Differential Turnout, Quality Challengers, and Party Differences in House Elections in the 1990s

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Differential Turnout, Quality Challengers, and Party Differences in House Elections in the 1990s"

Transcription

1 Differential Turnout, Quality Challengers, and Party Differences in House Elections in the 1990s Jamie L. Carson Michigan State University Charles J. Finocchiaro* Michigan State University Eduardo L. Leoni Columbia University David W. Rohde Michigan State University Abstract Extant research on congressional elections attributes changes in the partisan composition of the House of Representatives to familiar variables such as the presence of a quality challenger, campaign spending, incumbent performance, and the underlying strength of the partisan base in each district. To date, however, little systematic attention has been given to the effects of district-level turnout on incumbents electoral fortunes. In this paper, we examine the effect of differential turnout on House elections in the 1990s, with particular attention given to the 1994 and 1998 midterm elections. We employ a dataset including traditional variables, along with data tapping population growth and voter turnout throughout the 1990s. We find that not only is differential turnout an important variable to include in such analyses of congressional elections, but in the context of a more fully specified model, traditional variables such as challenger quality decline in explanatory power, with differences across the two major parties. *Corresponding Author: Department of Political Science, 303 S. Kedzie Hall, East Lansing, MI Phone: ; Fax: ; finocchi@msu.edu. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2001 Annual Convention of the Southern Political Science Association. We thank Jim Campbell, Bob Erikson, Robert Jackson, Michael Martinez, Mark Souva, and the panel participants for helpful comments, and Gary Jacobson for provid ing us with some of the electoral data used in this analysis.

2 Differential Turnout, Quality Challengers, and Party Differences in House Elections in the 1990s Introduction The congressional elections of 1994 ushered in an era of narrow Republican majorities in both the House and the Senate and gave rise to an ongoing struggle for control of each chamber. The new electoral context carried with it some unusual events that caught political pundits, journalists, and academics alike by surprise. In 1994, for instance, the Republicans reclaimed control of the House for the first time in 40 years, in the process defeating 34 Democratic incumbents and losing none of their own. The Republicans maintained control of the House two years later (albeit with a slightly smaller margin) in the face of the reelection of a popular Democratic incumbent president. Interestingly, with the president s coattails presumably withdrawn in 1998, the Democrats actually gained 5 seats at the midterm, the first time since 1934 that the party of the president did not lose seats in an off-year election. In 2000, with the election of a Republican president, the Republicans again held control of the House, but with a slight erosion in the size of their majority. There is a long-standing theory of congressional elections that relates aggregate turnout to electoral outcomes. This theory of surge and decline holds that House candidates of the president s party are advantaged in presidential election years, and then face greater electoral risks in the subsequent mid-term elections. In fact, some might suggest that Republicans were advantaged in 1994 by a decline in turnout among Democratic loyalists, while in 1998 a resurgence in the traditional Democratic base aided Democratic candidates and gave rise to the surprising result. While this sort of explanation conforms to aggregate-level expectations of the

3 surge-and-decline model of congressional elections for 1994 (i.e., the Democrats should have been aided in presidential election years, but hindered in off-year elections), this model does not correspond as closely with the outcome in the 1998 elections. Thus, it seems that a clarification or a more detailed examination of the impact of turnout on each of these elections may shed additional light on this apparent puzzle or paradox in our understanding of electoral patterns in the 1990s. Although the impact of turnout on election outcomes (and Democratic candidates in particular) has received widespread attention in the context of presidential elections (see, e.g., DeNardo 1980, 1986; Tucker and Vedlitz 1986; Radcliff 1994; Nagel and McNulty 1996), we know significantly less about its impact in congressional elections, particularly at the district level. 1 Analyses of congressional elections typically indicate that the alteration in the partisan composition of the House of Representatives can largely be explained by familiar variables such as the strength of the candidate s partisan base, campaign spending, and voters judgments on the performance of incumbents and the president. In our view, however, the election results may also be partially the result of the differential turnout of voters relative to the previous election. While we do not seek to explain completely the electoral outcomes as a result of changes in who chose to vote, we do argue that differential turnout is both a theoretically important aspect for study and potentially a partial explanation of the pattern of outcomes. To address the issue of turnout across congressional elections in the 1990s, we build upon conventional models of congressional elections (see, e.g., Jacobson 1995, 1999a) and incorporate additional variables to account for the role of turnout. In the next section, we briefly review the 1 Some exceptions include Dawson and Zinser (1976) and Cox and Munger (1989). There are, of course, a host of studies that examine the turnout decision at the individual level for presidential, congressional, gubernatorial, and state legislative elections. See Jackson (1996) for a useful review of the general turnout literature. Prominent among the studies of congressional elections are Caldeira, Patterson, and Markko (1985); Gilliam (1985); Jackson (1993); and McDonald and Popkin (2001). 2

4 surge and decline model of House elections before turning to a more general discussion of the role of turnout in congressional elections. Next, we present findings pertaining to the role of turnout and its effect on the two-party vote share for Democratic candidates in the House elections, and contrast these results to those for Republicans in the same period. We then shift our attention to explore more generally the impact of a number of related factors on turnout in each of these elections. We conclude the analysis with implications of our results and possible extensions for future work. Midterm House Elections and Turnout Surge and Decline Theory There are few trends in modern American elections as consistent as the decline in turnout between presidential and midterm elections. The theory of surge and decline posits a higher stimulus for turnout in presidential elections resulting from increased interest and information (Campbell 1985, 1997a). The increased attention given to presidential elections is said to spur voter participation, particularly on the part of those more disposed toward the winning candidate. Thus the short-term conditions favor congressional candidates of the party winning the presidency, who benefit from the participation of non-core voters. The theory suggests that in off years the two parties turn out at a more symmetric level, and the independent vote is more evenly divided between Democratic and Republican candidates. These conditions essentially withdraw the advantage enjoyed by the congressional candidates of the president s party in the previous election, setting the stage for increased seat loss. Campbell (1991) encapsulates surge and decline to hold that a party s presidential vote positively affects the change in its share of votes and seats in presidential election years and 3

5 negatively affects the change in its shares of votes and seats in the following midterm elections (478). Of course, a party s electoral performance is likely conditioned upon how its current standing compares with that of its long-term seat share. For instance, a party that is overexposed, or holds a significantly larger number of seats in contrast to their historical average, may be more likely to suffer at the polls, ceteris paribus. The notion that the relative number of seats held by the two parties in Congress directly influences their electoral fortunes was introduced by Oppenheimer, Stimson, and Waterman (1986) and extended in Waterman, Oppenheimer, and Stimson (1991). The Elections of the 1990s: Declining Turnout and Partisan Advantage The theory of surge and decline detailed by Campbell specifies a general, aggregate-level relationship between presidential and midterm elections, and evidence supports the contention that a party will suffer losses in the midterm in proportion to the influx of partisans in the preceding presidential election. Of course, this effect is not constant across congressional districts. The amount by which turnout declines from a particular presidential election to the successive midterm and the extent to which candidates of each party are affected is likely to vary across districts. For example, there was an obvious shift from 1992 to 1994 in the aggregate division of the vote from favoring the Democrats to favoring the Republicans. While the Democrats in 1992 probably did not receive the degree of on-year surge as might otherwise have been the case, we would argue that there remained a number of reasons to expect a poor electoral showing (and off-year seat loss) for the Democratic party in the House. 2 We suggest 2 Democratic candidates in 1992 likely did not experience a normal gain in votes and seats in fact, Republicans gained ten seats in the House due to the Perot candidacy, pro-gop redistricting, and the anti-incumbency mood (see Campbell 1993: ). However, we argue that it is still reasonable to link the poor Democratic showing in 4

6 that a component of this aggregate-level change resulted from differential reductions in the voting coalitions of the two parties across the districts held by Democratic incumbents. 3 More specifically, due to these types of factors, and other short-term forces that could be mentioned, we argue that the electoral environment of 1994 was tilted against Democratic candidates. For those who voted Democratic in 1992, became dissatisfied with the party, and viewed the Republican as an acceptable alternative, there was a straightforward option: they could switch their votes to the GOP candidate. However, for those who did not like the Republican candidate, another option was available: they could abstain altogether. Thus, we would expect that the greater the decline in turnout in a district from 1992 to 1994, the greater the damage to the Democratic incumbent in The case of 1998 presents a different picture from what we observed in The party of the president actually fared better at the midterm, with the president s party gaining seats for the first time in 64 years. Unlike four years earlier, Clinton s approval ratings remained high in 1998, the economy was strong, and there were few vulnerable Democratic incumbents (Jacobson 1999a). This resulted in a situation where the Republicans were put on the defensive, despite the traditional pattern of seat gain for the opposition party. The narrow balance in the House and the fact that neither political party seemed to have much of an advantage going into the election led to enhanced efforts to stimulate turnout on the part of the parties and allied interest groups. For the Democrats in particular, unions such as the AFL-CIO made a concerted effort to mobilize their members to turn out and vote for Democratic candidates. 4 In contrast to 1994, it appears 1994 to reduced turnout in that the president s approval rating remained low, the public s assessment of Congress was even poorer, and unified government offered a focal point for Republican counterattacks. 3 Some ideas presented in this paper are related to earlier work in Orme and Rohde (1995). 4 The AFL-CIO s change in strategy from a focus on television advertising in 1994 to grass-roots mobilization in 1998 had a significant impact in increasing the union vote as a percentage of the electorate (Abramson, Aldrich, and Rohde 1999: ). 5

7 that the Democrats (as opposed to Republicans) may have been aided by asymmetric turnout in the 1998 midterm elections. The decline in turnout was likely not uniform across districts and the result was perhaps an aggregate gain for Democrats in general (Abramson, Aldrich, and Rohde 1999: 258). Contextual Factors and Voter Mobilization The general disadvantage to the president s party in the midterm House elections attributed to declining turnout could be affected (either mitigated or worsened) by other factors. For one, turnout itself could be influenced by the electoral context in a particular district. There are three such factors that we deal with here. The first is the impact of a state-wide competitive election. In much the same way that presidential races draw marginal voters with limited political interest into the electorate, major state-wide races could have a similar (albeit less pronounced) impact if they are visible and closely contested. Such contests in midterm years could encourage potential voters who would otherwise abstain to participate, thereby leading to additional votes being cast concurrently in the House races. The effect of this variable is likely to be most pronounced in those districts where the congressional election is not particularly competitive and the incentive to abstain is highest. 5 The second and third contextual factors we seek to account for are related to the electoral impact of two significant segments of the electorate that are influenced by underlying ideological and economic interests: the Christian Right and union members. The level of electoral participation among those associated with the Christian Right has increased substantially since the mid-1980s (Green, Guth, and Wilcox 1995). The electoral effects and partisan impact of the 5 Indeed, Nicholson and Miller (1997) demonstrate that prior beliefs about the competitiveness of an election significantly impact voter turnout. 6

8 Christian Right took a significant step forward in the 1994 election. The distribution of voter guides and the active recruitment of candidates on the part of the Christian Coalition and other allied organizations were aimed at both stimulating turnout among conservative Christians and affecting their choices of candidates. Thus, we suggest that both turnout effects and direct impact on voters choices should be linked with those locales where the Christian Right had a significant presence. More specifically, we would expect that where the Christian Right was strong and effective, voting among their supporters should have been stimulated. This would likely result both in some new voters that abstained in the preceding presidential election deciding to vote (thereby mitigating the decline in turnout from 1992) and shifting the choices of some former Democratic voters to Republican House candidates. In a similar fashion, organized labor likely had an impact on turnout, particularly as the decade passed. In response to a weak showing on the part of union members in 1994, labor redoubled their efforts in 1996 and As we mentioned above, they shifted their strategy to one of grass-roots mobilization and voter education campaigns (Jacobson 1999b), and this change in strategy provided a boost to Democrats just as Republicans were advantaged in 1994 (though the magnitude of the effect in 1994 was apparently greater). Understanding the Democratic Vote in the House Elections The data for this segment of our analysis consists of all Democratic incumbents running for reelection in the 1994, 1996, 1998, and 2000 congressional elections. We exclude representatives from the state of Louisiana because of the unusual mixed primary-general election system that governs this state s congressional races. For the sake of comparison, we 7

9 also exclude Democratic incumbents who ran unopposed in either the current or previous election since their electoral margins were inflated by the lack of an opposition party candidate. 6 Building upon previous work that examines congressional elections in the 1990s (see, e.g., Jacobson 1995; Jacobson 1999a), our dataset incorporates the usual predictors of congressional election outcomes commonly employed by Jacobson and other congressional election scholars: the Democratic share of the two-party House vote in the previous election, the average Democratic share of the presidential vote in the congressional district in the two previous presidential elections (as a proxy for the political preferences of the constituency), the log of incumbent and challenger campaign spending, 7 and challenger quality (measured dichotomously and coded one if the challenger has previously held elected office and zero otherwise). These variables will establish a baseline from which we can assess whether the turnout-related variables provide additional explanatory power. To this set we add four additional explanatory variables: change in turnout from one election to the next, the presence of a competitive state-wide election, the union membership percentage for each state, and the Christian Right influence within the state Republican Party. Change in turnout is measured as the decline (or increase) in turnout from one election cycle to the next. 8 During midterm elections, we should generally expect turnout across congressional districts to decline whereas we should observe increases during presidential election years. The variable indicating the presence of a competitive state-race is measured dichotomously, coded one if either the gubernatorial or Senate race in the state during the election year was won by 10 6 Note that we do not consider Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, as a Democrat for the purposes of our analysis even though he regularly caucuses with the Democratic Party. 7 The log of incumbent and challenger campaign spending is used in order to transform the data to fit a diminishing marginal returns curve. Following Jacobson (1980), we assume that all challengers and incumbents spent at least 5,000 dollars, as any amount under this figure need not be reported to the Federal Election Commission. 8 See Appendix A for a discussion of the way in which turnout was extrapolated across the 1990s. The appendix also includes sources for each of the variables included in our analysis. 8

10 percent or less of the two-party vote. The union membership variable captures the percentage of individuals within each state who are members of a union. Finally, the Christian Right variable is dichotomous, coded one if the state Republican Party is viewed as being dominated by the Christian Right and zero otherwise (Persinos 1995). Obviously, a dummy variable is not the most desirable way in which one might capture the impact of such a dynamic. It would be preferable to have membership data similar to that of unions, but since such data is not available, the approach we adopt seems to be the best alternative. We return to the potential limitations of this variable later in our discussion. 9 Table 1 presents the results of the regression analyses examining the impact of the above factors on Democratic incumbent vote share in the 1994 through 2000 House elections. All of the conventional variables included in models of congressional elections are significant and in the predicted direction across all elections except challenger quality (which is negative and insignificant). 10 Additionally, the four turnout-related variables we introduced yield notable and varying effects on Democratic vote share in each of the elections. Following from the theory of surge and decline, which considers aggregate-level changes in turnout, we expect that changes in turnout are also important at the individual or district level. That is, the effect of changes in turnout is likely to differentially impact Democratic incumbents depending on the degree to which turnout declined in their particular districts. In line with our expectations, we observe that the change in turnout from 1992 to 1994 yields a significant effect 9 We were able to obtain from the Christian Coalition the actual number of voter guides distributed in various geographic areas in the 1994 election. While this data was usually reported at the congressional district level, there were some cases in which it was reported only at the state level (e.g., California, Florida, Illinois) and one case where it was not reported at all (New York). While we estimated the models with various operationalizations of the voter guide data, for the reasons stated above, the results were mixed and no one specification was free from unrealistic assumptions. 10 Previous research holds that incumbent spending should either be negative or have an insignificant effect on incumbent vote share (see Jacobson 1980). In this case, it is either negative or insignificant (or both) across the election years. 9

11 on Democratic incumbents vote shares. A decline in turnout, which occurred in every Democratic district, led to a corresponding decrease in electoral performance. Substantively speaking, the magnitude of the variable is not enormous, however neither is it inconsequential. Consider, for instance, the case of Rep. David Price (D-NC), in whose district turnout declined 25% from 1992 to The result of this decline was a 3½% decrease in his vote share (ceteris paribus), which in tandem with other factors (such as the strong Christian Right presence in North Carolina and the underlying partisanship of his district) led to his surprising defeat. 11 In addition, the turnout effects in 1994 were likely more pronounced due to the prominent influence of the Christian Right on the Republican Party apparatus in numerous states. On the other hand, in those cases where there was a competitive statewide race, Democratic incumbents seem to have benefited in that such races seem to have tempered the traditional decline in turnout occurring in midterm elections. << Insert Table 1 Here >> In 1996, the change in turnout among voters had an insignificant effect on Democratic incumbents vote share. This is not surprising, however, given that turnout among members of both major parties likely increased significantly in contrast to the preceding midterm election. Interestingly, however, the differential change in turnout from the 1996 to the 1998 election was also insignificant in its effect on Democratic incumbents vote shares. Unlike 1994, where the Democrats had unified control of government (including both chambers of Congress and the Presidency), Republicans held control of Congress in Democratic voters who were 11 See Price (2000) for his own interpretation of the unforeseen electoral defeat, which he also attributes in large part to the changing electorate. 10

12 dissatisfied in 1994 were faced with a difficult choice at the polls many probably found voting for the opposition party an unpalatable alternative, so the appeal of abstaining was probably greater than would ordinarily be the case. In 1998, the situation was quite different, in that there was a target for their attention the majority Republicans in Congress. Thus, it may well be the case that the type of effects resulting from differential turnout that we observed in 1994 may be particular to those instances in which one party is the focal point of attention in government. Additionally, it seems that variation in the composition of the electorate also benefited Democrats in Although turnout was lower this year than in any national election since World War II, it appears that the composition of the electorate was such that traditionally Democratic voters made up a greater proportion of the electorate than was the case in In fact, some have suggested that Democrats benefited from asymmetric turnout in 1998 in a similar manner as did Republicans in 1994, though not enough for them to recapture control of the House. One gauge of the changing composition of the electorate is the degree to which it was made up of union households, and by this standard most observers note an increase in participation on the part of this segment of the population. 12 The models for 1996 and 1998 do not suggest significant effects for the presence of a dominant Christian Right influence over the state Republican Party or union membership at the state level, although their impact on vote share is in the predicted direction. We did, however, perform joint-f tests to determine whether the variables exhibited a jointly significant impact on the dependent variable in both elections. Interestingly, we find that in both 1996 and 1998, the 12 It is difficult to discern exactly the change in union voting from 1994 to 1998 in that the Voter News Service altered the wording of this question in their exit polling beginning in While it appears as though there was an increase regardless of the question wording, the extent of the change attributable to this difference is difficult to ascertain (Morin 1998; Abramson, Aldrich, and Rohde 1999: 259). 11

13 variables together offer a statistically significant improvement in the fit of the model when contrasted with the baseline model that does not include them in the estimation. 13 Once again, turnout is insignificant in the 2000 election, probably for the same reason it was in As we saw in 1996, the presence of a competitive statewide race increased the vote share for Democratic incumbents in 2000, even in the context of the presidential election. Additionally, both the Christian Right and Union membership variables exert a significant influence on the Democrats vote share. Interestingly, however, the effect of union membership is in a negative direction, perhaps indicating some underlying dynamic about those states where labor union membership was proportionally higher. That is, it is likely not the case that union members defected wholesale from Democratic candidates in 2000, but rather that something else influenced the results in those states with higher levels of union membership. 14 Republican Electoral Fortunes in the House Elections To examine party-specific differences in electoral fortunes based on the above factors, we run a parallel analysis on Republican incumbents seeking reelection. Table 2 presents the results of the regression analyses examining the effects of these factors on Republican incumbent vote share in the 1994 through 2000 House elections. 15 Most notably, nearly all of the supplementary variables we include in our analysis across elections fail to meet conventional levels of statistical significance. With the exception of the change in turnout 13 The joint F-test allows for a comparison between the F-statistics of a constrained and an unconstrained regression model. The ratio between the two is compared to a critical F-value, which if exceeded indicates a significant loss of explanatory power by excluding the variables of interest. The F-statistic for 1996 is 3.68, which allows us to reject the null of no impact at p = Similarly, for 1998 we can say with 95% confidence that the two variables exert a significant effect. 14 In 2000, union households made up 27% of the electorate, splitting in favor of the Democratic candidate. In contrast, non-union households (73% of the electorate) split in favor of the Democratic candidate (Voter News Service). 15 As before, we exclude Republican incumbents who ran unopposed in either the current or previous election since their electoral margins would be inflated by the lack of an opposition party candidate. 12

14 variable in the 1994 elections and the Christian Right variable in the 2000 elections (both of which are only marginally significant), none of the other variables we include offer any additional explanatory power in the election models. This is not wholly unexpected, since it is thought that lower turnout disproportionately affected Democratic candidates in the 1990s (see Abramson, Aldrich, and Rohde 2001: 91). << Insert Table 2 Here >> For the most part, the conventional variables included in models of congressional elections are significant and in the predicted direction. For instance, Republican House candidates do worse in districts the higher the Democratic presidential vote share. Additionally, challenger spending is always negative and significant across the House elections, suggesting (as we would expect) that the more Democratic challengers spend, the smaller the electoral vote share for Republican incumbents (on this point, see especially Jacobson 1980; 2001). Also of interest, we observe that the Republicans vote margin in the previous election is always positive and significant, with the exception of 1994 (in terms of the 1992 elections). One potential explanation for this finding is the fundamental change that occurred in Campbell (1997b: 850) has argued that Republican presidential coattails were wasted in the 1980s, and the full effect of a realignment was not realized until the 1994 House elections. If this was in fact the case, then we should not be surprised to find that elections prior to 1994 offer little help in explaining results in 1994 and after the two series should possess inherent differences. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the analysis of Republican incumbents comes in terms of the challenger quality variable. Whereas this variable failed to reach conventional 13

15 levels of statistical significance for the models of Democratic incumbents, the challenger quality variable is both negative and marginally significant for Republican incumbents in the 1996 (p < 0.06) and 1998 (p < 0.06) elections. In certain respects, this finding is unique in that it suggests that there may be party-specific differences in the impact of this conventional variable on incumbents electoral fortunes. Although the quality of the challenger did not appear to play a significant role in affecting Democratic incumbents electoral margins when controlling for other factors, this is clearly not the case for Republican incumbents running in 1996 and The fact that the challenger quality variable has apparently declined in significance could indicate a number of possibilities. First, this result may be due in part to its inclusion in a more fully specified model. 16 It may be that the existing and additional variables we include encompass the explanatory power of this dichotomous variable, which Jacobson (1989: 776) acknowledges to be a somewhat crude measure. Second, the pattern we observe could be a sign that the measure is not quite as powerful a proxy for quality in the contemporary electoral context, particularly for Republican challengers. While Jacobson (2000) acknowledges that Republicans have been more successful in recruiting candidates that meet his criterion of quality in the 1990s, it may also be the case that the party also recruited candidates who ran highly effective campaigns yet would not be considered quality candidates according to Jacobson s typology. Predicting Turnout in House Elections, To this point, we have focused exclusively on understanding whether changes in turnout, along with other related variables, impacted Democratic incumbent vote share. However, an 16 We thank Bob Erikson for drawing our attention to this potential explanation. While a full examination of this possibility, along with the observed differences between the parties, is beyond the scope of this paper, we are exploring this phenomenon in related work. 14

16 equally important facet of congressional elections involves the factors that influence turnout in House elections. Accordingly, we shift our attention to a related analysis seeking to understand and predict the level of turnout in congressional districts from Our earlier discussion noted three variables that were hypothesized to influence the level of turnout in House elections: the presence of a competitive state-wide race, the Christian Right s dominance of state Republican Party organizations, and the degree of labor union membership in the state. Additionally, we consider the effects of three more variables. The first examines the degree of competitiveness of the House race. Just as competitive presidential and statewide races stimulate voters to participate in elections, we should expect the degree of competitiveness of a House race to yield an analogous, though likely smaller, effect. This effect should be more pronounced during a midterm election due to the absence of a presidential candidate at the top of the ticket. If voters view the outcome of the House race as a foregone conclusion, as has been the case for many House elections since the 1960s, there is less reason for voters to show up at polling places. Thus, we would expect a House race that is regarded as safe for the incumbent to suppress turnout, all else equal. Our measure for this variable is whether Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report rated the race as safe for the incumbent in its last pre-election analysis. We also include the vote share of third-party presidential candidates at the district level for the elections to control for the potential impact of third-party movements in stimulating turnout. For instance, there was a five percentage point increase in voter turnout in 1992 compared to 1988, which may be partially attributable to Perot s presence in the 1992 presidential contest. To a certain extent, Perot gave voice to the frustration of a large number of people, and many of his supporters indicated that they would not have voted if he had not been on the ballot. While we do not have strong theoretical expectations concerning the directionality 15

17 of this variable, it struck us as a potentially important factor to incorporate into the various models of turnout. Thus, we include the vote share received by Perot in the 1992 and 1996 elections for the relevant analyses and the percent of the vote received by Nader in the analysis of turnout in the 2000 elections. Lastly, we control for the level of turnout in the preceding election for each of our four models predicting turnout in the current election. It seems reasonable to expect that higher levels of turnout in one election should be related to higher levels in the subsequent election, after controlling for other factors hypothesized to influence turnout. Turning to the results of our models presented in Table 3, we find that previous turnout is both positive and significant across the four elections (as we would expect). Looking first at 1994, we find that increased vote share for Perot, the presence of a competitive state-wide race, and the degree of union membership all increase turnout at the district level. Conversely, if the race involved an incumbent considered safe, the effect on turnout was negative and significant, just as we would expect. In 1996, once again the vote share for Perot had a positive and significant effect on turnout in the election. On the other hand, we now see that the presence of the Christian Right and the level of union membership statewide yield a negative and significant influence on turnout in Unlike 1994, the competitive-state wide race and safe seat variables do not significantly influence turnout. This is not surprising to us, however, given the already stimulated turnout resulting from the presidential contest. << Insert Table 3 Here >> 16

18 The results of 1998 are similar to those of 1994 except for the fact that the district-wide presidential vote share for Perot is no longer statistically significant and the presence of the Christian Right now exerts a positive and significant influence on turnout in this election. By 2000, we find that the only significant variables are the presence of a competitive statewide race (which is positive and significant) and the Christian Right influence (which is negative and significant). In general, and particularly in midterm elections, the results above suggest that turnout is influenced by a number of contextual factors, many of which have little or nothing to do with the House election. For instance, we found that a prominent independent or third-party candidate could have a significant effect on turnout. Indeed, this seems to have been the case for Perot in 1994, and to a lesser degree in By 1998, however, his effect seems to have nearly dissipated. Similarly, the degree of competitiveness in statewide races also plays a role in influencing turnout beyond what might otherwise occur in House elections. The presence of a competitive statewide campaign reduces information costs for voters since issues come to the forefront of the agenda in campaign discourse (Kahn and Kenney 1999). Thus, we would expect voters to be more likely to get involved in those races where there is a pre-existing incentive for them to participate in the electoral process due to reduced information costs. Finally, there seem to be some mobilization effects on the part of certain socio-economic groups, although they do not appear to be uniform across the elections we consider. In the case of the Christian Right, for example, perhaps this is a function of the operationalization of this variable in our analysis. Future studies may benefit from the inclusion of measures that allow for a closer approximation of the strength of such groups at the state or even the district level. 17

19 Discussion While students of congressional elections have traditionally focused on the effects of factors such as district presidential vote, challenger quality, and campaign spending when analyzing election outcomes at the district level, we offer a modest addition to existing models. In this paper, we have examined the impact of changes in turnout and a number of related variables purported to impact voting behavior such as the presence of a competitive statewide race and the visibility of organized groups and their efforts to mobilize the electorate. We found that, at times, each of these variables offered some degree of explanatory power beyond the traditional variables included in extant research. In particular, our evidence indicates that differential turnout and related factors did have a consequential independent effect on the vote received by Democratic incumbents in In contrast, however, differential turnout did not appear to have a similar effect on Democratic electoral fortunes in This underscores the degree to which 1994 involved a unique set of circumstances that led to an even more unique outcome. Our analysis of Republican incumbents highlighted differences between the parties, both in terms of the turnout-related variables we included and the role of challenger quality in affecting incumbents electoral fortunes. Given the limited scholarly attention to turnout in congressional elections as compared to presidential contests, we also sought to explore the impact of a number of related variables in predicting turnout across congressional districts in the elections. In particular, we found that certain contextual factors such as the competitiveness of the race, the presence of a competitive state-wide race, the electoral showing of a third-party presidential candidate, and efforts at mobilization by labor unions played a role in affecting voter turnout. While these results are not path breaking, they do provide a more complete picture of this important aspect of 18

20 congressional elections and they document some factors heretofore not included in existing models of turnout. These results would appear to have some relevance for the 2002 midterm election and the continuing fate of the Republican majority in the House of Representatives. While redistricting will obviously play a role in the outcome of the next election in terms of individual races, we cannot discount the impact of turnout on members electoral fortunes. If we continue to observe an extraordinary decline at the midterm relative to turnout in the presidential election, then efforts at mobilization on the part of the parties and related interest groups will likely make a difference in determining whether the Republicans will maintain their majority status in the House. Of course, should turnout again decline in an asymmetric manner, as was the case for Democrats in 1994, then the party experiencing disproportionate abstention on the part of its core supporters is likely to suffer. 19

21 References Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde Change and Continuity in the 1996 and 1998 Elections. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. Abramson, Paul R., John H. Aldrich, and David W. Rohde Change and Continuity in the 2000 Elections. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press. Caldeira, Gregory A., Samuel C. Patterson, and Gregory A. Markko The Mobilization of Voters in Congressional Elections. Journal of Politics 47: Campbell, James E Explaining Presidential Losses in Midterm Congressional Elections. Journal of Politics 47: Campbell, James E The Presidential Surge and Its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections, Journal of Politics 53: Campbell, James E The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. Campbell, James E. 1997a. The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections, 2 nd ed. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky. Campbell, James E. 1997b. The Presidential Pulse and the 1994 Midterm Congressional Election. The Journal of Politics 59: Cox, Gary W., and Michael C. Munger Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections. American Political Science Review 83: Dawson, Paul A., and James E. Zinser Political Finance and Participation in Congressional Elections. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 425: DeNardo, James Turnout and the Vote: The Joke s on the Democrats. American Political Science Review 74: DeNardo, James Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections? American Political Science Review 80: Gilliam, Franklin D., Jr Influences on Voter Turnout for U.S. House Elections in Non- Presidential Years. Legislative Studies Quarterly 10:

22 Green, John C., James E. Guth, and Clyde Wilcox The Christian Right and the Republican Party. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL. Hirsch, Barry T., David A. Macpherson, and Wayne G. Vroman Estimates of Union Density by State. Monthly Labor Review 124 (July): Jackson, Robert A Voter Mobilization in the 1986 Midterm Election. Journal of Politics 55: Jackson, Robert A A Reassessment of Voter Mobilization. Political Research Quarterly 49: Jacobson, Gary C Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press. Jacobson, Gary C Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, American Political Science Review 83: Jacobson, Gary C The 1994 House Elections in Perspective. Political Science Quarterly 111: Jacobson, Gary C. 1999a. Impeachment Politics in the 1998 Congressional Elections. Political Science Quarterly 114: Jacobson, Gary C. 1999b. The Effects of the AFL-CIO s Voter Education Campaigns on the 1996 House Elections. Journal of Politics 61: Jacobson, Gary C Reversal of Fortune: The Transformation of U.S. House Elections in the 1990s. In Continuity and Change in House Elections, David W. Brady, John F. Cogan, and Morris P. Fiorina, eds. Stanford: Stanford University Press, Jacobson, Gary C The Politics of Congressional Elections, 5 th ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Patrick J. Kenney The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. McDonald, Michael P., and Samuel L. Popkin The Myth of the Vanishing Voter. American Political Science Review 95: Morin, Richard Citing Survey Change, Pollsters Retreat on Estimates of Union Vote. Washington Post, November 6, A5. 21

23 Nagel, Jack H. and John E. McNulty Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections. American Political Science Review 90: Nicholson, Stephen P., and Ross A. Miller Prior Beliefs and Voter Turnout in the 1986 and 1988 Congressional Elections. Political Research Quarterly 50: Oppenheimer, Bruce I., James A. Stimson, and Richard W. Waterman Interpreting United States Congressional Elections: The Exposure Thesis. Legislative Studies Quarterly 11: Orme, Robert E. and David W. Rohde Presidential Surge and Differential Decline: The Effects of Changing Turnout on the Fortunes of Democratic House Incumbents in Paper delivered at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois. Persinos, John F Has the Christian Right Taken Over the Republican Party? Campaigns and Elections (September): Price, David E The Congressional Experience, 2 nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Radcliff, Benjamin Turnout and the Democratic Vote. American Politics Quarterly 22: Tucker, Harvey J. and Arnold Vedlitz Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections? American Political Science Review 80: Waterman, Richard W., Bruce I. Oppenheimer, and James A. Stimson Sequence and Equilibrium in Congressional Elections: An Integrated Approach. Journal of Politics 53:

24 Table 1 Differential Turnout and the Vote for Democratic Incumbents, Variable Democrat s vote in previous election 0.413* (0.061) 0.426* (0.066) 0.344* (0.077) 0.523* (0.057) District presidential partisanship 0.211* (0.050) 0.237* (0.056) 0.210* (0.077) 0.188* (0.038) Challenger has held elected office (0.901) (1.035) (1.026) (0.833) Log of challenger s spending * (0.304) * (0.193) * (0.242) * (0.246) Log of incumbent s spending (0.750) * (0.600) (0.765) (0.479) Change in turnout 0.144* (0.070) (0.081) (0.083) (0.064) Competitive statewide race present 3.150* (0.716) 2.198* (1.107) (0.986) 1.302* (0.567) Christian Right * (0.704) (0.856) (0.901) * (0.883) Union membership (0.057) (0.065) (0.084) * (0.060) Constant 51.01* (10.85) 55.38* (10.25) 55.70* (12.30) 35.80* (8.14) N F-Value R Note: Coefficients are OLS estimates, generated in Stata 7.0. Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses. * Significant at p < 0.05

25 Table 2 Differential Turnout and the Vote for Republican Incumbents, Variable Republican s vote in previous election (0.099) 0.176* (0.053) 0.306* (0.081) 0.266* (0.073) District presidential partisanship * (0.081) * (0.059) * (0.070) * (0.063) Challenger has held elected office (1.225) (0.868) (1.085) (0.914) Log of challenger s spending * (0.373) * (0.260) * (0.173) * (0.229) Log of incumbent s spending (0.873) (0.661) (0.212) (0.606) Change in turnout (0.154) (0.085) (0.146) (0.071) Competitive statewide race present (1.049) (0.851) (0.787) (0.705) Christian Right (10.463) (0.756) (1.126) (0.756) Union membership (0.143) (0.067) (0.081) (0.068) Constant * (13.12) * (9.69) 71.66* (9.79) 73.90* (10.96) N F-Value R Note: Coefficients are OLS estimates, generated in Stata 7.0. Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses. * Significant at p < 0.05

26 Table 3 Using District Contextual Influences to Predict Turnout, Variable Previous turnout 0.594* (0.037) 0.631* (0.083) 0.407* (0.062) 0.562* (0.052) Perot percentage 0.244* (0.058) 0.388* (0.189) (0.175) Nader percentage (0.354) Competitive statewide race present 2.210* (0.760) (1.196) 6.940* (0.874) 5.731* (0.882) Christian Right (0.764) * (0.947) 2.387* (1.000) * (1.057) Safe seat * (0.625) (0.781) * (0.841) (0.866) Union membership 0.182* (0.051) * (0.078) 0.607* (0.073) (0.110) Constant (2.090) * (3.216) (3.074) * (2.387) N F-Value R Note: Coefficients are OLS estimates, generated in Stata 7.0. Robust standard errors are reported in parentheses. * Significant at p < 0.05

27 Appendix A1 Descriptive Statistics of Variables in Table 1 by Year Variable Mean St. Dev Mean St. Dev Mean St. Dev Mean St. Dev Democrat s vote in current election Democrat s vote in previous election District presidential partisanship Challenger has held elected office = = 34 0 = = 20 0 = = 33 0 = = 35 Log of challenger s spending Log of incumbent s spending Change in turnout Competitive state-wide race present 0 = 75 1 = = = 26 0 = 99 1 = 40 0 = = 41 Christian Right 0 = = 92 0 = 83 1 = 60 0 = 86 1 = 53 0 = 89 1 = 57 Union membership Note: For dichotomous variables, the frequency of each value is given.

Following the Leader: The Impact of Presidential Campaign Visits on Legislative Support for the President's Policy Preferences

Following the Leader: The Impact of Presidential Campaign Visits on Legislative Support for the President's Policy Preferences University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors Program Spring 2011 Following the Leader: The Impact of Presidential Campaign Visits on Legislative Support for the President's

More information

Amy Tenhouse. Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents

Amy Tenhouse. Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents Amy Tenhouse Incumbency Surge: Examining the 1996 Margin of Victory for U.S. House Incumbents In 1996, the American public reelected 357 members to the United States House of Representatives; of those

More information

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate Nicholas Goedert Lafayette College goedertn@lafayette.edu May, 2015 ABSTRACT: This note observes that the pro-republican

More information

The President's Party At The Midterm: An Aggregate And Individual-level Analysis Of Seat Loss And Vote Choice In U.S.

The President's Party At The Midterm: An Aggregate And Individual-level Analysis Of Seat Loss And Vote Choice In U.S. University of Central Florida Electronic Theses and Dissertations Masters Thesis (Open Access) The President's Party At The Midterm: An Aggregate And Individual-level Analysis Of Seat Loss And Vote Choice

More information

This journal is published by the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.

This journal is published by the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved. Article: National Conditions, Strategic Politicians, and U.S. Congressional Elections: Using the Generic Vote to Forecast the 2006 House and Senate Elections Author: Alan I. Abramowitz Issue: October 2006

More information

Midterm Elections Used to Gauge President s Reelection Chances

Midterm Elections Used to Gauge President s Reelection Chances 90 Midterm Elections Used to Gauge President s Reelection Chances --Desmond Wallace-- Desmond Wallace is currently studying at Coastal Carolina University for a Bachelor s degree in both political science

More information

A positive correlation between turnout and plurality does not refute the rational voter model

A positive correlation between turnout and plurality does not refute the rational voter model Quality & Quantity 26: 85-93, 1992. 85 O 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Note A positive correlation between turnout and plurality does not refute the rational voter model

More information

The 2002 Midterm Election: A Typical or an Atypical Midterm?

The 2002 Midterm Election: A Typical or an Atypical Midterm? FEATURES The 2002 Midterm Election: A Typical or an Atypical Midterm? James E. Campbell, University at Buffalo, SUNY t had been an inevitability rivaling Ideath and taxes. The president s party would lose

More information

UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works

UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Constitutional design and 2014 senate election outcomes Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8kx5k8zk Journal Forum (Germany), 12(4) Authors Highton,

More information

Res Publica 29. Literature Review

Res Publica 29. Literature Review Res Publica 29 Greg Crowe and Elizabeth Ann Eberspacher Partisanship and Constituency Influences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting Behavior in the US House This research examines the factors that influence

More information

A Behavioral Measure of the Enthusiasm Gap in American Elections

A Behavioral Measure of the Enthusiasm Gap in American Elections A Behavioral Measure of the Enthusiasm Gap in American Elections Seth J. Hill April 22, 2014 Abstract What are the effects of a mobilized party base on elections? I present a new behavioral measure of

More information

Introduction. Midterm elections are elections in which the American electorate votes for all seats of the

Introduction. Midterm elections are elections in which the American electorate votes for all seats of the Wallace 1 Wallace 2 Introduction Midterm elections are elections in which the American electorate votes for all seats of the United States House of Representatives, approximately one-third of the seats

More information

Chapter Four: Chamber Competitiveness, Political Polarization, and Political Parties

Chapter Four: Chamber Competitiveness, Political Polarization, and Political Parties Chapter Four: Chamber Competitiveness, Political Polarization, and Political Parties Building off of the previous chapter in this dissertation, this chapter investigates the involvement of political parties

More information

1. The Relationship Between Party Control, Latino CVAP and the Passage of Bills Benefitting Immigrants

1. The Relationship Between Party Control, Latino CVAP and the Passage of Bills Benefitting Immigrants The Ideological and Electoral Determinants of Laws Targeting Undocumented Migrants in the U.S. States Online Appendix In this additional methodological appendix I present some alternative model specifications

More information

The Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout

The Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout The Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout Alexander Kendall March 29, 2004 1 The Problem According to the Washington Post, Republicans are urged to pray for poor weather on national election days, so that

More information

What to Do about Turnout Bias in American Elections? A Response to Wink and Weber

What to Do about Turnout Bias in American Elections? A Response to Wink and Weber What to Do about Turnout Bias in American Elections? A Response to Wink and Weber Thomas L. Brunell At the end of the 2006 term, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision with respect to the Texas

More information

EXPLORING PARTISAN BIAS IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE,

EXPLORING PARTISAN BIAS IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, WHS (2009) ISSN: 1535-4738 Volume 9, Issue 4, pp. 2010 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. EXPLORING PARTISAN BIAS IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE, 1964-2008 ABSTRACT The purpose of this work is to examine the sources

More information

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate

The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate The Case of the Disappearing Bias: A 2014 Update to the Gerrymandering or Geography Debate Nicholas Goedert Lafayette College goedertn@lafayette.edu November, 2015 ABSTRACT: This note observes that the

More information

Forecasting the 2018 Midterm Election using National Polls and District Information

Forecasting the 2018 Midterm Election using National Polls and District Information Forecasting the 2018 Midterm Election using National Polls and District Information Joseph Bafumi, Dartmouth College Robert S. Erikson, Columbia University Christopher Wlezien, University of Texas at Austin

More information

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 4: An Examination of Iowa Turnout Statistics Since 2000 by Party and Age Group

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 4: An Examination of Iowa Turnout Statistics Since 2000 by Party and Age Group Department of Political Science Publications 3-1-2014 Iowa Voting Series, Paper 4: An Examination of Iowa Turnout Statistics Since 2000 by Party and Age Group Timothy M. Hagle University of Iowa 2014 Timothy

More information

The Outlook for the 2010 Midterm Elections: How Large a Wave?

The Outlook for the 2010 Midterm Elections: How Large a Wave? The Outlook for the 2010 Midterm Elections: How Large a Wave? What is at stake? All 435 House seats 256 Democratic seats 179 Republican seats Republicans needs to gain 39 seats for majority 37 Senate seats

More information

Running Ahead or Falling Behind: The Coattail Effect And Divided Government

Running Ahead or Falling Behind: The Coattail Effect And Divided Government Running Ahead or Falling Behind: The Coattail Effect And Divided Government Research Project Submitted by: Latisha Younger Western Illinois University American Government, Masters Program latisha_louise@yahoo.com

More information

United States House Elections Post-Citizens United: The Influence of Unbridled Spending

United States House Elections Post-Citizens United: The Influence of Unbridled Spending Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects Political Science Department 2012 United States House Elections Post-Citizens United: The Influence of Unbridled Spending Laura L. Gaffey

More information

Chapter 6 Online Appendix. general these issues do not cause significant problems for our analysis in this chapter. One

Chapter 6 Online Appendix. general these issues do not cause significant problems for our analysis in this chapter. One Chapter 6 Online Appendix Potential shortcomings of SF-ratio analysis Using SF-ratios to understand strategic behavior is not without potential problems, but in general these issues do not cause significant

More information

The California Primary and Redistricting

The California Primary and Redistricting The California Primary and Redistricting This study analyzes what is the important impact of changes in the primary voting rules after a Congressional and Legislative Redistricting. Under a citizen s committee,

More information

Partisan Advantage and Competitiveness in Illinois Redistricting

Partisan Advantage and Competitiveness in Illinois Redistricting Partisan Advantage and Competitiveness in Illinois Redistricting An Updated and Expanded Look By: Cynthia Canary & Kent Redfield June 2015 Using data from the 2014 legislative elections and digging deeper

More information

An Increased Incumbency Effect: Reconsidering Evidence

An Increased Incumbency Effect: Reconsidering Evidence part i An Increased Incumbency Effect: Reconsidering Evidence chapter 1 An Increased Incumbency Effect and American Politics Incumbents have always fared well against challengers. Indeed, it would be surprising

More information

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election Author(s): R. Michael Alvarez and Jonathan Nagler Source: American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42, No.

More information

Retrospective Voting

Retrospective Voting Retrospective Voting Who Are Retrospective Voters and Does it Matter if the Incumbent President is Running Kaitlin Franks Senior Thesis In Economics Adviser: Richard Ball 4/30/2009 Abstract Prior literature

More information

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 6: An Examination of Iowa Absentee Voting Since 2000

Iowa Voting Series, Paper 6: An Examination of Iowa Absentee Voting Since 2000 Department of Political Science Publications 5-1-2014 Iowa Voting Series, Paper 6: An Examination of Iowa Absentee Voting Since 2000 Timothy M. Hagle University of Iowa 2014 Timothy M. Hagle Comments This

More information

Sequential Choices and Partisan Transitions in U.S. Senate Delegations:

Sequential Choices and Partisan Transitions in U.S. Senate Delegations: Sequential Choices and Partisan Transitions in U.S. Senate Delegations: 1972-1988 Gary M. Segura Stephen P. Nicholson University of California, Davis A recent increase in the number of states sending mixed

More information

Vote Likelihood and Institutional Trait Questions in the 1997 NES Pilot Study

Vote Likelihood and Institutional Trait Questions in the 1997 NES Pilot Study Vote Likelihood and Institutional Trait Questions in the 1997 NES Pilot Study Barry C. Burden and Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier The Ohio State University Department of Political Science 2140 Derby Hall Columbus,

More information

Research Note: U.S. Senate Elections and Newspaper Competition

Research Note: U.S. Senate Elections and Newspaper Competition Research Note: U.S. Senate Elections and Newspaper Competition Jan Vermeer, Nebraska Wesleyan University The contextual factors that structure electoral contests affect election outcomes. This research

More information

Change in the Components of the Electoral Decision. Herbert F. Weisberg The Ohio State University. May 2, 2008 version

Change in the Components of the Electoral Decision. Herbert F. Weisberg The Ohio State University. May 2, 2008 version Change in the Components of the Electoral Decision Herbert F. Weisberg The Ohio State University May 2, 2008 version Prepared for presentation at the Shambaugh Conference on The American Voter: Change

More information

Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond

Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond Congressional Elections, 2018 and Beyond Robert S. Erikson Columbia University 2018 Conference by the Hobby School of Public Affairs, University of Houston Triple Play: Election 2018; Census 2020; and

More information

Drew Kurlowski University of Missouri Columbia

Drew Kurlowski University of Missouri Columbia Kurlowski 1 Simulation of Increased Youth Turnout on the Presidential Election of 2004 Drew Kurlowski University of Missouri Columbia dak6w7@mizzou.edu Abstract Youth voting has become a major issue in

More information

Political socialization: change and stability in political attitudes among and within age cohorts

Political socialization: change and stability in political attitudes among and within age cohorts University of Central Florida HIM 1990-2015 Open Access Political socialization: change and stability in political attitudes among and within age cohorts 2011 Michael S. Hale University of Central Florida

More information

WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT ELECTIONS WITH PARTISANSHIP

WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT ELECTIONS WITH PARTISANSHIP The Increasing Correlation of WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT ELECTIONS WITH PARTISANSHIP A Statistical Analysis BY CHARLES FRANKLIN Whatever the technically nonpartisan nature of the elections, has the structure

More information

The Macro Polity Updated

The Macro Polity Updated The Macro Polity Updated Robert S Erikson Columbia University rse14@columbiaedu Michael B MacKuen University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Mackuen@emailuncedu James A Stimson University of North Carolina,

More information

Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research. Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps

Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research. Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Date: January 13, 2009 To: From: Friends of Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research Stan Greenberg and James Carville, Democracy Corps Anna Greenberg and John Brach, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner

More information

In response to findings that demonstrate a demographic

In response to findings that demonstrate a demographic The Dynamic Consequences of Nonvoting in American National Elections CHRISTOPHER R. ELLIS, BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY JOSEPH DANIEL URA AND JENNA ASHLEY ROBINSON, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL A

More information

Electoral Reform, Party Mobilization and Voter Turnout. Robert Stein, Rice University

Electoral Reform, Party Mobilization and Voter Turnout. Robert Stein, Rice University Electoral Reform, Party Mobilization and Voter Turnout Robert Stein, Rice University stein@rice.edu Chris Owens, Texas A&M University cowens@polisci.tamu.edu Jan Leighley, Texas A&M University leighley@polisci.tamu.edu

More information

The Impact of Minor Parties on Electoral Competition: An Examination of US House and State Legislative Races

The Impact of Minor Parties on Electoral Competition: An Examination of US House and State Legislative Races The Impact of Minor Parties on Electoral Competition: An Examination of US House and State Legislative Races William M. Salka Professor of Political Science Eastern Connecticut State University Willimantic,

More information

Purposes of Elections

Purposes of Elections Purposes of Elections o Regular free elections n guarantee mass political action n enable citizens to influence the actions of their government o Popular election confers on a government the legitimacy

More information

EVALUATIONS OF CONGRESS AND VOTING IN HOUSE ELECTIONS REVISITING THE HISTORICAL RECORD

EVALUATIONS OF CONGRESS AND VOTING IN HOUSE ELECTIONS REVISITING THE HISTORICAL RECORD Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 74, No. 4, Winter 2010, pp. 696 710 EVALUATIONS OF CONGRESS AND VOTING IN HOUSE ELECTIONS REVISITING THE HISTORICAL RECORD DAVID R. JONES* Abstract The literature portrays

More information

Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives

Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives Jamie L. Carson Department of Political Science The University of Georgia 104 Baldwin Hall Athens, GA 30602 Work Phone: 706-542-2889

More information

Party Polarization, Revisited: Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Party Preference

Party Polarization, Revisited: Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Party Preference Party Polarization, Revisited: Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Party Preference Tiffany Fameree Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Ray Block, Jr., Political Science/Public Administration ABSTRACT In 2015, I wrote

More information

2016 State Elections

2016 State Elections 2016 State Elections By Tim Storey and Dan Diorio Voters left the overall partisan landscape in state legislatures relatively unchanged in 2016, despite a tumultuous campaign for the presidency. The GOP

More information

The Effect of State Redistricting Methods on Electoral Competition in United States House Races

The Effect of State Redistricting Methods on Electoral Competition in United States House Races The Effect of State Redistricting Methods on Electoral Competition in United States House Races Jamie L. Carson Department of Political Science University of Georgia 104 Baldwin Hall Athens, GA 30602 carson@uga.edu

More information

Author(s) Title Date Dataset(s) Abstract

Author(s) Title Date Dataset(s) Abstract Author(s): Traugott, Michael Title: Memo to Pilot Study Committee: Understanding Campaign Effects on Candidate Recall and Recognition Date: February 22, 1990 Dataset(s): 1988 National Election Study, 1989

More information

Predicting and Dissecting the Seats-Votes Curve in the 2006 U.S. House Election

Predicting and Dissecting the Seats-Votes Curve in the 2006 U.S. House Election Predicting and Dissecting the Seats-Votes Curve in the 2006 U.S. House Election Jonathan P. Kastellec Andrew Gelman Jamie P. Chandler January 3, 2007 Abstract The Democrats victory in the 2006 election

More information

PARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS

PARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS Number of Representatives October 2012 PARTISANSHIP AND WINNER-TAKE-ALL ELECTIONS ANALYZING THE 2010 ELECTIONS TO THE U.S. HOUSE FairVote grounds its analysis of congressional elections in district partisanship.

More information

The Center for Voting and Democracy

The Center for Voting and Democracy The Center for Voting and Democracy 6930 Carroll Ave., Suite 610 Takoma Park, MD 20912 - (301) 270-4616 (301) 270 4133 (fax) info@fairvote.org www.fairvote.org To: Commission to Ensure Integrity and Public

More information

AP PHOTO/MATT VOLZ. Voter Trends in A Final Examination. By Rob Griffin, Ruy Teixeira, and John Halpin November 2017

AP PHOTO/MATT VOLZ. Voter Trends in A Final Examination. By Rob Griffin, Ruy Teixeira, and John Halpin November 2017 AP PHOTO/MATT VOLZ Voter Trends in 2016 A Final Examination By Rob Griffin, Ruy Teixeira, and John Halpin November 2017 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Voter Trends in 2016 A Final Examination By Rob Griffin,

More information

The Forum. An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election. Barry C. Burden

The Forum. An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election. Barry C. Burden The Forum Volume 2, Issue 4 2004 Article 2 POST-ELECTION 2004 An Alternative Account of the 2004 Presidential Election Barry C. Burden Harvard University, bcburden@wisc.edu Copyright c 2004 by the authors.

More information

CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN EFFECTS ON CANDIDATE RECOGNITION AND EVALUATION

CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN EFFECTS ON CANDIDATE RECOGNITION AND EVALUATION CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN EFFECTS ON CANDIDATE RECOGNITION AND EVALUATION Edie N. Goldenberg and Michael W. Traugott To date, most congressional scholars have relied upon a standard model of American electoral

More information

Federal Primary Election Runoffs and Voter Turnout Decline,

Federal Primary Election Runoffs and Voter Turnout Decline, Federal Primary Election Runoffs and Voter Turnout Decline, 1994-2010 July 2011 By: Katherine Sicienski, William Hix, and Rob Richie Summary of Facts and Findings Near-Universal Decline in Turnout: Of

More information

Julie Lenggenhager. The "Ideal" Female Candidate

Julie Lenggenhager. The Ideal Female Candidate Julie Lenggenhager The "Ideal" Female Candidate Why are there so few women elected to positions in both gubernatorial and senatorial contests? Since the ratification of the nineteenth amendment in 1920

More information

Opening the Floodgates: Traditional vs. Outside Spending Before and After Citizens United. Matthew Steinberg. Northwestern Undergraduate

Opening the Floodgates: Traditional vs. Outside Spending Before and After Citizens United. Matthew Steinberg. Northwestern Undergraduate Opening the Floodgates: Traditional vs. Outside Spending Before and After Citizens United Matthew Steinberg Northwestern Undergraduate Supervised by Professor Laurel Harbridge i Table of Contents: Acknowledgements:...

More information

ELECTORAL VERDICTS Incumbent Defeats in State Supreme Court Elections

ELECTORAL VERDICTS Incumbent Defeats in State Supreme Court Elections 10.1177/1532673X04273414 AMERICAN Bonneau / ELECTORAL VERDICTS POLITICS RESEARCH / NOVEMBER 2005 ELECTORAL VERDICTS Incumbent Defeats in State Supreme Court Elections CHRIS W. BONNEAU University of Pittsburgh

More information

Does the Gift Keep on Giving?: House Leadership PAC Donations Before and After Majority Status

Does the Gift Keep on Giving?: House Leadership PAC Donations Before and After Majority Status Majority/Minority Leadership PAC Donations pg. 1 Does the Gift Keep on Giving?: House Leadership PAC Donations Before and After Majority Status John H. Aldrich Department of Political Science Duke University

More information

AVOTE FOR PEROT WAS A VOTE FOR THE STATUS QUO

AVOTE FOR PEROT WAS A VOTE FOR THE STATUS QUO AVOTE FOR PEROT WAS A VOTE FOR THE STATUS QUO William A. Niskanen In 1992 Ross Perot received more votes than any prior third party candidate for president, and the vote for Perot in 1996 was only slightly

More information

a Henry Salvatori Fellow, Alfred is the House? Predicting Presidential

a Henry Salvatori Fellow, Alfred is the House? Predicting Presidential Randall J. Jones, Jr. is Professor of Alfred G. Cuzan joined the faculty at the Political Science at the University of University of West Florida in 980. n Central Oklahoma. His published work 992, he

More information

Texas Elections Part I

Texas Elections Part I Texas Elections Part I In a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy. Matt Taibbi Elections...a formal decision-making process

More information

The Declining Value of Moderation in US House Elections. Henry A. Kim University of California, Santa Barbara

The Declining Value of Moderation in US House Elections. Henry A. Kim University of California, Santa Barbara The Declining Value of Moderation in US House Elections Henry A. Kim University of California, Santa Barbara h27kim@gmail.com Brad L. LeVeck University of California, Merced 1 bleveck@ucmerced.edu Prepared

More information

Political Campaign. Volunteers in a get-out-the-vote campaign in Portland, Oregon, urge people to vote during the 2004 presidential

Political Campaign. Volunteers in a get-out-the-vote campaign in Portland, Oregon, urge people to vote during the 2004 presidential Political Campaign I INTRODUCTION Voting Volunteer Volunteers in a get-out-the-vote campaign in Portland, Oregon, urge people to vote during the 2004 presidential elections. Greg Wahl-Stephens/AP/Wide

More information

Most Have Heard Little or Nothing about Redistricting Debate LACK OF COMPETITION IN ELECTIONS FAILS TO STIR PUBLIC

Most Have Heard Little or Nothing about Redistricting Debate LACK OF COMPETITION IN ELECTIONS FAILS TO STIR PUBLIC NEWS Release 1615 L Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 Tel (202) 419-4350 Fax (202) 419-4399 FOR RELEASE: FRIDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2006, 10:00 AM EDT Most Have Heard Little or Nothing about Redistricting

More information

Changing Votes or Changing Voters? How Candidates and Election Context Swing Voters and Mobilize the Base. Electoral Studies 2017

Changing Votes or Changing Voters? How Candidates and Election Context Swing Voters and Mobilize the Base. Electoral Studies 2017 Changing Votes or Changing Voters? How Candidates and Election Context Swing Voters and Mobilize the Base Electoral Studies 2017 Seth J. Hill June 11, 2017 Abstract To win elections, candidates attempt

More information

ISERP Working Paper 06-10

ISERP Working Paper 06-10 ISERP Working Paper 06-10 Forecasting House Seats from General Congressional Polls JOSEPH BAFUMI DARTMOUTH COLLEGE ROBERT S. ERIKSON DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CHRISTOPHER WLEZIEN

More information

System Structure, Campaign Stimuli, and Voter Falloff in Runoff Primaries

System Structure, Campaign Stimuli, and Voter Falloff in Runoff Primaries System Structure, Campaign Stimuli, and Voter Falloff in Runoff Primaries Charles S+ Bullock III The University of Georgia Ronald Keith Gaddie The University of Oklahoma Anders Ferrington The University

More information

In What s the Matter with Kansas?

In What s the Matter with Kansas? Voting on Values or Bread-and-Butter? Effects of Union Membership on the Politics of the White Working Class PETER L. FRANCIA the focus because, in the political arena, they typically endorse Democratic

More information

The reappearing American voter why did turnout rise in 92?

The reappearing American voter why did turnout rise in 92? MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive The reappearing American voter why did turnout rise in 92? Stephen Knack World Bank 1997 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27250/ MPRA Paper No. 27250, posted

More information

BLISS INSTITUTE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION SURVEY

BLISS INSTITUTE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION SURVEY BLISS INSTITUTE 2006 GENERAL ELECTION SURVEY Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics The University of Akron Executive Summary The Bliss Institute 2006 General Election Survey finds Democrat Ted Strickland

More information

THE EFFECT OF EARLY VOTING AND THE LENGTH OF EARLY VOTING ON VOTER TURNOUT

THE EFFECT OF EARLY VOTING AND THE LENGTH OF EARLY VOTING ON VOTER TURNOUT THE EFFECT OF EARLY VOTING AND THE LENGTH OF EARLY VOTING ON VOTER TURNOUT Simona Altshuler University of Florida Email: simonaalt@ufl.edu Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Kenny Abstract This paper explores the effects

More information

Partisan Nation: The Rise of Affective Partisan Polarization in the American Electorate

Partisan Nation: The Rise of Affective Partisan Polarization in the American Electorate Partisan Nation: The Rise of Affective Partisan Polarization in the American Electorate Alan I. Abramowitz Department of Political Science Emory University Abstract Partisan conflict has reached new heights

More information

Battleground 59: A (Potentially) Wasted Opportunity for the Republican Party Republican Analysis by: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber

Battleground 59: A (Potentially) Wasted Opportunity for the Republican Party Republican Analysis by: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber Battleground 59: A (Potentially) Wasted Opportunity for the Republican Party Republican Analysis by: Ed Goeas and Brian Nienaber In what seems like so long ago, the 2016 Presidential Election cycle began

More information

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS U.S. SENATE POLL Sept , ,005 Registered Voters (RVs)

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS U.S. SENATE POLL Sept , ,005 Registered Voters (RVs) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL MASSACHUSETTS U.S. SENATE POLL Sept. 22-28, 2011-1,005 Registered Voters (RVs) Sampling error on full sample is +/- 3.8 percentage points, larger for subgroups and for

More information

The Elasticity of Partisanship in Congress: An Analysis of Legislative Bipartisanship

The Elasticity of Partisanship in Congress: An Analysis of Legislative Bipartisanship The Elasticity of Partisanship in Congress: An Analysis of Legislative Bipartisanship Laurel Harbridge College Fellow, Department of Political Science Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research Northwestern

More information

Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010? A Second Look Over the Horizon. Alfred G. Cuzán. Professor of Political Science

Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010? A Second Look Over the Horizon. Alfred G. Cuzán. Professor of Political Science Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010? A Second Look Over the Horizon Alfred G. Cuzán Professor of Political Science The University of West Florida Pensacola, FL 32514 acuzan@uwf.edu An earlier,

More information

Inter- and Intra-Chamber Differences and the Distribution of Policy Benefits

Inter- and Intra-Chamber Differences and the Distribution of Policy Benefits Inter- and Intra-Chamber Differences and the Distribution of Policy Benefits Thomas M. Carsey Department of Political Science Florida State University Tallahassee, FL 32306 tcarsey@garnet.acns.fsu.edu

More information

Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006

Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government. October 16, 2006 Testimony of FairVote The Center for Voting and Democracy Jack Santucci, Program for Representative Government Given in writing to the Assembly Standing Committee on Governmental Operations and Assembly

More information

Patterns of Poll Movement *

Patterns of Poll Movement * Patterns of Poll Movement * Public Perspective, forthcoming Christopher Wlezien is Reader in Comparative Government and Fellow of Nuffield College, University of Oxford Robert S. Erikson is a Professor

More information

"An Empirical Examination of the Impetus for Political Party Defection"

An Empirical Examination of the Impetus for Political Party Defection "An Empirical Examination of the Impetus for Political Party Defection" Abstract Jim F. Couch Department of Economics and Finance University of North Alabama Florence, AL 35630, USA Taylor P. Stevenson

More information

The Role o f Parties in Legislative Campaign Financing

The Role o f Parties in Legislative Campaign Financing The Role o f Parties in Legislative Campaign Financing Anthony Gierzynski, University o f Vermont David Breaux, Mississippi State University The purpose of the analysis presented in this paper is to examine

More information

A Delayed Return to Historical Norms: Congressional Party Polarization after the Second World War

A Delayed Return to Historical Norms: Congressional Party Polarization after the Second World War B.J.Pol.S. 36, 000-000 Copyright 2006 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/s0000000000000000 Printed in the United Kingdom A Delayed Return to Historical Norms: Congressional Party Polarization after

More information

Experiments in Election Reform: Voter Perceptions of Campaigns Under Preferential and Plurality Voting

Experiments in Election Reform: Voter Perceptions of Campaigns Under Preferential and Plurality Voting Experiments in Election Reform: Voter Perceptions of Campaigns Under Preferential and Plurality Voting Caroline Tolbert, University of Iowa (caroline-tolbert@uiowa.edu) Collaborators: Todd Donovan, Western

More information

The Presidential Election. Paul Beck, The Ohio State University Lifelong Learning Institute December 7, 2016

The Presidential Election. Paul Beck, The Ohio State University Lifelong Learning Institute December 7, 2016 The Presidential Election Paul Beck, The Ohio State University Lifelong Learning Institute December 7, 2016 1 Introduction: Fundamentals of the 2016 Presidential Contests 2016 presidential results with

More information

Buying Elections in a Post-Citizens United World: The Effect of Campaign Spending in House Elections Since 2010

Buying Elections in a Post-Citizens United World: The Effect of Campaign Spending in House Elections Since 2010 Buying Elections in a Post-Citizens United World: The Effect of Campaign Spending in House Elections Since 2010 Malcom Fox Political Science Advisor Al Montero Abstract To what extent does campaign spending

More information

Party Money in the 2006 Elections:

Party Money in the 2006 Elections: Party Money in the 2006 Elections: The Role of National Party Committees in Financing Congressional Campaigns A CFI Report By Anthony Corrado and Katie Varney The Campaign Finance Institute is a non-partisan,

More information

Cleaning House? Assessing the Impact of Maine s Clean Elections Act on Electoral Competitiveness. Does full public financing of legislative elections

Cleaning House? Assessing the Impact of Maine s Clean Elections Act on Electoral Competitiveness. Does full public financing of legislative elections Cleaning House? Assessing the Impact of Maine s Clean Elections Act on Electoral Competitiveness by Richard J. Powell Does full public financing of legislative elections make races more competitive? Richard

More information

THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. by Andrew L. Roth

THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES. by Andrew L. Roth THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE: SOME FACTS AND FIGURES by Andrew L. Roth INTRODUCTION The following pages provide a statistical profile of California's state legislature. The data are intended to suggest who

More information

ELECTION OVERVIEW. + Context: Mood of the Electorate. + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward?

ELECTION OVERVIEW. + Context: Mood of the Electorate. + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward? 1 ELECTION OVERVIEW + Context: Mood of the Electorate + Election Results: Why did it happen? + The Future: What does it mean going forward? + Appendix: Polling Post-Mortem 2 2 INITIAL HEADLINES + Things

More information

Rural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 2008

Rural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 2008 June 8, 07 Rural America Competitive Bush Problems and Economic Stress Put Rural America in play in 08 To: From: Interested Parties Anna Greenberg, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner William Greener, Greener and

More information

Possible voting reforms in the United States

Possible voting reforms in the United States Possible voting reforms in the United States Since the disputed 2000 Presidential election, there have numerous proposals to improve how elections are conducted. While most proposals have attempted to

More information

Term Limits and Electoral Competitiveness: California's State Legislative Races

Term Limits and Electoral Competitiveness: California's State Legislative Races University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics 1997 Term Limits and Electoral Competitiveness: California's

More information

The Incumbent Spending Puzzle. Christopher S. P. Magee. Abstract. This paper argues that campaign spending by incumbents is primarily useful in

The Incumbent Spending Puzzle. Christopher S. P. Magee. Abstract. This paper argues that campaign spending by incumbents is primarily useful in The Incumbent Spending Puzzle Christopher S. P. Magee Abstract This paper argues that campaign spending by incumbents is primarily useful in countering spending by challengers. Estimates from models that

More information

Accountability, Divided Government and Presidential Coattails.

Accountability, Divided Government and Presidential Coattails. Presidential VS Parliamentary Elections Accountability, Divided Government and Presidential Coattails. Accountability Presidential Coattails The coattail effect is the tendency for a popular political

More information

Electoral Vulnerability and Legislative Responsiveness

Electoral Vulnerability and Legislative Responsiveness Electoral Vulnerability and Legislative Responsiveness Abstract This paper focuses on the relationship between legislators electoral vulnerability and their legislative behavior. I develop an alternative

More information

Political Parties and Soft Money

Political Parties and Soft Money 7 chapter Political Parties and Soft Money The role of the players in political advertising candidates, parties, and groups has been analyzed in prior chapters. However, the newly changing role of political

More information

Political Sophistication and Third-Party Voting in Recent Presidential Elections

Political Sophistication and Third-Party Voting in Recent Presidential Elections Political Sophistication and Third-Party Voting in Recent Presidential Elections Christopher N. Lawrence Department of Political Science Duke University April 3, 2006 Overview During the 1990s, minor-party

More information