SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
|
|
- Felicity Morrison
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 2008 CRYSTAL DOYLE ET AL., Petitioners, v. ARIF NOORANI, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the Fourteenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Doyle v. Noorani, 600 F.3d 1 (14th Cir. 2008). BENCH MEMORANDUM BEFORE: JUSTICES LUTTIG, KEALEY, AND JOHNSON Andrew Finnicum finnicum.a@law.wlu.edu E. Benton Keatley keatley.e@law.wlu.edu Davis Moot Court Administrators
2 INTRODUCTION The John W. Davis Moot Court Competition introduces Washington and Lee law students to the techniques and skills necessary for successful appellate advocacy. The competition simulates practice before the Supreme Court of the United States by requiring participants to submit briefs and present oral arguments on issues of current legal importance. This year s competition focuses on a question of First Amendment law: whether the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the government from allowing the VFW to erect and maintain a Latin cross in a federal preserve and whether the subsequent congressionally mandated transfer of the land to the VFW resolves any Establishment Clause violation. This memorandum will summarize some of the arguments available to both petitioner and respondent. On behalf of the Washington & Lee Moot Court Program, thank you for your participation. BACKGROUND OF THE CASE This year s problem and fact pattern were created by the Davis Moot Court Administrators; however, they are loosely based on Salazar v. Buono, (08-472), which came before the United States Supreme Court on October 7, The facts are fully presented in both the opinion of the District Court of the imaginary state of Pascagoula and the opinion of the Fourteenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Both opinions accompany this memorandum. The fact patterns in both opinions are virtually identical. The case focuses on Arif Noorani, a former employee of the National Park Service (NPS) in the Texico National Preserve. In 1934, the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) erected the first Latin cross on Sunshine Rock, located in the 90% federally owned Texico desert in southern Pascagoula as a memorial to veterans. Photos show the presence of wooden signs near the cross stating, "The Cross, Erected in Memory of the Dead of All Wars," and "Erected 1934 by Members Veterans of Foregin [sic] Wars, Death Valley Post 2884." The parties stipulated below that Latin cross is the preeminent symbol of Christianity. The wooden signs indicating the status of the cross as a memorial are no longer present, and the original cross, which is no longer standing, has been replaced several times by private parties since The cross has been a gathering place for Easter Sunrise services since as early as Visitors to the Preserve also use the site to camp. A local resident and member of the VFW built the current version of the cross ("the Cross") sometime in The current version of the Cross lacks an accompanying plaque indicating that it was intended to act as a memorial for soldiers. The Cross is mounted on the top of a prominent rock outcropping on the north side of Sierra Road, a narrow blacktop secondary road that passes through the Texico National Preserve. The Cross, standing between five and eight feet tall, is visible to vehicles traveling on the road from a distance of approximately 100 yards. The Preserve encompasses approximately 1.6 million acres of primarily federally owned land in the Texico Desert. Approximately 86,600 acres of private land remain within the Preserve's boundaries. Another 43,000 acres belong to the State of Pascagoula. The NPS has not opened up the area of Sunshine Rock to individuals to erect other free-standing permanent displays, religious or otherwise, and there are no other free-standing displays in the area. 2
3 The specific events leading up to this suit began in 2004, when the NPS refused the request of Johnny Manitoba, a former NPS employee and long-term acquaintance of Noorani, to erect a "stupa" (a dome-shaped Buddhist shrine) on a rock outcrop at a trail head located near the cross. Mr. Manitoba explicitly told the NPS that the stupa was for meditation purposes. The NPS also indicated to Manitoba that it intended to remove the cross. Following the NPS s announcement about the stupa, in 2005, the American Civil Liberties Union ("ACLU") threatened legal action if the NPS did not remove the cross. The NPS then completed an evaluation of the cross for commemorative significance and concluded that the cross did not qualify for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. As a result of correspondence with the ACLU, the NPS decided to remove the cross. The NPS located the private individuals believed to be responsible for maintaining the cross and met with them to discuss the possibility of their voluntarily removing the cross. The individuals expressed their unwillingness to remove the cross and their determination to replace the cross if it were taken down. Two weeks later, an NPS employee informed the local congressman of the NPS's decision to remove the cross. The United States Congress then passed an appropriations bill, a provision of which provided that none of the appropriated federal government's funds may be used to remove the cross. The NPS did not act to remove the cross due to the lack of funds. Later in 2006, Congress designated the cross as a national memorial commemorating United States participation in World War I and provided funds to replace the current cross with a replica of the original cross and a memorial plaque at the foot of the cross. In February 2007, Congress enacted another defense appropriations bill that included a land exchange agreement regarding the Sunshine Rock cross. The statute provides for the transfer of the land surrounding the cross to the local VFW in exchange for other privately held land within the Reserve. This transfer was underway when Noorani filed suit. Noorani is deeply offended by the cross display on public land in an area that is not open to others to put up whatever symbols they choose. Noorani will tend to avoid Sunshine Rock on his visits to the Preserve as long as the cross remains standing, even though traveling down Sierra Road is often the most convenient means of access to the Preserve. Both the District Court and a splintered Fourteenth Circuit agreed with Noorani. This Court, the Supreme Court of the United States, has granted certiorari to resolve the following questions. QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether the presence of the Latin Cross on Sunshine Rock in the Texico National Preserve in the State of Pascagoula violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. II. Whether Pub. L. No (a)-(f), 125 Stat (2007), codified at 51 U.S.C. 410aaa-56, mandating the exchange of the land on which the Latin Cross sits on Sunshine Rock to a private party violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. 3
4 Per the competition rules, competitors are limited in their arguments to First Amendment Establishment Clause issues. The competitors have been instructed that they cannot argue any other issues; however occasional references to and brief discussion of the Free Exercise and Free Speech clauses may be inevitable depending on the competitor's theory of the case. THE MERITS 1) Whether there is jurisdiction/standing in this case? Jurisdiction is assumed for the purpose of this argument. In contrast to the actual case that underlies this problem, standing is also assumed, and any extensive argument based upon standing would be inappropriate. 2) Whether the display of the cross violates the Establishment Clause? The First Amendment declares that Congress shall make no law respecting the Establishment of Religion. This Court has frequently struggled with exactly how to interpret the Establishment Clause and how to apply the various tests in individual cases. Due to numerous 5 4 decisions and plurality opinions, this Court has often avoided bright line rules in Establishment Clause jurisprudence. The context and facts of each individual case are important. The lower court invited this Court to reexamine its doctrine in this area, but competitors are free to argue under any of the prevailing tests. 3) Supreme Court Precedent: While other Supreme Court case law is certainly pertinent to this issue, the following cases are particularly noteworthy: Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971): In the famous Lemon case, this Court established a three-pronged test to determine whether government action violated the Establishment Clause. First, the government action must have a secular purpose. Second, the government action must not have the primary effect of advancing or inhibiting religion. Third, the government action must not foster excessive entanglement with religion. Later cases established that the failure of any one of these prongs is sufficient for the Court to find that a constitutional violation occurred. Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578, 583, 107 S. Ct. 2573, 2577, 96 L. Ed. 2d 510 (1987). While Lemon seems simple enough in its demands, its applicability has been repeatedly called into question by members of the Court. Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38, 106, (1985) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting) (criticizing the Lemon opinion for the difficulty of applying its prongs and concluding that "[t]hese difficulties arise because the Lemon test has no more grounding in the history of the First Amendment than does the wall theory upon which it rests"). Justice Scalia has gone so far as to suggest that the Lemon test has been killed and resurrected at the whim of the Court. Lamb's Chapel v. Ctr. Moriches Union Free Sch. Dist., 508 U.S. 384, 398, 113 S. Ct. 2141, , 124 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1993) (Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment) 4
5 ("Like some ghoul in a late-night horror movie..., Lemon stalks our Establishment Clause jurisprudence....") Regardless, the lower courts assumed that Lemon remains the prevailing test in Establishment Clause jurisprudence. Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668 (1984): Lynch involved the government display of a nativity scene amongst other holiday symbols during the Christmas season. In retrospect, it is not the majority opinion in Lynch that has deeply affected Establishment Cause analysis. Rather, Justice O'Conner's concurrence dealing with how to interpret the first two prongs of the Lemon test, purpose and primary effect, has garnered the most attention. In her concurrence, Justice O'Conner suggested that the "effect" prong "asks whether, irrespective of government's actual purpose, the practice... in fact conveys a message of endorsement or disapproval." Lynch, 465 U.S. at 690, (O'Connor, J., concurring). The "endorsement" test depends on the observation of the reasonable observer. However, how much information this Court will impute to a reasonable observer is unclear. Justice O'Connor has suggested that a reasonable observer "must be deemed aware of the history and context of the community and forum in which the religious display appears," including ownership of the land in question. Capitol Square Review & Advisory Bd. v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753, 780, (1995) (O'- Connor, J., concurring). Others have argued that a reasonable observer should be less wellinformed. Id. at 800 n.5 (Stevens, J., dissenting). Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677 (2005) (plurality opinion): In Van Orden, this Court shunned the use of either Lemon or Lynch in cases involving passive displays erected on government land by private parties. Instead, this Court focused on the context of the display and the history of both the nation as a whole and the display in particular. In Van Orden, the Ten Commandments were displayed by a private party amongst various other displays on state property. Based on the facts that the monument was surrounded by other displays, that the Ten Commandments had a longstanding tradition in the United States, and that this particular monument had gone unchallenged for forty years, the Court upheld the constitutionality of the display by the narrowest of margins. McCreary County v. ACLU. 545 U.S. 844 (2005): Decided the same day as Van Orden, McCreary involved an attempt by the local government to display the Ten Commandments in the local courthouse. Because the display in McCreary was recently erected and consistently challenged since its initial erection, Justice Breyer switched sides and voted against the display. The majority applied Lemon and found that the display had no secular perpose whatsoever. 4) Whether the land transfer solves an constitutional violation. Apparently fearing that a court may side with the ACLU during litigation, Congress commenced a process by which the government transferred the land upon which the cross sits to 5
6 the VFW. While Noorani challenged the statute before the transfer actually took place, the transfer would go forward should the Court choose to reverse. The government will likely argue that after the transfer, there would be no further violation of the Establishment Clause. Indeed, if the transfer goes through, the VFW's concerns about Free Exercise and Free Speech would be even more increased. Noorani will likely argue that the land transfer is a sham for various reasons. The issue of the land transfer as a remedy to an Establishment Clause violation is largely an issue of first instance in this court. However, both the parties and the lower courts in this case seemed to find two cases from the Seventh Circuit instructive to varying degrees. Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. v. City of Marshfield, 203 F.3d 487 (7th Cir. 2000). In Marshfield, the Seventh Circuit adopted a presumption that "absent unusual circumstances" "a sale of real property is an effective way for a public body to end its inappropriate endorsement of religion. We are aware, however, that adherence to a formalistic standard invites manipulation. To avoid such manipulation, we look to the substance of the transaction as well as its form to determine whether government action endorsing religion has actually ceased." Marshfield, 203 F.3d at 491. To the extent that Marshfield can be read to adopt a presumption of the effectiveness of a land sale to end a constitutional violation, the lower courts in this case refused to adopt such a presumption. This debate over presumption also ties into the larger question about how much deference is due to Congress in this situation. Marshfield held that the sale of 0.15 acres of city park land containing a statute of Jesus Christ to a private organization "validly extinguished any government endorsement of religion" because there were not unusual circumstances. However, the Seventh Circuit remanded to ensure that the privately held land would be clearly demarcated from the public park. Mercier v. Fraternal Order of the Eagles, 395 F.3d 693 (7th Cir. 2005) In Mercier, the Seventh Circuit held that the sale of 440 square feet of a city park containing a Ten Commandments monument to a private organization was valid because there were no "unusual circumstances." According to the Seventh Circuit, unusual circumstances that will invalidate a sale include (1) "a sale to a straw purchaser" leaving the public entity "with continuing power to exercise the duties of ownership," (2) a sale that does not comply with applicable law governing the sale of land by a public entity, or (3) "a sale well below fair market value resulting in a gift to a religious organization." Mercier, 395 F.3d at 702; Although the lower courts addressed Marshfield and Mercier, they replaced the Seventh Circuit's unusual circumstances with three of their own, (1) the government's continuing oversight and rights in the site containing the cross after the proposed land exchange; (2) the method for effectuating the land exchange; and (3) the history of the government's efforts to preserve the cross. 6
7 CONCLUSION The above considerations provide some of the possible arguments, and their counterarguments, that the participants are likely to present. The participants must only argue First Amendment Establishment Clause issues, but are in no way limited to the above arguments on those issues. The arguments here presented are based largely on the law the participants were given. Any additional arguments that you find to be persuasive or creative should be appropriately rewarded. As may be apparent, most of the issues in this case can be argued either way and have no apparent correct answer. The participants are being evaluated on their ability to persuasively present the arguments and respond to the judges. THANK YOU Most importantly, thank you very much for your generous time and attention to this year s 30 th Annual John W. Davis Appellate Advocacy Competition. We are delighted that your schedules permit you to assist us by judging the Final Round. This year's competition included many gifted competitors, which made the decision to narrow the field to these four Finalists especially difficult. We hope and expect that the Finalists will present compelling legal arguments with a completely professional style. In the meantime, should any questions arise regarding the Davis Moot Court Competition generally or any of the information contained in the materials, please contact either me, Andrew Finnicum (at finnicum.a@law.wlu.edu) or E. Benton Keatley (at keatley.e@law.wlu.edu). Thank you again for your generous attention. 7
NO In The Supreme Court of the United States. KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Petitioners, FRANK BUONO, Respondent.
NO. 08-472 In The Supreme Court of the United States KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Petitioners, v. FRANK BUONO, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationWHY CAN T PROPERTY TRANSFERS RESOLVE AN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PROBLEM? THE DIVIDE BETWEEN THE NINTH AND SEVENTH CIRCUITS AFTER BUONO V.
WHY CAN T PROPERTY TRANSFERS RESOLVE AN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PROBLEM? THE DIVIDE BETWEEN THE NINTH AND SEVENTH CIRCUITS AFTER BUONO V. KEMPTHORNE VICTORIA R. CALHOON * INTRODUCTION A white cross sits atop
More informationOCTOBER 2010 LAW REVIEW PUBLIC LAND SWAP PRESERVES WAR MEMORIAL CROSS
PUBLIC LAND SWAP PRESERVES WAR MEMORIAL CROSS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2010 James C. Kozlowski The First Amendment "Establishment Clause" in the United States Constitution provides that "Congress
More informationCRS-2 served a secular legislative purpose because the Commandments displays included the following notation: The secular application of the Ten Comma
Order Code RS22223 Updated October 8, 2008 Public Display of the Ten Commandments Summary Cynthia Brougher Legislative Attorney American Law Division In 1980, the Supreme Court held in Stone v. Graham
More informationPublic Display of the Ten Commandments and Other Religious Symbols
Public Display of the Ten Commandments and Other Religious Symbols Cynthia Brougher Legislative Attorney February 2, 2011 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and
More informationA Cross to Bear: The Need to Weigh Context in Determining the Constitutionality of Religious Symbols on Public Land
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 13 A Cross to Bear: The Need to Weigh Context in Determining the Constitutionality of Religious Symbols on
More information2010] THE SUPREME COURT LEADING CASES 219
2010] THE SUPREME COURT LEADING CASES 219 homicide offender: We learn, sometimes, from our mistakes. 109 Years ago, the Model Penal Code, in disapproving of the juvenile death penalty, declared that civilized
More informationHOW SALAZAR V. BUONO SYNTHESIZES THE SUPREME COURT S ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PRECEDENT INTO A SINGLE TEST
HOW SALAZAR V. BUONO SYNTHESIZES THE SUPREME COURT S ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PRECEDENT INTO A SINGLE TEST Adam Linkner INTRODUCTION Atop Sunrise Rock, a large Latin cross 1 casts a shadow over the Mojave
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 18-1254 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL ATHEISTS, INC., a Delaware non-profit organization, HOWARD SPRAGUE, and FLOYD LAWSON, on behalf of the organization, Petitioners, v.
More informationIs it unconstitutional to display a religious monument, memorial, or other item on public property?
These issue summaries provide an overview of the law as of the date they were written and are for educational purposes only. These summaries may become outdated and may not represent the current state
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Case: 17-13025 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 1 of 20 No. 17-13025 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AMANDA KONDRAT YEV, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 13-1061 In the Supreme Court of the United States MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER v. STEVE TRUNK, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL LAW: JUDICIAL OVERSIGHTS INCONSISTENCY IN SUPREME COURT ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE. Van Orden v. Perry, 125 S. Ct.
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: JUDICIAL OVERSIGHTS INCONSISTENCY IN SUPREME COURT ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE Van Orden v. Perry, 125 S. Ct. 2854 (2005) Jessica Gavrich * Texas State Capitol grounds contain
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 559 U. S. (2010) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 08 472 KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FRANK BUONO ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 559 U. S. (2010) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationCRS-2 morning and that the federal and state statutes violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. 4 The Trial Court Decision. On July 21
Order Code RS21250 Updated July 20, 2006 The Constitutionality of Including the Phrase Under God in the Pledge of Allegiance Summary Henry Cohen Legislative Attorney American Law Division On June 26, 2002,
More informationSeparating Church and State: Transfers of Government Land as Cures for Establishment Clause Violations
Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 85 Issue 1 Symposium on Criminal Procedure Article 20 December 2009 Separating Church and State: Transfers of Government Land as Cures for Establishment Clause Violations
More informationMontana Law Review. Tyson Radley O'Connell University of Montana School of Law. Volume 69 Issue 1 Winter Article
Montana Law Review Volume 69 Issue 1 Winter 2008 Article 7 1-2008 How Did the Ten Commandments End up on Both Sides of the Wall of Separation between Church and State? The Contradicting Opinions of Van
More informationOctober 15, By & U.S. Mail
(202) 466-3234 (202) 898-0955 (fax) www.au.org 1301 K Street, NW Suite 850, East Tower Washington, DC 20005 October 15, 2014 By Email & U.S. Mail Florida Department of Management Services Office of the
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL LAW ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PRAYERS BEFORE TOWN BOARD MEETINGS HELD CONSTITUTIONAL. Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct (2014).
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE PRAYERS BEFORE TOWN BOARD MEETINGS HELD CONSTITUTIONAL. Town of Greece v. Galloway, 134 S. Ct. 1811 (2014). TAYLOR PHILLIPS In Town of Greece v. Galloway, the United
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FALL TERM KEN L. SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, et. al.
No. 08-372 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FALL TERM 2009 KEN L. SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, et. al., Petitioners, v. FRANK BUONO, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Appellate Case: 08-4061 Document: 01018515330 Date Filed: 10/14/2010 Page: 1 Case No. 08-4061 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AMERICAN ATHEISTS, INC., a Texas, non-profit corporation;
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States. CONSTITUTIONAL ATHEISTS, INC., HOWARD SPRAGUE, and FLOYD LAWSON, Petitioners,
No. 18-1254 In the Supreme Court of the United States CONSTITUTIONAL ATHEISTS, INC., HOWARD SPRAGUE, and FLOYD LAWSON, Petitioners, v. GREENE STATE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, BARNEY FIFE, in his official
More informationUSDC IN/ND case 3:18-cv document 1 filed 12/20/18 page 1 of 5
USDC IN/ND case 3:18-cv-01019 document 1 filed 12/20/18 page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ROGER LAMUNION, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:18-cv-01019
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ----------------- No. 2005-328 ----------------- The City of Knerr, the State of Olympus and Samantha Sommerman, Parks Director, Petitioners v. Reverend William DeNolf,
More informationSEASONAL RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION
SEASONAL RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION Christmas is one of the most celebrated holidays of the American people. Each year, the Christmas season seems to begin earlier and earlier, as festive decorations bedeck
More informationA FIXTURE ON A CHANGING COURT: JUSTICE STEVENS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
Copyright 2012 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. Northwestern University Law Review Vol. 106, No. 2 A FIXTURE ON A CHANGING COURT: JUSTICE STEVENS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE
More informationNo No UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Proposed Intervenor- Appellant, MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASS N, INC.
No. 06-55769 No. 06-55919 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHILIP K. PAULSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGANS FOR THE MOUNT SOLEDAD NATIONAL WAR MEMORIAL, MOUNT
More informationThe Lemon Test Rears Its Ugly Head Again: Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District
University of Richmond Law Review Volume 27 Issue 5 Article 7 1993 The Lemon Test Rears Its Ugly Head Again: Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District Wirt P. Marks IV University of Richmond
More informationRemoving a Brick from the Jeffersonian Wall of Separationism: A Per Se Rule for Private Religious Speech in Public Fora
Volume 41 Issue 2 Article 5 1996 Removing a Brick from the Jeffersonian Wall of Separationism: A Per Se Rule for Private Religious Speech in Public Fora Ryan W. Decker Follow this and additional works
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ~---
To: The Chief Justice Justice Brennan Justice White Justice' Marshall Justice Blackmun Justice Powell Justice Rehnquist Justice Stevens From: Justice O'Connor Circulated: Recirculated: --------~ 1st DRAFT
More informationDangers to Religious Liberty from Neutral Government Programs
Berkeley Law Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1995 Dangers to Religious Liberty from Neutral Government Programs Jesse H. Choper Berkeley Law Follow this and additional works
More informationNO In The Supreme Court of the United States. JAMES W. GREEN, ET AL., Respondents.
NO. 09-531 In The Supreme Court of the United States HASKELL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ET AL., v. Petitioners, JAMES W. GREEN, ET AL., Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United
More informationNo IN THE. UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, AMERICAN ATHEISTS, et al., Respondents.
~uprrmr (~nurt of tier ~nitr~ No. 10-1276 IN THE UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, V. AMERICAN ATHEISTS, et al., Respondents. On Petition [or Writ o[ Certiorari to the United States Court o[
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
La 0 05/16 To: The Chief Justice Justice Brennan Justice White Justice Marshall Justice Blackmun Justice Rehnquist Justice Stevens Justice O'Connor From: Justice Powell Circulated: Recirculated: 2nd DRAFT
More informationRUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW AND RELIGION
RUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW AND RELIGION Volume 8.2 Spring 2007 INCONSISTENT GUIDEPOSTS: VAN ORDEN, MCCREARY COUNTY, AND THE CONTINUING NEED FOR A SINGLE AND PREDICTABLE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE TEST By Frank J.
More informationGOD AND THE LAW: THE RELIGION CLAUSES OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University Fall 2016
Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University Fall 2016 William H. Hurd Adjunct Professor william.hurd@troutmansanders.com Congress shall make no law respecting an Establishment of Religion or prohibiting
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 1999 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes
More informationNos & In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 13-57126 10/22/2014 ID: 9286977 DktEntry: 37 Page: 1 of 31 Nos. 13-57126 & 14-55231 444444444444444444444444 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit STEVE TRUNK, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-0-jgb-dtb Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 0 David J. Kaloyanides SBN 0 E: djpkaplc@me.com DAVID J.P. KALOYANIDES A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION Central Avenue Chino, CA 0 T: ( -0/F: (
More informationHeyl Royster. Governmental. Welcome Letter. A n I l l i n o i s L a w F i r m
A n I l l i n o i s L a w F i r m Heyl Royster Governmental Newsletter Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen 2012 Welcome Letter Dear Friends: We are reaching the time of the year when we question whether our
More informationThe Law of Church and State: U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Since 2002
Order Code RL34223 The Law of Church and State: U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Since 2002 October 30, 2007 Cynthia M. Brougher Legislative Attorney American Law Division The Law of Church and State: U.S.
More informationTHE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE Post Office Box 7482 Charlottesville, Virginia 22906-7482 JOHN W. WHITEHEAD Founder and President TELEPHONE 434 / 978-3888 FACSIMILE 434/ 978 1789 www.rutherford.org Sheriff Donald
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 02-1315 In The Supreme Court of the United States GARY LOCKE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Petitioners, v. JOSHUA DAVEY, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationNO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2015
Team C NO. 15-1245 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2015 JASON ADAM TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. TAMMY JEFFERSON, in her official capacity as Chairman, Madison Commission on Human Rights,
More informationOffice of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives Home Search Download Classification Codification About
Page 1 of 8 Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives Home Search Download Classification Codification About Go to 1st query term(s) -CITE- 4 USC Sec. 4 01/02/2006 -EXPCITE- TITLE
More informationEstablishment of Religion
Establishment of Religion Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion... Amendment I Teacher's Companion Lesson (PDF) In recent years the Supreme Court has placed the Establishment
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 08-472 d KEN L. SALAZAR, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, et al., IN THE Supreme Court of the United States v. Petitioners, FRANK BUONO, Respondent. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION
John Doe v. Gossage Doc. 10 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06CV-070-M UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION JOHN DOE PLAINTIFF VS. DARREN GOSSAGE, In his official capacity
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2006 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes
More informationINTRODUCTION HOW IS THIS TEXTBOOK DIFFERENT FROM TRADITIONAL CASEBOOKS?...VII ABOUT THE AUTHOR...XI SUMMARY OF CONTENTS... XIII
INTRODUCTION HOW IS THIS TEXTBOOK DIFFERENT FROM TRADITIONAL CASEBOOKS?...VII ABOUT THE AUTHOR...XI SUMMARY OF CONTENTS... XIII... XV TABLE OF CASES...XXI I. THE RELIGION CLAUSE(S): OVERVIEW...26 A. Summary...26
More informationCase 1:10-cv Document 11 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:10-cv-00583 Document 11 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM J. KELLY, v. Plaintiff, JESSE WHITE, in his capacity as Illinois
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 2 ARGUMENT... 3 I. Contrary to the Fourth
i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 2 ARGUMENT... 3 I. Contrary to the Fourth Circuit s Decision, Deliberative Body Invocations May
More informationCase 2:12-cv CB Document 11 Filed 01/08/13 Page 1 of 33
Case 2:12-cv-01406-CB Document 11 Filed 01/08/13 Page 1 of 33 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., DOE 4, by DOE 4 s next friend
More informationCase 2:12-cv TFM Document 20 Filed 01/22/13 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:12-cv-01319-TFM Document 20 Filed 01/22/13 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., DOE 1 by DOE 1 s next
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
Case: 13-4049 Document: 102-1 Page: 1 05/28/2014 1234266 8 13-4049-cv Newdow v. United States UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2013 (Submitted: April 21, 2014 Decided:
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 12-798 In The Supreme Court of the United States MARTIN COUNTY AND MARTIN COUNTY BOARD, Petitioner, v. ANNE DHALIWAL Respondent. On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The
More informationCase 7:11-cv MFU Document 12 Filed 10/18/11 Page 1 of 15. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division
Case 7:11-cv-00435-MFU Document 12 Filed 10/18/11 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Roanoke Division DOE 1, by Doe 1 s next friend and parent ) DOE 2, who also
More informationNO In The Supreme Court of the United States. PLEASANT GROVE CITY, UTAH, et al., Petitioners,
NO. 07-665 In The Supreme Court of the United States PLEASANT GROVE CITY, UTAH, et al., Petitioners, v. SUMMUM, a corporate sole and church, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT KAROTINE HOLIDAY DISPLAY GROUP; CHURCH OF KAROTINE; RUSS L. BELL.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT KAROTINE HOLIDAY DISPLAY GROUP; CHURCH OF KAROTINE; RUSS L. BELL Appellants, v. CITY OF DALTON, a political subdivision of the State of Rhode
More informationThe Cross National Memorial: At the Intersection of Speech and Religion, 61 Case W. Res. L. Rev (2011)
John Marshall Law School The John Marshall Institutional Repository Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2011 The Cross National Memorial: At the Intersection of Speech and Religion, 61 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1171 (2011)
More informationCase 1:07-cv Document 29 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:07-cv-06048 Document 29 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DAWN S. SHERMAN, a minor, through ) ROBERT I. SHERMAN,
More informationNos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. STEVE TRUNK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Case: 13-57126, 08/25/2016, ID: 10101715, DktEntry: 109-1, Page 1 of 19 Nos. 13-57126 & 14-55231 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEVE TRUNK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.
More informationNo Supreme Court of the United States. Argued Dec. 1, Decided Feb. 24, /11 JUSTICE MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.
FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY Copr. West 2000 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works 480 U.S. 9 IOWA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. Edward M. LaPLANTE et al. No. 85-1589. Supreme Court of the United States
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. McCREARY COUNTY, KENTUCKY, et. al., Petitioners. ACLU OF KENTUCKY, et Respondents.
Supreme Court, U.S. 1 1:)-5" 15 l~f 26 1 ].01~ t J~Fi(~F_. OF THE CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES McCREARY COUNTY, KENTUCKY, et. al., Petitioners. ACLU OF KENTUCKY, et Respondents. On Petition
More informationMarch 15, 2018 THE DISHONESTY OF THE FFRF LETTER
Josh Brown, Esq. Legal Counsel & Director of Policy (614) 284-4394 joshbrown@ccv.org March 15, 2018 TO: Mayor Lydia Mahalik City of Findlay 318 Dorney Plz. Findlay, OH 45840-3346 RE: Support for Mayor
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :0-cv-000-DGC Document Filed //0 Page of JWB WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 0 William Lamb, vs. Joseph Arpaio, Plaintiff, Defendant. No. CV 0-00-PHX-DGC (DKD ORDER
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. In the Supreme Court of the United States CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, ET AL. Petitioners, v. AMANDA KONDRAT YEV, ET AL. Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationThe Establishment Clause and Government Religious Displays: The Court That Stole Christmas
Touro Law Review Volume 15 Number 3 Article 10 1999 The Establishment Clause and Government Religious Displays: The Court That Stole Christmas Jennifer H. Greenhalgh Follow this and additional works at:
More informationMEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 Plaintiffs: FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., MIKE SMITH, DAVID HABECKER, TIMOTHY G. BAILEY and JEFF BAYSINGER
More informationIntroduction to Religion and the State
William & Mary Law Review Volume 27 Issue 5 Article 2 Introduction to Religion and the State Gene R. Nichol Repository Citation Gene R. Nichol, Introduction to Religion and the State, 27 Wm. & Mary L.
More information) ) ) DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT. Defendants Jacob C. Shade, Creade V. Brodie, Jr., and William R.
Case :-cv-00-glr Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DIVISION Jeffrey M. Davis, v. Plaintiff, Jacob C. Shade, Creade V. Brodie, Jr., and William
More informationNo for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 13-35770 05/07/2014 ID: 9085786 DktEntry: 30 Page: 1 of 22 No. 13-35770 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC., a Wisconsin non-profit
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 16-1436 In the Supreme Court of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF
More informationCornell Journal of Law and Public Policy
Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 6 Issue 3 Spring 1997 Article 6 Lost Opportunity to Sweeten the Lemon of Establishment Clause Jurisprudence: An Analysis of Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
NO. 13-1061 In the Supreme Court of the United States MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. STEVE TRUNK, et al., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment to the United
More informationNO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME: THE SUPREME COURT, PUBLIC OPINION, AND THE 10 COMMANDMENTS
NO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME: THE SUPREME COURT, PUBLIC OPINION, AND THE 10 COMMANDMENTS Ryan Cannon Abstract: Over the past three decades, scholarship regarding the effect of Supreme Court decisions on public
More informationWhy the Supreme Court has Fashioned Rules of Standing Unique to the Establishment Clause
University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications 2009 Why the Supreme Court has Fashioned Rules of Standing Unique to the Establishment Clause Carl H. Esbeck University
More informationCase 8:14-cv DKC Document 102 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 8:14-cv-00550-DKC Document 102 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND : AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, et al. : v. : Civil Action No. DKC 14-0550
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
NOS. 16-1436, 16-1540 In the Supreme Court of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al., Respondents. DONALD
More informationCivil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms
Presentation Pro Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. 2 3 4 A Commitment to Freedom The listing of the general rights of the people can be found in the first ten amendments
More informationGOD AND THE LAW: THE RELIGION CLAUSES OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. George Mason University Law School Fall 2014
George Mason University Law School Fall 2014 William H. Hurd Adjunct Professor william.hurd@troutmansanders.com Congress shall make no law respecting an Establishment of Religion or prohibiting the free
More informationLAWRENCE v. FLORIDA: APPLICATIONS FOR POST- CONVICTION RELIEF ARE PENDING UNDER THE AEDPA ONLY UNTIL FINAL JUDGMENT IN STATE COURT
LAWRENCE v. FLORIDA: APPLICATIONS FOR POST- CONVICTION RELIEF ARE PENDING UNDER THE AEDPA ONLY UNTIL FINAL JUDGMENT IN STATE COURT ELIZABETH RICHARDSON-ROYER* I. INTRODUCTION On February 20, 2007, the
More informationMagruder s American Government
Presentation Pro Magruder s American Government C H A P T E R 19 Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc. C H A P T E R 19 Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms SECTION
More informationCase 8:14-cv DKC Document 1 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 8:14-cv-00550-DKC Document 1 Filed 02/25/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND American Humanist Association, Case No. cv-14-550 Steven Lowe, Fred Edwords, and
More informationSeparation of powers and the democratic process
AMERICAN GOVERNMENT Separation of powers and the democratic process Americans regularly exercise their democratic rights by voting and by participating in political parties and election campaigns. The
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND VERIFIED COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND GRACE C. OSEDIACZ, : Plaintiff : : vs. : CA No. 03- : CITY OF CRANSTON, by and : through its Treasurer, Randy Rossi, : STEPHEN P. LAFFEY, individually
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
NO. 12-696 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States TOWN OF GREECE, v. Petitioner, SUSAN GALLOWAY AND LINDA STEPHENS, Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 12-696 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States TOWN OF GREECE, v. SUSAN GALLOWAY AND LINDA STEPHENS, On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Second Circuit Petitioner,
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 11-998 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- MOUNT SOLEDAD MEMORIAL
More informationMathew D. Staver, Esq. The Equal Access Act and the First Amendment Equal Access Means Equal Treatment
A NATIONWIDE PUBLIC INTEREST RELIGIOUS CIVIL LIBERTIES LAW FIRM 1055 Maitland Center Cmns. Second Floor Maitland, Florida 32751 Tel: 800 671 1776 Fax: 407 875 0770 www.lc.org 1015 Fifteenth St. N.W. Suite
More informationTRIBUTE TO JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA
\\server05\productn\n\nys\62-1\nys103.txt unknown Seq: 1 26-APR-06 9:00 TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA It s a great honor for me to pay tribute to Justice Scalia because clerking for him was one of
More informationBuckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna*
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna* I. INTRODUCTION In a decision that lends further credence to the old adage that consumers should always beware of the small print, the United
More informationLynch v. Donnelly: One Giant Step over the Wall?
Pace Law Review Volume 5 Issue 1 Fall 1984 Article 3 September 1984 Lynch v. Donnelly: One Giant Step over the Wall? Naomi Katz Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Recommended
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 07-665 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States PLEASANT GROVE CITY, UTAH, ET AL., Petitioners vs. SUMMUM, a corporate and sole church, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court
More informationOral arguments in the case are available on the Internet at:
WALLACE V. JAFFREE 72 U.S. 38 (1985) http://laws.findlaw.com/us/472/38.html Oral arguments in the case are available on the Internet at: http://www.oyez.org/oyez/frontpage Vote: 6 (Blackmun, Brennan, Marshall,
More informationLET US PRAY?: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STUDENT- LED GRADUATION PRAYER AFTER SANTA FE V. DOE
LET US PRAY?: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STUDENT- LED GRADUATION PRAYER AFTER SANTA FE V. DOE MATTHEW A. BILLS* The proper role of prayer in public schools is a divisive issue that continually challenges
More informationCOMMENTS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER: THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS
COMMENTS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER: THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 17-15589, 04/21/2017, ID: 10406255, DktEntry: 171-1, Page 1 of 33 No. 17-15589 IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit STATE OF HAWAII; ISMAIL ELSHIKH, Plaintiffs-Appellees, ALI
More informationTHE SPECIAL COUNSEL IS AN INFERIOR OFFICER
April 24, 2018 The Honorable Charles Grassley Chairman U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary Washington, DC 20510-6275 The Honorable Dianne Feinstein Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary
More information