CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi
|
|
- Scott Short
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2 nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi Decision No. CIC/YA/C/2014/000528/SB Dated: Complainant: Shri K. Kashinathan, 56, Rameswaram Road, T. Nagar, Chennai , Tamil Nadu. Respondent: The Director, Institute of Rural Management, IRMA, Anand, Gujarat Date of Hearing : / / / / / / / ORDER 1. Shri K. Kashinathan, filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) on with the CPIO, Institute of Rural Management (IRMA), seeking information regarding Written Test (Online) on Issues of Social Concern - February 2014, on the following points: i. Copy of his answer sheet as ordered by Supreme Court in the UPSC case How the complainant has scored 36 marks out of 40, though all answers were correct. ii. Why have the rules of selection not mentioned i.e. the weightage for CAT ad ISC examination. iii. Reasons for cut off marks of 35% for ISC and 37.5% for CAT. Why this was not mentioned in the admission notification as mandated by Supreme Court. iv. Why was there a delay in the declaration the result. Page 1 of 10
2 v. CAT marks and ISC marks of each of the candidates short listed for Group Activity and Interview separately for OC, OBC and SC/ST. 2. The CPIO vide letter dated provided para wise information to the complainant. Not satisfied with the response of the CPIO, the complainant filed a complaint dated before the Commission. 3. The matter was listed on before the Commission. However, the respondent sought adjournment for submission of written arguments. Accordingly, the case was adjourned to Hearing on : 4. The complainant Shri K. Kashinathan was absent despite notice. Shri Sayid Marzook, representing the respondent was present in person. 5. The respondent submitted that IRMA is not a Public Authority under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, The respondent also made a written submission in the matter which has been taken on record. The respondent requested the Commission to decide this issue in this matter. 6. The Commission observes that in order to decide whether the IRMA is a Public Authority under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, 2005 or not, further documents are required for examination. 7. The respondent is directed to submit the following documents with the Commission within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Annual reports of last 3 years; IT return for last 3 years; Details of grant received from the government/any organization/public from the inception of the institute; Balance sheet of last 3 years; Page 2 of 10
3 (v) (vi) Copy of land allotment agreement; and Allotment details, area of land, actual cost of land etc. Hearing on The complainant Shri K. Kashinathan and the respondent were absent despite notice. 9. This matter is adjourned to at 1:15 pm. Hearing on : 10. Shri Sayid Marzook, representing the respondent was present in person. 11. The Commission directed the respondent to file additional documents before The case is adjourned to at 1:00pm. 12. Due to administrative reasons the case has further been adjourned to Hearing on : 13. The complainant Shri K.Kashinathan was absent despite notice. Shri Ashutosh Ghade, Advocate, representing the respondent was present in person. 14. The respondent sought extension of time for filing additional documents relevant for concluding the issue involved in the matter. 15. The Commission accedes to the request of the respondent and thereby, adjourns the matter to at 1.00 p.m. 16. Copy of decision be given free of cost to the parties. Page 3 of 10
4 Hearing on : 17. The complainant Shri K. Kashinathan was absent despite notice. Shri Sayid Marzook, Legal Representative representing the respondent was present in person. 18. The respondent sought extension of time for filing some more documents relevant to the issues involved in the matter. 19. The Commission accedes to the request of the respondent and thereby, adjourns the matter to at 1.15 p.m. Hearing on : 20. The complainant Shri K. Kashinathan was absent despite notice. Shri Sayid Marzook, Legal Representative representing the respondent was present in person. 21. The counsel for the respondent submitted certain additional documents dated indicating the modus operandi undertaken by IRMA so as to cover the deficits reflected in the income-expenditure statement of IRMA. 22. The Commission directs the respondent to provide, by , the Income and Expenditure statement of IRMA since its inception as per the following table: - Year Total Income Interest Income from initial corpus Total Income (-) Interest Income (2-3) Total Expenditure Excess/Deficit of Income over Expenditure (4-5) The matter is adjourned to at am. Page 4 of 10
5 Hearing on : 24. The complainant Shri K. Kashinathan was not present despite notice. The Counsel for IRMA Shri Sayid Marzook Bafaki, vide his dated sought exemption from personal appearance. 25. Shri Sayid Marzook Bafaki, counsel for IRMA vide his dated requested the Commission to adjourn the hearing as he is unable to attend the hearing due to some pressing personal problem. 26. The Commission, considered the request of the respondent and adjourns the matter to at am. Hearing on : 27. The complainant Shri K. Kashinathan was absent despite notice. Shri Sayid Marzook, Legal Representative representing the respondent was present in person. 28. The respondent requested the Commission to grant him some more time to make additional submissions in the case. 29. The Commission, considered the request of the respondent and adjourns the matter to at am. Hearing on : 30. The complainant Shri K. Kashinathan was absent despite notice. Shri Sayid Marzook, Legal Representative of the respondent was present in person. 31. The respondent submitted that the present proceedings arise from the complaint of the complainant. The respondent submitted that the basic issue to be adjudicated in the present matter is whether IRMA is a Public Authority as per Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. Page 5 of 10
6 32. The respondent further submitted that in order to declare any body/organization as Public Authority, parameters of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act have to be satisfied and since the complainant has alleged that IRMA is a Public Authority under Section 2(h) of the Act, as per the Supreme Court s decision in the case of Thalappalam Service Cooperative Bank Limited v. State of Kerala, Civil Appeal No. 9017/2013 dated (hereinafter referred to as Thalappalam ), the burden to show that a body is owned, controlled or substantially financed by the appropriate Government is on the applicant who seeks information as per the observations of the Hon ble Supreme Court reproduced below: 50. The burden to show that a body is owned, controlled or substantially financed or that a non-government organization is substantially financed directly or indirectly by the funds provided by the appropriate Government is on the applicant who seeks information 33. Therefore, the onus is on the complainant in the present case to assert that IRMA is owned, controlled or substantially financed by the appropriate Government. Nonetheless, the respondent would like to establish as to how the parameters of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act cannot be satisfied as IRMA is an educational institution established for providing management education, training, research and consultancy support to co-operatives and rural development organizations in India. Ownership: 34. The respondent with regard to the ownership of IRMA, submitted that it was established in the year 1979 at Anand in the State of Gujrat by the IRMA Society, which is registered as a Society under the Society s Registration Act, Thus, the IRMA was established by the Society as an educational institution for imparting education in the field of Rural Management. The respondent further submitted that as per the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) which was executed by and between Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India and IRMA, IRMA has been referred to as an autonomous Page 6 of 10
7 body. Hence, IRMA cannot be said to be owned by the appropriate Government as it functions as per its Memorandum of Association. 35. The respondent further submitted that the complainant has also assigned another reason for declaring IRMA as Public Authority which is that IRMA follows reservation policy. However, it goes without saying that this parameter is of no relevance in deciding whether IRMA is a Public Authority or not since the same is no ground to declare a body as a Public Authority as per Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. Control: 36. The respondent with regard to the complainant s claim that IRMA is controlled by the Government since most of the members on the Board of Governors are from public sector or the co-operative sector, submitted that IRMA was established by the Society as an educational institution for imparting education in the field of Rural Management. The Society has its Memorandum of Association and Rules for its internal functioning, which reveals that the Board of Governors of the Society is not at all dominated by the public sector as sought to be suggested by the complainant. Merely because a representative each from the Central Government, the State Government and the National Dairy Development Board (NDDB) is nominated to the Board of Governors of the Society which has a total strength of 17 members, it cannot be said that there is an over- dominance of public sector in the Board of Governors of the Society. Further, it also deserves to be appreciated that the representation of the Central Government and State Government on the Board of Governors of the Society in the form of a representative each is there as the Society opted for it by a making a provision for the same in its Rules. Thus, it is not on account of any right vested in either the Central or the State Government. Similarly, the representation of co-operative sector is confined to only 3 members in the 17-member Board of Governors of the Society. Thus, in other words, the 3 members on the Board of Governors of the Society falling in the category of co-operative sector in generic term are representing a particular Page 7 of 10
8 group of the members of the Society. Besides this, in the definition of the term Public Authority under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, there is nothing to indicate that the presence of co-operative sector in the setup of any body is of any consequence for holding such body as Public Authority there under. As a matter of fact, the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Thalappalam (Supra) has held that merely because a body is registered as a co-operative society under the relevant statute, such body would not ipso facto become the Public Authority under the RTI Act. Thus, when a body which falls under the category of co-operative sector is not per se a Public Authority for the purpose of the RTI Act, it is indeed not possible to appreciate as to how the presence of such cooperative sector in the setup of another body would render such body as Public Authority. As per the definition of the term Public Authority under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, a body has to be controlled by either the Central Government or the State Government in order to be declared as Public Authority thereunder. However, the representation of the aforesaid nature from the Central Government and the State Government in the Board of Governors of the Society does not convey that the Society and IRMA are controlled by either the Central Government or the State Government or both. Also, the control referred to by Section 2(h) of the RTI Act has to be deep and pervasive control. Therefore, mere presence of a representative each from the Central Government and the State Government on the 17-member Board of Governors of the Society on account of the same having been voluntarily opted by the Society in its Rules cannot imply any control by either the Central Government or the State Government. Funding: 37. The respondent submitted that another reason assigned by the complainant for holding IRMA as Public Authority is that in the year , IRMA was provided with a grant of Rs. 25 crore by the Central Government. However, such one-time grant given to IRMA by the Central Government would not have the effect of conveying that IRMA stands substantially financed by the Central Government. As per Section 2(h)(d)(i) of Page 8 of 10
9 the Act, the funding should be substantial in nature. Further, financial assistance can be said to be of substantial nature if it emerges that without such financial assistance the body concerned would not have survived or would have difficulty in surviving. In this context, it is pertinent to notice the Supreme Court s observation in the Thalappalam case (Supra) wherein, it was held that funding cannot be termed substantial unless the records show that the funding was so substantial to the body that it practically runs from that funding and would struggle to exist without the said funding. However, in the present case, the grants received by IRMA from the Governmental agencies are for specific purposes. Also, the income from the initial corpus received from NDDB is excluded from the income-expenditure statement of IRMA as the same has to be utilized for the purposes stated in Note on Item No. 14 on the agenda of the 40 th Board meeting of NDDB. These purposes include providing IRMA s services to NDDB free of cost, except operation cost such as those of boarding, lodging, materials and supplies. Further, IRMA does not charge any tuition fee from the managers/officers sponsored by NDDB for attending IRMA s Post Graduate Programme in Rural Management. The respondent further submitted that IRMA can survive without these grants because at present it charges lesser fees from students as compared to the fees charged by similarly placed counterpart institutes of management and the fees could be raised in order to fill any deficit that arises. Hence, there is no funding of substantial nature by the appropriate Government to IRMA and accordingly, the parameter of substantial funding is also not satisfied. Decision 38. The Commission, after hearing the submissions of the respondent and perusing the written submissions made by both the parties, agrees with the respondent that as per the Hon ble Supreme Court s Decision in the case of Thalappalam, the onus is on the complainant to establish that IRMA is either owned, controlled or substantially financed by the appropriate Government in order to satisfy Section 2(h)(d)(i) of the RTI Act. However, the onus was not discharged conclusively by the complainant. In view of this, the Commission is Page 9 of 10
10 of the opinion that it would not be judicious to adjudicate upon the issue relating to declaration of IRMA as a Public Authority. 39. With the above observation, the complaint is disposed of. 40. Copy of the decision be provided to both the parties free of cost. Authenticated true copy. (Sudhir Bhargava) Information Commissioner (V.K. Sharma) Designated Officer Page 10 of 10
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi Tel :
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, 'B' Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi -110066 Tel : +91-11-26186535 Appeal No. CIC/SS/A/2013/001032 Appellant: Respondent: Harish Raju,
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) File No.CIC/SA/A/2014/000478 (Video Conference) Appellant : Sh. S.N.Shukla, Lucknow Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: EHTESHAM QUTUBUDDIN SIDDIQUE. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 16.01.2019 + W.P.(C) 9773/2018 EHTESHAM QUTUBUDDIN SIDDIQUE... Petitioner versus CPIO, INTELLIGENCE BUREAU... Respondent Advocates who appeared
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7 th January, W.P.(C) 5472/2014, CM Nos /2014, 12873/2015, 16579/2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7 th January, 2016 + W.P.(C) 5472/2014, CM Nos. 10868-69/2014, 12873/2015, 16579/2015 ASHFAQUE ANSARI... Petitioner Through: Mr. V. Shekhar,
More informationTHE TAMIL NADU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BILL, 2010
TO BE INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA Bill No. XXX of 2010 THE TAMIL NADU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BILL, 2010 A 43 of 1950. 5 BILL to provide for the creation of Legislative Council for the State of Tamil Nadu
More informationTAMIL NADU STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
TAMIL NADU STATE ELECTION COMMISSION INFORMATION UNDER SECTION 4(1) OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 1.1. Background, objective and purpose 1. INTRODUCTION The Right to Information Act, 2005 (Central
More informationCENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Information Commissioner CIC/SA/C/2015/000275
More informationTAMIL NADU STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
TAMIL NADU STATE ELECTION COMMISSION INFORMATION UNDER SECTION 4(1) OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 1.1. Background, objective and purpose 1. INTRODUCTION The Right to Information Act, 2005 (Central
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 29 th March, LPA No.777/2010
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 29 th March, 2012 + LPA No.777/2010 % ANAND BHUSHAN...Appellant Through: Ms. Girija Krishan Varma, Adv. Versus R.A. HARITASH Through: CORAM
More informationSub: In the matter of representation in compliance to the directions of Hon ble High Court, Jabalpur in Writ Petition no.
ORDER (Date of hearing: 12 th March, 2015) (Date of order: 30 th March, 2015) Shri Ashok Kumar Sable, - Petitioner S/o Shri Anand Rao Sable, R/o near Gas Godown, Mordongri Road, Sarni, District Betul (M.P.)
More informationDIRECTIONS BY THE CHAIRMAN, RAJYA SABHA UNDER THE RULES OF PROCEDURE AND CONDUCT OF BUSINESS IN RAJYA SABHA
«« Hindi version of this Publication is also available PARLIAMENT OF INDIA DIRECTIONS BY THE CHAIRMAN, RAJYA SABHA UNDER THE RULES OF PROCEDURE AND CONDUCT OF BUSINESS IN RAJYA SABHA RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT
More informationRequest of Furnishing Information inter alia regarding various general Administration and establishment matters in D/FPD Under RTI Act 2005
Request of Furnishing Information inter alia regarding various general Administration and establishment matters in D/FPD Under RTI Act 2005 F. No. D-21012/1/2005-Gen. Government of India Ministry of Consumer
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO OF Association for Democratic Reforms Versus
381 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3632 OF 2014 IN THE MATTER OF: Association for Democratic Reforms Union of India & Anr. Versus Petitioner Respondents AFFIDAVIT IN
More informationProf. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Central Information Commissioner CIC/NCFWO/A/2017/191483
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Room No.315, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066) Phone: 011-26181927 Fax: 011-26185088 Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar) Central
More informationORDER OF THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL AUTHORITY, MADHYA PRADESH ORDER OF 11 SEPTEMBER 2004
International Environmental Law Research Centre ORDER OF THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL AUTHORITY, MADHYA PRADESH Grievance Redressal Authority, Madhya Pradesh (Sardar Sarovar Project), Case No. 234 of 2004 ORDER
More informationTHE GOVERNORS (EMOLUMENTS, ALLOWANCES AND PRIVILEGES) AMENDMENT BILL, 2012
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 137 of 2012 43 of 1982. 5 10 THE GOVERNORS (EMOLUMENTS, ALLOWANCES AND PRIVILEGES) AMENDMENT BILL, 2012 A BILL further to amend the Governors (Emoluments, Allowances
More informationTHE TAMIL NADU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (REPEAL) BILL, 2012
1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA Bill No. XXI of 2012 THE TAMIL NADU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL (REPEAL) BILL, 2012 A BILL to provide for the repeal of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Council Act, 2010 and to
More informationII (2013) CPJ 10A (NC) (CN) NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI Hon ble Mr. Justice V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member PARMOD KUMAR
II (2013) CPJ 10A (NC) (CN) NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI Hon ble Mr. Justice V.B. Gupta, Presiding Member PARMOD KUMAR MALIK Petitioner versus HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
More informationMADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATIORY COMMISSION BHOPAL. ORDER (Date of Order : 7 th September, 2012)
MADHYA PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATIORY COMMISSION BHOPAL Sub : In the matter of approval of Power Purchase Agreement. ORDER (Date of Order : 7 th September, 2012) Petition No.11 of 2012 1. MP Power Management
More informationMEMBERS' REFERENCE SERVICE LARRDIS LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI LEGISLATIVE NOTE. No.18/LN/Ref./July/2017
MEMBERS' REFERENCE SERVICE LARRDIS LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI LEGISLATIVE NOTE No.18/LN/Ref./July/2017 For the use of Members of Parliament NOT FOR PUBLICATION 1 THE INTER-STATE RIVER WATER DISPUTES
More informationTHE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND NEURO-SCIENCES, BANGALORE BILL, 2010
THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND NEURO-SCIENCES, BANGALORE BILL, 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES Bill No. XCI of 2010 CLAUSES 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Declaration of National Institute
More informationDETAILS UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT
DETAILS UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT - 2005 The National Commission has considered the points mentioned under Section 4 of the Right of Information Act, 2005 and its Observations on the said points are
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Execution Application No. 154 of Tuesday, the 21 st day August, 2018
1 Court No. 1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW Execution Application No. 154 of 2018 Tuesday, the 21 st day August, 2018 Hon ble Mr. Justice SVS Rathore, Member (J) Hon ble Air Marshal BBP
More informationBEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH, CHENNAI. APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2015 (SZ). Versus
BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL, SOUTHERN ZONE BENCH, CHENNAI. APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2015 (SZ). IN THE MATTER OF: V.V.Minerals Represented by its Managing Partner, Mr.S.Vaikundarajan Tisaiyanvilai,
More informationPUNJAB GOVT. GAZ. (EXTRA), DECEMBER 23, 2016 (PASUA 2, 1938 SAKA)
191 PART I GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AND LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS, PUNJAB NOTIFICATION The 23rd December, 2016 No. 54-Leg./2016.-The following Act of the Legislature of the State of Punjab received
More informationPetition No 973 of 2014 and 1036,1037,1038,1039 &1040 of 2015 BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW
Petition No 973 of 2014 and 1036,1037,1038,1039 &1040 of 2015 BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION LUCKNOW Date of Order: 07.01.16 Present: Hon ble Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 Date of Judgment: W.P.(C) 8432/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 Date of Judgment:20.3.2013 W.P.(C) 8432/2011 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK... Petitioner Through: Mr.Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashim
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. Original Application No. 113 of Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017
1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW A.F.R. (Court No. 1) List A Original Application No. 113 of 2016 Monday, this the 17 th day of April, 2017 Hon ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon
More informationTHE PLAY SCHOOLS (REGULATION) BILL, 2015
1 As INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 42 of 2015 THE PLAY SCHOOLS (REGULATION) BILL, 2015 By SHRI MAHEISH GIRRI, M.P. 5 A BILL to regulate the functioning of play schools and for matters connected therewith
More informationTHE MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010
1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 123 of 2010 39 of 2002. 5 10 THE MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010 A BILL to amend the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. BE
More informationCOURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009
COURT NO. 2, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI O.A. NO. 140 OF 2009 O.A. No. 140/2009 IN THE MATTER OF:...Applicant Through : Mr. P.D.P. Deo with Ms. Monica Nagi, counsels for the Applicant
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) Judgment reserved on February 05, 2015 Judgment delivered on February 13, 2015 M/S VARUN INDUSTRIES LTD & ORS... Appellants
More informationNATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3146 OF 2012 (Against the order dated 16.07.2012 in First Appeal No. 201/2012 of the State Commission U.T., Chandigarh) WITH
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW RESERVE (Court No. 2) Original Application No. 47 of 2014
1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW RESERVE (Court No. 2) Original Application No. 47 of 2014 Wednesday, this the 23 rd day of November, 2016 Hon ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon
More informationTHE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION RULES. A. General
THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS STUDENTS ASSOCIATION RULES A. General 1. Short Title These Rules may be called the Chartered Accountants Students Association Rules. 2. In these Rules unless there is anything
More informationReserved on: 3 rd February, 2010 Pronounced on: 4 th February, 2010
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.C.1761/2009 Reserved on: 3 rd February, 2010 Pronounced on: 4 th February, 2010 # KAMAL GOYAL.... Petitioner! Through: Mr.Vikas Mahajan & Mr.Vishal Mahajan,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF Versus E KRISHNA RAO & ORS ETC. ETC.
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 11948-11950 OF 2016 UNION OF INDIA & ORS....Appellants Versus E KRISHNA RAO & ORS ETC. ETC....Respondents J U D
More informationTHE RAJASTHAN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BILL, 2013
1 AS INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA Bill No. XLIV of 2013 THE RAJASTHAN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BILL, 2013 A BILL to provide for the creation of the Legislative Council for the State of Rajasthan and for matters
More informationInsolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals and Liquidators (Recommendation) (Second) Guidelines, 2018
Insolvency Professionals to act as Interim Resolution Professionals and Liquidators (Recommendation) (Second) Guidelines, 2018 Provisions in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 30 th November, 2018
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. M. Aamira Fathima and Others Appellants VERSUS
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6654 OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.30567 of 2016) M. Aamira Fathima and Others Appellants
More informationAPPENDIX-FORM. (See Rule 3) (Appeal for Information under Right to Information Act 2005)
APPENDIX-FORM (See Rule 3) (Appeal for Information under Right to Information Act 2005) From Panikkaveettil K. Jabir Overseas Indians Legal Cell, 5th Floor, Metro Plaza Building, Market Road, Kochi, Kerala
More informationORDER. Between. In re :
In re : KERALA CONGRESS, a recognised State Party in the State of Kerala - Merger of the party with KERALA CONGRESS (M), a recognised State Party in the State Kerala. Between Shri P. J. Joseph...(Pro-merger
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: 07.03.2012 I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.1674/2011 SURENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Through Mr. J.S. Mann, Adv....
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018
MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION (Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018 Revenue Bar Association New No. 115
More informationCONSTITUTION OF DIABETES SINGAPORE
CONSTITUTION OF DIABETES SINGAPORE 1. Name This Society (hereinafter referred to as the Society) shall be known as Diabetes Singapore. 2. Place of Business The place of' business is at Blk 528, Jurong
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 8597 of 2010 PRESIDENT/SECRETARY, J.K. SYNTHETICS MAZDOOR UNION (CITU), INDIRA GANDHI NAGAR, KOTA & ORS. Versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
:1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 132 OF 2011 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 307 OF 2011 WRIT PETITION NO. 132 OF 2011 Reserve Bank of India, Central Office, 21 st Floor, RBI Building, Shahid
More informationIN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, CHANDIGARH
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI T.R.SOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 966/Chd/2014 (Assessment Year : 2007-08) The D.C.I.T.,
More informationK.K. MISHRA.APPELLANT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT. 2. By the order impugned, the High Court. of Madhya Pradesh has negatived the challenge
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S) 547 OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL] NO.6064 OF 2017] K.K. MISHRA.APPELLANT(S)
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS WITH
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS....RESPONDENT(S) WITH
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Delhi Rent Control Act R.C.REV.29/2012 Date of Decision: Versus
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Delhi Rent Control Act R.C.REV.29/2012 Date of Decision: 17.08.2012 SMT. NARENDER KAUR Through: Mr. Adarsh Ganesh, Adv... Petitioner Versus MAHESH CHAND AND
More informationGovt. of India National Commission for Minorities Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi-3
Govt. of India National Commission for Minorities Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi-3 Petitioner: Shri Parvinder Singh Respondent: Railway Board, New Delhi File No. S/PN/20/0030/09 The Bench of
More informationCIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS J U D G M E N T
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10379 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 8586 of 2016) MOHD. SAHID AND OTHERS.Appellants VERSUS RAZIYA KHANAM (D)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER. W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010. Date of Decision: Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RECRUITMENT MATTER W.P.(C) No. 8347/2010 Date of Decision: 10.02.2011 MRS. PRERNA Through Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate with Mr. Raunak Jain, Advocate and
More informationDRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, Draft National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2013
DRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 Draft National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2013 In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) to (d) of sub section (2) of section 132, clause, sub
More informationPART D: BILL OFFICE Responsibilities of Bill Office- The items of work for which this Section is responsible mainly consists of: -
PART D: BILL OFFICE 9.68 Responsibilities of Bill Office- The items of work for which this Section is responsible mainly consists of: - i) Government Bills: Scrutiny before introduction, Introduction,
More informationAS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA ON 11.08.2014 Bill No. 96 of 2014 5 THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION BILL, 2014 A BILL to regulate the procedure to be followed by the National Judicial Appointments
More informationINDIA ELECTORAL LAWS
INDIA ELECTORAL LAWS The President and Vice-President The President of India Election of President Manner of election of President Term of office of President 52. The President of India.- There shall be
More informationNOTIFICATION Shimla -2, the 21st January, 2006
(Authoritative English Text) GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT NOTIFICATION Shimla -2, the 21st January, 2006 No. PER (AR) F (7) -2/98-Vol.1. - In exercise of the powers
More information#25 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus. % Date of Decision: 30 th May, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN J U D G M E N T
#25 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM)117/2017 SANDISK CORPORATION Through versus J K ELECTRONICS & ORS Through... Plaintiff Ms. Shwetashree Majumder with Ms. Pritika Kohli, Advocates...
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RC. REV. No.75/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RC. REV. No.75/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 SMT. JAI SHREE LALLA Through: Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocate....Petitioner
More informationTHE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2013
TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 64 of 2013 21 of 1976. 5 THE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2013 A BILL further to amend the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976. BE it enacted by Parliament in
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. Date of Decision: CRL.A of 2013.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Date of Decision: 06.03.2014 CRL.A. 1011 of 2013 S.K. JAIN... Appellant Mr. Ajay K. Chopra, Adv. versus VIJAY KALRA... Respondent
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014 Dr. (Capt.) Suchitra Kakoty, W/o Sri Lekhoke Kakoty, R/o House No. 18, Bye Lane No.1,
More informationADMISSION TO HIGHER SPECIALITY (D.M./M,Ch) COURSES IN TAMIL NADU FOR SESSION
ADMISSION TO HIGHER SPECIALITY (D.M./M,Ch) COURSES IN TAMIL NADU FOR 2017-2018 SESSION Kind attention of the candidates who are opting higher speciality (D.M./M.Ch) courses Government Medical Colleges
More informationTamil Nadu Association For The... vs The Principal Secretary on 9 January, 2013
Madras High Court Tamil Nadu Association For The... vs The Principal Secretary on 9 January, 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.01.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARI PARANTHAMAN
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Judgment pronounced on: 10.04.2012 I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.136/2009 SUGANDHA SETHI...Plaintiff Through: Ms. N.Shoba with Mr.
More informationJHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI. Case No. 21 & 23 of 2010 ORDER
JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI Case No. 21 & 23 of 2010 Dated: 6 th October 2010 Shri Mukhtiar Singh, Chairperson Shri T. Munikrishnaiah, Member (Tech) ORDER IN THE MATTER OF
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 2842 of 2015 Md. Sahid Ali, S/o. Late Akbar Ali, R/o. Village- nmerapani Fareshtablak, P.S.- Merapani,
More informationBEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING. (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003)
BEFORE THE CONSUMER GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL FORUM B.E.S. & T. UNDERTAKING (Constituted under section 42(5) of Electricity Act 2003) Ground Floor, Multistoried Annex Building, BEST s Colaba Depot Colaba, Mumbai
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment reserved on: 15.03.2011 Judgment delivered on: 18.03.2011 RSA No.243/2006 & CM No.10268/2006 SHRI.D.V. SINGH & ANR...Appellants
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008 INSTITUTE OF TOWN PLANNERS, INDIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar
More informationCHAPTER XIV INSPECTION, INQUIRY AND INVESTIGATION
DRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 CHAPTER XIV INSPECTION, INQUIRY AND INVESTIGATION 14.1 For the purposes of clause (viii) of sub-section (2) of section 211, the Central Government may appoint
More informationPCH-HA(3)25/ ,
(Authoritative English text of this Department Notification Number PCH-HA(3)25/2007-1407-31, 22 nd May. 2009 as required under clause(3) of article 348 of the Constitution of India) Government of Himachal
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION Judgment reserved on : 26.04.2011 Judgment delivered on : 28.04.2011 R.S.A.No. 109/2007 & CM No. 5092/2007 RAMESH PRAKASH
More informationM/S. SAIPEM TRIUNE ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Plaintiff. - versus - INDIAN OIL PETRONAS PVT. LTD.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgment Reserved on: January 07, 2011 Judgment Pronounced on: January 10, 2011 CS(OS) No. 2340/2008 & I.A. No.
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA 5 THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016 By SHRI FEROZE VARUN GANDHI, M.P. A BILL further to amend the Constitution of India. Bill No. 174 of 2016 BE it enacted by Parliament
More informationTHE JAWAHARLAL INSTITUTE OF POST-GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, PUDUCHERRY ACT, 2008
THE JAWAHARLAL INSTITUTE OF POST-GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, PUDUCHERRY ACT, 2008 # NO. 19 OF 2008 $ [16th May, 2008] + An Act to declare the Institution known as the Jawaharlal Institute
More informationTHE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961
Sections:. Short title and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Registrar and Deputy Registrars. THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 96 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 4. Appeals from decisions of a single Judge of the
More information2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: SURAT WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2018 (PIL) (EXTRA ORDINARY JURISDICTION) Ref: In the matter of Public Interest Litigation related to collection and levy
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 55/2019 VS. COUNTER AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF UNION OF INDIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 55/2019 IN THE MATTER OF: JANHIT ABHIYAN PETITIONER VS. UNION OF INDIA RESPONDENT COUNTER AFFIDAVIT ON BEHALF OF UNION
More informationTHE KARNATAKA STATE COMMISSION FOR WOMEN ACT, 1995 CHAPTER I CHAPTER II. 4. Term of office and conditions of service of chairperson and members.
1 THE KARNATAKA STATE COMMISSION FOR WOMEN ACT, 1995 ARRANGAMENT OF SECTIONS Statement of Object and Reasons Sections: CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. 2. Short title and commencement. Definitions. CHAPTER II
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +CM Nos.7694-95/2010 (for restoration of CM No.266/2010 and for condonation of delay in applying for the same) in W.P.(C) 4165/2000 % Date of decision: 3 rd June,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition No of 2016
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition No. 1246 of 2016 Shri Abdul Kadir Mazumdar, Son of late Basir Uddin Mazumdar, Village Uttar Krishnapur,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Petitioners : WP(C) No.3049 of 2006 1. M/s. Bogidhola Tea and Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office
More informationTHE BANGLADESH OIL, GAS AND MINERAL CORPORATION ORDINANCE, 1985
THE BANGLADESH OIL, GAS AND MINERAL CORPORATION ORDINANCE, 1985 (ORDINANCE NO. XXI OF 1985). [11th April, 1985] An Ordinance to provide for the establishment of the Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Corporation.
More informationTHE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961
THE ADVOCATES ACT, 1961 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II BAR COUNCILS 3. State Bar Councils. 4. Bar Council of
More informationThe Institute shall consist of the following classes of members.
Regulations*. MEMBERSHIP The Institute shall consist of the following classes of members.. Members : They shall be elected by the Council on being proposed by one member and seconded by another and after
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 CRL.M.C. 4102/2011 Judgment delivered on:9th December, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 CRL.M.C. 4102/2011 Judgment delivered on:9th December, 2011 SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN & ORS... Petitioner Through : Mr.Sidhartha Luthra,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 Om Sai Punya Educational and Social Welfare Society & Another.Petitioners Versus All India Council
More informationTHE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 246 of 2016 5 THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016 By SHRI BAIJAYANT PANDA, M.P. A BILL further to amend the Whistle Blowers Protection Act, 2011.
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment reserved on: 24 th April, 2015 Judgment delivered on: 08 th October, 2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 24 th April, 2015 Judgment delivered on: 08 th October, 2015 + FAO(OS) 220/2015 & CM Nos.7502/2015, 7504/2015 SERGI TRANSFORMER EXPLOSION
More informationThe Right to Information Act, 2005
THE INSTITUTE OF COST ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA Information under Section 4(1)(b) of The Right to Information Act, 2005 1 P a g e INFORMATION UNDER SECTION 4(1)(b) OF RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 i) THE PARTICULARS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FAO.No.301/2010 Reserved on: Decided on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FAO.No.301/2010 Reserved on:09.02.2011 Decided on: 18.02.2011 WOLLAQUE VENTILATION & CONDITIONING PVT LTD. Appellant Through: Mr.
More informationGovt. of India National Commission for Minorities Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi-3
Govt. of India National Commission for Minorities Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi-3 Petitioner: Shri Ataullah Khan, Satyawati College, Ashok Vihar, Phase-III, Delhi- 110052. Respondents: 1. Dr.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) OF 2015 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 13 OF 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 13 OF 2003 (Arising from the Order dated May 13, 2015 passed in Writ Petition (Civil)
More informationTHE WATER (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) AMENDMENT BILL, 2014
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 42 of 2014 6 of 1974. 5 10 THE WATER (PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF POLLUTION) AMENDMENT BILL, 2014 By SHRI BHARTRUHARI MAHTAB, M.P. A BILL further to amend the Water
More informationBEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Quorum Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman Shri I. B. Pandey, Member
BEFORE THE UTTAR PRADESH ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Quorum Shri Desh Deepak Verma, Chairman Shri I. B. Pandey, Member In the matter of: Fixation of transmission tariff for 7.2 KM 400 KV dedicated
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Date of decision: February 01, WP(C) No /2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Date of decision: February 01, 2008 WP(C) No. 20210/2005 Union of India & Anr...Petitioners through Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate Versus Y.R.
More information9. COMMITTEE SECTION (H.A)
9. COMMITTEE SECTION (H.A) 9.1 Main functions of the Section: The primary function of this Section is to provide secretarial assistance to one of the eight Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees
More information