CRS CRS Reports are prepared for Members and committees of Congress IIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII!! I! I!~ I!! I I I!!II I
|
|
- Willa Matthews
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Northeast Interstate Dairy Compact Ralph M. Chite Specialist in Agricultural Policy Environment and Natural Resources Policy Division Summary The omnibus 1996 farm law contained a provision permitting the New England states to establish a dairy compact if the Secretary of Agriculture found a "compelling public interest" in the Northeast region. The compact would allow New England dairy farmers to receive a higher minimum price than the current federal minimum farm price in the region. Following a public comment period, the Secretary determined in August 1996 that such interest exists, allowing the New England states to begin the implementation process. Supporters of the compact contend that higher minimum prices are needed in the region because the federal minimum farm milk price is below dairy farmers' costs of production. Opponents, which include dairy processors, Upper Midwest producer groups, and some consumer groups, state that the higher farm milk prices in New England will reduce total demand for milk and cause surplus milk production. Background Dairy farm groups in the six New England states have long contended that the current minimum farm milk price dictated by federal policy in their region has been insufficient to cover their cost of producing milk on family-sized farms. Consequently, they state, many New England dairy farmers have been forced out of business. New England dairy farms account for approximately 3 percent of total U.S. production and are generally small operations. (See table below.) However, the New England states fear that the continued loss of dairy farms will have a ripple effect on the regional economy, especially since the rural landscape attracts tourists to the region. The late 1980s and early 1990s was a time of extreme volatility in milk prices for all dairy producers, and included several months when the base price for fluidgrade farm milk fell close to the federal support level. In response to the low prices prevalent at the end of 1990 and into 1991, several of the New England states implemented individual actions to raise farm milk prices in their respective states. However, these measures were quickly rescinded when the courts ruled that the required premiums processors must pay for out-of-state farm milk were a violation ~ of the commerce clause of the Constitution. Following this action, the A CRS CRS Reports are prepared for Members and committees of Congress IIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII!! I! I!~ I!! I I I!!II I
2 CRS-2 Massachusetts legislature adopted a surcharge in the spring of 1992 on all milk sold in the state, with the proceeds distributed solely to Massachusetts farmers. The Supreme Court ruled' in June 1994 that this order had the effect of taxing out-ofstate producers, since most of the milk sold in Massachusetts comes from other states. Number of New England and U.S. Dairy Farms (1) and Total New England and U.S. Milk Production (thousand lbs.) State Dairy Dairy Change Per Farms - Farms- in cent Milk Number Change Produc- Census Census of Dairy tion Farms ME 1, % 641 NH % 326 VT 3,198 2,194-1, % 2,538 CT % 526 RI % 32.5 MA % 448 Total 6,439 3,974-2, % 4,511 New England U.S. 168, ,412-55, % 155,644 Total Change from 1994 Prod. +0.3% +4.1% +3.3% -0.8% +2.8% -1.5% +1.9% +1.3% Sources: Farm Numbers: 1978 Census of Agriculture, 1992 Census of Agriculture; Milk Production: USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (1) A dairy farm is defined as a farm that earns more than 50 percent of its farm income from its dairy operations. In order to overcome the constitutional problems associated with the regulation of prices of interstate milk shipments, the New England states decided to work collectively and form an interstate dairy compact. A two-step process is required before a compact can become operational: ratification by the legislatures of the states participating in the compact, followed by the approval of the U.S. Congress. By 1993, all six of the New England state legislatures had ratified the Northeast interstate dairy compact. The compact creates an interstate commission with the power to set a minimum price paid by dairy processors to dairy farmers in the six states, at a level above the minimum price mandated by federal milk marketing orders. (See "The Compact and Federal Milk Marketing Orders" below.) The compact will regulate the farm price of milk used only for fluid consumption in the six-state region, regardless of where the milk originates. The interstate commission will
3 CRS-3 conduct formal hearings and determine the minimum price level based on farmer costs of production and consumer ability to pay. The 103rd Congress considered legislation (S and H.R. 4560) at the committee level that would have given final approval of this compact. S was amended and approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee but was not considered on the Senate floor. Hearings were held on H.R. 4560, but the bill was never reported out of the full House Judiciary Committee. Strong opposition from dairy processor groups and other dairy regions of the country contributed to the demise of the legislation in the 103rd Congress. Opponents maintain that the compact artificially encourages the production of milk within the Northeast region at the expense of other parts of the country that have lower production costs and can sell at lower prices. In addition, opponents maintain that the compact sets a precedent for other regions and industries to protect themselves from competition, an action which critics maintain is anti-consumer and market-distorting. The 1996 Farm Bill: Compact Approval Subject to certain conditions, congressional approval of the Northeast compact for the six New England states was granted by the 104th Congress upon enactment of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (P.L , the 1996 farm bill).l Conditions placed on congressional approval of the compact by Section 147 of the 1996 farm bill include: the finding by the Secretary of Agriculture of a "compelling public interest" within the Northeast region. (See "USDA Approval Action" below for details.) a limited life. The law requires that compact authority expire at the same time as the adoption of the required consolidation of federal milk marketing orders, which is required by April a prohibition on the regulation of the farm price of milk used in manufactured dairy products. The compact commission may regulate only the farm price of milk used for fluid consumption. limited membership beyond the six New England states. The law permits six other states to join the Northeast compact -- Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia. In order for any of 1 Neither the House- nor the Senate-passed versions of the 1996 farm bill contained approval of the dairy compact. The Senate committee-reported version of the bill did include approval of the compact, but the provision was removed on the Senate floor by a vote. This was the only congressional vote specifically on the Northeast compact. However, approval of the compact was included in the conference agreement on the omnibus 1996 farm bill. Section 147 of the farm bill contains congressional approval of the Northeast dairy compact and refers to section l(b) of Senate Joint Resolution 28, which authorizes the compact commission and establishes certain parameters for the operation of the compact.
4 CRS-4 these states to join, congressional approval is required and the state must be contiguous to a state already participating in the compact. compensation of USDA agencies. If the higher minimum price dictated by the compact commission leads to the overproduction of milk in the compact region, the commission must reimburse USDA for the amount of federal price support purchases it makes as a result of this overproduction. The commission must also compensate USDA for any technical assistance it receives from USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service. certain prohibitions against discrimination of outside milk. The law prohibits the compact commission from limiting in any way the marketing of milk produced in any other area of the U.S. The Commission also may not charge compensatory payments for outside milk as a barrier to the entry of milk into the region, or for any other purpose. USDA Action In accordance with the authority granted to the Secretary of Agriculture by the 1996 farm bill, the Secretary of Agriculture established a comment period (which ended June 3, 1996) to determine if a "compelling public interest" existed for the compact. The Secretary announced on August 8, 1996, that he had found such interest, thus allowing the New England states to implement the compact. In support of his statement, the Secretary noted that the state legislatures had already approved the compact, the Governors of each compact state had signed a resolution supporting the compact, and that Congress had consented to the compact. In a subsequent press release on August 9, the Secretary also expressed certain concerns about the compact. He stated that USDA will monitor closely its implementation, and encouraged Congress to exercise its oversight function as well. The Secretary expects the compact to be administered in a manner that will not restrict the ability of producers in other regions from shipping milk to the Northeast, nor have any adverse effect on dairy farmer income in other regions. He also expects the compact commission to closely monitor the effect of the compact on consumers, especially low-income families, and for the commission to provide assistance to offset any financial burdens the compact might place on these consumers. If the Secretary's concerns are not addressed in the development of the compact or if conditions otherwise warrant, he has indicated that he will revoke the authority to implement this compact. The Compact and Federal Milk Marketing Orders The farm price of approximately three-fourths of the Nation's fluid milk is regulated under 32 federal milk marketing orders, administered by USDA. Some states, California and Maine for example, have their own state milk marketing regulations, either instead of, or in addition to the federal rules. Federal milk marketing orders regulate processors that sell milk or milk products within an order
5 CRS-5 region by requiring them to pay not less than an established minimum price for the Grade A milk they purchase from dairy producers, depending on how the milk is used. This classified pricing system requires handlers to pay a higher price for milk used for fluid consumption (Class I) than for milk used in manufactured dairy products such as yogurt, ice cream, cheese, butter and nonfat dry milk (Class II, Class III and Class III-A products). Class III prices generally are the same in all orders nationwide. The basic formula price for farm milk used in Class III products is determined monthly and is based on the current price being paid to farmers by dairy product manufacturers in the Upper Midwest. A fixed differential is added to the Class III price to determine Class II prices. However, the highest minimum class price (Class I) varies from area to area. It is determined by adding to the basic formula price a "Class I differential", that generally rises with the geographical distance from the Upper Midwest, traditionally a milk surplus region. The current Class I differentials were legislatively determined and range from $1.20 per hundredweight (cwt.) in the Upper Midwest to $4.18 per cwt. in Southeast Florida. Processors in New England are regulated by the New England market order and must pay a minimum price for Grade A milk, regardless of where the milk is produced. The current Class I differential in the New England order is $3.24 per cwt., which is added to the basic formula price each month to determine the minimum price a New England processor must pay for milk used for fluid consumption. These payments are pooled along with sales of milk used for manufactured products. Each month, milk producers receive a weighted average price, or a blend price for the milk they sell, depending on what proportion of sales went into each class. Although the commission has not yet determined how milk pricing will work under the compact, one likely option is for it to establish a premium over the monthly Class I price in the region. As an example, assume that the commission imposed a $1.00 per cwt. premium for Class I milk, and the basic formula price for the month were $ New England processors would be required to pay a minimum price of $17.74 per cwt. for milk purchased for fluid consumption that month (the $13.50 basic formula price + the $3.24 Class I differential + the $1.00 compact-imposed premium.) Alternatively, the commission might set a minimum fluid milk price, which would serve as a price floor for Class I milk in the region, even if the Federal order Class I price should fall below that minimum. According to the interim compact commission, approximately 97 percent of all beverage milk consumed in New England is processed from bulk milk by New England-based milk plants. The remaining 3 percent is provided in finished, packaged form by processors in the New York-New Jersey order region. Under the compact, the packaged milk sold by New York-New Jersey processors to New England processors would be subject to the compact premium. That is, the premium would be payable to the farmers who supplied the milk, regardless of whether the milk originates in New England or in an outside state.
6 CRS-6 Compact Policy Issues In their attempt to secure congressional approval for the Northeast dairy compact, supporters faced strong opposition particularly from dairy processors, Upper Midwest milk producer groups, and some consumer groups. Opponents continue their efforts, and are seeking legal remedies to block further implementation of the compact. The following are some of the major issues. Effect on Consumer Prices: Opponents contend that the compact-required premium will be passed on to the consumer in the form of higher retail prices for fluid milk. They are concerned that these higher prices will have the greatest impact on low-income families. If the compact premium were fully conveyed to the consumer, then for every $1 per cwt. of premium, consumer milk prices would rise by 9 cents per gallon. Compact supporters admit that consumer prices might increase in the short term. However, they also contend that there is a sufficient margin between the farm price and retail price of milk, so that dairy processors should be able to absorb a portion of the premium without passing it on to the consumer. They also point out that the compact provides the commission with the discretionary authority to reimburse participants in the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Special Supplemental Food Program to offset the increase cost of fluid milk caused by the premium. Effect on Farm Milk Prices Outside New England: Some dairy farm groups in other regions fear that the higher minimum price mandated by the compact will have multiple negative effects on the national dairy economy. They contend that the compact premium will cause New England farmers to produce more milk than they otherwise would. On the demand side, they also are concerned that New England consumers will purchase less milk. The combination of these two effects, they say, would displace milk produced in other regions particularly the Upper Midwest, depress milk prices nationally, and reduce dairy farmer income outside the region. In response, compact supporters refer to the farm bill requirement that the commission be responsible for compensating USDA for its purchase of any additional surplus milk caused by the premium. They believe this condition is an adequate incentive for New England dairy farmers not to overproduce. Congressional Delegation of Authority: Opponents claim that the farm bill provision that required the Secretary of Agriculture to find a compelling public interest in the compact region as a condition of congressional approval is a violation of the Nondelegation Doctrine of the U.S. Constitution. They point out that the Constitution vests solely in Congress the power to approve interstate compacts. Furthermore, they say, Congress failed to provide "intelligible principles" to guide the Secretary's discretion. They also contend that the Secretary's finding of compelling public interest was arbitrary and capricious. Supporters of the compact note that Congress did not unconditionally delegate its authority, but instead established certain conditions that must be met as a prerequisite for its approval. A federal district judge heard initial arguments on this case on October 4.
AN OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL MILK MARKETING ORDERS
AN OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL MILK MARKETING ORDERS Lois Bansal Osler* INTRODUCTION Although the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (AMAA)l may strike many as an anticompetitive relic of the New Deal
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL
PRINTER'S NO. 3889 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE BILL No. 2597 Session of 2008 INTRODUCED BY CUTLER, DENLINGER, BEAR, BEYER, BOYD, CAUSER, CREIGHTON, FLECK, GEIST, HELM, HERSHEY, HICKERNELL,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 539 U. S. (2003) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
98-201 ENR CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Appropriations for FY1999: U.S. Department of Agriculture and Related Agencies Updated December 21, 1998 Ralph M. Chite, Coordinator Specialist
More informationc t DAIRY PRODUCERS ACT
c t DAIRY PRODUCERS ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationSugar Program Proposals for the 2012 Farm Bill
Sugar Program Proposals for the 2012 Farm Bill Remy Jurenas Specialist in Agricultural Policy June 19, 2012 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional Research
More informationFarm Bill Information Session. Annette Higby, NEFU Policy Director
Farm Bill Information Session Annette Higby, NEFU Policy Director Northeast Organic Dairy Producers Association Annual Meeting and Field Days September 28, 2012 Senate passed a bill in June House Agriculture
More informationResolution Urging Congress to Allow the Interstate Sale of State Inspected Meat and Poultry
2006 Annual Meeting Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Adopted Unanimously at Closing Business Session August 2, 2006 Resolution Urging Congress to Allow the Interstate Sale of State Inspected Meat and Poultry
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20106 Interstate Waste Transport: Legislative Issues James E. McCarthy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division January
More informationHouse Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin
House Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin Royce Crocker Specialist in American National Government August 23, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees
More informationPublic Informational Hearing on the Transparency of Dairy Pricing December 9, 2009
Ross H. Pifer, Director Agricultural Law Resource and Reference Center The Dickinson School of Law The Pennsylvania State University Lewis Katz Building University Park, PA 16802-1017 Tel: 814-865-3723
More informationWhat Is the Farm Bill?
Renée Johnson Specialist in Agricultural Policy Jim Monke Specialist in Agricultural Policy June 21, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional Research
More informationFood Security in the Northeast US
Food Security in the Northeast US John Eshleman and Kate Clancy February 9, 2015 Introduction Enhancing Food Security in the Northeast (EFSNE) is a five-year multidisciplinary research project with the
More informationCh. 2.1 Our Political Beginnings. Ch. 2.1 Our Political Beginnings. Ch. 2.1 Our Political Beginnings. Ch. 2.1 Our Political Beginnings
Ch. 2.1 Our Political Beginnings The US government has its roots in English history Limited Government The concept that government is limited in what it can and cannot do Representative Government Government
More informationCh. 150 MILK MARKETING FEES 7 CHAPTER 150. MILK MARKETING FEES GENERAL PROVISIONS
Ch. 150 MILK MARKETING FEES 7 CHAPTER 150. MILK MARKETING FEES GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 150.1. Definitions. 150.2. [Reserved]. 150.2a. License year; certification year. 150.3. Classification of licenses
More informationWhat Is the Farm Bill?
Renée Johnson Specialist in Agricultural Policy Jim Monke Specialist in Agricultural Policy June 21, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional Research
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RL34154 Possible Expiration (or Extension) of the 2002 Farm Bill Jim Monke, Coordinator, Resources, Science, and Industry
More informationRevised December 10, 2007
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org Revised December 10, 2007 PRESIDENT S VETOES COULD CAUSE HALF A MILLION LOW-INCOME PREGNANT
More informationThe House and Senate Farm Bills: A Comparative Study
The House and Senate Farm Bills: A Comparative Study FAPRI Policy Working Paper #01-02 March 2002 Prepared by the Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute University of Missouri 101 South Fifth
More informationBudget Issues That Shaped the 2014 Farm Bill
Jim Monke Specialist in Agricultural Policy April 10, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42484 Summary Congress returns to the farm bill about every five years to establish an omnibus
More informationRatifying the Constitution
Ratifying the Constitution Signing the Constitution Once the debate ended, Governor Morris of New Jersey put the Constitution in its final form. He competed the task of hand-writing 4,300 words in two
More informationThe Constitutional Convention. Howard Chandler Christy, Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United States (1940)
The Constitutional Convention Howard Chandler Christy, Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United States (1940) USHC 1.4 Analyze how dissatisfactions with the government under the Articles
More information2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA
Southern Tier East Census Monograph Series Report 11-1 January 2011 2010 CENSUS POPULATION REAPPORTIONMENT DATA The United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 2, requires a decennial census for the
More informationAcross-the-Board Rescissions in Appropriations Acts: Overview and Recent Practices
Across-the-Board Rescissions in Appropriations Acts: Overview and Recent Practices Jessica Tollestrup Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process September 20, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared
More informationFood Regulation Food Act No 250
New South Wales under the Food Act 2003 Her Excellency the Governor, with the advice of the Executive Council and with the approval of the Premier and the concurrence of the Attorney General, has made
More informationOverview of the 2008 Farm Bill: Where is the 2008 Farm Bill
Overview of the 2008 Farm Bill: Where is the 2008 Farm Bill and Comparisons How Did It and Get Contrasts There? USDA Ag Outlook Forum 2008 February 21, 2008 Randy Schnepf Specialist in Agricultural Policy
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code 97-684 GOV CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction Updated December 6, 2004 Sandy Streeter Analyst in American National
More informationTitle 7: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS
Title 7: AGRICULTURE AND ANIMALS Chapter 601: MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS Table of Contents Part 7. MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS... Section 2900. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section 2901. DEFINITIONS... 5 Section 2901-A. STANDARDS
More informationWASHINGTON POLICY OUTLOOK
WASHINGTON POLICY OUTLOOK Chip English Davis Wright Tremaine LLP ADPI Dairy Ingredient Seminar Shell Beach, California - October 8, 2013 Pretty Much Impossible to Miss Washington remains broken (maybe
More informationSection 8-1: The Articles of Confederation
Name: Date: Chapter 8 Study Guide Section 8-1: The Articles of Confederation 1. A constitution is a set of basic principles and laws, usually in written form, that state the powers and duties of a government.
More information(2) Production and Sale Prohibited. To prohibit the production and sale of unclean, adulterated, unwholesome milk, cream, or other dairy products;
2010 Arkansas Code Title 20 - Public Health And Welfare Subtitle 4 - Food, Drugs, And Cosmetics Chapter 59 - Milk And Dairy Products Subchapter 2 - Regulation of Manufacture and Sale Generally 20-59-205
More informationBudget Issues Shaping a Farm Bill in 2013
Jim Monke Specialist in Agricultural Policy June 3, 2013 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42484 c11173008 Summary
More informationAgriculture and Related Agencies: FY2012 Appropriations
Agriculture and Related Agencies: FY2012 Appropriations Updated March 20, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41964 Summary The Agriculture appropriations bill provides
More informationThe Dairy Products Act
DAIRY PRODUCTS c. 161 1 The Dairy Products Act being Chapter 161 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1930 (effective February 1, 1931). NOTE: This consolidation is not official. Amendments have been incorporated
More information530 East Montecito Street, Santa Barbara, CA
11/7/17 Ohio: The Ohio legislature has passed O.R.C. 5741.01 (I). This legislation provides tax collection on out-of-state retailers who enter into agreements with one or more residents of Ohio under which
More informationNumber of Bills Passed Per Issue
04 State Legislative Summary: January through July The 04 legislative session across the fifty states was another active one with 63 bills introduced and 3 enacted or vetoed pertaining to new or updated
More informationIC Chapter 5. Indiana Dairy Industry Development
IC 15-18-5 Chapter 5. Indiana Dairy Industry Development IC 15-18-5-1 "Board" Sec. 1. As used in this chapter, "board" refers to the Indiana dairy industry development board established by section 9 of
More informationState Legislation Requiring Genetically Modified Organism Labeling As of 7/15/13
State Legislation Requiring Genetically Modified Organism Labeling As of 7/15/13 State Bill # Notes AZ SB 1180 CO HB 1192 CT HB 6418 CT HB 6519 CT HB 6527* Governor signed on 6/25/13 FL HB 1233 SB 1728
More informationThe LIHEAP Formula. Libby Perl Specialist in Housing Policy. February 23, Congressional Research Service
Libby Perl Specialist in Housing Policy February 23, 2016 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33275 Summary The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) provides funds to states,
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1117
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. 0 State of Arkansas nd General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, HOUSE BILL By: Representative A. Davis By:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2004 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes
More informationThe Constitution. Multiple-Choice Questions
2 The Constitution Multiple-Choice Questions 1. At the Constitutional Convention, the delegates agreed that slaves would be counted as of a person for determining population for representation in the House
More information[ 2.1 ] Origins of American Political Ideals
[ 2.1 ] Origins of American Political Ideals [ 2.1 ] Origins of American Political Ideals Key Terms limited government representative government due process bicameral unicameral [ 2.1 ] Origins of American
More informationExpiring Unemployment Insurance Provisions
Katelin P. Isaacs Analyst in Income Security December 27, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41508 Summary Several key provisions related to extended federal unemployment benefits
More informationIC Chapter 11. Food: Eggs Offered for Sale and State Egg Board
IC 16-42-11 Chapter 11. Food: Eggs Offered for Sale and State Egg Board IC 16-42-11-1 Repealed (As added by P.L.2-1993, SEC.25. Repealed by P.L.28-2009, SEC.16.) IC 16-42-11-1.1 Definitions Sec. 1.1. The
More informationFour reasons we need government
Four reasons we need government 1. Need for Law and Order - Government makes laws to protect citizens, and punishes those who break the law. Laws provide order in a society. This allows citizens to live
More informationLearning Check. You CAN use your notes. You CAN NOT use your neighbor!
Learning Check You CAN use your notes. You CAN NOT use your neighbor! Constitution and Bill of Rights QC Standards B.1.i. Interpret the ideas and principles expressed in the U.S. Constitution B.1.j. Explain
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA 226 Forster Street, Harrisburg, PA 17102-3220 www.palwv.org - 717.234.1576 Making Democracy Work - Grassroots leadership since 1920 CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO PROPOSED
More informationProvince of Alberta DAIRY INDUSTRY ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter D-2. Current as of November 1, Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta DAIRY INDUSTRY ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of November 1, 2010 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park
More informationThe LIHEAP Formula. Libby Perl Specialist in Housing Policy. May 21, Congressional Research Service
Libby Perl Specialist in Housing Policy May 21, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33275 Summary The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) provides funds to states, the
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 544 U. S. (2005) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 03 1116, 03 1120 and 03 1274 JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, ET AL., PETITIONERS 03 1116 v. ELEANOR HEALD ET AL. MICHIGAN
More informationNew Population Estimates Show Slight Changes For 2010 Congressional Apportionment, With A Number of States Sitting Close to the Edge
67 Emerywood Court Manassas, Virginia 202 202 789.2004 tel. or 703 580.7267 703 580.6258 fax Info@electiondataservices.com EMBARGOED UNTIL 6:0 P.M. EST, SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 200 Date: September 26, 200
More informationWYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Wednesday, December 19, 2018 Contact: Dr. Wenlin Liu, Chief Economist WYOMING POPULATION DECLINED SLIGHTLY CHEYENNE -- Wyoming s total resident population contracted to 577,737 in
More informationKansas Legislator Briefing Book 2014
K a n s a s L e g i s l a t i v e R e s e a r c h D e p a r t m e n t Kansas Legislator Briefing Book 2014 B-1 Water Litigation B-2 State Water Plan Fund, Kansas Water Authority, and State Water Plan B-3
More informationMILK SANITATION LAW Act of Jul. 2, 1935, P.L. 589, No. 210 Cl. 31 AN ACT
MILK SANITATION LAW Act of Jul. 2, 1935, P.L. 589, No. 210 Cl. 31 AN ACT To safeguard human health and life by providing for the issuance of permits to, and regulation of persons and entities selling milk
More informationToday, we ll discuss a brief overview of The Farm Bill that includes defining what it is; describing what programs and topics are covered in it; how
1 Today, we ll discuss a brief overview of The Farm Bill that includes defining what it is; describing what programs and topics are covered in it; how the the bill is reauthorized, what types of program
More informationCHAPTER 2 NOTES Government Daily Lecture Notes 2-1 Even though the American colonists got many of their ideas about representative government and
CHAPTER 2 NOTES Government Daily Lecture Notes 2-1 Even though the American colonists got many of their ideas about representative government and freedom from England, that country has no written constitution.
More informationBudget Issues Shaping the 2018 Farm Bill
Budget Issues Shaping the 2018 Farm Bill December 6, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45425 SUMMARY Budget Issues Shaping the 2018 Farm Bill The farm bill is an omnibus,
More information(a) Short title. This Act may be cited as the "Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2013". (b) Findings. The Congress makes the following findings:
TRADE PROMOTION AUTHORITY ACT OF 2013 Section 1. Short title, findings and purpose (a) Short title. This Act may be cited as the "Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2013". (b) Findings. The Congress makes
More informationNortheast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact
Northeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact ARTICLE I. POLICY AND PURPOSE Sec. 1.1. There is hereby created the Northeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact.
More informationWater Law Senior College Jonathan Carlson
Water Law Senior College Jonathan Carlson The problem Future water shortages Supply side challenges: climate variability Demand side challenges: changes in use and demand State laws and administrative
More informationWhat Is the Farm Bill?
Order Code RS22131 Updated April 1, 2008 What Is the Farm Bill? Renée Johnson Analyst in Agricultural Economics Resources, Science, and Industry Division Summary The farm bill, renewed about every five
More informationThe Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction
The Congressional Appropriations Process: An Introduction Sandy Streeter Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process December 2, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared
More informationChapter URL:
This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Distribution of Union Membership among the States, 1939 and 1953 Volume Author/Editor: Leo
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RS20273 Updated September 8, 2003 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web The Electoral College: How It Works in Contemporary Presidential Elections Thomas H. Neale Government and
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
Nos. 01-950, 01-1018 In the Supreme Court of the United States HILLSIDE DAIRY, INC., ET AL., v. Petitioners, WILLIAM J. LYONS, JR., Secretary, Department of Food & Agriculture, State of California, ET
More informationThe Electoral College
The Electoral College Allocating Electors Among The States Each state has electors equal to the number of its Senators and Representatives in the U.S. Congress. In addition, per the Twenty-third Amendment
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL LAW I (LAW ) SPRING SEMESTER STETSON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Gulfport, Florida GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
STETSON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW Gulfport, Florida GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS THE ATTENTION OF ALL STUDENTS IS CALLED TO THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS: 1. The answers and the pledge are to be identified by examination
More informationFY 2014 Omnibus Spending Bill Restores Some Funds to Tribal Programs Bill Rejects Contract Support Costs Caps Proposal
Spending Bill Restores Some Funds to Tribal Programs Bill Rejects Contract Support Costs Caps Proposal January 15, House and Senate negotiators released a $1.012 trillion spending bill (HR 3547) on January
More informationCHAPTER 1 pp due date
Name CHAPTER 1 pp. 4-28 due date 1. Identify 2 reasons why politics has changed. f) 7. Explain which of the 6 key functions of government YOU think is the important and explain WHY you think it is the
More informationHouse Apportionment 2012: States Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin
House Apportionment 2012: s Gaining, Losing, and on the Margin Royce Crocker Specialist in American National Government August 23, 2013 CRS Report for Prepared for Members and Committees of ional Research
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RL32892 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Homeland Security Grant Formulas: A Comparison of Formula Provisions in S. 21 and H.R. 1544, 109 th Congress Updated May 13, 2005
More informationGPI State Legislative Update
February 6th, 2013 GPI State Legislative Update Arizona Senate Bill 1429 Author: Jackson, Introduced 2/5/2013 Summary: This bill would create a beverage container deposit refund program for the state.
More informationThe US Constitution of 1787 and Slavery Overview Grade North Carolina Essential Standards (to be implemented in the school year)
The US Constitution of 1787 and Slavery Overview Students will explore the Preamble to the US Constitution and the liberties and freedoms it sets forth. Students will then discuss the tensions between
More informationCranberries Grown in the States of Massachusetts, Rhode. Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michigan,
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/27/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-08526, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural
More informationUnit 2 Sources of Law ARE 306. I. Constitutions
Unit 2 Sources of Law ARE 306 I. Constitutions A constitution is usually a written document that sets forth the powers, and limitations thereof, of a government. It represents an agreement between a government
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code RL30095 CRS Report for Congress Received rough e CRS Web Committee Funding Resolutions and Processes, 106 Congress Updated March 25, 1999 Paul S. Rundquist Specialist in American National Government
More informationThe meeting was called to order at 6:38 p.m. by the Superintendent.
FREDERICKSBURG CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Fredericksburg, Virginia A regular meeting of the Fredericksburg City School Board was held at 6:30 p.m. on July 9, 2007 in the Lecture Room of James Monroe High School,
More informationAN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION
Popular Name AN AMENDMENT TO ESTABLISH THE ARKANSAS CITIZENS' REDISTRICTING COMMISSION Ballot Title THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION THAT CHANGES THE MANNER FOR THE DECENNIAL REDISTRICTING
More informationThe Dairy Producers Regulations, 1995
1 DAIRY PRODUCERS, 1995 A-20.2 REG 8 The Dairy Producers Regulations, 1995 being Chapter A-20.2 Reg 8 (effective January 13, 1995) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2000, c.50; and Saskatchewan
More informationTHE GOVERNOR Title 4 ADMINISTRATION
THE GOVERNOR Title 4 ADMINISTRATION PART I. GOVERNOR S OFFICE [ 4 PA. CODE CH. 6 ] [ EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2017-02 ] Pennsylvania Commission for Women October 6, 2017 Whereas, women in Pennsylvania make
More informationFSC-BENEFITED EXPORTS AND JOBS IN 1999: Estimates for Every Congressional District
FSC-BENEFITED EXPORTS AND JOBS IN 1999: Estimates for Every Congressional District Prepared for National Foreign Trade Council July 2, 2002 National Economic Consulting FSC-BENEFITED EXPORTS AND JOBS IN
More informationCRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web
Order Code RL30200 for Congress Received through the CRS Web Appropriations for FY2000: An Overview Updated February 29, 2000 Mary Frances Bley Information Research Specialist Information Research Division
More informationReport for Congress. District of Columbia: Issues in the 108 th Congress. March 10, Eugene Boyd Analyst Government and Finance Division
Order Code RL31771 Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web District of Columbia: Issues in the 108 th Congress March 10, 2003 Eugene Boyd Analyst Government and Finance Division Congressional
More informationIf Your Farm Produced or Pooled Grade A Milk In A Federal Milk Marketing Order During the Period January 2002 Through April 2007
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If Your Farm Produced or Pooled Grade A Milk In A Federal Milk Marketing Order During the Period January 2002 Through April 2007
More informationMonthly Legislative Update. September 26, 2017
Monthly Legislative Update September 26, 2017 Presentation Overview FY2018 Appropriations Update Status of Threatened Programs September Congressional To-Do List Looking Ahead: Tax Reform and Infrastructure
More informationREVISOR SGS/BR A
1.1... moves to amend H.F. No. 691 as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert: 1.3 "ARTICLE 1 1.4 STATE GOVERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS 1.5 Section 1. APPROPRIATIONS. 1.6 The sums
More informationThe 2008 Farm Bill: A Summary of Major Provisions and Legislative Action
Order Code RL33934 The 2008 Farm Bill: A Summary of Major Provisions and Legislative Action Updated June 19, 2008 Renée Johnson, Coordinator, Geoffrey S. Becker, Tom Capehart, Ralph M. Chite, Tadlock Cowan,
More informationadditional amount is paid purchase greater amount. coverage with option to State provides $30,000 State pays 15K policy; by legislator. S.P. O.P.
Table 3.10 LEGISLATIVE COMPENSATION: OTHER PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS Alabama..., although annual appropriation to certain positions may be so allocated.,, Alaska... Senators receive $20,000/year or $10,00/year
More information2011 NCSL LEGISLATIVE SUMMIT
2011 NCSL LEGISLATIVE SUMMIT Surplus Lines After SLIMPACT August 9, 2011 1 Overview of SLIMPACT Rick Masters, Special Counsel for Interstate Compacts CSG SLIMPACT is an Interstate Compact Agreements between
More informationORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF LAWRENCE, KANSAS: Chapter 291 of the Session Laws of Kansas, 1961, and
ORDINANCE NO. :3/ Ji,P AN ORDINANCE RElATING TO HEAL Til, REGUlATING TilE PRODUCTION, TRANSPORTATION, PROCESSING, HANDLING, SAMPLING, INSPECTION, EXAMINATION, GRADING, REGRADING, LABELING, DELIVERY AND
More informationSugar Provisions of the 2014 Farm Bill (P.L )
Sugar Provisions of the 2014 Farm Bill (P.L. 113-79) (name redacted) Analyst in Agricultural Policy March 21, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-... www.crs.gov R42551 Summary The 2014 farm bill (Agricultural
More informationOmnibus Appropriations Acts: Overview of Recent Practices
Omnibus Appropriations Acts: Overview of Recent Practices Jessica Tollestrup Analyst on Congress and the Legislative Process January 27, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32473 Summary
More informationFREDERICKSBURG CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Fredericksburg, Virginia
FREDERICKSBURG CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Fredericksburg, Virginia A regular meeting of the Fredericksburg City School Board was held at 6:30 p.m. on July 7, 2008 in City Council Chambers, 715 Princess Anne Street.
More informationDETAILED CODE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MEMBER DATA
FORMAT SUMMARY FOR MEMBER DATA Variable Congress Office Identification number Name (Last, First, Middle) District/class State (postal abbr.) State code (ICPSR) Party (1 letter abbr.) Party code Chamber
More informationChapter 8 Section Review Packet
Name: Date: Section 8-1: The Articles of Confederation Chapter 8 Section Review Packet 1. Constitution 2. Republicanism 3. Limited government 4. Suffrage 5. Articles of Confederation 6. Ratification 7.
More informationThe Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC): An Overview
Order Code RL34585 The Emergency Management Assistance Compact (EMAC): An Overview July 21, 2008 Bruce R. Lindsay Analyst in Emergency Management Policy Government and Finance Division The Emergency Management
More informationFederal Funding Update: The Craziest Year Yet
Federal Funding Update: The Craziest Year Yet Vermont State Visit August 31, 2012 Federal Funds Information for States Overview The Federal Budget Problem Pieces of the Federal Budget Pie Congressional
More informationThe Beginnings of a New American Government
The Constitution The Beginnings of a New American Government Dissatisfaction grew with the Articles of Confederation as disagreements over control of waterways and trade developed. In 1785 the first meeting
More information