ADVISING LEGISLATORS ON FEDERALISM. Charles A. Quagliato, Division of Legislative Services NCSL Legislative Summit August 7, 2017
|
|
- Sara Atkinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ADVISING LEGISLATORS ON FEDERALISM Charles A. Quagliato, Division of Legislative Services NCSL Legislative Summit August 7, 2017
2 It is true that the federal structure serves to grant and delimit the prerogatives and responsibilities of the States and the National Government vis-a-vis one another. The allocation of powers in our federal system preserves the integrity, dignity, and residual sovereignty of the States. The federal balance is, in part, an end in itself, to ensure that States function as political entities in their own right. Bond v. United States (Bond I), 564 U.S. 211, 221 (2011).
3 Federalism, central to the constitutional design, adopts the principle that both the National and State Governments have elements of sovereignty the other is bound to respect. See Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012); Gregory v. Ashcroft, 501 U.S. 452 (1991); U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995) (Kennedy, J., concurring).
4 From the existence of two sovereigns follows the possibility that laws can be in conflict or at crosspurposes. The Supremacy Clause provides a clear rule that federal law shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any state to the Contrary notwithstanding. Art. VI, cl. 2. Under this principle, Congress has the power to pre-empt state law. Arizona, 567 U.S. at ; See Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363, 372 (2000); Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824).
5 There is no doubt that Congress may withdraw specified powers from the States by enacting a statute containing an express pre-emption provision. Arizona, 567 U.S. at 399; see, e.g., Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. Whiting, 563 U.S. 582, 592 (2011).
6 State law must also give way to federal law in two other circumstances. First, the States are precluded from regulating conduct in a field that Congress, acting within its proper authority, has determined must be regulated by its exclusive governance. See Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Ass n, 505 U.S. 88, 115 (1992) (Souter, J. dissenting). The intent to displace state law altogether can be inferred from a framework of regulation so pervasive... that Congress left no room for the States to supplement it or where there is a federal interest... so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218, 230 (1947); see English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72, 79 (1990).
7 Second, state laws are pre-empted when they conflict with federal law. This includes cases where compliance with both federal and state regulations is a physical impossibility, and those instances where the challenged state law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress. Arizona, 567 U.S. at 399, 400 (2012) (quoting Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul, 373 U.S. 132, (1963); Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 (1940)); see also Crosby, 530 U.S. at 373 ( What is a sufficient obstacle is a matter of judgment, to be informed by examining the federal statute as a whole and identifying its purpose and intended effects ).
8 In pre-emption analysis, courts should assume that the historic police powers of the States are not superseded unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress. Rice, 331 U.S at 230; see Wyeth v. Levine, 555 U.S. 555, 565 (2009).
9 1) Express Pre-Emption Provision 2) Exclusive Governance - intent to displace state law altogether so that there s no room for the States to supplement it 3) Conflict with Federal Law compliance is a physical impossibility or is an obstacle to the purposes and objectives of Congress But historic powers of States not superseded unless that was the clear purpose of Congress.
Preemptive Effect of the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act
Preemptive Effect of the Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act The Bill Emerson G ood Samaritan Food Donation Act preem pts state good Samaritan statutes that provide less protection from civil
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 12-884 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF ALABAMA
More informationState of Arizona v. United States of America: The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on SB 1070
FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM State of Arizona v. United States of America: The Supreme Court Hears Arguments on SB 1070 Introduction In its lawsuit against the state of Arizona, the United
More informationAssociate Justice of the Supreme Court of the
Antonin Scalia Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America One of the most troublesome complexities of a federal system is the necessity of deciding upon the separate competencies
More informationThreading the Needle: State Immigration-Related Employment Laws Surviving a Federal Preemption Analysis
Wyoming Law Review Volume 12 Number 1 Article 12 2012 Threading the Needle: State Immigration-Related Employment Laws Surviving a Federal Preemption Analysis Christopher M. Sherwood Follow this and additional
More informationCase 1:13-cv NT Document 61 Filed 02/23/15 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 806 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 1:13-cv-00347-NT Document 61 Filed 02/23/15 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 806 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE CHARLES OUELLETTE, AMELIA ARNOLD, MAINE PHARMACY ASSOCIATION, MAINE SOCIETY OF
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 11-182 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF ARIZONA
More informationArizona v. United States: A Limited Role for States in Immigration Enforcement
Arizona v. United States: A Limited Role for States in Immigration Enforcement Kate M. Manuel Legislative Attorney Michael John Garcia Actg Section Research Manager/ Legislative Attorney September 10,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV /03/2012 HONORABLE MICHAEL D. GORDON
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Filed *** SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA HONORABLE MICHAEL D. GORDON CLERK OF THE COURT M. MINKOW Deputy WHITE MOUNTAIN HEALTH CENTER INC JEFFREY S KAUFMAN v. COUNTY OF
More informationGADE, DIRECTOR, ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v. NATIONAL SOLID WASTES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
88 OCTOBER TERM, 1991 Syllabus GADE, DIRECTOR, ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v. NATIONAL SOLID WASTES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh
More informationDEFENDING OTHER PARTIES IN THE CHAIN OF DISTRIBUTION
DEFENDING OTHER PARTIES IN THE CHAIN OF DISTRIBUTION Publication DEFENDING OTHER PARTIES IN THE CHAIN OF DISTRIBUTION July 16, 2009 On March 4, 2009, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated
More informationMarch 2, Re: Corporations -- Savings and Loan Associations -- Preemption of State Code by Federal Law
March 2, 1983 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 83-26 Marvin S. Steinert Savings and Loan Commissioner Room 220 503 Kansas Avenue Topeka, Kansas 66603 Re: Corporations -- Savings and Loan Associations -- Preemption
More informationJournal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary Volume 26 Issue 2 Article 8 10-15-2006 Finding a Compromise: The Struggle Between Federal Regulation and State Sovereignty - Analyzing
More informationNos & IN THE Supreme Court of the United States
Nos. 14-614 & 14-623 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States W. KEVIN HUGHES, ET AL., Petitioners, v. PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC, ET AL., Respondents. CPV MARYLAND, LLC, Petitioner, v. PPL ENERGYPLUS, LLC,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Rel: December 14, 2018 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama
More informationNo IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. ARIZONA, et al., UNITED STATES,
No. 11-182 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ARIZONA, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BRIEF
More informationSafety National Casualty Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 587 F.3d 714 (5th Cir. 2010)
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Safety National Casualty Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 587 F.3d 714 (5th Cir. 2010) I. INTRODUCTION The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOUISE CLARK, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-00-jls-wvg Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LOUISE CLARK, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff,
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case:0-cv-0-SBA Document Filed0//0 Page of 0 0 MICHAEL F. HERTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney ARTHUR R. GOLDBERG Assistant Branch Director JOEL McELVAIN,
More informationNo IN THE Supreme Court of the United States. ALFRED GOBEILLE, in His Official Capacity as Chair of the Vermont Green Mountain Care Board,
No. 14-181 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ALFRED GOBEILLE, in His Official Capacity as Chair of the Vermont Green Mountain Care Board, v. Petitioner, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
More informationIN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS. No CV
1 of 7 3/22/2007 8:39 AM Send this document to a colleague Close This Window IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-04-00144-CV STEVEN S. TUROFF, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROMEDCO RECOVERY TRUST, Appellant v. JACK
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 555 U. S. (2009) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 06 1249 WYETH, PETITIONER v. DIANA LEVINE ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT [March 4, 2009] JUSTICE THOMAS, concurring
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 17-230 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2017 Alice IVERS, v. Petitioner, WESTERLY PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationFacts About Federal Preemption
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER Facts About Federal Preemption How to analyze whether state and local initiatives are an unlawful attempt to enforce federal immigration law or regulate immigration Introduction
More informationNo. CV NCA (ABCx) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. NATIONAL MEAT PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee
No. CV 11-55440 NCA (ABCx) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT NATIONAL MEAT PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, Appellee v. COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS
More informationAT&T MOBILITY L.L.C. V. CONCEPCION: THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST PREEMPTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FAA
AT&T MOBILITY L.L.C. V. CONCEPCION: THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST PREEMPTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FAA INTRODUCTION Beginning in 1984 with Southland Corp. v. Keating, 1 the United States
More informationState Legalization of Recreational Marijuana: Selected Legal Issues
State Legalization of Recreational Marijuana: Selected Legal Issues Todd Garvey Legislative Attorney Brian T. Yeh Legislative Attorney January 13, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT. v. ) Case No
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TWELFTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR APPELLEE State of Franklin, ) Appellant, ) ) ) v. ) Case No. 16-02345 Electricity Producers Coalition Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 Table
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 WO ARIZONA CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC., an Arizona nonprofit corporation; ARIZONA EMPLOYERS FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM, INC., an Arizona non-profit corporation; CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED
More informationFederal Preemption and the Bankruptcy Code: At what Point does State Law Cease to Apply during the Claims Allowance Process?
Federal Preemption and the Bankruptcy Code: At what Point does State Law Cease to Apply during the Claims Allowance Process? 2017 Volume IX No. 14 Federal Preemption and the Bankruptcy Code: At what Point
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: January 15, 2003 Decided: August 1, 2003)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2002 (Argued: January 15, 2003 Decided: August 1, 2003) CLEAN AIR MARKETS GROUP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Docket Nos. 02-7519, 02-7569 GEORGE
More informationUnited States District Court
Case:0-cv-0-TEH Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 DAN VALENTINE, et al., v. NEBUAD, INC., et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, Defendants. NO. C0-0
More informationNew Federal Initiatives Project. Executive Order on Preemption
New Federal Initiatives Project Executive Order on Preemption By Jack Park* September 4, 2009 The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies www.fed-soc.org Executive Order on Preemption On May
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 529 U. S. (2000) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 98 1811 ALEXIS GEIER, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC., ET AL. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationState Power to Regulate Immigration: Searching for a Workable Standard in Light of United States v. Arizona and Keller v.
Nebraska Law Review Volume 91 Issue 2 Article 7 2012 State Power to Regulate Immigration: Searching for a Workable Standard in Light of United States v. Arizona and Keller v. City of Fremont Christopher
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 13-516 In the Supreme Court of the United States THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, TEXAS, Petitioner, v. VILLAS AT PARKSIDE PARTNERS, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United
More informationPre-Emption of Local Rent Control Laws by HUD Regulation
Fordham Law Review Volume 45 Issue 3 Article 7 1976 Pre-Emption of Local Rent Control Laws by HUD Regulation Mary Anne Wirth Recommended Citation Mary Anne Wirth, Pre-Emption of Local Rent Control Laws
More informationChamber of Commerce v. Whiting: A Law Student's Freewheeling Inquiry
Volume 58 Issue 6 Tolle Lege Article 3 5-1-2014 Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting: A Law Student's Freewheeling Inquiry Laura E. Ploeg Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr
More informationA Study in Judicial Sleight of Hand: Did Geier v. American Honda Motor Co. Eradicate the Presumption Against Preemption?
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 17 Issue 1 Article 2 5-1-2002 A Study in Judicial Sleight of Hand: Did Geier v. American Honda Motor Co. Eradicate the Presumption Against Preemption?
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-35262 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSHUA CALEB BOHMKER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF OREGON, et al., Defendants-Appellees, ROGUE RIVERKEEPER, et al.,
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiff White Mountain Health Center, Inc. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
0 0 Ezekiel R. Edwards (pro hac vice admission pending Emma A. Andersson (pro hac vice admission pending Criminal Law Reform Project American Civil Liberties Union Broad St, th Floor New York, NY 000 Telephone:
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 12-1429 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- IMAD BAKOSS, M.D.,
More informationCase 1:13-cv NT Document 57 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 761 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 1:13-cv-00347-NT Document 57 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 23 PageID #: 761 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE CHARLES OUELLETTE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) Civil No. 1:13-cv-00347-NT
More informationTohono O odham Nation v. City of Glendale, 804 F.3d 1292 (9th Cir. 2015)
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2015-2016 Tohono O odham Nation v. City of Glendale, 804 F.3d 1292 (9th Cir. 2015) Kathryn S. Ore University of Montana - Missoula, kathryn.ore@umontana.edu
More informationJournal of Dispute Resolution
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 1989 Issue Article 12 1989 Sour Lemon: Federal Preemption of Lemon Law Regulations of Informal Dispute Settlement Mechanisms - Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association
More informationAn Empirical Study of Obstacle Preemption in the Supreme Court
Nebraska Law Review Volume 89 Issue 4 Article 3 8-2011 An Empirical Study of Obstacle Preemption in the Supreme Court Gregory M. Dickinson Ropes & Gray, LLP, Boston, MA, greg.dickinson@ropesgray.com Follow
More informationNo In the Supreme Court of the United States. NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
No. 10-224 In the Supreme Court of the United States NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the
More informationDeciding Who Decides: Searching for a Deference Standard When Agencies Preempt State Law
From the SelectedWorks of John R Ablan March 1, 2013 Deciding Who Decides: Searching for a Deference Standard When Agencies Preempt State Law John R Ablan Available at: https://works.bepress.com/john_ablan/1/
More informationCase No. CV NCA (ABCx) United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit
Case No. CV 11-55440 NCA (ABCx) United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit NATIONAL MEAT PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, COMMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 06-1249 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States WYETH, v. DIANA LEVINE, Petitioner, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Vermont BRIEF OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER
More informationIn the Morris Tyler Moot Court of Appeals at Yale
No. 12-71 In the Morris Tyler Moot Court of Appeals at Yale ------------- ------------ ARIZONA, et al., Petitioners, v. THE INTER TRIBAL COUNCIL OF ARIZONA, INC., et al., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
More informationNO IN THE. NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, et al., Respondents.
NO. 10-224 IN THE NATIONAL MEAT ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, et al., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BRIEF FOR AMICI CURIAE
More informationECRA and the Bankruptcy Code
Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume 35 Voting Rights Symposium New Jersey's Environmental Cleanup Recovery Act (ECRA) Symposium January 1989 ECRA and the Bankruptcy Code Brian
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc JODIE NEVILS, APPELLANT, vs. No. SC93134 GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INC., and ACS RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., RESPONDENTS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY Honorable
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed 7/31/08 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO et al., D050333 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SAN DIEGO NORML et
More informationCase: 3:13-cv wmc Document #: 12 Filed: 07/30/13 Page 1 of 14
Case: 3:13-cv-00291-wmc Document #: 12 Filed: 07/30/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DUSTIN WEBER, v. Plaintiff, GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES,
More informationMinnesota s Climate Change Laws: Are They Unconstitutional? North Dakota Thinks So. William Mitchell College of Law March 14, 2012
Minnesota s Climate Change Laws: Are They Unconstitutional? North Dakota Thinks So William Mitchell College of Law March 14, 2012 Minnesota Climate Change Laws 216H.03 prohibits (1) new coal plants (2)
More informationNo Alice IVERS, Petitioner, v. WESTERLY PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Respondent
No. 17-230 Alice IVERS, Petitioner, v. WESTERLY PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Respondent On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Circuit BRIEF FOR PETITIONER Counsel for Respondent
More informationChevron's Sliding Scale in Wyeth v. Levine, 129 S. Ct (2009)
Harvard University From the SelectedWorks of Gregory M Dickinson Summer 2010 Chevron's Sliding Scale in Wyeth v. Levine, 129 S. Ct. 1187 (2009) Gregory M Dickinson, Harvard Law School Available at: https://works.bepress.com/gregory_dickinson/4/
More informationNo FRANCIS J. FARINA, Petitioner, NOKIA, INC., et al., Respondents.
No. 10-1064. Supreme Court, U.S. FILED I,R 2 8 2011 FRANCIS J. FARINA, Petitioner, V. NOKIA, INC., et al., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE DEFENDANTS I. INTRODUCTION
The Honorable Richard A. Jones IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 1 CITY OF SEATTLE, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. No. -cv-00raj BRIEF OF
More informationTOXIC AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES LITIGATION
I suggest the following simple ten ways to avoid malpractice in litigation: TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES LITIGATION October 2012 IN THIS ISSUE This article gives a brief overview of the history of the
More information1 Christopher S. Wren, Votes on Marijuana Are Stirring Debate, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 17, 1996,
DUAL SOVEREIGNTY PREEMPTION CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS LOCAL ZONING BAN ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES. City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc., 300 P.3d 494
More informationCase 3:18-cv RJB Document 129 Filed 08/16/18 Page 1 of 25. The Honorable Robert J. Bryan 7
Case :-cv-000-rjb Document Filed 0// Page of The Honorable Robert J. Bryan UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 0 LIGHTHOUSE RESOURCES INC., et al., Plaintiffs, and BNSF
More informationCon law Outline Basic Formula for Analysis: -- Make flow chart for each test Overview C. Congress s Authority
Con law Outline Basic Formula for Analysis: -- Make flow chart for each test Is the federal statute within the federal legislative power? If so, Does it offend individual rights? Overview A. Article 1,
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 09-115 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., Petitioners, v. MICHAEL B. WHITING, et al., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States
More informationThe New Presumption Against Preemption
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Law Faculty Scholarly Articles Law Faculty Publications 5-2010 The New Presumption Against Preemption Mary J. Davis University of Kentucky College of Law, mjdavis@uky.edu
More information2017 CO 98. No. 13SC128 Fuentes-Espinoza v. People Alien Smuggling Field Preemption Conflict Preemption.
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- THE STATE OF ARIZONA,
More informationUnmasking the Presumption in Favor of Preemption
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Law Faculty Scholarly Articles Law Faculty Publications Summer 2002 Unmasking the Presumption in Favor of Preemption Mary J. Davis University of Kentucky College of Law,
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 11-182 In The Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF ARIZONA and JANICE K. BREWER, Governor of the State of Arizona, in her official capacity, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
More informationPunitive Damage Award Against Nuclear Power Company Threatens Exclusivity of Federal Control: Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
Boston College Law Review Volume 26 Issue 3 Number 3 Article 4 5-1-1985 Punitive Damage Award Against Nuclear Power Company Threatens Exclusivity of Federal Control: Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp. Guy V.
More informationRegulation and the US Intergovernmental System. Lori A. Brainard Associate Professor Director, MPA Program Trachtenberg School of PPPA
Regulation and the US Intergovernmental System Lori A. Brainard Associate Professor Director, MPA Program Trachtenberg School of PPPA 1 A Mosaic of Government Actors Nearly 90,000 governments in the U.
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 08-1314 In the Supreme Court of the United States DELBERT WILLIAMSON, ET AL., v. Petitioners, MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC., ET AL., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the California Court of Appeal,
More informationCr. No IN THE STATE OF FLORIDINA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION THREE JEFFREY WILLIAMS, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDINA,
Cr. No. 08-1028 IN THE STATE OF FLORIDINA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION THREE JEFFREY WILLIAMS, v. Appellant THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDINA, Respondent ON APPEAL FROM THE STATE OF FLORIDINA DISTRICT
More informationViva! International v. Adidas: Preemption in the Realm of Endangered Species Protection
Viva! International v. Adidas: Preemption in the Realm of Endangered Species Protection Amanda Pearson* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 299 I. STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATION OF KANGAROOS... 300 II. VIVA!
More informationFrom the SelectedWorks of Colin Miller. August, 2007
From the SelectedWorks of Colin Miller August, 2007 Manifest Destiny?: How Some Courts Have Fallaciously Come To Require A Greater Showing Of Congressional Intent For Jurisdictional Exhaustion Than They
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 11-182 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF ARIZONA AND JANICE K. BREWER, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION OPINION AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE OCWEN FEDERAL BANK FSB 1 MORTGAGE SERVICING LITIGATION 1 1 Honorable Charles R. Norgle CHARLES R. NORGLE, District Judge
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
St. John's Law Review Volume 60 Issue 4 Volume 60, Summer 1986, Number 4 Article 6 June 2012 Common Law Claims Challenging Adequacy of Cigarette Warnings Preempted Under the Federal Cigarette Labeling
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 564 U. S. (2011) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE The City of Garden Grove, a Municipal Corporation, Petitioner, v. Orange County Superior Court, Respondent, Felix
More informationLabor Law - Conflict Between State Anti-Trust Law and Collective Bargaining Agreement
Louisiana Law Review Volume 19 Number 4 June 1959 Labor Law - Conflict Between State Anti-Trust Law and Collective Bargaining Agreement Aubrey McCleary Repository Citation Aubrey McCleary, Labor Law -
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 11-182 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- STATE OF ARIZONA
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :0-cv-00-SRB Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Valle del Sol, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, Michael B. Whiting, et al., Defendants. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA No. CV 0-0-PHX-SRB
More informationCase 4:15-cv JSW Document 55 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-jsw Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 TROY WALKER, Plaintiff, v. CONAGRA FOODS, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-jsw ORDER GRANTING MOTION
More informationCase 1:16-cv LY Document 1 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:16-cv-01228-LY Document 1 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION PFIZER, INC v. Plaintiff, TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
More informationRegulation and the US Intergovernmental System. Jed Kee Professor of Public Policy and Public Administration Trachtenberg School of PPPA
Regulation and the US Intergovernmental System Jed Kee Professor of Public Policy and Public Administration Trachtenberg School of PPPA 1 A Mosaic of Government Actors Nearly 90,000 governments in the
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 17-230 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States Alice IVERS, v. WESTERLY PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Petitioner, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the Twelfth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals BRIEF FOR
More informationJournal of Dispute Resolution
Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 1990 Issue 1 Article 9 1990 Consumers Swallow Another Lemon: Agency Consent Order Preemption of State Lemon Law Standards for Informal Dispute Resolution - General
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Jurisdiction Commons
Volume 62 Issue 3 Article 3 9-1-2017 Flying First Class: The Third Circuit Establishes a Methodology for Implied Preemption Analysis of Federal Premarket Approval Regulations in Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive
More informationPreemption and Textualism
Michigan Law Review Volume 112 Issue 1 2013 Preemption and Textualism Daniel J. Meltzer Harvard Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Constitutional
More informationNo UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ALICE IVERS, Petitioner, WESTERLY PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Respondent
No. 17-230 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ALICE IVERS, Petitioner, v. WESTERLY PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Respondent On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Circuit BRIEF OF
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
i No. 11-798 In the Supreme Court of the United States AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., Petitioners, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 530 U. S. (2000) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. State of New Hampshire
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Cheshire-Hillsborough County Jaffrey-Peterborough District Court Nashua District Court State of New Hampshire v. Frederico Barros-Batistele - #05-CR-1474,1475 Wellington Brustolin
More informationBender's Health Care Law Monthly September 1, 2011
Bender's Health Care Law Monthly September 1, 2011 SECTION: Vol. 2011; No. 9 Federal Pre-Emption Under The Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act From Medtronic, Inc. V. Lohr; Pliva, Inc. V. Mensing By Frederick R.
More informationLegislation & Regulation (Section 4) Fall 2013 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, [WCC 1015] SYLLABUS
Legislation & Regulation (Section 4) Fall 2013 Professor Stephenson Wed-Fri 8:20-9:40, [WCC 1015] Course Description: This course is an introduction to lawmaking in the modern administrative state. It
More informationBn t~e ~reme Court of t~e ~lnite~ ~tate~
Nos. 09-435 and 09-445 Bn t~e ~reme Court of t~e ~lnite~ ~tate~ NEW WEST, L.P., ET AL., PETITIONERS ~). CITY OF JOLIET, ILLINOIS, ET AL. TERESA DAVIS, ET AL., PETITIONERS Y. CITY OF JOLIET, ILLINOIS ON
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
NO. 12-884 In the Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF ALABAMA AND ROBERT BENTLEY, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On Petition
More information