FDA APPEALS IMPROVING YOUR ODDS OF SUCCESS: TRENDS, EXPECTATIONS, STRATEGIES. Jeffrey Shapiro
|
|
- Susan McCarthy
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FDA APPEALS IMPROVING YOUR ODDS OF SUCCESS: TRENDS, EXPECTATIONS, STRATEGIES March 21, 2012 Josephine Torrente Jeffrey Shapiro
2 Formal Dispute Resolution with CDER and CBER March 21, 2012 Josephine Torrente (202)
3 Agenda The FDRR Guidance Document Points to Consider for Successful FDRR Case Studies 3
4 The FDRR Guidance Document FDA Guidance for Industry Formal Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the Division Level CDER/CBER procedural guidance Issued February 2000 Available at: formation/guidances/ucm pdf Many Other Routes of Appeal Available Outside the scope of this webinar 4
5 The FDRR Guidance Document What Can be Appealed Scientific and procedural matters Refusal to approve Clinical hold Refusal to enter SPA Trial design requirements Applicability of statistical principles 5
6 The FDRR Guidance Document What to Submit Written request (letter) and supporting documentation Administrative information Follow details in FDA guidance document Substantive information Set out issue Procedural or scientific Steps taken toward resolution Identify solutions Advisory Committee? State expected outcome 6
7 The FDRR Guidance Document Possible Responses Appeal request granted or denied Plan for Advisory Committee Request additional information Schedule a meeting Request opinion from Office of Chief Counsel Timing (PDUFA Goal) Within 30 calendar days of receipt of the appeal (90%) If by phone, written response 14 days later 7
8 Points to Consider People Division Director or Deputy Director Office Director OND Director (J. Jenkins) or Deputy Director (S. Kweder) Center Director (J. Woodcock) or Deputy Director (D. Throckmorton) Process Must attempt resolution at signatory authority level No new information submitted as part of the appeal Cannot respond to issue in parallel with appeal 8
9 Points to Consider Striking an Appropriate Tone Inform Division/Office of decision to appeal Remove all irrelevant or accusatory language Refer to organizations rather than individuals Stick to the facts Ask how each fact matters to resolution Potential for Retaliation Most Division/Office Directors appreciate potential for scientific/procedural differences of opinion People are people 9
10 Points to Consider It s easy and cheap, I guess, to dispute rather than to actually go off and do the work. - John Jenkins, M.D. (The Pink Sheet Jan. 2, 2012) Suggests skepticism about appeals Appeal should only occur where: Regulatory burden being imposed exceeds time and cost of 2-3 rounds of appeal There is a legitimate basis for overturning the decision below 10
11 Points to Consider Meeting Considerations Unlikely to be beneficial at lower appeal levels May be helpful at OND level New decision makers Input from other OND experts All parties participate Typically delays response by 30 days 11
12 Points to Consider Response Expectations Dispute Appeal Denied Denied does not always mean the sponsor goes away unhappy. - Kim Colengelo Read the letter Well-considered Moves the ball forward Sets out path to resolution On approval issues need to resubmit NDA Appeal is typically of the decision not the action 6-month review clock 12
13 Case Studies Contrave Pixuvri Ryzolt Cayston 13
14 Case Studies - Contrave Background Combination of two approved drugs Seeking approval for treatment of obesity Pre-appeal Discussions 1/31/ CRL issued by Division Requires data from large clinical outcomes trial to rule out CV risk EOR meeting Division required unprecedented not feasible CVOT design 60, ,000 patients Rejected possibility of approval in low CV risk population 2012 General Advisory Committee planned Any agreement on Contrave would be subject to change 14
15 Case Studies - Contrave FDRR 6/3/2011 Appeal Announced Office: outcome not reported OND: 9/20/2011 response Sets forth reasonable and feasible study design criteria (<10,000 patients) Approval possible on interim data 2012 Advisory Committee meeting will not impact the advice provided in this letter and the agency will honor the advice provided Post-appeal 2/6/2012 SPA agreement with Division on study design First round agreement 15
16 Case Studies - Pixuvri Background New molecular entity Seeking approval for relapsed/refractory non-hodgkin s lymphoma Single pivotal trial Pre-appeal Discussions 3/22/2010 unanimous ODAC vote against approval Pivotal study failed trial because of the need to apply a statistical penalty CRL issued at Office level Same issue as ODAC 16
17 Case Studies - Pixuvri FDRR Appeal Filed 12/3/2010 Meeting OND requested additional analyses OND: 5/3/11 response Denied request to find that efficacy had been demonstrated BUT - pivotal study may have been successful Approval not necessarily out of reach Submit information regarding early study stop/ongoing results assessments Ascertain soundness of results after independent radiologic review 17
18 Case Studies - Pixuvri Post Appeal Meeting with review division 6/14/2011 to discuss resubmission Resubmission 10/25/11 ODAC scheduled for 2/9/2012 NDA withdrawn 1/30/2012 Company needed additional time to prepare 18
19 Case Studies - Ryzolt Background Extended release version of approved drug Seeking approval for moderate to severe pain indication Pre-appeal Discussions 9/28/ Approvable letter issued at Division level Method of handling of missing data (LOCF) inappropriate despite prespecification and SPA More conservative method (BOCF) renders results not significant 11/21/ EOR meeting 12/19/ Resubmission Additional sensitivity analyses 19
20 Case Studies - Ryzolt Pre-appeal Discussions (con t) 5/3/ Approvable letter 6/26/ EOR meeting FDRR 10/15/2007 Appeal Office: 11/20/2007 denial Support Division s conclusion 12/19/ appeal to OND: 1/18/2008 response Have not demonstrated efficacy BUT - proposes a third method for handling missing data If positive it could help reassure the Division that the outcome of the study is not biased by imputation Results are significant when third method is used 20
21 Case Studies - Ryzolt Appeal (con t) 3/31/ appeal to CDER - 6/27/2008 Concurs with OND I strongly recommend prompt submission of the statistical analysis suggested by [OND] in the form of a [resubmission] Post-appeal 7/2/ Resubmission Includes analysis by Jenkins Method 12/31/ Approval 21
22 Case Studies - Cayston Background Previously approved drug Seeking approval for treatment of cystic fibrosis patients with P. aeruginosa Pre-appeal Discussions 9/16/ CRL issued at Division level Prespecified pooled analysis of different dosing regimens not acceptable Treatment regimen effect unexplained 22
23 FDRR Case Studies - Cayston 11/24/2008 to Office: Dispute Appeal Denied 2/18/2009 Agreement with Division 3/13/2009 to OND: Dispute Appeal Denied 6/17/2009 4/10/ request for responses to questions 4/22/ response Extensive work to better characterize novel CF endpoint 4/24/ meeting 5/22/ submission New analyses submitted on appeal could not be considered BUT - recommended submission of new analyses to Review Division and consideration by Advisory Committee 23
24 Case Studies - Cayston Post-appeal Resubmission 12/10/ Advisory Committee Advisory Committee vote: 15-2 for approval 2/22/ Approval 24
25 Administrative Appeals March 21, 2012 Jeffrey K. Shapiro (202)
26 Getting past FDA is more challenging today than even 5 years ago Device technology is more complex Data requirements are more demanding Regulatory issues more prominent E.g., drug ingredients, combination products 26
27 FDA makes many decisions in every premarket review that could be disputed Requiring unduly burdensome data Rejecting a 510(k) or PMA Designating a drug primary mode of action (combination product) 27
28 Choose your battles wisely! All reviews involve friction Not possible to appeal all issues You may lose anyway and wind up where you started after a costly delay Appeals are generally slow and inefficient 28
29 Provide the review team with all supporting data and arguments The review team might be persuaded, making an appeal unnecessary It is generally not permissible to present new arguments or data on appeal 29
30 Post-market decisions are appealable Examples: Warning and untitled letters Application Integrity Policy Requirements of a post-approval study Imposition of a section 522 study 30
31 If there is no decision, there cannot be an appeal If a dispute arises during a 510(k) review, sometimes the applicant withdraws the 510(k) to enable further discussions That is fine but a 510(k) withdrawn cannot be appealed 31
32 SUPERVISORY REVIEW 21 CFR
33 Discussion with decision maker ends Goal is to prevent confusion and waste of FDA resources Relationship with Decision Maker Generally, FDA personnel are professionals who do not take appeals personally CDRH has general policy against bias/retaliation And yet must make a judgment whether appeal is worth interruption in relationship 33
34 A supervisory review is not public Under regulations, appeal involves consultation between supervisor and employee, or supervisor s review of the file Review is between CDRH personnel and applicant 34
35 First step: determine who signed the decision General CDRH hierarchy: Branch Division Office Center Commissioner 35
36 Supervisory review moves up the chain of command Example #1: 510(k) AI signed by Branch Chief Division Director Example #2: 510(k) NSE signed by Division Director Director ODE/OIVD Example #3: RFD decision signed by Director of OCP Associate Commissioner, Office of Special Medical Programs 36
37 Rarely, appeal could skip over the supervisor to the next level (telescoped review) Occurs when signatory has already consulted with supervisor, who is in agreement with decision Examples when it might occur: regulatory issue, new policy question or complex scientific question 37
38 Submit the supervisory review request in writing No required format Recommendation: a letter with attachments for background or supporting information 38
39 Ask for a meeting to present the case It is discretionary; usually granted May not be granted for intermediate decisions (e.g., dispute over an intermediate decision like an AI request) Review team may or may not be present (usually are) 39
40 An advisory panel is available Applicant may request scientific advisory panel A panel is cumbersome and rarely used In one case we had, the Director granted a panel, leading the Division to compromise Tip: an alternative might be to request the review authority refer the matter to an external subject matter expert for opinion 40
41 Elements of a good review request Statement of request Level of review and citation to 21 CFR Matter identification (e.g., K number) Request meeting or telephone conference, or expedited review on review of papers Optional: request panel or outside subject matter expert review Clear and concise explanation of dispute and why the decision should be reversed 41
42 Tip: keep it short and simple! Frame the appeal as narrowly as possible to make reversal easier If the dispute appears to be complex, supervisor is more likely to defer to the original decision Focus on defined errors that would justify reversal Don t present the Iliad and the Odyssey, focus on key procedural history 42
43 Potential review outcomes Refusal to hear Reversal, in whole or in part Affirmance, in whole or in part Return to employee for reconsideration under defined conditions Alternative: mediate settlement between submitter and employee 43
44 A supervisory review is an uphill battle Upper management is presumptively reluctant to overrule primary review team Inherent conflict of interest: they must work with these employees every day Tip: don t cast aspersions or blame a single official just present the facts 44
45 Time to decision is uncertain No time requirements in the regulation Upper management is busy, so appeals tend to languish Not part of the MDUFMA performance requirements Informally, upper management says the target is 3 months We have seen numerous appeals far beyond the target, e.g., 8 or 9 months to decision, or longer FDA does not publish information about appeals No public information about the number of appeals processed, time to decision or outcomes 45
46 Negotiating with FDA is slow Key dynamics FDA holds most of the power FDA personnel are busy and any one matter is not necessarily a priority FDA tends to operate by group decision, so there is not a point person with delegated authority to make real time decisions Result: negotiations are slow and iterative These dynamics can apply on appeal as well 46
47 OTHER OPTIONS 47
48 Legal/Regulatory Issue? May be able to characterize some or all of the dispute in legal /regulatory terms Especially if precedents are being disregarded Could present issue to Office of Chief Counsel for opinion Issue must be ripe and not scientific 48
49 Formal Appeal Procedures Citizen s Petition (21 C.F.R ) Petition for Administrative Reconsideration (21 C.F.R ) 21 CFR Part 12 - Formal Evidentiary Public Hearing 49
50 Formal Appeal Procedures 21 CFR Part 13 - Public Hearing Before A Board of Inquiry 21 CFR Part 14 - Public Hearing Before A Public Advisory Committee 21 CFR Part 16 - Regulatory Hearing Before the Food and Drug Administration 50
51 Formal appeal options offer due process but are not usually commercially viable solutions Take months or years to complete Must have deep pockets ($$$), especially for a panel Hardly ever used 51
52 J&J recently invoked formal appeal for SEDASYS Device intended to broaden categories of clinicians who can administer Propafol PMA not approvable (Feb 2010) Invoked statutory right to administrative review via advisory committee Within weeks of panel, latter cancelled based upon agreement of the parties that J&J believes provides a path to market 52
53 Note the length and complexity Feb 2010: CDRH issues not approvable letter per 21 CFR (f) Mar 2010: J&J treats letter as denial and requests administrative review by filing a petition for administrative reconsideration per 21 CFR , Oct 2010: CDRH issues outright denial of PMA per 21 CFR Nov 2010: CDRH grants petition for review per FDCA, sec. 515(d)(4) & (g)(2) Mar 2011: Commissioner refers matter to Medical Devices Dispute Resolution Panel per 2001 guidance and Medical Device Advisory Committee charter This panel may handle referrals of petitions for advisory committee review under sec. 515(g)(2) Dec 2011: Scheduled meeting of the Advisory Committee settlement occurred shortly before Proceedings of panel would have been be governed by sec. 515(g)(2), Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 21 CFR Part 14 governing advisory committees, and the MDAC charter Decision would have come no earlier than 2012 more than 2 years from the decision under appeal 53
54 GUIDANCE 54
55 Existing guidance MEDICAL DEVICE APPEALS AND COMPLAINTS: Guidance On Dispute Resolution (1998) Table (p. 16) outlines types of dispute and associated available processes Resolving Scientific Disputes Concerning The Regulation Of Medical Devices, A Guide To Use Of The Medical Devices Dispute Resolution Panel; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA (2001) 55
56 Draft guidance Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, CDRH Appeals Processes (Dec. 27, 2011) Will supersede preceding guidance when finalized 56
57 REFORM PROPOSAL 57
58 Reform Proposal Office of Appeals Office of Appeals for Premarket Submissions In the CDRH Director s Office Reporting to the CDRH Ombudsman With dedicated staff Multidisciplinary scientific / medical expertise, and varied premarket review experience Access to dedicated OCC counsel when needed Operating under a written procedure with established milestones and timelines 58
59 Office of Appeals Advantages Regularizes the appeals process Eliminates conflict of interest Develops an experienced team processing appeals more efficiently and consistently Could develop a database with information about dispute and resolution patterns Creates a single office to hold accountable with metrics for timely and fair appeals 59
60 Thank You! Josephine Torrente Jeffrey Shapiro (202) (202)
Formal Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the Division Level Guidance for Industry and Review Staff
Formal Dispute Resolution: Appeals Above the Division Level Guidance for Industry and Review Staff Good Review Practice DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.
More informationCENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH (CDRH)
CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH (CDRH) STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (SOP) FOR RESOLUTION OF INTERNAL DIFFERENCES OF OPINION IN REGULATORY DECISION-MAKING TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. Purpose 2. Background
More informationPOLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF THE CENTER DIRECTOR. Drug Safety Oversight Board (DSB) Table of Contents
Reprinted from FDA s website by EAS Consulting Group, LLC POLICY AND PROCEDURES OFFICE OF THE CENTER DIRECTOR Drug Safety Oversight Board (DSB) Table of Contents PURPOSE...1 BACKGROUND...1 POLICY...2 RESPONSIBILITIES...3
More informationInternal Agency Review of Decisions; Requests for Supervisory Review of Certain. Decisions Made by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/17/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-00646, and on FDsys.gov 4164-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Part I: Background and Regulatory Framework. Part II: MDUFMA, 510(k) and Validation
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to Reusing Single-Use Devices................................ ix Part I: Background and Regulatory Framework Section 1.................................................................
More informationCommunicating with CVM
Communicating with CVM Diane L. Heinz, DVM, MBA Director, Policy and Regulations Staff Center for Veterinary Medicine, FDA CVM s s Website Information related to recalls, including pet food How to file
More informationSubtitle F Medical Device Innovations
130 STAT. 1121 (B) unless specifically stated, have any effect on authorities provided under other sections of this Act, including any regulations issued under such sections.. (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.
More informationFDA REFORM LEGISLATION Its Effect on Animal Drugs TABLE OF CONTENTS
November 12, 1997 FDA REFORM LEGISLATION Its Effect on Animal Drugs TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND II. REFORM PROVISIONS AFFECTING ANIMAL DRUGS A. Supplemental Applications - Sec. 403 B. Manufacturing
More informationCenter for Devices and Radiological Health Appeals Processes: Questions and Answers About 517A
Reprinted from FDA s website by Center for Devices and Radiological Health Appeals Processes: Questions and Answers About 517A Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff DRAFT GUIDANCE
More informationAmendments to Regulations on Citizen Petitions, Petitions for Stay of Action, and Submission of
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/08/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-26912, and on FDsys.gov 4164-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
More informationOptional Appeal Procedures Available During the Planning Rule Transition Period
Optional Appeal Procedures Available During the Planning Rule Transition Period February 2011 1 Introduction This document sets out the optional administrative appeal and review procedures allowed by Title
More informationWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Docket No. FDA-2017-N-5101 COMMENTS of WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION to the FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Concerning Review of Existing Center for Drug Evaluation and
More informationPDA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Policies and Procedures
PDA STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Policies and Procedures Approved by the PDA Executive Management July 15, 2016 Approved by the ANSI Executive Standards Council March 01, 2017 Parenteral Drug Association
More informationHOGAN & HARTSON APR -9 P4 :18 BY HAND DELIVERY
HOGAN & HARTSON 2741 10 APR -9 P4 :18 Hogan & Hartson up Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 +1.202.637.5600 Tel +1.202.637.5910 Fax www.hhlaw.com Philip Katz Partner 202.637.5632
More information21 CFR Part 50 - Protection of Human Subjects
21 CFR Part 50 - Protection of Human Subjects Subpart A General Provisions 50.1 Scope. 50.3 Definitions. Subpart B Informed Consent of Human Subjects 50.20 General requirements for informed consent. 50.21
More information21 USC 360c. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 21 - FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER 9 - FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT SUBCHAPTER V - DRUGS AND DEVICES Part A - Drugs and Devices 360c. Classification of devices intended for human use (a) Classes
More informationOctober 15, 2018 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852
October 15, 2018 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Re: Docket No. FDA-2018-D-2310: Process to Request a Review of FDA's
More informationGuide to ACCA s complaints and disciplinary procedures
Guide to ACCA s complaints and disciplinary procedures Introduction This guide aims to assist complainants and members to understand ACCA s complaints and disciplinary process. In the event of any conflict
More informationSection moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:
1.1... moves to amend H.F. No. 1433 as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert: 1.3 "Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2016, section 3.842, subdivision 4a, is amended to read: 1.4
More informationCitation to Code of Federal Regulations and statutory citation (as applicable):
January 26, 2018 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Docket No.: FDA-2017-N-5101
More informationOFFICE OF EQUITY & DIVERSITY
OFFICE OF EQUITY & DIVERSITY OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING COMPLAINTS OF DISCRIMINATION EFFECTIVE: MARCH 1, 2006 OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING COMPLAINTS OF DISCRIMINATION INTRODUCTION Without
More informationACCREDITED STANDARDS COMMITTEE (ASC) Z540 OPERATING PROCEDURES 2016
ACCREDITED STANDARDS COMMITTEE (ASC) Z540 OPERATING PROCEDURES 2016 Accredited Standards Committee (ASC) procedure is used for the ASC Z540 Standards Committee. This version of the Accredited Standards
More informationEHRA NON-FACULTY GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
EHRA NON-FACULTY GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL Note: The following procedures have been established to provide detailed guidance to the parties of any EHRA Non-Faculty
More informationREGULATORY COMPLIANCE: GLOBAL EDITION
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE: GLOBAL EDITION Jennifer E. Dubas Endo Pharmaceuticals Michael C. Zellers Tucker Ellis LLP Pharmaceutical and medical device companies operate globally. Global operations involve
More informationPolicies and Procedures for Standards Development for the Industrial Electronics Society (IES) Standards Committee. Date of Submittal: August
Policies and Procedures for Standards Development for the Industrial Electronics Society (IES) Standards Committee Date of Submittal: August 25 2016 Date of Acceptance: 22 September 2016 Industrial Electronics
More informationBILLING CODE: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Executive Office for Immigration Review. 8 CFR Parts 1003, 1103, 1208, 1211, 1212, 1215, 1216, 1235
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/28/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-23874, and on FDsys.gov BILLING CODE: 4410-30 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
More informationDavid (Ivy Sports) Beats Goliath (FDA) Federal Appeals Court Rules FDA has No Inherent Authority to Rescind a 510(k)
David (Ivy Sports) Beats Goliath (FDA) Federal Appeals Court Rules FDA has No Inherent Authority to Rescind a 510(k) INTRODUCTION FDA again misjudged its strength and position and the little principled
More informationADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND GRIEVANCES Section 10. Overview. Definitions
Overview The Plan maintains distinct grievance and administrative review processes for members and providers, as well as access to the state s hearing system. Providers have the right to participate in
More informationFood and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997: Modifications to the List of
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/11/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-02801, and on FDsys.gov 4164-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
More informationSubpart A General Provisions
Pt. 11 necessitated such an action within 24 hours or sooner if requested by the Deputy Commissioner. In the absence or unavailability of the Deputy Commissioner, the presiding officer shall notify the
More informationPolicies and Procedures for Standards Development for the IEEE Cloud Computing Standards Committee. Date of Submittal: 08 July 2016
Policies and Procedures for Standards Development for the IEEE Cloud Computing Standards Committee Date of Submittal: 08 July 2016 Date of Acceptance: 22 September 2016 IEEE Cloud Computing Standards Committee
More informationIMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW
IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW IMPLEMENTATION AMCA 2016 Fall Training Monday, November 14, 2016 Christina Estes-Werther General Counsel League of Arizona Cities and Towns 2016 LEGISLATION
More informationCh SPECIAL PROVISIONS 52 CHAPTER SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Ch. 1003 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 52 CHAPTER 1003. SPECIAL PROVISIONS Subchap. Sec. A. TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDERS... 1003.1 B. INFORMAL PROCEEDINGS GENERALLY... 1003.41 C. APPLICATIONS AND PROTESTS... 1003.51
More informationMedBiquitous Standards Program Operating Procedures 12 May 2015
MedBiquitous Standards Program Operating Procedures 12 May 2015 MedBiquitous Consortium Standards Program Operating Procedures 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 1.0 General... 4 2.0 Organization
More informationAmerican Water Works Association (AWWA) Standards Program Operating Procedures
American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standards Program Operating Procedures Updates Approved by AWWA Standards Council October 25, 2017 (effective date) Table of Contents Preface 4 Section 1: Standards
More informationLitigation Webinar Series. Hatch-Waxman 101. Chad Shear Principal, San Diego
Litigation Webinar Series Hatch-Waxman 101 Chad Shear Principal, San Diego 1 Overview Hatch-Waxman Series Housekeeping CLE Contact: Jane Lundberg lundberg@fr.com Questions January 25, 2018 INSIGHTS Litigation
More informationIndustry Influence on Drug and Medical Device Safety at FDA $700 million in lobbying buys significant access March 29, 2012
Industry Influence on Drug and Medical Device Safety at FDA $700 million in lobbying buys significant access March 29, 2012 2012 is crucial for the Food and Drug Administration, as Congress votes on legislation
More informationAPPEALS AND GRIEVANCES Section 7. Overview
Overview The Plan maintains a member grievance system that includes a grievance process, an appeal process, an External Independent Review process and access to the Medicaid Hearing system. An appeal is
More informationTo: [Charles ], [Employee 1 ] [Department 1 ]
ADVISORY OPINION CASE NO. 02013.A Lobbying To: [Charles ], [Employee 1 ] [Department 1 ] Date: In a letter dated March 18, 2002, the City s [Department 1 ] asked the Board to re-visit Case No. 97055.A
More informationWASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Docket No. FDA-2016-D-2021 COMMENTS of WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION to the FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Concerning DRAFT GUIDANCE FOR INDUSTRY AND FDA STAFF: DECIDING
More informationDiscrimination and Harassment Complaints and Investigations Administrative Procedure (3435)
Discrimination and Harassment Complaints and Investigations Administrative Procedure (3435) Complaints The law prohibits coworkers, supervisors, managers, and third parties with whom an employee comes
More informationMedical Device Congress
Medical Device Congress Warning Letters: Strategies for Responding and their Impact in the Marketplace Jennifer L. Bragg Melanie Gross King & Spalding LLP (202) 626-5596 jbragg@kslaw.com mgross@kslaw.com
More informationSUBCHAPTER B PROCEDURAL RULES
SUBCHAPTER B PROCEDURAL RULES PART 11 GENERAL RULEMAKING PROCEDURES Subpart A Rulemaking Procedures Sec. 11.1 To what does this part apply? DEFINITION OF TERMS 11.3 What is an advance notice of proposed
More informationEnforcement, Due Process and Administrative Hearings - Memo
Enforcement, Due Process and Administrative Hearings - Memo Annette Higby, Attorney at Law December 2016 Contents Enforcement Options... 1 Certification Revocation or Condition Coverage... 2 Additional
More informationPolicies and Procedures for Standards Development for the IEEE Communication Society/Green ICT Standards Committee (COM/GreenICT-SC)
Policies and Procedures for Standards Development for the IEEE Communication Society/Green ICT Standards Committee (COM/GreenICT-SC) Date of Submittal: 29 Sep 2017 Date of Acceptance: 19 February 2018
More informationIN THIS ISSUE. Advertising, Antitrust, Labeling, Biosimilars, Cybersecurity, First Amendment, Data Integrity, DQSA Annual Conference, May 5-6
FDLI MEMBER MAGAZINE WWW.FDLI.ORG MARCH/APRIL 2016 FOOD AND DRUG LAW INSTITUTE IN THIS ISSUE Advertising, Antitrust, Labeling, Biosimilars, Cybersecurity, First Amendment, Data Integrity, DQSA 2016 Annual
More informationStakeholder Governance Guide
Stakeholder Governance Guide Effective 2.22.2017 Table of Contents Introduction... 4 Definition of Terms:... 5 1. Leadership... 7 1.1. Entity Leadership Selection... 7 1.1.2. Soliciting Leadership Nominations
More informationProposal to Refuse to Approve a New Drug Application for Oxycodone Hydrochloride
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/13/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-02903, and on FDsys.gov 4164-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
More informationADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS AND GRIEVANCES Section 10. Overview. Definitions
Overview The Plan maintains distinct grievance and administrative review processes for members and providers, as well as access to the State s Administrative Law Hearing (State Fair Hearing). The Plan
More informationMajor, Minor, FAX & Telephone Amendments
REGULATORY AFFAIRS Major, Minor, FAX & Telephone Amendments Final Guideline May 2000. Reviewed: IAGIM Science Committee a minor amendment status saves a lot of review & queue time APPROVED GUIDELINE Major,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendants.
Case 1:16-cv-01350 Document 1 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LANNETT COMPANY, INC., 13200 Townsend Road, Philadelphia, PA 19154 and LANNETT
More informationA Guide to the Legislative Process - Acts and Regulations
A Guide to the Legislative Process - Acts and Regulations November 2008 Table of Contents Introduction Choosing the Right Tools to Accomplish Policy Objectives What instruments are available to accomplish
More informationThe University of Texas System System Administration Internal Policy. Procedures for the Handling of an Allegation of Retaliation
1. Title 2. Policy Procedures for the Handling of an Allegation of Retaliation Sec. 1 Sec. 2 Purpose. The purpose of this Policy is to set forth the procedures adopted by The University of Texas System
More informationGuidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Citizen Petitions and Petitions for Stay ofaction Subject to Section 505(q) ofthe Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act DRAFT GUIDANCE This guidance document is being distributed for
More informationDobbs V. Wyeth: Are We There Yet, And At What Cost?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Dobbs V. Wyeth: Are We There Yet, And At What Cost?
More informationAfter Final Practice and Appeal
July 15, 2016 Steven M. Jensen, Member Why is a Final Rejection Important? Substantive prosecution is closed Filing a response to a Final Office Action does not stop the time for responding Application
More informationWhat is direct referral?
This information sheet is about the direct referral process under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). It has been prepared to help applicants understand the process. What is direct referral? The direct
More informationINITIAL ASSESSMENT FILING A COMPLAINT
COMPLAINT PROCESS PURSUANT TO THE UNIVERSITY SEXUAL AND GENDER-BASED HARASSMENT, SEXUAL VIOLENCE, RELATIONSHIP AND INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE AND STALKING POLICY * Brown University is committed to providing
More informationFDA WARNING LETTERS. FDA s Warning Letter Process and How to Respond
FDA WARNING LETTERS 1 FDA s Warning Letter Process and How to Respond Jessica L. Kocian Compliance Officer Compliance Branch Division of Human and Animal Food Operations West 6 Office of Regulatory Affairs
More informationRESNA Policies and Procedures for the Development of RESNA Assistive Technology Standards February 17, 2016
RESNA Policies and Procedures for the Development of RESNA Assistive Technology Standards February 17, 2016 Copyright by the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America
More informationA User s Guide to Legislation in the Northwest Territories
This Publication is intended strictly for a reference tool for Government of the NWT Employees A User s Guide to Legislation in the Northwest Territories Prepared by Legislation and House Planning Department
More informationGeneral Optical Council: Consultation on Guidance for the Investigation Committee, Case Examiners and the Fitness to Practise Committee
General Optical Council: Consultation on Guidance for the Investigation Committee, Case Examiners and the Fitness to Practise Committee The Optical Confederation represents the 12,000 optometrists, 6,000
More informationAPPENDIX I. Research Integrity Policy for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct
APPENDIX I Research Integrity Policy for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct Procedures for Responding to Allegation of Scientific Misconduct Allegation of scientific misconduct Preliminary
More informationCrosswalk of the Full Report of the Ad Hoc Committee to Review the CJA and the Interim Recommendations
Crosswalk of the Full Report of the Ad Hoc Committee to Review the CJA and the Interim Recommendations The CJA Review Committee unanimously recommends that Congress create an independent Defender Commission
More informationCh. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES GENERAL PROVISIONS
Ch. 41 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE APPEAL PROCEDURES 55 CHAPTER 41. MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDER APPEAL PROCEDURES Sec. 41.1. Scope. 41.2. Construction and application. 41.3. Definitions. 41.4. Amendments to regulation.
More informationChapter 157. Hearings and Appeals. Subchapter EE. Informal Review, Formal Review, and Review by State Office of Administrative Hearings
Chapter 157. Hearings and Appeals Subchapter EE. Informal Review, Formal Review, and Review by State Office of Administrative Hearings Division 1. Informal Review Statutory Authority: The provisions of
More informationProcedure for Considering Appeals to the NHS Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Individual Funding Request Appeal Panel
Procedure for Considering Appeals to the NHS Gloucestershire Clinical Commissioning Group Individual Funding Request Appeal Panel Appendix 8 1 Introduction 1.1 The CCG Individual Funding Request Appeal
More informationReview of Existing General Regulatory and Information Collection Requirements of the
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/08/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-19047, and on FDsys.gov 4164-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
More informationOCC Bulletin : Updated Guidance on Bank Enforcement Actions
OCC Bulletin 2017-48: Updated Guidance on Bank Enforcement Actions November 9, 2017 Financial Services On October 31, 2017, the Office of the Comptroller Currency ( OCC ) released OCC Bulletin 2017-48,
More informationUNOFFICIAL COPY OF SENATE BILL 681 CHAPTER
UNOFFICIAL COPY OF SENATE BILL 681 J3 5lr1495 CF 5lr0401 By: Senators Brochin and Green, Green, Britt, Conway, Gladden, Grosfeld, Hollinger, Pinsky, and Stone Introduced and read first time: February 4,
More informationa. Collectively, this law and regulations adopted under this title are to be known as the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Clean Air Program (CAP).
TITLE 47. CLEAN AIR PROGRAM CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 47 M.P.T.L. ch. 1 1 1. Title a. Collectively, this law and regulations adopted under this title are to be known as the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal
More informationLaw Enforcement Targets Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Executives
Law Enforcement Targets Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Executives Contributed by Kirk Ogrosky, Arnold & Porter LLP Senior executives at pharmaceutical and medical device companies are on notice from
More informationRules of Procedure. Effective: May 4, 2016
Rules of Procedure Effective: May 4, 2016 Rules of Procedure of the North American Electric Reliability Corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 100 APPLICABILITY OF RULES OF PROCEDURE... 1 SECTION 200 DEFINITIONS
More informationAssociation of Pool & Spa Professionals ANSI Accredited Procedures for Development of American National Standards
Association of Pool & Spa Professionals ANSI Accredited Procedures for Development of American National Standards (Approved by ANSI November 23, 2015 Replaces Previous Procedures Dated May 21, 2010) The
More informationRegulatory Accountability Act of Key Differences Between the Senate RAA and H.R. 5
Regulatory Accountability Act of 2017 Promoting transparency, accountability, and common sense in the regulatory process Sponsored by Senators Rob Portman and Heidi Heitkamp Key Differences Between the
More informationOffice Guide to the Agenda Process, 2012
Description of document: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Bureau and Office Guide to the Agenda Process, 2012 Requested date: January 2017 Released date: Posted date: Source of document: 08-March-2017
More informationGuidance for the public, FDA Advisory Committee Members, and FDA Staff: The Open Public Hearing at FDA Advisory Committee Meetings
Reprinted from FDA s website by Guidance for the public, FDA Advisory Committee Members, and FDA Staff: The Open Public Hearing at FDA Advisory Committee Meetings FINAL GUIDANCE Comments and suggestions
More informationADR CODE OF PROCEDURE
Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims
More informationSINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC)
GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) Written By S. Ravi Shankar Advocate on Record - Supreme Court of India National President of Arbitration Bar of India
More informationJACKSONVILLE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY PUBLIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS RULE (RULE NO.006)
JACKSONVILLE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY PUBLIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS RULE (RULE NO.006) DATE OF ADOPTION: August 27, 2009 LAST REVISED: June 24, 2010 1 I. Purpose and Scope. PUBLIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationNational Research Council Canada (NRC)
National Research Council Canada (NRC) NRC Research Ethics Board (NRC-REB) Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) 1. GENERAL The NRC Research Ethics Board (NRC-REB) helps NRC and its researchers maintain
More informationCounty Initiative and Referendum Manual
County Initiative and Referendum Manual Published by Elections Division phone 503 986 1518 255 Capitol St NE fax 503 373 7414 Suite 501 tty 1 800 735 2900 Salem OR 97310-0722 web www.sos.state.or.us 2010
More informationOperating Procedures for Accredited Standards Committee C63 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Date of Preparation: 3 March 2016
Operating Procedures for Accredited Standards Committee C63 Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Date of Preparation: 3 March 2016 Date of ANSI Approval and Reaccreditation of ASC C63: 21 June 2016 Table
More information9. Roles and responsibilities of Committee members
9. Overview 9.1. New Committee members are appointed by the BSB s Appointments Board on an annual basis and normally begin their three-year term in January. The roles of members are set out below and further
More informationIMUN Rules of Procedure
IMUN 2019 Rules of Procedure 10 th IMUN Department of Management: Yoonho Chung, Kyung Min Kim These rules apply to all procedures conducted in Incheon Model United Nations (IMUN). If in any case a situation
More informationChapter III ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. Administrative law concerns the authority and procedures of administrative agencies.
Chapter III ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Administrative law concerns the authority and procedures of administrative agencies. Administrative agencies are governmental bodies other than the courts or the legislatures
More informationAmendments to Healthcare Research
This is a controlled document. The master document is posted on the JRCO website and any print-off of this document will be classed as uncontrolled. Researchers and their teams may print off this document
More informationAmerican Public Health Association POLICY STATEMENT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Page 1 American Public Health Association Guidelines For the Preparation, Submission, Review, Revision, Consideration, And Adoption Of Proposed Policy Statements Introduction The policy statement development
More informationCHAPTER 11. APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT
APPEALS FROM COURTS 210 Rule 1101 CHAPTER 11. APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT Rule 1101. Appeals As of Right From the Commonwealth
More informationOPERATING PROCEDURES FOR ASME ADMINISTERED U.S. TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPS FOR ISO ACTIVITIES
OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR ASME ADMINISTERED U.S. TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPS FOR ISO ACTIVITIES Revision 0 Approved by ANSI Executive Standards Council, October 2, 2006 (Editorially Revised approved by ANSI
More informationPART 358. Sec
CHAPTER I1 DEPARVNT REGULATIONS Sec. 358.1 358.2 358.3 358.4 358.5 358.6 358.7 358.8 358.9 358.10 358.11 358.12 PART 358 FAIR HEARINGS (Statutory authority: Social Services Law, 20,30; L. 1971, ch. 110,
More informationStandard Operating Procedures (SOP) for New NPDES Individual Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities.
Bureau of Waterways Engineering and Wetlands Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for New NPDES Individual Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activities DISCLAIMER: The process
More informationCHAPTER 5. FORMAL PROCEEDINGS
Ch. 5 FORMAL PROCEEDINGS 52 CHAPTER 5. FORMAL PROCEEDINGS Subch. Sec. A. PLEADINGS AND OTHER PRELIMINARY MATTERS... 5.1 B. HEARINGS... 5.201 C. INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW... 5.301 D. DISCOVERY... 5.321 E. EVIDENCE
More informationChapter 6 Findings 97
Chapter 6 Findings 97 Findings Banks being the institutions of financial importance in every part of world, the resolution of the complaints relating to their conduct is also an essential attribute of
More informationCivil Justice Improvements (CJI) Committee. Update #2
A Brief Re-cap from Update #1 Civil Justice Improvements (CJI) Committee Update #2 CJI Committee members recognize that many factors, including the resources available to each court system, influence the
More informationNACC Standards for Child Welfare Law Attorney Specialty Certification California Specific
NACC Standards for Child Welfare Law Attorney Specialty Certification California Specific Section 1 General Principles Section 2 Standards for Certification Part 5 Examination Part 6 Writing Sample Part
More informationThe Public Voice in Health Care Reform: The Rulemaking Process
The Public Voice in Health Care Reform: The Rulemaking Process July 14, 2010 1:00 2:00 Department of Health & Human Services Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and Office on Disability 1 Regulations
More informationSENATE STAFF ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT
SENATE STAFF ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT (This document is based on the provisions contained in the legislation as of the latest date listed below.) BILL: CS/CS/SB 1160 SPONSOR: SUBJECT: Appropriations
More informationGAO DEFENSE TRADE. Mitigating National Security Concerns under Exon-Florio Could Be Improved
GAO September 2002 United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, U.S.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No: PLAINTIFF, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ENDOLOGIX, INC., JOHN MCDERMOTT, and VASEEM MAHBOOB,
More information