CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS
|
|
- Lee Webster
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS 2012
2 CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS When Congress investigates, even the most sophisticated businesses feel as though they have fallen through the looking glass. The rules of Congressional investigations are entirely different from those governing law enforcement investigations. The issuance of, response to, and enforcement of subpoenas is different. The rules governing the taking of oral testimony, whether through staff depositions or testimony in open committee, are different. The application of common law privileges is different often in startling ways. Media coverage, public relations, and partisan politics are often significant determinants of the course of the investigation. In this unusual setting, the playing field is not level, and it is not meant to be. Yet what occurs in a Congressional investigation can have devastating implications for the course of law enforcement and other executive branch investigations, a company s public image, filed or contemplated civil lawsuits, and a company s business and regulatory interests involving the government. Managing these situations requires special experience in addition to the lawyering skills associated with other forms of investigations or formal proceedings. Representing a client s interests in this context often requires the ability to identify, understand and resolve strategically the substantive legal, policy and political issues and to navigate the process procedurally. Whether advising companies on the appropriate tone and process to respond to a Congressional inquiry or subpoena, preparing and representing witnesses in connection with Congressional testimony, interacting with an investigating Committee, Member or staff, or managing the legal, policy, political, or public relations considerations outside of the investigating Committee, the Sidley Congressional Investigations team has the necessary resources to help a client navigate this often unfamiliar and hazard-filled terrain. CONGRESS: A UNIQUE LANDSCAPE Congressional investigations have a distinct procedural, practical, and substantive landscape that sets them apart from other kinds of litigation. Consider: There is no neutral decisionmaker; There are no rules of evidence; Congress claims it is not required to recognize common law evidentiary privileges; Many requests or demands for information will, as a practical or legal matter, lack an effective mechanism for compelling obedience, at least in any reasonable time period; Questioners may be non-lawyers and may be motivated by considerations far removed from a determination of the facts; and Those same individuals may have the power to change the applicable law. These just begin to describe the differences. Needless to say, the tools, background, and expertise of a typical litigator are generally not sufficient to navigate this landscape sure-footedly. Yet neither are Congressional investigations mere government relations exercises. Responding properly to a Congressional investigation requires a combination of legal skill, political judgment, and applicable experience. In counselling companies, corporate executives, and public officials on how to respond to Congressional inquiries and prepare for Congressional hearings, Sidley s Congressional Investigations team draws on its considerable experience to formulate strategies tailored to the unique features of Congressional probes. Such strategies are designed to minimize the unique risks probes can present. Understanding the dynamics of the Federal Government. Development of an appropriate strategy requires understanding who is asking for the information and why. Is it an official committee or subcommittee of the House or Senate, an individual committee chair, or simply an individual Member or group of Members from the majority or minority party? What are the goals of the investigating entity or Members? Are they policy-oriented? Political? Investigative? What other 2
3 institutions or entities may be involved and how? To what extent will partisan, political, or policy issues play a role in the inquiry? The answers to these questions can have a major impact on the proper course of action. Sidley has extensive experience with the Congressional committees that have investigative jurisdiction and their staffs in both Houses of Congress. Our team understands the players in both political parties, the political and policy context in which they are asking their questions, and how they are likely to react to various tactics and strategies our clients might adopt in response. We also take into account the potential effects of election cycles, news cycles, and the Congressional calendar, which can also have an important impact on those strategies. Understanding the formal and informal powers of the investigators. The sources of leverage on both sides of a Congressional investigation are often quite different from those that exist in litigation. Although rules of procedure typically play a far smaller role in Congressional investigations than in other types of litigation, understanding the rules of the relevant Congressional committee and the rules of the individual house of Congress of which it is a part, is an important starting point for evaluating the rights and leverage of each party to these disputes. In addition to understanding those rules, Sidley s lawyers design strategies that take into account the practical likelihood that subpoenas can be issued or successfully enforced, the external deadlines or timeframes under which the investigating committees are operating, committee resource constraints, the views and dispositions of individual committee members and the political balance of forces in the relevant chambers. Addressing the unique features of Congressional confrontations. Congressional investigations can play out in hearing rooms, on live television, on the front pages of major newspapers, and in the online outlets of new media. Unique reputational interests may be at stake, both for companies and their executives, in addition to the legal, regulatory and policy interests. Press leaks can be a tool the investigators use to bring pressure to bear on subpoena recipients. The course of such investigations may be affected by political factors wholly extraneous to the issues at hand. Sidley s lawyers are experienced in considering the ways in which press coverage can affect the strategies of both sides, and in working closely with its clients and with leading public relations firms to help anticipate and mitigate the effects of such coverage. Sidley s Government Strategies group members have deep Congressional experience and ensure that our legal strategies are appropriately complemented and bolstered by optimal political and public relations strategies. Tailoring document production and defense strategies. Determining how to respond to a Congressional document or information request depends upon many factors. Did the request take the form of a letter or subpoena? From whom? What powers do those individuals have in the committee and the chambers to which they belong? Depending upon the answers to these questions, the appropriate response might be no response at all, a polite letter, or a full-blown document production effort. Determining how to respond and what to produce, when, and how, requires active engagement with committee staff and on occasion with members of Congress. Sidley s Congressional Investigations team will often work with the investigating committee (majority and minority Members 3
4 and staff), conduct briefings for selected Members or staff, draft white papers, and design arguments with the individual attitudes and propensities of the Chairmen, Ranking Minority Members, and other key influencers, potentially including party leadership, in mind. When the decision is made to produce documents, Sidley attempts to negotiate appropriate confidentiality protections where necessary, and to negotiate the scope, sequence and timing of production to serve the client s interests while also satisfying the committee s demands. Preparing witnesses to testify before Congressional committees. Witness preparation for Congressional interviews, depositions, and especially hearings, differs in important respects from witness preparation in other settings. Sidley has extensive experience preparing company CEOs and others to testify before Congress. These are often challenging encounters, but there are proven strategies for looking and sounding as good as possible while still avoiding legal exposure and protecting important interests. In addition to the normal tools, Sidley anticipates the likely questions that will arise at hearings based, in part, on the personal knowledge and direct Congressional experience of members of Sidley s team, including former Congressman Rick Boucher, a 28-year veteran of the House of Representatives. We develop briefing books, Q&A documents, opening statements, and statements for the record to assist witnesses in preparing and testifying. We also help train witnesses on how to answer the kinds of questions they may expect from Congressmen and Senators, which often differ from those in a typical legal proceeding. In some instances, mock hearings can be conducted and videotaped to aid in refining witness presentations. Mitigating collateral consequences. In addition to the reputational risks arising from bad publicity, Congressional investigations carry with them unusually high risks of sparking other kinds of investigations and claims. A Congressional appearance that goes poorly, and results in adverse publicity or an adverse committee report, can spin off regulatory or other investigations within the executive branch, civil lawsuits by private litigants or by the federal or state governments. It can also prompt formal criminal referrals to the Department of Justice, either for suspected underlying criminal activity or for lying to Congress. Mitigating these risks and avoiding such collateral impacts is an important objective in virtually every Congressional appearance and must inform all aspects of the strategy for responding to a Congressional probe. Giving suitable attention to these vital objectives and designing effective strategies to mitigate them is one of the important ways in which Sidley s integrated Congressional investigation teams, which include professionals from the firm s White Collar and Government Strategies groups, help protect clients. SIDLEY s Congressional Investigations Practice Sidley s Congressional Investigations team has the experience and skills to meet these special challenges. Cross-functional, interdisciplinary teams. By design, Sidley s Congressional Investigation team combines the strength of our Government Strategies, White Collar Litigation and various regulated industries practices to give clients a team that: 4
5 Has deep experience with Congressional investigations from both the Congressional and respondent side. Former Congressman and Global Coordinator of Sidley s Government Strategies practice, Rick Boucher, served as a senior Member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, where he chaired two subcommittees that conducted scores of hearings. Knows how to develop an appropriate tone in managing the process with congressional investigators. Has experience preparing clients to testify in highstakes matters, in helping clients to avoid perjury traps and advising clients on invoking constitutional rights and privileges to avoid testifying or declining to answer particular questions. Uses its lawyering skills, as well as its understanding of the process, and the key players and their motivations, to identify the substantive, policy and political landscape, and develop strategies to resolve the issue at hand and mitigate collateral consequences. Can access significant substantive experience in underlying areas of law and regulation as diverse as health care, food and drug, banking and financial regulation, energy, environmental, privacy and data security, government contracts, SEC disclosure, and export controls and trade sanctions. Extensive background in both political branches of government. who participated in many Congressional investigations and understand how committees, Members, and their staffs think what their goals are and what influences them. Our team also includes numerous executive branch veterans who have dealt with Congress on behalf of the White House and other federal agencies. Six different lawyers on our team, while serving in the White House Counsel s Office, have helped defend three different presidents and White Houses in Congressional oversight investigations. Our ranks also include former General Counsels of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Management and Budget, the Department of Energy, the National Security Council, and the Department of Agriculture. Team members also include senior lawyers from the United States Trade Representative s Office, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Department of Justice, including an Acting Attorney General of the United States. All are available to provide advice and insight in service of our clients. We also have lawyers who hold the highest levels of security clearance and have practiced before Congressional Intelligence Committees. These resources give Sidley a robust understanding of legislative and executive branch perspectives, including how executive branch agencies and Inspectors General are likely to respond to requests for further, formal inquiries and what collateral consequences may flow from these inquiries. The Sidley team is comprised of lawyers who have deep experience in both Congress and the Executive branch. In addition to former Congressman Boucher, the Sidley team includes alumni of important investigative committee staffs 5
6 REPRESENTATIVE MATTERS Sidley was one of the first national firms to establish a significant presence in Washington, D.C.; it has had an office in the nation s capital since the late 1960s. Since that time, the firm s lawyers have handled an array of Congressional probes, including for clients caught up in many of the major political scandals of the past four decades. Our experience spans a wide range of investigative subject matters, Congressional investigating committees, and client types, including corporations and their executives, individual private citizens, and public officials. In the past, Sidley has represented: The former CEO of Freddie Mac in connection with Congressional hearings and other matters arising out of the financial crisis and appointment of a conservator at Freddie Mac. The U.S. Attorney General s former Chief of Staff, in connection with investigations conducted by the Senate Judiciary Committee, including joint House/Senate depositions and televised Senate hearings, into the termination of certain U.S. Attorneys. A major defense contractor in a Senate Armed Services Committee investigation into the use of private subcontractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. A leading trade association in connection with a Congressional inquiry into marketing practices and the regulatory framework involving the industry it represents. A leading pharmaceutical manufacturer in connection with a Congressional inquiry into its marketing practices. A leading biotechnology firm in connection with a Congressional inquiry into the pricing of certain of the company s products. An agricultural company and its chief executive in Congressional hearings relating to a food recall stemming from an outbreak of infection. A major industrial company in a Congressional probe of the impacts of the new healthcare law on public company financial reporting. A leading private investment entity in connection with a Congressional inquiry into issues relating to programs used by the federal government to encourage lending and investment after the financial crisis. The president and government of a sovereign country in connection with a U.S. Senate investigation of alleged money laundering and related banking offenses at Riggs Bank. A prominent local lobbying firm as well as an individual in connection with separate Congressional and DOJ investigations of alleged gratuities paid to Members of Congress. The government of a sovereign country in connection with a Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigation of offshore tax shelters. 6
7 A former White House official in connection with the Jack Abramoff and Valerie Plame investigations. The Major League Baseball Players Association in connection with Congressional investigations of steroid use in Major League Baseball. A private individual and campaign contributor in the investigation of President Clinton s pardon of Marc Rich. A non-profit organization in connection with GAO, Office of Inspector General, and House and Senate investigations related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Individuals in connection with campaign finance investigations. Individuals in connection with Whitewater and Travelgate investigations. General Richard Secord in Congressional Iran-Contra A senior executive of the U.S. Postal Service in Congressional and Inspector General investigations of alleged inappropriate expenditures and sexual harassment. A witness in Congressional hearings into telephone pretexting. White House officials before Congressional investigating committees examining the Clinton Administration s retention of FBI files on former government officials. Sidley lawyers, while serving as Members of the White House Counsel s Office, also represented the President and the White House in connection with Iran-Contra, the Clinton-era Whitewater and Lewinsky investigations, the investigation into the collapse of Enron, the separate House and Senate investigations into the federal response to Hurricane Katrina, and the investigation into the Bush Administration s warrantless wiretapping counterterrorism intelligence program. investigation. A university president in connection with Senate Finance Committee investigation of allegedly questionable expenditures and reimbursements. Senator Donald Riegle in Senate Ethics Committee s Keating 5 hearings. An individual in connection with Congressional investigation of a leader of college-based teacher educational programs. CONTACTS Bradford A. Berenson bberenson@sidley.com Rick Boucher rboucher@sidley.com Daron Watts dwatts@sidley.com 7
8 WORLD OFFICES Beijing Suite 608, Tower C2, Oriental Plaza No. 1 East Chang An Avenue Dong Cheng District Beijing China T: F: Brussels NEO Building Rue Montoyer 51 Montoyerstraat B-1000 Brussels Belgium T: F: Chicago One South Dearborn Chicago, Illinois T: F: Dallas 717 North Harwood Suite 3400 Dallas, Texas T: F: Frankfurt Taunusanlage Frankfurt am Main Germany T: F: Geneva Rue de Lausanne 139 Sixth Floor 1202 Geneva Switzerland T: F: Hong Kong Level 39 Two Int l Finance Centre 8 Finance Street Central Hong Kong T: F: London Woolgate Exchange 25 Basinghall Street London, EC2V 5HA United Kingdom T: F: Los Angeles 555 West Fifth Street Los Angeles, California T: F: New York 787 Seventh Avenue New York, New York T: F: Palo Alto 1001 Page Mill Road Building 1 Palo Alto, California T: F: San Francisco 555 California Street San Francisco, California T: F: Shanghai Suite 1901 Shui On Plaza 333 Middle Huai Hai Road Shanghai China T: F: Singapore 6 Battery Road Suite Singapore T: F: Sydney Level 10, 7 Macquarie Place Sydney NSW 2000 Australia T: F: Tokyo Sidley Austin Nishikawa Foreign Law Joint Enterprise Marunouchi Building 23F 4-1, Marunouchi 2-chome Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo Japan T: F: Washington, D.C K Street N.W. Washington, D.C T: F: Sidley Austin LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership which operates at the firm s offices other than Chicago, London, Hong Kong, and Sydney, is affiliated with other partnerships, including Sidley Austin LLP, an Illinois limited liability partnership (Chicago); Sidley Austin LLP, a separate Delaware limited liability partnership (London); Sidley Austin, a New York general partnership (Hong Kong); Sidley Austin, a Delaware general partnership of registered foreign lawyers restricted to practicing foreign law (Sydney); and Sidley Austin Nishikawa Foreign Law Joint Enterprise (Tokyo). The affiliated partnerships are referred to herein collectively as Sidley Austin, Sidley, or the firm. Attorney Advertising. For purposes of compliance with New York State Bar rules, Sidley Austin LLP s headquarters are 787 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10019, and One South Dearborn, Chicago, IL 60603, Prior results described herein do not guarantee a similar outcome. 01/12
A NEW BATTLEGROUND IN CLASS ACTIONS: THE COMMONALITY REQUIREMENT OF RULE 23(a)(2)*
A NEW BATTLEGROUND IN CLASS ACTIONS: THE COMMONALITY REQUIREMENT OF RULE 23(a)(2)* BY JEFFREY E. CRANE The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes 1 has thrust the commonality requirement
More informationE-DISCOVERY UPDATE. October Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
OCTOBER 1, 2012 E-DISCOVERY UPDATE October Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: 1.
More informationOctober Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
OCTOBER 25, 2013 E-DISCOVERY UPDATE October Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues:
More informationCONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS
CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIONS Congressional investigations move fast, and they do not conform to the rules of a courtroom. Media scrutiny, the glare of the spotlight, and shifting
More informationJune s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
JUNE 22, 2016 SIDLEY UPDATE June s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This Sidley Update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: 1. A Southern
More informationThe Normalization of Patent Rights
BEIJING BOSTON BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS GENEVA HONG KONG HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PALO ALTO SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. The Normalization of Patent Rights ACC
More informationAs DOJ Confronts Setbacks in Litigated FCPA Cases, The Government s Overall FCPA Enforcement Program Faces Increasing Scrutiny
As DOJ Confronts Setbacks in Litigated FCPA Cases, The Government s Overall FCPA Enforcement Program Faces Increasing Scrutiny February 16, 2012 Just as the Department of Justice ( DOJ ) is confronting
More informationFebruary Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 E-DISCOVERY UPDATE February Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues:
More informationBasic Upheld in Halliburton: Defendants May Rebut Price Impact
JUNE 23, 2014 SECURITIES LITIGATION UPDATE Basic Upheld in Halliburton: Defendants May Rebut Price Impact The U.S. Supreme Court this morning, in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc., No. 13-317
More informationOctober s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
OCTOBER 20, 2015 October s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This Sidley Update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: 1. A Sixth Circuit ruling
More informationSeptember s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
SEPTEMBER 15, 2017 September s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This Sidley Update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: 1. a District of
More informationLEGAL SUPERHEROES: VOL 2. MAKING YOU A LEGAL SUPERHERO!
LEGAL SUPERHEROES: VOL 2. MAKING YOU A LEGAL SUPERHERO! Session 7: 3:30-4:30 Presented by Sidley Austin Title: Antitrust Audits as part of a Gold Standard Compliance Program Speakers: Peter Huston, Partner,
More informationDecember Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
DECEMBER 19, 2013 E-DISCOVERY UPDATE December Edition of Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues:
More informationApril s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
April 20, 2017 SIDLEY UPDATE April s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This Sidley Update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: 1. a wake-up
More informationCounterterrorism and Humanitarian Engagement Project
Counterterrorism and Humanitarian Engagement Project Congressional Inquiries Background Briefing March 2013 I. Introduction 1 The tradition of congressional oversight began primarily as a function of checks
More informationPolitical Law. Timely and Sophisticated Legal Counsel for Your Political and Lobbying Endeavors. Attorney Advertising
Political Law Timely and Sophisticated Legal Counsel for Your Political and Lobbying Endeavors Attorney Advertising Political Law Establishing Corporate Policies and Compliance Systems Politics is more
More informationLatham & Watkins Health Care Practice
Number 878 June 8, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Health Care Practice This initiative represents a continuation and expansion of interagency efforts begun more than two years ago and illustrates an
More informationDecember s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
DECEMBER 20, 2017 SIDLEY UPDATE December s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This Sidley Update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: 1. a
More informationClient Alert. Background on Discovery Requests under Section 1782
Number 1383 August 13, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Eleventh Circuit Holds That Parties to Private International Commercial Arbitral Tribunals May Seek Discovery Assistance
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JONES DAY, ) Case No.: 08CV4572 a General Partnership, ) ) Judge John Darrah Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BlockShopper
More informationJune s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
June 19, 2017 SIDLEY UPDATE June s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This Sidley Update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: 1. a U.S. Supreme
More informationAlert Memo. I. Background
Alert Memo NEW YORK JUNE 25, 2010 U.S. Supreme Court Limits Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act to Security Transactions Made on Domestic Exchanges or in the United States On June 24, 2010, the
More informationTestimony of. Before the. United States House of Representatives Committee on Rules. Lobbying Reform: Accountability through Transparency
Testimony of Dr. James A. Thurber Distinguished Professor and Director, Center for Congressional and Presidential Studies American University Washington, DC Before the United States House of Representatives
More informationStatement for the Record. House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security. Hearing on Reauthorizing the Patriot Act
Statement for the Record House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security Hearing on Reauthorizing the Patriot Act Statement for the Record Robert S. Litt General Counsel Office of
More informationNew York s Highest Court Sets Forth New Standard for Challenges to Cost-Sharing Provisions in Arbitration Agreements
New York s Highest Court Sets Forth New Standard for Challenges to Cost-Sharing Provisions in Arbitration Agreements April 26, 2010 New York s highest court recently decided a case of first impression
More informationWho can create jobs in america? The American Worker Perspective on U.S. Job Creation
Who can create jobs in america? The American Worker Perspective on U.S. Job Creation Who can create jobs in america? The perspectives of a CFO master class The American Worker Perspective on U.S. Job Creation
More informationBackground. 21 August Practice Group: Public Policy and Law. By Raymond P. Pepe
21 August 2014 Practice Group: Public Policy and Law Permanent Injunction of Pennsylvania s Prohibition against Establishment of Political Committees to Receive Contributions of Corporate and Labor Union
More informationPROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE PROCEDURES MANUAL
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE PROCEDURES MANUAL NOVEMBER 19, 2014 NEW YORK STATE SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 14 WALL STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005 PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE PROCEDURES
More informationUse and abuse of anti-arbitration injunctions: strategies in dealing with anti-arbitration injunctions
Use and abuse of anti-arbitration injunctions: strategies in dealing with anti-arbitration injunctions Court assistance in international arbitration how to use it wisely and efficiently Anti-suit and anti-arbitration
More informationDelaware Chancery Court Confirms the Invalidity of Fee-Shifting Bylaws for Stock Corporations
4 January 2017 Practice Group(s): Corporate/M&A Delaware Chancery Court Confirms the Invalidity of Fee-Shifting Bylaws for By Lisa R. Stark and Taylor B. Bartholomew In Solak v. Sarowitz, C.A. No. 12299-CB
More informationWal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes June 22, 2011 In Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, No. 10-277 (June 20, 2011), the Supreme Court vacated the certification of the largest class action in history and issued
More informationDelaware Bankruptcy Court Confirms Lock-Up Agreements Are a Valuable Tool Not a Violation of the Bankruptcy Code
Latham & Watkins Number 1467 February 13, 2013 Finance Department Delaware Bankruptcy Court Confirms Lock-Up Agreements Are a Valuable Tool Not a Violation of the Bankruptcy Code Josef S. Athanas, Caroline
More informationOil States, SAS Institute, and New Approaches at the U.S. Patent Office
Oil States, SAS Institute, and New Approaches at the U.S. Patent Office Supreme Court Holds that Challenges to Patent Validity Need Not Proceed Before an Article III Court and Sends More Claims Into Review,
More informationFreedom of Information Act Request: Mobile Biometric Devices and Applications
51 LOUISIANA AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001.2113 TELEPHONE: +1.202.879.3939 FACSIMILE: +1.202.626.1700 Direct Number: (202) 879-3437 smlevine@jonesday.com VIA E-MAIL: ICE-FOIA@DHS.GOV U.S. Immigration
More informationAGRICULTURE. Side-by-Side Chart Agriculture
3 July 2013 AGRICULTURE Side-by-Side Chart Agriculture SAFEGUARD MEASURES http://eur-lex.europa.eu/lexuriserv/lexuriserv.do?uri=oj:l:2011:127:0006:1343:en:pdf http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/agreements/fta/korus/asset_upload_file288_12699.pdf
More information340B Update: HRSA Finalizes 340B Pricing & Penalties for Drug Manufacturers
18 January 2017 Practice Group: Health Care 340B Update: HRSA Finalizes 340B Pricing & Penalties for Drug Manufacturers By Richard P. Church, Michael H. Hinckle, Ryan J. Severson On January 5, 2017, the
More informationPossible models for the UK/EU relationship
Possible models for the UK/EU relationship This paper summarizes some potential alternative models for the UK s future relationship with the European Union, together with the key differences between the
More informationRisk and Return. Foreign Direct Investment and the Rule of Law. Briefing Note
Risk and Return Foreign Direct Investment and the Rule of Law Briefing Note Risk and Return Foreign Direct Investment and the Rule of Law 3 Briefing Note Background and objectives The Economist Intelligence
More informationCase KJC Doc 500 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 17-12913-KJC Doc 500 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: DEX LIQUIDATING CO. (f/k/a Dextera Surgical Inc.), Debtor. 1 Chapter 11 Case
More informationLatham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department
Number 1090 October 13, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department Recent Legislative Changes Affecting Pending and Future Projects Under CEQA This legislation is intended
More informationDaniel A. Petalas Principal
Principal Flour Mill Building 1000 Potomac Street NW Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20007-3501 T 202.298.1791 F 202.965.1729 dpetalas@gsblaw.com Dan delivers strategic and practical advice to help navigate
More informationFOUR TIMES SQUARE NEW YORK TEL: (212) FAX: (212) File No. S
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP DIRECT DIAL DIRECT FAX EMAIL ADDRESS FOUR TIMES SQUARE NEW YORK 10036-6522 TEL: (212) 735-3000 FAX: (212) 735-2000 www.skadden.com F'IRM/AFF"ILIATE OFFICES BOSTON
More informationSEC Proposes Amendments to Require Use of Universal Proxy Cards in Contested Elections
Memorandum SEC Proposes Amendments to Require Use of Universal Proxy Cards in Contested Elections November 2, 2016 On October 26, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission ( SEC ) proposed amendments
More informationNATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONWIDE CORPORATION CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEES
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONWIDE CORPORATION CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEES The Audit Committees are committees of the Board of Directors of Nationwide
More informationU.S. Supreme Court Forecloses Non-U.S. Corporate Liability Under the Alien Torts Statute
U.S. Supreme Court Forecloses Non-U.S. Corporate Liability Under the Alien Torts Statute Non-U.S. Corporations May Not Be Sued by Non-U.S. Plaintiffs Under the Alien Torts Statute for Alleged Violations
More informationpolitical law What Is Lobbying Under the LDA? January 2017 AUTHORS: ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: Ronald M. Jacobs Who Is a Lobbyist? Lawrence H.
political law January 2017 AUTHORS: Ronald M. Jacobs Co-chair, Political Law 202.344.8215 Lawrence H. Norton Co-chair, Political Law 202.344.4541 Cristina I. Vessels Associate 202.344.4706 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
More informationSupreme Court Addresses Fee Shifting in Patent Infringement Cases
Supreme Court Addresses Fee Shifting in Patent Infringement Cases In Pair of Rulings, the Supreme Court Relaxes the Federal Circuit Standard for When District Courts May Award Fees in Patent Infringement
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 1391 September 12, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Federal Circuit Holds that Liability for Induced Infringement Requires Infringement of a Patent, But No Single Entity
More informationAdapting to a New Era of Strict Criminal Liability Enforcement under Pennsylvania s Environmental Laws
October 11, 2013 Practice Groups: Oil and Gas Environmental, Land and Natural Resources Energy Adapting to a New Era of Strict Criminal Liability Enforcement under Pennsylvania s Environmental Laws By
More informationClient Alert. Revisiting Venue: Patriot Coal and the Interest of Justice. Background
Number 1447 January 2, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Revisiting Venue: Patriot Coal and the Interest of Justice Steps taken by parties on the eve of filing for bankruptcy are likely
More informationOctober s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
OCTOBER 18, 2017 October s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This Sidley Update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: 1. a Northern District
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 866 May 14, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department The Third Circuit Clarifies the Class Action Fairness Act s Local Controversy Exception to Federal Jurisdiction In addressing
More informationWHAT TO DO WHEN THE GOVERNMENT COMES CALLING:
WHAT TO DO WHEN THE GOVERNMENT COMES CALLING: Strategies for In-House Counsel Responding to and Preparing for Government Investigations Linda M. Watson Sotiris (Ted) Planzos (248) 988-5881 (202) 572-8666
More informationJanuary s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery
JANUARY 16, 2018 SIDLEY UPDATE January s Notable Cases and Events in E-Discovery This Sidley Update addresses the following recent developments and court decisions involving e-discovery issues: 1. Dec.
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 1025 May 13, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Pending a decision on BNY s appeal, structured transaction and derivative lawyers should carefully consider the drafting of current
More informationGrasping for a Hold on Ascertainability : The Implicit Requirement for Class Certification and its Evolving Application
26 August 2015 Practice Groups: Financial Institutions and Services Litigation Commercial Disputes Consumer Financial Services Class Action Defense Global Government Solutions Grasping for a Hold on Ascertainability
More informationAlert Memo. The Facts
Alert Memo FEBRUARY 27, 2012 Second Circuit Holds District Court Must Mandatorily Abstain from Deciding Parmalat State Court Action Related to U.S. Ancillary Bankruptcy Proceeding Under 28 U.S.C. 1334(c)(2),
More informationStreamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures
RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding
More informationAlert Memo. New York Court of Appeals Reaffirms In Pari Delicto Defense for Outside Professionals
Alert Memo NOVEMBER 5, 2010 New York Court of Appeals Reaffirms In Pari Delicto Defense for Outside Professionals When corporate fraud or other misdeeds are disclosed, investment banks, auditors and other
More informationThe Federal Preemption Battle Has Just Begun
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com The Federal Preemption Battle Has Just Begun
More informationConstitutionality of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Constitutionality of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board U.S. Supreme Court Concludes That Only the Tenure Provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Governing the Removal of PCAOB Members Are Unconstitutional
More informationELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE. Attacking Insider Trading and Other White Collar Cases Built on Evidence From Government Wiretaps: The Nuts and Bolts
Criminal Law Reporter Reproduced with permission from The Criminal Law Reporter, 92 CrL 550, 02/13/2013. Copyright 2013 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com ELECTRONIC
More informationPRINCIPLES OF AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
PRINCIPLES OF AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE University of Wroclaw Law School Wroclaw, Poland March 27-28, 2010 Edward Carter Supervisor Financial Crimes Prosecution Illinois Attorney General s Office
More informationCase 1:18-cr DLF Document 7-1 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT A
Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF Document 7-1 Filed 05/04/18 Page 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT A Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF Document 7-1 Filed 05/04/18 Page 2 of 6 Eric A. Dubelier Direct Phone: +1 202 414 9291 Email: edubelier@reedsmith.com
More informationFebruary 6, Practice Groups: Class Action Litigation Defense; Financial Institutions and Services Litigation
February 6, 2013 Practice Groups: Class Action Litigation Defense; Financial Institutions and Services Litigation Knowing Where You Are Litigating is Half the Battle: The Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument
More informationLOBBYING DISCLOSURE ACT/EDITION II
This material from Briefing Papers has been reproduced with the permission of the publisher, Thomson Reuters/West. Further use without the permission of the publisher is prohibited. For additional information
More informationIs Chinese Private Antitrust Litigation Ready to Take Off? By Jiangxiao Athena Hou 1 (Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP)
Is Chinese Private Antitrust Litigation Ready to Take Off? By Jiangxiao Athena Hou 1 (Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP) June 2015 China s Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) provides for private right of action.
More informationSecurity of Payment Legislation and Set-Off Under Commonwealth Insolvency Laws
1 April 2015 Practice Group(s): Energy & Infrastructure Projects and Transactions Real Estate Restructuring and Insolvency Security of Payment Legislation and Set-Off Under Commonwealth Australia Energy,
More informationNuclear Oversight Committee of the Duke Energy Corporation Board of Directors
CHARLOTTE MOSCOW CHICAGO NEW YORK GENEVA NEWARK HONG KONG PARIS LONDON SAN FRANCISCO LOS ANGELES WASHINGTON, D.C. Nuclear Oversight Committee of the Duke Energy Corporation Board of Directors Lisa Vaughn
More informationLatham & Watkins Corporate Department. The Lessons of Slayton v. American Express for Forward-Looking Statements
Number 1044 June 10, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate Department Second Circuit Wades Into the PSLRA Safe Harbor The Lessons of Slayton v. American Express for Forward-Looking Statements Specific,
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationUnited States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in United States v. Microsoft Corporation
United States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in United States v. Microsoft Corporation Court Will Review Whether a Warrant Issued Under the U.S. Stored Communications Act Compels a U.S.-Based Entity to
More informationTips For The Antitrust Lawyer Taking Depositions Abroad
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Tips For The Antitrust Lawyer Taking Depositions Abroad
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 1147 February 17, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department The Settlement does not affirm or overturn Judge Peck s controversial decision in the US Litigation barring enforcement of
More informationConfrontation or Collaboration?
Confrontation or Collaboration? Congress and the Intelligence Community Congressional Oversight of the Intelligence Community Eric Rosenbach and Aki J. Peritz Congressional Oversight of the Intelligence
More informationSupreme Court Upholds Landmark Federal Health Care Legislation
July 2, 2012 Supreme Court Upholds Landmark Federal Health Care Legislation In a high-profile test of the Supreme Court s approach to constitutional limits on Congressional power, the Court has upheld
More informationAlert Memo. Background
Alert Memo NEW YORK MAY 7, 2010 Lehman Bankruptcy Court Declines To Hold That The Safe Harbor Provisions Of Sections 560 And 561 Of The Bankruptcy Code Permit An Exception To Mutuality In Setoff On May
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department Securities Litigation and Professional Liability Practice
Number 1312 April 4, 2012 Client Alert While the Second Circuit s formulation answers some questions about what transactions fall within the scope of Section 10(b), it also raises a host of new questions
More informationINTERNATIONAL TRADE ALERT
January 14, 2004 INTERNATIONAL TRADE ALERT THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION Bribery and other corrupt practices, such as money laundering, once tolerated by many national governments and
More informationTHE BUSINESS IMMIGRATION GROUP
THE BUSINESS IMMIGRATION GROUP YOUR GLOBAL EMPLOYEES: Where you want them. When you need them. In today s global business environment, it s already a challenge to find employees and managers with the best
More informationThe Bribery Act Frequently Asked Questions WHAT IS THE BRIBERY ACT 2010? WHO MUST COMPLY WITH THE UKBA?
The Bribery Act 2010 Frequently Asked Questions WHAT IS THE BRIBERY ACT 2010? The Bribery Act 2010 ( UKBA ) is the primary anti-corruption law in the United Kingdom. It came into force in July 2011 and
More informationFTC's Proposed Petroleum Market Manipulation Rule And Market Manipulation Workshop
FTC's Proposed Petroleum Market Manipulation Rule And Market Manipulation Workshop Washington, DC November 19, 2008 On November 6, 2008, the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) held a workshop in which its
More informationSTREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers
More informationThe Supreme Court Adopts the Gartenberg Standard to Determine Whether an Investment Adviser Breached its Fiduciary Duty in Approving Fees
To read the decision in Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., please click here. The Supreme Court Adopts the Gartenberg Standard to Determine Whether an Investment Adviser Breached its Fiduciary Duty in Approving
More informationINTRODUCTION. 1. This is an action challenging the formation and operation of the Public Company
INTRODUCTION 1. This is an action challenging the formation and operation of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the Board ), an entity created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act ) to
More informationBOARD OF STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (MAURITIUS) LIMITED (the Bank ) TERMS OF REFERENCE
BOARD OF STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (MAURITIUS) LIMITED (the Bank ) TERMS OF REFERENCE MEMBERS: QUORUM: All Directors of the Board. At least 4 Directors, of whom at least 2 must be Non-Executive Directors
More informationThe Pre-Hearing Conference in Arbitration A Step by Step Guide
The Pre-Hearing Conference in Arbitration A Step by Step Guide By Philip S. Cottone, Esq. FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) calls it the Initial Pre-Hearing Conference in its securities arbitrations,
More informationSupreme Court Changes the Rules for Age Discrimination Cases, Holding Plaintiffs to a Heightened Proof Standard
Supreme Court Changes the Rules for Age Discrimination Cases, Holding Plaintiffs to a Heightened Proof Standard July 1, 2009 The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision issued on June 18, 2009 in
More informationIt s Time to Begin An Adult Conversation on PISA. CTF Research and Information December 2013
It s Time to Begin An Adult Conversation on PISA CTF Research and Information December 2013 1 It s Time to Begin an Adult Conversation about PISA Myles Ellis, Acting Deputy Secretary General Another round
More informationChina's New Exit-Entry Law Targets Illegal Foreigners July 2012
China's New Exit-Entry Law Targets Illegal Foreigners July 2012 Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of the alert please contact a person mentioned below or the person
More informationZubulake Judge Defines Discovery Duties and Spoliation Negligence Standards. January 29, 2010
Zubulake Judge Defines Discovery Duties and Spoliation Negligence Standards January 29, 2010 In an amended order subheaded Zubulake Revisited: Six Years Later, Judge Shira A. Scheindlin (SDNY), author
More informationCITY OF LOS ANGELES WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURES Revised July, 2013
CITY OF LOS ANGELES WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (WIA) COMPLAINT RESOLUTION PROCEDURES Revised July, 2013 The City of Los Angeles, as a Local Workforce Investment Area (LWIA) under the Workforce Investment
More informationInstant Messaging: Vote-A-Rama Provides Rare Insight into Tax Reform
March 28, 2013 Practice Groups: Public Policy and Law; Tax; Global Government Solutions Instant Messaging: Vote-A-Rama Provides Rare Insight By: Michael W. Evans, Mary Burke Baker, Karishma S. Page, Ryan
More informationLobbying by Non Profit Clients: Navigating Federal and State Regulations Complying with Lobbying Activity Tests, Limits, Registration and Reporting
Presenting a live 110 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Lobbying by Non Profit Clients: Navigating Federal and State Regulations Complying with Lobbying Activity Tests, Limits, Registration and Reporting
More informationSpence International Investments. LLC. eta/. v. the Republic of Costa Rica (ICSID Case No. UNCT/13/2)
SIDELEYI SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 +1 202 736 8000 +1 202 736 8711 FAX BEIJING HONG KONG SAN FRANCISCO BOSTON HOUSTON SHANGHAI. BRUSSELS LONDON SINGAPORE CENTURY CITY
More informationJOINT ETHICS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (JEEP) MANUAL OF PROCEDURES. December 2006
JOINT ETHICS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (JEEP) MANUAL OF PROCEDURES December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: ETHICS ENFORCEMENT... 1 JOINT ETHICS ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (JEEP)... 2 THIS MANUAL... 3 DEFINITIONS...
More information7501 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 700W Bethesda, MD Phone: Fax:
2018 Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP Erek L. Barron Partner 7501 Wisconsin Avenue Suite 700W Bethesda, MD 20814-6521 Phone: 301.804.3613 Fax: 301.804.3643 Email: ebarron@wtplaw.com 1800 M Street, NW Suite
More informationFraudMail Alert. Please click here to view our archives
FraudMail Alert Please click here to view our archives CIVIL FALSE CLAIMS ACT: Fifth Circuit Holds Prerequisite to Payment is a Fundamental Requirement in Establishing Falsity in a False Certification
More informationSenate Committee Rules in the 115 th Congress: Key Provisions
Senate Committee Rules in the 115 th Congress: Key Provisions Valerie Heitshusen Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process December 6, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44901
More informationPreparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness
Preparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness Presented by Sam Ramer (Counsel and VP, Government Relations, Symplicity Corporation), Leslie B. Kiernan (Partner, Akin Gump), Kristine L. Sendek-Smith (Partner,
More information