FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTION MAIN ISSUES OF CONCERN. Mélanie DE SAQUI DE SANNES, LL.M. Gide Loyrette Nouel, Budapest
|
|
- Kelley Osborne
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTION MAIN ISSUES OF CONCERN Mélanie DE SAQUI DE SANNES, LL.M. Gide Loyrette Nouel, Budapest I. Introduction and background The latest and most significant amendment to the young Hungarian Constitution entered into force on April 1 st, , fueling the intense debate around the wave of constitutional and legal reform in the country. Serious doubts over the compatibility of this Fourth constitutional amendment with the principle of the rule of law have been voiced on national 2 and international 3 levels. Hungary is once more the cause of important concern, two years after the adoption of its new Constitution 4 attracted the scrutiny of both the European Commission 5 and the Venice Commission. 6 The ongoing wave of reform was made possible by an exceptional situation of parliamentary supermajority. The conservative party Fidesz, led by actual Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, obtained - together with its ally KDNP (Christian Democratic People's Party) - 2/3 of seats in Parliament following the 2010 elections. From a political point of view, the governing party has thus been given considerable leeway to undertake the in-depth reform it deemed necessary to break with Hungary s communist past 7 and face economic challenges. 8 It is however accused by the opposition of abusing its power to pass measures considered, in form, to lack sufficient prior political debate 9 and, in substance, to undermine democracy. 10 From a legal point of view, the 2/3 majority fulfilled the requirements for the modification of the Hungarian constitutional order, through reforms at constitutional and legislative level. The supermajority adopted the new Constitution, 11 as well as so-called cardinal laws, which are required by the Constitution in order to specify certain areas of the constitutional order (e.g. operation of the Constitutional Court, administration of courts, protection of families, freedom of the press). 12 In addition, the Parliament enacted Transitional Provisions designed to organize the process of moving to a new constitutional order (e.g. determining the impact of the new Constitution on previously adopted laws and on the mandate of elected officials). 13 The new Constitution was amended 14 several times within the year following its entry into force. The First constitutional amendment 15 gave constitutional value to the Transitional Provisions, creating a small Fundamental Law 16 outside the Constitution. It also put an end to the ongoing debate about the independence of the Hungarian Central Bank by cancelling any possibility of merging the functions of its President with those of the Financial Supervisory Authority. The Second 17 and Third 18 amendments respectively introduced constitutional grounds for setting a registration condition for the exercise of voting rights - which was the object of strong criticism 19 - and modalities for the acquisition of agricultural land. The Fourth amendment to the Constitution introduces by far the most changes to the constitutional order, affecting the functioning of the Constitutional Court, the administration of the judiciary and the scope of certain fundamental rights. The main changes that have raised concern are presented below, in an attempt to set them before the background of ongoing reform in the country. II. Functioning of the Constitutional Court
2 2. Exclusion of any reference to prior decisions The Fourth amendment to the Constitution introduced a new provision according to which decisions of the Constitutional Court and their reasoning delivered prior to the entering into force of the new Constitution cannot be used for its interpretation. 20 As a result, the principles and interpretations developed by the Constitutional Court over the past twenty years no longer constitute a basis for future decisions. The Court is not prevented from coming to the same conclusions in future cases or from using the same reasonings as previously developed, but it is forced, should it wish to do so, to detail its argumentation in whole in a new decision instead of referring to its previous ones. While broadening the margin of interpretation of the Court, which is no longer bound by the case-law built on the basis of the previous Constitution, 21 this provision also creates great legal uncertainty with respect to applicable constitutional standards, since no continuity with the former practice of the Constitutional Court is ensured. Initially, the possibility for the Constitutional Court of referring to prior decisions had been questioned due to the statement contained in the Preamble of the new Constitution proclaiming the invalidity of the former Constitution of The Venice Commission, in its opinion on the new Constitution, considered that such a statement of political nature should not be understood as grounds for ignoring the rich case law of the Constitutional Court. 22 In addition, the Constitutional Court itself had interpreted this rule as allowing it to refer to arguments made in previous decisions as long as the constitutional provisions they were based on had remained similar. 23 The Fourth constitutional amendment breaks with this vision of continuity. The freedom of interpretation granted to the Constitutional Court is defended by the governing party as a guarantee of coherence, enabling new decisions to be made independently from considerations of the past. Opponents however point to the risk of arbitrariness if decisions are not embedded in a long-lasting constitutional practice. 24 Competence to review constitutional amendments The Constitution now reads that the Constitutional Court is competent to examine the procedural constitutionality of proposed amendments to the Fundamental Law, 25 while their substantial review is excluded from the scope of competence of the Court. The question whether the Constitutional Court is competent to review the Constitution, even though the Court s powers are derived from it, had not been entirely clarified under the former Constitution. Possibly due to the specific context of the parliamentary super-majority in Hungary and to the numerous amendments to the Constitution, the Constitutional Court had however recently granted itself the power to substantially examine such amendments. 26 The Fourth amendment to the Constitution does not allow such a jump, restricting the extension of the Court s competence to a procedural control of constitutional amendments. The exclusion of any substantial review of constitutional amendments is aimed at avoiding interference of the Constitutional Court in the exercise of the Parliament s constituent power. Competence in budgetary and tax matters
3 3. The latest constitutional amendment confirms the restriction to the competence of the Constitutional Court regarding the control of laws on budgetary and tax matters. 27 As long as the State debt exceeds half of the GDP 28, the constitutionality of such laws may only be reviewed with respect to specific fundamental rights, among which the right to life and human dignity and to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, but not, for example, the right to property. This provision, originally part of the Transitional Provisions, was struck down by the Constitutional Court in 2012 for lack of transitional nature, because it permanently excludes budgetary and tax laws adopted while the debt exceeded half the GDP from the control of the Court. 29 The latest constitutional amendment removes any ambiguity by integrating this rule into the permanent constitutional framework. Though the provision illustrates a laudable will to prioritize budgetary efficiency, it also creates a leveling between fundamental rights which, according to the Venice Commission, may impede their protection as a whole. 30 In addition, the Fourth amendment allows, for as long as the State debt exceeds half of the GDP, the establishment of a special tax aimed at covering the cost of potential fines which could be imposed on the Hungarian State by decision of the Constitutional Court or of the European Court of Justice. In other words, as it was pointed out by Vivian Reding, EU Commissioner for Justice and Fundamental Rights, in practice citizens would be penalized twice: once for not having had their rights under EU law upheld and a second time for having to pay for this." 31 Such a law, should it be adopted on the basis of the new constitutional provision, would also be excluded from the competence of the Constitutional Court. III. Administration of the judiciary Transfer of cases by the President of the National Judicial Office The Fourth amendment to the Constitution introduces a provision granting the President of the National Judicial Office (NJO) competence to transfer cases from the competent court to another court, in order to balance the case-load between courts and ensure the rendering of court decisions in reasonable time. 32 This rule, which was initially a Transitional Provision meant to apply until a balanced distribution of case-load between courts had been achieved, 33 was struck down by the Constitutional Court in 2012 because no definite time limit for the exercise of this competence was foreseen, making the provision lack the transitional purpose it was initially meant to have. 34 The provision is now integrated into the Constitution without any limitation of duration. The creation of the NJO in 2011 and the attribution of strong competences to its President came as a response to the need to establish an efficient and operational administration of justice. Though this goal is praiseworthy, the chosen model has raised the concern of the Venice Commission because it concentrates overwhelming powers in a single person. 35 In addition to his power to transfer cases, the President of the NJO can also put forward proposals for the appointment and relief of judges, and decide on their transfer. 36 Retirement of judges
4 4. The Fourth constitutional amendment does not directly affect the retirement age of judges, prosecutors and notaries, but a cardinal law regulating this issue has recently been enacted by Parliament 37 and provides for a gradual reduction of their retirement age (formerly set at 70 years) until it reaches the national retirement age (62 years). The implementation of a gradual lowering of the retirement age follows the ruling of the European Court of Justice which considered that the former system of abrupt forced early retirement of judges and prosecutors (in 2012) and notaries (by the end of 2014) constituted unjustified age discrimination, thus violating EU law. 38 The decision to spread the retirements over several years also appears necessary in order to minimize the direct influence of the President of the NJO on the appointment of new judges, which would gain in significance if many crucial positions in the judicial system were to be filled over a short period of time. 39 IV. Scope of fundamental rights General uncertainty due to absence of case-law basis The fact that the standards developed by the Constitutional Court in its past decisions may no longer be referred to in future decisions creates legal uncertainty regarding the extent of protection of the fundamental rights which had been defined and interpreted through case-law. The basic fundamental rights protected by the Constitution are stripped of the abundant details and clarifications brought by the Court. For example, a decision of the Court had set that the equal recognition of heterosexual and homosexual couples cohabitating without being married 40 could be derived from the general principle of equal treatment and the right to the protection of one s private life. It is also through a Court decision that for example the prohibition of discriminations had been defined, as the duty to treat all persons as equals without restriction to their right to human dignity, requiring that all rights and advantages be determined with respect and attention, equally taking into account the different personal interests of those concerned. 41 It remains to be seen whether the Constitutional Court will protect fundamental rights to the same extent as in the past. The case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and of the European Court of Justice, by which Hungary is bound, should offer guidance in this respect. Constitutional notion of the family Pursuant to the Fourth amendment to the Constitution, marriage is defined as the conjugal union of a man and a woman and marriage and the parent-child relationship are the basis of the family. 42 This traditional notion of the family was originally introduced in 2011 in the law on the Protection of Families, 43 but the provision was abolished by the Constitutional Court on the grounds that such a definition would exclude a number of family forms (partnerships where both members take care of each other s children, couples without children, single parents, same-sex unions ) from the protection due to families by the State. 44 The introduction of this notion of the family into the Constitution therefore raises concern as to the protection of non-traditional family structures at a constitutional level. Regarding in particular samesex unions, this constitutional amendment closes any possibility for the legislator to open marriage to same sex couples. Same-sex unions were recently authorized in Hungary by a law of following a decision of the Constitutional Court requiring a specific institution for homosexual unions, which did not duplicate the institution of marriage. 46
5 5. Freedom of the press - media regulation The Fourth amendment to the Constitution introduces a provision which expressly guarantees the free and equal access of all political parties to political advertising in the public media. 47 This principle of neutrality of public broadcasting had been set by case-law of the Constitutional Court under the previous Constitution, and its express integration into the new Constitution is to be welcomed as it ensures its protection despite the exclusion of any referral to previous decisions of the Constitutional Court. The provision as revised by the recent amendment also foresees that a cardinal law may restrict other forms of political campaign. Opponents to the recent reform fear that this will be used to enable the ban of political campaigning in the private media. 48 The Parliament had indeed previously adopted such a ban in the Election Procedure Act, 49 but the provision was struck down by the Constitutional Court at the beginning of this year on the grounds that such a rule would create a considerable restriction on political speech, especially since private media is the media reaching society to the widest extent. 50 Media regulation in Hungary has been an area of ongoing reform since controversial media laws were adopted in In particular, the political independence of the newly created Media and Infocommunications Authority was questioned and certain provisions regulating media content and conditioning the protection of journalistic sources were the object of strong criticism. 52 This led to a first set of reforms in 2011 and to a second set in 2012 after several provisions of these laws were struck down by the Constitutional Court. Use of public space - homelessness Pursuant to the latest constitutional amendment, the Constitution now foresees not only that the State shall strive to provide for decent housing conditions and access to public service for everyone, but also that it shall strive to guarantee housing for every homeless person. The amendment also adds that a decree may outlaw the use of certain public space for habitation in order to preserve the public order, safety and health, and cultural values. 53 This last sentence has been criticized as providing a constitutional basis for criminalizing homelessness. The criticism is based on the fact that a provision of the Petty Offence Act adopted in 2012, which was since abolished by decision of the Constitutional Court, 54 had set out that living on public premises constituted a petty offense punishable by fines or confinement. 55 In the light of the newly introduced protection of the homeless, the interpretation of the constitutional provision however seems aimed at maintaining control over certain public areas rather than at criminalizing homelessness as such. Churches - freedom of religion The Fourth constitutional amendment provides that certain conditions may be set by a cardinal law for the recognition of churches. 56 Such recognition grants religious organizations a favorable and protective legal status. This provision was initially part of the Transitional Provisions but was struck down by the Constitutional Court for lack of transitional nature, in a similar manner as the provisions on the competences of the Constitutional Court and of the President of the NJO (see above). 57
6 6. The integration of this provision into the permanent constitutional framework subsequently creates a constitutional basis for the already existing Hungarian Church Law, 58 which sets out criteria such as the requirement of existence for at least one hundred years internationally and twenty years in Hungary and of a certain degree of societal support. According to the Hungarian authorities, the regulation is aimed at guaranteeing the freedom of religion while reducing the number of registered churches operating in the country, some of which seem to have been registered for tax benefits rather than for conducting religious activities. 59 As a result of the adoption of this law, all formerly recognized churches (approx. 300) had to reapply for registration under the new law. The Venice Commission considers the Church law to provide a framework enabling the recognition of a relatively high number of churches in comparison to other European countries. 60 It however considers excessive the requirement of existence for a long period of time, and the recognition procedure to lack sufficient procedural guarantees, thus creating a risk of violation of the freedom of religion. 61 Higher education Where the new Constitution initially stated that the organization and financial management of institutions of higher education was to be regulated by law, the Fourth amendment introduced a modification placing their financial management under the supervision of the Government. 62 Though the independence of universities in the definition of content of research and education remains constitutionally protected, the abolishment of their financial autonomy 63 raises concern as to the reality of such independence. The Fourth amendment to the Constitution also foresees that receiving financial aid from the State for higher education may, by law, be set under the condition that the concerned students be employed in a Hungarian enterprise for a definite period of time after they finish their studies. 64 This provision subsequently constitutes a constitutional basis for the provision added in 2012 to the Act on Higher Education, according to which students whose tuition fees were covered by financial aid have to either work in Hungary for twice as long as they studied within the first twenty years after obtaining their degree (meaning working in Hungary for at least 10 years for students with a Master s Degree), or reimburse the full cost of their tuition fees. 65 This measure is considered by opponents to the recent amendment to disproportionately restrict the rights of students to choose their occupation freely, 66 but is defended by its proponents as a necessary means to ensure that public funds are used both to the benefit of individual students and of the Hungarian community as a whole. 67 V. Outlook and conclusion The Fourth constitutional amendment to the Hungarian Constitution introduces significant reforms into the constitutional order. These reforms have been carried out by the governing party with the support of an overwhelming parliamentary majority, and thus enjoy a high degree of legitimacy. These in-depth changes were however adopted at an extremely rapid pace through the enactment of a large number of laws and constitutional amendments, making it difficult for the parliamentary opposition, civil society groups, legal professionals or ordinary citizens to express their opinion and contribute to an open debate. 68 This manner in which the reform was carried out raises important concern, especially considering that the Constitutional Court s margin of action to control legal developments is significantly restricted.
7 7. First, the integration into the Constitution of Transitional Provisions, which had previously been abolished on procedural grounds by the Constitutional Court, excludes any possible control of their content in the future. The Constitutional Court is indeed not competent to substantially review constitutional amendments. In addition, a number of provisions were newly introduced into the Constitution in order to subsequently provide a constitutional basis for already existing laws. As a consequence, it is highly unlikely that such laws could be deemed unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court in case of expost constitutional review. Finally, the protection of fundamental rights in the future is rendered uncertain by the abolishment of the standards developed through the case-law of the Constitutional Court, together with the modification of the scope of a number of these rights. This is accentuated by the measures restricting the competence of the Constitutional Court in certain matters and by a feared decrease in independence of the judiciary. It remains to be seen if the decried risks occur as a result of this constitutional amendment. In the meantime, a political resolution is to be adopted in June 2013 by the European Parliament on the situation of fundamental rights in Hungary and the opinion of the Venice Commission on the latest constitutional amendments is expected around the same time. 69 If violations of EU law and of the European Convention of Human Rights were to be confirmed, the European Commission has indicated that it would take necessary steps in order to start infringement procedures where relevant. Only the future will tell with certainty whether the renovation of the Hungarian constitutional order brings progress or if it undermines democracy. 1 Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental law of Hungary, adopted on 11 March Hungarian Helsinki Committee/Hungarian Civil Liberties Union/Éötvös Károly Policy Institute - Main concerns regarding 3 European Commission press release of 12 April 2013: President Barroso voiced the Commission s serious concerns over the compatibility of the Fourth Amendment to the Hungarian Fundamental Law with EU legislation and with the principle of the rule of law. ; Victoria Nuland, US State Department spokesperson, expressed the concern of the US government that Hungary s constitutional amendments could threaten the principles of institutional independence and check s and balances that are the hallmark of democratic governance, 7 March The Fundamental Law of Hungary was adopted by Parliament on 18 April 2011 and entered into force on 1 January The European Commission launched infringement procedures IP/12/24, IP/12/222 and IP/12/395 against Hungary. 6 Formally known as the European Commission for Democracy through Law, it issued several opinions on the new Hungarian constitutional order, in particular opinion CDL-AD(2011)016 on the new Hungarian Constitution. 7 The former Hungarian Constitution had been in force since the creation of the communist People s Republic of Hungary in Its content underwent major reform in 1989 to transform Hungary into a liberal democratic state, but the changes took the form of amendments and no new Fundamental Law was formally adopted. 8 The new Constitution reflects the importance attached to balanced and sustainable budget management in article N(1). 9 Zita Gurmai, Hungarian politician and Member of the European Parliament for the Hungarian Socialist Party, debate on the Hungarian Constitution organized by the European University Institute in Florence, 2 March 2012: Amicus Brief for the Venice Commission, edited by: Prof. Gábor Halmai, Eötvös Loránd University / Prof. Kim Lane Scheppele, Princeton University, Feb Amicus Brief for the Venice Commission, edited by: Prof. Gábor Halmai, Eötvös Loránd University and Prof. Kim Lane Scheppele, Princeton University, Feb A 2/3 majority of all members of parliament is necessary to modify the Constitution according to article 24(3) of the prior Constitution of 1949 as amended in Cardinal laws require a 2/3 majority of present members of Parliament to be adopted, article T(4) of the new Constitution. 13 Act on the Transitional Provisions to the Fundamental Law of Hungary of 31 December 2011, entered into force on 1 January 2012, at the same time as the new Constitution. 14 A 2/3 majority of all members of parliament is necessary to modify the Constitution according to article S of the new Constitution of 2012.
8 8. 15 First Amendment to the Fundamental law of Hungary adopted on 18 June Expression used by the Constitutional Court to qualify the transitional Provisions in Decision 45/ Second Amendment to the Fundamental law of Hungary, adopted on 9 November Third Amendment to the Fundamental law of Hungary, adopted on 21 December The draft Electoral Law based on this constitutional provision set out that voters must register at least 2 weeks prior to elections. This is considered to favor political parties which have an active electorate. The law was struck down by the Constitutional Court before its enactment. 20 Closing provisions of the Constitution as modified by art. 19 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 21 Tibor Navracsics, Minister of Public Administration and Justice, in his letter to Thorbjorn Jagland, Secretary General of the Council of Europe, 7 March Opinion CDL-AD(2011)016 of the Venice Commission, 35, Decision 22/2012 of the Constitutional Court. 24 Hungarian Helsinki Committee/Hungarian Civil Liberties Union/Éötvös Károly Policy Institute - Main concerns regarding 25 Art. 24(5) of the Constitution as modified by art. 12 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 26 Decision 45/2012 of the Constitutional Court. 27 Art. 37(5) of the Constitution as modified by art. 17 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 28 Gross Domestic Product. 29 Decision 45/2012 of the Constitutional Court. 30 According to the Venice Commission in its opinion CDL-AD(2011)016, 98, 99, this provision goes against the aim of enhancing the protection of fundamental rights. 31 Intervention of Vivian Reding before the EU Parliament, Strasbourg plenary session on 17 April Art. 27(4) of the Constitution as modified by art. 14 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 33 Art. 11(3) of the Transitional Provisions to the Constitution. 34 Decision 45/2012 of the Constitutional Court. 35 Venice Commission opinion CDL-AD(2012)001, Section 76 of Act CLXI of 2011 on the Orgnisation and Administration of Courts. 37 Act XX of 2013 on the Modification of the Retirement Age of Members of the Judiciary. 38 European Court of Justice case C-286/ Venice Commission opinion CDL-AD(2012)001, 36 underlines the particular context of judicial appointment considering early retirement measures and powers of the President of the NJO. 40 Decision 14/1995 of the Hungarian Constitutional Court on couples who cohabit without being married, de facto concubinage, set the principle of equal recognition of heterosexual and homosexual couples. set the principle of equal recognition of same-sex civil unions. 41 Decision 1/1990 of the Constitutional Court. 42 Art. L(1) of the Constitution as modified by art. 1 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 43 Act CCXI of 2011 on the Protection of Families. 44 Decision 43/2012 of the Hungarian Constitutional Court. 45 Act XXIX of 2009 on same-sex registered civil unions. 46 Decision 154/2008 of the Constitutional Court. 47 Art.IX(3) of the Constitution as modified by art. 5 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 48 Hungarian Helsinki Committee/Hungarian Civil Liberties Union/Éötvös Károly Policy Institute - Main concerns regarding 49 Art. 151(1) of draft law T/8405 draft law, which was reviewed by the Constitutional Court before its enactment. 50 Decision 1/2013 of the Hungarian Constitutional Court. 51 Act CIV of 2010 on the Freedom of the Press and the Fundamental Rules of Media Content and Act CLXXXV of 2010 on Media Services and Mass Media. 52 Hungarian Helsinki Committee/Hungarian Civil Liberties Union/Éötvös Károly Policy Institute - Media Regulation in Hungary, September Art.XXII of the Constitution as modified by art. 8 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 54 Decision 38/2012 of the Constitutional Court. 55 article and reference of the petty offense act of Art.VII of the Constitution as modified by art. 4 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 57 Decision 45/2012 of the Constitutional Court. 58 Act CCVI of 2011 on the Right to Freedom of Conscience and Religion, and on the Legal Status of Churches, Religious Denominations and Religious Communities. 59 Venice Commission Opinion CDL-AD(2012)004, 13 retracing the position of the Hungarian authorities. 60 Venice Commission Opinion CDL-AD(2012)004, Venice Commission Opinion CDL-AD(2012)004, 64 and Art.X(3) of the Constitution as modified by art. 6 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary.
9 9. 63 Hungarian Helsinki Committee/Hungarian Civil Liberties Union/Éötvös Károly Policy Institute - Main concerns regarding 64 Art.XI(3) of the Constitution as modified by art. 7 of the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary. 65 Art.48/A/b) of Act CCIV of 2011 on National Higher Education. 66 Hungarian Helsinki Committee/Hungarian Civil Liberties Union/Éötvös Károly Policy Institute - Main concerns regarding 67 Tibor Navracsics, Minister of Public Administration and Justice, in his letter to Thorbjorn Jagland, Secretary General of the Council of Europe, 7 March Amicus Brief for the Venice Commission, edited by: Prof. Gábor Halmai, Eötvös Loránd University and Prof. Kim Lane Scheppele, Princeton University, Feb. 2012, p European Commission press release of 12 April 2013.
Fourth Amendment to Hungary s Fundamental Law
Fourth Amendment to Hungary s Fundamental Law The Fourth Amendment to Hungary s Fundamental Law (2013. ) Parliament, acting as a constitution-maker based on Article 1(2)a) of the Fundamental Law amends
More information27 April CLXI of 2011 on the Organisation and Administration of Courts of Hungary, adopted by the Venice Commission at
Analysis of the proposed amendment of the cardinal laws on the legal status of judges and the organisation and administration of courts in Hungary in light of the opinion of the Venice Commission 27 April
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 8 November 2018 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 8 November 2018 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2018/0902(COD) 14022/18 LIMITE COVER NOTE From: To: The General Secretariat of the Council Delegations FREMP 190
More informationFREEDOM OF EXPRESSION UNDER FIRE BRIEFING TO THE HUNGARIAN GOVERNMENT ON THE NEW MEDIA LEGISLATION
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION UNDER FIRE BRIEFING TO THE HUNGARIAN GOVERNMENT ON THE NEW MEDIA LEGISLATION Amnesty International Publications First published in March 2011 by Amnesty International Publications
More informationOPINION ON THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE ADOPTED ON
Strasbourg, 13 June 2005 Opinion no. 339 / 2005 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE ADOPTED ON 8.12.2004
More informationThe European Parliament Vote on Article 7 TEU against the Hungarian government
14 September 2018 The European Parliament Vote on Article 7 TEU against the Hungarian government Too Late, Too Little, Too Political? Sergio Carrera and Petra Bárd 12 September 2018 saw the European Parliament
More informationTURKEY LAW NO AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION
Strasbourg, 23 February 2017 Opinion No. 875/ 2017 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) TURKEY LAW NO. 6771 AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION This document will not be distributed
More information23 JANUARY 1993 DRAFT CONSTITUTION FOR ALBANIA
23 JANUARY 1993 DRAFT CONSTITUTION FOR ALBANIA PREAMBLE We, the people of Albania, desiring to construct a democratic and pluralist state based upon the rule of law, to guarantee the free exercise of the
More informationThe purpose of the electoral reform
In July 2013 it seems we have come to the end of a three-year process of electoral reform, but slight modifications may yet follow. Since the three new laws regulating Parliamentary elections (CCIII/2011
More informationHungary - Myths and Facts
Hungary - Myths and Facts Democracy Myth - The Government is removing all democratic checks and balances in Hungary. Fact Democratic checks and balances have not been removed. Parliament remains Hungary
More informationMandate of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers
NATIONS UNIES HAUT COMMISSARIAT DES NATIONS UNIES AUX DROITS DE L HOMME PROCEDURES SPECIALES DU CONSEIL DES DROITS DE L HOMME UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
More informationOPINION ON THE CARDINAL ACTS ON THE JUDICIARY THAT WERE AMENDED FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF OPINION CDL-AD(2012)001 ON HUNGARY
Strasbourg, 15 October 2012 Opinion no. 683 / 2012 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE CARDINAL ACTS ON THE JUDICIARY THAT WERE AMENDED FOLLOWING
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations (JUNE 2015)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations URGENT REFORM PRIORITIES FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA (JUNE 2015) The following is a list of urgent reform priorities to
More informationOPINION ON ACT CLXII OF 2011 ON THE LEGAL STATUS AND REMUNERATION OF JUDGES AND ACT CLXI OF 2011 ON THE ORGANISATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF COURTS
Strasbourg, 19 March 2012 Opinion 663/2012 CDL-AD(2012)001 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON ACT CLXII OF 2011 ON THE LEGAL STATUS AND REMUNERATION
More informationDirect Democracy in Hungary ( ): from Popular Sovereignty to Popular Illusion
Acta Univ. Sapientiae, Legal Studies, 6, 1 (2017) 109 118 Direct Democracy in Hungary (1989 2016): from Popular Sovereignty to Popular Illusion Zoltán Pozsár-Szentmiklósy Assistant Professor, Eötvös Loránd
More informationEUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR CHURCH AND STATE RESEARCH. OXFORD CONFERENCE 29 September 2 October 2011 Religion and Discrimination Law in the European Union
EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM FOR CHURCH AND STATE RESEARCH OXFORD CONFERENCE 29 September 2 October 2011 Religion and Discrimination Law in the European Union Religion and Discrimination Law Hungary Balázs Schanda
More informationMEMORANDUM. On the lawfulness under European and international law of amendment to Miskolc social housing law
MEMORANDUM On the lawfulness under European and international law of amendment to Miskolc social housing law Local government decree contravenes the Race Equality Directive Miskolc Local Government decree
More informationBULGARIA 2017 AMENDMENTS (*) TO THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM ACT AND. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (Extracts)
Strasbourg, 22 September 2017 Opinion No. 855 / 2016 CDL-REF(2017)040 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) BULGARIA 2017 AMENDMENTS (*) TO THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM ACT
More informationOpen letter to Mr. David Kramer, President of Freedom House Washington, DC, October 31, 2012
Dear Mr. Kramer, Open letter to Mr. David Kramer, President of Freedom House Washington, DC, October 31, 2012 As discussed at our meeting of last June, I would like to take the opportunity to comment on
More informationChapter 12 Some other key rights: freedom of thought, conscience, religion, opinion, expression, association and assembly
in cooperation with the Chapter 12 Some other key rights: freedom of thought, conscience, religion, opinion, expression, association and assembly Facilitator s Guide Learning objectives To familiarize
More informationThe Early Retirement Age of the Hungarian Judges
Date:14/2/17 Time:18:56:35 Page Number: 471 24 The Early Retirement Age of the Hungarian Judges gábor halmai introduction The retirement age for Hungarian judges was reduced from seventy years to sixty-two
More informationFighting International and National Corruption by Means of Criminal Law
75& #%6#,74+&+%# *70)#4+%# l #MCFÃOKCK -KCFÎ $WFCRGUV 0QU L RR L V. A. 1. Fighting International and National Corruption ILONA GÖRGÉNYI * Fighting International and National Corruption by Means of Criminal
More informationStrasbourg, 15 December <cdl\doc\2001\cdl\124_e> CDL (2001) 124 English only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION)
Strasbourg, 15 December 2001 Restricted CDL (2001) 124 English only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) DRAFT OPINION ON THE RATIFICATION OF THE EUROPEAN
More informationKim Lane Scheppele, Princeton University
Kim Lane Scheppele, Princeton University 1 2 Only a few countries in the world fail to hold elections but few countries in the world hold high quality elections. From: https://www.electoralintegrityproject.com/the
More informationCourting Controversy: the Impact of the Recent Reforms on the Independence of the Judiciary and the Rule of Law in Hungary
Courting Controversy: the Impact of the Recent Reforms on the Independence of the Judiciary and the Rule of Law in Hungary September 2012 Report of the International Bar Association s Human Rights Institute
More informationHungary. Basic facts The development of the quality of democracy in Hungary. The overall quality of democracy
Hungary Basic facts 2007 Population 10 055 780 GDP p.c. (US$) 13 713 Human development rank 43 Age of democracy in years (Polity) 17 Type of democracy Electoral system Party system Parliamentary Mixed:
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) FEDERAL CODE OF ELECTORAL INSTITUTIONS AND PROCEDURES OF MEXICO
Strasbourg, 14 January 2013 Opinion No. 680 / 2012 CDL-REF(2013)002 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) FEDERAL CODE OF ELECTORAL INSTITUTIONS AND PROCEDURES OF
More informationMinistry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland. Unofficial Translation from Finnish Legally binding only in Finnish and Swedish
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland Unofficial Translation from Finnish Legally binding only in Finnish and Swedish Act on Equality between Women and Men (609/1986; amendments up to 915/2016
More information9949/16 PR/mz 1 DG B 3A
Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 June 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0070 (COD) 9949/16 REPORT From: To: No. prev. doc.: Permanent Representatives Committee Council SOC 394 EMPL
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels 2 September /11 CRIMORG 124 COPEN 200 EJN 100 EUROJUST 122
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels 2 September 2011 13691/11 CRIMORG 124 COP 200 EJN 100 EUROJUST 122 NOTE from: the Polish delegation to: delegations No. prev. doc.: 14240/2/07/ CRIMORG 158 COP 144
More informationLAW ON POLITICAL PARTIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AS AMENDED BY LAW 192 OF 12 JULY 2012 ON THE PROHIBITION OF THE USE OF COMMUNIST SYMBOLS
Strasbourg, 11 February 2013 Opinion no. 697/2012 CDL-REF(2013)007 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) LAW ON POLITICAL PARTIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AS AMENDED
More informationJOINT OPINION THE ELECTORAL CODE OF THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
Warsaw, Strasbourg, 18 June 2013 Opinion No. 700/2012 CDL-AD(2013)020 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) AND OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
More informationConstitution of the Republic of Iceland *
Constitution of the Republic of Iceland * I. Art. 1. Iceland is a Republic with a parliamentary government. Art. 2. Althingi and the President of Iceland jointly exercise legislative power. The President
More informationC O U N T R Y R E P O R T
C O U N T R Y R E P O R T The Old and New n Superior Council of Magistracy On November 1 st, 2010, the n Superior Council of Magistracy (CSM) changed its composition. The judges and prosecutors from all
More informationCONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ICELAND 1 (No. 33, 17 June 1944, as amended 30 May 1984, 31 May 1991, 28 June 1995 and 24 June 1999)
CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF ICELAND 1 (No. 33, 17 June 1944, as amended 30 May 1984, 31 May 1991, 28 June 1995 and 24 June 1999) I. Article 1 Iceland is a Republic with a parliamentary government.
More informationVOLKSTAAT COUNCIL THE NATURE AND APPLICATION OF A BILL OF RIGHTS
VOLKSTAAT COUNCIL THE NATURE AND APPLICATION OF A BILL OF RIGHTS 1) A bill of fundamental rights must provide for the diversity of rights arising within a multinational society. 2) Within the multi-national
More informationConvention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950, CETS 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950, CETS 005) Usually called the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), it establishes a number of fundamental rights and
More informationAct XXXVI of on the National Assembly
Act XXXVI of 2012 on the National Assembly Based upon the Fundamental Law of Hungary stating that Hungary s supreme organ of popular representation shall be the National Assembly; having regard to the
More informationJOINT OPINION THE ACT ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY
Strasbourg, 18 June 2012 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 CDL-AD(2012)012 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) AND OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
More informationGUIDELINES ON ELECTIONS. Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 51 st Plenary Session (Venice, 5-6 July 2002)
Strasbourg, 10 July 2002 CDL-AD (2002) 13 Or. fr. Opinion no. 190/2002 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) GUIDELINES ON ELECTIONS Adopted by the Venice Commission at its
More informationAct on Equality between Women and Men ( 609/1986 ; amendments up to 232/2005 included)
The Act on Equality between Women and Men Act on Equality between Women and Men ( 609/1986 ; amendments up to 232/2005 included) Section 1 Objectives The objectives of this Act are to prevent discrimination
More informationJURISDICTION OF REGIONAL COURTS AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JURISDICTION OF REGIONAL COURTS AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 7); explanatory summary of bill published in Government Gazette No. 30399
More information15th meeting of the Joint Council on Constitutional Justice MINI-CONFERENCE ON MIGRATION. Venice, Italy. 8 June 2016
Strasbourg, 27 July 2016 CDL-JU (2016)005 Or. angl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) 15th meeting of the Joint Council on Constitutional Justice MINI-CONFERENCE ON MIGRATION
More informationNon-state Education Promotion Law of the People's Republic of China
Non-state Education Promotion Law of the People's Republic of China (Adopted at the 31st Session of the Standing Committee of the Ninth National People's Congress on December 28, 2002; amended in accordance
More informationSpeech. Martin Kuijer
Check against delivery Speech Selection, Promotion and Training of Judges: Impact on Judicial Accountability and the Integrity of the Justice System Martin Kuijer 2016 OSCE Human Dimension Seminar Warsaw,
More informationACT ON EQUALITY BETWEEN WOMEN AND MEN. (609/1986; amendments up to 232/2005 included) Section 1 Objectives
Lampiran 1. Act on Equality between Women and Men of Finland ACT ON EQUALITY BETWEEN WOMEN AND MEN (609/1986; amendments up to 232/2005 included) Section 1 Objectives The objectives of this Act are to
More informationBelarus. Media Freedom, Attacks on Journalists JANUARY 2014
JANUARY 2014 COUNTRY SUMMARY Belarus The human rights situation in Belarus saw little improvement in 2013. The state suppresses virtually all forms of dissent and uses restrictive legislation and abusive
More informationCase Summary Suresh Kumar Koushal and another v NAZ Foundation and others Supreme Court of India: Civil Appeal No of 2013
Case Summary Suresh Kumar Koushal and another v NAZ Foundation and others Supreme Court of India: Civil Appeal No. 10972 of 2013 1. Reference Details Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court of India (Civil Appellate
More informationHungary s One-way Ticket to the EU
Hungary s One-way Ticket to the EU Hungary and the Copenhagen Criteria Lise Esther HERMAN and Erin Marie SALTMAN Although its action tends to be perceived as undemocratic by fellow EU member states, Hungary
More informationThe Future of European Criminal Justice under the Lisbon Treaty
SPEECH/10/89 Viviane Reding Vice-President of the European Commission responsible for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship The Future of European Criminal Justice under the Lisbon Treaty Speech
More informationREPORT LUSTRATION: THE EXPERIENCE OF HUNGARY. by Prof. Dr. Andras Zs. VARGA (Judge at the Constitutional Court of Hungary, Member, Hungary)
Strasbourg, 19 November 2015 CDL-PI(2015)026 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) in co-operation with THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS PRAGUE IIR funded
More informationSUMMARY OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
x117510_srtrc_sheet4_p2_vw_x117510_srtrc_sheet4_p2_vw 04/12/2012 11:28 Page 1 SUMMARY OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS The 30 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaim
More informationREPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA DRAFT LAW ON THE MODIFICATION AND COMPLETION OF THE CONSTITUTION AND INFORMATIVE NOTE
Strasbourg, 9 February 2018 Opinion No. 916 / 2018 Engl.Only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA DRAFT LAW ON THE MODIFICATION AND COMPLETION OF THE CONSTITUTION
More informationPolitics within. A study of factors influencing internal political efficacy in international comparison
Abstracts Bene, Márton Politics within. A study of factors influencing internal political efficacy in international comparison This study is designed to uncover the individual- and context-level factors
More informationTitle VI: On Relations Between the Legislative Power and the Executive Power
REPUBLIC OF DJIBOUTI UNITY - EQUALITY - PEACE COMMISSION ON THE PREPARATION AND DRAFTING OF THE CONSTITUTION DRAFT CONSTITUTION MARCH 1992 Table of Contents Title I: On the State and Sovereignty Title
More informationJOINT OPINION ON AMENDMENTS TO THE ELECTION LAW OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Strasbourg, 20 June 2008 Opinion no. 460 / 2007 CDL-AD(2008)012 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) JOINT OPINION ON AMENDMENTS TO THE ELECTION LAW OF BOSNIA AND
More informationARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY
ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY 1576-00-00-08/EN WP 156 Opinion 3/2008 on the World Anti-Doping Code Draft International Standard for the Protection of Privacy Adopted on 1 August 2008 This Working
More informationNational Analysis. Prepared by EKINT Hungary. Institutional Framework and Enforcement Mechanisms in the Area of Political Party Finance
National Analysis Prepared by EKINT Hungary Institutional Framework and Enforcement Mechanisms in the Area of Political Party Finance Overall background Since 2010, most aspects of Hungary s constitutional
More informationUNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW. Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review* Senegal. Addendum
UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/11/24/Add.1 8 June 2009 ENGLISH Original: FRENCH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Eleventh session Agenda item 6 UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW Report of the Working
More informationHuman and Labor Rights Declaration
Date Prepared Checked Reason for issue (dd/mm/yyyy) by by 1 18/10/016 creation AGA CSA HDE 31/10/016 Distribution and publication AGA CSA HDE Approved by Page 1 of 9 CHANGES LOG: SUMMARY OF CHANGES REFERENCE
More informationPublic Interest in the Case Law of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic
Public Interest in the Case Law of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic Prof. Jiří Zemanek, Justice of the Constitutional Court of Czech Republic, Professor at Charles University in Prague Introduction
More informationThird Evaluation Round. Second Compliance Report on Malta
Adoption: 6 December 2013 Publication: 25 March 2014 Public Greco RC-III (2013) 22E Third Evaluation Round Second Compliance Report on Malta Incriminations (ETS 173 and 191, GPC 2) * * * Transparency of
More informationDRAFT OPINION ON THE DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE LAW ON POLITICAL PARTIES OF BULGARIA 1. on the basis of comments by
Strasbourg, 4 December 2008 Opinion no. 505/2008 CDL(2008)127* Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) DRAFT OPINION ON THE DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO THE LAW ON POLITICAL
More informationCONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON INTRODUCING CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND ON CONSTITUTIONAL REVISION. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 28 April 2015
Strasbourg, 2 February 2016 CDL-JU(2016)001 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE ON INTRODUCING CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS
More informationEUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Our rights, our freedoms T-shirts featuring 15 key articles Our Rights, Our Freedoms Human rights belong to everyone: every man, woman and child. They are universal
More informationNATIONS UNIES HAUT COMMISSARIAT DES NATIONS UNIES AUX DROITS DE L HOMME UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
NATIONS UNIES HAUT COMMISSARIAT DES NATIONS UNIES AUX DROITS DE L HOMME PROCEDURES SPECIALES DU CONSEIL DES DROITS DE L HOMME UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
More informationCritical issues as regards the implementation of the UN CEDAW Convention in Hungary
Critical issues as regards the implementation of the UN CEDAW Convention in Hungary Submitted to the UN CEDAW Committee for consideration in relation to the examination of the combined seventh and eighth
More informationThe Impact of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights University of Kent 7 December 2017
The Impact of the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights University of Kent 7 December 2017 Jonathan Cooper Doughty Street Chambers J.Cooper@Doughtystreet.co.uk @JonathanCoopr Human Rights within the EU: Early
More informationConsolidation Act on the Prohibition of Differences of Treatment in the Labour Market etc. 1)
Consolidation Act on the Prohibition of Differences of Treatment in the Labour Market etc. 1) This is an unofficial translation for informational purposes only. In case of discrepancy, the Danish text
More informationSituation in Egypt and Syria, in particular of Christian communities
P7_TA-PROV(2011)0471 Situation in Egypt and Syria, in particular of Christian communities European Parliament resolution of 27 October 2011 on the situation in Egypt and Syria, in particular of Christian
More information(Bill No. 38) Electoral System Referendum Act
HOUSE USE ONLY CHAIR: WITH / WITHOUT 3rd SESSION, 65th GENERAL ASSEMBLY Province of Prince Edward Island 67 ELIZABETH II, 2018 (Bill No. 38) Electoral System Referendum Act Hon. Jordan K. M. Brown Justice
More informationUPR Submission Saudi Arabia March 2013
UPR Submission Saudi Arabia March 2013 Summary Saudi Arabia continues to commit widespread violations of basic human rights. The most pervasive violations affect persons in the criminal justice system,
More informationFu n d a m e n t a l s s p r i n g s e s s i o n - f o r e c a s t. Hungarian legislation following the change in government
Fu n d a m e n t a l s Legislative features content issues: Strong institutional centralization: preparations for a new constitutional arrangement, Swift personal decisions: securing powerful positions,
More informationThe Evolution of the Constitutional System in Albania
The Evolution of the Constitutional System in Albania Dr. Evis Alimehmeti, PhD University of Tirana, Albania Abstract This paper aims to introduce the readers with the standards of the Albanian constitutional
More informationPurposes of the Law. Information of Public Importance. Public Authority Body. Legal Presumptions of Justified Interest
LAW ON FREE ACCESS TO INFORMATION OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE I Basic Provisions Purposes of the Law Article 1 This Law regulates the rights to access information of public importance held by public authority
More informationThe Constitution of Finland. 11 June 1999 (731/1999)
The Constitution of Finland 11 June 1999 (731/1999) Chapter 1 - Fundamental provisions Section 1 - The Constitution Finland is a sovereign republic. The constitution of Finland is established in this constitutional
More informationChapter 3. U.S. Constitution. THE US CONSTITUTION Unit overview. I. Six Basic Principles. Popular Sovereignty. Limited Government
Chapter 3 U.S. Constitution THE US CONSTITUTION Unit overview I. Basic Principles II. Preamble III. Articles IV. Amendments V. Amending the Constitution " Original divided into 7 articles " 1-3 = specific
More informationCONTROL ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
BULGARIA CONTROL ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS Scope of jurisdiction 1.1. What types are the controlled acts (bylaw/individual)? As per the Bulgarian legal theory and practice
More informationDECISION DC OF 15 MARCH 1999 Institutional Act concerning New Caledonia
DECISION 99-410 DC OF 15 MARCH 1999 Institutional Act concerning New Caledonia On 16 February 1999, the Prime Minister referred to the Constitutional Council, pursuant to Article 46 and the first paragraph
More informationJudicial reform why and how?
Pázmány Law Working Papers 2018/14 Varga Zs. András Judicial reform why and how? Pázmány Péter Katolikus Egyetem Pázmány Péter Catholic University Budapest http://www.plwp.eu Prof. Dr. András Zs. Varga
More informationUNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS Paris 2017 Universal Declaration of Human Rights Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the
More informationCommittee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. on the Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union ( ) (2011/2069(INI))
EUROPEAN PARLIAMT 2009-2014 Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 11.7.2012 2011/2069(INI) DRAFT REPORT on the Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union (2010-2011) (2011/2069(INI))
More informationQ&A: Trending Issues on Migration. The EU Quota Ruling. What are the Reasons for the Hungarian Government s Reaction?
PERSPECTIVE Q&A: Trending Issues on Migration The EU Quota Ruling What are the Reasons for the Hungarian Government s Reaction? TAMÁS BOROS Budapest 2017 When, after a journey through the Balkans, hundreds
More informationHUNGARY. Written by Péter Lakatos and Iván Sólyom, Lakatos, Köves and Partner. Media Regulation in Hungary: A Myth of Independence?
HUNGARY Written by Péter Lakatos and Iván Sólyom, Lakatos, Köves and Partner Media regulation in has been and remains at the forefront of fierce international and domestic debates, and under constant surveilance
More informationUnit Seven: Comparing Constitutions and Promoting Human Rights
Unit Seven: Comparing Constitutions and Promoting Human Rights Grade Level: Grades 9-12 National History Standards: Era 9: Standard 1C Analyze the impact of World War II and postwar global politics on
More informationChapter I THE CONSTITUTION
Chapter I THE CONSTITUTION A. THE CONSTITUTION The legal basis of the Indonesian state is the 1945 Constitution was promulgated the day after the 17 August 1945 proclamation of independence. The Constitution
More informationDRAFT OPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW ON THE COUNCIL FOR THE SELECTION OF JUDGES OF KYRGYZSTAN. on the basis of comments by
Strasbourg, 6 June 2011 Opinion No. 624 / 2011 CDL(2011)042 * Engl. only. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) DRAFT OPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW ON THE COUNCIL FOR THE SELECTION
More informationUniversal Declaration of Human Rights Resolution 217 A (III) Preamble
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was written between January 1947 and December 1948 by an eightmember group from the UN Commission on Human Rights with Eleanor Roosevelt as chairperson. Their
More informationTHE JUDICIARY, WHICH MUST BE INDEPENDENT, HAS COME UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE EXECUTIVE
Policy Note 19 March 2014 This policy note has been prepared by the Checks and Balances Network. The policy note evaluates Law no. 6524 Concerning Amendments to Certain Laws adopted by the Plenum of the
More informationIntroduction to the Judicial System of Korea
Supreme Court of Korea Introduction to the Judicial System of Korea Jan. 21, 2003 April, 2008 Judicial Branch Definition: The national authority that exercises judicial power separate from the administrative
More informationIlliberal Media Control and Politics in Globalized Contexts: Hungary and Singapore
Illiberal Media Control and Politics in Globalized Contexts: Hungary and Singapore Eva Polonska-Kimunguyi Monash University Hoe-Yeong Loke EU Centre in Singapore Outline The liberal media model Hungary
More informationACT OF 25 JUNE 2015 ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF POLAND AND AMENDMENTS
Strasbourg, 25 January 2016 Opinion No. 833/ 2015 CDL-REF(2016)009 Engl. Only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT OF 25 JUNE 2015 ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF POLAND
More informationOPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW ON PRINCIPLES OF THE STATE LANGUAGE POLICY OF UKRAINE
Strasbourg, 19 December 2011 Or. Engl. Opinion no.651/2011 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OPINION ON THE DRAFT LAW ON PRINCIPLES OF THE STATE LANGUAGE POLICY OF UKRAINE
More informationDRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2018/0000(INI) on the 2018 Commission Report on Montenegro (2018/0000(INI))
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Foreign Affairs 2018/0000(INI) 22.6.2018 DRAFT REPORT on the 2018 Commission Report on Montenegro (2018/0000(INI)) Committee on Foreign Affairs Rapporteur: Charles
More informationamended on 27 January 1997 and on 11 April 2000 PREAMBLE Conscious of our responsibilities and of our rights before history and before humanity;
THE CONSTITUTION OF BURKINA FASO Adopted on 2 June 1991, promulgated on 11 June 1991, amended on 27 January 1997 and on 11 April 2000 We, the Sovereign People of Burkina Faso, PREAMBLE Conscious of our
More informationFINAL OPINION ON THE DRAFT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON AMENDMENTS AND CHANGES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF GEORGIA
Strasbourg, 15 October 2010 Opinion no. 543/2009 CDL-AD(2010)028 Or. Engl. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) FINAL OPINION ON THE DRAFT CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON AMENDMENTS
More informationCHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
26.10.2012 Official Journal of the European Union C 326/391 CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2012/C 326/02) C 326/392 Official Journal of the European Union 26.10.2012 PREAMBLE..........................................................
More informationSTATEMENT OF THE COUNCIL'S REASONS
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 5 December 2003 (OR. fr) Interinstitutional File: 2001/0111 (COD) 13263/3/03 REV 3 ADD 1 MI 235 JAI 285 SOC 385 CODEC 1308 OC 616 STATEMT OF THE COUNCIL'S REASONS
More informationNATIONAL REPORT, Separation of Powers and Independence of Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Bodies,
Constitutional Court of Romania concerning NATIONAL REPORT, Separation of Powers and Independence of Constitutional Courts and Equivalent Bodies, for the 2nd Congress of the World Conference on Constitutional
More informationTEXTS ADOPTED. European Parliament resolution of 17 May 2017 on the situation in Hungary (2017/2656(RSP))
European Parliament 2014-2019 TEXTS ADOPTED P8_TA(2017)0216 Situation in Hungary European Parliament resolution of 17 May 2017 on the situation in Hungary (2017/2656(RSP)) The European Parliament, having
More information