science Fordham University Bronx, New York 10458 Office Phone: (718) 817-3952 Office Fax: (718) 817-3972 e-mail:
More informationThe Appointment Process for U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: An Overview
The Appointment Process for U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: An Overview -name redacted- Visiting Scholar October 22, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-... www.crs.gov R43762 Summary In
More informationThe Kavanaugh Nomination: Democratic Arguments Against the Nominee
1 Molly Hussey Brademas Center Summer Internship Program August 30, 2018 The Kavanaugh Nomination: Democratic Arguments Against the Nominee The United States Senate is tasked with the unique duty of confirming
More informationPresidential term: Lived: Occupations: Planter, Lawyer. Vice Presidents: Aaron Burr, George Clinton
In this resource you will find portraits of the individuals who served as presidents of the United States, along with their occupations, political party affiliations, and other interesting facts. **The
More informationJudicial Branch. SS.7.c.3.11 Diagram the levels, functions, and powers of courts at the state and federal levels.
Judicial Branch SS.7.c.3.11 Diagram the levels, functions, and powers of courts at the state and federal levels. U.S. Supreme Court Judicial branch of our federal government is in charge of resolving disputes
More informationCh. 4 The Congress. Ch. 4 The Congress. Ch. 4 The Congress. Ch. 4 The Congress. The National Legislature
The National Legislature The National Legislature is known as Congress and is made up of two chambers the House of Representatives & the Term - The length of time elected officials serve in office before
More informationBACKGROUNDER. On November 21, 2013, Senate Democrats used the so-called
BACKGROUNDER No. 3187 A Rules-Based Strategy for Overcoming Minority Obstruction of a Supreme Court Nomination James I. Wallner, PhD, and Ed Corrigan Abstract The current Standing Rules of the Senate empower
More informationReport for Congress. Presidential and Vice Presidential Succession: Overview and Current Legislation. Updated March 25, 2003
Order Code RL31761 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Presidential and Vice Presidential Succession: Overview and Current Legislation Updated March 25, 2003 Thomas H. Neale Government and
More informationCongress has three major functions: lawmaking, representation, and oversight.
Unit 5: Congress A legislature is the law-making body of a government. The United States Congress is a bicameral legislature that is, one consisting of two chambers: the House of Representatives and the
More informationREVIEW (last week): Congress. US House of Representatives. Speaker & party leaders some power. Business conducted in decentralized committees
10/12 & 10/14 Read: Ellis & Nelson Chpt 13: Senate represent people, not states Lowi, Chpt 6 REVIEW (last week): Congress US House of Representatives Power dispersed Speaker & party leaders some power
More informationCHAPTER 6: The legislative branch NAME
CHAPTER 6: The legislative branch NAME VOCAB 1. CONSTITUENT : voters represented by someone in a political office 2. CENSUS : government count of the population every 10 years 3. GERRYMANDER : drawing
More informationLobbyists and special interests have a major weapon The Club a select few in the Senate who hold the power to block legislation that
The Club During the days of the Republican-controlled Congress, GOP-insiders replaced the open debating and crafting of legislation with midnight votes and backroom deals. Powerful K Street lobbyists roamed
More informationFrom Deliberation to Dysfunction
AP Photo/HO/Columbia From Deliberation to Dysfunction It Is Time for Procedural Reform in the U.S. Senate Scott Lilly March 2010 www.americanprogress.org From Deliberation to Dysfunction It Is Time for
More informationTake a stand, supported by evidence, on whether there was a "corrupt bargain" between Henry Clay and John Q Adams.
The presidential election of 1824 represents a watershed in American politics. The collapse of the Federalist Party and the illness of the "official candidate" of the Democratic-Republicans led to a slate
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS20963 Updated March 17, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Nomination and Confirmation of the FBI Director: Process and Recent History Summary Henry B. Hogue Analyst
More informationElections. How we choose the people who govern us
Elections How we choose the people who govern us Electing the President Questions 1. What is an example of popular sovereignty? 2. Who are you really voting for when you vote in a presidential election?
More informationCopyright Center for Civic Education. All rights reserved.
THIS LESSON IS PROVIDED FOR REVIEW AND TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY REPRODUCTION IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE CENTER FOR CIVIC EDUCATION This sample lesson for middle school students
More informationCHAPTER 15. A Divided Nation
CHAPTER 15 A Divided Nation Trouble in Kansas SECTION 15.2 ELECTION OF 1852 1852 - four candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination. Many turned to Franklin Pierce, a little-known politician
More informationUnderstanding the U.S. Supreme Court
Understanding the U.S. Supreme Court Processing Supreme Court Cases Supreme Court Decision Making The Role of Law and Legal Principles Supreme Court Decision Making The Role of Politics Conducting Research
More informationAP Gov Chapter 15 Outline
Law in the United States is based primarily on the English legal system because of our colonial heritage. Once the colonies became independent from England, they did not establish a new legal system. With
More informationThe Antebellum Era ( ): The Rise of Jacksonian Democracy Part 1
The Antebellum Era (1781-1860): The Rise of Jacksonian Democracy Part 1 B. Building a Nation (Colonization-ca. 1877) 1. Colonization and Forging a Nation K. Identify and evaluate the political and territorial
More informationThe Legislative Branch C H A P T E R S 2 A N D 7 E S S E N T I A L S O F A M E R I C A N G O V E R N M E N T R O O T S A N D R E F O R M
The Legislative Branch C H A P T E R S 2 A N D 7 E S S E N T I A L S O F A M E R I C A N G O V E R N M E N T R O O T S A N D R E F O R M M S. CAMPBELL A P GOVERNMENT EDGREN HIGH SCHOOL Imagine for a moment
More informationIn the scheme of our national government, the presidency is preeminently the people's office. Grover Cleveland
In the scheme of our national government, the presidency is preeminently the people's office. Grover Cleveland expressed / enumerated powers: those clearly outlined in law constitutional powers: those
More informationChapter 7 Political Parties: Essential to Democracy
Key Chapter Questions Chapter 7 Political Parties: Essential to Democracy 1. What do political parties do for American democracy? 2. How has the nomination of candidates changed throughout history? Also,
More informationIssue Brief October 2016 The New Normal: Unprecedented Judicial Obstruction and a Proposal for Change
Issue Brief October 2016 The New Normal: Unprecedented Judicial Obstruction and a Proposal for Change Michael Gerhardt & Richard Painter As President Barack Obama enters the last few months of his second
More informationSupreme Court Nominations, : Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President
Supreme Court Nominations, 1789-2009: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary, and the Denis Steven Rutkus Specialist on the Federal Judiciary Maureen Bearden Information Research Specialist May 13, 2009
More informationRecess Appointments: Frequently Asked Questions
Recess Appointments: Frequently Asked Questions Henry B. Hogue Analyst in American National Government January 9, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional
More informationThe First Day of a New Congress: A Guide to Proceedings on the Senate Floor
The First Day of a New Congress: A Guide to Proceedings on the Senate Floor Michael L. Koempel Senior Specialist in American National Government Judy Schneider Specialist on the Congress Christina Wu Research
More information2.3- Legislative Branch
2.3- Legislative Branch 2.3- Identify the function and powers of the 3 branches of government. 2.6- Identify the process of law-making. By: Carter Greene Kickoff: KO QUESTION: If you were in Congress,
More informationRecess Appointments: Frequently Asked Questions
Recess Appointments: Frequently Asked Questions Henry B. Hogue Specialist in American National Government March 11, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21308 Summary Under the Constitution
More informationA GUIDE TO THE MASSACHUSETTS JUDICIAL SELECTION PROCESS THE MAKING OF A JUDGE
AM A S S A C H U S E T T S B A R S S O C I A T 1 9 1 1 I O N A GUIDE TO THE MASSACHUSETTS JUDICIAL SELECTION PROCESS THE MAKING OF A JUDGE 3 RD EDITION BY MARTIN W. HEALY, ESQ. CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
More informationCRS Report for Congress
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS21908 August 12, 2004 Senate Select Committee on Intelligence: Term Limits and Assignment Limitations Summary Judy Schneider Specialist
More informationNORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY 13 TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT PLAN OF ORGANIZATION
PREAMBLE NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY 13 TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT PLAN OF ORGANIZATION www.ncgop13.com We, the members of the Republican Party of the North Carolina Thirteenth Congressional District,
More informationPresidents of the United States Cards
Presidents of the United States Cards Print on card stock and laminate for more durability if desired. Use as trading cards with friends as flashcards or a timeline to learn the Presidents. Created by
More informationIntroduction to the Legislative Process in the U.S. Congress
Introduction to the Legislative Process in the U.S. Congress Valerie Heitshusen Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process February 16, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42843
More informationCongress. AP US Government Spring 2017
Congress AP US Government Spring 2017 Congressional Elections: House vs Senate Constituent: citizen who is represented by a member of Congress House is closer to constitutents House members come from individual
More informationFederal Election Commission: Membership and Policymaking Quorum, In Brief
Federal Election Commission: Membership and Policymaking Quorum, In Brief R. Sam Garrett Specialist in American National Government April 12, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45160
More informationU.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: Senate Rejections and Committee Votes Other Than to Report Favorably,
U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations: Senate Rejections and Committee Votes Other Than to Report Favorably, 1939-2013 Barry J. McMillion Analyst on the Federal Judiciary May 29, 2014 Congressional
More informationThe Making of a Nation Program No. 42
The Making of a Nation Program No. 42 James Monroe, Part 3: The Election of 1824 From VOA Learning English, welcome to the Making of a Nation, our weekly program of American history for people learning
More informationCONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS
CONGRESS CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS Who Wins Elections? Incumbent: Those already holding office. Figure 12.1 CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS The Role of Party Identification Most members represent the majority party
More informationHenry Clay met with Adams, and said he would use his influence as Speaker of the House to elect Adams if Adams named him Sec. of State Adams was
Election of 1824 Monroe ends 2 nd term, four candidates ran William Crawford Georgia Andrew Jackson Tennessee Henry Clay Kentucky John Quincy Adams Massachusetts each candidate had regional support and
More informationTemporary Assignments to Fill Vacancies on the New Jersey Supreme Court By Earl M. Maltz
Temporary Assignments to Fill Vacancies on the New Jersey Supreme Court By Earl M. Maltz New Jersey SEptember 2010 ABOUT THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies
More informationAmendments Between the Houses: Procedural Options and Effects
Amendments Between the Houses: Procedural Options and Effects Elizabeth Rybicki Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process January 4, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared
More informationIntroduction to the Legislative Process in the U.S. Congress
Introduction to the Legislative Process in the U.S. Congress Valerie Heitshusen Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process November 30, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees
More informationYOUR TASK: What are these different types of bills and resolutions? What are the similarities/differences between them? Write your own definition for
YOUR TASK: What are these different types of bills and resolutions? What are the similarities/differences between them? Write your own definition for each type of bill/resolution. Compare it with your
More informationRE: Electronic Surveillance Substitute Versions of H.R. 5825
BARRY M. KAMINS PRESIDENT Phone: (212) 382-6700 Fax: (212) 768-8116 bkamins@nycbar.org September 26, 2006 The Honorable Bill Frist Majority Leader United States Senate 509 Hart Senate Office Building Washington,
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code 98-156 GOV Updated January 29, 2001 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Presidential Veto and Congressional Procedure Gary L. Galemore Analyst in American National Government
More informationOne useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, three or more is congress. -John Adams
One useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, three or more is congress. -John Adams Legislate: turn public will into public policy (laws) Help their constituents deal with the federal bureaucracy (Veterans
More informationCHAPTER 5: CONGRESS: THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
CHAPTER 5: CONGRESS: THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH 1 Section 1: Congress Section 2: The Powers of Congress Section 3: The House of Representative Section 4: The Senate Section 5: Congress At Work SECTION 1: CONGRESS
More information4) Once every decade, the Constitution requires that the population be counted. This is called the 4)
MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) The Founders intended that the House of Representatives be 1) A) professional. B) electorally insulated.
More informationNo DD IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DENIS STEPHENS, PETER EVANS and DETREE JORDAN,
No. 02-16424-DD IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DENIS STEPHENS, Defendant-Appellant, v. PETER EVANS and DETREE JORDAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees. On Appeal from the United States
More informationTHE STATE OF THE JUDICIARY Judicial Selection During the 113 th Congress
THE STATE OF THE JUDICIARY Judicial Selection During the 113 th Congress October 24, 2013 A report by Alliance for Justice 11 Dupont Circle NW, Second Floor Washington, DC 20036 www.afj.org About Alliance
More informationRELIGIOUS AFFILIATION, PERSONAL BELIEFS, AND THE PRESIDENT S FRAMING OF JUDICIAL NOMINEES
RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION, PERSONAL BELIEFS, AND THE PRESIDENT S FRAMING OF JUDICIAL NOMINEES Lisa M. Holmes TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction... 679 II. The Modern Appointment Process and the Pryor Nomination...
More informationDo not copy, post, or distribute. RESOLVED, The. president has too much power in the selection of judges
13 PRO : David A. Yalof CON: John Anthony Maltese RESOLVED, The president has too much power in the selection of judges Few issues have engendered more controversy in Washington in recent years than the
More informationName Date Class KEY TERMS AND NAMES
Chapter 8, Section 1 For use with textbook pages 266 272 JACKSONIAN AMERICA KEY TERMS AND NAMES spoils system the practice of appointing people to government jobs on the basis of party loyalty and support
More informationThe Contenders: 1824
The Contenders: 1824 More white male voters. Income eligibility lifted Elimination of property voters Political campaigns appealing to the masses Nation was expanding. West wants a say They nominate H.
More informationOverview of the Presidency
Overview of the Presidency I. Official Qualifications A. Natural-born citizen. B. At least 35 years of age. C. Residency for at least last 14 years. II. Term of Office A. Four years. B. Maximum of two
More information