What s News in Tax. Trump and the NAFTA. Analysis that matters from Washington National Tax. by Luis A. Abad and Donald Hok, Washington National Tax *
|
|
- Rafe Fleming
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 What s News in Tax Analysis that matters from Washington National Tax Trump and the NAFTA January 23, 2017 by Luis A. Abad and Donald Hok, Washington National Tax * President Trump s campaign platform included promises to renegotiate a number of trade deals most notably, the North American Free Trade Agreement ( NAFTA ) with Mexico and Canada. This article considers whether a president has the authority to unilaterally withdraw from the NAFTA or whether the president must seek consent or authorization from Congress, and explores other avenues the president may have to modify tariffs. During the recent U.S. presidential campaign, Republican candidate Donald Trump ran, in part, on a platform to shake up America s global trade position by promising to renegotiate a number of trade deals most notably, the NAFTA with Mexico and Canada or risk a termination of the agreement by the United States. Candidate Trump also stated he would impose taxes of 35 percent for goods imported into the U.S. from Mexico, and 45 percent for goods from China. Although it is not clear, it is possible he might have been talking about tariffs (rather than taxes), which would be reminiscent of the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs of If so, such a drastic increase in tariffs would likely result in a substantial * Luis Abad is a principal with the Trade and Customs Services group of Washington National Tax ( WNT ). Donald Hok is a manager with the Trade and Customs Services practice currently assigned to WNT. 1 For the purpose of this article, it is assumed that a 35 percent tax on goods from Mexico would be in the form of a tariff on goods, rather than the border adjustable tax concept from the House Republican blueprint on tax reform. Note, however, that President Trump has described his proposal as a tax. Further, some of his advisors recently have suggested that a Trump Administration might support the border adjustments proposed in the tax reform blueprint. This also suggests that Trump may have been describing a tax law proposal, rather than a tariff. However, it is also possible that Trump was talking about tariffs, rather than taxes. In this regard, note that the blueprint s proposed border adjustments would apply to imports from all countries, not just Mexico and China. Further, in his campaign, Trump proposed a 15 percent statutory corporate rate (rather than the current 35 percent rate).
2 Trump and the NAFTA page 2 increase in import costs for U.S. companies, costs that consequently would be passed on to U.S. consumers in the form of higher prices for goods. 2 The potential impact of such policies may also lead our trade partners, Mexico in this case, to respond with counter tariff measures in retaliation, making it more expensive for U.S. companies to export and sell their goods in such foreign markets, possibly leading to a trade war. This issue is a concern for many companies with supply chains in Mexico. This article explores whether, as president, Trump has the authority to unilaterally withdraw from the NAFTA, or whether the United States president must seek consent or authorization from Congress before such a withdrawal, and what other avenues the President may have to modify tariffs. The Campaign Promise During a campaign speech on June 28, 2016, candidate Trump made the following statement: I m going to tell our NAFTA partners that I intend to immediately renegotiate the terms of that agreement to get a better deal for our workers. And I don t mean just a little bit better, I mean a lot better. If they do not agree to a renegotiation, then I will submit notice under Article 2205 of the NAFTA agreement that America intends to withdraw from the deal. 3 Following his November 8 election victory, President Trump s transition team made it clear that President Trump s trade promises are a priority for his presidency, and laid out a skeleton of Trump s trade policy for the first 200 days of his presidency. 4 The president also published a 7 Point Plan To Rebuild the American Economy by Fighting for Free Trade that underscores the president s campaign promise to renegotiate or withdraw from the NAFTA, a move that if undertaken unilaterally could result in litigation to resolve critical issues concerning the exercise of executive power in this regard. 5 NAFTA Article 2205 The NAFTA, a trade agreement between the United States, Canada, and Mexico, negotiated by President George H.W. Bush and signed into law by President Bill Clinton on December 8, 1993, intended to, among other things, eliminate trade barriers, promote fair competition, increase investment opportunities, and protect intellectual property rights between the member countries. 6 Article 2205 of the NAFTA provides that [a] Party may withdraw from this Agreement six months after it provides written notice of withdrawal to the other Parties. If a Party withdraws, the Agreement shall remain in 2 Report: Trump tariffs would be catastrophic for poor, Politico (May 12, 2016). 3 Full Transcript: Donald Trump s jobs plan speech, Politico (June 28, 2016). 4 Trump transition memo: Trade reform begins Day 1, CNN (Nov. 16, 2016), available at politics/donald-trump-trade-memo-transition. But see NAFTA Is Here To Stay, Even Under Trump, Erik Sherman, Forbes (Dec. 6, 2016) available at 5 Donald Trump s 7 Point Plan To Rebuild the American Economy by Fighting for Free Trade, available at 6 H.R rd Congress: North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act; Pub.L
3 Trump and the NAFTA page 3 force for the remaining Parties. 7 Thus, if the U.S. chooses to withdraw from NAFTA, it need only give the other member countries the requisite notice. The key question, however, is whether the president can unilaterally invoke article 2205 without the consent or approval of Congress. The U.S. Constitution conveys authority to both the president and Congress in dealing with foreign affairs. Article II, section 2, of the U.S. Constitution provides that the president shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur 8 At the same time, however, the Constitution grants Congress Power To lay and collect Duties [and] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations. 9 Moreover, Congress may delegate certain authority to the president to negotiate trade agreements by statute. Thus, the Constitution by itself may not necessarily be instructive on the issue at hand. The specific international agreement and enabling law must also be considered to assess which governmental body has the authority to withdraw the United States from the NAFTA. International Agreements Under the Constitution, the United States can become a party to an international agreement by treaty or by international agreements other than treaties. 10 A treaty is an international agreement whose entry into force with respect to the United States takes place only after the Senate has given its advice and consent. 11 Although what actually constitutes a treaty is unclear, 12 the process for ratifying a treaty requires consent of two-thirds of the senators present. 13 On the other hand, international agreements other than treaties include agreements made pursuant to either the provisions of an existing treaty, legislation (i.e., congressional-executive agreements), or the constitutional authority of the president (i.e., sole executive agreements). 14 The NAFTA was entered into pursuant to two enabling statutes: Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 ( OTCA ) and the Trade Act of These acts provided that agreements such as the NAFTA shall enter into force with respect to the United States if (and only if) after entering into the agreement, the President submits [to Congress] [] an implementing bill... and the implementing bill is enacted into law (the so-called fast track procedures ) The NAFTA Secretariat (Nov. 14, 2016), available at Trade-Agreement?mvid=1&secid=d5a8ba07-1fb2-4f28-88d0-a8eac08611a2. 8 U.S. Const. Art. II, Section 2. 9 U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Section U.S. Department of State, 11 Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) FAM See Made in the USA Foundation v. United States, 242 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2001). 13 Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution provides the president, with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur FAM H.R (100 th ): Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (19 U.S.C et seq.); Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C et seq.) U.S.C. 2903(a); 19 U.S.C. 2112(e).
4 Trump and the NAFTA page 4 Under the fast track procedures, Congress authorizes the president to submit a trade agreement implementing bill to Congress, which can be approved or denied by Congress but cannot be amended or filibustered. 17 Thus, the NAFTA is considered to be a congressional-executive agreement, 18 essentially legislation, enacted into law by the NAFTA Implementation Act ( NIA ) because it was approved by a simple majority in both houses of Congress in November 1993 (not two-thirds of the Senate, as would be required for a treaty ), and signed into law by then-president Clinton. 19 Accordingly, pursuant to the legislative power vested in Congress by article 1, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, absent a lawful delegation of authority to the president, only Congress has the authority to repeal existing laws, including the NIA. The NIA does authorize the president to proclaim such modifications or continuation of any duty, such continuation of duty-free or excise treatment, or such additional duties, as the President determines to be necessary or appropriate to carry out or apply articles 302, 305, 307, 308, and 703 and Annexes 302.2, 307.1, 308.1, 308.2, 300-B, 703.2, and of the [NAFTA]. 20 Section 125(b) of The Trade Act of 1974, as amended through P.L (enacted February 24, 2016), also authorizes the president to at any time terminate, in whole or in part, any proclamation made under this chapter, 21 which would include the NAFTA preferential tariff rates proclaimed pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 6641 (December 15, 1993). However, neither the NAFTA nor the NIA is a presidential proclamation, nor are they entered into force by proclamation. As a result, these provisions would not appear to authorize the president to unilaterally terminate NAFTA per se. Moreover, the NIA does not explicitly authorize the president to unilaterally invoke article 2205 of the NAFTA to withdraw from the agreement without congressional approval. Like the Constitution, the NIA is silent on the matter of who has the authority to abrogate a treaty or international agreement. Similarly, the enabling authorities, the OTCA and Trade Act of 1974, are not explicit on this point. OTCA is silent as to who has the authority to terminate a congressionally approved trade agreement; 22 and the Trade Act of 1974 appears to reserve that authority for Congress with respect to certain countries under specific circumstances. 23 Notwithstanding the ambiguity in these statutes, generally, in the absence of specific statutory language, Congress reserves the power to repeal the NIA and, arguably, to withdraw 17 See 19 U.S.C Jane M. Smith, Daniel T. Shedd, and Brandon J. Murrill, Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional- Executive Agreements Rather Than Treaties, Congressional Research Service (Apr. 15, 2013) available at 19 The bill was passed in a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives on November 17, 1993, and the U.S. Senate on November 20, 1993, after which it was signed into law by President William Clinton on December 8, H.R rd Congress: North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act; Pub.L U.S.C. 3331; See also 19 U.S.C. 2111, and 19 U.S.C. 2902, the basic authority for trade agreements, generally provide the same U.S.C. 2135(b). 22 See 19 U.S.C (Termination and withdrawal authority). 23 See 19 U.S.C (Termination and reservation authority; reciprocal nondiscriminatory treatment), which requires the president to recommend to Congress legislation for the termination of trade agreements when a major industrial country does not reciprocate trade concessions.
5 Trump and the NAFTA page 5 from the NAFTA under its broad constitutional powers to regulate commerce with foreign nations. Thus, should President Trump move to unilaterally withdraw from the NAFTA without congressional approval, it is likely that interested parties may challenge the matter, and the issue would be litigated before the federal courts. Judicial Precedent The federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have on several occasions declined to resolve similar questions regarding executive authority to terminate international treaties. In 2001, President George W. Bush withdrew the United States from the 1972 Treaty Between the United States of America and The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems (the ABM Treaty ). 24 Similar to article 2205 of NAFTA, the ABM Treaty contained a withdrawal clause upon six months notice, which President Bush invoked on December 13, Thirty-two members of the House of Representatives filed an action in the District Court for the District of Columbia arguing that the president did not have the authority to terminate the ABM Treaty without the consent of Congress. In dismissing the complaint, the court concluded, in part, that the issue of whether the president can terminate a treaty without congressional consent was a nonjusticiable political question best left for resolution to the political branches of our government. 26 In Goldwater v. Carter, members of Congress challenged President Jimmy Carter s authority to terminate a mutual defense treaty with Taiwan. 27 A plurality of the U.S. Supreme Court voted to dismiss the case, albeit on different grounds. Several of the justices, however, took the position that the question presented was political, and therefore nonjusticiable because it involves the authority of the President in the conduct of our country s foreign relations and the extent to which the Senate or the Congress is authorized to negate the action of the President. 28 In addition, Justice Rehnquist wrote in his concurring opinion that while the Constitution is express as to the manner in which the Senate shall participate in the ratification of a treaty, it is silent as to that body s participation in the abrogation of a treaty. 29 Similarly, in Beacon Products Corp. v. Reagan, the federal District Court of Massachusetts relied on the plurality opinion in Goldwater in holding that a constitutional challenge to [the President s] unilateral termination of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation with Nicaragua, without congressional consent, raised a political question and therefore, was not reviewable by the court Kucinich v. Bush, 236 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2002). 25 Article XV of the ABM stated that [e]ach Party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw if it decides that extraordinary events related to the subject matter of [the] Treaty jeopardized its supreme interests. 26 Kucinich v. Bush, 236 F. Supp. 2d 1, 33 (D.D.C. 2002). 27 Goldwater v. Carter, 444 U.S. 996 (1979). 28 Goldwater, 444 U.S. at Goldwater, 444 U.S. at 1003 (Rehnquist, J., concurring opinion). 30 Products Corp. v. Reagan, 633 F. Supp. 1191, (D. Mass. 1986).
6 Trump and the NAFTA page 6 Should President Trump unilaterally attempt to withdraw from the NAFTA, it is possible the federal courts may continue the trend of dismissing the issue on the basis that it raises a nonjusticiable political question. Thus, the issue potentially may be settled by some other aspect of the political or democratic process. However, it is notable that the cases discussed above involved a treaty, which may be distinguishable from a congressional-executive agreement, such as the NAFTA, which arguably is the province of Congress. Tariff Rates without NAFTA Assuming, for the sake of argument, that the NAFTA is terminated (either with or without congressional consent or authorization), the next question is: How high can tariff rates be raised on goods from Mexico? Candidate Trump repeatedly stated that he intended to increase the tax on imports from Mexico to 35 percent. In the event that the United States withdraws from the NAFTA, the current preferential NAFTA duty rates will remain in effect for one year. However, the president may, by proclamation, restore the pre- NAFTA duty rates. The president must then, within 60 days after the withdrawal, provide Congress recommendations as to the appropriate rates of duty for all articles which were affected by the termination or withdrawal. 31 Any increase to the NAFTA preferential rates would generally be limited to the Most Favored Nation ( MFN ) rate of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ( HTSUS ). Article I of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade ( GATT ) 1947, which establishes the principle of the MFN and adopted in the World Trade Organization ( WTO ) Agreement to which the United States is a signatory, states that: [A]ny advantage, favor, privilege or immunity granted by any contracting party to any product originating in or destined for any other country shall be accorded immediately and unconditionally to the like product originating in or destined for the territories of all other contracting parties. 32 Thus, under the WTO Agreement, specific goods imported from Mexico generally cannot be subject to higher tariff rates than goods from any other WTO-member country (i.e., the rate would be limited to the general column 1 MFN duty rate of the HTSUS). As discussed below, however, the president could potentially circumvent the MFN duty limits under exceptional circumstances. Alternatives to NAFTA Termination Even if the NAFTA is not terminated, or if the president lacks the authority to unilaterally withdraw from the NAFTA, the president has additional authorities to reshape the NAFTA and modify tariffs with respect to Mexico. As previously discussed, the president may at any time terminate or modify any proclaimed NAFTA preferential tariff rates as the president determines to be necessary or appropriate. 31 Trade Act of 1974, section 125(e); codified at 19 U.S.C. 2135(e) U.S.C et seq.
7 Trump and the NAFTA page 7 Depending on the authority invoked, a presidential tariff modification may or may not be subject to congressional consultation requirements. 33 Thus, it would appear the president can increase tariffs on Mexico without necessarily withdrawing from the NAFTA, subject to the limits imposed by the WTO agreement (i.e., the general MFN duty rate), as discussed above. However, in addition to the aforementioned tariff authority afforded to the president under the NAFTA, there are other statutes that the president may potentially invoke to modify and increase tariffs on imports from Mexico, effectively circumventing the lower preferential tariff rates under the NAFTA and potentially above the MFN duty rates required under the WTO Agreement. 34 These extraordinary tariff measures require that specific circumstances be present, generally of an economic or national security nature, in order to trigger the enabling presidential authority. These statutes include the Trade Expansion Act of and the Trade Act of 1974, 36 which, generally speaking, would provide the president the authority to impose limited remedies, such as tariffs or quotas, upon a finding of an adverse impact on national security related to imports or discriminatory trade practices against the United States. There are also statutes that provide the president with more expansive authority under extreme circumstances, such as war and national emergencies. For example, the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 ( TWEA ), 37 which delegates the president broad wartime powers to regulate international commerce; and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 ( IEEPA ), 38 which authorizes the president to declare a national emergency and regulate international trade. 39 Arguably, certain conditions presently exist that may be invoked to trigger said extraordinary measures, for example, pointing to current U.S. deficits, other trade imbalances, the general war on terror, or the specific conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. These conditions could also potentially permit the president to raise tariff rates beyond the MFN rates pursuant to the security exceptions of the WTO Agreement, 33 Presidential tariff modification made under 19 U.S.C. 3331(b) are subject to the prerequisite consultation and layover requirements of 19 U.S.C. 3313(a). 34 See FN 33 discussing the security exceptions to the GATT U.S.C U.S.C et seq U.S.C. App. 5(b) U.S.C. Chapter U.S.C. 1701(a) states that the president s authority under the IEEPA may be exercised to deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States, if the President declares a national emergency with respect to such threat. The IEEPA does not, however, define what conditions are required to constitute a national emergency. Similarly, the TWEA does not define the term national emergency, leaving it to the president s discretion. In U.S. v. Spawr Optical Research, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit stated that the TWEA contained no standards by which to determine whether a national emergency existed or continued; in fact, Congress had delegated to the President the authority to define all of the terms in [50 U.S.C. app. 5(b)(3)] including national emergency, so long as the definitions were consistent with the purposes of the TWEA. 685 F.2d 1076 (9th Cir. 1982).
8 Trump and the NAFTA page 8 which provide for the protection of [the United States ] essential security interest in time of war or other emergency in international relations. 40 Other Customs Consideration Regarding the NAFTA Should President Trump invoke article 2205 to withdraw from the NAFTA, this could also affect other general provisions of the NIA relating to general customs compliance. For example, Title VI of the NIA, commonly known as the Customs Modernization Act (or Mod Act ), amends important trade laws concerning customs compliance and enforcement in the United States. Section 637 of the Mod Act modified 19 U.S.C to impose the reasonable care compliance standard upon U.S. importers when making entry of goods. 41 Thus, the repeal of the NIA could potentially have a disruptive impact on importers and the trade compliance community in the United States, even if they are not importing from Mexico, as well as governmental enforcement actions. Fortunately, one possibility is that, notwithstanding withdrawal from the NAFTA, Congress could decide to not repeal the NIA and allow the law to remain on the books. Although it would be considered a dead statute with no practical effect with respect to tariffs for Mexican goods, it would maintain the other customs compliance provisions of the Mod Act in place. Alternatively, Congress could consider legislating a partial repeal of the NIA to preserve only certain sections of the NIA such as the Mod Act. 42 The NIA actually includes language that would automatically repeal some provisions of the NIA should a withdrawal from the NAFTA occur. 43 The NIA is silent, however, as to the remaining provisions, but presumably those provisions would remain in effect in the absence of specific legislation to repeal them. Thus, notwithstanding the U.S. s withdrawal from the NAFTA, there appears to be several alternatives to safeguard important provisions of the NIA, or Mod Act. Conclusion It remains to be seen what President Trump s final proposals on international trade, the NAFTA, and Mexico in particular, will be. Although the Constitution and NIA are silent on the matter of who has the authority to abrogate an agreement such as the NAFTA, Congress reserves the power to repeal the NIA vis-à-vis its legislative 40 Article XXI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994), annexed to the WTO Agreement, provides for security exceptions. That section states, in relevant part, that [n]othing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent any contracting party from taking any action which it considers necessary for the protection of its essential security interests taken in time of war or other emergency in international relations. See 19 U.S.C. 3511(d) which provides congressional approval to of the GATT U.S.C (requires U.S. importers to exercise reasonable care to enter, classify, and determine the value of imported merchandise and to provide any other information necessary to enable U.S. Customs and Border Protection to properly assess duties, collect statistics, and determine if any other applicable legal requirements are met). 42 For example, section 107 of the NIA effectively suspended the United States-Canada Free Trade Implementation Act of 1988 ( US-CA FTA ) by modifying the US-CA FTA s repeal provision. 43 Section 109(b) of the NIA states that [d]uring any period in which a country ceases to be a NAFTA country, sections 101 through 106 shall cease to have effect with respect to such country.
9 Trump and the NAFTA page 9 authority and, arguably, also to withdraw from the NAFTA under its broad powers to regulate commerce with foreign nations. However, the matter is not entirely clear, and each trade agreement or treaty that President Trump may attempt to terminate will have to be considered on a case by case basis, as the nature of the agreement, enabling authority or congressional delegation of authority, may differ. Nonetheless, should the Trump administration attempt to unilaterally invoke article 2205 of the NAFTA without seeking congressional approval, such a unilateral presidential exercise of power may potentially be subject to prolonged legal challenge. In such a case, as stated by the U.S. Supreme Court, [I]t would be error to suppose that every case or controversy which touches foreign relations lies beyond judicial cognizance. 44 Thus, the Court has left open the possibility for judicial review, and the matter could be tied up in litigation for years. This could leave importers and exporters uncertain about the long-term prospects, costs, and compliance obligations of doing business with Mexico. It could result in disruptions to supply chains. It is also possible that Mexico may not wait for the matter to be adjudicated before it begins imposing retaliatory tariffs, making goods more expensive for American consumers. This was the experience learned following the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs of 1930, when many economists viewed the retaliatory tariffs by America's trading partners to cause a significant reduction in American exports, by some estimations by more than half. 45 According to former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke, "Economists still agree that Smoot-Hawley and the ensuing tariff wars were highly counterproductive and contributed to the depth and length of the global Depression." 46 Ultimately, the matter could become a moot issue since Congress is currently controlled by the same party as the president, but even that is not a certainty since Trump s trade policy has received a chilly reception by some congressional Republicans, fearing a possible trade war, and others, including House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., who favor tax reform over tariffs. 47 It would seem that the most predictable course of action for the trade community (and supply chains), would be to attempt to reshape the NAFTA using clearly established executive authority, or to obtain congressional consent or authorization to terminate the NAFTA. 44 Kucinich v. Bush, 236 F. Supp. at 43, quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 211 (1962). 45 According to one article published by the Foundation for Economic Education ( FEE ), U.S. exports was reduced from $7 billion in 1929 to $2.4 billion in 1932 as a result, in part, by retaliatory tariff impositions by the U.S. s trading partners. Theodore Phalan, Deema Yazigi, and Thomas Rustici, The Smoot-Hawley Tariff and the Great Depression, Foundation for Economic Education (Feb. 29, 2012). U.S. imports, similarly, declined by up to 20 percent following enactment of the Smoot- Hawley tariffs, and fell another 40 percent during the following two years. The Battle of Smoot-Hawley, The Economist, (Dec. 18, 2008) available at 46 FRB: Speech--Bernanke, Monetary Policy and the Global Economy--March 25, 2013 available at 47 House G.O.P. Signals Break With Trump Over Tariff Threat, NY Times (Dec. 5, 2016); Ryan Dismisses Tariff Talk and Plugs Tax Reform, Tax Notes Today (Jan. 5, 2017).
10 Trump and the NAFTA page 10 The information contained in this article is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser. This article represents the views of the author or authors only, and does not necessarily represent the views or professional advice of KPMG LLP.
U.S. Withdrawal from Free Trade Agreements: Frequently Asked Legal Questions
U.S. Withdrawal from Free Trade Agreements: Frequently Asked Legal Questions Brandon J. Murrill Legislative Attorney September 7, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44630 Summary The
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code 97-896 Updated April 5, 2002 Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties Summary
More informationOrganization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD.Stat, accessed Jan. 31, Available at: https://stats.oecd.org/.
FR: Lori Wallach, Public Citizen s Global Trade Watch DT: November 13, 2017 RE: Presidential Authority to Terminate NAFTA Without Congressional Approval SUMMARY: A U.S. president has authority to notify
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code 97-896 Updated January 31, 2003 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties Summary
More information19 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 19 - CUSTOMS DUTIES CHAPTER 4 - TARIFF ACT OF 1930 SUBTITLE II - SPECIAL PROVISIONS Part III - Promotion of Foreign Trade 1351. Foreign trade agreements (a) Authority of President; modification and
More informationWhy Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties
Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties Jeanne J. Grimmett Legislative Attorney January 19, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary ADJUSTING IMPORTS OF STEEL INTO THE UNITED STATES
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 8, 2018 THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary ADJUSTING IMPORTS OF STEEL INTO THE UNITED STATES - - - - - - - BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION
More informationNAFTA RENEGOTIATIONS: A LONG WAY TO COMPLETE THE PROCESS
NAFTA RENEGOTIATIONS: A LONG WAY TO COMPLETE THE PROCESS Ryohei Yamada North America & Latin America Dept. Mitsui & Co. Global Strategic Studies Institute THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF RENEGOTIATION On August
More informationTrade Promotion Authority and Fast-Track Negotiating Authority for Trade Agreements: Major Votes
Trade Promotion Authority and Fast-Track Negotiating Authority for Trade Agreements: Major Votes Carolyn C. Smith Information Research Specialist January 12, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report
More informationThe House Report on the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
The House Report on the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ACT House Report (Ways and Means Committee) No. 103-361(I), Nov. 15, 1993
More informationIntersections of International Trade and Immigration: Current & Proposed Changes
Intersections of International Trade and Immigration: Current & Proposed Changes February 27, 2018 Speakers: Danielle M. Rizzo, Esq. Harris Beach PLLC Jon P. Yormick, Esq. Phillips Lytle LLP ERIE INSTITUTE
More informationCRS Report for Congress
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS22398 March 14, 2006 The Jackson-Vanik Amendment and Candidate Countries for WTO Accession: Issues for Congress Summary William H. Cooper
More informationMultilateral Trade and Policy Developments
US Multilateral Trade and Policy Developments Japan External Trade Organization November 2016 Contents US Trade Reports... 3 Implications of the 2016 Presidential Election for US Trade Policy... 3 Executive
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS20717 Updated July 6, 2001 Vietnam Trade Agreement: Approval and Implementing Procedure Vladimir N. Pregelj Specialist in International
More informationTrade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy
Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy William H. Cooper Specialist in International Trade and Finance January 13, 2014 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and
More informationCordray s Recess Appointment: Future Legal Challenges. By V. Gerard Comizio and Amanda M. Jabour*
Cordray s Recess Appointment: Future Legal Challenges By V. Gerard Comizio and Amanda M. Jabour* Introduction On January 4, 2012, President Obama appointed Richard Cordray as director of the Consumer Financial
More informationMozambique Zimbabwe Preferential Trade Agreement and SADC
LEGAL OPINION Mozambique Zimbabwe Preferential Trade Agreement and SADC SUBMITTED TO Ministry of Industry and Trade, Mozambique SUBMITTED BY Nathan Associates Inc. www.nathaninc.com PREPARED BY C. Michael
More informationTrade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy
Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy J. F. Hornbeck Specialist in International Trade and Finance William H. Cooper Specialist in International Trade and Finance August
More informationADJUSTING IMPORTS OF STEEL INTO THE UNITED STATES BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/15/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-05478, and on FDsys.gov ADJUSTING IMPORTS OF STEEL INTO THE UNITED
More informationJudicial Review of Unilateral Treaty Terminations
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 10-1-1979 Judicial Review of Unilateral Treaty Terminations Deborah Seidel Chames Follow this and additional
More informationNAFTA, TRUMP and the US CONGRESS Lawrence L. Herman September 2017
NAFTA, TRUMP and the US CONGRESS Lawrence L. Herman 2017 29 September 2017 A version of this article was posted on the Macdonald-Laurier Institute (Ottawa) website at: http://www.macdonaldlaurier.ca/category/inside-policy
More informationCuba Sanctions: Legislative Restrictions Limiting the Normalization of Relations
Cuba Sanctions: Legislative Restrictions Limiting the Normalization of Relations Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy Legislation Mark P. Sullivan Specialist in Latin American Affairs February
More informationADJUSTING IMPORTS OF STEEL INTO THE UNITED STATES BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/28/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-06425, and on FDsys.gov ADJUSTING IMPORTS OF STEEL INTO THE UNITED
More informationStudy Questions (with Answers) Lecture 18 Preferential Trading Arrangements
Study Questions (with Answers) Page 1 of 6(7) Study Questions (with Answers) Lecture 18 Preferential Trading Arrangements Part 1: Multiple Choice Select the best answer of those given. 1. Which of the
More informationDemocratic majority in Congress. No political mandate (43% of popular vote)
FOR Democratic majority in Congress AGAINST No political mandate (43% of popular vote) ECONOMY FAMILIES EDUCATION CRIME HEALTH CARE ENVIRONMENT Led by Newt Gingrich Congressman from Georgia/ Speaker of
More informationCRS Report for Congress
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS22094 Updated April 4, 2005 Summary Lawsuits Against State Supporters of Terrorism: An Overview Jennifer K. Elsea Legislative Attorney
More informationCITATION BY U.S. COURTS TO DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE CASES
CITATION BY U.S. COURTS TO DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE CASES Lawrence R. Walders* The topic of the Symposium is the citation to foreign court precedent in domestic jurisprudence.
More informationTrade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy
Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy J. F. Hornbeck Specialist in International Trade and Finance William H. Cooper Specialist in International Trade and Finance April
More informationHow Hard (or Easy) It Will Be for Trump to Fulfill His 100-Day Plan. By LARRY BUCHANAN, ALICIA PARLAPIANO and KAREN YOURISH NOV.
How Hard (or Easy) It Will Be for Trump to Fulfill His 100-Day Plan By LARRY BUCHANAN, ALICIA PARLAPIANO and KAREN YOURISH NOV. 21, 2016 President-elect Donald J. Trump released a plan last month outlining
More informationImplementing Bills for Trade Agreements: Statutory Procedures Under Trade Promotion Authority
Implementing Bills for Trade Agreements: Statutory Procedures Under Trade Promotion Authority Richard S. Beth Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process August 8, 2016 Congressional Research Service
More informationFACTS ON NAFTA COMMENTARY SOME BACKGROUND ON NAFTA HISTORY OF RATIFICATION KEY TAKEAWAYS LPL RESEARCH WEEKLY ECONOMIC.
LPL RESEARCH WEEKLY ECONOMIC COMMENTARY February 6 2017 FACTS ON John J. Canally, Jr., CFA Chief Economic Strategist, LPL Financial Matthew E. Peterson Chief Wealth Strategist, LPL Financial KEY TAKEAWAYS
More informationTO TAKE CERTAIN ACTIONS UNDER THE AFRICAN GROWTH AND OPPORTUNITY ACT AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/27/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-28144, and on FDsys.gov TO TAKE CERTAIN ACTIONS UNDER THE AFRICAN
More informationTRUMP, TRADE, AND NATIONAL SECURITY BLOWING UP THE WTO? Stuart S. Malawer
TRUMP, TRADE, AND NATIONAL SECURITY BLOWING UP THE WTO? Stuart S. Malawer The Trump administration s reliance on a national security provision in the recent Department of Commerce report proposing possible
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary ADJUSTING IMPORTS OF ALUMINUM INTO THE UNITED STATES
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 8, 2018 THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary ADJUSTING IMPORTS OF ALUMINUM INTO THE UNITED STATES - - - - - - - BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION
More informationReport for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code 97-389 E Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Generalized System of Preferences Updated June 28, 2002 William H. Cooper Specialist in International Trade and Finance Foreign Affairs,
More informationTrade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy
Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy J. F. Hornbeck Specialist in International Trade and Finance William H. Cooper Specialist in International Trade and Finance August
More informationGENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 ("GATT 1994") shall consist of:
Page 23 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON TARIFFS AND TRADE 1994 1. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 ("GATT 1994") shall consist of: (a) the provisions in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade,
More informationInternational Trade Agreements Spring Semester 2013 January 16 to May 10, 2013
International Trade Agreements Spring Semester 2013 January 16 to May 10, 2013 Ninth and Tenth Classes February 13/15, 2013 Professor Luis Ernesto Derbez Bautista Second Section - Trade Agreements: A Typology
More informationAPPENDIX 1 CHAPTER 2 (TRADE IN GOODS)
APPENDIX 1 CHAPTER 2 (TRADE IN GOODS) CHAPTER 2 TRADE IN GOODS Article 1 Reduction and/or Elimination of Customs Duties Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, each Party shall progressively reduce
More informationRecent Developments in NAFTA Law
Law and Business Review of the Americas Volume 15 2009 Recent Developments in NAFTA Law Melissa Long Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.smu.edu/lbra Recommended Citation Melissa Long,
More informationNew Year, New President, New Trade Agenda? John Murphy U.S. Chamber of Commerce
New Year, New President, New Trade Agenda? John Murphy U.S. Chamber of Commerce Who Said It? 2 We are absolutely going to keep trading. I am not an isolationist I want free trade, but it s got to be fair
More informationConcluding Comments. Protection
6 Concluding Comments The introduction to this analysis raised four major concerns about WTO dispute settlement: it has led to more protection, it is ineffective in enforcing compliance, it has undermined
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DENNIS KUCINICH, : Representative to Congress : from Ohio, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Civil Action No. 02-1137 (JDB) : ECF GEORGE W. BUSH,
More informationUS Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute)
US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE CHAPTER 49 SUPPORT OF PEACE TREATY BETWEEN EGYPT AND ISRAEL Please Note: This compilation
More informationTrade Agreements overview of current trade governance matters for South Africa. Trudi Hartzenberg
Trade Agreements overview of current trade governance matters for South Africa Trudi Hartzenberg trudi@tralac.org Overview Brexit: EU UK matters and SA Brexit from June 2016 referendum, to notification
More informationNational Security Policy. National Security Policy. Begs four questions: safeguarding America s national interests from external and internal threats
National Security Policy safeguarding America s national interests from external and internal threats 17.30j Public Policy 1 National Security Policy Pattern of government decisions & actions intended
More information2. Treaties and Other International Agreements
1 Treaties and Other Agreements 2. Treaties and Other International Agreements FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION By Louis Henkin Second Edition (1996) Chapter VII TREATIES, THE TREATY
More informationFBI Director: Appointment and Tenure
,name redacted, Specialist in American National Government May 10, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-... www.crs.gov R44842 Summary The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is appointed
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS21142 February 6, 2002 Summary Status of Trade Legislation in the 107 th Congress Vivian C. Jones Analyst in International Trade and Finance
More informationPrinciples and Practicality: Foreign Trade and the Global Supply
Free trade, one of the greatest blessings a government can confer on a people, is in almost every country unpopular. Thomas Babington Macaulay, English politician and historian, 1824 Principles and Practicality:
More informationTrade Promotion Authority (TPA): Frequently Asked Questions
Trade Promotion Authority (TPA): Frequently Asked Questions Ian F. Fergusson Specialist in International Trade and Finance Christopher M. Davis Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process November
More informationTowards a new model for North American economic integration
Ninth Annual Queen s Institute on Trade Policy Towards a new model for North American economic integration Presentation by KEN NEUMANN United Steelworkers National Director for Canada SPEAKING NOTES ON
More informationUS Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products. Request for Consultations by the European Union
US Certain Measures on Steel and Aluminium Products Request for Consultations by the European Union My authorities have instructed me to request consultations with the United States of America (United
More informationANALYSIS OF H.R THE SEPARATION OF POWERS RESTORATION ACT
ANALYSIS OF H.R. 2655 THE SEPARATION OF POWERS RESTORATION ACT WILLIAM J. OLSON William J. Olson, P.C. 8180 Greensboro Drive, Suite 1070 McLean, Virginia 22102-3823 703-356-5070; e-mail wjo@mindspring.com;
More informationFREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AND THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AND THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA The Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Government of the Democratic
More information(a) Short title. This Act may be cited as the "Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2013". (b) Findings. The Congress makes the following findings:
TRADE PROMOTION AUTHORITY ACT OF 2013 Section 1. Short title, findings and purpose (a) Short title. This Act may be cited as the "Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2013". (b) Findings. The Congress makes
More information2019: A Political Odyssey We need some downtime
2019: A Political Odyssey We need some downtime Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) He is racist, sexist, destructive to democratic institutions, more recently a Russian-spy Enduring reality: more voters
More informationDispute Settlement under FTAs and the WTO: Conflict or Convergence? David A. Gantz
1. Introduction Dispute Settlement under FTAs and the WTO: Conflict or Convergence? David A. Gantz Diverse dispute settlement mechanisms exist under the WTO on the one hand, and NAFTA on the other. These
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Order Code RS20139 Updated April 2, 2002 China and the World Trade Organization Summary Wayne M. Morrison Specialist in International Trade and Finance
More informationDELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE
TRADE BILL DELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM BY THE DEPARTMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL TRADE A. Introduction 1. This Memorandum has been prepared by the Department for International Trade (the Department) for the
More informationThe Discharge Rule in the House: Principal Features and Uses
The Discharge Rule in the House: Principal Features and Uses Richard S. Beth Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process October 14, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 97-552
More information31 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 31 - MONEY AND FINANCE SUBTITLE IV - MONEY CHAPTER 53 - MONETARY TRANSACTIONS SUBCHAPTER I - CREDIT AND MONETARY EXPANSION 5302. Stabilizing exchange rates and arrangements (a) (1) The Department
More informationCHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A: Investment
CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT Section A: Investment ARTICLE 9.1: DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Chapter: (d) covered investment means, with respect to a Party, an investment in its territory of an investor
More informationThe World Trade Organization and the future of multilateralism Note Key principles behind GATT general principle rules based not results based
The World Trade Organization and the future of multilateralism By Richard Baldwin, Journal of Economic perspectives, Winter 2016 The GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) was established in unusual
More informationThe Impact of WTO / GATS Arguments on UIGEA and State Law
LAW OFFICES OF IAN J. IMRICH, ESQ. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Suite 1240 10866 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90024 Ian J. Imrich, Esq. Telephone: 310.481.2258 iimrich@ijilaw.com Telecopier:
More information8. U.S. TRADE POLICY KEY TERMS
8. U.S. TRADE POLICY fast-track authority/trade promotion authority (TPA): authority given to the U.S. president by Congress to make international trade agreements that Congress can pass or reject but
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REPRESENTATIVE DENNIS KUCINICH, et al., v. Plaintiffs, GEORGE BUSH, President of the United States, et al., Civ. No. 02-1137 (JDB) Defendants.
More informationU.S. Federal System: Overview
U.S. Federal System: Overview Origins: In the 17th century, the English tradition of local autonomy in towns and shires influenced the form of government that developed in the American colonies. The English
More informationLame Duck Sessions of Congress Following a Majority-Changing Election: In Brief
Lame Duck Sessions of Congress Following a Majority-Changing Election: In Brief Jane A. Hudiburg Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process November 13, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700
More information6 Possible Iran Deal Scenarios
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 6 Possible Iran Deal Scenarios By Linda Tiller,
More informationAGRICULTURE. Side-by-Side Chart Agriculture
3 July 2013 AGRICULTURE Side-by-Side Chart Agriculture SAFEGUARD MEASURES http://eur-lex.europa.eu/lexuriserv/lexuriserv.do?uri=oj:l:2011:127:0006:1343:en:pdf http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/agreements/fta/korus/asset_upload_file288_12699.pdf
More information14 Multilateral or bilateral trade deals? Lessons from history
14 Multilateral or bilateral trade deals? Lessons from history Peterson Institute for International Economics and CEPR; Dartmouth College and NBER; Stanford Law School 1 The Trump Administration believes
More informationThe Past, Present and Future ACP-EC Trade Regime and the WTO
EJIL 2000... The Past, Present and Future ACP-EC Trade Regime and the WTO Jürgen Huber* Abstract The Lome IV Convention, which expired on 29 February 2000, provided for non-reciprocal trade preferences
More informationTrade implications of EU enlargement: Facts and Figures
MEMO/04/23 Brussels, 4 February 2004 Trade implications of EU enlargement: Facts and Figures Key Figures (2002) EU 15 EU 25 Population million (% of world) 379 (6.1%) 455 (7.3%) GDP billion (% of world)
More informationCambridge Model United Nations 2018 WTO: The Question of Free Trade Agreements in a Changing World
1 Study Guide: The Question of Free Trade Agreements in a Changing World Committee: World Trade Organisation Topic: The Question of Free Trade Agreements in a Changing World Introduction: The WTO aims
More informationNAFTA THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN. version 2.0
NAFTA THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN version 2.0 U.S. - MEXICO COMMERCIAL RELATIONS U.S. relations with Mexico are strong and vital. The two countries share a 2,000-mile border, and bilateral relations have
More informationWoonho Lee Standing Commissioner Korea Trade Commission
Woonho Lee Standing Commissioner Korea Trade Commission 1. Articles related to FTA and Exclusion of FTA Partners from Global Safeguard Measures 2. Related Dispute Cases 3. Related Articles in FTAs 1. Articles
More informationThe future of regional economic integration in the context of European African trade relations overcoming paradoxical patterns Summary Report
The future of regional economic integration in the context of European African trade relations overcoming paradoxical patterns Summary Report The expert dialogue was held under Chatham House Rule: "When
More informationConfusion and Opportunity: The Challenges of Canada s Trade Negotiations. by John Weekes
A POLICY March PAPER 2018 INTERNATIONAL TRADE SERIES CONFUSION AND OPPORTUNITY: THE CHALLENGES OF CANADA S TRADE NEGOTIATIONS CGAI Fellow Prepared for the Canadian Global Affairs Institute 1800, 421 7th
More informationThe Labor Cooperation Agreement among Mexico, Canada and the United States: Its Negotiation and Prospects
United States - Mexico Law Journal Volume 3 Current Issues: Corporations, Energy and Labor Comparisons of U.S. and Mexican Corporate and Securities Law Regulation of the Energy Industry - The NAFTA Labor
More informationOSHA TO EPA: ENVIRONMENTAL & SAFETY REGULATORY PREDICTIONS UNDER A TRUMP PRESIDENCY
OSHA TO EPA: ENVIRONMENTAL & SAFETY REGULATORY PREDICTIONS UNDER A TRUMP PRESIDENCY Association of Corporate Counsel In-House Counsel Forum April 5, 2017 Kristin R.B. White Member Jackson Kelly PLLC kwhite@jacksonkelly.com
More informationBusiness Trend: Global Trade A House of Mirrors or Horrors
Wealth Planning & Investment Management Wealth Planning & Investment Management Business Trend: Global Trade A House of Mirrors or Horrors Business Trend Global Trade A House of Mirrors Doylestown, PA
More informationBipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015: Section-by-Section Summary
Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015: Section-by-Section Summary Overview: Section 1: Short Title Section 2: Trade Negotiating Objectives Section 3: Trade Agreements
More informationILLINOIS BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL
VOLUME 23 FALL 2017 ILLINOIS BUSINESS LAW JOURNAL LEAVING NAFTA: THE INSURMOUNTABLE LEGAL AND ECONOMIC CHALLENGES FACING THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION NOTE Sophie Park* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code RL30225 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Most-Favored-Nation Status of the People s Republic of China Updated June 7, 2001 Vladimir N. Pregelj Specialist in International
More informationThe Mid-Session Review of the President s Budget: Timing Issues
Order Code RL32509 The Mid-Session Review of the President s Budget: Timing Issues Updated August 19, 2008 Robert Keith Specialist in American National Government Government and Finance Division The Mid-Session
More informationHow Progressives Can & Must Engage on NAFTA Renegotiations Findings from National Poll
Date: October 20, 2017 From: Stan Greenberg, Greenberg Research How Progressives Can & Must Engage on NAFTA Renegotiations Findings from National Poll Trade stands out from every other policy issue because
More informationChapter 9. Figure 9-1. Types of Rules of Origin
Chapter 9 RULES OF ORIGIN 1. OVERVIEW OF RULES Rules of origin are used to determine the nationality of goods traded in international commerce. Yet, no internationally agreed upon rules of origin exist.
More informationWorkshop on EU import requirements for fruit and vegetables
Workshop on EU import requirements for fruit and vegetables AGR 56876 organised by European Commission in co-operation with Ukrainian Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food Ukrainian Agribusiness club 8-9
More informationThe Next Battle over the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act. Will Take Place on the Criminal Front
[From the Winter/Spring 2015 Edition of the White Collar Crime Committee Newsletter, published by the American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section s White Collar Crime Committee] The Next Battle over
More informationAnnexure 4. World Trade Organization. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1947 and 1994
Annexure 4 World Trade Organization General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1947 and 1994 The original General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, now referred to as GATT 1947, provided the basic rules of the
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISIONS OF THE CANADA-UNITED STATES FREE TRADE AGREEMENT
DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROVISIONS OF THE CANADA-UNITED STATES FREE TRADE AGREEMENT David P. Cluchey* Dispute resolution is a major focus of the recently signed Canada- United States Free Trade Agreement. 1
More informationCOME SEE WHAT S HAPPENING IN D.C.! Room December
COME SEE WHAT S HAPPENING IN D.C.! Room 306-307 December 5 2017 CEUs New Process Certified Crop Advisor (CCA) Sign in and out of each session you attend. Pickup verification sheet at conclusion of each
More informationWTO Decisions and Their Effect in U.S. Law
Order Code RS22154 Updated January 30, 2007 WTO Decisions and Their Effect in U.S. Law Summary Jeanne J. Grimmett Legislative Attorney American Law Division Congress has comprehensively dealt with the
More informationKPMG report: U.S. congressional elections and tax policy; preliminary observations
KPMG report: U.S. congressional elections and tax policy; preliminary observations November 7, 2018 kpmg.com 1 Election Day in the United States was yesterday, November 6, 2018. All seats in the U.S. House
More informationFALSE CLAIMS ACT: District Court Rules That Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act Suspends False Claims Act s Six-Year Statute of Limitations
FraudMail Alert Please click here to view our archives FALSE CLAIMS ACT: District Court Rules That Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act Suspends False Claims Act s Six-Year Statute of Limitations What
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 1818 N Street, N.W. Suite 410 Washington, DC 20036, Plaintiff, v. C. A. No. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 950 Pennsylvania
More informationSubtitle A--Amendments to the Federal Power Act
HR 4 EAS In the Senate of the United States, April 25, 2002. Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 4) entitled `An Act to enhance energy conservation, research and development
More information19 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 19 - CUSTOMS DUTIES CHAPTER 4 - TARIFF ACT OF 1930 SUBTITLE III - ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS Part III - Ascertainment, Collection, and Recovery of Duties 1514. Protest against decisions of Customs
More informationWhen a presidential transition occurs, the incoming President usually submits the budget for the upcoming fiscal year (under current practices) or rev
Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Œ œ Ÿ When a presidential transition occurs, the incoming President usually submits the budget for the upcoming fiscal year (under current practices) or
More information