TEMPORARY INJUNCTION. upon the Plaintiff, Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC s Motion for Temporary Injunction
|
|
- Bernice Carroll
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION RESTORATION 1 FRANCHISE HOLDING, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, CASE NO.: CACE Plaintiff, v. ABRAHAM NEWMAN, et al. Defendants. / TEMPORARY INJUNCTION THIS CAUSE came before the Court for hearing on September 25 and October 2, 2015 upon the Plaintiff, Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC s Motion for Temporary Injunction (the Motion ), and the Court having heard argument of counsel, the testimony of the witnesses, and reviewed the file and the documentary evidence submitted by the parties, and otherwise being fully advised in the premises, hereby makes the following factual findings: A. Factual Background 1. Plaintiff, Restoration 1 Franchise Holding, LLC ( Restoration 1 ) was founded by its sole member, Andor Kovacs, the company s CEO. (Comp., Kovacs Testimony ( T. ). Defendant, Restoration 1 of South Florida, LLC ( Restoration 1 South Florida ) is located at 1341 SW 21 st Terrace, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (Ans., 5). Defendant, Restoration 1 of Kendall, Inc. ( Restoration 1 Kendall ) is located at 1835 NE Miami Gardens Drive, Suite 537, North Miami Beach, Florida (Ans., 6). Defendant, Restoration 1 of Boca Raton, LLC ( Restoration 1 Boca Raton ) is located at 102 NE 2 nd Street, Suite 160, Boca Raton, Florida.
2 (Ans., 7). Defendant, Payless Response Team, LLC ( Payless Response ) is located at 1341 SW 21 st Terrace, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (Ans., 8). Defendant, Payless Response Team II, LLC, ( Payless Response II ) is located at 102 NE 2 nd Street, Suite 160, Boca Raton, Florida. (Ans., 9). Defendants, Abraham Newman ( Newman ) and Erick Aguilar ( Aguilar ) are the managing members of Restoration 1 South Florida, Restoration 1 Boca Raton, Payless Response, and Payless Response II and Newman is the sole officer of Restoration 1 Kendall. (Ans., 10, 11). 2. Restoration 1 licenses their twenty-four franchisees, including twelve in Florida, to operate businesses providing residential and commercial water, fire, smoke and mold restoration services using the Restoration 1 Marks, including the federally registered mark, Restoration 1. (Comp., 14, 16, 17, Kovacs T., Hearing Exhibit ( Hrg. Ex. ) 1). Since 2009, Restoration 1 and its franchises have engaged in marketing efforts, including through the Restoration 1 website. (Comp., 19, 20, Kovacs, Mitchell and Menendez T., Hrg. Exs. 3 and 4). The Restoration 1 Marks are a valuable asset and generate goodwill as a symbol of Restoration 1 and the property restoration services their system offers. (Comp., 19, 20, Kovacs and Menendez T.). 3. Restoration 1 currently provides four weeks of training to its new franchisees, including one week of on-site job training at one or more customer locations and, on at least an annual basis, conducts on-site field visits to its franchised locations. (Kovacs, Mitchell and Menendez T., Hrg. Ex. 6). 4. Newman and Aguilar signed receipts acknowledging their receipt of Restoration 1 s Franchise Disclosure Documents ( FDDs ). (Kovacs, Newman and Aguilar T.). Newman read and reviewed portions of the Restoration 1 FDDs, including Item 19. Aguilar did not review 2
3 the FDD for Boca Raton and relied upon Newman to conduct the negotiations for the Boca Raton franchise. (Newman and Aguilar T., Hrg. Exs. 7, 11, 13). Newman did not request, and Kovacs did not provide to Newman, any written substantiation for the financial performance representation contained in Item 19 of the FDDs. There was disputed testimony regarding an oral representation by Kovacs to Newman concerning potential profit of 40%. Kovacs denied making such a statement On May 24, 2011, Newman executed a Restoration 1 franchise agreement, referred to as the South Florida Franchise Agreement, but the agreement did not provide Newman with an exclusive territory. (Ans., 22, Kovacs and Newman T., Hrg. Ex. 10). On November 14, 2013, Newman and Aguilar both executed a Restoration 1 franchise agreement for a designated territory known as Boca Raton. (Ans., 23, Newman T., Hrg. Ex. 12). On January 9, 2014, Newman executed a Restoration 1 franchise agreement for a designated territory known as Kendall. (Ans., 24, Newman T., Hrg. Ex. 14). Prior to the executing the Boca Raton and Kendall agreements, Newman did not demand in writing that Restoration 1 provide Newman with an exclusive territory for his South Florida Franchise Agreement. (Kovacs and Newman T.) Newman s and Aguilar s entities, Restoration 1 South Florida, Restoration 1 Boca Raton and Restoration 1 Kendall collected revenues from restoration services performed for their commercial and residential customers and reported those revenues to Restoration 1 and paid a 7% royalty on collected revenues. (Kovacs, Newman and Aguilar T.). According to Restoration 1 s records, Restoration 1 South Florida realized revenues in excess of $1,000,000 as of December 31, (Kovacs T., Hrg. Ex. 16). 1 In any event, Franchise Agreements contain a merger clause. 2 Newman testified that he did make oral requests to Kovacs. Kovacs denied this. 3
4 7. Kovacs testified that Restoration 1 provided a copy of its confidential Operations Manual to Newman on July 21, 2011 (Kovacs T., Hrg. Ex. 29). On February 3 and 4, 2014, Newman and Aguilar signed for an updated Operations Manual (the Manual ) at the 2014 Annual Meeting and agreed to keep it confidential. (Kovacs T., Hrg. Exs. 25). The manual was developed over the course of several years by Kovacs and other members of the Restoration 1 team. (Kovacs T., Hrg. Ex. 2). Restoration 1 s Manual provides a complete guide to establish and market a restoration services company. (Kovacs and Mitchell T.). 8. The Restoration 1 Franchise Agreements in Section and contain a restrictive covenant against competition. 9. Section 17.1 of the Franchise Agreements states that once a franchisee s rights under the Franchise Agreement are terminated, a former franchisee is required to take steps to de-identify itself as a Restoration 1 franchisee, including, returning the Manual, cancelling any state or local registrations of the name Restoration 1, assigning all its telephone numbers to Restoration 1, and paying all outstanding sums due to Restoration In March, 2015, Restoration 1 and Newman jointly executed Addendums to the South Florida, Boca Raton and Kendall Franchise Agreements required by the United States Small Business Administration ( SBA ) as a condition for Newman obtaining SBA assisted financing, in which the parties acknowledged: The Franchise Agreement is in full force and effect. (Hrg. Exs. 10, 12 and 14, Addendums dated March 5, 2015). Following the execution of these Addenda, Newman obtained a loan in excess of $500,000. (Newman T.). 11. After May, 2015, Newman and Aguilar failed to report their revenues or pay royalties on those revenues to Restoration 1. (Kovacs, Newman and Aguilar T.). On July 13, 2015, Restoration 1 sent default notices to Newman and Aguilar in connection with their defaults 4
5 under South Florida and Boca Raton Franchise Agreements, and upon their failure to cure, sent termination notices on August 6, 2015 terminating these agreements effective August 10, (Ans., 34, 35, 37, 38, Hrg. Exs. 17, 18, 19). On July 13, 2015, Restoration 1 notified Newman that he was in default of his obligations under the Kendall Franchise Agreement for his failure to achieve the required level of sales and his failure to actively operate the franchise business for a period of more than five (5) days, and that as a result, the agreement was terminated effective July 16, (Ans., 36, Hrg. Ex. 20). 12. One day after the termination of the South Florida and Boca Raton Franchise Agreements, Newman and Aguilar filed their Articles of Organization for Payless Response and Payless Response II on August 7, (Ans., 39 and Comp., Ex. J). Newman and Aguilar maintain their Payless Response and Rapid Recovery offices in the same offices as they operated as Restoration 1 South Florida and Boca Raton and provide the same services they provided as Restoration 1 franchisees. (Ans., 40, 42, Comp., Ex. K, Newman and Aguilar T.). Newman and Aguilar continue to utilize their Restoration 1 company names to communicate with customers and insurance companies in connection with their efforts to collect substantial accounts receivables from services performed while they were Restoration 1 franchisees. (Ans., 41, Newman and Aguilar T.). Newman and Aguilar have not returned any copies of Restoration 1 s Manuals, and claim not to have received copies of them. (Kovacs, Newman and Aguilar T.). 13. While Newman and Aguilar have taken some steps to remove the Restoration 1 trade name from third party websites since the termination of the Agreements, Restoration 1 of South Florida and Restoration 1 Boca Raton continues to appear on third party websites. (Kovacs, Newman and Aguilar T.). At the hearing, Defendants counsel stipulated that the Defendants would make all reasonable efforts to remove the Restoration 1 trade name from 5
6 third party websites upon receipt of notice from Restoration 1 as to the identity of the third party websites. 14. Since the termination of the Agreements, Restoration 1 has been unable to relicense the Boca Raton territory, its West Palm Beach franchisee has lost one of its plumbing referral sources and Restoration 1 has been unable to inspect the offices of its former franchisees. (Kovacs and Menendez T.). Restoration 1 s ability to maintain its competitive advantage through the continued compliance of its franchise agreements with other franchisees, the maintenance of the Restoration 1 Franchise System, its ability to re-market the territories serviced by these former franchisees, its goodwill associated with its trade names and trade mark in the Florida market and the value of its confidential Manual are threatened by Newman and Aguilar and their affiliated entities conduct in continuing to utilize the Restoration 1 trade name and to operate Payless Resource, Payless Resource II, and Rapid Recovery. (Kovacs, Mitchell and Menendez T.). B. Procedural History. Restoration 1 filed a Verified Complaint on August 26, 2015 seeking injunctive relief on Count I-Breach of Covenant Not to Compete; Count II-Breach of Covenant Not to Disclose Confidential Information; Count III-Common Law Unfair Competition, as well as a Verified Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction. Following further briefing and limited discovery conducted by the parties, the Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction. The testifying witnesses were Mr. Andor Kovacs, Mr. Derrick Mitchell, Mr. Erick Menendez, Mr. Abraham Newman, Mr. Erick Aguilar, Mr. Hal Sklar and Mr. Dan Delgado. 6
7 C. Plaintiff s Motion For Temporary Injunction. In seeking a temporary injunction, the movant must show: (1) irreparable harm; (2) a clear legal right; (3) no adequate remedy at law; and (4) that the public interest will be served. JonJuan Salon, Inc. v. Acosta, 922 So. 2d 1081, 1083 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2006). 1. The Restoration 1 Restrictive Covenants. At the hearing, Restoration 1 demonstrated that it has statutory and non-statutory legitimate business interests to support the enforcement of the restrictive covenants. Restoration 1 established that it has developed goodwill in its Restoration 1 Marks. Moreover, the evidence adduced demonstrated that Restoration 1 s long-term substantial relationships with its other franchisees, the preservation of the franchise system, as well as its ability to re-license territories associated with its former franchisees is being threatened. Restoration 1 also has legitimate business interests to protect in its confidential Manual. Mr. Kovacs testified as to the development of the Manual and both Kovacs and his franchisee, Derrick Mitchell, testified to the value of the Manual. Kovacs testified that the Manual distributed at the 2014 Annual Meeting was developed over the course of several years by Kovacs and other members of the Restoration 1 team. While the Manual may have been developed from publicly available information, the Court finds that Restoration 1 refined the information and compiled it in such a way that its Manual would permit an individual in possession of it to establish and market their own restoration business. See, e.g., Autonation, Inc. v. O Brien, 347 F. Supp. 2d 1299, 1307 (S.D. Fla. 2004) and Continental Group, Inc. v. KW Property Management, 622 F. Supp. 2d 1357, 1377 (S.D. Fla. 2009), finding the compilation of otherwise publicly available information can be protected as confidential information. 7
8 Restoration 1 also takes reasonable steps to protect its confidential information and requires its franchisees to execute Statements of Confidentiality acknowledging that they will maintain the confidentiality of the Manual. The Court finds that the restriction against the disclosure is reasonably tailored to protect Restoration 1 s legitimate business interests in protecting its confidential information and its efforts to market its services to its franchisees and its prospective franchisees. If such information is disclosed, Restoration 1 would be unable to measure or quantify the harm in terms of monetary damages since Restoration 1 s business methods, practices and operations would be available to a competitor and utilized for a competitive advantage. For these reasons, the Court finds that the restrictive covenant against non-disclosure is supported by Restoration 1 s legitimate business interests. See, 4UOrtho, LLC v. Practice Partners, Inc., 18 So. 3d 41, 43 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2009). Furthermore, the evidence presented at the hearing showed that the scope of restrictive covenant and the time and geographic restrictions are reasonably tailored to protect Restoration 1 s legitimate business interests. The temporal restriction of two years from the date of termination is appropriate given the franchise relationship that existed between Restoration 1 and the Defendants. See, Medi-Weightloss Franchising USA, LLC v. Medi-Weightloss Clinic of Boca Raton, LLC, 2012 WL *5, (M.D. Fla. 2012). As for the geographic scope of the Agreements, the Court finds that the restriction only restricts the former franchisees from owning, managing or providing services to a restoration services business located or operating within a twenty-five mile radius of their current location or any other current Restoration 1 business. As such, Newman, Aguilar and their Payless Resource and Rapid Recovery entities are free to conduct restoration services outside of these boundaries. 8
9 With respect to the Defendants Affirmative Defenses, the Court finds that Defendants have not met their burden with respect to those defenses presented at the hearing. Restoration 1 s legitimate business interests have not been disproved. Restoration 1 has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits. 2. Restoration 1 Has Carried Its Burden Restoration I has demonstrated that it has no adequate remedy at law and that it will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of a temporary injunction. The harm to Restoration 1 under the circumstances presented here cannot be remedied with an award of monetary damages. As Kovacs testified, Restoration 1 s potential losses cannot be quantified as the threat does not involve the loss of a specific customer but rather the preservation and growth of the entire Restoration 1 franchise system and the protection of the Restoration 1 Marks. [A]n injury is irreparable where the damage is estimable only by conjecture, and not by any accurate standard. JonJuan Salon, Inc. v. Acosta, supra, at 1084 (internal citation omitted). Here, Newman and Aguilar are providing restoration services through their affiliated entities in the same Florida markets where Restoration 1 does business through its Florida franchisees. In addition, they are continuing to utilize the Restoration 1 trade name. As such, in accordance with section (1) (j), Fla. Stat. (1996) the violation of their restrictive covenant against competition created a presumption of irreparable harm to Restoration 1. Based upon the record before it, the Court finds that the Defendants have not rebutted this statutory presumption. In addition, the franchise agreements protect Restoration 1 s confidential Manual from disclosure. 9
10 Defendants breaches of their non-competition covenants and threatened breaches of their non-disclosure covenants demonstrate that Restoration 1 is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims against them. Restoration 1 has shown that Newman and Aguilar breached their noncompetition covenant by establishing their Payless Resource and Rapid Recovery Team companies to perform the exact services they performed as Restoration 1 franchisees. Restoration 1 has further shown that Newman and Aguilar continue to use the Restoration 1 trade name by maintaining their State of Florida Division of Corporations registrations, by continuing to pursue collection efforts, by failing to de-identify on third party web sites and by continuing to use phone numbers associated with the franchise. Such uses of the Restoration 1 trade name constitute a breach of Newman s and Aguilar s post-termination obligations and threatens the goodwill associated with Restoration 1 Marks as Restoration 1 no longer has the ability to monitor and control the use of its trade name. The Defendants have not met their burden of showing any legal or equitable defenses to the imposition of a temporary injunction. Restoration 1 has further established that Newman s and Aguilar s threatened breaches of the restrictive covenant of non-disclosure and the resulting competitive advantage they or others would derive in the event of disclosure require the imposition of an injunction as an appropriate and effective remedy under section (1) (j), Fla. Stat. (1996). An injunction will serve the public interest as Florida has expressly articulated a strong public policy favoring the enforcement of restrictive covenants in section , Fla. Stat. (1996). 3. Bond. In accordance with Fla. R. Civ. P (b), the Court determines that an appropriate bond amount is $200, to protect the interests of the Defendants, in the event that it is 10
11 determined that an injunction has been wrongfully entered in this action. The injunctive relief set forth below will be effective as of the date and time the injunction bond is posted. The Clerk of Court is directed to accept the bond into the Court Registry. D. Conclusion. It is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff s Emergency Motion for Temporary Injunction is hereby GRANTED as follows: 1. Defendants Abraham Newman and Erick Aguilar, and their affiliated entities, Restoration 1 of South Florida, LLC, Restoration 1 of Kendall, Inc., Restoration 1 of Boca Raton, LLC, Payless Response Team, LLC, Payless Response Team II LLC, and their respective agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and all those persons in active concert or participation with them are hereby temporarily enjoined as follows: (a) For a period of two (2) years, either directly or indirectly, for themselves, or through, on behalf of or in conjunction with, any person, persons, partnership, corporation, limited liability company or other business entity: own an interest in, manage, operate or provide services to any Competitive Business (defined as any business that offers or provides or grants franchises or licenses to others to operate a business that offers or provides restoration services or other services the same or similar to those provided by Restoration 1 Businesses [referred to as a business providing residential and commercial water, fire, smoke and mold remediation services and related services such as cleaning and drying services and repair of structural damage]) located or operating within (a) a twenty-five (25) mile radius of the location of the Franchised Business Office and Storage, or (b) within a twenty-five (25) mile radius of any other Restoration 1 Business in existence at the time of termination or expiration; (b) From disclosing the Restoration 1 Manual and to immediately return to Franchisor the Manual; or to confirm in an affidavit that after diligent search that they have been unable to locate any of the manuals in their possession, custody or control; (c) From using the Restoration 1 Marks (defined as the service mark Restoration 1, and such other trade names, trademarks, service marks, trade dress, designs, graphics, logos, emblems, insignia, fascia, slogans, drawings and other commercial symbols of Restoration 1), and will take such action as may be necessary to cancel or assign to Franchisor, at Franchisor s option, any assumed name or equivalent registration filed with state, city or county 11
12 authorities which contains the name Restoration 1, including but not limited to, Restoration 1 of South Florida, LLC, Restoration 1 of Kendall, Inc. and Restoration 1 of Boca Raton, LLC; and (d) From using all telephone listings and numbers for the Franchised Business and assigning to Franchisor and shall notify the telephone company and all listing agencies of the termination or expiration of Franchisee s right to use any telephone numbers or facsimile numbers associated with the Marks in any regular, classified or other telephone directory listing and shall authorize transfer of same to or at the direction of Franchisor; including but not limited to (305) ; (305) ; (305) ; (786) ; (954) ; (786) ; (561) ; (561) ; (844) ; and (800) (2) The Plaintiff is directed to provide the Defendants with a listing of any third party websites utilizing the Restoration 1 trade name within two business days of the entry of this Order; and (3) The individual Defendants are directed to file an affidavit within (twenty) 20 days of the entry of the temporary injunction advising this Court of the status of their compliance with the injunction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order shall not be effective unless and until Plaintiff executes and files with the clerk of this court a bond in the amount of $200, conditioned for the payment of costs and damages sustained by defendants if defendants are wrongfully enjoined. The clerk shall on the filing by Plaintiff of the bond required by this Order certify a copy of this Order for service on defendants. DONE at Fort Lauderdale, Florida October 19, Copies Furnished to: All Counsel of Record /s/ William W. Haury, Jr. WILLIAM W. HAURY, JR. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE 3 Newman testified that he used his personal cell number in Restoration 1 promotional collateral. Newman was on notice of the de-identification and transfer requirements when he chose to do so. 12
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA WORLD OF BEER FRANCHISING, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2017-CA-000874 Division: L
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
F.C. Franchising Systems, Inc. v. Wayne Thomas Schweizer et al Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION F.C. FRANCHISING SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 1:11-cv-740
More informationCase Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..
Case 1::14-cv-22129-JEM Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/29/2014 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case Number: 14-22129-CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROW ARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROW ARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. Plaintiff, CASE NO. CACE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO.: 05-02976 DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
More informationCase 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084
Case 3:18-cv-00186-M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT BAUTISTA REO U.S., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Appellant, v. ARR INVESTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee. No.
More informationCase 0:17-cv RNS Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2017 Page 1 of 5. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Case 0:17-cv-60650-RNS Document 32 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/11/2017 Page 1 of 5 United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ABS-CBN Corporation, and others, Plaintiffs, v. Cinesilip.net,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Order Number 2016-28-Civ AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER INSTITUTING A UNIFORM TRIAL ORDER FOR CIRCUIT CIVIL CASES
More informationJOINT MARKETING AND SALES REFERRAL AGREEMENT
This Referral Agreement (the Agreement) is made effective as of 2012 (the Effective Date) by and between Aerospike, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with an address at 2525 E. Charleston Road, Suite 201,
More informationCOUNTY COURT JUDGE GIUSEPPINA MIRANDA PROCEDURES FOR DIVISION 52. (Amended May 1, 2017)
GIUSEPPINA MIRANDA COUNTY COURT JUDGE CIVIL DIVISION SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA BROWARD COUNTY COURTHOUSE 201 SE 6TH STREET, ROOM 13137 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 (954) 831-7230 COUNTY COURT
More informationCase 1:14-cv FAM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2014 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:14-cv-22132-FAM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2014 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and STATE OF FLORIDA, Case No.: l: 14-cv-22132-F
More informationRealogy Holdings Corp. Realogy Group LLC
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event
More informationA. WHEREAS, Licensor owns the rights to the Lit by Lumileds badge ( Lumileds Badge );
Lumileds: The Lit by Lumileds Badge License Agreement This License Agreement ( Agreement ), effective upon execution by both parties (the Effective Date ), is entered into by and between Lumileds LLC,
More informationTHE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO PRETRIAL ORDERS
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 5.10 PRETRIAL ORDERS WHEREAS, Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.200(c) requires that orders setting pretrial conferences shall be uniform
More informationFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN GREGORY W. STAPLES Federal Trade Commission 11000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 13209 Los Angeles, California 90024 (310) 235-4040 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission 6th
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA GOLF CLUBS AWAY LLC, Individually and On Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated, Case No. 09-29596-13 Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:10-cv JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:10-cv-10098-JLT Document 1 Filed 01/22/2010 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, ) a Delaware Limited Liability Company, )
More informationCase BLS Doc 134 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 18-11092-BLS Doc 134 Filed 05/25/18 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 ) RMH Franchise Holdings, Inc., et al., 1 ) Case No. 18-11092
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case Number: SC RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case Number: SC09-1722 Westgate Tabernacle Petitioners, vs. 4 th DCA CASE No. 4D07-3792 PALM BEACH COUNTY, Respondent. RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF Robert
More informationINDEPENDENT SALES AGENCY TERMS AND CONDITIONS
INDEPENDENT SALES AGENCY TERMS AND CONDITIONS This Agreement is made between Bandwave Systems, LLC (hereinafter referred to as Bandwave Systems ) and Agent, located at the respective addresses indicated
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION BAYSHORE ON THE BOULEVARD CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
More informationLICENSE AGREEMENT. For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
LICENSE AGREEMENT This License Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between the Wireless Application Protocol Forum Ltd. ( WAP Forum ) and You. In consideration of the covenants set
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, CASE NO. v. Plaintiff,
More informationCASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY CASE NO: Vs. Plaintiff Defendants / FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER THIS CASE having been reviewed by the
More informationCase 2:16-cv JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:16-cv-02816-JAR-JPO Document 69 Filed 09/20/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, JOEL JEROME TUCKER, individually and as an officer
More informationCustomized IDX RETS Solutions Data Information Sheet
Office Use Only: License#: CSTL Customized IDX RETS Solutions Data Information Sheet Set up fee: $500 Agent/Member : Agent MLS User ID: Brokerage : Third Party Vendor: URL(s): Primary: URL#2: URL#3: URL#4:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, N01. Defendants.
A FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GMAC REAL ESTATE, LLC, Plaintiff, OCT 1 3 2009 JAM rk 4-Ec V. METRO BROKERS, INC., KEVIN
More informationCase 1:14-cv KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:14-cv-20945-KMW Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/10/2015 Page 1 of 9 AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:11-cv-23619-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MAINSTREAM ADVERTISING, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,
More informationASHBY S STERLING ICE CREAM LICENSING AGREEMENT
ASHBY S STERLING ICE CREAM LICENSING AGREEMENT This Agreement is made between Ashby s Sterling Ice Cream, LTD., A Michigan corporation (licensor) and a corporation (Licensee). Licensor currently produces
More informationSoftware Licensing Agreement for AnyLogic 7.3.x
Software Licensing Agreement for AnyLogic 7.3.x THIS SOFTWARE LICENSING AGREEMENT (THE AGREEMENT ) IS A LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANYLOGIC NORTH AMERICA, LLC, ( AnyLogic ) AND YOU AND/OR THE ENTITY
More informationCase 0:14-cv WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:14-cv-60975-WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 WENDY GRAVE and JOSEPH GRAVE, vs. Plaintiffs, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ORDER
Case 2:13-cv-00274-EJL Document 7 Filed 06/28/13 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO ST. ISIDORE FARM LLC, and Idaho limited liability company; and GOBERS, LLC., a Washington
More informationAGREEMENT between BROWARD COUNTY and CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE for PARKING ACCESS IN THE COUNTY PARKING GARAGE
AGREEMENT between BROWARD COUNTY and CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE for PARKING ACCESS IN THE COUNTY PARKING GARAGE This AGREEMENT ("Agreement") between Broward County, a political subdivision of the State of
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D12-78
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2013 AVALON LEGAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC., etc., et al., Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR
More informationSTIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES, AND OTHER RELIEF
Case 8:14-cv-03078-CEH-EAJ Document 7 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 15 PageiD 70 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION -
Filing # 81074486 E-Filed 11/20/2018 03:30:35 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 17th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA GOLF CLUBS AWAY LLC, Individually and On Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated, Case No. 09-29596-13 Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Justin Alexander, Inc. ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:17-cv-4402 ) John Does 1-72 ) Judge Andrea R. Wood ) ) Magistrate Judge
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Southern District Court Case No. 0:13-cv Casey v. Bank of America, N.A. Document 11.
PlainSite Legal Document Florida Southern District Court Case No. 0:13-cv-60983 Casey v. Bank of America, N.A. Document 11 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation and Think
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CARLA HILES, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-9
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, CASE NO: Plaintiff, v. PRIME RESORTS
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - Plaintiff CASE NO.
Filing # 15405805 Electronically Filed 06/30/2014 04:31:04 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA - CIVIL DIVISION - OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff(s) vs. Defendant(s) / CASE NO. COMPLEX CIVIL DIVISION JUDGE ORDER SETTING TRIAL PRE-TRIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:15-cv-00299 Document 2-1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Navajo Nation, Civil Action No. 15-cv-00299
More informationEEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc.
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 10-5-2007 EEOC & Wolansky v. United Healthcare of Florida, Inc. Judge K. Michael Moore Follow this and
More informationDEALER AGREEMENT. Dealer-agreement Page 1 of 9 Initial:
DEALER AGREEMENT This Dealer Agreement ( Agreement ) is made as of the Effective Date set forth on the signature page attached hereto by and between Wimberley, Inc., a Virginia corporation ( Wimberley
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION FOR THOSE SEEKING A PROTECTION FROM ABUSE ORDER
GENERAL INFORMATION FOR THOSE SEEKING A PROTECTION FROM ABUSE ORDER 1. Before you can get a Protection from Abuse Order you and the person you want restrained must be intimate partners or household members.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. vs. Case No: ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA Plaintiff, vs. Case No: 2017- Defendant. / ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE THIS CAUSE is before the Court
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION DUNKIN DONUTS FRANCHISING LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; DD IP HOLDER LLC, a Delaware Limited
More information1. If you have not already done so, please join the conference call.
Under the Gun: A Primer on Preliminary Injunctive Relief in Non-Compete and Trade Secret Cases Thursday, November 29, 2012 Presented By the IADC Business Litigation Committee Welcome! The Webinar will
More informationFiling # E-Filed 08/28/ :22:03 PM
Filing # 31468664 E-Filed 08/28/2015 04:22:03 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA WALDEN LAKE COMMUNITY PRESERVATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT NIAGARA INDUSTRIES, INC. and RHEEM SALES COMPANY, Petitioners, v. GIAQUINTO ELECTRIC LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, GUARDIAN
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Administrative Order 2018-62-Civ ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER INSTITUTING A UNIFORM TRIAL ORDER FOR CIRCUIT CIVIL CASES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D06-5070 JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner, v. ALTERNATIVE LEGAL, INC., Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DECISION
More informationTrócaire General Terms and Conditions for Procurement
Trócaire General Terms and Conditions for Procurement Version 1 February 2014 1. Contractors Obligations 1.1 The Contractor undertakes to perform its obligations arising from this Agreement with due care,
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 29-1 Filed: 07/30/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:365
Case: 1:12-cv-09365 Document #: 29-1 Filed: 07/30/13 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:365 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Agreement"), effective as of the last date set forth
More informationCase 2:14-cv JTF-dkv Document 20 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID 182
Case 2:14-cv-02292-JTF-dkv Document 20 Filed 05/07/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID 182 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION SHANE PRATT; JODI PRATT; CHRIS WHITE;
More informationAGREEMENT. between BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. and. for BILLING RELATED TO THE SOUTHWEST REGIONAL LANDFILL
AGREEMENT between BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA and for BILLING RELATED TO THE SOUTHWEST REGIONAL LANDFILL This Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into by and between BROWARD COUNTY, a political subdivision
More informationNational Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS
National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Important Notice...3 Introduction...3 Standard Clause...3 Submission Agreement...3 Administrative
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Supreme Court Case No. SC BOCA INVESTORS GROUP, INC., Petitioner, IRWIN POTASH, ET AL., Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Supreme Court Case No. SC03-351 BOCA INVESTORS GROUP, INC., Petitioner, v. IRWIN POTASH, ET AL., Respondents. On Discretionary Conflict Review of a Decision of the Third
More informationIN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.
NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard
More informationChapter UNFAIR TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION. Article Credit Service Organizations
Chapter 50 -- UNFAIR TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION Article 11 --- Credit Service Organizations K.S.A. 50-1116. Kansas credit services organization act; citation; scope. (a) K.S.A. 50-1116 through 50-1135,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/18/2012 INDEX NO. 653645/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/18/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, Case No.: 08-07605
More informationINDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT
INDEPENDENT SALES ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This Independent Sales Associate Agreement (the Agreement ) is entered into on this day of February, 2015 ( Effective Date ) by and between Premiere Pharmaceutical
More informationTRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT [1]
TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT [1] Trademark License Agreement Comments [1] Trademark License Agreement This is a basic, general trademark license agreement usable by parties in any industry for the sale
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 9, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-2052 Lower Tribunal No. 17-14434 Sammie Investments,
More information[CLIENT] CHAPTER AFFILIATION AGREEMENT
SLS SAMPLE DOCUMENT 06/30/17 [CLIENT] CHAPTER AFFILIATION AGREEMENT This CHAPTER AFFILIATION AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is entered into as of, 20 ( Effective Date ), between [ ], a [ ] non-profit corporation
More informationEmployer Wins! Non-Competition Agreement Enforced and No Geographic Limitation
Employer Wins! Non-Competition Agreement Enforced and No Geographic Limitation Posted on March 17, 2016 Nice when an Employer wins! Here the Court determined that Employers may place reasonable restrictions
More informationCase 0:17-cv JJO Document 85 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:17-cv-60471-JJO Document 85 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 10 GRIFFEN LEE, v. Plaintiff, CHARLES G. McCARTHY, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.
More informationSERVICE REFERRAL AGREEMENT
SERVICE REFERRAL AGREEMENT THIS SERVICE REFERRAL AGREEMENT (the "Agreement" ) is made and entered into on the date accepted by the Company identified below in the acceptance process ( Referral Representative
More informationCase No CA000567MB. ~:r~:~~~~~~~galaffairs,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA THE CONSUMER LAW GROUP, P.A., AMERICAN DEBT NEGOTIATORS, INC., MICHAEL L. METZNER, an individual, RAN BARNEA,
More informationORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO AMEND AND FOR LEAVE TO ADD CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA ANDRE MILES and PATRICIA EMERY, on behalf of their son, ANDRE K. EMERY, v. Plaintiffs, CASE NO: 14-19008 CA MIAMI POSTAL
More informationLEHMAN TRIKES USA AUTHORIZED DEALER AGREEMENT. Products for Honda Motorcycles
LEHMAN TRIKES USA AUTHORIZED DEALER AGREEMENT Products for Honda Motorcycles THIS AGREEMENT made this day of, 201, by exchange through the mails between Spearfish, South Dakota and. BETWEEN: CHAMPION INVESTMENTS,
More informationCase: 1:18-cv Document #: 24 Filed: 05/16/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:499
Case: 1:18-cv-02516 Document #: 24 Filed: 05/16/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:499 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Mon Cheri Bridals, LLC ) ) v. ) Case
More informationIN THE CffiCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND J!'OR BROWARD COUNTY, FI~ORIDA CASE NO.: 1 0~044129(08)
IN THE CffiCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND J!'OR BROWARD COUNTY, FI~ORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.:
More information2016 PREMIER ACADEMY COACH INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT
2016 PREMIER ACADEMY COACH INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT THIS INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered by and between PREMIER BASKETBALL CLUB, a Colorado nonprofit youth sports organization
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:10-cv-01025-RHK-LIB Document 7 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA John Ellering; Karen Ellering; Select Associates Realty, LLC; EJK, Inc., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationLOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW
DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW Rule Effective 700. Subject Matter of the Family Law Court 07/01/2014 700.5 Attorneys and Self Represented Parties 07/01/2011 700.6 Family Law Filings 01/01/2012 701. Assignment of
More informationCase 2:12-cv KJM-EFB Document 40 Filed 01/14/13 Page 1 of 21
Case :-cv-00-kjm-efb Document 0 Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, V. Case No. :-cv-00-kjm-efb STIPULATED FINAL ORDER FOR
More informationOwnership of Site; Agreement to Terms of Use
Ownership of Site; Agreement to Terms of Use These Terms and Conditions of Use (the Terms of Use ) apply to the Volta Career Resource Center, being a web site located at www.voltapeople.com (the Site ).
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SAMCO PARTNERS, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, JOSEPH M. O DONNELL, EDWARD
More informationDetailed Table of Contents
Detailed Table of Contents Board of Editors... v v Foreword... vii vii Preface... ix ix Author Biographies... xi xi Summary Table of Contents... xix xix Chapter 1: PART I: INTRODUCTION The Origins of Trademark
More informationCONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE
CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE THIS CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE ("Agreement") is entered into on this day of, 20, by and between BROWARD COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY''
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: 05-CA-004652
More informationChapter 180 Attorney General; Department of Justice 2017 EDITION
(Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement) 180.400 Legislative findings. The Legislative Assembly finds that violations of ORS 323.800 to 323.806 threaten the integrity of the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement,
More informationKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ON BEHALF OF KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF THE MID-ATLANTIC STATES, INC.
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ON BEHALF OF KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF THE MID-ATLANTIC STATES, INC. KP CONTRACTOR AFFILIATE WEB SITES LICENSE PROVIDER ENTITY AGREEMENT License Subject to the terms
More informationCase 0:09-cv WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:09-cv-60016-WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA HOLLYWOOD MOBILE ESTATES LIMITED, a Florida Limited Partnership,
More informationJudicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court
Honorable Judge Amy M. Williams 545 First Avenue North, Room 417 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11 2019 JURY TRIAL WEEKS *ALL ONE WEEK DOCKETS* JANUARY 7 FEBRUARY
More informationTECHNOLOGY CONSULTING AGREEMENT
TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Technology Consulting Agreement (the Agreement ) is made and entered into as of the last date executed below (the Effective Date ) by and between Central Nine Career
More informationCase 0:18-cv WPD Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/27/2019 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:18-cv-62942-WPD Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/27/2019 Page 1 of 10 ABS-CBN CORPORATION, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 18-62942-CIV-DIMITROULEAS/SNOW
More informationCase No. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Plaintiffs, MATTHEW CALDWELL and THE CAMPAIGN TO ELECT MATT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA MATTHEW CALDWELL and CAMPAIGN TO ELECT MATT CALDWELL COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE, Case No. Plaintiffs, v. DR. BRENDA
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION. vs. DIVISION: A
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 05-CA-381
More informationDiscovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law
Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law Michael Grow Arent Fox LLP, Washington D.C., United States Summary and Outline Parties to civil actions or inter partes proceedings before the United
More informationTRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT
TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT This Trademark License Agreement (Agreement) is entered into by and between the City of Dunedin, Florida, a municipal corporation, at 542 Main Street, Dunedin, Florida 34698
More informationSUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
Chief Justice Directive 11-02 SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Reenact and Amend CJD 11-02 for Cases Filed January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015 I hereby reenact and amend CJD 11-02
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011 Opinion filed May 04, 2011. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D11-275 Lower Tribunal No. 08-59283
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-COHN/SELTZER
Tara Productions, Inc. v. Hollywood Gadgets, Inc. et al Doc. 205 TARA PRODUCTIONS, INC., vs. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 09-61436-CIV-COHN/SELTZER HOLLYWOOD
More information