Case No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI
|
|
- Samuel Marshall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI STATE of MISSOURI ex rel. PAMELA K. GROW; STEVEN AND LAURA M. HAUSLADEN; GEORGE W. HOWELL; ROBYN L. HAMLIN; PAUL CONRAD; MATTHEW A. HAY; RONALD C. REITER; GREGORY A. MURPHY; SALLY S. CATO; and CHARLES L. SANDERS, Relators, v. JEREMIAH W. NIXON, In his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of Missouri, Respondent. SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS I. INTRODUCTION Ever since this state was founded the Missouri Constitution has commanded the governor to issue writs of election to fill vacancies in either house of the General Assembly. See Mo. Const Art. III, 9 ( The governor shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies as may occur in either house of the general assembly. ); Mo. Const Art. IV, 14 ( The governor shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies as may occur in either house of the general assembly. ); Mo. Const Art. IV, 14 ( Writs of election to fill such vacancies as may occur in either house of the General Assembly shall be issued by the Governor. ); Mo. Const Art. III, 14 ( Writs of -1-
2 election to fill vacancies in either house of the general assembly shall be issued by the governor. ). But today Governor Nixon defies this constitutional command, claiming that he has no obligation to issue writs of election to fill vacancies in the General Assembly. Despite the fact that the Governor himself caused the vacancy in the 22 nd Senate District in December 2013, he has flatly refused to issue a writ of election that would enable the voters of Missouri s 22 nd Senate District to elect someone to restore their representation in that house of the state legislature. Similarly, since at least 1825, Missouri state law has mandated that whenever the governor shall receive any resignation or notice of a vacancy [in either house of the general assembly] he shall, without delay, issue a writ or writs of election to supply such vacancy Laws of the State of Missouri, Revised, Vol. II, p Almost precisely that same wording is still in effect today, now found in section , RSMo. This phrasing creates a binding responsibility on the governor to issue writs of election without delay when a vacancy occurs in the legislature, and when considered in light of the purpose of the law to ensure that citizens are properly represented in their legislature the only reasonable reading of this statute requires a conclusion that the election to fill that vacancy must be held as soon as possible. But today, in addition to his claim that he has no obligation whatsoever to issue writs of election to fill vacancies in the General Assembly, Governor Nixon claims that if he deigns to call a special election at all, he has absolute discretion as to when that election will be held. Thus, even though the 120 th Representative District lost its representative on June 5, 2013, Governor Nixon for nearly eight months refused to issue a writ of election to supply that legislative -2-
3 vacancy, and when he finally did so he bypassed the next regularly-scheduled election date (which would allow this district meaningful representation for the last six weeks of the Spring 2014 regular session of the General Assembly, as well as for any special election that might be called) in favor of an election date just three months before the next general election. As the facts of the instant case demonstrate, Governor Nixon s blatant disregard of his constitutional and statutory duty is audacious and (particularly when there are multiple vacancies in the General Assembly) it is dangerous to Missouri s constitutional system. If this Court endorses the Governor s arguments, it would allow the executive branch to continue depriving roughly 300,000 Missouri citizens of their right to be properly represented in their state legislature. It would also give the chief executive a green light to undercut the power of the legislative branch by depriving that body of members without allowing citizens to replace them. Missouri law plainly rejects the notion that the Governor may willfully forestall citizens ability to fill vacancies in the legislature. To the contrary, the Constitution requires the Governor to facilitate the filling of legislative vacancies. For this Court to hold otherwise would erode the foundational principle of Missouri s form of government that the people are the source of all political power, and the government exists to secure citizens rights. Mo. Const. Art. I, 1,
4 II. MISSOURIANS EXERCISE OF FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS DEPENDS ON LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTION When the American colonies declared their independence from England in 1776, one of their express reasons for doing so was that King George had denied their Right to Representation in the Legislature, which they described as being a Right inestimable to them, and formidable to Tyrants only. 1 See Declaration of Independence, 5. As the Missouri Supreme Court has recently noted, [n]o right is more precious in a free country than that of having a voice in the election of those who make the laws under which, as good citizens, we must live. Pearson v. Koster, 359 S.W.3d 35, 39 (Mo. banc 2012) (quoting Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 17 (1964)). Unlike the U.S. Constitution, the Missouri Constitution expressly acknowledges that this state s citizens have the right of suffrage, and declares that no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of that right. Mo. Const. Art. I, 25. A representative voice in each house of the state legislature is part and parcel of the right of suffrage, and it is also directly related to the right to apply to those invested with the powers of government for the redress of grievances by petition or remonstrance, which is protected under both the 1 The Declaration emphasized this point because it was part and parcel of the right of free elections expressed in the English Bill of Rights of That element of the English Bill of Rights was adopted in response to King James II s refusal to issue writs of election for Parliament. See Fagan v. Smith, 41 A.3d 816, 819 fn. 2 (Pa. 2012). -4-
5 First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article I, section 9 of the Missouri Constitution. 2 The Missouri General Assembly is the primary instrument through which citizens of this state exercise their right of self-governance. On the one hand, the persons elected to fill seats in the General Assembly give voice to their constituents interests and concerns in shaping the laws that will govern them. On the other, legislators also act as educators and intermediaries for their constituents, helping citizens of their district understand the state s laws and working to ensure that citizens are treated fairly in their interactions with government agencies. The right of representation in the legislature exists because, as the Founding Fathers knew all too well, a citizen with inadequate representation in the legislature is a citizen at a severe political disadvantage in comparison to those citizens with full representation. The rights the Relators have asserted in this matter demand the highest degree of judicial respect and protection, and this Court should subject to strict scrutiny any delay in securing citizens right of representation in the legislature. 2 If a citizen believes that state law should be changed in some way, their representatives in the General Assembly are their direct link to their government; a citizens legislators are precisely the persons they should be able to petition when the citizen wishes to explain why they think existing laws are flawed and to recommend improvements. -5-
6 III. THE GOVERNOR MUST ISSUE WRITS OF ELECTION WHENEVER A VACANCY OCCURS IN THE LEGISLATURE The Missouri Constitution expressly directs the Governor to issue writs of election when there is a vacancy in either house of the legislature, stating: Writs of election to fill vacancies in either house of the general assembly shall be issued by the governor. Mo. Const. Art. III, 14. (emphasis added) Interpreting similar constitutional provisions, a number of state and federal courts have concluded that the use of the word shall in this context is mandatory, depriving the officer charged with issuing writs of election of any discretion not to issue those writs. See, e.g., ACLU v. Taft, 385 F.3d 641 (6 th Cir. 2004)(use of word shall in U.S. Constitution requires executive authority of a state to issue writs of elections to fill vacancies in the U.S. House of Representatives); Jackson v. Ogilvie, 426 F.2d 1333 (7 th Cir. 1970)(same); Fagan v. Smith, 41 A.3d 816 (Pa. 2012)(use of word shall in Pennsylvania Constitution requires Speaker of Pennsylvania House of Representatives to issue writs of elections to fill vacancies in that house of the legislature); State ex rel. West Virginia Citizen Action Group v. Tomblin, 715 S.E.3d 36 (W.V. 2011)(use of word shall in West Virginia Constitution requires acting governor to call special election to fill vacancy in governor s office). Although in contexts not presented in the instant case there might be room for debate as to whether an official required to issue writs of election to fill legislative vacancies has discretion as to when those elections might be held, there can be no reasonable question as to the fact that Article III, section 14 of the Missouri Constitution does not give the Governor any discretion as to whether he will issue the writs. -6-
7 IV. VACANCIES IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SHOULD BE FILLED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE One factor that distinguishes legislative vacancies in Missouri from vacancies in many other jurisdictions is that, except in the case of a disaster caused by enemy attack on the United States, 3 there is no provision allowing for the appointment of persons to serve in the legislature while the people are waiting for their opportunity to choose a new legislator. Thus, where other jurisdictions ensure that someone will be tasked with providing a voice in the legislature on behalf of citizens whose chosen representative can no longer serve them, in Missouri the seat simply remains empty until filled via a special election. This total lack of legislative representation subjects Missourians to an even more severe burden than is addressed in similar cases from other jurisdictions. It also explains why Missouri s constitution and statutes both anticipate that vacancies in the legislature should be filled as soon as possible. It is telling that Article III, section 46(a), which allows for the temporary appointment of government officials in emergencies, specifically states that elections shall always be called as soon as possible to fill any elective vacancies that had been filled by appointments. Indeed, the Missouri Constitution makes clear that other sorts of vacancies even for offices of far less importance than that of a member of the General Assembly must be filled with haste. See Mo. Const. Art. IV, 40(a) (allowing members of conservation commission to fill vacancy if governor fails to do so within 3 Mo. Const. Art. III, 46(a). -7-
8 thirty days ); Art. 13, 3(6) (governor must act within thirty days to appoint person to fill vacancy on Missouri Citizens Commission on Compensation for Elected Officials). Missouri s statutes also indicate a need for haste in filling vacant offices. In addition to the statutory instruction that the Governor should issue writs of election to supply legislative vacancies without delay, RSMo , when a sheriff s office is vacated state law requires the election to fill that vacancy to be held on or before the tenth Tuesday after the vacancy occurs. RSMo That means that at most seventy days will elapse between the vacation of a sheriff s office and the date of the election to fill the vacancy. Fagan v. Smith is the case most similar to the instant case, and therefore should be most instructive to this Court. In that case, there were six vacancies in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and, although the Pennsylvania Constitution states that when a house of the state legislature has a vacancy the presiding officer of that house shall issue a writ of election to fill such vacancy, the Speaker of the House claimed that the courts could not compel him to act because he had discretion as to when to issue such a writ and when the elections should be held. Fagan, 41 A.3d at 819. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected this argument, holding that the use of the word shall created a mandatory, nondiscretionary ministerial duty to issue writs of election whenever legislative vacancies should occur. But that was not the end of the court s analysis. It also held that both the state s constitution and statutes contemplate that the writs of -8-
9 election should issue and the elections be held quickly. 4 Id. Thus, even if the Pennsylvania Constitution allowed a limited measure of discretion as to when special elections might be held to fill legislative vacancies, that limited measure of discretion did not allow regularly scheduled elections to go by without issuing writs to fill vacant seats. Id. This Court should adopt the same reasoning. The Fagan court was applying constitutional provisions with substantially the same wording as the relevant provisions in the Missouri Constitution. Compare Mo. Const. Art. III, 14 with Pa. Const. Art. II, 2; also compare Mo. Const. Art. I, 25 with Pa. Const. Art. I, 5. Missouri s constitution and statutes provide for the rapid filling of vacant offices of far less importance than that of a member of the General Assembly, and section explicitly instructs the Governor to issue writs of election for legislative vacancies without delay, implying that the elections themselves should also be held as soon as possible. Although Missouri law does not spell out precisely when elections to fill legislative vacancies must be held, it should be plain that they do not authorize a governor to deny or unreasonably interfere, as this Governor has, with citizens right to legislative representation. 4 The Fagan court based its conclusion in part on Article I, section 5 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which says, Elections shall be free and equal; and no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage. This provision is virtually identical to Article I, section 25 of the Missouri Constitution. -9-
10 As noted above, the Governor s refusal to set elections to coincide with the soonest already-scheduled election has infringed several constitutional rights held by the Relators and their disenfranchised neighbors. Where the Governor s failure to discharge his constitutional duty impacts citizens constitutional rights, the courts should subject the Governor s action (or inaction, as the case may be) to strict scrutiny. This would require the Governor to justify the infringement on the citizens rights by first showing proof that the infringement is necessary to achieve a compelling state interest, and then by proving that the Governor s action (or inaction) is narrowly tailored to accomplish its intended result. In this case, it is plain that the Governor has artificially prolonged the period of time that 300,000 Missourians must go without proper legislative representation by refusing to schedule special elections for the soonest possible already-scheduled election. The Governor has attempted to justify this denial of the citizens rights by claiming that filling these legislative vacancies at the already-scheduled April 8 election would be too costly for the state when compared to the expense of filling the vacancies four months later. Under a strict scrutiny standard, the Governor would be allowed to present proof that the cost of holding special elections on April 8 would place such a burden on the state that it has a compelling interest in holding the special elections on August 5, and it would be up to this Court to weigh the interest the government has asserted against the deprivation of 300,000 Missourians right to legislative representation. But in fact the Governor has made no effort to quantify the savings he expects to realize by holding special elections in conjunction with the August 5, 2014, election -10-
11 rather than the April 8, 2014, election. If the Court is to countenance the idea that financial concerns create a compelling interest that might justify several months worth of denying citizens their constitutional rights (and the Relators in no way concede this point,) at a bare minimum the Governor should be required to explain his cost-benefit analysis. He must clearly identify whatever savings he believes will result from delaying special elections for another six months and also identify the monetary value that the Governor places on allowing 300,000 Missourians to have proper representation in the legislature during its regular session and any special session that might be called. 5 The Governor should also be required to explain why, as a practical matter, he believes it would be proper for local jurisdictions (as opposed to the state government) to bear the cost of a special election which the Governor himself necessitated. In the absence of any such explanation, this Court should rule that the Governor s delay and denial of citizens constitutional rights is not justified, and it should issue a writ of mandamus ordering the Governor to do his duty, and to schedule the special elections as soon as possible. 5 The Court should also require such a cost-benefit analysis to explain why the Governor was willing to hold special elections in April 2013 for vacancies the Governor created in the 76 th and 157 th Representative Districts, but deemed it unreasonable to use the alreadyscheduled elections in August 2013, November 2013, February 2014, or April 2014 to fill the vacancy that has existed in the 120 th Representative District since June
12 V. CONCLUSION The Governor has a clear constitutional and statutory obligation to allow the Relators and their 300,000 neighbors the chance to elect new legislative representatives as soon as possible. This Court must not allow the Governor to continue depriving them of their fundamental constitutional rights. Respectfully submitted, David E. Roland Mo. Bar # Livingston Court NE Lacey, WA Phone: (314) Fax: (314) libertyandjustice@gmail.com Attorney for Relators CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on February 21, 2014, a copy of the above and foregoing was filed electronically via Missouri CaseNet and served upon: James R. Layton Solicitor General Supreme Court Building P.O. Box 899 Jefferson City, Missouri Phone: (573) Fax: (573) James.layton@ago.mo.gov David Roland Attorney for Relators -12-
MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT
MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STATE of Missouri ex rel. ) PAMELA K. GROW; STEVE AND ) LAURA M. HAUSLADEN; GEORGE ) W. HOWELL; ROBYN L. HAMLIN; ) PAUL CONRAD; MATT A. HAY; ) RONALD C. REITER;
More informationCase 6:18-cv FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 6:18-cv-06303-FPG Document 1 Filed 04/17/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL., RON CALZONE, ) Respondent, ) ) Case No. vs. ) ) MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION, ) Appellant. ) ) RESPONDENT S APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER QUESTIONS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI DEBORAH WATTS as Next ) Friend for NAYTHON KAYNE ) WATTS, ) ) Appellant/Cross-Respondent, ) ) v. ) SC91867 ) LESTER E. COX MEDICAL ) CENTERS, d/b/a FAMILY ) MEDICAL CARE
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY. ROBERT DALLAS NEWTON, JR. 135 W. Washington St. Brandon, WI 53919, PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY ROBERT DALLAS NEWTON, JR. 135 W. Washington St. Brandon, WI 53919, JANE NEWTON 135 W. Washington St. Brandon, WI 53919, DESIREE FRANK 547 East Washington St.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION RONALD CALZONE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:16-cv-04278-NKL ) NANCY HAGAN, et. al, ) ) Defendants. ) DEFENDANTS SUGGESTIONS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AMICUS BRIEF OF THE APPELLATE PRACTICE SECTION OF THE FLORIDA BAR IN SUPPORT OF THE PETITIONER
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT J. PLEUS, JR., Petitioner, v. Case No. SC09-565 HON. CHARLES GOVERNOR, CRIST, Respondent. ON ORIGINAL PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AMICUS BRIEF OF THE APPELLATE
More informationDefendant State of Missouri s Motion for Summary Judgment
IN CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 04CV323913 STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant. Defendant State of Missouri s Motion for Summary Judgment
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI MARY HILL, 1354 Wildbriar Drive Liberty, MO 64068, and ROGER B. STICKLER, 459 W. 104 th Street, #C Kansas City, MO 64114, and Case No. MICHAEL J. BRIGGS,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION DAVID ZINK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 12-4209-BP GEORGE LOMBARDI et al., Defendants. SUGGESTIONS IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF
More informationNo United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 09-35860 10/14/2010 Page: 1 of 16 ID: 7508761 DktEntry: 41-1 No. 09-35860 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Kenneth Kirk, Carl Ekstrom, and Michael Miller, Plaintiffs-Appellants
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Ronald John Calzone, Plaintiff-Appellant,
No. 17-2654 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Ronald John Calzone, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald Summers, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District
More informationThomas Jefferson. About The Author Born on April 13, 1743 in Virginia to a wealthy family.
Content Statement Explain a grievance listed in the Declaration of Independence in terms of its relationship to Enlightenment ideas of natural rights and the social contract. The Declaration of Independence
More informationDefendant State of Missouri s Motion to Dismiss
IN CIRCUIT COURT OF MONITEAU COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI RICHARD N. BARRY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CV704-29CC STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., Defendants. Defendant State of Missouri s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA and DARRYL BONNER, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES JUDD, KIMBERLY BOWERS, and DON PALMER,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
and Harry Van Sickle Commissioner of Elections PETITION FOR REVIEW AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND NOW COMES, Petitioner Lawrence M. Otter, individually and as a candidate for Bucks County Court of Common Pleas
More informationIN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT RONALD J. CALZONE AND ) C. MICHAEL MOON, ) ) Appellants, ) ) vs. ) WD82026 ) JOHN R. ASHCROFT, ET AL., ) Opinion filed: September 4, 2018 ) Respondents.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc ) IN THE ESTATE OF: ) Opinion issued January 16, 2018 JOSEPH B. MICKELS ) No. SC96649 ) PER CURIAM APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARION COUNTY The Honorable John J.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : :
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THE STATE OF OHIO ex rel. DANA SKAGGS, et al., v. Plaintiff - Relator, JENNIFER L. BRUNNER SECRETARY OF THE STATE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI RONALD J. CALZONE Plaintiff, vs. Chris Koster, Missosuri Attorney General and Richard Fordyce, Director of the Missouri Department of Agriculture and
More informationSUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. MISSOURI AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION, et al. Plaintiffs/Relators, vs. Case No. NIA RAY, Director, Division No. Missouri Department
More informationMandamus in Election Action
William & Mary Law Review Volume 1 Issue 1 Article 12 Mandamus in Election Action Thomas H. Focht Repository Citation Thomas H. Focht, Mandamus in Election Action, 1 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 107 (1957), http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol1/iss1/12
More informationText of the 1st - 10th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution The Bill of Rights
Text of the 1st - 10th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution The Bill of Rights 1st Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
More informationthereafter Secretary of State Tuesday next after the Four years, from State first Monday in November first day of January
SUBCHAPTER III. ELECTION AND ELECTION LAWS. Article 15. Time of Primaries and Elections. Part 1. Time of Primaries and Elections. 163A-700. Time of regular elections and primaries. (a) Unless otherwise
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE CHEROKEE NATION PETITION CHALLENGING ELECTION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE CHEROKEE NATION IN THE MATTER OF THE 2011 ) GENERAL ELECTION ) Case No. 2011 05 ) PETITION CHALLENGING ELECTION AND APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS Statutory
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY AT KANSAS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY AT KANSAS CITY STATE OF MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. ) Attorney General CHRIS KOSTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) Division: RAVEN THORNHEART, ) An individual,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. vs. L.T. No. 2D06-536
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA JAMES MARION MOORMAN, as attorney for, and next friend of, L.A., a Child, and JAMES CALVIN INGRAM, Petitioners, CASE NO.: SC07-856 vs. L.T. No. 2D06-536 JANIE
More informationPROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS BOARD. United States Constitution Study Guide
PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS BOARD United States Constitution Study Guide Section 21-7-304, Wyoming Statutes, 1969--"All persons hereafter applying for certificates authorizing them to become administrators
More informationPage 1 of 27 7700 East First Place, Denver, Colorado 80230 phone: 303/364-7700 fax: 303/364-7800 www.ncsl.org Succession to Positions of Governor and Lieutenant Governor (Feb. 2009) Alabama Article 5,
More informationAIR Government Test Review U.S. Constitution
AIR Government Test Review U.S. Constitution Principals of the U.S. Constitution Understanding the Constitution as the structure of the U.S. government and the Bill of Rights protecting citizen rights.
More informationFOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN PARTY, INC.; BARRY HESS; PETER SCHMERL; JASON AUVENSHINE; ED KAHN, Plaintiffs, vs. JANICE K. BREWER, Arizona Secretary of State, Defendant.
More informationIN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT HENRY T. HERSCHEL, MATTHEW W. MURPHY and JOHN A. TACKES, v. Respondents, JEREMIAH W. NIXON, JOHN R. WATSON, LAWRENCE G. REBMAN, PETER LYSKOWSKI, THE DIVISION
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TEXAS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TEXAS COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI BRAD JENNINGS Petitioner. v. Case No.: 16TE-CC00470 JEFF NORMAN Respondent. PETITIONER BRAD JENNINGS MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 8817679 Electronically Filed 01/06/2014 10:34:52 AM RECEIVED, 1/6/2014 10:38:32, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BARBARA DEVANE Petitioner, v. HON. RICK
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc RUTH CAMPBELL, ET AL., ) ) Appellants, ) ) vs. ) No. SC94339 ) COUNTY COMMISSION OF ) FRANKLIN COUNTY, ) ) Respondent, ) ) and ) ) UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY, ) d/b/a AMEREN
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (AMENDMENT) BILL, A Bill for. AN ACT of Parliament to amend the Constitution of Kenya
THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2011 A Bill for AN ACT of Parliament to amend the Constitution of Kenya ENACTED by the Parliament of Kenya, as follows Short title. 1. This Act may be cited
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No USDC No. 2:13-cv-00193
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-41126 USDC No. 2:13-cv-00193 IN RE: STATE OF TEXAS, RICK PERRY, in his Official Capacity as Governor of Texas, JOHN STEEN, in his Official
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc WES SHOEMYER, DARVIN BENTLAGE AND RICHARD OSWALD, Plaintiffs, v. No. SC94516 MISSOURI SECRETARY OF STATE JASON KANDER, Defendant. PER CURIAM ORIGINAL PROCEEDING: ELECTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 12 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CHARLES L. RYAN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VS. STEVEN CRAIG JAMES, Petitioner, Respondent. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the
More informationConstitutional Law Spring 2018 Hybrid A+ Answer. Part 1
Constitutional Law Spring 2018 Hybrid A+ Answer Part 1 Question #1 (a) First the Constitution requires that either 2/3rds of Congress or the State Legislatures to call for an amendment. This removes the
More informationConstitution of the Truman State University Student Government
Constitution of the Truman State University Student Government (Last revised Fall 2015 ) TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I: LEGISLATURE Section 1: Legislative Power Section 2: Membership Section 3: Definitions
More informationThe United States Constitution, Amendment 1 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
pg.1 The United States Constitution, Amendment 1 Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE COLORADO REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE
Appellate Case: 18-1173 Document: 010110044958 010110045992 Date Filed: 08/29/2018 08/31/2018 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL BACA, POLLY BACA, and ROBERT NEMANICH,
More informationBoard of Trustees Bylaws
Board of Trustees Bylaws Revised June 16, 2015 Table of Contents Preface... Page 4 Article I. Legal Basis. Page 4 Section 1. Establishment by General Assembly Section 2. Corporate Name Section 3. Office
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. Petitioner, v. NO. S-1-SC On an Original Petition for an Emergency Writ of Mandamus
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL, Petitioner, v. NO. S-1-SC-36422 HON. SUSANA MARTINEZ, Governor of the State of New Mexico, and DOROTHY
More informationNo Sn t~e ~uprem~ (~ourt of the i~tnit~l~
No. 09-154 Sn t~e ~uprem~ (~ourt of the i~tnit~l~ FILED ALIG 2 8 200 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL LOBBYISTS, INC., a Florida Not for Profit Corporation; GUY M. SPEARMAN, III, a Natural Person; SPEARMAN
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR STONE COUNTY, WISCONSIN. Plaintiffs, ) STONE COUNTY MUNICIPAL CLERKS, ) BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR INJUNCTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR STONE COUNTY, WISCONSIN CAREY KLEINMAN, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) STONE COUNTY MUNICIPAL CLERKS, ) WISCONSIN GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD, ) Defendants ) BRIEF IN SUPPORT
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document 995 Filed in TXSD on 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 995 Filed in TXSD on 02/22/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION MARC VEASEY, et al., Plaintiffs, VS. CIVIL
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Cause No. 1822-CR00642-01 v. ) ) Division No. 16 ERIC GREITENS, ) ) Defendant. ) Motion to Intervene
More informationHow to Fill a Vacancy
How to Fill a Vacancy Ventura County Elections Division MARK A. LUNN Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters 800 South Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 9009-00 (805) 654-664 venturavote.org Revised 0//7 Contents
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 08-704 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- TERRELL BOLTON,
More informationCHAPTER 5: CONGRESS: THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
CHAPTER 5: CONGRESS: THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH 1 Section 1: Congress Section 2: The Powers of Congress Section 3: The House of Representative Section 4: The Senate Section 5: Congress At Work SECTION 1: CONGRESS
More informationRules and By-Laws of the Columbia County Republican Party
Rules and By-Laws of the Columbia County Republican Party PO Box 1482, Evans, Georgia 30809 www.ccgagop.org RULES AND BY-LAWS OF COLUMBIA COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I: PURPOSE 3
More informationupreme aurt at tl)e f nite tateg
Nos. 10-367, 10-821 upreme aurt at tl)e f nite tateg ROLAND WALLACE BURRIS, U.S. SENATOR, Petitioner, V. GERALD ANTHONY JUDGE, et al., Respondents. PAT QUINN, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, v. GERALD
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Contestants,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Kenneth L. Simpkins, Esq. SBN: 0 LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH L. SIMPKINS 1-D Village Circle Carlsbad, CA 00 (0 0- Fax ( 1-0 Paul R. Lehto, Esq. SBN LAW OFFICE OF PAUL R. LEHTO P.O. Box Everett,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 06-730 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF WASHINGTON;
More information2018 Visiting Day. Law School 101 Room 1E, 1 st Floor Gambrell Hall. Robert A. Schapiro Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law
Law School 101 Room 1E, 1 st Floor Gambrell Hall Robert A. Schapiro Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Law Robert Schapiro has been a member of faculty since 1995. He served as dean of Emory Law from 2012-2017.
More informationThe Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution. What does the term amend mean?
The Bill of Rights to the United States Constitution What does the term amend mean? The Bill of Rights First ten amendments to the United States Constitution Introduced by James Madison to the First United
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Rel: January 11, 2019 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama
More information2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 11/03/14 Entry Number 27 Page 1 of 13
2:14-cv-04010-RMG Date Filed 11/03/14 Entry Number 27 Page 1 of 13 Colleen Therese Condon and Anne Nichols Bleckley, Plaintiffs, v. Nimrata (Nikki Randhawa Haley, in her official capacity as Governor of
More informationBEFORE THE ETHICS COMMISSION STATE OF MISSOURI
MISSOURI ETHICS COMMISSION, BEFORE THE ETHICS COMMISSION STATE OF MISSOURI Petitioner, v. Case No. 14-0005-I RON CALZONE, Respondent. MOTION TO DISMISS The Commission s case against Respondent, such as
More informationThe Legislative Branch Chapter 10, 11, 12
The Legislative Branch Chapter 10, 11, 12 Though the President is Commander in Chief, Congress is his commander. This is not a Government of kings, but a Government of the people, and Congress is the people.
More informationACADEMIC & STUDENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Wednesday, December 10, 2008
ACADEMIC & STUDENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE Wednesday, December 10, 2008 Item: AS: A-1 SUBJECT: Student Government Constitutional Amendments Proposed Committee Action Approval of the amendments to the Student
More informationBy-Laws of the Colorado Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice
Colorado Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice Last updated April 12, 2013 Maintained by the Division of Criminal Justice of the Colorado Department of Public Safety For the effective operation of
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA 226 Forster Street, Harrisburg, PA 17102-3220 www.palwv.org - 717.234.1576 Making Democracy Work - Grassroots leadership since 1920 CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO PROPOSED
More informationIN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI FIRST DEFENSE
IN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ex rei. ATTORNEY GENERA JIM HOOD v. GOVERNOR HALEY BAROUR PILED PLAITIFF JAN - 9 2008 CIVIL Ar.TTON
More informationCase: 1:10-cv SJD Doc #: 9 Filed: 09/15/10 Page: 1 of 12 PAGEID #: 117
Case 110-cv-00596-SJD Doc # 9 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 12 PAGEID # 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION RALPH VANZANT, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, JENNIFER BRUNNER
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN STUDENT GOVERNMENT PREAMBLE
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN STUDENT GOVERNMENT PREAMBLE Wmaking processes of the University community, to enhance the quality and scope of the student experience at e the students
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION. of the STUDENT ASSEMBLY. of the. COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA Ratified January
THE CONSTITUTION of the STUDENT ASSEMBLY of the COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA Ratified January 20 2003 PREAMBLE We, the Students of the College of William and Mary in Virginia; In order to create
More informationREMEDIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION UNDER THE KENYAN CONSTITUTION OF 2010
REMEDIES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION UNDER THE KENYAN CONSTITUTION OF 2010 By Dr. Mutakha Kangu Presented at An Lsk continuous professional development Seminar, held on 15 th to 16th September, 2016 at
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN February 26, 1999 WILLIAM E. LANDSIDLE, COMPTROLLER OF VIRGINIA
Present: All the Justices MARK L. EARLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA v. Record No. 981552 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN February 26, 1999 WILLIAM E. LANDSIDLE, COMPTROLLER OF VIRGINIA UPON
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc PAUL M. LANG and ALLISON M. BOYER Appellants, v. No. SC94814 DR. PATRICK GOLDSWORTHY, ET AL., Respondents. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY The Honorable
More informationGERALD A. JUDGE, DAVID KINDLER, AND ROLAND W.
No. 10-821 In the Supreme Court of the United States PAT QUINN, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, PETITIONER, GERALD A. JUDGE, DAVID KINDLER, AND ROLAND W. BURRIS, U.S. SENATOR, RESPONDENTS. On Petition
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI, ex rel. ) MISSOURI AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ) ASSOCIATION, ) 3322 American Drive ) Jefferson City, MO 65109, ) ) and ) ) REUTHER FORD, INC., )
More informationIn The Missouri Court of Appeals Western District
In The Missouri Court of Appeals Western District STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL., ) SAMUEL K. LIPARI, ) Relator, ) ) v. ) ) No. THE HONORABLE ) JUDGE MICHAEL W. MANNERS, ) CIRCUIT COURT OF ) JACKSON COUNTY,
More informationTHE FUTURE OF GUINN V. LEGISLATURE
THE FUTURE OF GUINN V. LEGISLATURE Troy L. Atkinson* United States Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson best articulated the human element, giving life to the Nation's Highest Court, when he stated: "We
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEORGIA SHIFT, vs. Plaintiff, GWINNETT COUNTY, FULTON COUNTY, DEKALB COUNTY, and COBB COUNTY, Defendants. Civil
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION HOA ELECTION DISPUTE REGINALD J. KORNEGAY,
More informationANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY STATE OF MISSOURI THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR ) FREEDOM OF THE PRESS et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 14AC-CC00254 ) DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS ) ) Defendant.
More informationAMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The Bill of Rights (Amendments 1-10) Amendment I - Religion, Speech, Assembly, and Politics Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
More informationHome Rule Charter. Approved by Hillsborough County Voters September Amended by Hillsborough County Voters November 2002, 2004, and 2012
Home Rule Charter Approved by Hillsborough County Voters September 1983 Amended by Hillsborough County Voters November 2002, 2004, and 2012 P.O. Box 1110, Tampa, FL 33601 Phone: (813) 276-2640 Published
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 554 U. S. (2008) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 06 984 (08A98), 08 5573 (08A99), and 08 5574 (08A99) 06 984 (08A98) v. ON APPLICATION TO RECALL AND STAY MANDATE AND FOR STAY
More informationTHE NEW JERSEY STATE LEGISLATURE
THE NEW JERSEY STATE LEGISLATURE THE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT The government of the State of New Jersey, like that of the United States, is divided into three coequal branches: the legislative, the executive,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA CRAIG MOORE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Appeal No. A07A0316 ) MARY T. CRANFORD, Judge of the) Coweta County Probate Court, ) ) Appellee ) APPELLANT S BRIEF Appellant Craig
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-3452 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Respondent-Appellant. Appeal From
More informationNOMINATION RULES OF THE ONTARIO LIBERAL PARTY
NOMINATION RULES OF THE ONTARIO LIBERAL PARTY As passed by the Campaign Committee, November 22, 2016, revised on July 20, 2017 and further revised on January 28, 2018. SECTION A AUTHORITY AND INTERPRETATION
More informationCase 1:12-cv MCA-RHS Document 20 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:12-cv-00421-MCA-RHS Document 20 Filed 08/24/12 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO JOHN W. JACKSON and 2ND ) AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )
More informationFlorida Atlantic University Student Government Constitution
Florida Atlantic University Student Government Constitution Preamble We the students of the Florida Atlantic University, in order to form a Student Government that will provide effective representation
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. PD-0596-13 & PD-0624-13 EX PARTE CHARLIE J. GILL, Appellant EX PARTE TOMMY JOHN GILL, Appellant ON APPELLANTS PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE
More informationDEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA PARTY PLAN
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA PARTY PLAN March 7, 2015 Revised September 8, 2018 The Honorable Susan Swecker, Chairwoman 919 East Main Street Suite 2050 Richmond, Virginia 23219 Telephone: (804) 644-1966
More informationWhy a State Should Adopt an Article V Application for A Convention of States if It Has Already Adopted a Balanced Budget Amendment Application
CONVENTIONOFSTATES.COM Why a State Should Adopt an Article V Application for A Convention of States if It Has Already Adopted a Balanced Budget Amendment Application By Michael Farris, JD, LLM Article
More informationS09A1367. FAVORITO et al. v. HANDEL et al. After a Pilot Project was conducted in 2001 pursuant to Ga. L. 2001, pp.
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: September 28, 2009 S09A1367. FAVORITO et al. v. HANDEL et al. CARLEY, Presiding Justice. After a Pilot Project was conducted in 2001 pursuant to Ga. L. 2001, pp.
More informationGUIDE TO PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION DIVISION
GUIDE TO PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION DIVISION Legal Services Table of Contents About the Guide to Proceedings Before the Immigration Division ii, iii Notes and references..iv Chapter 1... POWERS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER
Case 113-cv-00544-RWS Document 16 Filed 03/04/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION THE DEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and DR. EUGENE
More informationCase 6:18-cv AA Document 1 Filed 06/20/18 Page 1 of 10
Case 6:18-cv-01085-AA Document 1 Filed 06/20/18 Page 1 of 10 Christi C. Goeller, OSB #181041 cgoeller@freedomfoundation.com Freedom Foundation P.O. Box 552 Olympia, WA 98507-9501 (360) 956-3482 Attorney
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR ORDER LIFTING STAY INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Chapter 9 Case no. 13-53846 Debtor. Hon. Steven W. Rhodes BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION
More informationCase 2:17-cv MMB Document 34-2 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 217-cv-05137-MMB Document 34-2 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationConstitution. of the. Student Government Association. of the. University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point
Constitution of the Student Government Association of the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Votes Required for Action Type of Action Pass a resolution Authorize an official letter Vote Required Majority
More informationVIRGINIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY PLAN 1
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA VIRGINIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY PLAN February 18, 2008 The Honorable C. Richard Cranwell, State Chair 1108 E. Main Street, Second Floor Richmond, Virginia 23219 Telephone: (804)
More informationIN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT
IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ANDREW THOMPSON, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2007-EC-01989 CHARLES LEWIS JONES APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL
More information